ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No.8101/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-10-2016 in ITA No. 714/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) Date : 05-02-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Pooja Dhar, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Adv. M/S. Gagrat And Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No.695/2014. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8101/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) Date : 24-11-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Annapoo Rani, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to file correct copy of judgment. (SWETA DHYANI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No.8841/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/10/2016 in ITA No.749/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 01/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Ms. Shruti Srivastav, Adv. Mr. A.K. Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sheoran, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal NO.695/2014. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) COURT MASTER (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER
Listed on.1.5.2017 Court : 10 Item No.19 SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL NOS...CC. 8841 OF 2017 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petition) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ...PETITIONER VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petition abovementioned is filed against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 24 th October, 2016 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in ITA No. 749 of 2014 and is barred by time by 60 days. The Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Application for condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petitons. It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that Civil Appeal No. 695 of 2014 @ SLP No. 32315 of 2013 entitled “CITVI,MUMBAI vs M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD.” arising out of similar question of law which was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th January, 2014, when the Hon'ble Court has Granted leave. (Copy of the Order dated 13 th January, 2014 is enclosed herewith for reference). The matter alongwith application abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate PB4 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
FITEM NO.19 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No.8841/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/10/2016in ITA No.749/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 01/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASGMs. Shruti Srivastav, Adv.Mr. A.K. Srivastav, Adv.Mr. Dhruv Sheoran, Adv.Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Issue notice.Tag with Civil Appeal NO.695/2014. (ASHAÂ SUNDRIYAL)COURTÂ MASTER (CHANDERÂ BALA)COURTÂ MASTER
ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 6650/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. Respondent(s) Date : 27/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Nishanth Patil,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. U.A. Rana,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Mehta,Adv. M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed the deficit Court fee which is barred by time by 11 day. Delay in filing same is condoned. Ld. Counsel for the parties shall file the statement of case within the statutory period. After expiry of statutory period, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
Listed on : 27.09.2016 Court No. : R2 Item No. : 17 SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6650 OF 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMET TAX 6 ...APPELLANT VERSUS GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned alongwith C.A. No. 695 of 2014 was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 16 th August, 2016, when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No.6650/2014 Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit of valuation. List again on 27.09.2016.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has on 24 th September, 2016 filed the AdValorem Court fee of Rs. 1750/ in the matter above mentioned which is barred by time by 11 days. It is also submitted that Counsel for both the parties have not filed Statement of Case so far. The matter is ready for prefinal hearing. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for orders. DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. [ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate M/s Gagrat & Co., Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac3
bITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHCivil Appeal No(s). 6650/2014COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUSM/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. Respondent(s)Date : 27/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Nishanth Patil,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. U.A. Rana,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Mehta,Adv. M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd. Counsel for the appellant has filed the deficit Court feewhich is barred by time by 11 day. Delay in filing same iscondoned.Ld. Counsel for the parties shall file the statement of casewithin the statutory period. After expiry of statutory period,list the matter before the Hon'ble Court. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 695/2014 CIT-VI,MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH C.A. No. 6650/2014 Date : 16/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 695/2014 The office report is that the learned counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case. Viewed in that context,the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. C.A. No.6650/2014 Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit of valuation. List again on 27.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS
Listed on : 16.8.2016 Court : R2 Item No. : 15 SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 695 & 6650 of 2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVI APPELLANT VERSUS M/S. GLAXO INDIA LTD. ...RESPONDENT OF FICE REPORT FOR PREFINAL HEARING CIVIL APPEAL NO. 695 OF 2015 The office report is prepared as per circular No. F. 41/Jul./2008 dated 17th December, 2008. (A) There is sole respondent in the matter abovementioned and is represented through Counsel. (B) Not ap plicable. (C) No appliction for substitution is pending. (D) Counsel for both the parties have not filed statement of cases within stipulated time so far, in the matter as per Amended New Rule, 2013 vide order XIX Rule 32(1)(2), it shall be presumed that counsel for both the parties do not desire to Lodge Statement of Case in the Appeal. (F) Not applicable. CIVIL APPEAL No.6650 OF 2014 There is sole respondent in the matter above-mentioned and is represented through Counsel. It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant has has not filed AD-Valorem Court fee of Rs. 1750/-. till date. It is further submitted that Counsel for both the parties have not filed statement of cases so far.
The matters abovementined are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for Prefinal Hearing. DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016 A S SISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate M/S. Gagrat & Co., Advocate PB4 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\236 ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 695/2014 CIT-VI,MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH C.A. No. 6650/2014 Date : 16/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 695/2014 The office report is that the learned counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case. Viewed in that context,the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. C.A. No.6650/2014 Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit of valuation.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.16 List again on 27.09.2016.17:04:21 TLTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Civil Appeal No. 6650/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (for amendment of cause title) Date : 09/12/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. U. A. Rana, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Adv. For M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Amendment of cause title is allowed. Cause title be amended within 10 days. (RASHMI DHYANI) SR. P.A. (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER
BITEM NO.8 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2014 in Civil Appeal No. 6650/2014COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUSM/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s)(for amendment of cause title)Date : 09/12/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. U. A. Rana, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Adv. For M/s Gagrat & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAmendment of cause title is allowed.Cause title be amended within 10 days.(RASHMI DHYANI)SR. P.A. (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY)COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 6650/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (for amendment of cause title) Date : 01/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. U. A. Rana, Adv. for M/s Gagrat & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. List next week. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Sr. P.A. (S. S. R. Krishna) Assistant Registrar
¶ ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 6650/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 MUMBAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (for amendment of cause title) Date : 01/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. U. A. Rana, Adv. for M/s Gagrat & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. List next week. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (S. S. R. Krishna) Sr. P.A. Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJayant Kumar AroraDate: 2015.12.0216:12:30 ISTReason:
® ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9445/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/12/2012 in ITA No. 6715/2010 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) C.I.T.,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) Date : 30/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Narasimha, ASG Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. For Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Elkar Majumdar, Adv. For M/s Gagrat & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP (C)....CC 17301 of 2013. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P.A. Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJayant Kumar AroraDate: 2014.08.0210:41:04 ISTReason:
SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C) NO. 17284 OF 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX6, MUMBAI ....PETITIONER VERSUS M/S GALXO INDIA LTD. ....RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petition abovementioned is filed against the Judgment and Order dated 7 th March, 2014 of the High Court of Bombay in ITA No. 1375 of 2012. It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that Civil Appeal No. 695 of 2014 arising of the Special Leave Petition No. 32315 of 2013 entitled “ C.I.T VI Mumbai Vs M/s Galxo India Ltd. ” between the same parties (Annexure P6) which was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th January, 2014 when the Hon'ble Court has granted leave. (Copy of the Order dated 13 th January, 2014 is Annexed as Annexure P6 at Page Nos. 223224 of the Paper – Books.) The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2014 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR hm2
î ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17284/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/03/2014 in ITA No. 1375/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GALXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 21/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Kishen Kaul, ASG Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Connect with Civil Appeal No.695 of 2014. (Neetu Khajuria) (Renu Diwan)Signature Not Verified Sr.P.A. Court MasterDigitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIADate: 2014.07.2215:35:05 ISTReason:
SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APEAL (C) NO. 9445 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX …..PETITIONER VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD. ....RESPONDENT REVISED OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 31 st March, 2014 when the Hon'ble court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable on 2 nd July, 2014 Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. ” Accordingly, returnable notice on 2 nd July, 2014 to the sole respondent was issued on 19 th April, 2014 through Registered Post, as well as handed over to Advocate for dasti. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate has filed Affidavit of service alongwith proof on behalf of sole Respondent M/s Gagrat and co. Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the sole Respondent. Service of notice is complete. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate. M/S Gagrat and Co. Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR sk3
$ ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9445/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/12/2012 in ITA 6715/2010 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) C.I.T.,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s) Date : 02/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Narasimha,ASG Ms. Anita Sahani,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Ms. Mrinal Elkar Majumdar,Adv. For M/s. Gagrat & Co.,Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 30th July, 2014. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySarita PurohitDate: 2014.07.0513:25:41 ISTReason:
ôITEM NO.24 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)........./2013 CC 18797/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/12/2012 in ITA No.6715/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T.,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s)WITH I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP)Date: 31/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Shekhar,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Ms. Anita Sahni,Adv. Mr. Piyush Jain,Adv. Mr. Vishal Saxena,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.(Not present)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable on 2nd July, 2014. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. |(Sarita Purohit) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |
LITEM NO.69 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32315/2013(From the judgement and order dated 25/02/2013 in ITA No.6203/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)CIT-VI,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 13/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Tanushree Sinha, Adv. for Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs. M.Majumdar, Adv. for M/S Gagrat & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Parties are permitted to file additional documents in four weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |
¤ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 17301/2013(From the judgement and order dated 25/02/2013 in ITA No.6203/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)CIT-VI,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S GLAXO INDIA LTD Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 04/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Ms. Tanushree Sinha, Adv. for Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Of the two questions (g) and (h) which are now pressed for consideration before us, we are satisfied that notice may be issued confined to issue (g) before the High Court which reads as under: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the interest on DPEA liability is to be allowed as expenditure on year to year basis without appreciating the fact that the interest liability as contingent in nature as it is dependent on DPEA liability which is disputed before the Delhi High Court and therefore has to construed as contingent liability it is neither accrued nor arisen, and hence not allowable? Delay condoned. Issue notice confined to the above question, returnable in ten weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |