Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2013 / Diary 10133

LOKESH SHARMA . v. YOJNA SHARMA

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10133/2013

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

02-12-2013

Bench

Petitioner

LOKESH SHARMA .

Respondent

YOJNA SHARMA

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

êITEM NO.60 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4591/2013(From the judgement and order dated 24/08/2012 in WPCRL No.927/ 2012, ofThe HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)LOKESH SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSYOJNA SHARMA & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES,permission to fileadditional documents)Date: 02/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Mariaputham, Sr.Adv. Mr. Shubhashis R. Soren, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Zeymal Haque, Adv. Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Adv.St. of NCT of Delhi Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Shadman Ali, Adv. For Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard counsel for the parties, but we find no reason to entertain this special leave petition as the order practically is in favour of the petitioner who has been permitted visitation right with the child. The special leave petition is dismissed. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

RITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4591/2013LOKESH SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSYOJNA SHARMA & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder,permission to file additional documents,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATESDate: 01/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Shubhashis R.Soren,adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Zeyaul Haque,adv. Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee,Adv. Ms.Meenakshi,adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. The respondents have not filed counter affidavit in spite of two opportunities granted. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

,ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K.HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4591/2013LOKESH SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSYOJNA SHARMA & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder,permission to file additional documents,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATESDate: 29/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shubhashis R.Soren,adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ziaul Haque,adv. Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee,Adv. Mr.Rajendra Soni,adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner and the Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3-5 are present. Ld.counsel for the respondents seek four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to them. List again on 1.11.2013.| | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB

àITEM NO.104 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4591/2013LOKESH SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSYOJNA SHARMA & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder,permission to file additional documents,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATESDate: 15/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shubhashis R. Soren,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Zeyaul Haque,Adv. Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 1 and 2 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of the remaining unserved respondents. List the matter on 29.8.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

ÂITEM NO.8 COURT NO.13 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2013 CRLMP.NO(s). 9022(From the judgement and order dated 24/08/2012 in WPCRL No.927/2012, ofThe HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)LOKESH SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSYOJNA SHARMA & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 03/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Sisodiya, Sr.Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Shubhashis R. Soren, Adv. Mr. V.M. Vishnu, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Mr. Sambeet Das, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India