BHARAT SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB .

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRL.M.P. No.19160/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s) (For extension of time and office report) Date : 14/12/2016 This Crl.M.P. was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. (Not present) Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. (Not Present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of the petitioner who is appearing in person, by way of last chance, one year's further time is granted to him to deposit the last instalment. Accordingly, CRL.M.P. No.19160/2016 stands disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

"ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCRL.M.P. No.19160/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Crl.) No.2729/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s)(For extension of time and office report)Date : 14/12/2016 This Crl.M.P. was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. (Not present) Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. (Not Present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAt the request of the petitioner who is appearing in person,by way of last chance, one year's further time is granted to him todeposit the last instalment. Accordingly, CRL.M.P. No.19160/2016 stands disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Crl.M.P. No. 14317 of 2016 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 02/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Sharma, In person For Respondent(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,AOR Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We see no reason to entertain this application. Crl.M.P. No. 14317 of 2016 is, accordingly, dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 14317 OF 2016 (Application for modification and direction in the final order dated 16.08.2016) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2729 OF 2015 BHARAT SHARMA ...Petitioner(S) VERSUS  STATE OF PUNJAB      ...Respondent(S) OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.08.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “The petitioner has preferred this special leave petition  against the impugned order passed by the High Court rejecting the pre­arrest bail of the petitioner­husband.  For the reasons stated, the application for impleadment of the applicants as party Respondent nos.2 to 4 is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly.  By way of interim order dated 20.4.2015, while issuing notice, this Court stayed the arrest of the petitioner.  The petitioner, who is appearing in person, states that pursuant to this Court's order dated 13.7.2015, he has invested the amount in Fixed Deposit Receipts, as directed by this Court. Hence, no grievance survives. In view of the above, this Court's order dated 20.4.2015 staying the arrest of the petitioner, is made absolute.  We further direct that the amount invested in Fixed Deposit Receipts by the petitioner, shall continue to be in Fixed Deposit Receipts in the same Bank in the name of his minor daughter under the guardianship of the petitioner and the said amount along with interest shall be paid to his daughter upon her attaining majority. The petitioner further states that he is entitled to custody of the child from the newly impleaded respondent nos.2 to 4.

We feel that the matter of custody of the minor child should be mediated upon between the parties in the first instance. Hence, we direct the parties to appear before the Mediation Centre, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, at 11 A.M. on 7.9.2016 and settle the dispute amicably in regard to the custody of the minor child. We also make it clear that in case the mediation fails, the petitioner is given liberty to take recourse to avail remedy under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before an appropriate forum in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the special leave petition is disposed of.” It is submitted  that  Petitioner­in­Person has  filed an application above mentioned for modification of this Court's order dated 16.08.2016. Separate paper book of the application is circulated  for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. The application in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.   DATED this the 1 st  day of September, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Bharat Sharma, petitioner­in­person S/o Late Sh. Sham Lal, R/o VPO Nurpur Bedi, Tehsil Anandepur, District Ropar, Punjab 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate 3. Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

òITEM NO.55 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCrl.M.P. No. 14317 of 2016 InPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2729/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court OfPunjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 02/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Sharma, In person For Respondent(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,AORMr. Sanchar Anand, AAGMr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv.Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RWe see no reason to entertain this application.Crl.M.P. No. 14317 of 2016 is, accordingly,dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

1 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIB REVISED S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRL.M.P. No.9643/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No.29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (For impleadment as party respondent and office report) Date : 16/08/2016 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Subham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has preferred this special leave petition against the impugned order passed by the High Court rejecting the pre-arrest bail of the petitioner-husband. For the reasons stated, the application for impleadment of the applicants as party Respondent nos.2 to 4 is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. By way of interim order dated 20.4.2015, while issuing notice, this Court stayed the arrest of the petitioner. The petitioner, who is appearing in person, states that

2 pursuant to this Court's order dated 13.7.2015, he has invested the amount in Fixed Deposit Receipts, as directed by this Court. Hence, no grievance survives. In view of the above, this Court's order dated 20.4.2015 staying the arrest of the petitioner, is made absolute. We further direct that the amount invested in Fixed Deposit Receipts by the petitioner, shall continue to be in Fixed Deposit Receipts in the same Bank in the name of his minor daughter under the guardianship of the petitioner and the said amount along with interest shall be paid to his daughter upon her attaining majority. The petitioner further states that he is entitled to custody of the child from the newly impleaded respondent nos.2 to 4. We feel that the matter of custody of the minor child should be mediated upon between the parties in the first instance. Hence, we direct the parties to appear before the Mediation Centre, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, at 11 A.M. on 7.9.2016 and settle the dispute amicably in regard to the custody of the minor child. We also make it clear that in case the mediation fails, the petitioner is given liberty to take recourse to avail remedy under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before an appropriate forum in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the special leave petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

3 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRL.M.P. No.9643/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No.29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (For impleadment as party respondent and office report) Date : 16/08/2016 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Subham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has preferred this special leave petition against the impugned order passed by the High Court rejecting the pre-arrest bail of the petitioner-husband. For the reasons stated, the application for impleadment of the applicants as party Respondent nos.2 to 4 is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. By way of interim order dated 20.4.2015, while issuing notice, this Court stayed the arrest of the petitioner. The petitioner, who is appearing in person, states that

4 pursuant to this Court's order dated 13.7.2015, he has deposited the amount as directed by this Court. Hence, no grievance survives. In view of the above, this Court's order dated 20.4.2015 staying the arrest of the petitioner, is made absolute. We further direct that the amount deposited by the petitioner, shall be kept in Fixed Deposit Receipts in a Nationalised Scheduled Bank in the name of his minor daughter under the guardianship of the petitioner and the said amount along with interest shall be paid to his daughter upon her attaining majority. The petitioner further states that he is entitled to custody of the child from the newly impleaded respondent nos.2 to 4. We feel that the matter of custody of the minor child should be mediated upon between the parties in the first instance. Hence, we direct the parties to appear before the Mediation Centre, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, at 11 A.M. on 7.9.2016 and settle the dispute amicably in regard to the custody of the minor child. We also make it clear that in case the mediation fails, the petitioner is given liberty to take recourse to avail remedy under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before an appropriate forum in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the special leave petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 9643 OF 2015 (Application for impleadment) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2729 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 18427 & 19869 OF 2015 AND 13165 OF 2016 (Applications for respondent, seeking permission to appear and argue in person & permission to bring additional facts and  Permission to file additional documents ) BHARAT SHARMA ...Petitioner(S) VERSUS  STATE OF PUNJAB      ...Respondent(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.08.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice on impleadment application returnable in two weeks. In the meantime, proof of deposit of amount be filed.” Accordingly, Show Cause Notice on application for impleadment was issued to the  Petitioner­in­Person  and State of Punjab through Mr. Devendra Singh. It is submitted that as per track record of the speed post (copy enclosed), the envelope containing notice has been delivered on 10.08.2016 to the  Petitioner­in­Person .  It is further submitted  that  Petitioner­in­Person has on 02.08.2016  filed an application for  Permission to file additional documents  alongwith additional documents including proof of deposit . The application has been registered as Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 13165 of 2016.  Copy of the same is being circulated herewith for  perusal of the Hon'ble Court.   Service of show cause notice is complete. The application in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.   DATED this the 12 th  day of August, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Bharat Sharma, petitioner­in­person S/o Late Sh. Sham Lal, R/o VPO Nurpur Bedi, Tehsil Anandepur, District Ropar, Punjab 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate 3. Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

\22651ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIBREVISED S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCRL.M.P. No.9643/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Crl.) No(s).2729/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015in CRM No.29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s)(For impleadment as party respondent and office report)Date : 16/08/2016 This matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Subham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv.Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAGMr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has preferred this special leave petitionagainst the impugned order passed by the High Court rejecting thepre-arrest bail of the petitioner-husband. For the reasons stated, the application for impleadment of theapplicants as party Respondent nos.2 to 4 is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. By way of interim order dated 20.4.2015, while issuing notice,this Court stayed the arrest of the petitioner. The petitioner, who is appearing in person, states that2pursuant to this Court's order dated 13.7.2015, he has invested theamount in Fixed Deposit Receipts, as directed by this Court. Hence,no grievance survives. In view of the above, this Court's order dated 20.4.2015staying the arrest of the petitioner, is made absolute. We further direct that the amount invested in Fixed DepositReceipts by the petitioner, shall continue to be in Fixed DepositReceipts in the same Bank in the name of his minor daughter underthe guardianship of the petitioner and the said amount along withinterest shall be paid to his daughter upon her attaining majority.The petitioner further states that he is entitled to custodyof the child from the newly impleaded respondent nos.2 to 4. We feel that the matter of custody of the minor child shouldbe mediated upon between the parties in the first instance. Hence,we direct the parties to appear before the Mediation Centre, Punjaband Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, at 11 A.M. on 7.9.2016 andsettle the dispute amicably in regard to the custody of the minorchild. We also make it clear that in case the mediation fails, thepetitioner is given liberty to take recourse to avail remedy underthe Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before an appropriate forum inaccordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the special leave petition isdisposed of. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master3

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCRL.M.P. No.9643/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Crl.) No(s).2729/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015in CRM No.29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s)(For impleadment as party respondent and office report)Date : 16/08/2016 This matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Subham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv.Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAGMr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has preferred this special leave petitionagainst the impugned order passed by the High Court rejecting thepre-arrest bail of the petitioner-husband. For the reasons stated, the application for impleadment of theapplicants as party Respondent nos.2 to 4 is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. By way of interim order dated 20.4.2015, while issuing notice,this Court stayed the arrest of the petitioner. The petitioner, who is appearing in person, states that4pursuant to this Court's order dated 13.7.2015, he has depositedthe amount as directed by this Court. Hence, no grievance survives.In view of the above, this Court's order dated 20.4.2015staying the arrest of the petitioner, is made absolute. We further direct that the amount deposited by the petitioner,shall be kept in Fixed Deposit Receipts in a Nationalised ScheduledBank in the name of his minor daughter under the guardianship ofthe petitioner and the said amount along with interest shall bepaid to his daughter upon her attaining majority. The petitioner further states that he is entitled to custodyof the child from the newly impleaded respondent nos.2 to 4. We feel that the matter of custody of the minor child shouldbe mediated upon between the parties in the first instance. Hence,we direct the parties to appear before the Mediation Centre, Punjaband Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, at 11 A.M. on 7.9.2016 andsettle the dispute amicably in regard to the custody of the minorchild. We also make it clear that in case the mediation fails, thepetitioner is given liberty to take recourse to avail remedy underthe Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before an appropriate forum inaccordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the special leave petition isdisposed of. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent and permission to appear and argue in person) Date :01/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Sharma,I n-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,AOR Mr. Ritesh Khatri,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the impleadment application returnable in two weeks. In the meantime, proof of deposit of amount be filed. 1. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2729 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS. 9643, 18427 AND 19869 OF 2015 (Applications for impleadment as respondent, seeking permission to appear and argue in person and permission to bring additional facts) BHARAT SHARMA ...Petitioner(S) VERSUS  STATE OF PUNJAB      ...Respondent(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.7.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Learned counsel for the petitioner is ready with the  fixed deposit receipt(FDR) for an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs payable at Punjab National Bank pursuant to an settlement by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh dated 11.11.2014. He shall deposit the same with the Registry of this Court to the credit of the special leave petition.  The petitioner undertakes to make the deposit of the balance Rs. 12,00,000/­ (Rupees Twelve lakhs only), as agreed upon in the mediation proceedings. As and when the petitioner deposits the said amount with the Bank, such FDR shall also be deposited with the Registry of this Court.  This matter is adjourned. ” It is submitted that in compliance of this Court's Order quoted above,   Counsel for the Petitioner  has on 15.07.2015 produced a Fixed Deposit Receipt dated 16.04.2015 for an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs in favour of Aditi Sharma­minor under the guardianship of the petitioner herein. Thereafter, the Petitioner­in­Person had deposited Fixed Deposit Receipts in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/­ and 3,50,000/­ in favour of Aditi Sharma­minor under the guardianship of the petitioner on 06.11.2016 and 12.07.2016 respectively and are kept in the safe custody of Cash and Accounts Branch. It is further submitted  that  the  matter above mentioned

was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20.11.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:   “ List the matter in the month of August, 2016.” It is submitted  that the instant matter is an after notice matter. It is further submitted that  the sole Respondent/State of Punjab is represented through  Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate. Counter Affidavit   has also been filed and included in the Special Leave Petition Paper Books. It is lastly submitted that Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate had already filed an application for impleadment of the applicants (1) Krishan Kumar (2) Deepak Sharma and (3) Aditi Sharma (Minor) through legal guardian Krishan Kumar as respondents. Service of show cause notice is complete.   The matter alongwith application above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  DATED this the 29 th  day of July, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Bharat Sharma, petitioner­in­person S/o Late Sh. Sham Lal, R/o VPO Nurpur Bedi, Tehsil Anandepur, District Ropar, Punjab 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate 3. Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

² ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent and permission to appear and argue in person) Date :01/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Sharma,In-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,AOR Mr. Ritesh Khatri,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the impleadment application returnable in two weeks. In the meantime, proof of deposit of amount be filed. 1. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCHARANJEET KAURDate: 2016.08.0117:18:08 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent and permission to appear and argue in person) CrlMP No. 19869/2015(Appln. for permission to bring facts on record) Date : 20/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. For Impleadment Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter in the month of August, 2016. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

( ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent and permission to appear and argue in person) CrlMP No. 19869/2015(Appln. for permission to bring facts on record) Date : 20/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. For Impleadment Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter in the month of August, 2016. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.11.2116:11:32 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 18/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,AAG Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAG Mr. Apporv Singhal,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 20 th November, 2015. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2729 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 9643 OF 2015 (Application for impleadment as respondent) BHARAT SHARMA ...Petitioner(S) VERSUS  STATE OF PUNJAB      ...Respondent(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.08.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Perused the letter. Counter affidavit  be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.” It is further submitted that in compliance of this Court's Order quoted above,  Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate has on 07.09.2015 filed  Counter Affidavit  on  behalf of  sole respondent/State of Punjab. Copy of  Counter Affidavit   has been included in  Special Leave Petition   Paper Books   for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court    Service of show cause notice is complete.   The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  DATED this the  15 th  day of September, 2015.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate 3. Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

h ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 18/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,AAG Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAG Mr. Apporv Singhal,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 20th November, 2015. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2015.09.1817:00:54 ISTReason:h ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 18/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,AAG Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAG Mr. Apporv Singhal,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 20th November, 2015. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2015.09.1817:00:54 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 14/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2729 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 9643 OF 2015 (Application for impleadment as respondent) BHARAT SHARMA ...Petitioner(S) VERSUS  STATE OF PUNJAB      ...Respondent(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.7.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Learned counsel for the petitioner is ready with the  fixed deposit receipt(FDR) for an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs payable at Punjab National Bank pursuant to an settlement by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh dated 11.11.2014. He shall deposit the same with the Registry of this Court to the credit of the special leave petition.  The petitioner undertakes to make the deposit of the balance Rs. 12,00,000/­ (Rupees Twelve lakhs only), as agreed upon in the mediation proceedings. As and when the petitioner deposits the said amount with the Bank, such FDR shall also be deposited with the Registry of this Court.  This matter is adjourned. ” It is further submitted that in compliance of this Court's Order quoted above,   Counsel for the Petitioner  has on 15.07.2015 produced a Fixed Deposit Receipt dated 16.04.2015 for an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs in favour of Aditi Sharma­minor under the guardianship of the petitioner herein. The fixed deposit receipt has been kept in the safe Custody of Cash & Accounts Branch of this Registry. The Fixed Deposit is due to mature on 16.04.2018. It is further submitted  that   Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Fixed Deposit Receipt for the  balance amount of Rs. 12 lakhs, so far. It is further submitted  that the instant matter  is an after notice matter.

It is further submitted that  Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the sole Respondent/State of Punjab.  It is lastly submitted that Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate has already filed an application for impleadment of the applicants (1) Krishan Kumar (2) Deepak Sharma and (3) Aditi Sharma (Minor) through legal guardian Krishan Kumar as respondents.  The counsel has also filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of proposed respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Service of show cause notice is complete.   The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  DATED this the 11 th  day of August, 2015.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate 3. Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C2

ô ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 14/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.08.1417:28:18 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 13/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is ready with the fixed deposit receipt(FDR) for an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs payable at Punjab National Bank pursuant to an settlement by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh dated 11.11.2014. He shall deposit the same with the Registry of this Court to the credit of the special leave petition. The petitioner undertakes to make the deposit of the balance Rs. 12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve lakhs only), as agreed upon in the mediation proceedings. As and when the petitioner deposits the said amount with the Bank, such FDR shall also be deposited with the Registry of this Court. This matter is adjourned. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\222 ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 13/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is ready with the fixed deposit receipt(FDR) for an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs payable at Punjab National Bank pursuant to an settlement by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh dated 11.11.2014. He shall deposit the same with the Registry of this Court to the credit of the special leave petition. The petitioner undertakes to make the deposit of the balance Rs. 12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve lakhs only), as agreed upon in the mediation proceedings. As and when the petitioner deposits the said amount with the Bank, suchSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by FDR shall also be deposited with the Registry of thisDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.07.1412:57:38 IST Court.Reason: This matter is adjourned. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 01/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after a week. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION­IIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 2729 OF 2015 BHARAT SHARMA ...Petitioner(S) VERSUS  STATE OF PUNJAB      ...Respondent(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20.04.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice. In the mean time, there will be interim stay of arrest of the petitioner in FIR No. 94 dated 21.07.2014 registered under Section 406, 498­A of IPC at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab, for a period of twelve weeks. List the matter on 1 st  July, 2015.” Accordingly Show Cause Notice returnable on 01.07.2015 was issued to the sole respondent/State of Punjab  through Regd. A.D. Post on 27.04.2015.  A copy of the notice was also issued to Mr. Kuldip Singh, Standing Counsel for the State of Punjab. It is submitted that  A.D. Card duly signed has been received from the sole Respondent/ State of Punjab  but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the sole Respondent/State of Punjab .   It is further submitted that Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate has on 27.05.2015 filed an application for impleadment of the applicants (1) Krishan Kumar (2) Deepak Sharma and (3) Aditi Sharma (Minor) through legal guardian Krishan Kumar as respondents. The application has been registered as  Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 9643 if 2015 and copy of the application has been placed alongwith  Special Leave Petition Paper Books  as separate volume for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court . The counsel has also filed Vakalatnama /Appearance  on behalf of proposed respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Service of show cause notice is complete.

The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  DATED this the 22 nd  day of June, 2015.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate 3. *Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate  *You are requested to file  Vakalatnama /Appearance  on  behalf of  State of Punjab .  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK­C2

F ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent) Date : 01/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after a week. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2015.07.0117:00:03 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) Date : 20/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meantime, there will be interim stay of arrest of the petitioner in FIR No. 94 dated 21.07.2014 registered under Section 406, 498-A of IPC at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab, for a period of twelve weeks. List the matter on 1 st July, 2015. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¤ ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) Date : 20/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meantime, there will be interim stay of arrest of the petitioner in FIR No. 94 dated 21.07.2014 registered under Section 406, 498-A of IPC at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab, for a period of twelve weeks. List the matter on 1st July, 2015. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.04.2019:01:13 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2729/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/02/2015 in CRM No. 29812/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) BHARAT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 13/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is adjourned for one week. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER