1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1032 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(CRL.)No.4189 of 2012) THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appellant (s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1044 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 4970/2012) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1033-1035 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 9736-9738/2011) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1042-1043 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 4961-4962/2012) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1038-1039 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 4957-4958/2012) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1040-1041 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 4966-4967/2012) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1037 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 4951/2012) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1036 Of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No (S) . 4953/2012) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We find that the High Court has not dealt with the matter in a satisfactory manner. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the High Court for a fresh decision in accordance with law. The appeals are disposed of. The parties are directed to appear before the High Court for further proceedings on Monday, the 21 st August, 2017.
2 Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. ..........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ..........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) New Delhi, July 6, 2017.
3 ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.11 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-06-2011 in MCRC No. 657/2003 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior Bench) THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (II-A) SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 (II-A) SLP(Crl) No. 4961-4962/2012 (II-A) SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 (II-A) SLP(Crl) No. 4966-4967/2012 (II-A) SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 (II-A) SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 (II-A) (With appln. for exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 06-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Prachi Mishra,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar,Adv. Mr. Prateek Rusia,Adv. Mr. Chaitanya,Adv. Ms. Pragya Garg,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh, AOR Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar, AOR Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Prachi Mishra,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar,Adv. Mr. Prateek Rusia,Adv. Mr. Chaitanya,Adv. Ms. Pragya Garg,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan,Adv.
4 Mr. Srikant Dubey,Adv. Mr. R.C. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. In terms of the signed order, the appeals are disposed of. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)
1 ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/06/2011 in MCRC No. 657/2003 passed by the High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Gwalior) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR bail and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 (WITH Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 (WITH Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4961-4962/2012 (With WITH Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4966-4967/2012 (With WITH Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (WITH Office Report) Date : 01/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Bansuri Swaraj,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhinday Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar,Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv.
2 Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post after ensuing summer vacation. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
SECTION IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEALS(CRL.) NO. 4189, 4951, 4953, 495758, 496162, 496667 & 4970 OF 2012 AND 973638 OF 2011 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ... PETITIONER VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT 4189/2012 The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10 th May, 2012 when the Court was pleased to pass the following orders: “Exemption from filing OT is allowed. Delay condoned. Issue Notice”. There are seven Respondents. R. No. 2 is represented by Shri T. Mahipal, Advocate; R. No. 3 is represented by Shri C.N. Sree Kumar, Advocate; R. Nos. 4 & 5 are represented by Shri Anil Shrivastava, Advocates. Nobody has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 6 & 7 despite service. 4951, 4953, 495758, 496162, 496667 & 4970 of 2012 The matters abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02 nd July, 2012 when the Court was pleased to pass the following orders: “ Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue Notice. Tag with SLP(Crl.) No…...of 2012 (Crl.M.P. No. 11125 of 2012)”. Contd...p/2
2 4951/2012 There are five Respondents. R. No. 1 is represented by Mr. T. Mahipal; R.No. 2 & 3 are represented by Mr. Anil Shrivastava, Advocate. R. Nos. 4 and 5 are unserved. They are also respondents in connected Special Leave Petition No. 4970 of 2012 and are duly served with show cause notice. 4953/2012 There are six respondents. R.No. 1 is represented by Mr. T.Mahipal, Advocate; R. Nos. 3 & 4 are represented by Mr. Anil Shrivastava, Advocate. R. Nos. 2, 5 & 6 are unserved. They are also respondents in connected Special Leave Petition No. 4970 of 2012, 4189 of 2012 and 495758 of 2012 and have been served with the show cause notice. 495758/2012 There are three respondents in the matters. Service of show cause notice is complete on all of them as per Service Report received from the Trial Court concerned but nobody has entered appearance on their behalf. 496162/2012 and 496667 of 2012 There is one Respondent in each matter and they have been served through the District Court but nobody has entered appearance on their behalf. 4970/2012 There are eight respondents in this matter. R. Nos. 5 & 6 are represented by Mr. Anil Shrivastava, Advocate. Service of notice is also complete on remaining Respondents but nobody has entered appearance on their behalf.
3 973638/2011 There are three respondents. R. No.1 is represented by Mr. C.D.Singh, Advocate; R. Nos. 2 & 3 have been deleted from the array of parties vide this Hon’ble Court’s order dated 04 th October, 2013. The matters abovementioned are, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th April, 2017. Assistant Registrar Copy to: Mr. C.D.Singh, Advocate, Mr. T.Mahipal, Advocate, Mr. Anil Shrivastava, Advocate, Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar, Advocate Assistant Registrar
1ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/06/2011in MCRC No. 657/2003 passed by the High Court Of Madhya Pradesh AtGwalior)STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)WITH SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR bail and Office Report)SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012(WITH Office Report)SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012(WITH Office Report)SLP(Crl) No. 4961-4962/2012(With WITH Office Report)SLP(Crl) No. 4966-4967/2012(With WITH Office Report)SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012(WITH Office Report)Date : 01/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Bansuri Swaraj,Adv.Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv.Mr. Abhinday Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar,Adv.Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan,Adv.Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv.Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv.2Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv.UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPost after ensuing summer vacation.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Item No.7 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 15/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit K. Singh,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In all the matters service is deemed as complete. Appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
R Item No.7 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 15/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit K. Singh,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In all the matters service is deemed as complete. Appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit. Viewed thus,Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble CourtMadhu GroverDate: 2016.03.1516:28:14 SCTReason: under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
1 ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 (With appln.(s) for bail and appln.(s) for dispensing with the service of res.nos. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 08/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar,Adv. Mr. Reegan S. Bel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. ...2/-
2 Item No. 15 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Crl) Nos. 4189,4951 and 4953/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is given four weeks' time for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so. SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent Nos. 1-4 and 7-8 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 25.11.2014. SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the respondents have not filed the counter affidavit despite opportunities so far. Viewed thus, the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules , if and when the connected ones get ready for listing. SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 The office report indicates that service is complete as against the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules , if and when the connected ones get ready for listing. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
¶ 1 ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 (With appln.(s) for bail and appln.(s) for dispensing with the service of res.nos. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 08/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar,Adv. Mr. Reegan S. Bel,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv.Signature Not Verified ...2/-Digitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2014.09.0915:34:37 ISTReason: 2Item No. 15 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(Crl) Nos. 4189,4951 and 4953/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is given fourweeks' time for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of
notice already issued to the unserved respondents. The servedrespondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavitwithin a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so.SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent Nos.1-4 and 7-8 shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 25.11.2014.SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report isthat the respondents have not filed the counter affidavit despiteopportunities so far. Viewed thus, the matters shall be processedfor listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules, if and whenthe connected ones get ready for listing.SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 The office report indicates that service is complete asagainst the respondents but no one has entered appearance on theirbehalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed forlisting before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules, if and when theconnected ones get ready for listing. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarMG
, ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4189/2012 STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s) (With Office Report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 9736-9738/2011 (With prayer for and bail and and dispensing with the service of res.nos. and Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 4951/2012 SLP(Crl) No. 4953/2012 SLP(Crl) No. 4957-4958/2012 SLP(Crl) No. 4961-4962/2012 SLP(Crl) No. 4966-4967/2012 SLP(Crl) No. 4970/2012 (With prayer for and exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 04/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. C. D. Singh ,Adv. Mr. M.P. Singh,Adv. Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar , Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Shrivastav ,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Crl.) Nos. 4189/2012, 4951 and 4953/2012Signature Not VerifiedThe learned counsel for the petitioner is present. He seeksDigitally signed by and is given four weeks' time to file the affidavit in proof ofMadhu GroverDate: 2014.07.0710:20:42 ISTReason: dasti service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. ..2/- - 2 - The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file theCounter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case theyintend to do so.SLP(Crl.) Nos. 4961-4962 and 4966-4967/2012 The respondents have been served through the concernedDistrict Court but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.Since the service in the matter is complete therefore, the same
shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under therules.SLP(Crl.) No. 4970/2012 Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent Nos. 1-4 and 7-8.SLP(Crl.) Nos. 9736-9738/2011 Service is complete. The vakalatnama has been filed. Therespondents shall be at liberty to file the Counter affidavitwithin a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so. List all the incomplete matters on 8.9.2014. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarMG
HITEM NO.36 Court No.3 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDRNo.4/2002,CRLA No.655/2002CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OFM.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for bail and dispensing with the service of Res.Nos. and office report)Date: 05/05/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv. Mr. Resmitha R. Chandran, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Mr. B.P. Singh, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Adv. Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters in the month of July, 2014 Tag with SLP(Crl.) Nos....CrlMP Nos. 13685-13686 of 2012. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (M.S. NEGI) Court Master Assistant Registrar
pITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4189/2012STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITHSLP(Crl) NO. 4951 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4953 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4957-4958 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4961-4962 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4966-4967 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4970 of 2012(With office report)Date: 04/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Vikrant Singh Bais, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Lakhan Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr Abhay Gupta, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(CRL.) NO.4189/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,6 and 7 are reported to be dulyserved but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. -2-Item No.27 Respondent nos. 2,4 and 5 have failed to file counteraffidavit despite final chance granted on the last date. Dasti in respect of respondent no.3 is awaited.
SLP(CRL.) NO.4951/2012 Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 1,4 and 5 isawaited. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have failed to file counteraffidavit despite final chance granted on the last date.SLP(CRL.) NO. 4953/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel,Mr Abhay Gupta has made a submission at Bar that counteraffidavit would be filed during the course of the day. Copybe served on the other side and necessary proof be filed onrecord while on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 asubmission at Bar has been advanced by the ld. Counsel,Mr Anil Shrivastava that no counter affidavit is required tobe filed on record. Dasti in respect of respondent nos. 2,5 and 6 isawaited.SLP(CRL.) NO.S 4961-4962, 4966- 4967 OF 2012 Service report in respect of the sole respondent ineach matter is awaited.SLP(CRL.) NO.4957-58/2012 Service report in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 3 inboth matters is awaited. -3-Item No.27SLP(CRL.) NO.4970/2012 Service report in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 4, 7and 8 is awaited. Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 have failed to file counteraffidavit despite final chance granted on the last date. List again on 4.7.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj
2ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDR No.4/2002,CRLANo.655/2002CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for bail,dispensing with the service of Res.Nos. and officereport)Date: 31/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Mr. B.P. Singh,Adv. Ms. Shreya Dubey,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after four weeks, as prayed for. (O.P. SHARMA) (M.S. NEGI) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SEC. IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NOS. 9736-9738 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS. 26786-26788 OF 2013 (Applications for bail) BHIKAM ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF M.P. & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 2 nd March , 201 2 , when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed . Issue notice. ” Accordingly notice was issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in all the matters and Respondent No. 3 in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9738 of 2011 through registered A.D. Post. Mr. C. D. Singh, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/ appearance on behalf of common Respondent No. 1 in all the matters. Neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back from Respondent No. 2 in all the matters and Respondent No. 3 in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9738 of 2011. Thereafter the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Court of Registrar time to time and lastly listed on 14 th February, 2013 when the following order was passed :- “Notice is still awaited from Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that they are proforma respondents and an application to delete their names or to dispense with notice to them is proposed to be filed. Seeks a weeks time. Granted. List the matter on 5.3.2013.” It is submitted that application for deletion / dispense with service of Respondent No. 2 in all the matters and Respondent No. 3 in Special Leave Petition …. 2/- - 2-
(Crl.) No. 9738 of 011 in the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber on 4 th October , 2013, when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following order:- “Heard. Deletion of respondents no.2 and 3, Chandu and Balveer respectively prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, is permitted at the risk of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the parties submit that Chandu and Balveer have separately filed special leave petitions through the jail concerned. Office to verify and list these special leave petitions along with the said special leave petitions.” It is submitted that State of M.P. has filed Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4189 of 2012 and batch of 9 Special Leave Petitions against the order dated 29 th June, 2011 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in M.Cr.C. No. 657, 659 and 664 of 2003, 655 of 2002, Criminal Appeal No. 632 of 2002, Criminal Appeal No. 674 of 2002 and M.Cr.C. No. 681 of 2003 in which Chandu and B alveer are respondent and is pending after notice for hearing before the Hon'ble Court. It is submitted that office report dated 28 th November, 2013 in the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber on 3 rd January , 201 4 , when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following order:- “ List the SLP before an appropriate Bench.” The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. DATED this the 28 th day of November, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. C. N. Sreekumar, Advocate Mr. C. D. Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C-3/km
ÖITEM NO.39 Court No.4 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDR No.4/2002,CRLANo.655/2002CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for bail and dispensing with the service of Res.Nos. andoffice report)[CrlMP Nos. 4747-4749 are for deletion/dispensing with service onrespondent nos. 2-3]Date: 03/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Mr. B.P. Singh, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters after three weeks, as prayed for. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Assistant Registrar |
þITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4189/2012STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 4951 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4953 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4957-4958 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4961-4962 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4966-4967 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4970 of 2012(With office report)Date: 05/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(Crl.) No.4189/2012 Respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5 are granted six weeks' time, as finalchance, for filing counter affidavit on record.Item No.36 -2- Respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7 are reported to be duly and properly servedbut none appeared on their behalf. Dasti report in respect of respondent No.3 is awaited.SLP(Crl.) No.4951/2012 The duly represented respondent Nos.1 to 3 are granted six weeks'time, as final chance, for filing counter affidavit on record. Dasti report in respect of respondent Nos.4 and 5 is awaited.SLP(Crl.) No.4953/2012 Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 are granted six weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit on record subject to service of the complete set of thepleadings on the learned counsel appearing on their behalf within threeweeks of which necessary proof be filed on record. Dasti report in respect of respondent Nos.2, 5 and 6 is awaited.SLP(Crl.) No.4961-4962 and 4966-4967/2012 Notice be reissued to the sole respondent through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service.SLP(Crl.) No.4957-4958/2012 Notice be reissued to respondent Nos.1 to 3 through the concerned
District Court in addition to postal service.Item No.36 -3-SLP(Crl.) No.4970/2012 Notice be reissued to respondent Nos.1 to 4, 7 and 8 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Respondent Nos.5 and 6 are granted six weeks' time, as final chance,for filing counter affidavit on record. List again on 4.4.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
BITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K.HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4189/2012STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 4951 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4953 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4957-4958 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4961-4962 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4966-4967 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4970 of 2012(With office report)Date: 07/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr Abhay Gupta, Adv. Mr T Mahipal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(CRL.) NO.4189/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is given to him. -2-Item No.19 The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavitbefore the next date in case they choose to do so. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks' time to filethe affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice to the respondent No.3.Time as prayed for is given to him as last chance.SLP(CRL.) NO.4951/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.1 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 seeks four weeks time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is given to him. The other served respondents may file the counter affidavit withinthe period stipulated above in case they choose to do so. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks' time to file
the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice to the respondent Nos.4to 6. Time as prayed for is given to him as last chance.SLP(CRL.) NO.4961-62,4966-4967 of 2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. He seeks four weeks'time to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice to the solerespondent. Time as prayed for is given to him as last chance.SLP(CRL.) NO.4957-58/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. He seeks four weeks'time to file the affidavit in proof of -3-Item No.19dasti service of notice to respondent No.1 to 3. Time as prayed for isgiven to him as last chance.SLP(CRL.) NO.4970/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. He seeks fourweeks' time to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice torespondent Nos.1 to 4, 7 and 8. Time as prayed for is given to him as lastchance. The ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 may file thecounter affidavit before the next date in case they choose to do so. List again on 5.2.2014.| | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
ÀITEM NO.43 Court No.6 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDR No.4/2002,CRLANo.655/2002CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(Office report for directions)Date: 03/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the SLP before an appropriate Bench. |(Shashi Sareen) | |(P.S.N.Murthy) ||Court Master | |Court Master |
ðITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4189/2012STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 4951 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4953 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4957-4958 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4961-4962 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4966-4967 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4970 of 2012(With office report)Date: 25/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(CRL.) NO.4189/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 6 are ordered to proceed ex parte as theld. Counsel, Mr T Mahipal has failed to file vakalatnama and counteraffidavit on record. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 3 and 7 is awaited. -2-Item No.17SLP(CRL.) NO.4951/2012 Respondent No.1 is ordered to proceed ex parte as the ld. Counsel,Mr T Mahipal has failed to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit on recordas undertaken on the last date but till date no steps seems to have beentaken. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Dasti in respect of respondent nos. 4 and 5 is awaited.SLP(CRL.) NO.4953/2012 Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 1,2,5 and 6 is awaited. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are proceeded ex parte.SLP(CRL.) NO.4961-62,4966-67 OF 2012 Dasti in respect of the sole respondent is awaited (issued on30.10.2013).SLP(CRL) NO.4957-58/2012
Dasti in respect of sole respondent is awaited (issued on30.10.2013).SLP(CRL) NO.4970/2012 Dasti in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 7 and 8 is awaited. Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. List again on 7.1.2014.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
ôITEM NO.22 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4189/2012STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 4951 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4953 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4957-4958 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4961-4962 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4966-4967 of 2012(With office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 4970 of 2012(With office report)Date: 17/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present in all matters.SLP(CRL.) NO.4189/2012 The ld. Counsel, Mr Abhay Gupta appearing on behalf of Mr TMahipal, Advocate-on-record has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.2.He states that he will file the -2-Item No.22vakalatnama and the counter affidavit on behalf of the said respondentwithin a period of four weeks. Time as prayed for is given to him. Respondent Nos. 1,4,5 and 6 have not filed the counter affidavitthough they have been properly served. They may also file the counteraffidavit within the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so. As far as respondent Nos. 3 and 7 are concerned, the ld.counsel forthe petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for their service. Dasti ispermitted.SLP(CRL.) NO.4951/2012 The ld. Counsel, Mr Abhay Gupta appearing on behalf of Mr TMahipal, Advocate-on-record has appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 andhe has stated that he will file the vakalatnama and the counter affidaviton his behalf within a period of four weeks. Time as prayed for is
granted.Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 but noone has entered appearance on their behalf. They may also file the counteraffidavit within the period provided above in case they want to do so. The ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsfor the service of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Dasti is permitted.SLP(CRL) NO.4953/2012 The ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsfor the service of the respondent Nos. 1,2,5 and 6. Dasti is permitted. -3-Item No.22 Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 but noone has entered appearance on their behalf.SLP(CRL) NO.4961-62 ,4966-67 of 2012 The ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsfor the service on the sole respondent. Dasti is permitted.SLP(CRL) NO.4957-58/2012 The ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsfor the service in respect of all the three respondents. Dasti ispermitted.SLP(CRL) NO.4970/2012 Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 but noone has entered appearance on their behalf. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsfor the service of the respondent nos. 1 to 4,7 and 8. Dasti is permitted. List again on 25.11.2013.| | |(M.K. HANJURA) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
TITEM NO.49 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDR No.4/2002,CRLANo.655/2002CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for dispensing with the service of Res.Nos. and officereport)Date: 04/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Singh,Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Deletion of respondents no.2 and 3, Chandu and Balveer respectively prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, is permitted at the risk of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the parties submit that Chandu and Balveer have separately filed special leave petitions through the jail concerned. Office to verify and list these special leave petitions along with the said special leave petitions.|(Mahabir Singh) | (S.S.R. Krishna) || Court Master | Court Master |
vITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Resmitha R.Chandran,adv. Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Anshuman Shrivastava,adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application to delete respondent Nos. 2 & 3 from the party array. Office is directed to process it and list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. Await orders. List the matter on 25.04.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
øITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 14/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice is still awaited from Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that they are proformarespondents and an application to delete their names or to dispense withnotice to them is proposed to be filed. Seeks a weeks time. Granted. List the matter on 5.3.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) || | |Registrar || | | || | | || | | || | | || | | ||j | | |
üITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 02/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms./Mr. Resmitha R. Chandran,Adv. Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais,Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No. 2 and 3. List the matter on 14.2.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 30/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv. Mr./Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms./Mr. Aishwary Bhati,Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No. 2 and 3. List the matter on 2.1.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
\230ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 14/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv. Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has not filed counter affidavit inspite of last chance granted. Await return of notice of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. List the matter on 30.10.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||sushma | |Registrar |
NITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 31/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 2 & 3. List the matter on 14.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ITEM NO.28+67 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2012 CRLMP.NO(s). 11795(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in MCRC No.664/2003 of TheHIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR)STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSMADANLAL & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP, exemptionfrom filing OT and office report)WITH SLP(R)...CRLMP NO. 13948-13949 of 2012(C/delay in filing SLP and C/delay in refiling SLP and office report)SLP(Crl.)No.....Crl.M.P.No. 14089 of 2012(WIth appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WithSLP(Crl.)No.........Crl.M.P.No. 13681-13682 of 2012(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)SLP(Crl.)No.......Crl.M.P. No.13685-13686 of 2012(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)SLP(Crl.).....Crl.M.P. NO. 13448 of 2012(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)Date: 02/07/2012 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar,Adv.For Respondent(s) ....2/- -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(Crl.)No.....of 2012 (Crl.M.P.No. 11125 of 2012). [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
ÒITEM NO.20 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2012 CRLMP.NO(s). 11125(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in MCRC No.657/2003of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR)STATE OF M.P. Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHANDU & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, exemption from filing OTand office report)Date: 10/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing OT is allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
\206ITEM NO.106 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/05/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Resmitha R.Chandran,adv. Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Vikas Bansal,adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 2 & 3. List the matter on 31.07.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
>ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDRNo.4/2002,CRLA No.655/2002 & CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OFM.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Issue notice. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
jITEM NO.37 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLDRNo.4/2002,CRLA No.655/2002CRLA No.674/2002 of The HIGH COURT OFM.P AT GWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date: 10/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran,Adv. Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. List after two weeks. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
bITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLA.674/2008,CRLDR No.4/2002 & CRLA No.655/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P ATGWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T., bail and officereport )Date: 05/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Four weeks' time is allowed to place on record the earlier judgment of the High Court dated 18/9/2003 acquitting the appellant. List thereafter. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Veena Khera ] Court Master Court Master
bITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).9736-9738/2011(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in CRLA.674/2008,CRLDR No.4/2002 & CRLA No.655/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P ATGWALIOR)BHIKAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T., bail and officereport )Date: 05/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Four weeks' time is allowed to place on record the earlier judgment of the High Court dated 18/9/2003 acquitting the appellant. List thereafter. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Veena Khera ] Court Master Court Master