1 ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 8573-8574/2024 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 78888/2025 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION WITH C.A. No. 8576/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8575/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8595/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8577/2024 (IV) IA No. 78589/2025 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 78591/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. C.A. No. 8580/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8578/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8581/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8579/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8582/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8584/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8583/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8585/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8587/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8586/2024 (IV) I.A No. 95840 of 2016 - Application for Substitution, condonation of delay and setting aside abatement to bring on record legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 9(i) C.A. No. 8588/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8589/2024 (IV)
2 C.A. No. 8591-8592/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8590/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8593/2024 (IV) IA No. 173768/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION C.A. No. 8594/2024 (IV) IA No. 173840/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION C.A. No. 8596-8597/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8598/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8599/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8600/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8601/2024 (IV) IA No. 312150/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (IV) C.A. No. 8602/2024 (IV) SLP(C) No. 435/2025 (IV-D) IA No. 2722/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 2721/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES Date : 15-01-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For Appellant(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Keshav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Partik, Adv. Mr. Tarun Meel, Adv. Mr. Mayank Dubey, Adv. Mr. Devansh Khatter, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Mahendrou, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv.
3 Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Vandana Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, AOR Mr. Aman Gupta, Adv. Ms. Srishti Ghoshal, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mrs. Honey Verma, Adv. Mr. Harsh Gupta, Adv. Ms. Goldy Goyal, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Prachi Sohi, Adv. Ms. Pooja Devi, Adv. Mr. Kapil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Tarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shivam Birt, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, AOR Mr. Hardik Giri, Adv. Dr. Anurag Rana, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyadarshi Sanjay, A.S.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Ms. Agrima Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
4 Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Rathi, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Lodhi, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Adv. (Not present) Mrs. Honey Verma, Adv. Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR Mr. Abhishek Gurawa, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Thukral, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manish Chaurasiya, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Advocate General Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, A.A.G. Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR Mr. Robin Singh, Adv. Mr. Kapil Balwani, Adv. Ms. Komal Thakkar, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv. Ms. Srishti Jain, Adv.
5 Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Richa Verma, Adv. Mr. Eashwar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Karan Dewan, Adv. Ms. Aanchal Jain, AOR Mr. Kartik Yadav, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR Mr. Karan Sharma, AOR Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Ms. Vriti Gujral, Adv. Mr. G. Balaji, AOR Mr. Bikram Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Udita Singh, AOR Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. R.d. Maurya, Adv. Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Adv. Mr. Loveli Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Gargi Mishra, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Manish Raghav , AOR Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Rajan Thakur, Adv. Ms. Smriti Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Aman Pathak, Adv. Mr. Sumeet Mishra, Adv. Mr. Karanvir Gogia, Adv.
6 Ms. Varnika Gogia, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Abhishek Wadhwa, Adv. Mr. Mayank Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Kritika, Adv. Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Ms. Sapna Verma, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Kavita Verma, Adv. Ms. Priya Verma, Adv. Mr. Mohan Lal Gehlot, Adv. Mr. Sunny, Adv. Mr. Rishab Sardana, Adv. Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Mayank Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Satinder Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Charsnjit Kal, Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel, appearing for the State of Haryana, submits that an exhaustive exercise is being undertaken, which will be completed within a period of two weeks. However, learned counsel, appearing for the State of Punjab, seeks further time as the process is very comprehensive. Accordingly, we are inclined to grant six weeks’ time, as a last and final chance, for compliance of the earlier orders. We make it clear that in the event of non-compliance, the matter shall be proceeded with. List the matters on 12.03.2026. In the meantime, learned counsel, appearing for the
7 appellant(s), are permitted to file additional documents. (SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 8573-8574/2024 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 78888/2025 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION) WITH C.A. No. 8594/2024 (IV) (IA No. 173840/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION) C.A. No. 8600/2024 (IV) SLP(C) No. 435/2025 (IV-D) (IA No. 2722/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 2721/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 8576/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8575/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8595/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8577/2024 (IV) (IA No. 78589/2025 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No. 78591/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 8580/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8578/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8581/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8579/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8582/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8584/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8583/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8585/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8587/2024 (IV) 1
C.A. No. 8586/2024 (IV) (I.A No. 95840 of 2016 - Application for Substitution, condonation of delay and setting aside abatement to bring on record legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 9(i)) C.A. No. 8588/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8589/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8591-8592/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8590/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8593/2024 (IV) (IA No. 173768/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION) C.A. No. 8596-8597/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8598/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8599/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8601/2024 (IV) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (IV) C.A. No. 8602/2024 (IV) Date : 06-11-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Madhuri Negi, Adv. Mrs. Vandana Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Praveen Hans, Adv. Mr. Denson Joseph, Adv. 2
Mr. Tarun Mathur, Adv. Mr. Akshat Singhal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, AOR Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Vaneet, Adv. Mrs. Honey Verma, Adv. Ms. Goldy Goyal, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Prachi Sohi, Adv. Ms. Pooja Devi, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Roshan Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Saransh Attri, Adv. Ms. Kajol Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Parveen Paul, Adv. Ms. Amita Dhiman, Adv. Ms. Roopa Paul, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Mr. Yash Singhal, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Keshav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Partik Ahlawat, Adv. M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, AOR Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Hardik Giri, Adv. Mr. Pranav Singh Gautam, Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, AOR Ms. Goldy Goyal, AOR 3
Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Vedant Pradhan, AOR For Respondent(s) : Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Lodhi, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Rathi, Adv. Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR Mr. Manjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sundeep Pandhi, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Deepali Atreja, Adv. Mr. Rahul Thukral, Adv. Mr. Manish Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Advocate General Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, A.A.G. Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR 4
Mr. Robin Singh, Adv. Mr. Kapil Balwani, Adv. Mr. Shrikant Thokchom, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Karan Dewan, Adv. Ms. Raminder Kaur, Adv. Ms. Aanchal Jain, AOR Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Adv. Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Adv. Ms. Sukhdeep Kaur Rai, Adv. Mrs. Vasudha Gupta, Adv. Ms. Apoorva Pal, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR Mr. Karan Sharma, AOR Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Ms. Srishti Jain, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Vikram Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Suman, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rayi Peddi Raju, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Ms. Vriti Gujral, Adv. Mr. G. Balaji, AOR Mr. Bikram Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Udita Singh, AOR Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. Mr. R.d. Maurya, Adv. Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Adv. Mr. Loveli Tyagi, Adv. 5
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Satyadarshi Sanjay, A.S.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Ms. Agrima Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Atul, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, Adv. Mr. Hardik Giri, Adv. Mr. Pranav Singh Gautam, Adv. Ms. Preeti Kumari, Adv. Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Urfee Haider, Adv. Mr. Manish Raghav , AOR Mr. Manish Raghav, Adv. Mr. Piyush Sanghi, Adv. Ms. Khushbu Sahu, Adv. Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Aman Pathak, Adv. Mr. Sumeet Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vipin Gogia, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Karanvir Gogia, Adv. Ms. Varnika Gupta, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Gogia, Adv. Ms. Shivangi Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Indira M (marla Batta), Adv. Mr. Mayank Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Kritika, Adv. Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Ms. Sapna Verma, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Yunas, Adv. Ms. Kavita Verma, Adv. Ms. Priya Verma, Adv. Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. 6
Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Mayank Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rahul Rathore, Adv. Ms. Pallvi Hooda, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Nandal, Adv. Ms. Kavya Manuja, Adv. Ms. Tannu, Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, AOR Miss Aanchal Jain, AOR Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR Mr. Karan Sharma, AOR Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. G. Balaji, AOR Ms. Udita Singh, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Manish Raghav , AOR Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satinder Singh Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR 7
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter seeking adjournment circulated on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent(s) for filing detailed affidavit, list after four weeks. (NITIN TALREJA) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 8
1 ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 8573-8574/2024 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 8576/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8575/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8595/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8577/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8580/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8578/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8581/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8579/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8582/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8584/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8583/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8585/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8587/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8586/2024 (IV) I.A No. 95840 of 2016 - Application for Substitution, condonation of delay and setting aside abatement to bring on record legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 9(i) C.A. No. 8588/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8589/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8591-8592/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8590/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8593/2024 (IV) IA No. 173768/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION C.A. No. 8594/2024 (IV) IA No. 173840/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION C.A. No. 8596-8597/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8598/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8599/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8600/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8601/2024 (IV) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (IV) C.A. No. 8602/2024 (IV) SLP(C) No. 435/2025 (IV-B) Date : 21-08-2025 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
2 For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Mr. Yash Singhal, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Singh, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Keshav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Tarun Meel, Adv. Mr. Partik Ahlawat, Adv. Mr. Devansh Khatter, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Mahendrou, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Madhuri Negi, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mrs. Vandana Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. M K Ravi, Adv. Mr. Tarun Mathur, Adv. Mr. Akshat Singhal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, AOR Mr. Krishanan V, Adv. Mr. Chhatresh Kumar Sahu, Adv. Mr. Aman Gupta, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Harsh Gupta, Adv. Ms. Goldy Goyal, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mrs. Archna Midha, Adv. Mrs. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Aksveer Singh Saggu, Adv.
3 Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Rhythm Bharadwaj, Adv. Ms. Pooja Devi, Adv. Mr. Vijender Mann, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. Tar Jeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Parveen Paul, Adv. Ms. Roopa Paul, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shubham Saxena, Adv. Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Sathyapriya .s, Adv. M/s V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Shish Pallaler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, AOR Mr. Hardik Giri, Adv. Mr. Pranav Singh Gautam, Adv. Mr. Syed Danish Hasan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Rathi, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. P. N. Gupta, AOR Mrs. Bharti Gupta, Adv. Mr. T Shrinivas Murtiy, Adv. Mr. Puspraj Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Aashima Gupta, Adv. Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv. Mr. Atul Lakhan Pal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dewashish Vishwakarma, Adv. Mr. Praveen Pathak, Adv. Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR
4 Mrs. Parveen Qureshi, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Harish Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Deepali Atreja, Adv. Mr. Pulak Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jayant Malik, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, A.A.G. Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR Ms. Ankita M Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Robin Singh, Adv. Mr. Kapil Balwani, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Vikram Singh, Adv. Mr. Pushkar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Sachdeva, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Adv. Mrs. Sukhdeep Kaur Rai, Adv. Ms. Apoorva Pal, Adv. Mr. Krish Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR Mr. Karan Sharma, AOR
5 Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Ms. Vriti Gujral, Adv. Mr. G. Balaji, AOR Ms. Udita Singh, AOR Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, Adv. Mr. Sunny Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Satyadarshi Sanjay, A.S.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Ms. Agrima Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Manish Raghav , AOR Mr. Manish Raghav, Adv. Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Piyush Sanghi, Adv. Ms. Khushboo Sahu, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Vipin Gogia, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Karanvir Gogia, Adv. Ms. Varnika Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shivangi Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Indira M (marla Batta), Adv. Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Ms. Sapna Verma, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Yunas, Adv. Ms. Kavita Verma, Adv. Dr. Vinod Kumar Goyal, Adv. Mr. Bibhav Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Jamil Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Chandrakanta Sahoo, Adv.
6 Mr. Abhi Garg, Adv. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Satinder Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Yuvraj Nandal, Adv. Mr. Shiv Bhatnagar, Adv. Ms. Pallvi Hooda, Adv. Ms. Kavya Manuja, Adv. Ms. Tannu, Adv. Ms. Seema Sindhu, Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)- States seek more time to comply with the earlier order dated 15.05.2025. The concerned respondent(s) States shall comply with the earlier order dated 15.05.2025 within a period of six weeks. List the matters on 15.10.2025. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).8573-8574/2024 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No. 8576/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8575/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8595/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8577/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8580/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8578/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8581/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8579/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8582/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8584/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8583/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8585/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8587/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8586/2024 (IV) I.A No. 95840 of 2016 - Application for Substitution, condonation of delay and setting aside abatement to bring on record legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 9(i) C.A. No. 8588/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8589/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8591-8592/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8590/2024 (IV) 1
C.A. No. 8593/2024 (IV) IA No. 173768/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION C.A. No. 8594/2024 (IV) IA No. 173840/2024 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION C.A. No. 8596-8597/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8598/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8599/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8600/2024 (IV) C.A. No. 8601/2024 (IV) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (IV) C.A. No. 8602/2024 (IV) SLP(C) No. 435/2025 (IV-B) Date : 15-05-2025 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Keshav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. (Not Present) Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. M K Ravi, Adv. Mr. Tarun Mathur, Adv. Mr. Akshat Singhal, Adv. 2
Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, AOR Ms. Divyanshi Banshal, Adv. Mr. Chhatresh Kumar Sahu, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mrs. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Mrs. Archna Midha, Adv. Mr. Aksveer Singh Saggu, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Rhythm Bharadwaj, Adv. Ms. Anjali, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. Tarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Naveen .n, Adv. Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv. Mr. N. Nagan Pillai, Adv. Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Gurrick Jassar, Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Atul, Adv. Mr. Hardik Giri, Adv. Mr. Pranav Singh Gautam, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Rathi, Adv. Mrs. Shashi Verma, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. P. N. Gupta, AOR Mr. T. Srini Murthy, Advocate, Adv. Mr. P.n. Gupta, A.O.R, Mr. Pushpraj Gupta, Advocate, Adv. Mr. Bharti Gupta, Advocate, Adv. Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. 3
Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Nandal, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. Ms. Tannu, Adv. Ms. Ananya Basudha, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv. Ms. Kusum Pandey, Adv. Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR Mr. Praveen Pathak, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Deepali, Adv. Mr. Harish Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, D.A.G. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Rajmani Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Jain, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Vikram Singh, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Adv. 4
Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Adv. Mrs. Sukhdeep Kaur Rai, Adv. Mrs. Vasudha Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shwetabh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, A.A.G. Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR Mr. Robin Singh, Adv. Mr. Kapil Balwani, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. G. Balaji, AOR Ms. Udita Singh, AOR Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dhirendra Pratap Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Mr. Virender Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Satyadarshi Sanjay, A.S.G. (Not Present) Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Ms. Agrima Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Manish Raghav , AOR Mr. Manish Raghav, Adv. Mr. Shivaansh Sekhar Dixit, Adv. Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Rohit Gour, Adv. Mr. Bipin Bihary Singh, Adv. Ms. Divya Kumari Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Harshal V Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Aman Pathak, Adv. Mr. Sumeet Mishra, Adv. 5
Mr. Vipin Gogia, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Karanvir Gogia, Adv. Ms. Varnika Gupta, Adv. Mr. Aditya Goyal, Adv. Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Ms. Sapna Verma, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Yunas, Adv. Ms. Kavita Verma, Adv. Ms. Anju, Adv. Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Chandrakanta Sahoo, Adv. Mr. Satinder Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shiv Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Nandal, Adv. Ms. Pallvi Hooda, Adv. Ms. Tannu, Adv. Mr. Mayank Raghav, Adv. Ms. Seema Sindhu, Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel and learned senior counsel appearing for the respective parties. We are of the view that comprehensive affidavits are required from the States of Punjab and Haryana indicating the object and purpose for which the amendment to the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 has been introduced. The affidavits shall 6
also include the extent of land sought to be excluded by the impugned provision. The particulars shall further include the number of persons, who have been allotted land, along with the extent of land allotted to them, with specific reference to the possession, if any, with them. List the appeals on 21.08.2025. (D. NAVEEN) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 7
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 49620/2024 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-04-2024 in CWP No. 14117/2010 (O&M) passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh] GRAM PANCHAYAT HIJRAWAN KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS JASPAL SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.268956/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ) Date : 02-01-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Rishi Bhargava, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No.8575/2024. Counter affidavit to be filed within a period of four weeks. In the meantime, there shall be stay on the operation of the impugned order. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.803 COURT NO.9 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 8573-8574/2024 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 8595/2024 (IV) (Office FOR ON IA 46890/2012 FOR ON IA 3/2012 FOR ON IA 4/2012 FOR ON IA 63531/2013 FOR SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT ON IA 8/2016 FOR ON IA 9/2016) Date : 11-12-2024 These appeals were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR(mentioned by) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters on 19.03.2025. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 NO.30 COURT NO.13 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-08-2006 in LPA No. 423/2004 13-07-2007 in RA No. 5/2007 13-07-2007 in LPA No. 423/2004 13-07-2007 in CWP No. 2475/1982 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 1/2008 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 2/2008 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (IV-B) (FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 174601/2019) SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (IV-B) IA No. 1/2012 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (IV-B) (SERVICE IS COMPLETE. LIST A/W MAIN MATTER) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 24224/2010 (IV-B) FOR ON IA 108154/2012) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (Office FOR ON IA 46890/2012 FOR ON IA 3/2012 FOR ON IA 4/2012 FOR ON IA 63531/2013 FOR SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT ON IA 8/2016 FOR ON IA 9/2016 IA No. 8/2016 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (IV-B) (LIST FOR ON IA 67979/2013 FOR ON IA 82738/2013 FOR ON IA 107921/2013 FOR ON IA 108442/2013) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (IV-B) (SERVICE COMPLETE. LIST A/W MAIN MATTER) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (IV-B)
2 SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (IV-B) (SERVICE FOR ON IA 44984/2011 FOR ON IA 7750/2013 FOR ON IA 106817/2013 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 6/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 9/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 3/2015 IA No. 3/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 9/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (IV-B) (office report for direction) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (IV-B) (SERVICE COMPLETE. LIST A/W MAIN MATTER) SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (IA No.95840/2016 (APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION TO BRING ON RECORD THE LRS. OF DECEASED R. NO. 9(i) SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 (IV-B) (SERVICE COMPLETE list a/w main matter) SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 (IV-B) (SERVICE COMPLETE list a/w main matter) SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 (IV-B) (SERVICE COMPLETE list a/w main matter) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (IV-B) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (IV-B) (C.P No. 336 of 2012 in SLP(C) No. 11213 of 2011 "List the contempt petition along with the main matter" vide order dated 23.02.2017") SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (IV-B) Date : 23-07-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vivek K Thakur, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Mk Ravi, Adv.
3 Mr. Tarun Mathur, Adv. Mr. Akshat Singhal, Adv. Ms. Madhu Bala Gautam, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, AOR Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mrs. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Mrs. Archna Midha, Adv. Mr. Aksveer Singh Saggu, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Chandni Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Pareek, Adv. Mr. Tushar Rathi, Adv. Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Suman Sharma, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Apoorva Singh, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Bharat Bhushan, AOR Mr. Bhawani Dass Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Keshav Bansal, Adv. Mr. Devansh Khatter, Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hardik Giri, Adv. Mr. Anju Kumari Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nakshatra Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Deep Singh, Adv. Mr. Dilbag Singh, Adv. Mr. Sunny Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. Mr. Ashi Drall, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv.
4 Ms. Kiran Bala Dewangan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. P. N. Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhay Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Tirupati Gaurav Shahi, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Rathi, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Amber Shehbaz Ansari, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Hirday Virdi, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Davinder Singh Khurana, Adv. Mr. Manish Bansal, Adv. Mr. Manoj Rajpoot, Adv. Mr. Karunakar Rath, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Ms. Vriti Gujral, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Deepali, Adv. Mr. Arun Gaur, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Ms. S. Janani, AOR Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Adv. Mr. Harpuneet Singh Rai, Adv. Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Adv.
5 Mrs. Sukhdeep Kaur Rai, Adv. Mrs. Vasudha Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, D.A.G. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv. Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Ms. Hemlata Singh Rathore, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Dr. Vps Jadon, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Arora, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. Ms. Baani Khanna, AOR Mr. Robin Sigh, Adv. Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Govinda Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gaur, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Ms. Udita Singh, AOR Mr. N.K. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Amarjeet Singh Rana, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Nagar, Adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Baij Nath Yadav, Adv. Ms. Aditi Singh, Adv. Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv. Mr. Vinood Kumar Mantoo, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Bipin Bihary Singh, Adv. Ms. Divya Kumari Sharma, Adv. Mr. B.y.kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv.
6 Mrs. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Adv. Mr. Aman Pathak, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Shivraj Pawar, Adv. Mr. Vipin Gogia, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Karanvir Gogia, Adv. Ms. Varnika Gupta, Adv. Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sahil Patel, Adv. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Satinder Singh Gulati, Adv. Mr. Charanji Lal, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Ms. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Aditya Shankar Dixit, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Applications for exemption from filing official translation are allowed. Delay condoned. Leave granted. List on 27.11.2024. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.15 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-08-2006 in LPA No. 423/2004 13-07-2007 in RA No. 5/2007 13-07-2007 in LPA No. 423/2004 13-07-2007 in CWP No. 2475/1982 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 1/2008 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 2/2008 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (I.A. No.3 and 4 of 2012 – IMPLEADMENT) Date : 07-03-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Atul, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, Adv. Mrs. Kadambini, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Raj Sudhakar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Davinder Singh Khurana, Adv. Mr. Manish Bansal, Adv. Mr. Karunakar Rath, Adv. Mr. Manoj Rajpoot, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv.
2 Mr. Vikrant, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Chetan Jadon In, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Hardik Saxena, Adv. Ms. Hemlata Singh Rathore, Adv. Dr. Vps Jadon, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Govind Goel, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Satinder Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO. 4915 OF 2012 : List the matter on 23.07.2024 along with all connected matters. (SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.14 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-08-2006 in LPA No. 423/2004 13-07-2007 in RA No. 5/2007, in LPA No. 423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (FOR ON IA 3/2012, FOR ON IA 4/2012) Date : 22-02-2024 These matters were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 : List on 07.03.2024. (SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.1701 COURT NO.9 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (IA 3/2012) (IA 4/2012) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (I.A. for SUBSTITUTION) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (IV-B) Date : 04-01-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, Adv. Mr. Satish Hooda, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Raj Sudhakar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR
2 Mr. Ambar Shahabaz Ansari, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Lamba, Adv. Mr. Sagar Roy, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kumar, Adv. Ms. Avni Singh, Adv. Ms. Shreya Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr. Narasimha Murthy, Adv. Mr. Sahil, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Hardik Saxena, Adv. Ms. Hemlata Singh Rathore, Adv. Dr. Vps Jadon, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Satinder S. Gulati, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 4915 of 2012 It is reported that service on the impleadment application is complete. List the matter before the Regular Bench. SLP (C) No. 1059 of 2011 Peremptory order was passed by this Court on 06.10.2023 for filing affidavit of Dasti service in respect of proposed legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 9(i). However, I.A.No. 229101 of 2023 has been filed seeking exemption from filing affidavit of Dasti service.
3 Considering the same, peremptory order dated 06.10.2023 is recalled. The petitioner is directed to take steps for service on legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 9(i) within four weeks from today. SLP (C) No. 8111 of 2013 Service of notice is complete in the matter. List the matter before the Regular Bench. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (VIRENDER SINGH) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.1703 COURT NO.16 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SC 8111/2013, 4915/2012 and 1059 of 2011 are to be listed before Hon'ble Court (in Chamber)) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (FOR IA 3/2012 and IA 4/2012) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (FOR [SUBSTITUTION, C/D] ON IA 95840/2016) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (IV-B) Date : 06-10-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Dr. M.K. Ravi, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. Parikshit Parashar, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini V, AOR Mr. R.C. Kaushik, AOR Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Gupta, Adv. 1
Mr. Anand Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mrs. Kusum Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Ms. Kusum Pandey, Adv. Ms. Anamika Mishra, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Amber Shehabez Ansari, Adv. Mr. Sagar Roy, Adv. Ms. Avni Singh, Adv. Mr. Hari Singh, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Lamba, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Harsh Wardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Hardik Saxena, Adv. Ms. Hemlata Singh Rathore, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Satinder S. Gulati, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 4915 of 2012 I.A. Nos.3 and 4 of 2012 Issue notice on these applications, returnable in four weeks. As per Office Report dated 21.09.2023, service is 2
complete on all the respondents in this SLP. SLP(C) No.1059 of 2011 Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner in this special leave petition, seeks some more time to file an affidavit along with proof of dasti service in respect of the proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.9(i), in terms of the earlier order dated 28.07.2023. Needful in this regard shall be done within four weeks, failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed as against the proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.9(i), without further reference to this Court, and the petitioner would be solely responsible for the consequences thereof. SLP(C) No.8111 of 2013 In terms of the Office Report dated 21.09.2023, respondent No.3 has been served. Despite the same, there is no appearance for the said respondent. One last opportunity is given to respondent No.3 to enter appearance. List after four weeks. (RAVI ARORA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 3
1 ITEM NO.1704 COURT NO.14 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SC 8111/2013, 4915/2012 and 1059 of 2011 are to be listed before Hon'ble Court (in Chamber) ) WITH SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (I.A.NOS. FOR [SUBSTITUTION, C/D] ON IA 95840/2016) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (Office Report on Default) Date : 28-07-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mrs. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Dr. M.K. Ravi, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR Mr. S.P. Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vedant Pradhan, Adv. Mr. Anurag Malik, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Anand Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR
2 Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Ms. Kusum Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhanwar Pala Singh Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Roving Singh Solanki, Adv. Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Satinder S. Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No. 1059 of 2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks’ time to file affidavit alongwith proof of dasti service in respect to proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 9(i) . List after two weeks. In SLP(C) No. 8111 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks’ time to take appropriate steps for service of respondent No. 3. Dasti notice only. List after two weeks. In SLP(C) No. 4915 of 2012 List after two weeks. (POOJA SHARMA) (NIDHI WASON) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.1712 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SC 8111/2013, 4915/2012 and 1059 of 2011 are to be listed before Hon'ble Court (in Chamber) ) WITH SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (I.A.NOS. FOR [SUBSTITUTION, C/D] ON IA 95840/2016) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (Office Report on Default) Date : 01-05-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Dr. M.K. Ravi, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR (NP) Mr. Sujit Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Sharma, Adv. Miss Aanchal Jain, AOR Mr. Karan Dewan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR 1
Mr. Abhisek Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anmol Mishra, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Davinder Singh Khurana, Adv. Mr. Vikrant, Adv. Mr. Manoj Rajpoot, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, A.A.G. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Jadon, D.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Chetan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Harsvardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Amrita Verma, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Satinder S Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner in SLP(C) No. 1059/2011, seeks some time to file an affidavit in proof of dasti service in respect of the proposed LRs of deceased Respondent No.9(i). Needful shall be done by the next date of hearing. 2
SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 There is no representation for the petitioner in this special leave petition. As per the Office Report dated 12.04.2023, service of notice is incomplete in so far as Respondent No.3 is concerned. Steps shall be taken in that regard without fail by the next date of hearing. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Mr. Sujit Kr. Jha, learned counsel, appears in SLP(C) No. 4915/2012. As per Office Report dated 12.04.2023, steps are yet to be taken in relation to unserved Respondent Nos.15 and 16. Needful shall be done without fail by the next date of hearing. Failure to take steps as directed shall entail dismissal of the special leave petition against unserved Respondent Nos.15 and 16. List all these matters after four weeks. (Geeta Ahuja) (Ram Subhag Singh) Astt. Registrar-Cum-PS Branch Officer 3
1 ITEM NO.1702 COURT NO.13 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SLP (C) 6505/2012, 8111/2013, 6533/2012, 6473/2012, 4915/2012 and 1059 of 2011 are to be listed before Hon'ble Court (in Chamber) WITH SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (IA No. 95840/2016 - SUBSTITUTION, C/D) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (IV-B) (IA No. 22942/2020 - DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD IA No. 22945/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (IV-B) (SERVICE IS COMPLETE. LIST A/W MAIN MATTER) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 (IV-B) (IA No. 22935/2020 - DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD IA No. 22936/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (Office Report on Default) Date : 30-11-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Jasleen Kaur Sawhney, Adv. Ms. Monika Sharma, Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv Dr. M.K. Ravi, Adv.
2 Mr. Sanjay Bhasin, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Miss Aanchal Jain, AOR M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Umang Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Vijay pal, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon (DAG) Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Dy.AG Mr. Paras Dutta, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manoj Rajpoot, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Suraj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Amrita Verma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Tomar, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Satinder S. Gulati, Adv. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the court made the following O R D E R IA No.95840/2016 in SLP (Civil) No.1059/2011
3 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take steps to effect service on the legal representatives of the deceased, respondent No.9(1) and states that an affidavit of service shall be filed within four weeks. List after six weeks. I.A. Nos.22942 & 22945 of 2020 in SLP (Civil) No.6505/2012, I.A. Nos.22935 & 22936 of 2020 in SLP (Civil) No.6473/2012, I.A. Nos.22922 & 22923 of 2020 in SLP (Civil) No.6533/2012 Applications for discharge of previous Advocate-on-Record of the sole petitioner in all the matters as well as for exemption from filing Official Translation, are allowed. SLP (Civil) No.8111/2013 1. As per the office report, service of show cause notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2,4 to 6 and alternative arrangement notice is incomplete on the respondent No.3 2. Necessary steps for alternative arrangement be taken in respect of the respondent No.3 at the earliest. 3. List after six weeks. SLP (Civil) No.4915/2012 1. The matter was lastly listed in Chambers on
4 21.10.2019, when it was noticed that none had appeared for the petitioner. Further, period of three weeks was granted to take steps for effecting service on the unserved respondents No.10,19,20 and 21 and for taking adequate steps to substitute the deceased respondent No.22. 2. As per the office report, no steps have been taken by the petitioner till date. Appearance is entered by Mr. Shish Pal Laler, learned counsel who submits that the previous Advocate-on-Record appearing for the petitioner has since been elevated as an Additional District Judge, Jharkhand and necessary steps are being taken to engage another Advocate-on-Record. 3. Appearance has also been entered by learned counsel for the respondent No.23 who states that his client had purchased the subject property from respondents No.4,5,19 and 20 and sought impleadment in the present proceedings which was allowed vide order dated 28.08.2017. He therefore, states that the interest of the respondents No.19 and 20, who remain unserved, is taken care of by the respondent No.23. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions on the above aspect and may be granted one more opportunity to serve the unserved respondents and move an application for
5 substitution of the deceased respondent No.22. 5. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the petitioners to take necessary steps in this regard failing which, the petition shall be deemed to be dismissed as against the aforesaid unserved respondents. 6. List after six weeks. (Geeta Ahuja) (Ram Subhag Singh) Astt. Registrar-Cum-PS Branch Officer
1 ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.14 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (IV-B) (FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 174601/2019) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (I.A.NO. 2/2016 APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NOS.4, 5, 6 , 8, 9,10, 12 & 13, IA No. 3/2016 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN., IA No. 4/2016 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) I.A. NO. 95840/2016 (APPLN. FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PROPOSED LR. NO. 9(i) AND APPLN. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY OF MORE THAN 2 YEARS IN FILING APPLN. FOR SUBSTITUTION WITH PRAYER FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT) Date : 10-11-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Tyagi, AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Babita Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR
2 Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO. 1059/2011 The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the service of notice is complete in I.A. Nos. 2, 3 and 4 of 2016. Hence, the application for substitution of legal heirs of the deceased respondent nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13 is allowed, delay condoned and abatement is set aside. Amended cause title be filed within three weeks from today. Issue notice on I.A. No. 95840/2016, returnable after six weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted to be served. (POOJA SHARMA) (BEENA JOLLY) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.16 Court 13 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only Office Report on Default in SLP (C) No. 1059/2011) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (IV-B) (FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 174601/2019) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (Office Report on Default) Date : 20-07-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Ms. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Ms. Archna Midha, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gulati, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AAG Mr. S.K. Visen, Adv. Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Mr. Manan Bansal, Adv. Ms. Shweta Mohta, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR
2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. SLP(C) No. 1059/2011: Though the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the proposed legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 9(i), it appears that the death certificate has not been appended thereto. As a last opportunity, four weeks time is granted to the petitioner to do the needful and cure all the defects. List the matter after four weeks. (POOJA SHARMA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.21 Virtual Court 5 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only Application for Modification in SLP(C) No. 24739 of 2010 is to be listed before Hon'ble Court(In Chambers) ) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (IV-B) (FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 174601/2019 IA No. 174601/2019 - MODIFICATION) Date : 25-06-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Ms. Archna Midha, Adv. Ms. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Baldev Raj, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Ms. Bhavana Duhoon, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 24739 of 2010
2 Learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has no objection if the order dated 21.10.2019 is clarified to the extent that the SLP shall be taken to have abated qua Respondent no. 4 in view of the fact that he had died while the proceedings were still pending in the High Court. (ASHWANI KUMAR) (KAMLESH RAWAT) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.11 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SLP (C) No.1059/2011 is to be listed before Hon'ble Court (in Chamber) with Office Report on Default ) WITH SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (Office Report on Default) Date : 18-02-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Ms. H. Patel,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, four weeks’ time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects in the application for substitution to bring on record the L.Rs of proposed L.Rs No.9(i). (MADHU BALA) (ANAND PRAKASH) AR-CUM-PS BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.14 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (IV-B) (office report for direction) Date : 10-01-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Ms. Bhavana Duhoon, Adv. Mr. Manan Bansal, Adv. Mr. N. K. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per office report dated 20 th December,2019, the petitioner-Gram Panchayat has been served but there is no appearance. In the interest of Justice, no adverse order is passed today. Learned counsel appearing for the State of Punjab submits that they would get in touch with the Sarpanch of the petitioner– panchayat. List the matter after six weeks. (RASHMI DHYANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.16 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SLP (C) Nos. 24739/2010, 29291/2010, 1059/2011 and 4915/2012 are to be listed before Hon'ble Court (in Chamber) ) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (IV-B) (Office Report for Direction IA No. 137721/2018 - DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (IV-B) (office report for direction) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (IV-B) (OfficeReport for Direction IA No. 3/2016 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No. 4/2016 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT) Date : 21-10-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR
-2- Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mrs. Kamaldeep Gulati, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed to pass an appropriate order to dismiss the special leave petition as having been abated qua respondent no. 4. Under the circumstances the special leave petition qua respondent no. 4 stands dismissed as having been abated. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 None has appeared for the petitioner. Three weeks’ time is granted to take steps for effecting service on unserved respondent nos. 10, 19, 20 and 21 and to take steps for substitution in respect of respondent no 22 failing which necessary consequences shall follow. SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 Adjourned for two weeks. SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Two weeks’ time is granted to cure the defects for substitution application. (SONIA BHASIN) (DEEPAK SHARMA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct ) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct) Date : 30-01-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr.Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr.Anil Kumar,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,AAG Mr.Vishwapal Singh,AOR ……...2 ITEM NO.15 -2-
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Respondent Nos.1, 5 & 13 have already filed counter affidavit. Counter affidavit filed by respondent No.4 has already been taken off the record as per order dated 29.11.2018 of this Court. Respondent Nos.2, 9(ii), 14 and 23 have failed to file counter affidavit despite grant of last opportunity. Service is complete qua respondent Nos.3,6-8,11, 12, 17 & 18 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report qua respondent Nos.15 & 16 in the notice of alternative arrangement, the remarks indicates that “Insufficient address”. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall, within a period of four weeks, file the fresh particulars of the above respondents and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 29.11.2018 of this Court for effecting service upon respondent Nos.10, 19, 20 & 21 and also failed to file an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.22 despite last opportunity given. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for further orders. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar SB
ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct ) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct as per record of proceeding dated 10.08.2018) Date : 29-11-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj,AAG Mr.Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr.Satinder S.Gulati,Adv. Ms.Kamaldeep Gulati,AOR ……..2 ITEM NO.5 -2-
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Four weeks’ time, as a last chance, is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 28.09.2018 of this Court for effecting service upon respondent Nos.10, 19, 20 & 21 and to take steps in respect of deceased respondent No.22. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.4 has not cured the defects in the counter affidavit filed by him. Hence, the same is taken off the record. List the matter again on 30.01.2019. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar SB
ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MANOJ JAIN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct ) WITH SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct as per record of proceeding dated 10.08.2018) Date : 28-09-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr.Sandeep Singh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr.Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr.Priyank Jain,Adv. Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR ……..2 -2-
Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr.Satinder S.Gulati,Adv. Ms.Kamaldeep Gulati,Adv. Mr.Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr.Ashish Pandey,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Respondent No.4 has already filed counter affidavit. He is directed to serve copy of counter affidavit to respondent No.23 within two weeks, as a last chance. As per Trial Court report qua service upon respondent Nos.10, 19, 20 & 21, they are still unserved. Report has been perused. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondents and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. As per Trial Court report respondent No.22 has died. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks, file application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said respondent. List the matter again on 29.11.2018. MANOJ JAIN Registrar SB
ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. MANOJ JAIN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 959-960/2009 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (only SLP(C) Nos. 24739 and 29291 of 2010 and SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (IV-B) (alternative arrangement notice) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (IV-B) (only SLP(C) No.4915/2012 is to be listed before ld. Registrar Ct as per record of proceeding dated 15.05.2018) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (IV-B) (alternative arrangement notice) Date : 10-08-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.K.g.Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr.Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR …...2 ITEM NO.40 -2-
Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR Mr.Vishal Mahajan,Adv. Mr.Vinod Sharma,Adv. Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr.Sandeep Singh,Adv. Mr.Satinder S. Gulati,Adv. Mr.Kamal Deep Gulati,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 Service is complete qua respondent Nos.1,2,3,9,11,12 & 13 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Mr.Vinod Sharma, Advocate undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos.5(i)-5(iii), 6,7, 8(i)-8(iii) and 10 within one week. Four weeks’ time is given to file counter affidavit thereafter. The respondent No.4 is reported to have expired. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has not filed any I.A for substitution. Instead, he filed a letter stating therein that he has not been supplied the list of Lrs. of deceased respondent No.4 by the Advocate representing him. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for further orders. SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 Sole petitioner has been duly served by way of alternative arrangement. However, there is no appearance from his side. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for further orders. …...3
ITEM NO.40 -3- SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Respondent No.23 has not filed any counter affidavit, despite grant of last opportunity. Issue reminder to the concerned Court for service report of respondent Nos.10 and 19-22. Await return of service of notice for making alternative arrangement already issued to the respondent Nos.15 & 16. Respondent No.4 has not served the copy of counter affidavit to respondent No.23 so far. Be reported to the Hon’ble Court as and when the matter is listed. List the matter again on 28.09.2018. MANOJ JAIN Registrar SB
ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA . & ORS. Respondent(s) (I ) Date : 15-05-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr Satinder S Gulati, Adv. Mr Kamal Sehgal, Adv. Ms Kamaldeep Gulati, AOR Mr Himanshu Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.23 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.4 is granted one weeks time as last opportunity for filing proof of serving copy of the counter affidavit on respondent no.23.
-2- Item No.59 Respondent no.9(ii) has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Await service report from District Court, Ambala in respect of respondent nos. 10 and 19 to 22. Reminder be issued. Issue fresh notice for alternative arrangement in respect of respondent nos. 15 and 16. List again on 10.8.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 15.05.2018 hj
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA . & ORS. Respondent(s) (I) Date : 26-03-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr Sonit Sinhmar,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr Sanjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Ravi Panwar, AOR Mr Satinder S Gulati, Adv. Ms Kamaldeep Gulati, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 and 7 but none has entered appearance. Respondent nos. 2 and 14 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent no.23 submitted that they have received the copies of pleadings but copy of the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.4 has not been
-2- Item No.19 received. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.4 to serve copy of the counter affidavit to the ld. counsel for respondent no.23 within one weeks time. Respondent no.23 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent no.9(ii) is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith furnishing fresh address to effect service on respondent 10 and 19 to 22 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has requested for service to be effected through District Court, Ambala. Permission granted. Notice for alternative arrangement be issued to respondent nos. 15 and 16 immediately. List again on 15.5.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 26.03.2018 hj
ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA . & ORS. Respondent(s) (I) Date : 30-01-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar Tripathi, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr Satinder S Gulati, Adv. Ms Kamaldeep Gulati, AOR. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 2 and 14 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. It is submitted by the ld. Counsel for respondent no.23 that land was bought from respondent nos. 4 and 5. Respondent nos. 4 and 5 have already filed counter affidavit but the copy of the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.4 has not been served on the ld. Counsel for respondent no.23. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.4 is directed to serve
-2- Item No.28 the copy of the counter affidavit on the ld. Counsel for respondent no.23 within one weeks time. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.23 to file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter, as last opportunity. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 3,7,10 and 19 to 22 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued. Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr Ravi Panwar appears for respondent no.9(ii). Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within four weeks time. Fresh notices for alternative arrangement be issued in respect of respondent nos. 15 and 16. List again on 26.3.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 30.01.2018 hj
ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA . & ORS. Respondent(s) (I) Date : 24-11-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR Mr. Satinder S. Gulati, Adv. Mr. Kamaldeep Gulati, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Registry to update the database with regard to the name of the Ld. Counsel for the impleaded respondent. Respondent Nos.1, 4, 5 and 13 have already filed counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.2, 14 and 23 for filing counter affidavit.
Item No.46 -2- The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent Nos.3, 7, 9(ii), 10 and 19 to 22 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent Nos.6, 8, 11, 12, 17 and 18 have been served but no one has entered appearance. Respondent No.9(i) has already been deleted vide order dated 26.8.2017. Await service of notice for alternative arrangement/track report in respect of respondent Nos.15 and 16. List again on 30.1.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 24.11.2017 rd
1 ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.10 SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.NOS.6-7,8,9, 10, 53537/2017 & I.A.NO.53538/2017 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILLAGE TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR SUBSTITUTION, CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLICATION, SETTNG ASIDE ABATEMENT, APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT AND FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 28-08-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Sehgal,Adv. Mr. Satinder S. Gulati,Adv. Mr. Kamaldeep Gulati,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has purchased the property after disposal of the writ petition and prior to filing of this special leave petition.
2 In view of the said submission, the application for impleadment is allowed. However, it is made clear that the effect of impleadment will be considered on merits along with the main matter. The applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application, setting aside abatement and substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.9 are allowed. Applications for exemption from filing O.T. are allowed. Application for deletion of name of proposed legal representative no.9(i) of deceased respondent no.9 is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. (SAPNA BISHT) (RENUKA SADANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASST.REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 06/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 12.1.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.5. List again on 7.7.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
SECTION IVB Listed on.6.04.2017 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.7 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 412829 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Om Prakash ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 12.01.2017, when interalia the following order was passed:. “ .... SLP(C) No. 41284129/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent no.5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 20.02.2017.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps for the service of notice to the Respondent No. 5 so far. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 05th day of April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. 2. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty/chetan
bITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 06/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RTwo weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counselfor the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated12.1.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.5.List again on 7.7.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
SECTION IV B Listed on. 23.2.2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 3 CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Item No. 30 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 336 OF 2012 IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 11213 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat Village Chhoti Kohri ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mohinder Pal & Ors. ...Alleged Contemnor(s) OFFICE REPORT The Contempt Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.09.2012, 06.01.2015 and 09.02.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Order dated 28.09.2012 Issue notice. Personal appearance of the contemnors/respondents is dispensed with for the present. Order dated 06.01.2015 Mr. V.K. Jhanji, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8, submits that the counter affidavit on behalf of the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8 shall be filed during the course of the day. As prayed for by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, four weeks' time is granted to file a reply to the affidavits filed by the alleged contemnors. Put up thereafter. Order dated 09.02.2015 List the matter as NMD on nonmisceallneous day after four weeks. ” It is submitted that there are total eight alleged contemnors. Dr. S.K. Verma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama\Memo of Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of alleged contemnor nos.13. Alleged contemnor no. 4 has been served by Regd. A.D. Post but no one has
entered appearance on his behalf so far. Mrs. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama\Memo of Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of alleged contemnor nos. 58. Copy of the counter affidavits have been included in the paper books. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed reply to the counter affidavit filed by the alleged contemnor so far. Service of contempt notice on alleged contemnors is complete. The Contempt Petition, in the matter, is, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21st day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate. Dr. S. K. Verma, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 23/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Harshit Sawal,Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv. Mr. Rahul Thukral,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the contempt petition alongwith the main matter. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
ðITEM NO.30 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 23/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajat Sharma,Adv.Mr. Dinesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv.Mr. Harshit Sawal,Adv.Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv.Mr. Rahul Thukral,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList the contempt petition alongwith the main matter.[O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
Item No.7 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 20/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 9(i)which is
Item No.7 2 defective. Instead of curing it, Ld.Counsel has filed a letter stating therein that exact date of death of the said respondent could not be found despite making effort. Therefore, the matter may be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders with appropriate office report. SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 12.1.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.5. List again on 6.4.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
SECTION IVB Listed on.20.02.2017 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.7 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 1059 of 2011, AND 412829 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat of Vil. Udaipur . ..Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 12.01.2017, when the following order was passed:. “ SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 9(i) which is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application. SLP(C) Nos. 41284129/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No. 5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 20.2.2017. ” SLP (C) No. 1059/2011 It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has also filed application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased Respondent No. 9(i) and application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application alongwith setting aside abatement. In the
application, he has mentioned that Respondent No. 9(i) ri.e Sh. Singara Ram son of Mehar Chand died in the year 2014 leaving behind 2 Lrs. as per information received. But he has not annexed any proof regarding death of deceased Respondent No. 9(i). In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 27.01.2016 stating therein that Respondent No. 9(i) died in the year 2014 out exact date of death of the respondent could not be found despite making effort and further request to process for application (Copy of letter dated 27.01.2017 is enclosed herewith). SLP (C) No. 412829/2012 It is submitted that no postal report has been received from Postal Department in respect of Respondent No. 5 so far. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 17th day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
¦Item No.7 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012(With Office Report) Date : 20/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 1059/2011The office report indicates that the learned counsel for thepetitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 9(i)which isItem No.7 2defective. Instead of curing it, Ld.Counsel has filed a letterstating therein that exact date of death of the said respondentcould not be found despite making effort. Therefore, the mattermay be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders withappropriate office report. SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 12.1.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.5.List again on 6.4.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.36770/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2013 in LPA No. 671/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT TARAF BEHBAL BAHADAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 24/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Neelam Saini, Adv. For Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. K. Mahalik, Adv. For Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing spare copies and particulars of concerned Trial Court is condoned. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR) SR.P.A. AR-CUM-PS
´ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.36770/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2013in LPA No. 671/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT TARAF BEHBAL BAHADAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report for directions)Date : 24/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Ms. Neelam Saini, Adv. For Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. K. Mahalik, Adv. For Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay in filing spare copies and particulars ofconcerned Trial Court is condoned. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR) SR.P.A. AR-CUM-PS
Item No.9 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 12/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms./Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. H.S. Sachdeva,Adv.
Item No.9 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 9(i) which is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application. SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No. 5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 20.2.2017 . (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
lItem No.9 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012(With Office Report) Date : 12/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms./Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. H.S. Sachdeva,Adv.Item No.9 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 1059/2011The office report indicates that the learned counsel for thepetitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 9(i) which isdefective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeksrectify the defects whatever have been found in the saidapplication. SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to therespondent No. 5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioner within a period of four weeks. List again on 20.2.2017 . (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 28/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr.R.K.Pandey,Adv. Mr.Devendra Singh,Adv. … ...2
ITEM NO.9 -2- SC1059/2011 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.1059/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 26.10.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent No.1. The respondent No.9(i) is reported to be dead. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the said respondent. SLP(C) No.4128-4129/2012 Await report from the postal department in respect of the respondent No.5. List the matter again on 12.01.2017. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent Nos.4,6 & 7 despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
SECTION IVB Listed on.28.11.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.9 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 1059 of 2011, 412829 OF 2012 AND 36770 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat of Vil. Udaipur . ..Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.13(i) but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.1 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the Union of India . SLP(C) Nos. 41284129/2012 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.5 In the meantime, office shall enquire about the fate of notice sent to the said respondent under registered cover from the postal authorities. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with
the terms of the order dated 8.9.2016 of this Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 4, 6 and 7. List again on 28.11.2016.” SLP (C) No. 1059/2011 It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps to effect service on Respondent No. 1. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 25.10.2016 filed affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of proposed Lrs. of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 in response to show cause notice issued on 06.04.2016. As per dasti service report, service position of proposed Lrs. of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13 are as follows: Deceased Resp. Proposed Lrs No. Remarks 4 & 5 (Proposed Lrs of deceased R4 & 5 are common) 4(i), 4(ii) 5(i) 5(ii) Served, Report not filed, Served, Report not filed 6 6(iiii) Report not filed 8 & 12 (Proposed LRs of Deceased R8 & 12 are common) 8(iv) 12(iv) Served 9 9(i) 9(iiiii) Dead, Served 10 10(iiii) Served 13 13(iii) Refused to accept Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 1 and proposed Lr. No. 9(i) (Dead).
SLP (C) No. 412829/2012 It is submitted that Neither AD Card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from Respondent No. 5 so far. It is further submitted that letter to postal authority in respect of Respondent No. 5 has been issued and their response is still awaited. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not complied with the order dated 08.09.2016 by taking fresh steps for service of notice to the unserved Respondent Nos. 4, 6 & 7 and not furnished the particulars of concerned Trial Court. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service of notice so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate has filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 26th day November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
¢ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andsetting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondentand office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012SLP(C) No. 36770/2014(With Office Report) Date : 28/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr.R.K.Pandey,Adv. Mr.Devendra Singh,Adv. ⬠¦ ...2ITEM NO.9 -2- SC1059/2011 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.1059/2011Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated26.10.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent No.1.The respondent No.9(i) is reported to be dead. Ld.counsel forthe petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file anapplication for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of thesaid respondent.SLP(C) No.4128-4129/2012Await report from the postal department in respect of therespondent No.5.List the matter again on 12.01.2017.SLP(C) No. 36770/2014Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh stepsin the respect of the respondent Nos.4,6 & 7 despite opportunitiesgiven. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing beforethe Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await ordersand list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 6/2016, I.A. 7/2016, I.A. 8/2016, I.A. 9/2016, I.A. 10/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.4915/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5349/1986 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and deletion of the name of respondent and exemption from filing O.T. and setting aside an abatement and office report) Date : 28/10/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on substitution application as well as on condonation of delay in filing substitution application. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Ch. Matter. Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 6 7 (Application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. of deceased respondent No. 9 and application for exemption from filing official translation of death certificate) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 8 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 9 (Application for setting aside abatement) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 10 (Application for a deletion of proposed Lr. No. 9(i) from application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. of deceased respondent No. 9) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 4915 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat Village ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court(In Chamber) on 28.4.2016 and 29.7.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Order dated 28.4.2016 None appears for the petitioner. The special leave petition is dismissed for nonproseuction. Order dated 29.7.2016 For the reasons stated, I.A. No.5/2016 is allowed. The order dated 28.04.2016, dismissing the SLP (C) No.4915/2012 for nonprosecution is recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number. List the special leave petition in due course.” It is submitted that there are total 22 respondents in the instant Special Leave Petition Service of show cause notice is complete on all the respondents except respondent no. 9(dead), 7, 10, 1922.
It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has cured the defects in the application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent no. 9. He has filed application for exmeption from filing official translation of death certificate, application for condonation of delay i n filing substitution application, application for setting aside abatement as there is delay of 3628 days in filing application for substitution. The said applications are registered as I.A Nos. 69 and are included in SLP paper books. It is also submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed application for deletion of proposed Lr No. 9(i) from the application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. of deceased respondent respondent No. 9 as proposed Lr. No. 9(i) has also expired during the pendency of Special Leave Petition The said application is registered as I.A No.10 and included in SLP paper books. It is lastly submitted that fresh show cause notice was issued to respondent nos. 7, 10, 1922 by Registered A.D. Post as well as through Dasti on 14.9.2016. Service of show cause notice is awaited on them. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed Affidavit with Proof of Dasti service so far. The application in the matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) with this office report. Dated this the 7th day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. K.S Rana, Advocate. Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Advocate . Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. Mr. B.Y Kulkarni, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj
DITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 6/2016, I.A. 7/2016, I.A. 8/2016, I.A. 9/2016, I.A. 10/2016 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.4915/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 5349/1986 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. anddeletion of the name of respondent and exemption from filing O.T.and setting aside an abatement and office report)Date : 28/10/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIssue notice on substitution application as well as oncondonation of delay in filing substitution application. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
Item No.11 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With (With (With (With appln.(s) for substitution of deceased respondent and appln.(s) for substitution of deceased respondent and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Office Report) Date : 26/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. Neelam Saini,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.
Item No.11 2 Mr. Harshvardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. As per tracking report s ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No. 4 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Other appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.13(i) but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.1 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the Union of India .
Item No.11 3 SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.5 In the meantime, office shall enquire about the fate of notice sent to the said respondent under registered cover from the postal authorities. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 8.9.2016 of this Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 4, 6 and 7. List again on 28.11. 2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
vItem No.11 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)WITHSLP(C) No. 1059/2011(With (With (With (With appln.(s) for substitution of deceased respondent and appln.(s) for substitution of deceased respondent and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014Office Report) Date : 26/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. Neelam Saini,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.Item No.11 2 Mr. Harshvardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 25614/2010Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.As per tracking report s ervice of notice is complete on therespondent No. 4 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.Other appearing respondents have failed to file the counteraffidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed,in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing beforethe Hon'ble Court, under the rules. SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.13(i) butno one has entered appearance on his behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to therespondent No.1 shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition ispermitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counselrepresenting the Union of India .Item No.11 3SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent No.5In the meantime, office shall enquire about the fate of noticesent to the said respondent under registered cover from the postalauthorities.
SLP(C) No. 36770/2014Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the orderdated 8.9.2016 of this Court in respect of Respondent Nos. 4, 6 and7.List again on 28.11. 2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
1 ITEM NO.9 IN COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015, I.A. 8/2016, I.A. 9/2016, I.A. 10/2016, I.A. 11/2016, I.A. 12/2016, I.A. 13/2016, I.A. 14/2016, I.A. 15/2016, I.A. 16/2016, I.A. 6/2016, I.A. 7/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26920/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6955/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for substitution and substitution of deceased petitioner and substitution of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and deletion of respondents and exemption from filing O.T. and setting aside an abatement ) Date : 21/09/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Rajinder Mathur,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mohanty, Adv. for Ms. Sushma Suri,AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup,AOR Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitution allowed, and the legal representatives of deceased petitioner no.27 are taken on record. IA Nos. 1 to 3 are allowed accordingly.
2 Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitution allowed, and the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.13 are taken on record. IA Nos. 4 to 7 are allowed accordingly. IA No. 8 has been filed for deletion of the names of proposed legal representatives nos. 13(iii) and 13(iv) of deceased respondent no.13 is allowed, at the risk and responsibility of the petitioners. IA Nos. 9 to 12 have been filed for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 7 to 12 and 14. Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitution allowed, and the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 7 to 12 and 14 are taken on record. IA Nos. 9 to 12 are allowed accordingly. IA Nos. 13 to 16 have been filed for bring on record the legal representatives of deceased petitioner nos. 18, 24, 25 and 31. Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitution allowed, and the legal representatives of deceased petitioner nos. 18, 24, 25 and 31 are taken on record. IA Nos. 13 to 16 are allowed accordingly. Let amended memo of parties be filed within seven days. (Chander Bala) (Parveen Kumar) Court Master AR-cum-PS
L1ITEM NO.9 IN COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015,I.A. 8/2016, I.A. 9/2016, I.A. 10/2016, I.A. 11/2016, I.A. 12/2016,I.A. 13/2016, I.A. 14/2016, I.A. 15/2016, I.A. 16/2016, I.A.6/2016, I.A. 7/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No(s). 26920/2010(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 6955/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(for substitution and substitution of deceased petitioner andsubstitution of deceased respondent and c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and deletion of respondents and exemption fromfiling O.T. and setting aside an abatement )Date : 21/09/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Rajinder Mathur,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mohanty, Adv. for Ms. Sushma Suri,AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup,AOR Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitutionallowed, and the legal representatives of deceased petitioner no.27are taken on record. IA Nos. 1 to 3 are allowed accordingly.2Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitutionallowed, and the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.13are taken on record. IA Nos. 4 to 7 are allowed accordingly.IA No. 8 has been filed for deletion of the names ofproposed legal representatives nos. 13(iii) and 13(iv) of deceasedrespondent no.13 is allowed, at the risk and responsibility of thepetitioners.IA Nos. 9 to 12 have been filed for bringing on recordthe legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 7 to 12 and14.Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitutionallowed, and the legal representatives of deceased respondent nos.7 to 12 and 14 are taken on record. IA Nos. 9 to 12 are allowedaccordingly.IA Nos. 13 to 16 have been filed for bring on record thelegal representatives of deceased petitioner nos. 18, 24, 25 and31.Delay condoned. Abatement set aside. Substitutionallowed, and the legal representatives of deceased petitioner nos.18, 24, 25 and 31 are taken on record. IA Nos. 13 to 16 areallowed accordingly.Let amended memo of parties be filed within seven days. (Chander Bala) (Parveen Kumar) Court Master AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 15/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have already filed the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 6. List again on 26.10. 2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
SECTION IVB Listed on.15.09.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.20 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 412829 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Om Prakash ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23.01.2012, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Issue notice on the applications seeking condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Tag with SLP (C) No.24224 of 2010. Statusquo prevailing as on date shall be maintained.” Accordingly, show cause notice by Regd. A.D. Post was issued on 04.03.2012. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama\Memo of Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 14. Neither AD Cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from Respondent No. 5 so far. Service not being complete and the matter above mentioned time to time listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 27.01.2016, when inter alia the following order was passed: “ Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.5 in spite of last chance granted. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” The office report on default in the matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) on 29.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to
pass the following order : “ Two weeks’ time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the Office Report dated 14th May, 2016, failing which, the Special Leave Petitions shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 01.08.2016 filed spare copy of SLP and accordingly fresh show cause notice to Respondent No. 5 was issued on 16.08.2016. It is also submitted that as per tracking report item has been delivered but neither AD Cards nor unserved covers containing notice has been received back from Respondent No. 5 The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 08th day September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. Mob 9911639624 2. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Ch119, C.K. Daphtery, Supreme Court of India ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
XITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 15/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent Nos. 1 to 4 have already filed the counteraffidavit.Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent No. 6.List again on 26.10. 2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 08/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Tanuj Bagga,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms.Neelam Saini,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr.Deepak Thukral,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,Adv. Mr.Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.1059/2011 The office report is that the the respondent Nos.4(ii) and … ...2
ITEM NO.5 -2- SC1059/11 5(ii) have refused to accept the service of notice sent to them under registered cover. This refusal on their part constitutes proper service. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to respondent Nos.1 and 13(i). Service of notice is complete on the other lrs. Of respondent Nos.4,5,6,8,9,10,12 & 13 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 As per the tracking report received in respect of the respondent Nos.4,6 & 7, they could not be served as the door was locked. Hence, fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the above unserved respondents shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within the period provided above. In the meantime, the petitioner may also file the proof of dasti service of notice, if he has served these respondents. List the matter again on 24.10.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
SECTION IVB Listed on.08.09.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.5 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 1059 of 2011 AND 36770 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat of Vil. Udaipur ...Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) No. 1059/2011 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 17.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Issue notice on the proposed LRs of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. List I.A. No.2/2016, I.A. No.3/2016 & I.A. No.4/2016 after service is complete. ” Accordingly, show cause notice by usual mode of service as well as Dasti to all the proposed LRs of deceased respondents was issued on 06.04.2016. The matter above mentioned along with connected matters was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 19.07.2016, when inter alia the following order was passed: “ SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents.” Latest service position of proposed LRs of deceased
Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 & 13 is as follows; Deceased Resp. Proposed Lrs No. A.D Unserved cover Neith er A.D/ U/Cov er V/A Remarks 4 & 5 (Proposed Lrs of decease R4 & 5 are common) 4(iii), 5(iii) 4(i), 5(i) 4(ii), 5(ii) U/Cover with remarks 'Refused to accept' Complete on 4(i) & 5(i) Service may be treated as complete on common LR nos. 4(ii) & 5(ii) as Unserved cover with remarks 'Refused to Accept' received 6 6(iiii) 6(i) to 6(iii) Complete 8 & 12 (Proposed LRs of Deceased R8 & 12 are common) 8(iv) 12(iv) 8(iv) 12(iv) Complete 9 9(iiii) 9(i) – 9(ii) & 9(iii) Complete 10 10(iiii) 10(iii i) Complete 13 13(iii) 13(ii) 13(i) Service not complete on 13(i) It is also submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit with proof of dasti service so far.
Service of show cause notice is not complete on respondent No. 1 and 13(i). Service of show cause notice on common Lr nos. 4(ii) and 5(ii) may be treated as complete as unserved cover has been received back with remarks ' Refused to Accept'. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 The matter above mentioned alongwith connected matters was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 26.04.2016, when inter alia following order was passed:. “ ... SLP(C) Nos........ 36770/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in the respect of the unserved respondents in all matters despite opportunities given. Therefore, these matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 05.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Nobody appears. Required steps for service of notice upon respondent nos. 4, 6 and 7 shall be taken within four weeks' time failing which the Court may on the next date of hearing order for dismissal of Special Leave Petition.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has taken fresh steps and fresh show cause notice has been issued to unserved Respondent Nos. 4, 6 & 7 on 12.08.2016 through Registered A.D. Post. Counsel for the petitioner has filed a letter dated 28.07.2016 for dasti service and dasti notice has been issued to counsel for the petitioner on 12.08.2016.
It is further submitted that in the tracking report, remarks 'Item delivery attempted', 'Door Locked' have been given on 17.08.2016 in respect of all the 3 unserved Respondent Nos. 4, 6 and 7 and the item has been returned to New Delhi GPO on 22.08.2016 of all the 3 unserved respondents. But unserved covers containing notice have been received back so far. (Copy of tracking report is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect of Respondent Nos. 4, 6 & 7 so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 13 but no counter affidavit has been filed. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 5 so far. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 07th day September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh , Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
zITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andsetting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondentand office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 36770/2014(With Office Report) Date : 08/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Tanuj Bagga,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms.Neelam Saini,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr.Deepak Thukral,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,Adv. Mr.Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.1059/2011The office report is that the the respondent Nos.4(ii) and ⬠¦ ...2ITEM NO.5 -2- SC1059/11 5(ii) have refused to accept the service of notice sent to themunder registered cover. This refusal on their part constitutesproper service. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of fourweeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of noticealready issued to respondent Nos.1 and 13(i).Service of notice is complete on the other lrs. Of respondentNos.4,5,6,8,9,10,12 & 13 but no one has entered appearance on theirbehalf.SLP(C) No. 36770/2014As per the tracking report received in respect of therespondent Nos.4,6 & 7, they could not be served as the door waslocked. Hence, fresh steps for the service of notice by usual modeto the above unserved respondents shall be taken by the Ld.counselfor the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti inaddition is permitted to be served through the concerned TrialCourt, the particulars of which shall be furnished by theLd.counsel for the petitioner within the period provided above.In the meantime, the petitioner may also file the proof ofdasti service of notice, if he has served these respondents.List the matter again on 24.10.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (Office Report on default) Date : 01/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Piyush Hans, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr. Amit Singh, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted peremptorily for doing the needful. (RASHI GUPTA) (SUMAN JAIN) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
^ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date : 01/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Piyush Hans, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.Mr. Amit Singh, Adv.Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv.Mrs. Yugandhara Jha, Adv.Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv.Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks' time is granted peremptorily for doing theneedful. (RASHI GUPTA) (SUMAN JAIN) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No.5/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).4915/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5349/1986 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For restoration and office report) Date : 29/07/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R For the reasons stated, I.A. No.5/2016 is allowed. The order dated 28.04.2016, dismissing the SLP (C) No.4915/2012 for non-prosecution is recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number. List the special leave petition in due course. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 29/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.(Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.(Not Present) The Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks’ time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the Office Report dated 14 th May, 2016, failing which, the Special Leave Petitions shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (RASHI GUPTA) (SUMAN JAIN) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Ch. Matter. Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for restoration) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 4915 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat Village ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.2.2012 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “Issue notice. Statusquo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP (C) No. 24224 of 2010.” Accordingly show cause notice by Registered A.D. Post was issued on 28.3.2012. Service of show cause notice is incomplete. It is submitted that office report on default was listed before the Hon'ble Court(In Chamber) on 28.4.2016 with office report dated 30.3.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “ None appears for the petitioner. The special leave petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.” It is further submitted that Mr. K.S Rana, counsel for the petitioner has on 19.5.2016 filed an application for restoration. The same is within time. The same is registered as I.A No. 5.
The application in the matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) with this office report. Dated this the 27th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. K.S Rana, Advocate. Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Advocate . Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. Mr. B.Y Kulkarni, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj
SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on. Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 412829 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Om Prakash ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 04.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Though the office report indicates that no steps have been taken for effecting service upon unserved respondent No.5, learned counsel for the the petitioner submits that fresh process fee has already been deposited and spare copies have also been filed in the Registry. The Registry to verify and proceed with the matter. ” It is submitted that after carefully gone through the record it is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed fresh process fees and spare copies of SLP for reissue of show cause notice to unserved Respondent No.5 so far. The office report on default in matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber). Dated this the 14th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. Mob 9911639624 2. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Ch119, C.K. Daphtery, Supreme Court of India ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
¨ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.5/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No(s).4915/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 5349/1986 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For restoration and office report)Date : 29/07/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R For the reasons stated, I.A. No.5/2016 is allowed. The orderdated 28.04.2016, dismissing the SLP (C) No.4915/2012 fornon-prosecution is recalled and the special leave petition isrestored to its original number.List the special leave petition in due course. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
| ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 29/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.(Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.(Not Present) The Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the Office Report dated 14 th May, 2016, failing which, the Special Leave Petitions shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.Signature Not Verified (RASHI GUPTA) (SUMAN JAIN)Digitally signed by SR. P.A. COURT MASTERRASHI GUPTADate: 2016.08.0117:03:01 ISTReason:
Item NO.4 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 19/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bhagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Divya Sunderrajan,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.
Item NO.4 2 Mr. N.K. Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Jai Wadhwa,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr. Hemant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Keshav Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 The office report indicates that s ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. R espondent Nos. 3 to 8 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 have already filed the counter affidavit. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.
Item NO.4 3 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Respondent No. 4 has already filed the counter affidavit. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 2 , 5 and 6 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The Ld.Counsel for the respondent No.3 has failed to cure the defects found in the vakalatnama despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
SECTION IVB Listed on.19.07.2016 Court No.R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.4 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 1059, 34114 of 2011, 6505 of 2012 AND 8111 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat of Vil. Udaipur ...Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Etc. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) No. 1059/2011 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 17.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Issue notice on the proposed LRs of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. List I.A. No.2/2016, I.A. No.3/2016 & I.A. No.4/2016 after service is complete. ” Accordingly, show cause notice by usual mode of service as well as Dasti to all the proposed LRs of deceased respondents was issued on 06.04.2016. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama / Memo of Appearance on behalf of proposed LR No. 10(i). Unserved envelop from (common) proposed LR Nos. [4 & 5(ii)] with the remarks ' Refused to accept notice ' has been received. A.D. Cards duly signed received from (common) proposed [LR Nos. 8 & 12(ii) to (v)] and proposed LR Nos. 9(i)(ii), 10(iiiii) and 13(ii), but no one has entered appearance on their behalf so far. Neither AD Card nor
unserved cover containing notice has been received back from (common) proposed LR No. [(4 & 5(i)], [(8 & 12(i)] and proposed LR Nos. 6(i) to (iii), 9(iii) & 13(i) and also from Respondent No. 1 i.e. Union of India. Service of show cause notice upon (common) proposed LR Nos. 4 & 5(i), [8 & 12(i) and proposed LR no. 6(iiii), 9(iii), 13(i) and Respondent No. 1 is not complete. SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 It is submitted that there are total eight respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 & 2 have been served through Trial Court. No one has entered appearance on their behalf so far. Respondent No. 38 are represented through Mr. Praveen swarup, Advocate but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 It is submitted that there are total four respondents in the instant matter. Respondent No. 1 & 4 are represented through Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta and Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates and they have filed counter affidavits. Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 have been served by Dasti through Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana in terms of Order dated 17.03.2016 of the Hon'ble Chamber Judge, but Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana has not filed memo of appearance so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 It is submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has
not cured the defect in the vakalatnama and counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent No. 3 till date despite four weeks' time as last chance granted by the Ld. Registrar. Service of show cause notice is complete on all the 6 respondents as Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5 & 6 are served by Registered A.D. Post and Trial Court respectively but there is no appearance on their behalf and Respondent No. 4 is represented by Advocate but no counter affidavit has been filed. The matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 18th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. R. Gopalkrishna, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
¬Item NO.4 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 34114/2011Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 19/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bhagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Divya Sunderrajan,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.Item NO.4 2 Mr. N.K. Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Jai Wadhwa,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr. Hemant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Keshav Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 1059/2011Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe unserved respondents.SLP(C) No. 34114/2011The office report indicates that s ervice of notice is completeon the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance ontheir behalf. R espondent Nos. 3 to 8 have failed to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 have already filed the counteraffidavit. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 2and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewedthus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'bleCourt under the rules.Item NO.4 3
SLP(C) No. 8111/2013Respondent No. 4 has already filed the counter affidavit.S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 2 , 5 and 6but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.The Ld.Counsel for the respondent No.3 has failed to cure thedefects found in the vakalatnama despite opportunities. Viewed inthat context, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Awaitorders. List thereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36770/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2013 in LPA No. 671/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT TARAF BEHBAL BAHADAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. (Not present) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Nobody appears. Required steps for service of notice upon respondent nos. 4, 6 and 7 shall be taken within four weeks' time failing which the Court may on the next date of hearing order for dismissal of Special Leave Petition. (Jyoti Gupta) (Raj Rani Negi) Sr.P.A. Court Master
SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on. Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 36770 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat Taraf Behbal Bahadar ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 26.04.2016, when inter alia the following order was passed:. “ SLP (C) No. 36770/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in the respect of the unserved respondents in all matters despite opportunities given. Therefore, these matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps in respect of unserved Respondent Nos. 4, 6 and 7. The office report on default in matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber). Dated this the 06th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv. 118, M.C. Setalvad Chambers Supreme Court of India ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
X ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36770/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2013 in LPA No. 671/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT TARAF BEHBAL BAHADAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. (Not present) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Nobody appears. Required steps for service of notice upon respondent nos. 4, 6 and 7 shall be taken within four weeks' time failing which the Court may on the next date of hearing order for dismissal of Special Leave Petition. (Jyoti Gupta) (Raj Rani Negi) Sr.P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRASHMI DHYANIDate: 2016.07.0811:16:04 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 11002/2008 27/08/2010 in CM No. 8290/2010 27/08/2010 in CWP No. 11002/2008 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT) Date : 04/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though the office report indicates that no steps have been taken for effecting service upon unserved respondent No.5, learned counsel for the the petitioner submits that fresh process fee has already been deposited and spare copies have also been filed in the Registry. The Registry to verify and proceed with the matter. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER
8ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4128-4129/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 11002/2008 27/08/2010 in CM No. 8290/2010 27/08/2010 inCWP No. 11002/2008 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana AtChandigarh)OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date : 04/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThough the office report indicates that no stepshave been taken for effecting service upon unservedrespondent No.5, learned counsel for the the petitionersubmits that fresh process fee has already been depositedand spare copies have also been filed in the Registry. The Registry to verify and proceed with the matter. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5349/1986 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date :28/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv. (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, AAG Mr. Ronak, Adv. Mr. Sriram, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the petitioner. The special leave apetition is dismissed for non-proseuction. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Madhu Narula ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
SECTION IV B Ch. Matter. Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 4915 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.34 (Application for impleadment as Party Respondent) Gram Panchayat Village ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.2.2012 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “Issue notice. Statusquo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP (C) No. 24224 of 2010.” Accordingly show cause notice by Registered A.D. Post was issued on 28.3.2012. Thereafter Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Advocate has filed two separate applications on behalf of six applicants to implead as party respondents with Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance and said applications (IA Nos. 3 and 4) were listed before the Hon'ble Court(In Chamber) on 7.11.2012 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Issue notice in the I.As returnable after four weeks.” Accordingly, show cause notice by Registered A.D. Post was issued to the petitioner through counsel all 22 respondents on 28.1.2013. It is submitted that there are total 22
respondents in the instant matter. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 and he has filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 1 only. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale advocate has filed Vakalatnama & memo of Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Mr. A.P Medh Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 13 and 14 and has filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 13 only. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 15 and 16 but no Counter Affidavit has been filed so far. A.D. cards duly signed have been received from Respondent Nos. 6,8,11,12,17 and 18 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf so far. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice have been received from the Respondent Nos. 7,10 and 1922 so far. Respondent no. 9 has expired. Service not being complete in SLP as well as application and the matter above mentioned from time to time was listed before the Ld. Registrar court and it was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 27.1.2016 and inter alia pass the following order: “ SLP(C) No. 4915 OF 2012 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 6.11.2015 of this Court despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner and counsel for impleaded respondent has not taken any fresh steps in respect of unserved respondents Nos. 7,10 and 1922 so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the
petitioner has not cured the defects in the application for substitution of deceased of respondent no. 9 which was filed on 23.7.2013 so far. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside abatement, age of Lrs. has not been mentioned, application for exemption O.T of death certificate is unsigned. The office report on default is listed before the Hon'ble Court(In Chamber). Dated this the 30 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Advocate . Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. Mr. B.Y Kulkarni, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj
Ä ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4915/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5349/1986 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date :28/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv. (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, AAG Mr. Ronak, Adv. Mr. Sriram, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the petitioner.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by USHA The special leave apetition is dismissed for non-proseuction.RANI BHARDWAJDate: 2016.04.2915:56:46 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Madhu Narula ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 26/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Jasdeep Singh Dhillon,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harsh Vardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. ….......2
ITEM NO.4 -2- SC25614/2010 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.27490/2010 The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SLP(C) No.8111/2013 The respondent No.4 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the vakalatnama and counter affidavit which are defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in them. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. SLP(C) No.34114/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent No.2 and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List the matters again on 19.07.2016. SLP(C) Nos.25614, 26920/2010 & 36770/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in the respect of the unserved respondents in all matters despite opportunities given. Therefore, these matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
à ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 26/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Jasdeep Singh Dhillon,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harsh Vardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.04.2710:25:40 TLTReason: Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. ..........2ITEM NO.4 -2- SC25614/2010 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.27490/2010 The office report indicates that service of notice is completeon the respondents, but no one has entered appearance on theirbehalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
SLP(C) No.8111/2013 The respondent No.4 has failed to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed thevakalatnama and counter affidavit which are defective. Ld.counselshall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whateverhave been found in them. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but noone has entered appearance on their behalf.SLP(C) No.34114/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of fourweeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent No.2 and heshall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him withinthe same period. List the matters again on 19.07.2016.SLP(C) Nos.25614, 26920/2010 & 36770/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriatesteps in the respect of the unserved respondents in all mattersdespite opportunities given. Therefore, these matters shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers forfurther directions. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
SECTION IV B Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 4915 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.34 (Application for impleadment as Party Respondent) Gram Panchayat Village ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.2.2012 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “Issue notice. Statusquo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP (C) No. 24224 of 2010.” Accordingly show cause notice by Registered A.D. Post was issued on 28.3.2012. It is submitted that there are total 22 respondents in the instant matter. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 and he has filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5. Mr. A.P Medh Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 13 and 14 and has filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 13 only. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 15 and 16 but no Counter Affidavit has been filed so far. A.D. cards duly signed have been received back from Respondent Nos. 6,8,11,12,17 and 18 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf so far.
Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice have been received back from the Respondent Nos. 7,10 and 1922 so far.accordingly show cause notice was issued in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 3 viz. United India Insurance Company Ltd. But has not filed counter affidavit so far. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 so far. Service of show cause notice is incomplete in respect of respondent Nos. 12. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Advocate . Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rajesh
ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27490/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 1911/2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) NARESH KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh notice be issued to the unserved respondent Nos.3 and 4. Service may also be effected through standing counsel for the State of Haryana. (SWETA DHYANI) SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016, I.A. 3/2016, I.A. 4/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.1059/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and office report) Date : 17/03/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the proposed LRs of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. List I.A. No.2/2016, I.A. No.3/2016 & I.A. No.4/2016 after service is complete. (RASHMI DHYANI) SR.P.A. (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Listed on Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 27490 OF 2010. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Naresh Kumar, Etc. ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matters above mentioned alongwith connected matters was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20.09.2010, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 24224 of 2010. Statusquo prevailing as on date shall be maintained.” Accordingly, show cause notice by registered A.D. Post was issued on 30.11.2010. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama /Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 but has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. Respondent No. 5 has been served by registered A.D. Post but no one has entered appearance on his behalf so far. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice from Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 have been received back so far. Thereafter, the matter above mentioned alongwith connected matters was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Service is not complete. Let all the matters come up after service is complete.”
Service being not complete and the matter above mentioned alongwith connected matters was listed before the Ld. Registrar's court on 06.11.2015, when inter alia the following Order was passed: “ …. SLP(C) No.27490/2010 The office report indicates that although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.3 & 4, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter.” It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps in respect of unserved Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 so far. The default on the part of the Advocate is reported to the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) with this office report. Dated this the 2 nd day of January, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. 57, Lawyer's Chamber, S.C.I Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. 119, C.K.Daphtery, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
SECTION IVB Ch. Matter Listed on. Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 (Application for substitution of deceased respondent Nos.4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10,12 and 13) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.3 and 4 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside abatement) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 1059 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat Of Vil. Udaipur ...Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.01.2011, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained, in the meanwhile. Tag with SLP (C) No.24244 of 2010.” Accordingly, show cause notice by Regd. A.D. Post was issued on 11.02.2011. Service of show cause notice is incomplete. It is submitted that Mr. Rajinder Mathur, counsel for the petitioner has on 29.01.2016 filed an application for substitution to bring on record LRs. of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 along with applications for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside abatement. There is delay of more than 1844, 2219, 8063 days of the
deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 10 as counsel has filed a letter dated 01.02.2016 (copy enclosed) stating therein that exact date of death of Respondent Nos. 4, 5 & 10 could not be found out despite making many efforts and he is not aware of any other LRs. of the said deceased respondents. Counsel has requested that the applications may be processed as it is to be avoid unnecessary delay in the matter. There is delay of 1172, 7736, 6311, 5139 and 2889 days of deceased Respondent Nos. 6, 8, 9, 12 and 13. The same are registered as I.A. Nos. 24. The applications in the matter abovementioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) with this office report. Dated this the 09th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Y.P. Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Com1/Mty
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6505/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2011 in LPA No.2293/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAM SARUP & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh notice be issued to respondent Nos.2 and 3. P etitioner is permitted to serve dasti notice through standing counsel as well. (SWETA DHYANI) SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.5 & I.A. 6/2016 Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (Appln. for sell part of land and for bringing on record the LRs. of deceased respondent) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashmeet Singh, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A pplication for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased respondent No.8 has been filed. The application to bring on record LRs. of deceased respondent No.8 is allowed. Abatement, if any, stands set aside. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks from today. Let notice be issued to the LRs. of the deceased respondent No. 8. (SWETA DHYANI) SR.P.A. (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER
\234 ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6505/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2011 in LPA No.2293/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAM SARUP & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh notice be issued to respondent Nos.2 and 3. Petitioner is permitted to serve dasti notice through standing counsel as well. (SWETA DHYANI) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.03.1912:22:32 ISTReason:
\ ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27490/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 1911/2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) NARESH KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh notice be issued to the unserved respondent Nos.3 and 4. Service may also be effected through standing counsel for the State of Haryana. (SWETA DHYANI) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.03.1912:22:48 ISTReason:
\222 ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016, I.A. 3/2016, I.A. 4/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.1059/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and office report) Date : 17/03/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the proposed LRs of deceased Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. List I.A. No.2/2016, I.A. No.3/2016 & I.A. No.4/2016 after service is complete.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (RASHMI DHYANI) (CHANDER BALA)RASHMI DHYANIDate: 2016.03.1912:43:18 IST SR.P.A. COURT MASTERReason:
H ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.5 & I.A. 6/2016 Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (Appln. for sell part of land and for bringing on record the LRs. of deceased respondent) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashmeet Singh, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for substitution to bring on record the LRs. of deceased respondent No.8 has been filed. The application to bring on record LRs. of deceased respondent No.8 is allowed. Abatement, if any, stands set aside. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks from today.Signature Not Verified Let notice be issued to the LRs. of the deceasedDigitally signed by respondent No.8.SWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.03.1912:22:54 ISTReason: (SWETA DHYANI) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.8[CHAMBER] COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB [CORRECTED COPY] S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, IA No. 2/2015 and IA NO.3/2015 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 26806/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6956/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution, condonation of delay in filing substitution application and exemption from filing official translation and office report) Date : 08/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, A.O.R.[NP] For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, A.O.R.[NP] Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, A.O.R.[NP] Ms. Sushma Suri, A.O.R.[NP] UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- with the Supreme Court Advocates-on- Record Mutual Welfare Fund within four weeks. Subject to the compliance of the condition, abatement is set aside and let notice be issued on the application seeking substitution of legal representatives of respondent No. 8 returnable in four weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SUMAN JAIN]
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.8[CHAMBER] COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB [CORRECTED COPY] S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, IA No. 2/2015 and IA NO.3/2015 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 26806/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6956/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution, condonation of delay in filing substitution application and exemption from filing official translation and office report) Date : 08/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, A.O.R.[NP] For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, A.O.R.[NP] Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, A.O.R.[NP] Ms. Sushma Suri, A.O.R.[NP] UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- with the Supreme Court Advocates-on- Record Mutual Welfare Fund within four weeks. Subject to the compliance of the condition, abatement is set aside and let notice be issued on the application seeking substitution of legal representatives of respondent No. 8 returnable in four weeks.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.KALYANI GUPTADate: 2016.03.1711:33:05 ISTReason: [KALYANI GUPTA] [SUMAN JAIN]COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26921/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 04/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. S.S. Saini, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for setting aside abatement is allowed. Delay condoned in filing application for substitution. Application for substitution to bring on record Lrs of deceased respondent no. 6 namely Rajinder Singh is allowed. Application for exemption from filing Official Translation of Annexure R-2 filed with the application for bringing on record the LRs in the special leave petition is allowed.
-2- Cause title be amended accordingly. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
²ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26921/2010(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. andexemption from filing O.T. and setting aside an abatement)Date : 04/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv.Mr. S.S. Saini, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RApplication for setting aside abatement is allowed.Delay condoned in filing application forsubstitution.Application for substitution to bring on record Lrsof deceased respondent no. 6 namely Rajinder Singh isallowed.Application for exemption from filing OfficialTranslation of Annexure R-2 filed with the application forbringing on record the LRs in the special leave petition isallowed.-2-Cause title be amended accordingly. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 03/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.K.G.Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harsh Vardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Ms.Reena Pandey,Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,adv. … ....2
ITEM NO.5 -2- SC25614/2010 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.25614/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent No.4. Mr.M.P.Jha, Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks comply with the terms of the office report. SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the unserved respondents. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the unserved respondent No.3. SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the unserved respondent Nos.4,6 & 7. List the matter again on 26.04.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
z ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 03/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.K.G.Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harsh Vardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.03.03 Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv.16:50:59 TLTReason: Ms.Reena Pandey,Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,adv. .......2ITEM NO.5 -2- SC25614/2010 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.25614/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016of this Court in respect of the respondent No.4. Mr.M.P.Jha, Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weekscomply with the terms of the office report.SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for
the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016of this Court in respect of the unserved respondents.SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016of this Court in respect of the unserved respondent No.3.SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 27.01.2016of this Court in respect of the unserved respondent Nos.4,6 & 7. List the matter again on 26.04.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 14673/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 25/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Raunaq Dutt, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is allowed to comply with the office report. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (INDU POKHRIYAL) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
d ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 14673/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 25/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Raunaq Dutt, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is allowed to comply with the office report. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (INDU POKHRIYAL) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2016.02.2612:47:26 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30979/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No. 13042/1998 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE UCHABET Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 22/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted seven days' time to comply with the Office Report dated 28.12.2015. (SWETA DHYANI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
. ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30979/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No. 13042/1998 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE UCHABET Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 22/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted seven days' time to comply with the Office Report dated 28.12.2015. (SWETA DHYANI) (INDU POKHRIYAL) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.02.2317:09:47 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in taking fresh steps for service on unserved respondents, is condoned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27490/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 1911/2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) NARESH KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6505/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAM SARUP & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office Report on default) Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (with office report for directions) Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 34114/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No. 13043/1998 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report on default) Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last chance, three weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the office report dated 6 th January, 2016. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
¼ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 34114/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/09/2011in CWP No. 13043/1998 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report on default)Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs a last chance, three weeks' time is granted tolearned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the officereport dated 6 th January, 2016. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
\202ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(with office report for directions)Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAdjourned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
vITEM NO.23 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6505/2012GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAM SARUP & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAdjourned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
6ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in LPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 inLPA No. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 07/04/2010 in LPANo. 64/2006 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 2571/1982 passed by the HighCourt of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay in taking fresh steps for service on unserved respondents, is condoned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
\200ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27490/2010(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010in CWP No. 1911/2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)NARESH KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAdjourned. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 27/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr.N.K.Chauhan,Adv. Mr.Jitender Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.K.G.Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr.Harshvardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,Adv. ...2
ITEM NO.6 -2- SC25614/2010 Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr.Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr.A.N.Singh,Adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,Adv. Ms.Kavita Wadia,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.25614/2010 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of respondent No.4 at fresh address within four weeks. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said application. SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the respondent No.8. The said I.A. shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 The respondent Nos.7-12 are reported to be dead. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file an … .3
ITEM NO.6 -3- SC25614/2010 application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the said respondents. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent Nos. 13(iii) & 13(iv) and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.5 in spite of last chance granted. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 06.11.2015 of this Court despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2,5 & 6 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent No.4 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the vakalatnama and counter affidavit which are found to be defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in them. …....4
ITEM NO.6 -4- SC25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-3 & 5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent Nos. 4,6 & 7 and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. List the matter again on 03.03.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
Z*ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 26806/2010SLP(C) No. 26920/2010SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012SLP(C) No. 4915/2012SLP(C) No. 8111/2013SLP(C) No. 36770/2014(With Office Report) Date : 27/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr.N.K.Chauhan,Adv. Mr.Jitender Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.K.G.Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr.Harshvardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,Adv. ...2ITEM NO.6 -2- SC25614/2010 Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr.Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr.A.N.Singh,Adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,Adv. Ms.Kavita Wadia,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.25614/2010Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps inrespect of respondent No.4 at fresh address within four weeks.Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application forsubstitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondentNo.8 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of fourweeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the saidapplication.SLP(C) No. 26806/2010Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application forsubstitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the respondent No.8. Thesaid I.A. shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further future directions. Await orders and listthereafter.SLP(C) No. 26920/2010The respondent Nos.7-12 are reported to be dead. Ld.counsel forthe petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file an ⬠¦ .3ITEM NO.6 -3- SC25614/2010
application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the saidrespondents.Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of fourweeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent Nos. 13(iii) &13(iv) and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of noticeto them within the same period.SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps inrespect of the respondent No.5 in spite of last chance granted.Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Awaitorders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the orderdated 06.11.2015 of this Court despite opportunities given.Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await ordersand list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2,5 & 6but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondentNo.4 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the periodstipulated under the rules.Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed thevakalatnama and counter affidavit which are found to be defective.Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defectswhatever have been found in them.⬠¦....4ITEM NO.6 -4- SC25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-3 & 5, butno one has entered appearance on their behalf.Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of fourweeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent Nos. 4,6 & 7 andhe shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to themwithin the same period.List the matter again on 03.03.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).6505/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAM SARUP & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 09/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR (NP) Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR T he Court made the following O R D E R Though the matter was called out twice, none appeared for the parties. The office report dated 24 th November, 2015 indicates that no fresh steps have been taken to effectuate service upon unserved Respondent Nos.2 and 3. As a last chance, three weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the office report. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (CHANDER BALA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
®ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).6505/2012GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAM SARUP & ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 09/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal, AOR (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, AOR (NP) Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR T he Court made the following O R D E RThough the matter was called out twice, none appearedfor the parties. The office report dated 24 th November, 2015 indicatesthat no fresh steps have been taken to effectuate serviceupon unserved Respondent Nos.2 and 3. As a last chance, three weeks' time is granted tolearned counsel for the petitioner to comply with theoffice report. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (CHANDER BALA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
| ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26921/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for recalling of court's order dated 25.8.2015 and office report) Date : 23/11/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. For Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, AG Punjab and Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Adv. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Tushar Bakshi, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No.5 of 2015-for restoration is allowed. Order dated 25.8.2015 is recalled.Signature Not Verified The special leave petition is restored to itsDigitally signed bySukhbir Paul Kaur original number.Date: 2015.11.2316:34:46 ISTReason: [MALA KUMARI SHARMA] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.
ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 06/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rahul Dagar,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr.Tanuj Bagga,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. ….......2
ITEM NO.8 -2- Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr.N.K.Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,Adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra,Adv. Mr.A.N.Singh,Adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harshvardhan Jha,adv. Mr.Kunal Verma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ....3
ITEM NO.8 -3- SLP(C) No.24739/2010 The office report indicates that although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file the application for substitution to bring on record the lrs. Of the deceased respondent No.4, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No.25614/2010 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said application. Await the return of the service of notice for making alternative arrangement already issued to the respondent No.4. SLP(C) No.27490/2010 The office report indicates that although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.3 & 4, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No.26806/2010 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the Lrs. Of deceased respondent No.8. … ............4
ITEM NO.8 -4- SLP(C) No.1059/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No.30979 & 34114/2011 Although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondents in both the matters, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, these matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No.4915/2012 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court in respect of the unserved respondents. SLP(C) No.6505/2012 Although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.2 & 3, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No.6533/2012 The respondent Nos.4-6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-3, but no one …......5
ITEM NO.8 -5- has entered appearance on their behalf.Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SLP(C) No.4128-4129/2012 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court in respect of the respondent No.5. SLP(C) No.8111/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court in respect of the respondent No.3. SLP(C) No.36770/2014 Await service report in respect of the respondent Nos.4,6 & 7. List SLP(C) Nos.25614,26806/2010, 4915/2012, 4128-4129/2012, 8111/2013 & 36770/2014 again on 27.01.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
< ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 06/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rahul Dagar,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr.Tanuj Bagga,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.11.06 Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.16:47:02 TLTReason: Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. ..........2ITEM NO.8 -2- Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv.
Mr.N.K.Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,Adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra,Adv. Mr.A.N.Singh,Adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harshvardhan Jha,adv. Mr.Kunal Verma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ....3ITEM NO.8 -3-SLP(C) No.24739/2010 The office report indicates that although by order dated20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given tothe Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file the application forsubstitution to bring on record the lrs. Of the deceased respondentNo.4, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated inthe order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed forlisting before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further futuredirections. Await orders and list thereafter.SLP(C) No.25614/2010 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application forsubstitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondentNo.8 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of fourweeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the saidapplication. Await the return of the service of notice for makingalternative arrangement already issued to the respondent No.4.SLP(C) No.27490/2010 The office report indicates that although by order dated20.08.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given tothe Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the serviceof notice to the unserved respondent Nos.3 & 4, yet he has not donethe needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in thatcontext, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'bleJudge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders andlist thereafter.SLP(C) No.26806/2010 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the
Lrs. Of deceased respondent No.8. ...............4ITEM NO.8 -4-SLP(C) No.1059/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the orderdated 20.08.2015 of this Court despite opportunities given.Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await ordersand list thereafter.SLP(C) No.30979 & 34114/2011 Although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weekstime as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner totake fresh steps for the service of notice to the unservedrespondents in both the matters, yet he has not done the needfulwithin the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context,these matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and listthereafter.SLP(C) No.4915/2012 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.08.2015of this Court in respect of the unserved respondents.SLP(C) No.6505/2012 Although by order dated 20.08.2015 of this Court, four weekstime as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner totake fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondentNos.2 & 3, yet he has not done the needful within the periodstipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers forfurther future directions. Await orders and list thereafter.SLP(C) No.6533/2012 The respondent Nos.4-6 have already filed the counter affidavit.Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-3, but no one .........5ITEM NO.8 -5- has entered appearance on their behalf.Viewed thus, the matter shallbe processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.SLP(C) No.4128-4129/2012 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.08.2015of this Court in respect of the respondent No.5.SLP(C) No.8111/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.08.2015of this Court in respect of the respondent No.3.SLP(C) No.36770/2014 Await service report in respect of the respondent Nos.4,6 & 7. List SLP(C) Nos.25614,26806/2010, 4915/2012, 4128-4129/2012,8111/2013 & 36770/2014 again on 27.01.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26920/2010 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and substitution and interim relief and office report) Date : 28/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. S. Usha Reddy,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the Lrs. of Respondent No. 13 and other respondents. List again on 15.1.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
üNo data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, IA.NO.2/2015 and IA.No.3/2015 in in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26806/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6956/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln.and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 26/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for substitution of the proposed legal representatives of the respondent No.8 as also on the limitation application. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (MEENAKSHI MEHTA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
üNo data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 26921/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for restoration) Date : 14/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. (NP) Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. (NP) The Court made the following O R D E R Since none appeared to press the matter, list the matter before the Court. (Rashmi Dhyani) (Chander Bala) Sr.P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 26921/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for restoration) Date : 14/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. (NP) Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. (NP) The Court made the following O R D E R Since none appeared to press the matter, list the matter before the Court. (Rashmi Dhyani) (Chander Bala) Sr.P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byASHOK RAJ SINGHDate: 2015.10.1714:31:26 ISTReason: ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 26921/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for restoration) Date : 14/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. (NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. (NP) Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. (NP) The Court made the following O R D E R Since none appeared to press the matter, list the matter before the Court. (Rashmi Dhyani) (Chander Bala) Sr.P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byASHOK RAJ SINGHDate: 2015.10.1714:31:26 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, I.A.2/2015, I.A.3/2015, I.A.4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26920/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6955/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and condonation of delay in filing substitution application and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 23/09/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on all the I.As ., returnable within four weeks. (Sweta Dhyani) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, I.A.2/2015, I.A.3/2015, I.A.4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26920/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6955/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and condonation of delay in filing substitution application and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 23/09/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on all the I.As., returnable within four weeks. (Sweta Dhyani) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty)Signature Not Verified Sr. P.A. Court MasterDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.09.2417:35:32 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 17/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBES] For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Prateek Rusia, Adv. Ms. Nupur Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Vishwapal Sing, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R From the office report dated 10.08.2015, it is seen that notice has been issued to the sole petitioner on 03.08.2015. Await service. (SWETA DHYANI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
n ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 17/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBES] For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Prateek Rusia, Adv. Ms. Nupur Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Vishwapal Sing, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R From the office report dated 10.08.2015, it is seen that notice has been issued to the sole petitioner on 03.08.2015. Await service. (SWETA DHYANI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRajni MukhiDate: 2015.09.1911:14:53 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 4/2014, I.A. No. 5/2014, I.A. No. 6/2014, I.A. 7/2015, I.A. 8/2015, I.A. 9/2015, I.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26787/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6954/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) FAQIR CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 09/09/2015 These I.As. were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. K. Mahalik, Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R An application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing application for substitution for bringing on record the Lrs. of Petitioner No. 14. The delay has sufficiently been explained. Delay is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs. of Petitioner No. 14 who died on 11 th December, 2011 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. The application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in
paragraph 3 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Petitioner No. 14. An application is filed seeking condonation of delay in filing substitution application of Petitioner No. 27. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs. of Petitioner No. 27 who died on 13 th December, 2010 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. There is no opposition. The application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Petitioner No. 27 An application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing substitution application of deceased Respondent No. 19. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs of Respondent No. 19 who died on 13 th June, 1997 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. The application seeking substitution is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Respondent No. 19. Delay of 3491 days in bringing on record Lrs. of Respondent No. 6 is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs of Respondent No. 6 who died on 6 th October, 2000 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application. Application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Respondent No. 6. Amended cause title be filed within three weeks from today. (RASHI GUPTA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Sr.P.A. COURT MASTER
% ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 4/2014, I.A. No. 5/2014, I.A. No. 6/2014, I.A. 7/2015, I.A. 8/2015, I.A. 9/2015, I.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26787/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6954/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) FAQIR CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 09/09/2015 These I.As. were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. K. Mahalik, Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R An application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing application for substitution for bringing on record the Lrs. of Petitioner No. 14. The delay hasSignature Not Verified sufficiently been explained. Delay is condoned.Digitally signed bySarita PurohitDate: 2015.09.17 An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs. of13:37:45 ISTReason: Petitioner No. 14 who died on 11th December, 2011 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. The application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned inparagraph 3 of the application be substituted in place ofdeceased Petitioner No. 14. An application is filed seeking condonation of delay infiling substitution application of Petitioner No. 27. Causeshown is sufficient. Delay is condoned.
An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs. ofPetitioner No. 27 who died on 13 th December, 2010 leavingbehind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application.There is no opposition. The application is allowed. The namesof Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application besubstituted in place of deceased Petitioner No. 27 An application has been filed seeking condonation ofdelay in filing substitution application of deceasedRespondent No. 19. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay iscondoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs ofRespondent No. 19 who died on 13th June, 1997 leaving behindthe Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. Theapplication seeking substitution is allowed. The names of Lrs.mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application be substituted inplace of deceased Respondent No. 19. Delay of 3491 days in bringing on record Lrs. ofRespondent No. 6 is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs ofRespondent No. 6 who died on 6 th October, 2000 leaving behindthe Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application.Application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned inparagraph 2 of the application be substituted in place ofdeceased Respondent No. 6. Amended cause title be filed within three weeks fromtoday. (RASHI GUPTA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Sr.P.A. COURT MASTER
â ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26921/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 17720/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 25/08/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv.(Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Gunwant Dara, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Even on the second call no one appears for the petitioners. The special leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.08.2616:34:30 ISTReason: (Neeta) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 20/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rahul Dagar,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr./Ms.Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. …......2
ITEM NO.11 -2- Mr.Abhay Gupta,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gussain,Adv. Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra,Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.24739/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.4. SLP(C) No.25614/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said application. SLP(C) No.27490/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.3 & 4 in conformity of the order dated 1.05.2015 of this Court. … ........3
ITEM NO.11 -3- SLP(C) No.26806/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the lrs. of the deceased respondent No.8. The said I.A. shall be processed under the rules. SLP(C) No.1059/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 01.05.2015 of this Court in so far as it relates to the respondent Nos.1 & 13. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos.4,5,8-10 & 12 failing which appropriate orders shall follow on the next date. SLP(C) No.30979/2011 SLP(C) No.34114/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner in both the matters to comply with the terms of the order dated 01.05.2015 of this Court. SLP(C) No.4915/2012 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.9 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said application. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.7,8,10,13 & 14-22 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. SLP(C) No.6505/2012 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 01.05.2015 of this Court. … ........4
ITEM NO.11 -4- SLP(C) No.6533/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.6 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. SLP(C) No.4128-29/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.5 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. SLP(C) No.8111/2013 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has filed an application for exemption from filing official translation but the same is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said application. Await the return of the service of notice for making alternative arrangement already issued to the petitioner. SLP(C) No.36770/2014 Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.4,6 & 7 in compliance with the order dated 1.05.2015 of this Court. List the matter again on 06.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
^5 ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 20/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rahul Dagar,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr./Ms.Tanuj Bagga Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.08.2212:29:16 TLTReason: Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. .........2ITEM NO.11 -2- Mr.Abhay Gupta,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr.Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr.Monika Gussain,Adv. Mr.Vikas Singh Jangra,Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.24739/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to file an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.4. SLP(C) No.25614/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitionerhas filed an application for substitution to bring on record theLrs. of the deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. Ld.counselshall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever havebeen found in the said application. SLP(C) No.27490/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice byusual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.3 & 4 in conformity ofthe order dated 1.05.2015 of this Court. ...........3ITEM NO.11 -3-SLP(C) No.26806/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitionerhas filed an application for substitution to bring on record thelrs. of the deceased respondent No.8. The said I.A. shall beprocessed under the rules.SLP(C) No.1059/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated01.05.2015 of this Court in so far as it relates to the respondentNos.1 & 13. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to file an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos.4,5,8-10 & 12failing which appropriate orders shall follow on the next date.SLP(C) No.30979/2011 SLP(C) No.34114/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner in both the matters to comply with the terms of theorder dated 01.05.2015 of this Court.SLP(C) No.4915/2012 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application forsubstitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondentNo.9 which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of fourweeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the saidapplication. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the
unserved respondent Nos.7,8,10,13 & 14-22 shall be taken by theLd.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served.SLP(C) No.6505/2012 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated01.05.2015 of this Court. ...........4ITEM NO.11 -4-SLP(C) No.6533/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent No.6 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition ispermitted to be served.SLP(C) No.4128-29/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent No.5 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition ispermitted to be served.SLP(C) No.8111/2013 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the respondentNo.3 has filed an application for exemption from filing officialtranslation but the same is defective. Ld.counsel shall within aperiod of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found inthe said application. Await the return of the service of notice for makingalternative arrangement already issued to the petitioner.SLP(C) No.36770/2014 Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice byusual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.4,6 & 7 in compliancewith the order dated 1.05.2015 of this Court. List the matter again on 06.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26806/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6956/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 06/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naveen Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv. Mr. Sagar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to cure the defects pointed out in Office Report dated 15.05.2015. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER
ê ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26806/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6956/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 06/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naveen Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv. Mr. Sagar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to cure the defects pointed out in Office Report dated 15.05.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushil Kumar RakhejaDate: 2015.08.07 (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)10:08:42 ISTReason: COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.7 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (With Office Report)
ITEM NO.7 2 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 01/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Dagar,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.
ITEM NO.7 3 Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Waida,Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. R.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Ms. Kiran Ahlawat,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 The office report indicates that the respondent No.4 has expired. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said deceased respondent. SLP(C) No. 25614 and 26806/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that the Ld.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for
ITEM NO.7 4 substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit. SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 The office report states that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 14 and 27. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks comply with the terms of the office report. SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that the Ld.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.13 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit. The office report proceeds to state that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring
ITEM NO.7 5 on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 27. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 The office report states that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.6. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 13 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. The office report indicates that the Respondent Nos. 4,5,8,9,10 and 12 have expired. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the each deceased respondents. SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 The office report indicates that the respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn, if and when the connected ones get ready for listing.
ITEM NO.7 6 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1,2,6 and 7 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 7,8,10,12,13 and 19-22 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. The office report indicates that the Ld.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.9 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit.
ITEM NO.7 7 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. SLP(C) Nos. 6533 /2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No. 5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 Ms. Kiran Ahlawat, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent State and its functionaries. She seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No. 3,5 and 6 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.
ITEM NO.7 8 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 4,6 and 7 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. List again on 20.8.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
˜` ITEM NO.7 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.05.02 SLP(C) No. 11213/201108:20:56 CESTReason: (With Office Report)ITEM NO.7 2SLP(C) No. 30979/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012(With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment andOffice Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Date : 01/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Dagar,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.ITEM NO.7 3 Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Waida,Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv.
Mr. R.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Ms. Kiran Ahlawat,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 24739/2010 The office report indicates that the respondent No.4 hasexpired. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within aperiod of four weeks file an application for substitution to bringon record the Lrs. of the said deceased respondent.SLP(C) No. 25614 and 26806/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that theLd.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application forITEM NO.7 4substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondentNo.8 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period offour weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the saidaffidavit.SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 The office report states that the learned counsel for thepetitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 14 and 27. The saidapplication shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. Listthereafter. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a periodof four weeks comply with the terms of the office report.SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove.SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that theLd.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application forsubstitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondentNo.13 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period offour weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the saidaffidavit.
The office report proceeds to state that the Ld. Counsel forthe petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bringITEM NO.7 5on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 27. The saidapplication shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. Listthereafter.SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 The office report states that the learned counsel for thepetitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.6. The saidapplication shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. Listthereafter.SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 1 and 13 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove. The office report indicates that the Respondent Nos.4,5,8,9,10 and 12 have expired. The learned counsel for thepetitioners shall within a period of four weeks file an applicationfor substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the each deceasedrespondents.SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 The office report indicates that the respondents have failedto file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated underthe rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court on its own turn, if and when the connectedones get ready for listing.ITEM NO.7 6SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 1,2,6 and 7 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove.SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove.
SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 7,8,10,12,13 and 19-22 shall be taken bythe learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of threeweeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through theconcerned District Court the particulars of which shall befurnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within theperiod prescribed above. The office report indicates that the Ld.Counsel for thepetitioners has filed an application for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.9 which is defective.The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure thedefects whatever have been found in the said affidavit.ITEM NO.7 7SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove.SLP(C) Nos. 6533 /2012 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent No. 5 shall be taken by the learned counsel forthe petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in additionis permitted to be served through the concerned District Court theparticulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel forthe petitioners within the period prescribed above.SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 Ms. Kiran Ahlawat, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of therespondent State and its functionaries. She seeks and is givenfour weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent No. 3,5 and 6 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove.ITEM NO.7 8SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos. 4,6 and 7 shall be taken by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the concernedDistrict Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by thelearned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribedabove. List again on 20.8.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 959-960/2009 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report)
-2- SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 (With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report)
-3- Date : 13/04/2015 These petition were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. N.P. Midha, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anupam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Manish Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel, Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr.Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.
-4- Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhashish Bhowmick, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandahara Jha, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ajay Kapur, AAG Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mrs. Bharti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan, Adv. Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv. For Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan, Adv. Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pulak Bagchi, Adv. Mr. N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, Adv. Ms. S. Janani, Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manish Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.
-5- Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Khalid Akhtar, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Ms. Tanuj Bagga, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, AAG Mr. Prashant Tyagi, Adv. For UOI Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is not complete. Let all the matters come up after service is complete. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
Ò; ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 959-960/2009 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report)Signature Not Verified SLP(C) No. 26921/2010Digitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2015.04.16 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)17:18:05 ISTReason: SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report) -2- SLP(C) No. 29291/2010(With Interim Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 35087/2010(With Interim Relief)SLP(C) No. 1059/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11213/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11510/2011(With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay infiling substitution appln. and appln.(s) for setting aside anabatement and Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11831/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 13653/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 30979/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 34114/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 4915/2012(With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment andOffice Report) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013(With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014(With Office Report) -3-Date : 13/04/2015 These petition were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. N.P. Midha, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anupam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.
Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Manish Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel, Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr.Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. -4- Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhashish Bhowmick, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandahara Jha, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ajay Kapur, AAG Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mrs. Bharti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan, Adv. Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv.
For Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan, Adv. Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pulak Bagchi, Adv. Mr. N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, Adv. Ms. S. Janani, Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manish Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. -5- Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Khalid Akhtar, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Ms. Tanuj Bagga, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, AAG Mr. Prashant Tyagi, Adv.For UOI Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is not complete. Let all the matters come up after service iscomplete. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996,passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 959-960/2009 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln. (s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 (With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014
(With Office Report) Date : 13/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. S.P. Sharma, Adv. Mr. N.P. Midha, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. (Not present) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Subhash Bhomike, Adv Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Rajeev Datal, Adv. Mrs. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Adarsh Ganesh, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Rahul, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. (Not present) Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. (Not present) Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, AAG Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, AAG Mr. Parveen Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gauraan, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Addl. AG Mr. Ajay Kapur, AAG Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. (Not Present) Mr. Jyoti Mendiratia, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. M.P. Jhan, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Ray, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Mr. N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avjeet, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tenzing Tsering, Adv. Mr. Abhik Kunal, Adv. Mr. Rahul Chauhan, Adv. for Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.(Not present) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.
Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. (Not present) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. (Not present) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. (Not present) Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mrs. Bharti Gutpa, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased responent No. 1 in SLP(c) No. 11510/2011 is allowed. List the matters after six weeks. (Ashwani Kumar) (Sneh Bala Mehra) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
24 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996,passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 959-960/2009 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln. (s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SLP(C) No. 26921/2010Sukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2015.02.1617:03:39 IST (With Interim Relief and Office Report)Reason: SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35087/2010(With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011
(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11213/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11510/2011(With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for setting asidean abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitutionappln. and Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11831/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 13653/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 30979/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 34114/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 4915/2012With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment andOffice Report)SLP(C) No. 6473/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 6505/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 8111/2013(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 36770/2014(With Office Report) Date : 13/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. S.P. Sharma, Adv. Mr. N.P. Midha, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Subhash Bhomike, Adv Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.(Not present)
Mr. Rajeev Datal, Adv. Mrs. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Adarsh Ganesh, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Rahul, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. (Not present) Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, AAG Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, AAG Mr. Parveen Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gauraan, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Addl. AG Mr. Ajay Kapur, AAG Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. (Not Present) Mr. Jyoti Mendiratia, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. M.P. Jhan, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Ray, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Mr. N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avjeet, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tenzing Tsering, Adv. Mr. Abhik Kunal, Adv. Mr. Rahul Chauhan, Adv. for Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.(Not present)
Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv.(Not present) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.(Not present) Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mrs. Bharti Gutpa, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. ofdeceased responent No. 1 in SLP(c) No. 11510/2011 is allowed. List the matters after six weeks. (Ashwani Kumar) (Sneh Bala Mehra) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION IV B Listed on. 09.02.2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 9 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 51 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 336 OF 2012 IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 11213 OF 2011 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat Village Chhoti Kohri ...Petitioner(s) Versus Mohinder Pal & Ors. ...Alleged Contemnor(s) OFFICE REPORT The Contempt Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.01.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :- “Mr. V.K. Jhanji, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8, submits that the counter affidavit on behalf of the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8 shall be filed during the course of the day. As prayed for by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, four weeks' time is granted to file a reply to the affidavits filed by the alleged contemnors. Put up thereafter.” It is submitted that counsel for alleged contemnor Nos. 5 to 8 has on 07.01.2015 filed counter affidavit on behalf of alleged contemnor Nos. 5 to 8. Copy of the same has already been included in the SLP paper books . It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed reply to the affidavit filed on behalf of alleged contemnor Nos. 5 to 8. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate. Dr. S. K. Verma, Advocate . ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rajesh
ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 No(s). GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 09/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv. Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on non-misceallneous day after four weeks. (Ashwani Kumar) (Indu Pokhriyal) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
º ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 336/2012 In SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 No(s). GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 09/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv. Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on non-misceallneous day after four weeks. (Ashwani Kumar) (Indu Pokhriyal) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.02.1017:14:19 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014, I.A. 3/2014, I.A. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11510/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/02/2011 in LPA No. 302/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE SUMRA KHER.TR.PAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS DHANPAT & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 27/01/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned for four weeks to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file an affidavit with proof of service. (Ashwani Kumar) (Sneh Lata Sharma) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014, I.A. 3/2014, I.A. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11510/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/02/2011 in LPA No. 302/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE SUMRA KHER.TR.PAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS DHANPAT & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 27/01/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned for four weeks to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file an affidavit with proof of service. (Ashwani Kumar) (Sneh Lata Sharma) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.01.2816:11:19 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.29+43 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996,07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 959-960/2009 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 (With Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 09/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
-2- For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.D. Sharma, Sr.Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. SLP 27490/10 Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Ms. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Monohar Singh Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Rahul Dagar, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. P.N. Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhashish Bhowmick, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Akshay Vasishta, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv.
-3- Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr.Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Rathee, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mrs. Yugandhara Jha, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. For Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Alok Mahajan, Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rajesh, Adv. Mrs. Bharti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. SLP 11213/11 Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Ms. S. Janani, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv.
-4- Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Khalid Akhtar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Santosh Pd. Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Som Nath Saini, Adv. State of Punjab Mr. Ajay Kapur, AAG Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anish Roy, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is not complete in some of the matters. Let all the matters be listed after four weeks. Interim order to continue. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No.336/2012 In SLP(C) No.11213/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 06/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. For Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. For Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv. Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. V.K. Jhanji, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8, submits that the counter affidavit on behalf of the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8 shall be filed during the course of the day. As prayed for by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, four weeks' time is granted to file a reply to the affidavits filed by the alleged contemnors. Put up thereafter. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
À ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No.336/2012 In SLP(C) No.11213/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 06/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. For Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. For Mr. S. K. Verma,Adv. Mr. V.K. Jhanji, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. V.K. Jhanji, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8, submits that the counter affidavit on behalf of the alleged contemnor nos.5 to 8 shall be filed during the course of the day. As prayed for by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, four weeks' time is granted to file a reply to the affidavits filed by the alleged contemnors.Signature Not Verified Put up thereafter.Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.01.0615:12:38 ISTReason: (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014, I.A. 3/2014, I.A. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11510/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE SUMRA KHER.TR.PAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS DHANPAT & ORS. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 05/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav,Adv. Ms. Meenu Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted for filing the proof of service. List after two weeks. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (Renu Diwan) Court Master
X\ ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No.1059/2011 (With Office Report) Date : 16/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr.Manish Khandelwal,adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.12.18 Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.16:15:53 ISTReason: Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. ...........2ITEM NO.7 -2- Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms.Sahiba Pantel,adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Ms./Mr.Paromita Majumdar,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv.
Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr.Vikas Mahajeni,adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr.Yash Pal Dhingra,adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Ms.Vivekta Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,adv. Ms.Sahiba Pantel,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.24739/2010 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.3,4 11 & 12. Dastiin addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, theparticulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioner within the same period. SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 Mr.M.P.Jha, Ld.counsel shall cure the defects in the I.A.within a period of four weeks, whereafter no further extensionshall be provided. .........3ITEM NO.7 -3- Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice byusual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 3 & 8. Dasti in additionis permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particularsof which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitionerswithin the period stipulated above. SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 Four weeks time as last chance is given to Mr.Praveen Swarup &Mr.Rajendra Mathur, Ld.counsel to cure the defects whatever havebeen found in the I.As. for substitution.SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice byusual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.3 & 4. Dasti in additionis permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particularsof which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitionerwithin the period stipulated above. SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitionerhas filed an I.A. for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. ofthe deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. Ld.counsel shallrectify the defects whatever have been found in the saidapplication within a period of four weeks.
SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 The respondent Nos. 1 & 6 have failed to file the counteraffidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Therespondent Nos.2-5 have already filed the counter affidavit as getsrevealed from the perusal of the office report. Viewed thus, thematter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court asand when the connected ones get ready. .........4ITEM NO.7 -4- SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 The office report indicates that the petitioner Nos.3 and 27have died. Ld.counsel for the petitioners shall within a period ofthree weeks take appropriate steps to bring on record the Lrs. ofthe said deceased petitioners. The office report proceeds to state that the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners has filed an application to bring on record thelrs. of the deceased respondent No.13 which is defective.Ld.counsel shall rectify the defects whatever have been found inthe said application within a period of three weeks. SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.1-6 shall file the counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no furtherextension shall be provided. SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the respondentNos.2-5 has filed the counter affidavit which is defective.Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defectswhatever have been found in the said affidavit, whereafter nofurther extension shall be provided.SLP(C) No.1059/2011 The office report indicates that the matter has already beendirected to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Therefore, nofurther orders are required to be passed in it. SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 The office report states that service of notice is complete onthe respondent Nos. 1 & 7, but no one has entered appearance ontheir behalf. The office report proceeds to state that therespondent Nos.2-6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Viewedthus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'bleCourt as and when the connected ones get ready. .........5ITEM NO.7 -5- SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 The office report is that the respondent Nos.1-3 have alreadyfiled the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.4-12 has failed tofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under therules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready. SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report isthat the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an I.A. for
substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondentNo.1. The said I.A. shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Awaitorders and list thereafter. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice byusual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.8 & 10. Dasti in additionis permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particularsof which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitionerwithin the period stipulated above. SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 The office report states that although by order dated8.10.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was givento the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.1,2,6 & 7, yet hehas not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the mattershall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambersfor further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. ..........6ITEM NO.7 -6- SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 The office report is that the respondents have failed to filethe counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Court as and when the connected one gets ready.SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 The office report states that the respondent No.9 has died.Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of three weeks.file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. ofthe said deceased respondent. The office report further is that although by order dated08.10.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was givento the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondents, yet he has not donethe needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers forfurther future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 The office report states that although by order dated08.10.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was givento the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondent No.5, yet he has notdone the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shallbe processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers forfurther future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 6473/2012, SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 & SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe unserved respondents. ...............7ITEM NO.7 -7- SLP(C) No. 8111/2013
Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice byusual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.3,5 & 6. Dasti inaddition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, theparticulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioner within the period stipulated above. List incomplete matters again on 9.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......../2014 CC No(s). 18414/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2013 in LPA No. 671/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT TARAF BEHBAL BAHADAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 25/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- with the Supreme Court Employees' Welfare Fund within four weeks from today. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) NO.24739 of 2010. Status quo as of today shall be maintained by the parties. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER
2 ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......../2014 CC No(s). 18414/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2013 in LPA No. 671/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT TARAF BEHBAL BAHADAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 25/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- with the Supreme Court Employees' Welfare Fund within four weeks from today. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) NO.24739 of 2010. Status quo as of today shall be maintained by the parties.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2014.11.2717:15:35 ISTReason: [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
SECTION IVB Listed on. 21.11.2014 Court No. 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 15 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)CC NO. 18414 OF 2014 Gram Panchayat Taraf Behbal Bahadar ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Advocate on 26.09.2014 against the Judgment and Order dated 27.05.2013 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in LPA No. 671 of 2012(O&M) barred by time by 397 days along with an application for condonation of delay in filing SLP. It is further submitted that notice in SLP (C) No. 24739 of 2010 Entitled Gram Panchayat Nawan Pind Versus Financial Commissioner & Ors. referred to P-10 was directed on 01.09.2010 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. S. Chauhan. SLP is pending after notice (Copy of order dated 01.09.2010 is annexed as Annexure P-10 at page no. 88 in the paper books). The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 17th day of November, 2014 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rajesh
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 35087/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 15244/1997 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT,HAMIDPUR THRU ITS SARPANC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 19/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Ms. Bharti Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks one week further time to file affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice on respondent No. 1. Time, as prayed for, is granted. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to serve notice on the standing counsel for the State of Haryana. (PARDEEP KUMAR) ( RENUKA SADANA) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Listed on. Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 35087 OF 2010. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Gram Panchayat, Hamidpur Thr. Its Sarpanch Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 6.12.2010, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- " Delay condoned. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP (C) No. 24224 of 2010." Accordingly show cause notice to all the 7 respondents was issued through registered AD post on 31.1.2011. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Advocate has on 18.4.2011 filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 2-6 and also on 10.10.2011 filed counter affidavit on their behalf. Copies of the same are included in the SLP paper books. It is submitted that AD Card duly signed has been received back from Respondent No. 7 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. It is further submitted that pursuant to Hon'ble Court's Order dated 24.3.2014 fresh show cause notice to respondent No. 1 was issued through registered AD Post and as well as by way of Dasti which was to be served through concerned Advocate on Record, but neither AD Card
nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from so far. Counsel for the petitioner has also not filed any affidavit alongwith proof of Dasti service till date. It is further submitted that the matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 8.10.2014, when inter alia the following order was passed:- “.............................................. The office report states that although two opportunities have already been given to the Ld. counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice issued to the respondent No. 1, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter...............................” The matter is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers with this office report. Dated this the 5th day of November, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :-Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR YKS
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13653/2011 [From the judgment and order dated 8.3.2011 in LPA No. 415 of 2011 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh] GRAM PANCHAYAT BASAUDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 19/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. (not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. (not present) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. (not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Office Report dated 3.11.2014 points out that steps have not been taken for service in respect of respondent No. 3. In case, needful is not done within two weeks from today, special leave petition shall stand dismissed qua respondent No. 3 without further reference to the Court. (PARDEEP KUMAR) ( RENUKA SADANA) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER
Ö ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13653/2011 [From the judgment and order dated 8.3.2011 in LPA No. 415 of 2011 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh] GRAM PANCHAYAT BASAUDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 19/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. (not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. (not present) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. (not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Office Report dated 3.11.2014 points out that steps have not been taken for service in respect of respondent No. 3. In case, needful is not done within two weeks from today, special leave petition shall stand dismissed qua respondent No. 3 without further reference to the Court.Signature Not Verified (PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENUKA SADANA)Digitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2014.11.20 AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER10:52:39 SASTReason:
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 35087/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 15244/1997 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GRAM PANCHAYAT,HAMIDPUR THRU ITS SARPANC Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 19/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Ms. Bharti Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks one week further time to file affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice on respondent No. 1. Time, as prayed for, is granted. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to serve notice on the standing counsel for the State of Haryana. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENUKA SADANA)Signature Not Verified AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERDigitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2014.11.2010:52:48 SASTReason:
ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 08/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. ….......2
ITEM NO.5 -2- Mr.Dinesh Verma,adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Karan Kapoor,adv. Mr. A. S. Pundir,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr.Abhay Gupta,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Devanshu Kumar,adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr.Shivendra Dwivedi,adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Ms.Bharti Gupta,adv. Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,adv. Mr.Atul Kumar,adv. Mr.S.K.Verma,adv. Ms.Gunwant Dara,adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,adv. Mr.Vishal Gupta,adv. Dr.Vipin Gupta,adv. Mr.M.K.Ghosh,adv. Ms.S.Janani,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Mr.A.K.Tandale,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R … ......3
ITEM NO.5 -3- SLP(C) No. 24224/2010 The office report states that the service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1 to 7 and 12 to 14 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent Nos. 8 to 11 and 15 to 19 for filing the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready. SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 The office report states that the service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2, 9 and 13 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent Nos. 5 to 8 and 10 to file the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 3,4, 11 and 12. SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 The office report indicates that the I.A. filed by Mr. M.P. Jha, l earned counsel is defective. Learned counsel shall rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said I.As.within a period of four weeks. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No. 3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. …....4
ITEM NO.5 -4- SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent No. 1 for filing the counter affidavit, yet he has not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be given to him on that count taking into consideration the rule position. The office report is that the service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 7 to 18 and 20 to 23 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. These respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 with utmost dispatch. The office report further is that Mr. Praveen Swaroop and Mr. Rajendra Mathur, l earned counsel have filed applications for substitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 6 and 19 respectively which are defective. The learned counsel are directed to rectify the defects in these applications within a period of four weeks, as last chance. SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent shall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above, in case he intends to do so. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. …........5
ITEM NO.5 -5- SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.7 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent shall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above, in case he intends to do so. The office report indicates that the application for substitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 8 is defective. The learned counsel shall rectify the defects found in the said application within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be provided. Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 with utmost dispatch. SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counter affidavit. Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 with utmost dispatch . SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.7 to 12 & 14, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. These respondents shall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above, in case they intend to do so. The office report indicates that the application for substitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 13 is defective. The learned counsel shall rectify the defects found in the said application within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be provided. … ........6
ITEM NO.5 -6- Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 with utmost dispatch. SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 Office shall submit a detailed report in the matter on the next date. SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 for filing the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. The office report further is that the counter affidavit filed by the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 is defective. The learned counsel shall cure the defects found in the said counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, as last chance. SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.2-3,6,7 & 11 to file the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.1 & 13 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks whereafter no further extension shall be provided. The office report states that although two opportunities have already been given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file the application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the deceased respondent Nos.4,5,8,9,,10 & 12, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. … ..........7
ITEM NO.5 -7- SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 The office report states that although two opportunities have already been given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice issued to the respondent No.1, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Contemnor/respondents to file the counter affidavit. SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 The office report indicates that the respondent No.4 has already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 to 3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready. SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 The office report states that the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.1 is defective. The learned counsel shall rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, as last chance. The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. The office report further is that although two opportunities have already been given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved …....8
ITEM NO.5 -8- respondent No.3, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent Nos.2-7 & 9 to file the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. The office report is that I.A. for substitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent No.1 is defective. Ld.counsel shall rectify the defects within a period of three weeks, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.8 & 10 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 The office report indicates that the respondent Nos.1-4 have already filed the counter affidavit. The office report further is that although by order dated 24.07.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld. counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice issued to the respondent No.5, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. …..9
ITEM NO.5 -9- SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent Nos.3-5 & 9-11 to file the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.8, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.1,2,6 & 7. SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.1-8 shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 The office report indicates that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent Nos.15 & 16 to file the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. The office report further is that the application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the deceased respondent No.9 is defective. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects whatever have been found in the said application.
… ......10 ITEM NO.5 -10- Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.3,6,7,8,10, 12, 17 & 19-22. SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta Ld.counsel shall file the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.3 failing which the counter affidavit filed by him on behalf of the said respondent shall be taken off the record. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case he intends to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 The office report indicates that the respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.2-4. SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta Ld.counsel shall file the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.5 failing which the counter affidavit filed by him on behalf of the said respondent shall be taken off the record. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. These respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. … .......11
ITEM NO.5 -11 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 The office report indicates that the respondent Nos.1-4 have already filed the counter affidavit. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.5. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 & 2, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. These respondents shall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within the period provided above. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.3,5 & 6 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. List again on 16.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
b¨ ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 08/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s)Signature Not Verified Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.10.1016:08:23 ISTReason: Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. ..........2ITEM NO.5 -2- Mr.Dinesh Verma,adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Karan Kapoor,adv. Mr. A. S. Pundir,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr.Abhay Gupta,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Devanshu Kumar,adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr.Shivendra Dwivedi,adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Ms.Bharti Gupta,adv. Mr. P. N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,adv. Mr.Atul Kumar,adv. Mr.S.K.Verma,adv. Ms.Gunwant Dara,adv. Ms.Sushma Suri,adv. Mr.Vishal Gupta,adv. Dr.Vipin Gupta,adv. Mr.M.K.Ghosh,adv. Ms.S.Janani,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Mr.A.K.Tandale,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R .........3ITEM NO.5 -3-SLP(C) No. 24224/2010 The office report states that the service of notice iscomplete on the respondent Nos.1 to 7 and 12 to 14 but no one hasentered appearance on their behalf. What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is thatalthough two opportunities have already been given to therespondent Nos. 8 to 11 and 15 to 19 for filing the counteraffidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore nofurther opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that counttaking into consideration the rule position. Viewed thus, thematter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court asand when the connected ones get ready. SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 The office report states that the service of notice iscomplete on the respondent Nos.1,2, 9 and 13 but no one has entered
appearance on their behalf. What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is thatalthough two opportunities have already been given to therespondent Nos. 5 to 8 and 10 to file the counter affidavit, yetthey have not done the needful so far. Therefore no furtheropportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count takinginto consideration the rule position. Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent Nos. 3,4, 11 and 12.SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 The office report indicates that the I.A. filed by Mr. M.P.Jha, learned counsel is defective. Learned counsel shall rectifythe defects whatever have been found in the said I.As.within aperiod of four weeks. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unservedrespondent No. 3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioners within a period of four weeks. .......4ITEM NO.5 -4-SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is thatalthough two opportunities have already been given to therespondent No. 1 for filing the counter affidavit, yet he has notdone the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity iswarranted to be given to him on that count taking intoconsideration the rule position. The office report is that the service of notice is complete onthe respondent Nos. 7 to 18 and 20 to 23 but no one has enteredappearance on their behalf. These respondents shall be at libertyto file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, incase they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shallbe provided. Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 with utmost dispatch. The office report further is that Mr. Praveen Swaroop and Mr.Rajendra Mathur, learned counsel have filed applications forsubstitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 6 and 19respectively which are defective. The learned counsel are directedto rectify the defects in these applications within a period offour weeks, as last chance.SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to file the counteraffidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5 butno one has entered appearance on his behalf. The said respondentshall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within theperiod stipulated above, in case he intends to do so. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unservedrespondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel forthe petitioners within a period of three weeks.
...........5ITEM NO.5 -5-SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counteraffidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.7 butno one has entered appearance on his behalf. The said respondentshall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within theperiod stipulated above, in case he intends to do so. The office report indicates that the application forsubstitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 8 isdefective. The learned counsel shall rectify the defects found inthe said application within a period of four weeks whereafter nofurther extension shall be provided. Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 with utmost dispatch.SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counselfor the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counter affidavit. Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 with utmost dispatch.SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counteraffidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.7 to12 & 14, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Theserespondents shall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above, in case they intend to do so. The office report indicates that the application forsubstitution of the lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 13 isdefective. The learned counsel shall rectify the defects found inthe said application within a period of four weeks whereafter nofurther extension shall be provided. ...........6ITEM NO.5 -6- Issue notice of alternative arrangement to the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 with utmost dispatch.SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 Office shall submit a detailed report in the matter on thenext date.SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is thatalthough two opportunities have already been given to therespondent Nos. 1 and 6 for filing the counter affidavit, yet theyhave not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunityis warranted to be given to them on that count taking intoconsideration the rule position. The office report further is that the counter affidavit filedby the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 is defective. The learned counsel
shall cure the defects found in the said counter affidavit within aperiod of four weeks, as last chance.SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondentNos.2-3,6,7 & 11 to file the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unservedrespondent Nos.1 & 13 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioners within a period of three weeks whereafter no furtherextension shall be provided. The office report states that although two opportunities havealready been given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file theapplication for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of thedeceased respondent Nos.4,5,8,9,,10 & 12, yet he has not done theneedful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers forfurther future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. .............7ITEM NO.5 -7- SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 The office report states that although two opportunities havealready been given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file theaffidavit in proof of dasti service of notice issued to therespondent No.1, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed inthat context, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Awaitorders and list thereafter.SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 Four weeks time as last chance is given to theContemnor/respondents to file the counter affidavit.SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 The office report indicates that the respondent No.4 hasalready filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is completeon the respondent Nos. 1 to 3, but no one has entered appearance ontheir behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed forlisting before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones getready.SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 The office report states that the counter affidavit filed bythe respondent No.1 is defective. The learned counsel shall rectifythe defects whatever have been found in the said counter affidavitwithin a period of four weeks, as last chance. The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case theyintend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall beprovided. The office report further is that although two opportunitieshave already been given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner totake fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved .......8ITEM NO.5 -8-
respondent No.3, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed inthat context, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Awaitorders and list thereafter.SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is thatalthough two opportunities have already been given to therespondent Nos.2-7 & 9 to file the counter affidavit, yet they havenot done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunity iswarranted to be given to them on that count taking intoconsideration the rule position. The office report is that I.A. for substitution of the lrs. ofthe deceased respondent No.1 is defective. Ld.counsel shall rectifythe defects within a period of three weeks, whereafter no furtherextension shall be provided. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unservedrespondent Nos.8 & 10 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioner within a period of three weeks. SLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011 The office report indicates that the respondent Nos.1-4 havealready filed the counter affidavit. The office report further is that although by order dated24.07.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was givento the Ld. counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit inproof of dasti service of notice issued to the respondent No.5, yethe has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, thematter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further future directions. Await orders and listthereafter. .....9ITEM NO.5 -9- SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is thatalthough two opportunities have already been given to therespondent Nos.3-5 & 9-11 to file the counter affidavit, yet theyhave not done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunityis warranted to be given to them on that count taking intoconsideration the rule position. Service of notice is complete onthe respondent No.8, but no one has entered appearance on hisbehalf. The said respondent shall be at liberty to file the counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to doso, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice tothe unserved respondent Nos.1,2,6 & 7. SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.1-8 shall file the counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no furtherextension shall be provided. SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 The office report indicates that although two opportunitieshave already been given to the respondent Nos.15 & 16 to file the
counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far.Therefore, no further opportunity is warranted to be given to themon that count taking into consideration the rule position. Theother served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to doso, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. The office report further is that the application forsubstitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the deceased respondentNo.9 is defective. Three weeks time as last chance is given to theLd.counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects whatever havebeen found in the said application. .........10ITEM NO.5 -10- Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice tothe unserved respondent Nos.3,6,7,8,10, 12, 17 & 19-22. SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta Ld.counsel shall file the vakalatnama onbehalf of the respondent No.3 failing which the counter affidavitfiled by him on behalf of the said respondent shall be taken offthe record. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1,but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The saidrespondent shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavitwithin a period of four weeks, in case he intends to do so,whereafter no further extension shall be provided. SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 The office report indicates that the respondent No.1 hasalready filed the counter affidavit. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice tothe unserved respondent Nos.2-4. SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta Ld.counsel shall file the vakalatnama onbehalf of the respondent No.5 failing which the counter affidavitfiled by him on behalf of the said respondent shall be taken offthe record. Service of notice is complete on the respondentNos.1-3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Theserespondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavitwithin a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so,whereafter no further extension shall be provided. ..........11ITEM NO.5 -11 SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 The office report indicates that the respondent Nos.1-4 havealready filed the counter affidavit. Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice tothe unserved respondent No.5. SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.4to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on therespondent Nos. 1 & 2, but no one has entered appearance on their
behalf. These respondents shall also be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within the period provided above. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unservedrespondent Nos.3,5 & 6 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioners within a period of three weeks. List again on 16.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
Ì´ 1 ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24224/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing o.t. and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (With appln.(s) for Office Report)Signature Not Verified SLP(C) No. 11510/2011Digitally signed by (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report)Madhu GroverDate: 2014.07.2612:53:22 IST SLP(C) No. 11831/2011Reason: (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) 2ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVBSLP(C) No. 25383-25384/2011(With appln.(s) for Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 30979/2011(With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34114/2011(With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012(With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4915/2012(With appln.(s) for impleadment and impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6473/2012(With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6505/2012(With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6533/2012(With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8111/2013(With appln.(s) for Office Report)Date : 24/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta ,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad ,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat ,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur ,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta ,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan ,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan Jain,Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh ,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Karan Kapoor,Adv. Mr. A. S. Pundir ,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta ,Adv. 3ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB Mr. Vikas Mahajan,Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana ,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal ,Adv. Mr. Abhay Gupta,Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal ,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta ,Adv. Mr. Devanshu Kumar,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha ,Adv.
Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia ,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup ,Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. P. N. Gupta ,Adv. Mr. K.K. Mahalik,Adv. Mr.Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Gupta,Adv. Ms. Mansi Ajnani,Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta ,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta ,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh ,Adv. Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. S.K.Verma,Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. 4ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB Mr.Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandle,Adv. Mr. Sonit,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta ,Adv. Ms. Anubha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Ambuj Agarwal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 24224/2010 Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of therespondent Nos. 1 to 6. He seeks and is given six weeks time tofile the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. The other servedrespondents shall also be at liberty to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above, in case they intend to do so.SLP(C) No. 24739/2010 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file theprocess fee and the spare copies of the SLP for the service ofshow cause notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 3, 4, 11 and 12within a period of two weeks, failing which no extension shall beprovided. The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counteraffidavit within a period of six weeks, in case they intend to doso.SLP(C) No. 25614/2010
Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent No.3. 5ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counteraffidavit within a period of six weeks, in case they intend to doso. The office report indicates that the learned counsel Mr. M.P.Jha, Ld. Advocate has filed three applications, one for permissionto sell the property, the other for substitution to bring onrecord the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 8 and the third onefor the directions. All these applications are found to bedefective. The learned counsel is directed to cure the defectswhatever have been found in these applications within a period ofthree weeks. The office report further is that the I.A. for direction filedby the learned counsel for the petitioners is defective. Thelearned counsel shall rectify the defects whatever have been foundin the said application within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counteraffidavit within a period of six weeks, in case they intend to doso. The office report indicates that the learned counsel Mr.Praveen Swarup has filed three applications one for substitutionof deceased respondent No. 6, the other for the condonation ofdelay in filing the substitution application and the third one forthe exemption from filing Official Translation. Theseapplications are found to be defective. The learned counsel isdirected to rectify the defects whatever have been found in theseapplications within a period of three weeks. Mr. Rajendra Mathur, Ld. Advocate is directed to comply withthe terms of the office report within a period of three weeks. 6ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB The I.A. for substitution of the Respondent No. 19 also isreported to be defective. The learned counsel for the petitioneris directed to rectify the defects whatever have been found in thesaid application within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Ld. Advocate has filed vakalatnama onbehalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The Learned counsel seeksand is given six weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Respondent No. 5 has been served but no one has enteredappearance on his behalf. He shall also be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case heintends to do so. Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent Nos. 3 and 4.SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 Ms. Sushma Suri and Mr. Praveen Swarup, Ld. Advocates havefiled the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 6respectively. They seek and are given six weeks' time file the
counter affidavit. Respondent No. 7 has been served but no one has enteredappearance on his behalf. He shall also be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case heintends to do so. The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated above, in case theyintend to do so. 7ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB Ms. Kavita Wadia, Ld. Advocate who had filed the vakalatnamaon behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 has submitted herresignation as Standing Counsel for the State. The office shallissue the notice of alternative arrangement to these respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall rectify thedefects in the application for substitution of deceased respondentNo. 8 within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 26918/2010 Ms. Kavita Wadia, Ld. Advocate who had filed the vakalatnamaon behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 has submitted herresignation as Standing Counsel for the State. The office shallissue the notice of alternative arrangement to these respondents. Ms. Sushma Suri and Mr. Praveen Swarup, Ld. Advocates havefiled the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and 6respectively. They seek and are given six weeks' time to file thecounter affidavit.SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 Ms. Kavita Wadia, Ld. Advocate who had filed the vakalatnamaon behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 has submitted herresignation as Standing Counsel for the State. The office shallissue the notice of alternative arrangement to these respondents. The office report indicates that the respondent Nos. 7 to 12and 14 have been served but no one has entered appearance on theirbehalf. They shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavitwithin a period of six weeks, in case they intend to do so. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall comply with theterms of the office report within a period of four weeks. 8ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB Ms. Sushma Suri and Mr. Praveen Swarup, Ld. Advocates havefiled the vaklatnama on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and 6respectively. They seek and are given six weeks' time to file thecounter affidavit. The office report further indicates that petitioner No. 27 isdead and the I.A. for substitution is registered as I.A. Nos. 1 to3. The same shall be processed for listing before the Hon'bleJudge in Chambers for further future directions. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall take appropriatesteps to bring on record the Lrs. Of the deceased respondent No.13 within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 26921/2010 Ms. Kavita Wadia, Ld. Advocate who had filed the vakalatnamaon behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 has submitted her
resignation as Standing Counsel for the State. The office shallissue the notice of alternative arrangement to these respondents. Ms. Sushma Suri Ld. Advocate has filed the vaklatnama onbehalf of the respondent No. 1. She seeks and is given six weeks'time to file the counter affidavit. The learned counsel Mr. Praveen Swarup shall rectify thedefects in the application for substitution of deceased respondentNo. 6 within a period of four weeks.SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 Six weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counselfor the respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to file the counter affidavit. 9ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 have already filedthe counter affidavit but the same has not been served to Mr.Praveen Swarup, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 6. The learnedcounsel shall supply the copy to him and file proof within aperiod of week's time.SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta and Mr. Y.P. Dhingra, Ld. Counsel havefiled vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 3 and 6, 7and 11. They seek and are given six weeks time to file thecounter affidavit. Three weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner for filing an application to bring onrecord the Lrs. Of the deceased respondent Nos. 4, 5, 8, 9, 10and 12. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to complywith the terms of the office report within a period of threeweeks.SLP(C) No. 35087/2010 Three weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner for filing the affidavit in proof ofdasti service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 7 has been served but no one has enteredappearance on his behalf. He shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case he intendsto do so. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Ld. Counsel has already filed thevakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 6. 10 ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case theyintend to do so.SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 Service of show cause notice is complete in SLP as well as inthe Contempt Petition. The contemnors/respondents shall be atliberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of sixweeks, in case they intend to do so.
SLP(C) No. 11831/2011 Mr. Gagan Gupta, Ld. Advocate has filed vakalatnama and thecounter affidavit on behalf of the respondent No.4. Therespondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have been served but no one has enteredappearance on their behalf. They shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case theyintend to do so.SLP(C) No. 13653/2011 Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Ld. Counsel has filed vakalatnama onbehalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. He seek and is given sixweeks time to file the counter affidavit. The other served respondents shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case theyintend to do so. The office report indicates that respondent No. 4 has filedthe counter affidavit but the same is found to be defective. Thelearned counsel shall rectify the defects in the said counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks. 11ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB Three weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner for filing the process fee and thespare copies of the SLP for the service of show cause notice tothe unserved respondent No. 3.SLP(C) No. 11510/2011 The Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 7 seeks and isgiven six weeks' time, as last chance to file the counteraffidavit. The served respondents shall also be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case theyintend to do so. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed anapplication to bring on record the Lrs. Of the deceased respondentNo. 1 which is found to be defective. The learned counsel shallrectify the defects in the said application within a period of twoweeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 8 and10 within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) Nos. 25383-25384/2011 The office report indicates that the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4have already filed the counter affidavit. Three weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner for filing the affidavit in proof ofdasti service of notice already issued to the respondent No.5. 12ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVBSLP(C) No. 30979/2011 Six weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counselfor the respondent Nos. 3,4, 5 and 9 to 11 to file the counter
affidavit. The respondent No. 8 has been served but no one has enteredappearance on his behalf. He shall also be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case he intendsto do so. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1, 2, 6and 7 within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Mr. Praveen Swarup, Ld. Counsel has filed vakalatnama onbehalf of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 8. The Learned counsel seeksand is given six weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 Respondent Nos. 3, 6, 17 and 18 has been served but no one hasentered appearance on their behalf. They shall be at liberty tofile the counter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in casethey intend to do so. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondents within aperiod of three weeks. 13ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB The I.A. for substitution filed by the learned counsel for thepetitioner is defective. The learned counsel is directed to curethe defects in the said application within a period of threeweeks.SLP(C) No. 6473/2012 The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel Mr. KamalMohan Gupta has filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the respondentNos. 2 and 4 and has filed counter affidavit on behalf ofRespondent Nos. 2 to 4. The learned counsel shall file thevakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No.3 within a period of threeweeks, failing which the counter affidavit filed on behalf ofRespondent No. 3 shall be taken off the record. Respondent No.1has been served but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.He shall at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a periodof six weeks, in case they intend to do so. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.3 within aperiod of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 The office report indicates that the Respondent No. 1 hasalready filed the counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4within a period of three weeks.SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 Mr. Kamal Mohan, Ld. Counsel has filed the vakalatnama onbehalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 6 and the counter affidavit on
14ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVBbehalf of the respondent Nos. 4 to 6. Ld. Counsel shall file thevakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No. 5 also within fourweeks and in case it is not filed the counter affidavit filed onbehalf of Respondent No.5 shall be taken off the record. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have been served but no one has enteredappearance on their behalf. They shall be at liberty to file thecounter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in case theyintend to do so. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the respondent No.5 within a periodof three weeks.SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012 The office report indicates that the Respondent Nos.1 to 4have already filed the counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the respondent No.5 within a periodof three weeks.SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Mr. Abhav Kumar, Ld. Counsel has filed vakalatnama on behalfof the respondent No.4. He seeks and is given six weeks time tofile the counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been served but no one hasentered appearance on their behalf. They shall be at liberty tofile the counter affidavit within a period of six weeks, in casethey intend to do so. 15ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB The learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 3, 5 and6 within a period of three weeks. List again on 8.10.2014. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarMg
JITEM NO.15 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in LPANo.423/2004 dated 13/07/2007 in CWP No.2475/1982,LPANo.423/2004,RA No.5/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refilingSLP and prayer for interim relief and office report)(For final disposal)Date: 25/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. (NP) Ms. Anubha Aggarwal, Adv. For Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It has been pointed out that an appeal before this Court is pending challenging the validity and vires of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Haryana Amendment Act, 1996 and the question involved herein also is whether the Shamlat Deh land can be allowed to be allotted by the State in favour of the displaced persons/ allottee. Insofar as the validity of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Haryana Amendment Act, 1996 is concerned, the High Court has already upheld the validity as a consequence of which, Shamlat Deh land is permissible to be allotted to the displaced persons. ...2/- -2- However, it is informed that an appeal against thesaid judgment and order of the High Court, upholding theamendment, is pending in this Court bearing Special LeavePetition (C) No.24224 of 2010 i.e. Gram Panchayat ofVillage Kum-Kalan vs. State of Punjab & Ors., which ispending disposal. Since the implication of the same is that it willgovern the controversy in this case also, we deem itappropriate that this special leave petition be tagged tobe heard along with SLP(C) No.24224 of 2010. (Neetu Khajuria) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar
b8ITEM NO.8 Court No.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.4816/1996 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)
SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4128-4129/2012(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8111 of 2013(With office report)Date: 24/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor the parties: Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prem Nath Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Seeraj Bagga, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. Mr. Sureshtha Bagga, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhashish Bhowmick, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. K.G. Bhagat, Adv. Ms. Neha Jain, Adv. Dr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Ganesh, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Ajmani, Adv. Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv. Ms. Aarti Shakalya, Adv. Ms. Poonam Mutreja, Adv. Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shridhar Y. Chitale, Adv. Mr. Vivek Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.State of Haryana Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Ms. Nupur Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh Chikkara, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. Mr. M.K. Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv.
Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Dileep Pillai, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tenzing T, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kapur, AAG Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Faktim Gogoi, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Alok Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Arya, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia, Adv. Ms. S. Janani, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents in all special leave petitions returnable in four weeks. In addition to normal mode of service, Dasti service is permitted. Registry may take appropriate steps and give the notices to the Advocates-on-Record concerned. In SLP(C) No. 25614/2010, I.A. No. 4 of 2013 is allowed. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Assistant Registrar |
SECTION IV B Listed on 11-3-2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 10 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 13 PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 959-960 OF 2009. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS NOS. 1-3 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLPs) Gram Panchayat Village Kherari ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 9.1.2009, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. Let such notice be served on the learned Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana”. It is submitted that there are 8 respondents. R espondent nos. 1 and 2 are represented through Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate and have filed Counter Affidavit. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate is representing Respondent NO.3 and has also filed counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 4 to 8 are served by dasti service vide Ld. Registrar's Order dated 21.4.2009 but they have not chosen to enter appearance. Copies of both Counter Affidavits have already been included in the SLP paper books. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matters above mentioned were lastly listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23-9-2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- " Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, counsel for the respondent has circulated a letter praying for adjournment on the ground that she is indisposed. L ist after a week on a non-miscellaneous day.” The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
Dated this the 10th day of March , 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ckm
ITEM NO.MM-3 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.5417/1997of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for correction and prayer for interim relief andoffice report)Date: 15/01/2014 This Petition was MENTIONED today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Jha, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on any Tuesday in the month of February, 2014, before the appropriate Bench.|(Chetan Kumar) | |(Savita Sainani) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |
âITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURACONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 336 OF 2012 IN SLP(C) 11213/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 08/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghvendra Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Devanshu Kumar, Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for therespondent Nos.1 to 3 and the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.5 to 8are present. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 has stated that thesaid respondents have already filed the counter affidavit. The learned Advocate, Mr. Devanshu Kumar, appearing on behalf of Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate-on-Record for the respondent Nos.5 to 8 hasstated that the said respondentsItem No.33 -2-have also filed the counter affidavit. Office shall verify the positionand report accordingly. List again on 7.2.2014.| | | (M.K. HANJURA) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
¶:ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24739/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUSFINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report ) SLP(C)No.25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE MR. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS M.P. JHA MR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.26787/2010 FAQIR CHAND & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.27490/2010 NARESH KUMAR MR. BALBIR SINGHGUPTA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA SLP(C)No.26806/2010 HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. PRAVEENSWARUP MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.26918/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILL. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR KADIANA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.26920/2010 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. PRAVEENSWARUP MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.26921/2010 GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA MR. RAJINDER MATHUR & ORS. MS. KAVEETA WADIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. JAGJIT SINGHCHHABRA SLP(C)No.35087/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT,HAMIDPUR THRU MR. RAJINDER MATHUR ITS SARPANC MR. P.N. GUPTA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. SLP(C)No.11831/2011 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. MR. SHREE PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. MR. GAGAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.13653/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT BASAUDI MR. SATYENDRA KUMAR Vs. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER MR. ABHAY KUMAR & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA SLP(C)No.25383-25384/2011 MEWA SINGH MR. A.S. PUNDIR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. contd.......2
ITEM NO.14 -2- SLP(C)No.30979/2011 MR. RAHUL GUPTA GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE UCHABET MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. SLP(C)No.34114/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE MR. RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL DHUNDIANWALA MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS SLP(C)No.4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL. MR. K.S. RANA TAMNOWALI MR. ABHIJAT P.MEDH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA MR. BHASKAR Y.KULKARNI MR. ANIL KUMARTANDALE MR. BALBIR SINGHGUPTA, SLP(C)No.6505/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT MR. ANKUR MITTAL Vs. RAM SARUP & ORS. MR. BALBIR SINGHGUPTA SLP(C)No.6533/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT MR. ANKUR MITTAL Vs. NITI SEN BHATIA AND ORS MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA SLP(C)No.4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH MS.JYOTIMENDIRATTA Vs. STATE OFHARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.8111/2013 G.T.B.SAHIB CHARITABLE MR. S.K. SABHARWAL HOSPITAL SOCITY MR. ABHAY KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.Date: 18/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr.Shree Pal Singh,adv. Mr.Avneesh Garg,adv. Mr.R.P.Goel,adv. Mr.Abdul Wadud,adv. Mr.Subramonium Prasad,adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv. Mr.S.K.Sabharwal,adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr.Gagan Gupta,adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv. Mr.Vishal Mahajan,adv. Contd.......3
ITEM NO.14 -3- Mr.M.P.Jha,adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.R.K.Pandey,adv. Mr.Jagjit Singh Chhabra,adv. Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. Mr.Praveen Swarup,adv. Mr.Shridhar Y.Chitale,adv. Mr.Abhijat P.Medh,adv. Mr.P.N.Gupta,adv. Mrs.Bharti Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.4915/12 respondent No.13 clarifies that by last order it was recorded that his client adopts the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.14, which is not correct. According to him respondent No.13 has filed the counter affidavit which is being adopted by respondent No.14 and not vice versa. This is recorded. In SLP(C) No.25614/10, 26787/10 and 4915/12 the substitution applications are defective. The respective petitioners are directed to cure the defects in the substitution application. In SLP(C) No.26787/10 the 14th petitioner is reported to be dead. Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks time to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner. In SLP(C) No.26921/10 it is reported that respondent No.6 has died and the petitioner proposes to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.6. Contd.....4 ITEM NO.14 -4- In all other matters, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The respective petitioners are directed to take steps to issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents. List the matter on 6.12.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
àITEM NO.202 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in LPA No.423/2004 dated13/07/2007 in CWP No.2475/1982,LPA No.423/2004,RA No.5/2007 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and prayerfor interim relief and office report)(For Final Disposal)Date: 23/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.(NP) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, counsel for the respondent has circulated a letter praying for adjournment on the ground that she is indisposed. List after a week on a non-miscellaneous day. |(Neetu Khajuria) |(S.S.R. Krishna) ||Sr.P.A. |Court Master |
nITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 336 OF 2012 IN SLP(C) 11213/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 06/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on all the contemnors and vakalatnama has been filed. They are granted time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 18.11.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
SECTION IV B Listed on 23-8-2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.12 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 206 PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 959-960 OF 2009. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS NOS. 1-3 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLPs) Gram Panchayat Village Kherari ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 9.1.2009, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. Let such notice be served on the learned Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana”. It is submitted that there are 8 respondents. R espondent nos. 1 and 2 are represented through Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate and have filed Counter Affidavit. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocate is representing Respondent NO.3 and has also filed counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 4 to 8 are served by dasti service vide Ld. Registrar's Order dated 21.4.2009 but they have not chosen to enter appearance. Copies of both Counter Affidavits have already been included in the SLP paper books. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matters above mentioned were lastly listed before the Hon'ble Court on 7.2.2011, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- " Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit. Accordingly, let these petitions be treated as ready and be listed for final disposal at an early date.” The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
Dated this the 21st day of August ,2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ckm
¨ITEM NO.206 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in LPA No.423/2004 dated13/07/2007 in CWP No.2475/1982,LPA No.423/2004,RA No.5/2007 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andprayer for interim relief and office report)(For final disposal)Date: 23/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Anubha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Naresh Bakshi, Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG Mrs. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Anit Antil, Adv. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the respondent, list after one week. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
z%ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24739/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUSFINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C)NOS.25614, 26787, 27490, 26806, 26918, 26920, 26921, 35087/2010,11213, 11831, 13653, 25383-25384, 30979, 34114/2011, 4915, 6505, 6533 &4128-4129/2012Date: 13/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr.Abdul Wadud Aman,adv. Mr.Subramonium Prasad,adv. Mr.Rajinder Mathur,adv. Mr.Balbir Singh Gupta,adv. Mrs.Vipin Gupta,adv. Mr.Satyendra Kumar,adv. Mr.A.S.Pundir,adv. Mr.Rahul Gupta,adv. Mr.Rahul singh Chauhan,adv. Mr.R.P.Goyal,adv. Mr.K.S.Rana,adv. Mr.U.C.Mittal,adv. Mr.Ankur Mittal,adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,adv. Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr.Shreepal Singh,adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Contd....2ITEM NO.10 -2- Mr.M.P.Jha,adv. Ms.Kaveeta Wadia,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr.Praveen Swarup,adv. Mr.Jagjit Singh Chhabra,adv.
Mr.Yash Pal Dhingra,adv. Ms.Bharti Gupta,adv. Mr.P.N.Gupta,adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,adv. Mr.Atul Kumar,adv. Mr.S.K.Verma,adv. Mr.Shree Pal Singh,adv. Mr.Shridhar Y.Chitale,adv. Mr.Abhijat P.Medh,adv. Mr.Vikas Mahajan,adv. Mr.Bhaskar Y.Kulkarni,adv. Mr.Anil Kr.Tandale,adv. Mr.Balbir Singh Gupta,adv. Mr.Ankur Mittal,adv. Ms.Neetu Jain,adv. Mr.Abhay Kumar,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Mr.M.K.Ghosh,adv. Ms.S.Janani,adv. Mr.Imran Ahmad Abbasi,adv. Mr.Gagan Gupta,adv. Contd....3ITEM NO.10 -3- Mr.Shubham Bhalla,adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.11213/11 service is complete. No further steps. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In all other matters, service is incomplete. The respective petitioners are directed to take fresh steps against the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.26920/10 the petitioner No.27 is reported to be dead. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps to bring the Lrs. on record. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 the substitution application is defective. The applicant is granted four weeks time to cure the defects in the substitution application. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 Ld.counsel for respondent No.13 submits that respondent No.14 has filed counter affidavit which is adopted by respondent No.13. This is recorded. In SLP(C) No.26787 and 26921/2010 Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.6 has died and the details of the lrs. have been furnished. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps to bring the Lrs. on record. In SLP(C) No.11831/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks dasti notice against the unserved respondents. Permitted. Issue dasti. Await. List the matter on 18.10.2013.
| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
^ITEM NO.37[CHAMBER] COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (CQivil) No(s).8111/2013(From the judgment and order dated 12/03/2012 in CWP No.16100/2006 IN LPANo.174/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)G.T.B.SAHIB CHARITABLE HOSPITAL SOCIETY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 17/07/2013 This Petition was called on for default today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following|O R D E R ||Delay of 32 days in filing the process fee and spare copies is condoned. || ||[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |
¦:ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24739/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUSFINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report ) SLP(C)No.25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE MR. SUBRAMONIUMPRASAD IVB A/N-H Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS MR. M.P. JHA MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA SLP(C)No.26787/2010 FAQIR CHAND & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR IVB A/N-H Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MS. KAVITA WADIA SLP(C)No.27490/2010 NARESH KUMAR MR. BALBIR SINGHGUPTA IVB A/N-H Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA SLP(C)No.26806/2010 HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR IVB A/N-H Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP SLP(C)No.26918/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILL. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR IVB A/N-H KADIANA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MS. KAVITA WADIA SLP(C)No.26920/2010 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. MR. RAJINDERMATHUR IVB A/N-H Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP MS. KAVITA WADIA SLP(C)No.26921/2010 GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA MR. RAJINDER MATHUR IVB A/N-H & ORS. MS. KAVITA WADIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. JAGJIT SINGHCHHABRA SLP(C)No.35087/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT,HAMIDPUR THRU MR. RAJINDERMATHUR IVB A/N-O ITS SARPANC MR. P.N. GUPTA 99,109, 0 S.(3505)Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. SLP(C)No.11213/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI DR. (MRS.) VIPIN GUPTA IVB A/N-O KOHRI MS.JYOTI MENDIRATTA 99,109, 0 S.(3505)Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA MS. S. JANANI MR. S.K. VERMA, SLP(C)No.11831/2011 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. MR. SHREE PAL SINGH IVB A/N-O Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. MR. GAGAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.13653/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT BASAUDI MR. SATYENDRA KUMAR IVB A/N-H Vs. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER MR. ABHAY KUMAR 99,109, 0 S.(1807) & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
contd......2ITEM NO.10 -2- SP(C)No.25383-25384/2011 MEWA SINGH MR. A.S. PUNDIR IVB A/N-O Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. 99,109, 0 S.(3505) (WITH OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C)No.30979/2011 MR. RAHUL GUPTA IVB A/N-H GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE UCHABET MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP 99,109, 0 S.(3505)Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF 2ND LISTING AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C)No.34114/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE MR. RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL IVB A/N-H DHUNDIANWALA MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR DISCHARGE OF SLP(C)No.4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL. MR. K.S. RANA IVB A/N-O TAMNOWALI MR. ABHIJAT P. MEDH 99,109, 0 S.(3505)Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA MR. BHASKAR Y.KULKARNI MR. ANIL KUMARTANDALE MR. BALBIR SINGHGUPTA, SLP(C)No.6505/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT MR. ANKUR MITTAL IVB A/N-H Vs. RAM SARUP & ORS. MR. BALBIR SINGHGUPTA SLP(C)No.6533/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT MR. ANKUR MITTAL Vs. NITI SEN BHATIA AND ORS MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTA SLP(C)No.4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH MS.JYOTIMENDIRATTA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHANGUPTADate: 08/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Divya Shukla,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr.K.S.Rana,adv. Mr.R.P.Nafria,adv. Mr.Abdul Wadud,adv. Mr.Subramonium Prasad,adv. Mr.Avneesh Garg,adv. Mr.R.P.Goyal,adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv. Mr.Vishal Mahajan,adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Contd....3
ITEM NO.10 -3- Mr.Abhijat P.Medh,adv. Ms.Mansi Verma,adv. Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. Mr.Praveen Swarup,adv. Mr.Abhay Kumar,adv. Mrs.Neeta Jain,adv. Mr.Gagan Gupta,adv. Mr.Imran Ahmad,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Mr.Subham Bhalla,adv. Mr.P.N.Gupta,adv. Mrs.Bharti Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.34114/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed an application to discharge the counsel. Office is directed to process and put up. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.9. It is submitted by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner that the counter affidavit filed by the respondents have not been served on him. The respective respondent is directed to serve copy of the counter affidavit on the Ld.counsel for the petitioner. Contd......4 ITEM NO.10 -4- In SLP(C) Nos. 26787/10 and 26921/10 it is submitted by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner that the defects have been cured in all the above matters. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 6.08.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |
SB
öITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 336 OF 2012 IN SLP(C) 11213/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 22/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps have been taken. Notice addressed to respondent 6 has been returned unserved with endorsement "not residing". Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in correct address. The other respondents are awaited. However, it is submitted that advocate Mr. S.K. Verma has been instructed to appear for respondent No. 1 to 3. Seeks four weeks time for filing Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Granted. List the matter on 19.7.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
¨6ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report) ...2/-Item No.13 : 2 :SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4128-4129 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 18/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mrs. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv. Mr. R.P. Nafria,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Abdul Wadud,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. ...3/-Item No.13 : 3 : Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh,Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Varun Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Vivek R. Mohanty,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chawla,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv.
Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. M.K. Ghosh,Adv. Mr./Ms. Janani,Adv. Mr. Atul Jha,Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Jain,Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla,Adv. Ms. Pooja,Adv. ...4/-Item No.13 : 4 : Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.24224/2010 and 6473/2012 service is complete. The last chance granted to the remaining served respondents for filing counter affidavit is over. List the matters before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule. In SLP(C)No.24739/2010 notices addressed to respondent 11 and 12 have been returned unserved. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in correct address. In SLP(C)No.13653/2011 await return of notice of respondent No. 3. In SLP(C)Nos.11831, 30979, 25614, 26918, 26806/2010, 26920, 27490, 35087, 25383 and 25384/2011 and 6533/2012, 6505, 4128-4129/2012 Ld. counsel for the respective petitioners is directed to take fresh steps in correct address. In Contempt Petition No.336/2012 the contemptnor No. 5 to 8 are not served and the notices have been returned. Ld. counsel for the petitioner in the contempt petition is directed to take fresh steps against them in correct address. In SLP(C)No.26787/2010 the substitution application in relation to respondent No.6 is defective. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to cure the defects. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is also directed to take fresh steps against Lrs. of deceased respondent No. 14 as well as respondent No. 17, 27 and 45. In SLP(C)No.26921/2010 the substitution application is defective. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to cure the defects. ...5/- Item No.13 : 5 : In SLP(C)No.4915/2012 counsel for the petitioner has taken steps against the unserved respondents, however, belated by 93 days. Delay
explained. Heard. Allowed. Issue notice. Await return of notice. List the matters on 8.5.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
\ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8111/2013(From the judgement and order dated 12/03/2012 in LPA No.174/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)G.T.B.SAHIB CHARITABLE HOSPITAL SOCITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 25/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status-quo prevailing as on date. Tag with SLP (C) No.24224/2010. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
BITEM NO.12 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.1 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 2951/2013(From the judgement and order dated 12/03/2012 in CWP No.16100/2006,LPANo.174/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFPUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)G.T.B.SAHIB CHARITABLE HOSPITAL SOCITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report )Date: 04/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (IN-CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in refiling special leave petition is condoned. [Geeta Ahuja] [S.S.R. Krishna] Sr.PA Court Master
æ5ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.4 -2-SLP(C) NO. 4128-4129 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 01/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr.R.P.Nafria,adv. Mr. K.S. Rana Mr.Abdul Wadud Aman,adv Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr.Avneesh Garg,adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal Mr. Satyendra Kumar Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Ms.Divya Shukla,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr.Pranav Kr.Jha,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Rahul Gupta Mr. Bharat Bhushan Mr.A.N.Singh,adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv. Contd....3ITEM NO.4 -3-For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. M.P. Jha Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Vivek R.Mohanty,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Parihav Gupta,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Mr. Gagan Gupta Mr.U.P.singh,adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar
Mr.M.K.Ghosh,adv. Ms.S.Janani,adv. Mr.R.K.Pandey,adv. Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.24224/10 and 6473/12 service is complete. The respondent may file counter affidavit within four weeks as a last chance. Contd....4 ITEM NO.4 -4- In SLP(C) No.25614/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps against respondent No.3 within four weeks. In SLP(C) No.26787/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner No.14. Petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 19. It is submitted that the substitution application has been cured. In SLP(C) No.26921/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that the substitution application has been cured. Office is directed to process it accordingly. In SLP(C) No.26806/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps against the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.26920/10 it is reported that petitioner No.27 has expired. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time to bring the Lrs. on record. Petitioner is also directed to take steps against the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 13. In SLP(C) No.27490/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 3 & 4. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.9. In SLP(C) No.4128-4129/12 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time to take steps against the unserved respondent No.5. Contd....5 ITEM NO.4 -5- It is submitted by the petitioner in SLP(C) No.11510/10 that this case ordered to be tagged with the cases listed today and that the above case is not being listed. Office is directed to verify and put up. In all the above cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 18.03.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |
SB
ITEM NO.81 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASI.A. NO.2 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).34114/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for discharge of Advocate-on-Record and prayer for interimrelief and office report ))Date: 16/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr.R.P.Goyal has filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance on behalf of petitioner after obtaining the 'NOC' from the previous counsel Mr.Prashant Chaudhary. Office is directed to update the data. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 6. List the matter on 4.03.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
3ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) contd...2ITEM NO.6 -2-SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4128-4129 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date: 06/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga, Mr.D.P.S.Dagar,adv. Mr. K.S. Rana Mr. Prashant Chaudhary Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr.K.G.Bhagat,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mohd.Yusuf,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Rahul GuptaFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Contd....3ITEM NO.6 -3- Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr. M.P. Jha Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Vivek Mohanty,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh Mr.Akshay Verma,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr.Saurabh Gupta,adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta Ms.Neetu Jain,adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Mr.Vikas Mahajan,adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.24224/10 issue notice in the correct address furnished by the petitioner. In SLP(C) No.13653/11 await return of notice of respondent No.3. The remaining respondents have not filed counter affidavit in spite of last chance granted. Contd...4 ITEM NO.6 -4- In SLP(C) No.1059/11 Ld.counsel for the respondents have not taken steps in spite of last chance granted. However, I am inclined to grant four more weeks time subject to the condition that he takes steps and deposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost within four weeks. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. In SLP(C) No.25383-84/11, 35087/10 and 26787/10 Ld.counsel for the respective petitioners are directed to take fresh steps against the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.26787/10 petitioner to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. of petitioner No.14. In the above case substitution application is defective. Cure the defects. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 await return of notice of respondent No.3. In SLP(C) No.26918/10 respondent Nos.2-5 have filed counter affidavit. Await respondent No.1. The remaining respondents have not filed counter affidavit in spite of last chance granted. In SLP(C) No.26921/10 cure the defects in the substitution application within four weeks as a last chance. In all other remaining cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 01.02.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 3 & 4 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4915/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.5349/1986 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (Appln(s) for impleadment and office report) Date: 07/11/2012 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. For applicants Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice in the I.As. returnable after four weeks. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Indu Bala Kapur ] |
|Court Master | |Court Master |
äITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 336 OF 2012 IN SLP(C) 11213/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. ALLEGED CONTEMNOR/Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prabhoo Dayal Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul KUmar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG Haryana Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up after completion of service. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
pITEM NO.100 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11510/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/02/2011 in LPA No.302/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE SUMRA KHER.TR.PAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSDHANPAT & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 05/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv. (N.P.)For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Eklavya Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Aarti Shaklaya, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, Addl. Adv. Gen. Haryana Mrs. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the petitioner. Petitioner is directed to comply with the defects pointed out by the Registry within four weeks finally.| (GEETA AHUJA) | |(HARJINDER KAUR) ||SR.P.A | |COURT MASTER || | | |
:BITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4128-4129 of 2012(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.10 -2-SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 12/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv.
Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr.D.P.S.Dagar,adv. Mr. K.S. Rana,adv. Mr.Rajesh Kumar,adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary Mr.Varun Tandon,adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr.K.G.Bhagat,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr.Parnav Kr.Jha,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Rahul GuptaFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Contd....3ITEM NO.10 -3- Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. M.P. Jha Mrs.Bharati Gupta,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Shridhar Y.Chitale,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Gagan Gupta Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv. Mr.Satinder S.Gulati,adv. Mrs.Kamaldeep Gulati,adv. Mr.K.K.Malalik,adv. Mr.Jagjit Singh Chhabra,adv. Mr.Mithlesh Kr.Singh,adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.24224/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 8 and 9. In SLP(C) No.24739/10 take fresh steps against respondent Nos.1- 4 and 11-13. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Contd...4 ITEM NO.10 -4- In SLP(C) No.13653/11 take fresh steps against respondent No.3. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.1059/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps against the Lrs. of deceased respondent Nos. 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 12. Petitioner to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 1 and 13 as a last chance. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) Nos.25383-384/11 petitioner to take steps against respondent Nos. 1,2, 4 and 5. The remaining respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.35087/10 take fresh steps against respondent No.1. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 await respondent No.3. The remaining respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.26787/10 petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 1 and 19. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.26918/10 petitioner to take steps against respondent No.1. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Contd....5 ITEM NO.10 -5- In SLP(C) No.26921/10 the Substitution Application to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.6 is defective. Petitioner is directed to cure the defects. Petitioner shall also take fresh steps against respondent No.1. In SLP(C) No.26806/10 take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 1 & 8. In SLP(C) No.26920/10 petitioner to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 1 & 3. In SLP(C) No. 27490/10 petitioner to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 3 and 4. In SLP(C) No.30979/11 petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4-7, 10 and 11. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 respondent No.9 is reported to be dead. Petitioner is directed to take steps against the legal heirs. Petitioner to take fresh steps in correct address against respondent Nos. 10, 12 and 19-21. Two applications are filed for impleadment, which may be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. In SLP(C) No.34114/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for discharge of advocate which may be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
In all the remaining cases, the respective petitioners are directed to take fresh steps against the respective unserved respondents. Contd....6 ITEM NO.10 -6- In all the above cases, the notices to be served on the State of Punjab may be served on its Standing Counsel and proof may be filed. List the matters on 6.12.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
`ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 336 OF 2012 IN SLP(C)NO. 11213/2011 (For Prel.Hearing)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. Alleged Contemnors/Respondent(s)Date: 28/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Honey Verma,Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Personal appearance of the contemnors/respondents is dispensed with for the present. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master`ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 336 OF 2012 IN SLP(C)NO. 11213/2011 (For Prel.Hearing)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHINDER PAL & ORS. Alleged Contemnors/
Respondent(s)Date: 28/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Honey Verma,Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Personal appearance of the contemnors/respondents is dispensed with for the present. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
º2ITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report) contd.....2ITEM NO.18 -2-SLP(C) NO. 4128-4129 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 05/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr.D.P.S.Dagar,adv. Mr. K.S. Rana Mr. Prashant Chaudhary Mr. Subramonium Prasad Mr.Prabhoo Dayal Tiwari,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr.Mannan Khera,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr.Pranav Kumar Jha,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Rahul Gupta Mr.Varun Tandan,adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. contd....3ITEM NO.18 -3- Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. M.P. Jha Mrs.Bharti Gupta,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Shridhar Y.Chitale,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Gagan Gupta Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.M.K.Ghosh,adv. Ms.S.Janani,adv. Mr.Vishal Mahajan,adv. Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv.
Mohd.Mannan,adv. Mr.D.S.Mahra,adv. Mr.Kamaldeep Gulati,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) Nos.4128-29/12 respondent Nos.1-4 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent No.5. Contd....4 ITEM NO.18 -4- In SLP(C) No.24224/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks time for taking fresh steps in correct address against respondent Nos. 8 and 9. Granted. In SLP(C) No. 11213/11 service is complete. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In SLP(C) Nos.1059/11 respondent Nos. 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 12 are dead. Petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against the Lrs. of deceased respondent. In SLP(C) Nos.26787, 26806, 26918, 26920 and 26921/10 await return of notice of the petitioners in notice on alternative arrangement. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent Nos.4, 10 and 18 in correct address. In SLP(C) Nos. 26806 and 26920/10 notice on alternative arrangement on the petitioners is complete. Petitioners are directed to make alternative arrangement within four weeks as a last chance. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 notice addressed to respondent Nos.10, 12 and 19-21 have been returned unserved. Petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in correct address. Respondent No.9 is reported to have been expired. Petitioner is directed to take steps against the legal heirs. In all other remaining cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List incomplete matters on 12.10.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ÂITEM NO.17 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No.1 InPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).34114/2011(From the judgment and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No.13043/1998 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for withdrawal of SLP and office report)Date: 31/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.(NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the petitioner to press the application for withdrawal of special leave petition. The application for withdrawal of special leave petition is dismissed as not pressed.| (KUSUM SYAL) | |(INDU SATIJA) ||SR.P.A | |COURT MASTER || | | |
\200ITEM NO.19(CHAMBER) COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA No. 1 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).34114/2011(From the judgment and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No. 13043/1998 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Respondent(s)(With application for withdrawal of SLP and office report)Date: 30/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R| ||By order dated 7th May, 2012, the Court had called upon the applicant who ||filed the application to file an affidavit with documents indicating therein||the authority under which he has filed the application for withdrawal. ||No such affidavit has been filed. ||Two weeks' time is granted to the parties to do the needful in the matter. || ||[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[INDU SATIJA] ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |
%ITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.27 -2-SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 23/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.
Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr.Devender Dagar,adv. Mr. K.S. Rana Mr. Prashant Chaudhary Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr.U.C.Mittal,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Rahul Gupta Mr.Dinesh Verma,adv. Mr.Prabhoo Dayal,adv. Mr.P.N.Gupta,adv. Mr.Varun Chaudhary,adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. M.P. Jha Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Saurabh Kapoor,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh contd.....3ITEM NO.27 -3- Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Gagan Gupta Mr. Abhay Kumar Ms.Sandhya Bajaj,adv. Mr.Satinder S.Gulati,adv. Mr.Kamaldeep Gulati,adv. Mr.K.K.Mahalik,adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) Nos.4915/12 and 24224/10 it is submitted that respondents are filing vakalatnama. They are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) Nos. 26787, 26806, 26918, 26920 and 26921/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioners are directed to take steps against the Lrs. of deceased respondent within four weeks.
In all other matters await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 5.09.2012. | |(Sunil Thomas) | | | |Registrar | |SB
^ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 1 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).34114/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for withdrawal of Special Leave Petition and office report)Date: 23/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mrs. Kawaljit Kochar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List next week. The documents directed to be filed vide Order dated 07.05.2012will be filed by next week.| (Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Indu Satija) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |
4ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 1 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).34114/2011GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for withdrawal of Special Leave Petition andoffice report)Date: 07/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application for withdrawal of the Special LeavePetition. The Special Leave Petition has been filed by GramPanchayat Village Dhundianwala. The applicant will file an affidavit with documentsindicating therein the authority under which, he has filed theapplication for withdrawal. List this matter in July, 2012. Any party opposing the prayer for withdrawal may filedocuments to show that the applicant has no such authority. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Madhu Saxena) Sr. P.A. Assistant Registrar
b9ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report) contd...2ITEM NO.25 -2-SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 6473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 07/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir
Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr.Devender P.S.Dagar,adv. Mr. K.S. Rana Mr. Prashant Chaudhary Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr.U.C.Mittal,adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Rahul GuptaFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha Mr.Varun Chaudhary,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta contd....3ITEM NO.25 -3- Mr.Sridhar Y.Chitale,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit singh,adv. Mr.Sanjeev Kumar,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr.Saurabh Gupta,adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.Y.P.Mahajan,adv. Mr.D.S.Mehra,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.26787/10 notice on alternative arrangement was served on all the petitioners except petitioner No.12 and 14. Petitioner No.12 is still awaited. Petitioner No.14 is returned as dead. In the light of the Circular dated 1.09.1995 I feel that no
purpose will be served by awaiting service on alternative arrangement on respondent No.12. Hence the petitioners may make alternative arrangement if any. Service is incomplete against respondent Nos. 1 and 19. Petitioner may take steps thereafter against respondent Nos. 1 and 19. contd....4 ITEM NO.25 -4- In SLP(C) No.26918/10 notice on alternativearrangement has been served on the petitioner. Petitionermay take alternative arrangements. Petitioner also totake steps against unserved respondent No.1. In SLP(C) No.26921/10 notice on alternativearrangement is awaited from the sole petitioner. In thelight of the Circular dated 1.09.1995 I feel that nopurpose will be served by awaiting service on alternativearrangement from the petitioner. Petitioner may makealternative arrangement. Respondent No.6 has died and an application forsubstitution has been filed. The applicant in thesubstitution application is directed to cure the defects. In SLP(C) No.26806/10 notice on alternativearrangement has been served on all the petitioners.Petitioners are directed to take alternativearrangements. They may also take steps against respondentNo.1 and 8 who are unserved. In SLP(C) No.26920/10 notice of alternativearrangement is awaited from respondent Nos. 13, 17, 22and 32. Petitioner No.27 has been returned unserved asdead. The remaining have been served. In the light of theCircular dated 1.09.1995 I feel that no purpose will beserved by awaiting them. They may make alternativearrangement if any. The petitioner also to take stepsagainst the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 13. In SLP(C) No.4915/12 notice has been returned fromrespondent Nos. 5, 7, 10, 12, 16, 19, 20 and 21.Petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in correctaddress. contd....5ITEM NO.25 -5- Notice addressed to respondent No.9 has been returned with an endorsement "expired". Petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against the Lrs. within four weeks. In all other remaining cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 23.07.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
\222'ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report) CONTD....2ITEM NO.36 -2-SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 4915 of 2012(With office report)Date: 30/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir
Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr. K.S. Rana Mr. Subramonium Prasad Mr.Kunal Juneja,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr. Rahul GuptaFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Kunal Juneja,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta contd....3ITEM NO.36 -3- Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Gagan Gupta,adv Mr.Girish Rai,adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.R.K.Pandey,adv. Mr.Kuldip Singh,adv. Mr.Karunakar Mahalik,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.1059/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted three weeks time as a last chance for remitting the process fee and spare copy. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. In SLP(C) No.11831/11 await return of notice of the respondent Nos.1-3. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 notice addressed to respondent Nos.4, 10 and 18 have been returned. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps in correct address. In SLP(C) Nos. 26787, 26806, 26918, 26920 and 26921 of 2010 await return of notice of the petitioners on alternative arrangement.
In SLP(C) No.34114/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an I.A. for withdrawal of the SLP. Office to process it and list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. contd....4 ITEM NO.36 -4- In all other cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 7.05.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
bITEM NO.35 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 15/12/2011 in LPA No.2295/2011of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT Petitioner(s) VERSUSKHUB CHAND AND ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 6505 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6533 of 2012(With appln. for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgmentand with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed in SLP(C)No.6533 of 2012. Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date. Tag with SLP(C)No.24224 of 2010 etc. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4915/2012(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.5349/1986of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 21/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Devender P.S. Dagar, Adv. Mr. R.P. Nafria, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Status-quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP (C) No.24224 of 2010. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
æ8ITEM NO.31 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report) contd....2ITEM NO.31 -2-SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)Date: 15/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Bharat Bhushan,adv. Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.
Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr. Rahul GuptaFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,adv. Mr.Alok Mahajan,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta,adv. Mr.N.K.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Kunal Juneja,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta contd....3ITEM NO.31 -3- Dr. Kailash Chand,adv. Mr.R.K.Pandey,adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Abhay Kumar,adv. Mr.Gagan Gupta,adv. Mr.Saurabh Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.11831/11 respondent no.4 seeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the direction of this Court, the petitioner had remitted the process fee and spare copy prior to 9.01.2012 which could not be brought to the notice of the Court on 9.01.2012. On the above basis, Ld.counsel submits that the order imposing cost was not justified. Office is directed to verify whether the petitioner had remitted the process fee and spare copy as submitted. In SLP(C) No.24224/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that when he went to serve dasti notice issued by the Supreme Court through the Court of Senior Sub Judge, Ludhiana he was informed by the Nazir that the photostat copies of the
summons cannot be accepted and required him to furnish the summons in original with the seal and signature. The photocopies of the summons issued from the Court has been filed along with. Office to verify whether original summons have been issued to the petitioner and if not how it happened. Contd....4ITEM NO.31 -4- In SLP(C) No. 11510/11 Ld.counsel for thepetitioner has not remitted the process fee and sparecopy in spite of last chance granted. However, I aminclined to grant three more weeks time subject to thecondition that he files the process fee/spare copy anddeposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court LegalServices Committee as cost within three weeks. If theabove conditions are not satisfied, list the matterbefore the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If steps are taken, issue notice. Awaitreturn of notice. In SLP(C) No.1059/11 Ld.counsel for the petitionerhas not taken steps to bring on record the Lrs. ofdeceased respondents. Petitioner is granted four weekstime for taking necessary steps. The petitioner hasalso not remitted the process fee and spare copy forissuing notice to respondent Nos. 1 & 13. Petitioner isgranted three more weeks time as a last chance forremitting the process fee and spare copy. In SLP(C) No.26806/10 it is reported thatrespondent No.6 is dead. Petitioner is directed toverify and take steps if any required. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 notice addressed torespondent Nos. 4,10 and 18 have been returnedunserved. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted fourweeks time for taking fresh steps against the unservedrespondents. In SLP(C) No.26787/10 it is reported thatrespondent No.14 has expired. Petitioner to take stepsif any within four weeks. contd....5 ITEM NO.31 -5- In all other remaining cases, the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matter on 30.03.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
ÒITEM NO.25 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 896-897/2012(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.11002/2008and dated 27/08/2010 in CM No.8290/2010 in CWP.No.11002 of 2008 ofThe HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)OM PRAKASH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 23/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications seeking condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Tag with SLP (C) No.24224 of 2010. Status-quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
\212ITEM NO.5 COURT.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 21852/2011(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.5349/1986,of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.TAMNOWALI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report )Date: 13/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD IN CHAMBERSFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Devender P.S.Dagar,Adv. Mr. R.P.Nafria,Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in refiling the SLP is condoned, subject to the deposit of cost of Rs.5000/- with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee within four weeks. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
\,ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)Date: 09/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.Item no.32 -2-For Petitioner(s) Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Ms.Carishma Sehgal,adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar
Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr.Gaurav Maity,adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr.Seeraj Bagga,adv. Mr.Rajinder Mathur,adv. Mrs.D.Bharati Reddy,adv. Mr.Prabhakar Rao,adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Vaibhav Kumar,adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,adv. Mr.Alok Mahajan,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Kunal Juneja,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.Tarun Gupta,adv. Ms.S.Janani,adv. Mr.H.S.Sandhu,adv. Contd...3ITEM NO.32 -3- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.27490/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time as a last chance for taking steps against respondent Nos. 3 & 4. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await. In SLP(C) No. 29291/10 service is complete. Respondent Nos.2-6, 12 and 13 have filed counter affidavit. No further steps. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 notice addressed to respondent Nos. 4, 10 and 18 have been returned. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps in correct address. In SLP(C) No.11831/11 petitioner has not remitted the process fee and spare copy in spite of last chance granted. However, I am inclined to grant two more weeks time subject to the condition that he takes steps and deposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost within two weeks. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non- prosecution. In SLP(C) No.11510/11 petitioner is granted four more weeks time as a last chance for filing the process fee and spare copy. In SLP(C) No.11213/11 petitioner is granted four weeks time as a last chance for remitting the process fee and spare copy for issuing notice to respondent
No.2. Contd...4 ITEM NO.32 -4- The served respondent submit that the copy of the pleadings have not been served. Serve copy of the pleadings and file proof. The above respondents shall file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter. In all other remaining cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matters on 15.02.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
þITEM NO.MM-5C COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).34114/2011(From the judgement and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No.13043/1998of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE DHUNDIANWALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 13/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr. Naresh G.Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on Board. Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date. Tag with SLP(C)No.24224/2010 etc. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
¼+ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report) contd...2ITEM NO.19 -2-Date: 25/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr.Akshat Goel,adv Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga
Ms.Shweta Mazumdar,adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr.Bharat Bhushan,adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Ms.Divya Shukla,adv. Mr. Vineet BhagatFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr. M.P. Jha Mr.Alok Mahajan,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Pardeep Gupta,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Abhay Kumar Mr.Atul Kumar,adv. Mr.Prashant Shukla,adv. Contd....3ITEM NO.19 -3- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.29291/10 service is complete. Respondent Nos.2-6, 12-13 have filed counter affidavit. No request for counter affidavit from any of the remaining respondents. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In SLP(C) No.27490/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps against respondent Nos. 3 & 4. In SLP(C) No. 25614/10 vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 & 7. They are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Ld.counsel seeks dasti against the unserved respondents. Granted. Issue dasti. In SLP(C) No. 1059/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking steps against the Lrs. of deceased respondents. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for remitting the process fee and spare copy for issuing notice to the unserved respondents. It is submitted that advocate Mr.Y.P.Dhingra has filed vakalatnama on behalf of some of the respondents. However, his name is not being shown. Office to update the data. In SLP(C) No.24224/10 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks dasti against the unserved
respondents. Granted. Issue dasti. contd...4 ITEM NO.19 -4- In SLP(C) No.11831/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted three weeks time as a last chance for remitting the process fee and spare copy. In all the above cases, served respondents are granted four more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 9.01.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
\216ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30979/2011(From the judgement and order dated 06/09/2011 in CWP No.13042/1998of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE UCHABET Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 25/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr. V.K. Gaur,Adv. Mr. Vivek K. Thakur,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is allowed. Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date. Tag with SLP(C)No.24224 of 2010. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
0ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report) contd...2ITEM NO.30 -2-Date: 19/10/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Ms.Shweta Mohta,adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr.Bharat Bhushan,adv.
Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr.Gaurav Maity,adv. Mr. Vineet BhagatFor Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,adv. Mr.Alok Mahajan,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta Mr.Akshay Verma,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Pardeep Gupta,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Ms.Sudha Pal,adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Abhay Kumar UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R contd...3ITEM NO.30 -3- In SLP(C) No. 24224/10 await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.24739/10 all the respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit as a last chance. In SLP(C) No.13653/11 respondent Nos.4-13 are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.11213/11 await return of notice of the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.11510/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking steps against the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.1. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.11831/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps against the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.35087/10 await return of notice of respondent No.1. Respondent Nos.2-6 have filed counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.1059/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time as a last chance for taking steps against the Lrs. of deceases respondent. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has not remitted the process fee and spare copy in spite of last chance granted. However, I am inclined to grant two more weeks time subject to the condition that he remits the process fee and spare copy and deposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost within two weeks. Contd.....4
ITEM NO.30 -4- If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non- prosecution. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. In SLP(C) No.26787 and 26921/10 petitioner is granted four weeks time as a last chance for curing the defects in the application for substitution. Respondent is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 and connected cases petitioner is granted four weeks time as a last chance for taking steps against the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.29291/10 service is complete. Respondent Nos.2-5 are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing the counter affidavit. List the matters on 25.11.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
"ITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)Date: 13/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel,Adv. ..2/-Item No.45 : 2 : Mrs. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Carishma Sehgal,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv.
Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Maity,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Alok Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chawla,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Ms. Sudha Pal,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Y.P. Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.11510/2011 counsel for the petitioner granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps against Lrs. of respondent No. 1. ..3/- Item No.45 : 3 : In SLP(C)No.1059/2011 counsel for the petitioner granted two weeks time as a last chance for remitting process fee and spare copy of the pleadings. In SLP(C)No.26787 and 26921/2010 Ld. counsel for the petitioner granted four weeks time for curing the defects in the substitution application. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Advocate Mr. Y.P. Dhingra submits that his name is not being shown. Update the data. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matters on 19.10.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar"ITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )
WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010(With office report)Date: 13/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel,Adv. ..2/-Item No.45 : 2 : Mrs. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Carishma Sehgal,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Maity,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Alok Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chawla,Adv.
Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Ms. Sudha Pal,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Y.P. Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.11510/2011 counsel for the petitioner granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps against Lrs. of respondent No. 1. ..3/- Item No.45 : 3 : In SLP(C)No.1059/2011 counsel for the petitioner granted two weeks time as a last chance for remitting process fee and spare copy of the pleadings. In SLP(C)No.26787 and 26921/2010 Ld. counsel for the petitioner granted four weeks time for curing the defects in the substitution application. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Advocate Mr. Y.P. Dhingra submits that his name is not being shown. Update the data. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matters on 19.10.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
HITEM NO.22 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 14024-14025/2011(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 & 21.1.2011 inCWP No.14110/2008 and RP No.207/2010 in WP No. 14110 of 2008 ofThe HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)MEWA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refilingSLP, exemption from filing Certified copy and office report)Date: 02/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Manonj Swarup,Adv. Mr. Ashish Mohan,Adv. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop,Adv. Mr. A.S. Pundir,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date. Tag with SLP(C)No. 24224 of 2010. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
f ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)With In SLP(C)Nos.26787, 27490, 26806, 26918, 26920, 26921,29291/2010, 1059,/2011, 35087/2010, 11213, 11831, 13653 and11510/2011Date: 02/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shweta Mazumdar,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh,Adv. Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Aftab ali Khan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Ms. Sudha Pal,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chauhan,Adv. ..2/Item No.59 : 2 : Mr. P.N. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Alok Mahajan,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Surjeet K. Murty,Adv. Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Keshav K. Choudhary,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C)No.26787 and 26921/2010 respondent No.6 is reported to be dead. Ld. counsel for respondent No.1 has filed an application for substitution. Office to process it. In SLP(C)No.11510/2011 Ld. counsel for respondent No. 2 to 7 submits that respondent No.1 is no more. Details of the the Lrs. has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to take steps against the Lrs. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the pleadings within two weeks to the counsel for respondent No. 2 to 7 and file proof. In SLP(C)No.11213/2011 counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply complete set of the pleadings within two weeks to Ms. Jyoti Mendirata, advocate who has filed Vakalatnama for some of the respondents In SLP(C)No.1059/2011 counsel for the petitioner granted two weeks time as a last chance for remitting process fee and spare copy of the pleadings. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. Served respondents may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. It is submitted that State of Haryana and State of Punjab have not been served with copy of the pleadings. ..3/- Item No.59 : 3 : Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the pleadings within two weeks to the standing counsel for the respective States in respective matters and file proof. List the matters on 13.9.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
¼ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C)NOS.26787, 27490, 26806, 26918, 26920, 26921, 29291 OF2010 AND SLP(C)NOS.1059/11, 35087/10, 11213/11Date: 05/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr.Shish pal,adv. Mr.Balbir Singh Gupta,adv. Mr.Adarsh Ganesh,adv. Mr.Sureshta Bagga,adv. Dr.(Mrs.)Vipin Gupta,adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Naveen Kumar Chauhan,adv. Mr.Praveen Swarup,adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr.Alok Mahajan,adv. Mr.P.N.Gupta,adv. Ms.Kavita Wadia,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of unserved respondents in all the incomplete matters. Contd....2 ITEM NO.62 -2- Ld.counsel for the petitioner in each of the case is granted four weeks time as a last chance for taking steps against the respective unserved respondents. List the matter on 2.08.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
´ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11510/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/02/2011 in LPA No. 302/2011of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE SUMRA KHER.TR.PAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSDHANPAT & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 13/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP(C)No. 24224 of 2010. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
PITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13653/2011(From the judgement and order dated 08/03/2011 in LPA No. 415/2011of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT BASAUDI Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim reliefand office report)Date: 13/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivekta Singh,Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP(C)No. 24224 of 2010. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
\236ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11831/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in CWP No. 7926/2010of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 09/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. G.S. Ghuman,Adv. Mr. Akshat Goel,Adv. Ms. Ishita Sehgal,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on date. Tag with SLP(C)No. 24739 of 2010. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
àITEM NO.17 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 6311/2011(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.3722/1997 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE CHHOTI KOHRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refilingSLP and office report)Date: 15/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma,Adv. Mr. Jasmer Chand,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP(C)No. 24224 of 2010 etc. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.P.A. Court Master
àITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)SLP(C)Nos.26797, 27490, 26806, 26918, 26920, 26921, 29291/2010,1059/2011 and 35087/2010Date: 15/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajat Khattry,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh,Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Ms. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar,Adv. Mr. Praaveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Chawla,Advd. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. Mrs. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the petitioner granted time till 5.7.2011 as a last chance for taking steps against Lrs. of deceased respondent. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matters on 5.7.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
\230ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)With SLP(C)Nos.26787, 27490, 26806, 26918, 26920, 26921, 29291/210,1059/2011 and 35087/2010Date: 08/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mrs. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Rajat Khattry,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. N.K. Chauhan,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. Served respondents granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. ..2/- Item No.61 : 2 : It was submitted on last occasion that in SLP(C)No.26787 and 26921/2010 Mr. Rajinder Singh, respondent has expired and petitioners in above cases were directed to take fresh steps against the Lrs.of the above respondent, if required. Granted four weeks time as a last chance for taking steps, if any. It is further submitted that in SLP(C)No.1059/2011 respondent No.4,5, 8, 9, 10 and 12 have expired. Ld. counsel for the petitioner therein granted four weeks time for taking steps against Lrs. of the above respondents. List the matters on 15.4.2011.
(SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
\ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.959-960/2009(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in RA No. 5/2007& LPA No. 423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 of The HIGH COURT OFPUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refilingSLP and prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 07/02/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. Anubha Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit. Accordingly, let these petitions be treated as ready and be listed for final disposal at an early date. (Anita Malhotra) (Juginder Kaur) Sr.PA Court Master
þITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 01/02/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr.Rajat Khattry,adv. Mr.Balbir Singh Gupta,adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.Sanjeev Kr.adv. Mr.Praveen Swarup,adv. Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted on behalf of Mr.Praveen Swarup,advocate that vakalatnama is not being filed on behalf of the private respondents as submitted on last occasion. File vakalatnama. It is submitted by Mr.Praveen Swarup that one of the respondent Mr.Rajinder Singh has expired. If that be so, contd....2 ITEM NO.46 -2- petitioner may take fresh steps, if any against the Lrs. of deceased respondents. Await return of notice of the remaining respondents. List the matter on 8.03.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
ðITEM NO.14 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 19732/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in LPA No. 64/2006of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 06/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Bali, Adv. Mr.Randhir Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr.Seeraj J. Bagga, Adv. Mrs. Sureshta Bagga,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained, in the meanwhile. Tag with SLP (C) No.24224 of 2010. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
ÖITEM NO.94 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)With SLP(C)Nos.26787, 27490,26806,26918, 26920, 26921 and 29291/2010Date: 15/12/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jasneet Chandoke,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Sureshta Bagga,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Naveen Kr. Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted that Mr. Praveen Swarup, Advocate proposes to appear for the private respondents in SLP(C)Nos.26787, 27490, 26806, 26918, 26920 and 26921/2010. It is submitted on behalf of the above counsel that he has not received copy of the pleadings. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of the pleadings within two weeks to the counsel for respondents. They shall file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks thereafter. ..2/- Item No.94 : 2 : Await return of notice of the remaining respondents. All other served respondents in each of the case are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit, if any. List the matters on 1.2.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
\234ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 18272/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.15244/1997 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT,HAMIDPUR THRU ITS SARPANC Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 06/12/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Seeraj Bagga,Adv. Mrs. Sureshta Bagga,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. Tag with SLP(C)No.24224 of 2010. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.P.A. Court Master
˜ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C)NO.26787/10, 27490/10,26806/10, 26918/10, 26920/10,AND26921/10Date: 15/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Jaspeet Kaur,adv. Mrs.Sureshta Bagga,adv. Mr.Balbir Singh Gupta,adv. Mr.Shish Pal Lalrer,adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr.K.M.Gupta,adv. Mr.Vivekta Singh,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File is not received. List the matter on 09.12.2010. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29291/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No.17722/1996 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILLAGE MIONWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 25/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Adarsh Ganesh, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with SLP ) No.24739 of 2010. In the meanwhile, status quo prevailing as on date, shall be maintained. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
$ITEM NO.27 + 56 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25614/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 5417/1997of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14847 of 2010(With appln.for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 20/09/2010 This Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv. Mr.Prem Nath Aggarwal, Adv. Mrs. Sureshta BaggaFor Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjeev Walia, Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. ...2/- :2: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP © No.24224 of 2010. Status-quo prevailing as on date shallbe maintained.[ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ]
Court Master Court Master
BITEM NO.20+38 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 4816/1996of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 01/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.D. Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.K.G. Bhagat,Adv. Mrs. Manju Bhagat,Adv. Mr.Manohar Singh Bakshi,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Status quo prevailing as on date shall be maintained. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr. PA Court Master
8ITEM NO.48 Court No.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in RA No. 5/2007 & LPANo. 423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP andprayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 01/09/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Anubha Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr. V.K.Jhanji, Sr. Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. Astha, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, which is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, further four weeks' time is granted for filing rejoinder affidavit.(Sheetal Dhingra) (Juginder Kaur) Court Master Court Master
æITEM NO.60 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)959-960/2009(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 & 13/07/2007 inRA No. 5/2007 & LPA No. 423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 05/04/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG. Ms. Anubha Agrawal, Adv.R1&2 Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having regard to the letter circulated on behalf of the respondents, four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit; rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Sheetal Dhingra) (Juginder Kaur) Court Master Court Master
6ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLPDate: 04/12/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sugam Seth,Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete. Counsel for respondent No.1 appears and seeks further time to file counter affidavit. Four weeks time granted as a last chance. Thereafter, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar
ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)Date: 03/11/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sugam Seth,Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr.Gaurav Teotia,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete on all the respondents. The respondents who have appeared may file their counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks. List the matter on 4.12.2009. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar
ÂaITEM NO.55 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLPDate: 08/09/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Teotia, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice on the respondents is complete. The standingcounsel appears for the State of Haryana and seeks time to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit. The counsel for the petitioneris directed to supply copy of the pleadings to the counsel for therespondent within two weeks. List the matter on 3-11-09. (Ashok Menon)aa Registrar
zITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB SUPR EME COUR T OF I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP)Date: 11/08/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Await service of notice on the respondents. List the matter on 8.9.2009. (ASHOK MENON) Registrar
:ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB SUPR EME COUR T OF I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLPDate: 16/07/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER The counsel for the petitioner is directed to comply with the Office Reportregarding non-payment of Process fee and await service of notice on theRespondents. List the matter on 11-08-09. (Ashok Menon)aa Registrar
"ITEM NO.123 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).959-960/2009GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)Date: 21/04/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Fresh notice upon unserved respondents by registered post A.D. Dasti service in addition is allowed as prayed for which is permitted to be served through the standing counsel so far as State authorities are concerned. Petitioner may take help of the nearest civil court/trial court for confirming dasti service upon unserved respondents so far a private parties are concerned. For the purpose, copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned civil court/trial court. The Process Server of the concerned court is directed to affix the notice at the given address; if it could not be served in due course and to file proper report as provided under the Code of Civil Procedure. List the matter on 16.7.2009. (S.G.SHAH) Registrar
\206ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2008 CC 5666-5667/2008(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 & 13/07/2007 in RANo. 5/2007 & LPA No. 423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)With I.A. No.1 (C/delay in filing SLP)Date: 09/01/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. Let such notice be served on the learned Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana. (Ganga Thakur) (Juginder Kaur)P.S. to Registrar Court Master
òITEM NO.55 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2008 CC 5666-5667/2008(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 & 13/07/2007 in RANo. 5/2007 & LPA No. 423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 01/09/2008 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJUFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Let the matter be adjourned for a period of four weeks for the present. (Sheetal Dhingra) (Vijay Dhawan) Court Master Court Master
>ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2008 (CC 5666-5667/2008)(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in LPA No. 423/2004 & impugned judgment andorder dt.13.07.2007 in RA No. 5/2007 in LPA No.423/2004 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &dHARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and refiling SLP)Date: 05/05/2008 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARUN CHATTERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHALFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Neeraj Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr.Bharat Singh, Adv. Mr.Umang Shankar, Adv. Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER List two weeks after summer vacation for taking fresh instructions.( Satish K.Yadav ) ( Phoolan Wati Arora ) Court Master Court Master
¾ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2008 CC 5666-5667/2008(From the judgement and order dated 21/08/2006 in RA No. 5/2007 & LPA No.423/2004 & CWP No. 2475/1982 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KHERRARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)With I.A. No.1 (C/delay in filing SLP)Date: 28/04/2008 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jain,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Singh,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Chaturvedi,Adv. Mr. Umang Shankar,Adv. Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER List on 5.5.2008. (Ganga Thakur) (Radha R. Bhatia) P.S. to Registrar Court Master
ZIT E M NO.2 3 COURT NO.1 2 S EC T I O N IV B S UP R E M E COUR T OF I N D I A R ECO R D OF P R OC E E D I N G SPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../ 2 0 0 8 CC 5 6 6 6 - 5 6 6 7 / 2 0 0 8(From the judgement and order dated 2 1 / 0 8 / 2 0 0 6 in RA No. 5/ 2 0 0 7 & L P A No.4 2 3 / 2 0 0 4 & CW P No. 2 4 7 5 / 1 9 8 2 of The HIGH COUR T OF PUN J A B &HA R Y A N A AT CHAN DI G A R H)GRA M PA NC H A Y A T VI L L A G E KH E R R A R I Petitioner(s) VE R S U SSTA T E OF HAR Y A N A AND ORS Respondent(s)WI T H I.A. No. 1(Appln. for c/delay in filing SL P and c/delay in refiling SL P )Date: 2 1 / 0 4 / 2 0 0 8 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORA M : HON'B L E MR. JUS T I C E ALT A M A S KA B I R HON'B L E DR. JUS T I C E MUKUN D A K A M SHA R M AFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Ku m a r Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Ugra Shan k a r P r a s a d,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following OR D E R Let this matter stands over till next Monday to enable the petitioner to file copies of the relevant enactments. (Pooja Arora) (P.S. Tyagi) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ZIT E M NO.2 3 COURT NO.1 2 S EC T I O N IV B S UP R E M E COUR T OF I N D I A R ECO R D OF P R OC E E D I N G SPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../ 2 0 0 8 CC 5 6 6 6 - 5 6 6 7 / 2 0 0 8(From the judgement and order dated 2 1 / 0 8 / 2 0 0 6 in RA No. 5/ 2 0 0 7 & L P A No.4 2 3 / 2 0 0 4 & CW P No. 2 4 7 5 / 1 9 8 2 of The HIGH COUR T OF PUN J A B &HA R Y A N A AT CHAN DI G A R H)GRA M PA NC H A Y A T VI L L A G E KH E R R A R I Petitioner(s) VE R S U SSTA T E OF HAR Y A N A AND ORS Respondent(s)WI T H I.A. No. 1(Appln. for c/delay in filing SL P and c/delay in refiling SL P )Date: 2 1 / 0 4 / 2 0 0 8 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORA M : HON'B L E MR. JUS T I C E ALT A M A S KA B I R HON'B L E DR. JUS T I C E MUKUN D A K A M SHA R M AFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Ku m a r Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Ugra Shan k a r P r a s a d,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following OR D E R Let this matter stands over till next Monday to enable the petitioner to file copies of the relevant enactments. (Pooja Arora) (P.S. Tyagi) Sr. P.A. Court Master