COMMR.,BANGALORE DEVT.AUTHORITY vs NAGARATHNAMMANNI — SLP(C) No. 6597/2007

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010101242007

Filing Date

05-Apr-2007

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 6597/2007

Diary Number

10124/2007

Order Date

24-Feb-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMR.,BANGALORE DEVT.AUTHORITY

    Adv. VIJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAGARATHNAMMANNI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Jul-2010
  10. 26-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Apr-2010
  12. 02-Feb-2010
  13. 04-Dec-2009
  14. 26-Oct-2009
  15. 17-Jul-2009
  16. 01-May-2009
  17. 17-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 02-Apr-2009
  19. 04-Mar-2009
  20. 02-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 22-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 05-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 25-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 15-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 29-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 24-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 10-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 20-Apr-2007
  29. 05-Apr-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 6597/2007

  30. 12-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 05-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 6597/2007 On 24 February 2014, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition filed by Bangalore Development Authority against respondent Nagarathnammanni. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that BDA can pursue appropriate proceedings against respondents in accordance with law, while clarifying that the question of whether respondents have title or interest in the disputed property may be agitated in an appropriate proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case