\230YITEM NO.3 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.225/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)With S.L.P. (C) No.8594 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.8595 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.14858 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.17684 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal No.4443 of 2011S.L.P. (C) No.13557 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12211 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.18525 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.18371 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.27218 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.11563 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief)S.L.P. (C) No.23046 of 2011(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) ....2/- - 2 -S.L.P. (C) No.13069 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.20242 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.26865 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.15611 of 2010(With office report)
S.L.P. (C) No.25129 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.25130 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.29694 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.35117 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.28584 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.32855 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No 32856 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.17705 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.18335 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.3791 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.3792 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.3070 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.4878 of 2012(With office report) ....3/- - 3 -S.L.P. (C) No.7657 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.6408 of 2011(With appln(s). for c/delay in fling & refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P. (C) No.8758 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.9471 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.9474 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.10961 of 2011(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12035 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12109 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12884 of 2012(With office report)
S.L.P. (C) No.16279 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing & refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P. (C) No.19494 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.19926 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.23460 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing & refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P. (C) No.27789 of 2012(With office report)Date: 25/09/2012 These Matters were called on for hearing today. ....4/- - 4 -CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Anil Gaur,Adv. Mr. C.V.S. Rao,Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. for Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shekhar Naphade,Sr.Adv. Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar, learned counsel, states that he appears on behalf of all the respondents. Therefore, service is complete in all the matters. Heard learned counsel on both sides. Delay condoned. Leave granted. These civil appeals filed by the Department are disposed of with no order as to costs.
[ T.I. Rajput ] [ Indu Satija ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master [Signed order is placed on the file] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6949 OF 2012 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010) Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay ...Appellant(s) Versus Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ...Respondent(s) W I T H Civil Appeal No.6950/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.8594 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6951/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.8595 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6952/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.14858 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6953/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.17684 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6955/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.13557 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6956/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.12211 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6957/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.18525 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6958/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.18371 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6959/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.27218 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6960/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.11563 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6961/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.23046 of 2011, Civil Appeal No.6962/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.13069 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6963/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.20242 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6964/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.26865 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6965/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.15611 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6966/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.25129 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6967/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.25130 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6968/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.29694 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6969/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.35117 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6970/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.28584 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6971/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.32855 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6972/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No 32856 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6973/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.17705 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6974/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.18335 of 2010, Civil Appeal No.6975/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.3791 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6976/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.3792 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6977/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.3070 of 2011,
Civil Appeal No.6978/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.4878 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6980/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.7657 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6981/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.6408 of 2011, Civil Appeal No.6982/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.8758 of 2012, ....2/- - 2 - Civil Appeal No.6983/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.9471 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6984/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.9474 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6985/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.10961 of 2011, Civil Appeal No.6986/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.12035 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6987/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.12109 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6988/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.12884 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6989/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.16279 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6990/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.19494 of 2012, SCivil Appeal No.6991/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.19926 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6992/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.23460 of 2012, Civil Appeal No.6993/2012 @ S.L.P. (C) No.27789 of 2012 and Civil Appeal No.4443 of 2011. O R D E R Heard learned counsel on both sides. Delay condoned. Leave granted. The assessee(s) is a Co-operative Society engaged in the business of production of sugar from sugarcane and sale thereof. Assessee(s) buys sugarcane from its Members. Every month and on Diwali, assessee(s) sells certain quantity of sugar (final product) at concessional rate to farmers/cane growers/Members. The difference between the average price of sugar sold in the market and the price of sugar sold by the assessee(s) to its Members at concessional rate is sought to be taxed by the Department under the Head `Appropriation of Profit'. The question, whether the above difference between the fair market price and the concessional price should or should not be added to the total income of the assessee(s) Society, needs to be re-looked by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [for short, `CIT (A)']. Apart from the afore-stated question, CIT (A) would take into account, whether the above-mentioned practice of selling sugar at concessional rate has become the practice or custom in the Co-operative Sugar Industry?; and whether any Resolution has been passed by the State Government supporting ...2/- - 3 - the practice? The CIT (A) would also consider on what basis the quantity of the final product, i.e., sugar, is being fixed for sale to farmers/cane growers/Members each year on month-to-month basis, apart from Diwali? These are some of the questions which have not been addressed by the Authorities below in the impugned orders. The CIT (A) would be entitled to look into the Accounts and verify the basis for sale of sugar at concessional price on month-to-month basis. We, therefore, keep all questions of law and facts open. Needless to add, the CIT (A) would give liberty to both sides to produce relevant documents. For the above reasons, we remit the cases to CIT (A) to de-novo consider the matter. Accordingly, these civil appeals filed by the Department are
disposed of with no order as to costs. ........................CJI. [S.H. KAPADIA] ..........................J. [MADAN B. LOKUR] New Delhi, September 25, 2012. -tir-
H'ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.225/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)With S.L.P. (C) No.8594 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.8595 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.14858 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.17684 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal No.4443 of 2011S.L.P. (C) No.13557 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12211 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.18525 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.18371 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.27218 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.11563 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief)S.L.P. (C) No.23046 of 2011(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) ....2/- - 2 -S.L.P. (C) No.13069 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.20242 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.26865 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.15611 of 2010(With office report)
S.L.P. (C) No.25129 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.25130 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.29694 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.35117 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.28584 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.32855 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No 32856 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.17705 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.18335 of 2010(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.3791 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.3792 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.3070 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.4878 of 2012(With office report) ....3/- - 3 -S.L.P. (C) No.7657 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.6408 of 2011(With appln(s). for c/delay in fling & refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P. (C) No.8758 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.9471 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.9474 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.10961 of 2011(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12035 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12109 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.12884 of 2012(With office report)
S.L.P. (C) No.16279 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing & refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P. (C) No.19494 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No.19926 of 2012(With office report)S.L.P. (C) No.23460 of 2012(With appln(s). for c/delay in filing & refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P. (C) No.27789 of 2012(With office report)Date: 20/09/2012 These Matters were called on for hearing today. ....4/- - 4 -CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Nanda Kumar,Adv. Mr. Vikas Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary,Adv. Ms. Gargi Khanna,Adv. Mr. Anil Gaur,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. for Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shekhar Naphade,Sr.Adv. Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Place these matters on 25th September, 2012. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Indu Satija ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ÒITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 15621/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 23/01/2012 in ITA No.1061/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III Petitioner(s) VERSUSSOMESHWAR S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 17/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Ms. A. Subhashini,Adv. Mr. Alok Prasanna,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on Question Nos.(c) and (d) at Page Nos.2 and 3 of the Paper Book. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Indu Satija ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 9778/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in ITA No.3448/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S AJINKYATARA SAHAKARI SSK LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 03/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Anoopam N. Prasad,Adv. Mr. Anandh Kannan,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Indu Satija ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
\ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 10814/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 25/01/2012 in ITA No.1121/2011of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-1 PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, exemption from filingc/c of the impugned judgement and office report)Date: 09/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Zoheb Hossain,Adv. Ms. Neera Gupta,Adv. Ms. Samta Mishra,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Indu Satija ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 9472/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 06/07/2011 in ITA No.3329/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER SATARA SAHA.SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 04/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Anoopam Prasad,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Indu Satija ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
>ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 8430/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 25/07/2011 in ITA No.5203/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-1 PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S BHIMA SSK LIMITED Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 09/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Ms. Niranjana Singh,Adv. Mr. Alok Prasanna,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
xITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 6326/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 03/10/2011 in ITA No.4600/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSHUTATMA KISAN AHIR SAHKARI S.K.LTD Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 16/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anoopam Prasad,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
°ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 5704/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 29/07/2011 in ITA No.4076/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHATRAPI RAJARAM S.S.K. LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 09/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Anand Kannan,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 5460/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 04/07/2011 in ITAL No.2034/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF I.T.-I,KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSGANDHINGLAJ TALUKA S.S.S.KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 02/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. T.M. Singh,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sahejpal,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
jITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10961/2011(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 23/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerjee,ASG. Mr. Gautam Jha,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. for Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8594 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 4286/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 07/07/2011 in ITA No.4031/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSAHYADRI SAH SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 16/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab Banerjee,ASG. Mr. Gautam Jha,Adv. Mr. Manoj Kaushik,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8594 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 4155/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 04/07/2011 in ITA No.2033/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S TATYA SABEB KORE WARANA SSK LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 16/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Vikas Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8594 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÞITEM NO.3 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 3972/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 13/07/2011 in ITA No.6636/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S SRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 12/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. S. Madhusudhan Babu,Adv. Mr. D.L. Chidananda,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. T.M. Babu,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ôITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4443 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASC.I.T-III,PUNE Appellant (s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI S.S.K LTD. Respondent(s)Date: 02/03/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra S. Garia,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the appellant who was granted last opportunity for furnishing spare copy of the pleadings has not furnished spare copy of the pleadings even now. However, I am inclined to grant one more opportunity of three weeks time on the condition that he deposits Rs.500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost and file proof. If proof of deposit is not filed within the above three weeks the matter shall be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber without any further order. If spare copy of the pleadings furnished, list the matter on 11.4.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
DITEM NO.27 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6408/2011(From the judgement and order dated 01/02/2010 in ITAL No.2727/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T.-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S. CHHATRAPATI SAHAU SAH.SAK.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 02/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Ms. A. Subhashini,Adv. Mr. Gautam Jha,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
xITEM NO.11 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 3665/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 29/07/2011 in ITA No.4033/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSAJINKYATARA SSK LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 27/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÜITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10961/2011C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 23/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dharmendra Kr. Pandey, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Nobody is present for the respondent. No request for filing counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd
¨ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6408/2011C.I.T.-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S. CHHATRAPATI SAHAU SAH.SAK.K.LT Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )Date: 08/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Veena Katarki, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No request for filing counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (S.G.SHAH) REGISTRARhj
xITEM NO.7 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 1589/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 24/06/2011 in ITA No.3316/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III Petitioner(s) VERSUSYASHWANTRAO MOHITE KRISHNA SSK LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 03/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ªITEM NO.43 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3070/2011(From the judgement and order dated 14/09/2009 in ITA No.2076/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSVASANTDADA SSK LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 30/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. for Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
:ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012(CC 1149/2012)(From the judgement and order dated 29/06/2011 in ITA No.3438/2010of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSHUTATMA KISAN AHIR SAHAKARI S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)With S.L.P. (C) No........../2012 (CC 1301/2012)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 27/01/2012 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. D.D. Kamat,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag these petitions with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
öITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010C.I.T,BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(C) Nos.8594. 14858, 17684, 4443, 13557, 12211, 18525,18371, 27218, 11563, 23046, 13069, 26865, 15611, 29694, 35117,28584, 32855, 32856, 17705 and 18335/2010Date: 20/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kailash Pandey,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv. Mr. Pabitra Kumar Biswal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.4443/2011 counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks time as a last chance for furnishing the spare copy of the pleadings. If steps taken, issue notice on NLPA. Await return of notice. In all other remaining cases service is complete. Last opportunity granted to the respondent for filing counter affidavit is over. Hence, list the above the matters before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule. List the incomplete matters on 2.3.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
TITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17705/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1157/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KAR.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 06/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASG. Mr. C.V. Subba Rao,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÄITEM NO.26 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18335/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.999/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 06/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. H.P. Raval,ASG. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Ms. Neera Gupta,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
\200ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28584/2010(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2350/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SHAHU S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. D.K. Singh,Adv. Ms. Ritu Bhardwaj,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the specific question at Page 97 of the S.L.P. Paper Book relating to concessional issue, let this matter be tagged with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÄITEM NO.31 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32855/2010(From the judgement and order dated 10/09/2009 in ITA No.2088/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSGHODGANGA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)With S.L.P. (C) No.32856 of 2010(With office report)Date: 02/01/2012 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Nishant Patil,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sahejpal,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dwivedi,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag these petitions with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).35117/2010(From the judgement and order dated 05/08/2009 in ITA No.1821/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUSAPPASAHEB NALAWADE GADHINGLAJ TALUKA S.S Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 12/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. H.P. Raval,ASG. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed,Adv. Mr. Srinivas Khalap,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÜITEM NO.26 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17705/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1157/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KAR.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 09/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASG. Mr. C.V. Subba Rao,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
4ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18335/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.999/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 09/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. H.P. Raval,ASG. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed,Adv. Mr. Gourav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Prateesh Kapoor,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010C.I.T,BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 11563 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 12211 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13069 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 13557 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14858 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15611 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17684 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 18371 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 18525 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 20242 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 23046 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25129 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25130 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 26865 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27218 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 29694 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 4443 of 2011(With office report) ...2/-Item No.28 : 2 :SLP(C) NO. 8594 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8595 of 2010(With office report)Date: 09/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Khairati,Adv. Dr. Kailash Pandey,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s)
Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In C.A. No.4443/2011 Ld. counsel for the appellant granted two weeks time for furnishing spare copy of the pleadings for issuance of notice in NLPA. Await return of notice. In all the remaining cases service is complete. The served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 20.1.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
dITEM NO.33 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28584/2010(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2350/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SHAHU S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 28/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. D.K. Singh,Adv. Ms. Ritu Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÌITEM NO.36 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32855/2010(From the judgement and order dated 10/09/2009 in ITA No.2088/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSGHODGANGA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)With S.L.P. (C) No.32856 of 2010(With office report)Date: 28/11/2011 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anoopam N. Prasad,Adv. Mr. Nishant Patil,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petitions shall stand over for four weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
nITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17705/2010C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KAR.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 16/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr R.N.Verma, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Nobody is present for the respondent. No request forfiling counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (S.G.SHAH) REGISTRARhj
6ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29694/2010(From the judgement and order dated 22/07/2009 in ITA No.1446/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUSMAHANKALI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 11/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Ms. Arti Gupta,Adv. Mr. Arunabh Ganguli,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
"ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18335/2010C.I.T,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEHSBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 11/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr R.N.Verma, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No request for filing counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (S.G.SHAH) REGISTRARhj
\226ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010C.I.T,BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 11563 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 12211 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13069 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 13557 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14858 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15611 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17684 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 18371 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 18525 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 20242 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 23046 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25129 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25130 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 26865 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27218 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Civil Appeal NO. 4443 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report) contd....2ITEM NO.15 -2-SLP(C) NO. 8594 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8595 of 2010(With office report)Date: 11/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Veena A.Katarki,adv. Mrs.Shalini Chandra,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.8590/10 and connected cases advocate Mr.B.C.Dave has filed vakalatnama. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.20242, 25129 and 25130/10 service is complete on each of the sole respondent. No appearance for the respondent. Hence, place the matters before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. List the incomplete matters on 9.12.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
>ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32855/2010(From the judgement and order dated 10/09/2009 in ITA No.2088/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSGHODGANGA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)With S.L.P. (C) No.32856 of 2010(With office report)Date: 08/11/2011 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Nishant Patil,Adv. Mr. Anoopam Prasad,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petitions shall stand over for three weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28584/2010(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2350/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SHAHU S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 08/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. D.K. Singh,Adv. Ms. Ritu Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Anubhav Kumar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for three weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
¦ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25129/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.987/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSD.R.K.PANCHAGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)With S.L.P. (C) No.25130 of 2010(With office report)Date: 30/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Prateek Jalan,Adv. Ms. Rajni Ohri Lal,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag these petitions with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
\202ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18335/2010C.I.T,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEHSBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 21/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Await for service of notice on the respondent. List again on 11.11.2011. (H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARrd
$ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26865/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1893/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSVISHWASRAO NAIK SAHAKARI S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 19/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Mr. C.P. Sharma,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
jITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15611/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1522/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 16/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Kaushik,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Dushywant Parashar,Adv. Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for one week. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
\222ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17705/2010C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KAR.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 16/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Tanushree Sinha, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner present. Await service of notice upon the respondent. List again on 16.11.2011. (H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARhj
îITEM NO.23 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20242/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.988/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S DESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 12/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the issue of concessional rate, S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010 is pending. Hence, tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
NITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25129/2010C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSD.R.K.PANCHAGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 25130 of 2010(With office report)Date: 09/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appear in the matter. As per office report service is complete on therespondent but nobody has entered appearance. List before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARhj
\200ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010C.I.T,BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 11563 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief)SLP(C) NO. 12211 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 13557 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14858 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17684 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 18371 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 18525 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 23046 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 27218 of 2010(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8594 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8595 of 2010(With office report)Date: 30/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.Khairati,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave contd...2ITEM NO.28 -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) Nos.8590/10 and 23046/11, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) No.8594/10 and batch of cases, the respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 27.09.2011.
(Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
ÌITEM NO.33 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13069/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.231/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSAHYADRI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 29/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar,Adv. Ms. Rajni Ohri Lal,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Place this petition along with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
@ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20242/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.988/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S DESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 29/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
rITEM NO.36 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15611/2010(From the judgement and order(s) dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1522/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 19/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.S. SIRPURKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Kaushik,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Renuka Sadana ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ÌITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011(CC 12859/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.161/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, exemption from filingc/c of the impugned order and office report)Date: 16/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption allowed. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the special leave petition. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ T.I. Rajput ] A.R.-cum-P.S. A.R.-cum-P.S.
VITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4443 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYC.I.T-III,PUNE Appellant (s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI S.S.K LTD. Respondent(s)Date: 11/08/2011 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. S.A. Matto, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant is present. As last chance, three weeks' time is granted to theappellant to file spare copy of the SLP for the record of theHigh Court. List again on 17.10.2011. (H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARrd
ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11563/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1892/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSVISHWASRAO NAIK SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 08/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Ms. Neera Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kunal Bahri,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Place this petition along with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
@ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27218/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1522/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHIRA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 08/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattahcrya,ASG. Mr. Vikram Gulati,Adv. Mr. F.A. Ayyubi,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Place this petition along with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
.ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20242/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.988/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S DESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 08/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for three weeks in order to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
@ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13069/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.231/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSAHYADRI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 08/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar,Adv. Ms. Rajni Ohri Lal,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for three weeks. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18335/2010C.I.T,MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEHSBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 04/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr R.N.Verma, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Finallyfour weeks' time is granted to take fresh steps for confirmingthe service on the unserved sole respondent. List again on 21.9.2011. (H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARhj
PITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17705/2010C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KAR.LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 04/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. He isdirected to take fresh steps by speed post for confirming theservice of the unserved sole respondent within four weeks fromtoday. List again on 16.9.2011. (H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARhj
ÄITEM NO.35 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18525/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.224/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 01/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag the special leave petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
´ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18371/2010(From the judgement and order dated 09/09/2009 in ITA No.2078/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 01/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Ms. Arti Gupta,Adv. Mr. C.V.S. Rao,Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag the special leave petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
$ITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15611/2010C.I.T. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 27/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Zaki Ahmad Khan, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Sole respondent has been served. Postal record has been received. The learned counsel for the petitioner furnish the numbers of the tagged matters if there are any, within two weeks. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per Rules. (SUNIL THOMAS)kkj Registrar
´ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20242/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.988/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S DESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 18/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for three weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file vakalatnama as also counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
$ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18525/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.224/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 18/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file vakalatnama as also counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18371/2010(From the judgement and order dated 09/09/2009 in ITA No.2078/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 18/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Ms. Arti Gupta,Adv. Mr. C.V.S. Rao,Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file vakalatnama as also counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
öITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27218/2010C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHIRA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 15/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Anupama Sharma,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Respondent has not filed counter affidavit in spite of last opportunity granted. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
`ITEM NO.119 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8590/2010C.I.T,BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 13557 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14858 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17684 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 4443 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8594 of 2010(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8595 of 2010(With office report)Date: 14/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Rita K.Gupta,adv. Mr.Suryanaryana Singh,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.8590/10 await return of notice of the sole respondent. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps by registered post acknowledgment due. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. contd....2 ITEM NO.119 -2- In SLP(C) No.8594/10 and batch of cases the sole respondent is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C)No.8595/10 sole respondent has been served. No appearance for the respondent. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In SLP(C) No.13557/10 trace out the file and list along with the other matters. In Civil Appeal No.4443/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks time as a last chance for filing the spare copy.
List the matter on 30.08.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
üITEM NO.45 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12211/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/07/2009 in ITA No.3079/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER S.S.SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 11/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. J.K. Mishra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag this petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
$ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18371/2010(From the judgement and order dated 09/09/2009 in ITA No.2078/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 06/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Ms. Arti Gupta,Adv. Mr. Kunal Bahri,Adv. Mr. C.V.S. Rao,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file vakalatnama as also counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
¾ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20242/2010(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.988/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S DESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 06/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file vakalatnama as also counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÄITEM NO.32 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18525/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.224/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 06/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanium,SG. Mr. Mukul Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anubhav Kumarm,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy S. Khalidkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file vakalatnama as also counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
¼ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13557/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1894/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S VISHWASRAO NAIK SHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 04/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Mr. Vikas Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Shashank Garg,Adv. Mr. Kunal Bahri,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Place this special leave petition along with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
8"ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23536/2010(From the judgement and order dated 05/08/2009 in ITA No.1864/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI S.S.K LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 13/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha,ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Learned counsel for the respondent-assessee states that Questions (a), (b) and (d) are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Ltd. [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010]. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide the case de novo as regards Questions (a), (b) and (d) in terms of the order of this Court in Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Ltd. [supra]. ....2/- - 2 - To that extent, the civil appeal stands,accordingly, allowed with no order as to costs. As far as Question No.(c) is concerned,S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010 is pending in thisCourt. The Registry is directed to tag this matterwith S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. Liberty is granted to the respondent tofile counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
[Signed order is placed on the file] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4443 OF 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.23536 of 2010)Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune ...Appellant(s) VersusShri Chhatrapati Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd. ...Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. Learned counsel for the respondent-assessee statesthat Questions (a), (b) and (d) are squarely covered by thedecision of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Ltd.[Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010]. Accordingly, the matter isremitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) to decide the case de novo as regards Questions(a), (b) and (d) in terms of the order of this Court in ShriSatpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Ltd. [supra]. To that extent, the civil appeal stands, accordingly,allowed with no order as to costs. As far as Question No.(c) is concerned, S.L.P. (C)No.8590 of 2010 is pending in this Court. The Registry is ...2/- - 2 -directed to tag this matter with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. Liberty is granted to the respondent to file counteraffidavit. .........................CJI. [S.H. KAPADIA] ...........................J. [K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN] ...........................J. [SWATANTER KUMAR]New Delhi,May 13, 2011.
\234ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13557/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1894/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S VISHWASRAO NAIK SHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 09/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Mr. Vikas Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Shashank Garg,Adv. Mr. Kunal Bahri,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks to enable learned counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar [N.B.: The advocate, who argued the case for the respondent, did not give his appearance.]
îITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27218/2010C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHIRA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 05/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Harish Kr.Khinchi,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The sole respondent is granted last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 15.07.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
(ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12211/2010(From the judgement and order dated 07/07/2009 in ITA No.3079/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER S.S.SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 25/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. J.K. Mishra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. Place this petition after the ensuing summer vacation. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
¸ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23536/2010C.I.T-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI S.S.K LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 20/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Shrabani Chakrabarty, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Service is complete as against the respondent butnobody has cast appearance on his behalf. Since the matter is a complete one, appropriate stepsshall therefore be taken by the Registry for listing the samebefore the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. (M.K.HANJURA) Registrarhj
´ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 15/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. Issue notice also on the application for condonation of delay. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
\214ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13557/2010COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S VISHWASRAO NAIK SHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 15/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Savitri Pandey, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service complete. Counter affidavit not filed, in spite of last chance granted. No further steps. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per the rules. am (SUNIL THOMOS) REGISTRAR
\204ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12211/2010C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER S.S.SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 01/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Aaray Lingaiah, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. There is no representation on behalf of the solerespondent today, though the learned Advocate, Mr. Vimal S.Dave has already filed the vakalatnama and Memo of appearanceon his behalf. Since the matter is a complete one, therefore,appropriate steps for listing the same before the Hon'bleCourt on its own turn shall be taken by the Registry. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARrd
rITEM NO.39 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 01/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Government of India has taken appropriate steps in this matter. The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
æITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27218/2010C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHIRA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 01/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Harish Kr.Khinchi,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The sole respondent is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 5.05.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
\204ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12211/2010C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER S.S.SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 01/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Aaray Lingaiah, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. There is no representation on behalf of the solerespondent today, though the learned Advocate, Mr. Vimal S.Dave has already filed the vakalatnama and Memo of appearanceon his behalf. Since the matter is a complete one, therefore,appropriate steps for listing the same before the Hon'bleCourt on its own turn shall be taken by the Registry. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARrd
¸ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 11/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for two weeks. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ºITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13557/2010COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S VISHWASRAO NAIK SHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 08/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Ravindra S.Garia,adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 15.04.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
¼ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 11/02/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13557/2010COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S VISHWASRAO NAIK SHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 02/02/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv. Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma,adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Sole Respondent has filed vakalatnama. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 8.03.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
4ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011(CC 818/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 14/09/2009 in ITA No.2076/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSVASANTDADA SSK LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 28/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Kanchan Jain ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
¼ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 14/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
\212ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 16/12/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.P. Tripathi,ASG. Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Mr. Vismai Rao,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition shall stand over for four weeks to enable the Department to file an affidavit. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
:ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 18477/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 05/08/2009 in ITA No.1821/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUSAPPASAHED NALAWADE GADHINGLAJ TALUKA S.S Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 10/12/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Harin P. Raval,ASG. Ms. Naila Jung,Adv. Mr. Mihir Chatterjee,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
bITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 17249/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2349/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHRI CHHATRAPATI S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 22/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek K. Tankha,ASG. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar,Adv. Ms. Ritu Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find once again huge delay in filing of special leave petitions/appeals by the Department. It is important to note that delay exists in matters of stakes. At one point of time, we had invited the attention of the learned Attorney General of India. Since then, prompt action was taken. However, we find once again that there is lapse in filing of special leave petitions/appeals by the Department. In the circumstances, we direct ...2/- - 2 -the Director, Directorate of Taxation (L&R), tofile an affidavit explaining the reasons for delaywithin four weeks. Place this special leave petition belowS.L.P. (C) No......../2010 (CC 17106/2010) on thenext date of listing. The Registry shall send a copy of thisOrder to the learned Attorney General of India. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
\204ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 16944/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 10/09/2009 in ITA No.2088/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSGHODGANGA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)With S.L.P. (C) No......../2010 (CC 17505/2010)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 19/11/2010 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil,Adv. Mr. Anoopam N. Prasad,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matters should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 15408/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 22/07/2009 in ITA No.1446/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUSMAHANKALI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag Tripathi,ASG. Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Ms. Arti Gupta,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
*ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 15159/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 15/10/2009 in ITA No.2350/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SHAHU S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 04/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Subramaniam,SG. Mr. D.K. Singh,Adv. Mr. Anubhav Kumar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ZITEM NO.6 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 14057/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1522/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHIRA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 17/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Bhattacharya,ASG. Mr. H.R. Rao,Adv. Mr. Fazail A. Ayyubi,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
DITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 13896/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1893/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I Petitioner(s) VERSUSVISHWASRAO NAIK SAHAKARI S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 13/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma,Adv. Mr. Mihir Chatterjee,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÞITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 12844/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.987/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSD.R.K.PANCHAGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)With S.L.P. (C) No...........of 2010 (CC 13351/2010)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 30/08/2010 These Matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab Banerji,ASG. Mr. Prateek Jalan,Adv. Ms. Rajni Ohri Lal,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matters should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÌITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 9612/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 05/08/2009 in ITA No.1864/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI S.S.K LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 13/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Rohit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
&ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 10120/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.988/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-II Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S DESHBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 16/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha,ASG. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
(ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 8848/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.224/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanium,SG. Mr. Anubhav Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mukul Gupta,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
.ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 8920/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 09/09/2009 in ITA No.2078/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-I, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANGANGA S.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Ms. Arti Gupta,Adv. Ms. A. Subhashini,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ØITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 9127/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 01/07/2009 in ITA No.999/2009of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEHSBHAKTA RATNAPPA K.P.S.K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. H.P. Raval,ASG. Mr. Krishna Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Preesh Kapur,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
(ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 7995/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.226/2007of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER SATARA SAHAKARI SAK.KARK.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 05/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASG Mr. H. Raghavendra Rao,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. Tag the petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
0ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 8036/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1157/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T., PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KAR.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 05/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,ASG. Mr. C.V. Subba Rao,Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
´ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 7426/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No. 1522/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSONHARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 11/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG Mr. Rupesh Kumar, ADv. Mr. Mihir Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag along with the connected matter. (R.K.Dhawan) (Veera Verma) AR-cum-PS Assistant Registrar
ÎITEM NO.12 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 6845/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1518/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUSHUTATMAKISAN AHIR SAHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 07/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurab Banerji,ASG. Mr. H. Raghavendra Rao,adv. Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. Tag the petition with S.L.P. (C) No.8590 of 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÖITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 6416/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1894/2008of the HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S VISHWASRAO NAIK SHAKARI SAKHAR K.LTD Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 30/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha, ASG. Mr. Satya Siddiqui, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Kr. Mishra, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of our judgment in the case of Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik Vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited (Civil Appeal No.617/2010), dated 20th January, 2010. (N. Annapurna) (Madhu Saxena) AR-cum-PS Asstt. Registrar
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 6113/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.231/2007of the HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T-III,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSAHYADRI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 26/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, A.G. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. C.P. Sharma, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matters should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of our judgment in the case of Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik Vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited (Civil Appeal No.617/2010), dated 20th January, 2010. (N. ANNAPURNA) (MADHU SAXENA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
üITEM NO.19 IN COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 5668/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 07/07/2009 in ITA No.3079/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,PUNE Petitioner(s) VERSUSKISANVEER S.S.SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 16/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha,ASG. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Mr. J.K. Mishra,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
ÖITEM NO.18 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010(CC 5201/2010)(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.1892/2008of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVISHWASRAO NAIK SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 09/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,ASG. Mr. Kunal Bahri,Adv. Ms. Neera Gupta,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matter should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of the order of this Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited [Civil Appeal No.617 of 2010] dated 20th January, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
dITEM NO.19 & 67 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 3459/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/06/2009 in ITA No.225/2007of the HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)C.I.T,BOMBAY Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)......CC NO. 3992 of 2010 & 4146 of 2010(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLPs and office report)Date: 15/03/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya, ASG. Mr. H.R. Rao, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice as to why the matters should not be remitted to the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in terms of our judgment in the case of Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik Vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Limited (Civil Appeal No.617/2010), dated 20th January, 2010. (N. ANNAPURNA) (MADHU SAXENA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER