ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.& ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and interim relief and office report) Date : 02/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN Amicus Curiae Mr. Yasobant Das,Sr.Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary,Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy,Adv. For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Ms. Shivani Khandekar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Yasobant Das, learned senior counsel, who graciously agreed to our request to appear as Amicus Curiae on behalf of the petitioner, who earlier appeared as a party-in-person and we found him not in a position to explain the real grievance involved in this litigation. After hearing Mr. Das, learned Amicus Curiae, we find that the petitioner initially joined in the Respondent No.1/University as a 1
Stenographer. Subsequently he was shifted to a College run by the University itself. Thereafter, according to him, he was promoted as Superintendent by orders of Court. Be that as it may, in the year 2011 he filed a writ petition in the High Court in W.P. No.24888/2011 for a declaration to the effect that the action of Respondent No.1/University in not complying with the A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1966 in the context of promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar, Deputy Registrar and Joint Registrar was illegal and arbitrary. The said writ petition was dismissed by the High Court by order dated 8.9.2011. While dismissing the writ petition, the High Court held that the promotion to those posts were all governed by Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University (Administrative and Accounts Officers) Service Regulations framed in the year 1981 by virtue of the powers provided under Section 40 of the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Universities Act, 1963. The said order became final and conclusive. However, the petitioner filed another writ petition in W.P. No.27073 of 2011 challenging the 1981 Regulations framed by the University and contended that promotions to the post referred to above were to be made by applying Rules 5 and 6 of the State Service Rules. The said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 28.9.2011. The petitioner challenged the same by filing Writ Appeal No.310 of 2012. By the impugned judgment, the Division Bench took the view that the second writ petition of the petitioner was hit by the principles of res judicata in the light of the dismissal of his earlier writ petition, namely, W.P. No.24888/2011 by the order dated 8.9.2011. Though, we do not find the reasoning of the Division Bench more appropriate, still we do not find any scope to entertain this special leave petition, inasmuch as we find that the grievance of the petitioner pertains to non-consideration of his claim for promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar from the year 2005 onwards till he came to be superannuated in the year 2014. 2
According to the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar, the feeder cadres are Superintendent, Special Category Stenographers in the Administrative Office in the Colleges and Research Stations, that as the petitioner was working as Superintendent and having passed the account test as per Regulations 8 of the 1981 Regulations, he was entitled to be included within the zone for being considered for promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar. That apart, the other grievance of the petitioner is that under Regulation 10(2) of the 1965 Regulations all promotions should be made on the grounds of merit and ability and seniority to be considered only where merit and ability are approximately equal. The sum and substance of the claim of the petitioner is that in the light of the said Regulation 10(2) of the 1965 Regulations, he was eligible to be considered by including him in the zone of consideration which the respondent failed to do. The selections came to be made in the year 2005 onwards, wherein according to him, his claim to be considered within the zone was not made. In support of his submission, Mr. Das, learned Amicus Curiae, relied upon the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court dated 21.11.1985 passed in Writ Appeal No.586/1979 and Writ Appeal No.329/1980. However, forceful the claim may be, since that was not the ground that was raised nor prayed for in either of the writ petitions, namely, W.P. No.24888/2011 or W.P. No.27073 of 2011 there is no scope for considering such a claim which would have necessitated the challenge to the notification for selection as well as by impleading the selected candidates etc. In the absence of such a challenge made it is well neigh possible to consider the same in this proceeding. Therefore, leaving it open for the petitioner to work out his remedy, if any, in an appropriate manner, this special leave petition stands dismissed. 3
While appreciating the support and able assistance rendered by Mr. Yasobant Das, learned senior counsel, as an Amicus Curiae, we fix a remuneration of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) to be paid to him. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 4
LISTED ON : COURT NO : ITEM NO. : SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NO. 18120 OF 2014. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF R. V. N. S. MURTHY ..PETITIONER -Versus- ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV. & ANR ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 7 th July, 2014, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Subsequently the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar’s Court on 14 th July, 2015, when the following order was passed : “ Respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. ” Lastly, the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 7 th September, 2015, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ List this matter on a non-miscellaneous day in the month of January, 2016, before an appropriate Bench. ” RR
It is submitted that there are 2 Respondents in the matter. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent no. 1 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that fresh show cause notice along with dasti notice were issued to Respondent No. 2 on 8 th April, 2015 for effecting notice service on unserved Respondent no. 2. AD card duly signed has been received from the said Respondent but no one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent no. 2 (State of A.P). Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit service along with proof of service on behalf of Respondent no. 2 through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of A.P. It is lastly submitted that notice of hearing to the Petitioner-in-person has already been sent on 18 th December, 2015 by registered AD post but neither A.D. card nor unserved registered cover containing the notice has been received from the Petitioner-in-person so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matter is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 11 th day of January, 2016 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1.Mr. R.V.N.S Murthy , Petitioner-in-person Administrative Officer, College of Agriculture, ANGR. Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030 2. Mr. Yasobant Das, Senior Advocate B-367, New Friends Colony, New Delhi-25 3. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate Ch No. 219 4. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate Sd. Counsel for the State of A.P. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RR
Ò; ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.& ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and interim relief and office report) Date : 02/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN Amicus Curiae Mr. Yasobant Das,Sr.Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary,Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy,Adv. For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Ms. Shivani Khandekar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Yasobant Das, learned senior counsel, who graciously agreed to our request to appear as Amicus Curiae on behalf of the petitioner, who earlier appeared as a party-in-person and we found him not in a position to explain the real grievance involved inSignature Not Verified this litigation.Digitally signed byRenuka SadanaDate: 2016.02.0513:37:19 ISTReason: After hearing Mr. Das, learned Amicus Curiae, we find that the petitioner initially joined in the Respondent No.1/University as a 1Stenographer. Subsequently he was shifted to a College run by theUniversity itself. Thereafter, according to him, he was promotedas Superintendent by orders of Court. Be that as it may, in theyear 2011 he filed a writ petition in the High Court in W.P.No.24888/2011 for a declaration to the effect that the action ofRespondent No.1/University in not complying with the A.P. State andSubordinate Service Rules, 1966 in the context of promotion to thepost of Assistant Registrar, Deputy Registrar and Joint Registrarwas illegal and arbitrary. The said writ petition was dismissed bythe High Court by order dated 8.9.2011. While dismissing the writpetition, the High Court held that the promotion to those postswere all governed by Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University(Administrative and Accounts Officers) Service Regulations framedin the year 1981 by virtue of the powers provided under Section 40
of the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Universities Act, 1963. The said order became final and conclusive. However, thepetitioner filed another writ petition in W.P. No.27073 of 2011challenging the 1981 Regulations framed by the University andcontended that promotions to the post referred to above were to bemade by applying Rules 5 and 6 of the State Service Rules. Thesaid writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge byorder dated 28.9.2011. The petitioner challenged the same byfiling Writ Appeal No.310 of 2012. By the impugned judgment, theDivision Bench took the view that the second writ petition of thepetitioner was hit by the principles of res judicata in the lightof the dismissal of his earlier writ petition, namely, W.P.No.24888/2011 by the order dated 8.9.2011. Though, we do not find the reasoning of the Division Benchmore appropriate, still we do not find any scope to entertain thisspecial leave petition, inasmuch as we find that the grievance ofthe petitioner pertains to non-consideration of his claim forpromotion to the post of Assistant Registrar from the year 2005onwards till he came to be superannuated in the year 2014. 2According to the petitioner for promotion to the post of AssistantRegistrar, the feeder cadres are Superintendent, Special CategoryStenographers in the Administrative Office in the Colleges andResearch Stations, that as the petitioner was working asSuperintendent and having passed the account test as perRegulations 8 of the 1981 Regulations, he was entitled to beincluded within the zone for being considered for promotion to thepost of Assistant Registrar. That apart, the other grievance ofthe petitioner is that under Regulation 10(2) of the 1965Regulations all promotions should be made on the grounds of meritand ability and seniority to be considered only where merit andability are approximately equal. The sum and substance of the claim of the petitioner is thatin the light of the said Regulation 10(2) of the 1965 Regulations,he was eligible to be considered by including him in the zone ofconsideration which the respondent failed to do. The selectionscame to be made in the year 2005 onwards, wherein according to him,his claim to be considered within the zone was not made. Insupport of his submission, Mr. Das, learned Amicus Curiae, reliedupon the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court dated21.11.1985 passed in Writ Appeal No.586/1979 and Writ AppealNo.329/1980. However, forceful the claim may be, since that was not theground that was raised nor prayed for in either of the writpetitions, namely, W.P. No.24888/2011 or W.P. No.27073 of 2011there is no scope for considering such a claim which would havenecessitated the challenge to the notification for selection aswell as by impleading the selected candidates etc. In the absenceof such a challenge made it is well neigh possible to consider thesame in this proceeding. Therefore, leaving it open for the petitioner to work out hisremedy, if any, in an appropriate manner, this special leavepetition stands dismissed.
3 While appreciating the support and able assistance rendered byMr. Yasobant Das, learned senior counsel, as an Amicus Curiae, wefix a remuneration of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) tobe paid to him. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 4
ITEM NO.24 (MM) COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and interim relief and office report) Date : 12/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yasobant Das,Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary,Adv. Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 2.2.2016 at the top of the Board. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
LISTED ON : 12-01-2016 COURT NO : 6 ITEM NO. : 24 SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NO. 18120 OF 2014. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF R. V. N. S. MURTHY ..PETITIONER -Versus- ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV. & ANR ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 7 th July, 2014, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Subsequently the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar’s Court on 14 th July, 2015, when the following order was passed : “ Respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. ” Lastly, the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 7 th September, 2015, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order : “ List this matter on a non-miscellaneous day in the month of January, 2016, before an appropriate Bench. ” RR
It is submitted that there are 2 Respondents in the matter. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent no. 1 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that fresh show cause notice along with dasti notice were issued to Respondent No. 2 on 8 th April, 2015 for effecting notice service on unserved Respondent no. 2. AD card duly signed has been received from the said Respondent but no one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent no. 2 (State of A.P). Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit service along with proof of service on behalf of Respondent no. 2 through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of A.P. It is lastly submitted that notice of hearing to the Petitioner-in-person has already been sent on 18 th December, 2015 by registered AD post but neither A.D. card nor unserved registered cover containing the notice has been received from the Petitioner-in-person so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matter is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 11 th day of January, 2016 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1.Mr. R.V.N.S Murthy , Petitioner-in-person Administrative Officer, College of Agriculture, ANGR. Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030 2. Mr. Yasobant Das, Senior Advocate B-367, New Friends Colony, New Delhi-25 3. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate Ch No. 219 4. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate Sd. Counsel for the State of A.P. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RR
ì ITEM NO.24 (MM) COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and interim relief and office report) Date : 12/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yasobant Das,Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary,Adv. Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 2.2.2016 at the top of the Board. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJayant Kumar AroraDate: 2016.01.1217:25:05 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.70 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.& ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Shri Yasobant Das, Sr.Adv. (A.C.) Mr. D.B. Ray,Adv. Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Ms. Shivani Khandekar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter on a non-miscellaneous day in the month of January, 2016, before an appropriate Bench. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.70 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.& ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to appear and argue in person and interim relief and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Shri Yasobant Das, Sr.Adv. (A.C.) Mr. D.B. Ray,Adv. Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Ms. Shivani Khandekar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter on a non-miscellaneous day in the month of January, 2016, before an appropriate Bench. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTERSignature Not Verified COURT MASTERDigitally signed byNarendra PrasadDate: 2015.09.0817:02:41 ISTReason:
LISTED ON : 24-8-2015 COURT NO : 7 ITEM NO. : 70 SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NO. 18120 OF 2014. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF R. V. N. S. MURTHY ..PETITIONER -Versus- ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV. & ANR ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 7 th July, 2014, when he was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Subsequently the matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar’s Court on 14 th July, 2015, when he was pleased to pass the following order: “ Respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. ” It is submitted that there are 2 Respondents in the matter. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent no. 1 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that fresh show cause notice along with dasti notice were issued to Respondent No. 2 on 8 th April, 2015 for effecting notice service on unserved Respondent no. 2. AD card duly signed has been RR
received from the said Respondent but no one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent no. 2 (State of A.P). Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit service along with proof of service on behalf on Respondent no. 2 through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of A.P. Service is complete. The aforesaid matter is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 21 st day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1.Mr. R.V.N.S Murthy , Petitioner-in-person Administrative Officer, College of Agriculture, ANGR. Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030 2. Mr. Yasobant Das, Senior Advocate B-367, New Friends Colony, New Delhi-25 3. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate Ch No. 219 4. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate Sd. Counsel for the State of A.P. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RR
ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to appear and argue in person and office report) Date : 14/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Shivani Khandekar,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
V ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to appear and argue in person and office report) Date : 14/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Shivani Khandekar,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.Signature Not Verified (M K HANJURA)Digitally signed by RegistrarMadhu Grover MGDate: 2015.07.1514:42:04 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.86 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to appear and argue in person and office report) Date : 24/03/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary,Adv. Mr. Yasobant Das, Sr. Adv.(AC) For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be given. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of A.P. List again on 14.7.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 LISTED ON : 24-3-2015 ITEM NO. : 86 SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NO. 18120 OF 2014. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF R. V. N. S. MURTHY ..PETITIONER -Versus- ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV. & ANR ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 15 th January, 2015, when he was pleased to pass the following order: “Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List again on 24.03.2015.” It is submitted that notice was issued on 13 th October, 2014 to both Respondents. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. A period of more than thirty days have been elapsed but neither AD card nor unserved registered cover has been received from Respondent No. 2. Service is incomplete in respect of Respondent No. 2. The aforesaid matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this, the 23 rd day of March, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RR
Copy to:- 1.Mr. R.V.N.S Murthy , Petitioner-in-person Administrative Officer, College of Agriculture, ANGR. Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030 2. Mr. Yasobant Das, Senior Advocate B-367, New Friends Colony, New Delhi-25 3. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate Ch No. 219 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RR
ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to appear and argue in person and office report) Date : 15/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Mahima Sinha,adv. Petitioner-in-person,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar Tiwary,adv. Mr.Yasobant Das,adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List again on 24.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 LISTED ON : 15-1-2015 ITEM NO. : 82 SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NO. 18120 OF 2014. WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF R. V. N. S. MURTHY ..PETITIONER -Versus- ACHARYA N. G. RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV. & ANR ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Court on 7 th July, 2014, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Accordingly, notice was issued on 13 th October, 2014 to both Respondents. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. A period of more than thirty days have been elapsed but neither AD card nor unserved registered cover has been received from Respondent No. 2. Service is incomplete in respect of Respondent No. 2. The aforesaid matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 14 th day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1.Mr. R.V.N.S Murthy , Petitioner-in-person Administrative Officer, College of Agriculture, ANGR. Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030 2. Mr. Yasobant Das, Senior Advocate B-367, New Friends Colony, New Delhi-25 3. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, Advocate Ch No. 219 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RR
N ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18120/2014 R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to appear and argue in person and office report) Date : 15/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Mahima Sinha,adv. Petitioner-in-person,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar Tiwary,adv. Mr.Yasobant Das,adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List again on 24.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.01.1710:59:43 ISTReason:
˜ ITEM NO.57 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)....../2014 CC No(s). 6752/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No. 310/2012 passed by the High Court Of A.p At Hyderabad) R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s) I.A. No. 1/2014(With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 07/07/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yasobant Das, Sr. Adv. in-person For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR]Signature Not Verified COURT MASTER COURT MASTERDigitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2014.07.1216:18:16 ISTReason:
>ITEM NO.73 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 6752/2014(From the judgement and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No.310/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUSACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, permission to appear andargue in person and office report)Date: 09/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Petitioner-In-Person.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of the court, Shri Yasobant Das, learned senior counsel, has agreed to appear on behalf of the petitioner in this special leave petition. The Registry shall furnish a set of papers to learned senior counsel. List on 07.07.2014. [Nidhi Ahuja] [Sharda Kapoor] Court Master Court Master
>ITEM NO.73 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 6752/2014(From the judgement and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No.310/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUSACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, permission to appear andargue in person and office report)Date: 09/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Petitioner-In-Person.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of the court, Shri Yasobant Das, learned senior counsel, has agreed to appear on behalf of the petitioner in this special leave petition. The Registry shall furnish a set of papers to learned senior counsel. List on 07.07.2014. [Nidhi Ahuja] [Sharda Kapoor] Court Master Court Master
|ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 6752/2014(From the judgement and order dated 25/06/2013 in WA No.310/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)R.V.N.S. MURTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUSACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIV.&ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, permission to appear andargue in person and office report)Date: 08/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Petitioner-In-Person.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List tomorrow, 09.05.2014, before the Bench presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla. [Nidhi Ahuja] [Sharda Kapoor] Court Master Court Master