ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 10116/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2023 in RSA No. 1479/2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru] RAJASHEKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS B B SAROJAMMA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 92121/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No. 92123/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No. 92122/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 17-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sayooj Mohandas.M, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) : UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1) The re is a delay of 408 days in filing the special leave petition for which we do not find any plausible explanation in the averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay. 2) Even on merits, we see no reason and ground to interfere with the order impugned. 3) Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NIDHI AHUJA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
RAJASHEKAR v. B B SAROJAMMA
Supreme Court of India | Diary 10116/2025
Status
ROP - of Main Case
Decided On
17-04-2025
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
Petitioner
RAJASHEKAR
Respondent
B B SAROJAMMA
Primary Holding
A delay of 408 days in filing a special leave petition, unsupported by plausible explanation, warrants dismissal both on grounds of delay and on merits.