IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 161 OF 2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are satisfied that the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner-wife for transfer of FCOP No. 1520/2012 titled as “Harinath Raveen Kumar vs. Mahalingam Rupa Lakshmi” pending before the Vth ADJ-cum-Family Judge, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh to the Court of Principal Family Judge at Bangalore, Karnataka is justified and is fit to be allowed. We, accordingly, direct transfer of FCOP No. 1520/2012 titled as “Harinath Raveen Kumar vs. Mahalingam Rupa Lakshmi” pending before the Vth ADJ-cum-Family Judge, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh to the Court of Principal Family Judge at Bangalore, Karnataka. Let the records of the case be transferred without delay. The transfer petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. .......................... J. (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) .......................... J. (R.K. AGRAWAL) New Delhi; December 16, 2015.
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 16/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Mrs. Priya Aristotle, Adv. Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. T. Baskar Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)
ì IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 161 OF 2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are satisfied that the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner-wife for transfer of FCOP No. 1520/2012 titled as "Harinath Raveen Kumar vs. Mahalingam Rupa Lakshmi" pending before the Vth ADJ-cum-Family Judge, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh to the Court of Principal Family Judge at Bangalore, Karnataka is justified and is fit to be allowed. We, accordingly, direct transfer of FCOP No. 1520/2012 titled as "Harinath Raveen Kumar vs. Mahalingam Rupa Lakshmi" pending before the Vth ADJ-cum-Family Judge, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh to the Court of Principal Family Judge at Bangalore, Karnataka. Let the records of the case be transferred without delay. The transfer petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. .......................... J. (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) .......................... J. (R.K. AGRAWAL) New Delhi;Signature Not Verified December 16, 2015.Digitally signed byR.NATARAJANDate: 2016.01.0709:57:13 ISTReason:ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s)
(With appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 16/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Mrs. Priya Aristotle, Adv. Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. T. Baskar Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)
ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 01/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr M.B.Elakkumanan, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation report from the Supreme Court Mediation Centre has not been received. Reminder be issued. List again on 6.1.2016. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ä ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 01/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr M.B.Elakkumanan, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation report from the Supreme Court Mediation Centre has not been received. Reminder be issued. List again on 6.1.2016. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.10.0117:06:25 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 03/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation report from the Supreme Court Mediation Centre is still awaited. A fresh reminder be issued. List again on 1.10.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
T ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 03/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation report from the Supreme Court Mediation Centre is still awaited. A fresh reminder be issued. List again on 1.10.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.08.0717:24:45 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 01/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation report from the Supreme Court Mediation Centre is still awaited. Reminder be sent. List again on 3.8.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.14 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) Date : 13/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Lakshmy Iyengar, Adv. Mr. B. E Lakkumanan, Adv. Ms. Priya Aristotle, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sayoos Mohamdasna, Adv. Mr. T. Baskar Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the parties have agreed that the matter may be referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for settlement. In view of request made, let the parties appear before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre on 10.3.2015 at 10.30 A.M. for settlement. The Supreme Court Mediation Centre shall make an effort to settle the dispute between the parties and submit a report to this Court. Expenses of to and fro and stay shall be borne by the husband and is fixed at Rs. 25,000/- which he shall pay to her wife. List the matter after Mediation Report is received. (SONIA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.56 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 03/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs Priya Aristotle, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As counsel for the sole respondent has been served with the copies of pleadings, two weeks time is granted for filing counter affidavit. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner reports that there is negotiation for referring matter for mediation. List again on 20.1.2015. (DR. K.ARUL) Registrar
ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 18/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Krutin R Joshi, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the sole respondent submits that they have not received the complete set of pleadings as a result of which counter affidavit could not be filed. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to supply complete set of pleadings to the ld.counsel for the sole respondent within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks of the receipt of complete set of pleadings. List again on 3.12.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
X ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 18/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Krutin R Joshi, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the sole respondent submits that they have not received the complete set of pleadings as a result of which counter affidavit could not be filed. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to supply complete set of pleadings to the ld.counsel for the sole respondent within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks of the receipt of complete set of pleadings.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.09.20 List again on 3.12.2014.11:36:07 ISTReason: (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 161/2014 MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 08/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms Priya Aristotle, Adv. Mr. Joseph Aristotle S. ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr D Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List again on 18.9.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.08.1116:52:58 ISTReason:
ÂITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 161 OF 2014MAHALINGAM RUPA LAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARINATH RAVEEN KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 05/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Joseph Aristotle S.,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On behalf of the sole respondent, notice has beenaccepted by the learned Advocate, Mr. Sayooj Mohandas M., whohas undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit bythe next date. Complete set of the pleadings be served on thelearned counsel within two weeks of which necessary proof befiled on record and thereafter counter affidavit be filedwithin four weeks. List again on 8.8.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARrd