SMT SUNITA GUPTA v. STATE OF UP

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4245/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 06/04/2017 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. M. Rani Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. M.S. Mangla, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We are of the considered view that no case of made out for further indulgence in this matter. In case the applicants feels that they have been deprived of their just dues and are not being allotted the adequate land, the remedy is not before this Court. They may question the action of the concerned authority by way of appropriate petition in accordance with law before the appropriate forum/Court. With the aforesaid liberty, this application stands disposed of. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

ÆITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4245/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court OfJudicature at Allahabad)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 06/04/2017 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. M. Rani Mohapatra, Adv.Mr. M.S. Mangla, Adv.Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We areof the considered view that no case of made out forfurther indulgence in this matter. In case the applicantsfeels that they have been deprived of their just dues andare not being allotted the adequate land, the remedy isnot before this Court. They may question the action of theconcerned authority by way of appropriate petition inaccordance with law before the appropriate forum/Court.With the aforesaid liberty, this application standsdisposed of. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  03.04.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  11               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. :  9 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The matter  mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.02.2017,   when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for   the petitioners seeking adjournment, list the matter after   four weeks. ” It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Counsel for the Petitioner has filed   reply on behalf of the petitioner to the respondents application and the same has   already been included in the Paper Books. The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 31st day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Listed on : 03.03.2017 Court No. :   R­1 Item No. :         26 SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 4711 OF 2015 THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ...PETITIONER VERSUS M/S SUN MICROSYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 6 th February, 2017, when the following Order was passed:- “Application for amendment of cause title be filed within two weeks time. Registry thereafter to process under rules. List again on 3.3.2017.” It is submitted that Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate has on 13 th February, 2017 filed an application for Amendment of Cause title and the same has been registered as I.A. No. 2 and is to be listed before Chamber judge. It is further submitted that Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of sole respondent but he has not filed counter affidavit. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR min3

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4245/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 27/02/2017 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Minati Rani Mohatra, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking adjournment, list the matter after four weeks. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  27.02.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  11               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. : 12 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The I.A.  above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.02.2017,   with an office report dated 03.02.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the   following order: “ Let reply be filed within two weeks as prayed for.  List thereafter.  ” It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Counsel for the Petitioner has on   20.02.2017 filed reply on behalf of the petitioner to the respondents application and   the same has been included in the Paper Books. The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 23 rd  day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  06.02.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  8               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. : 11 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The I.A.  above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02.01.2017,   with an office report dated 23.12.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the   following order: “ Let reply be filed within four weeks.   List thereafter.” It is submitted that no reply has been filed in I.A.No. 2 of 2016 so far. The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 03 rd  day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  02.01.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  9               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. : 28 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The I.A.  above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.11.2016,   with an office report dated 04.10.2016,  when the Court was pleased to pass the   following order: “ Let reply be filed in Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2016 within four   weeks. ” It is submitted that no reply has been filed in I.A.No. 2 of 2016 so far. It is lastly submitted that the case file as well as the SLP Paper Books have   been weeded out after due preservation as per Supreme Court Rules 2013 and   Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1­7  has filed fresh paper books alongwith letter   dated 21.12.2016 (Copy enclosed for kind perusal of the Court). The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 23 rd  day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  15.11.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  10               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. :12 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The  matter above mentioned alongwith other connected matters was listed   before the Hon'ble Court on 03.02.2015,  when the Court dismissed the matter in   terms of the signed order (Copy of Signed Order dated 03.02.2015 is annexed as   Annexure A­1 at page Nos.13 to 60 in I.A. Paper Books). It is submitted that Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate has on 03.05.2016 filed   an application for directions on behalf of 7 applicants and the same has been   registered as I.A.No. 2. Counsel has also filed fresh SLP Paper Books. The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 04 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4245/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 27/02/2017 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Minati Rani Mohatra, Adv.Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counselfor the petitioners seeking adjournment, list the matterafter four weeks. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4245/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 06/02/2017 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let reply be filed within two weeks as prayed for. List thereafter. (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  06.02.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  8               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. : 11 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The I.A.  above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 02.01.2017,   with an office report dated 23.12.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the   following order: “ Let reply be filed within four weeks.   List thereafter.” It is submitted that no reply has been filed in I.A.No. 2 of 2016 so far. The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 03 rd  day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

xITEM NO.11 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4245/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s)(for directions and office report)Date : 06/02/2017 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLet reply be filed within two weeks as prayed for. List thereafter. (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4245/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 02/01/2017 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakansha Tiwari,Adv. Mr. M.S. Mangla,Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. (Madhu Bala) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  02.01.2017         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  9               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. : 28 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The I.A.  above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.11.2016,   with an office report dated 04.10.2016,  when the Court was pleased to pass the   following order: “ Let reply be filed in Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2016 within four   weeks. ” It is submitted that no reply has been filed in I.A.No. 2 of 2016 so far. It is lastly submitted that the case file as well as the SLP Paper Books have   been weeded out after due preservation as per Supreme Court Rules 2013 and   Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1­7  has filed fresh paper books alongwith letter   dated 21.12.2016 (Copy enclosed for kind perusal of the Court). The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 23 rd  day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LITEM NO.28 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4245/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 02/01/2017 This matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakansha Tiwari,Adv.Mr. M.S. Mangla,Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let reply be filed within four weeks.List thereafter. (Madhu Bala) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

LD. REGISTRAR COURT  LISTED ON : 22.11.2016 COURT NO. 2 ITEM NO. 5 SECTION­III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C ) NOS. 25543 OF 2012       Commissioner Trade Tax U.P.                              …..Petitioner                                                 ­VERSUS­ M/s S.R. Engineers                                       …..Respondent                                      OFFICE REPORT The Office Report was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 21 st  October, 2016 along with other connected matter, when the following order was passed:­ “ Office shall enquire about the fate of the notice sent to the sole respondent under registered cover from the concerned postal authorities.  List the matter again on 22.11.2016. ” It is submitted that as per postal enquiry regarding non­delivery of the notice conducted on 26 th  July, 2016,  a communication has been received from the postal authority stating therein that article returned on 24.02.2016 from allahabad but neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received back so far.  It is further submitted that Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Advocate for the petitioner has on 28 th  October, 2016 filed spare copy for issuance of fresh show cause notice to the unserved sole respondent.  Service of notice is not complete on sole respondent.  The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for orders. Dated this the  19 th  Day of November,  2016.          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. R.P. Mehrotra, Advocate 100, Lawyers Chambers. Supreme Court of India  New Delhi­110024.                      C3                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4245/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 21/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Puspa Mishra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let reply be filed in Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2016 within four weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ØITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4245/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature atAllahabad)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 21/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s)Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv.Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv.Ms. Puspa Mishra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLet reply be filed in Interlocutory Application No. 2of 2016 within four weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 4245/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 15/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Puspa Mishra, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 21.11.2016 (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                   Listed on :  15.11.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA            Court No. :  10               CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                 Item No. :12 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2               (Application for directions)  IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 4245 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY        ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS DIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS.    ...RESPONDENT(S)      OFFICE REPORT    The  matter above mentioned alongwith other connected matters was listed   before the Hon'ble Court on 03.02.2015,  when the Court dismissed the matter in   terms of the signed order (Copy of Signed Order dated 03.02.2015 is annexed as   Annexure A­1 at page Nos.13 to 60 in I.A. Paper Books). It is submitted that Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate has on 03.05.2016 filed   an application for directions on behalf of 7 applicants and the same has been   registered as I.A.No. 2. Counsel has also filed fresh SLP Paper Books. The Interlocutory Application  above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 04 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate. s2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

\202ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)4245/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012in CMWP No. 52285/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIVYA AGRAWAL & ORS Respondent(s)(for directions and office report)Date : 15/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Puspa Mishra, Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList on 21.11.2016(Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (For clarification/modification of Court's Order and office report) Date : 10/05/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Para 45 of the Judgment dated 14.05.2015 in S.L.P.(C) No. 19301/2012 etc. is clear, we have affirmed the judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court. Since we have not interfered with the judgment and order of the Full Bench of the High Court, no further clarification is required. I.A. No. 2/2015 stands disposed of accordingly. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                               Listed On: 10.05.2016         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No. : 9          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No. :   5 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for clarification of Court's order dated 03.02.2016.) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 19301 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTH. ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS.           ...RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The Application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.10.2015 with an office report dated 16.10.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:        “ Perused letter, dated 16.10.2015.      Three weeks' time is granted to the respondents to       file counter affidavit.]      List thereafter.” It is submitted that Counsel for Respondent has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23.11.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ List after three weeks. ” The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 09 th  day of May, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate           ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S­3

¼ ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (For clarification/modification of Court's Order and office report) Date : 10/05/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Para 45 of the Judgment dated 14.05.2015 in S.L.P.(C) No. 19301/2012 etc. is clear, we have affirmed the judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court. Since we have not interfered with the judgment and order of the Full Bench of the High Court, no further clarification is required. I.A. No. 2/2015 stands disposed of accordingly.Signature Not Verified (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)Digitally signed bySUSHIL KUMARRAKHEJA COURT MASTER COURT MASTERDate: 2016.05.1018:25:45 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                    LISTED ON: 23.112015         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA    COURT NO.  1           CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION        ITEM NO.     4 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for  clarification of Court's order dated 03.02.2015) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)  NOS. 19301 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF GREATER NOIDAINDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.10.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Perused letter, dated 16.10.2015.  Three weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file  counter affidavit.  List thereafter. ” It is submitted that Counsel for the Respondent has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 20 th  day of November, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S1

MATTER FOR 23.11.2015                        COURT NO.              ITEM NO.            SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 28246/2015      WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF         KARIM BUX (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.        ...PETITIONER                            VERSUS SHRI SHYAMLAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.  ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT   The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 05.10.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­   “Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to file additional documents.   List after two weeks.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 13.10.2015 filed additional documents i.e. Copy of written statement filed by petitioner before District Judge. Copy of the same is being circulated. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 20 th  day of November, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Ms . Divya Roy,  Adv.         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

Ä ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (for clarification/modification of court's order and office report) Date : 23/11/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr.L.N.Rao, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Shyam Divan, Sr.Adv. Ms.Nikhar Berry, Adv. Mr.M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Mr.S.Krishna, Adv. Mr.Jabar Singh, Adv. Mr.H.P.Sahu, Adv Mr.Shiv Kant Mishra, Adv. Mr.K.K.Mishra, Adv. Durga Dutt, Adv. For Ms.Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified List after three weeks.Digitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.11.2315:36:00 ISTReason: (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) GREATER NOIDAINDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (For clarification/modification of court's order and office report) Date : 26/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter, dated 16.10.2015. Three weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                         LISTED ON : 26.10.2015             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA  Court No.    : 1          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION    Item No.      : 5 INTERLOCATORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for Clarification of Court's Order dated 03.02.2015) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 19301 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY    ...PETITIONER        VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS.                …RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned alongwith Land acquisition (Noida Authority matters) was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 03.02.2015, when the Court was pleased to dismiss the same in terms of Signed Order dated 03.02.2015.(Copy of Signed Order dated 03.02.2015 is placed in the Paper Books of Interlocatory Application No. 2 as Annexure P­2 at page nos. 481­528) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate has on 01.09.2015 filed an application for Clarification of order dated 03.02.2015.      The said application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 2 and is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Report. Dated this the 16 th  day of October, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Þ ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) GREATER NOIDAINDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (For clarification/modification of court's order and office report) Date : 26/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter, dated 16.10.2015. Three weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by List thereafter.Charanjeet KaurDate: 2015.10.2617:07:57 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. RegistrarÞ ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)

GREATER NOIDAINDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (For clarification/modification of court's order and office report) Date : 26/10/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter, dated 16.10.2015. Three weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by List thereafter.Charanjeet KaurDate: 2015.10.2617:07:57 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar

SECTION­III­A   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO...CC 14781 OF 2014 WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petition) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI                 ...PETITIONER VERSUS M/S WORKING WOMEN'S FORUM ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petition above­mentioned is filed against the impugned Judgment and Order dated 3 rd  February, 2014 of the High Court of Judicature at  Madras  in T.C (A) No. 101 of 2009 and is barred by time by 82 days.  The Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Application for condonation of delay in filing, Special Leave Petition. It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petition No. 20461 of 2014 @CC.. No. 11085 of 2014  entitled “ DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs WORKING WOMEN'S FORUM” arising from a common order,   which was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30 th  July, 2014, when the Hon'ble Court has dismissed the same.(Copy of the Order dated 30 th  July, 2014 is enclosed herewith for reference.) It is further submitted that office Report on default dated 20 th  April, 2015 for not filing of additional documents as per undertaking letter was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber on 30 th  July, 2015, when His Lordship was pleased the following Order:­ “Ld. Counsel for the petitioner states that the matter may be listed since it is not necessary to file additional documents. The Registry may process the matter further.” The matter along with application above­mentioned is listed before Hon'ble Court with this office report.   DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR rm4

\222 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.No.2 of 2015 IN CIVIL APPEAL D. NO.(S).4746 OF 2015 SRI RADHA KRISHNA MATHUR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS GP. CAPT. ANIL BALI Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard. Time for compliance with the direction of this Court dated 10th April, 2015 is extended by another three months from today for settlement of all outstanding monthly dues payable to the concerned by the petitioner-U.O.I. I.A. No.2 of 2015 is accordingly allowed and disposed of. ......................J. (T.S. THAKUR) ......................J. (V. GOPALA GOWDA) ......................J. (R. BANUMATHI) NEW DELHI DATED 3rd August, 2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMahabir SinghDate: 2015.08.0510:11:45 ISTReason:ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 4746/2015SRI RADHA KRISHNA MATHUR & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSGP. CAPT. ANIL BALI Respondent(s)(for extension of time and office report)Date: 03/08/2015 This application was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Appellant(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar,SG Mr. R. Balasubramanian,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv. Ms. Movita,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sridhar Potaraju,Adv. Mr. S.S. Pandey,Adv. Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei,Adv. Mr. Arjun Singh,Adv. Mr. Mukunda Rao Angara,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Time for compliance with the direction of this Courtdated 10th April, 2015 is extended by another three months fromtoday for settlement of all outstanding monthly dues payableto the concerned.(MAHABIR SINGH) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2015 In Civil Appeal No, 4543/2015 DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For seeking modification/correction and office report) Date : 31/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Appellant(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                        LISTED ON: 31.07.2015                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA    Court No.                                              CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION        Item No.                    INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application seeking correction/modification) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015 DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS.                               ...APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                                                       ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter alongwith connected matters was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.05.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Application for permission to file Special Leave Petition(s), if any,  is granted.  Delay, if any, in filing/refiling S.L.P.(s)/appeal(s) is  condoned.  Delay, if any, in application(s) for substitution is/are  condoned.  Application(s) for substitution(s), if any, is/are allowed.  Application(s) for setting aside abatement  if any, is/are allowed.  Application(s) for impleadment(s)/intervention(s), if any, is/are rejected.  Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.K.Sikri pronounced the Judgment of  the Bench comprising Hon'ble the Chief Justice, His Lordship  and Hon'ble Mr.Justice Arun Mishra.  Leave granted.  The appeals as well as the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, in terms of the reportable signed Judgment.” (Copy of signed order dated 14.05.2015 is placed at page nos. 56­118 of the paper­books of Interlocutory Application.) It is submitted that Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate for the appellant has on 22.06.2015 filed an Interlocutory Application for seeking correction/modification ..2/­

­2­ in the aforesaid appeal. The same has been registered as Interlocutory Application No. 5. The Interlocutory Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report  Dated this the 16 th  day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR VN

SECTION XI                        LISTED ON: 31.07.2015                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA    Court No.                                              CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION        Item No.                    INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application seeking correction/modification) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015 DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS.                               ...APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                                                       ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter alongwith connected matters was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.05.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Application for permission to file Special Leave Petition(s), if any,  is granted.  Delay, if any, in filing/refiling S.L.P.(s)/appeal(s) is  condoned.  Delay, if any, in application(s) for substitution is/are  condoned.  Application(s) for substitution(s), if any, is/are allowed.  Application(s) for setting aside abatement  if any, is/are allowed.  Application(s) for impleadment(s)/intervention(s), if any, is/are rejected.  Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.K.Sikri pronounced the Judgment of  the Bench comprising Hon'ble the Chief Justice, His Lordship  and Hon'ble Mr.Justice Arun Mishra.  Leave granted.  The appeals as well as the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, in terms of the reportable signed Judgment.” (Copy of signed order dated 14.05.2015 is placed at page nos. 56­118 of the paper­books of Interlocutory Application.) It is submitted that Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate for the appellant has on 22.06.2015 filed an Interlocutory Application for seeking correction/modification ..2/­

­2­ in the aforesaid appeal. The same has been registered as Interlocutory Application No. 5. The Interlocutory Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report  Dated this the 16 th  day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR VN

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2015 In Civil Appeal No, 4543/2015 DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For seeking modification/correction and office report) Date : 31/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Appellant(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.07.3116:45:10 ISTReason:

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4506 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30969 OF 2011) SAVITRI DEVI .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4830 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27508 OF 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4508-12 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33552-33556 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4513-17 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33984-33988 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4518-24 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 36334-36340 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4819 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 333 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4525-26 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4527 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4529-30 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1664-1665 OF 2012)

2 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4531 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1739 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4532 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1858 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4533 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2411 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4534 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2537 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4535 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2557 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4536 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2603 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4537 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2607 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4538 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2612 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4539 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2873 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4540 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3298 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4541 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3473 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3916 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4544 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3918 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4545 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4021 OF 2012)

3 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4546 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4024 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4547 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4223 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4548 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4242 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4549 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4249 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4550 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4542 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4551 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4552 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5712 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4553 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5959 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4554 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6013 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4555 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6027 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4556 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6121 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4557 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6196 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4558 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6345 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4559 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6353 OF 2012)

4 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4560 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6363 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4561 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6368 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4563 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6369 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4564-67 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6466-6469 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4568-73 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6489-6494 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4575-76 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6534-6535 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4577 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4578 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6629 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4579-80 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6731-6732 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4581-89 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6748-6756 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4591 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7146 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4592 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7436 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4593 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4594 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7540 OF 2012)

5 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4595 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7541 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4596 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7815 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4597-98 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7934-7935 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4599 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4600 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8439 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4601 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8528 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8593 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4603 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8849 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4604 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8851 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4605-07 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8853-8855 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4608 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9527 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4609 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9678 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4610 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9748 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4611 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9761 OF 2012)

6 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4612 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10052 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4613-15 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10056-10058 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4616 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10315 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4617 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10597 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4618 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11303 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4619 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11304 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4620 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11879 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4621 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11993 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4622 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12299 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4623 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12461 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4624 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12844 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4625-30 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13641-13646 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4631 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15173 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4632 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15905 OF 2012)

7 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4633 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16007 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4634 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16336 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4635 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16337 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4636 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4637 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17041 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4638 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4639 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19356 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4640 OF 2015 ( ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.15370 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO.....CC 20540 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4641 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23723 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4642-4643 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23724-23725 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4644 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24203 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4645 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24720 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4646-4647 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25551-25552 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4648-4650 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26874-26876 OF 2012)

8 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4651 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4652 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27139 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4653-4660 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27389-27396 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4661-4666 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27502-27507 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4667 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28140 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4668 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29279 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4669 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33860 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4670 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37492 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4671 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37989 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4672 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37993 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4673 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38288 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4674 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38289 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4675 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38290 OF 2012)

9 CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NOS. 237-238 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4677 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8631 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4678 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4679 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8887 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4680 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9168 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4681 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9297 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4682 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12784 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4683 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13017 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4690-4691 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16722-16723 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4692 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4693 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18090 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4694 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18735 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4695 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18866 OF 2013)

10 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4696-4697 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19200-19201 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4698 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19922 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4699 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 20329 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4700 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23276 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4701-702 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23855-23856 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4703-4704 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23857-23858 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4705-4706 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23859-23860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4707-4709 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24622-24624 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4710-4711 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26176-26177 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4712 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26178 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4713 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26179 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4714-4715 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26681-26682 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4716 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26868 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4717 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26890 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4718 OF 2015

11 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30601 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4719 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30859 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4720 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4721 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30861 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4722 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30862 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4723 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32108 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4724 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33980 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4726 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 34176 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4727 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 35109 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4728 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37793 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4729 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39351 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4730-4731 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39697-39698 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4732-4733 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39699-39700 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4734 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39701 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4735-4736 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39702-39703 OF 2013)

12 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4737 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 802 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4738 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2495 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4739 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4566 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4740-4741 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5936-5937 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4742-45 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6024-6027 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4746 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6682 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4747 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7019 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4748 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7031 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4749 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7036 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4750 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10065 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4751-53 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10147-10149 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4754 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11737 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4755 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13401 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4756 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 14786 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4757 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12443 OF 2014)

13 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4758 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13034 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4759-60 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22298-22299 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4761-63 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22329-22331 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4764-65 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22384-22385 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4766-4768 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22716-22718 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4769-4770 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36155-36156 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4771 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4772-74 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36647-36649 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4775 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12433 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4776 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4777 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23772 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4778 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26260 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4779 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17559 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4780 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36242 OF 2013)

14 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4781 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29351 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4782 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18356 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4783 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19521 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4784 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19523 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4785 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19525 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4786 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19777 OF 2014) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 444 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4787 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25279 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4788 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27102 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4789 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4790 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36390 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4791 OF 2015 ( ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15397 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO...CC 21151 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4792 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36975 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4793 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9551 OF 2014)

15 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4794-95 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10049-10050 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4796 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10051 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4797 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12434 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4798-99 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12435-12436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4800 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12437 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12438 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4802 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12439 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4803 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12441 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4804 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12442 OF 2014) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 21 OF 2015 IN SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4805 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28167 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4806 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2057 OF 2015) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4807 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17686 OF 2014)

16 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15636 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4810-18 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17088-17096 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6569 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15635 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4808 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37126 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2197 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2195 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2198 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2199 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2225 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2226 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2704 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2705 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3022 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4902 OF 2014 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4928 OF 2014

17 J U D G M E N T A.K. SIKRI, J. These matters were heard in detail for few days and hearing was concluded on 05.02.2015. Thereupon, we communicated the result in the open Court by pronouncing that appeals were dismissed and the reasons shall follow. These are, thus, our reasons for dismissing the appeals. Leave is granted in all the special leave petitions. PROLOGUE : 2) The subject matter of most of these appeals are the Notifications dated 12-03-2008 issued by the State of U.P. under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (“Act” for short) read with Section 17 of the Act as well as declaration issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') vide Notification dated 30.06.2008. Land situate in various villages of Noida and Greater Noida in Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar was acquired. Some other Notifications under same provisions of the Act in respect of lands of these villages was also acquired by earlier Notifications. The purpose stated in the notifications was 'Planned Industrial Development'. Urgency provisions under Section 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act were invoked thereby dispensing with the right of objection otherwise given to the land holders under Section 5A of the Act. The total land which was

18 acquired by these notification was 589.188 hectares. Some writ petitions were initially filed in the High Court of Allahabad challenging the said Notifications, with primary contention that invocation of emergency provision and taking away valuable right of the land holders under Section 5A of the Act was illegal, mala fide , arbitrary and colourable exercise of power. Some of the writ petitions came up before the Division Bench of the said High Court. One was Writ Petition (C) 45777 of 2008 in the case of Harish Chand and Others v. State of U.P. and Others wherein the High Court upholding the very same Notifications, on arriving at the conclusion that invocation of Section 17 of the Act was justified, dismissed that writ petition. It so happened that another Division Bench of the same High Court decided Writ Petition (C) No. 17068 of 2009; titled Karan Singh v. State of U.P. and others. The Division Bench rendered its judgment dated 19-07-2011 in the said case accepting the aforesaid contention of the writ petitioners and holding that invocation of provisions of Section 17 of the Act was not justified. Accordingly, the Division Bench quashed these Notifications. 3) As a sequel, spate of writ petitions came to be filed challenging the lands acquired not only by the notification dated 12-03-2008 but even by earlier notifications as well. When these petitions came up before another Division Bench it noticed the aforesaid two conflicting views expressed by two different Division Benches. This led the said Division

19 Bench to refer the matter to the larger Bench and orders dated 26-07-2011 were passed in this behalf. This is how the matters were placed before the Full Bench and by that time as many as 471 writ petitions had accumulated. All these writ petitions were taken up analogously by the Full Bench and disposed of vide judgment dated 21.10.2011 with leading case known as Gajraj vs. State of U.P. (W.P. (C) 37443 of 201!). The Full Bench of the High Court has accepted the plea of the land holders that invocation of emergency clause contained in Section 17 of the Act was impermissible and unwarranted. At the same time, the High Court also noticed that in respect of land of many villages, possession had already been taken and substantial development work carried out. Even compensation was paid in such cases, the High Court, instead of quashing the Notifications in respect of those villages, chose to adopt the middle path in an endeavour to balance the equities of both sides. Thus, it enhanced the provisional compensation and also directed allotment of developed Abadi land to the extent 10% of their acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 sq. mtrs. However, in respect of three villages, when it found that no development work had been carried out at all by the Authorities during the intervening period, the High Court chose to quash the Notifications including consequential actions and directed restoration of the land to the respective land owners. 4) It may also be noticed at this stage that when there was flurry of writ

20 petitions in the High Court challenging the invocation of Section 17 and the Division Bench of the High Court in Harkaran Singh (supra) had held invocation of urgency powers to be bad in law, some land owners whose land was acquired much earlier by invoking clause (some of the Notifications of such land date back to 1979 or early 1980s as well) took adventurous step to file the writ petitions in the year 2011 challenging those Notifications. All these writ petitions, however, have been dismissed by the impugned judgment of the High Court on the ground that they are filed with inordinate delay and laches. 5) From the aforesaid, it is clear that three sets of directions are issued by the High Court, namely, (I) dismissing writ petitions filed with unexplained delays and laches; (ii) quashing the Notification in respect of three villages where no development work had taken place; and (iii) in respect of other villages, instead of quashing the action of acquisition of land in spite of accepting the plea that Section 17 was wrongly invoked, it has enhanced the compensation as well as extent of entitlement for allotment of developed Abadi plot. 6) The State Government/U.P. Development Board as well as many land owners have challenged the said Full Bench decision of the High Court. Insofar as special leave petitioners/appeals of the Government and Authority are concerned, they have already been dismissed. In these batches of matters, thus, we are concerned with the appeals of the land

21 owners. 7) Most of these appeals are filed against the Full Bench. However, some of the appeals arise against the earlier Division Bench judgment dated 25-11-2008 whereby the High Court had upheld the same Notifications and rejected the challenge to the acquisition of land. Some appeals are filed by the NOIDA authority where the Division Bench had quashed the notification. 8) After narrating these preliminaries of the matters, we advert to the facts and events of the cases. For the sake of convenience, we will refer to the facts appearing in the writ petition of Gajraj as that was the lead case before the High Court as well. FACTUAL MATRIX 9) This writ petition was filed by 27 writ petitioners claiming themselves to be Bhumidaars with transferable right and owners of different plots of land situate in Village Patwari, Pargana, Tehsil – Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar. The Notification dated 12-03-2008 was issued by the State Government under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 notifying that the land mentioned in the schedule is needed for the public purpose namely, for the “planned industrial development” in Gautam Buddha Nagar. Inquiry under Section 5A having been dispensed with vide Notification dated 12-03-2008, State Government proceeded to issue declaration under Section 6 of the Land

22 Acquisition Act dated 30-06-2008. 10) The petitioners had pleaded in the writ petition that dispensation of the inquiry under Section 5A can only be an exception where the urgency cannot brook the delay. The respondents, without application of mind, dispensed with the inquiry. The acquisition proceedings were deprecated as void, unconstitutional, tainted with malafide, abuse of authority/power and non application of mind. It was pleaded that the procedure under Section 5A is mandatory which embodies a just and wholesome principle that a person whose property is being acquired or intended to be acquired should have occasion to persuade the authorities that his property be not touched for acquisition. It was also argued that land use of village Patwari was changed in the Master Plan 2021 after the issuance of notifications under sections 4 and 6, which is colourable exercise of powers and entire exercise is arbitrary, illegal and infringes rights of the petitioners guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India. These petitioners also stated in the writ petition that though there was some delay in filing the writ petition if counted from the date of notification but the writ petition was filed only when it came to their knowledge that the land use of village Patwari was changed in the Master Plan 2021 after the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 and land was sought to be allotted to the private builders, thereby giving go by to the objective for which the land was acquired. The

23 petitioners further claimed that the part of the property of the petitioners is situate in village Abadi. It was pleaded that the authority had executed a lease deed dated 31-03-2010 in favour of respondent no. 4 M/s. Supertech Ltd, a company engaged in the construction, allotting 2,40,00 square meters land for constructing multi-storied complexes. It was also stated that although land was acquired for industrial development but the same had now been allotted to the builders by the Authority which clearly indicates that neither there was any appropriate plan and scheme for industrial development nor there was any urgency in the matter and the whole proceeding amounted to colourable exercise of power. 11) The State Government as well as Authority contested the matter by putting its justification to the invocation of Section 17 of the Act. It was pleaded that land was acquired for the purpose of industrial development. It was also stated that the Authority had been constituted vide Notification dated 28-01-1998 issued under the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 (hereafter referred to as the '1976 Act') and the land was to be developed in accordance with the aims and objectives contained in the said Act included development of the land for residential and other purposes as well and was not confined to industrial development alone. Objection was raised to the maintainability of the writ petitions by contending that except few petitioners, all other had received compensation on various dates and, therefore, they were

24 estopped from challenging the acquisition, once the possession of the land was taken, award was passed and compensation received. The Authorities also stated that land owner of about 83% of the land area had already been paid the compensation. In terms of numbers, out of 1605 persons, 1403 persons had accepted the compensation. Development works had been carried out in the area in question which had already been demarcated into various sectors. The nature of development carried out was stated in detail in the affidavit. Invocation of urgency clause was also sought to be justified. 12) M/s. Supertech Limited, to whom certain area was allotted for development of the housing colony was also impleaded as the respondent. On its impleadment, this respondent also filed its counter affidavit stating the circumstances under which it was allotted the land for development of residential units. It also contended that the substantial work had already been undertaken by the said Company. So much so, out of 6000 residential units which were proposed to be constructed, 4471 units had already been booked by the members of public and paid part considerations. It was pleaded that in this manner third party interest had also been created. It would be relevant to point out here that apart from M/s. Supertech Limited, there were at least 10 more such developers who had been allotted the various chunks of acquired land for similar housing projects etc.

25 JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT 13) After noticing the aforesaid facts and the contentions and having regard to the plethora of writ petitions which were filed pertaining to different villages, the High Court deemed it appropriate to categorize these writ petitions in different groups, village wise. 65 village wise categories were, accordingly, carved out. Out of these group 1-41 pertained to different villages of Greater NOIDA whereas villages in group 42-65 fell in NOIDA. Village Patwari was taken up as group 1. The High Court, thereafter, discussed the factual position in respect of each group which need not be mentioned, as unnecessary for our purposes. However, wherever this exercise is deemed proper, we would be referring to such factual details at the relevant steps. 14) Keeping in view the various submissions made by the writ petitioners in their petitions, the High Court framed as many as 17 issues or the points of consideration which had fallen for its discussion and decision. It would be apposite to take note of those issues at this juncture: “ (i) Object and Purpose of the 1976 Act: Whether the development of industries is the dominant purpose and object of U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. (ii) Whether Acquisition Compulsory: Whether for carrying out the development of industrial area under 1976 Act, it is compulsory and necessary to acquire the land by the Authority? (iii) Delay and Laches : Whether the delay and laches in the facts of the present case can bar the invocation or

26 Constitutional remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. (iv) National Capital Regional Planning Board Act, 1985, its Consequences: Whether the Authority can carry out development, utilise the land acquired as per its Master Plan 2021 without its approval/clearance by National Capital Regional Planning Board, and what is effect on its function of land acquisition after enforcement of 1985 Act? (v) Invocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4): Whether invocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act and dispensation of inquiry under section 5A was in accordance with law in the cases which are under consideration? (vi) Pre-notification and Post-notification delay: Whether delay caused before issuance of notification under Section 4 and delay caused subsequent to notification under Section 4 can be relied for determining as to whether urgency was such that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was necessary? (vii) Colourable Exercise of Power: Whether acquisition of land are vitiated due to mala fide and colourable exercise of powers? (viii) Taking of possession: Whether the possession of the land acquired was taken under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in accordance with law? (ix) Vesting: Whether after taking possession under Section 17(A) of the Act the challenge to the notifications under Section 4 read with 17(1) and 17(4) and Section 6 cannot be entertained due to the reason that land which has already been vested in the State cannot be divested? (x) Section 11A; Whether acquisition under challenge has lap0sed under Section 11A of the Act due to non-declaration of the award within two years from the date of publication of the declaration made under section 6? (xi) Section 17(3A): Whether non payment of 80% of the compensation as required by Section 17(3A) of the Land Acquisition Act is fatal to the acquisition o

27 proceedings? (xii) Waiver: Whether the petitioners who have accepted compensation by agreement have waived their right to challenge the acquisition proceedings? (xiii) Acquiescence: Whether the petitioners due to having accepted the compensation by agreement have acquiesced to the proceedings of land acquisition and they are estopped from challenging the acquisition proceedings at this stage? (xiv) Third Party Rights, Development and Construction: Whether due to creation of third party rights, development carried out by the Authority and developments and co0nstructions made by the allottees on the acquired land subsequent to the acquisition, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief of quashing the notifications under Section 4 read with Section 17(1) and 17(4) and Section 6 of the Act? (xv) Effect of Upholding of some of the notifications in some writ petitions earlier decided: What are the consequences and effect of earlier Division Bench judgment upholding several notifications which are subject matter of challenge in some of these writ petitions? (xvi) Conflicts in views of Division Benches: Which of the Division Bench decisions i.e. Harkaran Singh's case holding that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was invalid or earlier Division Bench judgment in Harish Chand's case holding that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was in accordance with law, has to be approved? (xvii) Relief: To what relief, if any, the petitioners are entitled in these writ petition?” 15) We are purposely eschewing the detailed discussion by the High Court on all the aforesaid issues. Suffice it to state here that after noticing the object and purpose of 1976 Act and discussing its provisions contained in this Act with reference to case law explaining the legal position of such

28 statutory authorities entrusted with the task of development works, the High Court concluded that the stand of the Authority that unless the land is acquired by it. It cannot carry out any development works until the 1976 Act was misconceived and incorrect. The High Court remarked that the Authority was labouring under the aforesaid misconception and, therefore, concentrated only on acquisition of the land without taking care of other modes and means of industrial development and excessive acquisition of fertile agriculture land was due to the above mindset of the Authority. Insofar as issues pertaining to compulsive acquisition and invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) are concerned, the High Court has arrived at a finding that such invocation of emergency/urgency clauses, thereby depriving the land owners of their most invaluable right to file objections under Section 5A of the Act, was illegal and unwarranted. As this issue is decided in favour of the land owners and against this finding appeals preferred by the State as well as the Authority have already been dismissed, it is not necessary to explain the raison d'etre behind these findings. We would be proceeding on the basis that invocation of Section 17(1) and Section 17(4) was wrong. Similarly, the findings of the High Court that exercise of power by the State was colourable and arbitrary need not be restated in detail, the same reason. 16) As far as the issue no. 4 pertaining the NCR planning Board Act is concerned, the High Court has held that land could not be acquired

29 without the permission of the Board. Opinion of the High Court on this aspect was questioned by the State of U.P. as well as Authority in its appeals. However, it was found that as a matter of fact, insofar as these cases are concerned consent of the Board had been obtained. Having regard to this position, while dismissing the appeals of the State/Authority, we have left the said question of law open, namely, whether permission of the deemed under the Act of 1985 is a pre-condition before acquisition of the land. Therefore, that aspect also needs no elaboration at our end in these appeals. 17) It becomes clear from the above that the High Court arrived at a conclusion that since invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was uncalled for and unwarranted, the acquisition of the land of the appellants herein was illegal. Notwithstanding, the same, the High Court did not grant the relief of setting aside the entire acquisition and restoring the land to the appellants. After the aforesaid findings, the High Court observed that insofar as grant of particular relief to the land owners in land acquisition proceedings is concerned, it depends on several important factors. Thus, the issue of 'reliefs' has been discussed specifically and independently under the aforesaid caption. Here, the High Court has observed that the creation of third party rights, development undertaken over the land in dispute as well as the steps taken by the land owners after declaration made under Section 6 of the Act would be the relevant consideration in

30 determining the kind of relief that is to be granted to the land owners. Discussing the aforesaid aspects in the contexts of these proceedings, the High Court pointed out that in majority of cases third party rights had been created after issue of declaration under Section 6 and after taking possession of the land, substantial developments including constructions had been undertaken. Thus, in those cases where substantial development had taken place and/or third party rights had been created, the High Court deemed it proper not to interfere with the acquisition. At the same time in order to balance the equities, it felt that grant of higher compensation and better share in the developed land to these land owners would meet the ends of justice. The exact relief given in this behalf shall be stated at the appropriate stage. 18) The High Court also found that in three villages no such third party rights had been created and no developments had taken place. So far as these villages are concerned, the High Court deemed it apposite to release the land in favour of the land owners of those villages. 19) The High Court also found that many writ petitions were filed challenging the acquisitions in respect of which notifications were issued much earlier, were totally stale and suffered from laches and delays. In the opinion of the High Court, all those writ petitions which pertained to notifications issued prior to the year 2000 and the writ petitions were filed

31 in the year 2011, these writ petitions deserved to be dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay and laches. 20) In nutshell, relief was categorised in three compartments. In the first instance, those writ petitions which were filed belatedly were dismissed. In the second category, three villages, namely, Devala (Group 40), village Yusufpur Chak Sahberi (Group 38) and Village Asdullapur (Group 42) the acquisition was set aside. Land acquisition in respect of remaining 61 villages is concerned, the acquisition was allowed to remain but the additional compensation was increased to 64.7% with further entitlement for allotment of development abadi plot to the extent of 10% of the acquired land of those land owners subject to maximum of 2500 sq. mtrs. 21) We now reproduce the exact nature of direction given by the High Court, which reads as follows: “ In view of the foregoing conclusions we order as follows: 1. The Writ Petition No. 45933 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 47545 of 2011 relating to village Nithari, Writ Petition No. 47522 of 2011 relating to village Sadarpur, Writ Petition No. 45196 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45208 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45211 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45213 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45216 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45223 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45224 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45226 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45229 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45230 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45235 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45238 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45283 of 2011 relating to village Khoda, Writ Petition No. 46764 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 46785 of 2011 relating to village Sultanpur, Writ Petition No. 46407 of 2011 relating to village Chaura Sadatpur and Writ

32 Petition No. 46470 of 2011 relating to village Alaverdipur which have been filed with inordinate delay and laches are dismissed. 2(i). The writ petitions of Group 40 (Village Devla) being Writ Petition No. 31126 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 59131 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 22800 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 37118 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 42812 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 50417 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 54424 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 54652 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 55650 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 57032 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 58318 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 22798 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 37784 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 37787 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 31124 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 31125 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 32234 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 32987 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 35648 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 38059 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 41339 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 47427 of 2011 and Writ Petition No. 47412 of 2011 are allowed and the notifications dated 26.5.2009 and 22.6.2009 and all consequential actions are quashed. The petitioners shall be entitled for restoration of their land subject to deposit of compensation which they had received under agreement/award before the authority/Collector. 2(ii) Writ petition No. 17725 of 2010 Omveer and others Vs. State of U.P. (Group 38) relating to village Yusufpur Chak Sahberi is allowed. Notifications dated 10.4.2006 and 6.9.2007 and all consequential actions are quashed. The petitioners shall be entitled for restoration of their land subject to return of compensation received by them under agreement/award to the Collector. 2(iii) Writ Petition No. 47486 of 2011 (Rajee and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) of Group-42 relating to village Asdullapur is allowed. The notification dated 27.1.2010 and 4.2.2010 as well as all subsequent proceedings are quashed. The petitioners shall be entitled to restoration of their land. 3. All other writ petitions except as mentioned above at (1) and (2) are disposed of with following directions: (a) The petitioners shall be entitled for payment of additional compensation to the extent of same ratio (i.e. 64.70%) as paid for village Patwari in addition to the compensation received by them under 1997 Rules/award which payment shall be ensured by the Authority at an

33 early date. It may be open for Authority to take a decision as to what proportion of additional compensation be asked to be paid by allottees. Those petitioners who have not yet been paid compensation may be paid the compensation as well as additional compensation as ordered above. The payment of additional compensation shall be without any prejudice to rights of land owners under section 18 of the Act, if any. (b) All the petitioners shall be entitled for allotment of developed Abadi plot to the extent of 10% of their acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 square meters. We however, leave it open to the Authority in cases where allotment of abadi plot to the extent of 6% or 8% have already been made either to make allotment of the balance of the area or may compensate the land owners by payment of the amount equivalent to balance area as per average rate of allotment made of developed residential plots. 4. The Authority may also take a decision as to whether benefit of additional compensation and allotment of abadi plot to the extent of 10% be also given to; (a) those land holders whose earlier writ petition challenging the notifications have been dismissed upholding the notifications; and (b) those land holders who have not come to the Court, relating to the notifications which are subject matter of challenge in writ petitions mentioned at direction No.3. 5. The Greater NOIDA and its allotees are directed not to carry on development and not to implement the Master Plan 2021 till the observations and directions of the National Capital Regional Planning Board are incorporated in Master Plan 2021 to the satisfaction of the National Capital Regional Planning Board. We make it clear that this direction shall not be applicable in those cases where the development is being carried on in accordance with the earlier Master Plan of Greater NOIDA duly approved by the National Capital Regional Planning Board. 6. We direct the Chief Secretary of the State to appoint officers not below the level of Principal Secretary (except the officers of Industrial Development Department who have dealt with the relevant files) to conduct a thorough inquiry regarding the acts of Greater Noida (a) in proceeding to implement Master Plan 2021 without approval of N.C.R.P. Board, (b) decisions taken to change the land use, (c) allotment made to the builders and (d)

34 indiscriminate proposals for acquisition of land, and thereafter the State Government shall taken appropriate action in the matter.” 22) We may point out at this stage that in respect of all these three categories, the High Court has provided its justification for granting relief in the aforesaid nature. We shall be referring to the same while discussing the cases of appellants belonging to one or the other category. 23) In nutshell, it may be pointed out that 65 villages which were the subject matter of bunch of writ petitions before the Full Bench of the High Court were grouped in 65 groups, village-wise and facts of acquisition, possession, if any, payment of compensation, developments, the nature of utilisation of those lands, and/or creation of third party rights were taken note of. Out of these 65 villages, 41 villages fall in Greater NOIDA and 24 in NOIDA. The High Court discussed the issue of laches and delays under Issue No. 3, as mentioned above, after referring to various judgments of this Court and culling out the principles contained therein on that basis. The High Court accepted the plea of inordinate delay insofar as acquisition of land in respect of village Nithari, Village Chauyra Sadedpur, Village Khoda, Village Sultanpur are concerned. These writ petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay. In respect of other villages, the Court repelled the contention of delay raised by the department, accepting the explanation given by land owners of those

35 villages that they did not oppose the acquisition earlier at the time of issuance of notification as the land was taken for industrial development. However, it is only when these land owners had come to know that instead of developing the land for the purpose for which it was acquired, the acquiring authority had transferred the land to the private persons and builders, that these land owners felt aggrieved and cheated and, therefore, there was sufficient explanation for coming to the Court at a time when these land owners discovered that the acquired land had been transferred to private persons. The Court, therefore, held that such writ petitions were to be entertained on merits, ignoring the delay. 24) Some of the appeals are filed by the land owners in respect of aforesaid villages where their petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. We are of the opinion that their writ petitions were rightly rejected by the High Court applying the principle of delays and laches. We are, thus, dismissing these appeals, upholding the order of the High Court. The Arguments : Appellants 25) Though many counsel appeared on behalf of appellants and argued the appeals, Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dwivedi, Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Mr. Mahabir Singh, Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Senior Advocates and Dr. Suraj Singh, Advocate were the main architects who built the edifice of the appellants'

36 appeals. Among themselves, they covered almost all the aspects which arise in these appeals. Other counsel either adopted those submissions or some of them pointed out some distinctive and peculiar facts of their cases. It is not necessary to reproduce the submission of each of the aforesaid senior counsel separately as we think that better course of action would be to spell out these submissions in consolidated form to avoid any repetition. The arguments which were advanced by these counsel, in support of their appeals, are recapitulated hereunder: (I) In the first instance, the illegalities committed in issuing the notifications for acquisition of land were pointed out which were even accepted by the High Court in the impugned judgment, in the following manner: (a) No permission of NCR Board was taken before issuing the notifications. (b) There was violation of Section 5-A of the Act which goes to the root of the matter, coupled with the finding that it amounted to colourable exercise of power. (c) There was violation of mandatory provision contained in Section 11-A of the Act as well. (d) Though, Section 17 (1) and Section 17 (4) of the Act were invoked, 80% of the compensation, which is mandatory requirement, was not paid to the appellants. (e) After acquiring the land purportedly for the purpose of industrial development, it was sold to private developers/real estate agencies for

37 residential purposes, that too at a much higher rate. As per the appellants, it would amply demonstrate that the Government acted more like a property dealer with intention to make money at the cost of the land owners/agriculturists. (II) It was further argued that even when status quo orders were passed in many writ petitions, the Government had violated those orders and in this manner, third party rights were created, thereby committing contempt of court. When the third party interest were created in the aforesaid manner, the High Court should not have influenced itself by the said consideration in denying the relief to the appellants after holding that acquisition was illegal. (III) It was also argued that in a case like this, doctrine of severance should have been applied by excluding only those portions of land in respect of which third party rights were created or development had taken place inasmuch as large chunk of land in these villages have still not been utilised for any purpose as these are thickly inhabited. By applying the doctrine of severance, Abadi land should have been included for the purpose of giving relief, when the acquisition was admittedly bound to be illegal. It was only, in this manner, equities could be balanced. (IV) It was sought to be argued that in respect of three villages where

38 acquisition is set aside on the ground that no development has taken place and third party rights are not created, this very principle should have been applied in respect of lands of those appellants in other villages where no third party rights were created or there was Abadi or where no possession was taken by the authorities and no compensation taken by the land owners and the land owners who belong to lower strata of society. In nutshell, the submission is that such cases are exactly at par with the cases of 3 villages falling in para 2 of the direction, where the land acquisition has been quashed even when the compensation was taken and same treatment be accorded to at least those appellants who fall in this category. (V) It was also argued that after holding the acquisition illegal, the Court had three alternatives namely: (a) payment of 67.4% compensation plus restoring 10% of the developed land to the land owners, which is followed by the High Court. (b) directing restoration of possession in all these cases with liberty to the Government to negotiate with the land owners. (c) permitting fresh acquisition. Submission was that first alternative was not the best alternative adopted by the High Court and in the interest of justice, the second or third alternative should have been resorted to, more so, when it was

39 found to be case of malice in law which can clearly be inferred from the findings arrived at by the High Court, on the basis of material established on record. 26) In support of these submissions, learned counsel for the appellants referred to the following judgments: (i) Anand Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. 1 “ 50. Use of the power by the government under Section 17 for 'planned development of the city' or `the development of residential area' or for `housing' must not be as a rule but by way of an exception. Such exceptional situation may be for the public purpose viz., rehabilitation of natural calamity affected persons; rehabilitation of persons uprooted due to commissioning of dam or housing for lower strata of the society urgently; rehabilitation of persons affected by time bound projects, etc. The list is only illustrative and not exhaustive. In any case, sans real urgency and need for immediate possession of the land for carrying out the stated purpose, heavy onus lies on the government to justify exercise of such power. xxx xxx xxx 55. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, therefore, the Government has completely failed to justify the dispensation of an enquiry under Section 5A by invoking Section 17(4). For this reason, the impugned notifications to the extent they state that Section 5A shall not apply suffer from legal infirmity. The question, then, arises whether at this distance of time, the acquisition proceedings must be declared invalid and illegal. 56. In the written submissions of the GDA, it is stated that subsequent to the declaration made under Section 6 of the Act in the month of December, 2004, award has been made and out of the 400 land owners more than 370 have already received compensation. It is also stated that out of the total cost of Rs. 8,85,14,000/- for development of the acquired land, an amount of Rs. 5,28,00,000/- has already been spent by the GDA and more than 60% of work has been completed. It, thus, seems that barring the appellants and few others all other tenure 1 (2010) 11 SCC 242

40 holders/land owners have accepted the `takings' of their land. It is too late in the day to undo what has already been done. We are of the opinion, therefore, that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the appellants are not entitled to any relief although dispensation of enquiry under Section 5A was not justified. 57. On behalf of the appellants, it was vehemently argued that the government may be directed to release their land from proposed acquisition. It was submitted by the appellants that houses/structures and buildings (including educational building) are existing on the subject land and as per the policy framed by the State Government, the land deserves to be exempted from acquisition. The submission of the appellants has been countered by the respondents and in the written submissions filed by the GDA, it is stated that the houses/structures and buildings which are claimed to exist, have been raised by the appellants subsequent to the notification under Section 4(1) of the Act and, therefore, they are not entitled to release of their land from acquisition. 58. In our view, since the existence of houses/structures and buildings as on November 22, 2003/February 20, 2004 over the appellants' land has been seriously disputed, it may not be appropriate to issue any direction to the State Government, as prayed for by the appellants, for release of their land from acquisition. However, as the possession has not been taken, the interest of justice would be subserved if the appellants are given liberty to make representation to the State authorities under Section 48(1) of the Act for release of their land. We, accordingly, grant liberty to the appellants to make appropriate representation to the State Government and observe that if such representation is made by the appellants within two months from today, the State Government shall consider such representation in accordance with law and in conformity with the State policy for release of land under Section 48(1) without any discrimination within three months from receipt of such representation.” 27) In support of the arguments that the equities were to be balanced on the facts of the case which according to the appellant were in their favour, following judgments were referred: (ii) H.M.T. Housing Building Co-operative Society v. Syed Khader &

41 Ors. 2 “ 22. In the present case there has been contravention of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act inasmuch as there was no prior approval of the State Government as required by the said section before steps for acquisition of the lands were taken. The report of Shri G.K.V. Rao points out as to how the appellant-Society admitted large number of persons as members who cannot be held to be genuine members, the sole object being to transfer the lands acquired for “public purpose”, to outsiders as part of commercial venture, undertaken by the office- bearer of the appellant-Society. We are in agreement with the finding of the High Court that the statutory notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act have been issued due to the role played by M/s S.R. Constructions, Respondent 11. On the materials on record, the High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that the proceedings for acquisition of the lands had not been initiated because the State Government was satisfied about the existence of the public purpose but at the instance of agent who had collected more than a crore of rupees for getting the lands acquired by the State Government. 23. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. But in the circumstances of the case there shall be no orders as to costs. 24. We direct that as a result of quashing of the land acquisition proceedings including the notifications as aforesaid, the possession of the lands shall be restored to the respective landowners irrespective of the fact whether they had challenged the acquisition of their lands or not. On restoration of the possession to the landowners they shall refund the amounts received by them as compensation or otherwise in respect of their lands. The appellant, the respondents and the State Government including all authorities/persons concerned shall implement the aforesaid directions at an early date.” (iii) H.M.T. House Building Cooperative Society v. M. Venkataswamappa and others 3 (iv) Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. State of Karnataka and others 4 “ 87. The three Judge Bench also approved the view taken by 2 (1995) 2 SCC 677 3 (1995) 3 SCC 128 4 (2012) 3 SCC 727

42 the High Court that the acquisition of land was vitiated because the decision of the State Government was influenced by the Estate Agent with whom the Appellant had entered into an agreement. Paras 21 and 22 of the judgment, which contain discussion on this issue are extracted hereunder: (1st H.M.T. House Building Coop. Society v. Syed Khader and others, (1995) 2 SCC 677 “ 21. Mr. G. Ramaswamy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, submitted that merely because the appellant Society had entered into an agreement with Respondent 11, M/s S.R. Constructions, in which the latter for the consideration paid to it had assured that the lands in question shall be acquired by the State Government, no adverse inference should be drawn because that may amount to a tall claim made on behalf of M/s S.R. Constructions in the agreement. He pointed out that the notifications under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) have been issued beyond the time stipulated in the agreement and as such, it should be held that the State Government has exercised its statutory power for acquisition of the lands in normal course, only after taking all facts and circumstances into consideration. There is no dispute that in terms of agreement dated 1-2-1985 payments have been made by the appellant Society to M/s S.R. Constructions. This circumstance alone goes a long way to support the contention of the writ Petitioners that their lands have not been acquired in the normal course or for any public purpose. In spite of the repeated query, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Society could not point out or produce any order of the State Government under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act granting prior approval and prescribing conditions and restrictions in respect of the use of the lands which were to be acquired for a public purpose. There is no restriction or bar on the part of the appellant Society on carving out the size of the plots or the manner of allotment or in respect of construction over the same. That is why the framers of the Act have required the appropriate Government to grant prior approval of any housing scheme presented by any cooperative society before the lands are acquired treating such requirement and acquisition for public purpose. It is incumbent on the part of the appropriate Government while granting approval to examine different aspects of the matter so that it may serve the public interest and not the interest of few who can as well afford to acquire such lands by negotiation in open market. According to us, the State Government has not granted the prior approval in terms of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act to the

43 housing scheme in question. The power under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act has been exercised for extraneous consideration and at the instance of the persons who had no role in the decision-making process - whether the acquisition of the lands in question shall be for a public purpose. This itself is enough to vitiate the whole acquisition proceeding and render the same invalid. 22. In the present case there has been contravention of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act inasmuch as there was no prior approval of the State Government as required by the said section before steps for acquisition of the lands were taken. The report of Shri G.K.V. Rao points out as to how the appellant-Society admitted large number of persons as members who cannot be held to be genuine members, the sole object being to transfer the lands acquired for “public purpose”, to outsiders as part of commercial venture, undertaken by the office- bearer of the appellant-Society. We are in agreement with the finding of the High Court that the statutory notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act have been issued due to the role played by M/s S.R. Constructions, Respondent 11. On the materials on record, the High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that the proceedings for acquisition of the lands had not been initiated because the State Government was satisfied about the existence of the public purpose but at the instance of agent who had collected more than a crore of rupees for getting the lands acquired by the State Government. xx xx xx 95. The Division Bench of the High Court in Subramani, ILR 1995 Kant 3139, noted that the terms of the agreement entered into between the Society and M/s. Devatha Builders was not for the acquisition of land but only for development of the acquired land. The Division Bench also noted that the agreement was entered into between the Society and the owners in 1985, whereas the Government gave approval for acquisition in 1985 and the agreement with the developer was of 1986. The Division Bench also noted that no stranger had been inducted as a member of the society. However, the acquisition which was under challenge in Writ Petition No. 28707 of 1995 was declared illegal because the House Building Cooperative Society concerned has not framed any housing scheme and obtained approval thereof from the State Government. The Division Bench also expressed the view that remedy under Article 226 was

44 discretionary and it was not inclined to nullify the acquisition made for the society because the petitioners had approached the Court after long lapse of time and there was no explanation for the delay. xx xx xx 132. Before concluding we consider it necessary to observe that in view of the law laid down in the 1st H.M.T. case (paragraphs 19, 21 and 22), which was followed in 2nd H.M.T. case and Vyalikawal House Building Cooperative Society's case, the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court in Narayana Raju's case that the framing of scheme and approval thereof can be presumed from the direction given by the State Government to the Special Deputy Commissioner to take steps for issue of notification under Section 4(1) cannot be treated as good law and the mere fact that this Court had revoked the certificate granted by the High Court cannot be interpreted as this Court's approval of the view expressed by the High Court on the validity of the acquisition. 133. In the result, the appeals are dismissed. However, keeping in view the fact that some of the members of the appellant may have built their houses on the sites allotted to them, we give liberty to the appellant to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of their land at the prevailing market price and hope that the landowners will, notwithstanding the judgments of the High Court and this Court, agree to accept the market price so that those who have built the houses may not suffer. 134. At the same time, we make it clear that the appellant must return the vacant land to the respondents irrespective of the fact that it may have carved out the sites and allotted the same to its members. This must be done within a period of three months from today and during that period the appellant shall not change the present status of the vacant area/sites. The members of the appellant who may have been allotted the sites shall also not change the present status/character of the land. The parties are left to bear their own costs.” 28) In support of the proposition that it was a case of malice in law, reference was made to the judgment in the case of S. Partap Singh v.

45 State of Punjab 5 . 29) Countering the arguments of delay and laches putforth by the respondents even in appellants cases, the reference was made to the judgment in the case of S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath and others 6 , in support of the plea that fraud vitiates all action and it was a case of fraud where land was acquired for one purpose but thereafter the Government sought to utilise it for some other purpose. In this behalf, reliance was also placed in the case of Vyalikaval Housebuilding Coop. Society v. V. Chandrappa and others 7 : “ 3. This writ petition was contested by the appellant society as the respondent and it was alleged that it was hopelessly barred by time being delayed by 14 years and it was also submitted that the writ petitioners had participated in the inquiry under Section 5A of the Act and have also received substantial amount from the appellant society pursuant to the agreement executed in their favour. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground of being hopelessly barred by time and the writ petitioners participated in the proceedings therefore they have acquiesced in the matter. Aggrieved against this order passed by learned Single Judge, a writ appeal was filed by the respondents which came to be allowed by the Division Bench for the reasons mentioned in another writ appeal decided by the same Division Bench headed by the Chief Justice of the High Court on 17.1.2000. In that writ appeal the Division Bench held that the entire acquisition on behalf of the appellant society was actuated with fraud as held in Narayana Reddy v. State of Karnataka ILR 1991 Kar. 2248. In that case it was held as follows: “ As seen from the findings of G.V.K. Rao Inquiry Report, in respect of five respondent societies and the report of the Joint Registrar in respect of Vyalikaval House Building Co-operative Society, these societies had indulged in enrolling large number of members illegally inclusive of ineligible members and had also indulged in enrolling large 5 AIR 1964 SC 72 6 (1994) 1 SCC 1 7 (2007) 9 SCC 304

46 number of bogus members. The only inference that is possible from this is that the office-bearers of the societies had entered into unholy alliance with the respective agents for the purpose of making money, as submitted for the petitioners otherwise, there is no reason as to why such an agreement should have been brought about by the office-bearers of the society and the agents. Unless these persons had the intention of making huge profits as alleged by the petitioners, they would not have indulged in enrolment of ineligible and bogus members. The circumstance that without considering all these relevant materials the Government had accorded its approval, is sufficient to hold that the agents had prevailed upon the Government to take a decision to acquire the lands without going into all those relevant facts. The irresistible inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the power conferred under the Land Acquisition Act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not for a bona fide housing scheme but is substantially for the purpose of enabling the concerned office-bearers of respondent-societies and their agents to indulge in sale of sites in the guise of allotment of sites to the members/ associate members of the society to make money as alleged by the petitioners and therefore it is a clear case of colourable exercise of power. Thus the decision of the Government to acquire the lands suffers from legal mala fides and therefore the impugned notifications are liable to be struck down.” 30) Judgment in the case of Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and Anr. v. G. Jayarama Reddy and Ors. 8 also relied upon to counter the plea of delay and laches, wherein this Court held: “ 24. The first question which needs consideration is whether the High Court committed an error by granting relief to Respondent 1 despite the fact that he filed the writ petition after a long lapse of time and the explanation given by him was found unsatisfactory by the learned Single Judge, who decided the writ petition after remand by the Division Bench. 25. Although the Framers of the Constitution have not prescribed 8 (2011) 10 SCC 608

47 any period of limitation for filing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the power conferred upon the High Court to issue to any person or authority including any Government, directions, orders or writs including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari is not hedged with any condition or constraint, in the last 61 years the superior courts have evolved several rules of self-imposed restraint including the one that the High Court may not enquire into belated or stale claim and deny relief to the petitioner if he is found guilty of laches. The principle underlying this rule is that the one who is not vigilant and does not seek intervention of the Court within reasonable time from the date of accrual of cause of action or alleged violation of constitutional, legal or other right is not entitled to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. Another reason for the High Court's refusal to entertain belated claim is that during the intervening period rights of third parties may have crystallized and it will be inequitable to disturb those rights at the instance of a person who has approached the Court after long lapse of time and there is no cogent explanation for the delay. We may hasten to add that no hard-and-fast rule can be laid down and no straightjacket formula can be evolved for deciding the question of delay/laches and each case has to be decided on its own facts. xx xx xx 31. In the light of the above, it is to be seen whether the discretion exercised by the Division Bench of the High Court to ignore the delay in filing of writ petition is vitiated by any patent error or the reasons assigned for rejecting the appellants' objection of delay are irrelevant and extraneous. Though it may sound repetitive, we may mention that in the writ petition filed by him, Respondent 1 had not only prayed for quashing of the acquisition proceedings, but also prayed for restoration of the acquired land on the ground that instead of using the same for the public purpose specified in the notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6 , the Corporation had transferred the same to private persons. Respondent 1 and the other landowners may not be having any serious objection to the acquisition of their land for a public purpose and, therefore, some of them not only accepted the compensation, but also filed applications under Section 18 of the Act for determination of market value by the court. However, when it was discovered that the acquired land has been transferred to private persons, they sought intervention of the Court and in the three cases, the Division Bench of the High Court nullified the acquisition on the ground of fraud and misuse of the provisions of the Act.”

48 The Arguments : Respondents 31) Mr. L.N. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the official respondents, emphatically countered the aforesaid submissions. He argued that in most of these appeals, writ petitions were filed in the High Court challenging the acquisition after passing of the award and taking possession of the land and in most of the cases, the land owners had even received the compensation. Therefore, these writ petitions were not maintainable and should have been dismissed on the ground of laches and delay inasmuch as acquisition cannot be challenged after the award is passed and compensation is received. He sought to distinguish the judgments cited by the appellants' counsel. He submitted that the High Court has wrongly fixed the cut-off date as 06.07.2011 . He also submitted that the High Court was in error in rejecting the arguments of acquiescence as acceptance of compensation clearly meant that these land owners had acquiesced into the action of the authorities in acquiring the land. His submission was that case should have been examined keeping in view the aforesaid factors and the plea taken by the writ petitioners that they felt aggrieved only when they came to know land was allotted/sold to private builders, was totally irrelevant and could not have been the ground to entertain the writ petitions on merits. 32) It was also argued by Mr. Rao that the High Court could not have enhanced the compensation by 64.7% in writ petition filed under Article

49 226 as it was not a public law remedy. His plea in this behalf was that Land Acquisition Act provided for complete machinery for determination of the compensation and reference by the land owners under Section 18 of the Act had already been sought and present way to matters are pending before the Reference Court to determine the market value of the land. He argued that merely because in the case of Patwari village, the Government had entered into an agreement with some of the villagers for payment of compensation by increasing it by 64.70%, would not mean that High Court could extend that to all villages in the absence of any agreement with those parties. In the same wave length, he challenged the direction for allotment of developed Abadi plot to the extent of 10% of the acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 square metres by pointing out that the aforesaid allotment was under the scheme of the Government which provided for allotment of 5% developed Abadi plot in respect of Noida land and 6% of developed Abadi plot where the land acquired was situated in Greater Noida. Here again, it was pleaded, the High Court could not tinker with the said policy by enhancing the entitlement for allotment to 10%. It was also argued that in any case once the compensation was enhanced, there was no reason to give allotment of larger area of land and it amounted to giving double benefit to the land owners. 33) Without prejudice to the aforesaid contentions, Mr. Rao submitted that in

50 spite of these serious infirmities in the judgment of the High Court, insofar as Government authorities are concerned, they were ready to pay the higher compensation and even allot land to the extent of 10% subject to the condition that quietus is given to all these cases with no further benefits. He pointed out that 64.7% additional compensation had already been given to about ninety percent land owners. Further, 6% of land/flats had already been allotted to ninety percent farmers. He further argued that care was taken at the time of acquisition itself not to touch the Abadi land. 34) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi and Mr. Pramod Swarup, senior advocates, who appeared for private respondents/builders to whom the land was allotted, supported the aforesaid submissions of Mr. Rao and submitted that substantial justice had been done by the High Court in these cases and, therefore, in exercise of its power under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, the Court should not interfere with the exercise done by the High Court. Our Analysis of the subject matter: 35) We have bestowed our serious consideration to the submissions made by learned counsel for parties on both sides. No doubt, the High Court has held that it was wrong exercise in law on the part of the Government

51 to invoke the provisions of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act, thereby dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5A of the Act which amounted to taking away the valuable right of the land owners. That is a finding on merit. However, it is subject to the caveat that the writ petitions filed by the appellants herein could be considered on merits and were not to be dismissed on the grounds of laches and delay. Such a contention was indeed taken by the respondents/ authorities before the High Court. However, the same has been repelled. Primary reason given by the High Court in this behalf is that the delay was explained satisfactorily inasmuch as the land acquired for the purposes of industrial development was, at a later period of time, allotted to private builders for development of residential units and when this was done it came to the knowledge of the appellants. Aggrieved by this step taken by the Noida authorities, the appellants filed the writ petitions. Thus, in nutshell, allotment of the land by the Noida authorities at a subsequent point of time has weighed with the High Court. In other words, it is clear that the appellants did not challenge the acquisition per se inasmuch as when the land was acquired even after invoking urgency provisions contained in Section 17 of the Act and dispensing with the requirement of Section 5A of the Act, this position was accepted by the land owners. They even allowed the authorities to proceed further in passing the award and taking possession from many of these land owners and even paying

52 compensation to them. It is a matter of record that before coming to the Court and filing the writ petitions, most of these appellants had received the compensation. They also sought reference under Section 18 of the Act for higher compensation. Physical possession of land of many of these appellants have also been taken. In many other cases, paper possession had been taken before filing of the writ petition. A great deal of argument was made as to whether such physical possession/paper possession should be treated as taking possession in the eyes of law, it would be a debatable point inasmuch as in various judgments, this Court has held that whenever there is large scale of acquisition and possession of large chunk of land belonging to number of persons is to be taken, paper possession would be a permissible mode, particularly when it is Abadi land. We are not going into this controversy since the ultimate outcome is not influenced by the aforesaid factor, as would be noticed in the later part of judgment. However, what we highlight and reiterate is that these appellants were not aggrieved by the acquisition per se in the manner it was done by the respondents. As per their own case, they became aggrieved only when they found that land was not utilised for the purpose for which it was acquired namely industrial development but a large portion thereof was sought to be given away to the builders for development of the land as residential. The High Court, while accepting such a plea of the land owners on the ground of laches

53 and delay, has referred to certain judgments which were relied upon before us as well and taken note of above. 36) This leads to an incidental issue as to whether development of land for residential purposes is impermissible and could have given a fresh cause of action to the land owners to approach the Court. Here, we would like to refer to the judgment of this Court in Nand Kishore Gupta and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 9 which concerns the same Act viz. U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. In that case, for Yamuna Express Project, the land was acquired setting it to be 'public purpose'. The land was utilised for construction of Yamuna Expressway and along therewith development of the part of the land was undertaken for commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential purposes as well. It was accepted that construction of Yamuna Expressway was work of public importance. However, the utilisation of land for development of other purposes, namely, commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential etc. was challenged, as not amounting to acquisition for 'public purpose'. There was another feature namely for the development of the land in the aforesaid manner Public Private Partnership (PPP) was formed and private parties were asked to undertake the development on BOT (Built, Operate and Transfer) basis. Such PPP on BOT basis was also challenged as colourable exercise of 9 (2010) 10 SCC 282

54 power in which private parties were involved. The challenge was repelled by this Court holding that acquisition of land along Yamuna Express for development of the same for commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential purposes was complimentary to creation of Expressway. Such complimentary purpose was also treated as 'public purpose'. It was also contended by the land owners that the acquisition was not for “public purpose” because: (a) its object was not covered by Section 3(f) of the Act, (b) it really fell not under Part II of the Act but under Part VII thereof as it virtually amounted to acquisition of land for the contractor Company J, (c) the compensation was coming wholly from J and not from the Government or YEIDA, (d) the acquisition for so-called interchange was not at all necessary and was a colourable exercise of power. They further contended that the application of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act was wholly unnecessary and therefore, the enquiry under Section 5-A could not have been dispensed with. All the aforesaid contentions were rejected. Going by the dicta in the aforesaid judgment, it is contended by the authorities that merely because the part of the land is utilised for residential purpose, it cannot be said that the respondents-authorities have not adhered to the purpose for which the land is acquired. As per them, this would be complimentary purpose to the main purpose. 37) We have to keep in mind that in all these cases, after the land was

55 acquired, which was of very large quantity and in big chunks, further steps were taken by passing the award, taking possession and paying compensation. In many cases, actual possession was taken and in rest of the cases, paper possession was taken where because of the land under Abadi , actual possession could not be taken on spot immediately. Fact remains that in many such cases where possession was taken, these land owners/appellants even received compensation. All these petitions have been filed only thereafter which may not be maintainable stricto sensu having regard to the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of this Court in Aflatoon and Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors. 10 and the dictum of this judgment is followed consistently by this Court in various cases [See Murari and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. 11 , Ravi Khullar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. 12 , Anand Singh and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 13 ] 38) Once we look into the matter from the aforesaid prospective, the argument of the appellants that giving away of the land by allotment to the private developers for construction of residential units gave them the fresh cause of action, gets dented to a great extent. No doubt, following Royal Orchid Hotels Limited case and other similar cases, the High Court has not dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellants on the 10 AIR 1974 SC 2077 11 (1997) 1 SCC 15 12 (2007) 5 SCC 231 13 (2010) 11 SCC 242

56 ground of delay and laches accepting the plea of the appellants that they felt aggrieved on coming to know that the land was sought to be given to the private persons for development. In this way, discretion is exercised by the High Court in entertaining the writ petitions on merits. Since such a discretion is exercised, we would not like to interfere with that discretion, more so, when a very fair stand is taken by Mr. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the Noida authority, as mentioned above. However, the aforesaid position in law is stated to highlight that it was equally possible to dismiss these writ petitions as the same were filed belatedly after passing of the award and when in most of the cases, possession was taken and compensation paid. When we examine the matter from the aforesaid angle, we reach an irresistible conclusion that the High Court has gone an extra mile in finding the solution to the problem and balancing the equities in a manner which is favourable to the land owners. 39) We have also to keep in mind another important feature. Many residents of Patwari village had entered into agreement with the authorities agreeing to accept enhanced compensation at the rate of 64.7%. This additional compensation was, however, agreed to be paid by the authorities only in respect of land owners of Patwari village. The High Court has bound the authorities with the said agreement by applying the same to all the land owners thereby benefiting them with

57 64.7% additional compensation. There could have been argument that the authorities cannot be fastened with this additional compensation, more particularly, when machinery for determination for just and fair compensation is provided under the Land Acquisition Act and the land owners had, in fact, invoked the said machinery by seeking reference under Section 18 thereof. Likewise, the scheme for allotment of land to the land owners provides for 5% and 6% developed land in Noida and Greater Noida respectively. As against that, the High Court has enhanced the said entitlement to 10%. Again, we find that it could be an arguable case as to whether High Court could grant additional land contrary to the policy. Notwithstanding the same, the Noida authority have now accepted this part of the High Court judgment after the dismissal of the appeals filed by the Noida authority, and a statement to that effect was made by Mr. Rao. We may point out that while dismissing the appeals of Noida authority, following remarks were made: “ 9. Insofar as allotment of 10 per cent of the plots is concerned, the High Court, in exercise of its discretionary power, has thought it fit, while sustaining the notification issued by the authority for protecting them for allotting 10 per cent of the developed plots; and, there again they have put a cap of 2,500 sq.mtrs. In fact, in the course of the order, the High Court has taken into consideration the agreement that was entered into by the authority with the villagers of Patwari and, in some cases, the authority itself has agreed to raise 6 to 8 per cent of the developed plots to the agriculturists. The High Court has also taken into consideration the observations made by this Court in the case of Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority , 2010 (7) SCC 129, where this Court has gone to the extent of directing the authorities to allot 15 per cent of

58 the developed plots. In our view and in the peculiar facts and circumtances of these cases, since the relief that is given to the respondents/agriculturists is purely discretionary relief by the Court in order to sustain the notification issued by the authorities, we do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court, at the instance of the petitioners/appellants/ authorities, namely, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA. 10. This order shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case.” 40) Thus, we have a scenario where, on the one hand, invocation of urgency provisions under Section 17 of the Act and dispensing with the right to file objection under Section 5A of the Act, is found to be illegal. On the other hand, we have a situation where because of delay in challenging these acquisitions by the land owners, developments have taken in these villages and in most of the cases, third party rights have been created. Faced with this situation, the High Court going by the spirit behind the judgment of this Court in Bondu Ramaswamy and Others (supra) came out with the solution which is equitable to both sides. We are, thus, of the view that the High Court considered the ground realities of the matter and arrived at a more practical and workable solution by adequately compensating the land owners in the form of compensation as well as allotment of developed Abadi land at a higher rate i.e. 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners against the eligibility and to the policy to the extent of 5% and 6% of Noida and Greater Noida land respectively.

59 41) Insofar as allegation of some of the appellants that their abadi land was acquired, we find that this allegation is specifically denied disputing its correctness. There is specific averment made by the NOIDA Authority at so many places that village abadi land was not acquired. It is mentioned that abadi area is what was found in the survey conducted prior to Section 4 Notification and not what is alleged or that which is far away from the dense village abadi. It is also mentioned that as a consequence of the acquisition, the Authority spends crores and crores of rupees in developing the infrastructure such as road, drainage, sewer, electric and water lines etc. in the unacquired portion of the village abadi. During the course of hearing, Chart No. 2 in respect of each village of Greater Noida was handed over for the consideration of this Court, wherein the amount spent by the Authority on the development, including village development (which is the unacquired village abadi), has been given in Column No. 4 thereof. It has been the consistent stand of the NOIDA Authority that prior to the issuance of Section 4 Notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, survey was conducted and the abadi found in that survey was not acquired. In fact, affidavits in this respect have also been filed not only in this Court but also in the High Court. We have mentioned that there has been a long gap between acquisition of the land and filing of the writ petitions in the High Court by these appellants challenging the acquisition. If they have undertaken

60 some construction during this period they cannot be allowed to take advantage thereof. Therefore, it is difficult to accept the argument of the appellants based on parity with three villages in respect of which the High Court has given relief by quashing the acquisition. 42) To sum up, following benefits are accorded to the land owners: (a) increasing the compensation by 64.7%; (b) directing allotment of developed abadi land to the extent of 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners; (c) c ompensation which is increased at the rate of 64.7% is payable immediately without taking away the rights of the land owners to claim higher compensation under the machinery provided in the Land Acquisition Act wherein the matter would be examined on the basis of the evidence produced to arrive at just and fair market value; This, according to us, provides substantial justice to the appellants. Conclusion 43) Keeping in view all these peculiar circumstances, we are of the opinion that these are not the cases where this Court should interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution. However, we make it clear that directions of the High Court are given in the aforesaid unique and peculiar/specific background and, therefore, it would not form precedent for future cases. 44) We may record that some of the appellants had tried to point out certain

61 clerical mistakes pertaining to their specific cases. For example, it was argued by one appellant that his land falls in a village in Noida but wrongly included in Greater Noida. These appellants, for getting such clerical mistakes rectified, can always approach the High Court. 45) The Full Bench judgment of the High Court is, accordingly, affirmed and all these appeals are disposed of in terms of the said judgment of the Full Bench. 46) In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petitions also stand disposed of. .............................................CJI (H.L. DATTU) .............................................J. (A.K. SIKRI) .............................................J. (ARUN MISHRA) NEW DELHI; MAY 14, 2015.

62 ITEM NO.1B COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.4506/2015 Arising from SLP(C)No.30969/2011 SAVITRI DEVI Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4830 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27508 OF 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4508-12 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33552-33556 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4513-17 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33984-33988 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4518-24 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 36334-36340 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4819 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 333 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4525-26 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4527 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4529-30 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1664-1665 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4531 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1739 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4532 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1858 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4533 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2411 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4534 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2537 OF 2012)

63 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4535 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2557 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4536 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2603 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4537 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2607 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4538 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2612 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4539 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2873 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4540 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3298 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4541 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3473 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3916 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4544 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3918 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4545 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4021 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4546 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4024 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4547 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4223 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4548 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4242 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4549 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4249 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4550 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4542 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4551 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4552 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5712 OF 2012)

64 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4553 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5959 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4554 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6013 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4555 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6027 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4556 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6121 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4557 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6196 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4558 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6345 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4559 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6353 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4560 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6363 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4561 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6368 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4563 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6369 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4564-67 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6466-6469 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4568-73 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6489-6494 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4575-76 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6534-6535 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4577 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4578 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6629 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4579-80 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6731-6732 OF 2012)

65 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4581-89 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6748-6756 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4591 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7146 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4592 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7436 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4593 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4594 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7540 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4595 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7541 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4596 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7815 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4597-98 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7934-7935 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4599 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4600 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8439 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4601 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8528 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8593 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4603 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8849 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4604 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8851 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4605-07 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8853-8855 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4608 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9527 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4609 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9678 OF 2012)

66 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4610 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9748 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4611 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9761 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4612 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10052 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4613-15 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10056-10058 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4616 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10315 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4617 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10597 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4618 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11303 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4619 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11304 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4620 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11879 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4621 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11993 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4622 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12299 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4623 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12461 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4624 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12844 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4625-30 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13641-13646 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4631 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15173 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4632 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15905 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4633 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16007 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4634 OF 2015

67 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16336 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4635 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16337 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4636 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4637 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17041 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4638 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4639 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19356 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4640 OF 2015 ( ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.15370 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO.....CC 20540 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4641 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23723 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4642-4643 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23724-23725 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4644 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24203 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4645 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24720 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4646-4647 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25551-25552 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4648-4650 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26874-26876 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4651 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4652 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27139 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4653-4660 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27389-27396 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4661-4666 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27502-27507 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4667 OF 2015

68 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28140 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4668 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29279 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4669 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33860 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4670 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37492 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4671 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37989 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4672 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37993 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4673 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38288 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4674 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38289 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4675 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38290 OF 2012) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NOS. 237-238 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4677 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8631 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4678 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4679 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8887 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4680 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9168 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4681 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9297 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4682 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12784 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4683 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13017 OF 2013)

69 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4690-4691 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16722-16723 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4692 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4693 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18090 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4694 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18735 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4695 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18866 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4696-4697 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19200-19201 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4698 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19922 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4699 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 20329 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4700 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23276 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4701-702 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23855-23856 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4703-4704 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23857-23858 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4705-4706 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23859-23860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4707-4709 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24622-24624 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4710-4711 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26176-26177 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4712 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26178 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4713 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26179 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4714-4715 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26681-26682 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4716 OF 2015

70 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26868 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4717 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26890 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4718 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30601 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4719 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30859 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4720 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4721 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30861 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4722 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30862 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4723 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32108 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4724 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33980 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4726 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 34176 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4727 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 35109 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4728 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37793 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4729 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39351 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4730-4731 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39697-39698 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4732-4733 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39699-39700 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4734 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39701 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4735-4736 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39702-39703 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4737 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 802 OF 2014)

71 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4738 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2495 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4739 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4566 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4740-4741 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5936-5937 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4742-45 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6024-6027 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4746 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6682 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4747 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7019 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4748 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7031 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4749 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7036 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4750 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10065 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4751-53 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10147-10149 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4754 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11737 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4755 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13401 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4756 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 14786 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4757 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12443 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4758 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13034 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4759-60 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22298-22299 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4761-63 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22329-22331 OF 2014)

72 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4764-65 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22384-22385 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4766-4768 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22716-22718 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4769-4770 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36155-36156 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4771 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4772-74 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36647-36649 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4775 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12433 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4776 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4777 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23772 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4778 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26260 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4779 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17559 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4780 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36242 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4781 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29351 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4782 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18356 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4783 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19521 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4784 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19523 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4785 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19525 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4786 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19777 OF 2014)

73 CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 444 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4787 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25279 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4788 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27102 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4789 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4790 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36390 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4791 OF 2015 ( ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15397 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO...CC 21151 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4792 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36975 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4793 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9551 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4794-95 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10049-10050 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4796 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10051 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4797 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12434 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4798-99 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12435-12436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4800 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12437 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12438 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4802 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12439 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4803 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12441 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4804 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12442 OF 2014)

74 CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 21 OF 2015 IN SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4805 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28167 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4806 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2057 OF 2015) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4807 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17686 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4808 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37126 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15636 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4810-18 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17088-17096 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6569 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15635 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2197 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2195 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2198 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2199 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2225 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2226 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2704 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2705 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3022 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4902 OF 2014 AND WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4928 OF 2014 Date : 14/05/2015 These matters were called on for pronouncement of Judgment today.

75 For the Parties : Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kedarnath Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Nagendra Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashank Samru, Adv. Mr. Aakash Kumar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shital Khatri, Adv. Mr. Rajsh Goyal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar, Adv. Mr. B.K. Pal, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. A.A. Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Alex Joseph, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. For M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co. Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. Punit Yadav, Adv. Mr. R.K. Adsure, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv.

76 Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. B.P. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv. Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Wajeeh Shah, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Prabhat K. Rai, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr.Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr.Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babu, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv. Ms. A.N. Singh, Adv.

77 Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv. Mr. V.P. Singh, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv. Mr. Anshul Narayan, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Giridhar G. Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Dinesh K. Garg, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv. Mr. Kumar Mihir, Adv. Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Maneesh Arora, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv. Mr. Arjun Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Dharm Singh, Adv. Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv. Mr.Nagesh Gajghate, Adv. Ms.Priya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv. Dr. Surat Singh, Adv.

78 Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv. Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv. Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikal Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv. Mr. Prabal Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Md. Shahd Anwar, Adv. Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv. Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv. Ms. Shirin Zaidi, Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv. Ms. Nikhar Berry, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Krishna, Adv. Mr. Ranvir Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravi Nanda, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Priya Sahadeo, Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Adv.

79 Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit R. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv. Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv. Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Adv. Ms. K.V. Bharathi Upadhaya, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv. Mr. Jai Singh, Adv. Mr. Rana S. Biswas, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kr. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Sunando Raha, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, Adv. Mr. Devender Kumar Goel, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.

80 Mr. Amrendra Saran, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Mohit Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Ms. Reena Singh, AAG, U.P. Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sumit Bansal, Adv. Mr. Ateev Mathur, Adv. Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Atul Bandhu, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Anuradha D. Misra, Adv. Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv. For M/s. Anuradha & Associates. Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amiet Andlay, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv. Ms. Sheeba Khan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Verma, Adv. Mr. Himanshu, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv. Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv.

81 Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Tanmay Nagar, Adv. Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. J.M. Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shikha Beri, Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit Manuja, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. For Col. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, Adv. For M/s. Lawyers Knit & Co. Mr. Zaki Ahmad Khan, Adv. Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv. Mr. Farhan Khan, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. Kamlesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidharthan, Adv. Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv.

82 Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv. Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Amit Pawan, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suryodaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sudhakar Prasad Tiwari,Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Adv. Mr. Harshivir Pratap Sharma, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garg, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shikha Beari, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh Rawal, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Ms. S. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Mr. Y.D. Nagar, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.

83 Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Dushyant Bhati, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Kulshrestha, Adv. Ms. Sushma Singh, Adv. Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv. Mr. P.C. Sharma, Adv. Ms. S. Usha Reddy, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Braham Singh, Adv. Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv. Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Adv.

84 Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Navanak Shekhar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Mayank Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Rushi Khan, Adv. Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Anil Kaushik, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. For M/s. A.P.& J. Chambers. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv. Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv. Ms. Akriti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv.

85 Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Sonal Jain, Adv. Mr. Sachin Naagar, Adv. Mr. Rajiv M. Brahma, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Dr. Satish Chandra, Adv. Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv. Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Vaishali R., Adv. Ms. Neelam Jain, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Devavrat Anand, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar R.S., Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Ajamani, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Ms. Nanita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Narain Mathur, Adv. Ms. Niranjana Singh, Adv. Mr. Ram Bhaj, Adv. Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Ms. Mahua Kalra,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif,Adv. Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv.

86 Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kr. Lakhanpal,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. Mr.K.K.L.Gautam, Adv. Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Ghan Shyam Vasisht,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Rajan,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Ms. S. Usha Reddy,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sumit Attri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rekha Pandey,Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. Mr.Dinesh Kr.Tiwary, Adv. Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.

87 Mr.Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Prakhar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Dipankar Das, Adv. Ms.Vijaya Lakshmi, Adv. Mr.Devesh Singh, Adv. Ms. Anu Gupta,Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Goyal,Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv. Ms.Sai Krishna Raj Gopal, Adv. Mr.Abhinav Mukerji, Adv. Ms.Sneha Jain, Adv. Ms. Aditi Gupta,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv.

88 Mr. Devesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr.Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Saravesh Singh Baghel, Adv. Mr. Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, Adv. Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Application for permission to file Special Leave Petition(s), if any, is granted. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling S.L.P.(s)/appeal(s) is condoned. Delay, if any, in application(s) for substitution is/are condoned. Application(s) for substitution(s), if any, is/are

89 allowed. Application(s) for setting aside abatement, if any, is/are allowed. Application(s) for impleadment(s)/ intervention(s), if any, is/are rejected. Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.K.Sikri pronounced the Judgment of the Bench comprising Hon'ble the Chief Justice, His Lordship and Hon'ble Mr.Justice Arun Mishra. Leave granted. The appeals as well as the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, in terms of the reportable signed Judgment. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS Asstt.Registrar (Signed reportable judgment is placed on the file)

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4506 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30969 OF 2011) SAVITRI DEVI .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4830 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27508 OF 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4508-12 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33552-33556 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4513-17 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33984-33988 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4518-24 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 36334-36340 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4819 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 333 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4525-26 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4527 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4529-30 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1664-1665 OF 2012)

2 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4531 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1739 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4532 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1858 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4533 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2411 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4534 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2537 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4535 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2557 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4536 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2603 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4537 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2607 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4538 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2612 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4539 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2873 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4540 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3298 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4541 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3473 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3916 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4544 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3918 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4545 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4021 OF 2012)

3 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4546 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4024 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4547 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4223 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4548 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4242 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4549 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4249 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4550 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4542 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4551 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4552 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5712 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4553 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5959 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4554 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6013 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4555 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6027 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4556 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6121 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4557 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6196 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4558 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6345 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4559 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6353 OF 2012)

4 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4560 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6363 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4561 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6368 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4563 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6369 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4564-67 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6466-6469 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4568-73 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6489-6494 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4575-76 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6534-6535 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4577 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4578 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6629 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4579-80 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6731-6732 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4581-89 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6748-6756 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4591 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7146 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4592 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7436 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4593 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4594 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7540 OF 2012)

5 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4595 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7541 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4596 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7815 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4597-98 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7934-7935 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4599 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4600 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8439 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4601 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8528 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8593 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4603 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8849 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4604 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8851 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4605-07 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8853-8855 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4608 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9527 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4609 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9678 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4610 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9748 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4611 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9761 OF 2012)

6 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4612 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10052 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4613-15 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10056-10058 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4616 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10315 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4617 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10597 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4618 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11303 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4619 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11304 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4620 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11879 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4621 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11993 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4622 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12299 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4623 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12461 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4624 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12844 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4625-30 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13641-13646 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4631 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15173 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4632 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15905 OF 2012)

7 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4633 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16007 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4634 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16336 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4635 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16337 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4636 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4637 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17041 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4638 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4639 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19356 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4640 OF 2015 ( ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.15370 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO.....CC 20540 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4641 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23723 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4642-4643 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23724-23725 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4644 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24203 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4645 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24720 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4646-4647 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25551-25552 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4648-4650 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26874-26876 OF 2012)

8 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4651 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4652 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27139 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4653-4660 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27389-27396 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4661-4666 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27502-27507 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4667 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28140 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4668 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29279 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4669 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33860 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4670 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37492 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4671 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37989 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4672 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37993 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4673 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38288 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4674 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38289 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4675 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38290 OF 2012)

9 CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NOS. 237-238 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4677 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8631 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4678 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4679 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8887 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4680 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9168 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4681 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9297 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4682 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12784 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4683 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13017 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4690-4691 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16722-16723 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4692 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4693 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18090 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4694 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18735 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4695 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18866 OF 2013)

10 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4696-4697 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19200-19201 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4698 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19922 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4699 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 20329 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4700 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23276 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4701-702 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23855-23856 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4703-4704 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23857-23858 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4705-4706 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23859-23860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4707-4709 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24622-24624 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4710-4711 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26176-26177 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4712 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26178 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4713 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26179 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4714-4715 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26681-26682 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4716 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26868 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4717 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26890 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4718 OF 2015

11 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30601 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4719 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30859 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4720 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4721 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30861 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4722 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30862 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4723 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32108 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4724 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33980 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4726 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 34176 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4727 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 35109 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4728 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37793 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4729 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39351 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4730-4731 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39697-39698 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4732-4733 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39699-39700 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4734 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39701 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4735-4736 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39702-39703 OF 2013)

12 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4737 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 802 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4738 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2495 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4739 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4566 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4740-4741 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5936-5937 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4742-45 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6024-6027 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4746 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6682 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4747 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7019 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4748 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7031 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4749 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7036 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4750 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10065 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4751-53 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10147-10149 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4754 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11737 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4755 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13401 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4756 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 14786 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4757 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12443 OF 2014)

13 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4758 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13034 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4759-60 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22298-22299 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4761-63 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22329-22331 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4764-65 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22384-22385 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4766-4768 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22716-22718 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4769-4770 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36155-36156 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4771 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4772-74 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36647-36649 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4775 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12433 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4776 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4777 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23772 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4778 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26260 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4779 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17559 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4780 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36242 OF 2013)

14 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4781 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29351 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4782 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18356 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4783 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19521 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4784 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19523 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4785 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19525 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4786 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19777 OF 2014) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 444 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4787 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25279 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4788 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27102 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4789 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4790 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36390 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4791 OF 2015 ( ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15397 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO...CC 21151 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4792 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36975 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4793 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9551 OF 2014)

15 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4794-95 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10049-10050 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4796 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10051 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4797 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12434 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4798-99 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12435-12436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4800 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12437 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12438 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4802 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12439 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4803 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12441 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4804 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12442 OF 2014) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 21 OF 2015 IN SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4805 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28167 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4806 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2057 OF 2015) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4807 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17686 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4808 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37126 OF 2012)

16 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15636 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4810-18 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17088-17096 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4837 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 35143 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4807 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17686 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15635 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4808 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37126 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15636 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4810-18 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 17088-17096 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2197 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2195 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2198 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2199 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2225 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2226 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2704 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2705 OF 2013

17 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3022 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4902 OF 2014 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4928 OF 2014 J U D G M E N T A.K. SIKRI, J. These matters were heard in detail for few days and hearing was concluded on 05.02.2015. Thereupon, we communicated the result in the open Court by pronouncing that appeals were dismissed and the reasons shall follow. These are, thus, our reasons for dismissing the appeals. Leave is granted in all the special leave petitions. PROLOGUE : 2) The subject matter of most of these appeals are the Notifications dated 12-03-2008 issued by the State of U.P. under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (“Act” for short) read with Section 17 of the Act as well as declaration issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') vide Notification dated 30.06.2008. Land situate in various villages of Noida and Greater Noida in Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar was acquired. Some other Notifications under same provisions of the Act in respect of lands of these villages was also acquired by earlier Notifications. The purpose stated in the notifications was 'Planned Industrial Development'.

18 Urgency provisions under Section 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act were invoked thereby dispensing with the right of objection otherwise given to the land holders under Section 5A of the Act. The total land which was acquired by these notification was 589.188 hectares. Some writ petitions were initially filed in the High Court of Allahabad challenging the said Notifications, with primary contention that invocation of emergency provision and taking away valuable right of the land holders under Section 5A of the Act was illegal, mala fide , arbitrary and colourable exercise of power. Some of the writ petitions came up before the Division Bench of the said High Court. One was Writ Petition (C) 45777 of 2008 in the case of Harish Chand and Others v. State of U.P. and Others wherein the High Court upholding the very same Notifications, on arriving at the conclusion that invocation of Section 17 of the Act was justified, dismissed that writ petition. It so happened that another Division Bench of the same High Court decided Writ Petition (C) No. 17068 of 2009; titled Karan Singh v. State of U.P. and others. The Division Bench rendered its judgment dated 19-07-2011 in the said case accepting the aforesaid contention of the writ petitioners and holding that invocation of provisions of Section 17 of the Act was not justified. Accordingly, the Division Bench quashed these Notifications. 3) As a sequel, spate of writ petitions came to be filed challenging the lands acquired not only by the notification dated 12-03-2008 but even by

19 earlier notifications as well. When these petitions came up before another Division Bench it noticed the aforesaid two conflicting views expressed by two different Division Benches. This led the said Division Bench to refer the matter to the larger Bench and orders dated 26-07-2011 were passed in this behalf. This is how the matters were placed before the Full Bench and by that time as many as 471 writ petitions had accumulated. All these writ petitions were taken up analogously by the Full Bench and disposed of vide judgment dated 21.10.2011 with leading case known as Gajraj vs. State of U.P. (W.P. (C) 37443 of 201!). The Full Bench of the High Court has accepted the plea of the land holders that invocation of emergency clause contained in Section 17 of the Act was impermissible and unwarranted. At the same time, the High Court also noticed that in respect of land of many villages, possession had already been taken and substantial development work carried out. Even compensation was paid in such cases, the High Court, instead of quashing the Notifications in respect of those villages, chose to adopt the middle path in an endeavour to balance the equities of both sides. Thus, it enhanced the provisional compensation and also directed allotment of developed Abadi land to the extent 10% of their acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 sq. mtrs. However, in respect of three villages, when it found that no development work had been carried out at all by the Authorities during the intervening period, the High Court chose

20 to quash the Notifications including consequential actions and directed restoration of the land to the respective land owners. 4) It may also be noticed at this stage that when there was flurry of writ petitions in the High Court challenging the invocation of Section 17 and the Division Bench of the High Court in Harkaran Singh (supra) had held invocation of urgency powers to be bad in law, some land owners whose land was acquired much earlier by invoking clause (some of the Notifications of such land date back to 1979 or early 1980s as well) took adventurous step to file the writ petitions in the year 2011 challenging those Notifications. All these writ petitions, however, have been dismissed by the impugned judgment of the High Court on the ground that they are filed with inordinate delay and laches. 5) From the aforesaid, it is clear that three sets of directions are issued by the High Court, namely, (I) dismissing writ petitions filed with unexplained delays and laches; (ii) quashing the Notification in respect of three villages where no development work had taken place; and (iii) in respect of other villages, instead of quashing the action of acquisition of land in spite of accepting the plea that Section 17 was wrongly invoked, it has enhanced the compensation as well as extent of entitlement for allotment of developed Abadi plot. 6) The State Government/U.P. Development Board as well as many land owners have challenged the said Full Bench decision of the High Court.

21 Insofar as special leave petitioners/appeals of the Government and Authority are concerned, they have already been dismissed. In these batches of matters, thus, we are concerned with the appeals of the land owners. 7) Most of these appeals are filed against the Full Bench. However, some of the appeals arise against the earlier Division Bench judgment dated 25-11-2008 whereby the High Court had upheld the same Notifications and rejected the challenge to the acquisition of land. Some appeals are filed by the NOIDA authority where the Division Bench had quashed the notification. 8) After narrating these preliminaries of the matters, we advert to the facts and events of the cases. For the sake of convenience, we will refer to the facts appearing in the writ petition of Gajraj as that was the lead case before the High Court as well. FACTUAL MATRIX 9) This writ petition was filed by 27 writ petitioners claiming themselves to be Bhumidaars with transferable right and owners of different plots of land situate in Village Patwari, Pargana, Tehsil – Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar. The Notification dated 12-03-2008 was issued by the State Government under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 notifying that the land mentioned in the schedule is needed for the public purpose namely, for the “planned industrial

22 development” in Gautam Buddha Nagar. Inquiry under Section 5A having been dispensed with vide Notification dated 12-03-2008, State Government proceeded to issue declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act dated 30-06-2008. 10) The petitioners had pleaded in the writ petition that dispensation of the inquiry under Section 5A can only be an exception where the urgency cannot brook the delay. The respondents, without application of mind, dispensed with the inquiry. The acquisition proceedings were deprecated as void, unconstitutional, tainted with malafide, abuse of authority/power and non application of mind. It was pleaded that the procedure under Section 5A is mandatory which embodies a just and wholesome principle that a person whose property is being acquired or intended to be acquired should have occasion to persuade the authorities that his property be not touched for acquisition. It was also argued that land use of village Patwari was changed in the Master Plan 2021 after the issuance of notifications under sections 4 and 6, which is colourable exercise of powers and entire exercise is arbitrary, illegal and infringes rights of the petitioners guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India. These petitioners also stated in the writ petition that though there was some delay in filing the writ petition if counted from the date of notification but the writ petition was filed only when it came to their knowledge that the land use of village Patwari was

23 changed in the Master Plan 2021 after the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 and land was sought to be allotted to the private builders, thereby giving go by to the objective for which the land was acquired. The petitioners further claimed that the part of the property of the petitioners is situate in village Abadi. It was pleaded that the authority had executed a lease deed dated 31-03-2010 in favour of respondent no. 4 M/s. Supertech Ltd, a company engaged in the construction, allotting 2,40,00 square meters land for constructing multi-storied complexes. It was also stated that although land was acquired for industrial development but the same had now been allotted to the builders by the Authority which clearly indicates that neither there was any appropriate plan and scheme for industrial development nor there was any urgency in the matter and the whole proceeding amounted to colourable exercise of power. 11) The State Government as well as Authority contested the matter by putting its justification to the invocation of Section 17 of the Act. It was pleaded that land was acquired for the purpose of industrial development. It was also stated that the Authority had been constituted vide Notification dated 28-01-1998 issued under the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 (hereafter referred to as the '1976 Act') and the land was to be developed in accordance with the aims and objectives contained in the said Act included development of the land for residential and other purposes as well and was not confined to industrial

24 development alone. Objection was raised to the maintainability of the writ petitions by contending that except few petitioners, all other had received compensation on various dates and, therefore, they were estopped from challenging the acquisition, once the possession of the land was taken, award was passed and compensation received. The Authorities also stated that land owner of about 83% of the land area had already been paid the compensation. In terms of numbers, out of 1605 persons, 1403 persons had accepted the compensation. Development works had been carried out in the area in question which had already been demarcated into various sectors. The nature of development carried out was stated in detail in the affidavit. Invocation of urgency clause was also sought to be justified. 12) M/s. Supertech Limited, to whom certain area was allotted for development of the housing colony was also impleaded as the respondent. On its impleadment, this respondent also filed its counter affidavit stating the circumstances under which it was allotted the land for development of residential units. It also contended that the substantial work had already been undertaken by the said Company. So much so, out of 6000 residential units which were proposed to be constructed, 4471 units had already been booked by the members of public and paid part considerations. It was pleaded that in this manner third party interest had also been created. It would be relevant to point

25 out here that apart from M/s. Supertech Limited, there were at least 10 more such developers who had been allotted the various chunks of acquired land for similar housing projects etc. JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT 13) After noticing the aforesaid facts and the contentions and having regard to the plethora of writ petitions which were filed pertaining to different villages, the High Court deemed it appropriate to categorize these writ petitions in different groups, village wise. 65 village wise categories were, accordingly, carved out. Out of these group 1-41 pertained to different villages of Greater NOIDA whereas villages in group 42-65 fell in NOIDA. Village Patwari was taken up as group 1. The High Court, thereafter, discussed the factual position in respect of each group which need not be mentioned, as unnecessary for our purposes. However, wherever this exercise is deemed proper, we would be referring to such factual details at the relevant steps. 14) Keeping in view the various submissions made by the writ petitioners in their petitions, the High Court framed as many as 17 issues or the points of consideration which had fallen for its discussion and decision. It would be apposite to take note of those issues at this juncture: “ (i) Object and Purpose of the 1976 Act: Whether the development of industries is the dominant purpose and object of U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. (ii) Whether Acquisition Compulsory: Whether for

26 carrying out the development of industrial area under 1976 Act, it is compulsory and necessary to acquire the land by the Authority? (iii) Delay and Laches : Whether the delay and laches in the facts of the present case can bar the invocation or Constitutional remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. (iv) National Capital Regional Planning Board Act, 1985, its Consequences: Whether the Authority can carry out development, utilise the land acquired as per its Master Plan 2021 without its approval/clearance by National Capital Regional Planning Board, and what is effect on its function of land acquisition after enforcement of 1985 Act? (v) Invocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4): Whether invocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act and dispensation of inquiry under section 5A was in accordance with law in the cases which are under consideration? (vi) Pre-notification and Post-notification delay: Whether delay caused before issuance of notification under Section 4 and delay caused subsequent to notification under Section 4 can be relied for determining as to whether urgency was such that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was necessary? (vii) Colourable Exercise of Power: Whether acquisition of land are vitiated due to mala fide and colourable exercise of powers? (viii) Taking of possession: Whether the possession of the land acquired was taken under Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in accordance with law? (ix) Vesting: Whether after taking possession under Section 17(A) of the Act the challenge to the notifications under Section 4 read with 17(1) and 17(4) and Section 6 cannot be entertained due to the reason that land which has already been vested in the State cannot be divested? (x) Section 11A; Whether acquisition under challenge has lap0sed under Section 11A of the Act due to non-declaration of the award within two years from the

27 date of publication of the declaration made under section 6? (xi) Section 17(3A): Whether non payment of 80% of the compensation as required by Section 17(3A) of the Land Acquisition Act is fatal to the acquisition o proceedings? (xii) Waiver: Whether the petitioners who have accepted compensation by agreement have waived their right to challenge the acquisition proceedings? (xiii) Acquiescence: Whether the petitioners due to having accepted the compensation by agreement have acquiesced to the proceedings of land acquisition and they are estopped from challenging the acquisition proceedings at this stage? (xiv) Third Party Rights, Development and Construction: Whether due to creation of third party rights, development carried out by the Authority and developments and co0nstructions made by the allottees on the acquired land subsequent to the acquisition, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief of quashing the notifications under Section 4 read with Section 17(1) and 17(4) and Section 6 of the Act? (xv) Effect of Upholding of some of the notifications in some writ petitions earlier decided: What are the consequences and effect of earlier Division Bench judgment upholding several notifications which are subject matter of challenge in some of these writ petitions? (xvi) Conflicts in views of Division Benches: Which of the Division Bench decisions i.e. Harkaran Singh's case holding that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was invalid or earlier Division Bench judgment in Harish Chand's case holding that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was in accordance with law, has to be approved? (xvii) Relief: To what relief, if any, the petitioners are entitled in these writ petition?” 15) We are purposely eschewing the detailed discussion by the High Court

28 on all the aforesaid issues. Suffice it to state here that after noticing the object and purpose of 1976 Act and discussing its provisions contained in this Act with reference to case law explaining the legal position of such statutory authorities entrusted with the task of development works, the High Court concluded that the stand of the Authority that unless the land is acquired by it. It cannot carry out any development works until the 1976 Act was misconceived and incorrect. The High Court remarked that the Authority was labouring under the aforesaid misconception and, therefore, concentrated only on acquisition of the land without taking care of other modes and means of industrial development and excessive acquisition of fertile agriculture land was due to the above mindset of the Authority. Insofar as issues pertaining to compulsive acquisition and invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) are concerned, the High Court has arrived at a finding that such invocation of emergency/urgency clauses, thereby depriving the land owners of their most invaluable right to file objections under Section 5A of the Act, was illegal and unwarranted. As this issue is decided in favour of the land owners and against this finding appeals preferred by the State as well as the Authority have already been dismissed, it is not necessary to explain the raison d'etre behind these findings. We would be proceeding on the basis that invocation of Section 17(1) and Section 17(4) was wrong. Similarly, the findings of the High Court that exercise of power by the State was colourable and

29 arbitrary need not be restated in detail, the same reason. 16) As far as the issue no. 4 pertaining the NCR planning Board Act is concerned, the High Court has held that land could not be acquired without the permission of the Board. Opinion of the High Court on this aspect was questioned by the State of U.P. as well as Authority in its appeals. However, it was found that as a matter of fact, insofar as these cases are concerned consent of the Board had been obtained. Having regard to this position, while dismissing the appeals of the State/Authority, we have left the said question of law open, namely, whether permission of the deemed under the Act of 1985 is a pre-condition before acquisition of the land. Therefore, that aspect also needs no elaboration at our end in these appeals. 17) It becomes clear from the above that the High Court arrived at a conclusion that since invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was uncalled for and unwarranted, the acquisition of the land of the appellants herein was illegal. Notwithstanding, the same, the High Court did not grant the relief of setting aside the entire acquisition and restoring the land to the appellants. After the aforesaid findings, the High Court observed that insofar as grant of particular relief to the land owners in land acquisition proceedings is concerned, it depends on several important factors. Thus, the issue of 'reliefs' has been discussed specifically and independently

30 under the aforesaid caption. Here, the High Court has observed that the creation of third party rights, development undertaken over the land in dispute as well as the steps taken by the land owners after declaration made under Section 6 of the Act would be the relevant consideration in determining the kind of relief that is to be granted to the land owners. Discussing the aforesaid aspects in the contexts of these proceedings, the High Court pointed out that in majority of cases third party rights had been created after issue of declaration under Section 6 and after taking possession of the land, substantial developments including constructions had been undertaken. Thus, in those cases where substantial development had taken place and/or third party rights had been created, the High Court deemed it proper not to interfere with the acquisition. At the same time in order to balance the equities, it felt that grant of higher compensation and better share in the developed land to these land owners would meet the ends of justice. The exact relief given in this behalf shall be stated at the appropriate stage. 18) The High Court also found that in three villages no such third party rights had been created and no developments had taken place. So far as these villages are concerned, the High Court deemed it apposite to release the land in favour of the land owners of those villages. 19) The High Court also found that many writ petitions were filed challenging

31 the acquisitions in respect of which notifications were issued much earlier, were totally stale and suffered from laches and delays. In the opinion of the High Court, all those writ petitions which pertained to notifications issued prior to the year 2000 and the writ petitions were filed in the year 2011, these writ petitions deserved to be dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay and laches. 20) In nutshell, relief was categorised in three compartments. In the first instance, those writ petitions which were filed belatedly were dismissed. In the second category, three villages, namely, Devala (Group 40), village Yusufpur Chak Sahberi (Group 38) and Village Asdullapur (Group 42) the acquisition was set aside. Land acquisition in respect of remaining 61 villages is concerned, the acquisition was allowed to remain but the additional compensation was increased to 64.7% with further entitlement for allotment of development abadi plot to the extent of 10% of the acquired land of those land owners subject to maximum of 2500 sq. mtrs. 21) We now reproduce the exact nature of direction given by the High Court, which reads as follows: “ In view of the foregoing conclusions we order as follows: 1. The Writ Petition No. 45933 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 47545 of 2011 relating to village Nithari, Writ Petition No. 47522 of 2011 relating to village Sadarpur, Writ Petition No. 45196 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45208 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45211 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45213 of

32 2011, Writ Petition No. 45216 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45223 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45224 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45226 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45229 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45230 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45235 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45238 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45283 of 2011 relating to village Khoda, Writ Petition No. 46764 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 46785 of 2011 relating to village Sultanpur, Writ Petition No. 46407 of 2011 relating to village Chaura Sadatpur and Writ Petition No. 46470 of 2011 relating to village Alaverdipur which have been filed with inordinate delay and laches are dismissed. 2(i). The writ petitions of Group 40 (Village Devla) being Writ Petition No. 31126 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 59131 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 22800 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 37118 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 42812 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 50417 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 54424 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 54652 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 55650 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 57032 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 58318 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 22798 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 37784 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 37787 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 31124 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 31125 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 32234 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 32987 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 35648 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 38059 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 41339 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 47427 of 2011 and Writ Petition No. 47412 of 2011 are allowed and the notifications dated 26.5.2009 and 22.6.2009 and all consequential actions are quashed. The petitioners shall be entitled for restoration of their land subject to deposit of compensation which they had received under agreement/award before the authority/Collector. 2(ii) Writ petition No. 17725 of 2010 Omveer and others Vs. State of U.P. (Group 38) relating to village Yusufpur Chak Sahberi is allowed. Notifications dated 10.4.2006 and 6.9.2007 and all consequential actions are quashed. The petitioners shall be entitled for restoration of their land subject to return of compensation received by them under agreement/award to the Collector. 2(iii) Writ Petition No. 47486 of 2011 (Rajee and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) of Group-42 relating to village Asdullapur is allowed. The notification dated 27.1.2010 and 4.2.2010 as well as all subsequent proceedings are quashed. The petitioners shall be entitled to restoration of their land.

33 3. All other writ petitions except as mentioned above at (1) and (2) are disposed of with following directions: (a) The petitioners shall be entitled for payment of additional compensation to the extent of same ratio (i.e. 64.70%) as paid for village Patwari in addition to the compensation received by them under 1997 Rules/award which payment shall be ensured by the Authority at an early date. It may be open for Authority to take a decision as to what proportion of additional compensation be asked to be paid by allottees. Those petitioners who have not yet been paid compensation may be paid the compensation as well as additional compensation as ordered above. The payment of additional compensation shall be without any prejudice to rights of land owners under section 18 of the Act, if any. (b) All the petitioners shall be entitled for allotment of developed Abadi plot to the extent of 10% of their acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 square meters. We however, leave it open to the Authority in cases where allotment of abadi plot to the extent of 6% or 8% have already been made either to make allotment of the balance of the area or may compensate the land owners by payment of the amount equivalent to balance area as per average rate of allotment made of developed residential plots. 4. The Authority may also take a decision as to whether benefit of additional compensation and allotment of abadi plot to the extent of 10% be also given to; (a) those land holders whose earlier writ petition challenging the notifications have been dismissed upholding the notifications; and (b) those land holders who have not come to the Court, relating to the notifications which are subject matter of challenge in writ petitions mentioned at direction No.3. 5. The Greater NOIDA and its allotees are directed not to carry on development and not to implement the Master Plan 2021 till the observations and directions of the National Capital Regional Planning Board are incorporated in Master Plan 2021 to the satisfaction of the National Capital Regional Planning Board. We make it clear that this direction shall not be applicable in those cases where the development is being carried on in accordance with the earlier Master Plan of Greater NOIDA duly approved by the National Capital Regional Planning Board.

34 6. We direct the Chief Secretary of the State to appoint officers not below the level of Principal Secretary (except the officers of Industrial Development Department who have dealt with the relevant files) to conduct a thorough inquiry regarding the acts of Greater Noida (a) in proceeding to implement Master Plan 2021 without approval of N.C.R.P. Board, (b) decisions taken to change the land use, (c) allotment made to the builders and (d) indiscriminate proposals for acquisition of land, and thereafter the State Government shall taken appropriate action in the matter.” 22) We may point out at this stage that in respect of all these three categories, the High Court has provided its justification for granting relief in the aforesaid nature. We shall be referring to the same while discussing the cases of appellants belonging to one or the other category. 23) In nutshell, it may be pointed out that 65 villages which were the subject matter of bunch of writ petitions before the Full Bench of the High Court were grouped in 65 groups, village-wise and facts of acquisition, possession, if any, payment of compensation, developments, the nature of utilisation of those lands, and/or creation of third party rights were taken note of. Out of these 65 villages, 41 villages fall in Greater NOIDA and 24 in NOIDA. The High Court discussed the issue of laches and delays under Issue No. 3, as mentioned above, after referring to various judgments of this Court and culling out the principles contained therein on that basis. The High Court accepted the plea of inordinate delay insofar as acquisition of land in respect of village Nithari, Village Chauyra

35 Sadedpur, Village Khoda, Village Sultanpur are concerned. These writ petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay. In respect of other villages, the Court repelled the contention of delay raised by the department, accepting the explanation given by land owners of those villages that they did not oppose the acquisition earlier at the time of issuance of notification as the land was taken for industrial development. However, it is only when these land owners had come to know that instead of developing the land for the purpose for which it was acquired, the acquiring authority had transferred the land to the private persons and builders, that these land owners felt aggrieved and cheated and, therefore, there was sufficient explanation for coming to the Court at a time when these land owners discovered that the acquired land had been transferred to private persons. The Court, therefore, held that such writ petitions were to be entertained on merits, ignoring the delay. 24) Some of the appeals are filed by the land owners in respect of aforesaid villages where their petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. We are of the opinion that their writ petitions were rightly rejected by the High Court applying the principle of delays and laches. We are, thus, dismissing these appeals, upholding the order of the High Court. The Arguments : Appellants 25) Though many counsel appeared on behalf of appellants and argued the

36 appeals, Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dwivedi, Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Mr. Mahabir Singh, Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Senior Advocates and Dr. Suraj Singh, Advocate were the main architects who built the edifice of the appellants' appeals. Among themselves, they covered almost all the aspects which arise in these appeals. Other counsel either adopted those submissions or some of them pointed out some distinctive and peculiar facts of their cases. It is not necessary to reproduce the submission of each of the aforesaid senior counsel separately as we think that better course of action would be to spell out these submissions in consolidated form to avoid any repetition. The arguments which were advanced by these counsel, in support of their appeals, are recapitulated hereunder: (I) In the first instance, the illegalities committed in issuing the notifications for acquisition of land were pointed out which were even accepted by the High Court in the impugned judgment, in the following manner: (a) No permission of NCR Board was taken before issuing the notifications. (b) There was violation of Section 5-A of the Act which goes to the root of the matter, coupled with the finding that it amounted to colourable exercise of power. (c) There was violation of mandatory provision contained in Section 11-A of the Act as well. (d) Though, Section 17 (1) and Section 17 (4) of the Act were invoked, 80%

37 of the compensation, which is mandatory requirement, was not paid to the appellants. (e) After acquiring the land purportedly for the purpose of industrial development, it was sold to private developers/real estate agencies for residential purposes, that too at a much higher rate. As per the appellants, it would amply demonstrate that the Government acted more like a property dealer with intention to make money at the cost of the land owners/agriculturists. (II) It was further argued that even when status quo orders were passed in many writ petitions, the Government had violated those orders and in this manner, third party rights were created, thereby committing contempt of court. When the third party interest were created in the aforesaid manner, the High Court should not have influenced itself by the said consideration in denying the relief to the appellants after holding that acquisition was illegal. (III) It was also argued that in a case like this, doctrine of severance should have been applied by excluding only those portions of land in respect of which third party rights were created or development had taken place inasmuch as large chunk of land in these villages have still not been utilised for any purpose as these are thickly inhabited. By applying the doctrine of severance, Abadi land should have been included for the

38 purpose of giving relief, when the acquisition was admittedly bound to be illegal. It was only, in this manner, equities could be balanced. (IV) It was sought to be argued that in respect of three villages where acquisition is set aside on the ground that no development has taken place and third party rights are not created, this very principle should have been applied in respect of lands of those appellants in other villages where no third party rights were created or there was Abadi or where no possession was taken by the authorities and no compensation taken by the land owners and the land owners who belong to lower strata of society. In nutshell, the submission is that such cases are exactly at par with the cases of 3 villages falling in para 2 of the direction, where the land acquisition has been quashed even when the compensation was taken and same treatment be accorded to at least those appellants who fall in this category. (V) It was also argued that after holding the acquisition illegal, the Court had three alternatives namely: (a) payment of 67.4% compensation plus restoring 10% of the developed land to the land owners, which is followed by the High Court. (b) directing restoration of possession in all these cases with liberty to the Government to negotiate with the land owners. (c) permitting fresh acquisition.

39 Submission was that first alternative was not the best alternative adopted by the High Court and in the interest of justice, the second or third alternative should have been resorted to, more so, when it was found to be case of malice in law which can clearly be inferred from the findings arrived at by the High Court, on the basis of material established on record. 26) In support of these submissions, learned counsel for the appellants referred to the following judgments: (i) Anand Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. 1 “ 50. Use of the power by the government under Section 17 for 'planned development of the city' or `the development of residential area' or for `housing' must not be as a rule but by way of an exception. Such exceptional situation may be for the public purpose viz., rehabilitation of natural calamity affected persons; rehabilitation of persons uprooted due to commissioning of dam or housing for lower strata of the society urgently; rehabilitation of persons affected by time bound projects, etc. The list is only illustrative and not exhaustive. In any case, sans real urgency and need for immediate possession of the land for carrying out the stated purpose, heavy onus lies on the government to justify exercise of such power. xxx xxx xxx 55. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, therefore, the Government has completely failed to justify the dispensation of an enquiry under Section 5A by invoking Section 17(4). For this reason, the impugned notifications to the extent they state that Section 5A shall not apply suffer from legal infirmity. The question, then, arises whether at this distance of time, the acquisition proceedings must be declared invalid and illegal. 56. In the written submissions of the GDA, it is stated that subsequent to the declaration made under Section 6 of the Act in 1 (2010) 11 SCC 242

40 the month of December, 2004, award has been made and out of the 400 land owners more than 370 have already received compensation. It is also stated that out of the total cost of Rs. 8,85,14,000/- for development of the acquired land, an amount of Rs. 5,28,00,000/- has already been spent by the GDA and more than 60% of work has been completed. It, thus, seems that barring the appellants and few others all other tenure holders/land owners have accepted the `takings' of their land. It is too late in the day to undo what has already been done. We are of the opinion, therefore, that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the appellants are not entitled to any relief although dispensation of enquiry under Section 5A was not justified. 57. On behalf of the appellants, it was vehemently argued that the government may be directed to release their land from proposed acquisition. It was submitted by the appellants that houses/structures and buildings (including educational building) are existing on the subject land and as per the policy framed by the State Government, the land deserves to be exempted from acquisition. The submission of the appellants has been countered by the respondents and in the written submissions filed by the GDA, it is stated that the houses/structures and buildings which are claimed to exist, have been raised by the appellants subsequent to the notification under Section 4(1) of the Act and, therefore, they are not entitled to release of their land from acquisition. 58. In our view, since the existence of houses/structures and buildings as on November 22, 2003/February 20, 2004 over the appellants' land has been seriously disputed, it may not be appropriate to issue any direction to the State Government, as prayed for by the appellants, for release of their land from acquisition. However, as the possession has not been taken, the interest of justice would be subserved if the appellants are given liberty to make representation to the State authorities under Section 48(1) of the Act for release of their land. We, accordingly, grant liberty to the appellants to make appropriate representation to the State Government and observe that if such representation is made by the appellants within two months from today, the State Government shall consider such representation in accordance with law and in conformity with the State policy for release of land under Section 48(1) without any discrimination within three months from receipt of such representation.” 27) In support of the arguments that the equities were to be balanced on the

41 facts of the case which according to the appellant were in their favour, following judgments were referred: (ii) H.M.T. Housing Building Co-operative Society v. Syed Khader & Ors. 2 “ 22. In the present case there has been contravention of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act inasmuch as there was no prior approval of the State Government as required by the said section before steps for acquisition of the lands were taken. The report of Shri G.K.V. Rao points out as to how the appellant-Society admitted large number of persons as members who cannot be held to be genuine members, the sole object being to transfer the lands acquired for “public purpose”, to outsiders as part of commercial venture, undertaken by the office- bearer of the appellant-Society. We are in agreement with the finding of the High Court that the statutory notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act have been issued due to the role played by M/s S.R. Constructions, Respondent 11. On the materials on record, the High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that the proceedings for acquisition of the lands had not been initiated because the State Government was satisfied about the existence of the public purpose but at the instance of agent who had collected more than a crore of rupees for getting the lands acquired by the State Government. 23. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. But in the circumstances of the case there shall be no orders as to costs. 24. We direct that as a result of quashing of the land acquisition proceedings including the notifications as aforesaid, the possession of the lands shall be restored to the respective landowners irrespective of the fact whether they had challenged the acquisition of their lands or not. On restoration of the possession to the landowners they shall refund the amounts received by them as compensation or otherwise in respect of their lands. The appellant, the respondents and the State Government including all authorities/persons concerned shall implement the aforesaid directions at an early date.” (iii) H.M.T. House Building Cooperative Society v. M. Venkataswamappa and others 3 2 (1995) 2 SCC 677 3 (1995) 3 SCC 128

42 (iv) Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. State of Karnataka and others 4 “ 87. The three Judge Bench also approved the view taken by the High Court that the acquisition of land was vitiated because the decision of the State Government was influenced by the Estate Agent with whom the Appellant had entered into an agreement. Paras 21 and 22 of the judgment, which contain discussion on this issue are extracted hereunder: (1st H.M.T. House Building Coop. Society v. Syed Khader and others, (1995) 2 SCC 677 “ 21. Mr. G. Ramaswamy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, submitted that merely because the appellant Society had entered into an agreement with Respondent 11, M/s S.R. Constructions, in which the latter for the consideration paid to it had assured that the lands in question shall be acquired by the State Government, no adverse inference should be drawn because that may amount to a tall claim made on behalf of M/s S.R. Constructions in the agreement. He pointed out that the notifications under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) have been issued beyond the time stipulated in the agreement and as such, it should be held that the State Government has exercised its statutory power for acquisition of the lands in normal course, only after taking all facts and circumstances into consideration. There is no dispute that in terms of agreement dated 1-2-1985 payments have been made by the appellant Society to M/s S.R. Constructions. This circumstance alone goes a long way to support the contention of the writ Petitioners that their lands have not been acquired in the normal course or for any public purpose. In spite of the repeated query, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Society could not point out or produce any order of the State Government under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act granting prior approval and prescribing conditions and restrictions in respect of the use of the lands which were to be acquired for a public purpose. There is no restriction or bar on the part of the appellant Society on carving out the size of the plots or the manner of allotment or in respect of construction over the same. That is why the framers of the Act have required the appropriate Government to grant prior approval of any housing scheme presented by any cooperative society before the lands are acquired treating such requirement and acquisition for public purpose. It is incumbent on the part of the 4 (2012) 3 SCC 727

43 appropriate Government while granting approval to examine different aspects of the matter so that it may serve the public interest and not the interest of few who can as well afford to acquire such lands by negotiation in open market. According to us, the State Government has not granted the prior approval in terms of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act to the housing scheme in question. The power under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act has been exercised for extraneous consideration and at the instance of the persons who had no role in the decision-making process - whether the acquisition of the lands in question shall be for a public purpose. This itself is enough to vitiate the whole acquisition proceeding and render the same invalid. 22. In the present case there has been contravention of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act inasmuch as there was no prior approval of the State Government as required by the said section before steps for acquisition of the lands were taken. The report of Shri G.K.V. Rao points out as to how the appellant-Society admitted large number of persons as members who cannot be held to be genuine members, the sole object being to transfer the lands acquired for “public purpose”, to outsiders as part of commercial venture, undertaken by the office- bearer of the appellant-Society. We are in agreement with the finding of the High Court that the statutory notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act have been issued due to the role played by M/s S.R. Constructions, Respondent 11. On the materials on record, the High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that the proceedings for acquisition of the lands had not been initiated because the State Government was satisfied about the existence of the public purpose but at the instance of agent who had collected more than a crore of rupees for getting the lands acquired by the State Government. xx xx xx 95. The Division Bench of the High Court in Subramani, ILR 1995 Kant 3139, noted that the terms of the agreement entered into between the Society and M/s. Devatha Builders was not for the acquisition of land but only for development of the acquired land. The Division Bench also noted that the agreement was entered into between the Society and the owners in 1985, whereas the Government gave approval for acquisition in 1985 and the agreement with the developer was of 1986. The Division Bench also noted that no stranger had been inducted as a

44 member of the society. However, the acquisition which was under challenge in Writ Petition No. 28707 of 1995 was declared illegal because the House Building Cooperative Society concerned has not framed any housing scheme and obtained approval thereof from the State Government. The Division Bench also expressed the view that remedy under Article 226 was discretionary and it was not inclined to nullify the acquisition made for the society because the petitioners had approached the Court after long lapse of time and there was no explanation for the delay. xx xx xx 132. Before concluding we consider it necessary to observe that in view of the law laid down in the 1st H.M.T. case (paragraphs 19, 21 and 22), which was followed in 2nd H.M.T. case and Vyalikawal House Building Cooperative Society's case, the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court in Narayana Raju's case that the framing of scheme and approval thereof can be presumed from the direction given by the State Government to the Special Deputy Commissioner to take steps for issue of notification under Section 4(1) cannot be treated as good law and the mere fact that this Court had revoked the certificate granted by the High Court cannot be interpreted as this Court's approval of the view expressed by the High Court on the validity of the acquisition. 133. In the result, the appeals are dismissed. However, keeping in view the fact that some of the members of the appellant may have built their houses on the sites allotted to them, we give liberty to the appellant to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of their land at the prevailing market price and hope that the landowners will, notwithstanding the judgments of the High Court and this Court, agree to accept the market price so that those who have built the houses may not suffer. 134. At the same time, we make it clear that the appellant must return the vacant land to the respondents irrespective of the fact that it may have carved out the sites and allotted the same to its members. This must be done within a period of three months from today and during that period the appellant shall not change the present status of the vacant area/sites. The members of the appellant who may have been allotted the sites shall also not change the present status/character of the land. The parties are left to bear their own costs.”

45 28) In support of the proposition that it was a case of malice in law, reference was made to the judgment in the case of S. Partap Singh v. State of Punjab 5 . 29) Countering the arguments of delay and laches putforth by the respondents even in appellants cases, the reference was made to the judgment in the case of S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath and others 6 , in support of the plea that fraud vitiates all action and it was a case of fraud where land was acquired for one purpose but thereafter the Government sought to utilise it for some other purpose. In this behalf, reliance was also placed in the case of Vyalikaval Housebuilding Coop. Society v. V. Chandrappa and others 7 : “ 3. This writ petition was contested by the appellant society as the respondent and it was alleged that it was hopelessly barred by time being delayed by 14 years and it was also submitted that the writ petitioners had participated in the inquiry under Section 5A of the Act and have also received substantial amount from the appellant society pursuant to the agreement executed in their favour. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground of being hopelessly barred by time and the writ petitioners participated in the proceedings therefore they have acquiesced in the matter. Aggrieved against this order passed by learned Single Judge, a writ appeal was filed by the respondents which came to be allowed by the Division Bench for the reasons mentioned in another writ appeal decided by the same Division Bench headed by the Chief Justice of the High Court on 17.1.2000. In that writ appeal the Division Bench held that the entire acquisition on behalf of the appellant society was actuated with fraud as held in Narayana Reddy v. State of Karnataka ILR 1991 Kar. 2248. In that case it was held as follows: “ As seen from the findings of G.V.K. Rao Inquiry Report, in 5 AIR 1964 SC 72 6 (1994) 1 SCC 1 7 (2007) 9 SCC 304

46 respect of five respondent societies and the report of the Joint Registrar in respect of Vyalikaval House Building Co-operative Society, these societies had indulged in enrolling large number of members illegally inclusive of ineligible members and had also indulged in enrolling large number of bogus members. The only inference that is possible from this is that the office-bearers of the societies had entered into unholy alliance with the respective agents for the purpose of making money, as submitted for the petitioners otherwise, there is no reason as to why such an agreement should have been brought about by the office-bearers of the society and the agents. Unless these persons had the intention of making huge profits as alleged by the petitioners, they would not have indulged in enrolment of ineligible and bogus members. The circumstance that without considering all these relevant materials the Government had accorded its approval, is sufficient to hold that the agents had prevailed upon the Government to take a decision to acquire the lands without going into all those relevant facts. The irresistible inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the power conferred under the Land Acquisition Act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not for a bona fide housing scheme but is substantially for the purpose of enabling the concerned office-bearers of respondent-societies and their agents to indulge in sale of sites in the guise of allotment of sites to the members/ associate members of the society to make money as alleged by the petitioners and therefore it is a clear case of colourable exercise of power. Thus the decision of the Government to acquire the lands suffers from legal mala fides and therefore the impugned notifications are liable to be struck down.” 30) Judgment in the case of Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and Anr. v. G. Jayarama Reddy and Ors. 8 also relied upon to counter the plea of delay and laches, wherein this Court held: “ 24. The first question which needs consideration is whether the High Court committed an error by granting relief to Respondent 1 despite the fact that he filed the writ petition after a long lapse of 8 (2011) 10 SCC 608

47 time and the explanation given by him was found unsatisfactory by the learned Single Judge, who decided the writ petition after remand by the Division Bench. 25. Although the Framers of the Constitution have not prescribed any period of limitation for filing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the power conferred upon the High Court to issue to any person or authority including any Government, directions, orders or writs including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari is not hedged with any condition or constraint, in the last 61 years the superior courts have evolved several rules of self-imposed restraint including the one that the High Court may not enquire into belated or stale claim and deny relief to the petitioner if he is found guilty of laches. The principle underlying this rule is that the one who is not vigilant and does not seek intervention of the Court within reasonable time from the date of accrual of cause of action or alleged violation of constitutional, legal or other right is not entitled to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. Another reason for the High Court's refusal to entertain belated claim is that during the intervening period rights of third parties may have crystallized and it will be inequitable to disturb those rights at the instance of a person who has approached the Court after long lapse of time and there is no cogent explanation for the delay. We may hasten to add that no hard-and-fast rule can be laid down and no straightjacket formula can be evolved for deciding the question of delay/laches and each case has to be decided on its own facts. xx xx xx 31. In the light of the above, it is to be seen whether the discretion exercised by the Division Bench of the High Court to ignore the delay in filing of writ petition is vitiated by any patent error or the reasons assigned for rejecting the appellants' objection of delay are irrelevant and extraneous. Though it may sound repetitive, we may mention that in the writ petition filed by him, Respondent 1 had not only prayed for quashing of the acquisition proceedings, but also prayed for restoration of the acquired land on the ground that instead of using the same for the public purpose specified in the notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6 , the Corporation had transferred the same to private persons. Respondent 1 and the other landowners may not be having any serious objection to the acquisition of their land for a public purpose and, therefore, some of them not only accepted the compensation, but also filed applications under Section 18 of the Act for determination of market value by the court. However, when it was discovered that the acquired land has been transferred to private persons, they sought intervention

48 of the Court and in the three cases, the Division Bench of the High Court nullified the acquisition on the ground of fraud and misuse of the provisions of the Act.” The Arguments : Respondents 31) Mr. L.N. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the official respondents, emphatically countered the aforesaid submissions. He argued that in most of these appeals, writ petitions were filed in the High Court challenging the acquisition after passing of the award and taking possession of the land and in most of the cases, the land owners had even received the compensation. Therefore, these writ petitions were not maintainable and should have been dismissed on the ground of laches and delay inasmuch as acquisition cannot be challenged after the award is passed and compensation is received. He sought to distinguish the judgments cited by the appellants' counsel. He submitted that the High Court has wrongly fixed the cut-off date as 06.07.2011 . He also submitted that the High Court was in error in rejecting the arguments of acquiescence as acceptance of compensation clearly meant that these land owners had acquiesced into the action of the authorities in acquiring the land. His submission was that case should have been examined keeping in view the aforesaid factors and the plea taken by the writ petitioners that they felt aggrieved only when they came to know land was allotted/sold to private builders, was totally irrelevant and could not have been the ground to entertain the writ petitions on merits.

49 32) It was also argued by Mr. Rao that the High Court could not have enhanced the compensation by 64.7% in writ petition filed under Article 226 as it was not a public law remedy. His plea in this behalf was that Land Acquisition Act provided for complete machinery for determination of the compensation and reference by the land owners under Section 18 of the Act had already been sought and present way to matters are pending before the Reference Court to determine the market value of the land. He argued that merely because in the case of Patwari village, the Government had entered into an agreement with some of the villagers for payment of compensation by increasing it by 64.70%, would not mean that High Court could extend that to all villages in the absence of any agreement with those parties. In the same wave length, he challenged the direction for allotment of developed Abadi plot to the extent of 10% of the acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 square metres by pointing out that the aforesaid allotment was under the scheme of the Government which provided for allotment of 5% developed Abadi plot in respect of Noida land and 6% of developed Abadi plot where the land acquired was situated in Greater Noida. Here again, it was pleaded, the High Court could not tinker with the said policy by enhancing the entitlement for allotment to 10%. It was also argued that in any case once the compensation was enhanced, there was no reason to give allotment of larger area of land and it amounted to giving

50 double benefit to the land owners. 33) Without prejudice to the aforesaid contentions, Mr. Rao submitted that in spite of these serious infirmities in the judgment of the High Court, insofar as Government authorities are concerned, they were ready to pay the higher compensation and even allot land to the extent of 10% subject to the condition that quietus is given to all these cases with no further benefits. He pointed out that 64.7% additional compensation had already been given to about ninety percent land owners. Further, 6% of land/flats had already been allotted to ninety percent farmers. He further argued that care was taken at the time of acquisition itself not to touch the Abadi land. 34) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi and Mr. Pramod Swarup, senior advocates, who appeared for private respondents/builders to whom the land was allotted, supported the aforesaid submissions of Mr. Rao and submitted that substantial justice had been done by the High Court in these cases and, therefore, in exercise of its power under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, the Court should not interfere with the exercise done by the High Court. Our Analysis of the subject matter: 35) We have bestowed our serious consideration to the submissions made

51 by learned counsel for parties on both sides. No doubt, the High Court has held that it was wrong exercise in law on the part of the Government to invoke the provisions of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act, thereby dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5A of the Act which amounted to taking away the valuable right of the land owners. That is a finding on merit. However, it is subject to the caveat that the writ petitions filed by the appellants herein could be considered on merits and were not to be dismissed on the grounds of laches and delay. Such a contention was indeed taken by the respondents/ authorities before the High Court. However, the same has been repelled. Primary reason given by the High Court in this behalf is that the delay was explained satisfactorily inasmuch as the land acquired for the purposes of industrial development was, at a later period of time, allotted to private builders for development of residential units and when this was done it came to the knowledge of the appellants. Aggrieved by this step taken by the Noida authorities, the appellants filed the writ petitions. Thus, in nutshell, allotment of the land by the Noida authorities at a subsequent point of time has weighed with the High Court. In other words, it is clear that the appellants did not challenge the acquisition per se inasmuch as when the land was acquired even after invoking urgency provisions contained in Section 17 of the Act and dispensing with the requirement of Section 5A of the Act, this position was accepted by the land owners. They even

52 allowed the authorities to proceed further in passing the award and taking possession from many of these land owners and even paying compensation to them. It is a matter of record that before coming to the Court and filing the writ petitions, most of these appellants had received the compensation. They also sought reference under Section 18 of the Act for higher compensation. Physical possession of land of many of these appellants have also been taken. In many other cases, paper possession had been taken before filing of the writ petition. A great deal of argument was made as to whether such physical possession/paper possession should be treated as taking possession in the eyes of law, it would be a debatable point inasmuch as in various judgments, this Court has held that whenever there is large scale of acquisition and possession of large chunk of land belonging to number of persons is to be taken, paper possession would be a permissible mode, particularly when it is Abadi land. We are not going into this controversy since the ultimate outcome is not influenced by the aforesaid factor, as would be noticed in the later part of judgment. However, what we highlight and reiterate is that these appellants were not aggrieved by the acquisition per se in the manner it was done by the respondents. As per their own case, they became aggrieved only when they found that land was not utilised for the purpose for which it was acquired namely industrial development but a large portion thereof was sought to be given away to

53 the builders for development of the land as residential. The High Court, while accepting such a plea of the land owners on the ground of laches and delay, has referred to certain judgments which were relied upon before us as well and taken note of above. 36) This leads to an incidental issue as to whether development of land for residential purposes is impermissible and could have given a fresh cause of action to the land owners to approach the Court. Here, we would like to refer to the judgment of this Court in Nand Kishore Gupta and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 9 which concerns the same Act viz. U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. In that case, for Yamuna Express Project, the land was acquired setting it to be 'public purpose'. The land was utilised for construction of Yamuna Expressway and along therewith development of the part of the land was undertaken for commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential purposes as well. It was accepted that construction of Yamuna Expressway was work of public importance. However, the utilisation of land for development of other purposes, namely, commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential etc. was challenged, as not amounting to acquisition for 'public purpose'. There was another feature namely for the development of the land in the aforesaid manner Public Private Partnership (PPP) was formed and private parties were asked to 9 (2010) 10 SCC 282

54 undertake the development on BOT (Built, Operate and Transfer) basis. Such PPP on BOT basis was also challenged as colourable exercise of power in which private parties were involved. The challenge was repelled by this Court holding that acquisition of land along Yamuna Express for development of the same for commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential purposes was complimentary to creation of Expressway. Such complimentary purpose was also treated as 'public purpose'. It was also contended by the land owners that the acquisition was not for “public purpose” because: (a) its object was not covered by Section 3(f) of the Act, (b) it really fell not under Part II of the Act but under Part VII thereof as it virtually amounted to acquisition of land for the contractor Company J, (c) the compensation was coming wholly from J and not from the Government or YEIDA, (d) the acquisition for so-called interchange was not at all necessary and was a colourable exercise of power. They further contended that the application of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act was wholly unnecessary and therefore, the enquiry under Section 5-A could not have been dispensed with. All the aforesaid contentions were rejected. Going by the dicta in the aforesaid judgment, it is contended by the authorities that merely because the part of the land is utilised for residential purpose, it cannot be said that the respondents-authorities have not adhered to the purpose for which the land is acquired. As per them, this would be

55 complimentary purpose to the main purpose. 37) We have to keep in mind that in all these cases, after the land was acquired, which was of very large quantity and in big chunks, further steps were taken by passing the award, taking possession and paying compensation. In many cases, actual possession was taken and in rest of the cases, paper possession was taken where because of the land under Abadi , actual possession could not be taken on spot immediately. Fact remains that in many such cases where possession was taken, these land owners/appellants even received compensation. All these petitions have been filed only thereafter which may not be maintainable stricto sensu having regard to the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of this Court in Aflatoon and Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors. 10 and the dictum of this judgment is followed consistently by this Court in various cases [See Murari and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. 11 , Ravi Khullar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. 12 , Anand Singh and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 13 ] 38) Once we look into the matter from the aforesaid prospective, the argument of the appellants that giving away of the land by allotment to the private developers for construction of residential units gave them the fresh cause of action, gets dented to a great extent. No doubt, following 10 AIR 1974 SC 2077 11 (1997) 1 SCC 15 12 (2007) 5 SCC 231 13 (2010) 11 SCC 242

56 Royal Orchid Hotels Limited case and other similar cases, the High Court has not dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellants on the ground of delay and laches accepting the plea of the appellants that they felt aggrieved on coming to know that the land was sought to be given to the private persons for development. In this way, discretion is exercised by the High Court in entertaining the writ petitions on merits. Since such a discretion is exercised, we would not like to interfere with that discretion, more so, when a very fair stand is taken by Mr. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the Noida authority, as mentioned above. However, the aforesaid position in law is stated to highlight that it was equally possible to dismiss these writ petitions as the same were filed belatedly after passing of the award and when in most of the cases, possession was taken and compensation paid. When we examine the matter from the aforesaid angle, we reach an irresistible conclusion that the High Court has gone an extra mile in finding the solution to the problem and balancing the equities in a manner which is favourable to the land owners. 39) We have also to keep in mind another important feature. Many residents of Patwari village had entered into agreement with the authorities agreeing to accept enhanced compensation at the rate of 64.7%. This additional compensation was, however, agreed to be paid by the authorities only in respect of land owners of Patwari village. The

57 High Court has bound the authorities with the said agreement by applying the same to all the land owners thereby benefiting them with 64.7% additional compensation. There could have been argument that the authorities cannot be fastened with this additional compensation, more particularly, when machinery for determination for just and fair compensation is provided under the Land Acquisition Act and the land owners had, in fact, invoked the said machinery by seeking reference under Section 18 thereof. Likewise, the scheme for allotment of land to the land owners provides for 5% and 6% developed land in Noida and Greater Noida respectively. As against that, the High Court has enhanced the said entitlement to 10%. Again, we find that it could be an arguable case as to whether High Court could grant additional land contrary to the policy. Notwithstanding the same, the Noida authority have now accepted this part of the High Court judgment after the dismissal of the appeals filed by the Noida authority, and a statement to that effect was made by Mr. Rao. We may point out that while dismissing the appeals of Noida authority, following remarks were made: “ 9. Insofar as allotment of 10 per cent of the plots is concerned, the High Court, in exercise of its discretionary power, has thought it fit, while sustaining the notification issued by the authority for protecting them for allotting 10 per cent of the developed plots; and, there again they have put a cap of 2,500 sq.mtrs. In fact, in the course of the order, the High Court has taken into consideration the agreement that was entered into by the authority with the villagers of Patwari and, in some cases, the authority itself has agreed to raise 6 to 8 per cent of the developed plots to the agriculturists. The High Court has also taken into

58 consideration the observations made by this Court in the case of Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority , 2010 (7) SCC 129, where this Court has gone to the extent of directing the authorities to allot 15 per cent of the developed plots. In our view and in the peculiar facts and circumtances of these cases, since the relief that is given to the respondents/agriculturists is purely discretionary relief by the Court in order to sustain the notification issued by the authorities, we do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court, at the instance of the petitioners/appellants/ authorities, namely, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA. 10. This order shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case.” 40) Thus, we have a scenario where, on the one hand, invocation of urgency provisions under Section 17 of the Act and dispensing with the right to file objection under Section 5A of the Act, is found to be illegal. On the other hand, we have a situation where because of delay in challenging these acquisitions by the land owners, developments have taken in these villages and in most of the cases, third party rights have been created. Faced with this situation, the High Court going by the spirit behind the judgment of this Court in Bondu Ramaswamy and Others (supra) came out with the solution which is equitable to both sides. We are, thus, of the view that the High Court considered the ground realities of the matter and arrived at a more practical and workable solution by adequately compensating the land owners in the form of compensation as well as allotment of developed Abadi land at a higher rate i.e. 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners

59 against the eligibility and to the policy to the extent of 5% and 6% of Noida and Greater Noida land respectively. 41) Insofar as allegation of some of the appellants that their abadi land was acquired, we find that this allegation is specifically denied disputing its correctness. There is specific averment made by the NOIDA Authority at so many places that village abadi land was not acquired. It is mentioned that abadi area is what was found in the survey conducted prior to Section 4 Notification and not what is alleged or that which is far away from the dense village abadi. It is also mentioned that as a consequence of the acquisition, the Authority spends crores and crores of rupees in developing the infrastructure such as road, drainage, sewer, electric and water lines etc. in the unacquired portion of the village abadi. During the course of hearing, Chart No. 2 in respect of each village of Greater Noida was handed over for the consideration of this Court, wherein the amount spent by the Authority on the development, including village development (which is the unacquired village abadi), has been given in Column No. 4 thereof. It has been the consistent stand of the NOIDA Authority that prior to the issuance of Section 4 Notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, survey was conducted and the abadi found in that survey was not acquired. In fact, affidavits in this respect have also been filed not only in this Court but also in the High Court. We have mentioned that there has been a long gap between

60 acquisition of the land and filing of the writ petitions in the High Court by these appellants challenging the acquisition. If they have undertaken some construction during this period they cannot be allowed to take advantage thereof. Therefore, it is difficult to accept the argument of the appellants based on parity with three villages in respect of which the High Court has given relief by quashing the acquisition. 42) To sum up, following benefits are accorded to the land owners: (a) increasing the compensation by 64.7%; (b) directing allotment of developed abadi land to the extent of 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners; (c) c ompensation which is increased at the rate of 64.7% is payable immediately without taking away the rights of the land owners to claim higher compensation under the machinery provided in the Land Acquisition Act wherein the matter would be examined on the basis of the evidence produced to arrive at just and fair market value; This, according to us, provides substantial justice to the appellants. Conclusion 43) Keeping in view all these peculiar circumstances, we are of the opinion that these are not the cases where this Court should interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution. However, we make it clear that directions of the High Court are given in the aforesaid unique and peculiar/specific

61 background and, therefore, it would not form precedent for future cases. 44) We may record that some of the appellants had tried to point out certain clerical mistakes pertaining to their specific cases. For example, it was argued by one appellant that his land falls in a village in Noida but wrongly included in Greater Noida. These appellants, for getting such clerical mistakes rectified, can always approach the High Court. 45) The Full Bench judgment of the High Court is, accordingly, affirmed and all these appeals are disposed of in terms of the said judgment of the Full Bench. 46) In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petitions also stand disposed of. .............................................CJI (H.L. DATTU) .............................................J. (A.K. SIKRI) .............................................J. (ARUN MISHRA) NEW DELHI; MAY 14, 2015.

P[ 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4506 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30969 OF 2011) SAVITRI DEVI .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4830 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27508 OF 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4508-12 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33552-33556 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4513-17 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33984-33988 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4518-24 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 36334-36340 OF 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4819 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 333 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4525-26 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4527 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1104 OF 2012)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4529-30 OF 2015Ramana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.09.1817:03:07 ISTReason: (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1664-1665 OF 2012) 2 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4531 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1739 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4532 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1858 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4533 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2411 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4534 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2537 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4535 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2557 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4536 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2603 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4537 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2607 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4538 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2612 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4539 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2873 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4540 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3298 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4541 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3473 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3916 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4544 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3918 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4545 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4021 OF 2012) 3 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4546 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4024 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4547 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4223 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4548 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4242 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4549 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4249 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4550 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4542 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4551 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4552 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5712 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4553 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5959 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4554 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6013 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4555 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6027 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4556 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6121 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4557 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6196 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4558 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6345 OF 2012)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4559 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6353 OF 2012) 4 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4560 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6363 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4561 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6368 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4563 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6369 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4564-67 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6466-6469 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4568-73 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6489-6494 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4575-76 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6534-6535 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4577 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4578 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6629 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4579-80 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6731-6732 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4581-89 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6748-6756 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4591 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7146 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4592 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7436 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4593 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7539 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4594 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7540 OF 2012) 5 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4595 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7541 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4596 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7815 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4597-98 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7934-7935 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4599 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4600 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8439 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4601 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8528 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8593 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4603 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8849 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4604 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8851 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4605-07 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8853-8855 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4608 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9527 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4609 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9678 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4610 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9748 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4611 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9761 OF 2012) 6 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4612 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10052 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4613-15 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10056-10058 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4616 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10315 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4617 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10597 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4618 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11303 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4619 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11304 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4620 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11879 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4621 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11993 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4622 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12299 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4623 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12461 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4624 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12844 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4625-30 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13641-13646 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4631 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15173 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4632 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15905 OF 2012)

7 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4633 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16007 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4634 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16336 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4635 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16337 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4636 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16380 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4637 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17041 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4638 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18104 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4639 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19356 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4640 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.15370 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO.....CC 20540 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4641 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23723 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4642-4643 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23724-23725 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4644 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24203 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4645 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24720 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4646-4647 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25551-25552 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4648-4650 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26874-26876 OF 2012) 8 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4651 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4652 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27139 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4653-4660 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27389-27396 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4661-4666 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27502-27507 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4667 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28140 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4668 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29279 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4669 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33860 OF 2012)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4670 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37492 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4671 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37989 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4672 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37993 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4673 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38288 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4674 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38289 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4675 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38290 OF 2012) 9 CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NOS. 237-238 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4677 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8631 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4678 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4679 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8887 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4680 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9168 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4681 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9297 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4682 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12784 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4683 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13017 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4690-4691 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16722-16723 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4692 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17635 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4693 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18090 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4694 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18735 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4695 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18866 OF 2013) 10 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4696-4697 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19200-19201 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4698 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19922 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4699 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 20329 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4700 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23276 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4701-702 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23855-23856 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4703-4704 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23857-23858 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4705-4706 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23859-23860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4707-4709 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24622-24624 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4710-4711 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26176-26177 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4712 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26178 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4713 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26179 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4714-4715 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26681-26682 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4716 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26868 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4717 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26890 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4718 OF 2015 11 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30601 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4719 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30859 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4720 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30860 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4721 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30861 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4722 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30862 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4723 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32108 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4724 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33980 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4726 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 34176 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4727 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 35109 OF 2013)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4728 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37793 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4729 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39351 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4730-4731 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39697-39698 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4732-4733 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39699-39700 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4734 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39701 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4735-4736 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39702-39703 OF 2013) 12 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4737 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 802 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4738 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2495 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4739 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4566 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4740-4741 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5936-5937 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4742-45 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6024-6027 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4746 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6682 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4747 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7019 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4748 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7031 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4749 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7036 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4750 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10065 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4751-53 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10147-10149 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4754 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11737 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4755 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13401 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4756 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 14786 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4757 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12443 OF 2014) 13 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4758 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13034 OF 2014)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4759-60 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22298-22299 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4761-63 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22329-22331 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4764-65 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22384-22385 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4766-4768 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22716-22718 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4769-4770 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36155-36156 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4771 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4772-74 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36647-36649 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4775 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12433 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4776 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4777 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23772 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4778 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26260 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4779 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17559 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4780 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36242 OF 2013) 14 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4781 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29351 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4782 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18356 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4783 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19521 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4784 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19523 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4785 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19525 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4786 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19777 OF 2014) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 444 OF 2013 IN SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4787 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25279 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4788 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27102 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4789 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36391 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4790 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36390 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4791 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15397 OF 2015 @ SLP (C) NO...CC 21151 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4792 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36975 OF 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4793 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9551 OF 2014) 15 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4794-95 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10049-10050 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4796 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10051 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4797 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12434 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4798-99 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12435-12436 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4800 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12437 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12438 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4802 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12439 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4803 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12441 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4804 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12442 OF 2014) CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 21 OF 2015 IN SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4805 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28167 OF 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4806 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2057 OF 2015) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4807 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17686 OF 2014) 16 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15636 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4810-18 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17088-17096 OF 2012)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6569 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15635 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4808 OF 2015 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37126 OF 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2197 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2195 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2198 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2199 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2225 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2226 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2704 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2705 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3022 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4902 OF 2014 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4928 OF 2014 17 JUDGMENTA.K. SIKRI, J. These matters were heard in detail for few days and hearing was concluded on 05.02.2015. Thereupon, we communicated the result in the open Court by pronouncing that appeals were dismissed and the reasons shall follow. These are, thus, our reasons for dismissing the appeals. Leave is granted in all the special leave petitions.PROLOGUE :2) The subject matter of most of these appeals are the Notifications dated 12-03-2008 issued by the State of U.P. under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act ("Act" for short) read with Section 17 of the Act as well as declaration issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') vide Notification dated 30.06.2008. Land situate in various villages of Noida and Greater Noida in Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar was acquired. Some other Notifications under same provisions of the Act in respect of lands of these villages was also acquired by earlier Notifications. The purpose stated in the notifications was 'Planned Industrial Development'. Urgency provisions under Section 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act were

invoked thereby dispensing with the right of objection otherwise given to the land holders under Section 5A of the Act. The total land which was 18 acquired by these notification was 589.188 hectares. Some writ petitions were initially filed in the High Court of Allahabad challenging the said Notifications, with primary contention that invocation of emergency provision and taking away valuable right of the land holders under Section 5A of the Act was illegal, mala fide, arbitrary and colourable exercise of power. Some of the writ petitions came up before the Division Bench of the said High Court. One was Writ Petition (C) 45777 of 2008 in the case of Harish Chand and Others v. State of U.P. and Others wherein the High Court upholding the very same Notifications, on arriving at the conclusion that invocation of Section 17 of the Act was justified, dismissed that writ petition. It so happened that another Division Bench of the same High Court decided Writ Petition (C) No. 17068 of 2009; titled Karan Singh v. State of U.P. and others. The Division Bench rendered its judgment dated 19-07-2011 in the said case accepting the aforesaid contention of the writ petitioners and holding that invocation of provisions of Section 17 of the Act was not justified. Accordingly, the Division Bench quashed these Notifications.3) As a sequel, spate of writ petitions came to be filed challenging the lands acquired not only by the notification dated 12-03-2008 but even by earlier notifications as well. When these petitions came up before another Division Bench it noticed the aforesaid two conflicting views expressed by two different Division Benches. This led the said Division 19 Bench to refer the matter to the larger Bench and orders dated 26-07-2011 were passed in this behalf. This is how the matters were placed before the Full Bench and by that time as many as 471 writ petitions had accumulated. All these writ petitions were taken up analogously by the Full Bench and disposed of vide judgment dated 21.10.2011 with leading case known as Gajraj vs. State of U.P. (W.P. (C) 37443 of 201!). The Full Bench of the High Court has accepted the plea of the land holders that invocation of emergency clause contained in Section 17 of the Act was impermissible and unwarranted. At the same

time, the High Court also noticed that in respect of land of many villages, possession had already been taken and substantial development work carried out. Even compensation was paid in such cases, the High Court, instead of quashing the Notifications in respect of those villages, chose to adopt the middle path in an endeavour to balance the equities of both sides. Thus, it enhanced the provisional compensation and also directed allotment of developed Abadi land to the extent 10% of their acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 sq. mtrs. However, in respect of three villages, when it found that no development work had been carried out at all by the Authorities during the intervening period, the High Court chose to quash the Notifications including consequential actions and directed restoration of the land to the respective land owners.4) It may also be noticed at this stage that when there was flurry of writ 20 petitions in the High Court challenging the invocation of Section 17 and the Division Bench of the High Court in Harkaran Singh (supra) had held invocation of urgency powers to be bad in law, some land owners whose land was acquired much earlier by invoking clause (some of the Notifications of such land date back to 1979 or early 1980s as well) took adventurous step to file the writ petitions in the year 2011 challenging those Notifications. All these writ petitions, however, have been dismissed by the impugned judgment of the High Court on the ground that they are filed with inordinate delay and laches.5) From the aforesaid, it is clear that three sets of directions are issued by the High Court, namely, (I) dismissing writ petitions filed with unexplained delays and laches; (ii) quashing the Notification in respect of three villages where no development work had taken place; and (iii) in respect of other villages, instead of quashing the action of acquisition of land in spite of accepting the plea that Section 17 was wrongly invoked, it has enhanced the compensation as well as extent of entitlement for allotment of developed Abadi plot.6) The State Government/U.P. Development Board as well as many land owners have challenged the said Full Bench decision of the High Court. Insofar as special leave petitioners/appeals of the Government and

Authority are concerned, they have already been dismissed. In these batches of matters, thus, we are concerned with the appeals of the land 21 owners.7) Most of these appeals are filed against the Full Bench. However, some of the appeals arise against the earlier Division Bench judgment dated 25-11-2008 whereby the High Court had upheld the same Notifications and rejected the challenge to the acquisition of land. Some appeals are filed by the NOIDA authority where the Division Bench had quashed the notification.8) After narrating these preliminaries of the matters, we advert to the facts and events of the cases. For the sake of convenience, we will refer to the facts appearing in the writ petition of Gajraj as that was the lead case before the High Court as well.FACTUAL MATRIX9) This writ petition was filed by 27 writ petitioners claiming themselves to be Bhumidaars with transferable right and owners of different plots of land situate in Village Patwari, Pargana, Tehsil - Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar. The Notification dated 12-03-2008 was issued by the State Government under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 notifying that the land mentioned in the schedule is needed for the public purpose namely, for the "planned industrial development" in Gautam Buddha Nagar. Inquiry under Section 5A having been dispensed with vide Notification dated 12-03-2008, State Government proceeded to issue declaration under Section 6 of the Land 22 Acquisition Act dated 30-06-2008.10) The petitioners had pleaded in the writ petition that dispensation of the inquiry under Section 5A can only be an exception where the urgency cannot brook the delay. The respondents, without application of mind, dispensed with the inquiry. The acquisition proceedings were deprecated as void, unconstitutional, tainted with malafide, abuse of authority/power and non application of mind. It was pleaded that the procedure under Section 5A is mandatory which embodies a just and

wholesome principle that a person whose property is being acquired or intended to be acquired should have occasion to persuade the authorities that his property be not touched for acquisition. It was also argued that land use of village Patwari was changed in the Master Plan 2021 after the issuance of notifications under sections 4 and 6, which is colourable exercise of powers and entire exercise is arbitrary, illegal and infringes rights of the petitioners guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India. These petitioners also stated in the writ petition that though there was some delay in filing the writ petition if counted from the date of notification but the writ petition was filed only when it came to their knowledge that the land use of village Patwari was changed in the Master Plan 2021 after the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 and land was sought to be allotted to the private builders, thereby giving go by to the objective for which the land was acquired. The 23 petitioners further claimed that the part of the property of the petitioners is situate in village Abadi. It was pleaded that the authority had executed a lease deed dated 31-03-2010 in favour of respondent no. 4 M/s. Supertech Ltd, a company engaged in the construction, allotting 2,40,00 square meters land for constructing multi-storied complexes. It was also stated that although land was acquired for industrial development but the same had now been allotted to the builders by the Authority which clearly indicates that neither there was any appropriate plan and scheme for industrial development nor there was any urgency in the matter and the whole proceeding amounted to colourable exercise of power.11) The State Government as well as Authority contested the matter by putting its justification to the invocation of Section 17 of the Act. It was pleaded that land was acquired for the purpose of industrial development. It was also stated that the Authority had been constituted vide Notification dated 28-01-1998 issued under the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 (hereafter referred to as the '1976 Act') and the land was to be developed in accordance with the aims and objectives contained in the said Act included development of the land for residential and other purposes as well and was not confined to industrial development alone. Objection was raised to the maintainability of the

writ petitions by contending that except few petitioners, all other had received compensation on various dates and, therefore, they were 24 estopped from challenging the acquisition, once the possession of the land was taken, award was passed and compensation received. The Authorities also stated that land owner of about 83% of the land area had already been paid the compensation. In terms of numbers, out of 1605 persons, 1403 persons had accepted the compensation. Development works had been carried out in the area in question which had already been demarcated into various sectors. The nature of development carried out was stated in detail in the affidavit. Invocation of urgency clause was also sought to be justified.12) M/s. Supertech Limited, to whom certain area was allotted for development of the housing colony was also impleaded as the respondent. On its impleadment, this respondent also filed its counter affidavit stating the circumstances under which it was allotted the land for development of residential units. It also contended that the substantial work had already been undertaken by the said Company. So much so, out of 6000 residential units which were proposed to be constructed, 4471 units had already been booked by the members of public and paid part considerations. It was pleaded that in this manner third party interest had also been created. It would be relevant to point out here that apart from M/s. Supertech Limited, there were at least 10 more such developers who had been allotted the various chunks of acquired land for similar housing projects etc. 25JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT13) After noticing the aforesaid facts and the contentions and having regard to the plethora of writ petitions which were filed pertaining to different villages, the High Court deemed it appropriate to categorize these writ petitions in different groups, village wise. 65 village wise categories were, accordingly, carved out. Out of these group 1-41 pertained to different villages of Greater NOIDA whereas villages in group 42-65 fell in NOIDA. Village Patwari was taken up as group 1. The High Court,

thereafter, discussed the factual position in respect of each group which need not be mentioned, as unnecessary for our purposes. However, wherever this exercise is deemed proper, we would be referring to such factual details at the relevant steps.14) Keeping in view the various submissions made by the writ petitioners in their petitions, the High Court framed as many as 17 issues or the points of consideration which had fallen for its discussion and decision. It would be apposite to take note of those issues at this juncture: "(i) Object and Purpose of the 1976 Act: Whether the development of industries is the dominant purpose and object of U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. (ii) Whether Acquisition Compulsory: Whether for carrying out the development of industrial area under 1976 Act, it is compulsory and necessary to acquire the land by the Authority? (iii) Delay and Laches : Whether the delay and laches in the facts of the present case can bar the invocation or 26Constitutional remedy under Article 226 of theConstitution of India.(iv) National Capital Regional Planning Board Act,1985, its Consequences: Whether the Authority cancarry out development, utilise the land acquired as perits Master Plan 2021 without its approval/clearance byNational Capital Regional Planning Board, and what iseffect on its function of land acquisition afterenforcement of 1985 Act?(v) Invocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4): Whetherinvocation of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the LandAcquisition Act and dispensation of inquiry undersection 5A was in accordance with law in the caseswhich are under consideration?(vi) Pre-notification and Post-notification delay:Whether delay caused before issuance of notificationunder Section 4 and delay caused subsequent tonotification under Section 4 can be relied fordetermining as to whether urgency was such thatinvocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was necessary?(vii) Colourable Exercise of Power: Whetheracquisition of land are vitiated due to mala fide andcolourable exercise of powers?(viii) Taking of possession: Whether the possession ofthe land acquired was taken under Section 17(1) of theLand Acquisition Act in accordance with law?(ix) Vesting: Whether after taking possession underSection 17(A) of the Act the challenge to thenotifications under Section 4 read with 17(1) and 17(4)and Section 6 cannot be entertained due to the reasonthat land which has already been vested in the Statecannot be divested?

(x) Section 11A; Whether acquisition under challengehas lap0sed under Section 11A of the Act due tonon-declaration of the award within two years from thedate of publication of the declaration made undersection 6?(xi) Section 17(3A): Whether non payment of 80% ofthe compensation as required by Section 17(3A) of theLand Acquisition Act is fatal to the acquisition o 27 proceedings? (xii) Waiver: Whether the petitioners who have accepted compensation by agreement have waived their right to challenge the acquisition proceedings? (xiii) Acquiescence: Whether the petitioners due to having accepted the compensation by agreement have acquiesced to the proceedings of land acquisition and they are estopped from challenging the acquisition proceedings at this stage? (xiv) Third Party Rights, Development and Construction: Whether due to creation of third party rights, development carried out by the Authority and developments and co0nstructions made by the allottees on the acquired land subsequent to the acquisition, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief of quashing the notifications under Section 4 read with Section 17(1) and 17(4) and Section 6 of the Act? (xv) Effect of Upholding of some of the notifications in some writ petitions earlier decided: What are the consequences and effect of earlier Division Bench judgment upholding several notifications which are subject matter of challenge in some of these writ petitions? (xvi) Conflicts in views of Division Benches: Which of the Division Bench decisions i.e. Harkaran Singh's case holding that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was invalid or earlier Division Bench judgment in Harish Chand's case holding that invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was in accordance with law, has to be approved? (xvii) Relief: To what relief, if any, the petitioners are entitled in these writ petition?"15) We are purposely eschewing the detailed discussion by the High Court on all the aforesaid issues. Suffice it to state here that after noticing the object and purpose of 1976 Act and discussing its provisions contained in this Act with reference to case law explaining the legal position of such 28 statutory authorities entrusted with the task of development works, the High Court concluded that the stand of the Authority that unless the land is acquired by it. It cannot carry out any development works until the 1976 Act was misconceived and incorrect. The High Court remarked that the Authority was labouring under the aforesaid misconception and,

therefore, concentrated only on acquisition of the land without taking care of other modes and means of industrial development and excessive acquisition of fertile agriculture land was due to the above mindset of the Authority. Insofar as issues pertaining to compulsive acquisition and invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) are concerned, the High Court has arrived at a finding that such invocation of emergency/urgency clauses, thereby depriving the land owners of their most invaluable right to file objections under Section 5A of the Act, was illegal and unwarranted. As this issue is decided in favour of the land owners and against this finding appeals preferred by the State as well as the Authority have already been dismissed, it is not necessary to explain the raison d'etre behind these findings. We would be proceeding on the basis that invocation of Section 17(1) and Section 17(4) was wrong. Similarly, the findings of the High Court that exercise of power by the State was colourable and arbitrary need not be restated in detail, the same reason.16) As far as the issue no. 4 pertaining the NCR planning Board Act is concerned, the High Court has held that land could not be acquired 29 without the permission of the Board. Opinion of the High Court on this aspect was questioned by the State of U.P. as well as Authority in its appeals. However, it was found that as a matter of fact, insofar as these cases are concerned consent of the Board had been obtained. Having regard to this position, while dismissing the appeals of the State/Authority, we have left the said question of law open, namely, whether permission of the deemed under the Act of 1985 is a pre-condition before acquisition of the land. Therefore, that aspect also needs no elaboration at our end in these appeals.17) It becomes clear from the above that the High Court arrived at a conclusion that since invocation of Section 17(1) and 17(4) was uncalled for and unwarranted, the acquisition of the land of the appellants herein was illegal. Notwithstanding, the same, the High Court did not grant the relief of setting aside the entire acquisition and restoring the land to the appellants. After the aforesaid findings, the High Court observed that insofar as grant of particular relief to the land owners in land acquisition

proceedings is concerned, it depends on several important factors. Thus, the issue of 'reliefs' has been discussed specifically and independently under the aforesaid caption. Here, the High Court has observed that the creation of third party rights, development undertaken over the land in dispute as well as the steps taken by the land owners after declaration made under Section 6 of the Act would be the relevant consideration in 30 determining the kind of relief that is to be granted to the land owners. Discussing the aforesaid aspects in the contexts of these proceedings, the High Court pointed out that in majority of cases third party rights had been created after issue of declaration under Section 6 and after taking possession of the land, substantial developments including constructions had been undertaken. Thus, in those cases where substantial development had taken place and/or third party rights had been created, the High Court deemed it proper not to interfere with the acquisition. At the same time in order to balance the equities, it felt that grant of higher compensation and better share in the developed land to these land owners would meet the ends of justice. The exact relief given in this behalf shall be stated at the appropriate stage.18) The High Court also found that in three villages no such third party rights had been created and no developments had taken place. So far as these villages are concerned, the High Court deemed it apposite to release the land in favour of the land owners of those villages.19) The High Court also found that many writ petitions were filed challenging the acquisitions in respect of which notifications were issued much earlier, were totally stale and suffered from laches and delays. In the opinion of the High Court, all those writ petitions which pertained to notifications issued prior to the year 2000 and the writ petitions were filed 31 in the year 2011, these writ petitions deserved to be dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay and laches.20) In nutshell, relief was categorised in three compartments. In the first instance, those writ petitions which were filed belatedly were dismissed. In the second category, three villages, namely, Devala (Group 40),

village Yusufpur Chak Sahberi (Group 38) and Village Asdullapur (Group 42) the acquisition was set aside. Land acquisition in respect of remaining 61 villages is concerned, the acquisition was allowed to remain but the additional compensation was increased to 64.7% with further entitlement for allotment of development abadi plot to the extent of 10% of the acquired land of those land owners subject to maximum of 2500 sq. mtrs.21) We now reproduce the exact nature of direction given by the High Court, which reads as follows: "In view of the foregoing conclusions we order as follows: 1. The Writ Petition No. 45933 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 47545 of 2011 relating to village Nithari, Writ Petition No. 47522 of 2011 relating to village Sadarpur, Writ Petition No. 45196 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45208 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45211 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45213 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45216 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45223 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45224 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45226 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45229 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45230 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45235 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45238 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 45283 of 2011 relating to village Khoda, Writ Petition No. 46764 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 46785 of 2011 relating to village Sultanpur, Writ Petition No. 46407 of 2011 relating to village Chaura Sadatpur and Writ 32Petition No. 46470 of 2011 relating to village Alaverdipurwhich have been filed with inordinate delay and laches aredismissed.2(i). The writ petitions of Group 40 (Village Devla) beingWrit Petition No. 31126 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 59131 of2009, Writ Petition No. 22800 of 2010, Writ Petition No.37118 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 42812 of 2009, WritPetition No. 50417 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 54424 of2009, Writ Petition No. 54652 of 2009, Writ Petition No.55650 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 57032 of 2009, WritPetition No. 58318 of 2009, Writ Petition No. 22798 of2010, Writ Petition No. 37784 of 2010, Writ Petition No.37787 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 31124 of 2011, WritPetition No. 31125 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 32234 of2011, Writ Petition No. 32987 of 2011, Writ Petition No.35648 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 38059 of 2011, WritPetition No. 41339 of 2011, Writ Petition No. 47427 of2011 and Writ Petition No. 47412 of 2011 are allowed andthe notifications dated 26.5.2009 and 22.6.2009 and allconsequential actions are quashed. The petitioners shallbe entitled for restoration of their land subject to deposit ofcompensation which they had received underagreement/award before the authority/Collector.2(ii) Writ petition No. 17725 of 2010 Omveer and othersVs. State of U.P. (Group 38) relating to village YusufpurChak Sahberi is allowed. Notifications dated 10.4.2006and 6.9.2007 and all consequential actions are quashed.The petitioners shall be entitled for restoration of their landsubject to return of compensation received by them under

agreement/award to the Collector.2(iii) Writ Petition No. 47486 of 2011 (Rajee and othersVs. State of U.P. and others) of Group-42 relating to villageAsdullapur is allowed. The notification dated 27.1.2010and 4.2.2010 as well as all subsequent proceedings arequashed. The petitioners shall be entitled to restoration oftheir land.3. All other writ petitions except as mentioned above at (1)and (2) are disposed of with following directions:(a) The petitioners shall be entitled for payment ofadditional compensation to the extent of same ratio (i.e.64.70%) as paid for village Patwari in addition to thecompensation received by them under 1997 Rules/awardwhich payment shall be ensured by the Authority at an 33early date. It may be open for Authority to take a decisionas to what proportion of additional compensation be askedto be paid by allottees. Those petitioners who have not yetbeen paid compensation may be paid the compensationas well as additional compensation as ordered above. Thepayment of additional compensation shall be without anyprejudice to rights of land owners under section 18 of theAct, if any.(b) All the petitioners shall be entitled for allotment ofdeveloped Abadi plot to the extent of 10% of their acquiredland subject to maximum of 2500 square meters. Wehowever, leave it open to the Authority in cases whereallotment of abadi plot to the extent of 6% or 8% havealready been made either to make allotment of the balanceof the area or may compensate the land owners bypayment of the amount equivalent to balance area as peraverage rate of allotment made of developed residentialplots.4. The Authority may also take a decision as to whetherbenefit of additional compensation and allotment of abadiplot to the extent of 10% be also given to;(a) those land holders whose earlier writ petitionchallenging the notifications have been dismissedupholding the notifications; and(b) those land holders who have not come to the Court,relating to the notifications which are subject matter ofchallenge in writ petitions mentioned at direction No.3.5. The Greater NOIDA and its allotees are directed not tocarry on development and not to implement the MasterPlan 2021 till the observations and directions of theNational Capital Regional Planning Board are incorporatedin Master Plan 2021 to the satisfaction of the NationalCapital Regional Planning Board. We make it clear thatthis direction shall not be applicable in those cases wherethe development is being carried on in accordance with theearlier Master Plan of Greater NOIDA duly approved bythe National Capital Regional Planning Board.6. We direct the Chief Secretary of the State to appointofficers not below the level of Principal Secretary (exceptthe officers of Industrial Development Department whohave dealt with the relevant files) to conduct a thoroughinquiry regarding the acts of Greater Noida (a) inproceeding to implement Master Plan 2021 withoutapproval of N.C.R.P. Board, (b) decisions taken to changethe land use, (c) allotment made to the builders and (d) 34

indiscriminate proposals for acquisition of land, and thereafter the State Government shall taken appropriate action in the matter."22) We may point out at this stage that in respect of all these three categories, the High Court has provided its justification for granting relief in the aforesaid nature. We shall be referring to the same while discussing the cases of appellants belonging to one or the other category.23) In nutshell, it may be pointed out that 65 villages which were the subject matter of bunch of writ petitions before the Full Bench of the High Court were grouped in 65 groups, village-wise and facts of acquisition, possession, if any, payment of compensation, developments, the nature of utilisation of those lands, and/or creation of third party rights were taken note of. Out of these 65 villages, 41 villages fall in Greater NOIDA and 24 in NOIDA. The High Court discussed the issue of laches and delays under Issue No. 3, as mentioned above, after referring to various judgments of this Court and culling out the principles contained therein on that basis. The High Court accepted the plea of inordinate delay insofar as acquisition of land in respect of village Nithari, Village Chauyra Sadedpur, Village Khoda, Village Sultanpur are concerned. These writ petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay. In respect of other villages, the Court repelled the contention of delay raised by the department, accepting the explanation given by land owners of those 35 villages that they did not oppose the acquisition earlier at the time of issuance of notification as the land was taken for industrial development. However, it is only when these land owners had come to know that instead of developing the land for the purpose for which it was acquired, the acquiring authority had transferred the land to the private persons and builders, that these land owners felt aggrieved and cheated and, therefore, there was sufficient explanation for coming to the Court at a time when these land owners discovered that the acquired land had been transferred to private persons. The Court, therefore, held that such writ petitions were to be entertained on merits, ignoring the delay.24) Some of the appeals are filed by the land owners in respect of aforesaid

villages where their petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. We are of the opinion that their writ petitions were rightly rejected by the High Court applying the principle of delays and laches. We are, thus, dismissing these appeals, upholding the order of the High Court. The Arguments: Appellants25) Though many counsel appeared on behalf of appellants and argued the appeals, Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dwivedi, Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Mr. Mahabir Singh, Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Senior Advocates and Dr. Suraj Singh, Advocate were the main architects who built the edifice of the appellants' 36 appeals. Among themselves, they covered almost all the aspects which arise in these appeals. Other counsel either adopted those submissions or some of them pointed out some distinctive and peculiar facts of their cases. It is not necessary to reproduce the submission of each of the aforesaid senior counsel separately as we think that better course of action would be to spell out these submissions in consolidated form to avoid any repetition. The arguments which were advanced by these counsel, in support of their appeals, are recapitulated hereunder:(I) In the first instance, the illegalities committed in issuing the notifications for acquisition of land were pointed out which were even accepted by the High Court in the impugned judgment, in the following manner:(a) No permission of NCR Board was taken before issuing the notifications.(b) There was violation of Section 5-A of the Act which goes to the root of the matter, coupled with the finding that it amounted to colourable exercise of power.(c) There was violation of mandatory provision contained in Section 11-A of the Act as well.(d) Though, Section 17 (1) and Section 17 (4) of the Act were invoked, 80% of the compensation, which is mandatory requirement, was not paid to the appellants.(e) After acquiring the land purportedly for the purpose of industrial development, it was sold to private developers/real estate agencies for 37 residential purposes, that too at a much higher rate.

As per the appellants, it would amply demonstrate that the Government acted more like a property dealer with intention to make money at the cost of the land owners/agriculturists.(II) It was further argued that even when status quo orders were passed in many writ petitions, the Government had violated those orders and in this manner, third party rights were created, thereby committing contempt of court. When the third party interest were created in the aforesaid manner, the High Court should not have influenced itself by the said consideration in denying the relief to the appellants after holding that acquisition was illegal.(III) It was also argued that in a case like this, doctrine of severance should have been applied by excluding only those portions of land in respect of which third party rights were created or development had taken place inasmuch as large chunk of land in these villages have still not been utilised for any purpose as these are thickly inhabited. By applying the doctrine of severance, Abadi land should have been included for the purpose of giving relief, when the acquisition was admittedly bound to be illegal. It was only, in this manner, equities could be balanced.(IV) It was sought to be argued that in respect of three villages where 38 acquisition is set aside on the ground that no development has taken place and third party rights are not created, this very principle should have been applied in respect of lands of those appellants in other villages where no third party rights were created or there was Abadi or where no possession was taken by the authorities and no compensation taken by the land owners and the land owners who belong to lower strata of society. In nutshell, the submission is that such cases are exactly at par with the cases of 3 villages falling in para 2 of the direction, where the land acquisition has been quashed even when the compensation was taken and same treatment be accorded to at least those appellants who fall in this category.(V) It was also argued that after holding the acquisition illegal, the Court had

three alternatives namely:(a) payment of 67.4% compensation plus restoring 10% of the developed land to the land owners, which is followed by the High Court.(b) directing restoration of possession in all these cases with liberty to the Government to negotiate with the land owners.(c) permitting fresh acquisition. Submission was that first alternative was not the best alternative adopted by the High Court and in the interest of justice, the second or third alternative should have been resorted to, more so, when it was 39 found to be case of malice in law which can clearly be inferred from the findings arrived at by the High Court, on the basis of material established on record.26) In support of these submissions, learned counsel for the appellants referred to the following judgments:(i) Anand Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.1 "50. Use of the power by the government under Section 17 for 'planned development of the city' or `the development of residential area' or for `housing' must not be as a rule but by way of an exception. Such exceptional situation may be for the public purpose viz., rehabilitation of natural calamity affected persons; rehabilitation of persons uprooted due to commissioning of dam or housing for lower strata of the society urgently; rehabilitation of persons affected by time bound projects, etc. The list is only illustrative and not exhaustive. In any case, sans real urgency and need for immediate possession of the land for carrying out the stated purpose, heavy onus lies on the government to justify exercise of such power. xxx xxx xxx 55. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, therefore, the Government has completely failed to justify the dispensation of an enquiry under Section 5A by invoking Section 17(4). For this reason, the impugned notifications to the extent they state that Section 5A shall not apply suffer from legal infirmity. The question, then, arises whether at this distance of time, the acquisition proceedings must be declared invalid and illegal. 56. In the written submissions of the GDA, it is stated that subsequent to the declaration made under Section 6 of the Act in the month of December, 2004, award has been made and out of the 400 land owners more than 370 have already received compensation. It is also stated that out of the total cost of Rs. 8,85,14,000/- for development of the acquired land, an amount of Rs. 5,28,00,000/- has already been spent by the GDA and more than 60% of work has been completed. It, thus, seems that barring the appellants and few others all other tenure1 (2010) 11 SCC 242 40

holders/land owners have accepted the `takings' of their land. It is too late in the day to undo what has already been done. We are of the opinion, therefore, that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the appellants are not entitled to any relief although dispensation of enquiry under Section 5A was not justified. 57. On behalf of the appellants, it was vehemently argued that the government may be directed to release their land from proposed acquisition. It was submitted by the appellants that houses/structures and buildings (including educational building) are existing on the subject land and as per the policy framed by the State Government, the land deserves to be exempted from acquisition. The submission of the appellants has been countered by the respondents and in the written submissions filed by the GDA, it is stated that the houses/structures and buildings which are claimed to exist, have been raised by the appellants subsequent to the notification under Section 4(1) of the Act and, therefore, they are not entitled to release of their land from acquisition. 58. In our view, since the existence of houses/structures and buildings as on November 22, 2003/February 20, 2004 over the appellants' land has been seriously disputed, it may not be appropriate to issue any direction to the State Government, as prayed for by the appellants, for release of their land from acquisition. However, as the possession has not been taken, the interest of justice would be subserved if the appellants are given liberty to make representation to the State authorities under Section 48(1) of the Act for release of their land. We, accordingly, grant liberty to the appellants to make appropriate representation to the State Government and observe that if such representation is made by the appellants within two months from today, the State Government shall consider such representation in accordance with law and in conformity with the State policy for release of land under Section 48(1) without any discrimination within three months from receipt of such representation."27) In support of the arguments that the equities were to be balanced on the facts of the case which according to the appellant were in their favour, following judgments were referred:(ii) H.M.T. Housing Building Co-operative Society v. Syed Khader & 41 Ors.2 "22. In the present case there has been contravention of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act inasmuch as there was no prior approval of the State Government as required by the said section before steps for acquisition of the lands were taken. The report of Shri G.K.V. Rao points out as to how the appellant-Society admitted large number of persons as members who cannot be held to be genuine members, the sole object being to transfer the lands acquired for "public purpose", to outsiders as part of commercial venture, undertaken by the office- bearer of the appellant-Society. We are in agreement with the finding of the High Court that the statutory notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act have been issued due to the role played by M/s S.R. Constructions, Respondent 11. On the materials on record, the High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that the proceedings for acquisition of the lands had not been initiated because the State Government was satisfied about the existence of the public purpose but at the instance of agent who had collected more than a crore of rupees for getting the lands

acquired by the State Government. 23. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. But in the circumstances of the case there shall be no orders as to costs. 24. We direct that as a result of quashing of the land acquisition proceedings including the notifications as aforesaid, the possession of the lands shall be restored to the respective landowners irrespective of the fact whether they had challenged the acquisition of their lands or not. On restoration of the possession to the landowners they shall refund the amounts received by them as compensation or otherwise in respect of their lands. The appellant, the respondents and the State Government including all authorities/persons concerned shall implement the aforesaid directions at an early date."(iii) H.M.T. House Building Cooperative Society v. M. Venkataswamappa and others3(iv) Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. State of Karnataka and others4 "87. The three Judge Bench also approved the view taken by2 (1995) 2 SCC 6773 (1995) 3 SCC 1284 (2012) 3 SCC 727 42the High Court that the acquisition of land was vitiated becausethe decision of the State Government was influenced by theEstate Agent with whom the Appellant had entered into anagreement. Paras 21 and 22 of the judgment, which containdiscussion on this issue are extracted hereunder: (1st H.M.T.House Building Coop. Society v. Syed Khader and others, (1995)2 SCC 677 "21. Mr. G. Ramaswamy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, submitted that merely because the appellant Society had entered into an agreement with Respondent 11, M/s S.R. Constructions, in which the latter for the consideration paid to it had assured that the lands in question shall be acquired by the State Government, no adverse inference should be drawn because that may amount to a tall claim made on behalf of M/s S.R. Constructions in the agreement. He pointed out that the notifications under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) have been issued beyond the time stipulated in the agreement and as such, it should be held that the State Government has exercised its statutory power for acquisition of the lands in normal course, only after taking all facts and circumstances into consideration. There is no dispute that in terms of agreement dated 1-2-1985 payments have been made by the appellant Society to M/s S.R. Constructions. This circumstance alone goes a long way to support the contention of the writ Petitioners that their lands have not been acquired in the normal course or for any public purpose. In spite of the repeated query, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Society could not point out or produce any order of the State Government under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act granting prior approval and prescribing conditions and restrictions in respect of the use of the lands which were to be acquired for a public purpose. There is no restriction or bar on the part of the appellant Society on carving out the size of the plots or the manner of allotment

or in respect of construction over the same. That is why the framers of the Act have required the appropriate Government to grant prior approval of any housing scheme presented by any cooperative society before the lands are acquired treating such requirement and acquisition for public purpose. It is incumbent on the part of the appropriate Government while granting approval to examine different aspects of the matter so that it may serve the public interest and not the interest of few who can as well afford to acquire such lands by negotiation in open market. According to us, the State Government has not granted the prior approval in terms of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act to the 43 housing scheme in question. The power under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act has been exercised for extraneous consideration and at the instance of the persons who had no role in the decision-making process - whether the acquisition of the lands in question shall be for a public purpose. This itself is enough to vitiate the whole acquisition proceeding and render the same invalid. 22. In the present case there has been contravention of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act inasmuch as there was no prior approval of the State Government as required by the said section before steps for acquisition of the lands were taken. The report of Shri G.K.V. Rao points out as to how the appellant-Society admitted large number of persons as members who cannot be held to be genuine members, the sole object being to transfer the lands acquired for "public purpose", to outsiders as part of commercial venture, undertaken by the office- bearer of the appellant-Society. We are in agreement with the finding of the High Court that the statutory notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Act have been issued due to the role played by M/s S.R. Constructions, Respondent 11. On the materials on record, the High Court was justified in coming to the conclusion that the proceedings for acquisition of the lands had not been initiated because the State Government was satisfied about the existence of the public purpose but at the instance of agent who had collected more than a crore of rupees for getting the lands acquired by the State Government. xx xx xx95. The Division Bench of the High Court in Subramani, ILR1995 Kant 3139, noted that the terms of the agreement enteredinto between the Society and M/s. Devatha Builders was not forthe acquisition of land but only for development of the acquiredland. The Division Bench also noted that the agreement wasentered into between the Society and the owners in 1985,whereas the Government gave approval for acquisition in 1985and the agreement with the developer was of 1986. The DivisionBench also noted that no stranger had been inducted as amember of the society. However, the acquisition which wasunder challenge in Writ Petition No. 28707 of 1995 was declaredillegal because the House Building Cooperative Societyconcerned has not framed any housing scheme and obtainedapproval thereof from the State Government. The Division Benchalso expressed the view that remedy under Article 226 was 44 discretionary and it was not inclined to nullify the acquisition made for the society because the petitioners had approached the Court after long lapse of time and there was no explanation for the delay.

xx xx xx 132. Before concluding we consider it necessary to observe that in view of the law laid down in the 1st H.M.T. case (paragraphs 19, 21 and 22), which was followed in 2nd H.M.T. case and Vyalikawal House Building Cooperative Society's case, the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court in Narayana Raju's case that the framing of scheme and approval thereof can be presumed from the direction given by the State Government to the Special Deputy Commissioner to take steps for issue of notification under Section 4(1) cannot be treated as good law and the mere fact that this Court had revoked the certificate granted by the High Court cannot be interpreted as this Court's approval of the view expressed by the High Court on the validity of the acquisition. 133. In the result, the appeals are dismissed. However, keeping in view the fact that some of the members of the appellant may have built their houses on the sites allotted to them, we give liberty to the appellant to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of their land at the prevailing market price and hope that the landowners will, notwithstanding the judgments of the High Court and this Court, agree to accept the market price so that those who have built the houses may not suffer. 134. At the same time, we make it clear that the appellant must return the vacant land to the respondents irrespective of the fact that it may have carved out the sites and allotted the same to its members. This must be done within a period of three months from today and during that period the appellant shall not change the present status of the vacant area/sites. The members of the appellant who may have been allotted the sites shall also not change the present status/character of the land. The parties are left to bear their own costs."28) In support of the proposition that it was a case of malice in law, reference was made to the judgment in the case of S. Partap Singh v. 45 State of Punjab5.29) Countering the arguments of delay and laches putforth by the respondents even in appellants cases, the reference was made to the judgment in the case of S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath and others6, in support of the plea that fraud vitiates all action and it was a case of fraud where land was acquired for one purpose but thereafter the Government sought to utilise it for some other purpose. In this behalf, reliance was also placed in the case of Vyalikaval Housebuilding Coop. Society v. V. Chandrappa and others7: "3. This writ petition was contested by the appellant society as the respondent and it was alleged that it was hopelessly barred by time being delayed by 14 years and it was also submitted that the writ petitioners had participated in the inquiry under Section 5A of the Act and have also received substantial amount from the appellant society pursuant to the agreement executed in their favour. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground of being hopelessly barred by time and the writ petitioners

participated in the proceedings therefore they have acquiesced in the matter. Aggrieved against this order passed by learned Single Judge, a writ appeal was filed by the respondents which came to be allowed by the Division Bench for the reasons mentioned in another writ appeal decided by the same Division Bench headed by the Chief Justice of the High Court on 17.1.2000. In that writ appeal the Division Bench held that the entire acquisition on behalf of the appellant society was actuated with fraud as held in Narayana Reddy v. State of Karnataka ILR 1991 Kar. 2248. In that case it was held as follows: "As seen from the findings of G.V.K. Rao Inquiry Report, in respect of five respondent societies and the report of the Joint Registrar in respect of Vyalikaval House Building Co-operative Society, these societies had indulged in enrolling large number of members illegally inclusive of ineligible members and had also indulged in enrolling large5 AIR 1964 SC 726 (1994) 1 SCC 17 (2007) 9 SCC 304 46 number of bogus members. The only inference that is possible from this is that the office-bearers of the societies had entered into unholy alliance with the respective agents for the purpose of making money, as submitted for the petitioners otherwise, there is no reason as to why such an agreement should have been brought about by the office-bearers of the society and the agents. Unless these persons had the intention of making huge profits as alleged by the petitioners, they would not have indulged in enrolment of ineligible and bogus members. The circumstance that without considering all these relevant materials the Government had accorded its approval, is sufficient to hold that the agents had prevailed upon the Government to take a decision to acquire the lands without going into all those relevant facts. The irresistible inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the power conferred under the Land Acquisition Act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not for a bona fide housing scheme but is substantially for the purpose of enabling the concerned office-bearers of respondent-societies and their agents to indulge in sale of sites in the guise of allotment of sites to the members/ associate members of the society to make money as alleged by the petitioners and therefore it is a clear case of colourable exercise of power. Thus the decision of the Government to acquire the lands suffers from legal mala fides and therefore the impugned notifications are liable to be struck down."30) Judgment in the case of Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and Anr. v. G. Jayarama Reddy and Ors.8 also relied upon to counter the plea of delay and laches, wherein this Court held: "24. The first question which needs consideration is whether the High Court committed an error by granting relief to Respondent 1 despite the fact that he filed the writ petition after a long lapse of time and the explanation given by him was found unsatisfactory by the learned Single Judge, who decided the writ petition after remand by the Division Bench.

25. Although the Framers of the Constitution have not prescribed8 (2011) 10 SCC 608 47any period of limitation for filing a petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India and the power conferred upon the HighCourt to issue to any person or authority including anyGovernment, directions, orders or writs including writs in thenature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warrantoand certiorari is not hedged with any condition or constraint, inthe last 61 years the superior courts have evolved several rulesof self-imposed restraint including the one that the High Courtmay not enquire into belated or stale claim and deny relief to thepetitioner if he is found guilty of laches. The principle underlyingthis rule is that the one who is not vigilant and does not seekintervention of the Court within reasonable time from the date ofaccrual of cause of action or alleged violation of constitutional,legal or other right is not entitled to relief under Article 226 of theConstitution. Another reason for the High Court's refusal toentertain belated claim is that during the intervening period rightsof third parties may have crystallized and it will be inequitable todisturb those rights at the instance of a person who hasapproached the Court after long lapse of time and there is nocogent explanation for the delay. We may hasten to add that nohard-and-fast rule can be laid down and no straightjacket formulacan be evolved for deciding the question of delay/laches andeach case has to be decided on its own facts. xx xx xx31. In the light of the above, it is to be seen whether thediscretion exercised by the Division Bench of the High Court toignore the delay in filing of writ petition is vitiated by any patenterror or the reasons assigned for rejecting the appellants'objection of delay are irrelevant and extraneous. Though it maysound repetitive, we may mention that in the writ petition filed byhim, Respondent 1 had not only prayed for quashing of theacquisition proceedings, but also prayed for restoration of theacquired land on the ground that instead of using the same forthe public purpose specified in the notifications issued underSections 4(1) and 6, the Corporation had transferred the same toprivate persons. Respondent 1 and the other landowners maynot be having any serious objection to the acquisition of theirland for a public purpose and, therefore, some of them not onlyaccepted the compensation, but also filed applications underSection 18 of the Act for determination of market value by thecourt. However, when it was discovered that the acquired landhas been transferred to private persons, they sought interventionof the Court and in the three cases, the Division Bench of theHigh Court nullified the acquisition on the ground of fraud andmisuse of the provisions of the Act." 48 The Arguments : Respondents31) Mr. L.N. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the official respondents, emphatically countered the aforesaid submissions. He argued that in most of these appeals, writ petitions were filed in the High Court challenging the acquisition after passing of the award and taking possession of the land and in most of the cases, the land owners had even received the compensation. Therefore, these writ petitions were not maintainable and should have been dismissed on the ground of laches

and delay inasmuch as acquisition cannot be challenged after the award is passed and compensation is received. He sought to distinguish the judgments cited by the appellants' counsel. He submitted that the High Court has wrongly fixed the cut-off date as 06.07.2011. He also submitted that the High Court was in error in rejecting the arguments of acquiescence as acceptance of compensation clearly meant that these land owners had acquiesced into the action of the authorities in acquiring the land. His submission was that case should have been examined keeping in view the aforesaid factors and the plea taken by the writ petitioners that they felt aggrieved only when they came to know land was allotted/sold to private builders, was totally irrelevant and could not have been the ground to entertain the writ petitions on merits.32) It was also argued by Mr. Rao that the High Court could not have enhanced the compensation by 64.7% in writ petition filed under Article 49 226 as it was not a public law remedy. His plea in this behalf was that Land Acquisition Act provided for complete machinery for determination of the compensation and reference by the land owners under Section 18 of the Act had already been sought and present way to matters are pending before the Reference Court to determine the market value of the land. He argued that merely because in the case of Patwari village, the Government had entered into an agreement with some of the villagers for payment of compensation by increasing it by 64.70%, would not mean that High Court could extend that to all villages in the absence of any agreement with those parties. In the same wave length, he challenged the direction for allotment of developed Abadi plot to the extent of 10% of the acquired land subject to maximum of 2500 square metres by pointing out that the aforesaid allotment was under the scheme of the Government which provided for allotment of 5% developed Abadi plot in respect of Noida land and 6% of developed Abadi plot where the land acquired was situated in Greater Noida. Here again, it was pleaded, the High Court could not tinker with the said policy by enhancing the entitlement for allotment to 10%. It was also argued that in any case once the compensation was enhanced, there was no

reason to give allotment of larger area of land and it amounted to giving double benefit to the land owners.33) Without prejudice to the aforesaid contentions, Mr. Rao submitted that in 50 spite of these serious infirmities in the judgment of the High Court, insofar as Government authorities are concerned, they were ready to pay the higher compensation and even allot land to the extent of 10% subject to the condition that quietus is given to all these cases with no further benefits. He pointed out that 64.7% additional compensation had already been given to about ninety percent land owners. Further, 6% of land/flats had already been allotted to ninety percent farmers. He further argued that care was taken at the time of acquisition itself not to touch the Abadi land.34) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi and Mr. Pramod Swarup, senior advocates, who appeared for private respondents/builders to whom the land was allotted, supported the aforesaid submissions of Mr. Rao and submitted that substantial justice had been done by the High Court in these cases and, therefore, in exercise of its power under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, the Court should not interfere with the exercise done by the High Court. Our Analysis of the subject matter:35) We have bestowed our serious consideration to the submissions made by learned counsel for parties on both sides. No doubt, the High Court has held that it was wrong exercise in law on the part of the Government 51to invoke the provisions of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act, therebydispensing with the enquiry under Section 5A of the Act which amountedto taking away the valuable right of the land owners. That is a finding onmerit. However, it is subject to the caveat that the writ petitions filed bythe appellants herein could be considered on merits and were not to bedismissed on the grounds of laches and delay. Such a contention wasindeed taken by the respondents/ authorities before the High Court.However, the same has been repelled. Primary reason given by the

High Court in this behalf is that the delay was explained satisfactorilyinasmuch as the land acquired for the purposes of industrialdevelopment was, at a later period of time, allotted to private builders fordevelopment of residential units and when this was done it came to theknowledge of the appellants. Aggrieved by this step taken by the Noidaauthorities, the appellants filed the writ petitions. Thus, in nutshell,allotment of the land by the Noida authorities at a subsequent point oftime has weighed with the High Court. In other words, it is clear that theappellants did not challenge the acquisition per se inasmuch as whenthe land was acquired even after invoking urgency provisions containedin Section 17 of the Act and dispensing with the requirement of Section5A of the Act, this position was accepted by the land owners. They evenallowed the authorities to proceed further in passing the award andtaking possession from many of these land owners and even paying 52compensation to them. It is a matter of record that before coming to theCourt and filing the writ petitions, most of these appellants had receivedthe compensation. They also sought reference under Section 18 of theAct for higher compensation. Physical possession of land of many ofthese appellants have also been taken. In many other cases, paperpossession had been taken before filing of the writ petition. A great dealof argument was made as to whether such physical possession/paperpossession should be treated as taking possession in the eyes of law, itwould be a debatable point inasmuch as in various judgments, this Courthas held that whenever there is large scale of acquisition andpossession of large chunk of land belonging to number of persons is tobe taken, paper possession would be a permissible mode, particularlywhen it is Abadi land. We are not going into this controversy since theultimate outcome is not influenced by the aforesaid factor, as would benoticed in the later part of judgment. However, what we highlight andreiterate is that these appellants were not aggrieved by the acquisitionper se in the manner it was done by the respondents. As per their owncase, they became aggrieved only when they found that land was notutilised for the purpose for which it was acquired namely industrialdevelopment but a large portion thereof was sought to be given away to

the builders for development of the land as residential. The High Court,while accepting such a plea of the land owners on the ground of laches 53 and delay, has referred to certain judgments which were relied upon before us as well and taken note of above.36) This leads to an incidental issue as to whether development of land for residential purposes is impermissible and could have given a fresh cause of action to the land owners to approach the Court. Here, we would like to refer to the judgment of this Court in Nand Kishore Gupta and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 9 which concerns the same Act viz. U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. In that case, for Yamuna Express Project, the land was acquired setting it to be 'public purpose'. The land was utilised for construction of Yamuna Expressway and along therewith development of the part of the land was undertaken for commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential purposes as well. It was accepted that construction of Yamuna Expressway was work of public importance. However, the utilisation of land for development of other purposes, namely, commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential etc. was challenged, as not amounting to acquisition for 'public purpose'. There was another feature namely for the development of the land in the aforesaid manner Public Private Partnership (PPP) was formed and private parties were asked to undertake the development on BOT (Built, Operate and Transfer) basis. Such PPP on BOT basis was also challenged as colourable exercise of9 (2010) 10 SCC 282 54 power in which private parties were involved. The challenge was repelled by this Court holding that acquisition of land along Yamuna Express for development of the same for commercial, amusement, industrial, institutional and residential purposes was complimentary to creation of Expressway. Such complimentary purpose was also treated as 'public purpose'. It was also contended by the land owners that the acquisition was not for "public purpose" because: (a) its object was not covered by Section 3(f) of the Act, (b) it really fell not under Part II of the

Act but under Part VII thereof as it virtually amounted to acquisition of land for the contractor Company J, (c) the compensation was coming wholly from J and not from the Government or YEIDA, (d) the acquisition for so-called interchange was not at all necessary and was a colourable exercise of power. They further contended that the application of Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Act was wholly unnecessary and therefore, the enquiry under Section 5-A could not have been dispensed with. All the aforesaid contentions were rejected. Going by the dicta in the aforesaid judgment, it is contended by the authorities that merely because the part of the land is utilised for residential purpose, it cannot be said that the respondents-authorities have not adhered to the purpose for which the land is acquired. As per them, this would be complimentary purpose to the main purpose.37) We have to keep in mind that in all these cases, after the land was 55 acquired, which was of very large quantity and in big chunks, further steps were taken by passing the award, taking possession and paying compensation. In many cases, actual possession was taken and in rest of the cases, paper possession was taken where because of the land under Abadi, actual possession could not be taken on spot immediately. Fact remains that in many such cases where possession was taken, these land owners/appellants even received compensation. All these petitions have been filed only thereafter which may not be maintainable stricto sensu having regard to the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of this Court in Aflatoon and Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.10 and the dictum of this judgment is followed consistently by this Court in various cases [See Murari and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.11, Ravi Khullar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.12, Anand Singh and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors.13]38) Once we look into the matter from the aforesaid prospective, the argument of the appellants that giving away of the land by allotment to the private developers for construction of residential units gave them the fresh cause of action, gets dented to a great extent. No doubt, following Royal Orchid Hotels Limited case and other similar cases, the High

Court has not dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellants on the10 AIR 1974 SC 207711 (1997) 1 SCC 1512 (2007) 5 SCC 23113 (2010) 11 SCC 242 56 ground of delay and laches accepting the plea of the appellants that they felt aggrieved on coming to know that the land was sought to be given to the private persons for development. In this way, discretion is exercised by the High Court in entertaining the writ petitions on merits. Since such a discretion is exercised, we would not like to interfere with that discretion, more so, when a very fair stand is taken by Mr. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the Noida authority, as mentioned above. However, the aforesaid position in law is stated to highlight that it was equally possible to dismiss these writ petitions as the same were filed belatedly after passing of the award and when in most of the cases, possession was taken and compensation paid. When we examine the matter from the aforesaid angle, we reach an irresistible conclusion that the High Court has gone an extra mile in finding the solution to the problem and balancing the equities in a manner which is favourable to the land owners.39) We have also to keep in mind another important feature. Many residents of Patwari village had entered into agreement with the authorities agreeing to accept enhanced compensation at the rate of 64.7%. This additional compensation was, however, agreed to be paid by the authorities only in respect of land owners of Patwari village. The High Court has bound the authorities with the said agreement by applying the same to all the land owners thereby benefiting them with 5764.7% additional compensation. There could have been argument thatthe authorities cannot be fastened with this additional compensation,more particularly, when machinery for determination for just and faircompensation is provided under the Land Acquisition Act and the landowners had, in fact, invoked the said machinery by seeking referenceunder Section 18 thereof. Likewise, the scheme for allotment of land to

the land owners provides for 5% and 6% developed land in Noida andGreater Noida respectively. As against that, the High Court hasenhanced the said entitlement to 10%. Again, we find that it could be anarguable case as to whether High Court could grant additional landcontrary to the policy. Notwithstanding the same, the Noida authorityhave now accepted this part of the High Court judgment after thedismissal of the appeals filed by the Noida authority, and a statement tothat effect was made by Mr. Rao. We may point out that whiledismissing the appeals of Noida authority, following remarks were made: "9. Insofar as allotment of 10 per cent of the plots is concerned, the High Court, in exercise of its discretionary power, has thought it fit, while sustaining the notification issued by the authority for protecting them for allotting 10 per cent of the developed plots; and, there again they have put a cap of 2,500 sq.mtrs. In fact, in the course of the order, the High Court has taken into consideration the agreement that was entered into by the authority with the villagers of Patwari and, in some cases, the authority itself has agreed to raise 6 to 8 per cent of the developed plots to the agriculturists. The High Court has also taken into consideration the observations made by this Court in the case of Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority, 2010 (7) SCC 129, where this Court has gone to the extent of directing the authorities to allot 15 per cent of 58 the developed plots. In our view and in the peculiar facts and circumtances of these cases, since the relief that is given to the respondents/agriculturists is purely discretionary relief by the Court in order to sustain the notification issued by the authorities, we do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court, at the instance of the petitioners/appellants/ authorities, namely, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA. 10. This order shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case."40) Thus, we have a scenario where, on the one hand, invocation of urgency provisions under Section 17 of the Act and dispensing with the right to file objection under Section 5A of the Act, is found to be illegal. On the other hand, we have a situation where because of delay in challenging these acquisitions by the land owners, developments have taken in these villages and in most of the cases, third party rights have been created. Faced with this situation, the High Court going by the spirit behind the judgment of this Court in Bondu Ramaswamy and Others (supra) came out with the solution which is equitable to both sides. We are, thus, of the view that the High Court considered the

ground realities of the matter and arrived at a more practical and workable solution by adequately compensating the land owners in the form of compensation as well as allotment of developed Abadi land at a higher rate i.e. 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners against the eligibility and to the policy to the extent of 5% and 6% of Noida and Greater Noida land respectively. 5941) Insofar as allegation of some of the appellants that their abadi land was acquired, we find that this allegation is specifically denied disputing its correctness. There is specific averment made by the NOIDA Authority at so many places that village abadi land was not acquired. It is mentioned that abadi area is what was found in the survey conducted prior to Section 4 Notification and not what is alleged or that which is far away from the dense village abadi. It is also mentioned that as a consequence of the acquisition, the Authority spends crores and crores of rupees in developing the infrastructure such as road, drainage, sewer, electric and water lines etc. in the unacquired portion of the village abadi. During the course of hearing, Chart No. 2 in respect of each village of Greater Noida was handed over for the consideration of this Court, wherein the amount spent by the Authority on the development, including village development (which is the unacquired village abadi), has been given in Column No. 4 thereof. It has been the consistent stand of the NOIDA Authority that prior to the issuance of Section 4 Notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, survey was conducted and the abadi found in that survey was not acquired. In fact, affidavits in this respect have also been filed not only in this Court but also in the High Court. We have mentioned that there has been a long gap between acquisition of the land and filing of the writ petitions in the High Court by these appellants challenging the acquisition. If they have undertaken 60 some construction during this period they cannot be allowed to take advantage thereof. Therefore, it is difficult to accept the argument of the appellants based on parity with three villages in respect of which the High Court has given relief by quashing the acquisition.

42) To sum up, following benefits are accorded to the land owners:(a) increasing the compensation by 64.7%;(b) directing allotment of developed abadi land to the extent of 10% of the land acquired of each of the land owners;(c) compensation which is increased at the rate of 64.7% is payable immediately without taking away the rights of the land owners to claim higher compensation under the machinery provided in the Land Acquisition Act wherein the matter would be examined on the basis of the evidence produced to arrive at just and fair market value; This, according to us, provides substantial justice to the appellants. Conclusion43) Keeping in view all these peculiar circumstances, we are of the opinion that these are not the cases where this Court should interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution. However, we make it clear that directions of the High Court are given in the aforesaid unique and peculiar/specific background and, therefore, it would not form precedent for future cases.44) We may record that some of the appellants had tried to point out certain 61 clerical mistakes pertaining to their specific cases. For example, it was argued by one appellant that his land falls in a village in Noida but wrongly included in Greater Noida. These appellants, for getting such clerical mistakes rectified, can always approach the High Court.45) The Full Bench judgment of the High Court is, accordingly, affirmed and all these appeals are disposed of in terms of the said judgment of the Full Bench.46) In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petitions also stand disposed of. .............................................CJI (H.L. DATTU) .............................................J. (A.K. SIKRI) .............................................

J. (ARUN MISHRA)NEW DELHI;MAY 14, 2015. 62ITEM NO.1B COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO.4506/2015 Arising from SLP(C)No.30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4830 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27508 OF 2010)CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4508-12 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33552-33556 OF 2011)CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4513-17 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 33984-33988 OF 2011)CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4518-24 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 36334-36340 OF 2011)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4819 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 333 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4525-26 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4527 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1104 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4529-30 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1664-1665 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4531 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1739 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4532 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1858 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4533 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2411 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4534 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2537 OF 2012) 63CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4535 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2557 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4536 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2603 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4537 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2607 OF 2012)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4538 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2612 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4539 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2873 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4540 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3298 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4541 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3473 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4543 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3916 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4544 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 3918 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4545 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4021 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4546 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4024 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4547 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4223 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4548 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4242 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4549 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4249 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4550 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4542 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4551 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4552 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5712 OF 2012) 64CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4553 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5959 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4554 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6013 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4555 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6027 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4556 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6121 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4557 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6196 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4558 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6345 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4559 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6353 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4560 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6363 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4561 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6368 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4563 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6369 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4564-67 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6466-6469 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4568-73 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6489-6494 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4575-76 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6534-6535 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4577 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6539 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4578 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6629 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4579-80 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6731-6732 OF 2012) 65CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4581-89 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6748-6756 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4591 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7146 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4592 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7436 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4593 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7539 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4594 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7540 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4595 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7541 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4596 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7815 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4597-98 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7934-7935 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4599 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8380 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4600 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8439 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4601 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8528 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8593 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4603 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8849 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4604 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8851 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4605-07 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8853-8855 OF 2012)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4608 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9527 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4609 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9678 OF 2012) 66CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4610 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9748 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4611 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9761 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4612 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10052 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4613-15 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10056-10058 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4616 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10315 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4617 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10597 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4618 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11303 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4619 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11304 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4620 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11879 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4621 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11993 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4622 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12299 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4623 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12461 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4624 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12844 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4625-30 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13641-13646 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4631 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15173 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4632 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15905 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4633 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16007 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4634 OF 2015 67(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16336 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4635 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16337 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4636 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16380 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4637 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17041 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4638 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18104 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4639 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19356 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4640 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.15370 OF 2015@ SLP (C) NO.....CC 20540 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4641 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23723 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4642-4643 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23724-23725 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4644 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24203 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4645 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24720 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4646-4647 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25551-25552 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4648-4650 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26874-26876 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4651 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4652 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27139 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4653-4660 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27389-27396 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4661-4666 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27502-27507 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4667 OF 2015 68(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28140 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4668 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29279 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4669 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33860 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4670 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37492 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4671 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37989 of 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4672 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37993 of 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4673 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38288 OF 2012)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4674 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38289 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4675 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 38290 OF 2012)CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NOS. 237-238 OF 2013INSLP (C) NOS. 1082-1083 OF 2012CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4677 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8631 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4678 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8635 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4679 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 8887 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4680 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9168 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4681 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9297 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4682 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12784 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4683 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13017 OF 2013) 69CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4690-4691 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 16722-16723 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4692 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17635 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4693 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18090 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4694 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18735 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4695 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18866 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4696-4697 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19200-19201 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4698 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19922 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4699 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 20329 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4700 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23276 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4701-702 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23855-23856 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4703-4704 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23857-23858 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4705-4706 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23859-23860 OF 2013)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4707-4709 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 24622-24624 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4710-4711 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26176-26177 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4712 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26178 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4713 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26179 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4714-4715 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26681-26682 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4716 OF 2015 70(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26868 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4717 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26890 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4718 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30601 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4719 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30859 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4720 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30860 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4721 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30861 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4722 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 30862 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4723 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32108 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4724 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33980 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4726 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 34176 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4727 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 35109 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4728 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37793 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4729 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39351 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4730-4731 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39697-39698 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4732-4733 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39699-39700 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4734 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39701 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4735-4736 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 39702-39703 OF 2013)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4737 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 802 OF 2014) 71CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4738 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2495 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4739 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 4566 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4740-4741 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 5936-5937 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4742-45 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6024-6027 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4746 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6682 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4747 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7019 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4748 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7031 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4749 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 7036 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4750 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10065 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4751-53 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10147-10149 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4754 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 11737 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4755 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13401 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4756 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 14786 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4757 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12443 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4758 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 13034 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4759-60 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22298-22299 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4761-63 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22329-22331 OF 2014) 72CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4764-65 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22384-22385 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4766-4768 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 22716-22718 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4769-4770 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36155-36156 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4771 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36436 OF 2014)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4772-74 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36647-36649 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4775 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12433 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4776 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 32391 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4777 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23772 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4778 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 26260 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4779 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17559 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4780 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36242 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4781 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 29351 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4782 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 18356 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4783 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19521 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4784 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19523 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4785 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19525 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4786 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 19777 OF 2014) 73CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 444 OF 2013INSLP (C) NO. 5566 OF 2012CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4787 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 25279 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4788 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 27102 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4789 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36391 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4790 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36390 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4791 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15397 OF 2015@ SLP (C) NO...CC 21151 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4792 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 36975 OF 2013)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4793 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 9551 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4794-95 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10049-10050 OF 2014)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4796 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 10051 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4797 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12434 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4798-99 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12435-12436 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4800 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12437 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12438 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4802 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12439 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4803 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12441 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4804 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12442 OF 2014) 74CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 21 OF 2015INSLP (C) NO. 27023 OF 2012CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4805 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 28167 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4806 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 2057 OF 2015)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4807 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17686 OF 2014)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4808 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 37126 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4809 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15636 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4810-18 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 17088-17096 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6569 OF 2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 15635 OF 2012)CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2197 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2195 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2198 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2199 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2225 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2226 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2704 OF 2013

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2705 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3022 OF 2013CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4902 OF 2014AND WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4928 OF 2014Date : 14/05/2015 These matters were called on for pronouncement of Judgment today. 75For the Parties : Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kedarnath Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Nagendra Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashank Samru, Adv. Mr. Aakash Kumar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shital Khatri, Adv. Mr. Rajsh Goyal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar, Adv. Mr. B.K. Pal, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. A.A. Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Alex Joseph, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. For M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co. Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. Punit Yadav, Adv. Mr. R.K. Adsure, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. 76Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv.

Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv.Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv.Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv.Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv.Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv.Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. B.P. Gupta, Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv.Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv.Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv.Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv.Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Adv.Mr. Wajeeh Shah, Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Tyagi, Adv.Mr. Prabhat K. Rai, Adv.Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv.Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Mr.Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.Mr.Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.Mr. Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv.Mr. Rovin Babu, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Ms. Rishu Mishra, Adv.Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv.Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv.Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv.Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv.Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv.Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv.Ms. A.N. Singh, Adv. 77Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv.Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv.Mr. V.P. Singh, Adv.Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv.Mr. Anshul Narayan, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv.Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr. Giridhar G. Upadhyay, Adv.Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv.Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv.Mr. Dinesh K. Garg, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv.Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv.Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv.Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv.Mr. Kumar Mihir, Adv.Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Adv.Mr. Maneesh Arora, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv.Mr. Arjun Bhandari, Adv.Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv.Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv.Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.Mr. Dharm Singh, Adv.Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv.Mr.Nagesh Gajghate, Adv.Ms.Priya Sharma, Adv.Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv.Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. 78Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv.Dr. Surat Singh, Adv.Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv.Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv.Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv.Mr. Vikal Mudgal, Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv.Mr. Prabal Bagchi, Adv.Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv.Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv.Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv.Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv.Md. Shahd Anwar, Adv.Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv.

Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv.Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv.Ms. Shirin Zaidi, Adv.Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, Adv.Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv.Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv.Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv.Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.Ms. Nikhar Berry, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Krishna, Adv.Mr. Ranvir Singh, Adv.Mr. Ravi Nanda, Adv.Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv.Ms. Priya Sahadeo, Adv.Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv.Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Adv. 79Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Adv.Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv.Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv.Mr. Sumit R. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Puneet Taneja, Adv.Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv.Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv.Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv.Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Adv.Ms. K.V. Bharathi Upadhaya, Adv.Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv.Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv.Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv.Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv.Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv.Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv.Mr. Jai Singh, Adv.Mr. Rana S. Biswas, Adv.Mr. Sunil Kr. Sharma, Adv.Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. Sunando Raha, Adv.Mr. Ankit Goel, Adv.Mr. Devender Kumar Goel, Adv.Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. 80Mr. Amrendra Saran, Sr. Adv.Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv.Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv.Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv.Mr. Mohit Bakshi, Adv.Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv.Ms. Reena Singh, AAG, U.P.Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv.Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Sumit Bansal, Adv.Mr. Ateev Mathur, Adv.Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Adv.Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.Mr. Atul Bandhu, Adv.Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv.Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv.Ms. Anuradha D. Misra, Adv.Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv.For M/s. Anuradha & Associates.Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv.Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv.Mr. Amiet Andlay, Adv.Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv.Mr. Mukul Kumar, Adv.Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv.Ms. Sheeba Khan, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Pradeep Verma, Adv.Mr. Himanshu, Adv.Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv.Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv. 81Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv.Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv.

Mr. S.K. Sinha, Adv.Mr. Tanmay Nagar, Adv.Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv.Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv.Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.Mr. J.M. Sharma, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv.Ms. Shikha Beri, Adv.Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv.Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pulkit Manuja, Adv.Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv.For Col. P.S. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv.Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv.Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv.Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv.Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv.Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv.Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv.Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv.Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv.Mr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, Adv.For M/s. Lawyers Knit & Co.Mr. Zaki Ahmad Khan, Adv.Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv.Mr. Farhan Khan, Adv.Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv.Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv.Mr. Kamlesh Mishra, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv.Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv.Mr. V.K. Sidharthan, Adv.Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv. 82Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv.Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Amit Pawan, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, Adv.Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv.Mr. Suryodaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Sudhakar Prasad Tiwari,Adv.Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv.Ms. Meenakshi, Adv.Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Adv.Mr. Harshivir Pratap Sharma, Adv.Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.Mr. Sanchit Garg, Adv.Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pulkit, Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv.Ms. Shikha Beari, Adv.Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv.Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv.Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv.Mr. Sandeep Singh Rawal, Adv.Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv.Ms. S. Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv.Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.Mr. Y.D. Nagar, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv.Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Adv.Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. 83Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv.Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv.Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Dushyant Bhati, Adv.Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv.Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv.Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv.Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv.Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Singh, Adv.Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.Mr. R.Chandrachud, Adv.Mr. Rajnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Sansriti Pathak, Adv.Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv.Mr. Sudhir Kulshrestha, Adv.Ms. Sushma Singh, Adv.Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv.Mr. P.C. Sharma, Adv.Ms. S. Usha Reddy, Adv.Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv.Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv.Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv.Mr. Braham Singh, Adv.Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv.Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Adv. 84Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv.Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv.Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv.Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Navanak Shekhar Mishra, Adv.Mr. Mayank Singh Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv.Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Rushi Khan, Adv.Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv.Mr. Anil Kaushik, Adv.Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv.Mr. Rajinder Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv.Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.For M/s. A.P.& J. Chambers.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv.Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv.Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv.

Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv.Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv.Ms. Akriti Gupta, Adv.Mr. Satendra Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. 85Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv.Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv.Mr. Sonal Jain, Adv.Mr. Sachin Naagar, Adv.Mr. Rajiv M. Brahma, Adv.Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv.Dr. Satish Chandra, Adv.Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv.Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv.Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv.Ms. Vaishali R., Adv.Ms. Neelam Jain, Adv.Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv.Mr. Devavrat Anand, Adv.Mr. Krishan Kumar R.S., Adv.Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv.Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv.Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv.Ms. Mansi Ajamani, Adv.Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv.Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv.Ms. Nanita Sharma, Adv.Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv.Mr. Ajay Narain Mathur, Adv.Ms. Niranjana Singh, Adv.Mr. Ram Bhaj, Adv.Ms. Arti Singh,Adv.Ms. Namita Choudhary,Adv.Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv.Ms. Mahua Kalra,Adv.Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif,Adv.Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv. 86Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,Adv.Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv.

Mr. Avinash Kr. Lakhanpal,Adv.Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv.Mr.K.K.L.Gautam, Adv.Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv.Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv.Mr. Ghan Shyam Vasisht,Adv.Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Rajan,Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.Ms. S. Usha Reddy,Adv.Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv.Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv.Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv.Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv.Mr. Sumit Attri, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv.Ms. Rekha Pandey,Adv.Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv.Mr.Dinesh Kr.Tiwary, Adv.Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. 87Mr.Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr.Prakhar Sharma, Adv.Mr.Dipankar Das, Adv.Ms.Vijaya Lakshmi, Adv.Mr.Devesh Singh, Adv.Ms. Anu Gupta,Adv.Mr. Pramod Dayal,Adv.Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv.Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv.Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv.Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain,Adv.Mr. Rajesh Goyal,Adv.

Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv.Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv.Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv.Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.Ms.Sai Krishna Raj Gopal, Adv.Mr.Abhinav Mukerji, Adv.Ms.Sneha Jain, Adv.Ms. Aditi Gupta,Adv.Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. 88 Mr. Devesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr.Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Saravesh Singh Baghel, Adv. Mr. Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, Adv. Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv.

Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Application for permission to file Special LeavePetition(s), if any, is granted. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling S.L.P.(s)/appeal(s) iscondoned. Delay, if any, in application(s) for substitution is/arecondoned. Application(s) for substitution(s), if any, is/are 89allowed. Application(s) for setting aside abatement, if any,is/are allowed. Application(s) for impleadment(s)/ intervention(s), ifany, is/are rejected. Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.K.Sikri pronounced the Judgment ofthe Bench comprising Hon'ble the Chief Justice, His Lordshipand Hon'ble Mr.Justice Arun Mishra. Leave granted. The appeals as well as the Contempt Petitions aredisposed of, in terms of the reportable signed Judgment.(G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS Asstt.Registrar (Signed reportable judgment is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2015 [D.NO. 4746 OF 2015] SRI RADHA KRISHNA MATHUR & ORS. ...APPELLANT(s) Versus GP. CAPT. ANIL BALI ...RESPONDENT(s) O R D E R Heard. 2. No substantial question of law of general/public importance arises for our consideration in this application for leave to appeal. The prayer for leave to appeal is, accordingly, declined and the application for leave to appeal dismissed. 3. At the request of Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General, we grant three months' time to the Union of India to calculate the arrears payable to the affected officers and to release the same in their favour. In that view, therefore, proceedingsSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2015.04.1610:46:26 ISTReason: : 2 :for enforcement of the order passed by the ArmedForces Tribunal shall remain in abeyance for a periodof three months. .......................J. (T.S. THAKUR)

.......................J. (R. BANUMATHI)NEW DELHI;APRIL 10, 2015.ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 4746/2015SRI RADHA KRISHNA MATHUR & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSGP. CAPT. ANIL BALI Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the Armed ForcesTribunal Act, 2007 and office report)Date : 10/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Appellant(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. Balasubramanian, Adv. Ms. Movita, Adv. for Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sridhar Potaraju,Adv. Mr. S.S. Pandey, Adv. Mr. G. Gangmei, Adv. Mr. Arjun Singh, Adv. Mr. M. Rao, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The prayer for leave to appeal is, accordingly, declinedand the application for leave to appeal dismissed in terms ofsigned order.(VEENA KHERA) (PARDEEP KUMAR) COURT MASTER AR-cum-PS [SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). 4320/2014 SUKHJINDER SINGH & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 18/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr/Ms.Niharika Ahluwalia,adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitioners has on 18.12.2014 filed a letter for the withdrawal of the instant petition. The petition has not been registered as yet and is therefore,permitted to be withdrawn. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 19301 OF 2012 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER(S) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 20498 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 20499 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24407-24408 OF 2012 51SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24409 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29701 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29702 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29703 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29704 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29705 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29706 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29707 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29708 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29709 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29710 OF 2012

2 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29711 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29712 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29713 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29714 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29715 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29716 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29718 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29719 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29720 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29721 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29723 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29724 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29725 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29726 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29727 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29728 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29729 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29730 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29731 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29732 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29733 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29734 OF 2012

3 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29735 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29736 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29737 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29738 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29739 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29740 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29741 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29742 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29745 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29746 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29747 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29748 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29749 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29750 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29751 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29752 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29753 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29754 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29755 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29756 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29757 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29758 OF 2012

4 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29759 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29760 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29761 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29762 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29763 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29764 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29766 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29767 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29768 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29769 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29770 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29771 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29772 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29773 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29774 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29775 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29776 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29782 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31654 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31655 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31656 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31657 OF 2012

5 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31658 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31659 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31660 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31663 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31664 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31665 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31666 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31668 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31669 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31670 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31671 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31672 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31673 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31674 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31676 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31677 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31679 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3583 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3584 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3585 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3586 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3587 OF 2013

6 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3588 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3589 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3590 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3591 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3592 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3593 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3594 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3595 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3596 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3597 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3598 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3599 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3600 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3601 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3602 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3603 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3604 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3605 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3606 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3608 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3609 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3615 OF 2013

7 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3618 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3619 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3622 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3625 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3626 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3627 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3628 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3629 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3630 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3632 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3633 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3634 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3636 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3637 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3639 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3640 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3641 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3642 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3643 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5199 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5200 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5201-5202 OF 2013

8 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5203 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 8678 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10702 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10703 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10704 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10706 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10707 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10708 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10709 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10710 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10711 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10712 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10713 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10714 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10715 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10716 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10717 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10718 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10719 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10720 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10721 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10722 OF 2013

9 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10723 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10724 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10725 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10726 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10727 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10728 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10729 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10731 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10732 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10733 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10734 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10735 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10736 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10737 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10738 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10739 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10740 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10741 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10742 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10743 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10745 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10746 OF 2013

10 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10747 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10748 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10749 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10750 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10751 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10752 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10753 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10754 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10755 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10756 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10757 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10758 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10759 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10760 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10761 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10762 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10763 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10764 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10765 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10766 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10767 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10768 OF 2013

11 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10769 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10770 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10772 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10773 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10774 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10775 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10776 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10777 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10778 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10779 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10780 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10781 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10782 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10783 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10784 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10785 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s)... OF 2013 CC 12658 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12684 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12686 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12688 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12690 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12693 OF 2013

12 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12695 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12697 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12699 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12700 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12701 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12702 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12703 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12706 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12707 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12710 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12713 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12714 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12715 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12716 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12717 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12718 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12721 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12722 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12724 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12725 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12726 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12727 OF 2013

13 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12728 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12729 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12730 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12731 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12732 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12733 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12734 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12735 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12736 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12738 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12739 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12740 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12741 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12742 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12743 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12744 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12745 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12747 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12748 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12749 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12750 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12751 OF 2013

14 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12752 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12753 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12754 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12755 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12756 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12757 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12758 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12759 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12760 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12762 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12763 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12764 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12765 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12766 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12768 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12769 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12770 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12771 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12772 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12773 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12774 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12775 OF 2013

15 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12776 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12777 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17722 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17724 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17726 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17728 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17729 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17730 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17732 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17733 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17734 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17735 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17737 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17739 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17740 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17742 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17744 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17745 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17748 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17749 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17750 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17751 OF 2013

16 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17752 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17753 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17755 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17756 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17758 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17759 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17761 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17762 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17763 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17765 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17766 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17767 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17768 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17770 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17771 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17772 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17773 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17774 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17777 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17778 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17779 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17782 OF 2013

17 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17785 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17787 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17790 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17792 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17793 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17795 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17798 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17800 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17801 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17802 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17804 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17805 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17806 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17808 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17810 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17811 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17812 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17813 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17814 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17816 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17817 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17818 OF 2013

18 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17819 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17821-17823 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17824 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17825 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17826-17828 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17829 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17830 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24108 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24109 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24110 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24111 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24112 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24113 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24114 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24115 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24116 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24118 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24119 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24120 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24121 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24122 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24123 OF 2013

19 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24124 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24125 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24126 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24127 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24128 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24129 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24130 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24131 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24132 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24133 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24134 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24135 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24136 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24137 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24138 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24139 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24140 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24141 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24142 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24143 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24144 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24145 OF 2013

20 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24146 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24147 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24148 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24149 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24150 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24151 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24152 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24153 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24154 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24155 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24156 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24157 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24158 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24159 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24160 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24161 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24162 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24163 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24164 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24165 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24166 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24167 OF 2013

21 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24168 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24169 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24170 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24171 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24172 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24173 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24174 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24175 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24178 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24179 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24180 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24181 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24182 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24183 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24184 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24185 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24187 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24188 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24189 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24190 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24191 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24192 OF 2013

22 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24193 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24194 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24195 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24198 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24199 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24200 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24201 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24202 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24203 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24204 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24205 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24206 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24207 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24208 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24209 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24210 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25467 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25468 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25478 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25480 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25481 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25482 OF 2013

23 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25483 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25484 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25485 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25486 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25487 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25488 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25489 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25490 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25491 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25492 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25493 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25494 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25495 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25497 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25498 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25499 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25500 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25501 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25502 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25503 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25504 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25505 OF 2013

24 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25506 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25507 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25508 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25509 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25510 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25511 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25512 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25513 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25514 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25515 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25516 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25517 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25518 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25520 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25521 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25522 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25523 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25524 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25526 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25527 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25528 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25529 OF 2013

25 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25530 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25531 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25532 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25533 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25534 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25535 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25536 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25537 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25538 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25539 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25540 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25541 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25542 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25543 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25544 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25545 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25546 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25547 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25548 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25549 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25550 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28724 OF 2013

26 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28726 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28727 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28728 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28729 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28730 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28731 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28732 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28733 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28734 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28736 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28737 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30366 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30367 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30368 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30369 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30370 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30371 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30372 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30373 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30374 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30375 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30376 OF 2013

27 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30377 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30378 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30379 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30380 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30381 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30382 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30383 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30384 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30385 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30386 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30387 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30388 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30389 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30390 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30391 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30392 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30393 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30394 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30395 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30396 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30397 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30398 OF 2013

28 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30399 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30400 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30401 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30402 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30403 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30404 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30405 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30406 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30407 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30408 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30409 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30410 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30411 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30412 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30413 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30414 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30415 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33288 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33289 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33290 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33291 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33292 OF 2013

29 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33293 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33294 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33295 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33296 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33297 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33298 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33299 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33300 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33301 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33302 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33303 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33304 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33305 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33306 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33307 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33308 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33309 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33310 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33312 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33313 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33314 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33315 OF 2013

30 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33316 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33317 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33319 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33320 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33321 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33322 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33323 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33324 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33325 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33326 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33327 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33328 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33329 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33330 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33331 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33332 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33333 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33334 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33335 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33336 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33337 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33338 OF 2013

31 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33339 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33341 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34562 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34563 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34564 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34565 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34566 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34567 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34568 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34569 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34570 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34571 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34572 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34573 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34574 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34575 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34576 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34577 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34578 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34579 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34580 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34581 OF 2013

32 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34582 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34583 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34584 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34585 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34586 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34587 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34588 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34589 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34590 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34591 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34592 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34593 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34594 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34595 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34596 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34597 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34598 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34599 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34600 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34601 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34602 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34603 OF 2013

33 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4064 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4065 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4066 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4067 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4068 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4069 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4070 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4071 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4072 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4073 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4074 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4075 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4081 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4086 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4087 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4088 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4089 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4090 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4091 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4092 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4094 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4095 OF 2014

34 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4096 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4097 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4098 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4099 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4100 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4101 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4102 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4103 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4104 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4105 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4106 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4107 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4108 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4109 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4110 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4111 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4112 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4113 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4114 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4115 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4117 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4118 OF 2014

35 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4119 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4120 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4121 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4122 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4123 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4124 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4125 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4126 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4127 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4128 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4129 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4150 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4151 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4152 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4153 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4154 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4155 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4156 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4157 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4158 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4159 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4164 OF 2014

36 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4165 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4166 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4167 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4168 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4169 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4170 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4172 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4173 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4176 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4177 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4178 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4179 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4180 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4181 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4182 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4184 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4185 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4186 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4187 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4188 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4189 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4190 OF 2014

37 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4191 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4192 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4193 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4194 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4197 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4198 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4199 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4200 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4201 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4202 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4203 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4204 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4205 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4206 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4207 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4208 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4209 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4210 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4211 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4212 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4213 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4214 OF 2014

38 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4215 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4216 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4217 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4218 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4219 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4220 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4221 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4222 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4223 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4224 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4225 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4226 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4227 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4228 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4229 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4230 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4231 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4232 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4233 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4234 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4235 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4236 OF 2014

39 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4237 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4238 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4239 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4240 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4241 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4242 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4243 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4244 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4245 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4246 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4247 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4248 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4249 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4250 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4252 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4253 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4280 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4281 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4282 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4284 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4285 OF 2014

40 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4286 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4287 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4288 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4289 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4290 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4291 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4292 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4293 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4296 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4297 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4298 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4299 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4303 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4304 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4305 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4306 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4307 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4308 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4309 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4310 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4311 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4312 OF 2014

41 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4313 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4314 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4315 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4316 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4317 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4318 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4319 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4320 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4321 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4322 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4323 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4324 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4325 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4326 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4327 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4328 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4329 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4330 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4331 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4567 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 8682 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 15635 OF 2012

42 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17286 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17287 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17291 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17292 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17295 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17296 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9538 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9605 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9610 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9614 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9708 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9855 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9953 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9962 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9983 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9986 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.10191 OF 2013

43 O R D E R 1. Application for permission to file Special Leave Petition(s), if any, is granted. 2. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling S.L.P. (s)/appeal(s) is condoned. 3. Delay, if any, in application(s) for substitution is/are condoned. 4. Application(s) for substitution(s), if any, is/are allowed. 4a. Application(s) for setting aside abatement, if any, is/are allowed. 5. Application(s) for impleadment(s)/ intervention(s), if any, is/are rejected.

44 MATTERS FILED BY THE AUTHORITY: 6. We have heard Shri L.Nageswara Rao, learned senior counsel for the New Oklha Industrial Development Authority/Okhla Industrial Development Authority(for short 'the authority') and other learned senior counsel and counsel for the respective parties to the lis. 7. Shri Nageswara Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the Authority, very fairly states that the Authority is primarily aggrieved by the two directions issued by the High Court while disposing of the batch of Writ Petitions. Firstly, a direction to allot 10 per cent of the plots in favour of the agriculturists/ land-loosers; and, secondly, a direction to the authority to take appropriate permission from the National Capital Regional Planning Board. To be precise, the directions issued by the High Court are as under : “ 5. The Greater NOIDA and its allottees are directed not to carry on develoopment and not to implement the Master Plan 2021 till the observations and directions of the National Capital Regional Planning Board are incorporated in MasterPlan 2021 to the satisfaction of the National Capital Regional Planning Board. We make it clear that this direction shall not be applicable in those cases where the development is being carried on in accordance with the earlier Master Plan of the Greater NOIDA duly approved by the National Capital Regional Planning Board.

45 6. We direct the Chief Secretary of the State to appoint officers not below the level of Principal Secretary (except the officers of Industrial Development Department who have dealt with the relevant files) to conduct a thorough inquiry regarding the acts of Greater Noida (a) in proceeding to implement Master Plan 2021 without approval of N.C.R.P. Board, (b) decisions taken to change the land use, (c) allotment made to the builders and (d) indiscriminate proposals for acquisition of land, and thereafter the State Government shall take appropriate action in the matter.” 8. Shri Rao, on instructions, fairly states that after disposal of the Writ Petitions, the authority has complied with the directions so issued in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the impugned judgment(s) and order(s). In view of the above, in our opinion, we need not have to answer the questions raised by the learned senior counsel in these proceedings. We leave it open for the authority to agitate the aforesaid issue(s) in an appropriate proceeding. 9. Insofar as allotment of 10 per cent of the plots is concerned, the High Court, in exercise of its discretionary power, has thought it fit, while sustaining the notification issued by the authority for protecting them for allotting 10 per cent of the developed plots; and, there again they have put a cap of 2,500 sq.mtrs. In fact, in the course of the order, the High Court has

46 taken into consideration the agreement that was entered into by the authority with the villagers of Patwari and , in some cases, the authority itself has agreed to raise 6 to 8 per cent of the developed plots to the agriculturists. The High Court has also taken into consideration the observations made by this Court in the case of Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority, 2010 (7) SCC 129, where this Court has gone to the extent of directing the authorities to allot 15 per cent of the developed plots. In our view and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, since the relief that is given to the respondents/ agriculturists is purely discretionary relief by the Court in order to sustain the notification issued by the authorities, we do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court, at the instance of the petitioners/appellants/authorities, namely, NOIDA and Greater NOIDA. 10. This order shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case.

47 11. With these observations, the Special Leave Petitions as also the Civil Appeals are disposed of, leaving the question of law raised open to be agitated in an appropriate case. 12. We grant three months' time from the date of receipt of a copy of the order to the authorities to pay the compensation and six months' time from the date of receipt of a copy of the order to allot 10 per cent of the developed plots to the claimants. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10317 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2639 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 38287 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 38188-38193 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2798 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3417 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4645 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4647 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4661 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5091 OF 2012 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.7 OF 2014 IN S.L.P. NO(S). 3242 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3242 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4687 OF 2012

48 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 37493 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16339-16341 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4383 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 14781 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 36644 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 36141 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31675 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 6458-6460 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 20326 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)..CC No(s).13297-13302 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5150 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5170 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 23750 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 23722 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 7542-7543 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30590 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16674 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16695 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16723 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 23446-23447 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 32140 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 22484 OF 2012

49 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2820 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 7017-7018 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2055 OF 2015 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 1554 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3776 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 6508 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 6849 OF 2012 Learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw their respective Special Leave Petition(s) with liberty to file appropriate review petition(s) before the High Court. Permission sought for is granted. The Special Leave Petition(s) is/are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate review petition(s) before the High Court within 30 days' time from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. If and when such review petition(s) is/are filed, we request the High Court to decide the same without reference to the period of limitation. In view of the withdrawal of S.L.P.(C)No.3242 OF 2012, no orders need be passed in Contempt Petition

50 (c)No.7 of 2014. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. … .................CJI. (H.L. DATTU) … ..................J. (A.K. SIKRI) … ..................J. (ARUN MISHRA) NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 03, 2015

51 ITEM NO.5+15 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 20498/2012 SLP(C) No. 20499/2012 SLP(C) No. 24407-24408/2012 SLP(C) No. 24409/2012 SLP(C) No. 29701/2012 SLP(C) No. 29702/2012 SLP(C) No. 29703/2012 SLP(C) No. 29704/2012 SLP(C) No. 29705/2012 SLP(C) No. 29706/2012 SLP(C) No. 29707/2012 SLP(C) No. 29708/2012 SLP(C) No. 29709/2012 SLP(C) No. 29710/2012 SLP(C) No. 29711/2012 SLP(C) No. 29712/2012 SLP(C) No. 29713/2012 SLP(C) No. 29714/2012 SLP(C) No. 29715/2012 SLP(C) No. 29716/2012 SLP(C) No. 29718/2012 SLP(C) No. 29719/2012 SLP(C) No. 29720/2012 SLP(C) No. 29721/2012 SLP(C) No. 29723/2012 SLP(C) No. 29724/2012 SLP(C) No. 29725/2012 SLP(C) No. 29726/2012 SLP(C) No. 29727/2012 SLP(C) No. 29728/2012 SLP(C) No. 29729/2012 SLP(C) No. 29730/2012 SLP(C) No. 29731/2012

52 SLP(C) No. 29732/2012 SLP(C) No. 29733/2012 SLP(C) No. 29734/2012 SLP(C) No. 29735/2012 SLP(C) No. 29736/2012 SLP(C) No. 29737/2012 SLP(C) No. 29738/2012 SLP(C) No. 29739/2012 SLP(C) No. 29740/2012 SLP(C) No. 29741/2012 SLP(C) No. 29742/2012 SLP(C) No. 29745/2012 SLP(C) No. 29746/2012 SLP(C) No. 29747/2012 SLP(C) No. 29748/2012 SLP(C) No. 29749/2012 SLP(C) No. 29750/2012 SLP(C) No. 29751/2012 SLP(C) No. 29752/2012 SLP(C) No. 29753/2012 SLP(C) No. 29754/2012 SLP(C) No. 29755/2012 SLP(C) No. 29756/2012 SLP(C) No. 29757/2012 SLP(C) No. 29758/2012 SLP(C) No. 29759/2012 SLP(C) No. 29760/2012 SLP(C) No. 29761/2012 SLP(C) No. 29762/2012 SLP(C) No. 29763/2012 SLP(C) No. 29764/2012 SLP(C) No. 29766/2012 SLP(C) No. 29767/2012 SLP(C) No. 29768/2012 SLP(C) No. 29769/2012 SLP(C) No. 29770/2012 SLP(C) No. 29771/2012 SLP(C) No. 29772/2012 SLP(C) No. 29773/2012 SLP(C) No. 29774/2012 SLP(C) No. 29775/2012 SLP(C) No. 29776/2012 SLP(C) No. 29782/2012 SLP(C) No. 31654/2012 SLP(C) No. 31655/2012 SLP(C) No. 31656/2012 SLP(C) No. 31657/2012 SLP(C) No. 31658/2012 SLP(C) No. 31659/2012 SLP(C) No. 31660/2012 .

53 SLP(C) No. 31663/2012 SLP(C) No. 31664/2012 SLP(C) No. 31665/2012 SLP(C) No. 31666/2012 SLP(C) No. 31668/2012 SLP(C) No. 31669/2012 SLP(C) No. 31670/2012 SLP(C) No. 31671/2012 SLP(C) No. 31672/2012 SLP(C) No. 31673/2012 SLP(C) No. 31674/2012 SLP(C) No. 31676/2012 SLP(C) No. 31677/2012 SLP(C) No. 31679/2012 SLP(C) No. 3584/2013 SLP(C) No. 3585/2013 SLP(C) No. 3586/2013 SLP(C) No. 3587/2013 SLP(C) No. 3588/2013 SLP(C) No. 3589/2013 SLP(C) No. 3590/2013 SLP(C) No. 3591/2013 SLP(C) No. 3593/2013 SLP(C) No. 3594/2013 SLP(C) No. 3595/2013 SLP(C) No. 3596/2013 SLP(C) No. 3597/2013 SLP(C) No. 3598/2013 SLP(C) No. 3599/2013 SLP(C) No. 3600/2013 SLP(C) No. 3601/2013 SLP(C) No. 3602/2013 SLP(C) No. 3603/2013 SLP(C) No. 3604/2013 SLP(C) No. 3605/2013 SLP(C) No. 3606/2013 SLP(C) No. 3608/2013 SLP(C) No. 3609/2013 SLP(C) No. 3615/2013 SLP(C) No. 3618/2013 SLP(C) No. 3619/2013 SLP(C) No. 3622/2013 SLP(C) No. 3625/2013 SLP(C) No. 3626/2013 SLP(C) No. 3627/2013 SLP(C) No. 3628/2013 SLP(C) No. 3629/2013 SLP(C) No. 3630/2013 SLP(C) No. 3632/2013 SLP(C) No. 3633/2013 .

54 SLP(C) No. 3634/2013 SLP(C) No. 3636/2013 SLP(C) No. 3637/2013 SLP(C) No. 3639/2013 SLP(C) No. 3640/2013 SLP(C) No. 3641/2013 SLP(C) No. 3642/2013 SLP(C) No. 3643/2013 SLP(C) No. 5199/2013 SLP(C) No. 5200/2013 (With appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5201-5202/2013 SLP(C) No. 5203/2013 SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 SLP(C) No. 10702/2013 SLP(C) No. 10703/2013 SLP(C) No. 10704/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10706/2013 SLP(C) No. 10707/2013 SLP(C) No. 10708/2013 SLP(C) No. 10709/2013 SLP(C) No. 10710/2013 SLP(C) No. 10711/2013 SLP(C) No. 10712/2013 SLP(C) No. 10713/2013 SLP(C) No. 10714/2013 SLP(C) No. 10715/2013 SLP(C) No. 10716/2013 SLP(C) No. 10717/2013 SLP(C) No. 10718/2013 SLP(C) No. 10719/2013 SLP(C) No. 10720/2013 SLP(C) No. 10721/2013 SLP(C) No. 10722/2013 SLP(C) No. 10723/2013 SLP(C) No. 10724/2013 SLP(C) No. 10725/2013 SLP(C) No. 10726/2013 SLP(C) No. 10727/2013 SLP(C) No. 10728/2013 SLP(C) No. 10729/2013 SLP(C) No. 10731/2013 SLP(C) No. 10732/2013 SLP(C) No. 10733/2013 SLP(C) No. 10734/2013 .

55 SLP(C) No. 10735/2013 SLP(C) No. 10736/2013 SLP(C) No. 10737/2013 SLP(C) No. 10738/2013 SLP(C) No. 10739/2013 SLP(C) No. 10740/2013 SLP(C) No. 10741/2013 SLP(C) No. 10742/2013 SLP(C) No. 10743/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10745/2013 SLP(C) No. 10746/2013 SLP(C) No. 10747/2013 SLP(C) No. 10748/2013 SLP(C) No. 10749/2013 SLP(C) No. 10750/2013 SLP(C) No. 10751/2013 SLP(C) No. 10752/2013 SLP(C) No. 10753/2013 SLP(C) No. 10754/2013 SLP(C) No. 10755/2013 SLP(C) No. 10756/2013 SLP(C) No. 10757/2013 SLP(C) No. 10758/2013 SLP(C) No. 10759/2013 SLP(C) No. 10760/2013 SLP(C) No. 10761/2013 SLP(C) No. 10762/2013 SLP(C) No. 10763/2013 SLP(C) No. 10764/2013 SLP(C) No. 10765/2013 SLP(C) No. 10766/2013 SLP(C) No. 10767/2013 SLP(C) No. 10768/2013 SLP(C) No. 10769/2013 SLP(C) No. 10770/2013 SLP(C) No. 10772/2013 SLP(C) No. 10773/2013 SLP(C) No. 10774/2013 SLP(C) No. 10775/2013 SLP(C) No. 10776/2013 SLP(C) No. 10777/2013 SLP(C) No. 10778/2013 SLP(C) No. 10779/2013 SLP(C) No. 10780/2013 SLP(C) No. 10781/2013 SLP(C) No. 10782/2013 SLP(C) No. 10783/2013 .

56 SLP(C) No. 10784/2013 SLP(C) No. 10785/2013 SLP(C) No. ..CC 12658/2013 SLP(C) No. 12684/2013 SLP(C) No. 12686/2013 SLP(C) No. 12688/2013 SLP(C) No. 12690/2013 SLP(C) No. 12693/2013 SLP(C) No. 12695/2013 SLP(C) No. 12697/2013 SLP(C) No. 12699/2013 SLP(C) No. 12700/2013 SLP(C) No. 12701/2013 SLP(C) No. 12702/2013 SLP(C) No. 12703/2013 SLP(C) No. 12706/2013 SLP(C) No. 12707/2013 SLP(C) No. 12710/2013 SLP(C) No. 12713/2013 SLP(C) No. 12714/2013 SLP(C) No. 12715/2013 SLP(C) No. 12716/2013 SLP(C) No. 12717/2013 SLP(C) No. 12718/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12721/2013 SLP(C) No. 12722/2013 SLP(C) No. 12724/2013 SLP(C) No. 12725/2013 SLP(C) No. 12726/2013 SLP(C) No. 12727/2013 SLP(C) No. 12728/2013 SLP(C) No. 12729/2013 SLP(C) No. 12730/2013 SLP(C) No. 12731/2013 SLP(C) No. 12732/2013 SLP(C) No. 12733/2013 SLP(C) No. 12734/2013 SLP(C) No. 12735/2013 SLP(C) No. 12736/2013 SLP(C) No. 12738/2013 SLP(C) No. 12739/2013 SLP(C) No. 12740/2013 SLP(C) No. 12741/2013 SLP(C) No. 12742/2013 SLP(C) No. 12743/2013 SLP(C) No. 12744/2013 SLP(C) No. 12745/2013 SLP(C) No. 12747/2013 SLP(C) No. 12748/2013 .

57 SLP(C) No. 12749/2013 SLP(C) No. 12750/2013 SLP(C) No. 12751/2013 SLP(C) No. 12752/2013 SLP(C) No. 12753/2013 SLP(C) No. 12754/2013 SLP(C) No. 12755/2013 SLP(C) No. 12756/2013 SLP(C) No. 12757/2013 SLP(C) No. 12758/2013 SLP(C) No. 12759/2013 SLP(C) No. 12760/2013 SLP(C) No. 12762/2013 SLP(C) No. 12763/2013 SLP(C) No. 12764/2013 SLP(C) No. 12765/2013 SLP(C) No. 12766/2013 SLP(C) No. 12768/2013 SLP(C) No. 12769/2013 SLP(C) No. 12770/2013 SLP(C) No. 12771/2013 SLP(C) No. 12772/2013 SLP(C) No. 12773/2013 SLP(C) No. 12774/2013 SLP(C) No. 12775/2013 SLP(C) No. 12776/2013 SLP(C) No. 12777/2013 SLP(C) No. 17722/2013 SLP(C) No. 17724/2013 SLP(C) No. 17726/2013 SLP(C) No. 17728/2013 SLP(C) No. 17729/2013 SLP(C) No. 17730/2013 SLP(C) No. 17732/2013 SLP(C) No. 17733/2013 SLP(C) No. 17734/2013 SLP(C) No. 17735/2013 SLP(C) No. 17737/2013 SLP(C) No. 17739/2013 SLP(C) No. 17740/2013 SLP(C) No. 17742/2013 SLP(C) No. 17744/2013 SLP(C) No. 17745/2013 SLP(C) No. 17748/2013 SLP(C) No. 17749/2013 SLP(C) No. 17750/2013 SLP(C) No. 17751/2013 SLP(C) No. 17752/2013 SLP(C) No. 17753/2013 SLP(C) No. 17755/2013 .

58 SLP(C) No. 17756/2013 SLP(C) No. 17758/2013 SLP(C) No. 17759/2013 SLP(C) No. 17761/2013 SLP(C) No. 17762/2013 SLP(C) No. 17763/2013 SLP(C) No. 17765/2013 SLP(C) No. 17766/2013 SLP(C) No. 17767/2013 SLP(C) No. 17768/2013 SLP(C) No. 17770/2013 SLP(C) No. 17771/2013 SLP(C) No. 17772/2013 SLP(C) No. 17773/2013 SLP(C) No. 17774/2013 SLP(C) No. 17777/2013 SLP(C) No. 17778/2013 SLP(C) No. 17779/2013 SLP(C) No. 17782/2013 SLP(C) No. 17785/2013 SLP(C) No. 17787/2013 SLP(C) No. 17790/2013 SLP(C) No. 17792/2013 SLP(C) No. 17793/2013 SLP(C) No. 17795/2013 SLP(C) No. 17798/2013 SLP(C) No. 17800/2013 SLP(C) No. 17801/2013 SLP(C) No. 17802/2013 SLP(C) No. 17804/2013 SLP(C) No. 17805/2013 SLP(C) No. 17806/2013 SLP(C) No. 17808/2013 SLP(C) No. 17810/2013 SLP(C) No. 17811/2013 SLP(C) No. 17812/2013 SLP(C) No. 17813/2013 SLP(C) No. 17814/2013 SLP(C) No. 17816/2013 SLP(C) No. 17817/2013 SLP(C) No. 17818/2013 SLP(C) No. 17819/2013 SLP(C) No. 17821-17823/2013 SLP(C) No. 17824/2013 SLP(C) No. 17825/2013 SLP(C) No. 17826-17828/2013 SLP(C) No. 17829/2013 SLP(C) No. 17830/2013 SLP(C) No. 24108/2013 .

59 SLP(C) No. 24109/2013 SLP(C) No. 24110/2013 SLP(C) No. 24111/2013 SLP(C) No. 24112/2013 SLP(C) No. 24113/2013 SLP(C) No. 24114/2013 SLP(C) No. 24115/2013 SLP(C) No. 24116/2013 SLP(C) No. 24118/2013 SLP(C) No. 24119/2013 SLP(C) No. 24120/2013 SLP(C) No. 24121/2013 SLP(C) No. 24122/2013 SLP(C) No. 24123/2013 SLP(C) No. 24124/2013 SLP(C) No. 24125/2013 SLP(C) No. 24126/2013 SLP(C) No. 24127/2013 SLP(C) No. 24128/2013 SLP(C) No. 24129/2013 SLP(C) No. 24130/2013 SLP(C) No. 24131/2013 SLP(C) No. 24132/2013 SLP(C) No. 24133/2013 SLP(C) No. 24134/2013 SLP(C) No. 24135/2013 SLP(C) No. 24136/2013 SLP(C) No. 24137/2013 SLP(C) No. 24138/2013 SLP(C) No. 24139/2013 SLP(C) No. 24140/2013 SLP(C) No. 24141/2013 SLP(C) No. 24142/2013 SLP(C) No. 24143/2013 SLP(C) No. 24144/2013 SLP(C) No. 24145/2013 SLP(C) No. 24146/2013 SLP(C) No. 24147/2013 SLP(C) No. 24148/2013 SLP(C) No. 24149/2013 SLP(C) No. 24150/2013 SLP(C) No. 24151/2013 SLP(C) No. 24152/2013 SLP(C) No. 24153/2013 SLP(C) No. 24154/2013 SLP(C) No. 24155/2013 SLP(C) No. 24156/2013 SLP(C) No. 24157/2013 SLP(C) No. 24158/2013 .

60 SLP(C) No. 24159/2013 SLP(C) No. 24160/2013 SLP(C) No. 24161/2013 SLP(C) No. 24162/2013 SLP(C) No. 24163/2013 SLP(C) No. 24164/2013 SLP(C) No. 24165/2013 SLP(C) No. 24166/2013 SLP(C) No. 24167/2013 SLP(C) No. 24168/2013 SLP(C) No. 24169/2013 SLP(C) No. 24170/2013 SLP(C) No. 24171/2013 SLP(C) No. 24172/2013 SLP(C) No. 24173/2013 SLP(C) No. 24174/2013 SLP(C) No. 24175/2013 SLP(C) No. 24178/2013 SLP(C) No. 24179/2013 SLP(C) No. 24180/2013 SLP(C) No. 24181/2013 SLP(C) No. 24182/2013 SLP(C) No. 24183/2013 SLP(C) No. 24184/2013 SLP(C) No. 24185/2013 SLP(C) No. 24187/2013 SLP(C) No. 24188/2013 SLP(C) No. 24189/2013 SLP(C) No. 24190/2013 SLP(C) No. 24191/2013 SLP(C) No. 24192/2013 SLP(C) No. 24193/2013 SLP(C) No. 24194/2013 SLP(C) No. 24195/2013 SLP(C) No. 24198/2013 SLP(C) No. 24199/2013 SLP(C) No. 24200/2013 SLP(C) No. 24201/2013 SLP(C) No. 24202/2013 SLP(C) No. 24203/2013 SLP(C) No. 24204/2013 SLP(C) No. 24205/2013 SLP(C) No. 24206/2013 SLP(C) No. 24207/2013 SLP(C) No. 24208/2013 SLP(C) No. 24209/2013 SLP(C) No. 24210/2013 SLP(C) No. 25467/2013 SLP(C) No. 25468/2013 .

61 SLP(C) No. 25478/2013 SLP(C) No. 25480/2013 SLP(C) No. 25481/2013 SLP(C) No. 25482/2013 SLP(C) No. 25483/2013 SLP(C) No. 25484/2013 SLP(C) No. 25485/2013 SLP(C) No. 25486/2013 SLP(C) No. 25487/2013 SLP(C) No. 25488/2013 SLP(C) No. 25489/2013 SLP(C) No. 25490/2013 SLP(C) No. 25491/2013 SLP(C) No. 25492/2013 SLP(C) No. 25493/2013 SLP(C) No. 25494/2013 SLP(C) No. 25495/2013 SLP(C) No. 25497/2013 SLP(C) No. 25498/2013 SLP(C) No. 25499/2013 SLP(C) No. 25500/2013 SLP(C) No. 25501/2013 SLP(C) No. 25502/2013 SLP(C) No. 25503/2013 SLP(C) No. 25504/2013 SLP(C) No. 25505/2013 SLP(C) No. 25506/2013 SLP(C) No. 25507/2013 SLP(C) No. 25508/2013 SLP(C) No. 25509/2013 SLP(C) No. 25510/2013 SLP(C) No. 25511/2013 SLP(C) No. 25512/2013 SLP(C) No. 25513/2013 SLP(C) No. 25514/2013 SLP(C) No. 25515/2013 SLP(C) No. 25516/2013 SLP(C) No. 25517/2013 SLP(C) No. 25518/2013 SLP(C) No. 25520/2013 SLP(C) No. 25521/2013 SLP(C) No. 25522/2013 SLP(C) No. 25523/2013 SLP(C) No. 25524/2013 SLP(C) No. 25526/2013 SLP(C) No. 25527/2013 SLP(C) No. 25528/2013 SLP(C) No. 25529/2013 SLP(C) No. 25530/2013 .

62 SLP(C) No. 25531/2013 SLP(C) No. 25532/2013 SLP(C) No. 25533/2013 SLP(C) No. 25534/2013 SLP(C) No. 25535/2013 SLP(C) No. 25536/2013 SLP(C) No. 25537/2013 SLP(C) No. 25538/2013 SLP(C) No. 25539/2013 SLP(C) No. 25540/2013 SLP(C) No. 25541/2013 SLP(C) No. 25542/2013 SLP(C) No. 25543/2013 SLP(C) No. 25544/2013 SLP(C) No. 25545/2013 SLP(C) No. 25546/2013 SLP(C) No. 25547/2013 SLP(C) No. 25548/2013 SLP(C) No. 25549/2013 SLP(C) No. 25550/2013 SLP(C) No. 28724/2013 SLP(C) No. 28726/2013 SLP(C) No. 28727/2013 SLP(C) No. 28728/2013 SLP(C) No. 28729/2013 SLP(C) No. 28730/2013 SLP(C) No. 28731/2013 SLP(C) No. 28732/2013 SLP(C) No. 28733/2013 SLP(C) No. 28734/2013 SLP(C) No. 28736/2013 SLP(C) No. 28737/2013 SLP(C) No. 30366/2013 SLP(C) No. 30367/2013 SLP(C) No. 30368/2013 SLP(C) No. 30369/2013 SLP(C) No. 30370/2013 SLP(C) No. 30371/2013 SLP(C) No. 30372/2013 SLP(C) No. 30373/2013 SLP(C) No. 30374/2013 SLP(C) No. 30375/2013 SLP(C) No. 30376/2013 SLP(C) No. 30377/2013 SLP(C) No. 30378/2013 SLP(C) No. 30379/2013 SLP(C) No. 30380/2013 SLP(C) No. 30381/2013 SLP(C) No. 30382/2013 .

63 SLP(C) No. 30383/2013 SLP(C) No. 30384/2013 SLP(C) No. 30385/2013 SLP(C) No. 30386/2013 SLP(C) No. 30387/2013 SLP(C) No. 30388/2013 SLP(C) No. 30389/2013 SLP(C) No. 30390/2013 SLP(C) No. 30391/2013 SLP(C) No. 30392/2013 SLP(C) No. 30393/2013 SLP(C) No. 30394/2013 SLP(C) No. 30395/2013 SLP(C) No. 30396/2013 SLP(C) No. 30397/2013 SLP(C) No. 30398/2013 SLP(C) No. 30399/2013 SLP(C) No. 30400/2013 SLP(C) No. 30401/2013 SLP(C) No. 30402/2013 SLP(C) No. 30403/2013 SLP(C) No. 30404/2013 SLP(C) No. 30405/2013 SLP(C) No. 30406/2013 SLP(C) No. 30407/2013 SLP(C) No. 30408/2013 SLP(C) No. 30409/2013 SLP(C) No. 30410/2013 SLP(C) No. 30411/2013 SLP(C) No. 30412/2013 SLP(C) No. 30413/2013 SLP(C) No. 30414/2013 SLP(C) No. 30415/2013 SLP(C) No. 33288/2013 SLP(C) No. 33289/2013 SLP(C) No. 33290/2013 SLP(C) No. 33291/2013 SLP(C) No. 33292/2013 SLP(C) No. 33293/2013 SLP(C) No. 33294/2013 SLP(C) No. 33295/2013 SLP(C) No. 33296/2013 SLP(C) No. 33297/2013 SLP(C) No. 33298/2013 SLP(C) No. 33299/2013 SLP(C) No. 33300/2013 SLP(C) No. 33301/2013 SLP(C) No. 33302/2013 SLP(C) No. 33303/2013 .

64 SLP(C) No. 33304/2013 SLP(C) No. 33305/2013 SLP(C) No. 33306/2013 SLP(C) No. 33307/2013 SLP(C) No. 33308/2013 SLP(C) No. 33309/2013 SLP(C) No. 33310/2013 SLP(C) No. 33312/2013 SLP(C) No. 33313/2013 SLP(C) No. 33314/2013 SLP(C) No. 33315/2013 SLP(C) No. 33316/2013 SLP(C) No. 33317/2013 SLP(C) No. 33319/2013 SLP(C) No. 33320/2013 SLP(C) No. 33321/2013 SLP(C) No. 33322/2013 SLP(C) No. 33323/2013 SLP(C) No. 33324/2013 SLP(C) No. 33325/2013 SLP(C) No. 33326/2013 SLP(C) No. 33327/2013 SLP(C) No. 33328/2013 SLP(C) No. 33329/2013 SLP(C) No. 33330/2013 SLP(C) No. 33331/2013 SLP(C) No. 33332/2013 SLP(C) No. 33333/2013 SLP(C) No. 33334/2013 SLP(C) No. 33335/2013 SLP(C) No. 33336/2013 SLP(C) No. 33337/2013 SLP(C) No. 33338/2013 SLP(C) No. 33339/2013 SLP(C) No. 33341/2013 SLP(C) No. 34562/2013 SLP(C) No. 34563/2013 SLP(C) No. 34564/2013 SLP(C) No. 34565/2013 SLP(C) No. 34566/2013 SLP(C) No. 34567/2013 SLP(C) No. 34568/2013 SLP(C) No. 34569/2013 SLP(C) No. 34570/2013 SLP(C) No. 34571/2013 SLP(C) No. 34572/2013 SLP(C) No. 34573/2013 SLP(C) No. 34574/2013 SLP(C) No. 34575/2013 .

65 SLP(C) No. 34576/2013 SLP(C) No. 34577/2013 SLP(C) No. 34578/2013 SLP(C) No. 34579/2013 SLP(C) No. 34580/2013 SLP(C) No. 34581/2013 SLP(C) No. 34582/2013 SLP(C) No. 34583/2013 SLP(C) No. 34584/2013 SLP(C) No. 34585/2013 SLP(C) No. 34586/2013 SLP(C) No. 34587/2013 SLP(C) No. 34588/2013 SLP(C) No. 34589/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for u/s 340 c.p.c. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34590/2013 SLP(C) No. 34591/2013 SLP(C) No. 34592/2013 SLP(C) No. 34593/2013 SLP(C) No. 34594/2013 SLP(C) No. 34595/2013 SLP(C) No. 34596/2013 SLP(C) No. 34597/2013 SLP(C) No. 34598/2013 SLP(C) No. 34599/2013 SLP(C) No. 34600/2013 SLP(C) No. 34601/2013 SLP(C) No. 34602/2013 SLP(C) No. 34603/2013 SLP(C) No. 4064/2014 SLP(C) No. 4065/2014 SLP(C) No. 4066/2014 SLP(C) No. 4067/2014 SLP(C) No. 4068/2014 SLP(C) No. 4069/2014 SLP(C) No. 4070/2014 SLP(C) No. 4071/2014 SLP(C) No. 4072/2014 SLP(C) No. 4073/2014 SLP(C) No. 4074/2014 SLP(C) No. 4075/2014 SLP(C) No. 4081/2014 SLP(C) No. 4086/2014 SLP(C) No. 4087/2014 SLP(C) No. 4088/2014 SLP(C) No. 4089/2014 SLP(C) No. 4090/2014 .

66 SLP(C) No. 4091/2014 SLP(C) No. 4092/2014 SLP(C) No. 4094/2014 SLP(C) No. 4095/2014 SLP(C) No. 4096/2014 SLP(C) No. 4097/2014 SLP(C) No. 4098/2014 SLP(C) No. 4099/2014 SLP(C) No. 4100/2014 SLP(C) No. 4101/2014 SLP(C) No. 4102/2014 SLP(C) No. 4103/2014 SLP(C) No. 4104/2014 SLP(C) No. 4105/2014 SLP(C) No. 4106/2014 SLP(C) No. 4107/2014 SLP(C) No. 4108/2014 SLP(C) No. 4109/2014 SLP(C) No. 4110/2014 SLP(C) No. 4111/2014 SLP(C) No. 4112/2014 SLP(C) No. 4113/2014 SLP(C) No. 4114/2014 SLP(C) No. 4115/2014 SLP(C) No. 4117/2014 SLP(C) No. 4118/2014 SLP(C) No. 4119/2014 SLP(C) No. 4120/2014 SLP(C) No. 4121/2014 SLP(C) No. 4122/2014 SLP(C) No. 4123/2014 SLP(C) No. 4124/2014 SLP(C) No. 4125/2014 SLP(C) No. 4126/2014 SLP(C) No. 4127/2014 SLP(C) No. 4128/2014 SLP(C) No. 4129/2014 SLP(C) No. 4150/2014 SLP(C) No. 4151/2014 SLP(C) No. 4152/2014 SLP(C) No. 4153/2014 SLP(C) No. 4154/2014 SLP(C) No. 4155/2014 SLP(C) No. 4156/2014 SLP(C) No. 4157/2014 SLP(C) No. 4158/2014 SLP(C) No. 4159/2014 SLP(C) No. 4164/2014 SLP(C) No. 4165/2014 .

67 SLP(C) No. 4166/2014 SLP(C) No. 4167/2014 SLP(C) No. 4168/2014 SLP(C) No. 4169/2014 SLP(C) No. 4170/2014 SLP(C) No. 4172/2014 SLP(C) No. 4173/2014 SLP(C) No. 4176/2014 SLP(C) No. 4177/2014 SLP(C) No. 4178/2014 SLP(C) No. 4179/2014 SLP(C) No. 4180/2014 SLP(C) No. 4181/2014 SLP(C) No. 4182/2014 SLP(C) No. 4184/2014 SLP(C) No. 4185/2014 SLP(C) No. 4186/2014 SLP(C) No. 4187/2014 SLP(C) No. 4188/2014 SLP(C) No. 4189/2014 SLP(C) No. 4190/2014 SLP(C) No. 4191/2014 SLP(C) No. 4192/2014 SLP(C) No. 4193/2014 SLP(C) No. 4194/2014 SLP(C) No. 4197/2014 SLP(C) No. 4198/2014 SLP(C) No. 4199/2014 SLP(C) No. 4200/2014 SLP(C) No. 4201/2014 SLP(C) No. 4202/2014 SLP(C) No. 4203/2014 SLP(C) No. 4204/2014 SLP(C) No. 4205/2014 SLP(C) No. 4206/2014 SLP(C) No. 4207/2014 SLP(C) No. 4208/2014 SLP(C) No. 4209/2014 SLP(C) No. 4210/2014 SLP(C) No. 4211/2014 SLP(C) No. 4212/2014 SLP(C) No. 4213/2014 SLP(C) No. 4214/2014 SLP(C) No. 4215/2014 SLP(C) No. 4216/2014 SLP(C) No. 4217/2014 SLP(C) No. 4218/2014 SLP(C) No. 4219/2014 SLP(C) No. 4220/2014 .

68 SLP(C) No. 4221/2014 SLP(C) No. 4222/2014 SLP(C) No. 4223/2014 SLP(C) No. 4224/2014 SLP(C) No. 4225/2014 SLP(C) No. 4226/2014 SLP(C) No. 4227/2014 SLP(C) No. 4228/2014 SLP(C) No. 4229/2014 SLP(C) No. 4230/2014 SLP(C) No. 4231/2014 SLP(C) No. 4232/2014 SLP(C) No. 4233/2014 SLP(C) No. 4234/2014 SLP(C) No. 4235/2014 SLP(C) No. 4236/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4237/2014 SLP(C) No. 4238/2014 SLP(C) No. 4239/2014 SLP(C) No. 4240/2014 SLP(C) No. 4241/2014 SLP(C) No. 4242/2014 SLP(C) No. 4243/2014 SLP(C) No. 4244/2014 SLP(C) No. 4245/2014 SLP(C) No. 4246/2014 SLP(C) No. 4247/2014 SLP(C) No. 4248/2014 SLP(C) No. 4249/2014 SLP(C) No. 4250/2014 SLP(C) No. 4252/2014 SLP(C) No. 4253/2014 SLP(C) No. 4280/2014 SLP(C) No. 4281/2014 SLP(C) No. 4282/2014 SLP(C) No. 4284/2014 SLP(C) No. 4285/2014 SLP(C) No. 4286/2014 SLP(C) No. 4287/2014 SLP(C) No. 4288/2014 SLP(C) No. 4289/2014 SLP(C) No. 4290/2014 SLP(C) No. 4291/2014 SLP(C) No. 4292/2014 SLP(C) No. 4293/2014 SLP(C) No. 4296/2014 SLP(C) No. 4297/2014 .

69 SLP(C) No. 4298/2014 SLP(C) No. 4299/2014 SLP(C) No. 4303/2014 SLP(C) No. 4304/2014 SLP(C) No. 4305/2014 SLP(C) No. 4306/2014 SLP(C) No. 4307/2014 SLP(C) No. 4308/2014 SLP(C) No. 4309/2014 SLP(C) No. 4310/2014 SLP(C) No. 4311/2014 SLP(C) No. 4312/2014 SLP(C) No. 4313/2014 SLP(C) No. 4314/2014 SLP(C) No. 4315/2014 SLP(C) No. 4316/2014 SLP(C) No. 4317/2014 SLP(C) No. 4318/2014 SLP(C) No. 4319/2014 SLP(C) No. 4320/2014 SLP(C) No. 4321/2014 SLP(C) No. 4322/2014 SLP(C) No. 4323/2014 SLP(C) No. 4324/2014 SLP(C) No. 4325/2014 SLP(C) No. 4326/2014 SLP(C) No. 4327/2014 SLP(C) No. 4328/2014 SLP(C) No. 4329/2014 SLP(C) No. 4330/2014 SLP(C) No. 4331/2014 SLP(C) No. 4567/2014 SLP(C) No. 8682/2014 SLP(C) No. 15635/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and interim relief and office report) SLP(C) No. 17286/2012 (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) SLP(C) No. 17287/2012 SLP(C) No. 17291/2012 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) SLP(C) No. 17292/2012 SLP(C) No. 17295/2012 SLP(C) No. 17296/2012 SLP(C)..CC No.9538/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report)

70 SLP(C)..CC No.9605/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9610/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9614/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9708/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9855/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9953/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9962/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9983/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.9986/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)..CC No.10191/2013 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) SLP(C)No.37126/2012 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, permission to file additional documents and office report) SLP(C)No.15636/2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report)

71 SLP(C)No.17088-17096/2012 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution application, permission to file additional documents, substitution and office report) WITH SLP(C)No.30969/2011 (With appln.(s) for impleading party and interim relief and office report) SLP(C) No. 27508/2010 . SLP(C) No. 33552-33556/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33984-33988/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36334-36340/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 333/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1082-1083/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1104/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3776/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1664-1665/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1739/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1858/2012 (With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2411/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2537/2012 SLP(C) No. 2557/2012 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report)

72 SLP(C) No. 2603/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2607/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2612/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2639/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2798/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2820/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2873/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3242/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3298/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3417/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3473/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for intervention and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3776/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3916/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3918/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4021/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4024/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4223/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

73 SLP(C) No. 4242/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4249/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4542/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4645/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4647/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4661/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4687/2012 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and appln.(s) for intervention and appln.(s) for directions and appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5091/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5150/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5170/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5566/2012 . SLP(C) No. 5712/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5959/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6013/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6027/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6121/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

74 SLP(C) No. 6196/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6345/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6353/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6363/2012 SLP(C) No. 6368/2012 SLP(C) No. 6369/2012 SLP(C) No. 6458-6460/2012 SLP(C) No. 6466-6469/2012 SLP(C) No. 6489-6494/2012 (With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for correction of name of the petitioner and appln.(s) for substitution and appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6508/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6534-6535/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6539/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6629/2012 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report)

75 SLP(C) No. 6731-6732/2012 (With appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6748-6756/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6849/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7146/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7436/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7539/2012 SLP(C) No. 7540/2012 SLP(C) No. 7541/2012 SLP(C) No. 7542-7543/2012 (With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to submit additional document(s) and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7815/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7934-7935/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8380/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8439/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8528/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8593/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8849/2012

76 SLP(C) No. 8851/2012 SLP(C) No. 8853-8855/2012 SLP(C) No. 9527/2012 SLP(C) No. 9678/2012 SLP(C) No. 9748/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 9761/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10052/2012 (With appln.(s) for directions and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10056-10058/2012 SLP(C) No. 10315/2012 SLP(C) No. 10317/2012 SLP(C) No. 10597/2012 SLP(C) No. 11303/2012 SLP(C) No. 11304/2012 SLP(C) No. 11879/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11993/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12299/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12461/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12844/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13641-13646/2012 SLP(C) No. 15173/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15905/2012 SLP(C) No. 16007/2012 SLP(C) No. 16336/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16337/2012 (With appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record and Office Report)

77 SLP(C) No. 16339-16341/2012 SLP(C) No. 16380/2012 SLP(C) No. 16674/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16695/2012 SLP(C) No. 16723/2012 SLP(C) No. 17041/2012 SLP(C) No. 18104/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19356/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 20540/2012 SLP(C) No. 22484/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 23446-23447/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 23722/2012 SLP(C) No. 23723/2012 SLP(C) No. 23724-23725/2012 SLP(C) No. 23750/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24203/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24720/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25551-25552/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26874-26876/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27023/2012 (With appln.(s) for permission to submit additional document(s) and Interim Relief and Office Report)

78 SLP(C) No. 27139/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27389-27396/2012 SLP(C) No. 27502-27507/2012 SLP(C) No. 28140/2012 SLP(C) No. 29279/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30590/2012 SLP(C) No. 31675/2012 SLP(C) No. 32140/2012 SLP(C) No. 33860/2012 SLP(C) No. 37492/2012 SLP(C) No. 37493/2012 SLP(C) No. 37989/2012 SLP(C) No. 37993/2012 SLP(C) No. 38188-38193/2012 SLP(C) No. 38287/2012 SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 (With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 237-238/2013 In SLP(C) No. 1082-1083/2012 SLP(C) No. 3583/2013 SLP(C) No. 4383/2013 SLP(C) No. 8631/2013 SLP(C) No. 8635/2013 SLP(C) No. 8887/2013 SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 .

79 SLP(C) No. 9297/2013 SLP(C) No. 11020/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12784/2013 SLP(C) No. 13017/2013 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13297-13302/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16722-16723/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17635/2013 SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 SLP(C) No. 18735/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18866/2013 SLP(C) No. 19200-19201/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19922/2013 SLP(C) No. 20326/2013 SLP(C) No. 20329/2013 SLP(C) No. 23276/2013 SLP(C) No. 23855-23856/2013 SLP(C) No. 23857-23858/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 23859-23860/2013 SLP(C) No. 24622-24624/2013 SLP(C) No. 26176-26177/2013 SLP(C) No. 26178/2013 SLP(C) No. 26179/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report)

80 SLP(C) No. 26681-26682/2013 SLP(C) No. 26868/2013 SLP(C) No. 26890/2013 SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30859/2013 SLP(C) No. 30860/2013 SLP(C) No. 30861/2013 SLP(C) No. 30862/2013 SLP(C) No. 32108/2013 SLP(C) No. 33980/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34176/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35109/2013 SLP(C) No. 35143/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 37793/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 39351/2013 SLP(C) No. 39697-39698/2013 SLP(C) No. 39699-39700/2013 SLP(C) No. 39701/2013 SLP(C) No. 39702-39703/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 802/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2495/2014 SLP(C) No. 4566/2014 SLP(C) No. 5936-5937/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6024-6027/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

81 SLP(C) No. 6682/2014 SLP(C) No. 7017-7018/2014 SLP(C) No. 7019/2014 SLP(C) No. 7031/2014 SLP(C) No. 7036/2014 SLP(C) No. 10065/2014 SLP(C) No. 10147-10149/2014 SLP(C) No. 11737/2014 SLP(C) No. 13401/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14786/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18356/2014 SLP(C) No. 19521/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19523/2014 SLP(C) No. 19525/2014 SLP(C) No. 19777/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) No. 444/2013 In SLP(C) No. 5566/2012 SLP(C) No. 25279/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27102/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36391/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36390/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C)..CC No.21151/2014

82 SLP(C)No. 36975/2013 SLP(C)No. 9551/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 10049-10050/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 10051/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12434/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12435-12436/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12437/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12438/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12439/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12441/2014 SLP(C)Nos. 12442/2014 SLP(C) No. 12443/2014 SLP(C) No. 13034/2014 SLP(C) No. 14781/2014 SLP(C) No. 22298-22299/2014 SLP(C) No. 22329-22331/2014 SLP(C) No. 22384-22385/2014 SLP(C) No. 22716-22718/2014 SLP(C) No. 36155-36156/2014 SLP(C) No. 36436/2014 SLP(C) No. 36644/2014 SLP(C) No. 36647-36649/2014 SLP(C) No. 12433/2014 SLP(C) No. 36141/2014 SLP(C) No. 32391/2014 SLP(C) No. 23772/2014 SLP(C) No. 26260/2014 SLP(C) No. 17559/2014 SLP(C) No. 36242/2014 SLP(C) No. 29351/2014 Contempt Petition No.7/2014 in SLP(C) No. 3242/2012 Contempt Petition No.21/2015 in SLP(C) No.27023/2012 SLP(C) No. 28167/2014 SLP(C) No. 2057/2015 SLP(C) No. 2055/2015 SLP(C) No. 17686/2014 C.A.No.2197 of 2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents, prayer for interim relief and office report) C.A.No.2195 of 2013 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) C.A.No.2198 of 2013 (With appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record, prayer for interim relief and office report)

83 C.A.No.2199 of 2013 C.A.No.2225 of 2013 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) C.A.No.2226 of 2013 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) C.A.No.2704 of 2013 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) C.A.No.2705 of 2013 C.A.Nos.2729-2730 of 2013 C.A.No.3022/2013 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) C.A.No.4902 of 2014 (With apln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) C.A.No.4928 of 2014 (With apln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 03/02/2015 These petitions/appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For the Parties : Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kedarnath Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Nagendra Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashank Samru, Adv. Mr. Aakash Kumar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shital Khatri, Adv. Mr. Rajsh Goyal, Adv.

84 Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar, Adv. Mr. B.K. Pal, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. A.A. Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Alex Joseph, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. For M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co. Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. Punit Yadav, Adv. Mr. R.K. Adsure, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. B.P. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv.

85 Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Wajeeh Shah, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Prabhat K. Rai, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Birendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babu, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv. Ms. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv. Mr. V.P. Singh, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv. Mr. Anshul Narayan, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv.

86 Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Giridhar G. Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Dinesh K. Garg, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv. Mr. Kumar Mihir, Adv. Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Maneesh Arora, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv. Mr. Arjun Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Dharm Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv. Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv. Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv. Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv.

87 Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikal Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv. Mr. Prabal Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Md. Shahd Anwar, Adv. Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv. Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv. Ms. Shirin Zaidi, Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv. Ms. Nikhar Berry, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Krishna, Adv. Mr. Ranvir Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravi Nanda, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Priya Sahadeo, Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit R. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv.

88 Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv. Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv. Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Adv. Ms. K.V. Bharathi Upadhaya, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv. Mr. Jai Singh, Adv. Mr. Rana S. Biswas, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kr. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Sunando Raha, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, Adv. Mr. Devender Kumar Goel, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Amrendra Saran, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv.

89 Mr. Mohit Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Ms. Reena Singh, AAG, U.P. Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sumit Bansal, Adv. Mr. Ateev Mathur, Adv. Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Atul Bandhu, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Anuradha D. Misra, Adv. Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv. For M/s. Anuradha & Associates. Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amiet Andlay, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv. Ms. Sheeba Khan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Verma, Adv. Mr. Himanshu, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv. Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv.

90 Mr. S.K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Tanmay Nagar, Adv. Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. J.M. Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shikha Beri, Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit Manuja, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. For Col. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, Adv. For M/s. Lawyers Knit & Co. Mr. Zaki Ahmad Khan, Adv. Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv. Mr. Farhan Khan, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. Kamlesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv. Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidharthan, Adv. Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv.

91 Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv. Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Amit Pawan, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suryodaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sudhakar Prasad Tiwari,Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Adv. Mr. Harshivir Pratap Sharma, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garg, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shikha Beari, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh Rawal, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Ms. S. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Mr. Y.D. Nagar, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.

92 Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Dushyant Bhati, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Kulshrestha, Adv. Ms. Sushma Singh, Adv. Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv. Mr. P.C. Sharma, Adv. Ms. S. Usha Reddy, Adv.

93 Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Braham Singh, Adv. Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv. Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Navanak Shekhar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Mayank Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. Mr. Rushi Khan, Adv. Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Anil Kaushik, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. For M/s. A.P.& J. Chambers. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.

94 Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv. Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv. Ms. Akriti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Satendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Sonal Jain, Adv. Mr. Sachin Naagar, Adv. Mr. Rajiv M. Brahma, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Dr. Satish Chandra, Adv. Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv. Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Vaishali R., Adv. Ms. Neelam Jain, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Devavrat Anand, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar R.S., Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Ajamani, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv. Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Ms. Nanita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Narain Mathur, Adv. Ms. Niranjana Singh, Adv. Mr. Ram Bhaj, Adv.

95 Ms. Arti Singh,Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv. Ms. Mahua Kalra,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif,Adv. Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kr. Lakhanpal,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Ghan Shyam Vasisht,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Rajan,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Ms. S. Usha Reddy,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv.

96 Mr. Sumit Attri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rekha Pandey,Adv. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Ms. Anu Gupta,Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Goyal,Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv. Ms. Aditi Gupta,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.

97 Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Saravesh Singh Baghel, Adv. Mr. Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, Adv. Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R MATTERS FILED BY THE AUTHORITY: The Special Leave Petitions as also the Civil Appeals are disposed of, in terms of the signed order.

98 S.L.P.(C)Nos.11020 of 2013 and 35143 of 2013 : De-link and list separately. MATTERS FILED BY INDIVIDUALS: S.L.P.(C)No.30969/2011, 27508/2010, 33552-33556/2011, 33984-33988/2011, 36334-36340/2011, 333/2012, 1082-1083/2012, 1104/2012, 1554/2012, 1664-1665/2012, 1739/2012, 1858/2012, 2411/2012, 2537/2012, 2557/2012, 2603/2012, 2607/2012, 2612/2012, 2873/2012, 3298/2012, 3473/2012, 3776/2012, 3916/2012, 3918/2012, 4021/2012, 4024/2012, 4223/2012, 4242/2012, 4249/2012, 4542/2012, 5566/2012, 5712/2012, 5959/2012, 6013/2012, 6027/2012, 6121/2012, 6196/2012, 6345/2012, 6353/2012, 6363/2012, 6368/2012, 6369/2012, 6466-6469/2012, 6489-6494/2012, 6508/2012, 6534-6535/2012, 6539/2012, 6629/2012, 6731-6732/2012, 6748-6756/2012, 6849/2012, 7146/2012, 7436/2012, 7539/2012, 7540/2012, 7541/2012, 7815/2012, 7934-7935/2012, 8380/2012, 8439/2012, 8528/2012, 8593/2012, 8849/2012, 8851/2012, 8853-8855/2012, 9527/2012, 9678/2012, 9748/2012, 9761/2012, 10052/2012, 10056-10058/2012, 10315/2012, 10597/2012, 11303/2012, 11304/2012, 11879/2012, 11993/2012, 12299/2012, 12461/2012, 12844/2012, 13641-13646/2012, 15173/2012, 15905/2012, 16007/2012, 16336/2012, 16337/2012, 16380/2012, 17041/2012, 18104/2012, 19356/2012, SLP(C)../2012 CC 20540, SLP(C)No.23723/2012, 23724-23725/2012, 24203/2012, 24720/2012, 25551-25552/2012, 26874-26876/2012, 27023/2012, 27139/2012, 27389-27396/2012, 27502-27507/202, 28140/2012, 29279/201, 33860/2012, 37492/2012, 37989/2012, 37993/2012, 38288/2012, 38289/2012, 38290/2012, CON.PET.(C)Nos.237-238/2013 in SLP(C)Nos.1082-1083/2012, 4383/2013, 8631/2013, 8635/2013, 8887/2013, 9168/2013, 9297/2013, 12784/2013, 13017/2013, SLP(C).../2013 CC Nos.13297-13302, SLP(C)Nos.16722-16723/2013, 17635/2013, 18090/2013, 18735/2013, 18866/2013, 19200-19201/2013, 19922/2013, 20329/2013, 23276/2013, 23857-23858/2013, 23859-23860/2013, 24622-24624/2013, 26176-26177/2013, 26178/2013, 26179/2013, 26681-26682/2013, 26868/2013, 26890/2013, 30601/2013, 30859/2013, 30860/2013, 30861/2013, 30862/2013, 32108/2013, 33980/2013, 34176/2013, 35109/2013, 37793/2013, 39351/2013, 39697-39698/2013, 39699-39700/2013, 39701/2013, 39702-39703/2013, 802/2014, 2495/2014, 4566/2014, 5936-5937/2014, 6024-6027/2014, 6682/2014, 7019/2014, 7031/2014, 7036/2014, 10065/2014, 10147-10149/2014, 11737/2014, 13401/2014, 14786/2014, 12443/2014, 13034/2014, 22298-22299/2014, 22329-22331/2014, 22384-22385/2014, 22716-22718/2014, 36155-36156/2014, 36436/2014, 36647-36649/2014, 12433/2014, 32391/2014, 23772/2014, 26260/2014, 17559/2014, 36242/2013, 29351/2014, 18356/2014, 19521/2014, 19523/2014, 19525/2014, 19777/2014, Con.Pet.(C)No.444/2013 in SLP(C)NO.5566/2012, 25279/2013, 27102/2014, 36391/2014, 36390/2014, SLP(C).../2013 CC 21151, SLP(C)No.36975/2013,

99 9551/2014, 10049-10050/2014, 10051/2014, 12434/2014, 12435-12436/2014, 12437/2014, 12438/2014, 12439/2014, 12441/2014, 12442/2014, Con.Pet.(C)No.21/2015 in SLP(C)No.27023/2012, SLP(C)No.28167/2014, 2057/2015, 17686/2014, 37126/2012, 15636/2012, 17088-17096/2012, C.A.No.2195/2013, 2198/2013, 2199/2013, 2225/2013,2226/2013, 2704/2013, 2705/2013, 2729-2730/2013, 3022/2013, 4902/2014 AND WITH C.A.No.4928/2014: Arguments heard. Judgment reserved in all matters except SLP(C)Nos.30969/2011, 1104/2012, 1858/2012, 2411/2014, 2612/2012, 2820/2012, 6489-6494/2012, 19521/2014 and C.A.No.2198/2013, 2729-2730/2013. S.L.P.(C)No.10317/2012, 2639/2012, 38287/2012, 38188-18193/2012, 2798/2012, 3417/2012, 4645/2012, 4647/2012, 4661/2012, 5091/2012, 3242/2012, 4687/2012, 37493/2012, 16339-16341/2012, 4383/2013, 14781/2014, 36644/2014, 36141/2014, 31675/2012, 6458-6460/2012, 20326/2013, CC 13297-13302/2013, 5150/2012, 5170/2012, 23750/2012, 23722/2012, 7542-7543/2012, 30590/2012, 16674/2012, 16695/2012, 16723/2012, 23446-23447/2012, 32140/2012, 22484/2012, 2820/2012, 7017-7018/2014, 1554/12, 3776/12, 3917/12, 6508/12, 6849/12 2055/2015 and Cont.Pet.(c)No.7/2014 in SLP(C)No.3242/2012: Disposed of as withdrawn, in terms of the signed order. List SLP(C)Nos.30969/2011, 1104/2012, 1858/2012, 2411/2014, 2612/2012, 2820/2012, 6489-6494/2012, 19521/2014 and C.A.No.2198/2013, 2729-2730/2013 on 4 th February, 2015. (G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS AR-cumPS Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file) – -------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011 S.L.P.(C) No.1104 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.1858 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2411 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2612 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2820 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.6489-6494 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.19521 of 2014 C.A. No.2198 of 2013 C.A. Nos. 2729-2730 of 2013

100 Date : 04/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Singh, Adv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Sharma, aDv. Mr. Sushant Sarkar, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, sr. Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr.Y.D.Nagar, Adv. Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Ms.Shefali Jain, Adv.

101 Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babli, Adv. Ms. Risu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nikhilesh Bhargava, adv. Mr.S.C.Maheshwari, Sr.Adv. Ms.Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr.M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Mr.Sanjay Krishna, Adv. Ms.Nihar B., Adv. Mr.Jabar Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravin dra Kumar, Adv. Ms.Reena Singh, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.V. Rao, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr.D.N.Goburdhun, Adv. Mr.Prabal Bagchi, Adv. O R D E R S.L.P.(C) No.2820 of 2012: Learned counsel appearing for the respective

102 petitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw their respective Special Leave Petition(s) with liberty to file appropriate review petition(s) before the High Court. Permission sought for is granted. The Special Leave Petition(s) is/are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate review petition(s) before the High Court within 30 days' time from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. If and when such review petition(s) is/are filed, we request the High Court to decide the same without reference to the period of limitation. I.A.No.3 of 2015 in S.L.P.(C)NO.1858/2012: Dr.Rajeev Dhavan, learned senior counsel for the applicant(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the I.A.No.3 of 2015 with liberty to agitate his grievance before an appropriate forum for appropriate relief(s). Permission sought for is granted. I.A.No.3 of 2015 is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to agitate his grievance before an appropriate forum for appropriate relief(s). Taken on board S.L.P.(C)No.2875 of 2014. Arguments Heard. (G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Court Master Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar – ------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011 S.L.P.(C) No.1104 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.1858 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2411 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2612 of 2012

103 S.L.P.(C) No.6489-6494 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.19521 of 2014 C.A. No.2198 of 2013 C.A. Nos. 2729-2730 of 2013 Date : 05/02/2015 These petitions/appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Singh, Adv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Sharma, aDv. Mr. Sushant Sarkar, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, sr. Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.

104 Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babli, Adv. Ms. Risu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nikhilesh Bhargava, adv. Mr.Mahabir Singh, Sr.Adv. Dr.B.K.Jauhari, Adv. Ms.Purnima Jauhari, Adv. Mr.Suresh Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravin dra Kumar, Adv. Ms.Reena Singh, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.V. Rao, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr.D.N.Goburdhun, Adv. Mr.Prabal Bagchi, Adv. Mr.Vimal Chandra S.Dave, Adv. Ms.Neelam Kalsi, Adv. ORDER CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2729-2730 OF 2013: The Civil Appeals are disposed of, in terms of the signed

105 order. Arguments heard. (G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Court Master Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar (Signed order in C.A.Nos.2729-2730 of 2013 is placed on the file) – ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011 S.L.P.(C) No.1104 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.1858 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2411 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.2612 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.6489-6494 of 2012 S.L.P.(C) No.19521 of 2014 C.A. No.2198 of 2013 Date : 10/02/2015 These petitions/appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Sharma, aDv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Sarkar, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr.Aditya Vikram, Adv. Ms.Aditi Gupta, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Dr.Rajeev Dhavan, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sudhir Nagar, Adv. Mr.Mohit Singh, Adv.

106 Mr.Ankur Prakash, Adv. Ms.Piyush Singh, Adv. Mr.Aditya P., Adv. Ms.Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr.Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr.Sarwa Mitter, Adv. For M/s.Mitter & Mitter Co.,Advs. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna, Sr.Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Ms.Shefali Jain, Adv. Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna,Sr.Adv. Mr.Y.D.Nagar, Adv. Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Ms.Shefali Jain, Adv. Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babli, Adv. Ms. Risu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Rovin Babu, Adv. Dr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr.Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Dr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr.Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv.

107 Mr.Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nikhilesh Bhargava, adv. Dr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Manish Tiwari, Adv. Dr.Surat Singh, Adv. Mr.Sudhanshu Palo, Adv. Mr.Brajesh Kr.Singh, Adv. Mr.Arun Kr.Panwar, Adv. Mr.Ashok Sharma, Adv. Mr.Nikhilesh Bhargava, Adv. Ms.Anjali Bhargava, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravin dra Kumar, Adv. Ms.Reena Singh, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.V. Rao, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. For Intervenor Mr.Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv. Mr.Adarsh Aggarwal, Adv. Mr.Wazih S., Adv. Mr.D.N.Guburdhun,Adv. Mr.Prabal Bagchi, Adv.

108 O R D E R Arguments concluded. Judgment reserved. (G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Court Master Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar

109 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2729-2730 OF 2013 M/S.GANGA CERAMICS PVT. LTD. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in C.M.W.P. No.36918 of 2008 and C.M.W.P. No.255773 of 2009, dated 04.09.2009. 2. Shri Mahabir Singh, learned senior counsel for the appellant, at the time of hearing of these appeals, would restrict his submissions to a smaller issue, namely that the representation dated 26.06.2010 filed by the appellant-herein pursuant to the public notice issued by the respondent-authority has not been considered despite of a long lapse of time. Therefore the learned senior counsel for the appellant would make a request to this

110 Court to direct the respondent-authorities to consider the said representation, in accordance with law. 3. Shri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent-authorities would submit that the said representation so filed by the appellant, if not considered already, would be considered in four months' time. 4. Taking into consideration the submission so made by learned counsel for the respondent-authorities, we direct the respondent-authorities to consider the said representation filed by the appellant in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months' time from today. 5. Till the said representation is duly considered by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law, the status quo , ordered by this Court, by order dated 05.07.2010, shall continue. 6. We clarify that during the pendency of the consideration of the said representation, the parties shall not alienate, transfer and create any third party

111 rights with respect to the subject matter of these appeals. 7. In view of the above, we dispose of these Civil Appeals. Ordered accordingly. ................CJI. (H.L. DATTU) ..................J. (A.K. SIKRI) ..................J. (ARUN MISHRA) NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 05, 2015

ü 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 19301 OF 2012 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER(S) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 20498 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 20499 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24407-24408 OF 2012 51SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24409 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29701 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29702 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29703 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29704 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29705 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29706 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29707 OF 2012Signature Not Verified SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29708 OF 2012Digitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.06.01 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29709 OF 201215:12:45 ISTReason: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29710 OF 2012 2SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29711 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29712 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29713 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29714 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29715 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29716 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29718 OF 2012

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29719 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29720 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29721 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29723 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29724 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29725 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29726 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29727 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29728 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29729 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29730 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29731 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29732 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29733 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29734 OF 2012 3SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29735 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29736 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29737 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29738 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29739 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29740 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29741 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29742 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29745 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29746 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29747 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29748 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29749 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29750 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29751 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29752 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29753 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29754 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29755 OF 2012

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29756 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29757 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29758 OF 2012 4 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29759 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29760 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29761 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29762 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29763 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29764 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29766 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29767 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29768 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29769 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29770 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29771 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29772 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29773 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29774 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29775 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29776 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 29782 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31654 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31655 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31656 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31657 OF 2012 5SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31658 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31659 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31660 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31663 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31664 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31665 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31666 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31668 OF 2012

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31669 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31670 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31671 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31672 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31673 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31674 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31676 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31677 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31679 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3583 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3584 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3585 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3586 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3587 OF 2013 6SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3588 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3589 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3590 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3591 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3592 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3593 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3594 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3595 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3596 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3597 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3598 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3599 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3600 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3601 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3602 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3603 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3604 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3605 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3606 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3608 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3609 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3615 OF 2013 7 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3618 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3619 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3622 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3625 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3626 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3627 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3628 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3629 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3630 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3632 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3633 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3634 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3636 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3637 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3639 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3640 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3641 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3642 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3643 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5199 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5200 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5201-5202 OF 2013 8SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5203 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 8678 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10702 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10703 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10704 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10706 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10707 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10708 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10709 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10710 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10711 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10712 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10713 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10714 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10715 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10716 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10717 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10718 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10719 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10720 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10721 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10722 OF 2013 9SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10723 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10724 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10725 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10726 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10727 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10728 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10729 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10731 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10732 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10733 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10734 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10735 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10736 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10737 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10738 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10739 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10740 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10741 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10742 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10743 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10745 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10746 OF 2013 10SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10747 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10748 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10749 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10750 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10751 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10752 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10753 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10754 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10755 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10756 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10757 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10758 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10759 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10760 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10761 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10762 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10763 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10764 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10765 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10766 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10767 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10768 OF 2013 11 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10769 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10770 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10772 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10773 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10774 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10775 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10776 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10777 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10778 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10779 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10780 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10781 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10782 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10783 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10784 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10785 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s)... OF 2013 CC 12658 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12684 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12686 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12688 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12690 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12693 OF 2013 12SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12695 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12697 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12699 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12700 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12701 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12702 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12703 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12706 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12707 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12710 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12713 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12714 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12715 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12716 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12717 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12718 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12721 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12722 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12724 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12725 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12726 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12727 OF 2013 13SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12728 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12729 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12730 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12731 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12732 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12733 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12734 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12735 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12736 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12738 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12739 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12740 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12741 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12742 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12743 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12744 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12745 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12747 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12748 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12749 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12750 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12751 OF 2013 14SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12752 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12753 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12754 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12755 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12756 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12757 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12758 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12759 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12760 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12762 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12763 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12764 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12765 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12766 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12768 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12769 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12770 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12771 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12772 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12773 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12774 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12775 OF 2013 15SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12776 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 12777 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17722 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17724 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17726 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17728 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17729 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17730 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17732 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17733 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17734 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17735 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17737 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17739 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17740 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17742 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17744 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17745 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17748 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17749 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17750 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17751 OF 2013 16SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17752 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17753 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17755 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17756 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17758 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17759 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17761 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17762 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17763 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17765 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17766 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17767 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17768 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17770 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17771 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17772 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17773 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17774 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17777 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17778 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17779 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17782 OF 2013 17SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17785 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17787 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17790 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17792 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17793 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17795 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17798 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17800 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17801 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17802 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17804 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17805 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17806 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17808 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17810 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17811 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17812 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17813 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17814 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17816 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17817 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17818 OF 2013 18 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17819 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17821-17823 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17824 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17825 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17826-17828 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17829 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 17830 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24108 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24109 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24110 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24111 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24112 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24113 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24114 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24115 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24116 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24118 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24119 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24120 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24121 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24122 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24123 OF 2013 19SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24124 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24125 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24126 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24127 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24128 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24129 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24130 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24131 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24132 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24133 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24134 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24135 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24136 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24137 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24138 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24139 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24140 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24141 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24142 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24143 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24144 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24145 OF 2013 20SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24146 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24147 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24148 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24149 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24150 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24151 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24152 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24153 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24154 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24155 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24156 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24157 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24158 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24159 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24160 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24161 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24162 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24163 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24164 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24165 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24166 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24167 OF 2013 21SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24168 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24169 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24170 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24171 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24172 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24173 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24174 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24175 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24178 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24179 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24180 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24181 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24182 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24183 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24184 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24185 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24187 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24188 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24189 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24190 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24191 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24192 OF 2013 22SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24193 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24194 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24195 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24198 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24199 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24200 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24201 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24202 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24203 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24204 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24205 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24206 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24207 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24208 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24209 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 24210 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25467 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25468 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25478 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25480 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25481 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25482 OF 2013 23SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25483 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25484 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25485 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25486 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25487 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25488 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25489 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25490 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25491 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25492 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25493 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25494 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25495 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25497 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25498 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25499 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25500 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25501 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25502 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25503 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25504 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25505 OF 2013 24SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25506 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25507 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25508 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25509 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25510 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25511 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25512 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25513 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25514 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25515 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25516 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25517 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25518 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25520 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25521 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25522 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25523 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25524 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25526 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25527 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25528 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25529 OF 2013 25SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25530 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25531 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25532 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25533 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25534 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25535 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25536 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25537 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25538 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25539 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25540 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25541 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25542 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25543 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25544 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25545 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25546 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25547 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25548 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25549 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 25550 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28724 OF 2013 26SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28726 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28727 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28728 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28729 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28730 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28731 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28732 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28733 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28734 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28736 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 28737 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30366 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30367 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30368 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30369 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30370 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30371 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30372 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30373 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30374 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30375 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30376 OF 2013 27SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30377 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30378 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30379 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30380 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30381 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30382 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30383 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30384 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30385 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30386 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30387 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30388 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30389 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30390 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30391 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30392 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30393 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30394 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30395 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30396 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30397 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30398 OF 2013 28SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30399 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30400 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30401 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30402 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30403 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30404 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30405 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30406 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30407 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30408 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30409 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30410 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30411 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30412 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30413 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30414 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30415 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33288 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33289 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33290 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33291 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33292 OF 2013 29SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33293 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33294 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33295 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33296 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33297 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33298 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33299 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33300 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33301 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33302 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33303 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33304 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33305 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33306 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33307 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33308 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33309 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33310 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33312 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33313 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33314 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33315 OF 2013 30SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33316 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33317 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33319 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33320 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33321 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33322 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33323 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33324 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33325 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33326 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33327 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33328 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33329 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33330 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33331 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33332 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33333 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33334 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33335 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33336 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33337 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33338 OF 2013 31SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33339 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 33341 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34562 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34563 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34564 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34565 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34566 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34567 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34568 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34569 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34570 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34571 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34572 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34573 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34574 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34575 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34576 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34577 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34578 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34579 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34580 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34581 OF 2013 32SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34582 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34583 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34584 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34585 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34586 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34587 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34588 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34589 OF 2013

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34590 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34591 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34592 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34593 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34594 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34595 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34596 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34597 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34598 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34599 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34600 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34601 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34602 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 34603 OF 2013 33SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4064 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4065 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4066 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4067 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4068 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4069 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4070 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4071 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4072 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4073 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4074 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4075 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4081 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4086 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4087 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4088 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4089 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4090 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4091 OF 2014

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4092 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4094 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4095 OF 2014 34SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4096 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4097 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4098 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4099 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4100 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4101 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4102 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4103 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4104 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4105 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4106 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4107 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4108 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4109 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4110 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4111 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4112 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4113 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4114 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4115 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4117 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4118 OF 2014 35SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4119 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4120 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4121 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4122 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4123 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4124 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4125 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4126 OF 2014

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4127 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4128 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4129 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4150 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4151 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4152 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4153 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4154 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4155 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4156 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4157 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4158 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4159 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4164 OF 2014 36SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4165 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4166 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4167 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4168 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4169 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4170 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4172 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4173 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4176 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4177 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4178 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4179 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4180 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4181 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4182 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4184 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4185 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4186 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4187 OF 2014

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4188 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4189 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4190 OF 2014 37SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4191 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4192 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4193 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4194 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4197 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4198 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4199 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4200 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4201 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4202 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4203 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4204 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4205 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4206 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4207 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4208 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4209 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4210 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4211 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4212 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4213 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4214 OF 2014 38SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4215 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4216 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4217 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4218 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4219 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4220 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4221 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4222 OF 2014

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4223 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4224 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4225 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4226 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4227 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4228 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4229 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4230 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4231 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4232 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4233 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4234 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4235 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4236 OF 2014 39SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4237 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4238 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4239 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4240 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4241 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4242 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4243 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4244 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4245 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4246 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4247 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4248 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4249 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4250 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4252 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4253 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4280 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4281 OF 2014

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4282 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4284 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4285 OF 2014 40SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4286 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4287 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4288 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4289 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4290 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4291 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4292 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4293 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4296 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4297 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4298 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4299 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4303 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4304 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4305 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4306 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4307 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4308 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4309 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4310 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4311 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4312 OF 2014 41SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4313 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4314 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4315 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4316 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4317 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4318 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4319 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4320 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4321 OF 2014

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4322 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4323 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4324 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4325 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4326 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4327 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4328 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4329 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4330 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4331 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4567 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 8682 OF 2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 15635 OF 2012 42 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17286 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17287 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17291 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17292 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17295 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 17296 OF 2012SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9538 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9605 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9610 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9614 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9708 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9855 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9953 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9962 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9983 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.9986 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)..CC No.10191 OF 2013 43 O R D E R

1. Application for permission to file Special LeavePetition(s), if any, is granted.2. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling S.L.P.(s)/appeal(s) is condoned.3. Delay, if any, in application(s) forsubstitution is/are condoned.4. Application(s) for substitution(s), if any,is/are allowed.4a. Application(s) for setting aside abatement, ifany, is/are allowed.5. Application(s) for impleadment(s)/intervention(s), if any, is/are rejected. 44MATTERS FILED BY THE AUTHORITY:6. We have heard Shri L.Nageswara Rao, learnedsenior counsel for the New Oklha Industrial DevelopmentAuthority/Okhla Industrial Development Authority(forshort 'the authority') and other learned senior counseland counsel for the respective parties to the lis.7. Shri Nageswara Rao, learned senior counselappearing for the Authority, very fairly states that theAuthority is primarily aggrieved by the two directionsissued by the High Court while disposing of the batch ofWrit Petitions. Firstly, a direction to allot 10 percent of the plots in favour of the agriculturists/land-loosers; and, secondly, a direction to theauthority to take appropriate permission from theNational Capital Regional Planning Board. To be precise,the directions issued by the High Court are as under : "5. The Greater NOIDA and its allottees are directed not to carry on develoopment and not to implement the Master Plan 2021 till the

observations and directions of the National Capital Regional Planning Board are incorporated in MasterPlan 2021 to the satisfaction of the National Capital Regional Planning Board. We make it clear that this direction shall not be applicable in those cases where the development is being carried on in accordance with the earlier Master Plan of the Greater NOIDA duly approved by the National Capital Regional Planning Board. 45 6. We direct the Chief Secretary of the State to appoint officers not below the level of Principal Secretary (except the officers of Industrial Development Department who have dealt with the relevant files) to conduct a thorough inquiry regarding the acts of Greater Noida (a) in proceeding to implement Master Plan 2021 without approval of N.C.R.P. Board, (b) decisions taken to change the land use, (c) allotment made to the builders and (d) indiscriminate proposals for acquisition of land, and thereafter the State Government shall take appropriate action in the matter."8. Shri Rao, on instructions, fairly states thatafter disposal of the Writ Petitions, the authority hascomplied with the directions so issued in paragraphs 5and 6 of the impugned judgment(s) and order(s). In viewof the above, in our opinion, we need not have to answerthe questions raised by the learned senior counsel inthese proceedings. We leave it open for the authority toagitate the aforesaid issue(s) in an appropriateproceeding.9. Insofar as allotment of 10 per cent of the plotsis concerned, the High Court, in exercise of itsdiscretionary power, has thought it fit, while sustainingthe notification issued by the authority for protectingthem for allotting 10 per cent of the developed plots;and, there again they have put a cap of 2,500 sq.mtrs. Infact, in the course of the order, the High Court has 46taken into consideration the agreement that was enteredinto by the authority with the villagers of Patwari and ,in some cases, the authority itself has agreed to raise 6to 8 per cent of the developed plots to theagriculturists. The High Court has also taken into

consideration the observations made by this Court in thecase of Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore DevelopmentAuthority, 2010 (7) SCC 129, where this Court has gone tothe extent of directing the authorities to allot 15 percent of the developed plots. In our view and in thepeculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, sincethe relief that is given to the respondents/agriculturists is purely discretionary relief by theCourt in order to sustain the notification issued by theauthorities, we do not find any good ground to interferewith the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by theHigh Court, at the instance of thepetitioners/appellants/authorities, namely, NOIDA andGreater NOIDA.10. This order shall not be treated as a precedentin any other case. 4711. With these observations, the Special LeavePetitions as also the Civil Appeals are disposed of,leaving the question of law raised open to be agitated inan appropriate case.12. We grant three months' time from the date ofreceipt of a copy of the order to the authorities to paythe compensation and six months' time from the date ofreceipt of a copy of the order to allot 10 per cent ofthe developed plots to the claimants. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 10317 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2639 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 38287 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 38188-38193 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2798 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3417 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4645 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4647 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4661 OF 2012

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5091 OF 2012 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.7 OF 2014 IN S.L.P.NO(S). 3242 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3242 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4687 OF 2012 48 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 37493 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16339-16341 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 4383 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 14781 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 36644 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 36141 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 31675 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 6458-6460 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 20326 OF 2013SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)..CC No(s).13297-13302 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5150 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 5170 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 23750 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 23722 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 7542-7543 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 30590 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16674 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16695 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 16723 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 23446-23447 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 32140 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 22484 OF 2012 49 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2820 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 7017-7018 OF 2014 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 2055 OF 2015 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 1554 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 3776 OF 2012 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 6508 OF 2012

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No(s). 6849 OF 2012 Learned counsel appearing for the respectivepetitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw their respective Special LeavePetition(s) with liberty to file appropriate reviewpetition(s) before the High Court. Permission sought for is granted. The Special Leave Petition(s) is/are disposed ofas withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate reviewpetition(s) before the High Court within 30 days' timefrom the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. If and when such review petition(s) is/arefiled, we request the High Court to decide the samewithout reference to the period of limitation. In view of the withdrawal of S.L.P.(C)No.3242 OF2012, no orders need be passed in Contempt Petition 50(c)No.7 of 2014. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition isdisposed of. ....................CJI. (H.L. DATTU) .....................J. (A.K. SIKRI) .....................J. (ARUN MISHRA)NEW DELHI;FEBRUARY 03, 2015 51ITEM NO.5+15 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19301/2012(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/07/2011in CMWP No. 29396/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS

PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH SLP(C) No. 20498/2012 SLP(C) No. 20499/2012 SLP(C) No. 24407-24408/2012 SLP(C) No. 24409/2012 SLP(C) No. 29701/2012 SLP(C) No. 29702/2012 SLP(C) No. 29703/2012 SLP(C) No. 29704/2012 SLP(C) No. 29705/2012 SLP(C) No. 29706/2012 SLP(C) No. 29707/2012 SLP(C) No. 29708/2012 SLP(C) No. 29709/2012 SLP(C) No. 29710/2012 SLP(C) No. 29711/2012 SLP(C) No. 29712/2012 SLP(C) No. 29713/2012 SLP(C) No. 29714/2012 SLP(C) No. 29715/2012 SLP(C) No. 29716/2012 SLP(C) No. 29718/2012 SLP(C) No. 29719/2012 SLP(C) No. 29720/2012 SLP(C) No. 29721/2012 SLP(C) No. 29723/2012 SLP(C) No. 29724/2012 SLP(C) No. 29725/2012 SLP(C) No. 29726/2012 SLP(C) No. 29727/2012 SLP(C) No. 29728/2012 SLP(C) No. 29729/2012 SLP(C) No. 29730/2012 SLP(C) No. 29731/2012 52 SLP(C) No. 29732/2012 SLP(C) No. 29733/2012 SLP(C) No. 29734/2012 SLP(C) No. 29735/2012 SLP(C) No. 29736/2012 SLP(C) No. 29737/2012 SLP(C) No. 29738/2012 SLP(C) No. 29739/2012 SLP(C) No. 29740/2012 SLP(C) No. 29741/2012 SLP(C) No. 29742/2012 SLP(C) No. 29745/2012 SLP(C) No. 29746/2012 SLP(C) No. 29747/2012 SLP(C) No. 29748/2012 SLP(C) No. 29749/2012 SLP(C) No. 29750/2012 SLP(C) No. 29751/2012 SLP(C) No. 29752/2012 SLP(C) No. 29753/2012 SLP(C) No. 29754/2012 SLP(C) No. 29755/2012 SLP(C) No. 29756/2012 SLP(C) No. 29757/2012 SLP(C) No. 29758/2012 SLP(C) No. 29759/2012 SLP(C) No. 29760/2012 SLP(C) No. 29761/2012 SLP(C) No. 29762/2012 SLP(C) No. 29763/2012 SLP(C) No. 29764/2012 SLP(C) No. 29766/2012

SLP(C) No. 29767/2012 SLP(C) No. 29768/2012 SLP(C) No. 29769/2012 SLP(C) No. 29770/2012 SLP(C) No. 29771/2012 SLP(C) No. 29772/2012 SLP(C) No. 29773/2012 SLP(C) No. 29774/2012 SLP(C) No. 29775/2012 SLP(C) No. 29776/2012 SLP(C) No. 29782/2012 SLP(C) No. 31654/2012 SLP(C) No. 31655/2012 SLP(C) No. 31656/2012 SLP(C) No. 31657/2012 SLP(C) No. 31658/2012 SLP(C) No. 31659/2012 SLP(C) No. 31660/2012. 53 SLP(C) No. 31663/2012 SLP(C) No. 31664/2012 SLP(C) No. 31665/2012 SLP(C) No. 31666/2012 SLP(C) No. 31668/2012 SLP(C) No. 31669/2012 SLP(C) No. 31670/2012 SLP(C) No. 31671/2012 SLP(C) No. 31672/2012 SLP(C) No. 31673/2012 SLP(C) No. 31674/2012 SLP(C) No. 31676/2012 SLP(C) No. 31677/2012 SLP(C) No. 31679/2012 SLP(C) No. 3584/2013 SLP(C) No. 3585/2013 SLP(C) No. 3586/2013 SLP(C) No. 3587/2013 SLP(C) No. 3588/2013 SLP(C) No. 3589/2013 SLP(C) No. 3590/2013 SLP(C) No. 3591/2013 SLP(C) No. 3593/2013 SLP(C) No. 3594/2013 SLP(C) No. 3595/2013 SLP(C) No. 3596/2013 SLP(C) No. 3597/2013 SLP(C) No. 3598/2013 SLP(C) No. 3599/2013 SLP(C) No. 3600/2013 SLP(C) No. 3601/2013 SLP(C) No. 3602/2013 SLP(C) No. 3603/2013 SLP(C) No. 3604/2013 SLP(C) No. 3605/2013 SLP(C) No. 3606/2013 SLP(C) No. 3608/2013 SLP(C) No. 3609/2013 SLP(C) No. 3615/2013 SLP(C) No. 3618/2013 SLP(C) No. 3619/2013 SLP(C) No. 3622/2013 SLP(C) No. 3625/2013 SLP(C) No. 3626/2013 SLP(C) No. 3627/2013 SLP(C) No. 3628/2013 SLP(C) No. 3629/2013 SLP(C) No. 3630/2013

SLP(C) No. 3632/2013 SLP(C) No. 3633/2013. 54 SLP(C) No. 3634/2013 SLP(C) No. 3636/2013 SLP(C) No. 3637/2013 SLP(C) No. 3639/2013 SLP(C) No. 3640/2013 SLP(C) No. 3641/2013 SLP(C) No. 3642/2013 SLP(C) No. 3643/2013 SLP(C) No. 5199/2013 SLP(C) No. 5200/2013(With appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record and OfficeReport) SLP(C) No. 5201-5202/2013 SLP(C) No. 5203/2013 SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 SLP(C) No. 10702/2013 SLP(C) No. 10703/2013 SLP(C) No. 10704/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10706/2013 SLP(C) No. 10707/2013 SLP(C) No. 10708/2013 SLP(C) No. 10709/2013 SLP(C) No. 10710/2013 SLP(C) No. 10711/2013 SLP(C) No. 10712/2013 SLP(C) No. 10713/2013 SLP(C) No. 10714/2013 SLP(C) No. 10715/2013 SLP(C) No. 10716/2013 SLP(C) No. 10717/2013 SLP(C) No. 10718/2013 SLP(C) No. 10719/2013 SLP(C) No. 10720/2013 SLP(C) No. 10721/2013 SLP(C) No. 10722/2013 SLP(C) No. 10723/2013 SLP(C) No. 10724/2013 SLP(C) No. 10725/2013 SLP(C) No. 10726/2013 SLP(C) No. 10727/2013 SLP(C) No. 10728/2013 SLP(C) No. 10729/2013 SLP(C) No. 10731/2013 SLP(C) No. 10732/2013 SLP(C) No. 10733/2013 SLP(C) No. 10734/2013. 55 SLP(C) No. 10735/2013 SLP(C) No. 10736/2013 SLP(C) No. 10737/2013 SLP(C) No. 10738/2013 SLP(C) No. 10739/2013 SLP(C) No. 10740/2013 SLP(C) No. 10741/2013 SLP(C) No. 10742/2013 SLP(C) No. 10743/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 10745/2013 SLP(C) No. 10746/2013 SLP(C) No. 10747/2013 SLP(C) No. 10748/2013 SLP(C) No. 10749/2013 SLP(C) No. 10750/2013 SLP(C) No. 10751/2013 SLP(C) No. 10752/2013 SLP(C) No. 10753/2013 SLP(C) No. 10754/2013 SLP(C) No. 10755/2013 SLP(C) No. 10756/2013 SLP(C) No. 10757/2013 SLP(C) No. 10758/2013 SLP(C) No. 10759/2013 SLP(C) No. 10760/2013 SLP(C) No. 10761/2013 SLP(C) No. 10762/2013 SLP(C) No. 10763/2013 SLP(C) No. 10764/2013 SLP(C) No. 10765/2013 SLP(C) No. 10766/2013 SLP(C) No. 10767/2013 SLP(C) No. 10768/2013 SLP(C) No. 10769/2013 SLP(C) No. 10770/2013 SLP(C) No. 10772/2013 SLP(C) No. 10773/2013 SLP(C) No. 10774/2013 SLP(C) No. 10775/2013 SLP(C) No. 10776/2013 SLP(C) No. 10777/2013 SLP(C) No. 10778/2013 SLP(C) No. 10779/2013 SLP(C) No. 10780/2013 SLP(C) No. 10781/2013 SLP(C) No. 10782/2013 SLP(C) No. 10783/2013. 56 SLP(C) No. 10784/2013 SLP(C) No. 10785/2013 SLP(C) No. ..CC 12658/2013 SLP(C) No. 12684/2013 SLP(C) No. 12686/2013 SLP(C) No. 12688/2013 SLP(C) No. 12690/2013 SLP(C) No. 12693/2013 SLP(C) No. 12695/2013 SLP(C) No. 12697/2013 SLP(C) No. 12699/2013 SLP(C) No. 12700/2013 SLP(C) No. 12701/2013 SLP(C) No. 12702/2013 SLP(C) No. 12703/2013 SLP(C) No. 12706/2013 SLP(C) No. 12707/2013 SLP(C) No. 12710/2013 SLP(C) No. 12713/2013 SLP(C) No. 12714/2013 SLP(C) No. 12715/2013 SLP(C) No. 12716/2013 SLP(C) No. 12717/2013 SLP(C) No. 12718/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12721/2013 SLP(C) No. 12722/2013

SLP(C) No. 12724/2013 SLP(C) No. 12725/2013 SLP(C) No. 12726/2013 SLP(C) No. 12727/2013 SLP(C) No. 12728/2013 SLP(C) No. 12729/2013 SLP(C) No. 12730/2013 SLP(C) No. 12731/2013 SLP(C) No. 12732/2013 SLP(C) No. 12733/2013 SLP(C) No. 12734/2013 SLP(C) No. 12735/2013 SLP(C) No. 12736/2013 SLP(C) No. 12738/2013 SLP(C) No. 12739/2013 SLP(C) No. 12740/2013 SLP(C) No. 12741/2013 SLP(C) No. 12742/2013 SLP(C) No. 12743/2013 SLP(C) No. 12744/2013 SLP(C) No. 12745/2013 SLP(C) No. 12747/2013 SLP(C) No. 12748/2013. 57 SLP(C) No. 12749/2013 SLP(C) No. 12750/2013 SLP(C) No. 12751/2013 SLP(C) No. 12752/2013 SLP(C) No. 12753/2013 SLP(C) No. 12754/2013 SLP(C) No. 12755/2013 SLP(C) No. 12756/2013 SLP(C) No. 12757/2013 SLP(C) No. 12758/2013 SLP(C) No. 12759/2013 SLP(C) No. 12760/2013 SLP(C) No. 12762/2013 SLP(C) No. 12763/2013 SLP(C) No. 12764/2013 SLP(C) No. 12765/2013 SLP(C) No. 12766/2013 SLP(C) No. 12768/2013 SLP(C) No. 12769/2013 SLP(C) No. 12770/2013 SLP(C) No. 12771/2013 SLP(C) No. 12772/2013 SLP(C) No. 12773/2013 SLP(C) No. 12774/2013 SLP(C) No. 12775/2013 SLP(C) No. 12776/2013 SLP(C) No. 12777/2013 SLP(C) No. 17722/2013 SLP(C) No. 17724/2013 SLP(C) No. 17726/2013 SLP(C) No. 17728/2013 SLP(C) No. 17729/2013 SLP(C) No. 17730/2013 SLP(C) No. 17732/2013 SLP(C) No. 17733/2013 SLP(C) No. 17734/2013 SLP(C) No. 17735/2013 SLP(C) No. 17737/2013 SLP(C) No. 17739/2013 SLP(C) No. 17740/2013 SLP(C) No. 17742/2013 SLP(C) No. 17744/2013 SLP(C) No. 17745/2013

SLP(C) No. 17748/2013 SLP(C) No. 17749/2013 SLP(C) No. 17750/2013 SLP(C) No. 17751/2013 SLP(C) No. 17752/2013 SLP(C) No. 17753/2013 SLP(C) No. 17755/2013. 58 SLP(C) No. 17756/2013 SLP(C) No. 17758/2013 SLP(C) No. 17759/2013 SLP(C) No. 17761/2013 SLP(C) No. 17762/2013 SLP(C) No. 17763/2013 SLP(C) No. 17765/2013 SLP(C) No. 17766/2013 SLP(C) No. 17767/2013 SLP(C) No. 17768/2013 SLP(C) No. 17770/2013 SLP(C) No. 17771/2013 SLP(C) No. 17772/2013 SLP(C) No. 17773/2013 SLP(C) No. 17774/2013 SLP(C) No. 17777/2013 SLP(C) No. 17778/2013 SLP(C) No. 17779/2013 SLP(C) No. 17782/2013 SLP(C) No. 17785/2013 SLP(C) No. 17787/2013 SLP(C) No. 17790/2013 SLP(C) No. 17792/2013 SLP(C) No. 17793/2013 SLP(C) No. 17795/2013 SLP(C) No. 17798/2013 SLP(C) No. 17800/2013 SLP(C) No. 17801/2013 SLP(C) No. 17802/2013 SLP(C) No. 17804/2013 SLP(C) No. 17805/2013 SLP(C) No. 17806/2013 SLP(C) No. 17808/2013 SLP(C) No. 17810/2013 SLP(C) No. 17811/2013 SLP(C) No. 17812/2013 SLP(C) No. 17813/2013 SLP(C) No. 17814/2013 SLP(C) No. 17816/2013 SLP(C) No. 17817/2013 SLP(C) No. 17818/2013 SLP(C) No. 17819/2013 SLP(C) No. 17821-17823/2013 SLP(C) No. 17824/2013 SLP(C) No. 17825/2013 SLP(C) No. 17826-17828/2013 SLP(C) No. 17829/2013 SLP(C) No. 17830/2013 SLP(C) No. 24108/2013. 59 SLP(C) No. 24109/2013 SLP(C) No. 24110/2013 SLP(C) No. 24111/2013 SLP(C) No. 24112/2013 SLP(C) No. 24113/2013 SLP(C) No. 24114/2013 SLP(C) No. 24115/2013

SLP(C) No. 24116/2013 SLP(C) No. 24118/2013 SLP(C) No. 24119/2013 SLP(C) No. 24120/2013 SLP(C) No. 24121/2013 SLP(C) No. 24122/2013 SLP(C) No. 24123/2013 SLP(C) No. 24124/2013 SLP(C) No. 24125/2013 SLP(C) No. 24126/2013 SLP(C) No. 24127/2013 SLP(C) No. 24128/2013 SLP(C) No. 24129/2013 SLP(C) No. 24130/2013 SLP(C) No. 24131/2013 SLP(C) No. 24132/2013 SLP(C) No. 24133/2013 SLP(C) No. 24134/2013 SLP(C) No. 24135/2013 SLP(C) No. 24136/2013 SLP(C) No. 24137/2013 SLP(C) No. 24138/2013 SLP(C) No. 24139/2013 SLP(C) No. 24140/2013 SLP(C) No. 24141/2013 SLP(C) No. 24142/2013 SLP(C) No. 24143/2013 SLP(C) No. 24144/2013 SLP(C) No. 24145/2013 SLP(C) No. 24146/2013 SLP(C) No. 24147/2013 SLP(C) No. 24148/2013 SLP(C) No. 24149/2013 SLP(C) No. 24150/2013 SLP(C) No. 24151/2013 SLP(C) No. 24152/2013 SLP(C) No. 24153/2013 SLP(C) No. 24154/2013 SLP(C) No. 24155/2013 SLP(C) No. 24156/2013 SLP(C) No. 24157/2013 SLP(C) No. 24158/2013. 60 SLP(C) No. 24159/2013 SLP(C) No. 24160/2013 SLP(C) No. 24161/2013 SLP(C) No. 24162/2013 SLP(C) No. 24163/2013 SLP(C) No. 24164/2013 SLP(C) No. 24165/2013 SLP(C) No. 24166/2013 SLP(C) No. 24167/2013 SLP(C) No. 24168/2013 SLP(C) No. 24169/2013 SLP(C) No. 24170/2013 SLP(C) No. 24171/2013 SLP(C) No. 24172/2013 SLP(C) No. 24173/2013 SLP(C) No. 24174/2013 SLP(C) No. 24175/2013 SLP(C) No. 24178/2013 SLP(C) No. 24179/2013 SLP(C) No. 24180/2013 SLP(C) No. 24181/2013 SLP(C) No. 24182/2013 SLP(C) No. 24183/2013 SLP(C) No. 24184/2013

SLP(C) No. 24185/2013 SLP(C) No. 24187/2013 SLP(C) No. 24188/2013 SLP(C) No. 24189/2013 SLP(C) No. 24190/2013 SLP(C) No. 24191/2013 SLP(C) No. 24192/2013 SLP(C) No. 24193/2013 SLP(C) No. 24194/2013 SLP(C) No. 24195/2013 SLP(C) No. 24198/2013 SLP(C) No. 24199/2013 SLP(C) No. 24200/2013 SLP(C) No. 24201/2013 SLP(C) No. 24202/2013 SLP(C) No. 24203/2013 SLP(C) No. 24204/2013 SLP(C) No. 24205/2013 SLP(C) No. 24206/2013 SLP(C) No. 24207/2013 SLP(C) No. 24208/2013 SLP(C) No. 24209/2013 SLP(C) No. 24210/2013 SLP(C) No. 25467/2013 SLP(C) No. 25468/2013. 61 SLP(C) No. 25478/2013 SLP(C) No. 25480/2013 SLP(C) No. 25481/2013 SLP(C) No. 25482/2013 SLP(C) No. 25483/2013 SLP(C) No. 25484/2013 SLP(C) No. 25485/2013 SLP(C) No. 25486/2013 SLP(C) No. 25487/2013 SLP(C) No. 25488/2013 SLP(C) No. 25489/2013 SLP(C) No. 25490/2013 SLP(C) No. 25491/2013 SLP(C) No. 25492/2013 SLP(C) No. 25493/2013 SLP(C) No. 25494/2013 SLP(C) No. 25495/2013 SLP(C) No. 25497/2013 SLP(C) No. 25498/2013 SLP(C) No. 25499/2013 SLP(C) No. 25500/2013 SLP(C) No. 25501/2013 SLP(C) No. 25502/2013 SLP(C) No. 25503/2013 SLP(C) No. 25504/2013 SLP(C) No. 25505/2013 SLP(C) No. 25506/2013 SLP(C) No. 25507/2013 SLP(C) No. 25508/2013 SLP(C) No. 25509/2013 SLP(C) No. 25510/2013 SLP(C) No. 25511/2013 SLP(C) No. 25512/2013 SLP(C) No. 25513/2013 SLP(C) No. 25514/2013 SLP(C) No. 25515/2013 SLP(C) No. 25516/2013 SLP(C) No. 25517/2013 SLP(C) No. 25518/2013 SLP(C) No. 25520/2013 SLP(C) No. 25521/2013

SLP(C) No. 25522/2013 SLP(C) No. 25523/2013 SLP(C) No. 25524/2013 SLP(C) No. 25526/2013 SLP(C) No. 25527/2013 SLP(C) No. 25528/2013 SLP(C) No. 25529/2013 SLP(C) No. 25530/2013. 62 SLP(C) No. 25531/2013 SLP(C) No. 25532/2013 SLP(C) No. 25533/2013 SLP(C) No. 25534/2013 SLP(C) No. 25535/2013 SLP(C) No. 25536/2013 SLP(C) No. 25537/2013 SLP(C) No. 25538/2013 SLP(C) No. 25539/2013 SLP(C) No. 25540/2013 SLP(C) No. 25541/2013 SLP(C) No. 25542/2013 SLP(C) No. 25543/2013 SLP(C) No. 25544/2013 SLP(C) No. 25545/2013 SLP(C) No. 25546/2013 SLP(C) No. 25547/2013 SLP(C) No. 25548/2013 SLP(C) No. 25549/2013 SLP(C) No. 25550/2013 SLP(C) No. 28724/2013 SLP(C) No. 28726/2013 SLP(C) No. 28727/2013 SLP(C) No. 28728/2013 SLP(C) No. 28729/2013 SLP(C) No. 28730/2013 SLP(C) No. 28731/2013 SLP(C) No. 28732/2013 SLP(C) No. 28733/2013 SLP(C) No. 28734/2013 SLP(C) No. 28736/2013 SLP(C) No. 28737/2013 SLP(C) No. 30366/2013 SLP(C) No. 30367/2013 SLP(C) No. 30368/2013 SLP(C) No. 30369/2013 SLP(C) No. 30370/2013 SLP(C) No. 30371/2013 SLP(C) No. 30372/2013 SLP(C) No. 30373/2013 SLP(C) No. 30374/2013 SLP(C) No. 30375/2013 SLP(C) No. 30376/2013 SLP(C) No. 30377/2013 SLP(C) No. 30378/2013 SLP(C) No. 30379/2013 SLP(C) No. 30380/2013 SLP(C) No. 30381/2013 SLP(C) No. 30382/2013. 63 SLP(C) No. 30383/2013 SLP(C) No. 30384/2013 SLP(C) No. 30385/2013 SLP(C) No. 30386/2013 SLP(C) No. 30387/2013 SLP(C) No. 30388/2013

SLP(C) No. 30389/2013 SLP(C) No. 30390/2013 SLP(C) No. 30391/2013 SLP(C) No. 30392/2013 SLP(C) No. 30393/2013 SLP(C) No. 30394/2013 SLP(C) No. 30395/2013 SLP(C) No. 30396/2013 SLP(C) No. 30397/2013 SLP(C) No. 30398/2013 SLP(C) No. 30399/2013 SLP(C) No. 30400/2013 SLP(C) No. 30401/2013 SLP(C) No. 30402/2013 SLP(C) No. 30403/2013 SLP(C) No. 30404/2013 SLP(C) No. 30405/2013 SLP(C) No. 30406/2013 SLP(C) No. 30407/2013 SLP(C) No. 30408/2013 SLP(C) No. 30409/2013 SLP(C) No. 30410/2013 SLP(C) No. 30411/2013 SLP(C) No. 30412/2013 SLP(C) No. 30413/2013 SLP(C) No. 30414/2013 SLP(C) No. 30415/2013 SLP(C) No. 33288/2013 SLP(C) No. 33289/2013 SLP(C) No. 33290/2013 SLP(C) No. 33291/2013 SLP(C) No. 33292/2013 SLP(C) No. 33293/2013 SLP(C) No. 33294/2013 SLP(C) No. 33295/2013 SLP(C) No. 33296/2013 SLP(C) No. 33297/2013 SLP(C) No. 33298/2013 SLP(C) No. 33299/2013 SLP(C) No. 33300/2013 SLP(C) No. 33301/2013 SLP(C) No. 33302/2013 SLP(C) No. 33303/2013. 64 SLP(C) No. 33304/2013 SLP(C) No. 33305/2013 SLP(C) No. 33306/2013 SLP(C) No. 33307/2013 SLP(C) No. 33308/2013 SLP(C) No. 33309/2013 SLP(C) No. 33310/2013 SLP(C) No. 33312/2013 SLP(C) No. 33313/2013 SLP(C) No. 33314/2013 SLP(C) No. 33315/2013 SLP(C) No. 33316/2013 SLP(C) No. 33317/2013 SLP(C) No. 33319/2013 SLP(C) No. 33320/2013 SLP(C) No. 33321/2013 SLP(C) No. 33322/2013 SLP(C) No. 33323/2013 SLP(C) No. 33324/2013 SLP(C) No. 33325/2013 SLP(C) No. 33326/2013 SLP(C) No. 33327/2013 SLP(C) No. 33328/2013

SLP(C) No. 33329/2013 SLP(C) No. 33330/2013 SLP(C) No. 33331/2013 SLP(C) No. 33332/2013 SLP(C) No. 33333/2013 SLP(C) No. 33334/2013 SLP(C) No. 33335/2013 SLP(C) No. 33336/2013 SLP(C) No. 33337/2013 SLP(C) No. 33338/2013 SLP(C) No. 33339/2013 SLP(C) No. 33341/2013 SLP(C) No. 34562/2013 SLP(C) No. 34563/2013 SLP(C) No. 34564/2013 SLP(C) No. 34565/2013 SLP(C) No. 34566/2013 SLP(C) No. 34567/2013 SLP(C) No. 34568/2013 SLP(C) No. 34569/2013 SLP(C) No. 34570/2013 SLP(C) No. 34571/2013 SLP(C) No. 34572/2013 SLP(C) No. 34573/2013 SLP(C) No. 34574/2013 SLP(C) No. 34575/2013. 65 SLP(C) No. 34576/2013 SLP(C) No. 34577/2013 SLP(C) No. 34578/2013 SLP(C) No. 34579/2013 SLP(C) No. 34580/2013 SLP(C) No. 34581/2013 SLP(C) No. 34582/2013 SLP(C) No. 34583/2013 SLP(C) No. 34584/2013 SLP(C) No. 34585/2013 SLP(C) No. 34586/2013 SLP(C) No. 34587/2013 SLP(C) No. 34588/2013 SLP(C) No. 34589/2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) foru/s 340 c.p.c. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34590/2013 SLP(C) No. 34591/2013 SLP(C) No. 34592/2013 SLP(C) No. 34593/2013 SLP(C) No. 34594/2013 SLP(C) No. 34595/2013 SLP(C) No. 34596/2013 SLP(C) No. 34597/2013 SLP(C) No. 34598/2013 SLP(C) No. 34599/2013 SLP(C) No. 34600/2013 SLP(C) No. 34601/2013 SLP(C) No. 34602/2013 SLP(C) No. 34603/2013 SLP(C) No. 4064/2014 SLP(C) No. 4065/2014 SLP(C) No. 4066/2014 SLP(C) No. 4067/2014 SLP(C) No. 4068/2014 SLP(C) No. 4069/2014 SLP(C) No. 4070/2014 SLP(C) No. 4071/2014 SLP(C) No. 4072/2014

SLP(C) No. 4073/2014 SLP(C) No. 4074/2014 SLP(C) No. 4075/2014 SLP(C) No. 4081/2014 SLP(C) No. 4086/2014 SLP(C) No. 4087/2014 SLP(C) No. 4088/2014 SLP(C) No. 4089/2014 SLP(C) No. 4090/2014. 66 SLP(C) No. 4091/2014 SLP(C) No. 4092/2014 SLP(C) No. 4094/2014 SLP(C) No. 4095/2014 SLP(C) No. 4096/2014 SLP(C) No. 4097/2014 SLP(C) No. 4098/2014 SLP(C) No. 4099/2014 SLP(C) No. 4100/2014 SLP(C) No. 4101/2014 SLP(C) No. 4102/2014 SLP(C) No. 4103/2014 SLP(C) No. 4104/2014 SLP(C) No. 4105/2014 SLP(C) No. 4106/2014 SLP(C) No. 4107/2014 SLP(C) No. 4108/2014 SLP(C) No. 4109/2014 SLP(C) No. 4110/2014 SLP(C) No. 4111/2014 SLP(C) No. 4112/2014 SLP(C) No. 4113/2014 SLP(C) No. 4114/2014 SLP(C) No. 4115/2014 SLP(C) No. 4117/2014 SLP(C) No. 4118/2014 SLP(C) No. 4119/2014 SLP(C) No. 4120/2014 SLP(C) No. 4121/2014 SLP(C) No. 4122/2014 SLP(C) No. 4123/2014 SLP(C) No. 4124/2014 SLP(C) No. 4125/2014 SLP(C) No. 4126/2014 SLP(C) No. 4127/2014 SLP(C) No. 4128/2014 SLP(C) No. 4129/2014 SLP(C) No. 4150/2014 SLP(C) No. 4151/2014 SLP(C) No. 4152/2014 SLP(C) No. 4153/2014 SLP(C) No. 4154/2014 SLP(C) No. 4155/2014 SLP(C) No. 4156/2014 SLP(C) No. 4157/2014 SLP(C) No. 4158/2014 SLP(C) No. 4159/2014 SLP(C) No. 4164/2014 SLP(C) No. 4165/2014. 67 SLP(C) No. 4166/2014 SLP(C) No. 4167/2014 SLP(C) No. 4168/2014 SLP(C) No. 4169/2014 SLP(C) No. 4170/2014

SLP(C) No. 4172/2014 SLP(C) No. 4173/2014 SLP(C) No. 4176/2014 SLP(C) No. 4177/2014 SLP(C) No. 4178/2014 SLP(C) No. 4179/2014 SLP(C) No. 4180/2014 SLP(C) No. 4181/2014 SLP(C) No. 4182/2014 SLP(C) No. 4184/2014 SLP(C) No. 4185/2014 SLP(C) No. 4186/2014 SLP(C) No. 4187/2014 SLP(C) No. 4188/2014 SLP(C) No. 4189/2014 SLP(C) No. 4190/2014 SLP(C) No. 4191/2014 SLP(C) No. 4192/2014 SLP(C) No. 4193/2014 SLP(C) No. 4194/2014 SLP(C) No. 4197/2014 SLP(C) No. 4198/2014 SLP(C) No. 4199/2014 SLP(C) No. 4200/2014 SLP(C) No. 4201/2014 SLP(C) No. 4202/2014 SLP(C) No. 4203/2014 SLP(C) No. 4204/2014 SLP(C) No. 4205/2014 SLP(C) No. 4206/2014 SLP(C) No. 4207/2014 SLP(C) No. 4208/2014 SLP(C) No. 4209/2014 SLP(C) No. 4210/2014 SLP(C) No. 4211/2014 SLP(C) No. 4212/2014 SLP(C) No. 4213/2014 SLP(C) No. 4214/2014 SLP(C) No. 4215/2014 SLP(C) No. 4216/2014 SLP(C) No. 4217/2014 SLP(C) No. 4218/2014 SLP(C) No. 4219/2014 SLP(C) No. 4220/2014. 68 SLP(C) No. 4221/2014 SLP(C) No. 4222/2014 SLP(C) No. 4223/2014 SLP(C) No. 4224/2014 SLP(C) No. 4225/2014 SLP(C) No. 4226/2014 SLP(C) No. 4227/2014 SLP(C) No. 4228/2014 SLP(C) No. 4229/2014 SLP(C) No. 4230/2014 SLP(C) No. 4231/2014 SLP(C) No. 4232/2014 SLP(C) No. 4233/2014 SLP(C) No. 4234/2014 SLP(C) No. 4235/2014 SLP(C) No. 4236/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4237/2014 SLP(C) No. 4238/2014 SLP(C) No. 4239/2014 SLP(C) No. 4240/2014

SLP(C) No. 4241/2014 SLP(C) No. 4242/2014 SLP(C) No. 4243/2014 SLP(C) No. 4244/2014 SLP(C) No. 4245/2014 SLP(C) No. 4246/2014 SLP(C) No. 4247/2014 SLP(C) No. 4248/2014 SLP(C) No. 4249/2014 SLP(C) No. 4250/2014 SLP(C) No. 4252/2014 SLP(C) No. 4253/2014 SLP(C) No. 4280/2014 SLP(C) No. 4281/2014 SLP(C) No. 4282/2014 SLP(C) No. 4284/2014 SLP(C) No. 4285/2014 SLP(C) No. 4286/2014 SLP(C) No. 4287/2014 SLP(C) No. 4288/2014 SLP(C) No. 4289/2014 SLP(C) No. 4290/2014 SLP(C) No. 4291/2014 SLP(C) No. 4292/2014 SLP(C) No. 4293/2014 SLP(C) No. 4296/2014 SLP(C) No. 4297/2014. 69 SLP(C) No. 4298/2014 SLP(C) No. 4299/2014 SLP(C) No. 4303/2014 SLP(C) No. 4304/2014 SLP(C) No. 4305/2014 SLP(C) No. 4306/2014 SLP(C) No. 4307/2014 SLP(C) No. 4308/2014 SLP(C) No. 4309/2014 SLP(C) No. 4310/2014 SLP(C) No. 4311/2014 SLP(C) No. 4312/2014 SLP(C) No. 4313/2014 SLP(C) No. 4314/2014 SLP(C) No. 4315/2014 SLP(C) No. 4316/2014 SLP(C) No. 4317/2014 SLP(C) No. 4318/2014 SLP(C) No. 4319/2014 SLP(C) No. 4320/2014 SLP(C) No. 4321/2014 SLP(C) No. 4322/2014 SLP(C) No. 4323/2014 SLP(C) No. 4324/2014 SLP(C) No. 4325/2014 SLP(C) No. 4326/2014 SLP(C) No. 4327/2014 SLP(C) No. 4328/2014 SLP(C) No. 4329/2014 SLP(C) No. 4330/2014 SLP(C) No. 4331/2014 SLP(C) No. 4567/2014 SLP(C) No. 8682/2014SLP(C) No. 15635/2012(With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and interimrelief and office report)SLP(C) No. 17286/2012(With appln.(s) for stay and office report)

SLP(C) No. 17287/2012SLP(C) No. 17291/2012(With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents andoffice report)SLP(C) No. 17292/2012SLP(C) No. 17295/2012SLP(C) No. 17296/2012SLP(C)..CC No.9538/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport) 70SLP(C)..CC No.9605/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9610/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9614/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9708/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9855/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9953/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9962/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9983/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.9986/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)..CC No.10191/2013(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and officereport)SLP(C)No.37126/2012(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, permission to fileadditional documents and office report)SLP(C)No.15636/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report) 71SLP(C)No.17088-17096/2012(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution application,permission to file additional documents, substitution and officereport)WITH SLP(C)No.30969/2011

(With appln.(s) for impleading party and interim relief and officereport)SLP(C) No. 27508/2010. SLP(C) No. 33552-33556/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33984-33988/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36334-36340/2011(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 333/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1082-1083/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1104/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3776/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1664-1665/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1739/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 1858/2012(With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) forexemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2411/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2537/2012 SLP(C) No. 2557/2012(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) 72 SLP(C) No. 2603/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2607/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2612/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2639/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2798/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2820/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2873/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3242/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 3298/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3417/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3473/2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) forintervention and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3776/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3916/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 3918/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4021/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4024/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4223/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) 73 SLP(C) No. 4242/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4249/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4542/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4645/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4647/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4661/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4687/2012(With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates andappln.(s) for intervention and appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and OfficeReport) SLP(C) No. 5091/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5150/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5170/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5566/2012. SLP(C) No. 5712/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5959/2012

(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6013/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6027/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6121/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) 74 SLP(C) No. 6196/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6345/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6353/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6363/2012 SLP(C) No. 6368/2012 SLP(C) No. 6369/2012 SLP(C) No. 6458-6460/2012 SLP(C) No. 6466-6469/2012 SLP(C) No. 6489-6494/2012(With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for correction ofname of the petitioner and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting asidean abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitutionappln. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s)for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) forc/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) forsubstitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. andappln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6508/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6534-6535/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6539/2012(With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for exemption fromfiling O.T. and appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) forexemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for impleadment andappln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief andOffice Report) SLP(C) No. 6629/2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) forsetting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s)for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside anabatement and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln.and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and OfficeReport) 75 SLP(C) No. 6731-6732/2012(With appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) forc/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) forsubstitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. andappln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln.(s) for c/delayin filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and

appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief andOffice Report) SLP(C) No. 6748-6756/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6849/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7146/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7436/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7539/2012 SLP(C) No. 7540/2012 SLP(C) No. 7541/2012 SLP(C) No. 7542-7543/2012(With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) forexemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to submitadditional document(s) and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7815/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7934-7935/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8380/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8439/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8528/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8593/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8849/2012 76 SLP(C) No. 8851/2012 SLP(C) No. 8853-8855/2012 SLP(C) No. 9527/2012 SLP(C) No. 9678/2012 SLP(C) No. 9748/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 9761/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10052/2012(With appln.(s) for directions and Interim Relief and OfficeReport) SLP(C) No. 10056-10058/2012 SLP(C) No. 10315/2012 SLP(C) No. 10317/2012 SLP(C) No. 10597/2012 SLP(C) No. 11303/2012 SLP(C) No. 11304/2012 SLP(C) No. 11879/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 11993/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12299/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12461/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12844/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13641-13646/2012 SLP(C) No. 15173/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15905/2012 SLP(C) No. 16007/2012 SLP(C) No. 16336/2012(With appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16337/2012(With appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record and OfficeReport) 77 SLP(C) No. 16339-16341/2012 SLP(C) No. 16380/2012 SLP(C) No. 16674/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16695/2012 SLP(C) No. 16723/2012 SLP(C) No. 17041/2012 SLP(C) No. 18104/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19356/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 20540/2012 SLP(C) No. 22484/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 23446-23447/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 23722/2012 SLP(C) No. 23723/2012 SLP(C) No. 23724-23725/2012 SLP(C) No. 23750/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24203/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 24720/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 25551-25552/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 26874-26876/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27023/2012(With appln.(s) for permission to submit additional document(s)and Interim Relief and Office Report) 78 SLP(C) No. 27139/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27389-27396/2012 SLP(C) No. 27502-27507/2012 SLP(C) No. 28140/2012 SLP(C) No. 29279/2012(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30590/2012 SLP(C) No. 31675/2012 SLP(C) No. 32140/2012 SLP(C) No. 33860/2012 SLP(C) No. 37492/2012 SLP(C) No. 37493/2012 SLP(C) No. 37989/2012 SLP(C) No. 37993/2012 SLP(C) No. 38188-38193/2012 SLP(C) No. 38287/2012 SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 SLP(C) No. 38290/2012(With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 237-238/2013 In SLP(C) No. 1082-1083/2012 SLP(C) No. 3583/2013 SLP(C) No. 4383/2013 SLP(C) No. 8631/2013 SLP(C) No. 8635/2013 SLP(C) No. 8887/2013 SLP(C) No. 9168/2013. 79 SLP(C) No. 9297/2013 SLP(C) No. 11020/2013

(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12784/2013 SLP(C) No. 13017/2013 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13297-13302/2013(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16722-16723/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 17635/2013 SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 SLP(C) No. 18735/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18866/2013 SLP(C) No. 19200-19201/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19922/2013 SLP(C) No. 20326/2013 SLP(C) No. 20329/2013 SLP(C) No. 23276/2013 SLP(C) No. 23855-23856/2013 SLP(C) No. 23857-23858/2013(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 23859-23860/2013 SLP(C) No. 24622-24624/2013 SLP(C) No. 26176-26177/2013 SLP(C) No. 26178/2013 SLP(C) No. 26179/2013(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) 80 SLP(C) No. 26681-26682/2013 SLP(C) No. 26868/2013 SLP(C) No. 26890/2013 SLP(C) No. 30601/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30859/2013 SLP(C) No. 30860/2013 SLP(C) No. 30861/2013 SLP(C) No. 30862/2013 SLP(C) No. 32108/2013 SLP(C) No. 33980/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34176/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35109/2013

SLP(C) No. 35143/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 37793/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 39351/2013 SLP(C) No. 39697-39698/2013 SLP(C) No. 39699-39700/2013 SLP(C) No. 39701/2013 SLP(C) No. 39702-39703/2013(With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for directions andOffice Report) SLP(C) No. 802/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 2495/2014 SLP(C) No. 4566/2014 SLP(C) No. 5936-5937/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6024-6027/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report) 81 SLP(C) No. 6682/2014 SLP(C) No. 7017-7018/2014 SLP(C) No. 7019/2014 SLP(C) No. 7031/2014 SLP(C) No. 7036/2014 SLP(C) No. 10065/2014 SLP(C) No. 10147-10149/2014 SLP(C) No. 11737/2014 SLP(C) No. 13401/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14786/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 18356/2014 SLP(C) No. 19521/2014(With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19523/2014 SLP(C) No. 19525/2014 SLP(C) No. 19777/2014 CONMT.PET.(C) No. 444/2013 In SLP(C) No. 5566/2012

SLP(C) No. 25279/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 27102/2014(With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36391/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) forc/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36390/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) forc/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C)..CC No.21151/2014 82SLP(C)No. 36975/2013SLP(C)No. 9551/2014SLP(C)Nos. 10049-10050/2014SLP(C)Nos. 10051/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12434/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12435-12436/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12437/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12438/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12439/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12441/2014SLP(C)Nos. 12442/2014SLP(C) No. 12443/2014SLP(C) No. 13034/2014SLP(C) No. 14781/2014SLP(C) No. 22298-22299/2014SLP(C) No. 22329-22331/2014SLP(C) No. 22384-22385/2014SLP(C) No. 22716-22718/2014SLP(C) No. 36155-36156/2014SLP(C) No. 36436/2014SLP(C) No. 36644/2014SLP(C) No. 36647-36649/2014SLP(C) No. 12433/2014SLP(C) No. 36141/2014SLP(C) No. 32391/2014SLP(C) No. 23772/2014SLP(C) No. 26260/2014SLP(C) No. 17559/2014SLP(C) No. 36242/2014SLP(C) No. 29351/2014Contempt Petition No.7/2014 in SLP(C) No. 3242/2012Contempt Petition No.21/2015 in SLP(C) No.27023/2012SLP(C) No. 28167/2014SLP(C) No. 2057/2015SLP(C) No. 2055/2015SLP(C) No. 17686/2014C.A.No.2197 of 2013(With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents,prayer for interim relief and office report)C.A.No.2195 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)C.A.No.2198 of 2013(With appln.(s) for discharge of advocate on record, prayer forinterim relief and office report) 83C.A.No.2199 of 2013

C.A.No.2225 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)C.A.No.2226 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)C.A.No.2704 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)C.A.No.2705 of 2013C.A.Nos.2729-2730 of 2013C.A.No.3022/2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)C.A.No.4902 of 2014(With apln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)C.A.No.4928 of 2014(With apln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 03/02/2015 These petitions/appeals were called on forhearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor the Parties : Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kedarnath Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Nagendra Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashank Samru, Adv. Mr. Aakash Kumar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shital Khatri, Adv. Mr. Rajsh Goyal, Adv. 84Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv.Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv.Mr. Chinmoy Khaladkar, Adv.Mr. B.K. Pal, Adv.Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv.Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv.Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Sr. Adv.Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv.Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.Mr. A.A. Chaudhary, Adv.Mr. Alex Joseph, Adv.Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv.Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv.

For M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co.Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv.Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv.Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Adv.Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati, Adv.Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv.Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv.Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv.Mr. Punit Yadav, Adv.Mr. R.K. Adsure, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv.Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, Adv.Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv.Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv.Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv.Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv.Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv.Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv.Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv.Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. B.P. Gupta, Adv.Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv.Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv.Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv. 85Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv.Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Adv.Mr. Wajeeh Shah, Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Tyagi, Adv.Mr. Prabhat K. Rai, Adv.Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv.Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Mr. Birendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.Mr. Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv.Mr. Rovin Babu, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Ms. Rishu Mishra, Adv.Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv.Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv.Mr. B.Y. Kulkarni, Adv.Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv.Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv.

Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv.Ms. A.N. Singh, Adv.Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv.Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv.Mr. V.P. Singh, Adv.Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv.Mr. Anshul Narayan, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. 86Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv.Mr. Giridhar G. Upadhyay, Adv.Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv.Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv.Mr. Dinesh K. Garg, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv.Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv.Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv.Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv.Mr. Kumar Mihir, Adv.Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Adv.Mr. Maneesh Arora, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv.Mr. Arjun Bhandari, Adv.Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv.Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv.Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.Mr. Dharm Singh, Adv.Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv.Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Adv.Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv.Dr. Surat Singh, Adv.Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv.Dr. Surat Singh, Adv.Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Adv.Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. 87

Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv.Mr. Vikal Mudgal, Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv.Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv.Mr. Prabal Bagchi, Adv.Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv.Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv.Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv.Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv.Md. Shahd Anwar, Adv.Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv.Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv.Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv.Ms. Shirin Zaidi, Adv.Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, Adv.Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv.Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv.Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv.Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.Ms. Nikhar Berry, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Krishna, Adv.Mr. Ranvir Singh, Adv.Mr. Ravi Nanda, Adv.Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv.Ms. Priya Sahadeo, Adv.Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv.Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Adv.Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Adv.Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv.Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv.Mr. Sumit R. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Puneet Taneja, Adv.Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. 88Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv.Mr. Zaki Khan, Adv.Mohd. Farhan Khan, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Adv.Ms. K.V. Bharathi Upadhaya, Adv.Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv.Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.

Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv.Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv.Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv.Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv.Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv.Mr. Jai Singh, Adv.Mr. Rana S. Biswas, Adv.Mr. Sunil Kr. Sharma, Adv.Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. Sunando Raha, Adv.Mr. Ankit Goel, Adv.Mr. Devender Kumar Goel, Adv.Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. Amrendra Saran, Sr. Adv.Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv.Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv.Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv.Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. 89Mr. Mohit Bakshi, Adv.Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv.Ms. Reena Singh, AAG, U.P.Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv.Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Sumit Bansal, Adv.Mr. Ateev Mathur, Adv.Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Adv.Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.Mr. Atul Bandhu, Adv.Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv.Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv.Ms. Anuradha D. Misra, Adv.Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Adv.For M/s. Anuradha & Associates.Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv.Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv.Mr. Amiet Andlay, Adv.Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv.

Mr. Mukul Kumar, Adv.Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv.Ms. Sheeba Khan, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Pradeep Verma, Adv.Mr. Himanshu, Adv.Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv.Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv.Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv. 90Mr. S.K. Sinha, Adv.Mr. Tanmay Nagar, Adv.Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv.Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv.Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.Mr. J.M. Sharma, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv.Ms. Shikha Beri, Adv.Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv.Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pulkit Manuja, Adv.Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv.For Col. P.S. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv.Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv.Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv.Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv.Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv.Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv.Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv.Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv.Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv.Mr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, Adv.For M/s. Lawyers Knit & Co.Mr. Zaki Ahmad Khan, Adv.Md. Shahid Anwar, Adv.Mr. Farhan Khan, Adv.Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv.Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv.Mr. Kamlesh Mishra, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. H.P. Sahu, Adv.Mr. Shivkant Mishra, Adv.

Mr. V.K. Sidharthan, Adv.Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv. 91Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv.Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Amit Pawan, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu, Adv.Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv.Mr. Suryodaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv.Mr. Sudhakar Prasad Tiwari,Adv.Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv.Ms. Meenakshi, Adv.Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Adv.Mr. Harshivir Pratap Sharma, Adv.Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.Mr. Sanchit Garg, Adv.Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pulkit, Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv.Ms. Shikha Beari, Adv.Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv.Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv.Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv.Mr. Sandeep Singh Rawal, Adv.Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv.Ms. S. Chauhan, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv.Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.Mr. Y.D. Nagar, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kr. Khanna, Sr. Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv.Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Adv.Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. 92Mr. Jetendra Singh, Adv.Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv.Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv.

Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv.Mr. Dushyant Bhati, Adv.Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv.Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv.Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv.Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv.Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.Mr. Gaurav Singh, Adv.Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv.Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.Mr. R.Chandrachud, Adv.Mr. Rajnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Sansriti Pathak, Adv.Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv.Mr. Sudhir Kulshrestha, Adv.Ms. Sushma Singh, Adv.Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv.Mr. P.C. Sharma, Adv.Ms. S. Usha Reddy, Adv. 93Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv.Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv.Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv.Mr. Braham Singh, Adv.Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv.Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Adv.Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv.Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv.Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv.Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Navanak Shekhar Mishra, Adv.Mr. Mayank Singh Chauhan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv.Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv.Mr. Amit Shukla, Adv.Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv.Mr. Rushi Khan, Adv.Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv.Mr. Anil Kaushik, Adv.Mr. B.S. Billowria, Adv.Mr. Rajinder Singh, Adv.Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.For M/s. A.P.& J. Chambers.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv.Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. 94Mr. Ajai K. Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Sagar Bansal, Adv.Mr. J.K. Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv.Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv.Ms. Akriti Gupta, Adv.Mr. Satendra Kumar, Adv.Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv.Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv.Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv.Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv.Mr. Sonal Jain, Adv.Mr. Sachin Naagar, Adv.Mr. Rajiv M. Brahma, Adv.Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv.Dr. Satish Chandra, Adv.Mr. Abhiuday Chandra, Adv.Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv.Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv.Ms. Vaishali R., Adv.Ms. Neelam Jain, Adv.Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv.Mr. Devavrat Anand, Adv.Mr. Krishan Kumar R.S., Adv.Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv.Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv.Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv.Ms. Mansi Ajamani, Adv.Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv.Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv.Ms. Nanita Sharma, Adv.Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Ajay Narain Mathur, Adv.Ms. Niranjana Singh, Adv.Mr. Ram Bhaj, Adv. 95Ms. Arti Singh,Adv.Ms. Namita Choudhary,Adv.Mr. Rabin Majumder,Adv.Ms. Mahua Kalra,Adv.Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif,Adv.Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv.Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,Adv.Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kr. Lakhanpal,Adv.Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv.Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv.Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv.Mr. Ghan Shyam Vasisht,Adv.Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Rajan,Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv.Ms. S. Usha Reddy,Adv.Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv.Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv.Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv.Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. 96Mr. Sumit Attri, Adv.Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv.Ms. Rekha Pandey,Adv.Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari,Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.Ms. Anu Gupta,Adv.

Mr. Pramod Dayal,Adv.Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv.Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv.Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv.Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain,Adv.Mr. Rajesh Goyal,Adv.Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv.Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv.Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv.Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.Ms. Aditi Gupta,Adv.Mr. Aftab Ali Khan,Adv.Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. 97 Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Saravesh Singh Baghel, Adv. Mr. Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, Adv. Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RMATTERS FILED BY THE AUTHORITY: The Special Leave Petitions as also the Civil Appeals aredisposed of, in terms of the signed order. 98S.L.P.(C)Nos.11020 of 2013 and 35143 of 2013: De-link and list separately.MATTERS FILED BY INDIVIDUALS:S.L.P.(C)No.30969/2011, 27508/2010, 33552-33556/2011,33984-33988/2011, 36334-36340/2011, 333/2012, 1082-1083/2012,1104/2012, 1554/2012, 1664-1665/2012, 1739/2012, 1858/2012,2411/2012, 2537/2012, 2557/2012, 2603/2012, 2607/2012, 2612/2012,2873/2012, 3298/2012, 3473/2012, 3776/2012, 3916/2012, 3918/2012,4021/2012, 4024/2012, 4223/2012, 4242/2012, 4249/2012, 4542/2012,5566/2012, 5712/2012, 5959/2012, 6013/2012, 6027/2012, 6121/2012,6196/2012, 6345/2012, 6353/2012, 6363/2012, 6368/2012, 6369/2012,6466-6469/2012, 6489-6494/2012, 6508/2012, 6534-6535/2012,6539/2012, 6629/2012, 6731-6732/2012, 6748-6756/2012, 6849/2012,7146/2012, 7436/2012, 7539/2012, 7540/2012, 7541/2012, 7815/2012,7934-7935/2012, 8380/2012, 8439/2012, 8528/2012, 8593/2012,8849/2012, 8851/2012, 8853-8855/2012, 9527/2012, 9678/2012,9748/2012, 9761/2012, 10052/2012, 10056-10058/2012, 10315/2012,10597/2012, 11303/2012, 11304/2012, 11879/2012, 11993/2012,12299/2012, 12461/2012, 12844/2012, 13641-13646/2012, 15173/2012,15905/2012, 16007/2012, 16336/2012, 16337/2012, 16380/2012,17041/2012, 18104/2012, 19356/2012, SLP(C)../2012 CC 20540,SLP(C)No.23723/2012, 23724-23725/2012, 24203/2012, 24720/2012,25551-25552/2012, 26874-26876/2012, 27023/2012, 27139/2012,27389-27396/2012, 27502-27507/202, 28140/2012, 29279/201,33860/2012, 37492/2012, 37989/2012, 37993/2012, 38288/2012,38289/2012, 38290/2012, CON.PET.(C)Nos.237-238/2013 inSLP(C)Nos.1082-1083/2012, 4383/2013, 8631/2013, 8635/2013,8887/2013, 9168/2013, 9297/2013, 12784/2013, 13017/2013,SLP(C).../2013 CC Nos.13297-13302, SLP(C)Nos.16722-16723/2013,17635/2013, 18090/2013, 18735/2013, 18866/2013, 19200-19201/2013,19922/2013, 20329/2013, 23276/2013, 23857-23858/2013,23859-23860/2013, 24622-24624/2013, 26176-26177/2013, 26178/2013,26179/2013, 26681-26682/2013, 26868/2013, 26890/2013, 30601/2013,30859/2013, 30860/2013, 30861/2013, 30862/2013, 32108/2013,33980/2013, 34176/2013, 35109/2013, 37793/2013, 39351/2013,39697-39698/2013, 39699-39700/2013, 39701/2013, 39702-39703/2013,802/2014, 2495/2014, 4566/2014, 5936-5937/2014, 6024-6027/2014,6682/2014, 7019/2014, 7031/2014, 7036/2014, 10065/2014,10147-10149/2014, 11737/2014, 13401/2014, 14786/2014, 12443/2014,13034/2014, 22298-22299/2014, 22329-22331/2014, 22384-22385/2014,22716-22718/2014, 36155-36156/2014, 36436/2014, 36647-36649/2014,

12433/2014, 32391/2014, 23772/2014, 26260/2014, 17559/2014,36242/2013, 29351/2014, 18356/2014, 19521/2014, 19523/2014,19525/2014, 19777/2014, Con.Pet.(C)No.444/2013 inSLP(C)NO.5566/2012, 25279/2013, 27102/2014, 36391/2014,36390/2014, SLP(C).../2013 CC 21151, SLP(C)No.36975/2013, 999551/2014, 10049-10050/2014, 10051/2014, 12434/2014,12435-12436/2014, 12437/2014, 12438/2014, 12439/2014, 12441/2014,12442/2014, Con.Pet.(C)No.21/2015 in SLP(C)No.27023/2012,SLP(C)No.28167/2014, 2057/2015, 17686/2014, 37126/2012,15636/2012, 17088-17096/2012, C.A.No.2195/2013, 2198/2013,2199/2013, 2225/2013,2226/2013, 2704/2013, 2705/2013,2729-2730/2013, 3022/2013, 4902/2014 AND WITH C.A.No.4928/2014: Arguments heard. Judgment reserved in all matters exceptSLP(C)Nos.30969/2011, 1104/2012, 1858/2012, 2411/2014, 2612/2012,2820/2012, 6489-6494/2012, 19521/2014 and C.A.No.2198/2013,2729-2730/2013.S.L.P.(C)No.10317/2012, 2639/2012, 38287/2012, 38188-18193/2012,2798/2012, 3417/2012, 4645/2012, 4647/2012, 4661/2012, 5091/2012,3242/2012, 4687/2012, 37493/2012, 16339-16341/2012, 4383/2013,14781/2014, 36644/2014, 36141/2014, 31675/2012, 6458-6460/2012,20326/2013, CC 13297-13302/2013, 5150/2012, 5170/2012, 23750/2012,23722/2012, 7542-7543/2012, 30590/2012, 16674/2012, 16695/2012,16723/2012, 23446-23447/2012, 32140/2012, 22484/2012, 2820/2012,7017-7018/2014, 1554/12, 3776/12, 3917/12, 6508/12, 6849/122055/2015 and Cont.Pet.(c)No.7/2014 in SLP(C)No.3242/2012: Disposed of as withdrawn, in terms of the signed order. List SLP(C)Nos.30969/2011, 1104/2012, 1858/2012,2411/2014, 2612/2012, 2820/2012, 6489-6494/2012, 19521/2014 andC.A.No.2198/2013, 2729-2730/2013 on 4th February, 2015.(G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi)AR-cum-PS AR-cumPS Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)---------------------------------------------------ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIS.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011S.L.P.(C) No.1104 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.1858 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2411 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2612 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2820 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.6489-6494 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.19521 of 2014C.A. No.2198 of 2013C.A. Nos. 2729-2730 of 2013 100Date : 04/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

For Appellant(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Singh, Adv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Sharma, aDv. Mr. Sushant Sarkar, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, sr. Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr.Y.D.Nagar, Adv. Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Adv. Ms.Shefali Jain, Adv. 101 Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babli, Adv. Ms. Risu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nikhilesh Bhargava, adv. Mr.S.C.Maheshwari, Sr.Adv. Ms.Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr.M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Mr.Sanjay Krishna, Adv. Ms.Nihar B., Adv. Mr.Jabar Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Ms.Reena Singh, Adv.

Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.V. Rao, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr.D.N.Goburdhun, Adv. Mr.Prabal Bagchi, Adv. O R D E RS.L.P.(C) No.2820 of 2012: Learned counsel appearing for the respective 102petitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court towithdraw their respective Special Leave Petition(s) with libertyto file appropriate review petition(s) before the High Court. Permission sought for is granted. The Special Leave Petition(s) is/are disposed of aswithdrawn with liberty to file appropriate review petition(s)before the High Court within 30 days' time from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this Order. If and when such review petition(s) is/are filed, werequest the High Court to decide the same without reference to theperiod of limitation.I.A.No.3 of 2015 in S.L.P.(C)NO.1858/2012: Dr.Rajeev Dhavan, learned senior counsel for theapplicant(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court towithdraw the I.A.No.3 of 2015 with liberty to agitate hisgrievance before an appropriate forum for appropriate relief(s). Permission sought for is granted. I.A.No.3 of 2015 is disposed of as withdrawn with libertyto agitate his grievance before an appropriate forum forappropriate relief(s). Taken on board S.L.P.(C)No.2875 of 2014. Arguments Heard.(G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi)Court Master Court Master Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar--------------------------------------------------

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIS.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011S.L.P.(C) No.1104 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.1858 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2411 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2612 of 2012 103S.L.P.(C) No.6489-6494 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.19521 of 2014C.A. No.2198 of 2013C.A. Nos. 2729-2730 of 2013Date : 05/02/2015 These petitions/appeals were called on forhearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Appellant(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Singh, Adv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Sharma, aDv. Mr. Sushant Sarkar, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, sr. Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. P.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. 104 Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Aditya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Surya Kant, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv.

Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babli, Adv. Ms. Risu Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nikhilesh Bhargava, adv. Mr.Mahabir Singh, Sr.Adv. Dr.B.K.Jauhari, Adv. Ms.Purnima Jauhari, Adv. Mr.Suresh Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Ms.Reena Singh, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.V. Rao, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr.D.N.Goburdhun, Adv. Mr.Prabal Bagchi, Adv. Mr.Vimal Chandra S.Dave, Adv. Ms.Neelam Kalsi, Adv. ORDERCIVIL APPEAL NOS.2729-2730 OF 2013: The Civil Appeals are disposed of, in terms of the signed 105order. Arguments heard.(G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi)Court Master Court Master Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar(Signed order in C.A.Nos.2729-2730 of 2013 is placed on the file)------------------------------------------------------------------ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIS.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011S.L.P.(C) No.1104 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.1858 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2411 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.2612 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.6489-6494 of 2012S.L.P.(C) No.19521 of 2014C.A. No.2198 of 2013

Date : 10/02/2015 These petitions/appeals were called on forhearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Appellant(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Madhvi Sharma, aDv. Mr. Bal Krishan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Sarkar, Adv. Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr.Aditya Vikram, Adv. Ms.Aditi Gupta, Adv. Mr.Brahm S.Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. Dr.Rajeev Dhavan, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sudhir Nagar, Adv. Mr.Mohit Singh, Adv. 106Mr.Ankur Prakash, Adv.Ms.Piyush Singh, Adv.Mr.Aditya P., Adv.Ms.Priyanka Singh, Adv.Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv.Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv.Mr.Amit Gupta, Adv.Mr.Sarwa Mitter, Adv.For M/s.Mitter & Mitter Co.,Advs.Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv.Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv.Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv.Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv.Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv.Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pulkit, Adv.Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv.Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv.Mr. P.S. Sharma, Adv.Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna, Sr.Adv.Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.Ms.Shefali Jain, Adv.Mr.Rakesh K.Khanna,Sr.Adv.Mr.Y.D.Nagar, Adv.Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.Ms.Shefali Jain, Adv.Mr. Surya Kant, Adv.Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv.

Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.Mr. Rovin Babli, Adv.Ms. Risu Mishra, Adv.Mr.Rovin Babu, Adv.Dr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr.Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.Dr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv.Mr.Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. 107 Mr.Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nikhilesh Bhargava, adv. Dr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Manish Tiwari, Adv. Dr.Surat Singh, Adv. Mr.Sudhanshu Palo, Adv. Mr.Brajesh Kr.Singh, Adv. Mr.Arun Kr.Panwar, Adv. Mr.Ashok Sharma, Adv. Mr.Nikhilesh Bhargava, Adv. Ms.Anjali Bhargava, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Ms.Reena Singh, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.Chandrachud, Adv. Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. Ms.Sansriti Pathak, Adv. Mr.Utkarsh Kulvi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.V. Rao, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv.For Intervenor Mr.Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv. Mr.Adarsh Aggarwal, Adv. Mr.Wazih S., Adv. Mr.D.N.Guburdhun,Adv. Mr.Prabal Bagchi, Adv. 108 O R D E R Arguments concluded. Judgment reserved.(G.V.Ramana) (Charanjeet Kaur) (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi)

Court Master Court Master Sr.P.A. Asstt.Registrar 109 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2729-2730 OF 2013M/S.GANGA CERAMICS PVT. LTD. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R1. These appeals are directed against the finaljudgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicatureat Allahabad in C.M.W.P. No.36918 of 2008 and C.M.W.P.No.255773 of 2009, dated 04.09.2009.2. Shri Mahabir Singh, learned senior counsel forthe appellant, at the time of hearing of these appeals,would restrict his submissions to a smaller issue, namelythat the representation dated 26.06.2010 filed by theappellant-herein pursuant to the public notice issued bythe respondent-authority has not been considered despiteof a long lapse of time. Therefore the learned seniorcounsel for the appellant would make a request to this 110Court to direct the respondent-authorities to considerthe said representation, in accordance with law.3. Shri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for therespondent-authorities would submit that the saidrepresentation so filed by the appellant, if notconsidered already, would be considered in four months'time.4. Taking into consideration the submission so madeby learned counsel for the respondent-authorities, wedirect the respondent-authorities to consider the saidrepresentation filed by the appellant in accordance with

law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, withinfour months' time from today.5. Till the said representation is duly consideredby the respondent-authorities in accordance with law, thestatus quo, ordered by this Court, by order dated05.07.2010, shall continue.6. We clarify that during the pendency of theconsideration of the said representation, the partiesshall not alienate, transfer and create any third party 111rights with respect to the subject matter of theseappeals.7. In view of the above, we dispose of these CivilAppeals. Ordered accordingly. ................CJI. (H.L. DATTU) ..................J. (A.K. SIKRI) ..................J. (ARUN MISHRA)NEW DELHI;FEBRUARY 05, 2015

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Ajmani, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 4. Issue notice to unserved respondents within one week. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. This matter is connected with a batch of petitions pending in this Court. Tag this matter with SLP(C) No.30969 of 2011 and list on 3 rd February, 2015. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ê ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Ajmani, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 4. Issue notice to unserved respondents within one week. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. This matter is connected with a batch of petitions pending in this Court. Tag this matter with SLP(C) No.30969 of 2011 andSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by list on 3rd February, 2015.Sanjay KumarDate: 2015.01.2410:48:22 ISTReason: (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...CC No.259/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/05/2012 in WC No. 15998/2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) RANBIR SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U P AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 322/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Adv. Mr. Mohit Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. List these special leave petitions on 3 rd February, 2015 along with a batch of NOIDA matters. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Vinod Kulvi) Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12443/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/04/2013 in CMWP No. 18579/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) DHANPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Virendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr.Kamrendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2/2014 is to be heard along with the main matter(s). (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3-4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 39702-39703/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46776/2011,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46775/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) AMRESH KUMAR & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Virendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr.Kamrendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.Nos.3-4/2014 are to be heard along with the main mater(s). (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19521/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52027/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) UMESH KUMAR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Virendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr.Kamrendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2/2014 is to be heard along with the main matter(s). (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

SECTION XI                                           LISTED ON:  16.01.2015        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                 Court No.         1         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                           Item No.          16 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for Directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 12443 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF DHANPAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “The name of respondent No. 4 is deleted from the array of  parties at the risk of the petitioners in SLP (c) No. 9551 of 2014. Notice. Tag with SLP (c) No. 30969 of 2011.  ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the three Respondents on 16.05.2014 through registered A.D. Post. Neither A.D card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back in respect of all the Respondents. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 27.11.2014 filed Application for Directions and the same has been registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 2. It is further submitted that SLP (c) No. 30969/2011 alongwith connected matters of NOIDA group are going to be listed on 20.01.2015. The Application for directions  is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 14 th  day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                           LISTED ON: 16.01.2015        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                 Court No.       1                  CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                          Item No.        18       INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 19521 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF UMESH KUMAR & ANR. ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 30969 of 2011.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the four Respondents through standing counsel for the State of U.P. and Vakalatnama and memo of appearance is awaited. It is submitted that SLP (c) No. 30969 of 2011 alongwith other NOIDA land matter are to be listed on 20.01.2015 before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that Dr. Rajeev Sharma, counsel for the petitioner has on 02.12.2014 filed application for directions and the same has been registered as I.A No. 2.   The application for direction is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 15 th  day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 16.01.2015        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA        Court No.         1         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                Item No.          11             INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3­4 (Application for Directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 39702­03 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AMRESH KUMAR & ANR. ETC. ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC.      ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The SLP above mentioned alongwith connected matters were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.11.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Counsel for the petitioners prays for deletion of proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 88. Prayer for deletion is allowed. Deletion in all these matters be carried out within four weeks. Issue notice returnable after six weeks. It will be open for the petitioners to file additional affidavits. To be  placed along with SLP (c) No. 30969/2011.” There are 88 Respondents in SLP (c) No, 39702/2013 and 47 Respondents in SLP(c) 39703/2013. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are common in both the matters. Respondent Nos. 4 to 88 in SLP 39702/2013 have been deleted vide Court's Order dated 19.11.2013 but no orders of deletion have been passed in respect of Proforma Respondent Nos. 4 to 47 in SLP No. 39703/2013. Accordingly, Cause Title has been amended and circulated to the Hon'ble Court. It is submitted that show cause notiece was issued to common Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 through registered Post A.D. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 but no counter affidavit has been filed. Service of show cause notice is awaited in respect of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 27.01.2014 filed additional affidavit. (copy enclosed)

­2­ It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 28.11.2014 filed application for directions in SLP No. 39702 and 39703 of 2013. The said application are registered as I.A Nos. 3 and 4.  The Applications in the matter above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 15 th  day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                         LISTED ON:  16.01.2015         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                Court No.           1          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                         Item No.           31 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1     & 2 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. CC..322 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SUSHIL KUMAR BANSAL & ANR. ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ­C No. 49916 of 2009. It is submitted that there is a delay of 232 days in filing and 39 days in refiling the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition No. (cc) 259 of 2015 and the instant matter arising out of common Judgment have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 14 th  day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON:  16.01.2015         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                Court No.          1          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                         Item No.           31 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. CC..259 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAMBIR SINGH AND ORS. ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 14.05.2012 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ­C No. 15998 of 2008. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (c) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of common followed Judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011, when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is listed alongwith Batch (Noida Matters) before the Hon'ble Court on 20.01.2015. (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 is enclosed herewith) It is submitted that there is a delay of 842 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 14 th  day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. F.S. Chauhan, Advocate                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

ITEM NO.809 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30969/2011 etc.etc. (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 62649/2008 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16/01/2015 These petitions were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.L.N.Rao, Sr.Adv.(Mentioned by) Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested by learned senior counsel for the respondent(s), list the matters on 3 rd February, 2015. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar NOTE : These matters are stated to be listed on 20.01.2015.

Ê ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3-4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 39702-39703/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46776/2011,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46775/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) AMRESH KUMAR & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Virendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr.Kamrendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.Nos.3-4/2014 are to be heard along with the main mater(s). (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.01.1712:23:31 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.809 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30969/2011 etc.etc. (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 62649/2008 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16/01/2015 These petitions were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.L.N.Rao, Sr.Adv.(Mentioned by) Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested by learned senior counsel for the respondent(s), list the matters on 3rd February, 2015. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar NOTE : These matters are stated to be listed on 20.01.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.01.1712:23:54 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...CC No.259/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/05/2012 in WC No. 15998/2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) RANBIR SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U P AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 322/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Adv. Mr. Mohit Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. List these special leave petitions on 3rd February, 2015 along with a batch of NOIDASignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIA matters.Date: 2015.01.1712:58:32 ISTReason: (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar

¶ ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12443/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/04/2013 in CMWP No. 18579/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) DHANPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Virendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr.Kamrendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2/2014 is to be heard along with the main matter(s). (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.01.1712:23:40 ISTReason:

( ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19521/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52027/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) UMESH KUMAR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 16/01/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Ms.Rishu Mishra, Adv. Mr.Virendra Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr.Kamrendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2/2014 is to be heard along with the main matter(s). (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi)Signature Not Verified Court MasterDigitally signed by Asstt.RegistrarRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.01.1712:23:58 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief and office report) Date : 09/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is adjourned for two weeks to enable the State to verify the contents of the affidavit filed by the petitioner. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

â ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief and office report) Date : 09/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is adjourned for two weeks to enable the State to verify the contents of the affidavit filed by the petitioner.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.01.0917:09:57 IST (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR)Reason: COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014, I.A. No. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6539/2012 RAJE & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment) Date : 05/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.L.Gautam,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Objections not filed. I.A. for impleadment is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (Renu Diwan) Court Master

t ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014, I.A. No. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6539/2012 RAJE & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment) Date : 05/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.L.Gautam,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Objections not filed. I.A. for impleadment is allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly. (SUMAN WADHWA) (Renu Diwan) AR-cum-PS Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2015.01.0710:30:06 ISTReason:

[Corrected copy] ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief and office report) Date : 18/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Aarti S., Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some time to verify the contents of the affidavit. List the matter on 09.01.2015. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                 LISTED ON :  18.12.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA        COURT NO. : 10         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                ITEM NO.    : 35 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 28167 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF   FIRERAM & ORS.     ...PETITIONER(S)        VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS .   ...RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07.11.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Learned counsel for the petitioners should file an affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners (ii) the area of subject lands (iii) the date on which the writ petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the writ petitions. List the matter thereafter.” It is submitted that pursuant to the above order of the Hon'ble Court, the Counsel for the Petitioner has on 10.11.2014 filed additional affidavit and the same is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 17 th  day of December, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Dr. Vipin Gupta, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

b [Corrected copy] ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief and office report) Date : 18/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Aarti S., Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some time to verify the contents of the affidavit. List the matter on 09.01.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.01.0710:14:42 ISTReason: (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

0 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 38290/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/02/2012 in CMWP No. 7660/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for withdrawal of SLP on behalf of petitioner no. 5 and office report) Date : 15/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rachit Mittal, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R For the reasons stated in I.A. No. 3 of 2014, special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn on behalf of petitioner No. 5. Cause-title be amended accordingly.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPardeep Kumar (RAJESH DHAM)Date: 2014.12.1817:15:52 SASTReason: (PARDEEP KUMAR) COURT MASTER AR-cum-PS

ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4087/2014 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAKASH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4089/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4090/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4091/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4092/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4094/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4095/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4096/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4097/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4098/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4099/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4100/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4101/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4103/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4104/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4105/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 11/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.

Item No.46 -2- For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sumit Attri, Adv. Mr. Mridula Ray Bhardwaj, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Files not received. List again on 29.1.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

N ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4087/2014 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAKASH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4089/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4090/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4091/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4092/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4094/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4095/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4096/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4097/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4098/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4099/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4100/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4101/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4103/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4104/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4105/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 11/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.12.1617:47:57 ISTReason: For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.Item No.46 -2-For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Sumit Attri, Adv. Mr. Mridula Ray Bhardwaj, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Files not received. List again on 29.1.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30969/2011 SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4065/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4066/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4067/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4068/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4069/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4070/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4071/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4072/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4073/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4074/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4075/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4081/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4086/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4088/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 09/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.

-2- Item No.14 For Petitioner(s) Mr Balkrishan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi,Adv. Mr Gudipati G Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr Gudipati G Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO. 30969/2011 Deleted REMAINING MATTERS Files not received. List again on 29.1.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30969/2011 SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 4065/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4066/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4067/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4068/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4069/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4070/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4071/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4072/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4073/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4074/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4075/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4081/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4086/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4088/2014 (With Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.12.1216:47:49 ISTReason: Date : 09/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. -2-Item No.14For Petitioner(s) Mr Balkrishan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi,Adv. Mr Gudipati G Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr Gudipati G Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO. 30969/2011 DeletedREMAINING MATTERS Files not received. List again on 29.1.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12461/2012 SURESH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 08/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. G.G. Kashyap, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Defects in application for intervention have not been cured despite giving reasonable time. Hence, the same is rejected on default. List the petition before Bench. (VINOD KUMAR) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 In Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009, CMWP No. 65544/2009,CMWP No. 68487/2009 dated 14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012, RA No. 2591/2012, RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further directions and with office report) Date : 08/12/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. For Respondent(s) M r. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gudipati G Kashyap, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter dated 05.12.2014. List the matter after six weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                                        LISTED ON:   08.12.2014         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                 Court No.       1         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                      Item No.         10 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 7 to 12 (Application for Directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 38188­38193 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SURTEY ETC. ETC.   ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Application above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.11.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Perused letter dated 07.11.2014. List the matter after three weeks.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit in I.A Nos. 7 to 12. Service of Show Cause Notice on the application is complete on the Respondents. The application above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 5 th  day of December, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1.Mr. D. K. Garg, Adv.   2. Mr. Ravindra Kr. , Adv.                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

¦ ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 In Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009, CMWP No. 65544/2009,CMWP No. 68487/2009 dated 14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012, RA No. 2591/2012, RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further directions and with office report) Date : 08/12/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Gudipati G Kashyap, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter dated 05.12.2014. List the matter after six weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.12.0817:37:35 ISTReason:

j ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12461/2012 SURESH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 08/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. G.G. Kashyap, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Defects in application for intervention have not been cured despite giving reasonable time. Hence, the same is rejected on default. List the petition before Bench. (VINOD KUMAR) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2014.12.1311:36:21 ISTReason:

1 ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32391/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/11/2014 in WC No. 58594/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) PRATAP SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T., prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 05/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yatish Mohan, Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No.16337 of 2012. Until further orders, the houses on the subject land, tube-well shall not be demolished nor the petitioners shall be forcibly dis-possessed if they are in actual physical possession of the subject land, tube-well. ...2/-

2 It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land(s) if they are not in actual physical possession. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Vinod Kulvi) Assistant Registrar

SECTION XI                      LISTED ON: 05.12.2014                  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA     COURT NO.   1                        CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION       ITEM NO.      52 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 32391 OF 2014 PRATAP SINGH & ORS.                                                                   ...PETITIONER(S)      VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.            ..RESPONDENT(S)     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 05.11.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ C. No. 58594 of 2014. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 16337 of 2012 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.03.2013 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (Copy of order dated 18.03.2013 marked as Annexure P­7 at page no. 78). (Main matter is SLP (C) No. 30969 of 2011). It is further submitted that the C.A.No. 1331 of 2010 referred to as Annexure P­5 was allowed by the Hon'ble Court on 01.02.2010 (Copy of order dated 01.02.2010 marked as Annexure P­5 at page nos. 68­70). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report Dated this the  03 rd  day of December, 2014.               ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1 Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SK

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11879/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/12/2011 in CMWP No. 74342/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAJ PAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for stay/status quo and office report) Date : 05/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sushant K.Yadav, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr.Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List I.A.No.2/2014 along with the main matter. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.79 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 7/2014 In SLP(C) No. 3242/2012 PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMA RAMAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date :05/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Ms. Nikhar Berry, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Pleadings are complete. List for hearing on a non-miscellaneous day. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

j ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11879/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/12/2011 in CMWP No. 74342/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAJ PAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for stay/status quo and office report) Date : 05/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sushant K.Yadav, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr.Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List I.A.No.2/2014 along with the main matter. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.12.0516:52:13 ISTReason:

1 ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32391/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/11/2014 in WC No. 58594/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) PRATAP SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T., prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 05/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yatish Mohan, Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No.16337 of 2012. Until further orders, the houses on the subject land, tube-well shall not be demolished nor the petitioners shall be forciblySignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIADate: 2014.12.0817:18:56 IST dis-possessed if they are in actual physicalReason: possession of the subject land, tube-well. ...2/- 2 It is made clear that under the garb ofthis order, the petitioners will not try toforcibly enter into the subject land(s) if theyare not in actual physical possession.

(Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 8/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).7542-7543/2012 SARJEET & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for deletion of the name of petitioner and office report) Date : 04/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Application filed for deletion of name of petitioner no. 11 from the array of parties in SLP (Civil) No. 7543 of 2012 is ordered. The cause title be amended accordingly. (NIDHI AHUJA) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 & I.A. No. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6539/2012 RAJE & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment) Date : 04/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for respondent No.3 prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file objections to the impleadment application. List after two weeks. Respondent No.3 is allowed to file counter affidavit also in the meantime. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS (COURT MASTER)

äITEM NO.4 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 8/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).7542-7543/2012SARJEET & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for deletion of the name of petitioner and office report)Date : 04/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Application filed for deletion of name of petitioner no. 11 from the array of parties in SLP (Civil) No. 7543 of 2012 is ordered. The cause title be amended accordingly. (NIDHI AHUJA) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

j ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 & I.A. No. 4/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6539/2012 RAJE & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment) Date : 04/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for respondent No.3 prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file objections to the impleadment application. List after two weeks. Respondent No.3 is allowed to file counter affidavit also in the meantime. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS (COURT MASTER)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byUsha Rani BhardwajDate: 2014.12.0516:08:46 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.15 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12461/2012 (Against the judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 46764 of 2011 passed by the High Court of Allahabad) SURESH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 03/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Even after the second call, none appeared for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents are present. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to the next sitting. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (MINAKSHI MEHTA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12844/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/12/2011 in CMWP No. 74349/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SHYAM SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for interim stay/status quo and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sushant K.Yadav, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr.Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2 of 2014 to be heard along with the main matter. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

\214 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12844/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/12/2011 in CMWP No. 74349/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SHYAM SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for interim stay/status quo and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sushant K.Yadav, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr.Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2 of 2014 to be heard along with the main matter. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.12.0116:32:16 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27023/2012 SHREECHAND(DEAD) BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 27139/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28140/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 28/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atif Suhrawardy, Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.27023/2012 Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the respondents for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) Nos.27139 and 28140/2012 Time is extended for taking fresh steps, which is pending from January, 2014, as last opportunity for serving the process on respondent Nos.1 to 3. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for respondent No.4 for filing counter affidavit. List again on 3.2.2015. (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27023/2012 SHREECHAND(DEAD) BY LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 27139/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28140/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 28/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atif Suhrawardy, Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.27023/2012 Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the respondents for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) Nos.27139 and 28140/2012 Time is extended for taking fresh steps, which is pending from January, 2014, as last opportunity for serving the process on respondent Nos.1 to 3.Signature Not Verified Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for respondent No.4 for filing counter affidavit.Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.12.0317:40:29 IST List again on 3.2.2015.Reason: (DR. K. ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16336/2012 KUDIYA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For impleadment and office report) Date: 20/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv. For Applicant(s) Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Somya Budholia, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applicant was one of the proforma respondents. However, this Court by Order dated 23-4-2012 had allowed the application for seeking deletion of proforma respondents Nos. 8 to 42. By means of the present application, the applicant wants to be impleaded as a petitioner. If the applicant so wants, he may file an application for intervention. The present application for impleadment is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. I.A. No.3 of 2014 is disposed of. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\222 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16336/2012 KUDIYA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For impleadment and office report) Date: 20/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv. For Applicant(s) Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Somya Budholia, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applicant was one of the proforma respondents. However, this Court by Order dated 23-4-2012 had allowed the application for seeking deletion of proforma respondents Nos. 8 to 42. By means of the present application, the applicant wants to be impleaded as a petitioner. If the applicant so wants, he may file an application for intervention. The present application for impleadment is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. I.A. No.3 of 2014 is disposed of.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVishal AnandDate: 2014.11.2122:36:34 ISTReason: (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5566/2012 RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 9678/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 (With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4064/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5936-5937/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6024-6027/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7017-7018/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7019/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7031/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7036/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10065/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10147-10149/2014 (With Office Report)

-2- Item No.23 Date : 19/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. M/s. Ap & J Chambers,Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv. Mr Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. Mr Shivpati B Pandey, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr Arvind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.5566/2012 Deleted. SLP(C) NO.9678/2012 Despite Registrar's Court order, fresh steps not taken. Time is extended for taking steps against unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide copies of pleadings to counsel for respondent No.3 in the meanwhile. SLP(C) NO.38288/2012 The ld. counsel for the petitioner to file proof of service of pleadings as directed earlier, as last opportunity.

-3- Item No.23 SLP(C) NO.38289/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide copies of pleadings to the counsel for respondent No.3. So far as respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, office to verify and file proper report. SLP(C) NO.38290/2012 As the counsel for the petitioner reports that they are likely to take steps for withdrawal as well as to move appropriate application for withdrawal. SLP(C) NO.8678/2013 There are four respondents. Office to verify about the factum of service, if any, for the respondents as counsel for the petitioner claims that service got effected. SLP(C) NO.9168/2013 There are two respondents. Service of respondent NO.2 got completed. Four weeks time is extended for filing counter affidavit. However, as the notice attempted on respondent no.1 is still awaited, await. SLP(C) NO.18090/2013 There are two respondents. Despite last opportunity given spare copies not filed. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.

-4- Item No.23 SLP(C) NO.30601/2013 There are eight respondents. Service of respondent Nos. 1 to 3,5 and 8 is still incomplete for want of service by dasti. As requested, time is extended by four weeks. SLP(C) NO.4064,5936-37,6024-27,7017-18,7019,7031,10147-49 of 2014 Fresh steps be taken. Time is extended by four weeks for serving process on the unserved respondents. SLP(C) NO.7036, 10065 of 2014 Steps not taken despite last chance. However, time is extended by four weeks. Registry to rectify the database so as to disclose correctly the name of the ld. Counsel, Mr Ravindra Kumar. List again on 22.1.2015. (DR. K.ARUL) Registrar

\220) ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5566/2012 RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 9678/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 (With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4064/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5936-5937/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6024-6027/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7017-7018/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7019/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7031/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7036/2014Signature Not Verified (With Office Report)Digitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.11.22 SLP(C) No. 10065/201410:56:45 ISTReason: (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10147-10149/2014 (With Office Report) -2-Item No.23Date : 19/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. M/s. Ap & J Chambers,Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv. Mr Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. Mr Shivpati B Pandey, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr Arvind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.5566/2012 Deleted.SLP(C) NO.9678/2012 Despite Registrar's Court order, fresh steps not taken.Time is extended for taking steps against unserved respondentNos. 1 and 2. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide copies ofpleadings to counsel for respondent No.3 in the meanwhile.SLP(C) NO.38288/2012 The ld. counsel for the petitioner to file proof ofservice of pleadings as directed earlier, as lastopportunity. -3-Item No.23SLP(C) NO.38289/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to provide copies ofpleadings to the counsel for respondent No.3. So far as respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, officeto verify and file proper report.SLP(C) NO.38290/2012 As the counsel for the petitioner reports that they arelikely to take steps for withdrawal as well as to move

appropriate application for withdrawal.SLP(C) NO.8678/2013 There are four respondents. Office to verify about the factum of service, if any,for the respondents as counsel for the petitioner claims thatservice got effected.SLP(C) NO.9168/2013 There are two respondents. Service of respondent NO.2 got completed. Four weekstime is extended for filing counter affidavit. However, as the notice attempted on respondent no.1 isstill awaited, await.SLP(C) NO.18090/2013 There are two respondents. Despite last opportunity given spare copies not filed. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers. -4-Item No.23SLP(C) NO.30601/2013 There are eight respondents. Service of respondent Nos. 1 to 3,5 and 8 is stillincomplete for want of service by dasti. As requested, timeis extended by four weeks.SLP(C) NO.4064,5936-37,6024-27,7017-18,7019,7031,10147-49 of2014 Fresh steps be taken. Time is extended by four weeks forserving process on the unserved respondents.SLP(C) NO.7036, 10065 of 2014 Steps not taken despite last chance. However, time isextended by four weeks. Registry to rectify the database so as to disclosecorrectly the name of the ld. Counsel, Mr Ravindra Kumar. List again on 22.1.2015.

(DR. K.ARUL) Registrar

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 6/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4687/2012 HARI SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 14/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply, if any, to I.A. No. 6 be filed within four weeks' time. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17686/2014 AVDHESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kashyap Gudipali, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of the learned counsel for respondent No.4 is appearing in the Cause List but as per the office report, service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 to 3 and office to check and submit report in respect of respondent No.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner to supply the complete set of the pleadings to the learned counsel for respondent No.4 within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks of receipt of the complete set of the pleadings. List again on 22.1.2015. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

4 ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17686/2014 AVDHESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kashyap Gudipali, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of the learned counsel for respondent No.4 is appearing in the Cause List but as per the office report, service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 to 3 and office to check and submit report in respect of respondent No.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner to supply the complete set of the pleadings to the learned counsel for respondent No.4 within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks of receipt of the complete set of the pleadings.Signature Not Verified List again on 22.1.2015.Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.11.1510:35:09 ISTReason: (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 in Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009, CMWP No. 65544/2009, CMWP No. 68487/2009 and dated 14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012, RA No. 2591/2012, RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further direction and office report) Date : 10/11/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter dated 07.11.2014. List the matter after three weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ITEM NO.57 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.25279/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/04/2013 in CWP No. 22794/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 10/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with S.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011. If the petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land(s), it will not be forcibly dispossessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land(s), if it is not in actual physical possession. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (H.S. Parasher) Court Master

Ô ITEM NO.57 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.25279/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/04/2013 in CWP No. 22794/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 10/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with S.L.P.(C) No.30969 of 2011. If the petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land(s), it will not be forcibly dispossessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into theSignature Not Verified subject land(s), if it is not in actual physical possession.Digitally signed byChetan KumarDate: 2014.11.1217:13:22 ISTReason: (Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

& ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 in Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009, CMWP No. 65544/2009, CMWP No. 68487/2009 and dated 14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012, RA No. 2591/2012, RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further direction and office report) Date : 10/11/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused letter dated 07.11.2014. List the matter after three weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.11.1017:13:52 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No(s).28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. Document and interim relief) Date : 07/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Aarti Shakalya, Adv. For Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners should file an affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners (ii) the area of subject lands (iii) the date on which the writ petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the writ petitions. List the matter thereafter. (R.NATARAJAN) (JASWINDER KAUR) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief) Date : 03/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 7.11.2014. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

Ä ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28167/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2014 in WC No. 33767/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) FIRERAM AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief) Date : 03/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 7.11.2014. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2014.11.0316:38:53 SASTReason:

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 38290/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/02/2012 in CMWP No. 7660/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for withdrawal of SLP on behalf of petitioner No. 5 and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. (not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. (not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the parties. List I.A. No. 3 after one week. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (H.S. PARASHER) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

À ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 38290/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/02/2012 in CMWP No. 7660/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for withdrawal of SLP on behalf of petitioner No. 5 and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv. (not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. (not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the parties. List I.A. No. 3 after one week. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (H.S. PARASHER) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2014.11.0316:37:52 SASTReason:

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No. 16616/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/11/2013 in WC No. 61065/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) JAGGI AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date :27/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Adv. Mr. KKL Gautam, Adv. MR. Nitin Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion of pro forma respondents is allowed. The names of pro forma respondents are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Delay condoned. Application for substitution of legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 3 is allowed. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                                LISTED ON : 27.10.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA       Court No.    :  1         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.      : 27 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition)   IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC NO. 16616 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.    (Application for deletion of proforma respondent) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.    (Application for substitution bringing the LRs. of deceased on record) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.    (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing Substitution)    JAGGI & ORS.          ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.            ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 08.11.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ­C No. 61065 of 2013. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (c) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of relied upon judgment of High Court was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 enclosed) It is further submitted that there is a delay of 208 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has filed application for substitution of deceased petitioner no. 3 alongwith application for condonation of delay in filing the substitution as there is a delay of 150 days in filing the same. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 16 th  day of October, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:     Ms. Rekha Pandey , Advocate vg ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 7/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4249/2012 ( Arising out of final judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 37119 of 2011) AJIT SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 27/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Ms. Prasena Eliabth Joseph, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Adv. for M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co,Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 7 of 2014 is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No. 16616/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/11/2013 in WC No. 61065/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) JAGGI AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date :27/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Adv. Mr. KKL Gautam, Adv. MR. Nitin Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion of pro forma respondents is allowed. The names of pro forma respondents are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Delay condoned. Application for substitution of legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 3 is allowed.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Notice.Charanjeet KaurDate: 2014.10.2717:05:57 ISTReason: Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

² ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 7/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4249/2012 ( Arising out of final judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 37119 of 2011) AJIT SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 27/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Ms. Prasena Eliabth Joseph, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Adv. for M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co,Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by I.A. No. 7 of 2014 is dismissed.Charanjeet KaurDate: 2014.10.2717:05:46 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :14/10/2014 COURT No. :2 ITEM No.  :9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 30381 of 2013 (With Prayer for Interim­Relief) Damodar Valley Corp. & Ors. ... Petitioners Versus BKB Transport Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.   ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ho'ble Court alongwith connected matters on 9/09/2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “Heard. Ms. Shipra Ghose, learned  counsel for the petitioner­Damodar Valley Corporation in SLP(C) No. 30381 of 2011, prays for and is permitted to retire. Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, learned  counsel who appears for the petitioner­corporation in the connected matters, is directed to take notice and file his vakalatanama on behalf of the petitioners­Corporation in SLP(C) No. 30381 of 2011 within two weeks. Post after two weeks.” It is submitted that Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Advocate has on 13/10/2014 filed Vakalatnama & memo of appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 13 th  day of October, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Ms. Shipra Ghose, Advocate Mr. Partha Sil, Advocate Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Advocate Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advocate Mr. Vijay Panjwani, Advocate Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate Assistant Registrar

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :14/10/2014 COURT No. :2 ITEM No.  :9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 30381 of 2013 (With Prayer for Interim­Relief) Damodar Valley Corp. & Ors. ... Petitioners Versus BKB Transport Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.   ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ho'ble Court alongwith connected matters on 9/09/2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “Heard. Ms. Shipra Ghose, learned  counsel for the petitioner­Damodar Valley Corporation in SLP(C) No. 30381 of 2011, prays for and is permitted to retire. Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, learned  counsel who appears for the petitioner­corporation in the connected matters, is directed to take notice and file his vakalatanama on behalf of the petitioners­Corporation in SLP(C) No. 30381 of 2011 within two weeks. Post after two weeks.” It is submitted that Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Advocate has on 13/10/2014 filed Vakalatnama & memo of appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 13 th  day of October, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Ms. Shipra Ghose, Advocate Mr. Partha Sil, Advocate Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Advocate Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advocate Mr. Vijay Panjwani, Advocate Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25279/2013 CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 10/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite last opportunity granted by the Registrar's Court on 7.8.2014, counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

| ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25279/2013 CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 10/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite last opportunity granted by the Registrar's Court on 7.8.2014, counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.10.1417:05:40 ISTReason: (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6363/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in W.P. No. 33597 of 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad at Lucknow) SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For direction and office report) Date : 08/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms . Tulika Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ameet Singh, Adv. Dr. Sandeep singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 3 of 2014 is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                                           Listed On : 08.10.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA       Court No. :  1         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.   :  4 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 & 4 (Application for direction and for Impleadment) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6363 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SANGITA GUPTA & ORS.   ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.               ...RESPONDENT(s)                OFFICE REPORT The applications above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.09.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Reply to applications be filed in four weeks' time finally.   List thereafter.”   It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent No. 8  (Noida Authority) has on 11.09.2014 filed reply to I.A. No. 3 and the same has been  included in the SLP Paper Book. Service of show cause notice is complete. The applications above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report. Dated this the 16 th  day of September, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Tulika Prakash, Advocate                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                           Listed On : 08.10.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA       Court No. :  1         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.   :  4 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 & 4 (Application for direction and for Impleadment) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6363 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SANGITA GUPTA & ORS.   ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.               ...RESPONDENT(s)                OFFICE REPORT The applications above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.09.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Reply to applications be filed in four weeks' time finally.   List thereafter.”   It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent No. 8  (Noida Authority) has on 11.09.2014 filed reply to I.A. No. 3 and the same has been  included in the SLP Paper Book. Service of show cause notice is complete. The applications above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report. Dated this the 16 th  day of September, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Tulika Prakash, Advocate                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6363/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in W.P. No. 33597 of 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad at Lucknow) SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For direction and office report) Date : 08/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ameet Singh, Adv. Dr. Sandeep singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 3 of 2014 is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.10.0917:04:51 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 65544/2009,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 68487/2009,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2591/2012,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for further directions and office report) Date : 22/09/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter dated 22.09.2014. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, call the matter after six weeks. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

1 ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...CC No(s). 10742/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46021/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 22/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Tiwary, Adv. Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Amit Srivastav, Adv. For Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the special leave petition is condoned. Although compensation has been received by the petitioner for compulsory acquisition for land but as certain matters having same features have been

2 entertained by this Court and notice have been issued therein, hence issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent, waives service for respondent No.2. Notice be now issued and served on unrepresented respondents. Since possession has already been taken over and compensation has been given, prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with special leave petition(C) No.30969 of 2011. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Renu Diwan) Court Master

Ô 1 ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)...CC No(s). 10742/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46021/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 22/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Tiwary, Adv. Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Amit Srivastav, Adv. For Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the special leave petition is condoned.Signature Not Verified Although compensation has been received by theDigitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIADate: 2014.09.2411:28:19 ISTReason: petitioner for compulsory acquisition for land but as certain matters having same features have been 2entertained by this Court and notice have beenissued therein, hence issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel forrespondent, waives service for respondent No.2. Notice be now issued and served onunrepresented respondents. Since possession has already been taken overand compensation has been given, prayer for interim

relief is rejected. Connect with special leave petition(C)No.30969 of 2011. (Neetu Khajuria) (Renu Diwan) Sr.P.A. Court Master

\216 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 65544/2009,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 68487/2009,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2591/2012,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for further directions and office report) Date : 22/09/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter dated 22.09.2014. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, call the matter after six weeks. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi)Signature Not Verified Court MasterDigitally signed by Asstt.RegistrarRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.09.2313:00:11 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 7 & 8 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7146/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 33957/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SUDHA RANI CHAUHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for permission to file appln. for modification/clarification and appln. for clarification/modification and office report) Date : 15/09/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms.______,Adv.(appearance not given) for Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ameet Siingh, Adv. Ms.Alka Sinha, Adv. For Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Three week's time is granted for filing the reply, if any to the I.A.s. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No. 15029/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2014 in CMWP No. 3586/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) FOOLWATI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date :15/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lalit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Satender Singh, adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 15.09.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             Court No.     : 2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     Item No.       : 27 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO.  CC.. 15029 OF 2014  WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. FOOLWATI DEVI            ...PETITIONER(s)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.            ...RESPONDENT(s)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the  Judgment and Order dated 07.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in C.M.W.P. No. 3586 of 2012. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (c) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 enclosed). It is submitted that there is a delay of 38 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report.  Dated this the 12 th  day of September, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vs

J ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No. 15029/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2014 in CMWP No. 3586/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) FOOLWATI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date :15/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lalit Kumar,Adv. Mr. Satender Singh, adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.09.1517:04:24 ISTReason:

¬ ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 7 & 8 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7146/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 33957/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SUDHA RANI CHAUHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for permission to file appln. for modification/clarification and appln. for clarification/modification and office report) Date : 15/09/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms.______,Adv.(appearance not given) for Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ameet Siingh, Adv. Ms.Alka Sinha, Adv. For Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified Three week's time is granted for filing the reply, if anyDigitally signed by to the I.A.s.Ramana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.09.1611:14:10 ISTReason: (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6849/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in WC No.50756/2009 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for direction and office report) Date : 12/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply affidavit, if any, be filed in a week's time finally. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON : 12.09.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      COURT NO :     2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         ITEM NO.     :     6     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                                   RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22.08.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Reply to I.A. No. 5 of 2014 be filed within two weeks' time. List thereafter.” It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent No. 4  (Noida Authority) has not filed reply so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 1 to 3  (State of U.P.).  The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with  office report. Dated this the 10 th  day of September, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR          vs

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 22.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      COURT NO:     2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         ITEM NO:          4     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                             RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Reply to I.A. No. 5 be filed within three weeks'  time finally. List thereafter.” It is submitted that counsel for the Respondent No. 3 (Noida Authority) has  not filed reply so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 1 to 3.  The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with  office report. Dated this the 20 th  day of August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 25.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      COURT NO:    2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         ITEM NO:          5     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                             RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.03.2012 when the following Order was passed: “Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2012 in  SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012 is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) [page No. 445 of the paper book]. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record of the petitioner within two weeks from today. Delay condoned in SLP(C.)..... [ CC 4634­4636/2012 ]. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, wavies service for the respondent – Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the un­represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 by Registered A.D. Post. Respondent No.4 is represented through Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate but no Counter Affidavit has been filed. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back from Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed an Application for direction and the same is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 5. The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with office report. Dated this the 16 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                        Before Hon'ble Chamber        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA    Judge         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION            INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for deletion of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 15) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                             RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.03.2012 when the following Order was passed: “Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2012 in  SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012 is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) [page No. 445 of the paper book]. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record of the petitioner within two weeks from today. Delay condoned in SLP(C.)..... [ CC 4634­4636/2012 ]. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, wavies service for the respondent – Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the un­represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.” It is submitted that  counsel for the petitioner  has filed an application for deletion of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 15 and the same is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber with this report. Dated this the 20 th  day of July, 2012. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                LISTED ON:20.04.2012        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA           COURT NO: 6             CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               ITEM NO:     22   PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 9859 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF M/s Bharat Nirman Co. & Anr   ...Petitioners   VERSUS Brij Bhushan & Ors.                ...Respondents                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 30.11.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CR  No. 542 of 2011. It is submitted that Mr. Jatinder Kr. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner has filed a letter dated 21.03.2012 (copy included as Page No. 61 of the  Special Leave Petition ). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 18 th  day of April, 2012. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr.  Jatinder Kr. Bhatia, Advocate        Mr. Arun Kr. Sinha, Advocate                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON:  16.04.2012        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA       Court No.      9         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.        54 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 2782 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NAGAR PANCHAYAT, BUDHANA   ...PETITIONER   VERSUS MOHD. AARIF & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 03.02.2012 when the following Order was passed:        “Issue notice.”   It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Mr. Ashutosh Garg, Advocate has on 13.03.2012 filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance alongwith counter affidavit on behalf of all the respondents and the same is being circulated for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court with this report. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 13 th  day of April, 2011.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate        Mr. Ashutosh Garg, Adv.                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rs

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15173/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 39966/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MAHARSHI VED VIHYAN VIDHYAPEETH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) I.A.No.2 (Appln.for impleadment) Date : 12/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms.Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. for M/s. Ap & J Chambers,Advs. For Respondent(s) Mr.Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr.Adv. Mr.Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2: Notice. I.A.No.1 : List the matter after disposal of R.P.(C)No.1428 of 2014 titled Rajendra Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

\234 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6849/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in WC No.50756/2009 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for direction and office report) Date : 12/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply affidavit, if any, be filed in a week's time finally. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.09.1215:56:27 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15173/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 39966/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MAHARSHI VED VIHYAN VIDHYAPEETH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) I.A.No.2 (Appln.for impleadment) Date : 12/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms.Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. for M/s. Ap & J Chambers,Advs. For Respondent(s) Mr.Basava Prabhu Patil, Sr.Adv. Mr.Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2: Notice. I.A.No.1:Signature Not Verified List the matter after disposal of R.P.(C)No.1428 of 2014Digitally signed by titled Rajendra Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Ramana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.09.1215:56:43 ISTReason: (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 in Petition) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23722/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46904/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For direction and office report) Date : 08/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. M r. Gopal Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. M r. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 3 of 2014 is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ô ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 in Petition) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23722/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46904/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For direction and office report) Date : 08/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 3 of 2014 is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.09.0817:22:41 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17686/2014 AVDHESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 05/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service report is awaited in respect of all the respondents. List again on 11.11.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17686/2014 AVDHESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 05/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service report is awaited in respect of all the respondents. List again on 11.11.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.09.0817:05:25 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6363/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in W.P. No. 33597 of 2010 passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad, at Lucknow) SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (fFr direction and office report) Date : 01/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply to the application be filed in four weeks' time finally. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

¤ ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6363/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in W.P. No. 33597 of 2010 passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad, at Lucknow) SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (fFr direction and office report) Date : 01/09/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply to the application be filed in four weeks' time finally. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.09.0117:13:48 ISTReason:

1 ITEM NOS.21+47 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 13416/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/04/2014 in CRLA No. 627/2000,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 45084/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) ADESH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13728/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13862/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 14027/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22298-22299/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22329-22331/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22384-22385/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22716-22718/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) AND WITH SLP(C)....CC NO.14311/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 29/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami ,Adv. Mr.Jabar Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma ,Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr.Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing Official Translation is allowed. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner(s), proforma respondents no.4 to 57 in SLP(C)...CC No.13862/2014 and Respondents no.4 to 47 in SLP(C)..CC 14311/2014 are deleted from the array of parties, at the risk of the petitioner(s). On an oral request made by Ms.Sandhya Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner, proforma respondents are deleted, at the risk of the petitioner. Amended Memo of Parties be filed in two weeks' time. Notice on the application(s) for condonation of delay as also on the Special Leave Petitions. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession. Tag with S.L.P.(C)NO.30969/2011 etc. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             Court No.  2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     Item No.  21 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO.  CC.. 13416 OF 2014  WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF ADESH & ORS             ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS.                  ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the  Judgment and Order dated 21.10.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in C.W.P. No. 45081 of 2011. It is submitted that SLP (c) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of common followed Judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 is enclosed) It is submitted that there is a delay of 906 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report.  Dated this the 28 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             Court No.    2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     Item No.    16 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO.  CC.. 13862 OF 2014  WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF KISHAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.            ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS.         ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the  Judgment and Orders dated 29.04.2014 & 17.02.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP No. 24475 of 2014, CMWP No. 24510 of 2012 & CMWP No. 52828 of 2011. It is submitted that there is a delay of 804 days in Special Leave Petition filed against order dated 17.02.2012 and Special Leave Petition filed against order dated 29.04.2014 is within time, and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment and have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report.  Dated this the 26 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             COURT NO. :  2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     ITEM NO.    : 21 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 22716­18 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF PAWAN BANSAL & ORS. ETC. ETC.    ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.          ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Orders dated 29.04.2014 & 26.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP Nos. 5655 & 5658 of 2012 & CMWP No. 28847 of 2014. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 13416 of 2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment and have been tagged together. It is submitted that Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate has filed a letter dated NIL. (copy included as page no. 480 of the Special Leave Petition) The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27 th  day of August, 2014.                                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                       vg         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                      CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     Supplementary List INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO.  CC.. 14311 OF 2014  WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF HARBEER SINGH & ORS.    ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                    ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the  Judgment and Order dated 21.10.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP No. 45072 of 2011. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (c) No. 4104 of 2014 arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22.01.2014 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 22.01.2014 enclosed) (Main matter is SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011). It is submitted that there is a delay of 923 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is submitted that SLP (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common order and have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report.  Dated this the 28 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate          vg ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             COURT NO. : 2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     ITEM NO.    :21 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 22329­31 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF KARAN SINGH & ETC. ETC.   ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                   ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP Nos. 24511, 24512 & 24513 of 2014. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                       vg         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             COURT NO. : 2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     ITEM NO.    :21 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 22384­85 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF ANUJ KUMAR & ORS.    ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                   ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP Nos. 10063 & 10064 of 2012. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                       vg         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             Court No. 2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     Item No. 16 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO.  CC.. 14027 OF 2014  WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. DHANPALI              ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                    ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the  Judgment and Orders dated 28.04.2014 & 04.08.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP No. 24201 of 2014 and CMWP No. 39842 of 2014. It is submitted that there is a delay of 12 days in Special Leave Petition filed against order dated 28.04.2014 and SLP filed against order dated 04.08.2014 is within time, and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is submitted that SLP (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment and have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report.  Dated this the 26 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             COURT NO. : 2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     ITEM NO.    :21 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 22298­99 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SOHAN PAL & SONPAL SINGH & ANR. ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                   ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP Nos. 24514 & 24515 of 2014. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 27 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                       vg         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                               LISTED ON  : 29.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA             COURT NO. 2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     ITEM NO.  21 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO.  CC.. 13728 OF 2014  WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS.             ...PETITIONER(S)     VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                    ...RESPONDENT(S)                     OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the  Judgment and Order dated 28.04.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at  Allahabad Lucknow Bench Lucknow in CMWP No. 2303 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 10 days in filing the SLP and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is submitted that SLP (cc) 13416/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common followed Judgment have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this  office report.  Dated this the 27 th  day of August, 2014.                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate  vg         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

\224 1 ITEM NOS.21+47 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 13416/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/04/2014 in CRLA No. 627/2000,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 45084/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) ADESH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13728/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13862/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 14027/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22298-22299/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22329-22331/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22384-22385/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22716-22718/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) AND WITH SLP(C)....CC NO.14311/2014Signature Not Verified (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Digitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.08.2916:44:38 ISTReason: Date : 29/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. 2CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami ,Adv. Mr.Jabar Singh, Adv. Mr.M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma ,Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv.

Mr.Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing OfficialTranslation is allowed. At the request of learned counsel for thepetitioner(s), proforma respondents no.4 to 57 in SLP(C)...CCNo.13862/2014 and Respondents no.4 to 47 in SLP(C)..CC 14311/2014are deleted from the array of parties, at the risk of thepetitioner(s). On an oral request made by Ms.Sandhya Goswami, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, proforma respondents are deleted, atthe risk of the petitioner. Amended Memo of Parties be filed in two weeks' time. Notice on the application(s) for condonation of delayas also on the Special Leave Petitions. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if thepetitioners are in possession, they will not be forciblydis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, thepetitioners will not try to enter the subject property if theyare not in possession. Tag with S.L.P.(C)NO.30969/2011 etc.(G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi)Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6682/2014 KHEMCHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 28/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted for doing the needful failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

z ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6682/2014 KHEMCHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 28/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted for doing the needful failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SUMAN WADHWA) (SUMAN JAIN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2014.08.3013:45:51 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11993/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in CMWP No. 42324 of 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.) KUDIYA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondents) Date : 25/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The names of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 29 to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall amend the cause title within four weeks. (S.K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (H.S. PARASHER) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23722/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46904/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for direction and office report) Date : 25/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Prasad ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Pramod Swarup, Sr.Adv. Mr.Ameet Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply, if any to I.A.No.3 of 2014 be filed in a week's time, finally. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON :  25.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                  Court No.  :  2           CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                           Item No.     :  19 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3 (Application for Direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 23722 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF   ZILEY SINGH & ORS ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble court on 09.06.2014 when the Court was please to pass the following order : “ Issue notice, returnable after one week.   Mr. Ravindra kumar, learned counsel, accepts notice  on behalf of respondent No.3. Notice be issued to the  remaining respondent, returnable after one week. Dasti, in  addition, is permitted.  ” There are three Respondents. Respondent No.3 has accepts the notice but no Counter Affidavit has been filed. It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 through Dasti as well as Speed Post. It is further submitted that Advocate for the Petitioner has filed the proof of delivery of the notice alongwith affidavit of Dasti service on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. It is submitted that Respondent No. 1 & 2 are represented through Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate but no Counter Affidavit has been filed. The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court for suitable date. Dated this the 22 nd   day of August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy To : Mr. Gopal Prasad, Advocate       Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vs

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11993/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in CMWP No. 42324 of 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.) KUDIYA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondents) Date : 25/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The names of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 29 to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall amend the cause title within four weeks.Signature Not Verified (S.K. RAKHEJA)Digitally signed bySushil Kumar RakhejaDate: 2014.08.27 (H.S. PARASHER)18:19:21 ISTReason: COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

˜ ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23722/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 46904/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for direction and office report) Date : 25/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Prasad ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Pramod Swarup, Sr.Adv. Mr.Ameet Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply, if any to I.A.No.3 of 2014 be filed in a week's time, finally.Signature Not Verified (G.V.Ramana)Digitally signed by (Vinod Kulvi) Court MasterRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.08.2516:23:21 IST Asstt.RegistrarReason:

1 REVISED ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36242/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No. 50235/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21151/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36975/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) SLP 36242 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) No. 36242 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioners have filed additional affidavit.

2 Issue notice. Dasti , in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. SLP (C) No...CC No. 21151: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority raises the grievance that copy of the special leave petition along with annexures has not been given to him till date. The advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the special leave petition along with the annexures to Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate within two weeks. List the matter thereafter. SLP (C) No. 36975 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioner has filed additional affidavit. Issue notice. Dasti , in addition to the ordinary process, is

3 permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to enter the subject property if he is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. (PARDEEP KUMAR) AR-cum-PS (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER

4 ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36242/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No. 50235/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21151/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36975/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) SLP 36242 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) Nos. 35043-35044 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioners have filed additional affidavit.

5 Issue notice. Dasti , in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. SLP (C) No...CC No. 21151: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority raises the grievance that copy of the special leave petition along with annexures has not been given to him till date. The advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the special leave petition along with the annexures to Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate within two weeks. List the matter thereafter. SLP (C) No. 36975 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioner has filed additional affidavit. Issue notice. Dasti , in addition to the ordinary process, is

6 permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to enter the subject property if he is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. (PARDEEP KUMAR) AR-cum-PS (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON:  22.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                 Court No.       2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                           Item No.         22 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 18356 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) YOGENDRA KUMAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.07.2014, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “ Notice on the application for condonation of  delay as also on the Special Leave Petition. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 / 2011 . ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the five Respondents on 01.08.2014 through registered A.D Post. Service of show cause notice is awaited. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 20 th  day of August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Mitter & Mitter Co., Advocate   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                LISTED ON : 22.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.   :    2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.     :    22 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC..NO. 9915 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AJAY CHAUDHARY         ...PETITIONER    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.     ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT    The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ © No. 50178 of 2009.   It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 enclosed) It is further submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18356 of 2014 @ CC No. 9789 of 2014, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to direct  issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 14.07.2014 enclosed) It is submitted that there is a delay of 71 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay.  It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18356 of 2014 @ CC No. 9789 of 2014 and the instant matter arising out of similar issue and have been tagged together. It is submitted that M/S Mitter & Mitter  Co., Advocates have filed a letter dated 05.08.2014. (copy enclosed) The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 15 th  day of July, 2014.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:   Mitter & Mitter Co., Advocate, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 22.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      COURT NO:     2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION           ITEM NO:          4     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                             RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Reply to I.A. No. 5 be filed within three weeks'  time finally. List thereafter.” It is submitted that counsel for the Respondent No. 3 (Noida Authority) has not  filed reply so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent No. 1 to 3.  The  Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with office report. Dated this the 20 th  day of August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5566/2012 RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 9678/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38287/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4064/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5936-5937/2014 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6024-6027/2014 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7017-7018/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7019/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7031/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7036/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10065/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10147-10149/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.

Item No.27 -2- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Goel ,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh ,Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. M/s. Ap & J Chambers ,Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary ,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra ,Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash ,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay ,Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan ,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma ,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg ,Adv. M/s. Ap & J Chambers ,Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary ,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg ,Adv. Mr. Amit Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathy, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.5566/2012 Despite Registrar Court's order dated 1.7.2014, petitioner has not taken any steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 to 3. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.

Item No.27 -3- SLP(C) No.9678/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 and 2. SLP(C) No.38287/2012 Despite undertaking given on 1.7.2014, vakalatnama has not been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. SLP(C) No.38288/2012 Four weeks' time is granted to the respondents for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No.38289/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the proof of supplying copy of the pleadings to the learned counsel for the respondents within one week. SLP(C) No.38290/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the proof of supplying complete set of the pleadings to the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for respondent No.4 for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No.8678/2013 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 4. SLP(C) No.9168/2013 Petitioner to file spare copies for effecting service on

Item No.27 -4- respondent No.1. Spare copies be furnished within one week. Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner for this purpose. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No.18090/2013 Petitioner to furnish the spare copies within one week for effecting service on respondent No.2. Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner for this purpose. Office report is silent with regard to the filing of the counter affidavit by respondent No.1. Office to report by the next date. SLP(C) No.30601/2013 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 8. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.4 for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No.4064, 5936-5937,6024-6027 and 7017-7018/2014 Service report is awaited. SLP(C) No.7019/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 to 4. Steps be taken within one week. Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner. SLP(C) No.7031/2014 Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit.

Item No.27 -5- SLP(C) No.7036 and 10065/2014 Petitioner has not taken steps for effecting service on the unserved respondents. Steps be taken within one week. Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner. SLP(C) No.10147-10149/2014 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 4. List again on 19.11.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

æ ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No. 9915/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/12/2013 in WC No. 50178/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) AJAY CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 18356/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. for M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) no. 30969 of 2011.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ]Charanjeet KaurDate: 2014.08.2216:57:21 IST Court Master Asstt. RegistrarReason:

`> 1 REVISED ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36242/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No. 50235/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21151/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 36975/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) SLP 36242 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingSignature Not Verified O R D E RDigitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2014.11.15 SLP (C) No. 36242 of 2013:13:04:07 SASTReason: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioners have filed additional affidavit. 2 Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, ispermitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for

the respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to theunrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if thepetitioners are in possession, they will not beforcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of thisorder, the petitioners will not try to enter thesubject property if they are not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011.SLP (C) No...CC No. 21151: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for therespondent No. 5 - Greater Noida Industrial DevelopmentAuthority raises the grievance that copy of the specialleave petition along with annexures has not been givento him till date. The advocate-on-record for the petitioner isdirected to supply copy of the special leave petitionalong with the annexures to Mr. Ravindra Kumar,advocate within two weeks. List the matter thereafter.SLP (C) No. 36975 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, thepetitioner has filed additional affidavit. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is 3permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service forthe respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to theunrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if thepetitioner is in possession, he will not be forciblydis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of thisorder, the petitioner will not try to enter the subjectproperty if he is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER 4ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36242/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2013in CMWP No. 50235/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature AtAllahabad)RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates andinterim relief and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC No. 21151/2013(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 36975/2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and Interim Relief andOffice Report)Date : 22/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s)SLP 36242 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv.SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) Nos. 35043-35044 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the petitioners have filed additional affidavit. 5 Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, ispermitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service forthe respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to theunrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if thepetitioners are in possession, they will not beforcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of thisorder, the petitioners will not try to enter thesubject property if they are not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011.SLP (C) No...CC No. 21151: Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for therespondent No. 5 - Greater Noida Industrial DevelopmentAuthority raises the grievance that copy of the specialleave petition along with annexures has not been givento him till date. The advocate-on-record for the petitioner isdirected to supply copy of the special leave petitionalong with the annexures to Mr. Ravindra Kumar,advocate within two weeks. List the matter thereafter.SLP (C) No. 36975 of 2013: In pursuance of the order dated 9.12.2013, the

petitioner has filed additional affidavit. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is 6permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service forthe respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to theunrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if thepetitioner is in possession, he will not be forciblydis-possessed by the respondents. It is made clear that under the garb of thisorder, the petitioner will not try to enter the subjectproperty if he is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

â ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2014 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 6849/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in WC No. 50756/2009 of the High Court of Judicture at Allahabad) GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For direction and office report) Date : 22/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply to I.A. No. 5 of 2014 be filed within two weeks' time. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.08.2216:57:16 ISTReason:

¦6 ITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5566/2012 RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 9678/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38287/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 4064/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 5936-5937/2014 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6024-6027/2014 (With appln.(s) for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7017-7018/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7019/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7031/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 7036/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10065/2014 (With appln.(s) for Office Report)Signature Not Verified SLP(C) No. 10147-10149/2014Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.08.25 (With appln.(s) for Office Report)17:07:36 ISTReason: Date : 22/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.Item No.27 -2-For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Deepak Goel ,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh ,Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. M/s. Ap & J Chambers ,Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary ,Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra ,Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash ,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay ,Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan ,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma ,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg ,Adv. M/s. Ap & J Chambers ,Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary ,Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg ,Adv. Mr. Amit Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathy, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.5566/2012 Despite Registrar Court's order dated 1.7.2014,petitioner has not taken any steps for effecting service onrespondent Nos.1 to 3. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers.Item No.27 -3-SLP(C) No.9678/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to take freshsteps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 and 2.SLP(C) No.38287/2012 Despite undertaking given on 1.7.2014, vakalatnama hasnot been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers.

SLP(C) No.38288/2012 Four weeks' time is granted to the respondents for filingcounter affidavit.SLP(C) No.38289/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish theproof of supplying copy of the pleadings to the learnedcounsel for the respondents within one week.SLP(C) No.38290/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish theproof of supplying complete set of the pleadings to thelearned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel forrespondent No.4 for filing counter affidavit.SLP(C) No.8678/2013 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1to 4.SLP(C) No.9168/2013 Petitioner to file spare copies for effecting service onItem No.27 -4-respondent No.1. Spare copies be furnished within one week.Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner for thispurpose. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.2 for filingcounter affidavit.SLP(C) No.18090/2013 Petitioner to furnish the spare copies within one weekfor effecting service on respondent No.2. Last opportunity isgranted to the petitioner for this purpose. Office report is silent with regard to the filing of thecounter affidavit by respondent No.1. Office to report by thenext date.SLP(C) No.30601/2013 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1to 3 and 5 to 8. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.4 for filing

counter affidavit.SLP(C) No.4064, 5936-5937,6024-6027 and 7017-7018/2014 Service report is awaited.SLP(C) No.7019/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner to take freshsteps for effecting service on respondent Nos.1 to 4. Stepsbe taken within one week. Last opportunity is granted to thepetitioner.SLP(C) No.7031/2014 Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.3 for filingcounter affidavit.Item No.27 -5-SLP(C) No.7036 and 10065/2014 Petitioner has not taken steps for effecting service onthe unserved respondents. Steps be taken within one week.Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner.SLP(C) No.10147-10149/2014 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos.1to 4. List again on 19.11.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No. 7/2014 In SLP(C) No. 3242/2012 PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMA RAMAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 22/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami ,Adv. Mr.Sanjaya Krishna, Adv. Mr.R.K.Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent nos.1 to 3, 6 & 7 is taken on record. Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in a weeks' time in respect of respondent nos.4 & 5. Rejoinder, if any, be filed in three weeks' time thereafter finally. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.08.2216:38:39 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                                     Listed on :    19.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA           Court No. :     2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.   :     6 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for Stay) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 25532 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NOIDA ...PETITIONER        VERSUS MUNDER SINGH & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The Interlocutory Application No. 2 (Application for Stay) in the matter above mentioned was  listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.07.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Reply, If any, to I.A. No. 2 of 2014 be filed in six weeks' time. List thereafter.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed Reply to I.A No. 2 so far. The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 14 th  day of August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr.  Ravindra Kumar, Advocate        Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, adv.                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                LISTED ON:  19­08­2014  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. : 2    CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION          Item No :  4   INTERLOCATORY APPLICATION NOS. 7­12 (Applications for further direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NOS. 38188­38193 OF  2012    SURTEY ETC. ETC.    PETITIONER(S)               VERSUS STATE OF U. P. & ORS.    RESPONDENT(S)                    OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30­7­2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order.:­ “ Reply, if any to the applications, be filed in three days' time.” It is submitted Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate has on 13.08.2014 filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 and the same is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. Service of show cause notice is already complete. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report . Dated this the 14 th  day of August, 2014.                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy  to:  Mr. D.K. Garg, Advocate  Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

6 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 2/2014 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25532/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/12/2011 in CMWP No. 72258/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (For stay and office report) Date : 19/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s)/ Mr. Arun K. Sinha ,Adv. Applicant(s) Mr. Sumit Sinha, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Prayer made in the application is to restrain the petitioner herein from taking possession of the lands forcibly. The request made in the application is not opposed by the petitioner herein. Therefore, the prayer made in the application is granted. I.A. No. 2 is disposed of accordingly. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.08.1916:54:35 ISTReason:

T ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 In Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009, CMWP No. 65544/2009, CMWP No. 68487/2009 and dated 14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012, RA No. 2591/2012, RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For further directions and office report) Date : 19/08/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg ,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhanjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Rejoinder affidavit be filed in four weeks' time. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.08.1916:54:59 ISTReason:

z ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25279/2013 CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 07/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is granted as last opportunity to the ld. Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 for filing counter affidavit. List again on 10.10.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.08.0913:29:52 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                                           Listed On :04.08.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA       Court No. : 2          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.   : 14 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 of 2014 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6363 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SANGITA GUPTA & ORS.   ...PETITIONER   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.               ...RESPONDENT                OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Learned counsel for the applicant is directed  to serve a set of application on the learned counsel  for the respondents.  Reply to the application be filed in four weeks' time.  List thereafter. ”   It is submitted that counsel for petitioner has filed proof of service Mr. Anuvrat  Sharma and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocates but no Vakalatnama and memo of  appearance and reply has been filed till date.  The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court for Orders. Dated this the 1 st  day of August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Tulika Prakash, Advocate                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6363/2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in W.P. No. 33597 of 2010 by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad, at Lucknow) SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (For direction and office report) (With I.A. No. 4-Appln. for impleadment) Date : 04/08/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash ,Adv. Mr. Akram, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply to I.A. Nos. 3 & 4 be filed in two weeks' time finally. List thereafter.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ]Charanjeet KaurDate: 2014.08.0417:37:48 IST Court Master Asstt. RegistrarReason:

\210 ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 6-8/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6458-6460/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No. 18037/2011,21/10/2011 in WC No. 48089/2011,09/12/2011 in WC No. 70603/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 30/07/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vishwajit Singh, Adv. For Ms. Veera Kaul Singh ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Ms.Bina Madhavan, Adv. For M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co ,Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners/applicant(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw I.A.Nos.6-8 of 2013. Permission sought for is granted.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.07.3015:59:26 IST I.A.Nos.6-8 of 2013 are disposed of as withdrawn.Reason: (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 64564/2009,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 65544/2009,21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 68487/2009,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2545/2012,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2591/2012,14/05/2012 in RA No. 2597/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (for further directions and office report) Date : 30/07/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr.Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr.Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr.Deepak Mishra, Adv. for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply, if any to the applications, be filed in three days' time.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (G.V.Ramana)Ramana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.07.3015:59:40 IST (Vinod Kulvi) Court MasterReason: Asstt.Registrar

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 25.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      COURT NO:    2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         ITEM NO:          5     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                             RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.03.2012 when the following Order was passed: “Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2012 in  SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012 is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) [page No. 445 of the paper book]. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record of the petitioner within two weeks from today. Delay condoned in SLP(C.)..... [ CC 4634­4636/2012 ]. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, wavies service for the respondent – Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the un­represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 by Registered A.D. Post. Respondent No.4 is represented through Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate but no Counter Affidavit has been filed. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back from Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed an Application for direction and the same is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 5. The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with office report. Dated this the 16 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 25.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      COURT NO:    2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         ITEM NO:          5     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6849 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS.                                    PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                             RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.03.2012 when the following Order was passed: “Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2012 in  SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012 is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) [page No. 445 of the paper book]. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record of the petitioner within two weeks from today. Delay condoned in SLP(C.)..... [ CC 4634­4636/2012 ]. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, wavies service for the respondent – Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the un­represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 by Registered A.D. Post. Respondent No.4 is represented through Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate but no Counter Affidavit has been filed. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back from Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has filed an Application for direction and the same is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 5. The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with office report. Dated this the 16 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON:   30.07.2014         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                 Court No.       2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                      Item No.         6 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 7 to 14 (Application for Directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 38188­38193 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SURTEY ETC. ETC.   ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Application above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30.06.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Objections, if any to I.A. Nos. 7­12/2014 be filed in three weeks' time finally. ” It is submitted that objections have not filed so far.  Service of Show Cause Notice on the application is complete on the Respondents. The application above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 24 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. D. K. Garg, Adv.                               ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

Þ ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2014 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6849/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No. 50756/2009 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) GINNI DEVI GARG & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (Appln. for direction and Office report) Date : 25/07/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply to I.A. No. 5 be filed within three weeks' time finally. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.2517:12:36 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON :  18.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.       : 20 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. CC..10238 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF  RAMESH & ORS.    ...PETITIONERS        VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.    ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2012 passed by the High Court of J udicature at Allahabad in C.M.W.P. No. 52255 of 2011 It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 4150 of 2014 arising out of same judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22.01.2014 w hen the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court (copy of order dated 22.01.2014 enclosed). It is further submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011, when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Court (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 enclosed). It is submitted that there is a delay of 736 days in filing the SLP and counsel has filed an application for condonation for delay to condone the said delay. It is submitted that Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, Advocate has filed a letter, dated 20.06.2014 (copy included as page no. 139 of the Special Leave Petition). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 16 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:       M r. Yashpal Dhingra, Advocate                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vs

Ò ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 10238/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52255/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) RAMESH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 18/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sushant K.Yadav, Adv. Mr.Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr.Ujjwal Pandey, Adv. Mr.Ankur Prakash, Adv. For Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the Special Leave Petition. Tag with S.L.P.(C)NO.4150/2014. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.07.1816:21:58 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 14.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.       2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.       26   INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing the SLP) IN  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. (cc) 9789 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF YOGENDER KUMAR            ...PETITIONER    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.     ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 08.12.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ (C) No. 50179 of 2009. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (c) No. 30969 of 2011 arising out of Similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 28.11.2011 enclosed) It is further sub9789mitted that there is a delay of 1535 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 11 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    M/S Mitter & Mitter Co. , Advocate                                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

0 ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 9789/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/12/2009 in WP No. 50179/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) YOGENDRA KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 14/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr.Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr.Sarwa Mitter, Adv. Ms.Sumati J.., Adv. for M/s Mitter & Mitter Co. ,Advs. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on the Special Leave Petition. Tag with S.L.P.(C)No.30969/2011. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi)Signature Not Verified Court MasterDigitally signed by Asstt.RegistrarRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.08.1413:28:59 ISTReason:

N ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 5-6 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7146/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 33957/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) SUDHA RANI CHAUHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (for status quo and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 14/07/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri ,Adv. Mr.Shikhil Suri, Adv. Akriti Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr.Rajesh Maurya, Adv. Mr.Sandeep Singh, Adv. For Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. Mr.Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. For Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Status quo, as of today, shalle be maintained by the parties, until further orders. However, we permit the respondents to make an appropriate application, if they so desire, for modification/vacating the interim order granted by us.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by I.A.Nos.5-6 are disposed of accordingly.Ramana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.07.1512:41:18 ISTReason: (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

SECTION XI                                           Listed on : 11.07.2014         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA        Court No. :           CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                       Item No.   :  INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for Status Quo) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 6 (Application for Exemption from filing Official Translation) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 7146 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SMT. SUDHA RANI CHAUHAN & ORS.                      ...PETITIONERS   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.           ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20.04.2012 when the following Order was passed: “ Application for deletion of proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 11 in S.L.P. (Civil) No. 6539/2012 is granted at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record for the petitioners within two weeks. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice for the respective respondent. Notice to proforma respondents in the respective special leave petitions is dispensed with at this stage.  Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. ”   Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 by registered A.D Post. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are represented through M/S Anuvrat Sharma and Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocates respectively but no Counter affidavit has been filed . A.D card duly signed has been received back from Respondent No. 3 but no Vakalatnama and memo of appearance and Counter affidavit have been filed. Service on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 to 16 (performa respondents)  is dispensed with vide Court's Order dated 20.04.2012 It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed Application for Status Quo alongwith application for exemption from filing Official Translation and the same are registered as I.A Nos. 5 & 6.

The applications above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office report. Dated this the 7 th  day of July, 2014.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv.        Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv.                                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¸ ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No(s). 8842/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/11/2011 in CMWP No. 64125/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) AVDHESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 10/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar pal Singh Jadon, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice. Tag with SLP(C) no. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.1017:09:05 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 08.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.      2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.       5 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the  Special Leave Petition ) IN   PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. (cc) 8721, 9938 &  10398 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF UMESH KUMAR & ANR. ETC. ETC.             ...PETITIONERS    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC. ETC.      ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Orders dated 17.02.2012, 10.12.2013 & 10.12.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP No. 52027 of 2011,  Writ (C) No. 50180 of 2009 & Writ C No. 50441 of 2009 respectively. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (c) No. 25488 of 2013 filed against the Petitioner No.1 herein arising out of Common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.07.2013 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 19.07.2013 enclosed) It is further submitted that there is a delay of 732, 71 & 71 days respectively in filing the Special Leave Petitions and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 9938 & 10398/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common relied upon order and have been tagged together.

The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 08.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.      2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.       5 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the  Special Leave Petition ) IN   PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. (cc) 8721, 9938 &  10398 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF UMESH KUMAR & ANR. ETC. ETC.             ...PETITIONERS    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC. ETC.      ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Orders dated 17.02.2012, 10.12.2013 & 10.12.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP No. 52027 of 2011,  Writ (C) No. 50180 of 2009 & Writ C No. 50441 of 2009 respectively. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (c) No. 25488 of 2013 filed against the Petitioner No.1 herein arising out of Common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.07.2013 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 19.07.2013 enclosed) It is further submitted that there is a delay of 732, 71 & 71 days respectively in filing the Special Leave Petitions and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 9938 & 10398/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common relied upon order and have been tagged together.

The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON: 08.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.      2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.       5 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the  Special Leave Petition ) IN   PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. (cc) 8721, 9938 &  10398 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF UMESH KUMAR & ANR. ETC. ETC.             ...PETITIONERS    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC. ETC.      ...RESPONDENTS                OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Orders dated 17.02.2012, 10.12.2013 & 10.12.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in CMWP No. 52027 of 2011,  Writ (C) No. 50180 of 2009 & Writ C No. 50441 of 2009 respectively. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (c) No. 25488 of 2013 filed against the Petitioner No.1 herein arising out of Common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.07.2013 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court. (copy of order dated 19.07.2013 enclosed) It is further submitted that there is a delay of 732, 71 & 71 days respectively in filing the Special Leave Petitions and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone the said delay. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (cc) 9938 & 10398/2014 and the instant matter arising out of common relied upon order and have been tagged together.

The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7 th  day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate                              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vg

& ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2014 CC No(s). 8721/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 52027/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) UMESH KUMAR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 9938/2014 (With prayer for and c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 10398/2014 (With prayer for and c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 08/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma ,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. for M/s Mitter & Mitter Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011.Charanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.0817:29:25 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 13401/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/12/2013 in WC 25818/2012, passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) SAORABH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondents(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 14786/2014 (With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 02/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal singh Jadon, Adv. Ms.Aditi Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.0216:52:36 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

SECTION XI                                     Listed on :    01.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA           Court No. :     2         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION              Item No.   :     7 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for Stay) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 25532 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NOIDA ...PETITIONER        VERSUS MUNDER SINGH & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The SLP above mentioned alongwith connected matters was  listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.07.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Connect with special leave petition (civil) No. 30969/2011” Accordingly show cause notice was issued to all the seven Respondents through Registered A.D post Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 alongwith an application for stay. The said application is registered as I.A. No 2.  Service of show cause notice is awaited in respect of Respondent Nos. 5 to 7. The Application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Chamber Judge with this office report. Dated this the 28 th  day of June, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr.  Ravindra Kumar, Advocate        Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, adv.                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

SECTION XI                                           Listed On :01.07.2014        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA       Court No. : 2          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION               Item No.   : 3 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for direction) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 6363 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SANGITA GUPTA & ORS.   ...PETITIONER   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.               ...RESPONDENT                OFFICE REPORT The  Special Leave Petition  above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.02.2012 when the following Order was passed: “Delay in filing special leave petitions is condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayers for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent ­ Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.  Service on the respondent ­ Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un­represented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.       ”   Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the Respondent  Nos. 1 to 15 by  registered A/D post. Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are served through standing counsel for  State of U.P. and Respondent Nos. 3 to 15 are served by Dasti. No one has chosen to  file vakalatnama and memo of appearance till date. It is submitted that counsel for petitioner has filed an application for direction  and the same is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 3. The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber  with this report. Dated this the 30th day of June, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:

Mr. Tulika Prakash, Advocate                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ra

° ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC No. 7821/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19.02.2014 in WP No. 10773 of 2014, dated 07.04.2014 in Civil Misc. W.P. No. 20390 of 2014 and dated 12.12.2011 in Civil Misc. W.P. No. 70986 of 2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) DAYANAND Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondents(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13034/2014 (With appln. For exemption from filing O.T. and Prayer for Prayer for Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14781/2014 (With appln. For exemption from filing O.T. and Prayer for Prayer for Interim Relief) Date : 01/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Ms. Nanita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. Mr. Harish Nautiyl, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Notice.Charanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.0116:12:00 ISTReason: Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

l* ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5566/2012 RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ORS Respondents(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 38287/2012 (With prayer for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 (with office report) SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 (with office report) Date : 01/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldip Singh ,adv. Mr. Deepak Goel ,Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar , Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary , Adv. Mr. K. S. Rana , Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar , Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra , Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash , Adv. Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay , Adv. For Respondent(s)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.07.05 Mr. Gaurav, Adv.11:17:10 ISTReason: Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar , Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam , Adv.Item No.33 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 5566/2012 Respondent No.4 seeks time to file counter affidavit.

Four weeks' time is granted for the said purpose. The learned counsel for the petitioner to take freshsteps for service upon respondent Nos.1 to 3.SLP(C) No. 38287/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner to supply copies ofthe pleadings to the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 2and 3, who undertakes to file vakalatnama thereafter.SLP(C) No. 38288/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed tosupply copies of the pleadings to the learned counsel forrespondent Nos.1 and 2. Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance befiled thereafter.SLP(C) No. 38289/2012 The learned counsel for respondent No.3 seeks four weeks'time to file counter affidavit from the date he receives copyof the pleadings. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit within four weeks.SLP(C) No. 38290/2012 The learned Advocate, Mr.Raman Yadav undertakes to filevakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1 within two weeks.Copy of the pleadings be supplied to him thereafter and counteraffidavit to be filed within four weeks thereafter.Item No.33 -3- The learned counsel for the petitioner to file process feeand spare copies for service upon respondent Nos.2 and 3. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.4 to filecounter affidavit.SLP(C) No. 8678/2013 The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh stepsfor service upon all the unserved respondents. The learnedcounsel for the petitioner seeks exemption to file extra set ofcopies on the ground that he has already supplied the same. Heundertakes to supply the copy as soon as appearance is put onbehalf of the respondents. The learned counsel to file the

process fee. Upon filing of the same, notice be issued to theunserved respondents.SLP(C) No. 9168/2013 Fresh steps be taken for service upon respondent No.1. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 seeks time to filecounter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted for the saidpurpose.SLP(C) No. 18090/2013 Fresh steps be taken for service upon the respondentsother than respondent No.2 on whose behalf vakalatnama has beenfiled by the learned Advocate, Mr. Ravindra Kumar.SLP(C) No. 30601/2013 The learned Advocate, Mr. Gaurav, appearing on behalf ofMr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record undertakes to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.1.Four weeks' time is granted.Item No.33 -4- Fresh steps be taken for service upon respondent Nos.2, 3and 5 to 8. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.4 for filingcounter affidavit. List again on 21.8.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

¬ ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 2/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 25532/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/12/2011 in CMWP 72258/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNDER SINGH & ORS. Respondents(s) (For stay and Office Report) Date : 01/07/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sumit Sinha, adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply, If any, to I.A. No. 2 of 2014 be filed in six weeks' time. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.0116:12:02 ISTReason:

Ü ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 3/2014 In Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 6363/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33597 of 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondents(s) (Appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) Date : 01/07/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. Mr. Akram, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to serve a set of application on the learned counsel for the respondents. Reply to the application be filed in four weeks' time. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.07.0116:12:08 ISTReason:

\230 ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-12/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 38188-38193/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/05/2012 in RA 2597/2012 in RA 2597/2012 in RA 2597/2012 in RA 2597/2012 in RA 2597/2012 in RA 2597/2012 passed by the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondents(s) (For further direction and Office Report) Date : 30/06/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr.Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr.Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr.Deepak Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Objections, if any to I.A.Nos.7-12/2014 be filed in three weeks' time finally.Signature Not Verified (G V RAMANA)Digitally signed by (VINOD KULVI) COURT MASTERRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.06.3015:33:57 IST ASSTT.REGISTRARReason:

þ ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 6-8/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 6458-6460/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/12/2011 in WC 70603/2011 in WC 70603/2011 in WC 70603/2011 passed by the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondents(s) (For directions and Office Report) Date : 30/06/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr.Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr.Pankaj Singh, Adv. for Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr.S.U.K.Sagar, Adv. Ms.Bina Madhavan, Adv. For M/s.Lawyers' Knit & Co., Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed in three weeks' time finally.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (G V RAMANA)Ramana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.06.3015:33:40 IST (VINOD KULVI) COURT MASTERReason: ASSTT.REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25279/2013 CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondents(s) Date : 30/06/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv. Mr Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is granted as last opportunity to the respondents for filing counter affidavit. List again on 7.8.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.07.0417:13:03 ISTReason:

˜ ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.No.3/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 23722/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP 46904/2011 passed by the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondents(s) (For directions and Office Report) Date : 09/06/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C NAGAPPAN (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr.N.P.Singh, Adv. Mr.S.K.Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice, returnable after one week. Mr.Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. Notices be issued to the remaining respondents, returnable after one week. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySatish Kumar YadavDate: 2014.06.0916:43:13 ISTReason: (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

òITEM NO. 8 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 7-12 INPetitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.38188-38193/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.64564/2009,CMWP No.65544/2009,CMWP No.68487/2009 dated14/05/2012 in RA No.2545/2012,RA No.2591/2012,RA No.2597/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(For further directions and office report)Date: 09/05/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to file reply to I.A. Nos. 7-12. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

òITEM NO. 8 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 7-12 INPetitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.38188-38193/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.64564/2009,CMWP No.65544/2009,CMWP No.68487/2009 dated14/05/2012 in RA No.2545/2012,RA No.2591/2012,RA No.2597/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(For further directions and office report)Date: 09/05/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to file reply to I.A. Nos. 7-12. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ªITEM NO.119 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).7017-7018/2014BRAHAM PAL YADAV & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)WITH SLP(C) No.7031/2014(with office report)SLP(C) No.7019/2014SLP(C) No.5936-5937/2014SLP(C) No.6024-6027/2014SLP(C) No.7036/2014SLP(C) No.10147-10149/2014(with office report)Date: 29/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghuveer Sharma, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Deepak Mishra, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kr. Garg, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhushan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) Nos.7017-7018, 7031 and 7019/2014 Service report in respect of the respondents isawaited.Item No.119 -2-SLP(C) No.5936-5937,6024-6027,7036 and 10147-10149/2014 On filing of the process fee and spare copies withinthree weeks, notice be issued forthwith to the respondentsthrough the concerned District Court besides usual mode. List again on 22.8.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARrd

ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9678/2012PARAG & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 24/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. M/S. Ap & J Chambers,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Dasti report in respect of respondent Nos.1 and 2 isawaited. The learned counsel for the petitioners to cure thedefects in the application for direction within three weeks.On compliance, the same be listed before the Hon'ble Court fornecessary orders. In the event of default, the matter be placed beforethe Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions. List again on 8.8.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARrd

 SECTION XI LISTED ON: 21.04.2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 31 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 36242, 36975 & CC 21151 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAMESHWAR PRASAD & OTHERS ETC. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24.03.2014, with office report dated 15.03.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List this group of matters after three weeks, as prayed by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.� It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner in SLP (cc) No. 21151 of 2013 has on 28.03.2014 also filed Additional Affidavit (copy enclosed). The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 17th day of April, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, Advocate Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GA

 SECTION XI Listed on: 21.04.2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.: 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No.: 4 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 6 - 8 (Application for directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 6458-6460 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF HANSO DEVI & ETC. & ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24.03.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Objections if any be filed to I.A. Nos. 6-8 in three weeks' time finally.� It is submitted that Counsel for the Respondent has not filed objections so far. The Applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 19th day of April, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Veer Kaul Singh, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate M/s Lawyer's Knit, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GA

2ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 6-8 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).6458-6460/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WCNo.18037/2011,WC No.48089/2011 dated 09/12/2011 in WCNo.70603/2011 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions and office report )Date: 21/04/2014 These applns. were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr.Abhindra Meheswari, Adv. For Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms.Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr.Suresh, Adv. For M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co ,Advs UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply, if any, to I.A.Nos.6-8/2013 in three days' time.Rejoinder, if any, be filed in three weeks' time. (G.V.Ramana) (Suneet Mahajan) Court Master Court Master

\232 1ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).35947/2010(From the judgement and order dated 30/07/2010 in WP No.2161/2007of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, BENCH AT LUCKNOW)U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Petitioner(s) VERSUSSANDEEP KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO. 69 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 21/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s)SLP 35947/2010 Ms. Garima Prashad,Adv.SLP 69/2011 Mrs Rani Chhabra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.SLP 69/11 Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List both matters for final disposal on a non- miscellaneous day within six months from today. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) AR-cum-PS Court Master

,ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 4076/2014(From the judgement and order dated 07/10/2013 in CMWPNo.55644/2013, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PRATAP SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 17/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

h 1ITEM NO.22 & 60 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 5684/2014(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.46370/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAI PRAKASH & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report) WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5847 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 9551 of 2014(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6020-6021 of 2014WITH I.As. 1-2 (C/Delay in filing/refiling SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6049 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6195 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C) NOs. 10049-10050 of 2014(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10051 of 2014(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6265 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6273 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report) 2S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6285 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6301 of 2014WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 15/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.

Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Ms. Shamma Anis, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of respondent No. 4 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners in SLP(C) No. 9551 of 2014. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

xITEM NO.92 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30601/2013MAHENDRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP andprayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 15/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service report in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 3and 5 is awaited. Four weeks time is granted as final chance torespondent No.4 for filing vakalatnama and counter affidaviton record. List again on 4.7.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj

*ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 2 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).1858/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.46295/2011 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAI PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions and prayer for interim relief andoffice report )Date: 07/04/2014 This appln. was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.S.R.SIngh, Sr.Adv. Mr.J.P.Nagar, Adv. For Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, oninstructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdrawI.A.No.2. Permission sought for is granted. I.A.No.2 is dismissed as withdrawn. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M EC O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.47567/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in re-filing SLP andoffice report )Date: 07/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kr. Tiwary, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Amended special leave petition (volumes 1 and 2) is taken on record. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondent. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect With S.L.P. (C) NO. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 2/2014 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30861/2013CHARAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.AND ORS. Respondent(s)( for deletion of the name of respondent)Date: 07/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Verma,Adv. Mr. Rahul Nabiyal,Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. Cause title be amended accordingly. (SUMAN WADHWA) (P.S.N.MURTHY) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

\224 REVISEDITEM NO.56 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 7 OF 2014 IN SLP(C) 3242/2012PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAMA RAMAN & ORS. Alleged/ Contemnor(s)(With office report)Date: 07/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.s. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.For Alleged Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.Contemnor(s)rrs.1 to 3, 6 & 7 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Shri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of alleged contemnors Nos. 1 to 3, 6 & 7. Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks' time. Fresh steps in respect of alleged contemnors Nos. 4 and 5 be taken within three weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarITEM NO.56 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 7 OF 2014 IN SLP(C) 3242/2012PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAMA RAMAN & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 07/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.s. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.rrs.1 to 3, 6 & 7 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Shri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 6 & 7. Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks' time. Fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 be taken within three weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

@ITEM NO. 4 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 4 InPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3916/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WPNo.45085/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Appln(s) for directions and prayer for interim relief and officereport)Date: 04/04/2014 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps in respect of service of notice on respondent Nos. 1 to 3 be taken in two weeks' time finally. List I.A. No. 4 along with main matter, i.e., SLP(C) No. 3916 of 2012. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar

ÆITEM NO.23 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA.No.2 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30861/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2011 in WPC No.65082/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHARAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.AND ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of the name of respondent)Date: 31/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA (In Chamber)For Petitioner(s) NoneFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears on behalf of the petitioner. List in the next week.(Satish K.Yadav) (S.S.R. Krishna) Court Master Assistant Registrar

tITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38287/2012RAM SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)WITHSLP(C) Nos.38289 and 38290/2012(with office report)Date: 27/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Akshay Verma, Adv. Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv. Mr. Akashdeep Verma, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.38287/2012 On behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, notice has been accepted by thelearned Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, appearing on behalf of Mr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record and on behalf of respondent No.3, noticehas been accepted by the learned Advocate, Mr. Ravindra Kumar, who haveundertakenItem No.34 -2-to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by the next date. Complete setof the pleadings be served on the learned counsels appearing on theirbehalf within two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record andthereafter counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.SLP(C) Nos.38289/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, notice has been accepted by the learnedAdvocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, appearing on behalf of Mr. AnuvratSharma, Advocate-on-Record, who has undertaken to file vakalatnama andcounter affidavit by the next date. Complete set of the pleadings beserved on the learned counsel within two weeks of which necessary proof befiled on record and thereafter counter affidavit be filed within fourweeks. Notice be reissued to respondent No.3 through the concerned DistrictCourt besides usual mode. Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly and properly served but noneappeared on his behalf.SLP(C) No.38290/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, notice has been accepted by the learnedAdvocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, appearing on behalf of Mr. Anuvrat

Sharma, Advocate-on-Record, who has undertaken to file vakalatnama andcounter affidavitItem No.34 -3-by the next date. Complete set of the pleadings be served on the learnedcounsel within two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record andthereafter counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Notice be reissued to respondent Nos.2 and 3 through the concernedDistrict Court besides usual mode. Six weeks' time is granted, as final chance, to respondent No.4 forfiling counter affidavit on record. List again on 11.7.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NOS.16-18 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16339-16341/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.42787/2011, WCNo.42789/2011, WC No.45085/2011 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)DHARAMPAL ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 25/03/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sinha, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NOS. 16-18 IN SLP(C) NOS. 16339-16341/2012 The applications are allowed at the risk and responsibility of the petitioners. |(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(INDU BALA KAPUR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

LISTED ON 24.03.2014 COURT NO. 3 ITEM NO. 35 SEC – IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1 AND 2 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing and refiling the SLP ) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO.CC..4567 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for exemption from filing O.T.) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS DR. (SMT.) ALKA SINGH ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the impugned Judgment and final Order dated 17.07.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in Writ Appeal No. 587/2012. It is submitted that SLP No. 30492/2013 @ SLP CC...16083/2013 arising out of relied upon judgment by High Court was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20.09.2013 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court(Copy of order dated 20.09.2013 marked as Annexure P-11 at Page no.161). It is further submitted that SLP No. 25395/2007 @ SLP CC...9707/2006 referred to as Annexure P-8 (at page nos. 118-119) was dismissed on the ground of delay this Court on 03.12.2007.

-2- It is also submitted that SLP CC...3351/2014, now registered as SLP No. 7264/2014, arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.02.2014 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court(Copy of order dated 28.02.2014 enclosed herewith). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 14 th day of March, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

 SECTION XI LISTED ON: 24.03.2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 9 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 36242, 36975 & CC 21151 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAMESHWAR PRASAD & OTHERS ETC. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.12.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36242 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter. S.L.P. (civil) No. 36975 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter. S.L.P. (C).../2013 [CC 21151/2013] Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter.� It is submitted that respective Counsels for the Petitioners in SLP (c) Nos. 36242 & 36975 of 2013 have on 02.01.2014 & 08.01.2014 respectively filed additional affidavit (copies enclosed) Cont. 2/- --2/- The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 15th day of March, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, Advocate Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GA

 SECTION XI Listed on: 24.03.2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.: 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No.: 9 INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 6 - 8 (Application for directions) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 6458-6460 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF HANSO DEVI & ETC. & ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.09.2013 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice on the interlocutory applications returnable in eight weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners- applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession.� Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the Respondent No. 1 (common in all the SLPs and Respondent Nos. 2 in SLP (c) No. 6458 of 2012 who is Respondent No. 3 in SLP (c) No. 6459 of 2012. Respondent No. 2 in SLP (c) No. 6459 of 2012 and Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 in SLP (c) No. 6460 of 2012. In respect of all these Respondents service is still awaited. It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Counsel for Respondent (Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority) (common in all the SLPs and M/S. Lawyers Knit & Co. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in SLP (c) No. 6460 of 2012 have not filed Counter Affidavits so far. The applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 14th day of March, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Veer Kaul Singh, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate M/s Lawyer's Knit, advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GA

ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CC 4245/2014Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37647/2012 ofthe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRAIL DEV.AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSRI CHAND AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 24/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on theSpecial Leave Petition. Tag with S.L.P.(C)No.30969/2011 etc.etc. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47567/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport)Date: 24/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kr. Tiwary, Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. V.S. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Rupam Singh, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after one week.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

PITEM NO.9 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).36242/2013(From the judgement and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No.50235/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permissoin to file lengthy list of dates and withprayer for interim relief and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21151 of 2013with IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and refiling SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 36975 of 2013(With appln. for exemption from filing OT and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 24/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s)SLP 36242 Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kr. Rai, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.SLP 36975 Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.SLP..CC 21151 Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this group of matters after three weeks, as prayed by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

¸ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 6-8 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6458-6460/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.18037/2011,WCNo.48089/2011 dated 09/12/2011 in WC No.70603/2011 of the HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions and office report )Date: 24/03/2014 These applns. were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr.Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. for Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms.Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr.S.U.K.Sagar, Adv. For M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co, Advs UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Objections if any be filed to I.A.Nos.6-8 in three weeks' timefinally. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

|ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAI.A.No.7-12 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38188-38193/2012SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for FURTHER DIRECTION and office report )Date: 24/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Dhananjay Garg,adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R|Ld.counsel for the petitioner is present. What gets revealed ||from the perusal of the office report is that service is ||complete as against the respondents, but no one has entered ||appearance on their behalf. Therefore, the matter shall be ||processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn.|| | | | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB

ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25279/2013CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 14/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Shamama Anis, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 notice has been accepted bythe ld. Counsel, Mr Anuvrat Sharma who has undertaken to file vakalatnamaand counter affidavit by next date. Complete set of pleadings be served onthe ld. counsel in three weeks time of which necessary proof be filed onrecord. Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks thereafter. Respondent No.3 is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavitsubject to service of complete set of pleadings in two weeks time of whichnecessary proof be filed on record. List again on 30.6.2014.| | |(M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

¾ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38288/2012JAGVIR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 12/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, notice has been accepted by thelearned Advocates, Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, appearing on behalf of Mr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record and Mr. Ravindra Kumar respectively.They have undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by the nextdate. Complete set of the pleadings be served on the learned counselwithin two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record and thereaftercounter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Respondent Nos.3 to 17 has been already deleted from the array of therespondents, as per the order of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers dated21.3.2013. List again on 1.7.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |

vITEM NO.37 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37989/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47734/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Although the petitioners have received compensation and for this reason, this may not be a fit case for any relief to the petitioners. But, since in similar matters, notice has been issued, we also issue notice in this matter. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No.2. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

ÎITEM NOS.21+65 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CC 3368-3369/2014Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2013 in CMWP No.56662/2013,CMWPNo.56664/2013 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BRAHAM PAL YADAV & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 4040 of 2014(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 3699 of 2014S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 3762 of 2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5936-5937 of 2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and deletion of proformarespondents and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6024-6027 of 2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NOS. 4167-4169 of 2014(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and substitution and c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report)Date: 03/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr.S.K.Dey, Adv. Mr.K.K.L.Gautam, Adv. Mr.R.Singhvi, Adv. For Mr. Brij Bhusan, Adv. : 2 : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. Mr.L.S.Bakshi, Adv. Mr.M.S.Bakshi, AdvFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C)No....cc 4167-4169/2014: Permission to file SLPs granted.

Delay in filing application for substitution is condoned. Application for substitution is allowed.SLP(C)No.5936-5937/2014: Application for deletion of proforma respondents is allowed, at therisk of the petitioner(s).Common order in all the Special Leave Petitions: Application(s) for exemption from filing Official Translation isallowed. Delay condoned. Notice. Tag alongwith S.L.P.(C)No.4064/2014 etc. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

\214ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)...... CC 13944/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.39584/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KHEMCHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in refiling SLP,c/delay in filing SLP and officereport)Date: 28/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Although in the light of the affidavit filed by the petitioners pursuant to the order dated 16.08.2013 there is not much which can be done in this matter, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since notice has been issued in other matters having similar issues, let notice be issued on the applications for condonation of delay so also on the special leave petition, returnable in ten weeks. We order accordingly. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÄITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASI.A.NO.7-12 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38188-38193/2012SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for FURTHER DIRECTION and office report )Date: 25/02/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Deepak Mishra,adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Kumar,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.3 and 4 have been served through the standing counsel. Service is complete. It is submitted that respondent Nos. 3 & 4 propose to appear through Mr.Ravindra Kumar,advocate. Granted time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. List the matter on 24.03.2014.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

àITEM NO.47 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29279/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.55188/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAGVIR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 24/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA (In Chamber)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners is granted two weeks' time to file process fee and spare copies of the petition for issue of show cause notice on respondent No.1. The application for deletion of proforma respondent No.3 to 9 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. [Usha Bhardwaj] [Suresh Kumar Verma] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

¤ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47567/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport)Date: 17/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. (N.P.)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioner praying for time on the ground of self illness. List the matter after four weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

ÚITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASI.A.NO.7-12 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38188-38193/2012SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for FURTHER DIRECTION and office report )Date: 17/02/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mmr.Abhishek Garg,adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice is awaited from respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks service of notice to respondent Nos. 3 & 4 through its standing counsel. Permitted. List the matter on 25.02.2014.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

\202 ITEM NO. 23 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 1778/2014 (From the judgement and order dated 22/04/2013 in CMWP No.22045/2013, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SHYAMVIR & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 2021 of 2014 WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report) Date: 10/02/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 30969 of 2011. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] ||Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |

\234 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 7 OF 2014 IN SLP(C) 3242/2012 (For Prel. Hearing) PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMA RAMAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date: 10/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice. Personal presence of the alleged contemnors is dispensed with. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] ||Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |

BITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37989/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47734/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 03/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. (not present)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the petitioners. List the matter after four weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30601/2013MAHENDRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refilingSLP and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 31/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice be reissued to respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 7 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Respondent No.4 is granted six weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record. According to the learned Advocate, Mr. RavindraKumar, vakalatnama has been already filed on record on behalf of therespondent No.4. Registry to verify and submit the report by the nextdate. List again on 15.4.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

TITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9678/2012PARAG & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 31/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Charu Ambwani, Adv. M/S. Ap & J Chambers,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 through thestanding counsel, being State authorities. Dasti allowed. On behalf of respondent No.3 notice has been already accepted bythe ld. Advocate, Mr Ravindra Kumar. Complete set of pleadings has beenreceived by the ld. Counsel. Six weeks time is granted to file counteraffidavit. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner seems to have moved anapplication for some directions which as per the office report is sufferingfrom certain defects. Same be cured in two weeks time and on compliance beprocessed as per rules. List again on 14.4.2014.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ITEM NO.3 IN COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 68 in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9527/2012HARBAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(For intervention and office report)Date: 30/01/2014 This I.A. was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant states that similar applications for intervention filed by the allottees have been allowed in other matters. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this application for intervention is allowed. The petitioner is directed to comply with the office report dated 14th November, 2013 within four weeks from today. (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

®ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 7-12 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38188-38193/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.64564/2009,CMWPNo.65544/2009,CMWP No.68487/2009 dated 14/05/2012 in RA No.2545/2012,RANo.2591/2012,RA No.2597/2012 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for further directions and office report )Date: 27/01/2014 These applns. were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr.Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr.Dhananjay Garg,Adv. Mr.Deepak Mishra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr.C.D.Singh, standing counsel, is directed to take notice on behalfof the State of Uttar Pradesh. Reply, if any, be filed in two weeks' time. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

@ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CC 549/2014Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014(From the judgement and order dated 09/01/2012 in CMWP No.346/2012 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PHIREY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 802 of 2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 24/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr.Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RS.L.P.(C)No..../2014 CC No.549: Learned counsel for the petitioners states that respondent nos.5 to13 are proforma respondents and, therefore, requests us to deleterespondent nos.5 to 13 from the array of parties. Request made by thelearned counsel for the petitioners is granted. Accordingly, we permitlearned counsel for the petitioners to delete the said respondents. Learnedcounsel for the petitioners is directed to file amended Memo of Parties ina week's time from today. : 2 : Notice on the application for condonation of delay as also on theSpecial Leave Petition.S.L.P.(C)No.802/2014: Application for exemption from filing Official Translation isallowed. Notice. Tag the matters with S.L.P.(C)No.30969/2011. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi)

Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ºITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25279/2013(From the judgement and order dated 24/04/2013 in CWP No.22794/2013 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 24/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawat, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable after six weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve a copy of the petition on the standing counsel for the State of U.P. [Usha Bhardwaj] [Sneh Lata Sharma] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

ó ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Group A Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19301/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No.29396/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITHSLP(C) Nos. 20498/2012,20499/2012,24407-24408/2012,29701/2012,29702/2012,29703/2012,29704/2012,29705/2012,29706/2012,29707/2012,29708/2012,29709/2012,29710/2012,29711/2012,29712/2012, 29713/2012,29714/2012,29715/2012,29716/2012,29718/2012,29719/2012,29720/2012,29721/2012,29723/2012,29724/2012,29725/2012,29726/2012,29727/2012,29728/2012,29729/2012,29730/2012,29731/2012,29732/2012,29733/2012,29734/2012,29735/2012,29736/2012,29737/2012,29738/2012,29739/2012,29740/2012,29741/2012,29742/2012,29745/2012,29746/2012,29747/2012,29748/2012,29749/2012,29750/2012,29751/2012,29753/2012,29755/2012,29752/2012,29754/2012,29756/2012,29757/2012,29758/2012,29759/2012,29760/2012,29761/2012,29762/2012,29763/2012,29764/2012,29766/2012,29767/2012,29768/2012,29769/2012,29770/2012,29771/2012,29772/2012,29773/2012,29774/2012,29775/2012,29776/2012,29782/2012, 3583/2013,3584/2013,3585/2013,3586/2013,3587/2013,3588/2013,3589/2013,3590/2013,3591/2013,3592/2013,3593/2013,3594/2013,3595/2013,3596/2013,3597/2013,3598/2013,3599/2013,3600/2013,3601/2013,3602/2013,3603/2013,3606/2013,3609/2013,3618/2013,3604/2013,3605/2013,3608/2013,3615/2013,3619/20133622/2013,3625/2013,3626/2013,3627/2013,3628/2013,3629/2013,3630/2013,3632/2013,3633/2013,3634/2013,3636/2013,3637/2013,3639/2013,3640/2013,3641/2013,3642/2013,3643/2013,5199/2013,5200/2013, 5201-5202/2013,5203/2013,8678/2013, 31654/2012,31655/2012,31656/2012,31657/2012,31658/2012,31659/2012,31660/2012,31663/2012,31664/2012,31665/2012,31666/2012,31668/2012,31669/2012,31670/2012,31671/2012,31672/2012,31673/2012,31674/2012,31676/2012,31677/2012,31679/2012, 17722/2013,17724/2013,17726/2013,17728/2013,17729/2013,17730/2013,17732/2013,17733/2013,17734/2013,17735/2013,17737/2013,17739/2013,17740/2013,17742/2013,17744/2013,17745/2013,17748/2013,17749/2013,17750/2013,17751/2013,17752/2013,17753/2013,17755/2013,17756/2013,17758/2013,17759/2013,17761/2013,17762/2013,17763/2013,17765/2013,17766/2013,17767/2013,17768/2013,17770/2013,17771/2013,24108/2013,24109/2013,24110/2013(XV),24111/2013,24112/2013,24113/2013,24114/2013,24115/2013,24116/2013,24118/2013,24119/2013,24121/2013,24120/2013,24122/2013,24123/2013,24124/2013,24125/2013,24126/2013,24127/2013,24128/2013,24129/2013,24130/2013,24131/2013,24132/2013,24133/2013,24134/2013,24135/2013,24136/2013,24137/2013,24138/2013,24139/2013,24140/2013,24141/2013,24142/2013,24143/2013,24144/2013,24145/2013,24146/2013,24147/2013,24148/2013,

24149/2013,24150/2013,24151/2013,24152/2013,24153/2013,24154/2013,24155/2013,24156/2013,24157/2013,24158/2013,24159/2013,24160/2013,24162/2013,24161/2013,24163/2013,24164/2013,24165/2013,24166/2013,24167/2013,24168/2013,24169/2013,24170/2013,24171/2013,24172/2013,24173/2013,24174/2013,24175/2013,24178/2013,24179/2013,24180/2013,24181/2013,24182/2013,24183/2013,24184/2013,24185/2013,24187/2013,24188/2013,24189/2013,24190/2013,24191/2013,24192/2013,24193/2013,24194/2013,24195/2013, 24198/2013,24199/2013, SLP....CC.NO.12658/2013,SLP(C) NOs.24200/2013,24201/2013,24202/2013,24203/2013,24204/2013,24205/2013,24206/2013,24207/2013,24208/2013,24209/2013,24210/2013,12684/2013,12686/2013,12688/2013,12690/2013,12693/2013,12695/2013,12697/2013,12699/2013,12700/2013,12701/2013,12702/2013,12703/2013,12706/2013,12707/2013,12710/2013,12713/2013,12714/2013,12715/2013,12716/2013,12717/2013,12718/2013,12721/2013,12722/2013,12724/2013,12725/2013,12726/2013,12727/2013,12728/2013,12729/2013,12730/2013,12731/2013,12732/2013,12733/2013,12734/2013,12735/2013,12736/2013,12738/2013,12739/2013,12740/2013,12741/2013,12742/2013,12743/2013,12744/2013,12745/2013,12747/2013,12748/2013,12749/2013,12750/2013,12751/2013,12752/2013,12753/2013,12754/2013,12755/2013,12756/2013,12757/2013,12758/2013,12759/2013,12760/2013,12762/2013,12763/2013,12764/2013,12765/2013,12766/2013,12768/2013,12769/2013,12770/2013,12771/2013,12772/2013,12773/2013,12774/2013,12775/2013,12776/2013,12777/2013,17772/2013,17773/2013,17774/2013,17777/2013,17778/2013,17779/2013,17782/2013,17785/2013,17787/2013,17790/2013,17792/2013,17793/2013,17795/2013,17798/2013,17800/2013,17801/2013,17802/2013,17804/2013,17805/2013,17806/2013,17808/2013,17810/2013,17811/2013,17812/2013,17813/2013,17814/2013,17816/2013,17818/2013,17817/2013,17819/2013,17821-17823/2013,17824/2013,17825/2013,17826-17828/2013,17829/2013,17830/2013,25478/2013, 25480/2013, 25481/2013, 25482/2013, 25483/2013, 25484/2013,25485/2013, 25486/2013, 25487/2013, 25488/2013,25489/2013,25490/2013,25491/2013,25492/2013,25493/2013,25494/2013,25495/2013,25497/2013,25498/2013,25499/2013,25500/2013,25501/2013,25502/2013,25503/2013,25504/2013,25505/2013,25506/2013,25507/2013,25508/2013,25509/2013,25510/2013,25511/2013,25512/2013,25513/2013,25514/2013,25515/2013,25516/2013,25517/2013,25518/2013,25520/2013,25521/2013,25522/2013,25523/2013,25524/2013, 25526/2013,25527/2013,25528/2013,25529/2013,25530/2013,25531/2013,25532/2013,25533/2013,25534/2013,25535/2013,25536/2013,25537/2013,25539/2013,25538/2013,25540/2013,25541/2013,25543/2013,25542/2013,25544/2013,25545/2013,25546/2013,25547/2013,25548/2013,25549/2013,25550/2013,10702/2013,10703/2013,10704/2013,10706/2013,10707/2013,10708/2013,10709/2013,10710/2013,10711/2013,10712/2013,10713/2013,10714/2013,10715/2013,10716/2013,10717/2013,10718/2013,10719/2013,10782/2013,10783/2013,10784/2013,10781/2013,10720/2013,10721/2013,10722/2013,10723/2013,10724/2013,10725/2013,10726/2013,10727/2013,10728/2013,10729/2013,10731/2013,10732/2013,10733/2013,10734/2013,10735/2013,10736/2013,10737/2013,10738/2013,10739/2013,10740/2013,10741/2013,10742/2013,10743/2013,10745/2013,10746/2013,10747/2013,10748/2013,10749/2013,10750/2013,10751/2013,10752/2013,10753/2013,10754/2013,10755/2013,10756/2013,10757/2013,10758/2013,10759/2013,10760/2013,10761/2013,10762/2013,10763/2013,10764/2013,10765/2013,10766/2013,10767/2013,10768/2013,10769/2013,10770/2013,10772/2013,10773/2013,10774/2013,10775/2013,10776/2013,10777/2013,10778/2013,10779/2013,10780/2013,10785/2013,26681-26682/2013,26176-26177/2013,26178/2013, 16722-16723/2013,26179/2013,25467/2013,25468/2013,26890/2013, 24622-24624/2013,28724/2013,26868/2013,30601/2013,19922/2013, 32708-32712/2013,23446-23447/2012,30366/2013,30367/2013,30368/2013,30369/2013,30372/2013,30371/2013,30370/2013,30373/2013,30374/2013,30375/2013,30376/2013,30377/2013,30378/2013,30379/2013,30380/2013,30381/2013,30390/2013,30382/2013,30383/2013,30384/2013,30385/2013,30386/2013,30387/2013,30388/2013,30389/2013,30391/2013,30392/2013,30393/2013,30394/2013,30395/2013,30396/2013,30397/2013,30398/2013,30399/2013,30400/2013,30401/2013,30402/2013,30403/2013,30404/2013,30405/2013,30406/2013,30407/2013,30408/2013,30409/2013,30410/2013,30411/2013, 30412/2013,30413/2013,30414/2013,30415/2013,33288/2013,33289/2013,33290/2013,33291/2013,33292/2013,33293/2013,33294/2013,33295/2013,33296/2013,33297/2013,33298/2013,33299/2013,33300/2013,

33301/2013,33302/2013,33303/2013,33304/2013,33305/2013,33306/2013,33307/2013,33308/2013,33309/2013,33310/2013,33312/2013,33313/2013,33314/2013,33315/2013,33316/2013,33317/2013,33319/2013,33320/2013,33321/2013,33322/2013,33323/2013,33324/2013,33325/2013,33326/2013,33327/2013,33328/2013,33329/2013,33330/2013,33331/2013,33332/2013,33333/2013,33334/2013,33335/2013,33336/2013,33337/2013,33338/2013,33339/2013,33341/2013,34562/2013,34573/2013,34574/2013,34563/2013,34565/2013,34567/2013,34569/2013,34564/2013,34570/2013,34571/2013,34566/2013,34568/2013,34572/2013,34575/2013,34581/2013,34576/2013,34580/2013,34583/2013,34582/2013,34578/2013,34584/2013,34579/2013,34577/2013,34585/2013,34586/2013,34587/2013,34588/2013,34589/2013,34590/2013,34591/2013,34592/2013,34593/2013,34594/2013,34595/2013,34596/2013,34597/2013,34598/2013,34599/2013,34600/2013,34601/2013,34602/2013,34603/2013)GROUP BSLP(C)No.30969/2011 SAVITRI DEVI Vs. STATE OF U.P.& ORS. (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) WITHSLP(C) NO.33984-33988/2011,2557/2012,333/2012,1858/2012,2537/2012,1739/2012,1082-1083/2012,2798/2012,2411/2012,1104/2012,3417/2012,4645/2012, 4647/2012,4661/2012,5091/2012,2873/2012,36334-36340/2011,1664-1665/2012,2603/2012,2612/2012,2639/2012,2820/2012,3298/2012,3918/2012,4024/2012,6345/2012,3473/2012,36352-36354/2011,4249/2012,9527/2012,5150/2012,5170/2012,9678/2012,3916/2012,6508/2012, 6849/2012,8528/2012,10056-10058/2012,5712/2012,5959/2012,6013/2012,6027/2012,6121/2012,6196/2012,6539/2012,8593/2012,8439/2012,7146/2012,10597/2012,6381/2012,12299/2012,12461/2012,10315/2012, 16339-16341/2012,16380/2012,11879/2012,12844/2012,16335/2012,10052/2012,16336/2012,16337/2012,11993/2012,16007/2012,9761/2012,15905/2012,4687/2012,15173/2012,17041/2012,8851/2012,10317/2012,4223/2012,4542/2012,6363/2012,6368/2012,6369/2012,4242/2012,3242/2012,1554/2012,3776/2012,2607/2012,6466-6469/2012, 2330-2333/2012,6458-6460/2012,13641-13646/2012,11303/2012,11304/2012,6731-6732/2012,8853-8855/2012,6748-6756/2012,5566/2012,6489-6494/2012,6534-6535/2012,8849/2012,7934-7935/2012,7815/2012,7539/2012,7540/2012,7542-7543/2012,4021/2012,7541/2012,6629/2012,19356/2012,8380/2012, 24409/2012,27508/2010,23722/2012,23723/2012,23724-23725/2012,27389-27396/2012, 37493/2012, 37492/2012,32140/2012,27502-27507/2012,23750/2012,18104/2012,7436/2012,9748/2012,33860/2012,38188-38193/2012,27023/2012,38287/2012,38288/2012,38289/2012,27139/2012,38290/2012,27930/2012,28140/2012, 30590/2012,16674/2012,16695/2012,16723/2012,4383/2013, 18090/2013, 8635/2013, 9297/2013,8631/2013,9168/2013,22484/2012,8887/2013,6353/2012,12784/2013,24203/2012,24720/2012,18866/2013,11020/2013,17633-17634/2013,17635/2013,26874-26876/2012,13017/2013,20326/2013,20329/2013, 23276/2013,31675/2012, 23855-23856/2013,23859-23860/2013, 23857-23858/2013,37993/2012,GROUP CSLP(C)No... CC 19892/2013(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19986 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19987 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19988 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19990 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19991 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19993 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19995 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19999 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20001 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20002 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20009 of 2013

S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20013 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20015 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20018 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20017 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20019 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20023 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20027 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20028 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20032 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20041 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20042 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20044 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20045 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20047 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20048 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20052 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20053 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20055 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20058 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20060 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20061 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20064 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20065 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20070 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20071 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20073 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20085 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20094 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20095 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20096 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20098 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20099 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20100 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20101 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20102 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20103 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20104 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20107 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20110 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20113 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20115 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20116 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20118 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20117 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20119 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20121 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20122 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20123 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20125 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20126 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20128 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20129 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20130 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20131 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20132 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20133 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20134 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20136 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20280 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20281 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20285 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20288 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20289 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20299 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20304 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20305 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20307 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20309 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20358 of 2013

S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20393 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20394 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20397 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20401 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20464 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20467 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20468 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20469 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20470 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20473 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20477 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20478 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20480 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20483 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20484 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20486 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20487 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20699 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20702 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20784 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20881 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20883 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20884 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20886 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21014 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21016 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21019 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21020 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21021 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21022 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21023 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21026 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21028 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21030 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21085 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21086 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21105 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21111 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21212 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21213 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21228 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21230 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21231 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21265 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21399 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21467 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21567 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21660 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21750 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21851 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21861 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21866 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21868 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21870 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21874 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21880 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21882 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21885 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21888 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21890 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21891 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21897 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21900 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21901 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21902 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21905 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21906 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21907 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21908 of 2013

S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21910 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21998 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22048 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22050 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22052 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22054 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22055 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22056 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22059 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22061 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22064 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22069 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22248 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22394 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22427 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22430 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22433 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22436 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22438 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22441 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22443 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22446 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22459 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22462 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22480 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22482 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22483 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22486 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22489 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22491 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22533 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22536 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22553 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22558 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22713 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22714 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22715 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22718 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22722 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22725 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22726 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22730 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 719 of 2014S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 97 of 2014 Date: 22/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s)/ Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kr. Mahajan, Adv. Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Krishna, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Ram Shiromani Yadav, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Ms. Sunita Pandit, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. J.P. Nagar, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ram Shromani Yadav, Adv. Ms. Sunita Pandit, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder, Adv. Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Mahua Kalra, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv. Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia,Adv. Mr. Braham Singh, Adv. Mr. M.S. Vidhuti, Adv. Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv. Mr. Girdhar Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv. MR. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv. M/s. Anuradha & Associates, Advs.

Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv. Mr. Navin Kr. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Pravin Satale, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Puneet Dutt Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumsr Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Rizwan Nizami, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Pankaj dubey, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. for M/s. AP & J Chambers,Advs. Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv. Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Ms. Pranali, Adv. Mr. Ravindera Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Suresh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Praseena E. Joseph, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pandey, Adv. for M/s. Lawyer's Knit & Co., Advs. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. Mr. Payal Dayal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jha, Adv. Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Debnandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Maneesh Arora, Adv. Mr. R. Chandrachud, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Singh, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta,Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sunit Sinha, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. adv. Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv. Mr. Amit Singh, Adv. Ms. Aloka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. M. Kirshnan, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. MR. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Inam, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Bhopal singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. Sardeep Singh, Adv. Md. Shahid Anwar,Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Ravi Sikri, Adv. Mr. Ayusha Kumar, Adv. Ms. Madhu Sikri,Adv.

Mr. Ravi Sikri, Adv. Ms. Ayushya Kumar, Adv. Ms. Madhu Sikri, Adv. Mr. Sudeep Shrotriya, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kr. Rai, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pathak, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Fatesh Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr.K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan, Adv. Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv. MR. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Gopalan Nair,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. MR. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Ms.Pragya Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr.Praveen Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. Ms. Shomila Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv. MS. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, Adv.

Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. M/S Mitter & Mitter & Co., Advs. Mr. Sudhir Kulshreshtha, Adv. Ms. Sushma Singh, Adv. Mr. Devesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Adv. Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv. Mr. I.C. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. G.Subramanium, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Saini, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Shudhansu Palo, Adv. Mr. Prashant Dahat, Adv.

Ms. Pranali, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. Dr. Meera Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Chandra Mishra, Adv. (SCLSC) Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. S.K. Vij, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Braham singh, Adv. Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R GROUP A & GROUP B Delay in filing process fee is condoned. Notice be now issued. GROUP C Notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on merits. ---- Delink SLP(C)Nos. 17633-17634 of 2013 and tag with SLP(C) Nos. 34981-34982 of 2011. Counter affidavit in all these groups be filed within three weeks' time. Two weeks' time is granted for filing rejoinder affidavit. The Registry to post these matters only after pleadings are complete. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] |

|Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |

NITEM NO.MM-15 COURT NO.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NOS.7-12 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38188-38193/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.64564/2009, CMWPNo.65544/2009, CMWP No.68487/2009 dated 14/05/2012 in RA No.2545/2012, RANo.2591/2012, RA No.2597/2012 of The HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for further direction and office report)Date: 21/01/2014 These Petitions were MENTIONED today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List I.A. Nos.7-12 filed in the special leave petitions on Monday (27.01.2014) before the appropriate Bench.|(Chetan Kumar) | |(Savita Sainani) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar |

Ô@ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CC 19892/2013Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013(From the judgement and order dated 03/01/2012 in CMWP No.76734/2011 ofthe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJENDRA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19986 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19987 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19988 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19990 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19991 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19993 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19995 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19999 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20001 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20002 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20009 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20013 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20015 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20018 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20017 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20019 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20023 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20027 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20028 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20032 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20041 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20042 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20044 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20045 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20047 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20048 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20052 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20053 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20055 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20058 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20060 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20061 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20064 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20065 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20070 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20071 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20073 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20085 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20094 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20095 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20096 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20098 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20099 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20100 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20101 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20102 of 2013

S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20103 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20104 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20107 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20110 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20113 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20115 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20116 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20118 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20117 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20119 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20121 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20122 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20123 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20125 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20126 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20128 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20129 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20130 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20131 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20132 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20133 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20134 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20136 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20280 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20281 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20285 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20288 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20289 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20299 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20304 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20305 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20307 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20309 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20358 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20393 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20394 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20397 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20401 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20464 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20467 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20468 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20469 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20470 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20473 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20477 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20478 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20480 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20483 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20484 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20486 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20487 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20699 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20702 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20784 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20881 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20883 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20884 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20886 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21014 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21016 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21019 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21020 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21021 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21022 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21023 of 2013

S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21026 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21028 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21030 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21085 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21086 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21105 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21111 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21212 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21213 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21228 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21230 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21231 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21265 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21399 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21467 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21567 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21660 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21750 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21851 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21861 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21866 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21868 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21870 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21874 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21880 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21882 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21885 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21888 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21890 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21891 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21897 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21900 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21901 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21902 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21905 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21906 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21907 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21908 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21910 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 21998 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22048 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22050 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22052 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22054 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22055 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22056 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22059 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22061 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22064 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22069 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22248 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22394 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22427 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22430 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22433 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22436 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22438 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22441 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22443 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22446 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22459 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22462 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22480 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22482 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22483 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22486 of 2013

(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22489 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22491 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22533 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22536 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22553 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22558 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22713 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22714 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22715 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22718 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22722 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22725 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22726 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22730 of 2013S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 719 of 2014S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 97 of 2014(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 20/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.L.Nageswara Rao, ASG Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, Adv.(NP) Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr.S.K.VIj, Adv. Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these cases along with S.L.P.(C)NO.19301/2012 etc.etc., whichare stated to be listed on 22nd January, 2014. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

ZITEM NO.50 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6458-6460/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.18037/2011,WC No.48089/2011 dated 09/12/2011 in WC No.70603/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With office report on default)Date: 13/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.\CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chamber)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last oppornity is granted to the petitioners for filing process fee and spare copies of I.As. No.6-8 within a period of four weeks. [Usha Bhardwaj] [Veena Lakhina] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

¦ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46021/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))Date: 13/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Tiwary, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÎITEM NO.37 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47567/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))Date: 13/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh K. Tiwary, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some mistakes have crept in the synopsis and list of dates. He thus prays that he may be permitted to amend the same. He may do so within four weeks. List the matter after four weeks. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

bITEM NO.21 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No.5 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7541/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37443/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. for impleadment and office report)Date: 13/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chamber)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.Applicant/respondent: M/s Lawyers Knit & Co. (NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice but no one appears in support of the application for impleadment. It is stated that the respondent has no objection if the application is allowed. In the interest of justice, list after eight weeks. [Usha Bhardwaj] [Veena Lakhina] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

ôITEM NO.23 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO. 2 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30860/2013(From the judgment and order dated 17/11/2011 in CMWP No.65079/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHARAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of proforma respondents)Date: 10/01/2014 This Application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv. Mr. Brijesh Panchal, Adv. Mr. Rahul Nabiyal, Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion of respondents no. 12 to 33 stands allowed at the risk of the petitioner. [SONIA KUMARI] [SNEH LATA SHARMA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

¤ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWP No.40334/2011, CWPNo.40345/2011,CWP No.40356/2011,CWP No.40359/2011,CWP No.44917/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and withprayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 06/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv. Ms. Reena Singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Connect with S.L.P. (C) 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

êITEM NO.28 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37793/2013(From the judgement and order dated 12/09/2013 in CMWP No.48313/2013 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 03/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankur Prakash,Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this special leave petition is identical to the issue raised in Special Leave Petition (C) No.30969 of 2011. Taking the aforesaid statement on record we issue notice on the special leave petition as also on the prayer for interim relief. Tag with Special Leave Petition (C) No.30969 of 2011. (A.S. BISHT) (VINOD KULVI) A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR

`ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil).......... CC 13944/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.39584/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KHEMCHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP,amendment ofthe petition and office report)Date: 03/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application No. 4 of 2013 is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). The amended petition shall be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¾ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.15 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO. 68 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9527/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in WCN No.46933/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HARBAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention and office report )Date: 03/01/2014 This Application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhir Naagar,Adv. Mr. Chetan Chawla, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Asha G. Nair, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applicant to serve copies of this application on the petitioners as well as respondents within two weeks'. Call after three weeks'. [SONIA KUMARI] [SNEH LATA SHARMA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

SECTION XI LISTED ON: 17.12.2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 11 CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 477 of 2013 IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 16380 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for Interim Order) BALRAJ SINGH & ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Application for Interim Order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.03.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Issue notice on the Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 returnable in six weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 2 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners- applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession." Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 6 on 09.04.2013 by registered A.D. Post and Respondent No. 2 through Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. But Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back from Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 6 so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Contempt Petiton and the same is registered as Contempt Petiton No. 477 of 2013. The Contempt Petition above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 16th day of December, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Y.P. Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

BITEM NO.43 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47567/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A. 1 (c/delay in refiling SLP,c/delay in filing SLP and officereport )Date: 16/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Salik Ram, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Tiwari, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after three weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 1-2 of .... in &Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 19205/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.48449/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAM PAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for substitution and permission to file SLP and c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)Date: 13/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Singhvi, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 1-2 of 2013 for permission to file special leave petition are granted. I.A. No. 4 of 2013 for condonation of delay in filing application for substitution is allowed. I.A. No. 3 of 2013 for substitution is granted. Application for deletion of names of proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 12 is granted at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause-title shall be filed by the advocate-on- record for the petitioners within one week from today. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing special leave petition as well as on the special leave petition. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3. Notice shall only be issued to un-represented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Sneh Lata Sharma) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.MM-4A COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos.2 & 3 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).19922/2013(From the judgement and order dated 02/05/2013 in CMWP No.24570/2013 ofthe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAKESH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions )Date: 10/12/2013 These applns. were called on for mentioning today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr.Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr.Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Tanmay Agarwal, Adv. For Mr.Vinay Garg, Adv. Mr.Ravinder Kumar, Adv.(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board. I.A.Nos.2 & 3 are dismissed. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar

øITEM NO.34 COURT.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18735/2013(From the judgement and order dated 29/04/2013 in WPC No.58707/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AMAR NATH GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim reliefand office report ))Date: 09/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel, waives service for the respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

$ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25551-25552/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WP No.24520/2011,WPNo.35635/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATISH CHAND & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions and prayer for interim relief and officereport )Date: 09/12/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 3-4 of 2013: If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject property, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents. However, under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land if they are not in actual physical possession. I.A. Nos. 3-4 of 2013 stand disposed of. S.L.P. (c) No 25551-25552 of 2012: Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |

äITEM NO.26 COURT.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).36242/2013(From the judgement and order dated 29/04/2013 in CMWP No.50235/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS Respondent(s)(for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer for interim reliefand office report ))WITHS.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 21151 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)SLP(C) NO. 36975 of 2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing OT and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 09/12/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s)SLP 36242/2013 Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Rai, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.SLP 36975/2013 Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.S.L.P.(C)...[CC 21151/2013] Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36242 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter.

S.L.P. (civil) No. 36975 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter. S.L.P. (C).../2013 [CC 21151/2013] Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\232ITEM NO.32 COURT.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 13944/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.395842011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KHEMCHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(I.A. No. 4 - appln.(s) for amendment and with office report )Date: 09/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after two weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

rITEM NO.14 COURT NO.15 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO. 3 & 4 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).8851/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42789/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MANJU BAJAJ & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention,exemption from filing O.T. and officereport)Date: 06/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for intervention is ordered. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the notice in the Special Leave Petition on the Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. |(Vishal Anand) | |(Indu Pokhriyal) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

&ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 1-2 in &Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 19205/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.48449/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAM PAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for substitution and permission to file SLP, c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))Date: 06/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on December 13, 2013.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÄITEM NO.10 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.NO. 4 IN Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9761/2012OM PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of proforma respondents and office report)Date: 05/12/2013 This I.A. was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. J.S. Arya, Adv. Mr. Mahendra Duby, Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application for deleting proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 71 from the array of respondents. There is no objection to the prayer. Therefore, the application is allowed at the risk of the petitioners. Cause title be amended accordingly. (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

vITEM NO.42 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6508/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.14112/2010 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NARMADA DEVI ATMA RAM CHARITABLE TRUST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 03/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. for Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in filing the process fee. Office to proceed according to Rules. (G.V.Ramana) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master

ºITEM NO.7 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 444 OF 2013 IN SLP(C) 5566/2012 [FOR PREL. HEARING]RAJBIR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 02/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Bansal, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. for Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Contempt Petition shall be considered at the time of consideration of special leave petition.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\236ITEM NO.8 Court No.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 7 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8853-8855/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.41558/2009,CMWPNo.33042/2011,CMWP No.48253/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)KHEM CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and office report ))Date: 02/12/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr.S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel ,Adv Mr.Sudhansu Palo ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one appears to support this application. The same is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. |(Shashi Sareen) | |(Veena Khera) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

pITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30601/2013MAHENDRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 02/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atulesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos.1 to 7. List again on 20.1.2014.| | | (M.K. HANJURA) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

VITEM NO.49 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.16339-16341/2012DHARAMPAL ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 25/11/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the application along with the main case. Learned counsel for the petitioners says that he will cure the defects with regard to filing of process fee and spare copies of special leave petitions within four weeks. [GEETA AHUJA] [INDU SATIJA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ÈITEM NO.4 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 4, 5 & 6 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5150/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46602/2011 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)LEKHRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. and exemptionfrom certified copy of the impugned order and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 22/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. If the petitioners applicants are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcefully dispossessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. The I.A. No.4 is disposed of accordingly. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

þITEM NO.36 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19200-19201/2013(From the judgement and order dated 04/04/2013 in CMWP No.18257/2013 anddated 15/04/2013 in CMWP No.20675/2013 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)BRHAM PAL SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim reliefand office report ))Date: 19/11/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

BITEM NO.13 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 19081-19082/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC Nos.45345 & 46160 of2011 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS ETC Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P & ORS. Respondent(s)(With I.A. Nos.1-2 for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 33980 of 2013(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19616 of 2013(With I.A. Nos.1-2 for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19671 of 2013(With I.A. Nos.1-2 for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 34176 of 2013(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 35143 of 2013(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20177-20178 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date:19/11/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rahul Verma,Adv. Mr. Kalu Ram Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Varun chaudhary,Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal,Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma,Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey,Adv. For Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well aslearned counsel for the respondents.S.L.P.(C) No......CC 19081-19082/2013: Counsel for the petitioners prays for deletion of proformarespondent Nos.4 to 17. Prayer for deletion is allowed.S.L.P.(C) No.33980/2013: Counsel for the petitioners prays for deletion of proformarespondent Nos.5 & 6. Prayer for deletion is allowed.S.L.P.(C) No......CC 20177-20178/2013: Counsel for the petitioners prays for deletion of proformarespondent Nos.4 to 88. Prayer for deletion is allowed. Deletion in all these matters be carried out within fourweeks. Issue notice returnable after six weeks. It will be open for thepetitioners to file additional affidavits. To be placed along with SLP(C) No.30969/2011.(A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ÊITEM NO.31 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37993/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47735/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 18/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. NO.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16336/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42323/2011 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KUDIYA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date: 18/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh,Adv. Mr. Akshant Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garg,Adv. For Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Harpreet Singh,Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, learned senior counsel in support of this application and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel appearing for Greater Noida Development Authority. The applicant seeks protection of the structure that the petitioners claim to have put up and with respect to which they claim to be in possession. According to the respondents, they are not in possession of the particular parcel of land. In the circumstances, we direct that if the petitioners are in possession, their possession of the structures concerned will remain protected as has been the order in the earlier case. It is further made clear that if the petitioners are not in possession, under the garb of this order they will not enter into possession and, in any case, they will maintain status quo with respect to the possession. I.A. No.2 is disposed of accordingly. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ÊITEM NO.32 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 15240/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.55014/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BRIJENDRA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP,permission tofile additional documents and office report )Date: 01/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Although compensation has been received by the petitioners as is clearly seen from the affidavit dated 25.10.2013, but since in a similar group of matters, notices have been issued, issue notice in the present matter as well on the application for condonation of delay and so also on the special leave petition. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÆITEM NO.20 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 19205/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.48449/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAM PAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report )Date: 01/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Adv. Mr. K.K. L. Gautam, Adv. for Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¾ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA.No.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16336/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42323/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KUDIYA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. for directions and office report)Date: 25/10/2013 This matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv. Mr. Puneet Taneja ,Adv Ms. Swati Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Stand over to 18th November, 2013. Service be completed in the meanwhile. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Sneh Lata Sharma ] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

¦ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.15 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9761/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WCNo.47502/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OM PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 21/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Manendra Dubey, Adv. Mr. G.P. Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would like to move an application to delete respondent Nos. 5 to 71 from the array of parties. The matter be listed as and when the application is filed.|(Anita Malhotra) | |(Veena Lakhina) ||Sr.PA | |Court Master |

zÎITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012BALIRAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim stay and prayer for interim relief and officereport )WITHSLP(C) NO.2411/2012SLP(C) NO.1104/2012SLP(C) NO.5091/2012SLP(C) NO.6345/2012SLP(C) NO.3473/2012SLP(C) NO.4249/2012SLP(C) NO.5150/2012SLP(C) NO.5170/2012SLP(C) NO.3916/2012SLP(C) NO.10056-10058/2012SLP(C) NO.5712/2012SLP(C) NO.5959/2012SLP(C) NO.6013/2012SLP(C) NO.6027/2012SLP(C) NO.7146/2012SLP(C) NO.10597/2012SLP(C) NO.6381/2012SLP(C) NO.16380/2012SLP(C) NO.11879/2012SLP(C) NO.10052/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.16337/2012SLP(C) NO.16007/2012SLP(C) NO.4687/2012SLP(C) NO.8851/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012SLP(C) NO.3242/2012SLP(C) NO.2607/2012SLP(C) NO.6748-6756/2012SLP(C) NO.5566/2012SLP(C) NO.7815/2012SLP(C) NO.7540/2012SLP(C) NO.6629/2012SLP(C) NO.19356/2012SLP(C) NO.37493/2013SLP(C) NO.7436/2012SLP(C) NO.9748/2012 -2-Item No.17SLP(C) NO.33860/2012SLP(C) NO.27930/2012SLP(C) NO.16674/2012SLP(C) NO.16695/2012SLP(C) NO.26874-26876/2012

(With office report)Date: 18/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr Rakesh Dahiya, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Mr Abdul Wadud Aman, Adv. Mr Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr Prabhat Kumar Rai, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr Stapal Singh, Adv. Mr Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr Rakesh K Sharma, Adv. Mr Chandrika Prasad Mishra, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv. Mr M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Mr Jabar Singh, Adv. Ms Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr Pahlad Singh Sharma, Adv. Mr Syed Tabinda Suman, Adv. Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv. Ms Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr Balraj Dewan, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Mr Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr S.K.Verma, Adv. Mr Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr Rajesh Goyal, Adv. Mr Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr R.D.Upadhyay, Adv. Mr Sudhir Naagar, Adv. Mr Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. -3-Item No.17For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr Deepak Goel, Adv. Ms Akanksha Mehra, Adv. M/S Lawyers Knit & Co. Mr A Ramesh, Adv. Mr C.S.N.Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr Bhaskar Y Kulkarni, Adv. Mr Abdhesh Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Adv.

Mr Mohit Bakshi, Adv. Mr Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr Sumit R Sharma, Adv. Mr Puneet Taneja, Adv. Ms Tatini Basu, Adv. Mr Krishna Tiwari, Adv. Ms Shomila Bakshi, Adv. Mr Rajeev Dubey, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Ms Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Ravi Sikri, Adv. Ms Madhu Sikri, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.1082-83/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent no.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him as lastchance. The ld. Counsel, Mr Rajeev Dubey appearing on behalf of Mr AnuvratSharma, Advocate-on-record seeks four weeks' time to file the vakalatnamaand the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Time asprayed for is given to him as last chance. -4-Item No.17SLP(C) NO.2411/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent NO.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.1104/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent NO.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.5091/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.5 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.5 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos. 2 to 4. -5-Item No.17 The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.6345/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against the respondent No.1. The saidrespondent may also file the counter affidavit within the period stipulatedabove in case he chooses to do so. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to the

respondent No. 2.SLP(C) NO.3473/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him as lastchance. Service is complete as against respondent Nos. 1 and 6 but no onehas entered appearance on their behalf. The said respondents may also filethe counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case theychoose to do so. -6-Item No.17 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed theprocess fee and the spare copies for the service of the respondent Nos.2,4,5,7 and 8. He seeks one weeks' time to file the requisites. Time asprayed for is granted to him as last chance.SLP(C) NO.4249/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent Nos.2 and 7 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Respondent No.7 has already filed the counter affidavit. The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file the processfee and the spare copies for the service of respondent Nos. 1 and 6 withina weeks' time failing which further appropriate orders shall follow on thenext date.SLP(C) NO.5150/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.4 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against respondent No.1 but no one hasentered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent -7-Item No.17may also file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above incase he chooses to do so. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos. 2 and 3.SLP(C) NO.5170/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Respondent No.1 may also file the counter affidavit within theperiod stipulated above in case he chooses to do so. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent No.3. The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.3916/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present.The ld. Counselfor the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time to file the counteraffidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. The ld. Counsel, Mr Rajeev Dubey appearing on behalf of Mr AnuvratSharma, Advocate-on-record has appeared for the respondent No.1 and heseeks four weeks' time for filing the -8-Item No.17vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted tohim.

Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos.3 and 4.SLP(C) NO.10056/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time forfiling the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed the process fee andthe spare copies. These are reported to be barred by time. Delay in filingthe process fee and the spare copies is condoned. Office shall takeappropriate further steps for the service of the unserved respondents.SLP(C) NO.3916/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time for filing the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is grantedto him. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos.1 and 3.SLP(C) NO.5959/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent no.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time for filing the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is grantedto him. -9-Item No.17 Service is complete as against the respondent No.1 but no one hasentered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent may also file thecounter affidavit within the period provided above in case he chooses to doso. Await the return of the notice already issued to the respondentNo.3.SLP(C) NO.6013/2012 The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time for filing the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is grantedto him.SLP(C) NO.6027/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time for filing the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is grantedto him. Service is complete as against the respondent No.1 but no one hasentered appearance on his behalf. He may also file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated above in case he chooses to do so. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent No.3.SLP(C) NO.7146/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time forfiling the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. -10-Item No.17 Await the return of the service report from the Trial Court. Service is complete as against the respondent No.3 but no one hasentered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent may also file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case he chooses todo so.SLP(C) NO.10597/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4,5 and 11 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 seeks four weeks' time forfiling the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Respondent No.5 has already filed the counter affidavit. Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Theymay also file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above incase they choose to do so. Await the return of the service of the show cause notice alreadyissued to the respondent Nos. 3,6,8,10,12 and 13.

SLP(C) NO.6381/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent Nos. 2,7 and 9 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.7 has stated that he hasalready filed the counter affidavit. Office shall verify the position andreport accordingly. The ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 9 seeks four weeks'time for filing the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted tohim. -11-Item No.17 Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent No.1.SLP(C) NO.16380/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time for filing the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is grantedto him. Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. Theymay also file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above incase they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.11879/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. Time asprayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against the other respondents.SLP(C) NO.10052/2012 The ld.counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. The otherserved respondents may also file the counter affidavit within the sameperiod in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.16336/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are -12-Item No.17present. They seek four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time asprayed for is granted to them. Service is complete as against the respondent No.1. The saidrespondent may also file the counter affidavit within the period stipulatedabove in case he chooses to do so. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos.5 to 7.SLP(C) NO.16337/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted tohim. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos.1,2 and 4.SLP(C) NO.16007/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against the respondent No.2. He may alsofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case hechooses to do so. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks two weeks' time to filethe affidavit in proof of dasti service on respondent No.1. Time as prayedfor is granted to him as last chance. -13-Item No.17

SLP(C) NO.4687/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 3,6 and 7 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 have already filed the counter affidavit. Service is complete as against the other respondents. They may alsofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case theychoose to do so.SLP(C) NO.8851/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted tohim. Service is complete as against the other respondents. They may alsofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case theychoose to do so.SLP(C) NO.4242/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. -14-Item No.17SLP(C) NO.3242/2012 The ld.counsel for the petitioner and the respondent representingGreater Noida Authority are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondentseeks four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for isgranted to him. Respondent No.8 has already filed the counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.2607/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent No. 2. Service is complete as against the respondent No.1. He may alsofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case hechooses to do so.SLP(C) NO.6748/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Serviceis complete as against the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has enteredappearance on their behalf. They may also file the counter affidavit withinfour weeks in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.5566/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.4 are present. -15-Item No.17 The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos. 1 to 3.SLP(C) NO.7815/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 and the ld. Counselappearing on behalf of Mr C.S.N.Mohan Rao, Advocate-on-record are present. Both the respondents seek four weeks' time to file the counteraffidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to them. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed the process feeand the spare copies for the service on respondent Nos. 3,5,6,8,9 and 11.He is directed to do the needful in a weeks' time failing which appropriateorders shall follow on the next date.

Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but noone has entered appearance on their behalf. They may also file the counteraffidavit within the period stipulated above in case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.7540/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsels for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are present. Theyseek four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for isgranted to them. Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 4,6,8 -16-Item No.17and 10. They may also file the counter affidavit within the periodstipulated above in case they choose to do so. Process fee and the spare copies have not been filed for theservice of the respondent Nos. 3,5,7,9,11,13,18 and 20. The ld. Counsel forthe petitioner shall be directed to do the needful within a weeks timefailing which further appropriate orders shall follow on the next date.SLP(C) NO.6649/2012 None appears.SLP(C) NO.19356/2012 None appears.SLP(C) NO.37493/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present.SLP(C) NO.7436/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted tohim. Service is complete as against the respondent No.1 He may also filethe counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case he choosesto do so. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent No. 2.SLP(C) NO.9748/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.4 are present. -17-Item No.17 The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against the respondent No.2. He may alsofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case hechooses to do so. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file the processfee and the spare copies for the service of notice on respondent Nos. 1,3and 5 within a weeks' time failing which appropriate orders shall follow onthe next date.SLP(C) NO.33860/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file the processfee and the spare copies for the service of notice on respondent No. 4within a weeks' time failing which appropriate orders shall follow on thenext date.SLP(C) NO.27930/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the respondent no.3 is present. He seeks fourweeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted tohim. Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 1,2,4 and 5.They may also file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated abovein case they choose to do so.SLP(C) NO.16674/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.2 are present. -18-

Item No.17 The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against the other respondents also but noone has entered appearance on their behalf. The said respondents may alsofile the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks in case theydesire to do so. The name of the ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 hasnot been reflected in the cause list. Office to rectify the database.SLP(C) NO.26874/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld. Counsel for therespondent No.3 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.3 seeks four weeks' time tofile the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted to him. Service is complete as against the other respondents. They may alsofile the counter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case theychoose to do so. List again on 2.12.2013.| | |(M.K. HANJURA) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

âITEM NO.12 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 5 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).7541/2012SATVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and office report)Date: 08/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

OITEM NOS.27 + 74 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 17580/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/02/2012 in CMWP No.7621/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEEPAK KUMAR & ORS Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )) WITHSLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. JIYA RAM & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17584 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RAHUL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17588 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DIVYA AGARWAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17589 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. JAGAT SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17590 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. GAJRAJ SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17593 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. BHOOP SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17596 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAMPAT & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17601 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. KISHAN SHARMA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP

CC.No.17603 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAJ KISHORE & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17607 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. OMVIR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17613 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. KHICHCHU & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17615 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. SANJAY & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17621 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NODIA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. ATRAJ SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17622 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SUKHVINDER & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17625 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. DEVENDRA SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17631 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. SUBHASH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17634 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. JAGPAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17737 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. MAHESH NAGAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17860 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. SATYAVIR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17884 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SUNIL AWANA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17885 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17887 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. SATENDRA SINGH RAWAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17889 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. M/S F.J.S HOLDINGS PVT LTD.& ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17890 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. SOHAN LAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17896 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. BRIJENDRA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17897 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL DEV.AUTH. Vs. RANJEET & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17898 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. UDAI SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17899 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAJPAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17900 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. GHANSHYAM & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17901 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DULI CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17902 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. KAMLESH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17905 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RAM CHARAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17907 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DHANRAJ & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17908 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. ANIL KUMAR YADAV & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17909 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. S.K AGARWAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17910 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. VIPIN KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17914 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. MAM CHAND & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17917 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. VIJENDRA KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17919 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. NANAK CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17920 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. JAGGU & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.18025 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SURENDRA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.18026 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RAJBIR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.18030 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. YASHPAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.18031 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. LOKESH KUMAR & ORS CC.No.18044 (WITH OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. GUDDI GOYAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.18054 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 18276/2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. URMILA & ORS. CC.NO.18276 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 18277/2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTH. Vs. DANVIR SINGH & ORS CC.NO.18277 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 18282/2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. PRABHAT ZARDA FACOTRY PVT.LTD.& ORS. CC.NO.18282 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 18286/2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. MANJU GUPTA & ORS. CC.NO.18286 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 18337/2013 GR,NOIDA IDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. SWARANA GUPTA & ORS. CC.NO.18337 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 07/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on special leave petitions.

Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¸ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46021/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 07/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghwendra Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. V.S. Mishra, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, advocate for the petitioner, praying for time on the ground of illness of the counsel. List the matter after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¦ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 46-53/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6466-6469/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42424/2011, WPNo.42439/2011,WP No.45777/2011,WP No.45779/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJESH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention,impleadment and office report)Date: 04/10/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co. Mr. A.Ramesh, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Y. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Manju Jana, Adv. Ms. Shilpi, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though in these applications, notice was duly served on the petitioner, there is no representation on their behalf. According to the applicants, they were the allottees by the 2nd respondent, who have developed the property which was acquired by the petitioner. They being necessary and proper parties, their rights would get seriously impinged in the event of any order being passed prejudicial to their interest. Accordingly, these applications are allowed and applicants are impleaded as party respondents. Necessary amendment to be carried out. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\210ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 14727/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44492/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MANOJ YADAV Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )Date: 26/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay and so also special leave petition. Though the petitioner states that he is in possession of the subject land, but the respondent No. 4 - New Okhla Industrial Development Authority contends that it has taken over the possession of the subject land. In view of the rival stand set up by the parties, we are of the view that it would be in fitness of things if the parties maintain status-quo, as obtaining today, in all respects with regard to the subject land. We order accordingly. It is made clear that if petitioner is not in possession of the subject land, under the garb of this order, he will not try to enter the subject property. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. |(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

EITEM NOS. 20 + 62 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 16617/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.52003/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH Petitioner(s) VERSUSKAVAR SINGH & ORS Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITHSLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. SHYAM LAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16622 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. KANWAR PAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16623 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SATAYA PAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16632 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DARSHAN LAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16634 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. JAI PRAKASH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16635 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. RAJENDRA AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16636 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RANDHIR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16637 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. KARAMVIR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16638 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTH. Vs. MEHAR CHAND AND ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16639 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH.

Vs. RAM KISHOR SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16644 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. BHUPAL SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16645 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SHER SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16740 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16876 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. PARSHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16877 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SAKEEL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16884 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH Vs. PRATAP SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16915 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH Vs. SHANTI & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16916 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DASHARATH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16921 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SHYAM WATI & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16920 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. HITESH KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16945 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. JAGAT & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16947 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. BUNDI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.16958 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RAM VIR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17287 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DHARMVEER & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17295 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. BRAMHA SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17351 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. HAVAN SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17352 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SHREECHAND & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17353 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DHARAM SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17354 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SATPAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17355 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SHYAM SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17362 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17377 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. VED VRATH SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.17381 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17398/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. BHOOLEY & ORS CC.NO.17398 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17549/2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. VEER SINGH & ORS. CC.NO.17549 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17550/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. BALRAJ SINGH & ORS CC.NO.17550 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17552/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. CHAMAN SINGH & ORS CC.NO.17552 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17553/2013 GR.NOIDS INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RAMESH CHAMDRA SHARMA & ORS.

CC.NO.17553 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17554/2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. RAM SWAROOP & ORS. CC.NO.17554 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17555/2013 GR.NOIDS INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. SUDHA DEVI & ORS. CC.NO.17555 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17557/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. VIRENDRA SINGH & ORS CC.NO.17557 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 17612/2013 GR.NOIDA INDSUL.DEV.AUTH Vs. UDAY KAPOOR & ORS. CC.NO.17612 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 27/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well on the special leave petitions returnable after ten weeks. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 15240/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.55014/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BRIJENDRA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP,permission to file additional documents and office report ))Date: 27/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land/s, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¾ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 6-8/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6458-6460/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.18037/2011 and WCNo.48089/2011 and dated 09/12/2011 in WC No.70603/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(for directions and office report)Date: 27/09/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. for M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co. Mr. A. Ramesh, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Y. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory applications returnable in eight weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis- possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos.46-49 & 50-53 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6466-6469/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42424/2011,WP No.42439/2011,WP No.45777/2011,WP No.45779/2011 of The HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJESH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention,impleadment and office report)Date: 26/09/2013 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv. (N.P.)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.(N.P.) M/s. Lawyer'S Knit & Co,AOR (N.P.) Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao,Adv. (N.P.) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv. (N.P.) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No representation for the applicants in both the applications, for impleadment and intervention. Post for dismissal before the Chamber Judge on the next date of hearing. |(NARENDRA PRASAD) | |(INDU POKHRIYAL) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)...... CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.46021/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF Allahabad)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 23/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after one week.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¦ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 11709/2013[From the judgment and order dated 21.20.2011 in WP NO. 42330 of 2011 ofthe High Court of judicature at Allahabad]MAHENDRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 19922 of 2013(With prayer for exemption from filing OT and with interim relief andoffice report)Date: 20/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. for Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.SLP 19922 Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindera Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (C) No...CC No. 11709 of 2013: Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition, returnable in ten weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 4 - New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of the subject land and that no compensation has been received by the petitioner in respect of the subject land. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 -New Okhla Industrial Development Authority disputes that the petitioner is in possession. In view of the rival contentions of the parties, we are satisfied that the interest of justice shall be sub-served if it is directed that in case the petitioner is in possession of the subject land, she will not be dispossessed until further orders. However, under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to enter the subject property if she is not in possession. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.

S.L.P. (C) 19922 of 2013: Issue notice. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others. |(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\202ITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37493/2012BHEEM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 20/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rajesh Goyal,Adv. Mr.Sunder Khatri,adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.1-4 have filed counter affidavit even now. Respondent Nos.5-79 have been deleted by the order of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber dated 11.9.13. Consequently the cause title of the SLP has been amended. Hence, service is complete. No further steps. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

>ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 13944/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.39584/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KHEMCHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 20/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vipin Kumar, Adv.for Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioners praying for time on the ground of self illness. List the matter after three weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

zITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 4-5/2012 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7542-7543/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.75042/2010,CMWPNo.32236/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SARJEET & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)( for stay and office report )Date: 20/09/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interim order dated 7.1.2013 passed by this Court shall continue to operate until further orders. I.A. Nos. 4-5 of 2012 stand disposed of accordingly. |(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\236ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18735/2013(From the judgement and order dated 29/04/2013 in WPC No.58707/2007 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AMAR NATH GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim reliefand office report )Date: 16/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let copy of this special leave petition be served on Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority by the advocate-on-record for the petitioners so that Mr. Ravindra Kumar can verify whether the present special leave petition is identical to special leave petition (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. state of U.P. and others. List the matter after two weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¾NITEM NOS. 15 + 57 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 15713/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.45728/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSZELAY RAM & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHSLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DHANI RAM & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15724 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. NANAK & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15725 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. MEGH RAJ & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15728 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DEVI RAM & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15737 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH Vs. GYANCHAND & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15744 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15766 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDL DEV Vs. ATTAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15803 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. AZIMULLAH AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15811 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. KAMLESH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15826 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. RAJ BEER & ORS.

WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15873 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NODIA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAJVIR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15886 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. DESHRAJ & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15885 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. BUNDI AND ORSCC.No.15888 (WITH OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. DEVENDRA AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15893 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. MOHAMMAD ALI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15909 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDL. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAJESH BHATI AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15911 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTHORITY Vs. BUNDI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15913 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. MAZID & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15926 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. LEELAWATI & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15980 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SAVITA DEVI & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15988 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. JAI PRAKASH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15990 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. DHARA SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15992 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. YATENDRA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15993 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. BALWANT AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.15999 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. PAWAN KUMAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16000 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. GAJRAJ SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16006 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DESH PAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16007 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUT Vs. RAJENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16025 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH Vs. GHANSHYAM SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16044 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. PRITHI SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16046 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH Vs. LEKH RAM & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16054 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. KRISHAN KUMAR BHATI AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16059 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16107 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. TAJPAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16118 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DHANPAL SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16212 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DIGENDER SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16213 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. RANDHIR SINGH AND ORS

WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16216 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. ESWAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16219 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DALVEER SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16223 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. RAM KISHAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16229 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. NIROTTAM AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16271 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. MAHENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16291 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. OMVEER SINGH & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16309 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH Vs. BEER SEN & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16310 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. ISHWAR CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16317 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. BALESHWAR AND ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLPCC.No.16319 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 16320/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. SUBEY RAM & ORSCC.NO.16320 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 16466/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DEVENDRA SINGH & ORSCC.NO.16466 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 16469/2013 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAMESH & ORSCC.NO.16469 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 13/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Indu Pokhriyal) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

úITEM NO.8 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.3 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4242/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.55243/2010 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SUDHA RANI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 13/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Khairati,Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No.3 is allowed. Respondent Nos. 3 to 12 be deleted from the array of parties. Cause title be amended accordingly. |(NARENDRA PRASAD) | |(RENUKA SADANA) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER | 1

ÊITEM NO.29 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47567/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 13/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghwendra Tiwani, Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. V.S. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after four weeks as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Indu Pokhriyal) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

øITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.3 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1554/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.45085/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JITENDRA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of proforma respondents and office report)Date: 12/09/2013 This Matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applicant/petitioners has filed an application for deletion of proforma respondents, prayer of which is as follows: "Delete the proforma respondents No.5 to 27 from the array of parties of the aforesaid Special Leave Petition.." Accepting the reasons given in the application, the interlocutory application is allowed. Proforma Respondent Nos.5 to 27 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Usha Sharma ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

\ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI(In Chambers) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8849/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46289/2011 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date: 12/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.(N.P.) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Show the name of the counsel for the petitioners in the list and list the matter after two weeks. (A.S. BISHT) (USHA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

.ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI(In Chambers) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6013/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.58310/2010 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAHAVIR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 11/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. (N.P.)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. From the Office Report dated 24.6.2013 it appears that the petitioners have not paid the process fee and spare copies of the SLP and therefore show cause notice could not be issued. It also appears that on 23.3.2012 while issuing notice, this Court recorded that on behalf of one of the respondents in the special leave petition - Greater Noida Development Authority, learned counsel appeared and accepted notice. Therefore, service on the said respondent is complete. In view of the fact that the petitioners have not taken necessary steps for service of notice, the special leave petition in so far as other respondents are concerned, stands dismissed. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37493/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47502/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BHEEM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of the name of respondents and office report)Date: 11/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (In Chambers)For Applicant/ Mr. Sunder Khatri,Adv.Petitioner(s) Ms. Shital Khatri,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Goyal,Adv. Mr. Reddy,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applicant/petitioner has filed an application for deletion of the name of respondents, prayer of which is as follows: "i. Delete the respondent No.5 to 79 being proforma respondents in the SLP(C) No.37493/2012." Accepting the reasons given in the application, the interlocutory application is allowed, as prayed for. Let the names of Respondent Nos.5 to 79 be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner. [ Alka Dudeja ] [ Sneh Lata Sharma ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI(In Chambers) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos.46-49 & 50-53 inPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6466-6469/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP Nos.42424, 42439,45777 & 45779 of 2011 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJESH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)For impleadment and intervention and office report)Date:10/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Singh,Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. For M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co,Advs. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao,Adv.(N.P.) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for I.A. Nos.46-49 and I.A. Nos.50-53. It is stated that the name of the Advocate who filed I.A. Nos.50-53 is not shown in the list. Let his name be shown in the list. List after two weeks. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI LISTED ON: 06.09.2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 50 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 25551-25552 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SATISH CHAND & ANR. ETC. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.09.2012, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: "Issue notice returnable in twelve weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted." Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the four respondents (common)on 19.09.2012 through registered A.D. Post as well as Dasti in addition was also issued through the Counsel for the Petitioner on 19.09.2012. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate has on 22.03.2013 put in appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 4 but has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 10.12.2012 filed affidavit of dasti service on behalf of all the respondents stating therein that notice have been served on all the respondents. Hence, service of show cause notice is complete by way of dasti service. Thereafter, the matter was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 04.01.2013, when the following order was passed: "Respondents reported to be duly served through dasti but none appeared. No further steps required to be taken in the matter. It be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules." The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25551-25552/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WP No.24520/2011 and WPNo.35635/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATISH CHAND & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 06/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÌITEM NO.56 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9761/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.47502/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OM PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 05/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.(MP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called twice but no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. The deficit court fee has not been paid and spare copies of the SLP have also not been filed. In the interest of justice, list again after four weeks. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

ÆITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA.No.7 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8853-8855/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.41558/2009,CMWPNo.33042/2011,CMWP No.48253/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)KHEM CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and office report)Date: 05/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s)/ Dr. Surat Singh, Adv.Applicants Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents returnable in six weeks. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master

\230\227ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012BALIRAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim stay and prayer for interim relief and officereport )WITHSLP(C) NO.2603/2012SLP(C) NO.2612/2012SLP(C) NO.2820/2012SLP(C) NO.3298/2012SLP(C) NO.6345/2012SLP(C) NO.3473/2012SLP(C) NO.4249/2012SLP(C) NO.8439/2012SLP(C) NO.7146/2012SLP(C) NO.10597/2012SLP(C) NO.16380/2012SLP(C) NO.11879/2012SLP(C) NO.10052/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.16007/2012SLP(C) NO.4687/2012SLP(C) NO.8851/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012SLP(C) NO.3242/2012SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012SLP(C) NO.11303/2012SLP(C) NO.11304/2012SLP(C) NO.5566/2012SLP(C) NO.7815/2012SLP(C) NO.7540/2012SLP(C) NO.37493/2012SLP(C) NO.37492/2012SLP(C) NO.18104/2012SLP(C) NO.7436/2012SLP(C) NO.9748/2012SLP(C) NO.33860/2012SLP(C) NO.38289/2012SLP(C) NO.27930/2012SLP(C) NO.30590/2012SLP(C) NO.16674/2012SLP(C) NO.16695/2012SLP(C) NO.26874-26876/2012 -2-Item No.25Date: 03/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.

Mr R.D.Upadhyay, Adv. Mr Sudhir Naagar, Adv. Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr Rajiv Dalal, Adv. Mr Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr Subhash Chandra Jain, Adv. Mr Ashok K Mahajan, Adv. Mr Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr Ajay Bansal, Adv. Mr Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Ms Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Ms Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv. Mr Shikhil Suri, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Mr Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Mr K.B.Rohtagi, Adv. Mr Aditya Kumar Archiya, Adv. Mr C.S.N.Mohan Rao, Adv. Ms Priyanka Rai, Adv. Mr Rajesh Goyal, Adv. Mr Braham Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr A Ramesh, Adv. Mr C.S.N.Mohan Rao, Adv. M/s. Lawyers Knit & Co. Mr S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr A.N.Singh, Adv. Mr Bhaskar Y Kulkarni, Adv. Mr Adarsh Upadhyay, Adv. -3-Item No.25 Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Ms Ashlesha Srivastava, Adv. Mr Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr Abdhesh Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Adv. Ms Tatini Basu, Adv. Ms Shomila Bakshi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.1082-83/2012 On behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the ld. Counsel, Ms AlkaSinha appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasaccepted notice and undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by

next date. Three weeks' time is granted as final chance. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date. Respondent Nos. 4 to 8 have been deleted as per order of theHon'ble Judge in Chambers passed on 13.8.2013.SLP(C) NO.2603,2612,2820 of 2012 In these batch of matters, respondents seem to have been dulyserved but none appeared on their behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready.SLP(C) NO.3298/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are reported to be duly served but noneappeared on their behalf. Respondent No.4 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready. -4-Item No.25SLP(C) NO.6345/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served but none appeared onhis behalf. Notice be re issued to respondent NO.2 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date.SLP(C) NO.3473/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 6 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file process fee and sparecopies within two weeks and on compliance notices be issued forthwith torespondent Nos. 2,4,5,7 and 8 through the concerned District Court inaddition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.4249/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 6 on filing processfee and spare copies within two weeks through the concerned District Courtin addition to postal service. Respondent Nos. 2,4 and 8 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. The ld. Counsel, Mr S.B.Tripathi appearing on behalf of Mr DeepakGoel, Advocate-on-record for respondent No.7 -5-Item No.25has made a submission at Bar that counter affidavit on his behalf has beenalready filed on record. Registry to verify and report accordingly.SLP(C) NO.8439/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready.SLP(C) NO.7146/2012 Respondent No.1 being State authority be served through thestanding counsel. Dasti allowed. Necessary steps as per rules be taken. Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date. Respondent No.3 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared on his behalf.SLP(C) NO.10597/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.4 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Respondent Nos. 5,9 and 11 have already filed counter affidavit on

record. Notices be re issued to respondent nos. 3,6 to 8,10,12 and 13through the concerned District Court in -6-Item No.25addition to postal service (process fee and spare copies be filed withintwo weeks).SLP(C) NO.16380/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4 are reported to be duly served throughpost and dasti but none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date. Service in respect of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 has been dispensedwith by the order of the Hon'ble Court.SLP(C) NO.11879/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4 are reported to be duly served throughpost but none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit despite finalchance granted on the last date. Service on respondent Nos. 5 to 21 has been dispensed with as perorder of the Hon'ble Court.SLP(C) NO.10052/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared on his behalf. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have failed to file counter affidavitdespite final chance granted on the last date. Service on respondent Nos. 4 to 41 has been dispensed with as perorder of the Hon'ble Court.SLP(C) NO.16336/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared on his behalf. -7-Item No.25 Respondent No.4 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court. Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 2,3,5 to 7 on filingprocess fee and spare copies within two weeks through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.16007/2012 Respondent No.1 being State authority be served through thestanding counsel. Dasti allowed. Necessary steps as per rules be taken. Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared on his behalf. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court.SLP(C) NO.4687/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,2,4,5 and 8 are reported to be duly servedthrough dasti and Trial Court but none appeared on their behalf. Respondent Nos. 3,6 and 7 are granted four weeks' time as finalchance for filing counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.8851/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1,6 and 13 on filingprocess fee and spare copies within two weeks, through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 have failed to file counter affidavitdespite final chance granted on the last date. -8-Item No.25 Respondent Nos. 5 and 7 to 12 are reported to be duly servedthrough post but none appeared on their behalf.SLP(C) NO.4242/2012 Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have been ordered to proceed ex parte asper order passed on 17.7.2013. Registry to process the application for deleting respondent Nos. 3to 12 from the array of respondents before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers

for necessary orders/directions.SLP(C) NO.3242/2012 Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 have been ordered to proceed ex parte as perorder passed on 17.7.2013. On behalf of respondent No.4, the ld. Counsel, Mr Yogesh Kumarappearing on behalf of Mr Vishwa Pal Singh, Advocate-on-record has acceptednotice and undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by nextdate. Four weeks' time is granted. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.8 has already come onrecord. On behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the ld. Counsel, Ms AlkaSinha appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasaccepted notice and undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit bynext date. Four weeks' time is granted. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time as final chance forfiling counter affidavit. -9-Item No.25SLP(C) NO.13641-13642/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready.SLP(C) NO.11303/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are reported to be duly served throughstanding counsel but none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready.SLP(C) NO.11304/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4 are reported to be duly served but noneappeared on their behalf. Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready.SLP(C) NO.5566/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service and in case State isa party it be served through the standing counsel. Fresh dasti allowed.Necessary steps as per rules be taken. -10-Item No.25 Respondent No.4 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court.SLP(C) NO.7815/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 3,5,6,8,9 and 11 throughthe concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Respondent Nos. 4,7 and 10 are granted four weeks' time as finalchance for filing counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.7540/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 22 are granted four weeks' time as finalchance for filing counter affidavit. Notices be issued to respondent Nos. 5,7,9,11,13,18 and 20 onfiling process fee and spare copies within two weeks through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service. Remaining respondents are reported to be duly served but noneappeared on their behalf.SLP(C) NO.37493/2012 Office report indicates that for want of process fee and sparecopies notices to all the 79 respondents could not be issued. However, theld. Counsel for the petitioner, Ms Priyanka Rai has made a submission atBar that respondent No.1-State of UP has been already duly served and

necessary proof has been already filed with the registry. She has furthermade a submission that an application for deleting respondent Nos. 5 to 79has been -11-Item No.25already moved on record and is updated for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers on 20.9.2013. Registry to ascertain, verify and submit proper report by nextdate.SLP(C) NO.37492/2012 None for the petitioner. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file process fee and sparecopies within two weeks and on compliance notices be issued to all the 39respondents through the concerned District Court in addition to postalservice.SLP(C) NO.18104/2012 All the four respondents are reported to be duly served throughpost and Trial Court but none appeared on their behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready.SLP(C) NO.7436/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared on his behalf. Respondent No.2 being State authority be served through thestanding counsel. Dasti allowed. Necessary steps as per rules be taken. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court.SLP(C) NO.9748/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1,3 and 5 on filing processfee and spare copies within two weeks -12-Item No.25through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared on his behalf. Respondent No.4 has failed to file counter affidavit within thetime granted by the Court.SLP(C) NO.33860/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. Notice be re issued to respondent No.4 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.38289/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 on filing processfee and spare copies within two weeks through the concerned District Courtin addition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.27930/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,2,4 and 5 are reported to be duly served throughpost but none appeared on their behalf. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Complete set of pleadings has been received by him.SLP(C) NO.30590/2012 All the three respondents are reported to be duly served but noneappeared on their behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready. -13-Item No.25SLP(C) NO.16674/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served by post but noneappeared on his behalf. The ld. Counsel, Mr Ravindra Kumar appearing for respondent Nos. 2and 3 is granted four weeks' time as final chance for filing vakalatnamaand counter affidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.16695/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served but none appeared onhis behalf.

The ld. Counsel, Mr Ravindra Kumar appearing for respondent Nos. 2and 3 is granted four weeks' time asfinal chance for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.26874-76/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared on their behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when otherconnected matters would become ready. Registry to rectify the database so as to disclose the names of theld. Advocates who have filed appearance. List again on 18.10.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 11709/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42330/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAHENDRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLPand office report ))WITHSLP(C) NO. 19922 of 2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 30/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)SLP.../2013CC 11709] Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.SLP 19922/2013 Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhanwarpal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (Civil)..../2013 [CC 11709/2013] In pursuance of the order dated July 5, 2013 the additional affidavit has not been filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some more time for filing the additional affidavit. Additional affidavit may now be filed within two weeks. List the matter after two weeks. S.L.P.(Civil) No. 19922 of 2013 List this petition along with S.L.P. (Civil) No. ..../2013 [CC 11709/2013] after two weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

òITEM NO.46 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6508/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.14112/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NARMADA DEVI ATMA RAM CHARITABLE TRUST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 27/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted to the petitioner to file process fee and spare copies of the S.L.P.| (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) | |(SHARDA KAPOOR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

\ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 23446-23447/2012SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 26/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar,Adv. Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 are awaited. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks service of notice onboth the respondents through the Standing Counsel. Permitted. Servenotice and file proof. List the matter on 29.10.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||mg | |Registrar |

JITEM NO.15 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 3-5/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6458-6460/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.18037/2011,WCNo.48089/2011 dated 09/12/2011 in WC No.70603/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and office report )Date: 26/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co ,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant to file counter affidavit, if any, in I.A. No. 3-5 of 2013 within four weeks. [ Neeta ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] Sr. P.A. Court Master

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 14727/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44492/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MANOJ YADAV Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))Date: 26/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

æITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report)Date: 26/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tabrez Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1 to 2 have been served by dasti. No appearance.Service is complete. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||mg | |Registrar |

¦ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 14542/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.51996/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAM SINGH & ORS Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 23/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\224ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 14346/2013(From the judgement and order dated 10/02/2012 in CMWP No.5303/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJBEER SINGH & ORS Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14636 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14637 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14643 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14655 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14659 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14712 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14792 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14845 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14846 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14847 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 23/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petitions. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25279/2013(From the judgement and order dated 24/04/2013 in CWP No.22794/2013 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CROSS COUNTRY INVESTMENTS (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 23/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to place on record copy of the Writ Petition and annexures filed along with the Writ Petition and counter-affidavit, if any, filed by the respondents within four weeks from today. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

SECTION. XI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16337/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No. 5670/2007 of Th e HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) KESARI SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS GOVT OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.03.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Issue notice on the Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Until further orders, the houses on the subject land/tube-well shall not be demolished nor the petitioners/applicant shall be forcibly dis-possessed if they are in actual physical possession of the subject land/tube-well until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners- applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession." Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 by registered A.D. post as well as dasti. But neither A. D. Card nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed affidavit of dasti service alongwith proof of dasti service so far. The applicaiton above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 14th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Pramit Saxena, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

|ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10885/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.49363/2011, ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 19/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent to unrepresented respondents only. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

|ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9269/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.65531/2010, ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)INCHHARAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))Date: 19/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 2 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent to unrepresented respondent No. 1 only. If the petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land if he is not in actual physical possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 3/2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16337/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.5670/2007 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KESARI SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSGOVT OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)(for directions and office report ))Date: 19/08/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)/For Applicant(s) Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per Office Report dated 14th day of August, 2013, service is incomplete on respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Let fresh steps be taken by the advocate-on-record for the petitioners and ensure that service is effected on unserved respondents within eight weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Until further orders, the interim order dated March 18, 2013 shall remain operative.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

®ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46021/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport)Date: 19/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.N. Jha, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioner praying for four weeks' time on the ground of illness of the arguing counsel. List the matter after four weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¤ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.333/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in Writ C-42439 of 2011 ofthe High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)JAGESHWAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 16/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pandey, Adv. for M/s Lawyer'S Knit & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, two weeks' more time is granted for curing the defects. |(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(INDU BALA KAPUR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

ÒITEM NO.11 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO.2 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).37492/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.48644/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MEGHRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of the name of respondent)Date: 16/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (In chambers)For Petitioner(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 30 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. I.A. No.2 is, accordingly, allowed. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur) Court Master Court Master

ÆITEM NO.6 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO.3 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).3916/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.45085/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 16/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (In chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 39 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. I.A. No.3 is, accordingly, allowed. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur) Court Master Court Master

bITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 7-8 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42200/2011,CMWPNo.44233/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALIRAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report )Date: 13/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 7-8 has been filed for deletion of respondent nos. 4 to 8 from the array of parties. The application for deletion of respondent nos. 4 to 8 from the array of parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. [ NEETA ] [ INDU POKHRIYAL ] Sr.P.A. Court Master

ÌITEM NO.4 COURT.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 2/2012 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).3417/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.27539/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PRAMOD KHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)( for transposing of respondent Nos. 6 & 7 as petitioners and officereport )withIA No. 2 in SLP 4647 of 2012[for transposing of respondent Nos. 6 & 7 as petitioners and office report)Date: 12/08/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. for Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 2 of 2012 in SLP (C) Nos. 3417 of 2012 and and I.A. No. 2 of 2012 in SLP (C) 4647 of 2012 are granted. Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 are allowed to be transposed as petitioners. Amended cause-title shall be filed by the advocate-on- record for the petitioners within two weeks from today.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

Æ4ITEM NO.37 COURT.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9580-9581/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37646/2012 andCMWP No.37652/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report))WITHS.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 9584 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report))S.L.P.(C) NOS. 16722-16723 OF 2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 10117 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report))Date: 12/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P.(Civil)...../2013 [CC 9580-9581/2013] Pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners. It appears therefrom that the petitioners have already accepted the compensation without any reservation. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are similar cases where the owners have accepted the compensation but this Court has issued notice. This is not controverted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions returnable in ten weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. S.L.P.(C) No....../2013 [CC NO. 9584 of 2013]

Pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioner. It appears therefrom that the petitioner has already accepted the compensation without any reservation. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are similar cases where the owners have accepted the compensation but this Court has issued notice. This is not controverted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition returnable in ten weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 16722-16723 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners in special leave petition filed against the impugned order passed in CMWP No. 15485 of 2013. We have perused the additional affidavit filed by the petitioners. In the additional affidavit, the petitioners have stated that they have not received any amount of compensation. Moreover, they claim that they are in possession. Let notice be issued on the special leave petitions returnable in ten weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 10117 of 2013] Pursuant to the order of this Court dated May 6, 2013, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners. It appears therefrom that the petitioners have already accepted the compensation without any reservation. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are similar cases where the owners have accepted the compensation but this Court has issued notice. This is not controverted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition returnable in ten weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.

|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÞITEM NO.33 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 5 & 6 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8528/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.40418/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)UMESH UPADHYAYA AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,intervention and officereport )Date: 12/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Kr. Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra,Adv.For Respondent(s)For Applicant (s) Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. Anupam Dwivedi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post the applications alongwith Special Leave Petition. [ NEETA ] [ INDU POKHRIYAL ] Sr.P.A. Court Master

ITEM NO. 16 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.As. Nos. 4-6 & 7-9 In Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.16339-16341/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.42787/2011,WC No.42789/2011,WC No.45085/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) DHARAMPAL ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (Appln(s) for intervention and exemption from filing O.T.and office report) Date: 12/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha G Nair, Adv. Mr. Anupam Dwivedi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Applications for intervention are allowed. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] ||Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |

SECTION. XI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4383/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 53711/2011 of T he HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.01.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others." Accordingly Show Cause Notice usual as well as dasti was issued to all the five respondents. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service stating therein that dasti notice served on all the respondents. It is submitted that the Name of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has been deleted vide Court's Order dated 2.5.2013 and Cause title has been amemded accordingly. It is submitted that counsel for petitioner has filed application for direction and same has been registered as Interlocatory Application No. 4 and copy of same is circulated herewith. Service of show cause notice is complete. The Applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION. XI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4383/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 53711/2011 of T he HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.01.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others." Accordingly Show Cause Notice usual as well as dasti was issued to all the five respondents. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service stating therein that dasti notice served on all the respondents. It is submitted that the Name of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has been deleted vide Court's Order dated 2.5.2013 and Cause title has been amemded accordingly. It is submitted that counsel for petitioner has filed application for direction and same has been registered as Interlocatory Application No. 4 and copy of same is circulated herewith. Service of show cause notice is complete. The Applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION. XI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4383/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 53711/2011 of T he HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.01.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others." Accordingly Show Cause Notice usual as well as dasti was issued to all the five respondents. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service stating therein that dasti notice served on all the respondents. It is submitted that the Name of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has been deleted vide Court's Order dated 2.5.2013 and Cause title has been amemded accordingly. It is submitted that counsel for petitioner has filed application for direction and same has been registered as Interlocatory Application No. 4 and copy of same is circulated herewith. Service of show cause notice is complete. The Applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION. XI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4383/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No. 53711/2011 of T he HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.01.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others." Accordingly Show Cause Notice usual as well as dasti was issued to all the five respondents. Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service stating therein that dasti notice served on all the respondents. It is submitted that the Name of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has been deleted vide Court's Order dated 2.5.2013 and Cause title has been amemded accordingly. It is submitted that counsel for petitioner has filed application for direction and same has been registered as Interlocatory Application No. 4 and copy of same is circulated herewith. Service of show cause notice is complete. The Applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 7th day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Advocate Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ôITEM NO.29 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10441-10442/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37647/2012,CMWPNo.37649/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 08/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Prayer for stay is rejected. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be issued to the remaining respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ZITEM NO.5 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 4/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).4383/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.53711/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for intervention and interim directions and office report )Date: 08/08/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s)R-3 Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.for intervenor Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Sr. AdvPanchsheel Buildtech Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.Pvt Ltd. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Av. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. No. 4 of 2013. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate waives service for respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to enter the subject property if he is not in possession.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

XITEM NO.30 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10885/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.49363/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 08/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on August 19, 2013, as prayed by Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3- Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

úITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 5/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).3242/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.32719/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim directions and office report )withIA No. 4 in SLP 10052 of 2012[for interim direction and office report)IA No. 5 in SLP 11303 of 2012[for interim direction and office report)Date: 08/08/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s)R-3 Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.R-4 Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv.R-8 Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. No. 5 of 2013 in S.L.P. (C) No. 3242 of 2012, I.A. No. 4 in S.L.P. (C) No. 10052 of 2012 and I.A. No. 5 in S.L.P. (C) No. 11303 of 2012. M/s. Ravindra Kumar, Vishwa Pal Singh and Ms. Asha G. Nair, advocates waive service for respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 8 respectively. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.

|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

RITEM NO.8 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7165/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47567/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 08/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kr. Tiwary, Adv. Mr. Chandran, Adv. Mr. N.N. Jha, Adv. Mr. V.S. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\230ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos. 2&3 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6629/2012KISHAN CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,intervention and officereport )Date: 06/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR IN CHAMBERSFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sanchit G.,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Himanshu Tyagi,Adv. Ms. Asha G.Nair,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA Nos. 2&3 are allowed, as these are not opposed. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SNEH LATA SHARMA] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

¢ITEM NO.86 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI(In Chambers) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6489-6494/2012JAI SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date:06/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sanchit Garga,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioners for making payment of deficit Court Fee and filing the proof of deposit of Rs.500/- with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

6ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos. 3-5 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6458-6460/2012HANSO DEVI & ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and office report )Date: 06/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR IN CHAMBERSFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.(NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.(NP) M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co.(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears. List after two weeks. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SNEH LATA SHARMA] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ÜITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos.5-6 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4249/2012AJIT SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,intervention and officereport )Date: 06/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR IN CHAMBERSFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Himanshu Tyagi,Adv. Ms. Asha G.Nair,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. S.B.Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA Nos. 5-6 are allowed, as these are not opposed. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SNEH LATA SHARMA] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

SECTION. XI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37993/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No. 47735/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT

 SECTION XI LISTED ON: 05.08.2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA COURT NO.: 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURI SDICTION ITEM NO.: 40 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 37989 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAJENDRA PAL & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.04.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: ''Further time of three weeks is granted to the petitioners to comply with the order dated January 4, 2013. List the matter after three weeks'' It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 18.04.2013 filed Addl. Affidavit and the same has been included in the paper books. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 02nd day of August, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1 Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

"ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9580-9581/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37646/2012,CMWPNo.37652/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report))WITHS.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 10117 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report))SLP(C) NO. 16722-16723 of 2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 9584 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report))Date: 05/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharamendra Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matters on August 12, 2013.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

,ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37993/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47735/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. (NOT PRESENT)For Respondent(s) The Court made the following O R D E R None appears. List the matter after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

.ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37989/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47734/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.(NOT PRESENT)For Respondent(s) The Court made the following O R D E R None appears. List the matter after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÆITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 13381/2013(From the judgement and order dated 29/11/2011 in CMWP No.68341/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHIEF EX. OFFICER NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSBEER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))WITHS.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 13480 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/d in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 02/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay and also on the special leave petitions. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 30969 of 2011. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 11709/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42330/2011, of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAHENDRI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))WITHSLP(C) NO. 19922 of 2013(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 02/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)SLP.../2013[CC 11709/2013] Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.SLP 19922/2013 Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (Civil) No. .../2013 [CC 11709/2013] Further time of three weeks is granted to the petitioner to file additional affidavit in compliance of order dated July 5, 2013. List the matter after three weeks. S.L.P.(Civil) No. 19922 of 2013 List this petition along with S.L.P. (Civil) No. .../2013 [CC 11709/2013] after three weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

XITEM NO.31 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 13297-13302/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.69329/2009, CMWPNo.69331/2009, CMWP No.69332/2009 and dated 14/05/2012 in RA No.2562/2012,RA No.2585/2012 and RA No.2576/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)JAGDISH CHAND ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution, permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 13378 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 13393 of 2013]With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 13405 of 2013]With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 13577 of 2013]With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 29/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)SLP..../2013[CC 13297-13302] Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. S.K. Bandhopdhyay, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Tayal, Adv.SLP..../2013[CC 13378];SLP..../2013[CC 13393];SLP..../2013[CC 13405], andSLP..../2013[CC 13577] Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv. Mr. Varun Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

List these matters after one week.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\230ITEM NO.11 Court No.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 4 & 5 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).8593/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.39819/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BUDH PAL & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention and exemption from filing O.T. and officereport)Date: 29/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv. Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Anupam Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the applicants. I.A. No. 4 (Application for intervention) is dismissed. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Court Master |

|ITEM NO.100 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37493/2012BHEEM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 29/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Priyanka Rai,Adv. Mr.Rajesh Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. for deletion may be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for appropriate orders. Await orders. List the matter on 20.9.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

îITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 2/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).2873/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2011 in CMWP No.45552/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PREM CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and with prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 26/07/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Dubey Mishra, Adv. Mr Bharat Dubey, Adv. for M/S Anuradha & Associates.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. for M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao ,Adv Mr. R. Singh, Adv. Ms. S. Singh,Adv. for Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta ,Adv Mr. Rakesh Kumar ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, learned senior counsel for the petitioners/applicants. I.A. No. 2 of 2013 is rejected.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 1-6/2013 in &Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal Civil)....../2013 CC 10774/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46418/2011, CMWPNo.46654/2011 and CMWP No.46655/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)RAJEEV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS Respondent(s)(for permission to file SLP and office report )Date: 26/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Ms. Sneha Goyal, Adv, for Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petition against the impugned order dated 21.10.2011 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 46655 of 2011 is refused in so far as applicants in Interlocutory Application Nos. 1-6 of 2013 is concerned, namely, Bhim Singh s/o Amar Singh, Dori Lal s/o Bhim Singh, Feere Singh s/o Bhim Singh, Ajit Singh s/o Bhim Singh, Rinku s/o Feere Singh and Smt. Rajwati who were not parties before the High Court. Interlocutory applications to delete the proforma respondents from the array of parties in terms of prayer clause (a) are allowed. Amended cause title/s shall be filed within two weeks. Thereafter, issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. The prayer for interim relief shall be considered after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

JITEM NO.15 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 237-238 OF 2013 IN SLP(C) 1082-1083/2012 [FOR PREL. HEARING]BALIRAM & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report )Date: 22/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sushant K.Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. for Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let Contempt Petitions come up along with the main Special Leave Petitions.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¤ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 7539-7540/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.48127/2011,CMWPNo.48128/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RATIRAM & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 11227-11228 of 2013With IA 1-2 ( c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 9698-9699 of 2013With IA 1-2 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 22/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 5774/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.60278/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMDATT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 22/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Prayer for interim relief is rejected. Connect with S.L.P (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÈaITEM NOS. 25 + 56 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 12804/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.51635/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSJITENDRA & ORS Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))WITHSLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTH. Vs. SARLA DEVI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12831 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTH.Vs. HARPAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12832 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MAHAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12833 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. SURJEET @ SURAJ PRAKASH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12835 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAM SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12836 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSL.DEVT.AUTH. Vs. HORAM & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12838 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. BALESHWAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12840 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. NANAK CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12841 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. UMESH KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12842 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. INDRAMAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP

CC.No.12843 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVT.AUTH. Vs. LAXMI NARAYAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12844 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. DINESH KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12845 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RUCHIKA YADAV & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12847 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. OMVEER & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12907 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. HUKUM SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12908 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. TARA CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12923 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. PREM SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12927 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. VIJAY SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12933 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. DEVENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12936 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUS. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DARSHAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12965 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. CHANDRAMAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12971 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. KUNWAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12974 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDU. DEV. AUTH. Vs. NAURAJ SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12975 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. DAYANAND SHARMA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12978 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. BHAGAT SINGH WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12980 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. PREM SINGH YADAV & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12982 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. BADLE & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13018 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EXEC.OFFICER NOIDA Vs. JAGDISH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13019 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. BRAHMPAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13020 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. KHUSHI RAM & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13021 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVT. AUTH. Vs. MAHENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13022 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MAHENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13023 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MAHESH KUMAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13024 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. NARESH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13027 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. JAGDISH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13131 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. USHA HOUSING DEV. CO. LTD. & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13132 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAMPHAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP

CC.No.13133 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA & ORS Vs. SARJEET & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13134 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO.,NOIDA Vs. BAL KISHAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13135 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. KAMLESH RANI SINGHAL & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13136 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. ARVIND SINGH SIROHI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13137 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. LIKKHI & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13138 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. POONAM BAWA & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13140 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHOLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. JAI PRAKASH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13141 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA & ORS Vs. AWADHESH KUMAR & ORS WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.13142 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY &ORS Vs. INDRAJEET & ORS. CC.No.13143 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. BUDHRAJ SINGH & ORS. CC.NO.13185 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. PHIREY SINGH & ORS CC.NO.13187 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUS. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RATI RAM & ORS. CC.NO.13191 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. MUNDER SINGH & ORS. CC.NO.13192 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. R.N.CHAURASIA FARM & ORS CC.NO.13193 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. KISHAN LAL & ORS CC.NO.13195 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO,NOIDA Vs. SUBHASH CHAND & ORS CC.NO.13196 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA & ORS Vs. JAGPAL & ORS CC.NO.13197 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. HARISH CHAND & ORS. CC.NO.13198 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAJ SINGH & ORS. CC.NO.13200 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. SHER SINGH & ORS. CC.NO.13199 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NOIDA Vs. VIRENDRA & ORS. CC.NO.13201 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. NAIPAL & ORS. CC.NO.13203 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA & ORS Vs. DEEPCHAND & ORS CC.NO.13205 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA & ORS Vs. DHARAMPAL & ORS CC.NO.13204 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA & ORS Vs. JASWANTI & ORS CC.NO.13209 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. SHARMA SINGH & ORS. CC.NO.13210 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. KARAM SINGH & ORS CC.NO.13213 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY

IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. BRAHAM SINGH & ORS CC.NO.13333 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAM KARAN & ORS. CC.NO.13335 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. RAJPAL & ORS CC.NO.13337 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. NIHAL & ORS CC.NO.13340 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 19/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petitions. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

nCITEM NO.8 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 3/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3417/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.27539/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PRAMOD KHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for interim stay and I.A. No. 2 - appln.(s) for transpositionof respondent Nos. 6 & 7 as petitioner and office report)I.A. No. 2/2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.4645/2012)(for interim stay and office report)I.A. No. 3/2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.4647/2012)(for interim stay and I.A. No. 2 - appln.(s) for transpositionof respondent Nos. 6 & 7 as petitioner office report)I.A. No. 2/2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.4661/2012)(for interim stay and office report)I.A. No. 2/2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.5091/2012)(for interim stay and office report)Date: 19/07/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. for Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (Civil) No.3417/2012 Interlocutory Application No. 3/2013 : We have heard Mr. Nikhil Jain, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (for short, 'Authority'). There is dispute between the parties about the actual physical possession of the subject land. On the one hand, the applicant-petitioner contends that he is in possession of the subject land, while the Authority claims that possession of the subject land has been taken over and it is the Authority which is in possession. In view of the above, we direct that if the applicant- petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, the applicant-petitioner will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is further made clear that if the Authority has taken possession of the subject land, then in the garb of this order, the applicant-petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land. Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2013 stands disposed of. Interlocutory Application No. 2/2012 : List this interlocutory application after two weeks.

Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.4645 of 2012 We have heard Mr. Nikhil Jain, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (for short, 'Authority'). There is dispute between the parties about the actual physical possession of the subject land. On the one hand, the applicant-petitioner contends that he is in possession of the subject land, while the Authority claims that possession of the subject land has been taken over and it is the Authority which is in possession. In view of the above, we direct that if the applicant- petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, the applicant-petitioner will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is further made clear that if the Authority has taken possession of the subject land, then in the garb of this order, the applicant-petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land. Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 stands disposed of. S.L.P. (Civil) No. 4647 of 2012 Interlocutory Application No. 3/2013 : We have heard Mr. Nikhil Jain, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (for short, 'Authority'). There is dispute between the parties about the actual physical possession of the subject land. On the one hand, the applicant-petitioner contends that he is in possession of the subject land, while the Authority claims that possession of the subject land has been taken over and it is the Authority which is in possession. In view of the above, we direct that if the applicant- petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, the applicant-petitioner will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is further made clear that if the Authority has taken possession of the subject land, then in the garb of this order, the applicant-petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land. Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2013 stands disposed of. Interlocutory Application No. 2/2012 : List this interlocutory application after two weeks. Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.4661 of 2012 We have heard Mr. Nikhil Jain, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (for short, 'Authority'). There is dispute between the parties about the actual physical possession of the subject land. On the one hand, the applicant-petitioner contends that he is in possession of the subject land, while the Authority claims that possession of the subject land has been taken over and it is the Authority which is in possession. In view of the above, we direct that if the applicant- petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, the applicant-petitioner will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is further made clear that if the Authority has taken possession of the subject land, then in the garb of this order, the applicant-petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land. Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 stands disposed of.

Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 in S.L.P. (Civil) No.5091 of 2012 We have heard Mr. Nikhil Jain, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (for short, 'Authority'). There is dispute between the parties about the actual physical possession of the subject land. On the one hand, the applicant-petitioner contends that she is in possession of the subject land, while the Authority claims that possession of the subject land has been taken over and it is the Authority which is in possession. In view of the above, we direct that if the applicant- petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, the applicant-petitioner will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is further made clear that if the Authority has taken possession of the subject land, then in the garb of this order, the applicant-petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land. Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013 stands disposed of. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6363/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.33597/2010 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SANGITA GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For impleadment and office report)Date: 18/07/2013 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr. Anurag Rawat, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NO.2 IN SLP(C) NO.6363 OF 2012 (Application for impleadment) Having perused the application for impleadment, proposed respondents Nos.16 and 17 need not be impleaded for the present. I.A. No.2 for impleadment is, accordingly, dismissed.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(INDU BALA KAPUR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

˜ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6027/2012SANT RAM & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 17/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File is not received. List the matter on 13.08.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

¾ITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 15/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Tabrez Ahmad,adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Office report indicates that respondent No.2 is still not served. Respondent No.3 has not filed counter affidavit in spite of time granted. Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks service of notice to respondent Nos. 1 & 2 through its standing counsel. Permitted. Issue dasti. Await return of dasti. List the matter on 26.08.2013. | | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

`ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23446-23447/2012SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 15/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar,adv. Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 3. List the matter on 26.08.2013. | | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

.\223ITEM NOS.28 + 59 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 11283/2013(From the judgement and order dated 03/04/2012 in CMWP No.13930/2012, ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NOIDA Petitioner(s) VERSUSREKHA RANI & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. NARAYAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11361 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MAHESH CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11367 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. MAHESH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11369 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. SATISH CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11371 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11374 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. NAWAB SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11375 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MAHENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11376 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. PRAKASH CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11412 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAMAN SINGHAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11414 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. LIKKHI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11415 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. WEDU & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11417 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. CHIDDA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11416 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. ANIL KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11419 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. SUKHVEER & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11420 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. DHARAM PAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11421 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. VIJAYPAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11422 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. BHANWAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11423 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. VED PRAKASH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11424 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. PAPPU & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11425 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. BALJEET & ORS.

WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11426 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. BHAGIRATHI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11428 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. AMAN SINGH CHAUHAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11429 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11430 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. BUDHDHU & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11442 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. KALA DEVI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11444 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. CHATAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11445 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. OM DATT & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11527 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAVINDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11528 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. SURENDER SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11553 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. VIJAY SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11554 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MADANLAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11555 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Vs. KISHAN SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11571 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MANOJ SHARMA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11572 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. UDAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11573 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 MAHENDRI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP C.No.11709 AND C/DELAY IN REFILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. RAGHUVAR DAYAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11724 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NOIDA Vs. BHAGIRATHI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11784 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAM MURTI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11786 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFFICER NEW OKHLA I.D.A. Vs. LIKHKHI RAM & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11806 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFFICER NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. MUKESH CHAUHAN & ORS. (WITH OFFICE REPORT) CC.No.11807 SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFFICER NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. KIRAN PAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11808 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. CHARAN SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11833 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. LAHRI SINGH ALIAS HARI & ORS.

WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11834 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. M/S NOIDA ESTATE AGENCY & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11835 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. KURE & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11836 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. SARLA DEVI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11838 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. VIRENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11840 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFFICER NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. JAI BHAGWAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11841 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. CHARAN SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11843 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. SHAILENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11845 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. VIRENDRA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11846 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHL I.D.A Vs. SHAKUNTALA YADAV & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11847 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 N.O.I.D.A. Vs. PREM CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11849 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MAWASI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11848 AND OFFICE REPORT)

SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. MANORAMA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11851 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA IND.DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. PIYUSH SHRIVASTVA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11852 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY & ORS. Vs. LILEY RAM AND ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11900 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, N.O.I.D.A. Vs. JAI BHAGWAN SHARMA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11901 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. BANWARI & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11904 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. RAJPAL SINGH KOCHAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11905 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. BALBIR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11906 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. GAJENDRA SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11908 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EXEC.OFFICER,NOIDA Vs. BHANWAR SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11909 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.11921 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. KUNDAN & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12064 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUS. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DIWAN SINGH & ORS.

WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12098 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EX. OFF. NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. KAMAL SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12115 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C)No.19922/2013 RAKESH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. MA GAYATRI DEVI TRUST & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12279 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA INDU.DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. MANJULA LAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12310 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 CHIEF EXEC.OFFR.NEW OKHLA INDUS.DEV.AUTH Vs. MUKESH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12335 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. MEHAR CHAND & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12348 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 C.E.O., NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTH. Vs. SURTA & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12363 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. GANGA LAL & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12440 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. VIJAY SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12442 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. JILEY SINGH & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12463 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NOIDA Vs. UDAI CHAND

WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12465 AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C).../2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. HARBEER & ORS. WITH I.A.1(C/DELAY IN FILING SLP CC.No.12466 AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12554/2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. BANWARI & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12617/2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. DHARAMVEER & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12619/2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. SHEELA DEVI & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12649/2013 NOIDA Vs. AAS MOHAMMAD & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12652/2013 CEO, NOIDA Vs. VEDPAL & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12654/2013 NOIDA Vs. GAJRAJ & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12656/2013 NEW OKHLA INDL.DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. AJAB SINGH & ORS (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12657/2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RAJPAL & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12659/2013 NEW OKHLA IND. DEV. AUTH. Vs. RATAN SINGH & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12658/2013 CHIEF EXEC.OFFICER NOIDA Vs. RAGHUBIR SINGH & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12663/2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTH. Vs. JAI PRAKASH & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12664/2013 NOIDA Vs. HARIRAM & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12667/2013 NOIDA Vs. BEDI & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12668/2013 NEW OKHLA INDL DEV AUTHORITY Vs. PRATAP SING & ORS (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12670/2013 NOIDA Vs. RAJANI AGARWAL & ORS.

(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12675/2013 NEW OKHLA I.D.A Vs. MOHAN LAL & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12679/2013 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. GAJE SINGH & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12680/2013 NEW OKHLA INDL.DEV.AUTHORITY Vs. TEJ SINGH & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12682/2013 NOIDA Vs. CHANDRAMAL & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12683/2013 CHIEF EXEC.OFFR.NOIDA Vs. SUKH VEER & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 12743/2013 NOIDA Vs. DHARAMPAL & ORS. (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 05/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.SLP.....(CC 11709) Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Adv.SLP 19922/2013 Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (Civil) No...../2013 [CC 11709 of 2013) and S.L.P. (Civil) No. 19922 of 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners pray for some time for filing additional affidavits in the respective special leave petitions indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavits may be filed within three weeks. List the matters thereafter. In the remaining Special Leave Petitions

Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ìITEM NO.36 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19200-19201/2013(From the judgement and order dated 04/04/2013 in CMWP No.18257/2013 anddated 15/04/2013 in CMWP No.20675/2013 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)BRHAM PAL SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim reliefand office report)Date: 05/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

tITEM NO.12 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10774/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46418/2011,CMWPNo.46654/2011CMWP No.46655/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)RAJEEV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS Respondent(s)( for permission to file SLP and office report )Date: 04/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Ms. Sneha Goyal, Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within two weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÞITEM NO.17 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10885/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.49363/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 04/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned senior counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

üITEM NO.18 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 10441-10442/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37647/2012,CMWPNo.37649/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 02/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. for Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\200ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NOS. 2 & 3 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4383/2013(From the judgment and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.53711/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For deletion of proforma respondents and intervention and office report)Date: 02/07/2013 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Monika Rathi, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. for Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NO.2 IN SLP(C) NO.4383/2013 This is an application filed by the petitioner for deleting respondents Nos. 4 to 5 from the array of parties . The application is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. The Registry may make the necessary corrections in the array of parties. I.A. NO.3 IN SLP(C) NO.4383/2013 The application for intervention will be taken up along with the main matter at the time of final hearing. In the meantime, notice be served on the petitioner and the respondents.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(INDU POKHRIYAL) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)......... CC 19473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47545/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR DUTT & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report )Date: 01/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Names of respondent Nos. 5 to 74 being proforma respondents are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Interlocutory application to delete the names of proforma respondents stands disposed of accordingly. Amended cause title shall be filed within two weeks. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 4. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. In para 7 of the additional affidavit filed on March 1, 2013, it is stated that land in question has already been taken over by the NOIDA in the year 1977. In view of that, prayer for stay is rejected. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

DITEM NO.42 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)......... CC 6512/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46785/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JEET RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 01/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 4. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

bITEM NO.56 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 7539-7540/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.48127/2011,CMWPNo.48128/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RATIRAM & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 11227-11228 of 2013With IA 1-2 (c/delay in in filing SLP and with office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 9698-9699 of 2013With IA 1-2 (c/delay in filing SlP and c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport)Date: 01/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioners praying for time for filing additional affidavit. Additional affidavit may be filed within two weeks. List this group of matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

æITEM NO.52 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 5774/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.60278/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMDATT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 01/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioner praying for further time for filing additional affidavit. List the matter after two weeks. Additional affidavit may be filed in the meanwhile.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

âITEM NO.62 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9580-9581/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37646/2012,CMWPNo.37652/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 10117 of 2013With IA 1-2 (c/delay in filing SLP and with office report)SLP(C) NO. 16722-16723 of 2013(With appln. for exemption from filing OT and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 9584 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 01/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this group of matters after four weeks. In the meanwhile, additional affidavits may be filed in S.L.P. (C) Nos...CC Nos. 9580-9581 of 2013 and S.L.P. (C) ...CC Nos. 9584 of 2013.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ìITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37493/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47502/ 2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BHEEM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 14/06/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (VACATION BENCH)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shital Khatri, Adv. Mr.Rajesh Goyal, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List in the first week of July, 2013. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.MM-8 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37493/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47502/ 2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BHEEM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 07/06/2013 This Petition was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (VACATION BENCH)For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rajesh Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List next week. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

²ITEM NO.8 Court No.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18735/2013(From the judgement and order dated 29/04/2013 in WPC No.58707/2007 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AMAR NATH GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 17/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA (VACATION BENCH)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Prima facie, we have doubts about the pleadings taken by the petitioners that they had purchased 5.9 acres(2.4055 hectares) of land which had been an "Abadi Land". Petitioners had filed the copies of the revenue record showing that it was the abadi land. However, it is in the name of the petitioners themselves. Such entries could have been prepared after purchase of the land. Petitioners are directed to file sufficient evidence to show that their vendor(s) were having abadi land to such a large extent. Petitioners may file the copy of the sale deed, the copies of the revenue record showing the nature of the land in the hand of their vendor(s). List the matter in the 2nd week of July, 2013.

| (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Court Master |

dITEM NO.59 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 7734/2013(arising out of order and judgment dated 21/10/2011 in WP (C) No. 42386 of 2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)SATENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 10/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have perused the affidavits filed on April 30, 2013 and May 8, 2013 by petitioner No. 1. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.110 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDIA No.3 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16380/2012BALRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 10/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ujjwal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Dasti report in respect of respondent Nos.1 and 3 to 6 is awaited. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.2 for filing counteraffidavit on record. List again on 22.7.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

jITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4021/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46636/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PEETAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and prayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 07/05/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sudeep Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory application for stay. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the applicant-petitioner is in actual physical possession of the subject land, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the applicant-petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land if he is not in actual physical possession.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 4/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5566/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47523/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(for directions and office report ))Date: 07/05/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Bansal, Adv. Mr. Devender Singh, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv . Mr. Pardaman Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel ,AdvFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory application for direction. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 4. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the applicants-petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis- possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the applicants-petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

HITEM NO.47 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 2484/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46561/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KRITI KUMARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 06/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In the additional affidavit filed by petitioner No. 2, a statement has been given that all petitioners are in possession; no compensation has been received by any one of them. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition.ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI(06/05/2013)Contd... Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 7734/2013(arising out of judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in W.P.(C) No. 42386/2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)SATENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 06/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jaideep Gutpa, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, prays for time to enable the petitioners to file further affidavit as there are some deficiencies in the affidavit filed on April 30, 2013. The further affidavit may be filed by the petitioners within three days. List the matter on May 10, 2013.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9580-9581/2013(From the judgement and order dated 09/08/2012 in CMWP No.37646/2012,CMWPNo.37652/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SRI CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 10117 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )SLP(C) NO. 16722-16723 of 2013(With appln. for exemption from filing OT and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 9584 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 06/05/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr Raghuvir Sharma, Adv. for Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

lITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.33984-33988/2011SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012SLP(C) NO.36334-36340/2011SLP(C) NO.2603/2012SLP(C) NO.2612/2012SLP(C) NO.2820/2012SLP(C) NO.3298/2012SLP(C) NO.6345/2012SLP(C) NO.3473/2012SLP(C) NO.4249/2012SLP(C) NO.8528/2012SLP(C) NO.8439/2012SLP(C) NO.7146/2012SLP(C) NO.10597/2012SLP(C) NO.16380/2012SLP(C) NO.11879/2012SLP(C) NO.10052/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.11993/2012SLP(C) NO.4687/2012SLP(C) NO.8851/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012SLP(C) NO.3242/2012SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012SLP(C) NO.11303/2012SLP(C) NO.11304/2012SLP(C) NO.5566/2012SLP(C) NO.8849/2012SLP(C) NO.7815/2012SLP(C) NO.7540/2012SLP(C) NO.37493/2012SLP(C) NO.37492/2012SLP(C) NO.18104/2012SLP(C) NO.7436/2012SLP(C) NO.9748/2012SLP(C) NO.33860/2012SLP(C) NO.38289/2012SLP(C) NO.27930/2012 -2-Item No.16SLP(C) NO.30590/2012SLP(C) NO.16674/2012SLP(C) NO.16695/2012SLP(C) NO.16723/2012SLP(C) NO.8631/2013SLP(C) NO.8887/2013

Date: 03/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr Balraj Dewan, Adv. Mr Kuldeep Yadav, Adv. Mr Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Ms Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr K.B.Rohtagi, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Abdul Wadud Aman, Adv. Mr Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr Anshuman Upadhyay, Adv. Mr Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr Shikhil Suri, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv. Mr M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Ms Sandhya goswami, Adv. Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Ms Reeta Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr M Khairati, Adv. Ms Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr Rajesh Goyal, Adv. Ms Sneha Goyal, Adv. Mr Ashok K Mahajan, Adv. Mr Imran Ahmad, Adv. Mr Subhash Chandra Jain, Adv. Mr Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Ayush Negi, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr Braham Singh, Adv. Mr R.D.Upadhyay, Adv. Mr S.K.Verma, Adv. Mr Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha G Nair, Adv. -3-Item No.16For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms Anindita Pujari, Adv. M/s Lawyers Knit & Co. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr K.B.Rohtagi, Adv. Mr Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr Bhaskar Y Kulkarni, Adv. Mr Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr Adarsh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr Deepak Goel, ADv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr A Ramesh, Adv.

Mr C.S.N.Mohan Rao, Adv. Ms Smita Bhargava, Adv. Mr Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr Arvind Kumar Tiwary, Adv. Mr Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.30969,33984-88,36334-40 of 2011 In these batch of matters, service is complete. Duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' time as finalchance for filing counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.1082-83/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time as final chance forfiling counter affidavit. An application for deleting respondent Nos. 4 to 8 from the arrayof respondents has been filed on record. Same be placed before the Hon'bleJudge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions. -4-Item No.16SLP(C) NO.2603,2612 and 2820 of 2012 In these batch of matters, sole respondent is State of UP. Fourweeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.11993/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file the process fee andspare copies within two weeks and on compliance notices be issued to therespondents through the concerned District Court in addition to postalservice.SLP(C) NO.8851/2012 Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1,6 and 13 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Remaining respondents are reported to be duly served but noneappeared nor any steps taken on their behalf.SLP(C) NO.10052,11303,11304,16664,16695,16723,30590 of 2012 The ld. counsel, Mr Sandeep Singh appearing on behalf of Mr AnuvratSharma, Advocate-on-record has accepted notice on behalf of therespondents and undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit bynext date. Four weeks' time is granted.SLP(C) NO.8528,8849 of 2012 It is pertinent to note that despite specific direction andreasonable opportunities, the ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed totake any steps for getting the notices served to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 inSLP(C) No. -5-Item No.168528/2012. Matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for necessary orders/directions.SLP(C) NO.3242/2012 On perusal of the record it appears that respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to8 have been duly served through dasti but none appeared nor any steps takenon their behalf. According to the ld. Counsel, respondent No.3 has also been dulyserved but the office report is silent about it. Registry to submit proper report by next date. Office report further indicates that the ld. Counsel Mr AnuvratSharma had accepted notice on behalf of the State of UP and itsauthorities, but no compliance has been made till date. Concernedrespondent is ordered to proceed ex parte.SLP(C) NO.3298/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Notice be issued to respondent NO.2 through the concerned DistrictCourt in addition to postal service.

Respondent No.4 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.SLP(C) NO.3473/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 6 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. -6-Item No.16 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has undertaken to file processfee and spare copies within a week and oncompliance notices be issued to respondent Nos. 4,5,7 and 8 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.7540/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 22 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. The ld. counsel for the petitioner to file process fee and sparecopies within a week and on compliance notices be issued to respondent Nos.4,6 to 8,10,12 and 16 to 20 through the concerned District Court inaddition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.4242/2012 Service is complete on all the 12 respondents. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Barthat he would be moving the necessary application for deleting respondentNos. 3 to 12 from the array of respondents being proforma respondents. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 despite being duly served have failed toappear nor any steps taken on their behalf.SLP(C) NO.10597/2012 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 5,9 and 11 hasalready come on record. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file the process fee andspare copies within a week and on compliance notice be issued to theunserved respondents through the concerned District Court in addition topostal service. -7-Item No.16SLP(C) NO.4249,7146,9748,16380,11879 of 2012 The ld. Counsel, Mr Sandeep Singh appearing on behalf of Mr AnuvratSharma, Advocate-on-record on behalf of respondent-State of UP has acceptednotice and undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by nextdate. Four weeks' time is granted. Respondent Nos. 1 and 6 in SLP(C) No.4249, 9748 of 2012 are yet tobe served. Notices be re issued through the concerned District Court inaddition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.8439/2012 It is pertinent to note that despite accepting notice on behalf ofrespondent No.1 neither vakalatnama nor counter affidavit has been filedtill date. Respondent NO.2 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Notice be re issued to respondent No.3 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.7436/2012 It is pertinent to note that despite accepting notice on behalf ofrespondent No.1 neither vakalatnama nor counter affidavit has been filedtill date. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file process fee and sparecopies within a week and on compliance notice be issued to respondent No.2through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time as final chance forfiling counter affidavit. -8-Item No.16SLP(C) NO.13641-42/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2(common) are reported to be duly servedthrough post but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter

affidavit.SLP(C) NO.4687/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Necessary steps betaken as per rules.SLP(C) NO.16336/2012 Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 1 to 7 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Necessary steps be taken as per rules.SLP(C) NO.18104/2012 It is pertinent to note that despite accepting notice on behalf ofState of UP and its authorities neither vakalatnama nor counter affidavithas been filed till date. Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Necessary steps betaken as per rules.SLP(C) NO.9748/2012 Notice be issued to the unserved respondents through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service.SLP(C) NO.8631/2013 Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time as final chance forfiling counter affidavit. -9-Item No.16 It appears that despite specific direction on the last date, theld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither filed an application fordeleting respondent Nos. 1,2 and 4 to 12 from the array of respondents nortook any necessary steps for getting the notices served. Place the matterbefore the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions.SLP(C) NO.8887/2012 Office report indicates that the report on default is yet to belisted before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers, as ordered on the last date.SLP(C) NO.33860/2012 File and office report not received. List again on 17.7.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

°ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9269/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.65531/2010, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)INCHHARAM Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 01/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No.7 inPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8853-8855/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.41558/ 2009, CMWPNo.33042/2011, CMWP No.48253/2011 of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)KHEM CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(For impleadment and office report)Date:30/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv. Dr. Surat Singh,Adv. Mr. Sudhama Palo,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice to respondent Nos.1, 6-8, 11 & 14 returnable in eight weeks. (A.S. BISHT) (HARJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

º#ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 9003/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.19987/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSANT RAM & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9018 of 2013] With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9020 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9021 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9022 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9025 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9026 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9027 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9028 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9029 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9032 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and and c/delay in refilingSLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9033 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9035 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9045 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9048 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9049 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)

S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9054 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9056 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9058 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9059 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9060 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9064 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9066 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9112 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9113 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9228 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9258 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9260 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9263 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9267 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9271 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9274 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9278 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9280 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...[CC NO. 9608 of 2013]With I.A.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)Date: 29/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.

For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)..... CC 6512/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46785/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JEET RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 29/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after one week.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

VITEM NO.43 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 19473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47545/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR DUTT & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 29/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Shiva Sharma, Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. Ms Monika Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after one week below S.L.P.(C) No...CC No. 6512 of 2012 - Jeet Ram and others vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46021/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 26/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHARAD ARVIND BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kr. Tiwary, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ðITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDI.A No.4 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7541/2012SATVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,impleadment and office report )Date: 22/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Mohd. Mytaba, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For impleading applicant Ms Praseena Elizabeth Joseph, Adv. M/s Lawyers's Knit & Co. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. Service report in respect of respondent No.2 is awaited. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. List again on 9.7.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

vITEM NO.50 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 5774/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.60278/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMDATT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))Date: 22/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by Mr. Prashant Kumar, advocate for the petitioner, praying for two weeks time for filing additional document. The same may be now filed within two weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

Þ$ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 7927/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.40669/2010 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GR.NOIDA INDUSL.DEV.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBASANTI DEVI & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITHSLP...CC No. 8397With (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8399 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8404 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8405 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8406 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8410 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8411 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8412 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8413 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8421 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8425 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8428 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8438 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8439 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8440 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8442 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8445 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8452 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8455 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8458 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8460 of 2013

With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8511 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8517 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8539 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8543 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8544 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8547 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8548 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8549 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8551-8553 of 2013With IA 1-3 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8653 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8696 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8699-8701 of 2013With IA 1-3 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8830 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8918 of 2013With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 16/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petitions. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

BITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6027/2012SANT RAM & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 16/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 2 granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No. 1 has been served by post. Acknowledgment card received. No appearance for respondent No. 2. Notice addressed to respondent 3 has been returned unserved. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent No.3. List the matter on 17.7.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

¾ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA No 4-6 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10056-10058/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37119/ 2011,CMWP No.46071/2011,CMWP No.46358/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)KRISHAN CHAND & ORS ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 15/04/2013 These applns. were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. B.S. Billoria, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA Nos. 4-6 are allowed at the risk of the petitioners. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

8ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).23446-23447/2012SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 15/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar,Adv. Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No. 1 and 3. Respondent No. 2 granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 15.7.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

¼ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 12/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner granted four weeks time as a last chance for taking fresh steps against unserved respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 granted four more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 15.7.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

`ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 7539-7540/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.48127/2011,CMWPNo.48128/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RATIRAM & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 12/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr Saurabh Pathak, Adv Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

bITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDI.A.NO.3 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6345/2012MAGANVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,permission to place addl. documents on record andprayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 10/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served but none appeared norany steps taken on his behalf. Service report in respect of respondent No.2 is awaited. Respondent No.3 is granted two weeks' time as final chance forfiling counter affidavit. List again on 3.5.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

úITEM NO.50 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37989/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47734/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 08/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Further time of three weeks is granted to the petitioners to comply with the order dated January 4, 2013. List the matter after three weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ðITEM NO.51 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37993/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47735/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 08/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Further time of three weeks is granted to the petitioners to comply with the order dated January 4, 2013. List the matter after three weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

XITEM NO.8 COURT NO. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46021/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )Date: 05/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioner praying for time on the ground of illness of the arguing counsel. List the matter after two weeks, as prayed.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 5-10/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13641-13646/2012(From the judgement and order dated 19/12/2011, 13/12/2011, 22/11/2011 and21/10/2011 in CWP No.73754/2011, CWP No.71556/2011 and CWP No.66439/2011,CWP No.66440/2011 and CWP No.40350/2011, CWP No.40361/2011 of The HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)INDRAJ SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and office report)Date: 01/04/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the impugned judgment with regard to the subject land, the following statement made in the counter affidavit has been noted : ".... Out of 2285 persons 2210 have accepted the compensation under agreement. Development works have been carried out in the village in question and the area has been demarcated in different sectors. In the village 3189 residential flats have been allotted under various schemes and in an area of 3672 sq. meter 976 flats were built by the Authority, which have been allotted. Group housing flats as well as facility flats have been allotted..." Having regard to above, we find no justification to grant any interim relief as prayed for in the interlocutory applications. Interlocutory Application Nos. 5-10 of 2012 for stay stand dismissed.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) |

|Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 4/2013in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4249/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37119/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AJIT SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 01/04/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)/For Applicant(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kr. Rai, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra ,Adv Mr. S.B. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel ,Adv Mr. Hinmanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application No. 4 of 2013 for stay is rejected. However, it is observed that any change, alteration or improvement on the subject land shall be subject to the final decision in the special leave petition and no equity shall be claimed by the concerned respondents - developers on that count.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ØITEM NO.13 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. NO.5 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).38288/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.48253/2011 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAGVIR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With application for deletion of the name of respondent andoffice report)Date: 21/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion is allowed in terms of the prayer at the risk of the petitioner. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¸EITEM NO.21 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 5745/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42332/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSARJEET & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5976 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5977 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5978 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5979 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5980 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5984 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5987 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5989 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6167 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6168 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6169 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6172 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6173 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6174 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6175 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6176 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6177 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6179 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6294 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6297 of 2013((With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6300 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6302 of 2013

(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6304 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6305 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6307 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6309 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6310 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6311 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6312 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6319 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6446 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6447 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, delay in refiling SLP and officereport )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6448 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6450 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6452 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6453 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6455 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6459 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6463 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6464 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6468 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6528 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6530 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6532 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6534 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6536 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6539 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6540 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6545 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6546 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6547 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6548 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6550 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )

S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6551 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6565 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6566 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6569 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6582 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6583 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6585 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6586 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6588 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6590 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6593 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6594 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6595 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6722 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6725 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6729 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6730 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6732 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6736 of 2013(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report )Date: 18/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petitions. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.

|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

`ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 4295/2013(From the judgement and order dated 03/10/2012 in CMWP No.50573/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAIVEER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 18/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. R.S. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 2 - Greater Notice Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondent only. If the petitioner is in possession, he will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioner will not try to forcibly enter into the subject property if he is not in possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.

|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 21905/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42417/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHHATTER PAL YADAV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1-3 (c/delay in filing SLP, directions, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 18/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition and on Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2013. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 2 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only to to un-represented respondents. If the petitioners are in actual physical possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

òITEM NO.6 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 3/2012 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).16337/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.5670/2007 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KESARI SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSGOVT OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)( for directions and office report )Date: 18/03/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. J.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Until further orders, the houses on the subject land/tube- well shall not be demolished nor the petitioners/applicant shall be forcibly dis-possessed if they are in actual physical possession of the subject land/tube-well until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 5774/2013(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.60278/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMDATT SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 18/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÀITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 37-45/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6748-6756/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWP Nos. 44926/2011,40421/2011, 40362/2011, 40347/2011, 44921/2011, 40423/2011, 40342/2011,40335/2011 and 46673 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)TEJ PAL & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay, permission to file lengthy list of dates and deletion ofproforma respondents and with prayer for interim relief and office report) [ONLY I.A. NOS. 37-45 FOR STAY ARE LISTED]Date: 15/03/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)/For Applicant(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application No. 19 of 2012 for deletion of names of proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 91 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6756 of 2012 is granted at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause titled shall be filed by the advocate-on- record for the petitioners within two weeks. Interlocutory Application Nos. 37-45 of 2013 for stay are rejected. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÎITEM NO.6 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 3/2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16380/2012(From the judgement and order dated 15/12/2011 in CMWP No.72782/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report ) [I.A. NO. 3 IS FOR INTERIM ORDER]Date: 15/03/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)/For Applicant(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sudeep Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 returnable in six weeks. ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI(15/03/2013)Contd... Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 2 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis- possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession.

|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¬ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8631/2013OMVEER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 12/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Gargi Tuli,adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.4 has already filed vakalatnama. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent Nos.5-10 are proforma parties and an application for deletion of them is proposed to be filed. Regarding the remaining respondents, notice could not be issued, since the process fee is deficit. Petitioner is granted two weeks time as a last chance to remit the deficit process fee. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await. List the matter on 3.05.2013. | | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ITEM NO.87 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2612/2012HARI SINGH AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NOS. 2820/2012,2603/2012,8851/2012,10052/2012,11303/2012,11304/2012,11993/2012,8528/2012,30590/2012(WITH Office Report)Date: 12/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.B. Rohtagi,Adv. Mr. M.P.S Tomar,Adv. Mr. Jitender Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. Anshuman Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra,Adv. Mr R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In these batch of matters, the Office Report indicates that some ofthe Respondents are yet to be served as shown in the Tabular Chart. The learned counsel for the petitioner has undertaken to takenecessary steps for getting the notice served on the unserved respondentsthrough the Standing Counsel, as all are the State Authorities. ..2/-ITEM NO.87 Duly represented respondents granted four weeks time as a finalchance for filing Counter Affidavit.In SLP(C) No. 11993/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner has to file the process feeand spare copies within a week and take necessary steps for getting thenotice served on the respondent through the Standing Counsel where StateAuthorities are concerned and through the concerned Court in case ofPrivate Parties. List again on 22.4.2013.

| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |mg

ÎITEM NO.5 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos. 11-15/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33984-33988/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWP No.44924/2011, CWPNo.40420/2011, CWP No.40418/2011, CWP No.40354/2011 and CWP No.40424/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 11/03/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabraz Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Sigh Rawal, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. for Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory applications for stay returnable in six weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

´ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos. 5-6/2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42200/2011 andCMWP No.44233/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALIRAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for interim stay and with prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 11/03/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv. for Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory applications returnable in six weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÎoITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.33984-33988/2011SLP(C) NO.2557/2012SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012SLP(C) NO.36334-36340/2011SLP(C) NO.3298/2012SLP(C) NO.3473/2012SLP(C) NO. 4249/2012SLP(C) NO.6539/2012SLP(C) NO.8439/2012SLP(C) NO.7146/2012SLP(C) NO.10597/2012SLP(C) NO.16380/2012SLP(C) NO. 11879/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.16007/2012SLP(C) NO.4687/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012SLP(C) NO. 8849/2012SLP(C) NO.7540/2012SLP(C) NO.37493/2012SLP(C) NO.37492/2012SLP(C) NO.18104/2012SLP(C) NO.7436/2012SLP(C) NO. 9748/2012SLP(C) NO.33860/2012SLP(C) NO.38289/2012SLP(C) NO.27930/2012SLP(C) NO.16674/2012SLP(C) NO.16695/2012SLP(C) NO. 16723/2012SLP(C) NO. 3242/2012 -2-Item No.21Date: 08/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Abhishek, Adv. Mr Balraj Dewan, Adv.

Mr Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr Avnish Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr K.K.L.Gautam, Adv. Mr Brij Bhusan, Adv. Mr Shikhil Suri, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv. Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Ms Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Ms Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr Dhananjaya Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr Rajesh Goyal, Adv. Mr Ashok K Mahajan, Adv. Mr Subhash Chandra Jain, Adv. Mr Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr Ashish Jha, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr Braham Singh, Adv. Mr R.D.Upadhyay, Adv. Mr Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr Tabrez Ahmad, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr Ashutosh Kr Sharma, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr Sajjad Wari, Adv. Mr S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr Bhaskar Y Kulkarni, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Mohit Bakeshi, Adv. Mr Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Mr Abdhesh Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Niendu Vatsyayan, Adv. -3-Item No.21 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NOS. 2557, 6539, 16007 OF 2012 Deleted.SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. An application for deleting respondent Nos. 4 to 8 from the arrayof respondents has been filed by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner. Samebe placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders.SLP(C) NO.4687/2012 Fresh notices be issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter

affidavit. Respondent Nos. 4,5 and 8 are reported to be duly served throughdasti but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. The ld. Counsels, Ms Tatini Basu and Ms Shomila Bakshi appearingon behalf of respondent nos. 6 and 7 have undertaken to file vakalatnama aswell as counter affidavit by next date. Complete set of paper books besupplied to them. Four weeks' time is granted.SLP(C) NO.16336/2012 Service report in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 7 is awaited. -4-Item No.21SLP(C) NO.10597/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file the spare copies withina week for facilitating issuance of notices to respondent Nos.3,6,7,8,10,12 and 13 through the concerned District Court in addition topostal service. Necessary steps be taken accordingly. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 9 and 11 has alreadycome on record. Duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' time forfiling counter affidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.7540/2012 Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 22 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Fresh notices be issued to respondent Nos. 4,6 to 8, 10,12,16 to 20through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Remaining respondents are reported to be duly served but noneappeared nor any steps taken on their behalf.SLP(C) NO.3473/2012 Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Fresh notices be issued to respondent Nos. 4 to 8 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. Remaining respondents are reported to be duly served but noneappeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. -5-Item No.21SLP(C) NO.4249/2012 Service report in respect of respondent Nos. 1 and 6 is awaited. Duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' time forfiling counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.8439/2012 On behalf of respondent no.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Respondent No.2 is also granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent No.3.SLP(C) NO.7146/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Respondent No.2 is also granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Respondent No.3 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared nor any steps taken on his behalf.SLP(C) NO.16380/2012 On behalf of respondent no.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. -6-Item No.21 Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are reported to be duly served through postand dasti but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.SLP(C) NO.11879/2012 On behalf of respondent no.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh Kr

Sharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are reported to be duly served through postand dasti but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.SLP(C) NO.4242/2012 Office report simply indicates that for want of payment of processfee fresh notices could not be issued. However, status/position of all therespondents has not been mentioned. Clear, specific report indicatingstatus/position of the respondents be submitted by next date so as tofacilitate this Court to pass further necessary orders.SLP(C) NO.3242/2012 On behalf of respondent no.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. -7-Item No.21 Fresh notices be issued to respondent Nos. 2 to 8 through dasti asprayed for. Necessary steps be taken.SLP(C) NO.8849/2012 Fresh notices be issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 through theconcerned District Court/standing counsel in addition to postal service.Necessary steps be taken. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.SLP(C) NO.7436/2012 On behalf of respondent no.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Fresh notice be issued to respondent No.2 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service. Respondent no.3 is granted two weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012 Simple endorsement has been made in the office report about servicebeing complete without specifying the status/position of the respondents.Registry to take note and submit specific, clear report indicatingposition/status of the respondents in these matters so as to facilitatepassing of further necessary orders by this Court. In future care should be taken by the registry to submit a veryclear and definite report on record as the passing of further necessaryorders are always held up for -8-Item No.21want of correct report resulting into delaying of proceedings.SLP(C) NO.37492,37493/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to pay process fee/spare copieswithin a week so as to facilitate issuance of notice on the unservedrespondents. On compliance notice be issued forthwith through the concernedDistrict Court/standing counsel in addition to postal service. It appears that an application for deleting respondent Nos. 4 to 30in SLP(C)No.37492/2012 from the array of respondents has been moved andrespondent No.5 in SLP(C) no. 37493/2012. Same be placed before the Hon'bleJudge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions.SLP(C) NO.27930/2012 For want of process, notices could not be issued. Office report simply indicates that for want of payment of processfee fresh notices could not be issued. However, status/position of all therespondents has not been mentioned. Clear, specific report indicatingstatus/position of the respondents be submitted by next date so as tofacilitate this Court to pass further necessary orders.SLP(C) NO.38289/2012 For want of process, notices could not be issued. Office report simply indicates that for want of payment of processfee fresh notices could not be issued. However, status/position of all therespondents has not been mentioned. Clear, specific report indicating

status/position -9-Item No.21of the respondents be submitted by next date so as to facilitate this Courtto pass further necessary orders.SLP(C) NO.33984-33988, 36334-36340, 30969 of 2011 Service is complete in all these batch of matters. Duly representedrespondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit onrecord.SLP(C) NO.16674, 16695, 16723 of 2012 In all these batch of matters, respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are the Stateauthorities. On behalf of respondent no.1 in SLP(C) Nos. 16674 and 16695 of2012, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh Kr Sharma appearing on behalf of MrAnuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record has undertaken to file vakalatnama aswell as counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted. In respect of unserved respondents in SLP(C) No. 16723/2012,submission at Bar has been made that notices be served through the standingcounsel, as the unserved respondents being State authorities, prayerallowed. Necessary steps be taken accordingly on payment of process fee andspare copies.SLP(C) NO.9748, 33860, 3298 of 2012 Service report in respect of the respondents is awaited.SLP(C) NO.18104/2012 The ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh Kr Sharma appearing on behalf of MrAnuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record has undertaken to file vakalatnama aswell as counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1 by next date. -10-Item No.21 Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared. Fresh notices be issued to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal service. List again on 15.4.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ÂITEM NO.11 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10742/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46021/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAMILA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 08/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.N. Jha, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioner praying for time on the ground of self illness. List the matter after three weeks.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 4-5/2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7542-7543/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.75042/2010 & CMWPNo.32236/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SARJEET & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and office report)Date: 08/03/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after four weeks. Interim order to continue in the meanwhile.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\206ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDIA 3/2012 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).6345/2012MAGANVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 04/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly and properly served throughpost but none appeared nor any steps have been taken on his behalf. Service report in respect of respondent No.2 is awaited. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record. List again on 10.4.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |

êIITEM NOS.28 + 56 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 4386/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42111/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSDILIP KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4572 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4574 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4575 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4577 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4581 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4583 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4585 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4586 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4587 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4591 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4592 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4594 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4600 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4601 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4602 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4622 of 2013]

With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4635 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4637 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4802 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4803 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4804 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4806 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4811 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4813 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4817 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4818 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4822 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4824 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4826 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5203 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5205 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5208 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5210 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5224 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5233 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5237 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5243 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5226 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)

S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5227 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5228 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5231 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5232 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5235 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5238 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5241 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5246 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5247 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5249 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5251 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5252 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5254 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5256 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5261 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5263 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5266 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5269 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5271 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5290 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5301 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5303 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5305 of 2013]

With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5306 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5308 of 2013] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5310 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5312 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5313 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5315 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5318 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5320 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5322 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5324 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5325 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5327 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5328 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 5332 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4633 of 2013] (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4623 of 2013] (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4629 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2013 [CC NO. 4631 of 2013](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 01/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petitions. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 4295/2013(From the judgement and order dated 03/10/2012 in CMWP No.50573/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAIVEER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 25/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned senior counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within two weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

6ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26874-26876/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.45716/2011, WCNo.48952/2011 and WC No.55615/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)DAYARAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to deleterespondent from array of party and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)WITHS.L.P.(C).....[CC NO. 17064 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)Date: 22/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)SLP 26874-26876/2012 Mr. Sudhir Naagar,Adv.SLP.....[CC 17064/2012] Mr. Shibashish Misra, Adv. (NOT PRESENT)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P.(Civil) Nos. 26874-26876/2012 Names of respondent Nos. 4 to 50 in special leave petition arising out of final judgment in Writ-C No. 45716 of 2011, respondent No. 4 in special leave petition arising out of final judgment in Writ- C No. 48952 of 2011 and respondent Nos. 4 to 29 in special leave petition arising out of final judgment in Writ-C No. 55615 of 2011 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Interlocutory Application Nos. 7-9 of 2012 stand disposed of accordingly. Amended cause title shall be filed within two weeks. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. If the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the subject land/s, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until further orders. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to forcibly enter into the subject land/s if they are not in actual physical possession. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.

SLP.....[CC 17064/2012] Nobody appears for the petitioners. List the matter after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÀITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).23446-23447/2012SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 22/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. Ms. Henna George,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of all the respondents. List the matter on 15.4.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

NITEM NO.48 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6353/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44695/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHARAM VEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment andwith prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 18/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr S. M. Krishnan, Adv. Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. I.A. No. 2 of 2012 for deletion of proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 25 is granted. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 3. Notice shall be issued only to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13750/2012(From the judgement and order dated 16/02/2012 in WC No.8746/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)ADITYA PAL SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 15/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to the respondent No.1. Connect with S.L.P. (C) NO. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÐITEM NO.45 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 22755/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.37054/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KUSUM DEVI AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.AND ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 15/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2. Notice shall be issued only to the respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others. If the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

TITEM NO.44 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).22484/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.60197/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHADDHA NAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report )WITHS.L.P.(C).....CC NO. 14901 of 2012 With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and permission to file additionaldocuments and With office report)Date: 15/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s)SLP 22484/2012 Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv.SLP..CC 14901/2012 Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for common respondent No. 2 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to unrepresented respondents. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÞITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 15/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv. Mr.Milan Laskar,adv. Mr.Lal Singh Thakur,adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted that respondent No.2 has filed vakalatnama through Mr.Ravinder Kumar. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.1 is still awaited. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent No.1. List the matter on 5.04.2013. | | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

úITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 4/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7541/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37443/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and office report)Date: 15/02/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. for Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. No. 4 of 2013. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 3. If the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ºITEM NO.45 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13100/2012(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2012 in CMWP No.3502/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMVEER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )Date: 11/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No.3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

àITEM NO.45 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)......... CC 17900/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.32979/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NARENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in six weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel, waives service for respondent No. 4 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall be sent only to unrepresented respondents. In the meanwhile, parties concerned shall maintain status quo with regard to subject property as obtaining today in all respects. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.2 COURT.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 3/2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6345/2012(From the judgement and order dated 06/01/2012 in WC No.41350/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAGANVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s)/ Applicant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay, permission to place addl. documents on record and withand prayer for interim relief and office report)CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARDate: 08/02/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s)/For Applicant(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. A. Ramesh, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Y. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory application for stay returnable in two weeks. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. If the petitioners-applicants are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners-applicants will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\200SITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.33984-33988/2011SLP(C) NO.2557/2012SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012SLP(C) NO.36334-36340/2011SLP(C) NO.3298/2012SLP(C) NO.3473/2012SLP(C) NO.4249/2012SLP(C) NO.6539/2012SLP(C) NO.8439/2012SLP(C) NO.7146/2012SLP(C) NO.10597/2012SLP(C) NO.16380/2012SLP(C) NO.11879/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.16007/2012SLP(C) NO.4687/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012SLP(C) NO.3242/2012SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012SLP(C) NO.8849/2012SLP(C) NO.7540/2012SLP(C) NO.37493/2012SLP(C) NO.37492/2012SLP(C) NO.7436/2012SLP(C) NO.9748/2012SLP(C) NO.33860/2012SLP(C) NO.38289/2012SLP(C) NO.27930/2012SLP(C) NO.16674/2012SLP(C) NO.16695/2012SLP(C) NO.16723/2012(With office report) -2-Item No.13Date: 04/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr Braham Singh, Adv. Mr R.D.Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr Sarbajit Dutta, Adv. Mr Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr Kuldeep Yadav, Adv. Mr Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Abdul Wadud Aman, Adv. Mr Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr K.K.L.Gautam, Adv. Mr Brij Bhusan, Adv. Mr Shikhil Suri, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv. Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr M.P.S.Tomar, Adv. Mr Jabar Singh, Adv. Ms Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Ms Tulika Prakash, Adv. Mr Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr Rajesh Goyal, Adv. Mr Bhagwan Singh, Adv. Mr Ashok K Mahajan, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr Tabrez Ahmad, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr Ashutosh Kr Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv Mr Vikrant Nilesh Goyal, Adv. Mr Bhaskar Y Kulkarni, Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.2557, 6539, 16336 AND 16007 OF 2012 Process fee and spare copies be filed within three weeks. In theevent of default, matter be placed before the -3-Item No.13Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders. Remaining duly represented respondents to file counter affidavitwithin four weeks.SLP(C) NO.10597/2012 None for the petitioner. In the interest of justice, delay of 11 days in filing process feeand spare copies stands condoned. Notice be issued forthwith through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal mode. Remaining duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' timefor filing counter affidavit.SLP(C) NO.4687, 7540 of 2012 Service report is awaited in respect of all the respondents.SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012 Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared. On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record, hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.

Service report in respect of respondent Nos. 4 to 8 is awaited(issued through dasti as well as through postal mode).SLP(C) NO.3473/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat -4-Item No.13Sharma, Advocate-on-record, has undertaken to file vakalatnama as well ascounter affidavit by next date. Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos. 4 to 8.SLP(C) NO.4249/2012 Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared. Respondent Nos. 2 and 8 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Fresh notice be issued to respondent No.6 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal mode. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.7 has already come onrecord.SLP(C) NO.8439/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record, hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. The ld. Counsel for respondent No.2 has sought time for filingcounter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted. Fresh notice be issued to respondent No.3 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal mode.SLP(C) NO.7146/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, -5-Item No.13Mr Ashutosh Kr Sharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record, has undertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit bynext date. Respondent No.3 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared. The ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 has sought time for filingcounter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted.SLP(C) NO.16380, 11879/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record, hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Respondent No.3 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared. Similarly, the ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 has also sought timefor filing counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted. Respondent No.4 is reported to be duly served through dasti butnone appeared.SLP(C) NO.4242/2012 None for the petitioner. Process fee and spare copy to be filed within fourweeks for issuance of notice to the respondent. In the event of default,matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders.SLP(C) NO.3242/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat -6-Item No.13Sharma, Advocate-on-record, has undertaken to file vakalatnama as well ascounter affidavit by next date. Fresh notice be issued to respondent Nos. 2 to 8 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal mode.SLP(C NO.8849/2012 Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.

Fresh notice be issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 through theconcerned District Court in addition to postal mode.SLP(C) NO.7436/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr Ashutosh KrSharma appearing on behalf of Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-record, hasundertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Fresh notice be issued to respondent No.2 through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal mode. The ld. Counsel for respondent No.3 has also sought time for filingcounter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted.SLP(C) NO.38289, 37492,37493/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Barthat necessary application for deletion of respondent Nos. 4 to 13 from thearray of respondents in the cause list would be moved during the course ofthe day. Report is silent about status of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Office tosubmit a clear report by next date. -7-Item No.13SLP(C) NO.16674,16695 AND 16723 OF 2012 Fresh notice to all the common respondents in these batch ofmatters through the concerned District Court in addition to the postal modebe issued. Necessary steps be taken within a week. Four weeks' time is granted for receipt of notice.SLP(C) NO.9748, 33860 of 2012 Office report indicates that the requisite process fee has beenpaid on 10.1.2013. Notice be issued forthwith.SLP(C) NO.3298/2012 For want of deficit process fee, notice could not be issued torespondent Nos. 1 to 3. Proper process fee be paid within one week andnotices be issued forthwith through the concerned District Court inaddition to postal mode. The application for deletion of respondent Nos. 5 to 19 registeredas IA No.2 has been moved. Same be placed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for necessary orders. Respondent No.4 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. List again on 8.3.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 19473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47545/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR DUTT & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 01/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Monika Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioners praying for further four weeks time for filing additional affidavit. List the matter after four weeks. Additional affidavit may be filed in the meanwhile.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 9/ 2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2557/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.11189/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)VISHNOO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and office report )Date: 28/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv Ms. Asha Singh, Adv. Mr. Punit Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv.For Respondent(s)R-3 Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.Applicant-intervenorsin I.A. 7-8 Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. No. 9 of 2013 returnable along with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 36334-36340 of 2011 - Sanjay Yadav and others etc. etc. vs. State of U.P. and others. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 3. If the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÀITEM NO.8 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/ 2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10315/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.41315/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PRAKSHIT BARDEJA & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for stay and office report)Date: 28/01/2013 This IA was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit Sinha, Adv.For Respondent(s)R-2 Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. No. 2 of 2012 returnable along with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 36334-36340 of 2011 - Sanjay Yadav and others etc. etc. vs. State of U.P. and others. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2. If the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 43-45/2013 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6466-6469/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42424/2011,WPNo.42439/2011,WP No.45777/2011,WP No.45779/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJESH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for directions and office report)Date: 28/01/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Nagendra Rai,Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s)R-2 Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.R-9 Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Ms. Vinita Sasidharan, Adv. for M/s Lawyer'S Knit & Co.For intervenors Mr Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.Supertech/APV Mr. Ravi Sikri, Adv.Realty Ltd. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Madhu Sikri, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv.For intervenorsIA 37-39 Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv.Gaur Sons Hi-Tech Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. Nos. 43-45 of 2012 returnable along with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 36334-36340 of 2011 - Sanjay Yadav and others etc. etc. vs. State of U.P. and others. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2 and Ms. Bina Madhavan, advocate waives service for respondent No. 9. If the petitioners are in possession, they will not be forcibly dis-possessed by the respondents until next date of hearing. It is made clear that under the garb of this order, the petitioners will not try to enter the subject property if they are not in possession.

|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.29 + 68 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 1883/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47267/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NEW OKHLA INDUS. DEV.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKANHAIYA LAL & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 1982 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 2484 of 2013With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC Nos. 2634-2635 of 2013With IA 1-2 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )withSLP (C) ...CC No. 2879 of 2013IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 21/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.SLP.. CC 2484 Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv.For Respondent(s)SLP.. CC Nos. 2634-2635 : Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P (C) Nos. ..CC Nos. 1883, 1982, 2634-2635, 2879: Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petitions. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others. S.L.P. (C) ...CC No. 2484:

Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÜITEM NO.5 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 15-21/2012 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).36334-36340/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.23451/2010,CMWPNo.34851/2010,CMWP No.38688/2011,CMWP No.38689/2011,CMWP No.41221/2011,CMWPNo.41309/2011,CMWP No.45349/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)SANJAY YADAV & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)( for directions and office report )Date: 21/01/2013 These IAs were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. for Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair ,Adv Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr.Adv. Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv. for Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on I.A. Nos. 15-21 of 2012 returnable after two weeks. In the meanwhile, contesting respondents may file their written response to I.A. Nos. 15-21 of 2012.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.7 inPetitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.8853-8855/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.48253/2011, CMWPNo.41558/2009 & CMWP No.33042/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)KHEM CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Appln(s) for impleadment and office report)Date: 16/01/2013 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Setu Niket, Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NO.7 in SLP(C) No.8854/2012 Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(KUSUM GULATI) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

¾ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 22755/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.37054/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KUSUM DEVI AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.AND ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 11/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

<*ITEM NO.22 + 69 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 22338/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.43265/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)N.O.I.D.A. Petitioner(s) VERSUSJAGDISH & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22339 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22340 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22341 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22680 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22681 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22756 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22851 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22913 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22916 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22918 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22920 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22921 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22926 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22927 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22931 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22932 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22950 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22952 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22954 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22955 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22956 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22959 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22961 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22962 of 2012

With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22963 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22964 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 22966 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )SLP(C)...CC 23411/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 23417/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 23457/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 23482/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 23499/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP)SLP(C)...CC 23521/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 23541/2012(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 33/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 37/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 39/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 42/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 1735/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 1736/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 1740/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 1741/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 1752/2013 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C)...CC 1794/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C)...CC 1827/2013 (WITH APPLN.(S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 07/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petitions. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.

|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\234ITEM NO.101 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).23446-23447/2012SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 07/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar,Adv. Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of all the respondents. List the matter on 22.2.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

\230ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37989/2012[From the judgment and order dated 17.2.2012 in W.C. NO. 47734 of 2011 ofthe High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 04/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\222ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).37993/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.47735/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 04/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÜITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25551-25552/2012SATISH CHAND & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 04/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Durgesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondents reported to be duly served through dasti but noneappeared. No further steps required to be taken in the matter. It beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

ÖITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9748/2012BABU RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)withSLP(C) No.33860/2012(with office report)withSLP(C) Nos.37493 and 3298/2012(with office report)Date: 03/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.9748/2012 In all there are five respondents, out of which, respondent Nos.1 to3 and 5 are yet to be served. Notices be served through the standingcounsel, if state authorities are concerned or through the District Courtso far as private parties are concerned, after payment of the process feeor filing of spare copies.Item No.48 -2- In the meanwhile, respondent No.4 to file counter affidavit.SLP(C) No.33860/2012 Fresh notices be served on the respondents through the standingcounsel, if state authorities are concerned or through the District Courtso far as private parties are concerned, after payment of the process feeand filing of spare copies.SLP(C) Nos.37493 and 3298/2012 Files not received. List all the matters again on 1.2.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

xIITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33984-33988/2011SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.2557/2012SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012SLP(C) NO.36334-36340/2011SLP(C) NO.6539/2012SLP(C) NO.3473/2012SLP(C) NO.4249/2012SLP(C) NO.8439/2012SLP(C) NO.7146/2012SLP(C) NO.10597/2012SLP(C) NO.16380/2012SLP(C) NO.11879/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.16007/2012SLP(C) NO.4687/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012SLP(C) NO.3242/2012SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012SLP(C) NO.8849/2012SLP(C) NO.7540/2012SLP(C) NO.7436/2012SLP(C) NO.30969/2011Date: 03/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv. Ms Tulika Prakash, ADv. Ms Sandhya Goswami, Adv. -2-Item No.19 Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv.

Mr Samir Ali Khan, Adv. Mr S.K.Singh, Adv. Mr Gopal Prasad, Adv. Mr Prashant R Dahat, Adv. Mr Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Mr K.K.L.Gautam, Adv. Mr Brij Bhusan, Adv. Mr Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr Ashish Jha, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr S.B.Tripathi, Adv. Mr Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr Bhaskar Y Kulkarni, Adv. Mr Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Adv. Mr Mohit Bakeshi, Adv. Mr Dheeraj Nair, Adv. Ms Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr Abdhesh Chaudhary, Adv. Ms Mudrika Bansal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.30969/2011 It appears from the office report that the ld. Advocate, Mr AnuvratSharma has moved a letter to the registry, requesting that respondent No.4being an officer of the State of U.P.(who is already respondent No.1) neednot be served separately and service should be treated as complete on -3-Item No.19all the respondents. I am afraid that such request cannot be considered asthere has to be a proper and legal service of the notice on respondentNo.4, though he may be officer of respondent No.1. Request cannot beacceded to. Necessary steps be taken accordingly.SLP(C) NO.33984-33988, 36334-40 of 2011 The ld. Advocate is directed to file vakalatnama/memo of appearanceon behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in SLP(C) No. 33984-88/2011( Stateauthorities) and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in SLP(C) No. 36334-40/2011.Necessary compliance be made accordingly by next date.SLP(C) NO.2557,6539,16336,16007 OF 2012 Perusal of the office report indicates that steps be taken forfiling process fee so as to facilitate issuance of notice to the concernedrespondents.SLP(C) NO.10597/2012 Though process fee has been paid but not accompanied with anapplication for condonation of delay. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he hasalready moved an application in this behalf. Registry to clarify theposition and then take further action according. The ld. Advocate appearing for respondent No.9 has submitted thatcounter affidavit has already been filed on record. The ld. Counsel for respondent No.11 has sought time for filing

counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted. -4-Item No.19 It is pertinent to note that office report in this regard issilent.SLP(C) NO.4687, 7540 of 2012 Service report is awaited.SLP(C) NO.1082-1083/2012 Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are reported to be duly served but noneappeared. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has requested for issuance ofdasti against respondent Nos. 4 to 8. Allowed. Necessary steps be takenaccordingly.SLP(C) NO.3473/2012 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos. 1,2 and 4to 8. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit.SLP(C) NO.4249/2012 Respondent Nos. 2 and 8 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are reported to be duly served but noneappeared. Respondent no.7 has already filed counter affidavit on record. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent No.6. -5-Item No.19 However, status of respondent No.1 is not clear from the officereport. Registry to submit a correct and proper report reflecting on thestatus of each of the respondents soas to facilitate this Court to pass necessary orders as per rules.SLP(C) NO.8439/2012 Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served through post but noneappeared. Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent No.3.SLP(C) NO.7146/2012 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.16380, 11879 OF 2012 Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 are reported to be duly served through postbut none appeared. Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has requested for issuance ofdasti against respondent No.4. Granted. Necessary steps be takenaccordingly.SLP(C) NO.4242/2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take necessary -6-Item No.19steps for depositing the process fee and filing spare copies by next datepositively so as to facilitate the registry to issue notices to therespondents.SLP(C) NO.3242/2012 It appears that notices were issued in the month of March, 2012. Itwould be appropriate for the ld counsel for the petitioner to takenecessary steps for getting the fresh notices re-issued through theconcerned District Court. Necessary steps be taken accordingly.SLP(C) NO.8849/2012 Service report is awaited in respect of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.7436/2012 It appears from the office report that show cause notices wereissued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on 27.6.2012 and its report is stillawaited. It would be appropriate if fresh notices are re-issued through theld. District Court. Necessary steps be taken accordingly. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counteraffidavit on record.SLP(C) NO.13641-13646/2012 Office report indicates that service is complete on all therespondents but it does not specify andpresent a correct picture about the status of respondents. -7-Item No.19 Registry is directed to take care in future in submitting a properand correct report when there are large number of matters tagged togetherso as to facilitate this Court to pass necessary orders and expedite theproceedings. Note be taken accordingly. List again on 4.2.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\226ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29279/2012JAGVIR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 03/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Akshay Verma, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh notices could not be issued for want of payment of processfee and filing of spare copies. Needful be done by next date. In the event of default, matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for necessary orders. List again on 31.1.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

\226ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil).......... CC 21905/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42417/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHHATTER PAL YADAV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 02/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter after four weeks.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)......... CC 6512/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46785/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JEET RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 02/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arjun Bhandari, Adv. Mr. P.S. Bhullar, Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

jITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report ))Date: 02/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tabrez Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No. 1 and 2. List the matter on 15.2.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

hITEM NO.43 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 15058/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.53711/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 14/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioner praying for time for filing additional affidavit. List the matter after four weeks. Additional affidavit may be filed by the petitioner in the meanwhile.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\236ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 19473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47545/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR DUTT & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (C/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 14/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by the advocate-on-record for the petitioners praying for further time for filing additional affidavit. Additional affidavt may now be filed within six weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27023/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.23560/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHREECHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment,exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and officereport)WITHS.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 16033 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)../2012 [CC NO. 16037 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 16040 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 16465 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP officereport)SLP(C) NO. 27139 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27930 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28140 of 2012(With office report)Date: 10/12/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. In the meanwhile, status quo, as obtaining today, with regard to the subject property shall be maintained by all concerned including the petitioners. Tag with S.L.P. (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

´ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 16463/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47502/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BHEEM SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 03/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Rajesh Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Connect with S.L.P.(C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¦ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 16187-16192/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.64564/2009,CMWPNo.65544/2009CMWP No.68487/2009 dated 14/05/2012 in RA No.2545/2012,RANo.2591/2012RA No.2597/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-6 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 03/12/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Connect with S.L.P.(C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ôITEM NO.45 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 16608/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.48644/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MEGHRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 03/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Adv. for Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Connect with S.L.P.(C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

tITEM NO.10 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 2 & 3 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8439/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.55243/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAM KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention and exemption from filing O.T. and officereport)Date: 03/12/2012 These Applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application for intervention is allowed but the intervenor will not be impleaded as respondent. The intervenor will however be heard through his counsel as and when the special leave petition is taken up. All the material filed by the intervenor in support of intervention application will be considered by the Court at the time of hearing of the matter. -2- The application for exemption from filing official translation is also allowed.| (KUSUM SYAL) | |(INDU SATIJA) ||SR.P.A | |COURT MASTER || | | |

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 1 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 21292/2012RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 03/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application for condonation of delay of 99 days in refiling the Special Leave Petition. Perused the application supported by Affidavit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The delay is condoned. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Indu Bala Kapur) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 1 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 21491/2012RAJENDRA PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 03/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application for condonation of delay of 96 days in refiling the Special Leave Petition. Perused the application supported by Affidavit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The delay is condoned. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Indu Bala Kapur) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

BITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25551-25552/2012SATISH CHAND & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 03/12/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted for filing the status of dasti service onrespondent Nos.1 to 4. List again on 4.1.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

^ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 3 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9761/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.47502/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OM PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for impleadment and office report)Date: 03/12/2012 This Application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Rishi Malhotra ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the application for impleadment along with the main matter.| (KUSUM SYAL) | |(INDU SATIJA) ||SR.P.A | |COURT MASTER || | | |

2ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 20540/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42548/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHATAT RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 30/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 34415-34417 of 2011 - Mangat Singh and others etc. etc. vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¼ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA No.2 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3298/2012OM PRAKASH @ OMI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report )Date: 29/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR IN CHAMBERSFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tabrez Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. Amended cause title be filed within four weeks. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 3 InPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12461/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46764/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURESH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 26/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application for deleting the name of proforma respondent nos. 5 to 7 from the array of parties. The application is allowed. The name of proforma respondent nos. 5 to 7 be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner. Last opportunity is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to file process fee and spare copies within two weeks. Cause title be amended within four weeks.| (KUSUM SYAL) | |(SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR) ||SR.P.A | |COURT MASTER || | | |

ÖITEM NO.20 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.Nos. 2 & 3 in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7146/2012SUDHA RANI CHAUHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention, exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date: 23/11/2012 These I.As. were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. (N.P.)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. (N.P.) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears. The application for intervention is allowed but the intervenor will not be impleaded as respondent. The intervenor will however be heard through his counsel as and when the S.L.P. is taken up. All the material filed by the intervenor in support of intervention application will be considered by the Court at the time of hearing of the matter. The application for exemption from filing official translation is also allowed.| (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) | | (INDU SATIJA) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

øITEM NO.38 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23750/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.49771/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALA DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 19/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On August 21, 2012, we directed the petitioner to file an additional affidavit on the following aspects : (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court, and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. Pursuant thereto, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioner wherein it is stated that she has received compensation of ` 63,24,000/- on July 23, 2008, the possession of the subject land has already been taken by the respondents before the filing of the Writ Petition and the Writ petition was filed before the High Court on August 26, 2011. From the above, it is clear that after three years of receipt of compensation the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court. Much before filing the Writ Petition, the possession of the subject land had already been taken by the respondents. In view of above, prima facie, we are not inclined to issue any notice, but since this is a group matter, we keep this special leave petition pending for being taken up along with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011 and other connected matters.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) |

|Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13100/2012(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2012 in CMWP No.3502/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMVEER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 19/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Avtul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. (not present) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after four weeks as prayed. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

zITEM NO.58 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No. 3-4 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13641-13646/2012INDRAJ SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and office report)Date: 19/11/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applications are allowed. The names of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are deleted from the array ofparties in SLP (C) 13641 of 2012 subject to all just exceptions. The names of Respondent Nos. 4 to 12 are deleted from the array ofparties in SLP (C) 13642 of 2012 subject to all just exceptions. The names of Respondent Nos. 4 to 13 are deleted from the array ofparties in SLP (C) 13644 of 2012 subject to all just exceptions. Amended cause title be filed within four weeks from today in all theSpecial Leave Petitions.| (Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 15058/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.53711/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATVEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 09/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Krishna, Adv. Mr. M.P. S. Tomar, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

®ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 19473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47545/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAMESHWAR DUTT & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 09/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter. |(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

&ITEM NO.20(CHAMBER) COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos. 2 & 3 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7146/2012(From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.33957/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SUDHA RANI CHAUHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With application for intervention, exemption from filing officialtranslation and office report)Date: 09/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv.(NP)For Intervenor Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv.For Respondent(s)For RR No. 2 Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R| ||While the Advocate for the intervenor is present no one appears either for ||the State authorities or for the petitioners in the Special Leave Petition. ||This mater will be taken up next week in the presence of the counsel for the||parties. || ||[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SNEH LATA SHARMA] ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

®ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27023/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.23560/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHREECHAND AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment,exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and officereport)WITHS.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 16033 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)../2012 [CC NO. 16037 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)S.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 16040 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 16465 of 2012] With I.A. 1 (for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP officereport)SLP(C) NO. 27139 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 27930 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 28140 of 2012(With office report)Date: 09/11/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Tomar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Jai Singh, Adv. Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Joseph Pookkatt, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this group of matters after two weeks. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\226+ITEM NO.22 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)withSLP(C) No.33984-33988/2011SLP(C) No.2557/2012SLP(C) No.36334-36340/2011SLP(C) No.6539/2012SLP(C) No.10597/2012SLP(C) No.16336/2012SLP(C) No.16007/2012SLP(C) No.4687/2012SLP(C) No.13641-13646/2012SLP(C) No.8849/2012SLP(C) No.7540/2012(with office report)Date: 08/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. Brij Bhushan, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imama, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Adv.Item No.22 -2-For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Ms. Namita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No.30969/2011 Deleted. In SLP(C) Nos.33984-33988 and 36334-36340/2011, the learned Advocate,Ms. Alka Sinha, appearing on behalf of Mr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record confirms that they have to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.They may do so before the next date. Learned counsel for the petitioner has to provide additional copy ofthe pleadings within a week against proper acknowledgment which is to befiled on record to avoid issuance of further notice. Nobody is present for the petitioner in SLP(C) No.7540/2012 whereinthe petitioner has to pay process fee and spare copies before 24.11.2012.Item No.22 -3- If it is not filed, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If it is filed, issue notice with dasti service upon the unservedrespondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon thelitigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to be served through thenearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned andthrough standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if processfee and spare copies are paid/filed before 24.11.2012.SLP(C) Nos.10597,8849 and 2557/2012 Nobody is present for the petitioners. Let there be a fresh notice with dasti service upon the unservedrespondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon thelitigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to be served through thenearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned andthrough standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if processfee and spare copies are paid/filed before 24.11.2012.SLP(C) Nos.6539 and 4687/2012 Let there be a fresh notice with dasti service upon the unservedrespondents. The litigant has to confirm dastiItem No.22 -4-notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permittedto be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where privateparties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authoritiesare concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before24.11.2012. So far as State of U.P./its officers/offices are concerned, thelearned Advocate, Ms. Alka Sinha, appearing onbehalf of Mr.Anuvrat Sharma, Advocate-on-Record accepts notice for suchrespondents, in that case, petitioners can serve advance copies of thepleadings within a week against proper acknowledgment which is to be filedon record to avoid issuance of further notice.SLP(C) No.8849/2012 To be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for deletion ofseveral respondents at the earliest, without waiting for the otherformalities of confirming service and pleadings in connected SLPs. All the served respondents in all the SLPs may file counter affidavitbefore the next date. List again on 3.1.2013.| | | (S.G. SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |

æ ITEM NO. 13 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No.3 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.12461/2012 (From the judgment and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46764/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) SURESH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report) Date: 06/11/2012 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr.Praveen Chaturvedi, Adv.(N/P) For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. (N/P) The Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out thrice. None appears. Adjourned, to be listed in due course.|(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(KUSUM GULATI) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.21 Court No.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 2 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).7815/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2011 in CMWP No.46998/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)LEKH PAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report ))Date: 05/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. (NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of proforma respondent Nos. 12 to 30 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner. Hence I.A. No. 2 is allowed.|(Shashi Sareen) | | (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ITEM NO.22 Court No.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 3-4 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7934-7935/2012(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2011 in CMWP No.66230/2011,CMWPNo.66235/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SUSHILA DEVI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report ))Date: 05/11/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. (NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The name of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 12 in SLP(C) No. 7934/2012 and proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 11 in SLP(C) No. 7935 of 2012 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Hence I.A. No. 3-4 are allowed.|(Shashi Sareen) | |(Sukhbir Paul Kaur) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\202ITEM NO.117 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6353/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44695/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHARAM VEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date: 05/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Muthu Kumar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner states that service has been effected on the caveator and proof has been filed. In view of the stand taken by the counsel, no further orders are necessary. |(Hemalatha Mohan) | (Harjinder Kaur) || Sr.P.A. | Court Master |

êITEM NO.8 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos.7 & 8Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2557/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.11189/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)VISHNOO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for intervention and exemption from filing O.T. and officereport)Date: 05/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application for intervention. It will be taken up with main matter.| (Sushma Batra) | |(Sneh Lata Sharma) ||Sr.P.A. | |Court Master |

¶ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 30/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Mehdi Imam,adv. Mr.Tabrez Ahmad,adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. List the matter on 2.01.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

\230ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3242/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.32719/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of proforma respondents 9 to 22 and officereport)Date: 29/10/2012 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application for deletion of proforma respondent nos. 9 to 22 is allowed at the risk of petitioners. | (Sanjay Kumar) Court Master | (Indu Satija) || |Court Master |

\210ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26874-26876/2012DAYARAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim reliefand office report ))WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17064 of 2012(With office report)Date: 29/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.Chawla, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Naagar,Adv. Mr. Shibashish MisraFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Registry has to be careful. In the present case Court has yet notissued notice but directed the petitioner to disclose certain facts onaffidavit within four weeks. Petitioner wants some more time to file suchaffidavit. Petitioner may file such affidavit before 21.11.2012. However,matter shall be listed before Hon'ble Court thereafter without waiting forsuch affidavit and without listing it before the Registrar Court sinceHon'ble Court has yet not issued the notice.| | | (S.G.SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |RS

8ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23446-23447/2012(From the judgement and order dated 16/04/2012 in WP No.3787/2009 dated16/05/2012 in WP No.3787/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report )Date: 29/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sibal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. Ms. Purti Marwaha, Adv. for Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process. In the meanwhile, status-quo, as obtaining today, with regard to the subject property shall be maintained by all concerned including the petitioners. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

îITEM NO.11 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4249/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37119/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AJIT SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report)Date: 29/10/2012 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application for deletion of respondent nos. 9 to 36 from the array of the parties is allowed at the risk of petitioners. | (Sanjay Kumar) Court Master | (Indu Satija) || |Court Master |

¬ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29279/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWP No.55188/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAGVIR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment andwith prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 29/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. for Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Manoj Saxena, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2. Service on respondent No. 2 is thus complete. Notice shall go only to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

vITEM NO.10 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.3 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3776/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.32719/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OM PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and office report)Date: 29/10/2012 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application for deletion of proforma respondent nos. 9 to 26 is allowed at the risk of petitioners. | (Sanjay Kumar) Court Master | (Indu Satija) || |Court Master |

\ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18104/2012(From the judgement and order dated 03/04/2012 in CMWP No.12659/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 19/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shaad Anwar, Adv. Ms. Shabnam, Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

"ITEM NO. 39 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(s) No. 9748 of 2012[From the judgment and order dated 21.10.2011 in WP No. 47545 of 2011 ofthe High Court of judicature at Allahabad]BABU RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,deletion of the name ofrespondent and prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 13834 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 15/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. for deletion of names of respondent Nos. 6 to 134 from the array of parties is granted. Amended cause-title shall be filed by the advocate-on- record for the petitioners within two weeks from today. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 4. Notice shall be issued only to unrepresented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÒITEM NO.22 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 17900/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.32979/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NARENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 12/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. S.C. Maheshwari, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, submits that some time may be granted to the petitioners to file a better affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay. Additional affidavit may be filed by the petitioners in support of the application for condonation of delay within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

úITEM NO.6 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No.2 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8849/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46289/2011 ofthe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of respondents and office report )Date: 12/10/2012 This appln. was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.2- application for deletion of the names of respondent nos.4to 36 from the array of parties is granted, at the risk of the petitioner'slearned counsel. (G.V.Ramana) (Indu Satija) Court Master Court Master

TITEM NO.23 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 17184/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47173/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV.AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSBAHADUR & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17786 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17792 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17794 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17798 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17800 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17803 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17804 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17806 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17808 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17810 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17812 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17825 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17826 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17827 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17833 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17835 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17836 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 17932 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 18064 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 18066 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 18070 of 2012With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 05/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv.S.L.P. (C)..CC No. 17932 Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\226ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 9906/2012(From the judgement and order dated 06/01/2012 in WPC No.643/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)ASHISH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 16674 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 16695 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)SLP(C) NO. 16723 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.)Date: 01/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Braham Singh, Adv. Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv. Mr. N.S. Vidhudi, Adv. Ms. Manju, Adv. Mr. Tariq Yameen, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¤ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24203/2012(From the judgement and order dated 01/05/2012 in WC No.46821/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NUPUR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment andwith prayer for interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 24720 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 01/10/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. Ms. Santosh Gupta, Adv. for M/S Mitter & Mitter Co.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in ten weeks. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¸ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 16187-16192/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.64564/2009, CMWPNo.65544/2009 and CMWP No.68487/2009 and dated 14/05/2012 in RANo.2545/2012, RA No.2591/2012 and RA No.2597/2012 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURTEY ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1-6 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 24/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Tayal, Adv. Ms. Ritu Puri, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions.ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI(24/09/2012)Contd..... The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

¼ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 16985/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.40422/2011, ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GR.NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVINOD KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))Date: 21/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R |(Hemalatha Mohan) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Sr.P.A. | |Court Master |

ðCITEM NO.32 + 59 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 15960/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46740/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GR.NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSURAJ MAL & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16146 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16148 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16151 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16154 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16158 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16162 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16174 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16183 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16213 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16456 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16461 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16462 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16463 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16472 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16479 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16514 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16517 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16519 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16521 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16522 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16525 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16529 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16531 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16533 of 2012

With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16535 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16537 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16550 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16551 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16553 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16555 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16568 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16570 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16571 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16573 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16576 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16578 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16582 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16583 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16585 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16590 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16596 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16598 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16599 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16604 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16607 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16608 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16616 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16619 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16845 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16846 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16847 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16849 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16850 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16853 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 16855 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )SLP(C)...CC 16985/2012I.A. NO.1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17090/2012I.A.No. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)

SLP(C)...CC 17092/2012I.A.No. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17093/2012I.A. No. 1( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17098/2012I.A. No. 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17100/2012I.A. No.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17101/2012I.A. No.1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17103/2012I.A. No.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17105/2012I.A. No.1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17106/2012I.A. NO. 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17108/2012I.A. NO. 1( c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17110/2012I.A. NO. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17113/2012I.A. NO.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17116/2012I.A. NO.1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17119/2012I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17122/2012I.A. NO. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17123/2012I.A. NO. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)...CC 17124/2012I.A. NO. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 21/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.SLP..CC No. 16608 Dr. Surat Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Setu Niket, Adv. for Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan, Adv.SLP..CC No. 16463 Mr. Sunder Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shital Khatri, Adv. for Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

S.L.P. (C) ....CC Nos. 16608 and 16463 of 2012: Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the above matters after four weeks. REMAINING MATTES: Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Connect with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 24407-24408 of 2012 {Gr. Noida Industrial Development Authority vs. Gajraj and others].|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\210ITEM NOS.38 + 60 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26874-26876/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.45716/2011, WCNo.48952/2011 and WC No.55615/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD)DAYARAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to delete respondent fromarray of party and with prayer for interim relief and office report)WITHSLP (C) No...... [ CC 17064 of 2012](with appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 21/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhir Naagar,Adv. Mr. Shibashish Misra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners pray for some time for filing additional affidavits indicting (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavits may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

*ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7540/2012DILIP KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 20/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Ms.Alka Sinha,adv. Mr.Anuvrat Sharma,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted that Mr.Anuvrat Sharma proposes to appear for the first respondent. Second respondent has appeared. Both the respondents are granted four weeks time for filing their respective counter affidavit. Registry to verify whether service is complete or not. List the matter on 19.11.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

<ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4687/2012HARI SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report ))Date: 19/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jabar Singh,Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 3 has not filed counter affidavit inspite of last chance granted. Await return of notice of the remaining unserved respondents. List the matter on 9.11.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 17/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Tabrej Ahmed,adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.3 has not filed counter affidavit in spite of last chance granted. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 2. List the matter on 30.10.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ðITEM NO.32 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18104/2012(From the judgement and order dated 03/04/2012 in CMWP No.12659/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 14/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhash Chandra Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter. |(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

,ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6489-6494/2012JAI SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 13/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the petitioners who was granted last opportunity for furnishing spare copy of the pleadings has not furnished spare copy of the pleadings even now. However, I am inclined to grant one more opportunity of four weeks time on the condition that he deposits Rs.500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost and file proof. If proof of deposit is not filed within the above four weeks the matter shall be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber without any further order. If spare copy of the pleadings furnished, list the matter on 1.11.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10750-10755/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.40338/2011, CMWPNo.40341/2011, CMWP No.40417/2011, CMWP No.40419/2011, CMWP No.40422/2011and CMWP No.46673/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)VIJAY PAL SINGH ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1-6 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 10/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for deleting respondent Nos. 4 to 88 in S.L.P. (Civil) No..../2012 [CC No. 10755/2012] being proforma respondents. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is granted at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause title shall be filed within two weeks from today. Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable along with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÚITEM NO.42 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 9352-9359/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44715/2011, CMWPNo.44718/2011, CMWP No.45013/2011, CMWP No.45014/2011, CMWP No.45015/2011,CMWP No.47010/2011, CMWP No.47015/2011 and CMWP No.47017/2011 of The HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RADHEY SHYAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1-8 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLPand office report)Date: 10/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for deleting respondent Nos. 5 to 11 in S.L.P. (Civil) No..../2012 [CC No. 9352/2012], respondent Nos. 5 to 8 in S.L.P. (Civil) No..../2012 [CC No. 9353/2012], respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in S.L.P. (Civil) No..../2012 [CC No. 9355/2012] and respondent Nos. 5 to 10 in S.L.P. (Civil) No..../2012 [CC No. 9356/2012] being proforma respondents. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is granted at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause title shall be filed within two weeks from today. Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable along with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for respondent No. 4 - Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

$ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25551-25552/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WP No.24520/2011and WP No.35635/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATISH CHAND & ANR.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 10/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar Pandita, Adv. Mr. J.P. Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Asha Upadhyay, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in twelve weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ZITEM NO.19 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13750/2012(From the judgement and order dated 16/02/2012 in WC No.8746/2012, of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)ADITYA PAL SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR. Respondent(s)With I.A. 1(C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 07/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter. | (Sanjay Kumar) Court Master | (Renu Diwan) || |Court Master |

DITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13641-13646/2012INDRAJ SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for and office report)Date: 06/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondentNos.1 and 2. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon thelitigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to be served through thenearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned andthrough standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if processfee and spare copies are paid/filed before 17.9.2012, else list before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution.Item No.69 -2- If notices are issued, list again on 26.11.2012. Served respondents may file counter affidavit till then. Irrespective of outcome of service upon respondent Nos.1 and 2, thematter shall be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for deletion ofrespondent Nos.4 and 5. For confirming service upon the unserved respondents, list again on26.11.2012.| | | (S.G. SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

<ITEM NO.78 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8849/2012CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List the matter on 4.10.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

@ITEM NOS.25 & 56 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).22484/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.60197/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHADDHA NAND & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C.)..... [ CC 14901/2012 ](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and with office report)Date: 31/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma,Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Avinah Kumar Jain, Adv. Ms. Tulika Prakash, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned senior counsel for the petitioners in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 22484/2012 and learned counsel for the petitioners in S.L.P.(C.)..... [CC 14901/2012] pray for some time for filing additional affidavits indicting (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavits may be filed within four weeks. List the matters after four weeks. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

bITEM NO.29 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24203/2012(From the judgement and order dated 01/05/2012 in WC No.46821/2009of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)NUPUR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report ))WITHSLP(C) NO. 24720 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 27/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sarwa Mitter, Adv. for M/S Mitter & Mitter Co.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicting (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

àITEM NO.209 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010(From the judgement and order dated 26/08/2010 in CMWP No.38758/2008 of theHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)M/S. CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for early hearing and taking additional document on recordand office report) (FOR FINAL DISPOSAL)Date: 24/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramanium Prasad,Adv. Mrs. Svaruna Bhandari Gugnani,Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan,Adv. for Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ameet Singh,Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha,Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra,Adv.(N.P.) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with SLP(C) Nos.24407-24408/2012 and other connected matters. (A.S. BISHT) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ÔITEM NO.22 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23446-23447/2012(From the judgement and order dated 16/04/2012 in WP No.3787/2009 and dated16/05/2012 in recall application and application for modification No. NILof 2012 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHYAM SUNDAR B AMBWANI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 24/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sibal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Ms. Purti Marwah, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. Ms. Henna George, Adv. Ms. K.V.Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicting (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI (24/08/2012) Contd.... The additional affidavit may be filed within two weeks. List the special leave petitions thereafter.|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

lITEM NO.17 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 13100/2012(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2012 in CMWP No.3502/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OMVEER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 21/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. for Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

0ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23750/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in WC No.49771/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALA DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ANOTHER Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report )Date: 21/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioner, (ii) the area of subject land, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

jITEM NO.19 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 11176/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.45933/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAVINDRA SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 13/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicting (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petition. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matter thereafter. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

Ø$ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.33984-33988/2011SLP(C) NO.333/2012SLP(C) NO.2873/2012SLP(C) NO.36334-36340/2011SLP(C) NO.3298/2012SLP(C) NO.36352-36354/2011SLP(C) NO.6508/2012SLP(C) NO.16339-16341/2012SLP(C) NO.16336/2012SLP(C) NO.16337/2012SLP(C) NO.11993/2012SLP(C) NO.9761/2012SLP(C) NO.15905/2012SLP(C) NO.4542/2012SLP(C) NO.6363/2012SLP(C) NO.4242/2012Date: 13/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Abhishek Anand, Adv. Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr Balraj Dewan, Adv. Ms Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Ms Anuradha Dubey Misra, Adv. M/s Anuradha & Associates, Adv. Mr Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr Arun K Sinha, Adv. Mr Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr Satpal Singh, Adv. -2-Item No.12 Mrs Seema Kashyap, Adv. Mr S.K.Sinha, Adv. Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. Mr K.S.Rana, Adv. Mr Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.

Ms Tulika Prakash, Adv. Ms Anima Kujur, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. M/s Lawyer's Knit & Co. Mr Maneesh Arora, Adv. Mr Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr A Ramesh, Adv. Mr C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr Tileshwar Prasad, Adv. Mr Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. Mr Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Ms Asha Gopalan Nair, ADv. Mr M.K.Choudhary, Adv. Ms Namita Choudhary, Adv. Ms Anzu K Varkey, Adv. Mr Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr Ravi Sikri, Adv. Ms Madhu Sikri, Adv. Mr Rishi Malhotra, Adv. Mr Aftab Ali Khan, Adv. Mr Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice with additional dasti service on unservedrespondents in all SLPs. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directlyupon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to serve throughthe nearest Civil Court/Trial Court where private parties are concerned andthrough standing counsel where State authorities are concerned. Process feeand spare copies are to be filed before 23.8.2012, else list before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If notices are issued, list again on 8.11.2012. -3-Item No.12 The ld. Advocate, Mr Anuvrat Sharma accepts notice for the State ofUP and its officers/offices. Petitioner has to provide additional copies ofpleadings against proper acknowledgment which is to be filed on record toavoid issuance of further notices. Rest of the respondents shall be served directly by the petitioner.However, wherever it is Government office, petitioner is permitted to servethrough the concerned standing counsel. All served respondents may file counter affidavit before the nextdate. Registry has to verify the SLP(C) nos. 6539,10597 and 2557 of 2012.If they are connected with the present group, they shall be listed withthis group on the next date without fail.| | |(S.G.SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR |hj

¨ITEM NOS.18 + 67 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9748/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.47545/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BABU RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and deletion of thename of respondent and with prayer for interim relief and officereport)WITHS.L.P.(C).../2012 [CC NO. 13834 of 2012](With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 13/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicting (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within three weeks. List the matters thereafter. |(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

:ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos.3-4 & 3 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1664-1665/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44695/2011,CMWP No.46165/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SATYA PAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and office report)Date: 08/08/2012 These I.As. were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Applications for deletion of name of respondent nos.4 to 12 in SLP(C) No.1664/2012 and respondent Nos.4 in SLP(C) No.1665/2012 from the array of parties is allowed. |(NARENDRA PRASAD) | |(PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER | 1

ÞITEM NO.19 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 12908/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37443/2011,dated 14/05/2012 in RA No. 368519 of 2011 in CMWP No.37443/2011 of The HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GR.NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s) VERSUSGAJRAJ & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 13307 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and With office report)Date: 06/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.F. Nariman, SG Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others. In the meanwhile, further proceedings in the Contempt Petitions arising out of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ZITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7540/20120ILIP KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 06/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to pay deficit process fee and insufficient spare copy within three weeks as a last chance. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await. The served respondents may file their counter affidavit in the meanwhile. List the matter on 20.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4687/2012HARI SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report ))Date: 01/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matter on 19.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

\226ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 31/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Tabraz Ahmed,adv. Mr.Bhopal Singh K.adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 2. List the matter on 17.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ÚITEM NO.54 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 8617/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46904/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8683 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8685-8686 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 30/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.P. Singh, Adv. for Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Bharti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Bansal, Adv. Mr. Varun Chaudhary, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In compliance of our order dated July 2, 2012, an additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners. The effect of receipt of compensation by the petitioners shall be examined at the time of final consideration of the matters since from the impugned judgment, various Special Leave Petitions have been filed and notices have been issued therein. Delay condoned. Issue notice in the present matters as well. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No.3. Notice shall be issued only to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011 - Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and others.

|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÒITEM NO.52 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8380/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.20505/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KAMLESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report )Date: 30/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received any compensation for the compulsory acquisition of his land and the petitioner continues to be in possession of the subject land. Issue notice. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 4. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, names of respondent Nos. 5 to 8 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner. Amended cause-title shall be filed by the petitioner within one week from today. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

\224ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6489-6494/2012JAI SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 25/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the petitioners seeks two weeks time for filing the requisite copies of the SLP. Granted as a last chance. Await return of notice. Respondent No. 4 seeks four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Granted. List the matter on 13.9.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

ÂITEM NO.121 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8849/2012CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 17/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RCounsel for the petitioners has remitted process fee and spare copy of thepleadings which is deficient. Cure the defects within a week as a lastchance. If defects are cured, issue notice. Await return of notice..List the matter on 5.9.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

°ITEM NO.119 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13641-13646/2012INDRAJ SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 12/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 seekstime to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. As last chance, petitioner has to pay requisite process fee and tosupply requisite sets of petition before 21.7.2012. If it is not done, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution.Item No.119 -2- If it is done, issue notice at the earliest with additional dastiservice, which is permitted to be served through the nearest CivilCourt/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standingcounsel, where state authorities are concerned. List again on 6.9.2012. Served respondents may file counter affidavit till then.| | | (S.G. SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

TITEM NO.11 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA No.1 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 11176/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.45933/2011, of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAVINDRA SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report ))Date: 11/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The delay of 124 days in refiling the special leave petition iscondoned subject to the payment of cost of rupees one thousand to bedeposited with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks.|(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |

ITEM NO.86 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7540/2012DILIP KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File is not received. List the matter on 6.08.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

NITEM NO.23 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10750-10755/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.40338/2011,CMWP No.40341/2011CMWP No.40417/2011CMWPNo.40419/2011CMWP No.40422/2011CMWP No.46673/2011 of The HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)VIJAY PAL SINGH ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-6 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 09/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensation received by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) the status of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

*ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 9275/2012(From the judgement and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No.747/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHETRAM SHARMA SHIKSHA SAMITI & ANR. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 9289 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 03/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on theprayers for interim relief. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

lITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 9247/2012(From the judgement and order dated 19/07/2011 in CMWP No.29396/2010 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUSPRAMOD & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 03/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on theprayer for interim relief. Ms. Sandhya Goswami, advocate accepts notice on behalf ofrespondent Nos. 1 to 5. Service on respondent Nos. 1 to 5 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ÞITEM NO.11 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 9352-9359/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44715/2011,CMWPNo.44718/2011CMWP No.45013/2011CMWP No.45014/2011CMWP No.45015/2011CMWPNo.47010/2011CMWP No.47015/2011CMWP No.47017/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RADHEY SHYAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-8 ( c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport )Date: 03/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filingan additional affidavit indicating (i) the date and amount of compensationreceived by the petitioners, (ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the dateon which the Writ Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) thestatus of possession on the date of filing of the Writ Petitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within four weeks. List the matters thereafter.|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ªITEM NO.29 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 9206/2012(From the judgement and order dated 14/12/2011 in CMWP No.72233/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHIDDA (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(for permission to file SLP and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report ))Date: 02/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application Nos. 1-2 of 2012 filed by petitioner Nos. 16 and 17 for permission to file special leave petition are allowed. Permission to bring legal representatives of petitioner No. 1 is granted. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.(Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

LITEM NO.24 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 8617/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46904/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)ZILEY SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)WITHS.L.P.(C)..../2012 (CC NO. 8683 of 2012) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report ))S.L.P.(C)..../2012 (CC NO. 8685-8686 of 2012) With I.A. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report ))Date: 02/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr,. N.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for some time for filing an additional affidavit indicting (i) thedate and amount of compensation received by the petitioners,(ii) the area of subject lands, (iii) the date on which theWrit Petitions were filed before the High Court and (iv) thestatus of possession on the date of filing of the WritPetitions. The additional affidavit may be filed within threeweeks. List the matters thereafter.

(Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.115 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4687/2012HARI SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES andprayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 11/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Tomar,Adv. Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No. 3 granted time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of the remaining unserved respondents. Respondent No. 9 to 23 have been deleted by the oder dated 21.2.2012 of the Hon'ble Court. List the matter on 1.8.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

ÎITEM NO.30 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15173/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/02/2012 in CMWPNo.39966/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAHARSHI VED VIHYAN VIDHYAPEETH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 10/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. for M/s. Ap & J ChambersFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Dasti,in addition to the ordinary process. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

´ITEM NO.113 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES andprayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 10/05/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Tabrez Ahmad,adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.3 is granted time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 2. List the matter on 31.07.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.MM-7C COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO. 3 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).5566/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.47523/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)( for directions )Date: 10/05/2012 This Petition was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan, Adv. Ms. Pallaki, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let I.A. No. 3 of 2012 come up along with the Special Leave Petition. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ÄITEM NO.14 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8380/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.20505/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KAMLESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report ))Date: 09/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri,Adv. (not present)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The case was called out twice. In the first call, nobody appeared for the petitioner and the case was kept back. In the second call also, no one appears for the petitioner. List the matter beyond ensuing Summer Vacation. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

îITEM NO.14 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7368/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.45672/2011,of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)ADESH CHOUDHARY & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 04/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Mr. Akshay Verma, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives notice on behalf of respondent No. 3. Service on respondent No. 3 is thus complete. Notice shall now go only to the unrepresented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

KITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) NO. 10056-10058 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10597 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 1082-1083 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 1104 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12299 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 1664-1665 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 1739 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 1858 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2411 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2537 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 2557 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 2603 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2612 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2639 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2798 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2820 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2873 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Item No.35 -2-SLP(C) NO. 3298 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 333 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 33984-33988 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 3417 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 3473 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 36334-36340 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 36352-36354 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 3916 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 3918 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)

SLP(C) NO. 4024 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4249 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4645 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4647 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4661 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5091 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5150 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5170 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5712 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5959 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6013 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6027 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6121 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6196 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Item No.35 -3-SLP(C) NO. 6345 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6381 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6508 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6539 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 7146 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8439 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8528 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8593 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 9527 of 2012(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 9678 of 2012(With office report)Date: 04/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohtagi Jain, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. K.S. Rana, Adv.

Mr. S. Muthu Krishna, Adv. Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv.Item No.35 -4- Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. M/S. Ap & J Chambers Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Satpal Sharma, Adv. Mr. V.S. Dubey, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Adv. M/S Anuradha & Associates, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. P.K.Jayakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv Mr. Sodeep Kr. Shrotriya, Adv. Ms. Madhu Sikri, Adv. Mr. Gurudatta Ankolker, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned Advocate, Mr. C.S. Mohan Rao confirmsthat they are appearing for M/s Supertech and accepts noticein all the SLPs for such litigant. In view of such statement, counsel for thepetitioners has to provide him additional copies of thepleadings, wherever Supertech is respondent and yet notserved, against proper acknowledgment which is to be filed onrecord to avoid issuance of further notice.Item No.35 -5- The learned Advocate Mr. S.B. Tripathi acceptsnotice for Onkarsons Pvt. Ltd. in all the SLPs for suchlitigant and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counteraffidavit. The learned Advocate, appearing on behalf ofMr.Anuvrat Sharma accepts notice for respondent No.1 - State

of U.P. in all concerned SLPs and seeks time to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit. The learned Advocate, Mr. Ravindra Kumar acceptsnotice for Greater Noide Authority in all the connected SLPsand seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.SLP(C) Nos.36334-36340/2011 The learned Advocate, appearing on behalf ofMs.Namita Chaudhary, Advocate-on-Record confirms that theyare appearing for Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and GaursonsHightech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and seeks time to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit. They may do so. Learned counsel for the petitioner has to provideadditional copy of the pleadings to all concerned appearingAdvocates in concerned petitions before 11.7.2012 againstproper acknowledgment which is to be filed on record to avoidissuance of further notice.Item No.35 -6- Served respondents may file counter affidavit beforethe next date.SLP(C) Nos.30969,33984-88,36352,36353,36354/2011 Let there be a fresh notice with dasti service uponthe unserved respondents in all the concerned SLPs, which ispermitted to be served either through standing counsel so faras state authorities are concerned or through the learnedAdvocate for any litigant, if such litigant is present asrespondent and represented by any Advocate in all theconcerned SLPs. List again on 13.8.2012.Remaining matters Deleted. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

\230ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 7166/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WPCNo.39133/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAYA CHANDRA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 30/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Shashi Kiran, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No.30969 of 2011 (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 3772-3774/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WCNo.42787/2011,WC No.42789/2011WC No.45085/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHARAMPAL ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-3 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 27/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Tanmay Nagar, Adv. Mr. Parminder Bhati, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for the respondent No. 4. Service on respondent No. 4 is thus complete. Notice shall now go only to the unrepresented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12299/2012(From the judgement and order dated 30/01/2012 in WC No.4934/2012of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHANTI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 23/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 3 - Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Service on respondent No. 3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.(Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ô 1ITEM NO.16 + 51 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 6628/2012(From the judgement and order dated 15/12/2011 in CMWP No.72782/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))WITHS.L.P.(C) NO. 11879 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 12844 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 7189 of 2012(With appln.(s) for condonation of delay and office report)S.L.P. (C) NO. 10052 OF 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 20/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. 2 Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondent. Notice to proforma respondents in the respective special leave petitions is dispensed with at this stage. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ôITEM NO.19 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10597/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2011 in CMWP No.52086/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date: 20/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K.S. Rana,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petition. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 4. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011.(Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

b 1ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6539/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.45345/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJE & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and deletion ofproforma respondents and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 7146 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8439 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8593 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugnedjudgment and exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)Date: 20/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Adv. Mr. K.K.L. Gautam, Adv. Mr. P.K.Jayakrishnan,Adv. 2Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv.Mr. Hasan Murtaza, Adv. 3For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion of proforma respondent Nos.

4 to 11 in S.L.P. (Civil) No. 6539/2012 is granted at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record for the petitioners within two weeks. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice for the respective respondent. Notice to proforma respondents in the respective special leave petitions is dispensed with at this stage. Notice shall only go to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

¬ITEM NO.MM-6B COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 2 of 2012 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5566/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.47523/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAJBIR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(for directions)Date: 18/04/2012 This IA was called on for hearing in the mentioning matters list of today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Vibhor Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Sameer singh, Adv. Mr. Ajit sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the interlocutory application returnable along with special leave petition. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the respondent No. 4. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

¾ 1ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4218-4219/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.40350/2011,CWP No.40361/2011 dated 22/11/2011 in CWPNo.66439/2011,CWP No.66440/2011 dated 13/12/2011 in CWPNo.71556/2011, dated 19/12/2011 in CWP No.73754/2011, of The HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)INDRAJ SINGH & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1-2 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 04/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam,Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Lal S. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Atif Suhrawardy, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 3. Service on respondent 2No. 3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-representedrespondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 3772-3774/2012(From the judgement and order(s) in WC Nos. 45085, 42789and 42787/2011, dated 21-OCT-11 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT ALLAHABAD)DHARAMPAL ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 04/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sinha,Adv. (N.P.)For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Called out twice. In the first call, no one appears for the petitioners and the matters were kept back. In the second call also, no one appears. List after two weeks. (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

BITEM NO.32 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7436/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.44181/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHARAM PAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 02/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 3 - Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Service on respondent No. 3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ØITEM NO.39 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9761/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.47502/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)OM PRAKASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 02/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. J.S. Arya, Adv. Mr. G. Naini, Adv. Mr. D.S. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 4 - Greater New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. Service on respondent No. 4 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Þ 1ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 3866/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.46483/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AJAB SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 3918 of 2012With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 30/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. Mr. M.P. S. Tomar, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority in both the matters. At the oral request of the learned counsel for the 2petitioner, names of respondent Nos. 4 to 156 in S.L.P. (C)No....CC No. 3866 are deleted from the array of parties atthe risk of the petitioner. Amended cause-title shall be filed within two weeksfrom today. Notice shall only go to the un-representedrespondents. Connect with S.L.P.(C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

àITEM NO.18 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4204/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.46764/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SURESH JAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)( for permission to file SLP and office report )Date: 30/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Praveen Chaturvedi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. Service on respondent No.3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with S.L.P.(C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

 1ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010(From the judgement and order dated 26/08/2010 in CMWP No.38758/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for taking additional documents on record and early hearing and office report ))[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]Date: 28/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Nandan, Adv. Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kr. Misra, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Pramod Swarup, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 1, prays for time to enable the advocate on record for the State to file counter affidavit. The same may be filed within four weeks from today. 2 Rejoinder, if any, may be filed by the petitionerwithin two weeks therefrom. List the matter after six weeks. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

 1ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010(From the judgement and order dated 26/08/2010 in CMWP No.38758/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for taking additional documents on record and early hearing and office report ))[FOR FINAL DISPOSAL]Date: 28/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Nandan, Adv. Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Shrish Kr. Misra, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Pramod Swarup, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 1, prays for time to enable the advocate on record for the State to file counter affidavit. The same may be filed within four weeks from today. 2 Rejoinder, if any, may be filed by the petitionerwithin two weeks therefrom. List the matter after six weeks. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2557/2012VISHNOO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 27/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned Advocate, Mr. Anuvrat Sharma acceptsnotice for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and seeks time to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner has to provideadditional copy of the pleadings to the said respondentswithin a week against proper acknowledgment which is to befiled on record to avoid issuance of further notice. List again on 4.5.2012. Served respondents may file counter affidavit tillthen. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

ÞITEM NO.20 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 3410/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.42787/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MEGH RAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)WITH IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 23/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B.H. Marlapalle, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pravin Satale, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. The names of respondent Nos. 5 to 53 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 4. Service on respondent No. 4 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

1ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5712/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.36775/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SHOBHA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 5959 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 6013 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 6027 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 6121 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 6196 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )Date: 23/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar, Adv. for Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. 2For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayers for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent - Greater Noida Development Authority. Service on respondent- Greater Noida Development Authority is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented

respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ÂITEM NO.21 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4416/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.41315/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PRAKSHIT BARDEJA & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 23/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit Sinha, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2. Service on respondent No. 2 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

T 1ITEM NO.22 + 67 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3916/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WP No.45085/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DHIRENDRA SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgmentand exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 6508 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgmentand exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012(With appln.(s) for substitution and exemption from filing c/c of theimpugned Judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 8528 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgmentand exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file lengthy list ofdates and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(c.)..... [ CC 4634-4636/2012 ] (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 19/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE 2For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.L. Khurana, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.K. Poswal, Adv. Mr. V.S. Dubey, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh,Adv. Mr. P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pathak, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Durga Dutt, Adv. Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ram Shiromani Yadav, Adv,.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 2012 in SLP(C) NO. 6849 of 2012 is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) [page No. 445 of the paper book]. Amended cause title shall be filed by the advocate on record of the petitioner within two weeks from today. Delay condoned in SLP(C.)..... [ CC 4634-4636/2012 ]. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, wavies service for the respondent - Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Court Master

4 1ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5150/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.46602/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)LEKHRAJ SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) NO. 5170 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 19/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Fateh Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. 2 Connect with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Court Master

\224ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4221/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.20227/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PARAG & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)With IA 1 ( c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 16/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. for M/S. Ap & J ChambersFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service on behalf of respondent No. 3. Service on respondent No. 3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to un-represented respondents. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

1ITEM NOS. 35 + 61 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6731-6732/2012(From the judgement and order dated 01/12/2011 in CMWP No.69199/2011 and CMWP No.69204/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)KURE & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report ))WITHS.L.P.(C).../2012 [ CC NOS. 4224-4226 of 2012 ] With I.A. 1-3 - c/delay in filing SLP and office reportS.L.P.(C) NO. 6748-6756 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgmentand permission to file lengthy list of dates and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C).../2012 [ CC NO. 4022 of 2012 ](With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C) NO. 5566 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6489-6494 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 6534-6535 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 7934-7935 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report) 2SLP (C) NO. 7815 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Vibhor Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.

Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Raval, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the respondents - Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority and New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Connect with S.L.P. (C.) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

vITEM NO.19 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 3336/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42789/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MANJU BAJAJ & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) With IA 1 (c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Adv. Ms. Reeta Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the respondent No. 4 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Service on respondent No. 4 is thus complete. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

¾ 2ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4249/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.37119/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AJIT SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 02/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Meghna De, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the respondent No. 2 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Service on respondent No. 2 is thus complete. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master2

J 1ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 3212/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WCN No.46933/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HARBAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(for substitution and permission to file SLP and c/delay in filingsubstitution application and office report )Date: 27/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhir Naagar,Adv. Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petition is granted. Delay condoned. Substitution allowed. Interlocutory Application for deleting the respondent Nos. 4 to 49 from the array of parties is granted. Amended cause title shall be filed within one week from today. Thereafter, issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the 2respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial DevelopmentAuthority. Notice shall only go to the unrepresentedrespondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of2011.

(Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

äITEM NO.39 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4687/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.41019/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)HARI SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,exemption from filing O.T.,permission to file lengthy listof dates and with prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 21/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. The names of respondent Nos. 9 to 23 are deleted at the risk of the petitioner. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 3 - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority in all the matters. Notice shall now to the unrepresented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

1ITEM NO.14 + 53 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2603/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.46393/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)AZAAD AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UP AND ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 2612 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2639 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 2820 of 2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 3298 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugnedjudgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 3918 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 4024 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayerfor interim relief and office report)SLP (C) No. 6345 of 2012(with appln.(s) for permission to place addl. documents on recordand exemption from filing O.T.. and with prayer for interim reliefoffice report)Date: 17/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE 2For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi,Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. for M/S. Ap & J Chambers Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Adv. Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Zaki Ahmad Khan, Adv. Mr. Ahmad S. Azhar, Adv. Ms. Seema Joshi, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv.

Mr. B.S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayers for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate, waives service on the respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the unrepresented respondents only. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

þ 1ITEM NO.36 + 68 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).4223/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.20505/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report )WITHS.L.P. (C.) No. 4542 of 2012(with appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugnedjudgment and exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)S.L.P. (C.) .... [CC 3276/2012] With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C.) .... [CC 3306/2012] With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C.) .... [CC 2779/2012] With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P. (C) No. 4242/2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugnedjudgment and exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report)Date: 13/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Khairati, Adv. 2Ms. Tulika Prakash,Adv. 3For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay in filing special leave petitions is condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayers for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Service on the respondent - Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority is thus complete. Notice shall only go to the un-represented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3473/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.41017/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)JAGRAM SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 10/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv. Mr. B.R. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shyam Nandan, Adv. Ms. Shweta Majumdar, Adv. Mr. Rajat Khatri, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 3 - The Greater New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

² 1ITEM NO.27+ 60 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3417/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.27539/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PRAMOD KHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 2873 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 4645 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 4647 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 4661 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )SLP(C) NO. 5091 of 2012(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interimrelief and office report )Date: 10/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE 2For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya,Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Adv.SLP 2873 Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anuradha Dubey Mishra, Adv. Ms. Tulika Mukherjee,Adv. Mr. Bharat Dubey, Adv. for M/S Anuradha & AssociatesFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayers for interim relief. On the oral prayer of Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, learned senior counsel, names of respondent Nos. 12 to 19 are deleted from the array of parties in S.L.P. (C) No. 2873 of 2012 at the risk of the petitioners. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent - The Greater New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2411/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in WC No.47068/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SUBHASH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1104 of 2012(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)Date: 07/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K.B. Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar Jain, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well as on the prayers for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2 - The Greater New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ÄITEM NO.29 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1739/2012(From the judgement and order dated 09/11/2011 in CMWPNo.50588/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)RAGHUBIR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report )Date: 06/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate waives service for respondent No. 4 - The Greater New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. Notice shall now go to the un-represented respondents. Connect with S.L.P. (C) No. 30969 of 2011.(Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

Ä% 1ITEM NO.41 + 68 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3242/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.32719/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)PHUNDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 1554 of 2012(With appln. for exemption from filing OT and permission to filesynopsis and list of dates and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)SLP(C) NO. 3776 of 2012(With appln. for exemption from filing OT and permission to filesynopsis and list of dates and with prayer for interim relief andoffice report)SLP(C) NO. 2607 of 2012(With appln. for exemtpion from filing C/C of the impugned judgmentand permission to file lengthy list of dates and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)SLP (C) ....CC Nos. 1206-1207 of 2012[with appln. for permission to file SLP and substitution and officereport]SLP (C) 2330-2333 of 2012[with appln. for deletion of proforma respondents and exemption fromfiling O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP (C) ...CC 1416 of 2012[with appln. for permission to file SLP and office report)Date: 06/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Goswami,Adv. 2 Mr. M.P.S. Tomar, Adv. Ms. H.C. Kharbanda, Adv. Mr. Jabar Singh, Adv. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal, Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Mr. Pallav Shisodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Mr. R.K. Poswal, Adv.

Mr. R.B. Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Veera Kaul Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file Special Leave Petitions granted in SLP (C) ...CC Nos. 1206-1207 of 2012 and SLP (C) ...CC No. 1416 of 2012. I.A. No....of 2011 - application for deletion of names of the proforma respondent nos. 5 to 11 (against W.P. No. 48089/2011) and respondent nos. 9 to 32 (against W.P. No. 70603 of 2011) from the arrays of parties is granted in S.L.P. (C) ...CC No. 1416 of 2012. I.A. No... of 2012 - Application for deletion of respondent Nos. 9 to 141 (against W.P. No. 46358/2011); Respondent Nos. 9 to 34 (against W.P. No. 37119/2011); Respondent Nos. 3 to 55 (against W.P. No. 46071 of 2011) and respondent Nos. 10 to 51 (against W.P. No. 46631 of 2011) from the array of parties is granted in SLP (C) Nos. 2330- 2333 of 2012. I.A. No...of 2011 - Application for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased petitioner- Bholay Ram and application for deletion of names of 3respondent Nos. 10 to 40 (against W.P. No. 42439 of 2011)and respondent No. 3 (against W.P. No. 45779 of 2011) fromthe array of parties are granted in SLP (C) No. CC Nos.1206-1207 of 2012. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as wellas on the prayers for interim relief. Mr. Ravinder Kumar, advocate waives service for therespondent - The Greater New Okhla Industrial DevelopmentAuthority. Notice shall now go to the un-representedrespondents. Connect with SLP (C) No. 30969 of 2011. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

¶ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2798/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.24295/2010of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MAWASI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)Date: 03/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Pramod Dayal,Adv. Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. Ms. Payal Dayal, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

,Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012 1ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.42200/2011 and CMWP No.44233/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)BALIRAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and deletion of proformarespondents and with prayer for interim relief and office report ))Date: 30/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sunita Pandit, Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Mr. Sushant K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Proforma respondent Nos. 9 to 36 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1082 of 2012 arising out of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 42200 of 2011 and proforma respondent Nos. 4 to 7 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1083 of 2012 arising out of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44233 of 2011Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1082-1083/2012 2 are allowed to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners. Amended cause title shall be furnished within two weeks from today. Interlocutory Application Nos. 3-4 of 2012 stand disposed of. Issue notice on the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service for the

respondent No. 3. Notice shall now be issued to the unrepresented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

rITEM NO.11 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 22099/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWP No.11189/2011of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)VISHNOO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(for permission to file SLP and office report ))Date: 16/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv. Ms. Asha Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petition is granted. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim reliefs. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, wavies service on respondent No. 3. Notice shall only go to un-represented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

S.L.P (Civil) Nos. 36334-36340/2011 AND 1664-1665/2012 1ITEM NO.15 + 68 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).36334-36340/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.23451/2010, CMWP No.34851/2010, CMWP No.38688/2011, CMWPNo.38689/2011, CMWP No.41221/2011, CMWP No.41309/2011, CMWPNo.45349/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SANJAY YADAV & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and deletion ofproforma respondents and with prayer for interim relief and officereport)WITHSLP(C) NO. 1664-1665 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)Date: 16/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Sandeep Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv. Mr. Sumit Sinha, Adv. Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RS.L.P (Civil) Nos. 36334-36340/2011 AND 1664-1665/2012 2 Interlocutory Application Nos. 1-7 of 2011 for deletion of the names of proforma respondents in Special Leave Petition Nos. 36334-36340 of 2011 are granted in terms of prayer (a) of the applications. Issue notice on both the special leave petitions as well as on the prayer for interim reliefs.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate, waives service on the respective respondents. Notice shall only go to un-represented respondents. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 30969 of 2011. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

tITEM NO.12 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.40334/2011, CWP No.40345/2011,CWP No.40356/2011,CWPNo.40359/2011,CWP No.44917/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT ALLAHABAD)SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report ))Date: 05/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur,Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well ason the prayer for interim reliefs. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and acceptsnotice on behalf of respondent No.3. Service on respondentNo.3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to un-represented respondents. (N.K. Goel) (Renu Diwan)Court Master Court Master

tITEM NO.12 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33552-33556/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.40334/2011, CWP No.40345/2011,CWP No.40356/2011,CWPNo.40359/2011,CWP No.44917/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT ALLAHABAD)SATISH KUMAR & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer forinterim relief and office report ))Date: 05/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur,Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petitions as well ason the prayer for interim reliefs. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and acceptsnotice on behalf of respondent No.3. Service on respondentNo.3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to un-represented respondents. (N.K. Goel) (Renu Diwan)Court Master Court Master

6 1ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33984-33988/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.40354/2011,CWP No. 40418/2011,CWP No.40420/2011,CWPNo.40424/2011,CWP No.44924/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT ALLAHABAD)SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 03/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur,Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal,Adv. Mr. Tabraz Ahmad,Adv. Ms. Shaweta Raghav,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent 3 Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on Special Leave Petitions as well as onprayer for interim reliefs returnable in ten weeks. 2 .....2/- Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice onbehalf of Respondent No. 3. Service on Respondent No. 3 isthus complete. Notice shall be issued to the remaining unservedrespondents. Connect with SLP (C) No. 30969 of 2011.

(N.K. Goel) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

6 1ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33984-33988/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CWPNo.40354/2011,CWP No. 40418/2011,CWP No.40420/2011,CWPNo.40424/2011,CWP No.44924/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT ALLAHABAD)SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment and PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayerfor interim relief and office report)Date: 03/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Singh Thakur,Adv. Mr. Bhopal Singh Rawal,Adv. Mr. Tabraz Ahmad,Adv. Ms. Shaweta Raghav,Adv. Mr. Balraj Dewan,Adv.For Respondent 3 Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on Special Leave Petitions as well as onprayer for interim reliefs returnable in ten weeks. 2 .....2/- Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice onbehalf of Respondent No. 3. Service on Respondent No. 3 isthus complete. Notice shall be issued to the remaining unservedrespondents. Connect with SLP (C) No. 30969 of 2011.

(N.K. Goel) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

0ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30969/2011(From the judgement and order dated 21/10/2011 in CMWPNo.62649/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)SAVITRI DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedJudgment,exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report )Date: 28/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr. Divya Nishant, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. Service on respondent No.3 is thus complete. Notice shall only go to un-represented respondents. (Pardeep Kumar) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

¼ 1ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010(From the judgement and order(s) dated 26/08/2010 in CMWPNo.38758/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions and taking additional document onrecord and permission to bring on record addl. facts and grounds andimpleadment as party respondent and withdrawal of application forimpleadment and early hearing and office report)Date: 31/10/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Adv. Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.K. Goswami, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma ,Adv Mr Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory application Nos. 7 & 8 for withdrawal of interlocutory application Nos. 5 & 6 are granted. In view thereof, interlocutory application Nos. 5 & 6 stand 2dismissed as withdrawn.Interlocutory application No. 3 for directions : In view ofthe order of status quo passed on October 08, 2010,obviously the parties have to follow the order in its letterand spirit and no party is permitted to alter the existingposition of the subject land in any manner whatsoever.

Interlocutory application No. 3 stands disposed ofaccordingly. List the special leave petition for final disposal ona non-miscellaneous day, i.e., March 28, 2012. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.78 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions,taking additional document on recordand prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 19/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shashank Kumar Lal, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since sufficient time has been granted to therespondent for filing counter affidavit, no further time canbe granted on the same count. List before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

þITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions,taking additional document on record andprayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 06/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Shashank Kumar Lal, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner and the ld.Counsel for the respondent No.2 are present. The ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks fourweeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time as prayedfor is granted to him, as last chance. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has stated thatshe has already filed the affidavit in proof of dastiservice in respect of respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. Officeshall verify the position and report accordingly. List again on 19.7.2011. (M.K.HANJURA) Registrarhj

8ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 3/2011 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).27508/2010(From the judgement and order dated 26/08/2010 in CMWP No.38758/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions and prayer for interim relief andoffice report)Date: 18/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv. Ms. Puja Dhar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner is permitted to take fresh steps to serve the unserved respondent. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. In view of the order of status quo already granted, we do not propose to pass any further interim order on I.A. No.3. However, on the facts and circumstances, the matter deserves early disposal. List immediately after service is complete.( Ravi P. Verma ) ( M.S. Negi ) Court Master Court Master

\200ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.27508/2010M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 29/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shashant K. Lal, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice upon the unserved respondents. Dasti service upon the unserved respondents isallowed, permitted to be served through standing counsel/nearest civil court or trial court. Process fee and spare copies are to be filed before6.12.2010. If not filed before 6.12.2010, list before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If filed before 6.12.2010, issue notice as per aboveorder and list the matter before this court again on24.1.2011. Served respondents may file counter affidavit tillthen. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

¬ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).27508/2010(From the judgement and order dated 26/08/2010 in CMWP No.38758/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)M/S CRANE BEL INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,taking additionaldocument on record and prayer for interim relief and officereport)Date: 08/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Venugopal,Sr.Adv. Mrs. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani,Adv. Ms. Puja Dhar,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Mr. Ravinder Kumar, learned counsel appears on caveator accepts notice for respondent No.2 -Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Status quo regarding possession.(O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master