ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10745/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016 in RSA No. 230/2013 18/01/2016 in CA No. 38/2009 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) USHA DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REWARI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shimy Arman Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that certain issues that were argued before the High Court, have not been noticed in the impugned judgment. He therefore seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a review petition before the High Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as afore-stated. Needless to mention, that the High Court shall not draw an inference regarding the maintainability of the review application, and if such an application is filed, the same shall be decided on its own merits, in accordance with law. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar ) Court Master AR-cum-PS
t ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10745/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016 in RSA No. 230/2013 18/01/2016 in CA No. 38/2009 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) USHA DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REWARI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shimy Arman Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that certain issues that were argued before the High Court, have not been noticed in the impugned judgment. He therefore seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a review petition before the High Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as afore-stated. Needless to mention, that the High Court shall not draw an inference regarding the maintainability of the review application, and if such an application is filed, the same shall beSignature Not Verified decided on its own merits, in accordance with law.Digitally signed byPARVEEN KUMARDate: 2016.04.2617:49:47 ISTReason: (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar) Court Master AR-cum-PS