DEVENDER KUMAR . v. STATE OF HARYANA .

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.98-112 OF 2005 CHANDGI AND ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.47 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NO.51 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.88-92 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.93-94 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NO.96 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.114-115 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.122-124 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.133-134 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NO.135 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.136-144 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.146-148 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.150-152 OF 2005

2 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NOS.18359-18369 OF 2009 I.A.NO.8 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.33010 OF 2009 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.14714 OF 2010 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NO.31303 OF 2011 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.14486 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NOS. 25428-25430 OF 2009 O R D E R 1. Interlocutory Application No.8 of 2009 in S.L.P. (C)No.33010 of 2009 is allowed. 2. Permission to file I.A.(s) in S.L.P.(C)Nos.25428-25430 of 2009 is granted. 3. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling the Special Leave Petition/application(s) for substitution is condoned. 4. Application(s) for substitution(s) is/are allowed. 5. These appeals are directed against the judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in L.P.A No.1273/99, dated 28.11.2000, and L.P.A. Nos.252, 238, 243,

3 246, 471, 509, 535, 536, 537, 740, 847, 1118, 1120 and 1126 of 2001, dated 07.08.2001, whereby and whereunder, the High Court has affirmed the order of the learned Single Judge granting parity in the instant case with that in the case of Om Prakash vs. State of Haryana, dated 13.03.1995 for awarding compensation. 6. For convenient disposal of the matters, we would only notice the facts in Civil Appeal Nos.98-112 of 2005 as the lead case. 7. Brief facts: The respondent-State had issued Notification No. LAC(G)-88/91, dated 16.12.1988 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Act”) to acquire 37.26 acres of land in village Khandsa, District Gurgaon for public purposes namely further development of land for Industrial Area in Urban Sector No. 37 at Gurgaon Urban Area. The Notification No. LAC (G) – 89 NTLA/146 dated 14.12.1989 under Section 6 of the Act was issued on finalization of the proceedings. 8. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, “the LAC”), determined the compensation payable for the acquired lands at Rs. 1.5 lacs per acre for village Khandsa by award dated 03.07.1992. 9. The claimants, not being satisfied with the compensation so awarded by the LAC, approached the LAC and sought for a reference under Section 18 of the Act to the Civil Court for

4 determination of the actual market value of the land acquired by the State Government. The LAC had referred the case of the claimants to the Reference Court where it was registered as L.A. Case No. 134 of 15.05.1995. The appellants had contended before the Reference Court that since the land in question is situated in the vicinity of National Capital Region, attached to Gurgaon City and surrounded by various HUDA sectors and factories, the market value of the land was not lesser than Rs.1000/- per square yard at the time of notification under Section 4 of the Act. The respondent-State, contesting the aforesaid plea, would contend that the market value of the land was lesser than Rs.1000/- per square yard at the time of acquisition and further adequate compensation has been paid for the acquired land and no enhancement in the compensation ought to be granted. The Reference Court after considering the aforesaid submissions had framed the issue with respect to determination of market value of the acquired land at the time of acquisition. The Reference Court for the purpose of determining the value of the land at the time of acquisition, took notice of its decision in Hambir vs. State of Haryana, L.A. Case No. 129-A of 03.09.1994, dated 02.09.1996, with respect to the land of village Basai. The said land was acquired under notification dated 08.03.1989 i.e. three months later than the notification for the land in the present case. The compensation for land in the aforesaid case was assessed at the rate of Rs.5.78 lacs per acre. In light of the same, the Reference Court held that the land of village Khandsa has better locational

5 advantage as it abuts the National Highway No. 8 i.e. Delhi Jaipur Road and therefore allowed 25 percent increase in the market price assessed in respect of the land of village Basai. Accordingly, the Reference Court calculated the market value of the acquired land at the time of acquisition as Rs.7,22,500/- per acre, irrespective of the nature of the land by its order dated 18.10.1996. 10. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, the claimants had preferred a Regular First Appeal before the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal in light of its judgment and order in L.P.A No. 183 of 2000 dated 16.11.2000, wherein it has upheld the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge granting parity with that in the case of Om Prakash and Ors. vs. State of Haryana, L.P.A Case No. 21 of 12.02.1994, dated 13.03.1995, for awarding compensation, wherein the land in village Basai was in question. 11. Aggrieved by the order so passed by the High Court, the appellants are before us in these appeals. The appellants would contend that the High Court has committed an error in law by failing to consider the clear finding of the Reference Court that the land in question has better situational advantage and greater potentiality than the land of village Basai which is located at a distance of 7-8 kms from the City limits. The appellants would further contend that 25 per cent more compensation should be

6 granted for the land in question over and above the land of village Basai which is assessed at Rs.150 per sq. yard in the case of Om Prakash vs. State, L.P.A Case No. 21 of 12.02.1994, dated 13.03.1995. 12. The learned counsel for the respondents would rely upon the order passed by this Court in Tule Ram (Dead) Through L.Rs. & Anr. vs. State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 1990 OF 2008, dated 27.02.2014, wherein the land of village Khandsa was in question. The learned counsel for the respondents relying on the aforesaid case submitted that the market value of the land determined in the village Khandsa in the instant case is fair and reasonable and does not require enhancement in the compensation awarded. 13. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties to the lis and also carefully perused the documents on record. We find no infirmity in the order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirming the order of the learned Singh Judge. Further, in light of the decision of this Court in Tule Ram (Dead) Through L.Rs. & Anr. vs. State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 1990 of 2008, dated 27.02.2014, we are of the view that there is no merit whatsoever in the present appeal. 14. Therefore, in our considered opinion, we see no good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s)

7 passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the Civil Appeals as well as the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. Ordered accordingly. .................CJI. (H.L. DATTU) ..................J. (A.K. SIKRI) ..................J. (ARUN MISHRA) NEW DELHI; JANUARY 29, 2015.

8 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 98-112/2005 CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH C.A. No. 47/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 51/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 88-92/2005 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) C.A. No. 93-94/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 96/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 114-115/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 122-124/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 133-134/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 135/2005 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 136-144/2005 (With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) C.A. No. 146-148/2005 (With Office Report)

9 C.A. No. 150-152/2005 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18359-18369/2009 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33010/2009 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14714/2010 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 31303/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14486/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25428-25430/2009 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) Date : 29/01/2015 These appeals/petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr.Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr.S.K.Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev K.Bhardwaj, Adv. For Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr.Puran Mal, Adv. Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.D.N.Dubey, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv.

10 Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr.Manoj Swarup, Adv. Ms.Tanya Swarup, Adv. For Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr.D.P.Singh, Adv. Mr.Vinay Arora, Adv. Mr.Salil Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Anil Mittal, Adv. Mr.Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Rr-ex-parte Mr. T. V. George,Adv.(NP) Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr.C.L.Sahu, Adv. Ms.Hema Sahu, Adv. Mr.Rajendra Sahu, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application No.8 of 2009 in S.L.P. (C)No.33010 of 2009 is allowed. Permission to file I.A.(s) in S.L.P.(C)Nos.25428-25430 of 2009 is granted. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling the Special Leave Petition/application(s) for substitution is condoned. Application(s) for substitution(s) is/are allowed. The Civil Appeals as well as the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed, in terms of the signed order. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)

SECTION IVB Listed on.29.1.2015 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 18359-69/2009, 33010/2009, 14714/2010, 31343/2011, 14486/2013 AND 25428-25430/2009 (SLP(C) No. 24530 of 2009 DISMISSED vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 01.04.2010) WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 7-9 IN SLP (C) No. 18359-69/2009 (Application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent and condonation of delay in filing substitution application) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 10 IN SLP (C) No. 18359-69/2009 (Application for deletion of the name of the performa respondent No. 4) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 8 IN SLP (C) No. 33010/2009 (Application for recalling Court's Order dated 30.11.2009) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1-13 IN SLP (C) No. 14714/2010 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 14-15 IN SLP (C) No. 14714/2010 (Application for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent and condonation of delay in filing substitution application) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1-13 IN SLP (C) Nos. 25428-25430/2009 (Application for permission to file SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 14-16 IN SLP (C) Nos. 25428-25430/2009 (Application for substitution of LRs. of deceased petitioner Nos. 1, 5 & 16 in RFA No. 2279 of 2000) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 17-79 IN SLP (C) Nos. 25428-25430/2009 (Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application) AND

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 25-27 & 28-30 IN SLP (C) Nos. 25428-25430/2009 (Application for condonation of delay in filing & refiling the SLPs) Bhagat Ram & Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Anr. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT Latest service position of each matters is as under :- SLP (C) NOS. 18359-69/2009 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24.7.2009, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Permission to file SLP granted. Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with C.A. No. 51 of 2005.” Accordingly show cause notice to both the common respondents in both the matters was issued on 5.1.2010. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of common both respondents. Counter Affidavit is included in the paper books. Service of show cause notice is complete. SLP (C) No. 33010/2009 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30.11.2009, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Delay condoned. Special Leave Petition is dismissed.” It is submitted that SLP was dismissed vide Court's Order dated 30.11.2009 and counsel for the petitioner had filed an application for recalling the Order dated 30.11.2009 which has been registered as IA No. 8 and the same was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.3.2010, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :-

“ Tag I.A. No. 8 alongwith SLP (C) Nos. 18359-69/2009.” SLP (C) No. 14710/2010 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 7.5.2010, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Issue notice on IAs 1 to 15, IA for condonation of delay and on SLP. Tag with Civil Appeal Nos.98-112 of 2005.” Accordingly show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 5.1.2010. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of both the respondents and Counter Affidavit is included in the paper books. Service of show cause notice is complete. SLP (C) No. 31303/2011 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28.11.2011, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 51 of 2005.“ Accordingly show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 5.1.2012. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of both the respondents but no Counter Affidavit is filed on their behalf so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. SLP (C) No. 14486/2013 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.4.2013, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal Nos. 98-112 of 2005.” It is submitted that there are two respondents. Accordingly notice was issued to both the respondents on 16.5.2013. Respondent No. 1 has not entered appearance though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from

Respondent no. 2 so far. Service of show cause notice is incomplete on respondent No. 2. SLP (C) NOS. 25428-25430/2009 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30.09.2009 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :- “Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in so far as the third SLP(No.13906/2009) the High Court judgment referring to the date of acquisition as 30.1.1989 is incorrect and the said case also relates to the same acquisition as the first two cases that is under notification dated 16.12.1988. In view of the said submission: Issue notice on I.A. Nos.1 to 19, on the application for condonation of delay and on SLPs. Tag with C.A.No.51/2005.” Accordingly, show cause notice by registered A.D. post was issued on 07.05.2010. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate has filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of both Respondents. Copies of the same have been included in the SLP paper books . It is submitted that SLP(C) No. 25430 of 2009 @ RFA No. 369 of 2001 has been dismissed in terms of Hon'ble Court's order dated 01.04.2010. It is further submitted that pursuant to Hon'ble Court's order dated 30.09.2009, the instant SLPs has been tagged with C.A. No. 51 of 2005. It is further submitted that the matters above mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar on 11.04.2011 when the following order was passed :- “Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. From the perusal of the Office report what comes to the fore is that Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed the Counter Affidavit. Since the matter is a complete one, therefore appropriate steps for listing the same before the Hon'ble Court on its own

turn shall be taken by the Registry.” Service of show cause notice is complete. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 5thday of November, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip/yks

\210m 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.98-112 OF 2005 CHANDGI AND ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.47 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NO.51 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.88-92 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.93-94 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NO.96 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.114-115 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.122-124 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.133-134 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NO.135 OF 2005 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.136-144 OF 2005Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.02.0310:30:32 IST CIVIL APPEAL NOS.146-148 OF 2005Reason: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.150-152 OF 2005 2 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NOS.18359-18369 OF 2009 I.A.NO.8 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.33010 OF 2009

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.14714 OF 2010 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NO.31303 OF 2011 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.14486 OF 2013 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NOS. 25428-25430 OF 2009 O R D E R1. Interlocutory Application No.8 of 2009 in S.L.P.(C)No.33010 of 2009 is allowed.2. Permission to file I.A.(s) in S.L.P.(C)Nos.25428-25430 of2009 is granted.3. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling the Special LeavePetition/application(s) for substitution is condoned.4. Application(s) for substitution(s) is/are allowed.5. These appeals are directed against the judgment(s) andorder(s) passed by the the High Court of Punjab and Haryana inL.P.A No.1273/99, dated 28.11.2000, and L.P.A. Nos.252, 238, 243, 3246, 471, 509, 535, 536, 537, 740, 847, 1118, 1120 and 1126 of2001, dated 07.08.2001, whereby and whereunder, the High Courthas affirmed the order of the learned Single Judge granting parityin the instant case with that in the case of Om Prakash vs. Stateof Haryana, dated 13.03.1995 for awarding compensation.6. For convenient disposal of the matters, we would onlynotice the facts in Civil Appeal Nos.98-112 of 2005 as the leadcase.7. Brief facts: The respondent-State had issued Notification No.LAC(G)-88/91, dated 16.12.1988 under Section 4 of the LandAcquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") to acquire 37.26 acres

of land in village Khandsa, District Gurgaon for public purposesnamely further development of land for Industrial Area in UrbanSector No. 37 at Gurgaon Urban Area. The Notification No. LAC (G)- 89 NTLA/146 dated 14.12.1989 under Section 6 of the Act wasissued on finalization of the proceedings.8. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, "the LAC"),determined the compensation payable for the acquired lands at Rs.1.5 lacs per acre for village Khandsa by award dated 03.07.1992.9. The claimants, not being satisfied with the compensationso awarded by the LAC, approached the LAC and sought for areference under Section 18 of the Act to the Civil Court for 4determination of the actual market value of the land acquired bythe State Government. The LAC had referred the case of theclaimants to the Reference Court where it was registered as L.A.Case No. 134 of 15.05.1995. The appellants had contended beforethe Reference Court that since the land in question is situated inthe vicinity of National Capital Region, attached to Gurgaon Cityand surrounded by various HUDA sectors and factories, the marketvalue of the land was not lesser than Rs.1000/- per square yard atthe time of notification under Section 4 of the Act. Therespondent-State, contesting the aforesaid plea, would contendthat the market value of the land was lesser than Rs.1000/- persquare yard at the time of acquisition and further adequatecompensation has been paid for the acquired land and noenhancement in the compensation ought to be granted. The ReferenceCourt after considering the aforesaid submissions had framed theissue with respect to determination of market value of theacquired land at the time of acquisition. The Reference Court for

the purpose of determining the value of the land at the time ofacquisition, took notice of its decision in Hambir vs. State ofHaryana, L.A. Case No. 129-A of 03.09.1994, dated 02.09.1996, withrespect to the land of village Basai. The said land was acquiredunder notification dated 08.03.1989 i.e. three months later thanthe notification for the land in the present case. Thecompensation for land in the aforesaid case was assessed at therate of Rs.5.78 lacs per acre. In light of the same, the ReferenceCourt held that the land of village Khandsa has better locational 5advantage as it abuts the National Highway No. 8 i.e. Delhi JaipurRoad and therefore allowed 25 percent increase in the market priceassessed in respect of the land of village Basai. Accordingly, theReference Court calculated the market value of the acquired landat the time of acquisition as Rs.7,22,500/- per acre,irrespective of the nature of the land by its order dated18.10.1996.10. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by theReference Court, the claimants had preferred a Regular FirstAppeal before the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Courtdismissed the appeal in light of its judgment and order in L.P.ANo. 183 of 2000 dated 16.11.2000, wherein it has upheld thejudgment and order of the learned Single Judge granting paritywith that in the case of Om Prakash and Ors. vs. State of Haryana,L.P.A Case No. 21 of 12.02.1994, dated 13.03.1995, for awardingcompensation, wherein the land in village Basai was in question.11. Aggrieved by the order so passed by the High Court, theappellants are before us in these appeals. The appellants wouldcontend that the High Court has committed an error in law byfailing to consider the clear finding of the Reference Court that

the land in question has better situational advantage and greaterpotentiality than the land of village Basai which is located at adistance of 7-8 kms from the City limits. The appellants wouldfurther contend that 25 per cent more compensation should be 6granted for the land in question over and above the land ofvillage Basai which is assessed at Rs.150 per sq. yard in thecase of Om Prakash vs. State, L.P.A Case No. 21 of 12.02.1994,dated 13.03.1995.12. The learned counsel for the respondents would rely uponthe order passed by this Court in Tule Ram (Dead) Through L.Rs. &Anr. vs. State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 1990 OF 2008, dated27.02.2014, wherein the land of village Khandsa was in question.The learned counsel for the respondents relying on the aforesaidcase submitted that the market value of the land determined in thevillage Khandsa in the instant case is fair and reasonable anddoes not require enhancement in the compensation awarded.13. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties to thelis and also carefully perused the documents on record. We find noinfirmity in the order of the Division Bench of the High Court ofPunjab and Haryana affirming the order of the learned Singh Judge.Further, in light of the decision of this Court in Tule Ram (Dead)Through L.Rs. & Anr. vs. State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 1990of 2008, dated 27.02.2014, we are of the view that there is nomerit whatsoever in the present appeal.14. Therefore, in our considered opinion, we see no goodground to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) 7passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the Civil Appeals as wellas the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. Ordered accordingly.

.................CJI. (H.L. DATTU) ..................J. (A.K. SIKRI) ..................J. (ARUN MISHRA)NEW DELHI;JANUARY 29, 2015. 8ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No(s). 98-112/2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(with office report)WITH C.A. No. 47/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 51/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 88-92/2005(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andappln.(s) for may refer to remarks and Office Report) C.A. No. 93-94/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 96/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 114-115/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 122-124/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 133-134/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 135/2005(With Office Report) C.A. No. 136-144/2005(With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for mayrefer to remarks and appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and OfficeReport) C.A. No. 146-148/2005(With Office Report) 9 C.A. No. 150-152/2005(With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 18359-18369/2009(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33010/2009(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14714/2010(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 31303/2011(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14486/2013(With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25428-25430/2009(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) forpermission to file SLP and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) forc/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report)Date : 29/01/2015 These appeals/petitions were called on forhearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Appellant(s) Mr.Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr.S.K.Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev K.Bhardwaj, Adv. For Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr.Puran Mal, Adv. Mr.S.R.Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.D.N.Dubey, Adv. Mr.Avnish Singh, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. 10 Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr.Manoj Swarup, Adv. Ms.Tanya Swarup, Adv. For Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr.D.P.Singh, Adv. Mr.Vinay Arora, Adv. Mr.Salil Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Anil Mittal, Adv. Mr.Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.

Rr-ex-parte Mr. T. V. George,Adv.(NP) Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr.C.L.Sahu, Adv. Ms.Hema Sahu, Adv. Mr.Rajendra Sahu, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Interlocutory Application No.8 of 2009 in S.L.P. (C)No.33010 of 2009 is allowed. Permission to file I.A.(s) in S.L.P.(C)Nos.25428-25430 of 2009 is granted. Delay, if any, in filing/refiling the Special Leave Petition/application(s) for substitution is condoned. Application(s) for substitution(s) is/are allowed. The Civil Appeals as well as the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed, in terms of the signed order. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.13 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2014, I.A. No.2/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 88-92/2005 SURESH SINGH AND OTHERS Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and office report) WITH I.A. Nos. 1 & 2 in Civil Appeal No(s). 136-144/2005 (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and office report) Date : 15/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2014 in Civil Appeal Nos. 88-92/2005 : Last opportunity is granted to the counsel for the appelllant (s) to comply with the office report dated 20.11.2014 within four weeks, subject to payment of Rs.500/-, as costs, to be deposited with the SCBA – Advocates' Welfare Fund within seven days' time from today.

2 I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal Nos. 136-144/2005 : Delay in filing applications for substitution is condoned. Application for substitution to bring on record the LRs of deceased appellant No.4 in C.A. No. 136/2005 is allowed. (R.NATARAJAN) (PARDEEP KUMAR) Court Master AR-cum-PS

8 1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.13 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 1/2014, I.A. No.2/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 88-92/2005 SURESH SINGH AND OTHERS Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and office report) WITH I.A. Nos. 1 & 2 in Civil Appeal No(s). 136-144/2005 (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and office report) Date : 15/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2014 in Civil Appeal Nos. 88-92/2005: Last opportunity is granted to the counsel for the appelllant (s) to comply with the office report dated 20.11.2014 within fourSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by weeks, subject to payment of Rs.500/-, as costs, to be depositedNeeta SapraDate: 2015.01.2116:47:22 ISTReason: with the SCBA - Advocates' Welfare Fund within seven days' time from today. 2I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal Nos. 136-144/2005: Delay in filing applications for substitution is condoned. Application for substitution to bring on record the LRs of

deceased appellant No.4 in C.A. No. 136/2005 is allowed. (R.NATARAJAN) (PARDEEP KUMAR) Court Master AR-cum-PS

ITEM NO.37 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14486/2013 DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 10/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.2 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within the period provided above. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 24.02.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.12 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-8/2014, I.A. Nos. 9-10/2014, I.A. Nos. 11-12/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 93-94/2005 SHANTI DEVI ETC. ETC AND ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 17/11/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ex-parte UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Abatement is set aside and delay condoned in filing the substitution applications as well as in filing the applications for setting aside abatement. Substitution applications to bring legal representatives of the deceased appellant No. 2-Kartar Singh in these appeals are allowed. Amended cause title be filed within two weeks. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

¾ ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.12 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 7-8/2014, I.A. Nos. 9-10/2014, I.A. Nos. 11-12/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 93-94/2005 SHANTI DEVI ETC. ETC AND ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 17/11/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Avnish Singh, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ex-parte UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Abatement is set aside and delay condoned in filing the substitution applications as well as in filing the applications for setting aside abatement. Substitution applications to bring legal representatives of the deceased appellant No. 2-Kartar Singh in these appeals are allowed. Amended cause title be filed within two weeks. (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTERSignature Not Verified COURT MASTERDigitally signed bySushil Kumar RakhejaDate: 2014.11.1917:42:32 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 6/2014, I.A. 7/2014, I.A. 8/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 135/2005 KARTAR SINGH & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Avnish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Rr-ex-parte UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 8 of 2014 for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A-2 is allowed. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and so also application for substitution of appellant No. 1. (PARDEEP KUMAR) (H.S. PARASHER) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

f ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 6/2014, I.A. 7/2014, I.A. 8/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 135/2005 KARTAR SINGH & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Avnish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Rr-ex-parte UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 8 of 2014 for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure A-2 is allowed. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and so also application for substitution of appellant No. 1.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPardeep KumarDate: 2014.11.0316:37:46 SASTReason: (PARDEEP KUMAR) (H.S. PARASHER) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.12 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 7-8/2014, I.A. 9-10/2014, I.A. 11-12/2014 in Civil Appeal No(s). 93-94/2005 SHANTI DEVI ETC. ETC AND ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 27/10/2014 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time granted for filing the application for setting aside abatement. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (H.S. PARASHER) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14486/2013 DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 23/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Vikramaditya Singh,adv. Ms.Kanika Agnihotri,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Vikramaditya Singh , Ld.counsel appears for the respondents. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. List again on 10.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

¢ ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14486/2013 DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) (With Office Report) Date : 18/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Juhi Chawla,Adv. Ms. Kanika Agnihotri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ms. Juhi Chawla, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of all the respondents. She seeks and is given six weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. List again on 22.9.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MgSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2014.07.2116:07:48 ISTReason:

þITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 27/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Kanika Agnihotri,adv. Ms.Juhi Chawla,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R|None for the petitioner. Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & ||2 is present. He seeks four weeks time to file the counter ||affidavit on behalf of both the respondents and the vakalatnama||on behalf of respondent No.2. Time as prayed for is given to ||her. ||List again on 18.07.2014. | | | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SBþITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )

Date: 27/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Kanika Agnihotri,adv. Ms.Juhi Chawla,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R|None for the petitioner. Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & ||2 is present. He seeks four weeks time to file the counter ||affidavit on behalf of both the respondents and the vakalatnama||on behalf of respondent No.2. Time as prayed for is given to ||her. ||List again on 18.07.2014. | | | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB

>ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 26/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the respondent who offered to appear on last occasion, is granted time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit, if any. Service is awaited. List the matter on 27.03.2014.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

*ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 12/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel who had offered to appear on behalf of the respondents submits that she has not been served with the copy of the pleadings. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve copy of the pleadings to the above counsel within two weeks, as last chance and file proof. The counsel who offered to appear may file Counter Affidavit and vakalatnama within four weeks for both the respondents. List the matter on 8.1.2014. | | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||mg | |Registrar |

\202ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 21/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Sushaw Gupta,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Dr. Monia Gusain,Advocate proposes to appear for both therespondents. The learned counsel is granted four weeks' time for filingvakalatnama and counter affidavit. List again on 25.10.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||mg | |Registrar |

ITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 03/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice. List the matter on 21.08.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

,ITEM NO.33 Court No.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).14486/2013(From the judgement and order dated 23/11/2012 in RFA No.6125/2011 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 26/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. for Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal Nos. 98-112 of 2005. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Court Master |

ITEM NO.65 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 21/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the petitioner has filed proof of dasti on the standing counsel for the State. Service is complete. No appearance for the respondents. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

|ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Joshi,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both the respondents granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 21.3.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

°ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 06/12/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr./Ms. Aditya Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Dr. Monika Gusain, advocate seeks four weeks time for filing Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents. Granted. List the matter on 5.2.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

\220ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 09/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. The respondent is granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit if any. List the matter on 6.12.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

FITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 28/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice is still awaited from both the respondents. However, it is submitted that advocate Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta proposes to appear for both the respondents. He seeks four weeks time for filing Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Granted. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the pleadings within two weeks to the standing counsel for the State and file proof. Respondent shall file counter affidavit, if any, within fur weeks thereafter. List the matter on 9.10.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

2( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NOs. 8-31 in CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R I.A.Nos. 8, 9 & 10 in C.A. No. 99 of 2005 There is an inordinate delay of 1341 days in filing theapplication for substitution of L.Rs. of deceased appellant No.4 (SamandarSingh). No cause, much less sufficient cause, has been shown forcondoning this huge delay. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay in filingapplication for substitution is rejected. Consequently, the substitution application, being barred bylimitation, stands dismissed. I.A.NOs. 11, 12 & 13 in C.A. No. 101 of 2005 There is a delay of 215 days in filing the application forsubstitution of L.Rs. of appellant No.3 (Surjit Singh). Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned, andthe substitution application is allowed. Amended cause title be filed within two weeks. I.A.NOs. 14, 15 & 16 in C.A. No. 101 of 2005 There is an inordinate delay of 1334 days in filing theapplication for substitution of L.Rs. of appellant No.1 (Iswar Singh). No cause, much less sufficient cause, has been shown forcondoning this huge delay. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay in filingapplication for substitution is rejected. Consequently, the substitution application, being barred bylimitation, stands dismissed. I.A.Nos. 17 to 22 in C.A.Nos. 99 & 104 of 2005 There is an inordinate delay of 1854 days in filing theapplication for substitution of L.Rs. of common appellant No.2 in CivilAppeal No. 99/2005 and appellant No. 1 in Civil Appeal No. 104 of 2005(Mahender Singh). No cause, much less sufficient cause, has been shown forcondoning this huge delay. Accordingly, the applications for condonation of delay infiling applications for substitution is rejected. Consequently, the substitution applications, being barred bylimitation, stand dismissed. I.A.Nos.23 to 28 in C.A. No. 109 of 2005 There is an inordinate delay of 579 days in filing theapplication for substitution of L.Rs. of appellant No.1 (Tek Ram). No cause, much less sufficient cause, has been shown forcondoning this huge delay. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay in filingapplication for substitution is rejected. Consequently, the substitution application, being barred bylimitation, stands dismissed. I.A.Nos. 29 to 31 in C.A. No. 112 of 2005 There is a delay of 347 days in filing the application for

substitution of L.Rs. of sole appellant (Leela Singh). Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned, andthe substitution application is allowed. Amended cause title be filed within two weeks. ........................J (CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD) NEW DELHI, JULY 16, 2012ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.8 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.NOs. 8-31 in CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution, exemption from filing O.T., c/delay in filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 16/07/2012 These I.As. were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv. Mr. Naveen Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shawah Bhusan, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, Addl.A.G. Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The I.As. are disposed of in terms of the signed order.| (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) | | (SHARDA KAPOOR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER | (SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE)

0ITEM NO.128 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rishi Jain,adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of both the respondents. List the matter on 28.08.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ªITEM NO.5 COURT NO.8 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.Nos. 8 & 10-14 In CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and appln. for substitution andapplication for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date: 11/05/2012 These Applications were called on forhearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh,Adv. Mr. Sameer Shrivastava,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjev Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the applications after summer vacation. (KUSUM SYAL) (INDU SATIJA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ÔITEM NO.30 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31303/2011(From the judgement and order dated 10/05/2011 in RFANo.840/2000 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSLAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 28/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Jain, Adv. Mrs. Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 51 of 2005. (Deepak Mansukhani) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB SUPR EME COUR T OF I ND I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report )Date: 11/04/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. From theperusal of the Office report what comes to the fore is thatRespondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed the Counter Affidavit. Since the matter is a complete one, therefore appropriatesteps for listing the same before the Hon'ble Court on its ownturn shall be taken by the Registry. (M.K. Hanjura) RegistrarMG

ÌITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 18/03/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedcounsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 are present. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2(common in all matters) seeks one week's time to rectify thedefects whatever have been noticed in the vakalatnama filed byhim on behalf of the said respondents. Time, as prayed for,is granted to him, as last chance. The office report reveals that the counter affidavithas already been filed by the said respondents. List again on 11.4.2011. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARrd

& IN CHAMBERSITEM NO.35 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA No.10 INPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18359-18369/2009(From the judgement and order dated 15/09/2008 in RFA No. 324/2001& RFA No. 371/2001 & RFA No. 372/2001 & RFA No. 374/2001 & RFA No.1729/2001 & RFA No. 2638/2000 & RFA No. 2649/2000 & RFA No.3979/2002 & RFA No. 3980/2002 & RFA No. 4992/2001 & RFA No.4994/2001 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)BHAGAT RAM ETC.ETC.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(Appln. for deleting the name of proforma R.No.3 in SLP(C)No.18362/2009 from the array of parties and with office report)Date: 11/02/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARJIT SINGH BEDIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjeev K. Bhardwaj,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Aditya Vikram,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG. Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv.for Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deletion is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. [SUMAN WADHWA] [VINOD KULVI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ºITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 11/02/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners and therespondent Nos.1 and 2 are present. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 isdirected to rectify the defects whatever have been found inthe vakalatname within a week's time. He seeks three weeks'time to file the counter affidavit. Time, as prayed for, isgranted to him. List again on 18.3.2011. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARrd

ITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURACHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)WITH Civil Appeal NO. 114-115 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 122-124 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 133-134 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 135 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 136-144 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 146-148 of 2005(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14714 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 150-152 of 2005(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 18359-18369 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 33010 of 2009(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 47 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 51 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 88-92 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 93-94 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 96 of 2005(With office report)Date: 13/01/2011 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv.Item No.91 -2- Mr. R.C. Kaushik, Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. Mrs.Amita Gupta, adv Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv, Dr. Sushil Balwada, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Rr-Ex-Parte Mr.T.V.George, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E RCA Nos.98-112/2005 Learned counsel for the appellant and therespondents are preent.CA Nos.133-134/2005 Nemo present.CA No.135/2005 Nemo present.CA Nos.136-144/205 Nemo present. All the appeals are ready. Original records havenot been called in view of the order dated 3.1.2005 passed bythe Ld. Registrar. Registry to process the matters forlisting before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn.Item No.91 -2-SLP(C) No.18359-18369/2009 Application has been filed for deleting respondentNo.3 from the array of the respondents and the same shall belisted before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further futuredirections.SLP(C) No.14714/2010 Learned counsel for the parties are present. Since the matter is a complete one, therefore,appropriate steps shall be taken by the Registry for listingthe same before the Hon'ble Court on their own turn. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARrd

°ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report )Date: 03/12/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Proof of service filed on record is not proper. This fact is to be placed before the Registrar(Judl.) to issue necessary circular conveying the Bar thatthere must be proper proof of service on record withoutfail. If petitioner fails to file proper proof of serviceon or before 3.1.2011, list before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for non-prosecution. (S.G.SHAH) Registrarhj

>ITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHCHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH Civil Appeal NO. 114-115 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 122-124 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 133-134 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 135 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 136-144 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 146-148 of 2005(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14714 of 2010(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 150-152 of 2005(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 18359-18369 of 2009(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 33010 of 2009(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 47 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 51 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 88-92 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 93-94 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 96 of 2005(With office report)Date: 25/11/2010 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Rahat Bansal, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mrs Lalita Kaushik Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav Mrs.Amita Gupta Mr. Sanjay Jain Dr. Sushil Balwada Mr. Gagan GuptaFor Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Rr-Ex-Parte

Mr.T.V.George UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Registry has to prepare a precise office report disclosing thestatus of service on unserved respondents specifically for each SLPseparately. Registry has to process it for final hearing also. List the matter again on 6.1.2011. (S.G.SHAH) Registrarba

<ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report )Date: 29/10/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List again on 3.12.2010. (S.G.SHAH) Registrarhj

BITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report )Date: 09/09/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Outcome of dasti service to be filed before 6.10.2010. (S.G.SHAH) Registrarhj

rITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report)Date: 20/07/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh dasti service upon the unserved respondent isallowed, permitted to be served through standing counsel. List again 9.9.2010. (S.G. SHAH) Registrarrd

VITEM NO.133 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18359-18369of 2009BHAGAT RAM ETC.ETC.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 13/05/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel appearing for the State of Haryana seeks further time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Four weeks time granted. List the matter on 27.07.2010. (Ashok Menon) RegistrarPS

âITEM NO.130 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report)Date: 10/05/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Registry has to explain to the undersigned within aweek that why this matter is listed on today, though noticeswere issued only on 5.5.2010. Await service. List again on 19.7.2010. (S.G. SHAH) Registrarrd

zITEM NO.19 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 6752/2010(From the judgement and order dated 24/09/2008 in RFA No.369/2001of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)SAVITRI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP, c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 07/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on IAs 1 to 15, IA for condonation of delay and on SLP. Tag with Civil Appeal Nos.98-112 of 2005. (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi)Court Master Court Master

vITEM NO.10 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA NOS. 4, 5, 6, 7 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 146-148 OF 2005 &I.A.Nos. 4-5 in C.A.Nos. 150-152 of 2005HARDAT SINGH(DEAD) Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)I.A.No.4 (Appln(s) for deleting the name of proformarespondent No. 6 from the array of parties in CA-147/2005)I.A.No.5:(Appln.for substitution to bring on record the Lrs ofdeceased sole appellant in CA-146/2005)I.A.No.6 (Appln. For c/delay in filing substitution appln. Ofsole appellant in CA-146/2005)I.A.No.7 (Appln. for setting aside the abatement)I.A.Nos. 4 & 5 (Appln. For deleting the names of proformarespondent Nos. 3 to 5 in CA-150/2005 and R.Nos. 3 & 7 in CA-152/2005 and office report )Date: 26/04/2010 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr.Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. All the I.As are allowed. I.A.No.4 in C.A. No.147/05 and I.A.Nos. 4 and 5 inC.A.Nos. 150 and 152 of 2005 are allowed, in terms of theprayer, at the risk of the applicant. (Kusum Syal) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master

ìITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).18359-18369/2009BHAGAT RAM ETC.ETC.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 15/04/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await service of notice on the respondents. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve notice on the standing counsel for the State of Haryana. List the matter on 13.5.2010. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

,ITEM NO.6 Court No.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 20-22/2010 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for clarification/modification of court's order dated30.9.2009 and office report)Date: 01/04/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On 30.9.2009, this Court directed notice recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that even the third petition - (SLP No.25430/2009 @ CC NO. 13906/2009) related to the acquisition dated 16.12.1988 and not 30.1.1989. Learned counsel for the petitioner has now made an application (I.A. No.20-22) submitting that he had committed a mistake in making the said submission and that the third SLP (SLP(C) 25430/2009) actually related to acquisition of a different date namely, 30.1.1989 and he had filed the joint SLP as reliance in both cases was on earlier order dated 13.5.2009. If that is so, SLP(C) No.25430/2009 could not have been filed along with the first two SLPs. There is virtually misjoinder of the cases. .....2. - 2 -ITEM NO.6 Court No.4 DATED 1/4/2010 ...contd. In view of the above, accepting the applications,SLP(C) No.25430/2009 is dismissed with liberty to file aseparate SLP. I.A. Nos.20-22 stand disposed of. ( Ravi P. Verma ) ( Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Court Master

ìITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 8/2010 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).33010/2009RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for recalling the court's order 30.11.2009)Date: 29/03/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag I.A. No.8 along with SLP(C) Nos.18359-69/2009. ( Ravi P. Verma ) ( M.S. Negi ) Court Master Court Master

\236ITEM NO.138 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18359-18369/2009BHAGAT RAM ETC.ETC.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/03/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue fresh notice to the respondents by Registered Post AD . List the matter on 14.4.2010. (ASHOK MENON) Registrar

ÐITEM NO.139 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K GUPTAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25428-25430/2009(From the judgement and order dated 15/09/2008 in RFA No.369/2001 & RFA No. 2279/2000 & RFA No. 2636/2000 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln.,clarification/modification of court'sorder and office report )Date: 09/03/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitionerthat inadvertently there has been a mistake while makingstatement on 30th September, 2009 before Hon'ble Court. I.A. dated10.10.2009 be listed before the Hon'ble Court for appropriateorders. (M.K. GUPTA) Registrarns

ÂITEM NO.114 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).18359-18369/2009BHAGAT RAM ETC.ETC.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/02/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await service of notice on the respondents. List the matter on 10.3.2010. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

2ITEM NO.65 COURT NO.5 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112, 136-144, 146-148 & 150-152 OF 2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 25/01/2010 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. D. P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to comply with the office report. (Neetu Sachdeva) (P.S.N.Murthy) Sr. P.A. Court Master

ÌITEM NO.24 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2009 CC 18767/2009(From the judgement and order dated 15/09/2008 in RFA No.2558/2000 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)RATI RAM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)Date: 30/11/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Aditi gupta, Adv. Mrs. Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Special Leave Petition is dismissed. (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

ÈITEM NO.41 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal Nos.98-112, 136-144, 146-148, 150-152/2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(Office report on default))Date: 03/11/2009 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. B.D. Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last opportunity, four weeks' time is granted to theAppellant(s) to comply with the Office Report on default dated 5thOctober, 2009. (O.P. Sharma) (P.S.N. Murthy) Court Master Court Master

FITEM NO.13 Court No.5 SECTION IVB SUPR EME COUR T OF I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2009 CC 13904-13906/2009(From the judgement and order dated 15/09/2008 in RFA No. 2279/2000 &RFA No. 2636/2000 and 24.09.2008 in RFA 369/2001 of The HIGH COURT OFPUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(for substitution, permission to file SLP, c/delay in filing substitution appln.and office report)Date: 30/09/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASOK KUMAR GANGULYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in so far as the third SLP(No.13906/2009) the High Court judgment referring to the date of acquisition as 30.1.1989 is incorrect and the said case also relates to the same acquisition as the first two cases that is under notification dated 16.12.1988. In view of the said submission: Issue notice on I.A. Nos.1 to 19, on the application for condonation of delay and on SLPs. Tag with C.A.No.51/2005. (Pawan Kumar) (Phoolan Wati Arora)AR-CUM-PS Court Master

0ITEM NO.131 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).18359-18369/2009BHAGAT RAM ETC.ETC.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 30/09/2009 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Manisha Kaushik,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Teotia,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. Trace out the file. List the matter on 26.10.2009. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

\200IT EM NO.1 1 Cour t No.7 S E C T I O N IVB S U P R E ME C O U R T O F IN D IA RE C O R D OF PROC E E D I N G SPeti tio n ( s ) for Speci al Leave to Appe al (Civi l )....../20 0 9 CC 93 4 8- 93 5 8/ 2 0 0 9(F r o m the judge m e n t and order dated 15/09/2 0 0 8 in RF A No. 32 4/2 0 0 1 &RF A No. 37 1/2 0 0 1 & RF A No. 372/2 0 0 1 & RF A No. 37 4/ 2 0 0 1 & RF A No.17 2 9/ 2 0 0 1 & RF A No. 26 3 8/ 2 0 0 0 & RF A No. 26 4 9/ 2 0 0 0 & RF A No.39 7 9/ 2 0 0 2 & RF A No. 39 8 0/ 2 0 0 2 & RF A No. 49 9 2/ 2 0 0 1 & RF A No.49 9 4/ 2 0 0 1 of The HIGH COUR T OF PU N J A B & HAR Y A N A ATCHA N D I G A R H )BHA G A T RAM ET C. E T C . & OR S. Peti ti o n e r ( s ) VER SU SS T A T E OF HAR Y A N A & A N R . Respo n d e n t ( s )(Wit h appl n ( s ) for per mi s s i o n to file SL P , s u b s t i t u t i o n ,c/dela y in filingsubs ti t u t i o n appln. and office repo r t )Date: 24/07/2 0 0 9 These Peti ti o n s wer e called on for heari n g today.COR AM : HON'B L E MR. J U S T I C E R.V. RA V E E N D R A N HON'B L E MR. J U S T I C E B. SUD E R S H A N RED D YFo r Peti ti o n e r ( s ) Mr. Nar e s h Kau s h i k , Ad v. Ms. Aditi Gup t a, Ad v. Mrs Lali ta Kau s h i k , A d v .Fo r Respo n d e n t ( s ) UPO N heari n g coun sel the Cour t made the follo w i n g O R D E R Per m i s s i o n to file SL P gran te d. Delay condon ed. Issue notice. Tag wi t h C.A. No. 51 of 20 0 5 .( Ravi P. Ver m a ) ( M.S. Negi ) Cou r t Master Cou r t Master

¤IT E M NO.53 Court No.6 SECT I O N IV S UP R E M E CO U R T O F I N D I A R ECO R D OF P R OC E E D I N G S CIV I L AP P E A L NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005CHA N D G I ETC.ETC. Appellant (s) VE R S U SSTAT E OF HA R Y A N A & AN R. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)W I T H Civil Appeal NO. 136- 144 of 2005(Office report on default)Civil Appeal NO. 146- 148 of 2005(Office report on default)Civil Appeal NO. 150- 152 of 2005(Office report on default)Date: 06/05 / 2 009 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.COR A M : HON' B L E M R. JUST I C E TA RU N CHATT E R J E E (In Chambers)For parties Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr.T.V.George,Adv. Mr. B.D. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sunil Roy, Adv. Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Ranbir Yadav, learned counsel appearing submits that Advocate-on-Record Shri B.D. Sharma has expired. The Registry is directed to issue notice to the petitioner to engage new lawyer.( Manish Vats ) ( Phoolan Wati Arora ) Sr. P.A. Court Master

\234ITEM NO.108 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IV SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHCHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)WITH Civil Appeal NO. 114-115 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 122-124 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 133-134 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 135 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 136-144 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 146-148 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 150-152 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 47 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 51 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 88-92 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 93-94 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 96 of 2005(With office report)Date: 04/02/2009 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal,Adv. Mr. B.D. Sharma Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mrs Lalita Kaushik Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav Mr. Surender Pal, Adv. Mrs.Amita Gupta Mr. Sanjay Jain Dr. Sushil BalwadaFor Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr.T.V.George,Adv. Mr Vinay Kumar Garg Ms. Kavita Wadia UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER As a last chance, earlier order be complied with within two weeks. If it isnot complied within two weeks, list the matter before the ITEM NO. 108 -2-Hon'ble Chamber Judge for non-prosecution against the unserved respondents. If it is

complied with, then issue notice as per earlier order and list the matter on 25-3-2009. List the matter on 25-3-2009. (S.G.SHAH)va Registrar

\200ITEM NO.103 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IV SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHCHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH Civil Appeal NO. 114-115 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 122-124 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 133-134 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 135 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 136-144 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 146-148 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 150-152 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 47 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 51 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 88-92 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 93-94 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 96 of 2005(With office report)Date: 17/12/2008 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. B.D. Sharma,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup,Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Syed Rehan,Adv. ...2/- :2: Mrs.Amita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. B.K. Singh,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Bhel,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr.T.V.George,Adv. Mr Vinay Kumar Garg,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Issue fresh notice by Registered Post A.D. to the unserved respondents. Dasti service is allowed as prayed for. Petitioner may take help of the nearest civil court. For the purpose, copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned civil court; details of which are to be furnished by the learned Advocate for the petitioner to the Registry within a week. List the matter on 4.2.2009. (S.G.SHAH) Registrar

ÆITEM NO.108 COURT NO.R-2 SECTION IV SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )WITH Civil Appeal NO. 114-115 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 122-124 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 133-134 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 135 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 136-144 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 146-148 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 150-152 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 47 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 51 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 88-92 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 93-94 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 96 of 2005(With office report)Date: 26/11/2008 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. B.D. Sharma,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup,Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mrs.Amita Gupta,Adv. ...2/- :2: Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.T.V.George,Adv. Mr Vinay Kumar Garg,Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Nobody is present for any of the litigants. Appellants have to take appropriate steps to confirm service upon unserved respondents in the concerned SLPs before 17.12.2008. Registry has to explain and to disclose proper proof of minor respondents as pointed out in office report dated 25.11.2008 to the undersigned within a week in writing List the matter on 17.12.2008. (S.G.SHAH) Registrar

\ITEM NO.125 COURT NO.R-2 SECTION IV SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 98-112 OF 2005CHANDGI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Civil Appeal NO. 146-148 of 2005(With office report)Civil Appeal NO. 150-152 of 2005(With office report)Date: 18/09/2008 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. Dipesh Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.T.V.George,Adv. Mr Vinay Kumar Garg,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Since the matter is listed after a long time learned counsel for the appellants in all the appeals are directed to verify the record and the office report and to take appropriate steps for confirming service upon unserved respondents. For the purpose fresh notice is to be issued. Additional dasti service is allowed. Appellants have to file process fee within two weeks. Dasti service is allowed to be forwarded through concerned trial court/civil court. Appellants have to provide details of the concerned court to the Registry at the earliest. States authorities are permitted to be served through the standing counsel. List the matter on 26.11.2008. (S.G.SHAH) Registrar

\236ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.3 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.7 in CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 51 OF 2005JAI NARAIN (D) BY LRS. & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)(For deletion the name of appellant No.1 (d) from the array of parties)(With office report dt. 24.1.2007)Date: 22/02/2007 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Mrs. Lalita Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.T.V.George,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The prayer for deleting the name of appellant No. 1(d) from the array of parties is accepted at the risk of the appellants. (Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Kanwal Singh) Court Master Court Master

SLP(C)No. 1873-1887 OF 2002ITEM No.3 & 65 Court No. 2 SECTION IVB A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1873-1887/2002 (From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA 252, 238, 243, 248, 471, 509, 535, 536, 537, 740, 847, 1118, 1120, 1126 of 2001 and 28.11.2000 in LPA 1273/99 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) CHANDGI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s) (With Office Report ) WithSLP(C)No.13041/2002,SLP(C)No.15191-15193/2002,SLP(C)No.16957-16959/2004,SLP(C)No.1909-1917/2002,SLP(C)No.19492/2003,SLP(C)No.4080/2003,SLP(C)No.5340/2002,SLP(C)No.6029-6033/2002,SLP(C)No.6034-6035/2002,SLP(C)No.7584-7585/2002,SLP(C)No.952-953/2002 andSLP(C)No.26252-26254/2004 (with appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 03/01/2005 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA For Petitioner (s)Mr. Anil Karnwal, Adv.Dr. Sushil Balwada, Adv.Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv.Mr. R.C. Kaushik, Adv.Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv.Mr. Ranbir Yadav, Adv.Mr. B.D. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Bhava Dutt Sharma, Adv.Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv.Mrs. Shilpa Chauhan, Adv.Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, Adv....2/-: 2 :Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv.Mrs. Amita Gupta, Adv.Mr. D.P. Singh, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent (s) Ms. Kavita Wadia, Adv.

Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Adv.Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv.Mr. Anil K. Thakur, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Delay condoned.Printing dispensed with. The appeals shall be heard on the SLP paper books. Parties may file additional documents, if any, within ten weeks. Original record need not be called for. (PAWAN KUMAR) (PREM PRAKASH) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SLP(C)No. 1873-1887 OF 2002ITEM No.4+51 Court No. 2 SECTION IVB A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1873-1887/2002(From the judgement and order dated 28.11.2000 passed in LPA Nos.1273/99 & LPA Nos.252, 238, 243, 246, 471, 509, 535, 536, 537, 740, 847, 1118, 1120, 1126 of 2001 passed on 7.8.2001) CHANDGI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)( With Office Report ) WithSLP(C)No.952-953/2002(With Appln.(s) for permission to file additional affidavit)SLP(C)No.5340/2002(With Appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and substitution of deceased respondent No.2 and exemption from filing c/copy of the reference order and office report)SLP(C)No.1909-1917/2002(With office report)SLP(C)No.6029-6033/2002 SLP(C)No.6034-6035/2002 (With Appln.(s) for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent No.2 and exemption from filing reference order and office report)SLP(C) NO.7584-7585/2002(With Appln.(s)for c/delay in filing SLP and permission to place addl.documents on record and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)SLP(C)No.15191-15193/2002 (With Appln.(s)for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C)No.13041/2002(With office report)SLP(C)No.4080/2003(With office report)SLP(C)No.19492/2003 (With office report)SLP(C)No.16957-16959/2004,(With Appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)SLP(C) ......../2004 (CC No.11526-11528)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 03/12/2004 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA For Petitioner (s)/ RespondentDr. Sushil Balwada, Adv.Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv.Mr. Gian Singh, Adv.For Mr. R.C. Kaushik, Adv.Mr. B.D. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Bhava Dutt Sharma, Adv.Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv.Ms. Shilpa Chohan, Adv. Mr. S.C. Gupta, Adv. Mrs.Lalita Kaushik, Adv.Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Amita Gupta, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent (s) Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Thakur, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned by four weeks.SLP(C) ......../2004 (CC No.11526-11528)Issue notice.Dasti, in addition, is permitted.( Satish K. Yadav ) ( Prem Prakash ) Court Master Court Master

tSLP(C)... 6523-6525 OF 2004ITEM No.11 Court No. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)...(CC.6523-6525/2004) (From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2000 in LPA 183/2000, LPA 184/2000 and LPA 185/2000 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) HARDAT SINGH Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent (s) With I.A. 1-3 (c/delay in filing SLP)( With Office Report ) Date : 13/08/2004 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.K. THAKKER For Petitioner (s)Ms. Avneet Toor, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice in the special leave petitions as also on the applications for condonation of delay.Tag with SLP(C) Nos. 6029-6030/2002. (Ajay Kr. Jain) (Radha R. Bhatia) Court MasterCourt Master

SLP(C)No. 1873-1887 OF 2002ITEM No.20 Court No. 6 SECTION IVB A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.1873-1887/2002(From the judgement and order dated 28/11/2000 in LPA 1273/99 & dated 07/08/2001 in 252, 238, 243, 246, 471, 509 535, 536, 537, 740, 847, 1118, 1120, 1126 of 2001 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)CHANDGI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)( With Office Report ) With SLP(C)Nos.952-953/2002-(With appln.(s) for permission to fileadditional affidavit)SLP(C)No.5340/2002-(With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP andc/delay in refiling SLP and substitution of deceased respondent No.2 and exemption from filing c/copy of the reference order andoffice report)SLP(C)Nos.1909-1917 and 13041 of 2002 and 19492/2003-(With officereport)SLP(C)Nos.6029-6033/2002SLP(C)Nos.6034-6035/2002-(With appln.(s) for substitution of LRs.of deceased respondent No.2 and exemption from filing referenceorder and office report)SLP(C)Nos.7584-7585/2002-(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and permission to place addl. documents on record and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)SLP(C)Nos.15191-15193/2002-(-(With appln.(s) for c/delay infiling SLP and office report)SLP(C)No.4080/2003-(With appln.(s) for substitution and officereport)Date : 12/01/2004 These Petitions were called on for hearing today...2/-.2.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVARAJ V. PATIL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.M. DHARMADHIKARI For Petitioner (s)Ms. Deep Shikha Bharti, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, Adv.Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv.Mr. Gian Singh, Adv.Mr. S.M. Hooda, Adv.Mr. R.C. Kaushik, Adv.Mr. B.D. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv.Ms. Shilpa Chohan, Adv.Ms. Lalita Kaushik, Adv.Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv.Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. For Respondent (s)Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Adv.Ms. Kavita Wadia, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Substitution application for bringing LRs. of petitioner No.1 is allowed.Issue notice to the proposed LRs. of deceased respondent No.2.Issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents in these matters. Four weeks' time is granted to the respondent-State to file counter affidavit.List these matters after service on all the respondents is complete. Sarita (Shelly Sengupta) Court Master

LSLP(C)... 8453 OF 2003ITEM No.7 Court No. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)...(CC.8453/2003) (From the judgement and order dated 11/10/2002 in LPA 1144/01 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) SAVITRI DEVI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA Respondent (s)( for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report ) Date : 09/10/2003 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. LAHOTI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MATHUR For Petitioner (s) Mrs.Amita Gupta,Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned.Issue notice.Tag with SLP(C) Nos. 1873-1887/2002. (Ajay Kr. Jain) (Suraj Parkash) Court MasterCourt Master

\232 SLP(C)No. 1873-1887 OF 2002ITEM No.23 Court No. 4 SECTION IVB A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1873-1887/2002 (From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA,LPA 252/01,LPA 238/01, 243,248, 471,509, 535, 536, 537, 740, 847,1118, 1120, 1126/01 and dated 28.11.2000 in LPA 1273/99 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) CHANDGI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)( With Office Report ) WithSLP(C)No.13041/2002,SLP(C)No.15191-15193/2002,SLP(C)No.1909-1917/2002,SLP(C)No.4080/2003,SLP(C)No.5340/2002,SLP(C)No.6029-6033/2002,SLP(C)No.6034-6035/2002,SLP(C)No.7584-7585/2002,SLP(C)No.952-953/2002(With appln. for permission to file additional affidavit)(With appln. for C/delay in filing SLP and C/delay in refiling SLP and substitution of decesased respondent No.2 and exemption from filing c/c of the reference order and office report) Date : 07/03/2003 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. SINGH For Petitioner (s) Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Ms. Shilpa Chohan,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh,Adv. Ms. Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. B.D. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Bhava Dutt Sharma,Adv. For Respondent (s) Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. J.P. Dhanda,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Rai,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RL....L.....I............T.......T.......T.......T.......T......J.SP2 Adjourned by four weeks..SP1 (Ganga Thakur) (Prem Prakash) P.S.to Registrar Court Master

*ITEM No.17 Court No. 6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)...CC 1699/2003 (From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2000 in LPA 1469/00 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) JAI NARAIN (D) BY LRS. & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s) ( With Appln(s). for permission to file SLP and substitution ) ( With Office Report ) Date : 21/02/2003 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. SINGH For Petitioner (s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RL....L.....I............T.......T.......T.......T.......T......J.SP2 Permission to file SLP is granted. Issue notice on application for condonation of delay, SLP and substitution. Tag with SLP(C) Nos. 7584-85/02..SP1 (Ganga Thakur) (Prem Prakash) P.S.to Registrar Court Master

¾ SLP(C)No. 13041 OF 2002ITEM No.12 Court No. 9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.13041/2002 (From the judgement and order dated 04/02/2002 in LPA 2227/01 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) RISAL SINGH Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)( With Office Report ) Date : 29/07/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. LAHOTI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH KUMAR For Petitioner (s) Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R............L.........I..............................................J.SP2 Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) Nos. 1873-1887/2002..SP1............L.........T..............................................J (Ajay Kr. Jain) (Radha R. Bhatia) Court Master Court Master

4SLP(C)... 5696 OF 2002ITEM No.13 Court No. 8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)...CC 5696/2002(From the judgement and order of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH in LPA Nos. 1597/2001 passed on 22.3.2001 and LPA 956/02 &1401/01 passed on 4.2.2002) MISRI DEVI AND ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. Respondent (s) With I.A. 1 (C/delay in filing SLP ) (With Office Report) Date : 22/07/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. LAHOTI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH KUMAR For Petitioner (s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Suresh C. Gupta,Adv. Ms. Shilpa Chohan,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.....J..SP2 Issue notice in SLP as well as on application seeking condonation of delay. Tag with SLP(C).....CC 2648-2649/02..SP1 (N.K. Goel) (Radha R. Bhatia) Court Master Court Master

Ì SLP(C)No. 1873-1887 OF 2002ITEM No.39 Court No. 9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1873-1887/2002(From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA Nos.252, 243,246, 471, 509, 535, 537, 740, 847, 1118, 1120, 1126 of 2001 and in LPANo .1273/99 on 28.11.2000 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH) CHANDGI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)( With Office Report ) WithSLP(C)No.1909-1917/2002(with office report) ,SLP(C)No.5340/2002(withappln. for c/delay in filing SLP and C/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report), SLP(C)No.6029-6033/2002, SLP(C)No.6034-6035/2002(withoffice report) ,SLP(C)No.7584-7585/2002(with appln. for c/delay infiling SLP and office report),SLP(C)No.952-953/2002 Date : 26/04/2002 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.M. DHARMADHIKARI For Petitioner (s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Chohan, Adv. Mrs. Lalitha Kaushik, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Gian Singh, Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Bhava Dutt Sharma, Adv. For Respondent (s) Mr. J.P. Dhanda, Adv. Mr. K.P. Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....J.SP2 Mr. K.P. Singh, Advocate takes notice on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in all the matters and seeks four weeks' time for filing counter-affidavit. Time is granted as prayed for. Two weeks thereafter is granted for filing rejoinder-affidavit, if any..SP1 (Pawan Kumar) (Prem Prakash) Court Master Court Master

SLP(C)... 2648-2649 OF 2002ITEM No.2 Court No.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)...CC 2648-2649/2002(From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA 231/01 and LPA251/01 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) GOVERDHAN DASS & ANR. Petitioner (s) VERSUS HARYANA STATE & ANR. Respondent (s)With I.A. No.1-2 ( for c/delay in filing SLP )( With Office Report ) Date : 05/04/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DORAISWAMY RAJU For Petitioner (s) Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....J.SP2 Issue notice on SLP as well as on delay. Tag with SLP(C) No...CC 279-282/2002..SP1 (Pawan Kumar) (Prem Prakash) Court Master Court Master

\230 SLP(C)No. 1909-1917 OF 2002ITEM No.14 & 62 Court No. 5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1909-1917/2002(From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA 257,262,265-66,466, 478-79,523-24/2001 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) LACHHMAN SINGH AND ORS Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent (s) ( With Office Report ) With SLP(C) .../2002 (CC 1726) (With Appln. for permission to file SLP) Date : 11/02/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISHESHWAR PRASAD SINGH For Petitioner (s) Mr. A. Sharan, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....J.SP2 List the matters after two weeks..SP1 (S. Thapar) ( Janki Bhatia) PS to Registrar Court Master

" SLP(C)No. 952-953 OF 2002ITEM No.27 Court No. 5 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.952-953/2002 (From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA 476/01 and 1117/2001 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) NARAIN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)(With prayer for interim relief) Date : 28/01/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAJENDRA BABU HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMA PAL For Petitioner (s) Mr. Manoj Swarup,Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R............L......I..................................................J.SP2 Issue notice. Tag on with SLP(C)..CC..279-282/2002..SP1 (Meenu Sethi) (Om Prakash) Court Master Court Master

SLP(C)... 279-282 OF 2002ITEM No.7 Court No. 4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CC 279-282 Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)....../2002 (From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2001 in LPA,LPA 252/01,LPA 238/01,RFA 2429/97,LPA 246/01,RFA 59/97,LPA 509/01,RFA 1095/98,LPA 535/01,LPA 536/01,LPA 537/01,LPA 847/01,LPA 1118/01,LPA 1120/01,LPA 1126/01,LPA 1273/99,LPA 243/01,RFA 655/97 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) CHANDGI & ORS. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent (s)(With prayer for interim relief)( With Appln(s). for c/delay in filing SLP )( With Office Report ) Date : 25/01/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.T. THOMAS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. PHUKAN For Petitioner (s) For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

DEVENDER KUMAR . v. STATE OF HARYANA .

Full Judgment Text

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status