Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1369 of 2018 Arvind Kumar Tiwari & Ors. .... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. …. Respondent (s) WITH Writ Petition (Civil) No.1330 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.606 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.1488 of 2018 Writ Petition (Civil) No.42 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.41 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.339 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.267 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.330 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.376 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.487 of 2019 Writ Petition (Civil) No.754 of 2019 1 | Page
J U D G M E N T L. NAGESWARA RAO, J. 1. The complaint of the Writ Petitioners is that their result/ marks of “Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) Ranker’s Examination 2000-2008” have not been declared. The further grievance of the Petitioners is that the benefit of the judgment dated 30.01.2017 of this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.45 of 2016 ( Raghuraj Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. ) has not been extended to them. 2. A Notification was issued on 12.06.2010 by U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board (for short “the Board”) for selection to 5389 posts of Sub Inspector (Civil Police) Rankers’ by promotion from eligible Constables and Head Constables on the basis of a Departmental examination. The vacancies pertained to the years 2000-2008. Constables and Head Constables who completed a period of three years’ service on the first day of the year of recruitment and who have not attained 40 years of age were eligible to take part in the selection. Recruitment to posts of Sub-Inspectors is governed by Uttar Pradesh Sub-Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules, 2008 (for short “the Rules”). Rule 5 2 | Page
thereof provides that 50% of the posts of Sub-Inspectors shall be filled up by direct recruitment and the remaining 50% by promotion on the basis of Departmental examination from amongst substantially appointed Head Constables and Constables of the Uttar Pradesh Civil Police/ Armed Police/ Armed Police Mounted Police/ P.A.C. Procedure for recruitment by promotion to the post of Sub-Inspector is governed by Rule 16 of the Rules according to which the Board shall conduct a written examination. The written examination shall carry 300 marks. The allocation of marks is as follows: 1. Hindi Essay (based on Law and Order case study and police functioning) - 100 marks 2. Basic Law, Construction and Police Procedure (Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, Evidence Act and Police Manual etc.) – 100 marks 3. Numerical and Mental Ability Test – 50 marks 4. Mental Aptitude Test/ I.Q. Test/ Responding – 50 marks 3. Except the subject Hindi Essay, questions of other subjects would be of objective type. Note 2 to Rule 16(2) stipulates that a candidate who fails to obtain minimum 50% marks in each subject shall not be eligible for promotion. 4. The examination was conducted on 13.03.2011. The Board issued a Notification on 20.04.2011 cancelling 08 questions which were found to be incorrect. Thereafter, 3 | Page
another Notification was issued by the Board on 26.05.2011 cancelling 18 questions which were found to be incorrect. On 11.06.2011, the result of the written examination was declared and 3891 candidates were selected out of whom 3351 candidates qualified after going through the physical test and group discussion. 5. A Writ Petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by some of the unsuccessful candidates to set aside the result of the written examination. They complained of irregularities in the conduct of written examination. The cancellation of 18 questions was the main point taken by the Writ Petitioners. As the cancellation of questions was not due to any mistake of the candidates, a learned Single Judge of the High Court directed the Board to award full marks for the cancelled questions. Having been informed that there were several vacancies, the Respondents-therein were permitted to send the Writ Petitioners for training if found eligible after revision of the list. The said judgment of the learned Single Judge was challenged by a Special Appeal before the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Court, vide interim order dated 30.08.2012, stayed the operation of the judgment of the learned Single Judge and directed that no person shall be sent for training. The State of U.P. 4 | Page
approached this Court questioning the order passed by the Division Bench on 30.08.2012. This Court set aside the order of the Division Bench on 07.10.2013. 6. By an order dated 18.07.2014, this Court took note of the ongoing litigation pertaining to the selection to the posts of Sub-Inspectors by promotion in the State of Uttar Pradesh and issued the following directions: (a) The posts that have been filled up by successful candidates as has been apprised to us at the Bar are 3358 and the candidates who have joined in the said posts and presently working shall not be disturbed. (b) The U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow shall scrutinize the papers of all the Candidates, namely, the persons, who had approached the Writ Court and the Candidates who had not approached the Writ Court and if they have attempted and answered the 18 questions which were wrongly set out, they will be awarded full marks for said 18 questions. 5 | Page
(c) If a candidate has not answered any erroneous question, the same shall be proportionately reduced. To clarify, the candidate shall only get full marks of questions answered. (d) A fresh select list shall be drawn up taking into account the aforesaid marks in respect of 2031 posts which are available in present pertaining to the year 2008. (e) The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of three months, hence the successful candidates shall be duly intimated and subsequent action shall be taken by the State. 7. From the 3358 candidates who were declared successful by a Notification dated 11.06.2011, 3248 candidates actually joined. 110 candidates who were not permitted to join due to their crossing the age of 40 years, were given the benefit of relaxation of age pursuant to an order passed by this Court. In Writ Petition (Civil) No.45/ 2016 Raghuraj Singh (supra), this Court directed the Petitioners to be accommodated in the existing vacancies of Sub-Inspectors (Civil Police) Ranker if they have obtained 6 | Page
marks between 190.16667 and 223.33333. It is clear from a perusal of the order that the Petitioners therein were qualified for being selected and promoted as Sub-Inspectors (Civil Police) Ranker. 8. These Writ Petitions have been filed seeking a direction that the order passed in Raghuraj Singh (supra) should be extended to them after declaring the marks obtained by them. The contention of the Petitioners is that there are several unfilled vacancies. It was submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that there is no reason for which their marks are not declared. It was submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that there can be no objection for declaring their marks and their promotion if they are found eligible. Finally, it was argued on behalf of the Petitioners that they are entitled for the same order that was passed in Raghuraj Singh (supra) in Writ Petition (Civil) No.45/ 2016. On behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh, it was contended that the Petitioners are not entitled for the relief sought as they did not qualify in the selection of the test. According to the Respondents, the selection test is conducted in four stages. In the first stage of written examination, the candidates failing to obtain 50% marks in each of the four subjects prescribed for written examination shall be filtered out and the candidates 7 | Page
obtaining minimum 50% marks in every subject shall be included in the list of candidates for physical ability test. The learned counsel appearing for the State referred to a decision of the Board dated 22.02.2011 according to which the papers of objective type answer sheets will be evaluated initially. The Hindi Essay answer sheet will be taken up for evaluation thereafter only of those candidates who have obtained minimum 50% in each of the subjects which are of objective type. In other words, the candidates who do not secure minimum 50% marks in the three objective type subjects shall be disqualified and the examination paper for Hindi Essay shall not be evaluated. Initially, the marks of the candidates who were declared unsuccessful in the examination was not declared. By a Notification dated 17.05.2019, the Board uploaded the marks of all unsuccessful candidates. Several applications were filed seeking information relating to the marks obtained by them in the written examination. In response to the applications filed by 1815 candidates, marks have been given to 1637 candidates. 9. The scheme of the examination conducted for selection by promotion to the post of Sub-Inspectors of Police is in accordance with Rule 16 of the said Rules. There are three 8 | Page
subjects which are categorized as objective type. Note 2 of Rule 16 provides that a candidate who fails to obtain minimum of 50% marks in each subject shall not be eligible for promotion. The decision of the Board dated 22.02.2011 makes it clear that unless a candidate obtains minimum 50% marks in the objective type subjects, they shall not be entitled to seek evaluation of the Hindi Essay Subject. Such of those candidates who failed to secure 50% marks in the objective type subjects stood disqualified. The Writ Petitioners are in such category. Therefore, their Hindi Essay paper was not evaluated and the marks were not declared. The decision of the Board was taken prior to the date of the examination and no fault can be found with the same. More than 50,000 candidates appeared for the examination and the short-listing of the candidates in stages is within the domain of the Board and cannot said to be arbitrary and discriminatory. 10. The Petitioners are not entitled for extension of the order passed in Raghuraj Singh (supra). There is no dispute about the fact that the Petitioners-therein were qualified. Whereas, in these writ petitions the Petitioners could not secure 50% marks in the objective type subjects and therefore are not entitled to seek evaluation of the Hindi 9 | Page
Essay paper. Yet another point pertaining to the ambiguity in the process of conducting written examination was raised on behalf of some of the Petitioners. It was argued that subjects C and D were clubbed as one paper. However, they were treated as separate subjects for assessment whether the candidate has secured minimum 50% marks. It is clear from Rule 16 that there are four different subjects and the note to the Rule provides that the candidates should secure 50% marks in each of the subjects to be qualified. Therefore, subjects C and D cannot be clubbed together. It is clear from the sample papers circulated to the candidates much in advance that subjects C and D would be treated separately though both the subjects were clubbed for the purpose of holding examination. Certain errors that were made in the preparation of the list were pointed out by the Petitioners. These Writ Petitions relate to the selection conducted for promotion to the post of Sub-Inspectors pursuant to an advertisement issued in 2010. We are informed by the State Government that the scheme of the examination has also undergone a change. By an order dated 02.12.2020 in SLP (C) No. 28838/2019, this Court refused to entertain any challenge to the same selection process on the ground that several years have gone by. Selections conducted more than 10 | Page
a decade earlier cannot be the subject matter of interference by this Court. 11. For the aforementioned reasons, the Writ Petitions are dismissed. .....................................J. [ L. NAGESWARA RAO ] .....................................J. [ ANIRUDDHA BOSE ] New Delhi, July 26, 2021. 11 | Page
1 ITEM NO.1501 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) ([HEARD BY: HON. L. NAGESWARA RAO AND HON. ANIRUDDHA BOSE, JJ.] ) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1330/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 339/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 267/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 330/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 376/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 487/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 606/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 754/2019 (X) Date : 26-07-2021 These petitions were called on for pronouncement of judgment today. For the parties : Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr. Ajay Bansal Adv Mr.Pawan Shukla Adv Mr. Gaurav Yadava Adv Ms. Veena Bansal Adv Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr Dinesh Diwivedi. Sr Adv Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv Mr. Manish Shankar Srivastav, Adv Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mugdal, Adv Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv
2 Ms. Garima Prashad, Sr. Adv Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv Mr. Pawan kumar Shukla, Adv Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Siddharth Krishna Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Vibha Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Adv Mr. Ashish Kumar Sinha, Adv Binita Jaiswal, Adv Mr. Md. Shahid Anwar, AOR Mr. Syed Rehan, Adv. Mr. Intakhab Alam, Adv Mr. Mohammad Naseem Mughal, Adv. Mr. Rshid Izhar, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Manohar Pratap, Advocate Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr. Alok Singh, Adv Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao pronounced the Non-Reportable Judgment of the Bench comprising His Lordship and Hon’ble Mr. Justice
3 Aniruddha Bose. The writ petitions are dismissed in terms of the Signed Non-Reportable Judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Geeta Ahuja) (Anand Prakash) Court Master Court Master (Signed Non-Reportable Judgment is placed on the file)
1 ITEM NO.6 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with applns. for exemption from filing affidavit and intervention/impleadment) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1330/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 606/2019 (X) (with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) (with applns. for exemption from filing affidavit and intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) (with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) (with applns. for intervention/impleadment, impleading party, exemption from filing O.T., exemption from filing affidavit) W.P.(C) No. 339/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 267/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 330/2019 (X) (with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 376/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 487/2019 (X) (with applns. for intervention/impleadment, exemption from filing O.T.) W.P.(C) No. 754/2019 (X) (with applns. for intervention/impleadment, impleading party, exemption from filing O.T., exemption from filing affidavit) Date : 13-07-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dave,Sr. Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR
2 Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv Mr. Pawan kumar Shukla, Adv Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Garima Prashad, Sr.Adv./AAG Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Md. Shahid Anwar, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Ra kesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Amit Upreti, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Arguments concluded. Judgment reserved. Written submissions, if any, be filed by 16.07.2021. (B.Parvathi) (Beena Jolly) Court Master Court Master
1 ITEM NO.10 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with applns. for exemption from filing affidavit and intervention/ impleadment) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1330/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 606/2019 (X) (with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) (with applns. for intervention/impleadment and exemption from filing affidavit) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) ( with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) (with applns.for intervention/impleadment, exemption from filing O.T. ) W.P.(C) No. 339/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 267/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 330/2019 (X) (with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 376/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 487/2019 (X) (with applns.for intervention/impleadment, exemption from filing O.T. ) W.P.(C) No. 754/2019 (X) (with applns.for exemption from filing o.t., intervention/impleadment, exemption from filing affidavit ) Date : 17-02-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT For the parties : Mr. Atmaram NS Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr. S.S Rebello, Adv Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR
2 Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. V. Shekhar Sr. Adv Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Adv Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana,AOR Mr. A.Deb Kumar, Adv Ms. Garima Prashad, AOR Ms. Deepa, Adv Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv Mr. Ajay Bansal Adv Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla Adv Mr. Gaurav Yadava Adv Ms. Veena Bansal Adv MR. Raj Singh Rana AOR Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Md.Shahid Anwar, AOR Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv Mr. Vivek Bhojajka, Adv Mr. Pran Krishna Jana, Adv Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR Mr. Prashant Shukla Adv Mr. Suyash Srivastava Adv Ms. Shreya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Madhumay Mishra Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR
3 Mr. Abhishek Puri, Adv. Ms. Reeta Puri, Adv. Ms. Smriti Puri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv Mr. Alok Singh, Adv Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR Mr. Apsal Ansari, Adv. Md. Shahid Anwar,AOR Mr. Syed Rehan, Adv Mohd Naseem Mugha, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 25.03.2021. (B.Parvathi) (Beena Jolly) Court Master Court Master
1 ITEM NO.28 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With applns for exemption from filing affidavit, intervention/ impleadment) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1330/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 606/2019 (X) (with appln.for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 487/2019 (X) (With appls.for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T.,for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 376/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 330/2019 (X) (for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No.339/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 267/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) (With appls.for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T.,for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) (with appln. for intervention/impleadment) W.P.(C) No.1488/2018 (X) (With applns for exemption from filing affidavit, intervention/ impleadment)
2 W.P.(C) No. 754/2019 (X) (with applns. for exemption from filing, intervention/impleadment , exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 12-01-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For the parties : Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv Mr. Satyam Pandey, Adv Mr. D.N. Dubey, Adv Ms. Madhubala, Adv Mr. Atul Khaneja, Adv Mr. D. K. Pandey, Adv Mr. Atmaram N.S Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr. S.S Rebello, Adv Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. R.P. Singal Sr. Adv Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey Adv. Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana,AOR Mr. Gaurav Agrawal Adv Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey Adv. Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Maninder Dubey Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana,AOR Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR
3 Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv Mr. Alok Singh, Adv Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Md. Shahid Anwar, AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Prashant Shukla Adv Mr. Suyash Srivastava Adv Shreya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh Adv Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Bharti, Adv. Ms. Garima Prashad, AOR Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv Mr. A. Dev Kumar, Adv Ms. Deepa, Adv Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv Mrs. Garima Prashad, AOR Mr. Manohar Pratap, Adv Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 17.02.2021. Additional documents, if any, be filed in the meanwhile. (Geeta Ahuja) (Beena Jolly) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1330/2019 RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION ) Date :22-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List along with W.P.© No. 1369 of 2018. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
REVISED ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1330/2019 RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION ) Date :22-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. Ram Awadh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kr. Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List along with W.P.© No. 1369 of 2018. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1330/2019 RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION ) Date :22-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List along with W.P.© No. 1369 of 2018. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.14 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 5604/2019 RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.156163/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ) Date : 24-10-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. Registry to proceed further. (SUSHMA KUMARI BAJAJ) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
WP(C) 1369/2018 etc. 1 ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondents (IA No. 19452/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 183190/2018 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 180310/2018 – INTERVENTION /IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 142394/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 132125/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No. 80354/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) (IA No. 32502/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 12724/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 8214/2019 – INTERVENTION /IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 76384/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 63728/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 52119/2019 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 36627/2019 – INTERVENTION /IMPLEADMENT and IA No. 33633/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) (IA No. 36938/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) (IA No. 33644/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No. 33643/ 2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) W.P.(C) No. 339/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 267/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 330/2019 (X) (IA No. 85944/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) W.P.(C) No. 376/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 487/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 606/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 754/2019 (X) Date : 23-10-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv.
WP(C) 1369/2018 etc. 2 Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Sanjeet Paliwal, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. P.N. Puri, Adv. Mrs. Reeta Dewan Puri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Puri, Adv. Mr. Jaswant Singh, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR For Respondents Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Alok Singh, Adv. Dr. Amrender Pratap Yadav, Adv. Ms. Manju Sharma Jetley, AOR Mr. Ombir Singh, Adv. Mr. Manju Nath, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR Mr. Narender Kumar Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. D.K. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Omkar Prasad, Adv. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. (AOR) Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Ms. Garima Prashad, AOR Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv. Ms. A. Deepa, Adv. Mr. Jahar Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr. Suyash Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Md. Shahid Anwar, AOR Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR
WP(C) 1369/2018 etc. 3 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has circulated a letter seeking adjournment in the matter by four weeks to file rejoinder affidavit. The prayer is allowed. (Deepak Guglani) (Anand Prakash) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) With WP(C) No.1488/2018 Date : 31-07-2019 These petitions were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jamshed P. Cama, Sr. Adv. (mentioned by) Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, list these matters on 23.10.2019 before the appropriate Bench. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Civil) No.754/2019 CONSTABLE PNO 920690754 AKHILESH KUMAR TRIPATHI & ORS.Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 02-07-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Raghunath Das Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Makrand Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with Writ Petition (Civil) No.1369 of 2018. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Civil) No.606/2019 CONSTABLE PNO 980510940 RAKESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION ) Date : 09-05-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. For Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with W.P.(C) No.1369 of 2018. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 339/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 267/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 330/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 376/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 487/2019 (X) Date : 07-05-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manohar Pratap,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr.Pawan Kumar Shukla,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AOR Ms.Aparna Trivedi,Adv. Mr. Vishal Prasad,AOR ……..2
ITEM NO.42 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1369/2018, 1488/2018, 41/2019 & 42/2019 Four week’s time, as a last chance, is given to all respondents to file counter affidavit. Matters be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Court as per rules after expiry of four weeks. Writ Petition(c) No.376/2019 The office report indicates that service of notice is complete upon all the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mrs. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AOR undertakes to appear for all the above respondents. She seeks and is given two week’s time to file vakalatnama and four week’s time to file counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to provide copy of pleadings to the above respondent within one week after filing vakalatnama. Writ Petition(c) No.267, 330 & 339/2019 All the respondents are granted four weeks’ time, to file counter affidavit. Writ Petition(c) No.487/2019 Service of notice already issued to all the respondents is awaited. However, Mrs. Swarupama Chaturvedi, AOR undertakes to appear for all the above respondents. She seeks and is given two week’s time to file vakalatnama and four week’s time to file counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to provide copy of pleadings to the above respondent within one week after filing vakalatnama. List the matter again on 18.10.2019. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar SB
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(Civil) No. 487/2019 LNK PNO 980580279 GYAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date :22-04-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr.Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumr Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vivek vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with WP(C) No. 1369/2018. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI ] A.R.-cum-P.S. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 376/2019 NK PNO 930540342 RAMPAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION ) Date : 05-04-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv. For Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with WP(C) No.1369/2018. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.15, 15.1 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 330/2019 CONSTABLE PNO 940560389 DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV & ORS.Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) WITH W.P.(C) No. 339/2019 (X) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 25-03-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Shisodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with WP(C) No. 1369/2018. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Kumari Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 267/2019 CONSTABLE PNO 930580144 SANJAY KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date :08-03-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with WP(C) No. 1369/2018. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Kumari Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar
ITEM NO.54 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY W. P. (C) NO. 1488 OF 2018, 41 AND 42 OF 2019 ARE TO BE LISTED ON 21/02/2019 VIDE LD REGISTRAR COURTS ORDER DATED 08/01/2019 ) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) W.P.(C) No. 41/2019 (X) Date : 21-02-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishal Prasad,Adv. Mr.Raj Singh Rana,Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar,Adv. Ms. Aparna Trivedi,Adv. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi,Adv.
ITEM NO.54 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R W.P.(C) Nos. 1488/2018 and W.P.(C) Nos. 41 and 42/2019 S ervice of notice is complete qua all the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of all respondents. She seeks and is given two weeks’ time to file vakalatnama and four weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. List again on 7.5.2019. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar MG
ITEM NO.21, 21.1 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 41/2019 SHIVENDRA PAL SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH W.P.(C) No. 42/2019 (X) Date : 18-01-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Satpal Singh, AOR Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ram Anugrah Singh, Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with WP(C) No. 1488/2018. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Kumari Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar
ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 (X) Date : 08-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishal Prasad,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R W.P.(C) No. 1369/2018 S ervice of notice is complete qua all the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to all the respondents. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that in W.P.(C) No. 1488/2018 the respondents are the same as arrayed in W.P.(C) No. 1369/2018. Registry to verify the same and report accordingly. List again on 21.2.2019. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar MG
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).1488/2018 CONSTABLE SATYAVEER SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.178987/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) Date : 02-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable six weeks. Tag with W.P.(Civil) No.1369 of 2018. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Civil) No.1369/2018 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.162892/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 22-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Soli J. Sorabjee, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pallavi Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR