Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2016 / Diary 10054

RAJNI BALA v. SUMIT GULATI .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10054/2016

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

28-03-2017

Bench

Petitioner

RAJNI BALA

Respondent

SUMIT GULATI .

Primary Holding

Under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code, matrimonial proceedings pending before a court in one State may be transferred to a court in another State where the convenience of the parties, particularly the wife, so warrants.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 PDF 10 PDF 11 PDF 12 PDF 13 PDF 14 PDF 15 PDF 16 PDF 17 PDF 18 PDF 19 PDF 20 PDF 21 PDF 22 PDF 23 PDF 24 PDF 25 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMIT GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (wife). Although the service is complete on both the respondents, yet nobody appeared for them when the matter was called out. This petition under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code read with Order XLI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 has been filed by the petitioner (the wife) for transfer of proceedings in H.M.A. No.DMC/138/2016 titled as “Sumit Gulati vs. Rajni Bala & Anr.” pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, Punjab to the Family Court, Rohini Court, Delhi. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the grounds taken in the transfer petition, we direct transfer of the aforesaid case being H.M.A. No.DMC/138/2016 titled as “Sumit Gulati vs. Rajni Bala & Anr.” pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, Punjab to the Family Court, Rohini Court, Delhi. Let the record of the case be transferred without delay. The Transfer Petition is allowed in the afore-stated terms. ......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J ( ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ) NEW DELHI; 28TH MARCH, 2017.

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMIT GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) Date: 28/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR (Not Present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. . (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed Order is placed on the file)

SECTION – XVIA   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    LISTED ON :    28­03­2017      CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION      COURT NO :     6                              ITEM No.    :      4 TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 576     OF  2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2016 (Application for ex­parte Stay) RAJNI BALA .....Petitioner VERSUS                  SUMIT GULATI & ANR. .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13­04­2016,   when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ “ Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of further proceedings in HMA No.DMC/138/2016 titled as “Sumit Gulati vs Ms. Rajni Bala & Anr” pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, Punjab.” Accordingly, notice was issued to the both respondents through Regd. A.D. Post on 28­04­2016. It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing the said notice has been received back from respondent No. 1. It is further submitted that Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate has on  30­08­2016 filed vakalatnama and Memo of appearance alongwith Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent NO. 2.  Copy of the Counter Affidavit has been included in the paper books. Thereafter, the Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on  08­12­2016  ,  when he was pleased to pass the following Order:­   “Last opportunity is granted to learned counsel for the  petitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice on respondent no. 1 within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. Dasti, in addition, is also allowed. Respondent no. 2 has already filed counter affidavit. List again on 27.01.2017. ” Accordingly, Fresh Notice was issued to the Respondent No. 1 through Registered A.D. post on 23­12­2016 as well as dasti on 21­12­2016. It is submitted that notice has not been delivered to the Respondent NO. 1  as per track report of Postal Authority.  Contd...2/­

­2­ It is further submitted that unserved registered cover containing the said notice has been received from the respondent No. 1 from the postal authority with remarks “Refused ”. It is further submitted that Mr. Shreepal Singh, Advocate  for sole petitioner has on 23­01­2017 filed proof of affidavit of dasti service stating therein that Rajni Bala, Sole petitioner has on 9­1­2017 went to the home of respondent No. 1 and served him the dasti notice personally, by signing and Left thumb impression on the notice. Lastly, the Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on  27­01­2017  ,  when  the following Order was passed:­ “None appears for respondent No.1, despite due service. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.” Service of show cause notice is complete by dasti service on respondent No. 1. Service of show cause notice is complete on both the respondents. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the  27 th  day of March, 2017.                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :   Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Advocate      Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate mc    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

FIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMIT GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)O R D E RWe have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(wife).Although the service is complete on both the respondents, yetnobody appeared for them when the matter was called out.This petition under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Coderead with Order XLI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 has been filedby the petitioner (the wife) for transfer of proceedings in H.M.A.No.DMC/138/2016 titled as ⬠SSumit Gulati vs. Rajni Bala & Anr.⬠\235pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar,Punjab to the Family Court, Rohini Court, Delhi.After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner andtaking into consideration the grounds taken in the transferpetition, we direct transfer of the aforesaid case being H.M.A.No.DMC/138/2016 titled as ⬠SSumit Gulati vs. Rajni Bala & Anr.⬠\235pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar,Punjab to the Family Court, Rohini Court, Delhi.Let the record of the case be transferred without delay. The Transfer Petition is allowed in the afore-stated terms. ......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J ( ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ) NEW DELHI; 28TH MARCH, 2017.ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMIT GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for stay and office report)Date: 28/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR (Not Present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER(Signed Order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 27/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for respondent No.1, despite due service. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION – XVIA   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    LISTED ON :    27­01­2015      CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION      COURT NO :       R­1                              ITEM No.    :      38 TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 576     OF  2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2016 (Application for ex­parte Stay) RAJNI BALA .....Petitioner VERSUS                  SUMIT GULATI & ANR. .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on  08­12­2016  ,  when he was pleased to pass the following Order:­   “Last opportunity is granted to learned counsel for the  petitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice on respondent no. 1 within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. Dasti, in addition, is also allowed. Respondent no. 2 has already filed counter affidavit. List again on 27.01.2017. ” Accordingly, Fresh Notice was issued to the Respondent No. 1 through Registered A.D. post on 23­12­2016 as well as dasti on 21­12­2016. It is submitted that notice has not been delivered to the Respondent NO. 1  as per track report of Postal Authority. (Copy enclosed). It is further submitted that unserved registered cover containing the said notice has been received from the respondent No. 1 from the postal authority with remarks “Refused”. It is further submitted that Mr. Shreepal Singh, Advocate  for sole petitioner has on 23­01­2017 filed proof of affidavit of dasti service stating therein that Rajni Bala, Sole petitioner has on 9­1­2017 went to the home of respondent and served him the dasti notice personally, by signing and Left thumb impression on the notice. Service of show cause notice is complete by dasti service on respondent No. 1. Service of show cause notice is complete on both the respondents. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office Report. Dated this the  25 th  day of January, 2017.                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :   Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Advocate      Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate mc    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

bITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 27/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for respondent No.1, despite due service.Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.Registry to process the matter for being listed beforethe Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 08/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last opportunity is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice on respondent no. 1 within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. Dasti, in addition, is also allowed. Respondent no. 2 has already filed counter affidavit. List again on 27.01.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION – XVIA   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    LISTED ON :    08­12­2016      CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION      COURT NO :       R­1                              ITEM No.    :   52 TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 576     OF  2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2016 (Application for ex­parte Stay) RAJNI BALA .....Petitioner VERSUS                   SUMEET GULATI & ANR. .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on  20­10­2016  ,  when he was pleased to pass the following Order:­   “ Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1  within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter  affidavit. List again on 8.12.2016. ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps for effecting service on respondent No. 1. Hence, show cause notice could not be issued on Respondent No. 1 Service of show cause notice is not complete on Respondent  No. 1. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 05 th  day of December, 2016                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :   Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Advocate    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR MC

jITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 08/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLast opportunity is granted to learned counsel for thepetitioner to take fresh steps for service of notice on respondentno. 1 within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued.Dasti, in addition, is also allowed. Respondent no. 2 has already filed counter affidavit.List again on 27.01.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION – XVIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LISTED ON : 20-10-2016 CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION COURT NO : R-1 ITEM No. :   64 TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 576 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2016 (Application for ex-parte Stay) RAJNI BALA .....Petitioner VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. .....Respondents OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 01-09-2016 , when he was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. Await service of respondent No.1. List again on 20.10.2016. ” Accordingly, Fresh notices were issued to the both Respondents through Registered A.D. post on 08-08-2016. It is submitted that neither A.D. card nor unserved registered cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent No. 1 so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 18 th day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR MC

\202ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

\202ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

\202ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.1within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.List again on 8.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 01/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit. Await service of respondent No.1. List again on 20.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

lITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 01/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.Await service of respondent No.1.List again on 20.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.106 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps to be taken for service of both the respondents within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 1.9.2016. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar

RITEM NO.106 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGHTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFresh steps to be taken for service of both therespondents within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.List again on 1.9.2016. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016 RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for ex-parte stay) Date: 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of further proceedings in HMA No.DMC/138/2016 titled as “Sumit Gulati vs Ms. Rajni Bala & Anr” pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, Punjab. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

BITEM NO.14 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 576/2016RAJNI BALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUMEET GULATI & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for ex-parte stay)Date: 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIssue notice.In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of furtherproceedings in HMA No.DMC/138/2016 titled as Sumit Gulati vsMs. Rajni Bala & Anr pending before the Additional District &Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, Punjab.(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India