ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1222/2015 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Appellant(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 12489/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 28/01/2016 This appeal and petition were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. Mr. Sanket Yenagi, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanket Yenagi, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No. 1222 of 2015 The civil appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Special Leave Petition(C) No. 12489 of 2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this special leave petition. The prayer is allowed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S. (Signed order is placed on the file)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1222 OF 2015 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Appellant(s) Versus HUCCHAMA AND OTHERS Respondent(s) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C) NO. 12489 OF 2015 HUCHAMMA AND OTHERS Petitioner(s) Versus CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Respondent(s) O R D E R Civil Appeal No. 1222 of 2015 After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court at this stage. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. However, we give liberty to the appellant to file a review petition before the High Court for referring the matter to the Collector to decide the quantum of penalty that should be levied upon by the appellant, within one month.
-2- Special Leave Petition(C) No. 12489 of 2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this special leave petition. The prayer is allowed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ........................J. (M.Y. EQBAL) ........................J. (ARUN MISHRA) New Delhi, January 28, 2016
ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1222/2015 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Appellant(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 12489/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 28/01/2016 This appeal and petition were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. Mr. Sanket Yenagi, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanket Yenagi, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal No. 1222 of 2015 The civil appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Special Leave Petition(C) No. 12489 of 2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this special leave petition. The prayer is allowed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2016.01.3010:35:53 ISTReason: [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S. (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1222 OF 2015SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Appellant(s) VersusHUCCHAMA AND OTHERS Respondent(s) WITH
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C) NO. 12489 OF 2015HUCHAMMA AND OTHERS Petitioner(s) VersusCHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Respondent(s) O R D E R Civil Appeal No. 1222 of 2015 After hearing learned counsel for theparties, we do not find any reason to interfere withthe impugned order passed by the High Court at thisstage. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. However, we give liberty to the appellant tofile a review petition before the High Court forreferring the matter to the Collector to decide thequantum of penalty that should be levied upon by theappellant, within one month. -2- Special Leave Petition(C) No. 12489 of 2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners seekspermission to withdraw this special leave petition.The prayer is allowed. The special leave petitionis, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ........................J. (M.Y. EQBAL) ........................J. (ARUN MISHRA)New Delhi,January 28, 2016
LISTING ON 29.09.2015 COURT NO. 9 ITEM NO. 118 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 12489 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) Smt. Huchamma & Ors. ...Petitioners -Versus- Sri CHandrashekar ...Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1704.2015 with an Office Report dated 16.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “ Issue notice on application for condonation of delay as well as on special leave petition. ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent 25.04.2015 through Regd. A.D. Post. Ms. Anjana Chandrasekhar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of sole respondent. Service is complete. Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar on 11.08.2015 with an office report dated 10.08.2015, when he was pleased to pass the following Order: “ The Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent submits that he has not received the complete set of the pleadings which has prevented him to file counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the complete set of the pleadings within two weeks and file proof thereof. Upon receiving the same, the Ld. Counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks thereafter. List again on 29.10.2015. ”
-2- It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 02.09.2015 filed proof of service of pleadings on sole respondent but the sole respondent has not filed counter affidavit, so far. The matter above mentioned is listed alongwith CA No. 1222 of 2015 before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 28 th day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate Ms. Anjana Chandrasekhar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .
ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12489/2015 HUCHAMMA & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent submits that he has not received the complete set of the pleadings which has prevented him to file counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the complete set of the pleadings within two weeks and file proof thereof. Upon receiving the same, the Ld. Counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks thereafter. List again on 29.10.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar
ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12489/2015 HUCHAMMA & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 11/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent submits that he has not received the complete set of the pleadings which has prevented him to file counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the complete set of the pleadings within two weeks and file proof thereof. Upon receiving the same, the Ld. Counsel for the respondent to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks thereafter. List again on 29.10.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.08.24 (SURAJIT DEY)11:17:03 ISTReason: Registrar
ITEM NO.120 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).1222/2015 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Appellant(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 15/07/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanket Yengai, Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of both the parties, list the matter along with SLP(C)...CC No.6648 of 2015 after four weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
LISTING ON 15.07.2015 COURT NO. 12 ITEM NO. 120 SEC.IVA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2015 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU ..APPELLANT Versus HUCCHAMA AND ORS. ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07.01.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “ Leave granted. Interim order granted on 25.07.2015 shall continue. List the matter on 14th July, 2015. ” This is an appeal by Special Leave against the Judgment and Order dated 20.03.2014 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Passed in W.P. No. 27694/2012. There are three respondents. All are represented by Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate. Service is complete. The appeal above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 15 th day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekhar, Advocate 2. Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 6648/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore) HUCHAMMA & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 17/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. Mr. Sanket M. Yenagi, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on application for condonation of delay as well as on special leave petition. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
LISTING ON 17.04.2015 COURT NO. 6 ITEM NO. 25 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) CC.. NO. 6648 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Smt. Huchamma & Ors. ...Petitioners -Versus- Sri CHandrashekar ...Respondent OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the final Judgment and Order dated 20.03.2014 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in W.P. No. 27694/2012 (GM-CPC). It is submitted that Civil Appeal No. 1222/2015, arising out of SLP(C) No.17224/2014, arising out of same judgment between the cross parties was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25.07.2014 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice and the same is still pending before the Hon'ble Court (copy of order dated 25.07.2014 enclosed). It is further submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 11121/2014, arising out of SLP(C) CC.. No. 6109/2014, arising out of same judgment was dismissed as withdrawn by this Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014 (copy of order dated 21.04.2014 enclosed). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 16 th day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR -kzd
0 ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 6648/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore) HUCHAMMA & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 17/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Jain,Adv. Mr. Sanket M. Yenagi, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on application for condonation of delay as well as on special leave petition. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.04.1716:08:40 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. M s. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saket M. Yenagi, Adv. Ms. Kiruba Munusamy, Adv. Mr. Sounder Saran Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Interim order granted on 25.7.2014 shall continue. List the matter on 14 th July, 2015. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ö ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saket M. Yenagi, Adv. Ms. Kiruba Munusamy, Adv. Mr. Sounder Saran Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Interim order granted on 25.7.2014 shall continue. List the matter on 14th July, 2015. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.01.0717:14:12 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Nandakumar, Adv. Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Parivesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Saket M. Yenagi, Adv. Ms. Kiruba Munusamy, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on Wednesday, the 7 th January, 2015. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
LISTING ON 5.1.2015 COURT NO. 7 ITEM NO. 21 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 17224 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Sri. Chandrashekar @ Hanumantharaju ...Petitioner -Versus- Smt. Hutchama & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1.12.2014 with an Office Report dated 28.11.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Two weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for respondent to file counter affidavit. List thereafter.'” It is submitted that Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate has not filed further counter affidavit, so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The above mentioned matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 22 nd day of December, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, Advocate B-505, Express Greens Apartment Sector – 44, Noida 201301 2. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate 205, C.K. Daphtary Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR PC 1
& ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Nandakumar, Adv. Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Parivesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Saket M. Yenagi, Adv. Ms. Kiruba Munusamy, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on Wednesday, the 7th January, 2015. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDeepak MansukhaniDate: 2015.01.0614:56:17 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Nandakumar,Adv. Mr. R. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Parivesh Singh,Adv. Mr. Gautam Kumar,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for respondent to file counter affidavit. List thereafter. [O.P. SHARMA] [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
LISTING ON 01.12.2014 COURT NO. 7 ITEM NO. 4 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 17224 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Sri. Chandrashekar @ Hanumantharaju ...Petitioner -Versus- Smt. Hutchama & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25.07.2014 with an Office Report dated 23.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Issue notice. There shall be stay of further proceedings in OS No. 26784/2008 pending before the Court of XXVII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to Respondent Nos. 1-3 on 21.08.2014 through Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate but no Counter Affidavit filed. Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar on 07.11.2014, when he was pleased to pass the following Order: “Despite time granted by the Registrar's Court, counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of the respondents. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. However, if counter affidavit is filed within four weeks, the same be taken on record.” It is submitted that Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate has on 27.11.2014 filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondents and the same is being circulated with this report. In view of the above said order, the matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 28 th day of November, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to: 1. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, Advocate B-505, Express Greens Apartment Sector – 44, Noida 201301 2. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate 205, C.K. Daphtary Block, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR -kzd
ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite time granted by the Registrar's Court, counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of the respondents. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. However, if counter affidavit is filed within four weeks, the same be taken on record. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
ö ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite time granted by the Registrar's Court, counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of the respondents. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. However, if counter affidavit is filed within four weeks, the same be taken on record. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.11.1017:23:04 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.86 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 22/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents for filing counter affidavit. List again on 7.11.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
\200 ITEM NO.86 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 22/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents for filing counter affidavit. List again on 7.11.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.09.2417:01:16 ISTReason:
LISTING ON 25.07.2014 COURT NO. 9 ITEM NO. 25 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 17224 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Sri. Chandrashekar @ Hanumantharaju ...Petitioner -Versus- Smt. Hutchama & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the final Judgment and Order dated 20.03.2014 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in W.P. No. 27694 of 2012. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 11121 of 2014, arising out of SLP(C) CC.. No. 6109 of 2014, arising out of same judgment was dismissed as withdrawn by this Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014. Copy of same has been annexed as Annexure P-4 at Page Nos. 81-82. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 23 rd day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR -kzd
ü ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17224/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in WP No. 27694/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka at Bangalore) SRI CHANDRASHEKAR @ HANUMANTHARAJU Petitioner(s) VERSUS HUCCHAMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 25/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.V. Chandrashekar,Adv. Mr. N.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Nanda Kumar,Adv. Mr. R. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Parivesh Singh,Adv. Ms. Vedanayaki Kiran D,Adv. Mr. Prateek Gupta,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. There shall be stay of further proceedings in OS No.26784/2008 pending before the Court of XXVII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTERSignature Not Verified COURT MASTERDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2014.07.2613:26:21 ISTReason: