ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(Civil) No. 580/2013 NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s) (With office report) Date :12/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Transfer petition is disposed of as having become unnecessary. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 580 OF 2013 NEHA SHARMA ... PETITIONER VERSUS RAJAT TEJPAL ... RESPONDENTS O R D E R 1. This Transfer Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of O.P. No. 193 of 2013 titled as "Rajat Tejpal vs. Neha Sharma" pending before the Court of Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar, Andhra Pradesh. 2. We are informed by learned counsel for the parties that during the pendency of the transfer petition the parties have amicably settled all their disputes. 3. In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition for our consideration and
2 decision. Accordingly, we dispose of the Transfer Petition as having become unnecessary. 4. We direct the parties to the lis to withdraw the complaint(s)/petition(s)/ application(s) filed before various forums within 30 days from today. 5. If for any reason, any of the parties to the lis fails to withdraw the case(s), the opposite party is at liberty to approach this Court for appropriate relief(s) by filing appropriate application(s). Ordered accordingly. .......................J. [ H. L. DATTU ] .......................J. [ S.A. BOBDE ] .......................J. [ ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE ] NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER 12, 2014.
¼ ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(Civil) No. 580/2013 NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s) (With office report) Date :12/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Adv. Ms. Sweta Rani, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Transfer petition is disposed of as having become unnecessary. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2014.09.1713:30:26 ISTReason: 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 580 OF 2013 NEHA SHARMA ... PETITIONER VERSUS RAJAT TEJPAL ... RESPONDENTS O R D E R
1. This Transfer Petition is filed under Section25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seekingtransfer of O.P. No. 193 of 2013 titled as"Rajat Tejpal vs. Neha Sharma" pending beforethe Court of Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District,L.B. Nagar, Andhra Pradesh.2. We are informed by learned counsel for theparties that during the pendency of the transferpetition the parties have amicably settled alltheir disputes. 3. In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition for our consideration and 2decision. Accordingly, we dispose of theTransfer Petition as having become unnecessary.4. We direct the parties to the lis towithdraw the complaint(s)/petition(s)/application(s) filed before various forumswithin 30 days from today.5. If for any reason, any of the parties to thelis fails to withdraw the case(s), the oppositeparty is at liberty to approach this Court forappropriate relief(s) by filing appropriateapplication(s). Ordered accordingly. .......................J. [ H. L. DATTU ] .......................J. [ S.A. BOBDE ] .......................J. [ ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE ]
NEW DELHI;SEPTEMBER 12, 2014.
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 580/2013 NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 05/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr.Nihal Ahmad, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. Ms.Sweta Rani, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call on 12 th September, 2014, at the request of learned counsel for respondent. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar
æ ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 580/2013 NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 05/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr.Nihal Ahmad, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. Ms.Sweta Rani, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call on 12th September, 2014, at the request of learned counsel for respondent. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2014.09.0516:20:46 ISTReason:
¢ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for vacating stay,stay,permission to file additionaldocuments and office report )Date: 28/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Saurabh Bhardwaj, Adv. for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call the matter after six months. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar
&ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for vacating stay,stay,permission to file additionaldocuments and office report )Date: 24/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.____,Adv.(Proxy,name not given) for Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, call the matterafter four weeks. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar
\224ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,vacating stay,permission to file additionaldocuments and office report ))Date: 25/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the parties say that some more time is required for amicable resolution of the matrimonial disputes of their clients. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the parties, eight weeks' further time is allowed for the purpose of amicable settlement. List the case after ten weeks. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |
bITEM NO.52 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,vacating stay,permission to file additionaldocuments and office report)Date: 07/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Shukla,AOR UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The case is adjourned. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |
nITEM NO.50 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and vacating stay and permission to file additionaldocuments and office report)Date: 06/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDAFor Petitioner(s) Ms.Sonia Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Shukla, Adv. Mr.Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Ms.Deepali Dwivedi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the parties state that their clients havealmost settled their matrimonial disputes and decided to live together.They request for an adjournment. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the case isadjourned to 07.10.2013. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master
nITEM NO.52 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,vacating stay,and office report ))WITH I.A.NO.3(appln. permission to file additional documents)Date: 12/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,AOR.For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Alok Shukla,AOR. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondent gave out that his client has arranged for a separate accommodation and is willing to live with the petitioner without any condition. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for a short adjournment to seek instructions whether or not his client is ready and willing to live with the respondent in the separate accommodation arranged by him. List the case after ten days (23.08.2013). |(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |
0ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 580 OF 2013(for prel. hearing)NEHA SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT TEJPAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-parte stay)Date: 18/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHARAD ARVIND BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the transfer petition as also on the petitioner's prayer for interim relief, returnable on 12.07.2013. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. In the meanwhile, further proceedings in O.P. No.193 of 2013 titled Rajat Tejpal v. Neha Sharma, pending in the Court of Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Naqar within the State of Andhra Pradesh shall remain stayed. It shall be the petitioner's duty to serve the respondent before the next date of hearing failing which the interim order passed today shall stand automatically vacated. The parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre of the Supreme Court on 03.06.2013 to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement of their matrimonial dispute. The In-charge, Mediation Centre of the Supreme Court, shall submit report to this Court within next three weeks. List the case on 12.07.2013. A copy of this order be served upon the respondent along with the notice at the address given in the memo of the transfer petition. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Court Master || | | |