1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.937 of 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R This appeal has been preferred against Order dated 23.12.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, declining to quash the proceedings against the appellants registered under Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Sections 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code. A complaint has been lodged by respondent no.2, Bandi Arathi, against the appellants who are husband, parents of the husband and brother of the husband of respondent no.2. The complaint was lodged on 31.07.2008 stating that marriage between appellant no.1 and respondent no.2 took place on 09.11.2003. Out of the wedlock, a son was born. They lived at Washington, U.S.A. Respondent no.2 visited India some time in December 2005 along with her son to see her ailing father. She also visited the house of the in-laws where the family members of appellant no.1 harassed her which amounted to offence alleged.
2 It is pointed out on behalf of the appellants that proceedings were initiated by appellant-husband against respondent-wife , for the custody of the child by filing habeas corpus petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which petition was allowed on 24.09.2010. Appeal against the said order, filed by respondent no.2, was dismissed by this Court on 16.07.2013 vide Judgment in Arathi Bandi v. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao & Others – (2013) 15 SCC 790. Since, in spite of the said Judgment, respondent no.2 did not hand over the custody of the child, contempt proceedings were initiated before this Court and on 28.03.2016, this Court directed handing over of the custody of the child to appellant no.1. In view of the above background, we are satisfied that the complaint filed by respondent no.2 against the appellants is malafide and abuse of the process of the Court. The same is accordingly quashed. The appeal is allowed. .........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ..........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) New Delhi, JANUARY 19, 2017.
3 ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937 of 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (Office Report) Date : 19/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.D. Anand,Sr.Adv. Mr. S.K. Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Deepak Girdhar,Adv. Ms. Nidhi,Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. Mr. Mrityunjai Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of the signed order, these appeal is allowed: “In view of the above background, we are satisfied that the complaint filed by respondent no.2 against the appellants is malafide and abuse of the process of the Court. The same is accordingly quashed. The appeal is allowed.” (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)
ª1IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.937 of 2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)O R D E RThis appeal has been preferred against Order dated23.12.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at AndhraPradesh at Hyderabad, declining to quash the proceedingsagainst the appellants registered under Sections 4 and 6 of theDowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Sections 498-A and 506 ofIndian Penal Code. A complaint has been lodged by respondent no.2, BandiArathi, against the appellants who are husband, parents of thehusband and brother of the husband of respondent no.2. Thecomplaint was lodged on 31.07.2008 stating that marriagebetween appellant no.1 and respondent no.2 took place on09.11.2003. Out of the wedlock, a son was born. They lived atWashington, U.S.A. Respondent no.2 visited India some time inDecember 2005 along with her son to see her ailing father. Shealso visited the house of the in-laws where the family membersof appellant no.1 harassed her which amounted to offencealleged.2It is pointed out on behalf of the appellants thatproceedings were initiated by appellant-husband againstrespondent-wife , for the custody of the child by filing habeascorpus petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh whichpetition was allowed on 24.09.2010. Appeal against the saidorder, filed by respondent no.2, was dismissed by this Court on16.07.2013 vide Judgment in Arathi Bandi v. Bandi JagadrakshakaRao & Others (2013) 15 SCC 790. Since, in spite of the saidJudgment, respondent no.2 did not hand over the custody of thechild, contempt proceedings were initiated before this Courtand on 28.03.2016, this Court directed handing over of thecustody of the child to appellant no.1.In view of the above background, we are satisfied that thecomplaint filed by respondent no.2 against the appellants ismalafide and abuse of the process of the Court. The same isaccordingly quashed.The appeal is allowed..........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)..........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT)New Delhi,JANUARY 19, 2017.3ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 937 of 2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(Office Report)Date : 19/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.D. Anand,Sr.Adv.Mr. S.K. Kapoor,Adv.
Mr. Deepak Girdhar,Adv.Ms. Nidhi,Adv.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.Mr. Mrityunjai Singh,Adv.UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn terms of the signed order, these appeal is allowed: In view of the above background, we aresatisfied that the complaint filed byrespondent no.2 against the appellants ismalafide and abuse of the process of theCourt. The same is accordingly quashed.The appeal is allowed. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER(Signed order is placed on the file)
ITEM NO.61 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 16/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv. M r. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.D. Anand,Sr.Adv. Mr. Abhik Kumar,Adv. Ms. Nidhi,Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list on Thursday, the 19 th January, 2017, higher up in the list. (MAHABIR SINGH) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.61 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 16/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv.M r. Sanjay Jain,Adv.Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.D. Anand,Sr.Adv.Mr. Abhik Kumar,Adv.Ms. Nidhi,Adv.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard.At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,list on Thursday, the 19 th January, 2017, higher up in the list.(MAHABIR SINGH) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 13/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. Mr. Mrityunjai Singh,Adv. Ms. Nidhi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At request, list on Monday, the 16 th January, 2017. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 937 OF 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The appeal above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.12.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “ None appears for the respondent – State. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court in person states, that she is not in a position to engage an independent counsel, and she be provided a counsel. The Registry is directed to place the matter before the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, which shall provide an appropriate counsel to respondent no.2, within two weeks from today. The Registry shall also furnish a copy of the entire paper book to the counsel provided to respondent no.2. The telephone number of the counsel be communicated to respondent no.2 (Mobile 9900038073, email: arati.anne@gmail.com ), so as to enable her to correspond with him, in case she desires to do so. Post for hearing on 13.01.2017 .” It is submitted that pursuant to order dated 15.12.2016, a copy of the order and paper book was sent to Supreme Court Legal Services Committee and Supreme Court Legal Services Committee has appointed Ms. Nidhi, Advocate on behalf of Respondent No.2 but she has not filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No.2. However, she has on 11.1.2017 filed memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2. It is further submitted that Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Advocate is representing Respondent No.1. It is lastly submitted that Original Records from the High Court as well as from the Trial Court have been received and same are available in the Court Room for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. The Appeal is ready for hearing on SLP Cum Appeal Paper Books.
The appeal above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 12 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate 95, Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D 2.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 3.Ms. Nidhi, Advocate C2/sv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 13/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv.Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.Mr. Mrityunjai Singh,Adv.Ms. Nidhi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAt request, list on Monday, the 16 th January, 2017.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.121 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 15/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.(Not present) For RR No.2 Ms. Arathi Bandi, in person UPON hearing the counsel & in person the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for the respondent – State. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court in person states, that she is not in a position to engage an independent counsel, and she be provided a counsel. The Registry is directed to place the matter before the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, which shall provide an appropriate counsel to respondent no.2, within two weeks from today. The Registry shall also furnish a copy of the entire paper book to the counsel provided to respondent no.2. The telephone number of the counsel be communicated to respondent no.2 (Mobile 9900038073, email: arati.anne@gmail.com ), so as to enable her to correspond with him, in case she desires to do so. Post for hearing on 13.01.2017. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar) Assistant Registrar AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.121 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 15/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.(Not present)For RR No.2 Ms. Arathi Bandi, in person UPON hearing the counsel & in person the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for the respondent ⬠State.Respondent no.2, who is present in Court in personstates, that she is not in a position to engage an independentcounsel, and she be provided a counsel.The Registry is directed to place the matter before theSupreme Court Legal Services Committee, which shall provide anappropriate counsel to respondent no.2, within two weeks fromtoday. The Registry shall also furnish a copy of the entire paperbook to the counsel provided to respondent no.2. The telephonenumber of the counsel be communicated to respondent no.2 (Mobile9900038073, email: arati.anne@gmail.com ), so as to enable her tocorrespond with him, in case she desires to do so.Post for hearing on 13.01.2017. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar)Assistant Registrar AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 24/11/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Parties seek a short adjournment so as to reflect on the modalities of settlement. Post for hearing on 15 th December, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 937 OF 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27.10.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order : “ Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states, that he has already been given a No Objection Certificate whilst handing over papers of the case to respondent No.2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner as also respondent No.2 shall intimate the next date of hearing to respondent No.2 through her E-mail address, which has been expressed by respondent No.2 in the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America, wherein the said E-mail address is the address for communication. Respondent No.2 be also informed that Mr.K.Parameshwar, learned counsel, shall not appear for her hereinafter. Accordingly, the Registry shall not indicate the name of the said learned counsel as the counsel representing respondent No.2 in the cause-list hereinafter. Post for hearing on 24.11.2016 .” Accordingly, a copy of Record of Proceeding dated 27.10.2016 has been sent to Respondent No.2 and name of Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocate has been deleted from the computer. The appeal above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 21 st day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate 95, Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D 2.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 3.Mr. K. Parmeshwar, Advocate 127, Old Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D C2/sv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ÆITEM NO.102 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s).937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 24/11/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv.Mr. Vinay Arora,Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv.Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RParties seek a short adjournment so as to reflect onthe modalities of settlement.Post for hearing on 15 th December, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar
Crl.A.No.937/13 1 ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 27/10/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr.Vinay Arora, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr.Baskula Athik, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states, that he has already been given a No Objection Certificate whilst handing over papers of the case to respondent No.2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner as also respondent No.2 shall intimate the next date of hearing to respondent No.2 through her E-mail address, which has been expressed by respondent No.2 in the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America, wherein the said E-mail address is the address for communication.
Crl.A.No.937/13 2 Respondent No.2 be also informed that Mr.K.Parameshwar, learned counsel, shall not appear for her hereinafter. Accordingly, the Registry shall not indicate the name of the said learned counsel as the counsel representing respondent No.2 in the cause-list hereinafter. Post for hearing on 24.11.2016. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
@Crl.A.No.937/13 1ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s).937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 27/10/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Appellant(s) Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr.Vinay Arora, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K.Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr.Baskula Athik, Adv.Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states, that he hasalready been given a No Objection Certificate whilst handing overpapers of the case to respondent No.2.In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioneras also respondent No.2 shall intimate the next date of hearing torespondent No.2 through her E-mail address, which has beenexpressed by respondent No.2 in the proceedings pending in theSuperior Court of Washington, County of King, United States ofAmerica, wherein the said E-mail address is the address forcommunication.Crl.A.No.937/13 2Respondent No.2 be also informed that Mr.K.Parameshwar,learned counsel, shall not appear for her hereinafter.Accordingly, the Registry shall not indicate the name of the saidlearned counsel as the counsel representing respondent No.2 in thecause-list hereinafter.Post for hearing on 24.11.2016. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 937 OF 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT This is an appeal by special leave granted vide this Court's order dated 6.7.2013. It is submitted that Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on both the respondents and the said Respondents are represented by Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar and Mr. K. Parmeshwar, Advocates, respectively. It is further submitted that Original Records from the High Court as well as from the Trial Court have been received and same are available in the Court Room for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. The Counsel for the Appellant has not filed Additional Documents and the matter was listed before the Court of Registrar on 24.7.2014 when the following order was passed: “ What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although by order dated 02.04.2014 of this Court, the Ld.counsel for the parties were given four week's time as last chance to file the additional documents, yet they have not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules .” The Appeal is ready for hearing on SLP Cum Appeal Paper Books. The appeal above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 24 th day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate 95, Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D 2.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 3.Mr. K. Parmeshwar, Advocate 127, Old Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D C2/sv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRLMP.886/2016 in Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 01/07/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard learned counsel for the rival parties, we are satisfied that prayer `(a)' made in Crl.MP.No.886 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal No.937 of 2013 deserves to be allowed, inasmuch as, the passports of appellant Nos.2 and 3 should be released to them so as to enable appellant Nos.2 and 3 to get the same renewed. The instant petition is accordingly allowed to the aforesaid limited effect. It is, however, directed that appellant Nos.2 and 3 shall seek the permission of this Court before travelling abroad. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
® ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRLMP.886/2016 in Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 01/07/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.K.Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard learned counsel for the rival parties, we are satisfied that prayer `(a)' made in Crl.MP.No.886 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal No.937 of 2013 deserves to be allowed, inasmuch as, the passports of appellant Nos.2 and 3 should be released to them so as to enable appellant Nos.2 and 3 to get the same renewed. The instant petition is accordingly allowed to the aforesaid limited effect. It is, however, directed that appellant Nos.2 and 3 shall seek the permission of this Court before travelling abroad.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySATISH KUMAR YADAVDate: 2016.07.0212:30:56 TLTReason: (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRLMP. 886/2016 in Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) WITH IA Nos. 7-9/2016 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 496-498/2013 In Crl.A. No. 934-936/2013 (for directions and permission and office report) Date : 28/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR(NP) M r. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.(NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the rival parties. We are now of the view, that order dated 16.7.2013 passed by this Court needs to be implemented in letter and spirit. In the above view of the matter, as a first step to the implementation of the above order, we direct that the respondent – Arathi Bandi, who is present in Court in person, to handover the custody of her son – Anand, to the applicant – Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao forthwith. The son – Anand shall accompany Bandi Jagadrakshaka
2 Rao from the premises of this Court, and accordingly, hereinafter Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao shall be responsible for his safe custody. A copy of the list of documents, which has been furnished to the Court, by the learned counsel for the applicant, is taken on record. A copy thereof has been furnished to the learned counsel for the wife. All the documents mentioned in the list of documents shall be handed over by Arathi Bandi to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao, through his counsel against receipt, within one week from today. List for further consideration after four weeks. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar ) Court Master AR-cum-PS
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.886 OF 2016 (Application for directions) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 937 OF 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The application above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.3.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Issue notice in Crl.MP No.886 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 937 of 2013 and I.A. Nos. 7-9 of 2016 in Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 496-498 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 934-936 of 2013, returnable on 28.03.2016 .” Accordingly, show cause notice returnable on 28.3.2016 was issued to Respondents on 17.3.2016 through their respective Advocates-on-record. Service of show cause notice is complete. The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 17 th day of March, 2015. sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate 95, Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D 2.Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 3.Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastava, Advocate Library-2, S.C.I, New Delhi C2/sv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\2241ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCRLMP. 886/2016 in Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(for directions and office report)WITHIA Nos. 7-9/2016 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 496-498/2013 In Crl.A. No. 934-936/2013(for directions and permission and office report) Date : 28/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR(NP) M r. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.(NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RWe have heard learned counsel for the rival parties.We are now of the view, that order dated 16.7.2013 passedby this Court needs to be implemented in letter and spirit. In the above view of the matter, as a first step to theimplementation of the above order, we direct that the respondent ⬠Arathi Bandi, who is present in Court in person, to handover thecustody of her son ⬠Anand, to the applicant ⬠Bandi JagadrakshakaRao forthwith. The son ⬠Anand shall accompany Bandi Jagadrakshaka2Rao from the premises of this Court, and accordingly, hereinafterBandi Jagadrakshaka Rao shall be responsible for his safe custody.A copy of the list of documents, which has been furnishedto the Court, by the learned counsel for the applicant, is taken onrecord. A copy thereof has been furnished to the learned counselfor the wife. All the documents mentioned in the list of documentsshall be handed over by Arathi Bandi to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao,through his counsel against receipt, within one week from today.List for further consideration after four weeks.(Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar ) Court Master AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRLMP. 886/2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) WITH I.A. Nos. 7-9 of 2016 In CONMT.PET.(C) No. 496-498/2013 In Crl.A. No. 934-936/2013 (For directions and office report) Date : 14/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice in Crl.MP No. 886 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 937 of 2013 and I.A. Nos. 7-9 of 2016 in Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 496-498 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 934-936 of 2013, returnable on 28.03.2016. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Renuka Sadana ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
Ì ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRLMP. 886/2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) WITH I.A. Nos. 7-9 of 2016 In CONMT.PET.(C) No. 496-498/2013 In Crl.A. No. 934-936/2013 (For directions and office report) Date : 14/03/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice in Crl.MP No. 886 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 937 of 2013 and I.A. Nos. 7-9 of 2016 in Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 496-498 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 934-936 of 2013, returnable onSignature Not Verified 28.03.2016.Digitally signed by USHARANI BHARDWAJDate: 2016.03.1417:46:35 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Renuka Sadana ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
Crl.A.No.937/13 1 ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay, stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 04/01/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr.Brijendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv.(NP) Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. For Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR(NP) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.(NP) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In compliance of the Motion Bench order dated 15.12.2015, the child – Master Anand had remained at Hyderabad from 28.12.2015 to 02.01.2016. On 02.01.2016, the child was restored to his mother who, we are informed, took custody of him and left Hyderabad for Bangalore. Learned counsel for the appellants is accordingly permitted to restore the passport to the appellant.
Crl.A.No.937/13 2 Learned counsel for respondent No.2, having sought instructions from her, states that the next vacation is to commence on 01.04.2016. To provide for similar arrangement, list again on 29.03.2016 at 2.00 P.M. before the same Bench. Like hitherto before, there should be some interaction between Master Anand and his father Bandi Jagadraksha Rao (appellant No.1 herein) from now upto 29.03.2016. The parties are agreed that appellant No.1 - Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be free to converse with his son – Master Anand at SKYPE from 7.00 P.M. to 8.00 P.M. on every Saturday hereinafter. Ordered accordingly. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
ô Crl.A.No.937/13 1 ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay, stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 04/01/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr.Brijendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv.(NP) Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. For Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR(NP) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.(NP) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In compliance of the Motion Bench order dated 15.12.2015, the child - Master Anand had remained at Hyderabad from 28.12.2015 to 02.01.2016. On 02.01.2016, the child was restored to his motherSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by who, we are informed, took custody of him and left Hyderabad forSatish Kumar YadavDate: 2016.01.0518:00:02 ISTReason: Bangalore. Learned counsel for the appellants is accordingly permitted to restore the passport to the appellant.Crl.A.No.937/13 2 Learned counsel for respondent No.2, having soughtinstructions from her, states that the next vacation is to commence
on 01.04.2016. To provide for similar arrangement, list again on29.03.2016 at 2.00 P.M. before the same Bench. Like hitherto before, there should be some interactionbetween Master Anand and his father Bandi Jagadraksha Rao(appellant No.1 herein) from now upto 29.03.2016. The parties areagreed that appellant No.1 - Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be free toconverse with his son - Master Anand at SKYPE from 7.00 P.M. to8.00 P.M. on every Saturday hereinafter. Ordered accordingly. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
Crl.A.No.937/13 etc. 1 ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) With CONMT.PET.(C)No.496-498/2013 In Crl.A.Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 15/12/2015 This appeal/petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv.(Mentioned by) For Respondent(s) Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Upon being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R On a mention made by Mr.Sanjay Jain, learned counsel for the appellants, with no objection of the counsel for the respondents, we direct that order dated 11.12.2015 be read as under: “This Court by its motion Bench order dated 7.10.2015 permitted visitation rights to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao with his son Master Anand. Whereafter, the instant matter was directed to be posted for hearing again in December, 2015, so as to provide for visitation rights during the course of the winter vacation of Master Anand from 28.12.2015 to 02.01.2016 . During the course of hearing, parties agreed that respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi would take her son Master Anand from Bangalore to Hyderabad. The
Crl.A.No.937/13 etc. 2 appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao will receive them at the Hyderabad airport, where from he would escort respondent no.2 to a reasonable hotel accommodation, to be arranged by him, and thereupon, take the custody of his son Master Anand for the period from 28.12.2015 to 02.01.2016. He would restore custody of his son to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi at her hotel accommodation in Hyderabad, and thereupon, escort her as well as her son Master Anand to the Hyderabad airport, for their return to Bangalore. Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be responsible to bear the entire financial liability insofar as the travel and other expenses including hotel expenses are concerned. The visitation rights, referred to above, shall be subject to the father-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao depositing his passport with Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned senior counsel representing him in this Court. The passport will be returned to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao only if the learned senior counsel, in whose custody the passport has been entrusted, is satisfied, that the custody of Master Anand has been restored to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi finally on 02.01.2016 . Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao has handed over his passport to Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate in Court. He is restrained from travelling out of India till the passport handed over to Ms. Meenakshi Arora is returned to him. List again on 4.1.2016 at 2.00 p.m. before the same Bench.” (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
\226' Crl.A.No.937/13 etc. 1 ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) With CONMT.PET.(C)No.496-498/2013 In Crl.A.Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 15/12/2015 This appeal/petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv.(Mentioned by) For Respondent(s) Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Upon being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R On a mention made by Mr.Sanjay Jain, learned counsel for the appellants, with no objection of the counsel for the respondents, we direct that order dated 11.12.2015 be read as under: "This Court by its motion Bench order dated 7.10.2015 permitted visitation rights to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao with his son Master Anand. Whereafter, the instant matter was directed to be posted for hearing again in December, 2015, so as to provide for visitation rights during the course of the winter vacation of Master Anand from 28.12.2015 toSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySatish Kumar Yadav 02.01.2016.Date: 2015.12.1517:17:41 ISTReason: During the course of hearing, parties agreed that respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi would take her son Master Anand from Bangalore to Hyderabad. TheCrl.A.No.937/13 etc. 2 appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao will receive them at the Hyderabad airport, where from he would escort
respondent no.2 to a reasonable hotel accommodation, to be arranged by him, and thereupon, take the custody of his son Master Anand for the period from 28.12.2015 to 02.01.2016. He would restore custody of his son to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi at her hotel accommodation in Hyderabad, and thereupon, escort her as well as her son Master Anand to the Hyderabad airport, for their return to Bangalore. Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be responsible to bear the entire financial liability insofar as the travel and other expenses including hotel expenses are concerned. The visitation rights, referred to above, shall be subject to the father-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao depositing his passport with Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned senior counsel representing him in this Court. The passport will be returned to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao only if the learned senior counsel, in whose custody the passport has been entrusted, is satisfied, that the custody of Master Anand has been restored to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi finally on 02.01.2016. Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao has handed over his passport to Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate in Court. He is restrained from travelling out of India till the passport handed over to Ms. Meenakshi Arora is returned to him. List again on 4.1.2016 at 2.00 p.m. before the same Bench." (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
1 ITEM NO.302 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No. 496-498/2013 In Crl.A. No. 934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 11/12/2015 These appeal/petition were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv.(Not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This Court by its motion Bench order dated 7.10.2015 permitted visitation rights to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao with his son Master Anand. Whereafter, the instant matter was directed to be posted for hearing again in December, 2015, so as to provide for visitation rights during the course of the winter vacation of Master Anand from 25.12.2015 to 31.12.2015. During the course of hearing, parties agreed that respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi would take her son Master Anand from Bangalore to Hyderabad. The appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao
2 will receive them at the Hyderabad airport, where from he would escort respondent no.2 to a reasonable hotel accommodation, to be arranged by him, and thereupon, take the custody of his son Master Anand for the period from 25.12.2015 to 31.12.2015. He would restore custody of his son to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi at her hotel accommodation in Hyderabad, and thereupon, escort her as well as her son Master Anand to the Hyderabad airport, for their return to Bangalore. Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be responsible to bear the entire financial liability insofar as the travel and other expenses including hotel expenses are concerned. The visitation rights, referred to above, shall be subject to the father-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao depositing his passport with Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned senior counsel representing him in this Court. The passport will be returned to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao only if the learned senior counsel , in whose custody the passport has been entrusted, is satisfied, that the custody of Master Anand has been restored to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi finally on 31.12.2015. Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao has handed over his passport to Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate in Court. He is restrained from travelling out of India till the passport handed over to Ms. Meenakshi Arora is returned to him. List again on 4.1.2016 at 2.00 p.m. before the same Bench. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PS
º" 1 ITEM NO.302 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No. 496-498/2013 In Crl.A. No. 934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 11/12/2015 These appeal/petition were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay Arora, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv.(Not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This Court by its motion Bench order dated 7.10.2015 permitted visitation rights to appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao with his son Master Anand. Whereafter, the instant matter was directed to be posted for hearing again in December, 2015, so as to provide for visitation rights during the course of the winter vacation of Master Anand from 25.12.2015 to 31.12.2015.Signature Not Verified During the course of hearing, parties agreed thatDigitally signed byParveen Kumar ChawlaDate: 2015.12.1213:56:46 ISTReason: respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi would take her son Master Anand from Bangalore to Hyderabad. The appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao 2will receive them at the Hyderabad airport, where from he would
escort respondent no.2 to a reasonable hotel accommodation, to bearranged by him, and thereupon, take the custody of his son MasterAnand for the period from 25.12.2015 to 31.12.2015. He wouldrestore custody of his son to respondent no.2-Bandi Arathi at herhotel accommodation in Hyderabad, and thereupon, escort her as wellas her son Master Anand to the Hyderabad airport, for their returnto Bangalore. Appellant no.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be responsibleto bear the entire financial liability insofar as the travel andother expenses including hotel expenses are concerned. The visitation rights, referred to above, shall besubject to the father-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao depositing his passportwith Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned senior counsel representing himin this Court. The passport will be returned to appellantno.1-Bandi Jagadraksha Rao only if the learned senior counsel , inwhose custody the passport has been entrusted, is satisfied, thatthe custody of Master Anand has been restored to respondentno.2-Bandi Arathi finally on 31.12.2015. Appellant no.1-BandiJagadraksha Rao has handed over his passport to Ms. MeenakshiArora, Senior Advocate in Court. He is restrained from travellingout of India till the passport handed over to Ms. Meenakshi Arorais returned to him. List again on 4.1.2016 at 2.00 p.m. before the sameBench.(Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 10/12/2015 This appeal was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.(mentioned by) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post before the Bench, which heard this matter on 27.10.2015, on 11.12.2015 at 2.00 p.m. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PS
FITEM NO.801 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)Date : 10/12/2015 This appeal was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.(mentioned by) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPost before the Bench, which heard this matter on27.10.2015, on 11.12.2015 at 2.00 p.m. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PS
\212 ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 10/12/2015 This appeal was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.(mentioned by) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post before the Bench, which heard this matter on 27.10.2015, on 11.12.2015 at 2.00 p.m. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PSSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byParveen Kumar ChawlaDate: 2015.12.1617:06:31 ISTReason:
Crl.A.No.937/13 1 ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 27/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.(NP) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This order is in continuation of our Motion Bench order dated 07.10.2015. We are informed that the visitation rights between Master Anand and his father – Bandi Jagadraksha Rao were fruitful. The rival parties as also Master Anand are present in Court in person. The custody of Master Anand has been handed over to his mother – Arathi Bandi. In the above view of the matter, we permit the learned counsel for the appellant to return the passport of the appellant to him so as to enable him to return to USA.
Crl.A.No.937/13 2 The parties are agreed that similar visitation rights should be accorded even during the winter vacation. We are informed that Master Anand would be free from his school from 25.12.2015 to 03.01.2016. For arranging the above visitation rights for the winter vacation, proceedings in this case are deferred to 10.12.2015. We are also of the view that there should be some interaction between Master Anand and his father - Bandi Jagadraksha Rao (the appellant herein) in the interregnum i.e., from now up to 25.12.2015. The parties are agreed that the appellant - Bandi Jagadraksha Rao shall be free to converse with his son – Master Anand on SKYPE from 7.00 P.M. to 8.00 P.M. on every Saturday and Sunday hereinafter. Ordered accordingly. List on 10.12.2015 as part-heard. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
üNo data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.
Crl.A.No.937/13 etc.etc. 1 ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 07/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms.Minakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr.Vinay Arora, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr.Adv. Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr.Brijendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R During the course of hearing, it was suggested to us that certain visitation rights should be provided to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao. Consequent upon the consensus arrived at by the rival parties, on the basis of instructions obtained by the learned counsel, we direct as under: 1. That the custody of Master Anand, son of Arathi Bandi, would be
Crl.A.No.937/13 etc.etc. 2 handed over to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao on 14 th October, 2015 at 10.00 A.M. Master Anand will be returned to his mother at 3.00 P.M. The instant arrangement shall be followed on 15 and 16 th October, 2015. Thereafter, the custody of Master Anand shall be handed over by his mother to his father from 10.00 A.M. to 8.00 P.M. for the next 9 days from 17 th October, 2015 to 25 th October, 2015. On each day, Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao shall personally restore the custody of his son to the mother. In case any difficulty is faced, by either of the parties with reference to the visitation rights extended to the father from 14 th October, 2015 to 25 th October, 2015, it shall be open to either of the parties, to make a mention before this Court, and obtain appropriate directions. The visitation rights referred to above, shall be subject to the father - Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao depositing his passport with Ms.Minakshi Arora, learned Senior Counsel representing him in this Court. The passport will be returned to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao only if the learned senior counsel, in whose custody the passport has been entrusted, is satisfied that the custody of Master Anand has been restored to Arathi Bandi finally. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao, Arathi Bandi and Master Anand shall appear before this Court on 27 th October, 2015. List on 27 th October, 2015, at the top of the Board. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
ä Crl.A.No.937/13 etc.etc. 1 ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 07/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Ms.Minakshi Arora, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. Mr.Vinay Arora, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr.Adv. Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr.Brijendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R During the course of hearing, it was suggested to us that certain visitation rights should be provided to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao. Consequent upon the consensus arrived at by the rival parties,Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by on the basis of instructions obtained by the learned counsel, weSatish Kumar YadavDate: 2015.10.0717:12:37 ISTReason: direct as under: 1. That the custody of Master Anand, son of Arathi Bandi, would beCrl.A.No.937/13 etc.etc. 2handed over to Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao on 14th October, 2015 at10.00 A.M. Master Anand will be returned to his mother at 3.00P.M. The instant arrangement shall be followed on 15 and 16th
October, 2015. Thereafter, the custody of Master Anand shall behanded over by his mother to his father from 10.00 A.M. to 8.00P.M. for the next 9 days from 17 th October, 2015 to 25th October,2015. On each day, Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao shall personally restorethe custody of his son to the mother. In case any difficulty is faced, by either of the partieswith reference to the visitation rights extended to the father from14th October, 2015 to 25th October, 2015, it shall be open to eitherof the parties, to make a mention before this Court, and obtainappropriate directions. The visitation rights referred to above, shall be subjectto the father - Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao depositing his passportwith Ms.Minakshi Arora, learned Senior Counsel representing him inthis Court. The passport will be returned to Bandi JagadrakshakaRao only if the learned senior counsel, in whose custody thepassport has been entrusted, is satisfied that the custody ofMaster Anand has been restored to Arathi Bandi finally. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao, Arathi Bandi and Master Anandshall appear before this Court on 27th October, 2015. List on 27th October, 2015, at the top of the Board.(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 30/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.(NP) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent and states that the arguing counsel is not available. He accordingly seeks a short accommodation. List for hearing on 07.10.2015. To be shown on the top of the board. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
l ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.496-498/2013 In Crl.A. Nos.934-936/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions and permission) Date : 30/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.(NP) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent and states that the arguing counsel is not available. He accordingly seeks a short accommodation. List for hearing on 07.10.2015. To be shown on the top of the board. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySatish Kumar YadavDate: 2015.10.0314:58:41 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) Date : 23/07/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Appellant(s) Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Ms. Arundhati Katju, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR(NP) Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. for Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR(NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 03.09.2015. Post with Contempt Petition(C) Nos.496-498/2014 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 934-936 of 2013. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) Date : 22/07/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Appellant(s) Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Ms. Arundhati Katju, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR(NP) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,AOR(NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Arguments heard for some time. List again on 23.07.2015, as first item. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PS
ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) Date : 22/07/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Appellant(s) Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Ms. Arundhati Katju, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. for Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav,AOR(NP) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,AOR(NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Arguments heard for some time. List again on 23.07.2015, as first item. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla) Court Master AR-cum-PSSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byParveen Kumar ChawlaDate: 2015.07.2217:36:34 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) Date : 21/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Appellant(s) Mr.Nidheseh Gupta, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Brigendra Singh, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Mukhija, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after a week. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 937 OF 2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. ...Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT This is an appeal by special leave granted vide this Court's order dated 6.7.2013. It is submitted that Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on the respondents and the said Respondent are represented by Dr. Kailash Chand and Mr. D.Mahesh Babu, Advocate. It is further submitted that Original Records from the High Court as well as from the Trial Court have been received and same are available in the Court Room for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. The Counsel for the Appellant has filed Additional Documents and the matter was listed before the Court of Registrar on 24.7.2014 when the following order was passed: “ What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although by order dated 02.04.2014 of this Court, the Ld.counsel for the parties were given four week's time as last chance to file the additional documents, yet they have not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules .” The Appeal is ready for hearing on SLP Cum Appeal Paper Books. The appeal above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 23 rd day of March, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1.Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate 95, Lawyers Chambers, S.C.I, N.D 2.Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate (no address) 3.Mr. D.Mahesh Babu, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, New Delhi C2/sv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\212 ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Criminal Appeal No(s). 937/2013 BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and stay of arrest and office report) Date : 24/07/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand ,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu ,Adv. Mr.Uday Kumar Sagar,adv. Ms.Vishakha Upadhyaya,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although by order dated 02.04.2014 of this Court, the Ld.counsel for the parties were given four week's time as last chance to file the additional documents, yet they have not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA)Signature Not Verified Registrar SBDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.07.3110:15:49 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 937 OF 2013 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURABANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay of arrest,stay and office report )Date: 02/04/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat,adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.S.Madhusudhan Babu,adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr.Amjid Maqbool,adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R|Ld.counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the ||respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are present. They seek and are granted ||four weeks time as last chance for filing the additional ||documents. ||List again on 24.07.2014. | | | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB
¸ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 937 OF 2013BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay of arrest,stay and office report)Date: 27/02/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Madhusudhan Babu,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. B. Ramakrishna Rao,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both sides are granted time for filing additional documents, if any. List the matter on 31.3.2014.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||mg | |Registrar |
hITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3335/2012BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,stay of arrest and office report )Date: 08/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Savita Devi,adv. Mr.D.Mahesh Babu,adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.S.Madhusudan Babu,adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has not filed counter affidavit in spite of last chance granted. Respondent No.2 seeks four weeks time. Granted. Ld.counsel for the petitioner contends that the matter is connected to a habeas corpus matter. Hence, respondent No.2 is granted four more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. The matter shall be listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules thereafter.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3335/2012BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,stay of arrest and office report )Date: 07/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.S.Madhusudhan Babu,adv. Dr.Kailash Chand,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.2 has been served through the counsel appearing in the connected case. Dr.Kailash Chand proposes to appear for respondent No.2. Seeks four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Granted. List the matter on 8.10.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
âITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3335/2012BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay,stay of arrest and office report ))Date: 06/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.D.Mahesh Babu,adv. Mr.M.Bala Shivudu,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice addressed to respondent no.2 has been returned unserved. Respondent No.1 appears through advocate Mr.D.Mahesh Babu. Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.2 has appeared through Dr.Kailash Chand in connected matter SLP(Cr)No.10606-608/10 which is ordered to be taken up along with the present SLP. Serve notice on the counsel for respondent No.2 in the connected case and file proof. List the matter on 7.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
üITEM NO.15 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3335/2012(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2011 in CRP No.6711/2009,of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)BANDI JAGADRAKSHA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,exemption from filing c/c of theimpugned Judgment and stay of arrest and office report ))Date: 07/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain,AOR.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice, returnable four weeks after the summer vacation. In the meantime, the proceedings in Criminal Case No.213 of 2008, pending before the XIII Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, in respect of Charge-sheet No.32 of 2009, dated 20th February, 2009, shall remain stayed. Let this matter be taken up along with SLP(Crl)No.10606-10608 of 2010, which is between the same parties. (Sheetal Dhingra) (Juginder Kaur) COURT MASTER Assistant Registrar