THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY v. STATE OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit No. 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII-A) ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) (IA No. 1/2011 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 11-02-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Asghar Ali, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Ms. Aditi, Adv. Ms. Varishti, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. 1

Original Suit No. 1/2008 etc. Mr. Asghar Ali, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. K.M. Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singhania, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Ms. Saubhagya Sundriyal, Adv. Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Mr. Kabir Singh, Adv. Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Shailesh Mandiyal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Mrs. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Choursia, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1) On consensus, the Advocate on Record for the parties 2

Original Suit No. 1/2008 etc. shall sit and prepare separate compilation in each Suit and the same be filed within eight weeks. 2) List on 22 nd April, 2026. (NIDHI AHUJA) (MANOJ KUMAR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH) 3

ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit No. 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII-A) ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) (IA No. 1/2011 - GRANT OF INJUNCTION) Date : 12-11-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Asghar Ali, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Ms. Saubhagya Sundriyal, Adv. Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Mr. Kabir Singh, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Advocate General Mr. Maninder Singh, A.A.G. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Asghar Ali, Adv. Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. 1

Original Suit No. 1/2008 etc. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singhania, Adv. Mr. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Chitrandga Rashtravara, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1) Perused the letter circulated and heard learned counsel. Learned counsel for the parties have stated that convenience compilation is required to be filed. 2) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, learned Advocate on Record, is appointed as nodal officer. The compilation shall include all the documents, pleadings and relevant orders. 3) Needful be done within eight weeks. 4) List for hearing on 11.02.2026. (NIDHI AHUJA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2

ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) (FOR GRANT OF INJUNCTION ON IA 1/2011) ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII-A) Date : 18-07-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Asghar Ali, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Ms. Aditi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Asghar Ali, Adv.

2 Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, ASG Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Ms. Shivika Sharma, Adv., Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Mr. Kabir Singh, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Ms. Aditi, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List for regular hearing on 12.11.2025. (GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.76 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 24-03-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. Shivmangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. K.M.Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. 1

Mr. S.K.singhania, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Chitrandga Rashtravara, Adv. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are informed that recording of evidence has been completed. List on 18 th July, 2025, for fixing a date for hearing If the Registry has not yet digitalised the record of suit, including the oral and documentary evidence adduced in the suit, the same shall be done. In the meanwhile, copies thereof be supplied to learned counsel appearing for the parties. (KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) ([ ONLY OS 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ] ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 07-01-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. S Wasim A Qadri, Sr.Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, Adv. Mr. Saeed Qadri, Adv. Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for cross-examination of Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3, witness of defendant no.3 (Ministry of Power). The Witness (DW-3) is present. Ld. Counsel for the parties to the Suit are present.

-2- Statement of DW-3 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of the Ld. Counsels for both the parties from Question no.54 to 60. Cross-examination of the witness DW-3 is concluded today. Counsel for the Defendant No. 4 has submitted that no witness will be produced from his side. The submission is taken on record. No other witness of any of the defendants remain to be cross- examined. In light of record of proceeding dated 09.12.2024 of the Hon’ble Court, list on 24.03.2025 before the Hon’ble Court for directions. SUJATA SINGH Registrar

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) ([ ONLY OS 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ] ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 06-01-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. S Wasim A Qadri, Sr.Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, Adv. Mr. Saeed Qadri, Adv. Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

-2- ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Today, it is fixed for cross-examination of Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3, witness of defendant no.3 (Ministry of Power). The Witness (DW-3) is present. Ld. Counsel for the parties to the Suit are present. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel for the defendant No. 2 that the counsel for the defendant No. 2 does not wish to cross- examine the witness. Thereafter, DW-3 was partially cross-examined by the Ld. Counsel for defendant No.4 Mr. Aditya Sharma, for the State of Haryana. Statement of DW-3 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of the Ld. Counsels for both the parties from Question no.40 to 53. Accordingly 07.01.2025, time 2:00 P.M, is fixed for recording of remaining deposition/cross-examination of witness Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3 on behalf of DW-1, as per the consent of parties. SUJATA SINGH Registrar SC

-1- ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) ([ ONLY OS 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ] ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 11-12-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, Adv. Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Mr. Saeed Qadri, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for cross-examination of Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3, witness of defendant no.3 (Ministry of Power). The Witness (DW-3) is present. Ld. Counsel for the parties to the Suit are present. Statement of DW-3 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of the Ld. Counsels for both the parties from Question nos.29 to 39. With that, the cross-examination of DW-3 is complete on behalf of State of Punjab (Defendant No.1). Accordingly, 06.01.2025 and 07.01.2025, time 2:00 P.M, is fixed for recording of remaining deposition/cross-examination of witness Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3 on behalf of the remaining Defendants, as per the consent of parties. SUJATA SINGH Registrar pm

-1- ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) ([Only OS 2 of 2011 is listed for recording of evidence] ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 10-12-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Mr. Saeed Qadri, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

ITEM NO.83 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s)/ Plaintiff VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)/ Defendant(s) (List all the matter as per Hon'ble court's order dated 09.08.2024) WITH ORGNL.SUIT Nos. 2/2011 and 2/2007 Date : 09-12-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.M.Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. S.S.Singhania, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. 1

Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikas Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Chitrandga Rashtravara, Adv. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The recording of evidence is still in progress, as pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the parties. List on 24 th March, 2025 for directions so that this Court can monitor the recording of evidence. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (ANU BHALLA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 2

-1- ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS. 2 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2.00 PM. ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 05-11-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. R. K. Churasia, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Today, it is fixed for remaining deposition/cross-examination of Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3, witness of defendant no.3 (Ministry of Power). Earlier the date was fixed for recording of evidence on 05.11.2024 and 06.11.2024, time 2:00 P.M. However, the Witness of defendant no.3 (Ministry of Power), has not turned up today. An adjournment letter has been moved by Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Senior Advocate, stating therein that the said witness is not available throughout the week, as he is engaged in his official duties. Accordingly, 10.12.2024 and 11.12.2024, time 2:00 P.M, is fixed for recording of remaining deposition/cross-examination of witness Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3 on behalf of DW-1, as well as remaining evidence of the defendants, as per the consent of parties. Let the matter be listed before the Hon’ble Court on 09.12.2024 in light of order passed by the Hon’ble Court on 09.08.2024. SUJATA SINGH Registrar PM

-1- ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS. 2 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2.00 PM. ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 14-10-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. K. Chaurasia, AOR Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Ms. Bhavana Kapur, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR

-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Today, it is fixed for cross-examination of Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3, witness of defendant no.3 (Ministry of Power). The Witness (DW-3) is present. Ld. Counsel for the parties to the Suit are present. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff Ms. Nidhi Jaswal that the plaintiff does not wish to cross-examine the witness. Thereafter, DW-3 was partially cross-examined by the Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1 Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, for the State of Punjab. Statement of DW-3 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of the Ld. Counsels for both the parties from Question no.1 to 9. Earlier the date was fixed for recording of evidence on 15.10.2024, 17.10.2024 and 18.10.2024 but on the oral request of the Ld. Advocate for Defendant No.1, made on the ground of his own indisposition, the date is re-scheduled. Accordingly 05.11.2024 and 06.11.2024, time 2:00 P.M, is fixed for recording of remaining deposition/cross-examination of witness Mr. Vishal Pal Singh, DW-3 on behalf of DW-1, as per the consent of parties. SUJATA SINGH Registrar PM

ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS. 2 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED FOR FIXING THE SCHEDULE OF RECORDING OF EVIDENCE. ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 06-09-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR contd….

-2- Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. R.K. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Today the matter is listed for fixing the schedule of recording of evidence of DW-3, Mr. Vishal Pal Singh. Ld. counsel for DW-3 submits that witness is available on 14 th , 15 th , 17 th and 18 th October, 2024. Defendant No.3, Ministry of Power is directed to keep the witness DW-3 present on 14 th , 15 th , 17 th and 18 th October, 2024. Call on 14.10.2024 at 2.00 P.M. SUJATA SINGH Registrar rd

ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s)/ Plaintiff VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)/ Defendants WITH ORGNL.SUIT Nos. 2/2011 and 2/2007 Date : 09-08-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mrs. Abhinandini Sharma, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Wasim Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. S.k.singhania, Adv. Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv. Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR 1

Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K.shailendra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikash Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mrs. Abhinandini Sharma, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Argha Roy, Adv. Ms. Ojaswini Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ruby, Adv. Mr. Zartab Anwar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Recording of evidence is in progress before the concerned Registrar. For the time being, we adjourn the present suits till 9 th December, 2024 so that further progress can be ascertained. To be listed for directions on 9 th December, 2024. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 2

REVISED ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 19-07-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. R.K. Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. N. Vishakha Murthy, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Counsel for all the parties are present. DW-3, Mr. Vishal Pal Singh is absent today. Learned counsel for DW-3 submits that the witness is now transferred to other department, so he could not appear before the court today. He also submits that there is no possibility of getting the presence of DW-3 on 22.07.2024 and he requested for adjournment of the case in the next month. As per the records, the Hon’ble Court has directed to list this suit on 09.08.2024 before the Court. Hence, Registry is directed to list the matter before the Court. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 19-07-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Counsel for all the parties are present.

DW-3, Mr. Vishal Pal Singh is absent today. Learned counsel for DW-3 submits that the witness is now transferred to other department, so he could not appear before the court today. He also submits that there is no possibility of getting the presence of DW-3 on 22.07.2024 and he requested for adjournment of the case in the next month. As per the records, the Hon’ble Court has directed to list this suit on 09.08.2024 before the Court. Hence, Registry is directed to list the matter before the Court. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit No.1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO.2 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2:30 PM IN REGISTRAR COURT NO.1 BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SHRI H.S. SHETTY) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 14-05-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheswari, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.K. Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. Mr. D. Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. 1

Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW- 2 is present. Learned counsel for all the parties are present. Learned counsel for the State of Rajasthan has cross-examined DW- 2. The statement of DW- 2 is recorded in questions and answers from question Nos.1 to 7. With that, the cross-examination of DW-2 is closed and he is discharged. Learned counsel for the defendant No.3 prays for time to keep his witness i.e. DW-3 - Vishal Pal Singh present on the next date after vacation. Defendant No.3-Ministry of Power is directed to keep this witness DW-3 present on 19.07.2024 and 22.07.2024 at 2.30 P.M. Call on 19.07.2024. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar 2

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2:30 PM ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 30-04-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A Qadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Chetan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Amogh Bansal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar-DW2 is present. The learned counsel for the parties are present. Learned Counsel for State of Haryana has further cross- examined DW-2. The statement of DW-2 is recorded in questions and answers form to 47 to 55. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR for State of Rajasthan seeks time for cross-examination of DW-2 and submits that she had reserved right to cross-examination as per order dated 31.01.2024. As per that order, learned Senior Counsel for the plaintiff (State of Rajasthan) Dr. Manish Singhvi submitted that he does not wish to cross-examine DW-2 at this stage and he reserves his right to re-examine the witness. However, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submits that it was by mistake mentioned so, because DW-2 is not the witness of the Plaintiff, so she cannot re-examine DW-2 but she has the right of cross-examination only. Having considered the submission, request is allowed and the plaintiff is permitted to cross-examine DW-2. The witness (DW-2) is directed to appear on 14.05.2024 at 2.30 p.m. List 14.05.2024. . H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

R E V I S E D ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2.30 PM.) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 18-04-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Adv. … contd.

-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, D.W.2 is present. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. Learned Counsel for the State of Haryana has further cross- examined DW.2. The statement of DW.2 is recorded in question and answer form from Q.Nos. 32 to 46. Learned counsel for the State of Haryana seeks further time for cross-examination. In fact on a previous date further cross-examination was fixed today and tomorrow i.e. 18.4.2024 and 19.4.2024. However, due to non-availability of the Registrar of this Court tomorrow i.e. on 19.4.2024, further cross-examination of D.W.2 is fixed on 30.4.2024 at 2.30 p.m. The witness (D.W.2) is directed to be present on 30.04.2024 at 2.30 p.m. without fail. List on 30.04.2024 at 2.30 p.m. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2.30 PM.) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 18-04-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, D.W.2 is present. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. Learned Counsel for the State of Haryana has further cross- examined DW.2. The statement of DW.2 is recorded in question and answer form from Q.Nos. 32 to 46. … contd.

-2- Learned counsel for the State of Haryana seeks further time for cross-examination. In fact on a previous date further cross-examination was fixed today and tomorrow i.e. 18.4.2024 and 19.4.2024. However, due to non-availability of the Registrar of this Court tomorrow i.e. on 19.4.2024, further cross-examination of D.W.2 is fixed on 30.4.2024 at 2.30 p.m. The witness (D.W.2) is directed to be present on 30.04.2024 at 2.30 p.m. without fail. List on 30.04.2024 at 2.30 p.m. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED FOR FIXING A SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AT 2.30 PM ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 04-04-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR contd….

-2- Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 As directed by the Hon’ble Court, the matter is listed today for fixing schedule for further recording of evidence. As per the order dated 20.3.2024, on that day, DW-2, Mr.Manoj Kumar was cross-examined by the Ld. counsel for the State of Haryana partly and he had sought time for further cross-examination. With consent of Ld. counsels for all the parties, further cross-examination of DW-2 is scheduled on 18.4.2024 and 19.4.2024 at 2.30 P.M. Ld. counsel for defendant No.2 is directed to keep DW-2, Mr. Manoj Kumar present on the said two dates without fail. Ld. counsel for defendant No.3 submits that on the next date of hearing, he will take instruction as to whether or not to lead evidence of DW-3, Mr. Vishal Pal Singh. Ld. counsel for defendant No.4 – State of Haryana, on instruction, submits that though DW-4, Mr. Sandeep Taneja had filed an affidavit, that he will not be examined further. Submission is taken on record. Call on 18.4.2024 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 and ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 01-04-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. S.Wasim A.Qadri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. S K Singhania, Adv. Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. 1

Mr. Sughosh Subramanian, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheswari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Argha Roy, Adv. Ms. Ojaswini Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ruby, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have perused the last office report which indicates that recording of evidence is in progress before a Registrar of this Court in Original Suit No.2 of 2011. 2

The office report records that Shri H.Shashidhara Shetty, the learned Registrar of this Court has been appointed to record the evidence in Original Suit No.2 of 2011. The Registry will fix the said suit before the Registrar on 4 th April, 2024 for fixing a schedule for further recording of evidence. List for directions on 9 th August, 2024. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 3

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED AT 2:30 P.M, FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE. ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 20-03-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Manish Singhi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Ms. Aaashish Arora, Adv. Mr. N M Jain, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shweta Meena, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. S. Wasim Qadri, Ar. Adv. Mr. Ranjan Charurasia, Adv. Mr. Deepak Bhati, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. Ld. Counsel for both parties are present. Ld. Counsel for the State of Haryana has further cross- examined DW-2. The statement of DW-2 is recorded in question and answer form from Q. Nos. 17 to 31. Ld. Counsel for State of Haryana seeks time for further cross- examination of DW-2. However, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsels for the parties that vide order dated 03-01-2024, the Hon’ble Court in OS 1/2008 passed a direction that OS 2/2007 and OS 2/2011 shall be tagged with OS 1/2008 and all the three suits shall be placed before the Court on 1 st April 2024 for direction for fixing the date. Hence office is directed to list the matter before the Court as per the direction. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED AT 2:30 P.M, FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE. ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 18-03-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, AAG Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Satjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR contd...

-2- Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia,Adv. Mr. G. S. Makker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. Ld. Counsel for both parties are present. Ld. Counsel for the State of Haryana has cross-examined DW-2. The statement of DW-2 is recorded in question and answer form from Q. Nos. 1 to 16. Ld. Counsel for the State of Haryana seeks time for further cross-examination. Hence, further cross-examination is deferred for the day. For further cross-examination of DW-2, call on 20.03.2024 at 02:30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SHRI H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 AT 2:30 P.M. FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 04-03-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Mheshwari, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant are present. Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab has further cross-examined DW-2. The Statement of DW-(2) is recorded in question and answer form, from question Nos. 71 to 78. Ld. Counsel for State of Punjab closed his side of cross- examination. Ld. Counsel for State of Haryana seeks time for cross- examination of DW-2. At this stage, with the consent of both the parties and witness, further cross-examination of DW-2 is fixed on 18.03.2024 and 20.03.2024 at 2.30 PM. For further cross-examination, DW-2 is directed to appear on above date and time. Call on 18.03.2024 at 2.30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SHRI H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 AT 2:30 P.M. FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 23-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qaudri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Sidhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. S. Chitvan Dinghal, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. contd….

-2- Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant are present. Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab further cross-examined DW-2. The Statement of DW-(2) is recorded in question and answer form, from Question Nos. 61 to 70. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab seeks adjournment for further cross-examination. Allowed. Further, cross- examination of DW-2 is deferred for the day. For further cross-examination, DW-2 is directed to appear on 04.03.2024 at 2.30 P.M. Call on 04.03.2024 at 2:30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SHRI H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 AT 2:30 P.M. FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 22-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Wasim A.Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Sidhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mr. Saahil Gupta, Adv. Mr. Deepak Bhati, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant are present. Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab further cross-examined DW-2. The Statement of DW-(2) is recorded in question and answer form, from Question No. 44 to 60. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab seeks adjournment for further cross-examination. Allowed. Further, cross- examination of DW-2 is deferred for the day. For further cross-examination, DW-2 is directed to appear tomorrow at 2:30 PM. Call on 23.2.2024 at 2:30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.39 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2011 LISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SHRI H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 AT 2:30 P.M. FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE ) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2011 (XVII-A) Date : 21-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Mayan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Apurv S. Adv. Mr. Shailjananda Mishra, Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Wasim Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Sidhant Kohli, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. Ld. Counsel for both the parties are present. Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab further cross-examined DW- 2. The Statement of DW-(2) is recorded in question and answer form, from Question No. 39 to 43. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab seeks adjournment for further cross-examination. Allowed. Further, cross- examination of DW-2 is deferred for the day. For further cross-examination, DW-2 is directed to appear tomorrow at 2:30 PM. Call on 22.2.2024 at 2:30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) ([TO BE TAKEN UP AT 2.30 P.M.] O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR FIXING THE RECORDING OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 01-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Sidhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Deepak Bhati, Adv. Ms. Shivendra Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar, DW-2 is present. The Ld. Counsel for the

-2- parties are present. DW-2 is further cross-examined by the Ld. Counsel for the Defendant No. 1 (State of Punjab). The statement of DW-2 is recorded in question and answer form, from Question No. 22 to 39. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the State of Punjab seeks adjournment for further cross-examination. Allowed. Further, cross- examination of DW-2 is deferred for the day. As per the convenience and as consented by the Ld. Counsel of the parties and the witness, further cross-examination of DW-2 is fixed from 21.02.2024 to 23.02.2024. DW-2 is directed to be present on all above three dates without fail. Call on 21.02.2024 at 2:30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit No.2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR FIXING THE SCHEDULE OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 31-01-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sidhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham M., Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manoj Kumar-DW2 is present. The learned counsel for the parties are present. 1

The learned Senior Counsel for the plaintiff (State of Rajasthan) Dr. Manish Singhvi submits that he does not wish to cross-examine DW-2 at this stage and he reserves his right to re- examine the witness, if required at a later stage. Heard. Perused. Permitted. DW-2 is cross-examined by learned counsel for the plaintiff No.1 (State of Punjab). The statement of DW-2 is recorded in questions and answers form to 1-21. At this stage, the learned counsel for the State of Punjab seeks an adjournment for further cross-examination. Allowed, and further cross-examination of DW-2 is deferred for the day. The witness is directed to appear tomorrow i.e. 01.02.2024 at 2.30 p.m. List 01.02.2024. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar 2

ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) (IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 03-01-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K.Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Mayne, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh, Adv. 1

Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. S.Wasim A.Qadri,Sr.Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. Mr. Chinmayee Chandra,Adv. Ms. Shivika Mehra,Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Singh,Adv. Mr. Pratham Sagar,Adv. Mr. G.S.Makkar, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the parties agree that these two suits in which evidence has been completely recorded will have to be heard along with Original Suit No.2 of 2011 in which oral evidence is being recorded. The learned counsel for the parties further state that, in all probability, recording of evidence in Original Suit No.2 of 2011 will be complete by March, 2024. The Registrar (Judicial) will seek appropriate orders from Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for tagging Original Suit No.2 of 2011 with these two Suits. If Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India assigns all three Suits to this Bench, we direct that these Original Suits shall be placed on 1 st April, 2024 for directions for fixing a date for hearing. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 2

ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR FIXING THE SCHEDULE OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 15-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Mayank Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. R.K. Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR contd….

-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Matter is called for directions. Ld. counsels for all the parties are present. As requested by Ld. counsels, DW-2, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources will be summoned for cross-examination on 31.1.2024 and 1.2.2024. Ld. counsel for defendant No.2 (Union of India, Ministry of Water Resources) is directed to keep DW-2 present on the next date of hearing. Thereafter, DW-3, Mr. Vishal Pal Singh and then DW-4, Mr.Sandeep Taneja will be summoned for cross-examination. Call on 31.1.2024 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2:00 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 08-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chituan Singhal, Adv. Mr. R.K. Chorasiya, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for further cross-examination of Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1).

Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1), the witness is present. Ld. Counsels of both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 4 – State of Haryana. The Statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of Ld. Counsels of both the parties from Q. No. 74 to 97. During the cross-examination, 11 documents were confronted to the witness and were marked as Ex. D-4 (CON)- 1(DW-1) to Ex. D-4 (CON)- 11 (DW-1). With this, the Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 4 has closed cross-examination of DW-1. The counsel for defendant No. 1- State of Punjab has closed his side. Call on 15.12.2023 at 12:00 noon for direction to fix date for examination of the witness on behalf of defendant No. 2 to 4. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2:30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 30-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shaitendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. R.K. Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. G.S. Makkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). Contd..

-2- Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present. Learned Counsels for both the parties are present. DW- 1 is further cross-examined by learned counsel for defendant No.4- State of Haryana. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties from question nos. 62 to 73. Hence, Further cross examination of DW-1 is deferred for the day. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for Defendant No.1 seeks for a week time, as he wants to produce some certified documents. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, the date fixed earlier has been cancelled and a further cross-examination of DW-1 is fixed on 08 th December 2023 at 2.00 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2:30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 24-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.K. Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). Contd…...2/-

-2- Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned counsel for Defendant No.4 – State of Haryana. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties, from Question Nos. 47-61. At this stage learned counsel for Defendant No.4 makes a request to defer further cross-examination of DW-1. Thereafter with the consent of both the parties and the witness, the dates are fixed for further cross-examination of Dw-1 on 30.11.2023 and 01.12.2023 at 2.30 p.m. For further cross-examination, call on 30.11.2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2:30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 23-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing Dr. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Chintan Singhal, Adv. Mr. G. S. Makkar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan 1

Singh Mann (DW-1). Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann(DW-1) is present. Learned counsels for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned counsel for Defendant No.4 – State of Haryana. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties from Question nos.30 to 46. At this stage, Ld. counsel for Defendant No.4 makes request to defer further cross-examination of DW-1. For further cross- examination, call on 24.11.2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar 2

ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 12 NOON (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 22-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Sakshem Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mr. Chintan Singhal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1).

Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned counsel for Defendant No.4 – State of Haryana. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties, from Question Nos. 15-29. At this stage learned counsel for Defendant No.4 makes a request to defer further cross-examination of DW-1. For further cross-examination, call on 23.11.2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 10-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). contd….

-2- Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann(DW-1) is present. Learned counsels for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned senior counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties from Question nos.87 to 89. With that Ld. counsel for State of Rajasthan has closed his side of cross-examination. DW-1 is re-examined by Ld. counsel for State of Punjab and the same has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties as question Nos.1 and 2. Thereafter, Ld. counsel for the defendant No.4-State of Haryana, Mr. Aditya Sharma started the cross-examination of the witness -DW-1 and statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties from Question nos.1 to 14. At this stage, Ld. counsel for defendant No.4 makes request to defer further cross-examination of DW-1. For cross-examination, call on 22.11.2023, 23.11.2023 and 24.11.2023 at 12 noon. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 09-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). contd….

ITEM NO.43 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 08-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann(DW-1) is present. contd….

-2- Learned counsels for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned senior counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties from Question nos.60 to 74. At this stage, at the request of Ld. counsel for the plaintiff, further cross-examination of DW-1 is deferred for the day. Call on 9.11.2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.65 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 07-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Chetan Singhal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). contd….

ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 03-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr Vinay K Shailendra, Adv. Mr Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr S Wasim A Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr Rajan Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. Mr Chetan Singhal, Adv. Mr G.S.Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Contd….

-2- Item no.53 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). Mr Jagmohan Sngh Mann(DW-1) is present. Learned counsels for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned senior counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the present of learned counsel for both the parties from Question nos. 36 to 46. At this stage, at the request of the parties, further cross- examination of the witness is deferred for the day. With the consent of both the parties and the witness, further cross-examination of DW-1 is fixed on 7 th , 8 th , 9 th and 10 th November, 2023. DW-1 is directed to be present on the said days at 2.30 P.M. and the ld.counsels for the plaintiff/defendant(State of Haryana) are requested to complete the cross-examination on these days fixed. Call on 7.11.2023 at 2.30. P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 02-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present. Learned counsel for

both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned senior counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1, has been recorded in question and answer form, in the presence of learned counsel for the parties from Question Nos. 28 to 35. At this stage, learned senior counsel for the plaintiff seeks for an adjournment. Accordingly, further cross-examination of DW-1 is deferred for the day. Three documents are confronted to the witness which are marked as Exb. No. P-1 (CON)-9 (DW-1) to P-1 (CON)-11 (DW-1). For further cross- examination of DW-1, call on 03.11.2023 at 2:30 pm. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

1 ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) Date : 17-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. S Wasim Quadari, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Chitwan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

2 Today, it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned senior counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1, has been recorded in question and answer form, in the presence of learned counsel for the parties from Question Nos. 15 to 27. At this stage, learned senior counsel for the plaintiff seeks for an adjournment. Accordingly, further cross-examination of DW-1 is deferred for the day. With the consent of both the parties and the witness, further cross-examination of DW-1 is fixed on 2 nd and 3 rd November, 2023. DW-1 is directed to be present on the said dates at 2.30 p.m., without fail. Call on 02.11.2023 at 2.30 p.m. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 16-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Sinhal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1). 1

Learned counsel for the DW-1 (State of Punjab) submits that the witness is not keeping well. Witness was present but due to stomach upset, he could not appear before the Court and seeks adjournment of the matter for the day. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned for the day. For further cross-examination of DW-1 is fixed on 17.10.2023. Call on 17.10.2023 at 2:30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar 2

ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 13-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr.Jagmohan Singh Mann. Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present. Learned counsel for both the parties are present. DW-1 is further cross-examined

-2- by learned senior counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1, has been recorded in question and answer form, in the presence of learned counsel for the parties from Question Nos.10 to 14. At this stage, learned senior counsel for the plaintiff seeks for an adjournment. Accordingly, further cross-examination of DW-1 is deferred for the day. With the consent of both the parties and the witness, further cross-examination of DW-1 is fixed on 16 th and 17 th of October, 2023. DW-1 is directed to be present on the said dates at 2.30 P.M., without fail. Call on 16.10.2023, at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 12-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Ms Shubhangi Aggrawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr Vinay K Shailendra, Adv. Mr Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr Wasim A Quadri, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr Chitvan, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Contd….

-2- Item no.44 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for cross-examination of Mr Jagmohan Singh Mann(DW-1). The witness, DW-1 is present. Ld. Counsels for both the parties are present. DW-1 is cross-examined by the ld. Counsel for the plaintiff- State of Rajasthan. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of ld. Counsels for the parties from Question No.1 to Question No.9. The ld. Counsel for the plaintiff-State of Rajasthan has confronted six documents and out of them, first three documents are marked, subject to proof, as Exb.No.P-1(CON)-1 to P-1(CON)-3 and the other three documents are marked at Exb.P-1(CON)- 4 to P- 1(CON)- 6. At this stage, the ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks for adjournment. Accordingly, further cross-examination of DW-1 is deferred for the day. For further cross-examination of DW-1, call on 13.10.2023. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. in Registrar Court-1 (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 29-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. S Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsels for both the parties are present. Contd…

-2- Ld. counsel for defendant No.1 – State of Punjab submits that his witness DW-1 – Jagmohan Singh Mann will be available on 12 th and 13 th October, 2023 and he will keep him present on these dates for cross-examination. Allowed. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff also be present on both the dates i.e., 12 th and 13 th October, 2023. Call on 12 th and 13 th October, 2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. in Registrar Court-1 (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 28-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr Vinay K Shailendra, Adv. Mr Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr S.Wasim A Qadri, Adv. Mr R.K.Churasia, Adv. Mr A.K.Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. S Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasiya, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Contd….

-2- Item no.5 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 has moved an application seeking direction in this matter for adjournment by ten weeks on the ground that the witness is presently residing at Canada. He has undergone cardiac surgery and is recovering. Therefore, he is not able to be present today and seeks for adjournment at least by ten weeks. After hearing both the parties, ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 is directed to consult his witness, Mr Jagmohan Singh Mann and come back tomorrow to fix a date for trial on a shorter date and also see the option of Video Conference. Call on 29.8.2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.81 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. in Registrar Court-1 (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 07-07-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Arpit Parkash, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. S Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Parth Kaushik, Adv.

:: 2 :: Item No. 81 UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today, the matter is fixed for further cross examination of PW1, Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta. The learned counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant are present. The PW1 is further cross-examined by the learned counsel for the defendant No. 1 – State of Punjab. The statement of PW1 stands recorded in question and answer format in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties from Question Nos. 78 to 96. With that, the learned counsel for the defendant No.1 has closed the cross-examination. The learned counsel for the defendant Nos. 2 and 3 submits that they do not want to cross-examine the PW1. With that the evidence of PW1 is closed. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has closed the evidence on plaintiffs side. Now, the learned counsel for the defendant No.1 in the Original Suit No. 2 of 2011 submits that the State of Haryana (defendant No. 4) is a proforma party and sailing with the plaintiff, so the evidence of defendant No. 4 should be recorded first and then the evidence of defendant No. 1 may be recorded. Learned counsel for the plaintiff opposed it and submits that the evidence of defendants may be recorded in sequence and the affidavits of the parties have already been filed and no prejudice would be caused to the defendant No. 1.

:: 3 :: Item No. 81 Heard. Perused. The defendant Nos. 1 to 4 have already filed affidavits and as per the Rules, the evidence of defendants should be recorded in sequence. Therefore, the prayer of the learned counsel for the defendant No. 1 is not heeded to and directed to lead the evidence on the next date of hearing for the evidence of defendant No.1. As consented by the learned counsel for both the parties, the cross-examination of Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW1) is fixed on 28 th and 29the August, 2023. learned counsel for the defendant No. 1 is directed to keep the witness present on those dates at 2.30 pm. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.81 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. in Registrar Court-1 (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 06-07-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Arpit Parkash, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shritendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim Quadari, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Adv Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr. Parth Kaushik, Adv. Contd….

-2- UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr Arun Kumar Gupta, PW-1. The witness(PW-1) is present. Ld. Counsel for the parties to the Suit are present. PW-1 is further cross-examined by the ld. Counsel for defendant No.1-State of Punjab. Statement of PW-1 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of the ld. Counsels for both the parties from Question No.67 to Question No.77. Thereafter, on the request of the ld. Counsels for the parties, further cross-examination of PW-1 is deferred for the day. Call on 07.07.2023 at 2.30 P.M. for further cross-examination of PW-1. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. in Registrar Court-1 (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 05-07-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr Vinay K Shailendra, Adv. Mr Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Wasim Qaudri, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr Wasim A Quadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr Parth Kaushik, Adv. Contd…. -2-

Item no.1 UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today, it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr Arun Kumar Gupta, PW-1. The witness(PW-1) is present. Ld. Counsel for the parties to the Suit are present. PW-1 is further cross-examined by the ld. Counsel for defendant No.1-State of Punjab. Statement of PW-1 has been recorded in question and answer format in the presence of the ld. Counsels for both the parties from Question No.50 to Question No.66. Thereafter, on the request of the ld. Counsels for the parties, further cross-examination of PW-1 is deferred for the day. Call on 06.07.2023 at 2.30 P.M. for further cross-examination of PW-1. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 24-04-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Wasim Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr Wasim A Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sidhhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR Mr Parth Kaushik, Adv. Contd….

2 Item no.70 UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today, the matter is fixed for further cross-examination of PW-1, Mr Arun Kumar Gupta. The ld. Counsels for the plaintiff and defendant are present. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has moved an application seeking adjournment, since PW-1-Mr Arun Kumar Gupta has suddenly developed fever and is not in a position to travel to Delhi. It is also submitted that Doctor has advised three weeks rest to the witness. With the consent of the ld. Counsels for both the parties and having regard to the illness of the witness, matter is adjourned to 5 th , 6th and 7 th of July, 2023 at 2.30 P.M. for further cross-examination of PW-1. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to get PW-1 present on the above days without fail. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 0 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) ) Date : 27-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr Vinay K Shailendra, Adv. Mr Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr Wasim A Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr Aditya Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today the matter is fixed for further cross-examination of PW-1, Mr Arun Kumar Gupta. Contd….

-2- Item no.1 Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff and defendant are present. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application seeking adjournment of the matter and defer further cross-examination of PW-1 till 15 th April, 2023 as the witness is not keeping well. Heard. The IA is allowed. Further cross-examination of PW-1 is deferred for the day and also on 28 th and 29 th March, 2023. With the consent of ld. Counsels for both the parties, matter is adjourned to 24 th , 25 th and 26 th April, 2023 at 2.30 P.M. for further cross-examination of PW-1 and the witness(PW-1). PW- 1 is directed to be present without fail on all the three dates at 2.30 PM. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 0 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011.) ) Date : 21-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr Manish Singhvi, Sr.Adv. Mr Atul Jha, Adv. Ms Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr Vinay K Shailendra, Adv. Mr Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr Lokesh Sinhal, Sr.AAG Mr Akshay Amritanshu, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta. Contd…

-2- The witness(PW-1) is present and the ld. Counsels for the parties to the Suit are present. PW-1 is further cross-examined by Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1 – State of Punjab. The statement of PW-1 was recorded in question and answer format in the presence of Ld. Counsels for both the parties from question Nos.40 to 49. The ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 confronted an agreement dated 31 st December, 1981 to the witness and it is marked, subject to proof as Ex-D-1(CON)-1. Thereafter, on the request of the witness and the ld. Counsels for the parties, further cross-examination of PW-1 is deferred for the day. Call on 27, 28 and 29 th March, 2023 at 2.30 PM for further cross examination of PW-1. The ld. Counsels for the parties and the witness(PW-1) are directed to be present without fail on all three dates at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 0 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011.) ) Date : 20-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. S.Wasim Qudri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr.AAG Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for further cross-examination of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta. Contd…

-2- The witness(PW-1) is present. Ld. Counsels for the parties to the Suit are present. PW-1 is further cross-examined by Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1 – State of Punjab. The statement of PW-1 was recorded in question and answer format in the presence of Ld. Counsels for both the parties from question No.29 to 39. Thereafter, on the request of the Ld. Counsels for the parties, further cross-examination of PW-1 is deferred for the day. Call on 21.2.2023 at 2.30 PM for further cross examination of PW-1. Witness is directed to be present tomorrow i.e. 21.2.2023 at 2.30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

R E V I S E D ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY,BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011.) ) Date : 24-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Senior Advocate Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. (State of Punjab) Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Wasim S Quadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR (Union of India) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mrs. Arachana Preeti Gupta, AOR Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Rohit Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kalra, Adv. (State of Haryana) Contd….

ITEM NO.79 -2- UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for cross-examination of PW-1 Mr.Arun Kumar Gupta. The learned counsel for parties to the suit are present. The learned counsel for defendant No.4 i.e., State of Haryana submits that he does not wish to cross-examine PW-1. The said submission is taken on record. Thereafter, learned counsel for defendant No.1 commenced cross-examination of PW-1. The statements of PW-1 were recorded in question and answer format in the presence of learned counsels for both the parties, from question No.1 to question No.28. Thereafter, on the request of learned counsels for the parties, further cross-examination of PW-1 is deferred. Witness-PW-1 says till 19 th February, 2023 he would not be able to come as he has personal engagements and needs time till 20 th February, 2023. Accordingly, upon hearing both the learned counsels for the parties, the next date of hearing is fixed on 20 th and 21 st February, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. The witness-PW-1 is directed to appear on the said dates without fail. Call on 20.02.2023 for Further Cross Examination of PW-1. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY,BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011.) ) Date : 24-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Senior Advocate Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. (State of Punjab) Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Wasim S Quadri, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR (Union of India) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mrs. Arachana Preeti Gupta, AOR Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Rohit Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kalra, Adv. (State of Haryana) Contd…. ITEM NO.79 -2-

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Today it is fixed for cross-examination of PW1 Mr.Arun Kumar Gupta. The learned counsel for parties to the suit are present. The learned counsel for defendant No.4 i.e., State of Haryana submits that he does not wish to cross-examine PW1. The said submission is taken on record. Thereafter, learned counsel for defendant No.1 commenced cross-examination of PW1. The statements of PW1 were recorded in question and answer format in the presence of learned counsels for both the parties, from question No.1 to question No.28. Thereafter, on the request of learned counsels for the parties, further cross-examination of PW1 is deferred. Wintness-PW1 says till 19 th February, 2023 he would not be able to come as he has personal engagements and needs time till 20 th February, 2013. Accordingly, upon hearing both the learned counsels for the parties, the next date of hearing is fixed on 20 th and 21 st February, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. The witness-PW1 is directed to appear on the said dates without fail. Call on 20.02.2023 for Further Cross Examination of PW1. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plantiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 2.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY,BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011.) ) Date : 04-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms. Archana Preeti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R contd...

-2- Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that his witness is absent today and seeks for adjournment. He also submits that he has filed IA No. 197958/22 through E-mail seeking direction and has sought to defer tendering of evidence of cross-examination of PW-1 for any day after 15 January, 2023 and exempt the personally appearance of PW-1 on 04.01.2023. Learned counsel for the defendants submits no objection for that application. Accordingly, IA No. 197958/22 is allowed. Learned counsel for both the parties seek adjournment to 24/01/2023 at 2:30 PM for cross-examination of PW-1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is directed to keep his witness present(PW-1) on that day without fail. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED ONLY FOR FIXING THE SCHEDULE OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 12.30 P.M. (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY,BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011.) ) Date : 08-12-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Arpit Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Mayank Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mrs. Arachana Preeti gupta, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manish Singhvi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (State of Rajasthan) submits his witness is ready to tender evidence in

Original Suit No. 02/2011 and not in Original Suit No. 01/2011. He Further submits that identical suit in Original Suit No. 01/2008 is ready for hearing, in which, evidence is already complete and ready for hearing. Therefore, evidence may be recorded first in Original Suit No. 02/2011 and then in Original Suit No. 01/2011. Ld. Counsel for the Defendant No. 1 submits that evidence is to be recorded in sequence. Ld. Counsels for the Defendant Nos. 2, 3 and 4 submits they have no objection for recording evidence in either of Original Suit No. 01/2011 or in Original Suit No. 02/2011. Having considered the submission on both sides, it is directed that evidence in Original Suit No. 02/2011 shall be let in first and then in Original Suit No. 01/2011. Ld. Counsel for the Defendant No. 1 in Original Suit No. 02/2011 submits, State of Haryana (Defendant No. 4) may be directed to cross-examine PW. 1 first, as it is proforma party and sailing with plaintiff; otherwise, it will prejudice the right of Defendant No. 1. Accordingly, Defendant No. 4 is directed to cross-examine PW. 1 first, on the next date of hearing, if he is willing to cross examine PW. 1. Defendant No. 1 is also directed to be ready for cross examination on the next date of hearing. Witness Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Retired Ex-Officio Secretary to the Government, Indira Gandhi Nahar Department, Government of Rajasthan and the Chairman and Administrator of the Indira Gandhi Nahar Board be present to tender evidence on 04.01.2023. List on 04.01.2023 at 2:30 P.M. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar

1 Corrected ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LIST WITH O.S. NO. 2 SEPARATELY,BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) Date : 11-11-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvasi, Adv. Mr. Harsh Singh Rawat, Adv. Ms. Snehal U. Kanzarkar, Adv. Mr. Arpit Parkash, Adv. Mr. Vikalp Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Ghai, Adv. Gen. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Ms. Kanika Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Kirti Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Mayank Dahiya, Adv. Ms. Priyanka C., Adv. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasiya, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Prashant Singh -I, Adv. Mr. Sugosh Subramanian,Adv Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mrs. Arachana Preeti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv.

2 Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rohit Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is reported that the evidence on affidavit of the concerned witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) are already filed. Now those witnesses are to be cross-examined. Put up on 04.01.2023 for cross-examination before the learned Registrar. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.1 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvasi, Adv Mr. Harsh Singh Rawat, Adv For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailednra, Advocate Mr. Tushar Mehta LD SG Mr. S.V. Raju LD ASG Mr. M.K.Maroria AOR Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv Ms. Deepabali Dutta Adv Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Ld. ASG Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia Advocate Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Advocate Mr. Sughosh Subramanian adv Mr. Prashant Singh adv Mrs. Vimla Sinhaadv Ms. Madurima Mridul Adv Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma AOR Mr. Wasim Quadri, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Archana Preeti Gupta, Adv.

2 Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv Mr. Rajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. for State of Haryana Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent-State seeking adjournment, list the matter after four weeks. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 REVISED ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit No.1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII-A) Date : 17-02-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Parties Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Nanda, AG Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Purushaindra Kaurav, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mrs. Archana Preeti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chandra Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Anuradha Mishra, Adv. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Chinmoyee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Sarad Kr. Singhania, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv.

2 Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Narender Singh, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At request, list the matters on 17.04.2020. (RACHNA) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit No.1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 1/2008 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII-A) Date : 17-02-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Parties Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Nanda, AG Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Purushaindra Kaurav, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mrs. Archana Preeti Gupta, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chandra Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Anuradha Mishra, Adv. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Ms. Chinmoyee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Sarad Kr. Singhania, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv.

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 25-09-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvasi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. ANS Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mrs. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Yasir rauf, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendru, Adv. Mr. Purushaindra Kaura, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms. Preeti Kuchiya, Adv. Mr. Chadra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Ms. Harsha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv.

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter before the Bench of which one of us (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari) is not a member. It is agreed between the parties that the matter may be adjourned for four months as some negotiations are going on. List the matter after four months. In the meantime, affidavit by way of evidence be filed. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 Revised ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 MAY BE SHOWN SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE", ) Date : 20-08-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. M/s. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. ANS Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mrs. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr.Ranjan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S.Makker, Adv. Mr. Purushaindra Kaurav, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Harsha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is agreed that issue No.4 regarding maintainability of the suit be taken up as a preliminary issue. Post this matter on 25.09.2019. In the meantime, it will be open to the defendants to file affidavit of evidence, if so advised. It is made clear that no further time to file affidavit of evidence will be granted. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 MAY BE SHOWN SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE") Date : 06-08-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Harsha, Adv. Mrs. Pinky Anand, ASG Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mrs. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mrs. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Hemant Arya, Adv. Mr. Chakitan V.S. Papta, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. D.S. Mahra, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let the matter be listed before a Bench of which one of us (Hon. Surya Kant, J.) is not a Member. Pleadings to be completed in the meantime. (R. NATARAJAN) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 MAY BE SHOWN SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE) Date : 12-04-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv./AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Mayne, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mr. U.P. Singh, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Kartikeya Vajpai, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mrs. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Yasir Rauf, Adv. Mrs. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The issues framed by us today are as follows:- 1. Whether the Government of India is under a mandatory obligation to take over the physical possession of the irrigation headworks, at Ropar, Harike and Firozepur and place the same under the physical control of Bhakra Beas Management Board for the administration, maintenance and operation of said irrigation headworks, and whether there is a corresponding legal obligation on the part of the State of Punjab to deliver possession of the above mentioned irrigation headworks to the Government of India? (OPP) 2. Whether the Union of India is under obligation to direct the BBMB to take possession of irrigation headworks at Ropar, Harike and Firozepur? (OPP) 3. Whether Sections 78 and 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 is ultra vires to the Constitution either on the ground of lack of legislative competence on the part of the Parliament or on the ground that the same is inconsistent with the Article 3 & 4 of the Constitution? (OPD) [This issue has already been framed in O.S No.2 of 2007] 4. Whether the suit filed by the State of Rajasthan is maintainable in view of Section 11 of the Inter- State River Disputes Act, 1966 read with Article 262(2) of the Constitution of India? (OPD)

3 5. Whether the Government of India is under an obligation to take over the physical possession of the irrigation headworks at Ropar, Harike and Firozepur in the light of provisions contained in Section 79 r/w Section 48 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966? (OPD) 6. Whether the State of Rajasthan has any locus to file the instant suit given the fact that it receives no water from the headworks of Ropar and Firozepur and there is a joint monitoring/observation of Gauges along with Rajasthan and BBMB at Harike and has suffered no prejudice in this regard? (OPD) 7. To what relief the plaintiff is entitled? (OPP) Affidavits of evidence be submitted to the Registrar of this Court within a period of three months from today. List on Tuesday, the 6 th August, 2019. (R. NATARAJAN) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (VIDE ORDER DATED 09.03.2018 “O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 MAY BE SHOWN SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE”) Date : 08-03-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, AOR Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Kartikeya Vajpai, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Hemant Arya, Adv. Mr. Yasir Rauf, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

2 Mr. D.S. Mahra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after two weeks. (R. NATARAJAN) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IA 1/2008, in Original Suite No(s).1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 06-03-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For The Parties: Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Mr. Avdesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Nisarg Choudhary,Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati,Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta,Adv. Ms. Priyanka Parida,Adv. Mr. Kartikeya Vajpai,Adv. Mr. A.K.Ganguli,Sr.Adv. Mr. R.S.Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K.Shailendra,Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr. Atul Jha,Adv. Mr. D.K.Devesh,Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghuvanshi,Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR

2 Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Mr. Ujjwal Singh,Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim,Adv. Mr. Gautam Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. K.K.Venugopal,ASG Mr. A.N.S.Nadkarni,ASG Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania,Adv. Mr. S.M.Sharma,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar,Adv. Mr. C.Chandra,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. J.S.Attri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Narender Singh,Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha,Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rahul Dev Singh,Adv. Ms. Neha Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after summer vacation. (B.Parvathi) (Kailash Chander) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (VIDE ORDER DATED 09.03.2018 "LIST O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE") Date : 08-02-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Kartikeya Vajpai, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Ms. Snidha Mehra, Adv. Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Hemant Arya, Adv. Mr. Yasir Rauf, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List in the first week of March, 2019. (R. NATARAJAN) (SANTOSH KUMAR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER

1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, AOR Ms. Pinki Anand, ASG Ms. ANS Nadkarni, ASG Mr. A.K. Panda, Sr.Adv. Mrs. V. Mohna, Sr.Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Adv. Mr. Hemant Arya, Adv. Mr. C. Vikram Shekhar Papta, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr.Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

2 As agreed to by all the parties, the matter is adjourned by two weeks. (MANAV SHARMA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite No.1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (With IA No.1 - For grant of interim relief) WITH Original Suit No.2/2007 (XVII) Date : 07-01-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar,Sr.Adv. State of Haryana Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,AOR (AAG) Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran,Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta,Adv. Mr. Deepshikhar Bharati,Adv. State of Pb. Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. J.S. Attri,Sr.Adv. State of HP Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,AOR Mr. Manish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Narender Singh,Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv. UOI Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri,Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,AOR Mr. Sharad Kumar Singhania,Adv. Ms. Charanya Lakshmi Kumaran,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,AOR State of Raj. Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,AOR ..2/-

.2. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad,AOR Mr. Ujjwal Singh,Adv. Mr. Mojahid Katrim Khan,Adv. Mr. Gautam Prabhakar,Adv. for Mr. M. Shoeb Alam,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 6.3.2019, as prayed. (Kailash Chander) (Sarita Purohit) Assistant Registrar AR-cum-PS

1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12-10-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER Counsel for the parties Mr. Vikramjit Banerejee, ASG Mr. S. S. Shamsherry, AAG, Rajasthan Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. A. K. Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Wasim Qadri, Adv. Mr. G. S. Makkar, Adv. Mr. Hemant Arya, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv.

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment due to personal difficulty. Post after Christmas vacation. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. MANOJ JAIN Original Suit (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 11-09-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Senior Advocate Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Addl. Advocate General Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Advocate Mrs. Sujata Dalabehera, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Parida, Advocate Ms. Rita Gupta, Advocate Mrs. Nisarg Chaudhary, Advocate Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Advocate ( IN O.S.01/2008 ) For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Senior Advocate Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Addl. Advocate General Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Advocate Mrs. Sujata Dalabehera, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Parida, Advocate Ms. Rita Gupta, Advocate Mrs. Nisarg Chaudhary, Advocate Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Advocate ( IN O.S.02/2007 ) Sh. J.S. Attri, Senior Advocate Sh. Abhinav Mukherji, Advocate Sh. Manish Kumar, Advocate Sh. Vijay Kumar , Advocate …..2

ITEM NO.26 -2- Sh. R.S Suri, Senior Advocate Sh. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advocate Sh. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. (Plaintiff in O.S. 2/2007) Sh. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Rajashthan Sh. Vikram Banerjee, Adv. Sh. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Sh. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Sh. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Sh. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Sh. Abhishek Raj, Adv. Sh. Arvind Sharma, Adv. Sh. G.S.Makker,Adv Mrs. Shefali Sethi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORIGINAL SUIT No. 2/2007 Shri Verinder Badial, Witness of Defendant No. 4 has been cross-examined by the Plaintiff(State of Punjab). Since the other defendants did not cross-examine said witness, the witness is discharged from the proceedings. No other witness remains to be examined in this suit. In the present suit, the plaintiff has examined one witness and two witnesses have been examined from the side of defendants. Defendant No.3 had though submitted affidavit of one witness but as per order sheet dated 9.04.2018, said witness was eventually decided not to be examined by defendant No.3. Therefore, the evidence in Original Suit No. 2 of 2007 stands completed. ORIGINAL SUIT NO.1/2008 Evidence in main suit i.e. Original Suit No. 1 of 2008 has already been completed on 26.07.2016. In the said suit the plaintiff has examined one witness and defendants have examined two witnesses in all. ……..3

ITEM NO.26 -3- Registry is directed to take steps to place both the above- said matters before the Hon’ble Court. MANOJ JAIN Registrar

1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 27-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. S. S. Shamshery, AAG, Rajasthan Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Ms. Indira Bhaskar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. A. K. Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Vimha Sinha, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. G. S. Makkar, Adv. Mr. Jaideep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Ms. Sujata Dalabehera, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Haryana submits that the State of Haryana has no objection to the draft issues as proposed by the State of Rajasthan. The submission is recorded. The learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Punjab has today circulated the draft issues and the learned senior counsel appearing for the States of Haryana and Rajasthan seek some time to respond to it. Post after six weeks. The learned counsel for the State of Punjab shall file the draft issues in the Registry. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR PS : Copy of the draft issues filed by the State of Punjab is enclosed with this Record of Proceeding.

1 ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. MANOJ JAIN Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 08-08-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukherji, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. B.L. Shivhare, Adv. Mr A.K. Sharma, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Laxmi Shastri, Adv. (O.S.1/2008) Mr. G.S. Makkar, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR

2 Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORIGINAL SUIT No. 2/2007 Shri. Verinder Badial, witness on behalf of defendant no.4 is present. However, Shri. M.Shoeb Alam, learned counsel for defendant no.4 has very fairly admitted that he, in terms of last order, could not intimate the other counsels about the fact that the witness will be turning up today for the purposes of recording of the deposition. In view of the aforesaid, the affidavit of Shri. Verinder Badial, which is already on record, is tendered in evidence as Examination in Chief by said witness. His Cross-Examination would take place on 11 th September, 2018 at 2:30 P.M. The date has been given after asertaining the convenience of the witness as well as of the counsels for both the sides. MANOJ JAIN Registrar SS

1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit No(s). 2 of 2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 27-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. C. S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. S. Shamsherry, AAG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Mrs. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. G. S. Makker, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhanker, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Puneet, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Ms. Priyanka, Adv. Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The State of Rajasthan has submitted the draft issues. The defendants seek some time to respond to the same. Post after four weeks. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS/SEEKING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 13-07-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Santosh Prasad Chaursiya, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Abhishek Raj, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Rajashtan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In Original Suit No. 2 of 2007 Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, learned counsel for the defendant No. 4 Fairly conceded that sufficient opportunities have already been granted to the State of Jammu & Kashmir to produce the witness but the witness could not be produced as he has retired from the services. He seeks three weeks' time to produce the witness. Heard and perused the record. In view of the submission made, absolute last and final opportunity is given to the State of Jammu and Kashmir to produce the witness on the next date of hearing. The intimation about the presence of the witness will be given to the opposite counsel well in advance. List on 8 th August, 2018 at 2.30 p.m. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar PS

1 ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS/SEEKING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 17-05-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms. Harsha, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Chandrashekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Prasad Chaursiya, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. S.S. Shamsherry, Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv.

2 Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the State of Jammu & Kashmir submitted that he has taken up the matter with the State Government seeking instructions as to whether it would like to examine witness on its behalf. However, instruction are awaited. As a sequel thereto he placed on record emails thereby showing that he has taken up the matter with the State Government but instructions are awaiting. In the interest of justice, one last and final opportunity is granted to produce the witness failing which the matter shall be placed before the Hon’ble Court. List again on 13 th July, 2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 07-05-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

Item No.74 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (VIDE ORDER DATED 09.03.2018 "LIST O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE", ) Date : 25-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.S.Shamshery,AAG Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee,ASG Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. Ankit Raj,Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr.Vinay K.Shailendra,Adv. Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms.Reena Pandey,Adv. Mr.M.K.Maroria,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr.Arun Kumar Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of the Hon'ble Court's Order dated 9.3.2018 the instant suit was directed to be listed before Registrar's Court for the purpose of hearing the formalities regarding exhibition of documents.

Item No.74 2 I have gone through the file, the documents filed in suit are grouped in three categories viz. Admitted documents: meaning thereby those documents wherein the contents and execution is admitted besides parties are not interested to lead any oral evidence in support of those documents. Secondly, those documents wherein the contents and execution is in dispute. Thirdly, those documents, wherein the documents are denied in toto. Documents filed by the State of Rajasthan (plaintiff) P(A)-1 to P(A)-5, happens to be those documents which are categorically admitted by the defendants. Meaning thereby the documents stand admitted in material particulars by the parties. Therefore, these documents are exhibited as Exhibit P(A)-1 to P(A)-5 given the submission made by the parties they wish not to lead any evidence viz. these documents, so such documents can be received in evidence. Whereas documents P(AD)-1 to P(AD)-19 are those documents which are filed by the plaintiff wherein the documents are denied by some of the defendants. So these documents are subject matter of evidence and are required to be exhibited as P(AD)-1 to P(AD)-19. Whereas P(D)-1 to P(D)-25 are those documents which are filed by the plaintiff and these are denied in toto by the defendants. They are exhibited as Ext. P(D)-1 to P(D)-25. Whereas the documents filed by the defendants i.e D1(A)-1 to D1(A) -2, D3(A)-1, D4(A)-1 to D4(A)-9 are those documents which are admitted in material particulars by the plaintiff and co-defendants. viz-a-viz these documents, parties wish not to lead any evidence and therefore, these are to be received in evidence and exhibited as Ext. D1(A)-1 to D1(A)-2, D3(A)-1, D4(A)-1 to D4(A)-9 respectively.

Item No.74 3 Whereas documents D1(AD)-1 to D1(AD)-2, D4(AD)-1, filed by the defendants contents and execution thereof is denied by some of the co-defendants and plaintiff. So these documents are subject matter of evidence and required to be exhibited as Ext. D1(AD)-1 to D1(AD)-2D4(AD)-1. Documents, D1(D)-1 to D1(D)-10 are those documents which are filed by the defendants and they are denied in toto by the plaintiff and the co-defendants. These are exhibited as Ext. D1(D)-1 to D1(D)-10. Since admission denial stage is over, matter be listed before the Hon'ble Court. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

REVISED ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 09-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikramjit Banderjee, ASG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. P.Kumar Biswal, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, AOR. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. Ms. Harsha, Adv.

Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Ms. Pooja Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Prakash Gautam, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Matter stood posted for production of witness of defendant No. 3 i.e. State of Himachal Pradesh. Today, it is submitted by Shri J.S. Attri, learned Senior Counsel representing State of Himachal Pradesh that he is under instructions not to produce the witness for the purpose of cross-examination and that the affidavit of the witness lead by State of Himachal Pradesh be not lead in evidence. Statement taken on record. In this background, the on-oath statement given by way of affidavit shall be taken off the record. Whereas Defendant No. 4 State of Jammu and Kashmir has earlier filed on-oath statement of witness Verinder Badial. Learned counsel for the Defendant No. 4 is, therefore, directed to produce his witness for the purpose of cross-examination, in case he desires so. He seeks time to obtain instructions in this regard. Granted. List on 7 th May, 2018 at 2.30 P.M. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

ITEM NO.24 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 09-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikramjit Banderjee, ASG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. P.Kumar Biswal, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, AOR. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms. Priyanka Parida, Adv. Ms. Harsha, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR

Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Ms. Pooja Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Prakash Gautam, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Matter stood posted for production of witness of defendant No. 3 i.e. State of Himachal Pradesh. Today, it is submitted by Shri J.D. Attri, learned Senior Counsel representing State of Himachal Pradesh that he is under instructions not to produce the witness for the purpose of cross-examination and that the affidavit of the witness lead by State of Himachal Pradesh be not lead in evidence. Statement taken on record. In this background, the on-oath statement given by way of affidavit shall be taken off the record. Whereas Defendant No. 4 State of Jammu and Kashmir has earlier filed on-oath statement of witness Verinder Badial. Learned counsel for the Defendant No. 4 is, therefore, directed to produce his witness for the purpose of cross-examination, in case he desires so. He seeks time to obtain instructions in this regard. Granted. List on 7 th May, 2018 at 2.30 P.M. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

1 ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 07-05-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Harsha, Adv. Ms. Priyanka P., Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar singh, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv.

2 Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Ms. Pooja Tiwari, Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Mohd. Shahid Hussain, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Matter is posted for recording of statement of witness no.4, i.e, State of Jammu & Kashmir. However, the witness is not present. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, for State of Jammu & Kashmir stated that learned Advocate-on-record is busy in a Special Bench in Court No.1 more so, they are yet to receive instructions from the State of Jammu & Kashmir as to whether it would like to examine the witness or not. He seeks and is granted one week’s time to apprise this Court. List again on 17.05.2018 at 2.30 P.M. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 2/2011 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (VIDE ORDER DATED 09.03.2018 "LIST O.S. 1/2011 AND O.S. 2/2011 SEPARATELY BUT IN SEQUENCE",) Date : 06042018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.S.S.Shamshery,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Vinay K.Shailendra,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar,Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr.Swaran Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This matter has been fixed for exhibition of documents. It is submitted by the Ld.counsel for the Plaintiff that he would be preparing a chart of the documents which are sought to be exhibited by both the parties as evidence and the same will be submitted before this Court on the next date of hearing. Allowed. List the matter again on 25.04.2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar SB

ITEM NO.81 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s).1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR DIRECTIONS REGARDING FURTHER RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 13-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Ms. Harsha, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Mr. Deepak Tyagi, Adv. Mrs.Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR

Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is posted for production of witnesses of defendant no.3, i.e, State of Himachal Pradesh. It is submitted by Mr. J.S. Attri, learned Senior Counsel representing State of Himachal Pradesh, that he seeks further four weeks' time to take instructions from the State as to whether it intends to produce any listed witness for the purpose of cross-examination. Statement is taken on record. Given last opportunity. List on Monday, i.e., on 09.04.2018 at 2:30 P.M. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

(REVISED) ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM FOR RECORDING CROSS-EXAMINATION IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 31-01-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Senior Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Shri Naresh Kumar Jasrai, witness of Defendant No. 5 has been cross-examined by the plaintiff. The State of Rajasthan does

not intend to produce more witness. So, evidence of State of Rajasthan is closed. Defendant No. 3, State of Himachal Pradesh represented by Shri J.S. Attri, Senior Advocate says that though the State of Himachal Pradesh has led the affidavit of one of its witness and that he would be seeking instructions from the State as to whether such witness is to be produced or not. For that, he needs time. Granted. List on 13 th March, 2018 at 2:30 P.M. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM FOR RECORDING CROSS-EXAMINATION IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 31-01-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Senior Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Shri Naresh Kumar Jasrai, witness of Defendant No. 5 has been cross-examined by the plaintiff. The State of Rajasthan does not intend to produce more witness. So, evidence of State of

Rajasthan is closed. Defendant No. 3, State of Himachal Pradesh represented by Shri Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate says that though the State of Himachal Pradesh has led the affidavit of one of its witness and that he would be seeking instructions from the State as to whether such witness is to be produced or not. For that, he needs time. Granted. List on 13 th March, 2018 at 2:30 P.M. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

1 ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS Respondent(s) (MATTER WILL BE TAKEN UP FOR RECORDING CROSS-EXAMINATION BEFORE REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM IN O.S. 2 OF 2007) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) (MATTER WILL BE TAKEN UP AT 2.30 PM FOR RECORDING CROSS-EXAMINATION IN R-2) Date : 07-12-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Plaintiff Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advocate (State of Punjab) Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Advocate For Defendant Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar,Sr. Advocate (State of Haryana) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Piyush Hans, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Advocate Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Advocate For State of Rajasthan Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ankit Raj, Advocate Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adocate-on-Record For State of Mr. J.S. Attri, Senior Advocate Himachal Pradesh Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. Ms. Suman Rani, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Advocate

2 For State of Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Jammu & Kashmir Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR Mr. Kamal Kishore, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Learned counsel for the parties is present. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for plaintiff that Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Advocate, is engaged in a part-heard matter before the Hon'ble Court and, thus, may not be able to appear before this Court for cross-examination of the witness. In view of the submissions made, the matter is adjourned. Be posted on 31 st January, 2018. (SANJAY PARIHAR) Registrar (J-IV)

1 REVISED ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. MANOJ JAIN Original Suite (s). No(s). 1/2008 THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY OS 2/2007 MAY BE LISTED AGAINST THIS ITEM- FOR RECORDING OF EVIDENCE IN REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 AT 2.30 PM) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (XVII) Date : 08-08-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukherji, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Addl.A.G. Mr. Avdhesh Kumar singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sheoran, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Mr. B.L. Shivhare, Adv. Mr A.K. Sharma, Adv.

2 Dr. Mrs. Laxmi Shastri, Adv. (O.S.1/2008) Mr. G.S. Makkar, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ORIGINAL SUIT No. 2/2007 Shri. Verinder Badial, witness on behalf of defendant no.4 is present. However, Shri. M.Shoeb Alam, learned counsel for defendant no.4 has very fairly admitted that he, in terms of last order, could not intimate the other counsels about the fact that the witness will be turning up today for the purposes of recording of the deposition. In view of the aforesaid, the affidavit of Shri. Verinder Badial, which is already on record, is tendered in evidence as Examination in Chief by said witness. His Cross-Examination would take place on 11 th September, 2018 at 2:30 P.M. The date has been given after asertaining the convenience of the witness as well as of the counsels for both the sides. MANOJ JAIN Registrar SS

ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Original Suit (s).No(s). 1/2008 STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 Date : 22/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Uday Prakash Yadav, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Mr. Fauzil Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makkar, Adv. Ms. Reena Pandey, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.

Item No.59 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused office report, as such, put up in terms of order of the Hon'ble Court dated 27.2.2017 on 17.4.2017 at 2.30 P.M. for further cross-examination of Shri Amarjit Singh Dullet, witness. The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed to produce the witness on the given date. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

¾ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALOriginal Suit (s).No(s). 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) WITHORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007Date : 22/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Uday Prakash Yadav, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Adv. Mr. Fauzil Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makkar, Adv. Ms. Reena Pandey, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.Item No.59 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPerused office report, as such, put up in terms of orderof the Hon'ble Court dated 27.2.2017 on 17.4.2017 at 2.30 P.M.for further cross-examination of Shri Amarjit Singh Dullet,witness. The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed toproduce the witness on the given date. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit (s).No(s). 1/2008 STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) (OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION) WITH ORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007 (OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION) Date: 27/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Plaintiff(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mrs. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priranka Parida, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra, Adv. For Defendant(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, AOR Mr. M. Shoel Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. M. Karim Khan, Adv.

-2- Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. M. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Chandra Nand Jhan, Adv. Mr. Yugal Kishor Prasad, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mrs. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priranka Parida, Adv. Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singhania, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the plaintiff – State of Haryana in Original Suit No.1 of 2008 and Defendant No.2 in Original Suit No.2 of 2007 and perused the Office Report 23 rd February, 2017.

-3- No application as required has been filed within the stipulated period by the defendant No.2 – State of Haryana in Original Suit No.2/2007 so far. We direct that examination and cross-examination of the witnesses to carry on in the matter. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ÎITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSOriginal Suit (s).No(s). 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) (OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION)WITHORGNL.SUIT No. 2/2007(OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION)Date: 27/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAFor Plaintiff(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mrs. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priranka Parida, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra, Adv.For Defendant(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, AOR Mr. M. Shoel Alam, AOR Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Singh, Adv. Mr. M. Karim Khan, Adv.-2- Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. M. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Chandra Nand Jhan, Adv. Mr. Yugal Kishor Prasad, Adv. Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Avdhesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mrs. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priranka Parida, Adv. Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. S.K. Singhania, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, AOR Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Rajasthan

Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the plaintiff â¬ State of Haryana in Original Suit No.1 of 2008 and Defendant No.2in Original Suit No.2 of 2007 and perused the Office Report 23 rdFebruary, 2017.-3-No application as required has been filed within thestipulated period by the defendant No.2 â¬ State of Haryana inOriginal Suit No.2/2007 so far.We direct that examination and cross-examination of thewitnesses to carry on in the matter.(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit No. 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 01/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav,Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj,Adv. For Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar,Sr.Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Mr. R.K.Rajwanshi,Adv. Ms. Priyanka P.,Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati,Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani Singh,Adv. Mr. G.S.Makkar,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumr,Adv. Mr. M.K.Maroria,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K.Shailendra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Costs of Rs.500/- has been deposited with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee and proof of depositing the costs has also been filed. Process the matter for listing it before the Court. (Anita Malhotra) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master

ÖITEM NO.20 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSOriginal Suit No. 2/2011STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s)(Office report for directions)Date : 01/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv.Mr. Prateek Yadav,Adv.Mr. Ankit Raj,Adv.For Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagdeep Dhankhar,Sr.Adv.Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv.Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv.Mr. R.K.Rajwanshi,Adv.Ms. Priyanka P.,Adv.Ms. Deepshikha Bharati,Adv.Ms. Sunita Rani Singh,Adv.Mr. G.S.Makkar,Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumr,Adv.Mr. M.K.Maroria,Adv.Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv.Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.Mr. Vinay K.Shailendra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RCosts of Rs.500/- has been deposited with theSupreme Court Legal Services Committee and proof ofdepositing the costs has also been filed.Process the matter for listing it before the Court. (Anita Malhotra) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit. No.2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report for directions) Date : 17/08/2016 This suit was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. MR. Ankit Raj, ADV. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Mr. Vikram Banerjee, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,AOR Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rajwanshi, Adv. Mr. Navneet Gupta, Adv. Mr. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Deepak Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay of 167 days in filing replication is condoned subject to deposit of costs of Rs.500/- with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks from today. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (RENU DIWAN) SR.P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite No. 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendants(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 01/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S.Shamshery,AAG,Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee,Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav,Adv. Mr. Ishu Prayash,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.K.Verma,Adv. Mr. S.N.Tevdal,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K.Shailandra,Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan,Adv. Mr. Anil Grover,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharti,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By order dated 09.12.2015, learned Chamber Judge had granted one week's time to the counsel for the plaintiff for filing replication. However, no such replication has been filed.

2 Learned counsel for the plaintiff prays for a week's time to prefer an application for condonation of delay along with replication if any. (ASHIMA CHHABRA) SR. P.A. (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER

Ä 1 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite No. 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendants(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 01/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S.Shamshery,AAG,Rajasthan Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee,Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav,Adv. Mr. Ishu Prayash,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.K.Verma,Adv. Mr. S.N.Tevdal,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K.Shailandra,Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan,Adv. Mr. Anil Grover,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharti,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified By order dated 09.12.2015, learned Chamber Judge hadDigitally signed bySAPNA BISHTDate: 2016.02.0217:14:09 ISTReason: granted one week's time to the counsel for the plaintiff for filing replication. However, no such replication has been filed. 2 Learned counsel for the plaintiff prays for a week'stime to prefer an application for condonation of delayalong with replication if any.

(ASHIMA CHHABRA) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite. No. 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 09/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. S. Shamshery,AAG Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee,Adv. Ms. Preeti Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Yishu Prayash,Adv. Ms. S. Spandana Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar,Adv. Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, one week's time is granted to the learned counsel for the plaintiff for filing replication. If the replication is not filed within the extended time, the plaintiff shall not be entitled to file other replication. (ASHIMA CHHABRA) SR. P.A. (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

âITEM NO.18 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite. No. 2/2011STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s)(Office report for directions)Date : 09/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. S. Shamshery,AAG Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee,Adv. Ms. Preeti Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Yishu Prayash,Adv. Ms. S. Spandana Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar,Adv. Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Suman,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs prayed, one week's time is granted to the learnedcounsel for the plaintiff for filing replication. If thereplication is not filed within the extended time, theplaintiff shall not be entitled to file otherreplication. (ASHIMA CHHABRA)SR. P.A. (SUMAN JAIN)COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit. No. 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report for directions) Date : 10/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. S. Shamshery, Adv. Mr. Vikramjeet Banarjee, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anurag Pandey, Adv. For D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R L earned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted one week's time to file replication. If the replication is not filed within one week, the right to file the same will be closed. (RASHMI DHYANI) (SUMAN JAIN) Sr. P.A. Court Master

þ ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suit. No. 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report for directions) Date : 10/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. S. Shamshery, Adv. Mr. Vikramjeet Banarjee, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anurag Pandey, Adv. For D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted one week's time to file replication. If the replication is not filed within one week, the right to file the same will be closed. (RASHMI DHYANI) (SUMAN JAIN)Signature Not Verified Sr. P.A. Court MasterDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.09.1513:57:30 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite (s). No(s). 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report for directions) Date : 06/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Kusoom Khan, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Md. Hussain, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time granted to file replication by the State, at the request of the learned standing counsel for the State. (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

2 ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.14 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite (s). No(s). 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report for directions) Date : 06/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Kusoom Khan, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Md. Hussain, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time granted to file replication by the State, at the request of the learned standing counsel for the State.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVinod KumarDate: 2015.05.0817:34:28 ISTReason: (VINOD KR.JHA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

J 1 ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Original Suite (s). 2/2011 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 01/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Vikram Jeet, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sarfraz A. Siddiqui, Adv. Mr. S.K. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma ,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra ,Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. Shankar Divedi, Adv. Mr. B.Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool ,Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Prity Kunwar, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv.Digitally signed by Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv.Vinod KumarDate: 2014.08.0710:51:58 IST Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv.Reason: 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having regard to the explanation given by Mr. R.S. Suri,Senior Advocate, four weeks' further time is granted to therespondent State of Punjab to file the written statement. Sincethe time is allowed to the State of Punjab, other respondents whohave not filed their written statements so far are also allowed tofile the same. It is made clear that this is the last opportunity

given for filing their written statement and thereafter noopportunity will be granted. (VINOD KUMAR) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

òITEM NO.23 In Court No.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No. 2 of 2011STATE OF RAJASTHAN Plaintiff (s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant (s)(Office report on default)Date: 30/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Prakash Yadav, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool ,Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. R.S. Suri, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of defendant no. 1 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant no. 3 seeks further time to file written statement. Finally, eight weeks time is granted to both to file written statement. [ Neeta ] [ Sharda Kapoor] Sr. P.A. Court Master

,ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim relief and office report)WITHORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007Date: 27/01/2014 These Suits were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENCounsel for the parties Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. V.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Prakash Yadav, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kr. Sharma, Adv. ...2/- : 2 : Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. for Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. (NP) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. (NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R Learned counsel on either side submit that this matter be also placed before the Registrar for the purpose of cross- examination of witnesses as Original Suit No. 2 of 2007 is also pending before the Registrar. Ordered accordingly. Learned counsel for the State of Haryana also submitted that in the previous order dated October 18, 2013 passed in OS NO. 2 of 2007, it has been recorded that the Union of India has filed its evidence, but, in fact, it is not so. Submission recorded. |(N.S.K. Kamesh) | |(Saroj Saini) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

hITEM NO.101 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED ORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 11/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat ,Adv Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RO.S. No.1/2008 Today, the learned counsels representing the parties are presentbefore the Court. It appears that the evidence by way of affidavits on behalf of thecontesting parties have already come on record,Item No.101 -2-including documents on which the parties have placed their reliance insupport of their rivals' claims. After due deliberations with the learnedcounsel for the parties, the present suit is scheduled for Cross-Examination from 15th January to 17th January, 2014 at 2.30 P.M.O.S. No.2/2007 In the present proceeding, the plaintiff - State of Punjab hasalready tendered evidence by way of affidavit as well as documents havebeen also filed on record. So far as the defendants - States are concerned, barring State ofHimachal Pradesh, represented through the learned Senior Advocate, Mr. J.S.Attri, none of the defendants - States are desirous of tendering anyevidence on record either oral or documentary. Registry to issue notice to the learned Senior Advocate, Mr.J.S.Attri, appearing for the defendants - State of H.P. to file the necessaryevidence by way of affidavit as well as documents on record on or before15th to 17th January, 2014 as the present suit has been clubbed alongwithOriginal Suit No.1/2008 as per the direction of the Hon'ble Court. Registry is also directed to update the Cause List so that thelearned counsel for the parties should have the

Item No.101 -3-prior intimation of the progress of the matters well in advance so as tofacilitate them to take the necessary steps accordingly.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |

ÆITEM NO.101 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED ORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008 WITH ORIGINAL SUIT No.2/2007STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 31/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat ,Adv Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E ROriginal Suit No.1/2008 The present suit is to be listed for cross- examination of thewitnesses on behalf of the plaintiff andItem No.101 -2-the learned Advocate, Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi,, appearing on behalf of Mr.Ejaz Maqbool, Advocate-on-Record for the State of Haryana has been directedto submit a complete List of the Witnesses as well as List of the Documentsby 11.11.2013.Original Suit No.2/2007 It is pertinent to note that the learned counsel, appearing on behalfof the plaintiff - State of Punjab, State of Rajasthan and Union of Indiahave already filed the evidence by way of affidavit on record. In fact thelearned counsel, appearing for the State of Haryana has already made asubmission that they would not like to file any evidence by way ofaffidavit on record. It appears that the learned Senior Advocate, Mr.J.S.Attri, appearingfor Himachal Pradesh has prayed for some time to file the evidence by wayof affidavit. It is pertinent to note that a further direction came to be passed bythe Hon'ble Court to list the matters on 27.1.2014 so as to enable theconcerned parties to file their respective evidence by way of affidavit. Under the circumstances and in view of the directions passed in the

above-noted suit, Registry to issue the necessary intimation to the learnedSenior Advocate, Mr.J.S.Attri, appearing for the State of Himachal PradeshtoItem No.101 -3-remain present before this Court on 11.11.2013 so as to fix up the scheduleof the hearing of the matter. List again on 11.11.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

DITEM NO.26 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO.2 of 2007Date: 18/10/2013 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG Mr. Vinay Kuhar,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi,Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.State of Punjab Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra,Adv.State of HP Mr. J.S. Attri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh,AAG Mr. V.K. Sharma,Adv. Ms. Priyanka Bharihoke,Adv.State of Rajasthan Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh,Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv. ..2/- .2. Mr. Mohan Jain,ASG Mr. D.K. Thakur,Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar,Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sidharth Dave,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.(Not present) Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv.(Not present) Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv.

Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R O.S.No.1/2008 : Learned counsel appearing for the Union of India has submitted that the Union of India would not like to file any evidence by way of affidavit and written submission has already been filed by them. It has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff, State of Punjab and State of Rajasthan that evidence has already been filed by them. In the circumstances, it is directed that the matter may be placed before the Registrar for cross-examination of the concerned parties. O.S.No.2/2007 : It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff, State of Punjab and State of Rajasthan and the Union of India that evidence has already been filed by them. Learned counsel appearing for the State of Haryana states that they would not like to file any evidence. Mr. J.S. Attri, learned Senior counsel, appearing for the State of Himachal Pradesh, prays for some time to file evidence by way of affidavit. ..3/- .3. List the matters on 27th January, 2014, so as to enable the concerned parties to file their respective evidence by way of affidavits. |(Sarita Purohit) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

´ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT No. 1 of 2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITHORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007Date: 26/08/2013 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, Addl. Adv. Gen, Haryana Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Anit Antil, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalandra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohan Jain, ASG Mr. D. K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Chandra Kumar, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv. Mr. M. S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. S. S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Ms. Insha Mir, Adv. Mr. Raghav Chadha, Adv. (State of J & K) Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Adv. (State of Himachal Pradesh) Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Time to file evidence is extended by 30th September, 2013.

The matter be listed on 18th October, 2013. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

\220ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT No. 1 of 2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITHORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007Date: 22/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, Addl. Adv. Gen, Haryana Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohan Jain, ASG Mr. D. S. Thaur, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. S. S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. Zaid Ali, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. (State of Himachal Pradesh) Mr. Sunit Fernandes, Adv. Ms. Insha, Adv. Mr. Raghav Chadha, Adv. (State of Jammu & Kashmir) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for theDefendant No. 1 - State of Punjab seeking adjournment for filing evidenceby way of affidavits in both the suits, list on 26th August, 2013.

The abovesaid affidavits be filed in the meantime. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

âITEM NO.38 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report ))WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 26/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. Mr. Mohan Jain, ASG Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv.

-2- Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Varun Thakur, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. Amit Lubhaya, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Ms. Insha Mir, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Ms. Snigdha Pandey Kaushik, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the State of Punjab. Stand over to 22nd July, 2013 as requested on behalf of the State of Punjab. Learned counsel is permitted to make corrections in the pleadings. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (S.S.R.Krishna) Court Master Court Master

òITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA PLAINTIFF(S) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. DEFENDANT(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO.2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 21/03/2013 These Suits were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG (Haryana) Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat ,Adv Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. .....2/- : 2 : Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Ms. Insha Mir, Adv. Ms. Snigdha Pandey, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG (Rajasthan) Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.2 of 2007 As prayed for, time till 18th April, 2013 is granted to the plaintiff to file affidavit of evidence. | (Sanjay Kumar) Court Master | (Indu Satija) || |Court Master |

ºITEM NO.MM-1 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2008STATE OF HARYANA PLAINTIFF(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. DEFENDANT(s)WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007Date: 20/03/2013 These matters were mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDAFor Plaintiff(s) Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post it tomorrow, i.e., 21st March, 2013 for direction.| (S.K. Rakheja) | |(Indu Satija) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

ªITEM NO.36 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2008STATE OF HARYANA ... PLAINTIFF (S) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ... DEFENDANT(S)(With appln(s) for AMENDING/REFRAMING of Issue No. 7 framed by this Hon'bleCourt on 6.8.2012 (I.A. No. 2) and for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORGNL. SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 22/02/2013 These matters were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDAFor Plaintiff(s) Mr. Vinod A. Bobde, Sr. Adv.in O.S. No. 1/08 Mr. K.K. Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Ms. Mrigank Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Ms. Kamna Sagar, Adv.For State of Haryana Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG, Haryana Mr. Tarjit Singh Chikkara, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv.For Defendant(s)/ Mr. P.P. Malhotra, A.S.G. (N.P.)U.O.I. Mr. Mohan Jain, A.S.G. Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. Chetan Chawla, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv.For State of Punjab Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv.& for Plaintiff in Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv.O.S. No. 2/2007 Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Adv.For State of Rajasthan Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Adv.For U.T. Of Chandigarh Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat, Adv.For State of J & K Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Ms. Vernika Tomar, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Ms. Insha Mir, Adv.For State of H.P. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, AAG Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. Mr. N.K. Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R O.S. No. 1 of 2008: The State of Punjab opposes the prayer made in this application (I.A. No. 2) on the ground that it shifts the onus of proof on it. We allow the application (I.A. No. 2) in terms of the prayer made. It is stated by learned senior counsel representing the State of Haryana that affidavit of Evidence shall be filed within six weeks. Let it be done. O.S. No. 2 of 2007: Learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Haryana states that it does not intend to file affidavit of evidence in the suit. List both the matters on Friday, the 26th April, 2013 for directions. | (S.K. Rakheja) | |(Indu Satija) ||Court Master | |Court Master |

LITEM NO.40 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report) WITHORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007Date: 04/02/2013 These cases were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Parties (s) Mr. Vinod A.Bobde, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.K. Lahiri,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv.-on-record Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi,Adv. Ms. Kamna Sagar, Adv.For Haryana Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.-on-recordFor Punjab Mr. Rajiv Dhawan,Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv.-on-record Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. P.P. Malhotra, ASG Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. D.K.Thakur,Adv. Mr. Shailender Saini, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.-on-record ...2/- -2-For Chandigarh Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv.-on-record Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Adv.-on-recordFor J&K Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv.-on-record Ms. Vernika Tomar,Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma,Adv. Ms. Insha Mir, Adv.

For H.P. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,Adv.-on-record Mr. Suryanaryana Singh, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv.-on-record UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these cases before a bench of which one of us (Surinder Singh Nijjar, J.) is not a member. |(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(INDU BALA KAPUR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |

ÜITEM NO.27 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT No. 2 of 2011STATE OF RAJASTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 05/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Addl.Adv. Gen, Rajasthan Mr. Amit Lubhaya, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. (For State of Punjab) Mr. K. K. Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Taniha Kishore, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. (For State of Haryana) Ms. Varuna Bhandar Gugnani, Adv. (For UOI) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Six weeks' time, as requested by learned counsel for the defendants,is granted to file statement of case.| (Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(Indu Bala Kapur) ||Sr. P.A. | |Court Master |

®BITEM NO.39 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT NO.1 of 2008STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s)(With appln. for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORIGINAL SUIT NO.2/2007Date: 06/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Plaintiff(s) Mr. Vinod A.Bobde,Sr.Adv.in OS.No.1/08 Mr. K.K. Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv. Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Adv. Ms.Kamna Sagar, Adv.State of Haryana Mr.Manjit Singh, AAG, Haryana, Adv. Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv.For Defendant(s) Mr. Mohan Jain,ASGFor UOI Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr.Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Zaid Ali, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahara, Adv. Ms.Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. SWA Qadri, Av. Mr. Shailder Saini, Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For State of Punjab Mr. Rupinder Singh Suri,Sr.Adv.& for plaintiff in Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv.OS.No.2/07 Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra.Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. ...2/- :2:State of Rajasthan Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Anjani KUmar Dubey, Adv. Mr. R.Gopalakrishnan,Adv.U.T. Chandigarh Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr.Adv. Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshn Singh Rawat, Adv.State of J & K Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Ms.Vernika Tomar, Adv. Mr. Shashank K. Lal, Adv.

State of H.P. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The following issues have been framed in both the Suits: ISSUES FRAMED IN SUIT NO.1/2008: (1) Whether Sections 78 and 79 of the Punjab Re-organisation Act, 1966 is ultra vires the Constitution either on the ground of lack of legislative competence on the part of the Parliament or on the ground that the same is inconsistent with Articles 3 & 4 of the Constitution? (2) Whether the suit filed by the State of Haryana is maintainable in view of Section 11 of the Inter-State River Water Dispute Act, 1966 read with Article 262(2) of the Constitution of India? (3) Whether the Government of India is under a mandatory obligation to take over the physical possession of the irrigation headworks, at Ropar, Harike and Ferozpur and place the same under the physical control of Bhakra Beas Management Board for the administration, maintenance and operation of the said irrigation headworks, and whether there is a corresponding legal obligation on the part of the ..3/- :3: State of Punjab to deliver possession of the above-mentioned irrigation headworks to the Government of India? (4) Whether the State of Haryana has an enforceable legal right under the provisions of the P.R. Act, 1966 to such of the reliefs claimed in the Suit? (5) Whether the directions contemplated under Section 79(8) of the Punjab Re-organisation Act take within their sweep a direction to deliver the physical possession of the irrigation headworks mention in Section 79(1)? (6) Whether the irrigation headworks in dispute statutorily vest in the State of Punjab under Section 48 of the Act, and, therefore, impermissible in law to compel the State of Punjab to part with the possession of the said irrigation headworks? (7) Whether the State of Haryana has any locus to file the instant suit given the fact that it receives no water from the Headworks of Ropar, Harike, Ferozepur and has suffered no prejudice in this regard? ISSUES FRAMED IN SUIT NO.2/2007 1. Whether Sections 78 and 79 of the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966 are ultra vires the Constitution of India? 2. If so, whether the State of Punjab is entitled to a consequential declaratory decree declaring the provisions of Sections 78 and 79 ultra vires, and all acts, deeds and things done

pursuant to the said provisions or in consequence thereof, non-est and void ab initio? ...4/- :4: 3. Whether the provisions of Order XXXII, Rules 1 and 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 are ultra vires of the Constitution of India and the State of Punjab entitled to a consequential declaratory decree? 4. Whether Punjab's Suit is barred by Article 262 of the Constitution of India read with Section 11 of the Inter State River Waters Disputes Act, 1956 because Punjab claims a legal right to regulate the waters of the rivers Ravi, Beas and Sutlej in its territory and consequently, whether the Suit is liable to be rejected at the threshold? 5. Whether Punjab's Suit is barred by the provisions of Order XXIII, Rule 6(b) read with Order XXXII, Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 and consequently, whether the Suit is liable to be rejected at the threshold? 6. Whether the decision of this Hon'ble court in its judgment dated June 4, 2004 in the case of State of Haryana v. State of Punjab as reported inter-alia in (2004) 12 SCC 673 at pgs. 703- 704, paras 72-77 operates as res judicata and those questions cannot be re-agitated in a fresh suit under Artilce 131 of the Constitution of India? 7. Whether it is legally impermissible for the State of Punjab to challenge the very statute under Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution of India to ...5/- :5: which it owes its existence as an unit of the federation of India and consequently, the Suit is liable to be rejected on this ground as well? 8. Whether the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966 which created the present States of Punjab and Haryana being an Act of Parliament under Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution of India which confer plenary power to reorganize States and is paramount and unfettered by Article 246 and the three Lists in the VIIth Schedule of the Constitution of India and is ex-facie a competent piece of legislation in its entirety? Eight weeks' time is granted for filing affidavit for examination-in-chief to both the parties. Put up on 29th October, 2012. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

FITEM NO.94 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report ))WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 31/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. Ms. Vernika Tomar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the parties are represented. Heard Ld. counsel for both sides. The State of Jammu and Kashmir has served ...2/- Item No.94 : 2 : statement of admission and denial to the counsel for the contesting parties in open court. Counsel for both sides accept the statement of admission and denial prepared by the office. In the light of the above, office shall finalise the marking of the documents in accordance with the pattern followed and serve copy on the contesting parties before 6.8.2012. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as directed by the Hon'ble Court.

| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |

ÀITEM NO.123 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASORIGINAL SUIT 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report ))WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 23/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Ms. Sudha Pal,Adv. Mr. K.K. Dhawan,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both sides are represented. It is submitted by the parties that they have not been served The statement of ...2/- Item No.123 : 2 : admission and denial filed by the State of Jammu & Kashmir. Ld. standing counsel for the State of Jammu & kashmir is directed to serve copy of it on the counsel appearing for the parties within 3 days and file proof. The office has prepared a composite statement of admission and denial based on the statement of admission and denial filed by the contesting parties. The office shall serve a copy of it each to the Ld. counsel for the contesting parties. The Ld. counsel for such parties may verify and submit whether the composite statement of case is in order. List on 31.7.2012 as last item.

4ITEM NO.81 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report ))WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007(With office report)Date: 07/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. Sharavan Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kr. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. Ms. Vernika Tomar,adv. Mr. Krishna Adhikary,Adv. ...2/-Item No.81 : 2 : UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Union of India, State of Jammu & Kashmir, State of Himachal Pradesh and Union Territory of Chandigarh granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing their statement of admission and denial. Office to process it. List the matters on 3.7.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

ÒITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASORIGINAL SUIT 2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 19/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay K. Shailender,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Harsh Vardhan Surana,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool ,Adv Mr. Naresh K. Sharma ,Adv Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat ,Adv Ms. Astha Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes ,Adv Mr. M.S. Doabia,Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Plaintiffs and defendants are represented. Heard. Plaintiff and defendant No.2 submits that they are willing to file statement of admission and denial by tomorrow. ...2/- Item No.72 : 2 : Office to receive it. Union of India, State of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan seek time for filing statement of admission and denial. Office to prepare a consolidate list of documents admitted and denied by the parties. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court on 23.4.2012 as already ordered. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar

JITEM NO.47 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 of 2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)WITH ORGNL.SUIT NO. 2 of 2007 (For Prel.Hearing)(With office report)Date: 26/03/2012 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Plaintiff(s) Mr. Vinod A. Bobde,Sr.Adv.in OS 1/08 & State Mr. K.K. Lahiri,Adv.of Haryana in OS No. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv.2/2007 Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.For Defendant(s) Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.For State of Punjab Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. GOpal Jain,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra,Adv.For UOI Mr. H.P. Raval,ASG Mr. Mohan Jain,ASG Mr. A. Mariyaputam,Sr.Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar,Adv. Mr. D.K. Thakur,Adv. Mr. Harish Kr.Khinghi,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Quadri,Adv. Mr. T.Qadri,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. ....2/- -2-For State of Dr. Manish Singhvi,AGRajasthan Mr. D.V. Devesh,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv.State of J&K Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. Mr. Krishana Adhikany,Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma,Adv. Ms. Vemika T.,Adv.U.T.Chandigarh Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia,Adv. Mr. S.S.Rawat,Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.For State of H.P. Mr.Naresh K. Sharma,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, list on 9th April, 2012. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master

¤ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendant(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)Date: 21/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Plaintiff(s) Mr. Vinod A.Bobde,Sr.Adv. Mr. K.K. Lahiri,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv. Ms. Kamna Sagar,Adv. Mr. M. Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.For Defendant(s) Mr. Mohan Jain,ASGFor UOI Mr. Prabhat Kumar,Adv. Mr. A. Mariaputham,Sr.Adv. Mr. W.S.A. Quadri,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Punjab Mr. Rupinder Singh Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. S.Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain,Adv.For Rajasthan Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr. Devanshu K. Devesh,Adv. Mr. R.Gopalakrishnan,Adv. ...2/- -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on Friday i.e. 2nd March, 2012. In the meantime, parties are permitted toexchange draft issues and documents etc. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master

vITEM NO.22 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT No. 2 of 2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report for Directions)Date: 10/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy ,Adv Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv. Mr. Krishanu Abhikary, Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Devanshu K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, four weeks' time is granted to the petitionerto file replication to the written statement filed by RespondentNo. 6, failing which, the petitioner shall not be allowed to filereplication. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Renuka Sadana) Sr. P. A. Court Master

ÄITEM NO.46 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Plaintiff(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Defendant(s)(With Office report on default)Date: 28/11/2011 This suit was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU (In chambers)For Plaintiff(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv.For Defendant(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur Kwatra, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy ,Adv Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal ,Adv Mr. Naresh K. Sharma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' further time is granted to comply with office report dated 14.10.2011. Replication in two weeks' time, finally. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

xITEM NO.100 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)Date: 07/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Manita Verma, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shailambr , Adv. Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Abhinav S. Raghavendra, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the States of Punjab, Rajasthan and Haryana are present. List the matter on 11.04.2011 at 2.00 P.M. (M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRARKKJ

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT 2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT) Date: 06/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s)Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr Adv.Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv.Mr. Vinay K. Shailandra, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.For Respondent(s)Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy,Adv Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,AdvMr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal ,Adv Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,AdvMr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the defendant No. 6 to enable him to take appropriate steps in order to comply with office report dated March 17, 2011. The replications, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Sonia) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr P.A. Court Master

òITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No. 2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Plaintiff VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. defendant(s)(Office report for directions)Date: 25/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM (IN CHAMBERS)For Plaintiff(s) Mr. R.S.Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki,Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain,Adv. Mr.Vinay K. Shailendra,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.For Defendant(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr.D.K. Devesh,Adv. Mr. Vikramjeet Banarjee,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A.Qadri,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi B.Adv. Ms. Garima Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy ,Adv Ms. Kamini Jaiswal ,Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma ,Adv. ....2/- -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Another eight weeks' time is granted for filingwritten statements to Union of India, Union Territoryof Chandigarh as well as other defendants and also fordeposit of cost of Rs.10,000/-. Further four weeks'time is granted for filing replication by plaintiff-State of Punjab. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.P.A. Court Master

¼ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for interim Relief and office report)Date: 22/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Vinod A.Bobde,Sr.Adv. Mr.Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms.Sakshi B.Adv. Ms. Garima Kapoor,Adv. Mrs. Shally Bhasin Maheshwari,Adv. Mr. Rishi Maheshwari,Adv. Ms. Anne Mathew,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohan Jain,ASG Mr. A. Maryaputham,Sr.Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma,Adv. Ms. Yogita Yadav,Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar,Adv. Mr. Deepak Jain,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi,AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh,Adv. Mr. Sahil S.Chauhan,Adv. Mr. R.Gopalakrishnan,Adv. ...2/- -2- Mr. Mohan V. Katkari,Adv. Mr. Arun K.Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalindra,Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain,Adv. Mr. Ankur Sood,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List I.A. No.1 of 2008 on 8th February,2011. In the meanwhile, parties are directed tofile their draft issues.

[Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.P.A. Court Master

bITEM NO.10 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO.1 of 2008 (FOR PREL.HEARING)STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. for interim Relief and office report)Date: 04/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Garima Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mohan Jain, ASG Mr. Prabhat Kumar. Adv. Mr. Deepak Jain, Adv. Mr. M. KhaRITI, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr.Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr.Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalindara, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. Sahil S. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. The respondents are permitted to file additional documents, as per rules, within six weeks. List thereafter. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

lITEM NO.18 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2008STATE OF HARYANA Plaintiff VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Defendants(Office report for Directions)Date: 10/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI (IN CHAMBERS)For Plaintiff Mr. K.K. Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Garima Kapoor, Adv.For Defendants Mr. Subhash Kaushik, Adv.(Union of India) Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv.(Defendant No.1) Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Vinay Shailendra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter before the Court. (Rama Chopra) (Mithlesh Gupta) P.A. Court Master

DITEM NO.94 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No. 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report for Directions)Date: 10/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Lahri, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool ,Adv Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Garima Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Katpaliwa, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalendra, Adv. Mr. Anand Vardhan Sharma, Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to file replications to the written statements filed by Defendant No. 1 i.e. State of Punjab and further four weeks time for additional affidavit, if any. (Manmohan Rawat) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master

\206ITEM NO.88 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No. 2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report for Directions)Date: 10/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Arun Katpwalia, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay K. Shalendra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Varun Thakur, Adv. for Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy ,Adv Mr. S. Mehdi Imam, Adv Mr. Parvej Dabas, Adv. Mr. K.K. Lahri, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool ,Adv Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Garima Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. D.K. Devesh, Adv.- Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fours weeks' time is granted to all the respondents to file written statements to complete the pleadings. Further Four weeks' time is granted for filing replications. (Manmohan Rawat) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master

ÈITEM NO.79 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No.1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report for directions))Date: 22/03/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Banga,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.R.S.Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr.Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr.Aruin Kathpalia,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv Mr.Vinay Kumar Shailendra,Adv. Dr.Manish Singhvi AAG (Rajasthan) Mr.D.K.Devesh,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv Mrs.Kiran Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr.A.K.Sharma,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the State of Haryana to fileReplications. (KUSUM SYAL) (P.S.N. MURTHY) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report for directions)Date: 14/09/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Vinay Shailendra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Rashmi Malhotra,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Tarun Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha,Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Anis Suhrawardy,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In pursuance of the order dated 15.7.2009 passed by the Chamber Judge, the State of J & K is granted four weeks further time to file written statement. Replication, if any, may be filed within eight weeks thereafter.(A.S. BISHT) (S.S.R. KRISHNA)COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA SUPR EME COUR T OF I ND I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL SUIT No.2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report for directions)Date: 15/07/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARUN CHATTERJEE ( IN CHAMBERS )For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Adv. Mr.Mohan Katarki, Adv. Mr.Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr.Vinay Shailendra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms.Shashi Kiran, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms.Sakshi Baga, Adv. Ms.Garima Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. Mr.J.S.Attri, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER As a last opportunity, six weeks' time is granted to the defendants tofile their written statements. In the event, it is not filed within the timespecified, the defence of the defendants shall be struck out. Service upon defendant No.4 (State of Jammu & Kashmir) andDefendant No.5 (State of Rajasthan) be effected by registered post as wellas by dasti within a period of six weeks from this date.(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master

ªITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1/2008STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(office report for directions)Date: 28/01/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARUN CHATTERJEE (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms. Taruna Singh, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. R.S. Suri ,Adv. Mr. Aruneshwar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shweta Verma, Adv. for Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Eight weeks' time is granted for filing written statement by all the defendants. Four weeks' time is granted for filing replication thereafter. (Asha Kukrety) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Sr.P.A. Court Master

&ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSORIGINAL SUIT No.2/2007STATE OF PUNJAB Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 24/09/2008 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARUN CHATTERJEE (IN CHAMBER)For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri,Adv. Mr.Arun Katpalia, Adv. Mr.Mohan V.Katarki,Adv. Mr.Vinay K.Shailendra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.A.Tarique, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Ms.Sakshi Baga, Adv. Ms.Taruna Singh, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Defendant No.1 (Union of India),Defendant No.2 (State of Haryana), Defendant No.3 (State of Himachal Pradesh)and Defendant No.6 (Union Territory of Chandigarh) prayed for twelve weeks'time to file written statement. The said prayer is allowed. So far as DefendantNo.4 (State of Jammu & Kashmir) and Defendant No.5 (State of Rajasthan) areconcerned, no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Let fresh service beeffected on defendant Nos.4 and 5 within four weeks from this date.( Satish K.Yadav ) ( Phoolan Wati Arora ) Court Master Court Master

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY v. STATE OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Full Judgment Text

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status