ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10627/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/12/2015 in RP No. 2234/2015 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) PARSHOTAM KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD Respondent(s) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Yogendra Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Parveen Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arunav Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Sonia Garg, Adv. Mr. Nitin Garg, Adv. Mr. Mahender Tiwari, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner says that paragraph 7 which has been quoted in the impugned order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission does not exist. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a review petition. Leave and liberty granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. In case the petitioner is not satisfied with the outcome of the review petition, he is at liberty to approach this Court. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master
\232 ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10627/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/12/2015 in RP No. 2234/2015 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) PARSHOTAM KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD Respondent(s) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Yogendra Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Parveen Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arunav Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Sonia Garg, Adv. Mr. Nitin Garg, Adv. Mr. Mahender Tiwari, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner says that paragraph 7 which has been quoted in the impugned order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission does not exist. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a review petition. Leave and liberty granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. In case the petitioner is not satisfied with the outcome of the review petition, he is at liberty to approachSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2016.04.26 this Court.09:19:30 ISTReason: (Meenakshi Kohli) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master