G. SRINIVAS v. V. RAMULU .

ITEM NO.27               COURT NO.1               SECTION XII­A                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6114/2017 G. SRINIVAS                                        Appellant(s)                                 VERSUS V. RAMULU  & ANR.                                  Respondent(s) Date : 09­04­2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR          HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Appellant(s) Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats, Adv.                   Ms. Rajkumari Banju, Adv. [AOR]                     For Respondent(s) Mr. S.L. Gupta, Adv.                  Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. [AOR] Mr. Lalit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Tomar, Adv. Mr. Bikash Chandra, Adv.                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending application(s), if any, may be deemed to have been disposed of. (Subhash Chander)                   (H.S. Parasher)    AR­cum­PS                      Assistant Registrar [Signed Order is placed on the file]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6114 OF 2017 G. Srinivas ....Appellant Versus V. Ramulu & Anr. ....Respondents O R D E R Heard Ms. Shivangi Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. S.L. Gupta, learned counsel on behalf of respondent no.2­insurer. In the course of hearing, a suggestion was given to Ms. Shivangi Singh, learned counsel for the appellant whether the claim put forth in the claim petition will stand satisfied if the amount, as awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal­cum­IX Additional Chief Judge (F.T.C.), city Civil Court ('the tribunal'), Hyderabad and as enhanced by the High Court, is further enhanced by Rs.2,00,000/­ (Rupees two lac).  Learned counsel for the appellant accepted the same.  Learned counsel for respondent no.2­insurer, however, left it to the discretion of the Court.  The compensation is enhanced accordingly. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct that the insurer shall deposit the enhanced amount before the tribunal within 12 weeks hence.

C.A.No.6114/17 .... (contd.) ­ 2 ­ If the enhanced amount is not deposited within the stipulated time,  it  shall  carry  interest  @  9%  p.a. from  the  date  of presentation of the application.  If, however, it is deposited within time, no interest shall accrue on the same. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.  There shall be no order as to costs.     .......................CJI.    [DIPAK MISRA]    .........................J.    [A.M. KHANWILKAR]    .........................J.    [Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD] New Delhi. April 09, 2018.

ITEM NO.36               COURT NO.1               SECTION XII­A                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal  No(s). 6114/2017 G. SRINIVAS                                        Appellant(s)                                 VERSUS V. RAMULU  & ANR.                                  Respondent(s) Date : 28­03­2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Appellant(s) Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Banju, Adv. [AOR]                     For Respondent(s) Mr. S.L. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv.                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R Mr. S.L. Gupta, learned counsel who ordinarily appears on behalf of National Insurance Co. Ltd. and is present in Court shall obtain instructions from respondent no.2­ insurer. Let the matter be listed on 09 th  April 2018. (Subhash Chander)               (H.S. Parasher)    AR­cum­PS                  Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8693/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/04/2015 in MACMA No. 849/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh) G. SRINIVAS Petitioner(s) VERSUS V. RAMULU AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP) Date : 02/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Banju, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ZITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8693/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/04/2015in MACMA No. 849/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh)G. SRINIVAS Petitioner(s) VERSUSV. RAMULU AND ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP)Date : 02/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Banju, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.Leave granted.(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-cum-PS Court Master