Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2016 / Diary 1004

RITU v. PARVEEN

Supreme Court of India | Diary 1004/2016

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

14-03-2016

Bench

Petitioner

RITU

Respondent

PARVEEN

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 1898/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/09/2015 in CRR No.2459/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RITU AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PARVEEN AND ORS Respondent(s) CRLMP.1898/2016(With c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 14/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv. Ms.Savita Devi, Adv. Ms.Mamta Rani, Adv. Mr.Manohar Pratap, Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley, Adv. For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Delay condoned. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

\204 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 1898/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/09/2015 in CRR No.2459/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RITU AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PARVEEN AND ORS Respondent(s) CRLMP.1898/2016(With c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 14/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv. Ms.Savita Devi, Adv. Ms.Mamta Rani, Adv. Mr.Manohar Pratap, Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley, Adv. For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Delay condoned. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.Signature Not Verified (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA)Digitally signed bySATISH KUMAR YADAVDate: 2016.03.1417:12:44 TLTReason: AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)....../2016 (CRLMP No(s). 1898/2016) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/09/2015 in CRR No. 2459/2015 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RITU AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PARVEEN AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 08/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Savita Devi,Adv. Ms. Mamata Rani,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter seeking an adjournment on account of personal difficulty. Prayer is allowed. List the matter after four weeks. (Madhu Bala) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Court Master

LITEM NO.26 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)....../2016 (CRLMP No(s). 1898/2016)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/09/2015in CRR No. 2459/2015 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)RITU AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSPARVEEN AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP)Date : 08/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Savita Devi,Adv.Ms. Mamata Rani,Adv.Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner hascirculated a letter seeking an adjournment on account ofpersonal difficulty.Prayer is allowed.List the matter after four weeks. (Madhu Bala) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India