IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509 of 2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) O R D E R The matter has been called out twice but none appears on behalf of the respondent. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We find that the petitioner has 3 1 / 2 years old child and it will be inconvenient for the petitioner to continue with the proceedings in Secunderabad (Telangana). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we allow the transfer petition and transfer the Family Court O.P. No. 47 of 2014 titled as Cornelius David Delight Roberts vs. Cornelius Hephzibah Delight from Family Court, City Civil Complex, Secundarabad (Telangana) to the Family Court, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. … ....................J. [Madan B. Lokur] … ....................J. [Uday Umesh Lalit] NEW DELHI February 2, 2015
ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 02/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. Ms. T. Kishore, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice but none appears on behalf of the respondent. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER [Signed Order is placed on the file]
ö IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509 of 2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) O R D E R The matter has been called out twice but none appears on behalf of the respondent. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We find that the petitioner has 31/2 years old child and it will be inconvenient for the petitioner to continue with the proceedings in Secunderabad (Telangana). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we allow the transfer petition and transfer the Family Court O.P. No. 47 of 2014 titled as Cornelius David Delight Roberts vs. Cornelius Hephzibah Delight from Family Court, City Civil Complex, Secundarabad (Telangana) to the Family Court, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. .......................J. [Madan B. Lokur]Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.02.1705:52:54 ISTReason: .......................J. [Uday Umesh Lalit] NEW DELHI February 2, 2015ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS
CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for stay and office report)Date : 02/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. Ms. T. Kishore, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice but none appears on behalf of the respondent. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER [Signed Order is placed on the file]
ITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 13/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Parul Prasad,adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
v ITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 13/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Parul Prasad,adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.01.1511:16:30 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sumit Kumar,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner within the same period. List again on 13.1.2015 . (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
X ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sumit Kumar,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner within the same period. List again on 13.1.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2014.10.3115:49:23 ISTReason: (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
\210 ITEM NO.81 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 509/2014 CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUS CORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 11/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Tanima Kishore,adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List again on 28.10.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.08.1116:20:25 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 509 OF 2014CORNELIUS HEPHZIBAH DELIGHT Petitioner(s) VERSUSCORNELIUS DAVID DELIGHT ROBERTS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay)Date: 17/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of further proceedings in O.P. no. 47 of 2014 titled as Cornelius David Delight Roberts versus Cornelius Hephzibah Delight pending before the Family Court, City Civil Complex, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh. (Vishal Anand) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master