1 ITEM NO.23+53 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 5221/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/11/2015 in CRM No. 2813/2015 30/11/2015 in CRMA No. 1/2012 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad) PATEL PRAHLADBHAI JAGABHAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp) With SLP(Crl.) ...Crl.M.P.No. 5380/16, (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp & O.R.) SLP(Crl.) ...Crl.M.P.No. 5394/16 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp & O.R.) SLP(Crl.) ...Crl.M.P.No. 5428/16(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp & O.R.) Date : 01/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.N. Ray, Adv. Mr. Jaiprakash Umot, Adv. Mr. Lokesh K. Choudhary, Adv. Mrs. Sumita Ray,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay codoned. We are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. However, we request the High Court to decide the appeal
2 within three months, if possible. It will also be permissible for the petitioner to move an application before the High Court for interim bail on the ground of sickness. In case, appeal is not decided within three months, the petitioner(s) may renew the request for bail which shall be considered on its own merits. The special leave petitions are dismissed. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
SECTIONIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5428 OF 2016 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO... OF 2016 PATEL RAMESHBHAI KANJIBHAI & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate on behalf of Petitioners against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 03.12.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) No. 2823 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 16 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and the same is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioners has not filed order dated 09.11.2011 mentioned in the impugned order. In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 19.03.2016 which has been included in the Special Leave Petition paper books at page Nos. 9293 for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5221 of 2016 as both are arising out of same FIR/criminal case and being listed together. The application above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1
SECTIONIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5380 OF 2016 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO... OF 2016 PATEL DAHYABHAI VANABHAI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate on behalf of Petitioner against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 10.12.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) No. 2820 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 09 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and the same is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed orders dated 02.03.2002 and 09.11.2011 mentioned in the impugned order. In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 19.03.2016 which has been included in Special Leave Petition paper books at page Nos. 5758 for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5221 of 2016 as both are arising out of same FIR/criminal case and being listed together. The application above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1
SECTIONIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5394 OF 2016 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO... OF 2016 PATEL KALABHAI BHIKHABHAI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate on behalf of Petitioner against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 03.12.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) No. 2816 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 16 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and the same is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed orders dated 02.03.2002 and 09.11.2011 mentioned in the impugned order. In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 19.03.2016 which has been included in the Special Leave Petition paper books at page Nos. 5657 for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5221 of 2016 as both are arising out of same FIR/criminal case and being listed together. The application above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1
SECTIONIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5428 OF 2016 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO... OF 2016 PATEL RAMESHBHAI KANJIBHAI & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate on behalf of Petitioners against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 03.12.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) No. 2823 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 16 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and the same is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioners has not filed order dated 09.11.2011 mentioned in the impugned order. In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 19.03.2016 which has been included in the Special Leave Petition paper books at page Nos. 9293 for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5221 of 2016 as both are arising out of same FIR/criminal case and being listed together. The application above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1
SECTIONIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5380 OF 2016 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO... OF 2016 PATEL DAHYABHAI VANABHAI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate on behalf of Petitioner against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 10.12.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) No. 2820 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 09 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and the same is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed orders dated 02.03.2002 and 09.11.2011 mentioned in the impugned order. In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 19.03.2016 which has been included in Special Leave Petition paper books at page Nos. 5758 for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5221 of 2016 as both are arising out of same FIR/criminal case and being listed together. The application above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1
SECTIONIIB IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5394 OF 2016 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO... OF 2016 PATEL KALABHAI BHIKHABHAI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate on behalf of Petitioner against the impugned final Judgment and Order dated 03.12.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) No. 2816 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2012. It is submitted that there is a delay of 16 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and the same is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed orders dated 02.03.2002 and 09.11.2011 mentioned in the impugned order. In this regard, he has filed a letter dated 19.03.2016 which has been included in the Special Leave Petition paper books at page Nos. 5657 for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is lastly submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5221 of 2016 as both are arising out of same FIR/criminal case and being listed together. The application above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 29 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mrs. Sumita Ray, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C1
Ò 1 ITEM NO.23+53 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 5221/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/11/2015 in CRM No. 2813/2015 30/11/2015 in CRMA No. 1/2012 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad) PATEL PRAHLADBHAI JAGABHAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp) With SLP(Crl.) ...Crl.M.P.No. 5380/16, (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp & O.R.) SLP(Crl.) ...Crl.M.P.No. 5394/16 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp & O.R.) SLP(Crl.) ...Crl.M.P.No. 5428/16(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing slp & O.R.) Date : 01/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.N. Ray, Adv. Mr. Jaiprakash Umot, Adv. Mr. Lokesh K. Choudhary, Adv. Mrs. Sumita Ray,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified Delay codoned.Digitally signed byASHWANI KUMARDate: 2016.04.02 We are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the11:14:27 ISTReason: High Court. However, we request the High Court to decide the appeal 2within three months, if possible. It will also be permissible forthe petitioner to move an application before the High Court forinterim bail on the ground of sickness. In case, appeal is not
decided within three months, the petitioner(s) may renew therequest for bail which shall be considered on its own merits. The special leave petitions are dismissed. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER