1 ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(Civil) No. 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On 03.02.2016, following order was passed by the learned Registrar: “ The office report indicates that although by order dated 24.11.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the sole respondent, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.”
2 However, no steps have been taken for effecting service of notice upon sole respondent. In these circumstances, this Transfer Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (PANKAJ KUMAR NEGI) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER [Signed Order is placed on the file]
3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Transfer Petition(Civil) No.521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) O R D E R On 03.02.2016, following order was passed by the learned Registrar: “ The office report indicates that although by order dated 24.11.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the sole respondent, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.” However, no steps have been taken for effecting service of notice upon sole respondent. In these circumstances, this Transfer Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. .................J. [UDAY UMESH LALIT] NEW DELHI; APRIL 25, 2016
SECTION XVI-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LISTE D ON : CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CHAMBER MATTER: ITEM NO. : TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 521 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2015 (Application for Ex-Parte stay) MANISHA JAVALKAR .....Petitioner VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR .....Respondent OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10 th April, 2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice. In the meanwhile, further proceedings in H.M.A. No.1712 of 2014 titled as “Sh. Abhijeet Umakant Javalkar Vs. Smt. Manisha Javalkar”, pending in the Family Court, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, shall remain stayed. ” Accordingly notice was issued to the Sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on 7 th May, 2015. It is submitted that neither A.D card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from the Sole Respondent. Thereafter the matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 7 th September, 2015 when he was pleased to pass the following order. “Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the sole respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 24.11.2015.” Contd ..2/-
-2- It is submitted that counsel for the Petitioner has neither filed spare copy of the Transfer Petition nor taken fresh steps for effecting service of notice on sole Respondent hence fresh notice could not be issued. Lastly the matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 3 rd February, 2016 when he was pleased to pass the following order; “ The office report indicates that although by order dated 24.11.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the sole respondent, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.” Service of show cause notice is not complete. The default on the part of counsel for the Petitioner is reported to Hon'ble Judge in Chamber with this Office Report. Dated this the 11 th day of Febraury, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Ä1ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(Civil) No. 521/2015MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E ROn 03.02.2016, following order was passed by the learned Registrar:⬠S The office report indicates that although byorder dated 24.11.2015 of this Court four weekstime as last chance was given to the LearnedCounsel for the petitioner to take fresh stepsfor the service of notice to the solerespondent, yet he has not done the needfulwithin the period stipulated in the order.Viewed in that context, the matter shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further future directions.Await orders. List thereafter.⬠\2352However, no steps have been taken for effecting service of notice upon sole respondent.In these circumstances, this Transfer Petition standsdismissed for non-prosecution. (PANKAJ KUMAR NEGI) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER[Signed Order is placed on the file]3IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONTransfer Petition(Civil) No.521/2015MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s)O R D E ROn 03.02.2016, following order was passed by the learned Registrar:⬠S The office report indicates that although byorder dated 24.11.2015 of this Court fourweeks time as last chance was given to theLearned Counsel for the petitioner to takefresh steps for the service of notice to thesole respondent, yet he has not done theneedful within the period stipulated in theorder. Viewed in that context, the mattershall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further futuredirections. Await orders. List thereafter.⬠\235However, no steps have been taken for effecting service of notice upon sole respondent.In these circumstances, this Transfer Petition standsdismissed for non-prosecution.
.................J. [UDAY UMESH LALIT]NEW DELHI;APRIL 25, 2016
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. Post after two weeks. (Sonali Saund) (Renuka Sadana) Sr. P. A. Court Master
SECTION XVI-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LISTE D ON : CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CHAMBER MATTER: ITEM NO. : TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 521 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2015 (Application for Ex-Parte stay) MANISHA JAVALKAR .....Petitioner VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR .....Respondent OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10 th April, 2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice. In the meanwhile, further proceedings in H.M.A. No.1712 of 2014 titled as “Sh. Abhijeet Umakant Javalkar Vs. Smt. Manisha Javalkar”, pending in the Family Court, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, shall remain stayed. ” Accordingly notice was issued to the Sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on 7 th May, 2015. It is submitted that neither A.D card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from the Sole Respondent. Thereafter the matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 7 th September, 2015 when he was pleased to pass the following order. “Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the sole respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 24.11.2015.” Contd ..2/-
-2- It is submitted that counsel for the Petitioner has neither filed spare copy of the Transfer Petition nor taken fresh steps for effecting service of notice on sole Respondent hence fresh notice could not be issued. Lastly the matter was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 3 rd February, 2016 when he was pleased to pass the following order; “ The office report indicates that although by order dated 24.11.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the sole respondent, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.” Service of show cause notice is not complete. The default on the part of counsel for the Petitioner is reported to Hon'ble Judge in Chamber with this Office Report. Dated this the 11 th day of Febraury, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ú ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. Post after two weeks. (Sonali Saund) (Renuka Sadana) Sr. P. A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySONALI SAUNDDate: 2016.04.1210:26:55 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 03/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhash Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sandhya Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that although by order dated 24.11.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the sole respondent, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 03/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subhash Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sandhya Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe office report indicates that although by order dated24.11.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was givento the Learned Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps forthe service of notice to the sole respondent, yet he has not donethe needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed inthat context, the matter shall be processed for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Awaitorders. List thereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 24/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Sandhya Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 07.09.2015 of this Court in respect of the sole respondent. List the matter again on 03.02.2016. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar SB
X ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 24/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Sandhya Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 07.09.2015 of this Court in respect of the sole respondent. List the matter again on 03.02.2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (SURAJIT DEY)Sushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.11.2610:13:30 TLT RegistrarReason: SB
ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the sole respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 24.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the sole respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 24.11.2015. (M K HANJURA)Signature Not Verified Registrar MGDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.09.0816:35:58 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 02/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List again on 7.09.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
b ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 02/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent. List again on 7.09.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.07.0316:23:08 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition (Civil) No.521/2015 MANISHA JAVALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABHIJEET UMAKANT JAVALKAR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay) Date : 10/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sandhya Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meanwhile, further proceedings in H.M.A. No.1712 of 2014 titled as “Sh. Abhijeet Umakant Javalkar Vs. Smt. Manisha Javalkar”, pending in the Family Court, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, shall remain stayed. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master