IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 324 of 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 2469 of 2015 Uttam Chand … Petitioner versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent O R D E R There is an inordinate delay of 331 days in filing the present petition for review of order dated 23.3.2015 passed by this Court, dismissing the aforementioned special leave petition. Thus, though the present petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself, yet we have carefully perused the same and the papers annexed in support thereof. We are satisfied that no case for review of the impugned order has been made out. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay, as well as, on merits. .……………… ..……………….…....…J. (Jagdish Singh Khehar) ………………...…………………….…J. (S.A. Bobde) New Delhi; July 28, 2016.
CHAMBER MATTRE SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(Crl.) No.324/2016 In SLP(Crl) No.2469/2015 UTTAM CHAND Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office report) Date : 28/07/2016 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The review petition is dismissed on the ground of delay, as well as, on merits in terms of the signed order. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)
< IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 324 of 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 2469 of 2015 Uttam Chand ... Petitioner versus State of Himachal Pradesh ... Respondent O R D E R There is an inordinate delay of 331 days in filing the present petition for review of order dated 23.3.2015 passed by this Court, dismissing the aforementioned special leave petition. Thus, though the present petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself, yet we have carefully perused the same and the papers annexed in support thereof. We are satisfied that no case for review of the impugned order has been made out. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay, as well as, on merits. ..................................................J. (Jagdish Singh Khehar) .................................................J. (S.A. Bobde) New Delhi; July 28, 2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySATISH KUMAR YADAVDate: 2016.07.2817:25:33 TLTReason:CHAMBER MATTRE SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(Crl.) No.324/2016 In SLP(Crl) No.2469/2015UTTAM CHAND Petitioner(s) VERSUS
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing review petition and officereport)Date : 28/07/2016 This petition was circulated today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The review petition is dismissed on the ground of delay,as well as, on merits in terms of the signed order. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)