\234 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO.501 OF 2014 NEETU ... PETITIONER VS. VINEET KUMAR ... RESPONDENT O R D E R The respondent has refused to accept the notice. In the circumstances, we are constrained to take up the matter. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through this transfer petition filed by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Order XXXVI-B of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it fit and proper to transfer the H.M.A. Petition No.35 of 2014 titled as Vineet Kumar Vs. Smt. Neetu, from the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi, to the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Katni, Madhya Pradesh.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySarita Purohit We order accordingly.Date: 2014.08.0910:45:14 ISTReason: Within a fortnight of communication of copy of this 1 order, the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi shall transmit the record to the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Katni, Madhya Pradesh, where the matter itself shall be decided within a period of next three months, without granting undue adjournment to
either of the parties. The Transfer Petition is allowed in the above terms with a direction to the Registry to immediately transmit copy of this order to both the Courts. ..............J. [ANIL R. DAVE ] ..............J. [VIKRAMAJIT SEN]New Delhi;July 30, 2014. 2ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 501/2014NEETU Petitioner(s) VERSUSVINEET KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for stay and office report)Date : 30/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. J.H. Jafri,Adv. For Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent has refused to accept the notice. The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)
3
pITEM NO.601(MM) COURT NO.7 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 501 OF 2014NEETU Petitioner(s) VERSUSVINEET KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,exemption from filing O.T.)Date: 04/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Mr. J.H.Jafri,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned by counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on Board. Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of further proceedings in the matrimonial case being HMA 35/14 titled Vineet Kumar v. Smt. Neetu, pending before Principal Judge, Family Court Dwarka, New Delhi, for a period of three months. (SUMAN WADHWA) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER