ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.16 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).4413-4414/2012 M/S VEDANTA ALUMINIUM LTD. & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4286/2012 (XI-A) FOR APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL OF SLP BY THE RESPONDENT ON IA 64322/2026 Date : 27-02-2026 These appeals were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE For Appellant(s) : Ms. Samapika Biswal, AOR Ms. Mehak Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R IA No.64322/2026 in C.A. No.4286/2012 : List on 10.03.2026. (NEHA GUPTA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Civil Appeal No.4280/2012 COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S VEDANTA ALUMINUM LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4285/2012 Date : 25/04/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv. Ms. Madhu Goel, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Parties have not filed statement of case. Statutory period has already been expired. Matter may be processed for listing before Hon'ble Court. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar
SECTIONIII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4280 AND 4285 of 2012 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Odisha & Anr. ....Appellants vs M/s Vendanta Aluminium Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondents OFFICE REPORT FOR PREFINAL HEARING It is submitted that there are three Respondents in the abovementioned matters. Parties are common in both the appeals. Matters are tagged with Civil Appeal Nos.44134414 of 2012 and other connected matters. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are represented through Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. Service of notice is complete through High Court on respondent No.3 but no Vakalatnama/appearance filed. Parties are common in cross appeals/connected matters. It is further submitted that Counsel for the appellant and also Counsel for the Respondent have not filed statement of case in both the matters despite this Registry's notice dated 17 th December, 2012 and 13 th April, 2013. Time to file Statement of Case has already been expired as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. It is lastly submitted that since the instant appeal is arising out of Writ Petition, this is incapable of valuation. Appeals are ready for hearing. The Office Report for prefinal hearing is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for orders. Dated this the 21st day of April, 2017. Assistant Registrar Copy to: Ms. Kirti R. Mishra, Advocate Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate Assistant Registrar c5
*ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOELCivil Appeal No.4280/2012COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSM/S VEDANTA ALUMINUM LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 4285/2012Date : 25/04/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv.Ms. Madhu Goel, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RParties have not filed statement of case. Statutory period hasalready been expired.Matter may be processed for listing before Hon'ble Court. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar
ITEM NO.92 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 4413-4414/2012 M/S VEDANTA ALUMINIM LTD.& ANR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4284/2012 (With C.A. No. 4286/2012 (With C.A. No. 4415-4416/2012 (With C.A. No. 4417-4418/2012 Date : 27/08/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv., Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of three common respondents in the first set of appeals i.e., C.A. No.4413-4418/2012, of all the three common respondents in C.A. No.4284/2012 where respondent Nos.2 and 3 were served at SLP stage itself but have failed to enter appearance and of both the respondents in C.A. No.4286/2012 where respondent No.2 has failed to enter appearance, despite being served, stands complete.
Item No.92 -2- None of the parties in any of these appeals have filed the statement of case. Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumed to have been accepted. All the appeals stand complete. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 441314, 441516, 441718, 4284 & 4286 of 2012 M/S VEDANATA ALUMINIUM LTD. & ANR. ...APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT ON PREFINAL HEARING MATTER The office report is prepared as per circular No. F.41/Jul./2008 dated 17 th December, 2008. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.441314, 441516, 441718 OF 2012 (A) There are three common Respondents and are represented through Counsel. (B) Not applicable. (C) Not applicable. (D) No substitution application is pending. (E) Counsel for both the parties has not filed Statement of Case till date. (F) Not applicable. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4284 OF 2012 (A) There are three Respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Counsel and Respondent No. 2 and 3 has been served at SLP stage but no one has entered appearance. (B) Not applicable. (C) Not applicable. (D) No substitution application is pending. (E) Counsel for both the parties has not filed Statement of Case till date. (F) Not applicable .
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4286 OF 2012 (A) There are two Respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Counsel and Respondent No. 2 has been served through High Court but no one has entered appearance. (B) Not applicable. (C) Not applicable. (D) No substitution application is pending. (E) Counsel for both the parties has not filed Statement of Case till date. (F) Not applicable The office report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for orders. DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF AUGUST, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. Ms. Kirti Renu Mishra, Advocate. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR min1
Ô ITEM NO.92 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 4413-4414/2012 M/S VEDANTA ALUMINIM LTD.& ANR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4284/2012 (With C.A. No. 4286/2012 (With C.A. No. 4415-4416/2012 (With C.A. No. 4417-4418/2012 Date : 27/08/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv., Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of three common respondents in the first set of appeals i.e., C.A. No.4413-4418/2012, of all the three common respondents in C.A. No.4284/2012 where respondent Nos.2 and 3 were served at SLP stage itself but have failed to enter appearance and of both the respondents in C.A. No.4286/2012Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.09.02 where respondent No.2 has failed to enter appearance, despite11:49:54 ISTReason: being served, stands complete.Item No.92 -2- None of the parties in any of these appeals have filed
the statement of case. Since it is no more a mandate afterthe amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in thatcircumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumedto have been accepted. All the appeals stand complete. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'bleCourt, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
PITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4413-4414 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHM/S VEDANTA ALUMINIM LTD.& ANR Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH Civil Appeal NO. 4280 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4284 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4285 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4415-4416 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4417-4418 of 2012Date: 17/09/2012 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr Abeer Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Ms Apurva Upmanyu, Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms Apurva Upmanyu, Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Concerned appellants in the group of Civil Appeal Nos. 4415-4416,4417-4418, 4284 and 4280 of 2012 have to file additional copies before18.10.2012.| | |(S.G.SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
tITEM NO.37 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4413-4414 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHM/S VEDANTA ALUMINIM LTD.& ANR Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH Civil Appeal NO. 4280 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4284 of 2012Civil Appeal No. 4286 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4285 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4415-4416 of 2012Civil Appeal NO. 4417-4418 of 2012Date: 30/07/2012 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Abeer Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Abeer Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned Advocate, Mr. Abeer Kumar, appearing on behalf of Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate-on-Record for the appellant in C.A. Nos.4413 to4418 of 2012 accepts notice for the same litigant in connected CivilAppeals being C.A.Nos.4280, 4284 and 4285 of 2012. However, petitionersItem No.37 -2-have to supply additional copies of the pleadings for the record of theHigh Court before 6.8.2012. The learned Advocate, Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, appearing on behalf of Ms.Kirti Renu Mishra, Advocate-on-Record for the appellant in C.A. Nos.4284,4280 and 4285 of 2012 accepts notice for the same litigants - Mr. VedantaAluminum Ltd. and Mr. Nabal Kishore Sharma in all connected matters, wheresuch persons are respondents. List again on 17.9.2012.CA No.4286/2012 Deleted.| | | (S.G. SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
ITEM NO. 32 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4962/2012(From the judgement and order dated 18/01/2012 in WPCNo.710/2012, dated 01/03/2012 in WPC No.710/2012,MC No.2804/2012of The HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK)M/S VEDANTA ALUMINIUM LTD.& ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of theimpugned order and permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and with prayer for interim reliefand office report) WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5026 of 2012(For exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of theimpugned order and permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and with prayer for interim reliefand office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5027 of 2012(For exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of theimpugned order and permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and with prayer for interim reliefand office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10080/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10083/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10092/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C)..../2012 CC 6244/2012WITH I.A.1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 27/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE ..2/- : 2 :For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.In SLPs.CC 4962,5026,Mr. Tarun Gulati, Adv.5027/12 Mr. Abeer Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shashi Mathews, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv.-on-RecordFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.In SLPs/10080, Ms. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv.-on-Record10083,10092/12,CC 6244Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, Adv.
rrs. In ccs.4962,5026,Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv.5027/2012,For Respondent(s) Ms. Suveni Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Venkatraman, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Nakul Mohta, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in SLP(C)..CC6244/2012. Leave granted. The appeals will be heard on the SLP paper books. Additional documents, if nay, may be filed by the parties. We have heard learned counsel for the parties on the question of interim relief. Having done so we direct that it will be open to the assessing officer to continue with the assessment proceedings in respect of the years in question on the basis of the material in his possession in addition to the report of tax audit in terms of Section 41 of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act. 2004. However, final assessment order shall not be passed without the leave of this Court. However, direction with regard to the deposit shall remain stayed in SLP(C)CC 4962, 5026,5027 of 2012. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master
´ITEM NO. 32 & 68 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4962/2012(From the judgement and order dated 18/01/2012 in WPCNo.710/2012, dated 01/03/2012 in WPC No.710/2012,MC No.2804/2012of The HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK)M/S VEDANTA ALUMINIM LTD.& ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of theimpugned order and permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and with prayer for interim reliefand office report) WITHS.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5026 of 2012(For exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of theimpugned order and permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and with prayer for interim reliefand office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5027 of 2012(For exemption from filing c/copy as well as plain copy of theimpugned order and permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and with prayer for interim reliefand office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10080/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10083/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C) NO. 10092/2012(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 26/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE ..2/- : 2 :For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.In SLPs.CC 4962,5026,Mr. Tarun Gulati, Adv.5027/12 Mr. Abeer Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv.-on-RecordFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.In SLPs/10080, Ms. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv.-on-Record10083,10092/12 & Ms. Apurva Upmanuyu Adv.rrs. In ccs.4962,5026,5027/2012For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Mr. Dwivedi appearing for the State submits that the special leave petition against the judgment of the High Court in the case of Bhushan Power & Steels has also been filed and the said petition is likely to be listed shortly. Let all these matters be listed together. In the meantime, proceedings before the assessing officer pursuant to the impugned order may continue but final assessment order shall not be passed without the leave of the Court. The statement made by Mr. Dwivedi and recorded in order dated 16 th march, 2012 shall continue to be in force till the aforesaid cases are listed for preliminary hearing. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master
VITEM NO.MM-4B COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 4962/2012(From the judgment and order dated 18/01/2012 in WPCNo.710/2012 dated 01/03/2012 in MC No.2804/2012 in WPCNo.710/2012 of The HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK)M/S VEDANTA ALUMINIUM LTD.& ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and exemption from filing c/copyas well as plain copy of the impugned order and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5026 of 2012(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and exemption from filing c/copyas well as plain copy of the impugned order and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5027 of 2012(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP without c/copy as wellas plain copy of impugned order and exemption from filing c/copyas well as plain copy of the impugned order and with prayer forinterim relief and office report)Date: 16/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing inthe mentioning board today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tarun Gulati, Adv. Mr. Abeer Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv. Ms. Pritika Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv. ...2/- :2: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on the date fixed. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned Senior Counselappearing for the State, who is on caveat,submits that till the next date, no coercivesteps shall be taken against the petitioners to
recover the amount in question as the State isalso contemplating filing of special leavepetition against the impugned order.(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master