ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).854/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/10/2016 in FAO No. 238/2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) YAMUNA S AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS ANILKUMAR P Respondent(s) (With Interim Relief) Date : 16/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv. Ms. Reena Roy, Adv. Ms. Seema Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Garg, Adv. Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the counsel has prayed for liberty to file review before the High Court. We, accordingly, grant the petitioners liberty to file review petition on the grounds on which this special leave petition is filed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as aforementioned. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).854/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/10/2016 in FAO No. 238/2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) YAMUNA S AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS ANILKUMAR P Respondent(s) (With Interim Relief) Date : 16/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv. Ms. Reena Roy, Adv. Ms. Seema Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Garg, Adv. Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the counsel has prayed for liberty to file review before the High Court. We, accordingly, grant the petitioners liberty to file review petition on the grounds on which this special leave petition is filed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as aforementioned. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).854/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/10/2016in FAO No. 238/2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala atErnakulam)YAMUNA S AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSANILKUMAR P Respondent(s)(With Interim Relief)Date : 16/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv.Ms. Reena Roy, Adv.Ms. Seema Jain, Adv.Mr. Vikas Garg, Adv.Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,the counsel has prayed for liberty to file review beforethe High Court. We, accordingly, grant the petitioners liberty tofile review petition on the grounds on which this specialleave petition is filed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissedas withdrawn with liberty, as aforementioned. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).854/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/10/2016in FAO No. 238/2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala atErnakulam)YAMUNA S AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSANILKUMAR P Respondent(s)(With Interim Relief)Date : 16/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv.Ms. Reena Roy, Adv.Ms. Seema Jain, Adv.Mr. Vikas Garg, Adv.Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,the counsel has prayed for liberty to file review beforethe High Court. We, accordingly, grant the petitioners liberty tofile review petition on the grounds on which this specialleave petition is filed. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissedas withdrawn with liberty, as aforementioned. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master