-1- ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Civil Appeal No(s). 2101/2024 SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Appellant(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 24-10-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) M/S. Dharmaprabhas Law Associates, AOR Mr. Awanish Kumar, Adv. Mr. S.k Pandey, Adv. Mr. Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Adv. Mr. Anshul Rai, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, AOR Mr. Chiranjeev Johri, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Sole appellant is duly represented. Respondent No. 4 is duly represented. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel appearing for respondent no.4 that counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of said respondent on 15.04.2021. Let Registry to verify and update the records. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have filed counter affidavit.
-2- Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 and 5 but none has entered appearance. As per office report, Ms. Kanupriya Tiwari appearing on behalf of Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR has not filed vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1. However, it has been submitted by Ld. Counsel that vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of said respondent has already been filed. The same submission was given by the Ld. Counsel on the last date. She further submits that if there is any defect in vakalatnama and counter affidavit, she will cure the same by moving an application within one week. Let such an application, if any, be moved within a period of one week. After the expiry of said period, matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon’ble Court as per rules. SUJATA SINGH Registrar pm
1 ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Civil Appeal No(s). 2101/2024 SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Appellant(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 03-09-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanket,Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Kanupriya Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, AOR Mr. Chiranjeev Johri,Adv. Ms. Chandra Nand Jha,Adv. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Argha Roy, Adv. Ms. Ojaswini Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ruby, Adv. Mr. Zartab Anwar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 3 seeks and is granted four
2 weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Service is complete on Respondent No. 5, there is no appearance. Service is complete on respondent No.1. Ld. Counsel Ms. Kanupriya Tiwari appearing on behalf of Mr. Pramod Dayal, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.1 submits that vakalatnama and counter affidavit have already been filed in respect of Respondent No. 1. Registry to verify the same. Service of notice for alternative arrangement is awaited upon the Sole Appellant. However Ld. Adv Mr. Sanket has appeared on behalf of the appellant without filing any vakalatnama and has sought time for filing statement of case. List again on 24.10.2024. SUJATA SINGH Registrar MG
ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Civil Appeal No(s). 2101/2024 SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Appellant(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) ) Date : 16-07-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, AOR Mr. Chiranjeev Johri, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh, Adv. Ms. Sweta Yadav, Adv. Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Argha Roy, Adv. Ms. Ojaswini Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ruby, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 and 5 but none has entered appearance. contd….
-2- Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that Advocate-on- record for the appellant has been designated as Senior Advocate. Submission is taken on record. Registry to issue notice for alternative arrangement to the appellant. List again on 3.9.2024. SUJATA SINGH Registrar rd
ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7726/2018 (Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 28-02-2018 in WA No. 253/2015 passed by the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at Jabalpur) SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 06-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S Murlidhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Karthik Kathir, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR Mr. Siddharth Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ankita Khare, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Nema, Adv. Mr. Ramsakha Kushwaha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Adv. Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Bittu Singh, Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv. Mr. Argha Roy, Adv. Ms. Ojaswini Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Hearing be expedited. (NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.39 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7726/2018 SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 11-09-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Radhe Shyam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.3 has not filed counter affidavit, despite last and final opportunity having been granted. Further opportunity is declined. Service is complete on respondent Nos.4 and 5 but none has entered appearance. Last and final opportunity is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court after completion of period of four weeks whether counter affidavit is filed or not as further opportunity stands declined. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar rd 11.9.2018
ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7726/2018 SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 03-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajsh Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Radhe Shyam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR Ms. Kanupriya Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Chandrika Prasad Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on respondent No.1. The Ld. Advocate, Mr.Chandrika Prasad, appearing on behalf of Mr.Pramod Dayal, Advocate-on-record appears for respondent No.1 and submitted that vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1 has already been filed. Counter affidavit may be filed within four weeks. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit.
Item No.53 -2- Last and final opportunity is granted to respondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Service is complete on respondent Nos.4 and 5 but none has entered appearance. List again on 11.9.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 03.08.2018 rd
ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7726/2018 SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 02-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on respondent nos. 1,2,4 and 5 but none has entered appearance. Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 3.8.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 02.07.2018 hj
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7726/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-02-2018 in WA No. 253/2015 passed by the High Court Of M.P Principal Seat At Jabalpur) SHACHEENDRA KUMAR CHATURVEDI Petitioner(s) VERSUS AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF and IA No.41782/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date :06-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Srivastava, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruchi Sahay, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Shrivastava, Adv. Ms. Garima Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Issue notice. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, termination of the petitioner shall remain stayed and status quo regarding service condition of the petitioner shall be maintained. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Kumari Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar