ITEM NO.115 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY OM PRKASH GUPTA (D) THR. LRS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No.3301/2017 (XIV-A) Date : 07-06-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL (VACATION BENCH) For Appellant(s) Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Adv. Ms. Shagun Thakur, Adv. Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv. Ms. Poornima Singh, Adv. Ms. Shagun Thakur, Adv. Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Deb Kumar, Adv. Ms. Dumni Soren, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent, list after four weeks. (ARJUN BISHT) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER Civil Appeal No(s). 3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY OM PRKASH GUPTA (D) THR. LRS. Respondent(s) Date : 21-07-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Bharat Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kshitij Mudgal,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1(1) to 1(iv) are duly represented. Being complete matter, process the same for being listed before the Hon’ble Court, as per rules. In the meantime, Ld. Counsel for appellant shall provide the copy of pleadings to Ld. Counsel for Respondent. S.P.S. LALER Registrar MG
ITEM NO.3 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER Civil Appeal No(s). 3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY OM PRKASH GUPTA (D) THR. LRS. Respondent(s) Date : 21-04-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. A. DEB KUMAR, ADV. Mrs. A. DEEPA, ADV. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice of alternative arrangement is complete on respondent nos. 1(iii) and 1(iv), but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Learned counsel for appellant has failed to furnish fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos. 1(i) and 1(ii), for issuance of notice of alternative arrangement. However, learned counsel for appellant submits that he will be filing fresh particulars of above said respondents during the course of day, along with spare copies. He is directed to do so during the course of the day. Notice thereafter be issued, accordingly. List again on 21.07.2022. S.P.S. LALER Registrar pm
ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Civil Appeal No(s). 3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY OM PRKASH GUPTA (D) THR. LRS.Respondent(s) Date : 08-03-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite due service, none appears for Respondent Nos. 1(iii) and 1(iv). Learned counsel for the appellant, is granted two weeks time as a last chance, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars of respondent Nos. 1((i) and 1(ii), in compliance of Registrar Court order dated 3.02.2022 List on 21 st April, 2022. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Registrar
ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Civil Appeal No(s). 3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY OM PRKASH GUPTA (D) THR. LRS. Respondent(s) Date : 03-02-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. T. S. Sabaris,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1(iii) and 1(iv) have been served in alternative arrangement notice but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report alternative arrangement notice issued to Respondent Nos. 1(i) and 1(ii)could not be served and returned back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of two weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondents and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. List again on 8.3.2022. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Registrar MG
ITEM NO.112, 112.1 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY OM PRKASH GUPTA (D) THR. LRS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 3301/2017 (XIV) Date : 19-06-2019 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (VACATION BENCH) For Appellant(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gautam, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R From the perusal of order dated 17.07.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge (Annexure P-6), it appears that in Civil Revision bearing No. 26/2003, the High Court of Gauhati vide order dated 23.03.2004 had directed that the Trial Court shall first decide as to whether the issue(s) should be referred to arbitration or not. This order is extremely relevant for deciding the matter. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to file a copy of the afore-mentioned order. List the matter on 24.07.2019 before an appropriate regular Bench. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ SAROJ KUMARI GAUR ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 3298/2017 UNION OF INDIA Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORPORATION A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR SRI OM PRKASH Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 3301/2017 (XIV) Date : 14-05-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gautam,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the Parties shall file the statement of case within the statutory period thereafter the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar MG
ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. THR. ITS PROP. (D) THR. LRS.Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 23/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. A.K. Panda,Sr.Adv. Mr. Vibhu Shanker Mishra,Adv. Mr. Amarjeet Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Mishra,Adv. Mr. G.S. Makkar,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gautam,Adv. Mr. Girdhar Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
LISTED ON: 23.02.2017 Before Court No. 3 Item No. 37 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 AND 11777/2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP.ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT SLP(C) NO. 16175/2013 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 22.04.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :- “Delay condoned. Application seeking exemption from filiing official translation is allowed. Issue notice. ” It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid order and order dated 31.03.2014 of Hon’ble Judge in Chambers, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent on 04.04.2014 by registered A.D. On the demise of sole proprietor of respondent No. 1, legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 1 have been brought on record vide order dated 26.10.2015 of Hon’ble Judge in Chambers, accordingly cause title has been amended and included in SLP paper books. Mr. R.D. Updhayay, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance as well as counter affidavit on behalf of all 4 Lrs. Of deceased respondent no. 1 and counter affidavit have been included in SLP paper books. Service is complete. SLP(C) NO. 11777/2014 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 25.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :- “Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(Civil) No.16175 of 2013 arising out of SLP CC No. 8618 of 2013. There will be interim stay of the arbitration proceedings.
It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid order, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent on 21.05.2014 by registered A.D. Neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received. Application for substituted service by way of publication of notice in respect of unserved sole respondent was allowed vide Order dated 12.01.2015 of Ld. Registrar (J-II). Counsel for the petitioner has on 19.05.2015 filed affidavit with proof of publication of notice but no one has entered appearance so far. For non appearance of the sole respondent, the matter was lastly listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 26.08.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :- “The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listed before the Hon’ble court, under the rules.” Service is complete. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. G.S.Makker, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1/nk
DITEM NO.37 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati)UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. THR. ITS PROP. (D) THR. LRS.Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 11777/2014(With Office Report) Date : 23/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERFor Petitioner(s) Mr. A.K. Panda,Sr.Adv.Mr. Vibhu Shanker Mishra,Adv.Mr. Amarjeet Singh,Adv.Mr. Rajesh Mishra,Adv.Mr. G.S. Makkar,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gautam,Adv.Mr. Girdhar Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLeave granted.[O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) Date : 05/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Surajita Pattanaik,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prasang Shukla,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that all the respondents have already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
LISTED ON: 05.02.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 32 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 27.11.2015, when the Court was pleased to inter-alia pass the following Order :- “Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondents to file the counter affidavit. List again on 5.2.2016. ” It is submitted that counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1(i) to 1(iv) has filed counter affidavit. Service is already complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
j ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) Date : 05/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Surajita Pattanaik,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prasang Shukla,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that all the respondents have already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2016.02.0516:21:33 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) Date : 27/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Surajita Pattanaik,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gautam,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondents to file the counter affidavit. List again on 5.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
LISTED ON: 27.11.2015 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. : 2 Item No. : 19 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 07.05.2015, when the Court was pleased to inter-alia pass the following Order :- “ SLP(C) No.16175/2013:- The office report is that although by order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter ” It is submitted that LRs of deceased sole Respondent have been brought on record vide Hon’ble Judge-in-Chambers Order dated 26.10.2015. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of LRs of 1(i) to 1(iv) but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 26 th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
H ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) Date : 27/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Surajita Pattanaik,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gautam,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the respondents to file the counter affidavit. List again on 5.2.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.11.2716:23:28 SCTReason:
1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court of Gauhati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) (for bringing on record the lrs. of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 26/10/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today.company CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H. S. Gautam, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of 2015 Sole proprietor of the respondent company has died on 29 th October, 2004. An application has been filed for bringing on record the Lrs of deceased sole proprietor of the respondent company alongwith applications for condonation of delay in filing application for substitution and setting aside abatement. Cause shown for the delay is sufficient. The delay in filing application for substitution is condoned and
2 abatement is set aside. Sole proprietor of the respondent company has died on 29 th October, 2004 leaving behind Lrs mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application for substitution. Application for substitution is allowed. Let a note be made that the sole proprietor of the respondent company has died and is represented by Lrs mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. Amended cause title be filed within four weeks from today. [RASHI GUPTA] [RAJINDER KAUR] SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
LISTED ON: 26.10.2015 CHAMBER MATTER SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3, 4 & 5 (Application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. Of deceased respondent No. 2, condonation of delay in filing application for substitution and setting aside abatement) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The I.As above mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers on 13.08.2015 when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following Order:- “An application has been filed seeking service through publication in the newspapers to serve legal heirs and representative nos. 1(ii) and 1(iii) of deceased sole respondent as they are not residing on the last known address and their present address is unascertained. I.A. for substituted service through publication is allowed. Registry to take steps to issue the proforma notice for publication as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. After the publication has made, the learned counsel for the petitioner shall file proof of publication in the Registry within four weeks thereof. ” It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid order, notice for publication of Chamber Summon in respect of proposed Legal respondent No. 1(iii) was handed over to counsel for the petitioner on 04.09.2015 and counsel for the petitioner has on 13.10.2015 filed affidavit with proof of publication of Chamber Summon in respect of proposed Lr. 1(iii) in two newspapers i.e. Amar Assam (Assamese edition) and Assam Tribune (English Edition). Proposed Lr. 1(i) & 1(iv) have already been served with Chamber Summons. ..2/-
..2.. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Advocate representing Lr. No. 1(ii)namely Mr. Lochan Gupta has on 06.10.2015 filed a copy of special power of attorney executed by Lr. Nos. 1 (i), 1(iii) and 1(iv) in favour of Lr. No. 1 (ii) to act and represent on their behalf. Counsel appearing for Lr. No. 1(ii) was asked to furnish original Special Power of Attorney vide this Registry’s letter dated 12.10.2015 but he has not done the needful so far. Service of Chamber Summons on proposed Lrs. 1(i) to 1(iv) is complete. The applications in the matter above mentioned are listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chamber with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 15 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
ò 1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court of Gauhati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) (for bringing on record the lrs. of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 26/10/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today.company CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H. S. Gautam, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of 2015 Sole proprietor of the respondent company has died on 29thSignature Not Verified October, 2004. An application has been filed for bringing onDigitally signed bySarita PurohitDate: 2015.10.31 record the Lrs of deceased sole proprietor of the respondent18:27:34 ISTReason: company alongwith applications for condonation of delay in filing application for substitution and setting aside abatement. Cause shown for the delay is sufficient. The delay in filing application for substitution is condoned and 2abatement is set aside. Sole proprietor of the respondent company has died on 29thOctober, 2004 leaving behind Lrs mentioned in paragraph 3 ofthe application for substitution. Application for substitutionis allowed. Let a note be made that the sole proprietor of therespondent company has died and is represented by Lrs mentionedin paragraph 3 of the application.
Amended cause title be filed within four weeks fromtoday. [RASHI GUPTA] [RAJINDER KAUR] SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Guwahati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) (for bringing on record the lrs. of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 31/08/2015 These I.As. were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag Pandey, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R An application has been filed seeking service through publication in the newspapers to serve legal heirs and representative nos. 1(ii) and 1(iii) of deceased sole respondent as they are not residing on the last known address and their present address is unascertained. I.A. for substituted service through publication is allowed. Registry to take steps to issue the proforma notice for publication as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. After the publication has made, the learned counsel for the petitioner shall file proof of publication in the Registry within four weeks thereof. (RASHI GUPTA) (RAJINDER KAUR) Sr.P.A. COURT MASTER
LISTED ON: 31.08.2015 CHAMBER MATTER SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3, 4 & 5 (Application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. Of deceased respondent No. 2, condonation of delay in filing application for substitution and setting aside abatement) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The I.As above mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers on 13.07.2013 with Office Report dated 03.07.2015, when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Post the matter after four weeks. ” It is submitted that application for substituted service by way of publication of chamber summons in newspaper in respect of proposed Lr. 1(iii) was placed before Ld. Registrar(J-II) and the same was allowed vide Order dated 22.07.2015. Instead of filing affidavit with proof of publication of chamber summons, counsel for the petitioner has on 14.08.2015 filed affidavit with proof of service of chamber summons duly served on proposed Lr No. 1(iii) but no one has entered appearance so far. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of proposed Lr. 1(ii). No one has entered appearance on behalf of proposed Lr.(i) & Lr(iv) though already served with chamber summons. Service of chamber summons is complete. The applications in the matter above mentioned are listed before the Hon’ble Judge in Chamber with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 18 th DAY OF AUGUST, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
´ ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Guwahati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) (for bringing on record the lrs. of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement) Date : 31/08/2015 These I.As. were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag Pandey, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R An application has been filed seeking service through publication in the newspapers to serve legal heirs and representative nos. 1(ii) and 1(iii) of deceased sole respondent as they are not residing on the last known address and their present address is unascertained. I.A. for substituted service through publication is allowed. Registry to take steps to issue the proforma notice for publication as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. After the publication has made, the learned counsel for the petitioner shall file proof of publication in the RegistrySignature Not Verified within four weeks thereof.Digitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.09.0116:29:01 ISTReason: (RASHI GUPTA) (RAJINDER KAUR) Sr.P.A. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11777/2014 UOI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GANESH ROAD LINE Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Reena Pandey,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
z ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11777/2014 UOI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GANESH ROAD LINE Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Reena Pandey,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.08.2714:34:56 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court of Guwahati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) (For bringing on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution application and setting aside an abatement) Date : 13/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babu, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post the matter after four weeks. (Neeta) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 3/2015, I.A. 4/2015, I.A. 5/2015 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 16175/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No. 497/2012 passed by the High Court of Guwahati) UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) (For bringing on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution application and setting aside an abatement) Date : 13/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Adv. Mr. Karmendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Rovin Babu, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post the matter after four weeks. (Neeta) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Sr. P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.07.1511:42:19 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 07/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.A.Deb Kumar,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.16175/2013 The office report is that although by order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter …......2
ITEM NO.35 -2- SLP(C) No.11777/2014 Ld.counsel for petitioner shall within a period of three weeks comply with the terms of the office report, whereafter no further extension shall be given. List again on 26.08.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
LISTED ON: 07.05.2015 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 2 ITEM NO: 35 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 & 11777/2014 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 26.02.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ SLP(C) No. 16175/2013 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of Order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court. SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the proof of publication whereafter no further extension shall be given. List again on 7.5.2015.” SLP(C) NO: 16175/2013:- It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed chamber summons for effecting service upon proposed Lrs. of deceased sole respondent despite this Registry’s letter dated 01.04.2015. Service is not complete on sole respondent. SLP(C) NO: 11777/2014:- It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed proof of publication but he has not filed original copy of newspaper despite this Registry’s letter dated 30.03.2015. Service is not complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 5 th DAY OF MAY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 26/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Sharma,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 16175/2013 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of Order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court. SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the proof of publication whereafter no further extension shall be given. List again on 7.5.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
LISTED ON: 26.02.2015 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: ITEM NO: SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 & 11777/2014 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 12.12.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks time to cure the defects in the I.As. Time as prayed for is granted. List again on 26.02.2015 .” SLP(C) NO: 16175/2013:- It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not cured the following defects in application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of sole deceased respondents:- 1. Applciation for setting aside abatement if any not filed as application for substitution is barred by time by 3595 days. 2. Chamber summon to effect service upon proposed Lrs. has not been taken out. SLP(C) NO: 11777/2014:- It is submitted that notice of publication in respect of sole respondent to be published in two newspapers was handed over to counsel for the petitioner on 25.02.2015. Proof of publication is awaited. Service is not complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
X ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 26/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Sharma,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 16175/2013 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of Order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court. SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the proof of publication whereafter no furtherSignature Not Verified extension shall be given.Digitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.02.2811:00:26 ISTReason: List again on 7.5.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PRAVEEN KUMAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 12/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rahul Jain,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks time to cure the defects in the I.As. Time as prayed for is granted. List again on 26.02.2015. (PRAVEEN KUMAR) Registrar SB
LISTED ON: 12.12.2014 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 2 ITEM NO: 50 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONs FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 & 11777/2014 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 25.09.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ SLP(C) No. 16175/2013 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the sole respondent has expired. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said respondent within a period of three weeks. SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the sole respondent within a period of three weeks and he shall also take appropriate steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List again on 12.12.2014.” SLP(C) NO: 16175/2013:- It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 01.12.2014 filed application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased sole respondent but same is defective for the reason that age of proposed Lrs. is not mentioned and fact that there are no other Lrs. apart from those mentioned in application has not been stated. Counsel for the petitioner has cured the defects despite the Registry’s letter dated 02.12.2014. SLP(C) NO: 11777/2014:- It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 01.12.2014 filed application for substituted service but same is defective for the reason that he mentioned the tile of application substation instead of substituted service and also ..2/-
..2.. not mentioned that newspaper in question have wide circulation or not. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 10 th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ch. No. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
r ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PRAVEEN KUMAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 12/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rahul Jain,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks time to cure the defects in the I.As. Time as prayed for is granted. List again on 26.02.2015. (PRAVEEN KUMAR) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.12.1612:20:42 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 25/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Om Prakash,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 16175/2013 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the sole respondent has expired. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said respondent within a period of three weeks. SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the sole respondent within a period of three weeks and he shall also take appropriate steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List again on 12.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
LISTED ON: 25.09.2014 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 2 ITEM NO: 59 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONs FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 & 11777/2014 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 23.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ The learned counsel for the petitioner in both the petitions shall take fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondents within a period of two weeks’, failing which appropriate orders shall follow on the next date. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 25.09.2014. ” SLP(C) NO: 16175/2013:- It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid order, fresh notice to sole respondent was issued on 05.08.2014 by regd. Mode as well as dasti. Counsel for the petitioner has on 28.08.2014 filed affidavit with proof of dasti service duly served on son of sole respondent alongwith death certificate of sole respondent and a letter of his son wherein it is mentioned that he is the sole heir after death of his father. (Flag ‘A’ in Part-II file). SLP(C) NO: 11777/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid order, fresh notice to sole respondent was issued on 05.08.2014 by regd. Mode as well as dasti. Counsel for the petitioner has on 28.08.2014 filed affidavit with proof of dasti service stating therein that “said address not found”. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 23 rd DAY OF September, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
ü ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16175/2013 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 25/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Om Prakash,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 16175/2013 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the sole respondent has expired. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said respondent within a period of three weeks. SLP(C) No. 11777/2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the sole respondent within a period of three weeks and he shall also take appropriate steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2014.09.27 List again on 12.12.2014.10:55:30 ISTReason: (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
LISTED ON: 23.07.2014 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 2 ITEM NO: 66 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONs FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 & 11777/2014 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT SLP(C0 NO: 16175/2013:- The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'BLE Judge in Chamber on 31.03.2014, when their Lordship was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ On 22.04.2013, an order was passed for issuance of notice after condoning the delay. Since process fee of Rs.10/- and spare copy of the special leave petition was not filed, notice has not been issued till date. The petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.10/- and spare copy of the special leave petition during the course of the day, failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 31.03.2014 filed process fee and spare copy and accordingly notice to sole respondent was issued on 04.04.2014. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice to sole respondent has been received so far. Service is not complete. SLP(C) NO: 11777/2014:- The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (Civil) No. 16175 of 2013 arising out of SLP CC. No. 8618 of 2013. There will be interim stay of the arbitration proceedings.” ..2/-
..2.. it is submitted that as directed above show cause notice was issued on 21.05.2014 to sole respondent. Neither A.D. card nor unserved covers containing show cause notice has been received back so far. Service is not complete on sole respondent. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
LISTED ON: 23.07.2014 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 2 ITEM NO: 66 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONs FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 16175/2013 & 11777/2014 UNION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS M/S. ROAD CARRYING CORP. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT SLP(C0 NO: 16175/2013:- The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'BLE Judge in Chamber on 31.03.2014, when their Lordship was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ On 22.04.2013, an order was passed for issuance of notice after condoning the delay. Since process fee of Rs.10/- and spare copy of the special leave petition was not filed, notice has not been issued till date. The petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.10/- and spare copy of the special leave petition during the course of the day, failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 31.03.2014 filed process fee and spare copy and accordingly notice to sole respondent was issued on 04.04.2014. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice to sole respondent has been received so far. Service is not complete. SLP(C) NO: 11777/2014:- The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (Civil) No. 16175 of 2013 arising out of SLP CC. No. 8618 of 2013. There will be interim stay of the arbitration proceedings.” ..2/-
..2.. it is submitted that as directed above show cause notice was issued on 21.05.2014 to sole respondent. Neither A.D. card nor unserved covers containing show cause notice has been received back so far. Service is not complete on sole respondent. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: M r. D.S. Mahra, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 6328/2014(From the judgement and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRP No.78/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI, ASSAM)UOI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S GANESH ROAD LINE Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 25/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P. P. Malhotra, ASG. Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Yasir Rauf, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (Civil) No. 16175 of 2013 arising out of SLP CC. No. 8618 of 2013. There will be interim stay of the arbitration proceedings. [Nidhi Ahuja] [Sharda Kapoor] Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16175/2013(From the judgement and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No.497/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI ,ASSAM)UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 31/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vijay Prakash, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On 22.04.2013, an order was passed for issuance of notice aftercondoning the delay. Since process fee of Rs.10/- and spare copy of thespecial leave petition was not filed, notice has not been issued till date. The petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.10/- and spare copy ofthe special leave petition during the course of the day, failing which thespecial leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference tothe Court. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant Registrar
\212ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 8618/2013(From the judgment and order dated 19/11/2012 in CRP No.497/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI ,ASSAM)UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S ROAD CARRYING CORP. Respondent(s)With IA No. 1 (Condonation of delay in filing SLP)Date: 22/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Paras Kuhad, ASG. Mr. R. Nedumaran, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. Anil Antil, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R| ||Delay condoned. ||Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. ||Issue notice. || ||[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |