ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2015 in WP No. 8341/2004 passed by the High Court Of Madras) P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 17/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Mohana,Sr.Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Balaji,Adv. Mr. Muthu Vel Palani,Adv. Mr. S. Kumar,Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. The compassionate appointment of respondent no.1 having been terminated in the year 1995 cannot be revived now. The direction to appoint respondent no.1 in place of the petitioner is set aside. The petitioner's services need not be dispensed with. The special leave petition is disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
LISTED ON. 17.2.2017 COURT NO. 11 ITEM NO. 58 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1 st April, 2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice. Status-quo as on date shall be maintained in the meantime.” It is submitted that show cause notice has been issued to all the five Respondents by Registered post on 5 th August, 2015. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Ms. P. Soma Sundaram, Advocate and opportunity to file counter affidavit has been declined to him by Ld. Registrar's vide order dated 17 th February, 2016. Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate has already on 16 th November, 2016 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. The said Counter Affidavit has been included in the Special Leave Petition paper books. Service of show cause notice is complete. Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court from time to time and lastly listed on 17 th January, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “Opportunity to respondent no. 1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 2 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.” ...2/-
-2- The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 16 th day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, Advocate Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac
îITEM NO.58 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2015in WP No. 8341/2004 passed by the High Court Of Madras)P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUSP. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 17/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Mohana,Sr.Adv.Mr. M.P. Parthiban,Adv.Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Balaji,Adv.Mr. Muthu Vel Palani,Adv.Mr. S. Kumar,Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard.The compassionate appointment of respondent no.1having been terminated in the year 1995 cannot be revivednow. The direction to appoint respondent no.1 in place ofthe petitioner is set aside. The petitioner's servicesneed not be dispensed with.The special leave petition is disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Muthu Vel Palani M, Adv. Mr. B. Balaji,Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 2 to 5 have already filed counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
LISTED ON. 17.1.2017 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 01 ITEM NO. 26 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 23 rd November, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Opportunity to respondent no. 1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no. 3 despite due service. Respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5 to file counter affidavit within four weeks' time. List again on 17.01.2017.” It is submitted that there are five respondents in the matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Counsel and opportunity to file counter affidavit has already been declined to him vide Ld Registrar's order dated 17 th February, 2016. Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate has already on 16 th November, 2016 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 16 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac
nITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUSP. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 17/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Muthu Vel Palani M, Adv. Mr. B. Balaji,Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E ROpportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavithas already been declined. Respondent nos. 2 to 5 have already filed counteraffidavit.Registry to process the matter for being listed beforethe Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 23/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. MP. Parihiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Opportunity to respondent no. 1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent no. 3 despite due service. Respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5 to file counter affidavit within four weeks' time. List again on 17.101.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
LISTED ON. 23.11.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 01 ITEM NO. 41 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 16 th September, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Opportunity to respondent no. 1 for filing counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent nos. 2, 3 and 5 despite due service. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no. 2 within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. List again on 23.11.2016.” It is submitted that there are five respondents in the matter. Fresh show cause notice has been issued to respondent No.4 by Registered A.D. Post on 30 th September, 2016. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Counsel and opportunity to file counter affidavit has been declined to him vide Court's order dated 17 th February, 2016. Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate has on 16 th November, 2016 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance and counter affidavit filed by the 3 rd Respondent on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac
àITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUSP. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 23/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. MP. Parihiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E ROpportunity to respondent no. 1 to file counter affidavit hasalready been declined.None appears for respondent no. 3 despite due service. Respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5 to file counter affidavit within four weeks' time. List again on 17.101.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 16/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Opportunity to respondent no. 1 for filing counter affidavit has already been declined. None appears for respondent nos. 2, 3 and 5 despite due service. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no. 2 within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. List again on 23.11.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
LISTED ON. 16.9.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 01 ITEM NO. 40 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 13 th July, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Process issued to respondent No.3 has not been received back served or unserved. Fresh steps be taken for effecting service of the said respondent within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 16.9.2016.” It is submitted that fresh show cause notice has been issued to respondent No.3 by Registered A.D. Post on 9 th August, 2016. A.D. card duly signed and stamped of earlier notice issued to respondent No.3 has been received but no one has entered appearance on his behalf so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of served respondent Nos. 2 and 5 so far. Respondent No.1 is represented through Counsel and opportunity to file counter affidavit has been declined to him vide Court's order dated 17 th February, 2016. Service of show cause notice is not complete on respondent No.4. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 15 th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac
ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUSP. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 16/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P. Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E ROpportunity to respondent no. 1 for filing counter affidavithas already been declined. None appears for respondent nos. 2, 3 and 5 despite dueservice. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps foreffecting service on respondent no. 2 within two weeks' time andnotice thereafter be issued. List again on 23.11.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 13/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Process issued to respondent No.3 has not been received back served or unserved. Fresh steps be taken for effecting service of the said respondent within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 16.9.2016. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar
LISTED ON. 13.7.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 38 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 28 th March, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service on respondent nos. 2,4 and 5 is complete but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent No.3 within four weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 13.7.2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 12 th April, 2016 filed spare copy. Accordingly, fresh show cause notice has been issued to Respondent No. 3 on 21 st April, 2016 but neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 12 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ac
¬ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUSP. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 13/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RProcess issued to respondent No.3 has not been receivedback served or unserved. Fresh steps be taken for effectingservice of the said respondent within two weeks. Noticethereafter be issued.List again on 16.9.2016. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar
ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 28/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr S Ramesh, Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined Service on respondent nos. 2,4 and 5 is complete but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent No.3 within four weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 13.7.2016. (DR. K ARUL) Registrar
LISTED ON. 28.03.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 40 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 17 th February, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Respondent No.1 has not filed the counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined. Await service of respondent Nos.2 and 3. None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 5, despite due service. List again on 28.3.2016.” It is submitted that A.D. card duly signed has been received from respondent No. 2, but no one has entered appearance so far. In respect of respondent No. 3, neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 17 th day of March, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
æ ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 28/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr S Ramesh, Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined Service on respondent nos. 2,4 and 5 is complete but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent No.3 within four weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2016.03.2911:18:16 ISTReason: List again on 13.7.2016. (DR. K ARUL) Registrar
ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has not filed the counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined. Await service of respondent Nos.2 and 3. None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 5, despite due service. List again on 28.3.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
LISTED ON. 17.02.2016 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 71 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 9 th December, 2015, when the following order was passed:- “Respondent No.1 has yet to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' as last opportunity. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are yet to be served. Learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps within four weeks' time. Notices, thereafter, be issued. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 but none has put an appearance. List again on 17.2.2016.” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate, has not filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 so far. It is further submitted that fresh show cause notice has been issued to Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 on 20 th January, 2016 and service of notice is awaited. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 15 th day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
\224 ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has not filed the counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined. Await service of respondent Nos.2 and 3. None appears for respondent Nos.4 and 5, despite due service. List again on 28.3.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2016.02.1717:09:55 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 09/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. P. Parthiban Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has yet to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' as last opportunity. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are yet to be served. Learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps within four weeks' time. Notices, thereafter, be issued. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 but none has put an appearance. List again on 17.2.2016 . (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
LISTED ON. 9.12.2015 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 72 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 21 st September, 2015, when the following order was passed:- “Among five respondents herein, respondent no.1 is represented. Vakalatnama on his behalf has already been filed. Counter affidavit however, is awaited. Be filed within four weeks time. Service report of remaining respondent nos. 2 to 5 is also awaited. List again on 9.12.2015. ” It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate has not filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 so far. A.D. cards duly signed have been recived from respondent Nos. 4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. In respect of respondent Nos. 2 and 3, neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notices have been received so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 8 th day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
È ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 09/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. P. Parthiban Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Soma Sundaram,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has yet to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' as last opportunity. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are yet to be served. Learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps within four weeks' time. Notices, thereafter, be issued. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 but none has put an appearance. List again on 17.2.2016. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.12.1510:09:18 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.83 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 21/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr H.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr P Somasundaram, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Among five respondents herein, respondent no.1 is represented. Vakalatnama on his behalf has already been filed. Counter affidavit however, is awaited. Be filed within four weeks time. Service report of remaining respondent nos. 2 to 5 is also awaited. List again on 9.12.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
LISTED ON. 21.09.2015 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 83 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1 st April, 2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice. Status-quo as on date shall be maintained in the meantime.” Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Registrar's Court on 1 st May, 2015, when the following order was passed:- “Petitioner has not filed the spare copies, despite the time stipulated for the purpose, in view of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 1.4.2015 stands expired. The matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers, when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following order:- “Delay in filing spare copies is condoned.” ...2/-
-2- It is submitted that there are five respondents. Show cause notice has been issued to all the five respondents on 5 th August, 2015. Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate has on 18 th September, 2015 filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 and his name has been updated in the computer data. In respect of respondent Nos. 2 to 5, neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notices have been received so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 19 th day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate Mr. P. Somasundaram, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
ITEM NO.70 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2015 in WP No. 8341/2004 passed by the High Court Of Madras) P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 29/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. (Babita Pandey) (Rajinder Kaur) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER
CHAMBER MATTER LISTED ON. 29.07.2015 COURT NO. 8 ITEM NO. 70 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents REVISED OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1 st April, 2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice. Status-quo as on date shall be maintained in the meantime.” Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Registrar's Court on 1 st May, 2015, when the following order was passed:- “Petitioner has not filed the spare copies, despite the time stipulated for the purpose, in view of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 1.4.2015 stands expired. The matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” It is submitted that there are five respondents. Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 30 th June, 2015 filed spare copies which is barred by time by 90 days and he has also on 2 nd July, 2015 filed an application for condonation of delay in filing spare copies. ...2/-
-2- The office report on Default is reported to the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers. Dated this the 28 th day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
^ ITEM NO.70 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2015 in WP No. 8341/2004 passed by the High Court Of Madras) P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 29/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. (Babita Pandey) (Rajinder Kaur) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2015.07.3012:46:49 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.133 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 01/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Petitioner has not filed the spare copies, despite the time stipulated for the purpose, in view of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 1.4.2015 stands expired. The matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
LISTED ON. 1.5.2015 LD. REGISTRAR'S COURT NO. 01 ITEM NO. 133 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 9553 OF 2015 P. Raja ...Petitioner Versus P. Tamil Mani & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1 st April, 2015, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice. Status-quo as on date shall be maintained in the meantime.” It is submitted that there are five respondent. Show cause notice could not be issued to all the five respondents as Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, counsel for the petitioner has not filed spare copies so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 29 th day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
ITEM NO.133 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 01/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Petitioner has not filed the spare copies, despite the time stipulated for the purpose, in view of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 1.4.2015 stands expired. The matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.05.1118:02:14 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9553/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2015 in WP No. 8341/2004 passed by the High Court of Madras) P. RAJA Petitioner(s) VERSUS P. TAMIL MANI & ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Status-quo as on date shall be maintained in the meantime. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (PARDEEP KUMAR) AR-CUM-PS AR-CUM-PS