IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6283/2015 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAVINDER PAL Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6281/2015 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6284/2015 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6285/2015 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6289/2015 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6286/2015 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6288/2015 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6287/2015 (XIV-A) CIVIL APPEAL NO.893 /2021 [@ SLP(C) No. 15138/2017 (XIV)] O R D E R Leave granted in SLP(C) No.15138/2017. The interpretation of Rule 19 (ii) of the Delhi Police (Promotion and Confirmation) Rules, 1980 arises in these cases qua the aspect whether the seniority of the persons promoted out of 1
turn would be reckoned from the year of promotion or from the year the eligibility list is drawn. The relevant Rule reads as under: “19. Ad-hoc promotions-(i) In special circumstances when there are no approved names on promotion lists, and vacancies exists, the Commissioner of Police, may promote suitable officers in order of seniority to next higher rank temporarily. Such promotions shall not entitle the officers concerned to claim and right for regular appointment or seniority or for appointment to such or any other equivalent post and shall be liable to reversion without notice as soon as qualified men become available. (ii) To encourage outstanding sportsmen, marksmen, officers who have shown exceptional gallantry and devotion to duty, the Commissioner of Police may, with prior approval of Administrator, promote such officers to the next higher rank provided vacancies exist. Such promotions shall not exceed 5 per cent of the vacancies likely to fall vacant in the given year in the rank. Such promotions shall be treated as ad-hoc and will be regularized when the persons so promoted have successfully completed the training course prescribed like (Lower School Course), if any. For purposes of seniority such promotees shall be placed at the bottom of the promotion list drawn up for that year .” (emphasis supplied) The issue was examined by a three Judges Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal which opined in favour of the appellant(s)/Government but that matter was referred to a five 2
Judges Bench of the Tribunal which held that the correct interpretation of Rule implied that the officers promoted out of turn, in any year, shall be placed for purposes of seniority at the bottom of the promotion list of the year in which out of turn promotion is given 1 . This view was based on the stated unambiguous views of the expression “ that year ” which was held to be alluding to the year in which the official is granted the out of turn promotion and not the year in which the eligibility lists are prepared. It is the aforesaid view of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal which was assailed before the High Court and in terms of the impugned judgment dated 06.05.2013 the view of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal has been upheld. If we turn to the order of the High Court, we may notice that it has recognized that under Rule 19(ii) the promotions are to be treated as ad hoc to be regularized when the persons so promoted successfully complete the training course prescribed. The rationale for the same is stated to be that if officer who earns the promotion by virtue of Rule 19(ii) may otherwise not be eligible for promotion as per the seniority position and may not have been sent for the mandatory promotional courses. It is the case of the appellant that relying on the three Judges Bench of the Tribunal, that the seniority in the department has to be accorded when they complete the probation and as per Rule 22 of the said Rule, it would operate from the date of first 1
O.A.No.2047/2006 and OA NO.2612/2005 dated 24.03.2011 3
appointment to the post in question. We are in agreement with the view taken by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal and the High Court. We may, at the inception, note that this is a matter of a local Act and local Rules and normally, the view taken by the High Court must prevail unless some patent illegality in interpretation of rules is shown. That is not the position in the present case. We are persuaded to take this view as a reading of the Rule 19, sub-Rule (ii) makes it clear that for purposes of seniority, they would be placed at the bottom of the promotion list drawn up for that year. This would, in turn, imply that the promotions are earned in the year when the vacancy accrued. They are given ad hoc promotions first because of certain special circumstances i.e. for an act of bravery, gallantry and devotion to duty. How the seniority would be reckoned would be clarified from the last portion of the Rule which provides that for purposes of seniority, such promotees shall be placed at the bottom of the promotion list drawn up for that year. Thus, the High Court was correct opining in para 17 of the impugned order that the plain and simple English language should guide that in the promotion list drawn up that year i.e. the year of promotion, the names of the subordinate officers have to be entered and for the purposes of seniority to be so placed at the bottom of the promotion list drawn up for that year which, in turn, would imply that the year of the promotion and not any other year. We may also take note of the additional reason given by the 4
High Court in para 21 of the impugned order. The said paragraph reads as under:- “21. We give one more additional reason. If we look at sub Rule (i) of Rule 19 of the “Delhi Police (Promotion & Confirmation) Rules, 1980” we find that if no approved names are on the promotion lists and vacancies exist, as a special circumstance the Commissioner of Police may promote suitable officers in order of seniority to the next higher rank temporarily and these officers are not entitled to claim right for regular promotion or seniority. Meaning thereby, the Draftsman was conscious of temporary promotions and the consequence thereof as envisaged by sub Rule (i) and promotions with consequences thereof as envisaged by sub Rule (ii) of Rule 19 of the Delhi Police (Promotion & Confirmation) Rules, 1980.” The aforesaid is a supporting factor in interpretation of the Rule in the manner done by the five Judges Bench of the Tribunal and the High Court with which we concur. The result of the aforesaid is that the appeals are dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. At request of some of the counsel for the respondent(s), we clarify that if there was any interim orders in some cases, that would stand dissolved and the consequences of the judgment passed 5
by us should be implemented by the appellants, if not already implemented, within a maximum period of two months from today. …………………………………………….J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL] …………………………………………….J. [AJAY RASTOGI] NEW DELHI; MARCH 04, 2021. 6
ITEM NO.102 Court 9 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6283/2015 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAVINDER PAL Respondent(s) WITH C.A. Nos.6281/2015, 6284/2015, 6285/2015, 6289/2015, 6286/2015, 6288/2015, 6287/2015 and SLP(C) No. 15138/2017 Date : 04-03-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Appellant(s) Mr. R.S.Suri,ASG Mr. Anmol Chandan,Adv. Mr. R.K.Verma,Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vijay Kasana, Adv. Ms. Ketki Chayya Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Singal,Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Bharadwaj,Adv. Mr. Abhiesumat Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shaurya Dogra,Adv. Mr. Vikram Singh Jakhar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted in SLP(Civil)No.15138/2017. The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order. 7
Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) [Signed order is placed on the file] 8
ITEM NO.5 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6283/2015 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAVINDER PAL Respondent(s) (only I.A. 317/2020 in C.A. No. 6281/2015 to be listed) WITH C.A. No. 6281/2015 (XIV-A) (IA No. 317/2020 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION) Date : 02-09-2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN For Appellant(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, ASG Mr. B V Balaram Das, AOR Mr. R.K. Verma,Adv. Mr. Anmol Chandan,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Rishi Bharadwaj,Adv. Mr. Shaurya Dogra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the interlocutory application for early hearing. List the appeal in the month of February, 2021. The interlocutory application for early hearing stands disposed of accordingly. (MADHU BALA) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A. NO. 6286 OF 2015 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT) WITH C.A. No. 6286/2015 (XIV) Date : 24042018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms.Reena Pandey,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6286/2015 Ld.counsel for the parties have not filed the statement of case within the statutory period. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar SB
ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A. NO. 6286 OF 2015 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT) WITH C.A. No. 6286/2015 (XIV) Date : 09-03-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.Kamal Kishore,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. NO. 6286 OF 2015 Issue reminder to the concerned High Court for certificate of service in respect of respondent No.6. List the matter again on 24.04.2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar SB
ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A. NO. 6286 OF 2015 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT) WITH C.A. No. 6286/2015 (XIV) Date : 16-02-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.Sudhakar Dwivedi,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Amit Mehta,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6286/2015 Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1-5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Await certificate of service in respect of the respondent No.6 from the concerned High Court. List the matter again on 09.03.2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar SB
ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A. NO. 6286 OF 2015 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT) WITH C.A. No. 6286/2015 (XIV) Date : 04-01-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Gajanand Kirodiwal,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6281/2015 Being ready matter, place the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. C.A. No. 6286/2015 Issue reminder for certificate of service for respondent Nos. 2 to 6. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 16.2.2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar MG
ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No.6281/2015 U.O.I.. & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A. NOS. 6288 AND 6286 OF 2015 ARE TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT) WITH C.A. No. 6286/2015 (XIV) C.A. No. 6288/2015 (XIV) Date : 07-11-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vibhu Shankar Mishra, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.6288/2015: As per Office Report, sole respondent served, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Learned counsel for the parties shall file statement of case withing statutory period. Thereafter list the matter before Hon'ble Court. C.A. No.6286/2015: Await Service report in respect of respondent nos.2 to 6. C.A.No.6281/2015: File not received. List the matter again on 04.01.2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar RR
\204ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No.2/2016 in Civil Appeal No.6285/2015COMMNR.OF POLICE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for directions and office report)Date : 06/01/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASGMr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. Bala, Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. For Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard. I.A. No.2/2016, filed for directions, is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. NO.2/2016 in Civil Appeal NO.6285/2015 COMMNR.OF POLICE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 15/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Bala Subramanian, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Ms. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. For Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chander Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. For Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, four weeks' time is granted to the appellants to file affidavit. Put up thereafter. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
\230ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO.2/2016 in Civil Appeal NO.6285/2015COMMNR.OF POLICE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 15/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Appellant(s) Mr. R. Bala Subramanian, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Ms. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. For Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chander Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. For Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs prayed for, four weeks' time is granted to the appellantsto file affidavit. Put up thereafter. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Civil Appeal No. 6285/2015 COMMNR.OF POLICE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 28/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Aarti Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rabindra K. Mohanty, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after one week. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
2ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Civil Appeal No. 6285/2015COMMNR.OF POLICE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUSASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 28/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Appellant(s) Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv.Mr. Ananya Mishra, Adv.Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.Ms. Aarti Sharma, Adv.Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.Mr. Rabindra K. Mohanty, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv.Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList after one week.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
ITEM NO.10 IN COURT NO.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 6285/2015 COMMNR.OF POLICE & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 07/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Appellant(s) Ms. Pinki Anand, ASG. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanyam, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Mr. Mrinimay Bhattmewra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per the Office Report dated 03.10.2016, reply to I.A. No.2/2016 has not been filed. List the matter after two weeks. In the meantime reply be filed. (SWETA DHYANI) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
´ITEM NO.10 IN COURT NO.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 6285/2015COMMNR.OF POLICE & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s)(For directions and office report)Date : 07/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Appellant(s) Ms. Pinki Anand, ASG. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. Balasubramanyam, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Mr. Mrinimay Bhattmewra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs per the Office Report dated 03.10.2016, reply to I.A.No.2/2016 has not been filed.List the matter after two weeks. In the meantime reply befiled. (SWETA DHYANI) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER
Item No.95 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.& ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6283/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6284/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6285/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) C.A. No. 6287/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 6289/2015 Office Report) Date : 01/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Debojit Borkakati,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.
Item No.95 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the appellants does not wish to file the statement of case. Ld. Counsel for the respondents have failed to file the statement of case. However, s ervice is complete. Filing of Statement of Case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. (M V RAMESH) Registrar M G
Listed on: 01.08.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 95 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6281, 6283, 6284, 6285, 6287, 6288 AND 6289 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF U.O.I. & Ors. etc... ...Petitioners VERSUS Brahm Jeet Singh etc... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The appeals above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 06.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “In all the matters numbered above, the learned counsel for the appellants shall file the statement of case within a period of 45 days and the learned counsel for the respondents shall file the same within a period of 35 days thereafter. List again on 1.8.2016.” It is submitted that Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate has on 09.01.2016 filed a letter stating therein that no need to file statement of case in all the matters. Letter is placed bellow. It is further submitted that service of notice of lodgment petition of appeal is complete. The appeals above-mentioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report for pre-final hearing. DATED THIS THE 29 th DAY of JULY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. D.S. Mehra, Adv. (Central Agency) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ch. No. 28 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/avi
v Item No.95 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.& ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6283/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6284/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6285/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) C.A. No. 6287/2015 Office Report) C.A. No. 6289/2015 Office Report) Date : 01/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Debojit Borkakati,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.Digitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.0116:48:40 ISTReason:Item No.95 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the appellants does not wish to file thestatement of case. Ld. Counsel for the respondents have failed to file thestatement of case. However, service is complete. Filing ofStatement of Case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme CourtRules, 2013. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed forlisting before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn.
(M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6285/2015 COMMNR.OF POLICE & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Respondent(s) (For directions and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chandrashekhar, Adv. Mr. Mrinmay, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Reply to I.A. No. 2 of 2016 be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
Item No.109 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015 U.O.I.& ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6283/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6284/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and ) C.A. No. 6285/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6287/2015 C.A. No. 6289/2015 Date : 06/05/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sudhakar Dwivedi,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhishek Goyal,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.
Item No.109 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In all the matters numbered above, the learned counsel for the appellants shall file the statement of case within a period of 45 days and the learned counsel for the respondents shall file the same within a period of 35 days thereafter. List again on 1.8.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
Listed on: 06.05.2016 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 109 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6281, 6283, 6284, 6285, 6287, 6288 AND 6289 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF U.O.I. & Ors. etc... ...Petitioners VERSUS Brahm Jeet Singh etc... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6281, 6283 and 6284/2015 It is submitted that there is sole respondent in these appeals and is represented by Mr. Arind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6285/2015 It is submitted that there are 2 respondents in this appeal and are represented by Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. Service of notice of lodgment petition of appeal is complete. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6287/2015 It is submitted that there are 3 respondents in this appeal. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 have been deleted vide Court’s Order dated 30.07.2015. Service of notice of lodgment petition of appeal is complete. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6288/2015 It is submitted that there is sole responden t in this appeal but no one has entered appearance so far. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6289/2015 It is submitted that there is sole respondent in this appeal and is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. It is further submitted that counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case in all the matters so far.
The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report for pre-final hearing. DATED THIS THE 04 th DAY of MAY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. D.S. Mehra, Adv. (Central Agency) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ch. No. 28 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/avi
,Item No.109 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHCivil Appeal No(s). 6281/2015U.O.I.& ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSBRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s)WITHC.A. No. 6283/2015(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6284/2015(With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and ) C.A. No. 6285/2015(With (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and ) C.A. No. 6287/2015C.A. No. 6289/2015Date : 06/05/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Sudhakar Dwivedi,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhishek Goyal,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.Item No.109 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn all the matters numbered above, the learned counsel for theappellants shall file the statement of case within a period of 45days and the learned counsel for the respondents shall file thesame within a period of 35 days thereafter. List again on 1.8.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11470/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No. 6626/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in New Delhi) U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11471/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11473/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13309/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16162/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16445/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 13/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.
2 For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Singhal, Adv. Mr. Ajesh, Adv. Ms. Jyotsna Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned, if any. Leave granted. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ G.V. Ramana ] A.R.-cum-P.S. A.R.-cum-P.S.
Listed on: 13.08.2015 Before Court No. Item No. SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 11470, 11471, 11472, 11473, 13309, 16162 , 16445 AND 28543 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF U.O.I. & Ors. etc... ...Petitioners VERSUS Brahm Jeet Singh etc... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Post for these matters after ensuing summer vacation for hearing in usual course. " The service position of the matters is as under:- SLP (C) NOS. 11470, 11471 and 11472/2014 It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of sole respondent in all the SLPs and he has also filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. (Copies of same have been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete in all the matters. SLP (C) NO. 11473/2014 It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of both respondents but he has not filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. Service is complete in the matter. ...2/-
...2... SLP (C) NO. 13309/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.05.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 11470/2014. " It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to sole respondent by registered AD. AD card duly singed has been received. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has on 08.12.2014 filed counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent but has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16162/2014 It is submitted that there is sole respondent in this matter and is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. He has on 08.12.2014 filed Counter Affidavit with Annexures A-1 to A-3 and the same has been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16445/2014 It is submitted that there are 3 respondents in this matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 has already filed counter affidavit and the same has been included in SLP Paper Books. Names of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Chamber Judge Order dated 30.07.2015. Accordingly, cause title has been amended and included in SLP paper books. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 28543/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. ...... CC No. 4929 of 2014." It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the 6 on 18.11.2014 through registered A.D. post. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received so far. Service is not complete. ...3/-
...3... The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY of AUGUST, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
l 1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11470/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No. 6626/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in New Delhi) U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11471/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11473/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13309/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16162/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16445/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 13/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM :Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICECharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.08.1317:48:44 IST HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAReason: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. 2For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Singhal, Adv. Mr. Ajesh, Adv. Ms. Jyotsna Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned, if any. Leave granted. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ G.V. Ramana ] A.R.-cum-P.S. A.R.-cum-P.S.
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16445/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WPC No. 4278/2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAGVINDER SINGH & ORS Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent and office report) Date : 30/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 2/2015 for deletion the names of respondent nos. 2 and 3 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks. (Rachna) (Renu Diwan) Sr. P.A. Court Master
Listed on: 30.07.2015 Before Court No. Item No. SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 11470, 11471, 11472, 11473, 13309, 16162 , 16445 AND 28543 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for deletion of name of respondent nos. 2 and 3 in SLP (C) No. 16445/2014) U.O.I. & Ors. etc... ...Petitioners VERSUS Brahm Jeet Singh etc... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Post for these matters after ensuing summer vacation for hearing in usual course. " The service position of the matters is as under:- SLP (C) NOS. 11470, 11471 and 11472/2014 It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of sole respondent in all the SLPs and he has also filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. (Copies of same have been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete in all the matters. SLP (C) NO. 11473/2014 It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of both respondents but he has not filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. Service is complete in the matter. ...2/-
...2... SLP (C) NO. 13309/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.05.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 11470/2014. " It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to sole respondent by registered AD. AD card duly singed has been received. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has on 08.12.2014 filed counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent but has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16162/2014 It is submitted that there is sole respondent in this matter and is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. He has on 08.12.2014 filed Counter Affidavit with Annexures A-1 to A-3 and the same has been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16445/2014 It is submitted that in SLP(C) No. 16445/2014, counsel for the petitioner has on 06.05.2015 filed an application for deletion of name of Respondent Nos. 2 & 3(registered as I.A. No. 2) and the same has been placed with SLP Paper Books. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 has already filed counter affidavit and the same has been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 28543/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. ...... CC No. 4929 of 2014." It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the 6 on 18.11.2014 through registered A.D. post. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received so far. Service is not complete. ...3/-
...3... The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 14 th DAY of JULY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. D.S. Mehra, Adv. (Central Agency) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ch. No. 28 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/avi
CHAMBER MATTER SECTION : XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for deletion of name of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) Nos. 16445/2014 GNCT of Delhi & Ors. etc. Petitioners VERSUS ASI Jagvinder Singh & Ors. etc. Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed alongwith connected matters before the Hon'ble Court on 29.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- "Post for these matters after ensuing summer vacation for hearing in usual course. " It is submitted that there are 3 respondents in this matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Neither AD cards nor unserved covers received from Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 06.05.2015 filed an application for deletion of name of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Registered as I.A. No. 2) and the same has been placed with SLP Paper Books. The application in the matter above-mentioned is listed before Hon'ble Judge in Chamber with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY OF MAY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. M r. D. S. Mahra, Advocate 2. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-2/Avi
ö ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16445/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WPC No. 4278/2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAGVINDER SINGH & ORS Respondent(s) (For deletion of the name of respondent and office report) Date : 30/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 2/2015 for deletion the names of respondent nos. 2 and 3 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (Rachna) (Renu Diwan)Neeta SapraDate: 2015.08.0112:33:42 IST Sr. P.A. Court MasterReason:
Listed on: 15.07.2015 Before Court No. Item No. SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 11470, 11471, 11472, 11473, 13309, 16162 , 16445 AND 28543 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for deletion of name of respondent nos. 2 and 3 in SLP (C) No. 16445/2014) U.O.I. & Ors. etc... ...Petitioners VERSUS Brahm Jeet Singh etc... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Post for these matters after ensuing summer vacation for hearing in usual course. " The service position of the matters is as under:- SLP (C) NOS. 11470, 11471 and 11472/2014 It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of sole respondent in all the SLPs and he has also filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. (Copies of same have been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete in all the matters. SLP (C) NO. 11473/2014 It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of both respondents but he has not filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. Service is complete in the matter. ...2/-
...2... SLP (C) NO. 13309/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.05.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 11470/2014. " It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to sole respondent by registered AD. AD card duly singed has been received. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has on 08.12.2014 filed counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent but has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16162/2014 It is submitted that there is sole respondent in this matter and is represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate. He has on 08.12.2014 filed Counter Affidavit with Annexures A-1 to A-3 and the same has been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16445/2014 It is submitted that in SLP(C) No. 16445/2014, counsel for the petitioner has on 06.05.2015 filed an application for deletion of name of Respondent Nos. 2 & 3(registered as I.A. No. 2) and the same has been placed with SLP Paper Books. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 has already filed counter affidavit and the same has been included in SLP Paper Books. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 28543/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. ...... CC No. 4929 of 2014." It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the 6 on 18.11.2014 through registered A.D. post. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received so far. Service is not complete. ...3/-
...3... The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 14 th DAY of JULY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. D.S. Mehra, Adv. (Central Agency) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ch. No. 28 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/avi
1 ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11470/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No. 6626/2011,22/09/2011 in OA No. 2905/2009 passed by the 9999) U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11471/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11473/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13309/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16162/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16445/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 29/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pinki Anand, ASG Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.
2 Ms. R.S. Suri, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Singal, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Ms. Jyotsna Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Sadhya Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post for these matters after ensuing summer vacation for hearing in usual course. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Vinod Kulvi) Assistant Registrar
Ü 1 ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11470/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No. 6626/2011,22/09/2011 in OA No. 2905/2009 passed by the 9999) U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11471/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11473/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 13309/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16162/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16445/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 29/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICENEETU KHAJURIADate: 2015.05.0517:25:32 IST HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEReason: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pinki Anand, ASG Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. 2 Ms. R.S. Suri, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Singal, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv.
Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv. Ms. Jyotsna Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Sadhya Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post for these matters after ensuing summer vacation for hearing in usual course. (Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3668 of 2015 (@ Civil Appeal Diary No. 6285 of 2015) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARRAYCOM (INDIA) LTD. Respondent(s) O R D E R Delay condoned. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The civil appeal is accordingly dismissed. A deposit of Rs.50,000/- may be returned to the appellant. … ....................J. [Madan B. Lokur] … ....................J. [Adarsh Kumar Goel] NEW DELHI APRIL 10, 2015 1
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 6285/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARRAYCOM (INDIA) LTD. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal) Date : 10/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Appellant(s) Mr. A.K. De, Adv. Mr. Debasis Misra,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Zahid Ali, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shuvodeep Roy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The civil appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. A deposit of Rs.50,000/- may be returned to the appellant. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER [Signed Order is placed on the file] 2
ITEM NO.65 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16445/2014 GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAGVINDER SINGH & ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 19/03/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Santosh Kumar,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr.Anil K.Singal,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.16445/2014 The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit as gets revealed from the perusal of the office report. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.2 & 3 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within the period provided above. … ..........2
ITEM NO.65 -2- SLP(C) No.28543/2014 Mr.Anil K.Singhal, Ld.counsel appears for the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the other unserved respondent shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within the period provided above. Filing of the spare copies of the petition is dispensed with. List again on 09.07.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.65 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16445/2014 GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAGVINDER SINGH & ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 19/03/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Santosh Kumar,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr.Anil K.Singal,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.16445/2014 The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit as gets revealed from the perusal of the office report. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.2 & 3 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particularsSignature Not Verified of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitionersDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.03.2111:44:26 ISTReason: within the period provided above. .............2ITEM NO.65 -2- SLP(C) No.28543/2014 Mr.Anil K.Singhal, Ld.counsel appears for the respondent No.1.He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama andthe counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theother unserved respondent shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is
permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars ofwhich shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitionerswithin the period provided above. Filing of the spare copies ofthe petition is dispensed with. List again on 09.07.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.107 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11470/2014 U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11471/2014 SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 SLP(C) No. 11473/2014 SLP(C) No. 13309/2014 SLP(C) No. 16162/2014 SLP(C) No. 16445/2014 SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 07/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Binod K.Upadhyay,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Abhishek Goyal,adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr.Udit Arora,adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.11470/2014,11471/2014,11472/2014,11473 & 16162/2014 The office report is that the sole respondent in each matter has already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, all the matters numbered above shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. … .......2
ITEM NO.107 -2- SLP(C) No.13309/2014 The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. SLP(C) No.16445/2014 The office report indicates that the respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos.2 & 3. SLP(C) No.28543/2014 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. List again on 16.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
Listed on: 07.01.2015 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 2 Item No. 107 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 11470, 11471, 11472, 11473, 13309, 16162 , 16445 AND 28543 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF U.O.I. & Ors. etc... ...Petitioners VERSUS Brahm Jeet Singh etc... ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) NOS. 11470, 11471, 11472 AND 11473/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Delay condoned. Issue notice." It is submitted that, show cause notice was issued on sole respondent in all the SLPs through registered A.D. post. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of sole respondent in all the SLPs and he has also filed counter Affidavit in all the SLPs. Service is complete in all the matters. SLP (C) NO. 13309/2014 Pursuant to this Court's order dated 08.05.2014, show cause notice was issued to the sole Respondent by registered A.D. on 22.05.2014. A.D. card duly signed has been received, but none has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16162/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 30.06.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 11472/2014 and 13309/2014.
It is submitted that as directed above, show cause notice to the sole respondent was issued through Advocate on 11.07.2014. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has on 24.07.2014 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of sole respondent after obtaining no objection certificate from erstwhile Advocate. He has also on 08.12.2014 filed Counter Affidavit with Annexures A-1 to A-3. Service is complete. SLP (C) NO. 16445/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with CC No. 11470 of 2014." It is submitted that as directed above, show cause notice was issued to Respondent No. 1 thourgh, Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advcoate and Respondent Nos. 2 to 3 by registered AD. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate has on 08.12.2014 filed Counter Affidavit with Annexures A-1 to A-2. Nothing has been received from Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 so far. Service is not complete on Respondent Nos. 2 to 3, SLP (C) NO. 28543/2014 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. ...... CC No. 4929 of 2014." It is submitted that show cause notice was issued on 18.11.2014 through registered A.D. post. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received so far. Service is not complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 06 th DAY of JANUARY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. D.S. Mehra, Adv. (Central Agency) Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ch. No. 28 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/avi
ITEM NO.107 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11470/2014 U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11471/2014 SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 SLP(C) No. 11473/2014 SLP(C) No. 13309/2014 SLP(C) No. 16162/2014 SLP(C) No. 16445/2014 SLP(C) No. 28543/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 07/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Binod K.Upadhyay,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Abhishek Goyal,adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr.Udit Arora,adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.11470/2014,11471/2014,11472/2014,11473 & 16162/2014 The office report is that the sole respondent in each matterSignature Not Verified hasDigitally signed bySushma Kumari Bajaj already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, all theDate: 2015.01.09 matters numbered above shall be processed for listing before the12:44:45 ISTReason: Hon'ble Court under the rules. ..........2ITEM NO.107 -2-SLP(C) No.13309/2014
The office report indicates that service of notice is completeon the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance on hisbehalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon'ble Court under the rules.SLP(C) No.16445/2014 The office report indicates that the respondent No.1 hasalready filed the counter affidavit. Await the return of theservice of notice already issued to the respondent Nos.2 & 3.SLP(C) No.28543/2014 Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe unserved respondents. List again on 16.03.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 10323/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No. 6768/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at N. Delhi) LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABDUL NAZEER KUNJU & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date : 13/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, ASG Ms. Indra Sawhney, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. ...... CC No. 4929 of 2014. (Neeta) (Usha Sharma) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER
LISTED ON: 13.10.2014 BEFORE COURT NO: ITEM NO: SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CC NO. 10323/2014 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. /2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1 & 2 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLP) LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS ABDUL NAZEER KUNJU & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.05.2013 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in W.P. No. 6768 of 2011 with application for condonation of Delay in filing (barred by time by 233 days) The matter was found defective and returned to the counsel. He has on 17.06.2014 refiled the matter after curing the defects which is barred by time by 50 days. It is further submitted that in view of undertaking letter dated 16.06.2014 counsel for the petitioner has on 18.09.2014 filed a letter stating the date of order was wrongly mentioned as 31.12.99 instead of 03.12.99 and the correct date of document is 03.12.99. In this regard, he has filed the copy of order dated 03.12.99 and the same is being circulated herewith. It is further submitted that SLP(C) No. 11472/2014 @ CC NO. 6286/2014 arising out of common order was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 21.04.2014 when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice. Copy of order dated 21.04.2014 is enclosed herewith and the matter falls under “Complete” category. ..2/-
..2.. The matter alongwith application above-mentioned is listed before Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 10 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
$ ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 10323/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No. 6768/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at N. Delhi) LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS ABDUL NAZEER KUNJU & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) Date : 13/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, ASG Ms. Indra Sawhney, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. ...... CC No. 4929 of 2014. (Neeta) (Usha Sharma) Sr. P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNeeta SapraDate: 2014.10.1517:15:39 ISTReason:
\204 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 7830/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WPC 4278/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) GNCT OF DELHI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAGVINDER SINGH & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 01/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. Radhakanta Tripathy, Adv. Mr. N.K. Jha, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with CC No. 11470 of 2014Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (Neeta) (Usha Sharma)Neeta SapraDate: 2014.07.0310:52:00 IST Sr. P.A. Court MasterReason:
ü ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C).....CC No.7502/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP 2414/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) COMMR. OF POLICE & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR Respondents(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 30/06/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Mr. Ravindra Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. Atul Y.Chitale, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Tag with SLP (C) Nos. 11472/2014 and 13309/2014.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRajni MukhiDate: 2014.07.0317:19:12 ISTReason: [RAJNI MUKHI] [USHA SHARMA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
ÊITEM NO.20 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 7343/2014(From the judgement and order dated 06/05/2013 in WPC No.5514/2012,of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)COMM. OF POLICE & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR TYAGI Respondent(s)I.A.1(c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 08/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.P. Malhotra, ASG Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Seema Rao, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 11470/2014. [ Meenakshi ] [ Usha Sharma] Court Master Court Master
æITEM NO.43& 66 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 4929/2014(From the judgement and order dated 06/05/2013 in WP No.6626/2011of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI)U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5279 of 2014(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6286 of 2014(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6612 of 2014(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 21/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. A.K. Kaul, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Supriya Juneja, Adv. Mr. Gurmohan Singh Bedi, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singla, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. [RAJNI MUKHI] [USHA SHARMA] SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
\222ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 4929/2014U.O.I.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBRAHM JEET SINGH Respondent(s)I.A.1 (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5279 of 2014I.A.1 (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 31/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SENFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Supriya Juneja,Adv. Mr. A.K. Kaul,Adv. For Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ms. Supriya Juneja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prays for a week time on the ground that the arguing counsel, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, learned ASG, has been taken ill. Post on 21.04.2014. |(Narendra Prasad) | |(Renuka Sadana) ||Court Master | |Court Master |