Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 10023

VITHAL BAPU MANE v. BALASAHEB SIDHU MASAL

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10023/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

13-04-2017

Bench

Petitioner

VITHAL BAPU MANE

Respondent

BALASAHEB SIDHU MASAL

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

Download Judgment (PDF) Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10541/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/01/2017 in SA No. 284/1994 passed by the High Court of Bombay) VITHAL BAPU MANE Petitioner(s) VERSUS BALASAHEB SIDHU MASAL AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 13/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. We do not find any reason to entertain this petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

:ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10541/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/01/2017in SA No. 284/1994 passed by the High Court of Bombay)VITHAL BAPU MANE Petitioner(s) VERSUSBALASAHEB SIDHU MASAL AND ORS Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief)Date : 13/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe petitioner. We do not find any reason to entertain thispetition. The special leave petition is, accordingly,dismissed. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India