SEC. IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO. 3809 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 5553 OF 2013 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) S. KALIA PERUMAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE REP. BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POL.&ORS ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The application above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22 nd April, 2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :- “Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in two weeks confining to the fact that why the direction in para 4 should not be modified in view of the High Court's conclusion in para 3. Dasti in addition.” Accordingly, show cause notice usual as well as dasti returnable for 1 st July, 2013 was issued to all the three respondents. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates have filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and 3 respectively. Service of show cause notice is complete. The application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
DATED this the 20 th day of April, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- Mr. R. Sathish , Advocate Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR cs/c2
HITEM NO.24 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2013 CRLMP.NO(s). 7649(From the judgement and order dated 08/11/2012 in CRLM No.35054/2012, of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)DILBAGH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 18/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.L. Chander Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court refusing to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioner, inter alia, for the offence under Section 304-A, IPC on the ground that the aforesaid offence is not compoundable. However, it will be open for the petitioner to cite the decision of this Court in Puttaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka, 2009 (1) RCR (Criminal) 501 before the Trial Court for the purpose of consideration of the sentence to be awarded in case the petitioner is found to be guilty. The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly.| (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) | | (SHARDA KAPOOR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |