IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1526 OF 2017 RAM AUTAR APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF U.P. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 26.11.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. 2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ……………………………………………J. (VIKRAM NATH) ……………………………………………J. (SANDEEP MEHTA) NEW DELHI; JANUARY 30, 2025 1
ITEM NO.110 COURT NO.6 SECTION III-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1526/2017 RAM AUTAR Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 30-01-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA For Appellant(s) : Dr. Vijay Kumar Shukla, Adv. Ms. Nupur Shukla, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Gulati, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Sunil Murarka, Adv. Ms. Nitya Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. J.N.S. Tyagi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is accordingly dismissed in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file.) 2
ITEM NO.18 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 1526/2017 RAM AUTAR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Respondent(s) Date : 24042018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Dr.Rajeev Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the parties have not filed the statement of case within the statutory period. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar SB
ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief, exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 03/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar Shukla,Adv. Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon,Adv. Mr. Rovin Babu,Adv. Mr. Raghuvir Sharma,Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Sharma,Adv. Ms Parul Sharma,Adv. Ms. Suman Rani,Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Liberty is granted to file further affidavit within a period of six weeks. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
\234ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief, exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date : 03/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar Shukla,Adv.Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv.Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv.Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv.Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon,Adv.Mr. Rovin Babu,Adv.Mr. Raghuvir Sharma,Adv.Mr. Dharmendra Sharma,Adv.Ms Parul Sharma,Adv.Ms. Suman Rani,Adv.Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv.Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv.Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted.Liberty is granted to file further affidavitwithin a period of six weeks. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 27/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Sharma,Adv. Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kr.,Adv. Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv. Ms. Parul Sharma,Adv. Mr. Yugal K. Prasad,Adv. Ms. Suman Rani,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 3 rd February, 2017. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
SECTION XI LISTED ON: 27.01.2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No.: PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13268 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAM AUTAR ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23.01.2017, with an office report dated 20.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Learned counsel for the respondentState seeks time to ascertain the factual position with regard to reinstatement/reappointment for the post of Mandi Sahayak passed by the Deputy Director on 21.07.2012. Post on Friday i.e. 27.01.2017.” It is submitted that Counsel for the RespondentState has not filed any documents so far. Service is complete. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 24 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate. Mr. Rajiv Yadav, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2
ÂITEM NO.59 COURT NO.10 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 27/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Sharma,Adv.Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kr.,Adv.Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv.Ms. Parul Sharma,Adv.Mr. Yugal K. Prasad,Adv.Ms. Suman Rani,Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv.Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv.Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agarwal,Adv.Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 3 rd February, 2017. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 23/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondent-State seeks time to ascertain the factual position with regard to reinstatement/reappointment for the post of Mandi Sahayak passed by the Deputy Director on 21.07.2012. Post on Friday i.e. 27.01.2017. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master
SECTION XI LISTED ON: 23.01.2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.: 11 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No.: 50 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13268 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAM AUTAR ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.01.2017, with an office report dated 11.01.2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ At request of Mr. V.K. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, post on Monday, the 23 rd January, 2017. Rejoinder affidavit, if not already, be filed in the meantime.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 19.01.2017 filed Rejoinder Affidavit alongwith translated copies of Annexures but no application for exemption from filing official translation has been filed by him. However, the Rejoinder Affidavit is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. Service is complete. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 20 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate. Mr. Rajiv Yadav, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2
ÌITEM NO.50 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 23/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondent-State seeks time toascertain the factual position with regard toreinstatement/reappointment for the post of Mandi Sahayak passed bythe Deputy Director on 21.07.2012.Post on Friday i.e. 27.01.2017.(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master
ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 16/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Shukla,Adv. Mr. A. Mehrotra,Adv. Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. (R-1) Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At request of Mr. V.K. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, post on Monday, the 23 rd January, 2017. Rejoinder affidavit, if not already, be filed in the meantime. (MAHABIR SINGH) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
^ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 16/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Shukla,Adv.Mr. A. Mehrotra,Adv.Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv.Mr. Ravinder Kumar,Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv.(R-1) Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv.Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv.Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv.UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAt request of Mr. V.K. Shukla, learned counsel for thepetitioner, post on Monday, the 23 rd January, 2017.Rejoinder affidavit, if not already, be filed in themeantime.(MAHABIR SINGH) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on Monday i.e. 16 th January, 2017. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
SECTION XI LISTED ON: 13.01.2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No.: 11 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No.: 42 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13268 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAM AUTAR ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24.04.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice.” There are total 5 Respondents in the matter. Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to all the Respondents was issued by registered A.D. post on 06.05.2015. Respondent No. 1 is represented through Mr. Rajiv Yadav, Advocate. But he has failed to file Counter Affidavit within the stipulated period. Respondent Nos. 2 , 4 and 5 are represented through Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate. He has filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf (Copy included in the paper books). Fresh show cause notice to Respondent No. 3 was issued on 06.08.2016 through newly introduced Bar Coding Slip System. As per Track Report the same has been delivered on 12.08.2016. But none has entered appearance on its behalf so far. Service is complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Court of Registrar on 26.09.2016, when the following order was passed: “ The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.” The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 11 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to: Dr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2
ÆITEM NO.42 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s)Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv.Ms. Nupur Shukla,Adv.Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv.Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv.Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on Monday i.e. 16 th January, 2017. (Madhu Bala) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG
ÒITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counteraffidavit.As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but noone has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the mattershall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under therules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ÒITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counteraffidavit.As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but noone has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the mattershall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under therules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ÒITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counteraffidavit.As per tracking report respondent No.3 has been served but noone has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the mattershall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under therules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG
ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to respondent No.3. List the matter again on 26.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
>ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 12/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counteraffidavit.The respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated under the rules.Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of fourweeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of noticealready issued to respondent No.3.List the matter again on 26.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance, is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1 for filing the counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the respondent no. 3 has filed the counter affidavit, but has failed to file the Vakalatnama. Therefore, the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.3 is taken off the record. Thus, f resh steps for the service of notice to the respondent no.3 shall be taken by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted to be served on the Ld. Standing Counsel appearing for the State of U.P. List again on 12.08.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS
TITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time, as last chance, is granted to the Ld. Counselfor the respondent no.1 for filing the counter affidavit.Respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5 have already filed the counteraffidavit. Ld. Counsel for the respondent no. 3 has filed thecounter affidavit, but has failed to file the Vakalatnama.Therefore, the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondentno.3 is taken off the record. Thus, f resh steps for the serviceof notice to the respondent no.3 shall be taken by the Ld. Counselfor the petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti, inaddition, is permitted to be served on the Ld. Standing Counselappearing for the State of U.P. List again on 12.08.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarPS
ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 07/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms.Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr.Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Therefore, the counter affidavit filed by him on behalf of the said respondent is taken off the record. List the matter again on 05.07.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
"ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 07/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms.Pallavi Pratap,Adv. Mr.Rajiv Yadav,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks. The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5have already filed the counter affidavit.Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed thecounter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama.Therefore, the counter affidavit filed by him on behalf of the saidrespondent is taken off the record. List the matter again on 05.07.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks as last chance to file the vakalatnama failing which the counter affidavit filed by him shall be taken off the record. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.1 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld.Standing counsel representing the State of U.P. List the matter again on 07.04.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
\212 ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Anchal Mehrotra,Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks as last chance to file the vakalatnama failing which the counter affidavit filed by him shall be taken off the record. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.1 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld.Standing counsel representingSignature Not Verified the State of U.P.Digitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.02.1810:09:07 TLTReason: List the matter again on 07.04.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 11/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks file the vakalatnama failing which the counter affidavit filed by him shall be taken off the record. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.1. List the matter again on 17.02.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
¸ ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13268/2015 RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 11/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2,4 & 5 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks file the vakalatnama failing which the counter affidavit filed by him shall be taken off the record. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.1.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.12.11 List the matter again on 17.02.2016.16:14:43 TLT (M V RAMESH)Reason: Registrar SB
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No......./2015 CC No. 7035/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma, A.O.R. Mr. Ashish Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Anchal Mehrotra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER
P ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No......./2015 CC No. 7035/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/11/2014 in SA No. 970/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM AUTAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) Date : 24/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma, A.O.R. Mr. Ashish Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Anchal Mehrotra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2015.04.2417:20:21 ISTReason: [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER