ITEM NO.101 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2842/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS Ex. RECT RAKESH KUMAR (NO. 15347148 P) Respondent(s) Date : 25-05-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA (Vacation Bench) For Appellant(s) Mr. Jayant K. Sud, ASG Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR Mr. Rohit Vats, Adv. Ms. Nisha Gaur, Adv. Mr. Shubham Rana, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (NEELAM GULATI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed order is placed on the file)
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 2842 OF 2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS Ex. RECT RAKESH KUMAR (NO. 15347148 P) Respondent(s) O R D E R Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the matter in detail, w e are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed. .............................J. ( S. ABDUL NAZEER ) .............................J. ( PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA ) NEW DELHI MAY 25, 2022
ITEM NO.120 COURT NO.4 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2842/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR (NO. 15347148 P) Respondent(s) Date : 22-05-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH (VACATION BENCH) For Appellant(s) Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chakitan Vikram Shekhar Papta, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR (Not Present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one appears for the respondent. List the matter after summer vacation. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER
ITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 2842/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s) Date : 05/12/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.B.P.Nahar,adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the appellants has already filed the statement of case. The office report further is that the Ld.counsel for the respondent has failed to file the statement of case although he has been notified to do so by notice dated 27.09.2011 of this Registry . Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
Ü ITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 2842/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s) Date : 05/12/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.B.P.Nahar,adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the appellants has already filed the statement of case. The office report further is that the Ld.counsel for the respondent has failed to file the statement of case although he has been notified to do so by notice dated 27.09.2011 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.12.0810:44:27 ISTReason: (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 2842/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s) Date : 19/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.S.Nagarajan,adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List again on 5.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
4 ITEM NO.95 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 2842/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s) Date : 19/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.S.Nagarajan,adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List again on 5.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.11.2116:50:55 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.12 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2842 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant (s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date: 26/11/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Zaki Ahmed Khan, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv. for Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Monika Manocha, Adv. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Adv. Ms. Monika Sharma, Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time, as requested by learned counsel for the appellants, is granted to file the statement of case. |(S.K. Rakheja) | |(Indu Bala Kapur) ||Court Master | |Court Master |
úITEM NO.87 COURT NO.10 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2842 OF 2011UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant (s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 07/11/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Mr. Shalini Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up after two weeks as learned counsel for the appellants is not aware of the office report dated 01.11.2012. | (Sanjay Kumar) Court Master | (Veena Khera) || |Court Master |
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.4 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).11764/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/09/2009 in SA No.122/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL)UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 28/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Mrs.Shwetha Verma, Adv. for Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. Ms.Monika Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Stay to continue. (G.V.Ramana) (Neeru Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master
´ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).11764/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/09/2009 in SA No.122/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL)UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 07/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.K.K.Kaul, Adv. Ms.Shailly, Adv. for Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated, the matter isadjourned by two weeks. We direct the respondent to give a copy of thecounter affidavit during the course of the day to thepetitioner. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks. (G.V.Ramana) (Neeru Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master
\222ITEM NO.67 COURT NO.4 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).11764/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/09/2009 in SA No.122/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL)UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 31/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.H.P.Rawal, ASG Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Ms.Sweta Verma, Adv. For Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. Ms.Monka Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondent undertakes tosupply another copy of the counter affidavit to the learnedAdditional Solicitor General. Rejoinder, if any, be filedwithin three weeks. List this matter after four weeks. (G.V.Ramana) (Neeru Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11764/2010UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)Date: 25/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. Ms.Sonam Dixit,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No counter affidavit has been filed by the Respondent inspite of last opportunity granted. No further steps as submittedby the Ld.counsel for the petitioner. Hence, place the matterbefore the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
¨ITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11764/2010UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interimrelief ))Date: 06/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Biju V.K.,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K. Koul,Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete. Sole respondent granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 25.11.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
ÜITEM NO.74 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11764/2010UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interimrelief ))Date: 20/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The sole respondent granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 6.10.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
\ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11764/2010UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interimrelief ))Date: 12/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr.(Mrs.) Laxmi Shastri,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice on the respondent. List the matter on 20.8.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 5439/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/09/2009 in SANo.122/2008 of the HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL)UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAKESH KUMAR Respondent(s)(With I.A. No.1 for c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 12/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. H.P. Rawal,ASG Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the application for condonation of delay. Meanwhile, contempt proceedings before the High Court shall remain stayed. (A.S. BISHT) (NEERU BALA VIJ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER