THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST vs RAHUL PITTU SAVALKAR — SLP(C) No. 9832/2026

Case under Labour and Industrial Laws : Payment of Wages, Bonus, Provident Fund, Gratuity, Service Benefits, Benefits Under Esic Act, 1948, Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (Now Employees Compensation Act, 1923)and Payment of Overtime Wages and Minimum Wage. Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010100142026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 9832/2026

Diary Number

10014/2026

Order Date

13-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Labour and Industrial Laws : Payment of wages, bonus, provident fund, gratuity, service benefits, benefits under ESIC Act, 1948, compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (now Employees Compensation Act, 1923)and payment of overtime wages and minimum wage. Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

    Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL PITTU SAVALKAR

    Adv. SUMIT TETERRWAL [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9832/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court heard SLP No. 9832/2026 filed by the Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest against Rahul Pittu Savalkar challenging a Bombay High Court judgment dated 03-09-2025. The Court condoned the delay in filing and dismissed the special leave petition, finding no sufficient grounds to interfere with the impugned High Court order under Article 136 of the Constitution. All pending applications stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case