Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2013 / Diary 10014

RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK v. DEV RAJ ARORA

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10014/2013

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

Bench

Petitioner

RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK

Respondent

DEV RAJ ARORA

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

Download Judgment (PDF) Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15613/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2013 in CM No. 576/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEV RAJ ARORA Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 24/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.K. Maitra,Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Rajeshwar Kr. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manish Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ramandeep Kaur Chawla,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We do not see any merit in this special leave petition, which is hereby dismissed. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¾ ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15613/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2013 in CM No. 576/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEV RAJ ARORA Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 24/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.K. Maitra,Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. Rajeshwar Kr. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manish Gupta,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ramandeep Kaur Chawla,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We do not see any merit in this special leave petition, which is hereby dismissed. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTERSignature Not Verified COURT MASTERDigitally signed byMahabir SinghDate: 2014.11.2417:00:49 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15613/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2013 in CM No. 576/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEV RAJ ARORA Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 08/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.K.Maitra, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. R.S.Rathi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr.Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manish Gupta, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the parties are not averse for exploring the possibility of an amicable settlement with the help of Mediation Centre in the Supreme Court. The parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre on 13.10.2014 at 4.00 P.M. The Mediation Centre shall submit its report within six weeks. Post after the needful is done. (Shashi Sareen) Court Master (Veena Khera) Court Master

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15613/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2013 in CM No. 576/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEV RAJ ARORA Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 08/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.K.Maitra, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy,Adv. Mr. R.S.Rathi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr.Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Manish Gupta, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the parties are not averse for exploring the possibility of an amicable settlement with the help of Mediation Centre in the Supreme Court. The parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre on 13.10.2014 at 4.00 P.M. The Mediation CentreSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by shall submit its report within six weeks.Shashi SareenDate: 2014.09.1008:03:15 ALMTReason: Post after the needful is done. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

>ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15613/2013(From the judgement and order dated 15/02/2013 in CM No.576/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)RUMAJHUMA BHAUMIK Petitioner(s) VERSUSDEV RAJ ARORA Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief)Date: 06/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.K. Maitra,Adv. Mr. R.S. Rathi,Adv. Ms. Kusum,Adv. Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Issue notice. Proceedings before trial court shall remain stayed in the meantime.|(Mahabir Singh) | (Veena Khera) || Court Master | Court Master |

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India