STATE OF M.P . v. SHANKAR

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). 19261/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3809/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE Petitioner(s) LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR VERSUS MAHINDER SINGH Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 08/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present special leave petition is covered by the order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 07.10.2016 in SLP(C)......CC No(s).17830 of 2016. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed. (SAPNA BISHT) (HARESH SINGH NEGI) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

SUPPLE. MATTER FOR : 05.05.2017 COURT NO. ITEM NO. SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10022 OF 2016 KAUSHALIYA PETITIONER VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24.10.2016, when the court was pleased to pass the following order: (Copy of R/P dated 24.10.2016 enclosed herewith). It is submitted that pursuant to order dated 24.10.2016, the 'Supreme Court Mediation Centre', New Delhi has submitted a report of settlement agreement dated 10.02.2017. Copy of the same is enclosed herewith for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. Service is complete. The matter was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court and taken board on 01.05.2017 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ List this matter on Friday, 5 th May, 2017 before the appropriate Bench.” The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 4 th day of May, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Aishwarya Bhati , Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR `2/db/OR

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 05.05.2017       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  13                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :  54     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 15866 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI                  ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTS & ORS.      ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   02.12.2016 with an office report dated 01.12.2016, when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the   petitioner seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit, four weeks'   time is granted to him to file rejoinder affidavit. List   thereafter.” There are 3 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted that service of show cause notice is already complete and no   one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2.  It is further submitted that Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate for   Respondent No. 1 has on 16.11.2016  filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of   Respondents but the same is defective for the reason that he has given caption   “Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondents” though he is appearing for Respondent   No. 1 only and the same has been communicated to the Counsel vide Registry's letter   dated 22.11.2016. Later the said Counsel has on 25.11.2016 filed Vakalatnama and   Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 but he has not taken “No   Objection Certificate” from erstwhile Advocates M/s Anuradha & Associates.   However, Copy of the Counter Affidavit has been included in the Paper Books. It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, Counsel for the Petitioner has   on 07.03.2017 filed Rejoinder Affidavit with the permission of the Hon'ble Court and   the same has been included in the Paper Books. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 04 th  day of May, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate. M/s Anuradha & Associates, Advocates. S2    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.8 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jodhpur) KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 05/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Dr. Nupur Bhati, Adv. Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Gopal, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter was referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties. As per the report received from the said Centre, the parties have entered into a settlement agreement dated 10.04.2017. A copy of the said settlement agreement has also been annexed with the report. It reveals that the parties have settled all their

2 disputes amicably. The learned counsel for both the parties affirm the aforesaid position. This petition is disposed of in terms of the said settlement which shall be part of this order. Both the parties shall abide by the terms of the settlement. The petitioner shall vacate the premises within 10 days and simultaneously she would be provided other accommodation which has been agreed to by the respondent. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XVII    MATTER FOR :  04.05.2017     R.COURT NO. : 01       ITEM NO.  : 59             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15426 OF 2016 Combitic Global Caplet Pvt. Ltd.         ...Petitioner              Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd.         ...Respondent                               OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 4.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice.” Accordingly, show cause notice has been issued to sole respondent through Registered A.D. Post. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received back so far. Service of notice is incomplete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF MAY, 2017.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Ajay Marwah,Advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

êITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13936/2016SULAKSHNA Petitioner(s) VERSUSORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR. Respondent(s)Date : 03/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Shikha Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit.Service is complete on the respondent No.2, but no one has enteredappearance on his behalf. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'bleCourt as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

SECTION – III  B          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)  No. 13671 OF  2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Medical Council of India  …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th  February, 2017 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner,  list the matter after ten weeks.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit as per letter circulated before the Hon'ble Court on 10 th  February, 2017 so far. Service is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 27 th   Day of  April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ 1. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,  Advocate House No. F­12, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi   2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vm

&ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.8 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016in SBCSA No.39/2016 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan atJodhpur)KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUSJODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s)Date : 01/05/2017 This matter was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. (mentioned by) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList this matter on Friday, 5 th May, 2017 before theappropriate Bench. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ÜITEM NO.4 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13671/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/04/2016in WP No. 3454/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With Interim Relief and Office Report)Date : 01/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Adv.Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv.Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Adv.Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv.Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter for adjournment circulated by learnedcounsel for the petitioner, list the matter after pleadings arecomplete.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Sharda Kapoor)Court Master (SH) Court Master (NS)

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10004/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/10/2015 in SAD No. 707/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) DEEPAK KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOVT. OF U.P LUCKNOW (U.P) AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 10006/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10008/2016 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10005/2016 (With Office Report) Date : 28/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI Counsel for the parties Dr. A. Francis Julian, Sr. Adv. Mr. Krishna M. Singh, Adv. Mr. Danish Zubair Khan, Adv. Mr. Antony R. Julian, Adv. Mr. Ubaid Ul Hasan Khan, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, Rejoinder Affidavit be filed within four weeks. Post after summer vacation. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10004/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/10/2015in SAD No. 707/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)DEEPAK KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOVT. OF U.P LUCKNOW (U.P) AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 10006/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 10008/2016(With Office Report)SLP(C) No. 10005/2016(With Office Report)Date : 28/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHICounsel for the parties Dr. A. Francis Julian, Sr. Adv. Mr. Krishna M. Singh, Adv. Mr. Danish Zubair Khan, Adv. Mr. Antony R. Julian, Adv. Mr. Ubaid Ul Hasan Khan, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, Rejoinder Affidavit be filed within fourweeks. Post after summer vacation. (Jayant Kumar Arora)Court Master (Renu Diwan)Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19591/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3952/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NARINDER KAUR Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CC No.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (SONALI SAUND) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.19 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18694/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 469/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS GAGANDEEP SINGH Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C) No. 31830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present special leave petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19559/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5690/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NAURANG DASS Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CC No.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 6/2017 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11340/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/01/2011 in CWP No. 2570/2004 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) GURMEET SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Respondent(s) (for impleadment and office report) Date : 27/04/2017 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajay Marwah,Adv. Mr. Birendra Kumar Mishra,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application filed by the applicant seeking impleadment as petitioners in SLP(c) No. 11340/2016. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the petitioners are also affected by the issues involved in the Special Leave Petition and they shall also be fully covered by the outcome of the Special Leave Petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in SLP(c) No. 11340/2016 has no objection of applicant being impleaded as petitioners. Application, as prayed, is allowed. (SONALI SAUND) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.18888/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4461/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS DAYA RANI Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CC No.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.22 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18889/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4470/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS TARSEM DASS Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C) No. 31830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present special leave petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19520/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4733/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH T HROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Petitioner(s) VERSUS TEJ SINGH AND ANR Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C) Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same impugned judgment has been dismissed, the present special leave petition must also follow suit and is accordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).18886/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4460/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SARUP CHANDER AND ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C) Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same impugned judgment has been dismissed, the present special leave petition must also follow suit and is accordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19556/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 5688/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Petitioner(s) VERSUS PARDEEP KUMAR AND ORS Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CC No.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19266/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3808/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS KARAM SINGH Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. S. Doabia, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel t he Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits on record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C) No.31830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the same judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

\210ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19557/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 5683/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAMESH CHANDER AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. T. S. Doabia, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel t he Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitson record a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C)No.31830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame judgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the presentSpecial Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered bythe aforesaid. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

˜ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.18696/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 468/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAVI MAHAJAN & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CCNo.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the samejudgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is alsodismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (SONALI SAUND) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ªITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.18884/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4458/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSOM PAL AND ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CCNo.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the samejudgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is alsodismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (SONALI SAUND) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

´ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19148/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4501/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSJAI PAL SINGH Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CCNo.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the samejudgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (SONALI SAUND) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

>ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).18886/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.4460/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSARUP CHANDER AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C)Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame impugned judgment has been dismissed, the presentspecial leave petition must also follow suit and isaccordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

<ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19122/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.4530/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSPHULA DEVI Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C)Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame impugned judgment has been dismissed, the presentspecial leave petition must also follow suit and isaccordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

>ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19142/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.4505/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C)Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame impugned judgment has been dismissed, the presentspecial leave petition must also follow suit and isaccordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

8ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19260/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.3810/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARHTHR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHUPINDER SINGH AND ANR. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C)Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame impugned judgment has been dismissed, the presentspecial leave petition must also follow suit and isaccordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

>ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19268/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.3980/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSGIAN SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C)Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame impugned judgment has been dismissed, the presentspecial leave petition must also follow suit and isaccordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

>ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19523/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No.5685/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSITA DEVI Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr.Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of order dated 27.03.2017 passed in SLP (C)Diary No.19029/2016 whereby the matter arising out of thesame impugned judgment has been dismissed, the presentspecial leave petition must also follow suit and isaccordingly dismissed. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.19 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18694/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 469/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGHTHE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSGAGANDEEP SINGH Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv.Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C) No. 31830of 2016 whereby the matter arising of the same judgment hasbeen dismissed. Therefore, the present special leave petitionis also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

(ITEM NO.22 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18889/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4470/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THRTHE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSTARSEM DASS Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv.Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AORFor Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C) No. 31830of 2016 whereby the matter arising of the same judgment hasbeen dismissed. Therefore, the present special leave petitionis also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

âITEM NO.26 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19528/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 5478/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAN SINGH Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CCNo.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the samejudgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is alsodismissed as covered by the aforesaid.(RASHI GUPTA)SR.P.A. (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)COURT MASTER

ºITEM NO.34 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19559/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 5690/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSNAURANG DASS Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 27/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP (C)......... CCNo.17830 of 2016 whereby the matter arising out of the samejudgment has been dismissed. Therefore, the present Special Leave Petition is alsodismissed as covered by the aforesaid.(RASHI GUPTA)SR.P.A. (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s). 21928/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/06/2012 in TA No. 133/2003 24/02/2016 in TA No. 133/2003 24/02/2016 in RP No. 75/2015 passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board) GOPI CHAND KUKREJA AND ANIL KUMAR KUKREJA TRADING AS KUKREJA ENTERPRISES Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRAHALAD RAI AGARWALA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 26/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Agrawal, Adv. Mr. R.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Sonal Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry in its office report dated 27.02.2017. (SONALI SAUND) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

,ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18697/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 467/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSURINDER SINGH Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 26/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner submits on record a copyof the order dated 07.10.2016 of the main matter i.e.SLP(C).....CC No. 17830 of 2016 which has been dismissed bythis Court on 07.10.2016. Hence, this Special Leave Petitiondoes not survive for consideration. Therefore, the presentSpecial Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by theaforesaid. (POOJA SEHGAL) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

TITEM NO.35 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19597/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 3949/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSGURMAIL KAUR AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 26/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner submits on record a copyof the order dated 07.10.2016 of the main matter i.e.SLP(C).....CC No. 17830 of 2016 which has been dismissed bythis Court on 07.10.2016. Hence, this Special Leave Petitiondoes not survive for consideration. Therefore, the presentSpecial Leave Petition is also dismissed as covered by theaforesaid. (POOJA SEHGAL) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

¨ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 19145/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4503/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THRTHE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSKRISHAN KUMAR Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 26/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv.Mr. M.S. Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AORMs. Mansa Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits onrecord a copy of the order dated 07.10.2016 of SLP(C) No. 31830of 2016 whereby the matter arising of the same judgment hasbeen dismissed. Therefore, the present special leave petitionis also dismissed as covered by the aforesaid. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

ITEM NO.34 IN COURT NO.14 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 10077/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/05/2015 in SA No. 21/2011 passed by the High Court of Patna) SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS TETARI DEVI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 24/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AOR Ms. Rekha Banker, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No steps have been taken to file the fresh particulars of respondent nos. 3,7,10 and 15. No steps have also been taken to bring on record LRs. of deceased respondent nos. 6 and 20. No steps have been taken to cure the defects in the application for substitution of deceased respondent nos. 1,2 and 21. As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, four weeks' time is granted to comply with the O ffice Report dated 30.3.2017 , failing which the special leave petition shall be deemed to be dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. (LAYA RAWAT) (UMA MALHOTRA ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10500/2016 SUNDARIBAI LAXMINARAYAN AGARWAL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER L.R. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHANLAL MOTILAL JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 21/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Shailja Nanda Mishra,Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1 & 4 are granted four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Service is complete on the respondent Nos.12-16, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the other respondents within four weeks. List the matter on 21.07.2017. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

LISTED ON : 18.04.2017 BEFORE COURT NO.: 02              ITEM NO.: 14       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13908 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANIK BHIMRAO JADHAV ....PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.              ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned along­with connected matter were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07th March, 2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :­   "On 24th November, 2016, this Court had taken note of the fact that the Central Government has constituted a Multi-Agency Group (MAG) consisting of officers of C.B.D.T., R.B.I., Enforcement Directorate and Financial Intelligence Unit and the Member (Investigation) C.B.D.T. has been nominated as the convenor of the M.A.G. On that day, it was also submitted by the learned Additional Solicitor General that five reports had already been prepared by the M.A.G. Today when the matter was taken up, we have been apprised by Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General of India and Mr. P.S. Narasimha, learned Additional Solicitor General that the sixth report by the M.A.G. is complete and the Union of India is prepared to file all the reports in a sealed cover before this Court. Needless to say, the basic purpose of the lis is to have a fair and appropriate inquiry for the purpose of taking necessary action against the persons who have violated the law. Needless to say, the same has to be taken care of in accordance with law and if there is violation of any law that relates to any criminal investigation, the same is also to be taken care of. Regard being had to the aforesaid, we direct the Union of India to file all the six reports in a sealed cover within four weeks hence. Whether there would be a separate SIT to look into this issue or not, will be considered after the reports are filed by the Union of India and perused by this Court. Let the matter be listed on 18th April, 2017." ..2/­

­2­ It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to aforesaid order, Union Of India has not filed any report so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 17 th   day of April, 2017.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh, Advocate L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.12 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 19258/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2556/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS TELU AND ANR. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) M r. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv.[NP] For Respondent(s) T he Court made the following O R D E R Even on the second call none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The S pecial leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19267/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 3979/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS MATU RAM Respondent(s) (Office report on default) Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s). 19141/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4497/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRITPAL CHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this special leave petition has become infructuous in view of order dated 07.10.2016 passed by this Court in SLP(C).....CC No. 17830 of 2016. The special leave petition is, accordingly dismissed as infructuous. (Shashi Sareen) ( Madhu Narula) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ITEM NO.11 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 19149/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 4500/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) M r. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv.[NP] For Respondent(s) T he Court made the following O R D E R Even on the second call none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The S pecial leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

\212ITEM NO.11 IN COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 19149/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4500/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THRTHE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSPRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) M r. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv.[NP] For Respondent(s) T he Court made the following O R D E REven on the second call none appeared on behalf of thepetitioner.The S pecial leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s). 19141/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 4497/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSPRITPAL CHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv.Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that thisspecial leave petition has become infructuous in view of orderdated 07.10.2016 passed by this Court in SLP(C).....CC No. 17830 of2016.The special leave petition is, accordingly dismissed asinfructuous.(Shashi Sareen) ( Madhu Narula) AR-cum-PS Court Master

JITEM NO.25 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19265/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 726/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSJAGMAL SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date : 18/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks&#39; time is granted to the learned counsel for thepetitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry.(RASHI GUPTA)SR.P.A. (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.20 IN COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18698/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 466/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARNAM SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 17/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manpreet S. Doabia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a connected matter i.e. SLP(C).........CC No. 17830 of 2016 arising out of the same impugned final judgment was dismissed on 07.10.2016. In view of the above, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

ITEM NO.24 IN COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 19257/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2557/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS JABAR SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 17/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manpreet S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Manpreet S. Doabia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a connected matter i.e. SLP(C).........CC No. 17830 of 2016 arising out of the same impugned final judgment was dismissed on 07.10.2016. In view of the above, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. (LAYA RAWAT) (MADHU NARULA ) SR.P.A. CO URT MASTER

Listed On. 13.4.2017 Ld. Registrar's Court No. 01 Item No. 48 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 13911 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF C. Manimala & Ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar’s Court on 23 rd March, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “None appears for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 11 and 13 to 17, despite due service. Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent No.3 has not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined. Await service/track report in respect of respondent No.12. List again on 13.4.2017.“ It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, service is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that as per track report, delivery report is still pending on respondent No. 12. Service is incomplete on Respondent No. 12. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this, the 12 th day of April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. R. Nedumaran, Advocate Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

LISTED ON :13.04.2017                                        BEFORE COURT NO.: 02                             ITEM NO.49                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14678 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 4 AND 5 (Applicatons for directions and exemption from filing Official Translation filed by Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS  AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR.  ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.                                   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25th May, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ "Issue notice returnable within four weeks." It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there are seven respondents in the instant matter. Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6 but he has filed counter­affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5 only. Counter­affidavit has been included in the paper­books. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent No. 7 but he has not filed counter­affidavit so far. Service of notice is complete. It is further submitted that Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner has filed applications for directions and exemption from filing Official Translation which were registered as I. A. Nos. 4 and 5 respectively and listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15th November, 2016, when the Court was pleased to inter­alia pass the following Order:­ "............... Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the petitioner shall deliver the shoes through Leather Industries Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (LIDCOM), the respondent No.7 herein, within six weeks hence to the Ashramshalas as determined by the State Government. The amount shall be paid to the petitioner through LIDCOM within two months ..2/-

-2- from the date of delivery. Let the matter be listed after four months for final disposal. Needless to say, the present order is without prejudice to the contentions to be raised by the parties." The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report.          Dated this the 12th day of April, 2017.                   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Ms. Abha R. Sharma , Advocate Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra , Advocate Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

nITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOELPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13911/2016C MANIMALA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment andinterim relief and office report)Date : 13/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arijeet Singh, Adv. Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 have beenserved but no one has put in appearance.Opportunity to respondent No.3 to file counter affidavithas already been declined.The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh stepsfor service of respondent No.12 within two weeks. Noticethereafter be issued.List again on 7.7.2017. (RAJESH KUMAR GOEL) Registrar

ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18825/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/04/2016 in ARBA No. 23/2016 passed by the High Court of M.P.at Jabalpur) M/S. JABALPUR CORRIDOR (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to remove the defects as pointed out by the Registry. (POOJA SEHGAL) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).19121/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No.4520/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS JASBIR SINGH Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. (N.P.) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears even on the second call. The special leave petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).24517/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2014 in MSA No.3/2014 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore) MRS. CATHERINE PINTO AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JOEL CUTINHO AND ORS Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Dr.Sushil Balwada, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners is granted four weeks' time to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry, failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

\224ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).24517/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2014in MSA No.3/2014 passed by the High Court of Karnataka atBangalore)MRS. CATHERINE PINTO AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSJOEL CUTINHO AND ORS Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Dr.Sushil Balwada, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioners is granted fourweeks&#39; time to cure the defects as pointed out by theRegistry, failing which the special leave petition shallstand dismissed without further reference to the court. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Court Master

ÎITEM NO.30 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No. 18825/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/04/2016in ARBA No. 23/2016 passed by the High Court of M.P.at Jabalpur)M/S. JABALPUR CORRIDOR (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSMADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks&#39; time is granted to learned counsel for thepetitioner to remove the defects as pointed out by theRegistry. (POOJA SEHGAL) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON: 10.04.2017    COURT NO.:  14 (Chamber)   ITEM NO. :  35 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10077 of 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) SANJAY KR.GUPTA & ANR.    ...Petitioner(s) Versus TETARI DEVI & ORS.           ...Respondent(s) REVISED     OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The Office report for directions was listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber on 25.01.2017 when the HIS Lordship was pleased to pass the following order. Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioners to do the needful in terms of the office report dated 22.12.2016. There are twenty one respondents in this matter. It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither filed fresh particulars nor taken any fresh steps to effect service on unserved respondent Nos.  3, 7, 10  and 15, so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, advocate has on 29.03.2017 filed application for substitution of deceased respondent Nos. 1 and 21 and also mentioned in para 4 that the  lrs. Of deceased respondent No.2 has already on record as respondent Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6. But the application is defective for the reason that death certificate of respondent Nos. 1 and 21 has not been filed, age of lrs. are also not mentioned in the application. However unregistered application is included in paper­books.   It is lastly submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has also not filed application to bring on record of the legal representatives of deceased respondent Nos. 6 & 20, so far. The  default on the part of Advocate is reported before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber Court with this office report. Dated this the 30 th  day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Manish Kr. Saran, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19263/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015 in RFA No. 2558/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS DHARAM SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 10/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. M. S. Doabia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a connected matter i.e. SLP(C).......CC Nos.17830/2016 arising out of the same impugned final judgment was dismissed on 07.10.2016. In view of the above, the special leave petition is also stands dismissed. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ØITEM NO.24 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.19263/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/10/2015in RFA No. 2558/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THR THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUSDHARAM SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 10/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. S. Doabia, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. M. S. Doabia, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that a connected matter i.e. SLP(C).......CCNos.17830/2016 arising out of the same impugned finaljudgment was dismissed on 07.10.2016.In view of the above, the special leave petition isalso stands dismissed. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

LISTED ON : 23.02.2017 COURT NO. : 04 ITEM NO. : 53 SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 13706, 13719, 19969 AND 20212 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANNE SUBRAMANYAM ETC. ...PETITIONERS -VERSUS- SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016 above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13 th May, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Until further orders, status quo, as on today with regard to the possession of property, shall be maintained by the parties.” Subsequently, the matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13 th January, 2017, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Perused the letter. List the matters after four weeks.” SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016:- It is submitted to the Hon’ble Court that there are two respondents in each matter. Respondent No. 2 is common in both matters above-mentioned. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in both matters and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of common LR

Respondent No. 2 in both matters and also filed counter-affidavit which is already included in SLP paper books. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 19969 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 13706 of 2016. It is submitted that Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 20212 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13719 of 2016. It is submitted that Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matters are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 22 nd day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Copy to:- 1. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate. 172, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi- 110091. 2. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate 302, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase- II, Delhi- 110 091 3. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate 159, Lawyer's Chambers, High Court of Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Listed On. 23.03.2017 Ld. Registrar's Court No. 01 Item No. 50 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 13911 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF C. Manimala & Ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registar's Court on 16 th February, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “None appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 despite due service. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit. Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No. 12 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 23.3.2017. “ It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, service is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate for respondent No. 3 has not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that show cause notice was issued to respondent No. 12 on 4 th March, 2017. As per track report, delivery report is still pending on respondent No. 12. Service is incomplete on Respondent No. 12. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this, the 21 st day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. R. Nedumaran, Advocate Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

vk

ìITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13911/2016C MANIMALA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment andinterim relief and office report)Date : 23/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 11 and 13to 17, despite due service.Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondentNo.3 has not filed counter affidavit, as such, furtheropportunity is declined.Await service/track report in respect of respondentNo.12.List again on 13.4.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.6 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s). 19518/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/04/2014 in WP No. 5010/2011 24/04/2014 in WP No. 5197/2011 24/04/2014 in WP No. 5954/2011 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) KAMLA MILLS LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD.AND ORS Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 08/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. For M/s. Parekh & Co. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for and is granted four weeks' time to cure the defects as pointed out in the office-report dated 01.02.2017. (R. NATARAJAN) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) Court Master Court Master

\206SLP(C) 15005/161ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.15005/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/08/2015in MFA No. 4574/2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka atBangalore)SURENDRAN M. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUMESHA V. AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 07/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravi Panwar, Adv. Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Adv.Mr. Akhil Roy, Adv. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard Mr. Ravi Panwar, learned counsel for thepetitioners and Ms. Meenakshi Midha, learned counsel for therespondent No.2, the National Insurance Co. Ltd.SLP(C) 15005/162In the course of hearing, a suggestion was given forenhancement of the compensation that has been granted by theHigh Court. Learned counsel for the parties left it to thediscretion of this Court.Having heard learned counsel for the parties atlength, we are of the considered opinion that the amount ofcompensation deserves to be enhanced by a further sum ofRs.3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakh only) which shall bedeposited by the respondent No.2 before the tribunal withineight weeks hence. Needless to say, as we have granted alump sum amount, the insurer shall not be liable to pay anyinterest on the said enhanced sum, if it is deposited withinthe time stipulated herein-above. If the amount is notdeposited within the time granted by this Court, it shallcarry interest at the rate of 9% from the date ofpresentation of the application before the tribunal. Thetribunal shall disburse the amount in favour of the claimantskeeping in view the principle stated in General Manager ,Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum vs.Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Others (1994) 2 SCC 176.The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposedof. There shall be no order as to costs.(Chetan Kumar)Court Master (H.S. Parasher)Court Master

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.9 SECTION S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS F. No./2017/RS APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS AN ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD FILED BY MS. AMRREETA SWAARUP, MS. UPASANA GUPTA, MR. PANKAJ KUMAR MISHRA, MS. PREETI SINGH, MS. FAUZIA SHAKIL, MR. SHUBHAM BHALLA, MR. SYED JAFAR ALAM, MR. PANKAJ BHAGAT, MS. GARIMA BAJAJ, MS. ASTHA BHATNAGAR, MR. CHAITANYA SUDHAKAR JOSHI, MR. ANAND KUMAR MISHRA, MR. VAIBHAV KUMAR, MR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA, MR. AKSHAT KULSHRESTHA, MR. DHRUV PALL, MR. ANOOP PRAKASH AWASTHI, MR. ANKIT GOEL, MR. ABHAS KUMAR, MR. RISHI JAIN, MS. SANSRITI PATHAK, MR. AMAN VARMA, MR. VAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVA, MR. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN, MS. NISHTHA KUMAR, MS. ASTHA SHARMA, MR. ADBHUT PATHAK, MR. PARMATMA SINGH, MR. UJJAL BANERJEE, MR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH, MR. SURJENDU SANKAR DAS, MR. SHOVAN MISHRA, MS. MITHU JAIN, MR. ABHAYANAND JENA, MR. KAUSHIK CHOUDHURY, MR. DURGA DUTT, MR. SANDEEP SUDHAKAR DESHMUKH, MR. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR, MR. RAJAT ARORA, MS. HERINDER KAUR BRAR, MR. SAHIL BHALAIK, MS. HARSH LATA, MR. TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN, MR. UDAYADITYA BANERJEE, MR. PALLAV MONGIA, MR. AMIT AGRAWAL, MR. SURESH DUTT DOBHAL, MR. ANKUR BANSAL, MS. PARUL SHUKLA, MS. AMRITA SINGH, MR. A. KARTHIK, MR. ANAND SHANKAR JHA, MS. RUCHIRA GOEL, MS. SONAM GUPTA, MS. SMITA MAAN, MR. PRANAYA GOYAL, MS. SAKSHI KAKKAR, MR. TISHAMPATI SEN, MR. ANIRUDDHA DESHMUKH, MR. SIDDHARTH, MR. DEEPAYAN MANDAL, MR. RAHUL BHATIA, MR. ANKUR YADAV, MS. SUMAN YADAV, MR. ABHISHEK SINGH, MS. ANNE MATHEW, MR. ANEESH MITTAL, MR. RAVI PANWAR, MR. AVNISH PANDEY, MR. K. PAARI VENDHAN, MR. CHANDAN KUMAR, MR. BHARADWAJ S., MS. RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN, MS. ASWATHI M.K., MS. T. ARCHANA, MR. ANANDO MUKHERJEE, MR. ANILENDRA PANDEY, MS. VANDANA SHARMA, MS. RACHITTA PRIYANKA, MS. RUPALI SAMANTA GHOSH, MR. NIKHIL SWAMI, MR. SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH, MR. MRIGANK PRABHAKAR, MR. VINAY ARORA, MS. TARUNA SINGH, MR. NISHANTH PATIL, MR. MAHESH THAKUR, MR. RAHUL SHARMA, MR. SHANKEY AGRAWAL, MS. YUGANDHARA PAWAR JHA, MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. SAMEER ABHYANKAR, MR. AJAI KUMAR BHATIA, MS. TANUJ BAGGA, MR. SAMEER KUMAR, MR. SAHIL TAGOTRA, MR. GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI, DR. NISHESH SHARMA, MR. AKSHAY VERMA, MR. SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH, MR. CHITRANSHUL A. SINHA, MR. PRABHAT KAUSHIK, MR. KONARK TYAGI, MR. NITISH MASSEY, MR. ALJO K. JOSEPH, MR. PIYUSH KANT ROY, MR. KESHAV RANJAN, MS. HARVINDER CHOWDHURY, MR. RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA, MR. SAMIR MALIK, MS. KUSUM, MR. WASI HAIDER, MR. SOUMYA DUTTA, MR. SACHIN SHARMA, MR. HASAN MURTAZA, MR. RAJESH KUMAR, MS. SWETA RANI, MR. ALDANISH REIN, MR. DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH, MR. TAPAN BIJOY DEB CHOUDHURY, MR. ABHIGYA, MR. JATINDER PAL SINGH, MS. AARTHI RAJAN, MR. GAURAV, MR. DEVENDRA SINGH, MR. SRIRAM P., MR. SHOHIT CHAUDHRY, MS. SRISHTI SINGH, MS. PALLAVI PRATAP, MS. VIDYA VIJAYSINH PAWAR, MR. SUMIT TETERRWAL 1

Date : 06/03/2017 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Applicant(s) MS. AMRREETA SWAARUP, MS. UPASANA GUPTA, MR. PANKAJ KUMAR MISHRA, MS. PREETI SINGH, MS. FAUZIA SHAKIL, MR. SHUBHAM BHALLA, MR. SYED JAFAR ALAM, MR. PANKAJ BHAGAT, MS. GARIMA BAJAJ, MS. ASTHA BHATNAGAR, MR. CHAITANYA SUDHAKAR JOSHI, MR. ANAND KUMAR MISHRA, MR. VAIBHAV KUMAR, MR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA, MR. AKSHAT KULSHRESTHA, MR. DHRUV PALL, MR. ANOOP PRAKASH AWASTHI, MR. ANKIT GOEL, MR. ABHAS KUMAR, MR. RISHI JAIN, MS. SANSRITI PATHAK, MR. AMAN VARMA, MR. VAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVA, MR. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN, MS. NISHTHA KUMAR, MS. ASTHA SHARMA, MR. ADBHUT PATHAK, MR. PARMATMA SINGH, MR. UJJAL BANERJEE, MR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH, MR. SURJENDU SANKAR DAS, MR. SHOVAN MISHRA, MS. MITHU JAIN, MR. ABHAYANAND JENA, MR. KAUSHIK CHOUDHURY, MR. DURGA DUTT, MR. SANDEEP SUDHAKAR DESHMUKH, MR. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR, MR. RAJAT ARORA, MS. HERINDER KAUR BRAR, MR. SAHIL BHALAIK, MS. HARSH LATA, MR. TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN, MR. UDAYADITYA BANERJEE, MR. PALLAV MONGIA, MR. AMIT AGRAWAL, MR. SURESH DUTT DOBHAL, MR. ANKUR BANSAL, MS. PARUL SHUKLA, MS. AMRITA SINGH, MR. A. KARTHIK, MR. ANAND SHANKAR JHA, MS. RUCHIRA GOEL, MS. SONAM GUPTA, MS. SMITA MAAN, MR. PRANAYA GOYAL, MS. SAKSHI KAKKAR, MR. TISHAMPATI SEN, MR. ANIRUDDHA DESHMUKH, MR. SIDDHARTH, MR. DEEPAYAN MANDAL, MR. RAHUL BHATIA, MR. ANKUR YADAV, MS. SUMAN YADAV, MR. ABHISHEK SINGH, MS. ANNE MATHEW, MR. ANEESH MITTAL, MR. RAVI PANWAR, MR. AVNISH PANDEY, MR. K. PAARI VENDHAN, MR. CHANDAN KUMAR, MR. BHARADWAJ S., MS. RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN, MS. ASWATHI M.K., MS. T. ARCHANA, MR. ANANDO MUKHERJEE, MR. ANILENDRA PANDEY, MS. VANDANA SHARMA, MS. RACHITTA PRIYANKA, MS. RUPALI SAMANTA GHOSH, MR. NIKHIL SWAMI, MR. SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH, MR. MRIGANK PRABHAKAR, MR. VINAY ARORA, MS. TARUNA SINGH, MR. NISHANTH PATIL, MR. MAHESH THAKUR, MR. RAHUL SHARMA, MR. SHANKEY AGRAWAL, MS. YUGANDHARA PAWAR JHA, MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. SAMEER ABHYANKAR, MR. AJAI KUMAR BHATIA, MS. TANUJ BAGGA, MR. SAMEER KUMAR, MR. SAHIL TAGOTRA, MR. GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI, DR. NISHESH SHARMA, MR. AKSHAY VERMA, MR. SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH, MR. CHITRANSHUL A. SINHA, MR. PRABHAT KAUSHIK, MR. KONARK TYAGI, MR. NITISH MASSEY, MR. ALJO K. JOSEPH, MR. PIYUSH KANT ROY, MR. KESHAV RANJAN, MS. HARVINDER CHOWDHURY, MR. RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA, MR. SAMIR MALIK, MS. KUSUM, MR. WASI HAIDER, MR. SOUMYA DUTTA, MR. SACHIN SHARMA, MR. HASAN MURTAZA, MR. RAJESH KUMAR, MS. SWETA RANI, MR. ALDANISH REIN, MR. DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH, MR. TAPAN BIJOY DEB CHOUDHURY, MR. ABHIGYA, MR. JATINDER PAL SINGH, MS. AARTHI RAJAN, MR. GAURAV, MR. DEVENDRA SINGH, MR. SRIRAM P., MR. SHOHIT CHAUDHRY, MS. SRISHTI SINGH, MS. PALLAVI PRATAP, MS. VIDYA VIJAYSINH PAWAR, MR. SUMIT TETERRWAL 2

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The names of Ms. Amrreeta Swaarup, Ms. Upasana Gupta, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Ms. Preeti Singh, Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Mr. Syed Jafar Alam, Mr. Pankaj Bhagat, Ms. Garima Bajaj, Ms. Astha Bhatnagar, Mr. Chaitanya Sudhakar Joshi, Mr. Anand Kumar Mishra, Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, Mr. Akshat Kulshrestha, Mr. Dhruv Pall, Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, Mr. Ankit Goel, Mr. Abhas Kumar, Mr. Rishi Jain, Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Mr. Aman Varma, Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, Ms. Nishtha Kumar, Ms. Astha Sharma, Mr. Adbhut Pathak, Mr. Parmatma Singh, Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Mr. Surjendu Sankar Das, Mr. Shovan Mishra, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Abhayanand Jena, Mr. Kaushik Choudhury, Mr. Durga Dutt, Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, Mr. Omprakash Ajitsingh Parihar, Mr. Rajat Arora, Ms. Herinder Kaur Brar, Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, Ms. Harsh Lata, Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Mr. Pallav Mongia, Mr. Amit Agrawal, Mr. Suresh Dutt Dobhal, Mr. Ankur Bansal, Ms. Parul Shukla, Ms. Amrita Singh, Mr. A. Karthik, Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, Ms. Ruchira Goel, Ms. Sonam Gupta, Ms. Smita Maan, Mr. Pranaya Goyal, Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Mr. Tishampati Sen, Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Mr. Siddharth, Mr. Deepayan Mandal, Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Mr. Ankur Yadav, Ms. Suman Yadav, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Anne Mathew, Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Mr. Ravi Panwar, Mr. Avnish Pandey, Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, Mr. Chandan Kumar, Mr. Bharadwaj S., Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, Ms. Aswathi M.K., Ms. T. Archana, Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Mr. Anilendra Pandey, Ms. Vandana Sharma, Ms. Rachitta Priyanka, Ms. Rupali Samanta Ghosh, Mr. Nikhil Swami, Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, Mr. Vinay Arora, Ms. Taruna Singh, Mr. Nishanth Patil, Mr. Mahesh Thakur, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Shankey Agrawal, Ms. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Mr. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Ms. Tanuj Bagga, Mr. Sameer Kumar, Mr. Sahil Tagotra, Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, Dr. Nishesh Sharma, Mr. Akshay Verma, Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr. Konark Tyagi, Mr. Nitish Massey, Mr. Aljo K. Joseph, Mr. Piyush Kant Roy, Mr. Keshav Ranjan, Ms. Harvinder Chowdhury, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Mr. Samir Malik, Ms. Kusum, Mr. Wasi Haider, Mr. Soumya Dutta, Mr. Sachin Sharma, Mr. Hasan Murtaza, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Sweta Rani, Mr. Aldanish Rein, Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, Mr. Tapan Bijoy Deb Choudhury, Mr. Abhigya, Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Ms. Aarthi Rajan, Mr. Gaurav, Mr. Devendra Singh, Mr. Sriram P., Mr. Shohit Chaudhry, Ms. Srishti Singh, Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Ms. Vidya Vijaysinh Pawar and Mr. Sumit Teterrwal, Advocates are ordered to be registered as Advocate-on-Record in terms of Rule 2(20) of Order V of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. (RASHI GUPTA) SR.P.A. (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER 3

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :3/03/2017 COURT No. :3 ITEM No.  :46 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10082 of 2016 (With Prayer for Interim Relief) MOZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN ... Petitioner Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT  The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 23/01/2017 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ “ List before a Bench wherein Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitva Roy is not a Member.”   It is submitted that Mr. Rauf Rahim, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 25/01/2017 filed Rejoinder Affidavit to the Counter­affidavit filed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Copy of the same has been included in the SLP Paper­books.    Service of notice is complete on all the respondents. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­report. Dated this the 1 st  day of March, 2017. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­   Mr. Rauf Rahim, Advocate Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate Assistant Registrar AY

MATTER FOR:02.03.2017                       COURT NO.12                   ITEM NO.10 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     10066/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS.   ...PETITIONERS                             VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble  Court on 04.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­       “Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice.” It is submitted that accordingly, notice was issued on 26.5.2016 to all the 4 respondents by registered AD Post. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocates have filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Counsel for the respondent No. 2 has on 17.11.2016 filed counter affidavit. Copy of the same has already been included in the SLP paper books but respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. AD Card duly signed has been received back in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance so far. Fresh Show Cause Notice was issued to respondent No. 4 on 20.10.2016 by Regd. AD Post, as per track report Item Delivered at “Rajasthan Secretariat”. Service is complete. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Hon'ble   Court with this office report. Dated this the 01 st  day of March, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Sanjay Kuamr Tyagi , Adv.   2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.   3. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Adv.        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3540 OF 2017 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.10066 OF 2016) SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. APPELLANT(s) VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS. RESPONDENT(s) O R D E R 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. The appellants have come up for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Trial Court. The High Court has enhanced it by one lakh. Dissatisfied with the same, the appeal has been preferred by the claimants. 4. Lalaram died in an accident on 31.05.1995, when the vehicle - Jeep RJ 21C 1253 in which he was travelling met with an accident with a truck No. RJ 19G 4170. Hemaram also died. Three other passengers who were travelling also suffered grievous injuries. An FIR was lodged. 5. On a claim petition filed for compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Merta City, Rajasthan, a sum of Rs. 3,10,000/- was awarded along with an interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing the petition till

2 realisation. 6. The High Court enhanced the compensation by a further sum of Rs.1,00,000/- without assessing compensation as per the yardstick settled by this Court in a number of decisions. Hence, this appeal by way of Special Leave Petition . 7. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. 8. In our opinion, the deduction of pension which has been made by the High Court was impermissible. The salary of the deceased was Rs.7,600/-. He died at the age of 45 years. Considering the same, 30% of his income for future prospects was also required to be added, as per the decision of this Court in the case of Sarla Verma & Ors . v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr [(2009) 6 SCC 121]. Accordingly, if we add 30% of his income (30% of 7600) i.e. Rs.2300/- approximately, in his salary and the figure comes to Rs. 9900/-. Hence, we deem it proper to assess the income of the deceased @ Rs.10,000/- per month. As the deceased had been survived by five children and widow, in the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to deduct a sum of Rs.2,000/- only towards self-expenditure of the deceased (i.e. 10,000-2000 = 8000). Taking the monthly dependency at Rs.8,000/- p.m. and Rs.

3 96,000/- per annum and then applying the multiplier of 15 as laid down by the Court in Sarla Verma's case(supra), the compensation amount on account of dependency, comes to Rs. 14,40,000/-. In addition, an amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- is granted for loss of love and affection, funeral expenses and loss of estate. For loss of consortium, a sum of Rs. 50,000/- is also granted to the widow of the deceased. Total compensation comes to Rs. 17,40,000/-. (Rupees Seventeen Lakh Forty Thousand only) 6. The enhanced amount of compensation awarded to be paid along with an interest @ 7.5% from the date of filing of the application till the date of realization after deducting the amount already paid/deposited, within a period of 3 months from today. 7. The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent. ....................J. (ARUN MISHRA) ....................J. (AMITAVA ROY) NEW DELHI; MARCH 2, 2017.

4 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10066/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/08/2015 in SBCMA No. 164/1999 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With Office Report) Date : 02/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mrinmay Bhattmewara, Adv. Mr. A.P.S. Jadann, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rohit K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.15 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No.23210/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/05/2016 in CP No. 10/1999 11/05/2016 in CA No.15/2015 passed by the High Court of Patna) JAI PRAKASH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SEEMA DEVI AND ORS Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 02/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. R. Setia,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, two weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry, failing which the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

LISTED ON :01.03.2017                                        BEFORE COURT NO.:07                             ITEM NO.:09                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14990 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for vacating stay) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS  ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD           ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 27th January 2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: " Learned counsel for the parties on both the sides have fairly submitted that an equitable solution of the dispute can be worked out.  Post on 01.03.2017 to await the outcome. " I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to aforesaid order, counsel for the parties have not filed any document so far. Service of notice is complete. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 28th day of February, 2017.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar , Advoc ate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

^ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission tofile additional documents and vacating stay and interim relief andoffice report)Date : 01/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Adv.Mr. Prashant Goudar, Adv. Mr. Rahat Bansal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Suruchi Suri, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for thepetitioners seeking adjournment for four weeks. It is reportedthat there is good progress in the process of settlement.Post after four weeks. (Jayant Kumar Arora)Court Master (Renu Diwan)Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).22363/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgments and orders dated 25/07/2014 in CWP No.14437 of 2013, dated 11/08/2014 in CWP No.20195 of 2012, dated 11/09/2014 in VATREF Nos.8, 11, 12, 20, 21, 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, 42, 44, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55 and 56 of 2010, VATREF Nos.2, 3, 4, 12 and 15 of 2011 and dated 21/07/2015 in VATAP Nos.4, 6 and 7 of 2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S. R.K. RAYON P. LTD. AND ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (With office report on default) Date : 28/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Hans, Adv. For Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the office report dated 23 rd January, 2017. As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry, failing which the special leave petitions shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (Neetu Khajuria) Court Master (Asha Soni) Court Master

LISTED ON : 23.02.2017 COURT NO. : 04 ITEM NO. : 53 SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 13706, 13719, 19969 AND 20212 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANNE SUBRAMANYAM ETC. ...PETITIONERS -VERSUS- SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016 above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13 th May, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Until further orders, status quo, as on today with regard to the possession of property, shall be maintained by the parties.” Subsequently, the matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13 th January, 2017, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Perused the letter. List the matters after four weeks.” SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016:- It is submitted to the Hon’ble Court that there are two respondents in each matter. Respondent No. 2 is common in both matters above-mentioned. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in both matters and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of common LR

Respondent No. 2 in both matters and also filed counter-affidavit which is already included in SLP paper books. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 19969 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 13706 of 2016. It is submitted that Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 20212 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13719 of 2016. It is submitted that Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matters are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 22 nd day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Copy to:- 1. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate. 172, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi- 110091. 2. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate 302, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase- II, Delhi- 110 091 3. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate 159, Lawyer's Chambers, High Court of Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

ÆITEM NO.53 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 13706/2016(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10/02/2016IN WP NO. 36625/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATHYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH)MANNE SUBRAMANYAM PETITIONER(S) VERSUSSRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ANDINTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)WITHSLP(C) NO. 13719/2016(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C) NO. 20212/2016(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C) NO. 19969/2016(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 23/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAFor Petitioner(s)SLP(C) 13706/16, 13719/16 Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv.& rr in SLP(C) 20212/16 & Mr.J. Govardhan Reddy, Adv.19969/16 Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv.Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. SLP(C) 20212/16, 19969/16 Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv.& rr in SLP(C) 13706/16, Mr. Taranjeet Singh Sawhney, Adv.13719/16 Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. G.K. Deshpande, Adv.Mr. A.V.S. Raju, Adv. Mr. Somanatha Padhan, Adv. Page No. 1 of 2UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RHeard the learned counsels for the petitioners andperused the relevant material.Permission to file additional documents is grantedWe do not find any legal and valid ground forinterference. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.The petitioners will be at liberty to seek refund of theamount paid. [VINOD LAKHINA]COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI]COURT MASTERPage No. 2 of 2

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.14 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s). 23212/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/05/2016 in CP No. 10/1999 11/05/2016 in CA No. 16/2015 passed by the High Court Of Patna) JAI PRAKASH SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUJATA DEVI AND ORS Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 22/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. R. Setia,Adv.(Not Present) For Respondent(s) T he Court made the following O R D E R None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry. (SONALI SAUND) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

SECTION XVI    LISTED ON: 17.2.2016    COURT NO.: 1     ITEM NO. : 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10396 of 2016 (With prayer for interim­relief) With  INTERLOCOUTORY APPLICATION No.1 (Application for permission to filed additional documents) With  INTERLOCOUTORY APPLICATION No.2 (Application for Exemption from filing Official Translation) THE CHAIRMAN NHAI & ANR.        ...Petitioner(s) Versus ARVIND KR. THAKUR & ANR.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before Hon'ble court on 25.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice.  As prayed for, there shall be interim stay of the operation and implementation  of the impugned judgment, subject to the condition that the amount collected towards toll on the completed portion of the Highway, in question, shall be deposited in a nationalized Bank.” Accordingly show­cause notice returnable for 4.7.2016 was issued on 30.4.2016 to both the respondents by registered AD post. Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra, advocate has filed Vakaltanama on behalf of respondent No.1 but no counter­affidavit has been filed, so far. It is further submitted vide Ld registrar's order dated 11.08.2016 fresh show­cause notice was issued to Respondent No­2 through registered AD post as well as dasti. Counsel for the petitioner has on 03.09.2016 filed  affidavit of dasti proof in respect of respondent No.2 . but no one has entered appearance on his behalf, so far. Service of show­cause notice is complete.   In view of the Ld. Registrar's order dated 23.09.2016, t he matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office report.   Dated this the 16 th  day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. M.V Kini & Associates, Advocate Mr. R.K Mishra, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

@ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10396/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/04/2016 in CWJC No.12858/2015 passed by the High Court Of Patna)THE CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSARVIND KUMAR THAKUR AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report)Date : 17/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar,SGMs. Gunjan Sinha,Adv.Mr. Simranjeet Singh,Adv.for M/s. M.V. Kini & Associates,Advs. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv.No.1 Mr. Govind Jee,Adv.Mr. Ramesh K Mishra,Adv. Mr. T. Sudhaker,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLeave granted.Interim order passed on 25 th April, 2016 tocontinue, till further orders.Post for final hearing in the 1 st week of May, 2017. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

Listed On. 16.02.2017 Ld. Registrar's Court No. 01 Item No. 52 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 13911 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF C. Manimala & Ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registar's Court on 13 th January, 2017, when the following order was passed:- “None appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 despite due service. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit. Await service/track report in respect of respondent No.12. List again on 16.2.2017. “ It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, service is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate for respondent No. 3 has not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that as per track report, delivery report is still pending on respondent No. 12. Service is incomplete on Respondent No. 12. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this, the 16 th day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. R. Nedumaran, Advocate Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

âITEM NO.52 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13911/2016C MANIMALA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment andinterim relief and office report)Date : 16/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to17, despite due service.Four weeks&#39; time, as last opportunity, is granted torespondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit.Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.12within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.List again on 23.3.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

SECTION – III  B          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)  No. 13671 OF  2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Medical Council of India  …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 28 th  October, 2016 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner,  list the matter after ten weeks.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit as per letter circulated before the Hon'ble Court on 26 th  October, 2016 so far. Service is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 10 th   Day of  February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ 1. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,  Advocate House No. F­12, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi   2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

ITEM NO.601 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2017 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13032/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/04/2016 in SCA No. 2620/2016 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) NEOTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Respondent(s) (for directions and office report) Date : 08/02/2017 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Mr. Anil Soni, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application is dismissed. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

LISTED ON : 30.01.2017                                     BEFORE COURT NO.: 07     ITEM NO.: 06        SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15874 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF GEETABAI ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ SAVITA       ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 05th December, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: "Though, the respondent is not appeared in spite of service of notice, in the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that fresh notice be served upon the respondent. Issue fresh notice, returnable in six weeks." It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to aforesaid order, fresh notice was issued to sole respondent and as per tracking report (Copy enclosed), notice has not been delivered and returned to New Delhi GPO with postal remarks "Insufficient Address". The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 27th day of January, 2017.                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr.R.P. Goyal, Advocate  L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15874/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/03/2016 in SA No. 178/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) GEETABAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAVITA Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 30/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per the office report, fresh notice issued to the sole respondent could not be served and was returned with the postal remarks 'insufficient address'. Correct and complete address shall be furnished by the petitioner on the basis of which fresh steps shall be taken to serve the respondent. Issue fresh notice, returnable in six weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master

LISTED ON :27.01.2017                                        BEFORE COURT NO.:06                             ITEM NO.:48                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14990 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for vacating stay) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS  ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD           ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 03rd January 2017, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: " Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent seeking adjournment.  List on 27.01.2017. " I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that in view of the letter circulated by the counsel for the sole respondent, additional affidavit has been filed on 24.01.2017 and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. Service of notice is complete. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 25th day of January, 2017.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar , Advoc ate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¼ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and vacating stay and interim relief and office report)Date : 27/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa,Adv. Mr. Prashant F. Goudar,Adv.Mr. Rahat Bansal,Adv.Mr. Goutham Shivshankar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanium,Sr.Adv.Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.Mrs. Amrita Singh,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the parties on both the sides have fairlysubmitted that an equitable solution of the dispute can be workedout.Post on 01.03.2017 to await the outcome. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:  25.01.2017   COURT NO.:  11 (Chamber)   ITEM NO. :  76 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10077 of 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) SANJAY KR.GUPTA & ANR.    ...Petitioner(s) Versus TETARI DEVI & ORS.           ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS The matter above­mentioned was listed before Hon'ble court on 8.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned.  Issue notice.” Accordingly show­cause notice was issued on 23.04.2016 to the all the twenty one respondents through registered AD post. Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4 but he has not filed counter­affidavit, so far.  AD card duly signed has been received back from respondent Nos. 8­9, 11­12, 14, 16­19 and 21, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf, so far.   In respect of respondent Nos. 5 & 13 remarks  “refused” and  Service on respondent Nos. 5 & 13 held as deemed service by the Ld. Registrar order dated 3.10.2016. It is submitted that  Neither AD card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from respondent No.10, so far. Unserved cover containing notice has been received back with remarks “dead” and “not reside” in respect of respondent nos. 1­2, 6 & 20, and 3 & 15 and  postal remarks “incomplete address” in respect of Respondent No.7.  C ounsel was informed vide registry letter dated 27.4.2016 and 6.6.2016 to take steps of the aforesaid respondents.

­2­ It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither filed fresh particulars and taken fresh steps to effect service on unserved respondent Nos.  3, 7, 10 & 15 nor filed application to bring legal representatives on record of the deceased respondent Nos. 1­2, 6 & 20, so far. Service of notice is incomplete. In view of Ld. Registrar's order dated 16.12.2016 Office­report for directions is listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd  day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Manish Kr. Saran, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P

ITEM NO.76 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10077/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/05/2015 in SA No. 21/2011 passed by the High Court of Patna) SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS TETARI DEVI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report for directions) Date : 25/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Kumar Saran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioners to do the needful in terms of the office report dated 22.12.2016. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:  23.01.2017   COURT NO.:  12 (Chamber)   ITEM NO. :  46 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10077 of 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) SANJAY KR.GUPTA & ANR.    ...Petitioner(s) Versus TETARI DEVI & ORS.           ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS The matter above­mentioned was listed before Hon'ble court on 8.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned.  Issue notice.” Accordingly show­cause notice was issued on 23.04.2016 to the all the twenty one respondents through registered AD post. Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4 but he has not filed counter­affidavit, so far.  AD card duly signed has been received back from respondent Nos. 8­9, 11­12, 14, 16­19 and 21, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf, so far.   In respect of respondent Nos. 5 & 13 remarks  “refused” and  Service on respondent Nos. 5 & 13 held as deemed service by the Ld. Registrar order dated 3.10.2016. It is submitted that  Neither AD card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from respondent No.10, so far. Unserved cover containing notice has been received back with remarks “dead” and “not reside” in respect of respondent nos. 1­2, 6 & 20, and 3 & 15 and  postal remarks “incomplete address” in respect of Respondent No.7.  C ounsel was informed vide registry letter dated 27.4.2016 and 6.6.2016 to take steps of the aforesaid respondents.

­2­ It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither filed fresh particulars and taken fresh steps to effect service on unserved respondent Nos.  3, 7, 10 & 15 nor filed application to bring legal representatives on record of the deceased respondent Nos. 1­2, 6 & 20, so far. Service of notice is incomplete. In view of Ld. Registrar's order dated 16.12.2016 Office­report for directions is listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd  day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Manish Kr. Saran, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P

ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10082/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/03/2016 in MAT No. 229/2016 passed by the High Court of Calcutta) MOZZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 23/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv. Ms. Reshmi Rea Sinha, Adv. Ms. Rudra Dutta, Adv. Mr. Sukesh Ghosh, Adv. Mr. P.C. Das, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List before a Bench wherein Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy is not a Member. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Suman Jain) Court Master

JITEM NO.43 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13446/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/03/2016in APP No. 11/2016 31/03/2016 in APP No. 868/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 23/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri,Sr.Adv.Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.Mr. Sudhir Naagar,Adv.Mr. Vijay Kasana,Adv.Mr. Ambrish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Subramanyam,Sr.Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv.Mr. Hari Kr.V,Adv.Mr. Shashank Mishrav UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLeave granted subject to the condition that the appellantdeposits an amount of Rupees Two Crores with the Registry of thisCourt within a period of eight weeks. On such deposit, therespondent would be at liberty to withdraw the same on furnishingimmovable property security to the satisfaction of the Registrar ofthis Court.[O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

LISTED ON : 13.01.2017 COURT NO. : 04 ITEM NO. : 56 SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 13706, 13719, 19969 AND 20212 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANNE SUBRAMANYAM ETC. ...PETITIONERS -VERSUS- SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016 above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13 th May, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Until further orders, status quo, as on today with regard to the possession of property, shall be maintained by the parties.” Subsequently, the matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 9 th December, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 List these matters after four weeks to enable the counsel to file counter affidavit.” SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016:- It is submitted to the Hon’ble Court that there are two respondents in each matter. Respondent No. 2 is common in both matters above-mentioned. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in both matters and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Mr. Arun LR

Aggarwal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of common Respondent No. 2 in both matters and also filed counter-affidavit which is already included in SLP paper books. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 19969 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 13706 of 2016. It is submitted that Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 20212 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13719 of 2016. It is submitted that Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and has on 4 th January, 2017 filed Counter affidavit which has already been included in SLP paper books. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matters are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 12 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Copy to:- 1. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate. 172, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi- 110091. 2. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate 302, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase- II, Delhi- 110 091 3. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate 159, Lawyer's Chambers, High Court of Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Listed On. 13.01.2017 Ld. Registrar's Court No. 1 Item No. 71 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)No. 13911 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF C. Manimala & Ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11 th May, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Heard. Issue notice. We direct that in case the petitioner herein deposit twice the amount of the highest bid offered by the successful bidder for the respective shop in their occupation, they shall be allowed to continue, pending further orders from this Court. The arrears at the said rate shall also be deposited w.e.f. 1 st January, 2016 within a period of two months from today. Deposit shall be made with the Panchayat concerned. The petitioner may file an amended cause title, impleading the successful bidders as party respondents, within two weeks, in which event, notices shall issue even to the successful bidders.“ T hereafter, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 8 th July, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Application for impleadment has been filed by the petitioner but beyond the period granted by the Hon'ble Court. As such, the matter be processed for listing under rules. ” ...2/-

-2- Subsequently, t he matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 18 th November, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners to file 10 more spare copies within a week's time and Registry to issue notice thereafter. List again on 13.01.2017.” It is submitted that pursuant to the order dated 11 th May, 2016, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents on 30 th November, 2016. As per tracking report, article has been delivered to Respondent Nos. 1 to 11 and 13 to 16 was delivered on 2 nd ,5 th and 9 th December, 2016 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf so far. In respect of Respondent No. 12, delivery report is still pending. It is further submitted that Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate has on 20 th May, 2016 filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 3 but he has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this, the 12 th day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. R. Nedumaran, Advocate Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 13706/2016 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10/02/2016 IN WP NO. 36625/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH) MANNE SUBRAMANYAM PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) WITH SLP(C) NO. 13719/2016 (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C) NO. 20212/2016 (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) SLP(C) NO. 19969/2016 (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 13/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) SLP(C) 13706/16 & 13719/16 & rr in SLP(C) 20212/16, 19969/16 Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv. SLP(C) 20212/16, 19969/16 Mr. Arun Aggarwal,Adv. & rr in SLP(C) 13706/16 & Mr. Taranjeet Singh, Adv. 13719/16 Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A.V.S. Raju, Adv. Mr. Somanatha Padhan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. List the matters after four weeks. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 428 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C)No. 13729 of 2016 AMIR HUSSAIN (HUSEN) ... Appellant VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Respondents O R D E R Leave granted. Since the Foreigners Tribunal had decided the matter ex-parte and the petitioner has provided some justification for non-appearance before the Tribunal, we are of the opinion that the petitioner be given one more chance to adduce evidence in support of his case. The petitioner shall, however, be allowed to adduce that evidence only which is made subject matter of these proceedings. The Tribunal is requested to decide the matter within three months during which period, the petitioner shall remain in custody. The impugned order is, thus, set aside and the appeal is allowed in the aforesaid manner. ......................, J. [ A.K. SIKRI ] ......................, J. [ R.K. AGRAWAL ] New Delhi; January 13, 2017.

ITEM NO.64 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13729/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/12/2015 in WPC No. 5896/2015 passed by the High Court of Gauhati) AMIR HUSSAIN (HUSEN) Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Mr. Milan Laskar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. S. Narasimha, ASG. Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Piyush Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Shikha Kumari, Adv. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master [Signed order is placed on the file.]

ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13911/2016 C MANIMALA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment and interim relief and office report) Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17 despite due service. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit. Await service/track report in respect of respondent No.12. List again on 16.2.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

:ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13911/2016C MANIMALA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment andinterim relief and office report)Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNone appears for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to17 despite due service.Four weeks&#39; time is granted to respondent No.3 for filingcounter affidavit.Await service/track report in respect of respondentNo.12.List again on 16.2.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ÎITEM NO.56 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 13706/2016(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10/02/2016IN WP NO. 36625/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATHYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH)MANNE SUBRAMANYAM PETITIONER(S) VERSUSSRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ANDINTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)WITHSLP(C) NO. 13719/2016(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C) NO. 20212/2016(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)SLP(C) NO. 19969/2016(WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 13/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s)SLP(C) 13706/16 & 13719/16 & rr in SLP(C) 20212/16, 19969/16 Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv.SLP(C) 20212/16, 19969/16 Mr. Arun Aggarwal,Adv.& rr in SLP(C) 13706/16 & Mr. Taranjeet Singh, Adv.13719/16 Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. A.V.S. Raju, Adv. Mr. Somanatha Padhan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RPerused the letter.List the matters after four weeks. [VINOD LAKHINA]COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI]COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.3/2016 in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.13934/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/11/2014 in WA No.48/2013 passed by the High Court Of Manipur At Imphal) RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (for deletion of the name of respondent) Date : 12/01/2017 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Uday Manaktala, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Nishesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. I.A.3/2016, application for deletion of some proforma respondents from the array of parties is allowed at the risk and peril of the petitioners. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) COURT MASTER (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 13949/2016 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 11/03/2016 IN CRA NO. 110/2016 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) ABDUL GANI ABDUL MAJID DONGRE & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS LIYAKAT ABDULLAH DHOLE & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 06/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.S. Kazi, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Ms. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sagheer A. Khan, Adv. Mr. C. George Thomas, Adv. Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. We do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER

SECTION – III - B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10003 OF 2016 M/s. Samtel India Limited …..Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate ….Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18 th July, 2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order :- “ List the matter after pleadings are complete.” It is submitted that Service of Show Cause Notice is complete as sole Respondent is represented through Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate and he has on 3 rd August, 2016 filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Sole Respondent. Copies of Counter Affidavit has been included in paper books. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 03 rd Day of January, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate, 13, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 110001. 2. Mr. B. K. Prasad, Advocate Central Agency Section. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR VM

¢ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay)USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and vacating stay and interim relief and office report)Date : 03/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa,Adv.Mr. Prashant F. Goudar,Adv.Mr. Goutham Shivshankar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Amrita Singh,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for therespondent seeking adjournment.List on 27.01.2017. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Listed On: 02.01.2017 Before Court No.2 Item No. 60 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) Nos. 15416, 15594 AND 26723/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS Avval Singh & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT SLP(C)Nos. 15416 and 26723/2016 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 16.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to inter-alia pass the following Order:- “... SLP(C) Nos. 15416 and 26723 of 2016 Four weeks time, as last chance, is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 04.10.2016 of this Court in respect of the unserved respondents. List again on 02.01.2017.... ” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither furnished the fresh address of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 nor filed spare copies for issuance of fresh notice to respondent in terms of Ld. Registrar order dated 04.10.2016. Service is not complete on Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. SLP (C) No. 15549/2016 The matter above mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 16.02.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Delay in filing the special leave petition is condoned subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/-, as costs, with the supreme Court Employees’ Mutual Welfare Fund, within two weeks from today. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 24745/2015. In the meantime, contempt proceeding, if any, shall not be processed with. ” It is submitted that as directed above show cause notice was issued to both the respondent by registered A.D. Neither A. D. cards nor unserved covers have been received from both the Respondents so far. Service is not complete on both the Respondents.

-2- The matters above mentioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this office report. DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. S.N.Terdal, Adv. CAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-1

ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15416/2016 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS AVVAL SINGH AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 23110-23111/2016 SLP(C) No. 26723/2016 SLP(C) No. 22848-22849/2016 SLP(C) No. 28273/2016 SLP(C) No.15594/2016 (Office Report) Date : 02/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vipin Kumar,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.15416/2016 & 26723/2016 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps in the respect of the respondent Nos.1 & 2 despite opportunities given. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. … ....2

ITEM NO.60 -2- SC15416/2016 SLP(C) No.15594/2016 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of both the respondents within four weeks. SLP(C) No. 23110-23111/2016,22848-22849/2016 &28273/2016 Files not received. List the matters again on 01.02.2017. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

\212ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15416/2016UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSAVVAL SINGH AND ORS Respondent(s)(with office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 23110-23111/2016SLP(C) No. 26723/2016SLP(C) No. 22848-22849/2016SLP(C) No. 28273/2016SLP(C) No.15594/2016(Office Report) Date : 02/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vipin Kumar,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) Nos.15416/2016 & 26723/2016Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the freshparticulars and to take fresh steps in the respect of therespondent Nos.1 & 2 despite opportunities given. Therefore, thematter shall be processed for listing before the Hon&#39;ble Judge inChambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter. ⬠¦ ....2ITEM NO.60 -2- SC15416/2016SLP(C) No.15594/2016Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh stepsin respect of both the respondents within four weeks.SLP(C) No. 23110-23111/2016,22848-22849/2016 &28273/2016Files not received.List the matters again on 01.02.2017. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:  16.12.2016   COURT NO.:  R­2   ITEM NO. :  83 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10077 of 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) SANJAY KR.GUPTA & ANR.    ...Petitioner(s) Versus TETARI DEVI & ORS.           ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 15.11.2016 when he was pleased to pass the following order: “Ld. Counsel for t he respondent No.4 has stated that the copies of the pleadings have not been provided to him by the petitioner. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall provide the copies of the pleadings to the Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 within a week's time and file proof. Ld. Counsel for the above said respondent shall file the counter-affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to comply the terms of the order dated 03.10.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos. 3, 7, 10, 15 and deceased respondent Nos.1,2, 6 & 20. List the matter again on 16.12.2016 .” It  is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed  proof of service after serving the copy of pleadings to the counsel for the respondent No.4 , so far.  Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate has not filed counter­affidavit on behalf of respondent No.4, so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither filed fresh particulars nor taken any fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 3, 7, 10 and 15.

­2­ It is lastly submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed application for substitution to bring on record of lrs. Of deceased respondent Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 20, so far. Service of notice is still incomplete in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 6­7, 10, 15 & 20. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.  Dated this the 13th day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Manish Kr. Saran, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P

SECTION XVI LISTED ON:  COURT NO.:  Chambers ITEM NO. :  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCOUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 & 2 (Application for Restoration of SLP & condonation of delay in filing the recall order dated 28.04.2016.) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)..... DEFECTIVE DIARY NO.  43055 OF 2015 ANIL KUMAR CHAUDHARY ...Petitioner() Versus RETI DEVI  & ORS. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that defective Diary No. 43055 of 2015 was listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­Chamber on 28.04.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Learned counsel for the petitioners has not cured the defects. Period of 90 days has elapsed. Hence, the special leave petition is dismissed.” It is submitted that Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Advocate has on 02.12.2016 refiled the matter after curing the defects and also filed an application for recall of order dated 28.04.2016 alongwith an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for recalling/restoration, which is barred by time by 188 days.  The application for restoration in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chambers for orders.   Dated this the 15 th  day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Neeraj Shekhar , Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:    COURT NO.: Chamber   ITEM NO. :  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 832­833 of 2010 (With prayer for interim­relief) RAM KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. ...Petitioner(s) Versus SHIBAL MAHTO & ORS. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 04.08.2016 when he was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish complete address of proposed legal representatives Nos. 1 to 4 of deceased respondent No.10 within two weeks time. Dasti in addition is allowed. Notices accordingly be issued. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on the legal representatives Nos. 1 to 4 of deceased respondent No.11 within two weeks time. Dasti in addition is allowed. Notices accordingly be issued. Registry to submit report regarding status of all the other respondents in the next office report. List again on 5.10.2016. ” It is submitted that there are eleven respondents in this matter. M/s Abhishek Chaudhary and Abhay Kumar Jha, advocates have filed vakaltanama on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Counsel for respondent No.1 has filed Counter­affidavit but no counter­affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No.2, so far.  Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service with proof stating therein that respondent Nos. 3 to 7 refused to accept notice in the presence of witness and respondent Nos. 8 and 9 received notice.

­2­ It is further submitted that as per Ld. Registrar's order dated 4.08.2016 fresh show­cause notice was issued on 10.9.2016 to the lrs of each of the deceased respondent Nos. 10 and 11 through registered AD post as well as dasti. AS per tracking report  lrs. Of deceased respondent Nos. 10 (i) to (iv) and 11 (ii) have been received without remarks and Lrs. Of deceased respondent Nos. 11 (i) and (iii) to (iv)  have been received with remarks “item not delivered respectively (copy enclosed). Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of dasti service, so far. The matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office report.  Dated this the 4 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Mr. L.R Singh, Advocate     Mr. M.P Jha, Advocate     Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IV­B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL ) NO. 11340 OF 2016 GURMEET SINGH AND ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.                    ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court  on 19 th  October, 2016 when the following pass the following Order: “Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Dasti, in addition, is allowed. Respondent Nos. 5 to 122, being performa Respondents, need not be served vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 18.04.2016. List again on 14.12.2016.” Accordingly, fresh notice was issued to Respondent Nos. 1 to  4 through registered A. D. Post and dasti service. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate and he has also filed counter affidavit on his behalf. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Birendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate but he has not filed counter affidavit so far.  It is further submitted that as per tracking report, notice has been delivered to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 at “Bathinda City” on 07.11.2016. (Copy of tracking report enclosed. ) Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report.  Dated this the 13 th  Day of December, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocate Mr. Birendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a

LISTED ON:  09.12.2016                                    BEFORE COURT NO.:  5                  ITEM NO.: 13 SECTION – IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATTE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13949 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF ABDUL GANI ABDUL MAJID DONGRE & ORS.                       ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ LIYAKAT ABDULLAH DHOLE & ORS.                      ...RESPONDENTS             OFFICE REPORT  It is submitted for the information for the Hon'ble Court that Counsel for the petitioner has filed two separate undertaking documents containing orders dated 05.10.2011 and 17.04.2013 in view of letter dated 07.05.2016 filed by him and the same is already included in the paper books. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has also filed caveat proof.    The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with report.  Dated this the 08 th  day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED, Advocate MR. EJAZ MAQBOOL, Advocate   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR VT

LISTED ON : 09.12.2016 COURT NO. : 05 ITEM NO. : 52 SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 13706, 13719, 19969 AND 20212 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANNE SUBRAMANYAM ETC. ..PETITIONERS -VERSUS- SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. ETC. ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016 above-mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13 th May, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Until further orders, status quo, as on today with regard to the possession of property, shall be maintained by the parties.” Subsequently, the matter i.e. SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016 above-mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar’s Court on 11 th August, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Four weeks time, as last chance is given to both the respondents to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court. SLP (C) Nos. 13706 & 13719 of 2016:- It is submitted to the Hon’ble Court that there are two respondents in each matter. Respondent No. 2 is common in both matters above-mentioned. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in both matters and Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate has filed LR

Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of common Respondent No. 2 in both matters. No counter-affidavit has been filed in both the matter so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 19969 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 13706 of 2016. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 8 th August, 2016 to both the Respondents. Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but they have not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP (C) No. 20212 of 2016:- The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 1 st August, 2016, when the Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13719 of 2016. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 8 th August, 2016 to both the Respondents. Mr. Somantha Padhan, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but they have not filed counter-affidavit so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matters are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 8 th day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Copy to:- 1. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate. 172, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi- 110091. 2. Mr. Somnatha Padhan, Advocate 302, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase- II, Delhi- 110 091 3. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate 159, Lawyer's Chambers, High Court of Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13934/2016 RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent) Date : 09/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Uday Manaktala,Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr.Sapam Biswajit Meitei,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms.Joshita Pai,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.4-9, 11,13, 14-17, 19-21, 23, 24 & 27 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 has stated that he has received the paper book. Four weeks time is given to file the counter affidavit. … ...2

ITEM NO. 62 -2- SC13934/2016 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an I.A. for the deletion of respondent Nos.10, 12, 18, 22, 25 & 26 from the array of parties. The said I.A. shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13934/2016RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent)Date : 09/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Uday Manaktala,Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr.Sapam Biswajit Meitei,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms.Joshita Pai,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent Nos.4-9, 11,13, 14-17, 19-21, 23, 24 & 27 shallbe at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of fourweeks. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counteraffidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 has stated that he hasreceived the paper book. Four weeks time is given to file thecounter affidavit. ⬠¦ ...2ITEM NO. 62 -2- SC13934/2016The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the petitionerhas filed an I.A. for the deletion of respondent Nos.10, 12, 18,22, 25 & 26 from the array of parties. The said I.A. shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon&#39;ble Judge in Chambers forfurther future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

4ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). 21908/2016HARI DUTT SHARMA AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSANIL SHARMA Respondent(s)Date : 07/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Deepak Vuttsya,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Raheja,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd.counsel for the petitioner has stated that he does notintend to withdraw the instant petition and he has filed a letterdated 7.12.2016 to withdraw the said withdrawal letter dated19.10.2016 today itself and shown the proof in Court. Hence hisrequest is acceded to. Registry to process further as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

LISTED ON : 05.12.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.:08                             ITEM NO.:04                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14990 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for vacating stay) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS  ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD           ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07th November 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: " In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking adjournment, matter is adjourned for four weeks.  Reply to I.A. No.3 be filed in the meanwhile. " I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that counsel for the petitioners has on 02.12.2016 filed statement of objections to the application for vacation of stay with the permission of the Court and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 02.12.2016 filed statement of rejoinder on behalf of the petitioners along­with application for exemption from filing Official Translation with the permission of the Court and the same are being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. Service of notice is complete. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 03rd day of December, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar , Advoc ate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTED ON : 05.12.2016                                     BEFORE COURT NO.: 09     ITEM NO.: 59        SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15874 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF GEETABAI ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ SAVITA       ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29th August, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: "Sole respondent has been duly served as the AD card signed by her has been received back. However, nobody has entered appearance on her behalf. To await appearance, list the matter after two weeks". It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that nobody has entered appearance on behalf of sole­respondent so far. Service of notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 02nd day of December, 2016.                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr.R.P. Goyal, Advocate  L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015 in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and vacating stay and interim relief and office report) Date : 05/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Adv. Mr. Prashant F. G., Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R. S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rekha Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are prepared to settle the entire outstanding dues to the Bank in terms of the Agreement with an additional reasonable compensation as well for the inconvenience caused to the Bank. The learned senior counsel appearing for the Bank shall get instruction. List on 03.01.2017. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15874/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/03/2016 in SA No. 178/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Nagpur) GEETABAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAVITA Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though, the respondent is not appeared in spite of service of notice, in the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that fresh notice be served upon the respondent. Issue fresh notice, returnable in six weeks. (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15874/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/03/2016 in SA No. 178/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Nagpur) GEETABAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAVITA Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 05/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though, the respondent is not appeared in spite of service of notice, in the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that fresh notice be served upon the respondent. Issue fresh notice, returnable in six weeks. (Ashwani Thakur) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

MATTER FOR : 02.12.2016 COURT NO.12 ITEM NO.2 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS.14664/2016 & 29730/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 in SLP (C) No. 14664/2016 (Application for withdrawal of SLP) PRINCIPAL SEC., HIGHER EDU. & ANR. ETC. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS DR. I. K. MANSOORI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) No. 14664/2016 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.11.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “List on 2.12.2016 .” It is submitted that pursuant to order quoted above, counsel for the respondents have not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 12.09.2016 filed an application for withdrawal of SLP alongwith Annexure A-1 which is registered as I.A. No. 2. Copy of the same has already been included in the SLP paper books. Neither AD cards nor unserved registered cover has been received back from respondent No. 3 & 4 so far. Service is not complete on respondent Nos. 3 & 4. ...2/-

-2- SLP (C) No. 29730/2016 It is submitted that pursuant to order dated 26.09.2016 Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Advocate has on 29.11.2016 filed affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 but he has not filed Vakalatnama and memo of appearance so far. Copy of the same is circulated to the Hon'ble Court. Track Report of show cause notice in respect of Respondent No. 2 shows that “item delivered” has been received at New Delhi, GPO and track report in respect of Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shows that “item delivered” to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of them so far. Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 2. The matters above-mentioned alongwith application are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 1 st day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/LK/OR

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 02.12.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  4                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :  6     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 15866 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTS & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   15.11.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ As a last opportunity, counter affidavit be filed within two  weeks.  List the matter on 2 nd  December, 2016.” There are 3 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted that service of show cause notice is already complete and no   one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2.  It is further submitted that Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate for   Respondent No. 1 has on 16.11.2016  filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of   Respondents but the same is defective for the reason that he has given caption   “Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondents” though he is appearing for Respondent   No. 1 only and the same has been communicated to the Counsel vide Registry's   letter dated 22.11.2016. Later the said Counsel has on 25.11.2016 filed   Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 but he has   not taken “No Objection Certificate” from erstwhile Advocates M/s Anuradha &   Associates. However, Copy of the Counter Affdiavit is being circulated to the Hon'ble   Court. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 01 st   day of December, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate. M/s Anuradha & Associates, Advocates. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

\232ITEM NO.64 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15866/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016in SAD No. 135/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSM.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 02/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANTFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv.Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra,Sr.Adv.Ms. Anuradha Dubey Mishra ,Adv.Ms. Tulika Mukherjee,Adv.Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh,Adv. M/s Anuradha & Associates,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for thepetitioner seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit, four weeks&#39;time is granted to him to file rejoinder affidavit. Listthereafter.[O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

1 ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s). 22363/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 11/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 12/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 12/2011 25/07/2014 in CWP No. 14437/2013 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 15/2011 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 2/2011 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 20/2010 11/08/2014 in CWP No. 20195/2012 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 21/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 3/2011 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 33/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 35/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 36/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 37/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 39/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 4/2011 21/07/2015 in VATAP No. 4/2015 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 42/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 44/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 50/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 52/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 53/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 54/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 55/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 56/2010 21/07/2015 in VATAP No. 6/2015 21/07/2015 in VATAP No. 7/2015 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 8/2010 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S. R.K. RAYON P. LTD. AND ETC. ETC. Respondent(s) (Office-report on default) Date : 29/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR (N.P.) For Respondent(s) The counsel the Court made the following O R D E R When the matter was called, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioners.

2 Perused the office report dated 26.10.2016. In the interest of justice, four weeks' time is granted to the petitioners, to cure the defects as pointed out in the office-report. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

1ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s). No(s).22363/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated11/09/2014 in VATR No. 11/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 12/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 12/2011 25/07/2014 in CWP No. 14437/201311/09/2014 in VATR No. 15/2011 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 2/201111/09/2014 in VATR No. 20/2010 11/08/2014 in CWP No. 20195/201211/09/2014 in VATR No. 21/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 3/201111/09/2014 in VATR No. 33/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 35/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 36/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 37/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 39/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 4/201121/07/2015 in VATAP No. 4/2015 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 42/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 44/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 50/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 52/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 53/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 54/2010 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 55/201011/09/2014 in VATR No. 56/2010 21/07/2015 in VATAP No. 6/201521/07/2015 in VATAP No. 7/2015 11/09/2014 in VATR No. 8/2010passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSM/S. R.K. RAYON P. LTD. AND ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(Office-report on default)Date : 29/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR (N.P.) For Respondent(s) The counsel the Court made the following O R D E R When the matter was called, nobody was present on behalf ofthe petitioners.2Perused the office report dated 26.10.2016.In the interest of justice, four weeks&#39; time is granted to thepetitioners, to cure the defects as pointed out in theoffice-report. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

°ITEM NO.62 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10075/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015in WC No.59470/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 28/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv.Mr. Shashank Vajpayee,Adv.Mr. Shagun Vajpayee, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv.Mr. M. R. Shamshad,Adv.Ms. Shiwani Luthra, Adv.Ms. Harshita Deshwal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList this matter before a Bench of which one of us(R.K. Agrawal, J.) is not a Member after obtaining necessaryinstructions from Hon&#39;ble the Chief Justice. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL)COURT MASTER (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)COURT MASTER

LISTED ON :25.11.2016                         BEFORE COURT NO.: 04                              ITEM NO.:65       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13446 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. ....PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ B.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD.                     ...RESPONDENT     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13th   May 2016, when the Court was pleased to  pass the following Order: "Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be interim stay of the operation of the impugned order of the High Court. However, Mr. Basant R., learned senior counsel appearing for the caveator/respondent submits that the machinery belonging to the sole caveator/respondent is lying at the site within the control of the petitioner, therefore, the respondent may be permitted to remove its machinery. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the said prayer. In the circumstances, the caveator/respondent is permitted to remove its machinery in the presence of some duly authorized person on behalf of the petitioner after taking note of appropriate inventory. This is without prejudice to the rights and claims of the respondent." Thereafter, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Registrar on 14th    September, 2016, when the following Order was passed: "The office report is that the sole respondent has already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. " It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is sole respondent in the instant matter. Mr. P. I. Jose, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance and counter­affidavit on behalf of the sole Caveator/respondent. Counter­affidavit has been included in the paper­books. ...2/­

­2­ It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 21.11.2016 filed rejoinder affidavit with the permission of the Court and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. Service of notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 23rd    day of November, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Punit D. Tyagi, Advocate Mr. P. I. Jose, Advocate L  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   :25.11.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     : 4                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :  25                    INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Application for Condonation of Delay in filing  the Special Leave Petition)              IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. CC... 21904 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.            ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS PRAVEEN KUMAR AND ORS.                    ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above­mentioned has been filed against the   Judgment and Order dated 02.02.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at   Allahabad, in Writ­A No. 43034 of 2014. It is submitted that there is a delay of 175 days in filing the Special Leave   Petition and counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay to condone   the said delay. It is further submitted that SLP(C) No. 22670 of 2016 arising out of similar   issue was dismissed by this Hon'ble Court on 15.07.2016. (Copy of order dated   15.07.2016 is enclosed). It is lastly submitted that SLP(C) No. 30533 of 2016 arising out of similar   issue was dismissed by the Hon'ble Court on 07.10.2016. (Copy of order dated   07.10.2016 is enclosed). The  matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this   office report. Dated this the 22 nd   day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Advocate.            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ÖITEM NO.37 COURT NO.9 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14691/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/11/2015 in CRP No.3760/2008 passed by the High Court Of Madras)R. JEYALAKSHMI Petitioner(s) VERSUSG. RAJENDRAN Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report)Date : 25/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Pawan,Adv.Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar,Adv.For Mr. Shibashish Misra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe special leave petition is dismissed. Pendingapplications stand disposed of. (Sarita Purohit) (Mala Kumari Sharma ) Court Master Court Master

MATTER FOR:23.11.2016                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.77 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     10066/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS.   ...PETITIONERS                             VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 21.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­    “The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No. 1 to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 4. List again on 23.11.2016.” It is submitted that counsel for the Respondent No. 2 has on 17.11.2016 filed counter affidvit. Copy of the same has already included in the paper books. Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 has not filed the counter affidavit so far. AD Card duly signed has been received back in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance so far. Fresh Show Cause Notice was issued to respondent No. 4 on 20.10.2016 by Regd. AD Post, as per track report Item Delivered at “Rajasthan Secretariat”. Service is complete. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd  day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1. Mr. Sanjay Kuamr Tyagi , Adv.   2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.   3. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Adv.        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

ÌITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10066/2016SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHINYA RAM AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 23/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Rohit Kumar Sinha,Adv. Mr.Sanjay Kr.Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated under the rules. The respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit.Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.3 & 4, butno one has entered appearance on their behalf.Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing beforethe Hon&#39;ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

Listed On. 18.11.2016 Ld. Registrar's Court No. 1 Item No. 76 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)No. 13911 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF C. Manimala & Ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11 th May, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Heard. Issue notice. We direct that in case the petitioner herein deposit twice the amount of the highest bid offered by the successful bidder for the respective shop in their occupation, they shall be allowed to continue, pending further orders from this Court. The arrears at the said rate shall also be deposited w.e.f. 1st January, 2016 within a period of two months from today. Deposit shall be made with the Panchayat concerned. The petitioner may file an amended cause title, impleading the successful bidders as party respondents, within two weeks, in which event, notices shall issue even to the successful bidders.“ It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioners, has on 11 th May, 2016, filed only seven spare copies of Special Leave Petition to issue notice to the respondents but he has not filed ten more spare copies of Special Leave Petition to issue notice to the newly impleaded respondent Nos. 8 to 17 despite this Registry's letter dated 22 nd August, 2016. Hence, the notice could not be issued to the respondents so far. ...2/-

-2- The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this, the 17 th day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. R. Nedumaran, Advocate Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

\224ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 13911/2016C MANIMALA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment andinterim relief and office report)Date : 18/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. For Respondent(s) Karunakar Mahalik,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioners to file 10 more sparecopies within a week&#39;s time and Registry to issue noticethereafter. List again on 13.01.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

LISTED ON : 15.11.2016                 BEFORE COURT NO.:04                                 ITEM NO.:12       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 4 AND 5 (Application for directions and exemption from filing O.T.) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) 14678 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRISANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOGSANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.                      ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT  The Applications above­mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 8th November, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ "Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that Mr.Nishant R.Katneshwarkar,learned standing counsel for the State of Maharashtra shall obtain instructions from the competent authority of the State Government whether the shoes manufactured by the petitioner-Sanstha be supplied to the schools at 60% of the rate that the petitioner had quoted to the corporation, Respondent No.7 herein. Needless to say, such supply and payment of money shall be without prejudice to the contentions to be raised by the petitioners as well as by the respondents. Let the matter be listed on 15.11.2016". It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to aforesaid order, counsel for the State of Maharashtra has not filed any documents so far.. Service of notice is complete. The Applications in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 11th day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Y.P. Dhingra, Advocate L Mr. Nishant R.Katneshwarkar,Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 15.11.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  12                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :  1     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 15866 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTS & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   17.10.2016, with an office report dated 07.10.2016 when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “As prayed for three weeks' time is granted for filing counter  affidavit. List the matter after three weeks.” There are 3 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted that service of show cause notice is already complete and no   one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 have not   filed Counter Affidavit so far. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 10 th   day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate. M/s Anuradha & Associates, Advocates. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:  11.11.2016   COURT NO.:  R­2   ITEM NO. :  104 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10077 of 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) SANJAY KR.GUPTA & ANR.    ...Petitioner(s) Versus TETARI DEVI & ORS.           ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 03.10.2016 when he was pleased to pass the following order: “ The respondent No.4 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.8-9, 11-12, 14, 16-19 & 21, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent Nos.5 & 13 have refused to accept the service of notice sent to them under registered cover. This refusal on their part constitutes proper service. The unserved covers containing the notices have been received back from the respondent Nos.3,7 & 15 with postal remarks “not reside” & “incomplete address”. Hence, Ld. counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondents within a period of four weeks and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them and to the respondent No.10 within the same period. The respondent Nos.1,2, 6 & 20 are reported to be dead. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. Of the said respondents. List the matter again on 15.11.2016. .” It  is submitted that  Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate has not filed counter­affidavit on behalf of respondent No.4, so far. Service of notice is complete on behalf of respondent Nos. 8­9, 11­12, 14, 16­19 and 21, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf, so far.

­2­ It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither filed fresh particulars nor taken any fresh steps in respect of respondent No. 10. It is lastly submitted that counsel for the petitioner has neither taken any fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 3, 7 and 15 nor filed application for substitution to bring on record of lrs. Of deceased respondent Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 20. Service of notice is still incomplete in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 6­7, 15 & 12. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.  Dated this the 11th day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Manish Kr. Saran, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P/J

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 15866/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016 in SAD No. 135/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 15/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai,Adv. Mr. Mrinmay Bhattmewara,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For M/s Anuradha & Associates,Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As a last opportunity, counter affidavit be filed within two weeks. List the matter on 2 nd December, 2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Saroj Kumari Gaur) Court Master Court Master

\232ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 10075/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015in WC No. 59470/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 15/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNot taken up.List on 28.11.2016. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

NITEM NO.1 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) 15866/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016in SAD No. 135/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSM.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 15/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai,Adv.Mr. Mrinmay Bhattmewara,Adv.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s)Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv.For M/s Anuradha & Associates,Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs a last opportunity, counter affidavit be filedwithin two weeks.List the matter on 2 nd December, 2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Saroj Kumari Gaur) Court Master Court Master

Listed on: 11.11.2016 Before Court No. 5 Item No. 34 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CC Nos. 20757-20758/2016 PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) Nos. /2016 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1-2 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing in SLP) Union of India & Ors. Petitioners VERSUS Paras Ram Respondents OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matters have been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 04.11.2015 and 16.03.2016 of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in CWP No. 1097/2012 and R.P. No. 22/2016 alongwith application for condonation of delay in filing SLP (barred by time by 214 and 58 days respectively) and the same have been included in SLP paper books. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition(C) Nos. 31121-31122/2016 @ CC No. 19670-19671/2016 arising out of common order was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.10.2016 alongwith main matter i.e. SLP (C) No. 31116-31117/2016, when the Court was pleased to direct issue notice returnable after six weeks. Copy of order dated 21.10.2016 is enclosed herewith. The said matter matter is noted for listing before the Hon’ble Court on 12.12.2016 as per Computer Data. The matters alongwith applications above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with the office report. DATED THIS THE 09 th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-2

MATTER FOR : 11.11.2016 COURT NO.12 ITEM NO.1 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS.14664/2016 & 29730/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 in SLP (C) No. 29730/2016 (Application for withdrawal of SLP) PRINCIPAL SEC., HIGHER EDU. & ANR. ETC. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS DR. I. K. MANSOORI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT SLP (C) No. 14664/2016 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.07.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. List the matter thereafter.” It is submitted that pursuant to order quoted above, counsel for the respondents have not filed counter affidavit so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 12.09.2016 filed an application for withdrawal of SLP alongwith Annexure A-1 which is registered as I.A. No. 2. Copy of the same has already been included in the SLP paper books. Neither AD cards nor unserved registered cover has been received back from respondent No. 3 & 4 so far. Service is not complete on respondent Nos. 3 & 4. ...2/-

-2- SLP (C) No. 29730/2016 The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.09.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “It appears that against the same judgment, Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Rajasthan has preferred the Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 14664 of 2016, in which notice has been issued and Respondent No. 1 has already appeared in that case as appears from the order passed on 01.07.2016. We are informed that the said matter is likely to be listed on 11 th November, 2016. Delay condoned. Let this matter be also tagged and listed on that day. In the meantime, notice may be served on non-appearing respondents. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 1. Hence notice is waived to Respondent No. 1. In the meantime, vakalatnama and counter affidavit, if any, may be filed on behalf of Respondent No. 1.” It is submitted that pursuant to order quoted above the instant matter is tagged with SLP (C) No. 14664/2016. Accordingly, notice was issued on 07.10.2016 through registered AD to the respondents 2 to 4. Track Report shows that “item delivered” has been received at New Delhi, GPO in respect of respondent No. 2 and track report shows that “item delivered” to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of them so far. Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 2. The matters above-mentioned alongwith application are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 10 th day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/LK/OR

¬ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14664/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2016in CSA No.1080/2015 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan AtJaipur)PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSDR. I.K. MANSOORI AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for withdrawal of SLP and interim relief andoffice report)WITHSLP(C) No. 29730/2016Date : 11/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASGMs. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv.Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv.Mr. Mishra Saurabh,Adv.Mr. Ankit Kr. Goel, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv.Mr. Milan Lasker, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks time toget instructions.List on 21.11.2016. (ASHAÂ SUNDRIYAL)COURTÂ MASTER (S.S.R.KRISHNA)COURTÂ MASTER

2ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Diary No(s).20206/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/09/2015in LPA No. 1249/2015 23/09/2015 in SCA No. 17034/2014 passed by theHigh Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)RAMLAL MOHANLAL VALA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 11/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Ms. Nidhi,Adv. (Not Present) For Respondent(s) T he Court made the following O R D E RNone appears on behalf of the petitioner. Three weeks&#39; time is granted to the learned counsel for thepetitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry in itsoffice report dated 27.09.2016, failing which the Special LeavePetition shall stand dismissed without further reference to theCourt. (SONALI SAUND) (SHAKTI PARKASH SHARMA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.86 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13934/2016 RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 10/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Uday Manaktala, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv. Ms. Joshita Pai, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 28.09.2016 of this Court in respect of respondent nos. 11, 15 and other unserved respondents. One week's time as a last chance is given to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioners to serve a copy of the pleadings to the Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1, who shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter. Mr. Uday Manaktala, Ld. Counsel for the petitioners represent that he has filed an application for the deletion of respondent nos. 10, 12, 18, 22, 25 and 26 from party array. Contd..2/-

Item No. 86 - 2 - SLP(C) No. 13934/2016 Ms. Joshita Pai, Ld.counsel appears on behalf of Ms. Aparna Bhat, Ld. AOR, for the respondent nos. 4 to 9, 11, 13, 14 to 17, 19 to 21, 23, 24 and 27. She seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama and thereafter four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. The respondent Nos.2 and 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. List again on 09.12.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4 & 5/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 08/11/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sukhadeo, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, learned standing counsel for the State of Maharashtra shall obtain instructions from the competent authority of the State Government whether the shoes manufactured by the petitioner-Sanstha be supplied to the schools at 60% of the

2 rate that the petitioner had quoted to the Corporation, Respondent No.7 herein. Needless to say, such supply and payment of money shall be without prejudice to the contentions to be raised by the petitioners as well as by the respondents. Let the matter be listed on 15.11.2016. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

tITEM NO.33 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13684/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2016in WP No. 11334/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)VIJAY ZUMBAR MORE Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent and permission to file additional documents and vacating interim order and interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 19086/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 28781/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 08/11/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kharde,Adv.Mr. Rahul Joshi,Adv.Mr. Vinay Navare,Adv.Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay Navare,Adv.Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv.Mr. Makarand D.Adkar,Adv.Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.Ms. Aparna Jha,Adv.Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma,Adv.1UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLeave granted.Interim order granted earlier, to continue. (Anita Malhotra) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master2

LISTED ON : 07.11.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.:09                             ITEM NO.:04                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14990 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for vacating stay) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS  ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD           ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29th August 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: " In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent seeking adjournment for filing counter affidavit, four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. " I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to aforesaid order, counsel for the sole respondent has filed counter­affidavit and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioners has not filed rejoinder­affidavit to the counter­affidavit filed by the respondent. It is lastly submitted that Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate has filed an application for vacating stay which is registered as I. A. No. 3 and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. Service of notice is complete. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 28th day of October, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar , Advoc ate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

&ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay)USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief, application for vacation of stay and office report)Date : 07/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa,Adv.Mr. Prashant F. Goudar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv.Ms. Amrita Singh, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter circulated by learned counsel forthe petitioners seeking adjournment, matter is adjournedfor four weeks.Reply to I.A. No.3 be filed in the meanwhile. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 28.10.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  2                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   41 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 10075 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   07.10.2016, with an office report dated 05.10.2016, when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “List on 28.10.2016.” There are 4 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted that Service of Show Cause Notice is complete on all the   respondents, but no one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 3   and 4. It is submitted that Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Counsel for the Petitioner has   on with the leave of the Court 26.10.2016 filed Rejoinder Affidavit to the Counter   Affidavit of Respondent No. 2 with the permission of the Hon'ble Court and the same   is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 27 th   day of October , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:        Mr. P. K. Singh, Advocate.    Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

SECTION – III  B          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)  No. 13671 OF  2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Medical Council of India  …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26 th  August 2016 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “No one is present on behalf of the Union of India. We have been informed that nobody was present even in the Registrar Court. The Central Agency will take note of this and engage an advocate on behalf of the Union of India. In the meanwhile, therewill be a stay of the demand as against the petitioner.” It is submitted that Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has on 30 th  August 2016 filed  Vakalatnama/ Appearance and Counter Affidavit on beahlf of both the Respondents.  Copies of Counter Affidavit have been included in SLP Paper Books.  The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 2 nd  Day of September, 2016. Sd/­ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ 1. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,  Advocate House No. F­12, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi   2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

PITEM NO.64 COURT NO.7 SECTION III B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13671/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/04/2016in WP No. 3454/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 28/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narasimha, ASGMr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Adv.Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv.Mr. C. Mukund, Adv.Mr. Anurag, Adv.Mr. S.M. Vivek Anandh, Adv.Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter circulated by learned counsel for thepetitioner, list the matter after ten weeks.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13696/2016 M/S. HOTEL TRAMBOO CONTINENTAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 26/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 5 for filing counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court immediately after the expiry of the period of four weeks, irrespective of the fact whether counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5 is filed or not, as further opportunity is deemed to be declined. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ðITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10004/2016DEEPAK KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOVT. OF U.P LUCKNOW (U.P) AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 10006/2016Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10008/2016Office Report) SLP(C) No. 10005/2016Office Report)Date : 26/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Danish Zubair Khan,Adv. Mr. Krishna M. Singh, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks&#39; time, as last opportunity, is granted to therespondents in all the matters for filing counter affidavit.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon&#39;ble Court immediately after the expiry of the period offour weeks, irrespective of the fact whether counter affidaviton behalf of all the respondents is filed or not, as furtheropportunity is deemed to be declined. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 4 & 5 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 24/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Rohit Suhdevo, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let the matter be listed on 8.11.2016 as prayed for by Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel for the State. He has assured that the State shall take appropriate steps as suggested by this Court. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 4 & 5 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report)Date : 24/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv.Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv.Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Rohit Suhdevo, Adv.Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv.Mr. Sidharth Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLet the matter be listed on 8.11.2016 as prayed for by Mr.Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel for the State. He hasassured that the State shall take appropriate steps as suggested bythis Court.(Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

MATTER FOR:21.10.2016                       COURT NO.R­2                  ITEM NO.69 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     10066/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS.   ...PETITIONERS                             VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 07.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­    “One weeks' time as last chance is given to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to serve the copy of the pleadings on the respondent No. 1 and the said respondent shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No. 2 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No. 3, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time as last chance is also given to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No. 4.  List the matter again on 21.10.2016.” It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 9.9.2016 filed proof of service to serve the copy  of pleadings to the counsel for respondent No. 1. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have not filed the counter affidavit so far. AD Card duly signed has been received back in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance so far. Fresh Show Cause Notice was issued to respondent No. 4 but same is awaited.  Service is not complete on respondent no. 4. T he matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. Dated this the 20 th  day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:    1. Mr. Sanjay Kuamr Tyagi , Adv.   2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.   3. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Adv.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

MATTER FOR 16.12.2013                    COURT NO. 8                             ITEM NO. 67 SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 22480/2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF UP & ORS  ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS MAHENDRA ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11.11.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “List the matter after a week.”  It is submitted that Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Counsel for the Sole Respondent has on 12­11­2013 filed the Counter Affidavit. Copy of the same has been included in the paper books. Service is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 13th day of December, 2013.                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/am/OR

MATTER FOR 11.11.2013        COURT  NO. 10           ITEM NO. 15  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 22480 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF UP & ORS. ...PETITIONER VERSUS MAHENDRA ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 7.10.2013, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ "In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent seeking adjournment for filing the counter affidavit, matter is adjourned for four weeks."  It is submitted that counsel for the sole respondent has not filed Counter Affidavit in view of his letter dated 4­10­2013 so far. Service is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 1st day of November, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/sk/F.OR.

MATTER FOR 7.10.2013        COURT  NO. 10           ITEM NO. 14  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 22480 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF UP & ORS. ...PETITIONER VERSUS MAHENDRA ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.07.2013, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ "Issue notice."  It is submitted that accordingly show cause notice was issued to sole Respondent on 1.8.2013. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. has filed Vakalatnama & memo of appearance on behalf of sole Respondent but not filed Counter Affidavit so far. Service is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 5th day of October, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/sk/F.OR.

LISTED ON : 21.10.2016                               BEFORE COURT NO.:   08         ITEM NO.:67        SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 13684 AND 19086  OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for deletion of Respondent No.7 in SLP(C) NO.13684 of 2016) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 4 AND 5 (Applications for vacating interim relief and permission to filed additional documents in SLP (C) No. 13684 of 2016) VIJAY KUMAR MORE ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.       ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19th September, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: "Since the respondents in the connected matter i.e. SLP (C) No. 19086 of 2016 are served, service be treated as complete in SLP (C) No. 13684 of 2016 also. List on 29.09.2016." It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 4 has filed applications for vacating interim relief and permission to file additional documents which are registered as I. A. Nos. 4 and 5 and the same are being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. Service of notice is complete. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 18th day of October, 2016.                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr.Rahul Joshi, Advocate  Ms.Abha R. Sharma,Advocate.            Ms. Aparna Jha,Advocate. Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate  L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10066/2016 SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 21/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.3 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.1 to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 4. List again on 23.11. 2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016 in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUS A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 (with Office Report) Date : 21/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. H. S. Jois, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Adv. Mr. Krutin R. Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R. S. Hegde, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post the matters in the first week of February, 2017 on a non-miscellaneous day. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar

|ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10066/2016SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBHINYA RAM AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 21/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 has failed to file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent No.3 but noone has entered appearance on his behalf.Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondentNo.1 to file the counter affidavit.Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent No. 4.List again on 23.11. 2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

HITEM NO.67 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13684/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2016 in WP No. 11334/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)VIJAY ZUMBAR MORE Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent and interim relief and office report)I.A. Nos. 4 and 5 (Applications for vacating interim relief and permission to file additional documents)WITHSLP(C) No. 19086/2016Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 28781/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Date : 21/10/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kharde, Adv. Mr. Rahul Joshi,Adv. Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Gwen Karthika, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Makarand D. Adkar, Adv. Mr. Amit Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Abdul Gaffar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek yadav, Adv. Ms. Aparna Jha,Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma,Adv.-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList these matters on 8 th November, 2016 as Item No.1 onthe Board. [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [RENU DIWAN] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.83 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10082/2016 MOZZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.5 has been served by post as well as by dasti notice, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent Nos.1-3 and 4 have already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

BITEM NO.83 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10082/2016MOZZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 20/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent No.5 has been served by post as well as bydasti notice, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.The respondent Nos.1-3 and 4 have already filed the counteraffidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listingbefore the Hon&#39;ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

SECTION IV­B IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL ) NO. 11340 OF 2016 WITH  INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned Order) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for permission to produce additional document and to urge additional facts and grounds) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for deletion of the names of proforma respondent Nos. 5 to 122 from the array of parties) GURMEET SINGH AND ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.                    ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The SLP (C)...CC No. 7054 of 2016 was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18 th  April, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Permission to file special leave petition is granted.  Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay, prayer for interim relief and the special leave petition.  Respondent Nos. 5 to 122 being performa respondents , no need to serve notice on them.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the Respondents except Respondent Nos. 5 to 122  through registered A. D. Post. Neither A. D. Cards nor unserved covers have been received back so far.  Service of show cause notice is incomplete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report.  Dated this the 18 th  Day of October, 2016.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 17.10.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  11                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   6     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 15866 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTS & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   14.09.2016, with an office report dated 10.09.2016 when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “ In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the  respondents for seeking adjournment of the matter to enable  him to file Counter affidavit. List after four weeks.”  There are 3 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted that Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Counsel for Respondent No. 1   and M/s Anuradha & Associates, Advocates, for Respondent No. 3 have not filed   Counter Affidavit on their behalf so far. No one has entered appearance on behalf of   Respondent No. 2 so far.  The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 07 th   day of October, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate. M/s Anuradha & Associates, Advocates. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15866/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016 in SAD No. 135/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 17/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prabhat Kr. Rai, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anuradha D. Mishra, Adv. M/s Anuradha & Associates,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for three weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. List the matter after three weeks. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

$ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos.4 & 5 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14678/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay)SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS Petitioner(s)AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(For directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date : 17/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv.Ms. Gwen Karthika, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Adv.Mr. Sandeep Kir. Dwivedi, Adv.Mr. Umesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AORMr. Rohit S., Adv.Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv.Mr. Siddharth Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList the matter on 24 th October, 2016.(Chetan Kumar)Court Master (H.S. Parasher)Court Master

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 07.10.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  2                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   48 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 10075 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   02.09.2016, with an office report dated 06.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “ Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner  seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit.  Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks.  Stand over to 7.10.2016.” There are 4 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Mr. M.R.   Shamshad, Advocate has on 01.07.2016 filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance   & Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 and the same has  been  included   in the paper books.  Service of show cause notice is complete but no one has entered appearance   on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 so far. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Rejoinder Affidavit   so far.  The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 05 th   day of October , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:        Mr. P. K. Singh, Advocate.    Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10075/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015 in WC No. 59470/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta,Adv. Mr. S. Bajpai,Adv. Ms. Shakun S. Shukla,Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Geeta Luthra,Sr.Adv. Mr . M. R. Shamshad,Adv. Ms. Shiwani Lohia,Adv. Mr. Aditya Samaddar,Adv. Ms. Harshita Deshwal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 28.10.2016. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

äITEM NO.48 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10075/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015in WC No. 59470/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 07/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta,Adv.Mr. S. Bajpai,Adv.Ms. Shakun S. Shukla,Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Geeta Luthra,Sr.Adv.Mr . M. R. Shamshad,Adv.Ms. Shiwani Lohia,Adv.Mr. Aditya Samaddar,Adv.Ms. Harshita Deshwal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList on 28.10.2016. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :6/10/2016 COURT No. :R­2 ITEM No.  :76 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10082 of 2016 (With Prayer for Interim Relief) MOZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN ... Petitioner Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT  The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 29/08/2016 when he was pleased to pass the following Order:­ “ Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have already filed the counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.4 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.    Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks.    Dasti   in   addition   is   permitted   to be   served   through   the   Ld.   Standing   Counsel representing   the  Union of India . List again on 6.10. 2016. ” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 19/09/2016 to Respondent No. 5 by registered AD post. Delivery report has been received with the remarks “Delivered” on behalf of Respondent No. 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf so far.  It is submitted that Mr. Rauf Rahim, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 1/09/2016 filed proof of service after serving the copy of SLP to Respondent No. 5 but he has not filed Affidavit of service in respect of Respondent No. 5. Service of notice is complete as per Delivery report. It is further submitted that Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate has on 4/10/2016 filed Counter­affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 4.

­2­ The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 5 th  day of October, 2016. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­   Mr. Rauf Rahim, Advocate Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate   Assistant Registrar AY

ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10082/2016 MOZZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 06/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv. Ms. Poulami Das Dey, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. Mr. Sukesh Ghosh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed the counter affidavit. Respondent no.4 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent no.5, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the Rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS

tITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10082/2016MOZZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUSHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 06/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv. Ms. Poulami Das Dey, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran,Adv. Mr. Sukesh Ghosh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRespondent nos. 1 to 3 have already filed the counteraffidavit. Respondent no.4 has failed to file the counter affidavitwithin the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice iscomplete on the respondent no.5, but no one has entered appearanceon his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed forlisting before the Hon&#39;ble Court under the Rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarPS

âITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15005/2016SURENDRAN M. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUMESHA V. AND ANR. Respondent(s)Date : 05/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. N. Bhat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Aniruddha Thakur,Adv. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RService of notice is complete on the respondent No.1, but noone has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent No.2 hasalready filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shallbe processed for listing before the Hon&#39;ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:  03.10.2016   COURT NO.:  R­2   ITEM NO. :  85 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10077 of 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) SANJAY KR.GUPTA & ANR.    ...Petitioner(s) Versus TETARI DEVI & ORS.           ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before Hon'ble court on 8.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned.  Issue notice.” Accordingly show­cause notice was issued on 23.04.2016 to the all the twenty one respondents through registered AD post.  Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4 but he has not filed counter­affidavit, so far.  AD card duly signed has been received back from respondent Nos. 8­9, 11­12, 14, 16­19 and 21, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf, so far.  Neither AD card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from respondent No.10, so far. It is submitted that unserved cover containing notice has been received back with remarks “dead”, “refused” and “not reside” in respect of respondent nos. 1­2, 6 & 20, 5 & 13 and 3 & 15 and  postal remarks “incomplete address” in respect of Respondent No.7. C ounsel was informed vide registry letter dated 27.4.2016 and 6.6.2016 to take steps of the aforesaid respondents. But counsel has not done the needful, so far.  Service of notice is incomplete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.  Dated this the 29 th  day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Manish Kr. Saran, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar, advocate     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P/J

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos.4 & 5/2016 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN Petitioner(s) VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (For directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 03/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Mr. Gwen K.B. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Chingle, Adv. Mr. Keshav Ranjan, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv. Mr. Rohit, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let the matter be listed on 17 th October, 2016. We would like that the competent authorities of State of Maharashtra, the respondent No.7 and the petitioner-Society shall meet in the meantime and try to arrive at a consensus. We have said so as in course of hearing we come to know that a piquant situation has been created by the respondents. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (H.S. Parasher) Court Master

1 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016 in CMP No. 200002/2015 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Kalaburagi) M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE)Respondent(s) (for stay and office report) Date : 03/10/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Vemulapali Prasad Rao, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. K. Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Anil Seth, Adv. Ms. Shefali Mitra, Adv. Mr. Udit Seth, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA no. 2/2016 has been filed with the prayer as follows:- “In view of the submissions made hereinabove, it is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to kindly: a) grant stay of the appointment of Mr. S.P.S. Jain as the Presiding Arbitrator in the arbitral proceedings connected with the present special leave petition;

2 b) grant stay of the consequent Arbitral proceedings; c) pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” Heard learned counsel for the parties. We direct that there shall be interim stay of the arbitration proceedings pursuant to the judgment under appeal. IA no. 2/2016 stands disposed of accordingly. Leave granted. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

LISTED ON : 30.09.2016                 BEFORE COURT NO.: 13                                 ITEM NO.:07       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for extension of time) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10477 OF 2016 SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ JBF INDUSTRIES LTD                     ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT  The I. A. No. 1 (Application for extension of time) in the SLP above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26th August, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ " Heard learned counsel for the parties.  While dismissing petitioner's special leave petition no. 10477/2016 on 29.04.2016, this court granted two months' time to deposit the required amount as per High Court's order.  This Interlocutory Application was filed on 29.06.2016 seeking extension of the time, if possible by four months.  The petitioner is desirous of depositing the amount by disposing some properties situated at Raipur for which permission of the High Court will be required and for that petitioner is taking steps.  As prayed for, four weeks' time is granted to the petitioner.  Post the matter after four weeks.  " It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that no document have been filed by counsel for the petitioner so far. The application in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 28th day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya, Advocate Mr. Vivek A. Vasi, Advocate L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

\202ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 IN PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S).15402/2016(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 04/12/2015IN CRP NO. 3491/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATHYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH)N. BALAKRISHNA PETITIONER(S) VERSUSMUKUNDLAL KHIRAIYA RESPONDENT(S)(FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND OFFICE REPORT)Date : 30/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANTFor parties: Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Adv.Mr. Vyom Raghuvanshi, Adv.Mr. Azmat H. Amanullah, Adv.Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. Ms. Divya Roy, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RHeard the learned counsel for the applicant andperused the relevant material.I.A. No.2 of 2016 for extension of time isdismissed. [VINOD LAKHINA]COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI]COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13934/2016 RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 28/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr. Santosh Prasad, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that he has not been supplied with the copy of the paperbooks so far. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of one week serve the copy of the paperbooks on the Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1 and he shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks thereafter, as a last chance. Four weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to file the counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners shall furnish the fresh particulars of the respondent nos. 11 and 15 within a period of four weeks, as a last chance and take f resh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. Contd....2/-

Item No. 84 - 2 - F resh steps for the service of notice to the other unserved respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Respondent nos. 5, 6, 8, 12, 14 and 23 have been served, but there is no appearance on their behalf. List again on 10.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar PS

BITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13934/2016RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 28/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr. Santosh Prasad, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLd. Counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that he has notbeen supplied with the copy of the paperbooks so far. Ld. Counselfor the petitioners shall within a period of one week serve thecopy of the paperbooks on the Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1and he shall file the counter affidavit within a period of fourweeks thereafter, as a last chance. Four weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to therespondent nos. 2 and 3 to file the counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners shall furnish the freshparticulars of the respondent nos. 11 and 15 within a period offour weeks, as a last chance and take f resh steps for the serviceof notice to them within the same period. Contd....2/-Item No. 84 - 2 -F resh steps for the service of notice to the other unservedrespondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioners within a period of four weeks.Respondent nos. 5, 6, 8, 12, 14 and 23 have been served, butthere is no appearance on their behalf. List again on 10.11.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarPS

Listed On: 27.09.2016 Before Court No. Item No. SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No.15008 /2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Nos. 1-4 AND 5 (Applications for permission to file SLP and condonation of delay in filing SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Nos. 6, 7 AND 8 (Applications for impleadment to implead the applicants as party petitioners ) Billingda Lapang & Ors. ...PETITIONERS Versus State of Meghalaya & Ors. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 26.08.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice to Respondent Nos.3 to 6 through Speed Post, returnable on 27.09.2016. Issue notice in I.A. Nos.6, 7 & 8 also through Speed Post, returnable on 27.09.2016. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 2. Ms. Gunjan Sinha, learned counsel, waives notice on behalf of Respondent No. 3. Mr. Rishi Motaliya, learned counsel, waives notice on behalf of Respondent Nos.4 & 5. Let notice be issued to rest of the respondent(s). The respondents shall file their counter affidavit two weeks before the next date of hearing. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing. The Registrar, High Court of Meghalaya shall forward the entire record pertaining to W.P. (C) No.164 of 2015 to this Court within four weeks. ” It is submitted that as directed above, show cause notice to Respondent No. 6 was issued on 15.09.2016 by speed post. Notice has been delivered at GPO Shillong as per Speed Post tracking system. Show cause notice to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 through Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, M/s. M.V. Kini and Mr. Rishi

Matoliya, Advocate was issued on 15.09.2016. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate has already filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Advocate has on 21.09.2016 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. M/s. M.V. Kini, Advocates have not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 so far. It is further submitted that original record pertaining to W.P. (C) No. 164/2015 is available for the reference of Hon’ble Court. Service is complete. The matter alongwith applications above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 26 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. 2. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv. 3. Mr. Prithvi Pal, Adv. 4. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/Avi

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15008/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2015 in WPC No.164/2015 passed by the High Court Of Meghalya At Shilong) BILLINDA LAPANG AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP, c/delay in filing SLP and impleadment and and office report) Date : 27/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv. Mr. Prithvi Pal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Not taken up. List on 18 th October, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ÜITEM NO.22 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15008/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2015 in WPC No.164/2015 passed by the High Court Of Meghalya At Shilong)BILLINDA LAPANG AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP, c/delay in filing SLP and impleadment and and office report)Date : 27/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv.Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv.Mr. Prithvi Pal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNot taken up.List on 18 th October, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

LISTED ON : 26.09.2016                 BEFORE COURT NO.: 6                                 ITEM NO.:11       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.4 (Application for direction filed by Mr.Chandra Prakash,Advocate ) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13032 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF NEOTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY     ....PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION                  ...RESPONDENT     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10th May, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ "Exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment granted. Issue notice. Dasti in addition, is permitted". It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that there is sole­respondent in this matter. Mr Harish Pandey,Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/appearance and Counter affidavit on behalf of sole­respondent and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court.. Service of notice is complete. It is further submitted that Mr.Chandra Prakash, Advocate has filed  an application for directions which is registered as I.A.No.4.  The Application in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to: Mr.Chandra Prakash, Advocate L Mr.Harish Pandey,Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTING ON 26.09.2016 COURT NO. 4 ITEM NO. 8 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for Stay) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15004 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for placing on record additional documents) AND WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for bring on record additional documents) AND WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5 (Application for permission to file additional documents as Annexure R1 To R15) M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ...PETITIONER -VERSUS- RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The interlocutory application No. 2(Application for stay) in the matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.09.2016 with an office report dated 05.09.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List the matter on 26 th September, 2016.” It is submitted that Mr. G Ramakrishna Prasad counsel for the petitioner has on 14.09.2016 filed an application for placing on record additional documents with annexure P 24 to P 27. The same is registered as I.A. No. 3. Copy of the same is being circulated for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that Mr. G Ramakrishna Prasad counsel for the petitioner has on 17.09.2016 filed an application for permission to bring on record additional documents with annexure P 28 to P 33. The same is registered as I.A. No. 4. Copy of the same is being circulated for perusal of the Hon'ble Court.

It is submitted that Mr. S.K. Dhingra counsel for the respondent has on 21.09.2016 filed counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent alongwith application for permission to file additional documents with annexure R1 to R15. Counsel has stated in his para 18 that documents mentioned in counter affidavit are part of the record of Court below except the facts mentioned in Para 8-16 and the annexure marked as R-5, R-7, R-10 to R-15 with regard for which seperate application is being filed. The application is registered as I.A. No. 5. Copies of the counter affidavit and application are being circulated for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. Service of show cause notice is complete. The interlocutory application for stay in the matter above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 24 th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Advocate Mr. S.K. Dhingra, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RJ/-

MATTER FOR : 26.09.2016 COURT NO. 9 ITEM NO.11 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10022 OF 2016 KAUSHALIYA PETITIONER VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 05.09.2016, when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, matter stands adjourned for three weeks.” It is submitted that pursuant to Advocate's letter dated 02.09.2016 counsel for the petitioner has on 21.09.2016 filed rejoinder affidavit with prior permission of the Hon'ble Court. Copy of the same is circulated to the Hon'ble Court. Service is complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 23 rd day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Aishwarya Bhati , Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR `2/db/OR

LISTED ON : 26.09.2016                         BEFORE COURT NO.: 3                              ITEM NO.:6       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.4 and 5 (Application for direction and exemption from filing O.T. filed by Ms.Abha R.Sharma,Advocate) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14678 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. ....PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.                ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 25th May 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: "Issue notice returnable within four weeks". It is submitted submitted that there are seven respondents in this matter.Mr.Nishant  R. Katneshwarkar and Mr.Y.P. Dhingra,Advocates have filed Vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 7 respectively but counter affidavit not filed. Service of notice is complete. It is further submitted that Ms. Abha R. Sharma, counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for direction and exemption from filing O.T. which are registered as I.A.Nos.4 and5. The Applications in the matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 24th    day of September, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms.Abha R.Sharma, Advocate  Mr. Y.P. Dhingra,,Advocate.            Mr.Nishant R.Katneshwarkar,Advocate.           ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos.4 & 5/2016 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS Petitioner(s) AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (For directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 26/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 3 rd October, 2016, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the State. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (H.S. Parasher) Court Master

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016 in CMP No. 200002/2015 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi) M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE) Respondent(s) (For stay and office report) Date : 26/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Vemullapalli Prasadrao, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Wasay Khan, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. K. Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Anil Seth, Adv. Ms. Shefali Mitra, Adv. Mr. Brahm Shankar Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 03.10.2016. [JYOTI GUPTA ] [RAJINDER KAUR] SR. PA COURT MASTER

xITEM NO.8 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016in CMP No. 200002/2015 passed by the High Court of Karnataka atKalaburagi)M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE) Respondent(s)(For stay and office report)Date : 26/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Vemullapalli Prasadrao, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Wasay Khan, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. K. Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Anil Seth, Adv. Ms. Shefali Mitra, Adv. Mr. Brahm Shankar Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList the matter on 03.10.2016. [JYOTI GUPTA ] [RAJINDER KAUR] SR. PA COURT MASTER

\210ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan AtJodhpur)KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUSJODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s)(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)Date : 26/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Gopal, Adv. Ms. Eshita Kapur, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv. Tanuja Patra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList after three weeks as prayed for by the learned counsel for the respondents(Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XVI   LISTED ON:    COURT NO.: Chambers   ITEM NO. :  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) CC NO. 10304 of 2016 (With prayer for interim­relief) RAJENDRA PARSAD ...Petitioner() Versus KHEDU RAI AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS The matter above­mentioned  was listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chambers on 04.07.2016 when his Lordship was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay in refiling is condoned, subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs. 1,000/­,  by way of costs, to the credit of supreme Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks from today. Registry to proceed with the matter accordingly.” It submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 12.08.2016 deposited the cost of Rs. 1000/­ and he has on 17.8.2016 filed proof of payment of the cost. The same is barred by time by 25 days. But counsel for the petitioner has not filed application for condonation of delay in depositing the same.  The office­report for directions is listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chamber.    Dated this the 6 th  day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Shantanu Sagar , Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016 SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment and interim relief and office report) Date : 23/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 7 for filing counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court immediately after four weeks irrespective of the fact whether counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 7 is filed or not. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ÜITEM NO.74 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10396/2016THE CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSARVIND KUMAR THAKUR AND ANR Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report)Date : 23/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Gunjan Sinha Jain,Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ramesh K Mishra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.1to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on therespondent No.2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.List the matter before the Hon&#39;ble Court as per rules after expiryof four weeks. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

`ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment and interim relief and office report)Date : 23/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks&#39; time, as last opportunity, is granted torespondent Nos.1 to 7 for filing counter affidavit.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon&#39;ble Court immediately after four weeks irrespective of thefact whether counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1to 7 is filed or not. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

fITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13032/2016NEOTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Petitioner(s) VERSUSALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for directions and permission to file synopsis andlist of dates and placing addl. facts and documents on record and interim relief and office report)Date : 20/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shashank Shikhar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSole respondent has already filed counter affidavit.The matter stands complete.Registry to process the same for being listed before theHon&#39;ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ðITEM NO.5 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13684/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2016in WP No. 11334/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)VIJAY ZUMBAR MORE Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 19086/2016(with Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 19/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Gwen Karthika, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kharde, Adv. Mr. Rahul Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Makarand D. Adkar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. Ms. Aparna Jha, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Adv.UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since the respondents in the connected matter i.e. SLP (C)No. 19086 of 2016 are served, service be treated as complete inSLP (C) No. 13684 of 2016 also. List on 29.09.2016.(Jayant Kumar Arora)Court Master (Renu Diwan)Assistant Registrar

LISTING ON 14.09.2016 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 4 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 15427 & 15454 OF 2016 R.A. NAGENDRANATH ...PETITIONER -VERSUS- A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. ETC ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22.08.2016 with office report dated 17.08.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “ Post these matters after two weeks. In the meantime, rejoinder affidavit may be filed. ” It is submitted that Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocate has on 24.08.2016 filed Vakalatnama/Memo of appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 2 in SLP(C) No. 15454/2016. Copy of counter affidavit is being circulated for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not filed rejoinder affidavit in both the matters so far. Service of show cause notice in both matters is complete. The matters above mentioned are, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 9 th day of September, 2016 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR -RJ

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 14.09.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  13                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   5     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 15866 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTS & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   22.08.2016, with an office report dated 17.08.2016 when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “ Two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to  effect service on unserved respondents.  List after two weeks.” There are 3 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted that Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh & Ms. Anuradha & Associates,   Advocates have put in appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 respectively   but have not filed Counter Affidavit so far. Show Cause Notice issued to Respondent   No. 2 by newly intorduced Bar Coding System on 01.09.2016. As per India Post   delivery report the notice has been dispatched to Sathion.(Copy enclosed). The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 10 th   day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Advocate. M/s Anuradha & Associates, Advocates. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ITEM NO.110 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13446/2016 RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 14/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ambarish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Shashank Mishra,Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the sole respondent has already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016 in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad) R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUS A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 (With Office Report) Date : 14/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. Mr. Krutin R. Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Hegde, Adv. Mr. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post after two weeks. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

øITEM NO.4 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court of KarnatakaCircuit Bench at Dharwad)R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUSA.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)WITHSLP(C) No. 15454/2016(With Office Report)Date : 14/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. Mr. Krutin R. Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Hegde, Adv. Mr. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPost after two weeks. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.110 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13446/2016RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 14/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ambarish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Shashank Mishra,Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe office report is that the sole respondent has alreadyfiled the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon&#39;ble Court under the rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

LISTING ON 09.09.2016 COURT NO. 5 ITEM NO. 7 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for Stay) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15004 OF 2016 M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ...PETITIONER -VERSUS- RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent on 23.05.2016 by Registered A.D. Post. Mr. S.K. Dhingra, Advocate has on 06.09.2016 filed memo of appearance/vakalatnama on behalf of the sole respondent, but no counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the sole respondent, so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 13.08.2016 filed an Application for Stay. Same has been registered as I.A. No. 2 and included in the Paper Books. The application (I.A. No. 2) in the matter above mentioned is, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 5 th day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Advocate Mr. S.K. Dhingra, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016 in CMP No. 200002/2015 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Kalaburagi) M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE)Respondent(s) (for stay and office report) Date : 09/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Vemulapalli Prasad Rao, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Wasay Khan, Adv. Mr. Bharat J. Joshi, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Anil Seth, Adv. Ms. Shefali Mitra, Adv. Mr. Udit Seth, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 26 th September, 2016. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

NITEM NO.7 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 2/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/01/2016in CMP No. 200002/2015 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Kalaburagi)M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE)Respondent(s)(for stay and office report)Date : 09/09/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Vemulapalli Prasad Rao, Adv.Mr. Mohd. Wasay Khan, Adv.Mr. Bharat J. Joshi, Adv.Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Dhingra, Adv.Mr. Anil Seth, Adv.Ms. Shefali Mitra, Adv.Mr. Udit Seth, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList the matter on 26 th September, 2016.(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

MATTER FOR: 07.09.2016 COURT NO. R-1 ITEM NO. 81 SECTION - XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10066 OF 2016 SMT. SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. ....PETITIONERS VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS. ....RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 27.07.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “Mr. Ankit Acharya, Ld. Counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent No. 1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the copy of pleadings to the said respondent within one week after filing the vakalatnama. The respondent No. 2 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No. 3, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No. 4 within four weeks. Issue notice thereupon. List the matter again on 007.09.2016.” It is submitted that Mrs. Pratiksha Sharma, Advocate has on 02.08.2016 filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 but counter affidavit has not been filed so far. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed proof of service to serve the copy of pleadings to the counsel for respondent No. 1. Counsel for respondent No. 2 has not filed counter affidavit so far. AD cards duly signed has been received back in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps in respect of respondent No. 4 so far. Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 4. The matter above-mentioned is listed before Ld. Registrar Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 5 th September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/s/off report/m.doc.

MATTER FOR : 05.09.2016 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 7 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10022 OF 2016 KAUSHALIYA PETITIONER VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.08.2016, when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “Rejoinder be filed within two weeks. List immediately thereafter.” It is submitted that Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Advocate has on 31.08.2016 filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of all the three respondents after taking 'No Objection' from the erstwhile advocate Mr. T. Mahipal. Copy of the counter affidavit is circulated herewith. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed rejoinder affidavit so far. Service is complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 2 nd day of September, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Aishwarya Bhati , Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR `2/db/OR

LISTED ON : 05.09.2016 COURT NO : 5 ITEM NO. 17 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 15425 of 2016 DEVENDER SINGH ... PETITIONER VERSUS DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 01.03.2016 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in WP (C) No. 1756 of 2016. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed undertaking letter on 26.05.2016 to file copy of Orders dated 23.05.2014 and 31.10.2014. Instead of filing above undertaking documents he has given a letter dated 02.06.2016 stating that these documents are not available and not relevant for adjudication and the same was listed before the Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers on 26.08.2016, when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following Order :- "In view of the stand taken by the counsel for the petitioner in his letter dated 02.08.2016, for the present he is exempted from filing the copies of order dated 23.5.2014 and 31.10.2014." The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. Lib-2, SCI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-3/NK

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jodhpur) KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Ms. Eshita Kapur, Adv. Ms. Anshul Sharma, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. T. Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Anil Kumar Tandal, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, matter stands adjourned for three weeks. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14703/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in CMM No.1065/2010 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) EKTA MITTAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT MITTAL Respondent(s) Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv. For Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though served, nobody appears for the respondent. In the interest of justice, hearing is adjourned. List the matter on 30 th September, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14703/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in CMM No.1065/2010 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) EKTA MITTAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT MITTAL Respondent(s) Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv. For Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though served, nobody appears for the respondent. In the interest of justice, hearing is adjourned. List the matter on 30 th September, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15425/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2016 in WPC No. 1756/2016 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) DEVENDER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Ms. Neelam Dhaka, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The impugned order is an order by which the High Court declined to interfere with a show cause notice to the petitioner proposing to terminate his services. As of today, the petitioner's service stood terminated. In the circumstances, we do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue such remedies as are available to him with respect to final order of termination. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan AtJodhpur)KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUSJODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report)Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Ms. Eshita Kapur, Adv. Ms. Anshul Sharma, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. T. Mukherjee, Adv.Ms. Anil Kumar Tandal, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, matter stands adjourned for three weeks. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

®ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14703/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in CMM No.1065/2010 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)EKTA MITTAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT MITTAL Respondent(s)Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Kumar,Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv.For Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThough served, nobody appears for the respondent.In the interest of justice, hearing is adjourned.List the matter on 30 th September, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

®ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14703/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in CMM No.1065/2010 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)EKTA MITTAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSRAJAT MITTAL Respondent(s)Date : 05/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Kumar,Adv.Mr. Rakesh Kumar,Adv.For Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThough served, nobody appears for the respondent.In the interest of justice, hearing is adjourned.List the matter on 30 th September, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :29/08/2016 COURT No. :R­2 ITEM No.  :106 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10082 of 2016 (With Prayer for Interim Relief) MOZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN ... Petitioner Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT  The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 18/07/2016 when he was pleased to pass the following Order:­ “ Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have already filed the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 5. List again on 29.8.2016.” It is submitted that Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate has on 26/08/2016 filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate has not filed Counter­affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 4, so far. Neither AD card nor unserved registered cover containing notice has been received back from the Respondent No. 5 so far.  Service of notice is incomplete on behalf of Respondent No. 5. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 27 th  day of August, 2016. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­   Mr. Rauf Rahim, Advocate Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate   Assistant Registrar AY

LISTED ON : 29.08.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.:10                             ITEM NO.:05                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14990 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS  ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD           ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 05th July 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: " Issue notice.  In the meantime, there shall be stay of operation and implementation of the impugned Judgment. " I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is sole respondent in the instant matter. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent by registered A. D. post. Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of the sole respondent after taking 'No Objection' from the erstwhile advocate, Ms. Shweta Garg but he has not filed counter­affidavit so far. Service of notice is complete. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 26th day of August, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar , Advoc ate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTED ON : 29.08.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.:11                             ITEM NO.:09                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15874 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF GEETABAI  ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ SAVITA            ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 08th July 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: " Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.  In the meantime, status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained. " I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is sole respondent in the instant matter. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent by registered A. D. post. A. D. card duly signed has been received back from the sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on its behalf so far. Service of notice is not complete. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 26th day of August, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. R. P. Goyal, Advocate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15874/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/03/2016 in SA No. 178/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) GEETABAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAVITA Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 29/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Sole respondent has been duly served as the AD card signed by her has been received back. However, nobody has entered appearance on her behalf. To await appearance, list the matter after two weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

ðITEM NO.5 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report)Date : 29/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa,Adv.Mr. Prashant F.Goudar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv.Ms. Amrita Singh,Adv.Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter circulated by learned counsel forthe respondent seeking adjournment for filing counteraffidavit, four weeks&#39; time is granted for filing counteraffidavit.Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed withinfour weeks thereafter. (Anita Malhotra) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Assistant Registrar

LISTING ON 26.08.2016 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 1 SEC.IVA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 13689 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for interim relief of stay of the impugned Judgment) Prabhavati And Anr.     ...PETITIONERS VERSUS Mandakini W/o Mohan Patil    ... RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 04.07.2016 with an office report dated 01.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :   ''Post after four weeks.  In the meantime, the petitioners shall take steps to complete the service on the sole respondent.  Dasti, in addition, is permitted.'' Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 15.07.2016 by Regd. A.D. Post and dasti in addition to sole respondent. Counsel for the petitioners has not filed affidavit with proof of Dasti Service so far. It is submitted that Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate has on 22.08.2016 filed Vakalatnama/Memo of appearance on behalf of sole respondent, but has not filed counter affidavit. Service of show cause notice on sole respondent is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 24 th  day of August, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO:  Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Advocate Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR pc2

SECTION ­ III          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C)  No. 13671 OF  2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Medical Council of India  …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th  May,  2016 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file lengthy list of dates granted. Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be a stay of operation of the impugned order dated 27.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi.” Accordingly, show cause notice returnable on 11 th  July, 2016 was issued to both the Respondents through registered A.D. Post on 20 th  May, 2016.   Notice has been served on both the Respondents on 01 st  June 2016 as per report of the Postal Authorities. A copy of Notice was also sent to Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate (Standing Counsel for Union of India), but he has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the Respondnets/ Union of India so far.  It is submitted that Office Report was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 11 th  July 2016, when the following orders were passed: ...2/­

­2­ “As per the report of the Postal Department, show cause notice has been delivered on both the respondents on 1.6.2016. Service is complete but none has put in appearance. Registry to process the matter for listing before the   Hon'ble Court, as per rules.” It is further submitted Service of Notice is complete, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on beahlf of both the Respondents so far.  The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 8 th  Day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ 1. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,  Advocate House No. F­12, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi   2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, [Standing Counsel for the Union of India], Central Agency Section, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

Listed On: 26.08.2016 Before Court No. 2 Item No. 7 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No.15008 /2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Nos. 1-4 AND 5 (Applications for permission to file SLP and condonation of delay in filing SLP) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Nos. 6, 7 AND 8 (Applications for impleadment to implead the applicants as party petitioners ) Billingda Lapang & Ors. ...PETITIONERS Versus State of Meghalaya & Ors. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 04.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks from today. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. List the matter on 26 th August, 2016.” It is submitted that as directed above, Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate has on 08.08.2016 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance as well as counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Counter Affidavit has been included in SLP Paper Books. Counsel for the petitioner has on 09.08.2016 filed rejoinder affidavit alongwith application for exemption from filing official translation. He has not affixed the Court fees of Rs. 120/- for the application for exemption from filing Official Translation. However, Rejoinder Affidavit alongwith application is being circulated herewith. It is further submitted that Mr. Prithvi Pal, Advocate has on 05.08.2016 filed three separate applications for impleadment to implead the applicants as party petitioners (registered as I.A. Nos. 6, 7 and 8) and the same have been placed with SLP Paper Books.

The matter alongwith applications above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 24 th DAY OF AUGUST, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. 2. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv. 3. Mr. Prithvi Pal, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/Avi

LISTING ON 26.08.2016 BEFORE REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 93 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15004 OF 2016 M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ...PETITIONER -VERSUS- RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 23.05.2016 to sole respondent by Registered A.D. Post. Neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing show cause notice from sole respondent has been received back so far. Service of show cause notice on sole respondent is incomplete. It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 13.08.2016 filed an application for stay which is defective for the reason that Date of High Court Order mentioned in the applicaion is wrong. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Registrar Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 24 th day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.93 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016 M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE)Respondent(s) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat J. Joshi, Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Advocate-on-Record, Mr. S.K. Dhingra appears for the sole respondent. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes to cure the defects in the application for stay during the course of the day itself. If so, Registry to process under rules. List again on 30.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15005/2016 SURENDRAN M. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESHA V. AND ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. N. Bhat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List the matter again on 05.10.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15008/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2015 in WPC No. 164/2015 passed by the High Court of Meghalya at Shilong) BILLINDA LAPANG AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and impleadment and permission to file SLP and office report) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s)/ Mr. Vijay Hansaria,Sr.Adv. Applicants Mr. Shaurya Sahay,Adv. Mr. Prithvi Pal,Adv. Mr. Manish,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv RR.1 & 2 Mr. Subhro Sanyal,Adv. RR.4 & 5 Mr. Kaustav P.,Adv. Mr. Kshitish B.,Adv. Mr. Rishi Motaliya,AOR RR.3 Ms. Gunjan Sinha,Adv. For M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice to Respondent Nos.3 to 6 through Speed Post, returnable on 27.09.2016. Issue notice in I.A. Nos.6, 7 & 8 also through Speed Post, returnable on 27.09.2016. 1

Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 2. Ms. Gunjan Sinha, learned counsel, waives notice on behalf of Respondent No. 3. Mr. Rishi Motaliya, learned counsel, waives notice on behalf of Respondent Nos.4 & 5. Let notice be issued to rest of the respondent(s). The respondents shall file their counter affidavit two weeks before the next date of hearing. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing. The Registrar, High Court of Meghalaya shall forward the entire record pertaining to W.P. (C) No.164 of 2015 to this Court within four weeks. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15425/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2016 in WPC No. 1756/2016 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) DEVENDER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Respondent(s) (office report for directions) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the stand taken by the counsel for the petitioner in his letter dated 02.08.2016, for the present he is exempted from filing the copies of order dated 23.5.2014 and 31.10.2014. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13689/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2016in RSA No. 100052/2016 passed by the High Court of KarnatakaCircuit Bench at Dharwad)PRABHAVATI AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANDAKINI W/O MOHAN PATIL Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for interim relief and office report)Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Shweta Jain, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLeave granted. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.93 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15004/2016 M/S APR-VNR (JV) REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. (A GOVT. OF INDIA ENTERPRISE)Respondent(s) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat J. Joshi, Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Advocate-on-Record, Mr. S.K. Dhingra appears for the sole respondent. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes to cure the defects in the application for stay during the course of the day itself. If so, Registry to process under rules. List again on 30.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRASHI GUPTADate: 2016.08.2712:34:23 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13671/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/04/2016 in WP No. 3454/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. Mr. Amandeep Kaur, Adv. Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv. Mr. Tarun Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one is present on behalf of the Union of India. We have been informed that nobody was present even in the Registrar Court. The Central Agency will take note of this and engage an advocate on behalf of the Union of India. In the meanwhile, there will be a stay of the demand asSignature Not Verified against the petitioner.Digitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.08.2709:51:31 ISTReason: (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Ma

ster

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15008/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2015in WPC No. 164/2015 passed by the High Court of Meghalya at Shilong)BILLINDA LAPANG AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and impleadment and permission to file SLP and office report)Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s)/ Mr. Vijay Hansaria,Sr.Adv.Applicants Mr. Shaurya Sahay,Adv.Mr. Prithvi Pal,Adv.Mr. Manish,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,AdvRR.1 & 2 Mr. Subhro Sanyal,Adv.RR.4 & 5 Mr. Kaustav P.,Adv.Mr. Kshitish B.,Adv.Mr. Rishi Motaliya,AORRR.3 Ms. Gunjan Sinha,Adv.For M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIssue notice to Respondent Nos.3 to 6 through Speed Post,returnable on 27.09.2016.Issue notice in I.A. Nos.6, 7 & 8 also through Speed Post,returnable on 27.09.2016.1Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, learned counsel waives notice on behalfof Respondent No. 1 & 2.Ms. Gunjan Sinha, learned counsel, waives notice on behalf ofRespondent No. 3.Mr. Rishi Motaliya, learned counsel, waives notice on behalfof Respondent Nos.4 & 5.Let notice be issued to rest of the respondent(s).The respondents shall file their counter affidavit two weeksbefore the next date of hearing.Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed before the next date ofhearing.The Registrar, High Court of Meghalaya shall forward theentire record pertaining to W.P. (C) No.164 of 2015 to this Courtwithin four weeks. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 1/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10477/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/02/2016in AP No. 342/2014 24/02/2016 in AAN No. 463/2015 passed by theHigh Court Of Bombay)SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUSJBF INDUSTRIES LTD Respondent(s)(for extension of time and office report)Date : 26/08/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Rao N., Adv. Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Adv. Ms. Aditi Bhansali, Adv. Mr. Vivek A. Vashi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard learned counsel for the parties. While dismissing petitioner&#39;s special leave petition no.10477/2016 on 29.04.2016, this court granted two months&#39; time todeposit the required amount as per High Court&#39;s order. This Interlocutory Application was filed on 29.06.2016 seekingextension of the time, if possible by four months. The petitioner is desirous of depositing the amount bydisposing some properties situated at Raipur for which permissionof the High Court will be required and for that petitioner istaking steps. As prayed for, four weeks&#39; time is granted to the petitioner. Post the matter after four weeks. (SONALI SAUND ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

LISTED ON : 22.08.2016                 BEFORE COURT NO.:10                                 ITEM NO.:09       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13684 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF VIJAY ZUMBAR MORE   ....PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.               ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13th May, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­   " Issue notice returnable within six weeks.  The interim protection granted by the High Court will continue until further orders. " It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that there are fifteen respondents in the instant matter. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents by registered A. D. post. Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 3 but she has not filed counter­affidavit so far. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4 but counter­affidavit has not been filed so far. Neither A. D. cards nor usnerved covers have been received back from respondent Nos. 2 and 5 to 15 so far. Service of notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 2 and 5 to 15. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 17th day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Rahul Joshi , Advocate Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate  Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTED ON 22.08.2016 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 49 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 15427 & 15454 OF 2016 R.A. NAGENDRANATH ...Petitioner -Versus- A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. ETC ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.07.2016 with office report dated 01.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has yet not been promoted despite availability of vacancies. Issue notice. Respondents to file reply within the period of a month and if so, the personal appearance of respondents is dispensed with. Post on 22.08.2016.” Accrodingly, show cause notice was issued on 21.7.2016 to the four respondent in SLP(C) No. 15427/2016 and two respondent in SLP(C) NO. 15454/2016 by Regd. A.D. post . Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatanama/Memo of appearance on behalf of all the four respondents in SLP(C) No. 15427/2016 and respondent No. 1 in SLP(C) No. 15454/2016. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing show cause notice from respondent No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 has been received back. It is submitted that Mr. Rajeev Singh counsel for the respondents has on 17.08.2016 filed counter affidavits on behalf of respondent no. 1 in SLP(C) No. 15427/2016 and SLP(C) No. 15454/2016. Copies of the same are being circulated for perusal of the Hon'ble Court. Service of show cause notice on respondent no. 2 in SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 is incomplete.

The matters above mentioned are, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 17 th day of August, 2016 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dkm

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 22.08.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  13                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   3     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 15866 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTS & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   11.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is  allowed.  Issue notice returnable in four weeks.  Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the three Respondents on   25.07.2016 through registered A.D. post as well as Dasti. Neither A.D. Cards nor   unserved cover containing the notice has been received back of all the Respondents. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed Affidavit of dasti   service so far. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 17 th   day of August , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15410/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/04/2016 in MP No. 1/2015 28/04/2016 in WP No. 20527/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras) MADURAI ACHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS GANESAN ACHARI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 22/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Anand Padmanabhan, Adv. Mr. Romil Pathak, Adv. Ms. Amritha Sarayoo, Adv. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We do not see any merit in this special leave petition which is hereby dismissed. This order, however, shall not prevent the petitioner from seeking appropriate redress against the order which the Tehsildar/Collector of Kancheepuram may pass in regard to removal of encroachment from the Survey No.870/11, Pettai Street, Cheyyur, Kancheepuram District. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016 in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUS A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 Office Report) Date : 22/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. Mr. Krutin R. Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) In both matters Mr. R.S. Hegde, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Adv. Mr. Shanti Prakash, Adv. For Mr. Rajeev Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post these matters after two weeks. In the meantime, rejoinder affidavit may be filed. [RENU DIWAN] [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] ASSISTANT REGISTRAR A.R.-CUM-P.S.

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15866/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016 in SAD No. 135/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 22/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioner to effect service on unserved respondents. List after two weeks. (Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master

>ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15410/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/04/2016in MP No. 1/2015 28/04/2016 in WP No. 20527/2014 passed by the HighCourt Of Madras)MADURAI ACHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUSGANESAN ACHARI AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment)Date : 22/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Anand Padmanabhan, Adv.Mr. Romil Pathak, Adv.Ms. Amritha Sarayoo, Adv. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard.We do not see any merit in this special leave petition whichis hereby dismissed.This order, however, shall not prevent the petitioner fromseeking appropriate redress against the order which theTehsildar/Collector of Kancheepuram may pass in regard to removalof encroachment from the Survey No.870/11, Pettai Street, Cheyyur,Kancheepuram District. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.130 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13696/2016 M/S. HOTEL TRAMBOO CONTINENTAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 17/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.F. Philip, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nikesh Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to all the respondents for filing counter affidavit. List again on 26.10.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.803 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15410/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/04/2016 in MP No. 1/2015 28/04/2016 in WP No. 20527/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras) MADURAI ACHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS GANESAN ACHARI AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 17/08/2016 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anand Padmanabhan,Adv. (mentioned by) Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post on Monday, the 22 nd August, 2016 before an appropriate Bench. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Z ITEM NO.803 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15410/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/04/2016 in MP No. 1/2015 28/04/2016 in WP No. 20527/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras) MADURAI ACHARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS GANESAN ACHARI AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 17/08/2016 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anand Padmanabhan,Adv. (mentioned by) Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post on Monday, the 22nd August, 2016 before an appropriate Bench. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySHASHI SAREENDate: 2016.08.1715:18:19 ISTReason:

MATTER FOR 16.08.2016                   COURT NO. 10          ITEM NO.11  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     10022/2016      WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF          KAUSHALIYA    ...PETITIONER                            VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.06.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Let reply be filed within four weeks.  Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks, thereafter.  List the matter after six weeks .” It is submitted that counsel for the respondent No. 1 has still not filed counter affidavit, hence no rejoinder affidavit has been filed so far. It is further submitted that as per the Court's order dated 22.04.2016, counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 who has stated to take instructions as to whether represent respondent Nos. 2 & 3 as well has not filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance so far. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Hon'ble  Court with this office report. Dated this the 12 th  day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1.   Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,  Adv.   2.   Mr. T. Mahipal , Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jodhpur) KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 16/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Ms. Ishita Kapur, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar Naik, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Rejoinder be filed within two weeks. List immediately thereafter. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.120 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13934/2016 RAJKUMAR BIJOY SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 16/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Vats, Adv. For Respondent(s) Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv. Mr. Gautam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall file counter affidavit within four weeks. Service is complete in respect of respondent nos. 5, 6, 8, 12, 14 and 23 but no one has entered appearance. Learned Counsel for the petitioners shall furnish fresh particulars of respondent nos. 11 and 15 and also take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent nos. 11 and 15. Other respondents are awaited. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent nos. 4 and 27 are performa respondents and he will take appropriate steps for deletion of these respondents from the array of parties. List again on 28.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar JG

\222ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10022/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan AtJodhpur)KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUSJODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s)(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)Date : 16/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Ms. Ishita Kapur, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar Naik, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RRejoinder be filed within two weeks. List immediately thereafter. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XVI    LISTED ON: 11.8.2016    COURT NO.: R­2     ITEM NO. : 108 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10396 of 2016 (With prayer for interim­relief) THE CHAIRMAN NHAI & ANR.        ...Petitioner(s) Versus ARVIND KR. THAKUR & ANR.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's court on 04.07.2016 when he was pleased to pass the following order: “ Mr.Ramesh K.Mishra , Ld.counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given two weeks time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the copy of pleadings to the said respondent within one week after filing the vakalatnama. Await the return of service of notice already issued to both the respondent No.2. List the matter again on 11.08.2016. .” It is submitted that Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra, advocate who appears on behalf of respondent No.1 has neither filed  Vakalatnama nor counter affidavit, so far.  It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 22.07.2016 filed proof of service after serving the copy of pleadings to the counsel for the respondents.   Neither AD card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from respondent No.2. Service of show­cause notice is incomplete.   T he matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office report.  Dated this the 10 th   day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. M.V Kini & Associates, Advocate      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 LISTED ON : 11.08.2016 ITEM NO. : 113 SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 13706 & 13719 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANNE SUBRAMANYAM ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. ETC. ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 4 th July, 2016, when the following order was passed:- “Both the respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List the matter again on 11.08.2016.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 20 th May, 2016 to all the Respondents in both the matters. There are 2 respondents in each matter. Respondent No. 2 is common in both matters above-mentioned. Mr. Somnathappadhan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in both matters and Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of common Respondent No. 2 in both matters. No counter-affidavit has been filed in the matter so far. Service is complete. The aforesaid matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report. Dated this, the 10 th day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Copy to: 1. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate. 172, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi- 110091. 2. Mr. Somnathappadhan, Advocate 302, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase- II, Delhi- 110 091 3. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate 159, Lawyer's Chambers, High Court of Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

@ ITEM NO.108 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10396/2016 THE CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS ARVIND KUMAR THAKUR AND ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 11/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Gunjan S. Jain,Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Govind Jee,Adv. Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the respondent No. 1 to file the counter affidavit. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the Union of India.Signature Not Verified List again on 23.9.2016.Digitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.1116:27:02 ISTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

x ITEM NO.113 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13706/2016 MANNE SUBRAMANYAM Petitioner(s) VERSUS SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13719/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 11/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Taranjeet Singh,Adv. Mr. Arun Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. A.V.S. Raju,Adv. Mr. Somanatha Padhan,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to both the respondents to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.1116:27:01 ISTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

òITEM NO.48 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10075/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015 in WC No.59470/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 08/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNot taken up.List the matter on 2 nd September, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

hITEM NO.6 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13729/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/12/2015in WPC No. 5896/2015 passed by the High Court of Gauhati)AMIR HUSSAIN (HUSEN) Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 08/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv.Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. S. Patwalia, ASG.Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.Mr. A. Bhattacharya, Adv.Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv.Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv.Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.Ms. Vartika Sahay, Adv.M/s Corporate Law Group. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe petition stands adjourned by four weeks to enablethe respondent-State to file counter affidavit, as prayed forin the letter circulated. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

LISTED ON : 05.08.2016                 BEFORE COURT NO.: 11                                 ITEM NO.:07       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for extension of time) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10477 OF 2016 SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ JBF INDUSTRIES LTD                     ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT  The SLP above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29th April, 2016 when the Court while dismissing the SLP was pleased to pass the following Order:­ " We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition. But to enable the petitioner to comply with the order, insofar as the direction to deposit the amount alone, not for furnishing bank guarantee, we grant two months' time to the petitioner.  The special leave petition stands dismissed. " It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya, Advocate has filed an application for extension of time which is registered as I. A. No. 1. It is further submitted that Mr. Vivek A. Vasi, Advocate for the sole respondent has on 02.08.2016 filed reply to the petitioner's application seeking extension of time which is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. The application in the matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 03rd day of August, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya, Advocate Mr. Vivek A. Vasi, Advocate L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¨ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10075/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015 in WC No.59470/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad)RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 05/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv.(Not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. Ms. Shivani Luthara,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe learned counsel for the petitioner is notpresent. List the matter on 8 th August, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

\210ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. 1/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10477/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/02/2016in AAN No. 463/2015 24/02/2016 in AP No. 342/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUSJBF INDUSTRIES LTD Respondent(s)(for extension of time and office report)Date : 05/08/2016 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rana Mukherjee, sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Rao N., Adv. Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya,Adv. Mr. Mukund P. Unny, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aditi Bansali, Adv. Mr. Vivek A. Vashi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At joint request, list on 26 th August, 2016. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13446/2016 RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 01/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ambarish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 13.9. 2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

\236 ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13446/2016 RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 01/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ambarish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 13.9.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.0116:48:42 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   :29.07.2016        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  5                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   25     PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NOS. 15863 AND 15363 OF   2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4 (Application for permission to file additional documents alongwith application for   exemption from filing official translation in SLP(C) No. 15863/2016) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 2 & 3 (Application for permission to file additional documents alongwith application for   exemption from filing official translation in SLP(C) No. 15363/2016)    VIPIN KUMAR SINGH                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   08.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Perused the letter.     The matters are adjourned for three weeks, as prayed for.” It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to above   said order, Counsel for the Petitioner in both the matters above­mentioned have filed   application for permission to file additional documents and application for   exemption from filing official translation. The applications are registered as I.A.Nos.   3 & 4 in SLP (C) No. 15863/2016 and I.A.Nos. 2 & 3 in SLP (C) No. 15363/2016   and same are  being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this   office report. Dated this the 28 th   day of July , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

1 ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15404/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2016 in WP No. 496/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Nagpur) DR. SHIVAJI VYANKATESH BHOSLE Petitioner(s) VERSUS MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, MUMBAI AND ORS.Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 29/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar,Sr.Adv. Mr. Satyajit Desai,Adv. Mr. Akash Kakade,Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent NO. 2 who is the main contesting respondent, being the successful sole petitioner before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. In view of the appearance of the main contesting respondent and also in view of the submissions advanced before us, it is not necessary to keep this matter pending. On going through the impugned order by which the High Court of Judicature at Bombay has kept the Writ

2 Petition No. 496/2016 pending but has vacated the interim order of status quo passed by it on 1 st February, 2016, we find that the High Court has assigned no reasons at all, not even in one sentence, as to why the earlier order has been vacated when the writ petition is still pending. We were inclined to interfere with the said order but learned counsel for Respondent NO. 2 submits that in the meantime appointment letter dated 18 th April, 2016 has been issued in favour of this Respondent who has joined on 22 nd April, 2016. In view of such development brought to our notice, we refrain from interfering with the matter by ordering status quo. But this is because Respondent No.2 has agreed that the writ petition itself may be heard and decided expeditiously preferably within a period of two months. With that concession in mind, we dispose of the special leave petition by observing that the developments such as appointment and joining as noted shall be subject to the final result of the writ petition pending before the High Court. Further, the writ petition itself be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of two months. We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case between the parties. (Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15863/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2016 in SA No. 144/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) VIPIN KUMAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and permission to submit additional documents) WITH SLP(C) No. 15363/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., permission to submit additional document(s) and Interim Relief) Date : 29/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Singh,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav,Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Pandey,Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. S.R. Singh,Sr.Adv. Mr. Avnish Singh,Adv. Ms. Shweta Yadav,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted in both the SLPs. List the appeals for final hearing in January, 2017. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

MATTER FOR: 27.07.2016 COURT NO. R-2 ITEM NO. 90 SECTION - XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10066 OF 2016 SMT. SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. ....PETITIONERS VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS. ....RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 04.04.2016 when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “Exemption allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice.” It is submitted that accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the 4 respondents on 26.05.2016 by registered AD post. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate has on 22.07.2016 filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2, but counter affidavit has not been filed so far. AD cards duly signed have been received back in respect of respondent Nos. 1 & 3, but no one has entered appearance so far. Neither AD card nor unserved cover has been received back in respect of respondent No. 4 so far. Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 4. The matter above-mentioned is listed before Ld. Registrar Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 25 th July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/s/off report/m.doc.

ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13032/2016 NEOTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and placing addl. facts and documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 27/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Raghvendra Mishra, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the sole respondent for filing counter affidavit. List again on 20.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

\222 ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10066/2016 SUGAN KANWAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHINYA RAM AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 27/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rohit K.Sinha,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ankit Acharya,Adv. Ms.Pratiksha Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr.Ankit Acharya, Ld.counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the copy of pleadings to the said respondent within one week after filing the vakalatnama. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No 3, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.4 within four weeks. Issue notice thereupon.Signature Not Verified List the matter again on 07.09.2016.Digitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.07.2816:00:56 TLTReason: (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar SB

SLP(C) 15403/2016 1 ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.15403/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016 in WP No. 443/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS SACRED HEART MINORITY SOCIETY AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC 11698/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP) S.L.P.(C) No.15451/2016 (With interim relief and office report) Date: 25/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Ms. Amandee Kaur, Adv. Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravi Kant, Adv. Mr. Mayank Manish, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr. Gaurav Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Kant, learned counsel for the respondents.

SLP(C) 15403/2016 2 Delay condoned. It is submitted by Mr. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the N.C.T.E. that in respect of the institutions involved in these cases, one institution has not yet submitted the application and in respect of the other institutions' applications, there are deficiencies. Regard being had to the aforesaid, it is directed that the institution, namely, Vidha Sudha Welfare Foundation Samiti, which has not yet submitted the application, is permitted to submit an application within four weeks hence. The deficiencies shall be intimated to the other institutions within the said period. As far as the institution, which has not yet submitted the application and is granted time to submit an application within four weeks hence, shall be inspected as expeditiously as possible and be intimated the deficiencies, if any. In case the institution removes the deficiencies, it shall be granted recognition for the academic year 2017-2018. Needless to say, for granting the recognition the N.C.T.E. is requested to follow the requisite procedure as prescribed in law. The special leave petitions stand disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (H.S. Parasher) Court Master

dSLP(C) 15403/20161ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.15403/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016in WP No. 443/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Petitioner(s) VERSUSSACRED HEART MINORITY SOCIETY AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to file additional documents and interimrelief and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC 11698/2016(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)S.L.P.(C) No.15451/2016(With interim relief and office report)Date: 25/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AORMs. Amandee Kaur, Adv.Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv.Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv.Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravi Kant, Adv.Mr. Mayank Manish, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard Mr. Gaurav Sharma, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr. Ravi Kant, learned counsel for therespondents.SLP(C) 15403/20162Delay condoned.It is submitted by Mr. Sharma, learned counselappearing for the N.C.T.E. that in respect of theinstitutions involved in these cases, one institution has notyet submitted the application and in respect of the otherinstitutions&#39; applications, there are deficiencies.Regard being had to the aforesaid, it is directedthat the institution, namely, Vidha Sudha Welfare FoundationSamiti, which has not yet submitted the application, ispermitted to submit an application within four weeks hence.The deficiencies shall be intimated to the other institutionswithin the said period.As far as the institution, which has not yetsubmitted the application and is granted time to submit anapplication within four weeks hence, shall be inspected asexpeditiously as possible and be intimated the deficiencies,if any. In case the institution removes the deficiencies, itshall be granted recognition for the academic year 2017-2018.Needless to say, for granting the recognition the N.C.T.E. isrequested to follow the requisite procedure as prescribed inlaw.The special leave petitions stand disposed ofaccordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (Chetan Kumar)Court Master (H.S. Parasher)Court Master

LISTED ON :22.07.2016               BEFORE COURT NO.: 13                              ITEM NO.: 02       SECTION­IX          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14991 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for permission to file additional documents) ABDUL RAZAK FAUJDARKHAN (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.  ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ SMT. SHARADA R. ADYANTHAYA & ANR                       ..RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01st July, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :­   "In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners for adjournment of the matter for filing Additional documents, the matter is adjourned by three weeks." It is submitted for the information of the information of the Hon'ble Court that pursuant to aforesaid order, counsel for the petitioner has on 16.07.2016 filed additional documents along­with an application for permission to file additional documents which is registered as I. A. No. 2 and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report.  Dated this the 20th day of July, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Advocate.  L  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.4 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10001/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/11/2014 in SBCWP No. 6968/2013 21/11/2014 in DBCSA No. 21/2014 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) MANA RAM CHOUDHARY AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 22/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, AOR Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Adv. Ms. Anshul Sharma, Adv. Ms. Eshitha Sharma, Adv. Ms. Tanuja Patra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay condoned. The special leave petition is dismissed. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (H.S. Parasher) Court Master

î ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14991/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09/03/2015 in CRA No. 64/2007 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) ABDUL RAZAK FAUJDARKHAN (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SMT. SHARADA R. ADYANTHAYA & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. For permission to file additional documents, interim relief and office report) Date : 22/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) MR. Preshit Surshe,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the special leave petition. Liberty, as prayed for, is granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMADHU BALADate: 2016.07.2311:24:24 ISTReason:

\206 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.4 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10001/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/11/2014 in SBCWP No. 6968/2013 21/11/2014 in DBCSA No. 21/2014 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) MANA RAM CHOUDHARY AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 22/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, AOR Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Adv. Ms. Anshul Sharma, Adv. Ms. Eshitha Sharma, Adv. Ms. Tanuja Patra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay condoned. The special leave petition is dismissed.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCHETAN KUMARDate: 2016.07.2310:14:25 ISTReason: (Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

MATTER FOR : 21.07.2016 COURT NO. 6 ITEM NO. 3 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS.14664/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION & ANR. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS DR. I. K. MANSOORI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.07.2016, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Issue notice. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Therefore, service of notice on respondent No. 1 is waived. He may file the counter affidavit within two weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within one week thereafter. Let notice be issued to other respondents. Notice be also issued to the NCT of Delhi. Liberty to serve the standing counsel for the NCT of Delhi. List this matter on 21 st July, 2016. Till then, there shall be stay of operation and implementation of the impugned order. ” It is submitted that accordingly, show cause notice was issued to respondent No. 1 & 2 through M/s. Shakil Ahmad Syed and Gaurav Sharma, Advocates and respondent Nos. 3 & 4 through registered AD post. But counsel for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Hence, no rejoinder affidavit has been filed. Neither AD cards nor unserved cover has been received back from respondent No. 3 & 4 so far. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 04.07.2016 filed proof of service after serving copy of the SLP on Mr. Gaurav Sharma, standing counsel for NCT of Delhi but he has not filed vakalatnama/Appearance, so far. Service is not complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 20 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

-2- Copy to : Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/LK/OR

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :18/07/2016 COURT No. :R­2 ITEM No.  :105 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10082 of 2016 (With Prayer for Interim Relief) MOZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN ... Petitioner Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT  The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22/04/2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:­ “ Issue notice. In the meanwhile, the effect and operation of the impugned Order shall remain stayed.”   Accordingly, show cause notice returnable on 18/07/2016 was issued on 28/04/2016 to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 by registered AD post. It is submitted that Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate has on 12/05/2016 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, but he has not filed Counter­affidavit, so far. It is further submitted that Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate has on 1/07/2016 filed Vakaltnama & Memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 4, but she has not filed Counter­affidavit, so far. Neither AD card nor unserved registered cover containing notice has been received back from the Respondent No. 5 so far and a period of 30 days from the date of issue of notice has elapsed. Service of notice is incomplete on behalf of Respondent No. 5.

­2­ The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 15 th  day of July, 2016. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­   Mr. Rauf Rahim, Advocate Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate   Assistant Registrar AY

1 ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13426/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/03/2016 in APP No. 442/2012 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) MUKESH KHEMCHANDBHAI PARMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE OFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to appear and argue in person and office report) Date : 18/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Khemchandbhai Parmar, Petitioner-in-person For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to appear and argue in-person is granted. The petitioner is aggrieved of the rejection of the application for early hearing of the appeals pending before the High Court. Having regard to the nature of the claim and their consequential effects, the petitioner is granted liberty to renew his request by filing an appropriate application for early hearing before the High Court. If such a request is made, the same may be considered and the matter be disposed of by the High Court as early

2 as possible. The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

n ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.8 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10003/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/01/2016 in DBCER No. 9/2004 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur) M/S. SAMTEL INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 18/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kavita Jha,Adv. Ms. Purva Juneja, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Adv. Mr. Shamik Sajanwala, Adv. Ms. Saroj Bala, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Mr. A. Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after pleadings are complete. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.1816:59:09 ISTReason:

þ ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.14 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15420/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/03/2016 in WP No. 9329/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) TRIMURTI BALAK MANDIR SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS VITHABAI BHIKAN DESALE AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 15/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Amul Kakarde,Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. We are not persuaded to interfere with the order passed by the High Court on merits. The special leave petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, the cost of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) is set aside.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byGULSHAN KUMARARORADate: 2016.07.1611:12:34 ISTReason: (Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master

SECTION - III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 13671 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Medical Council of India …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th May, 2016 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file lengthy list of dates granted. Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be a stay of operation of the impugned order dated 27.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi.” Accordingly, show cause notice returnable on 11 th July, 2016 was issued to both the Respondents through registered A.D. Post on 20 th May, 2016. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved covers containing the show cause notice have been received back from the said Respondents far. It is submitted that Postal Enquiry was held and the Reports of the Postal Department show that show cause notice have been delivered to both the Respondents on 1 st June, 2016. It is further submitted thqt a copy of the show cause notice was also given to Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate (Standing Counsel for the Union of India) but he has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the Respondents/Union of India so far. The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court for orders. Dated this the 8 th Day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

-2- Copy to:- 1. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate House No. F-12, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Standing Counsel for the Union of India, Central Agency Section, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

SECTION - XVII Listed on: 11.07.2016 Court No: 1 Item No: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15870 OF 2016 Ashok Kumar Mishra ..Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned has been filed by Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, Advocate, against the Order dated 31 st March 2016, of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in Writ Petition (S) No. 2200 of 2013. It is submitted that the Registrar General, Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi is respondent No. 3 in this matter. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 8 TH DAY OF JULY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, Advocate, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.123 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13671/2016 MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per the report of the Postal Department, show cause notice has been delivered on both the respondents on 1.6.2016. Service is complete but none has put in appearance. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar

ITEM NO.124 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016 SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for impleadment and interim relief and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. Mr. Y.P. Dhingra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that she will take fresh steps for effecting service of respondent Nos.1 to 7 by substituted service within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 5.8.2016. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15866/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016 in SAD No. 135/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) CHANDRA PRAKASH RAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M.D. U.P. SAHKARI CHINI MILLS SANGH LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai, Adv. Mr. Mrinmay Bhattewara, Adv. Dr. Ashish Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice returnable in four weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [RAJ RANI NEGI] COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15870/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/03/2016 in WPS No. 2200/2013 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand At Ranchi) ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.6 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15888/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2016 in CMPMD No. 1460/2016 in WA No. 54220/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras) COMMISSIONER, THOOTHUKUDI CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS PACKIYA SELVI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) WITH SLP(C) No. 15902/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 11/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Venkataramani,AAG (Sr.Adv.) Mr. I. Ganesan,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain these special leave petitions, which are dismissed. Needless to state that after effecting the payment to the dependents, the Corporation/Municipality/Panchayat concerned can proceed against the tortfeasor for recovering the amount, in the manner known to law. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RAJ RANI NEGI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.6 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15888/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/02/2016in CMPMD No. 1460/2016 in WA No. 54220/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras)COMMISSIONER, THOOTHUKUDI CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner(s) VERSUSPACKIYA SELVI AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief)WITHSLP(C) No. 15902/2016(With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 11/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Venkataramani,AAG (Sr.Adv.)Mr. I. Ganesan,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RWe are not inclined to entertain these special leavepetitions, which are dismissed.Needless to state that after effecting the payment to thedependents, the Corporation/Municipality/Panchayat concerned canproceed against the tortfeasor for recovering the amount, in themanner known to law.Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RAJ RANI NEGI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\212ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15870/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/03/2016in WPS No. 2200/2013 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand AtRanchi)ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amarendra Sharan,Sr.Adv.Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard.We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. Thespecial leave petition is accordingly dismissed.Applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\204ITEM NO.123 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. CHIRAG BHANU SINGHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13671/2016MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 11/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs per the report of the Postal Department, show causenotice has been delivered on both the respondents on 1.6.2016.Service is complete but none has put in appearance.Registry to process the matter for listing before theHon&#39;ble Court, as per rules. (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 08.07.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  2                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   1 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 10075 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on   09.05.2016, with an office report dated 06.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to   pass the following order: “List on 8 th  July, 2016.  Four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit.  Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, be filed thereafter.” There are 4 Respondents in the matter. It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Mr. M.R.   Shamshad, Advocate has on 01.07.2016 filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance   & Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 2 and the same is being circulated   to the Hon'ble Court but no rejoinder affidavit has been filed. Service of show cause notice is complete but no one has entered appearance   on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 so far. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office   report. Dated this the 06 th   day of July , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:        Mr. P. K. Singh, Advocate.   Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

Listed On. 8.7.2016 Ld. Registrar's Court No. 1 Item No. 87 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)No. 13911 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. … (Application for impleadment) C. Manimala & Ors. ...Petitioners VERSUS The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11 th May, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Heard. Issue notice. We direct that in case the petitioner herein deposit twice the amount of the highest bid offered by the successful bidder for the respective shop in their occupation, they shall be allowed to continue, pending further orders from this Court. The arrears at the said rate shall also be deposited w.e.f. 1st January, 2016 within a period of two months from today. Deposit shall be made with the Panchayat concerned. The petitioner may file an amended cause title, impleading the successful bidders as party respondents, within two weeks, in which event, notices shall issue even to the successful bidders.“ It is submitted that pursuant to above quoted order, show cause notice could not be issued to all respondents and impleading parties as Mr. R. Nedumaran, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 29 th June, 2016 filed an application for impleadment of Respondent Nos. 8 to 17 in the Special Leave Petition with affidavit alongwith Annexure P-1 and amended cause title. The same is barred by time by 49 days and Counsel has not filed application for condonation of delay in filing impeadment application. ...2/-

-2- It is further submitted that Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate has on 20 th May, 2016 filed vakalatnama on behalf of R.No. 3. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this, the 6 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. R. Nedumaran, Advocate Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10075/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015 in WC No.59470/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Aditya Samaddar,Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Yadav,Adv. Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya,Adv. Mr. M.R. Shamshad,Adv. (Not present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 seeking adjournment, list the matter on 5 th August, 2016. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15413/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/02/2016 in SA No. 222/1999 passed by the High Court Of M.P. At Jabalpur) INDRAWATI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DR.RISHABHA KUMAR JAIN Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Nitin Gaur,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chinmoy A. Khaladkar,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Pandey ,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Leave granted. Status quo, in relation to suit accommodation, obtaining as on today, shall be maintained subject to payment of entire arrears of rent by the petitioner to respondent within four weeks and shall continue to pay future rent every month to respondent. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15418/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/04/2016 in FA No. 3463/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) SHRI DATTA SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BABASAHEB & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shridhar Y. Chitale, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain this Special Leave Petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Sr. P.A. (Renu Diwan) Court Master

ITEM NO.62 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016 in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad) R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUS A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 (Office Report) Date : 08/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. Mr. Krutin R. Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has yet not been promoted despite availability of vacancies. Issue notice. Respondents to file reply within the period of a month and if so, the personal appearance of respondents is dispensed with. Post on 22.08.2016. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.64 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15863/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2016 in SA No. 144/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) VIPIN KUMAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file synopsis and list of dates) WITH SLP(C) No. 15363/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief) Date : 08/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. The matters are adjourned for three weeks, as prayed for. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15874/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/03/2016 in SA No. 178/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) GEETABAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAVITA Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice, returnable in six weeks. In the meantime, status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15875/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2016 in WP No. 1071/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) THE SWASTIK REALTY PVT LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS JOGINDER SINGH SALARIYA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv. Mr. Bhavin Bhatia, Adv. for Mr. Aviral Kashyap,AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground to interfere with the impugned order is made out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar ) Court Master AR-cum-PS

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15883/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/06/2016 in WA No. 296/2016 passed by the High Court of M.P at Jabalpur) VINOD Petitioner(s) VERSUS MADHYA PRADESH CONGRESS COMMITTEE AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. C. K. Rai,Adv. Mr. Paramhans, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. However, the question of law is kept open. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

8 ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15883/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/06/2016 in WA No. 296/2016 passed by the High Court of M.P at Jabalpur) VINOD Petitioner(s) VERSUS MADHYA PRADESH CONGRESS COMMITTEE AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. C. K. Rai,Adv. Mr. Paramhans, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. However, the question of law is kept open. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan) SR. P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJAYANT KUMAR ARORADate: 2016.07.0911:59:59 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15877/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/03/2016 in CMWP No. 2614/2004 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) KARAMCHARI SANGH KRISHI LAAGAT YOJANA UPRBS COLLEGE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, NEW DELHI & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.) Date :08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ankit Acharya, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dave, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission sought for is granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Individual employees, along withSignature Not Verified Association, shall be allowed to agitate theirDigitally signed by grievance in accordance with law.CHARANJEET KAURDate: 2016.07.1117:00:52 ISTReason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

Ð ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15874/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/03/2016 in SA No. 178/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) GEETABAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAVITA Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice, returnable in six weeks. In the meantime, status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNIDHI AHUJADate: 2016.07.0912:16:19 ISTReason:

LISTED ON. 5.7.2016 COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 34 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15410 OF 2016 WITH INTROLUCTORY APPLICATION NO.1 (Applications for Exemption from filing the certified copy of the impugned order) AND INTROLUCTORY APPLICATION NO.... (Application for filing Additional document on record) WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Madurai Achari ... Petitioner Versus Ganesh Achari & Ors ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned has been filed on 19 th May, 2016 against the final Judgment and Order dated 28 th April, 2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in M.P. No. 1 of 2015 in W.P. No. 20527 of 2014. It is submitted Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 1 st July, 2016 filed an application for filing additional documents Nos 1 to 15 with affidavit, the same is defective for the reasons that the documents have not been marked as annexures in the additional documents and affidavit is also not proper. However, copy of the same is circulated herewith. The matter alongwith application above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 4 th day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk

LISTED ON: 05.07.2016                       BEFORE COURT NO.: 10                                                                          ITEM NO.: 39 SECTION – IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS 14990 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NOS 2 of 2016 (Applications for  permission to file additional documents ) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS                ..PETITIONER                     ­VERSUS­ THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD           ..RESPONDENTS             OFFICE REPORT  The application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP along with matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in chamber on  10 th  May 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Delay in refiling the SLP is condoned.” It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that counsel for the petitioner has filed application for permission to file additional document and the same has been registered as Interlocutory Application No. 2. Copies of same are being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. The matters above mentioned along with application is listed before the Hon'ble court with this office report.  Dated this  the 4 th     day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. S.M. Jadhav & Co , Advocate's                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¢ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15412/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2016in RSA No. 843/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)MUKESH KUMAR AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSVIDYA DEVI AND ANR. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. andexemption from filing O.T. and setting aside an abatement andsubstitution and interim relief and office report)Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RApplication for setting aside abatement againstRespondent No.2 is allowed. Delay condoned in filing substitution application. Application for substitution is allowed. The special leave petition is dismissed. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

æ ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14990/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/09/2015 in WP No. 3465/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) USHADEVI RAJARAM NIMBALKAR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) Date : 05/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Adv. Mr. Prashant F. Goudar, Adv. Mr. Goutham Shivshankar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meantime, there shall be stay of operation and implementation of the impugned Judgment. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Renu Diwan) Sr. P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJAYANT KUMAR ARORADate: 2016.07.0815:19:33 ISTReason:

SECTION - III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10003 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF M/s Samtel India Limited …..Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate ….Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12 th May, 2016 when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice returnable in four weeks. In the meanwhile, there shall be a stay of further proceedings.” Accordingly, show cause notice returnable on 4 th July, 2016 was issued to sole Respondent through registered A.D. Post on 27 th May, 2016. Neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover containing the show cause notice has been received back from the said Respondent far. It is submitted that a copy of the show cause notice was also given to Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate (Standing Counsel for Union of India/Respondent) but he has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of the Union of India/Respondent so far. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 8 th Day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate 13, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi 110001 2. Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

SECTION XVI    LISTED ON: 4.7.2016    COURT NO.: R­2     ITEM NO. : 91 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10396 of 2016 (With prayer for interim­relief) THE CHAIRMAN NHAI & ANR.        ...Petitioner(s) Versus ARVIND KR. THAKUR & ANR.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before Hon'ble court on 25.04.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Issue notice.  As prayed for, there shall be interim stay of the operation and implementation  of the impugned judgment, subject to the condition that the amount collected towards toll on the completed portion of the Highway, in question, shall be deposited in a nationalized Bank.” Accordingly show­cause notice returnable for 4.7.2016 was issued on 30.4.2016 to both the respondents by registered AD post. Neither AD card nor unserved cover containing notice have been received back from both the respondents. Service of show­cause notice is incomplete.   T he matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office report.  Dated this the 1 st   day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. M.V Kini & Associates, Advocate      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

REGISTRAR COURT NO. 2 LISTED ON : 04.07.2016 ITEM NO. : 96 SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 13706 & 13719 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MANNE SUBRAMANYAM ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. ETC. ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Court on 13 th May, 2016, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice. Until further orders, status quo, as on today with regard to the possession of property, shall be maintained by the parties.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued on 20 th May, 2016 to all the Respondents in both the matters. There are 2 respondents in the each matter. Respondent No. 2 is common in both matters above-mentioned. Mr. Somnathappadhan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1 in both matters and Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of common Respondent No. 2 in both matters. No counter-affidavit has been filed in the matter so far. The aforesaid matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report. Dated this, the 1 st day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

Copy to: 1. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate. 172, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi- 110091. 2. Mr. Somnathappadhan, Advocate 302, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar, Phase- II, Delhi- 110 091 3. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate 159, Lawyer's Chambers, High Court of Delhi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LR

LISTING ON 04.07.2016 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 10 SEC.IVA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 13689 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for interim relief of stay of the impugned Judgment) Prabhavati And Anr.     ...PETITIONERS VERSUS Mandakini W/o Mohan Patil    ... RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :   ''Issue notice on the prayer for interim relief as well as on the special leave petition, returnable within six weeks.'' Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent on 23.05.2016 through Regd. A.D. Post. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from the sole respondent, so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on sole respondent. It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 20.05.2016 filed an application for interim relief of stay of impugned order(I.A. No. 1) and the same has been included in the paper books. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 1 st  day of July, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO:  Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR pc2

Listed On: 04.07.2016 Before Court No. 2 Item No. 24 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No.15008 /2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1-4 AND 5 (Applications for permission to file SLP and condonation of delay in filing SLP) Billingda Lapang & Ors. ...PETITIONERS Versus State of Meghalaya & Ors. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter alonwith applications above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 13.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Issue notice to Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 only at this stage. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, the learned counsel, accepts notice for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Implementation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed. List the matter on 4 th July, 2016.” It is submitted that as directed above, show cause notice to Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 through Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate was issued on 13.06.2016. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate has not filed Vakalatnama/Appearance as well as counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1-2 so far. The matter alongwith applications above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 30 th DAY OF JUNE, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. 2. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-2/Avi

LISTED ON: 04.07.2016 BEFORE COURT NO: 2 ITEM NO: 28 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 15408/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for permission to place additional documents on record) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for seeking permission to file lengthy list of dates and synopsis) ASHES KIRAN PRASAD ... PETITIONER VERSUS SHRI KUNDAN SINHA ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 02.03.2016 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, of Judicature at Delhi in Contempt Petition(C) No. 656 of 2015 in Original Application No. 2848 of 2014 alongwith application for permission to place additional documents on record and permission to file lengthy list of dates and synopsis (regd. as I.A. Nos. 1 & 2 respectively) and the same have been included in SLP paper books. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner was required to file copy of Order dated 02.03.2016. In this regard, he has given a letter dated 23.05.2016 and the same is placed at page No. 188 of SLP paper books. The matter alongwith applications above-mentioned is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 1 st DAY OF JULY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Siddhartha Jha, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-1

SECTION IV B Listed on.04.07.2016 Court No.7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.56 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 15406 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3 (Application for seeking permission to file additional documents) Ghanshyam And Anr ....Petitioner(s) Versus Nanak Chand And Ors ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur, Advocate on 26.02.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 28.11.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No. 731 of 2015 along with the applications for exemption from filing official translation and seeking permission to file additional documents. It is further submitted that initially SLP filed against the Order dated 28.11.2015 was within time but there was a delay of 56 days in refiling the SLP. Counsel has filed an application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP and the same has been condoned by Additional Registrar I-B on 26.05.2016. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 01st day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR com5/nk

LISTED ON 04.07.2016 COURT NO.10 ITEM NO.42 SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 15427 & 15454 OF 2016 R.A. NAGENDRANATH ...Petitioner(s) -Versus- A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP © No. 15427 of 2016 The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the final Judgment and Order dated 26.02.2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in CCC No. 100032 of 2016 (Civil). SLP © No. 15474 of 2016 The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the final Judgment and Order dated 11.02.2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in CCC No. 1540 of 2015 (Civil). It is submitted that the instant matter is tagged with SLP(C) 15427 of 2016 as both are filed by same petitioner and are arising out of similar issue. The matters above mentioned are, therefore, listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 1 st day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR dkm

Listed on : 4.7.2016                    Court No. 5                                 Item No. 36                                SECTION XI­A                               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION                                    PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) No. 15428 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF  WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy)                   MR. LOKNATH BISWAL                               .....Petitioner                                  Versus UNION OF INDIA                            ....Respondent                    OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that this Special Leave Petition has been filed by Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, Advocate on 13 th May, 2016 against the Judgment and Orders dated 19.04.2016 of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Misc. Case No. 63 of 2015 arising out of ARBA No. 40 of 2013. It is further submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that in view of letter of undertaking dated 24.05.2016, Counsel for the petitioner has on 27.05.2016 filed copy of the order dated 27.11.2015 (Copy of the same is being circulated herewith for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court) The matter alongwith application above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 27 th  day of June, 2016.      Sd/­                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10003/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/01/2016 in DBCER No. 9/2004 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur) M/S. SAMTEL INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Ms. Purva Juneja, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B.K. Prasad, AOR (NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice, but there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent. List the matter after ten days. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15401/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2015 in RSA No. 4598/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) SANDEEP MARWAHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUNITA RANA AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Adv. Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (Rajni Mukhi) (Saroj Gaur ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.50+52+67 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15403/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016 in WP No. 443/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS SACRED HEART MINORITY SOCIETY AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C) No. 15445/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and permission to place addl. Documents on record and interim relief and office report) S.L.P.(C) No. 15451/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and permission to place addl. Documents on record and interim relief and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11621/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11651/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11698/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12243/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Adv. Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR

2 For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravi Kant, Adv. Mr. Mayank Manish, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R S.L.P. (C) Nos.15445/16, S.L.P.(C) Nos. (CC-11621, 11651 and 12243/2016) Delay condoned. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, National Council for Teacher Education, submits that the respondent-institutions have been granted recognition after due consultation with the State Government for the academic session 2017-2018 In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives on the merits of these cases. At this juncture, Mr. Gaurav Sharma has submitted that the High Court of Delhi should not have entertained the writ petitions. Ordinarily, we would have addressed to the said issue, but as the recognition has been granted, we keep the said issue open. However, it will be open to N.C.T.E to raise the issue of jurisdiction before the High Court in the subsequent case, if any, by citing this order. The special leave petitions are, accordingly disposed of. SLP (C) Nos.15403 & 15451/2016 and SLP(C) Nos. (CC-11698/2016) List these matters after two weeks. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15406/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/11/2015 in RSA No. 731/2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) GHANSHYAM AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NANAK CHAND AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Reepak Kansal, Adv. Mr. Harish S.R., Adv. Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15407/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/02/2016 in RP No. 135/2016 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Reddressal Commission, New Delhi) RAHUL Petitioner(s) VERSUS ARVIND Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kishor Lambat, Adv. Ms. Aditi Deshpande, Adv. M/s. Lambat & Associates. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the special leave petition with liberty to file a review before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi. The special leave petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15408/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/03/2016 in COP No.656/2015 in OA No.2848/2014 656/2015 passed by the Cat At Delhi) ASHES KIRAN PRASAD Petitioner(s) VERSUS KUNDAN SINHA Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ayushi Kiran,Adv. For Mr. Siddhartha Jha,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not see any substance in this petition as no case for contempt is made out. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of. However, it would be open to the petitioner to take appropriate legal proceedings if he is aggrieved by his non-promotion. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra ) Court Master Assistant Registrar *Order may be given dasti.

ITEM NO.57 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15417/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in First Appeal No. 171/2016 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) DISCOVER CONDOS Petitioner(s) VERSUS MEENAL VIRENDRA VERMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Samir Malik, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016 in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad) R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUS A.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 15454/2016 (Office Report) Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post on 08.07.2016. (Rajni Mukhi) (Saroj Gaur ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

t ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15408/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/03/2016 in COP No.656/2015 in OA No.2848/2014 656/2015 passed by the Cat At Delhi) ASHES KIRAN PRASAD Petitioner(s) VERSUS KUNDAN SINHA Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ayushi Kiran,Adv. For Mr. Siddhartha Jha,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not see any substance in this petition as no case for contempt is made out. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of. However, it would be open to the petitioner to take appropriate legal proceedings if he is aggrieved by his non-promotion. (Sarita Purohit)Signature Not Verified (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court MasterDigitally signed by Assistant RegistrarSARITA PUROHITDate: 2016.07.0416:53:40 ISTReason: *Order may be given dasti.

$ ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 15405/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2016 in WP No. 5337/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SHEETAL JALINDER MOHITE Petitioner(s) VERSUS MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date :04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCHARANJEET KAURDate: 2016.07.0417:00:33 ISTReason:

¸ ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15426/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/01/2016 in FA No. 612/2013 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNISULE PVT LTD) Petitioner(s) VERSUS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Respondent(s) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Marwah, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.0417:13:20 ISTReason:

Ì ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15424/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/12/2015 in RP No. 2078/2015 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) M/S UNNATI PARBOILING INDUSTRIES Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 15502/2016 Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Divya Roy, AOR (NP) For Respondent(s) The Court made the following O R D E R The matters have been called out twice, but there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The special leave petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.0417:12:58 ISTReason:

B ITEM NO.57 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15417/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in First Appeal No. 171/2016 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) DISCOVER CONDOS Petitioner(s) VERSUS MEENAL VIRENDRA VERMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Samir Malik, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.0417:13:07 ISTReason:

ð ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15428/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/04/2016 in MC No. 63/2015 passed by the High Court Of Orissa At Cuttack) LOKANATH BISWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Avijit Patnaik,Adv. Mr. Srisatya Mohanty,Adv. Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. The special leave petition is dismissed. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by OMPARKASH SHARMADate: 2016.07.0416:49:19 ISTReason:

ÀITEM NO.20 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13672/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/01/2016in CWP No. 9509/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & HaryanaAt Chandigarh)RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Gupta,Adv.Mr. Srilok Nth Rath,Adv.Mr. Sanjay Gupta,Adv.Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Puneet Bali,Sr.Adv.Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.Mr. Tushar Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard.We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. Thespecial leave petition is accordingly dismissed.We however request the High Court to expedite the hearing anddisposal of the writ petition filed by the petitioner-associationas far as possible within a period of two months from the date acopy of this order is placed before it. In case for any reason itis not possible to hear and dispose of the writ petition, the HighCourt may consider on merits the prayer made by the petitioner forgrant of any interim relief. We make it clear that we haveexpressed no opinion on the merits of the case. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

` ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13706/2016 MANNE SUBRAMANYAM Petitioner(s) VERSUS SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13719/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Suyodhan,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Arun Aggarwal,Adv. Mr.Somnathappadhan,adv. Mr.A.V.S.Raju,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Both the respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List the matter again on 11.08.2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.07.0416:09:06 TLTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

è ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10003/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/01/2016 in DBCER No. 9/2004 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur) M/S. SAMTEL INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Ms. Purva Juneja, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B.K. Prasad, AOR (NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter has been called out twice, but there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent. List the matter after ten days. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.07.0417:13:16 ISTReason:

\204 ITEM NO.50+52+67 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15403/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016 in WP No. 443/2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Petitioner(s) VERSUS SACRED HEART MINORITY SOCIETY AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C) No. 15445/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and permission to place addl. Documents on record and interim relief and office report) S.L.P.(C) No. 15451/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and permission to place addl. Documents on record and interim relief and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11621/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11651/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 11698/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12243/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byGULSHAN KUMARARORADate: 2016.07.06 For Petitioner(s)14:46:07 ISTReason: Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Adv. Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR 2For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravi Kant, Adv. Mr. Mayank Manish, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RS.L.P. (C) Nos.15445/16, S.L.P.(C) Nos.(CC-11621, 11651 and 12243/2016) Delay condoned. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner, National Council for Teacher Education, submits thatthe respondent-institutions have been granted recognition after dueconsultation with the State Government for the academic session2017-2018 In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives on the merits ofthese cases. At this juncture, Mr. Gaurav Sharma has submittedthat the High Court of Delhi should not have entertained the writpetitions. Ordinarily, we would have addressed to the said issue,but as the recognition has been granted, we keep the said issueopen. However, it will be open to N.C.T.E to raise the issue ofjurisdiction before the High Court in the subsequent case, if any,by citing this order. The special leave petitions are, accordingly disposed of.SLP (C) Nos.15403 & 15451/2016 and SLP(C) Nos. (CC-11698/2016) List these matters after two weeks. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

´ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15427/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2016in CCCN No. 100032/2016 passed by the High Court of KarnatakaCircuit Bench at Dharwad)R.A. NAGENDRANATH Petitioner(s) VERSUSA.C.J. BETHEL AND ORS. Respondent(s)WITHSLP(C) No. 15454/2016(Office Report) Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPost on 08.07.2016. (Rajni Mukhi) (Saroj Gaur ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

\220 ITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10396/2016 THE CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ARVIND KUMAR THAKUR AND ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Karan Grover,Adv. M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ramesh K.Mishra,Adv. Mr.Shashank Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr.Ramesh K.Mishra, Ld.counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent No.1. He seeks and is given two weeks time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the copy of pleadings to the said respondent within one week after filing the vakalatnama. Await the return of service of notice already issued to both the respondent No.2.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.07.04 List the matter again on 11.08.2016.16:08:49 TLTReason: (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13689/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2016 in RSA No. 100052/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) PRABHAVATI AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANDAKINI W/O MOHAN PATIL Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for interim relief and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post after four weeks. In the meantime, the petitioners shall take steps to complete the service on the sole respondent. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Saroj Gaur) Sr. P.A. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJAYANT KUMAR ARORADate: 2016.07.0611:06:41 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15008/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/12/2015in WPC No. 164/2015 passed by the High Court Of Meghalya At Shilong)BILLINDA LAPANG AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(Office report)Date : 04/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Hansaria,Sr.Adv.Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv.Mr. Shaury Sahay,Adv.Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi,Adv.Ms. Rekha Bakshi,Adv.Mr. Avnish Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.V. Kharbyngolah,Adv.Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RCounter affidavit be filed within two weeks fromtoday.Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within twoweeks thereafter.List the matter on 26 th August, 2016. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

MATTER FOR:01.07.2016         COURT NO. 6             ITEM NO.33  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     14664/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTEIRM RELIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION AND ANR.      ...PETITIONER                              VERSUS DR. I.K. MANSOORI & ORS.       ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The  petition above mentioned has been filed by Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Advocate on 29.04.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2016 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur in DB Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No. 1080/2015. It is submitted that  counsel for the petitioner has not filed notification dated 09.12.1964, letter dated 28.05.2013 and order dated 01.05.2015 and he has given a letter of undertaking in this regard. Copy of the letter dated 10.05.2016 has already been included in the SLP paper books at Page No. 137. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  Dated this the 27 th  day of June, 2016.              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1.   Mr. Mishra Saurabh , Adv. 2.  Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.               ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

LISTED ON: 01.07.2016                           BEFORE COURT NO.: 14        ITEM NO.: 25 SECTION – IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATTE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14991 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELEIF WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in refiling) ABDUL RAZAK FAUJDARKHAN (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.        ... PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ SMT. SHARADA R. ADYANTHAYA & ANR.                 ...RESPONDENTS             OFFICE REPORT  T he matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber on 10.05.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Delay in refiling the SLP is condoned.”   The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report.  Dated this the 30 th     day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: 1.   Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,  Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR am

SECTION - III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 14667 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF M/s. Sal Steel …..Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Central Excise, Nasik ….Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned has been filed by Mr. Awanish Sinha, Advocate, on behalf of the Petitioner against the Final Judgment/Order dated 26 th February, 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Central Excise Appeal No. 137 of 2014. It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 22 nd January, 2016 filed Additional Documents (in separate volumes) as per his letter of Undertaking dated 8 th December, 2015. Copies of the said documents (in separate volumes) have been tagged with main SLP Paper Books. It is further submitted that the application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP was listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers on 10 th May, 2016 when His Lordship was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay in refling the SLP is condoned.” Hence, t h e matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report Dated this the 14 th Day of May , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: 1. Mr. Awanish Sinha, Advocate, LGF-6/33-33A, Vikram Vihar, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12657/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/01/2016 in WPC No. 10208/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SOCIETY FOR VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND JUSTICE Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.Dutta, Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer,Adv. Mr. Raj Kumar Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Shruti Jose, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. Delay condoned. We do not see any merit in this special leave petition, which is hereby dismissed. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).12673/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2016 in RSA No.340/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) TEJA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SATISH KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Chatanya Siddharth, Adv. Ms.Shweta Shukla, Adv. For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).12673/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2016 in RSA No.340/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) TEJA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SATISH KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Chatanya Siddharth, Adv. Ms.Shweta Shukla, Adv. For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14667/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2015 in CEA No. 137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) M/S. SAL STEEL Petitioner(s) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASIK Respondent(s) (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Premranjan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Awanish Sinha,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

,ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).12673/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2016in RSA No.340/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)TEJA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSATISH KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Chatanya Siddharth, Adv.Ms.Shweta Shukla, Adv. For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.No ground for interference is made out in exercise of ourjurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.12 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14667/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/02/2015 in CEA No. 137/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) M/S. SAL STEEL Petitioner(s) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASIK Respondent(s) (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Premranjan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Awanish Sinha,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byASHWANI KUMARDate: 2016.07.0212:41:24 ISTReason:

â ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.6 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14664/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2016 in CSA No. 1080/2015 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur) PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DR. I.K. MANSOORI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mishra Saurabh,Adv. Mr. Ankit Kr. Lal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anoop George Choudhri Sr.Adv. Ms. June Choudhri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Issue notice.Signature Not Verified Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, learned counsel accepts noticeDigitally signed byNARENDRA PRASADDate: 2016.07.02 on behalf of Respondent NO.1.12:47:52 ISTReason: Therefore, service of notice on respondent No.1 is waived. He may file the counter affidavit -2-within two weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filedwithin one week thereafter. Let notice be issued to other respondents. Notice be also issued to the NCT of Delhi. Liberty toserve the standing counsel for the NCT of Delhi. List this matter on 21st July, 2016.

Till then, there shall be stay of operation andimplementation of the impugned order. [SHARDA KAPOOR] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

SECTION XVI LISTED ON: 30.06.2016 COURT NO.: 12 ITEM NO. : 44 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 14704 OF 2016   (With prayer for interim­relief) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing official translation) M/S RUBY CONSTRUCTIONS    ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petitions above­mentioned have been filed by Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate against the Judgments and Orders dated 19.02.2016 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in I.A No. 8347 of 2013 in First Appeal No. 67 of 2006. It is submitted that SLP(C) No. 19497­19498 of 2007 between the same parties was disposed of by this Hon'ble Court on 05.04.2010. The Copy of the Record of Proceedings dated 05.04.2010 is annexed as Annexure P­4 at page nos. 52­53 of SLP paper­books. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  Dated this the 19th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13908/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/04/2016 in PIL No. 54/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay at Aurangabad) MANIK BHIMRAO JADHAV Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Tag with W.P.(Criminal) No.65 of 2016. (Ashok Raj Singh) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13929/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2016 in RSA No. 30/2012 passed by the Gauhati High Court at Agartala) KAJAL PAUL Petitioner(s) VERSUS AGARTALA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the special leave petition. Permission granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

1 s ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.14 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13976/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/04/2016 in CRP No. 1494/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh) M/S MSR INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S IMPACT METALS LTD. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Ms. Firdouse Qutb Wani,Adv. Mr. Z.J. Rizvi, Adv. Mr. Abhilash Attri, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since the Impugned Order is an interim order in Civil Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the matter is still pending with the High Court, we are not inclined to interfere. It appears that the Petitioner as plaintiff had obtained an interim injunction from the trial court but that could not be extended further because of the impugned interim order passed by the High Court. In these circumstances and considering the nature of the controversy, we grant liberty to the Petitioner to move

2 to the High court for seeking appropriate relief by way of an interim order or for hearing of the main matter itself expeditiously. Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14703/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in CMM No. 1065/2010 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) EKTA MITTAL AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT MITTAL Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Kumar, Adv. For Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice by speed post, in addition to the normal course, returnable on 5 th September, 2016. [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [SNEH BALA MEHRA] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 14704/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2016 in IA No. 8347/2013 in FA No. 67/2006 passed by the High Court of Patna) M/S. RUBY CONSTRUCTIONS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tathagat Harsh Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Dalal, Adv. Mr. Mayur Chaturvedi, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since the impugned order is only an interim order, we are not inclined to interfere with the same. However, having regard to the nature of dispute, it would be appropriate that the appeal pending before the High Court is decided at the earliest. We, therefore, request the High Court to make an endeavour to decide the appeal within a period of six months from today. The special leave petition stands disposed of. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

È ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 14704/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2016 in IA No. 8347/2013 in FA No. 67/2006 passed by the High Court of Patna) M/S. RUBY CONSTRUCTIONS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tathagat Harsh Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Dalal, Adv. Mr. Mayur Chaturvedi, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since the impugned order is only an interim order, we are not inclined to interfere with the same. However, having regard to the nature of dispute, it would be appropriate that the appeal pending before the High Court is decided at the earliest. We, therefore, request the High Court to make an endeavour to decide the appeal within a period of six months from today.Signature Not Verified The special leave petition stands disposed of.Digitally signed byNIDHI AHUJADate: 2016.07.0213:21:50 ISTReason: (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

æ ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13929/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2016 in RSA No. 30/2012 passed by the Gauhati High Court at Agartala) KAJAL PAUL Petitioner(s) VERSUS AGARTALA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the special leave petition. Permission granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNIDHI AHUJADate: 2016.07.0213:21:45 ISTReason:

1 s ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.14 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13976/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/04/2016 in CRP No. 1494/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh) M/S MSR INDIA LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S IMPACT METALS LTD. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Ms. Firdouse Qutb Wani,Adv. Mr. Z.J. Rizvi, Adv. Mr. Abhilash Attri, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since the Impugned Order is an interim order in Civil Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the matter is still pending with the High Court, we are not inclined to interfere. It appears that the Petitioner as plaintiff hadSignature Not Verified obtained an interim injunction from the trial court butDigitally signed byNEELAM GULATIDate: 2016.07.04 that could not be extended further because of the11:32:22 ISTReason: impugned interim order passed by the High Court. In these circumstances and considering the nature of the controversy, we grant liberty to the Petitioner to move 2to the High court for seeking appropriate relief by wayof an interim order or for hearing of the main matteritself expeditiously. Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(NEELAM GULATI) (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

B ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14703/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in CMM No. 1065/2010 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) EKTA MITTAL AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAJAT MITTAL Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 30/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prem Kumar, Adv. For Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice by speed post, in addition to the normal course, returnable on 5th September, 2016. [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] [SNEH BALA MEHRA] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRARSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPARVEEN KUMARDate: 2016.07.0415:31:12 ISTReason:

MATTER FOR 29.06.2016                   COURT NO. 12          ITEM NO.16  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     10022/2016      WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF          KAUSHALIYA    ...PETITIONER                            VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPOR    T The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Let counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.  Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks, thereafter.  List the petition therafter .” It is submitted that counsel for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit, hence no rejoinder affidavit has been filed so far. It is further submitted that as per the Court's order dated 22.04.2016, counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 who has stated to take instructions as to whether represent respondent Nos. 2 & 3 as well has not filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance so far. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the  Hon'ble  Court with this office report. Dated this the 28 th  day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1.   Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,  Adv.   2.   Mr. T. Mahipal , Adv.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTED ON : 29.06.2016 COURT NO.: 14 ITEM NO. : 31 SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C) NO. 13759 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1/2016 (Application for Exemption from filing certified copy of impugned final Judgment and order) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2/2016 (Application for permission to file lengthy list of dates and synopsis) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3/2016 (Application for permission to bring on record additional documents (Vol-II)) M/S SRI ZENITH INFRA REP BY ITS PARTNER SMT. P. SUJATHA HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER -VERSUS- M/S. S.V.S.V.S. PROJECTS PVT LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HYDERABAD & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 13 th April, 2016 of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh in CRP No. 1116 of 2016. It is submitted to the Hon'ble Court that Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri, Counsel for the Petitioner has filed additional documents alongwith application for permission to bring on record the same. The application alongwith additional documents are placed below for kind perusal of Hon’ble Court. The aforesaid matter alongwith applications are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 20 th day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NS

Copy to : Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri, Advocate 16, Old Lawyer’s Chambers ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NS

LISTED ON : 29.06.2016 COURT NO.: 6 ITEM NO. : 40 SECTION XII-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C) NO. 13972 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A. MALLI BABU & ANR. ...PETITIONERS -VERSUS- UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN & OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 19 th February, 2016 of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition No. 5474 of 2016. It is submitted to the Hon'ble Court that SLP(C) No. 23782 of 2015 (Main matter SLP(C) No. 23767 of 2015) order dated 05.12.2013 in WPMP No. 43175 of 2013 in Writ Petition No. 34718 of 2013 (Annexure P-2 of High Court Order ) was dismissed by Hon’ble Court on 17.08.2015 (A copy of Record of Proceedings dated 17.08.2015 is enclosed herewith for kind perusal of Hon’ble Court) The aforesaid matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 20 th day of June, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Atulesh Kumar, Advocate 15, M.C Setalvad Lawyer's Chamber, Supreme Court ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NS

LISTED ON : 29.06.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.: 11                             ITEM NO.: 45                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13951 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing Certified Copy) JAYASHREE @ SHANTABAI AND ORS.    ...PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ GRAM PANCHAYAT, DHAWALPUR, TQ. PARNER,  DISTRICT AHMEDNAGAR AND ORS.                    ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT  I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that  counsel for the petitioner has on 04.05.2016 filed a letter stating therein that the copy resolutions dated 10.03.2011 and 10.08.2014 mentioned in the impugned order and synopsis are not necessary/required for the hearing of the present Special Leave Petition (Copy of the Advocate's letter dated 04.05.2016 is included in the paper­books at page No. 105). The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 21st day of June, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Uday B. Dube, Advocate  L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 10022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T., interim relief and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Ms. Eshita Kapur, Adv. Mr. T. Gopal, Adv. Ms. Heena Khan, Adv. Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. B. Singh, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks, thereafter. List the matter after six weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13901/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/02/2016 in RP No. 810/2011 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi) MOHAN LAL SISODIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS LIC OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Kr. Chawla, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Basant Kr. Chawla, Adv. Mr. Debasis Misra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13906/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/08/2015 in WA No.100806/2014 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad) MANI PRA SAMPADANA MAHASWAMIGALU Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. H.N. Nagmohan Das,Sr.Adv. Mr. E.C. Vidya Sagar,Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandra Sagar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition, so as to enable the petitioner to approach the High Court with a request for an early hearing of the appeal, which is pending before the High Court. Permission is granted. The special leave petition is disposed of as withdrawn. We are sure that if such a request is made by the petitioner, the High Court shall consider the same and shall make an effort to decide the appeal at an early date. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13928/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/01/2016 in RSA No. 68/2015 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati) PAULINE MAZUMDAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITA SMITH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Parthiv K. Goswami, Adv. Mr. Yashvardhan Singh, Adv. Ms. Diksha Rai,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR JHA) COURT MASTER (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13951/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in WP No. 10625/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) JAYASHREE @ SHANTABAI AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS GRAM PANCHAYAT, DHAWALPUR, TQ. PARNER, DISTRICT AHMEDNAGAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Uday B. Dube, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Special Leave Petition since the parties intend to settle the matter amicably outside the Court. Permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petition is granted. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Sr. P.A. (Chander Bala) Court Master

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 13972/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2016 in WP No. 5474/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh) A. MALLI BABU & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atulesh Kumar, A.O.R. Ms. Hema Malik, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no infirmity in the order impugned herein. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13901/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/02/2016in RP No. 810/2011 passed by the National Consumer DisputesRedressal Commission, New Delhi)MOHAN LAL SISODIA Petitioner(s) VERSUSLIC OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Kr. Chawla, Adv.Mr. Hitesh Kr. Sharma, Adv.Mr. Basant Kr. Chawla, Adv.Mr. Debasis Misra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe special leave petition is dismissed.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

ÀITEM NO.52 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.13936/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2016in RP No. 2675/2015 passed by the National Consumers DisputesReddressal Commission, New Delhi)SULAKSHNA Petitioner(s) VERSUSORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and interim relief)Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RApplication for exemption from filing certified copyof the impugned judgment is allowed.Issue notice.(Chetan Kumar)Court Master (H.S. Parasher)Court Master

ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13951/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/02/2016 in WP No. 10625/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) JAYASHREE @ SHANTABAI AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS GRAM PANCHAYAT, DHAWALPUR, TQ. PARNER, DISTRICT AHMEDNAGAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Uday B. Dube, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Special Leave Petition since the parties intend to settle the matter amicably outside the Court. Permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petition is granted. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJAYANT KUMAR ARORADate: 2016.07.0213:05:50 ISTReason: (Jayant Kumar Arora) (Chander Bala) Sr. P.A. Court Master

ØITEM NO.16 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 10022/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016in SBCSA No. 39/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan atJodhpur)KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUSJODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T., interim relief andoffice report)Date : 29/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor Petitioner(s)Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv.Ms. Eshita Kapur, Adv.Mr. T. Gopal, Adv.Ms. Heena Khan, Adv.Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s)Mr. S. B. Singh, Adv.Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLet reply be filed within four weeks.Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within twoweeks, thereafter.List the matter after six weeks. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15871/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/06/2016 in LPA No. 249/2016 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi) BALDEV SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) WITH SLP(C) No. 15879/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 27/06/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR [VACATION BENCH] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Adv. Ms. Diksha Ojha, Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the special leave petitions. The special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to any other remedy in accordance with law. We do not express any opinion on availability of any such remedy. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (H.S. PARASHER) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15871/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/06/2016 in LPA No. 249/2016 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand At Ranchi) BALDEV SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 15879/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 24/06/2016 These petitions were orally mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on Board. List the matter on 27.06.2016. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master

\202 ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15871/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/06/2016 in LPA No. 249/2016 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand At Ranchi) BALDEV SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 15879/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 24/06/2016 These petitions were orally mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on Board. List the matter on 27.06.2016. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (Madhu Narula)Signature Not Verified Court Master Court MasterDigitally signed byGULSHAN KUMARARORADate: 2016.06.2418:07:03 ISTReason:

Listed on: Before Court No. Item No. SECTION IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 15419 of 2016 SHASHILAL RAGHAVAN NAI PETITIONER -VERSUS- MARY KUTTY EMMANUAL RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that  Special Leave Petition (C) No. 30769 of 2012 between cross parties arising out of similar issue was dismissed by the Hon'ble Court on 29.10.2012 (Copy of the order dated 29.10.2012 is enclosed herewith). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 2 nd  day of June, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Chirag M. Shroff , Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ga

¾ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15419/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/05/2016in WP No. 5366/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)SHASHILAL RAGHAVAN NAIR Petitioner(s) VERSUSMARY KUTTY EMMANUAL Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and interim relief and office report)Date : 06/06/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY(VACATION BENCH)For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. H. Marlapalle, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bipin Joshi, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw this Special Leave Petition. Permission is granted. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed aswithdrawn. (Jayant Kumar Arora)Sr. P.A. (Sneh Lata Sharma)Court Master

\200ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15006/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/05/2016in RCRP No. 527/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At NewDelhi)J.D. TYTLER NURSERY SCHOOL Petitioner(s) VERSUSAMARJEET KAUR Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and permission to file additional documents)Date : 30/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY(VACATION BENCH)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Ashish Jha, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Adv. Mr. Karma Dorjee, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv. Ms. Samten Doma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Adv. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Promil Seth Mago, Adv. Ms. Ruhini Dey, Adv. Mr. Ashish Rana, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain this Special Leave Petition,which is, accordingly, dismissed.Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.(Jayant Kumar Arora)Sr. P.A. (Sneh Lata Sharma)Court Master

LISTED ON :25.05.2016               BEFORE COURT NO.:                               ITEM NO.:       SECTION­IX          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 14678 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing Certified Copy of the Impugned Order) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for Impleadment) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR.       ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.               ..RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 12th May, 2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order :­   "Post this petition in the week commencing 23rd May, 2016." It is submitted for the information of the information of the Hon'ble Court that as per para 1A of the SLP paper­books filed by counsel for the petitioner, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein are necessary parties as Chief Minister and Minister Tribal Development Department have endorsed the note dated 13.07.2015 which is affected to the petitioners. They were also party respondents before the High Court . Hence, they are necessary parties. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Vacation Bench with this report.  Dated this the 20th day of May, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocate.  L  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment and interim relief and office report) Date : 25/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD [VACATION BENCH] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable within four weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

<ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).14678/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay)SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment and interimrelief and office report)Date : 25/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT HON&#39;BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD[VACATION BENCH]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIssue notice returnable within four weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

LISTED ON 13.05.2016(Supply) COURT NO. ITEM NO. SEC.IV-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. /2016 (Application for modification/clarification of order dated 04.05.2016) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11163 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF The Tobacco Institute of India. ...Petitioner(s) -Versus- Union of India & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters on 04.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, learned senior counsel submits that the subject-matter of challenge in writ proceedings in which the impugned order has been passed pertains to the constitutional validity of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Amendment Rules, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) framed by the Government of India and the same is pending before the Karnataka High Court. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General has handed over a list of cases on the issue pending before various High Courts. It is seen from the list that most of the matters are pending before the Karnataka High Court and few of them are pending in Bombay, Gujarat and Delhi High Courts. It has been contended before us by learned counsel appearing for the parties that all the matters which are pending before different High Courts be transferred to a particular High Court so that the matters can be heard and disposed of at a time. In view of that, it is considered appropriate, at this stage, to transfer all the matters pending before the different High Courts to the Karnataka High Court. We, therefore, transfer all matters pending before various High Courts, as referred to hereinabove, on the issue to the Karnataka High Court. We request the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court to

constitute a Bench, which would dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from date. We further make it clear that the matters should be disposed of by the Principal Bench of the Karnataka High Court. We have also been informed that the cases transferred include Public Interest Litigation petitions pending for implementation of the said Rules. In view of that, we would also request the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court to decide whether the cases transferred hereby would be taken up by a Division Bench or a Single Bench in accordance with the Rules of the said High Court. Stay, if any, already granted by any High Court shall not be given effect to till the cases are finally disposed of. We make it clear that any other order passed by any High Court including the order passed by this Court dated 06.05.2009 on the Interlocutory Applications filed in Writ Petition (C) No. 549/2008 with regard to the stay shall not stand in the way of the Karnataka High Court to decide the matter on merits. The Secretary General of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the Registrar Generals of the concerned High Courts where similar matters are pending with a request to take necessary steps for sending the relevant records/documents to the Karnataka High Court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The Special Leave Petitions and the Writ Petitions stand disposed on the aforestated terms. ” It is submitted that Mr. Rajan Narain, Advocate has on 11.05.2016 filed an application for modification/clarification of order dated 04.05.2016 (copy enclosed) on behalf of Godfrey Philips India Ltd along with Annexures A & B with affidavit. The applicant is not a party in the SLP. Thereafter, the application above mentioned in the matter was mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 11.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “List this I.A on Friday, the 13 th May, 2016.” In view of the aforesaid order, the unregistered application is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 12 th day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Rajan Narain, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

dkm

MATTER FOR:13.05.2016 COURT NO. 5 ITEM NO. 32 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13730/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4 (Application for substitution and condonation of delay in filing substitution application) DAMODAR DAS (D) THROUGH LRS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS PUSHKARNA BRAHMIN BHIMJI KA MOHALA VIKAS SAMITI & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Petition above mentioned has been filed by Smt. Pratibha Jain, Advocate on 29.02.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.12.2015 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Execution Second Appeal No. 27/1994. It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has filed Special Leave Petition within time but after curing the defects on refiling of the Special Leave Petition is barred by time by 36 days and the same has been condoned by competent authority. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has also filed an application for substitution to bring on record the LRs of deceased Respondent No. 2 viz. Mr. Udai Kishan S/o Shri Damodar Das alongwith application for condonation of delay in substitution application as the same is barred by time by 225 days which have been registered as I.A. Nos. 3 and 4. Copy of the same have already been included in the paper books. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 12 th   day of May, 2016.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:     1.  Smt. Pratibha Jain, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Listed on: 13.5.2016     Court No. 8                      Item  No. 37                      SECTION  XI­A                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION              PETITION  FOR SPECIAL  LEAVE  TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 13679 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF                    AJAY JOJO JAMES & ANR.   ....Petitioners                Versus    ADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES OF  KERALA & ORS.                                      ...Respondents                             OFFICE REPORT    This Special Leave Petition has been filed by Mr. Romy Chocko, Advocate on 05 th May, 2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 24.02.2016 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.P. (C) No. 37182 of 2015. It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that W.P. (C) No. 76 of 2015 entitled ASHISH RANJAN & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. referred to on Page 'P' of list of dates was disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 18.01.2016. (Copy of the record of proceeding dated 18.01.2016 is enclosed herewith for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court). The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 10 th  day of May, 2016.               Sd/­                      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IVB       Listed on 13.5.2016           Court No.5              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.30              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO.13687  OF  2016     WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF  AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. . (Application for permission to bring on record facts and  documents) Managing Director, Pepsu Road Transport Corp. Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Spirit Global Constructions Pvt Ltd. & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr.Abhinav Mukerji, Advocate on 25.4.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 5.2.2016 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Arbitration No. 91/2015.  It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has on 12.5.2016 filed an application for permission to bring on record facts and documents subsequent to the passing of impugned judgment and final order and the same is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.  Dated this the 12th day of May, 2016.                                                               ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :­  Mr.  Abhinav Mukerji  , Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  neeraj

LISTED ON :13.05.2016                           BEFORE COURT NO.: 05                                ITEM NO.: 35       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13784 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF DIPESH DEVENDRABHAI GAUR AND ORS ....PETITIONERS ­VERSUS­ RAMESHBHAI MANGALBHAI PATEL AND ANR .  ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that there is a delay of 36 days in re­filing the instant matter and the same has been condoned by the Ld. Additional Registrar. It is further submitted that SLP (C) No. 28224 of 2015 between the same parties arising out of similar issue was dismissed/disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 18.09.2015 (Copy of the Order dated 18.09.2015 is included in the paper books as annexure P­10 at page No. 76). The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 12 th   day of May, 2016.                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Mohan Pandey, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTING ON 13.05.2016 (Supple.) COURT NO.  ITEM NO.  SEC.IV­A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13905 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing O.T.) M/S RENAISSANCE MINES & MINERALS PVT. LTD. ...PETITIONER ­Versus­ STATE OF M.P. & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the final Judgment and Order dated 11.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 11956/2015. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 13641/2016 and the instant matter arising out of common order and have been tagged together. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 10 th  day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR PC4

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13369/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/01/2016 in RP No.1129/2010 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Reddressal Commission, New Delhi) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS KOLLA SANTHI AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Banerjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. G.V.R. Choudary, Adv. Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri,Adv. Mr. A. Chandra Sekhar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appellant-Corporation shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000,00/- (Rupees ten lakhs only) along with interest in the Registry of this Court within a period of four weeks. The respondents will be entitled to withdraw the aforesaid amount without giving any security. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

1 ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13446/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/03/2016 in APP No. 868/2014 31/03/2016 in APP No. 11/2016 passed by the High Court of Bombay) RAHEJA UNIVERSAL PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.E. BILLIOMORIA AND CO. LTD. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. Mr. Ankit Parhar, Adv. Mr. Ambarish Pandey, Adv. Ms. Abhilash Chaudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Basant R., Sr. Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv. Mr. Kunal Manav, Adv. Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be interim stay of the operation of the impugned order of the High Court. However, Mr. Basant R., learned senior counsel appearing for the caveator/respondent submits that the machinery belonging to the sole caveator/respondent is lying at the site within the control of the petitioner, therefore, the respondent may be permitted to remove its machinery.

2 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the said prayer. In the circumstances, the caveator/respondent is permitted to remove its machinery in the presence of some duly authorized person on behalf of the petitioner after taking note of appropriate inventory. This is without prejudice to the rights and claims of the respondent. (SWETA DHYANI ) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13657/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/04/2016 in WP No. 43082/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh) MITRA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.V.Viswanathan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Ray, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. Mr. Govind Manoharan, Adv. Ms. Shruti Iyer, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kapur, Adv. Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Ms. Shubhra Kapur, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13676/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/01/2016 in RFA No. 1501/2003 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SUKHDEV SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB, THR. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES Respondent(s) Date :13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jaspreet Gogia,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 08.07.2016. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Chander Bala ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13689/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/02/2016 in RSA No. 100052/2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad) PRABHAVATI AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANDAKINI W/O MOHAN PATIL Respondent(s) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the prayer for interim relief as well as on the special leave petition, returnable within six weeks. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13700/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/02/2016 in CO No. 3928/2015 passed by the High Court of Calcutta) SRI TAPAS BISWAS Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chinmoy A. Khalodkar, Adv. Mr. Srimanta Ray, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

1 ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13706/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/02/2016 in WP No. 36625/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh) MANNE SUBRAMANYAM Petitioner(s) VERSUS SRIDHAR ENTERPRISES & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) WITH SLP(C) No. 13719/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 13/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao,Sr.Adv. Mr. J. Govardhan Reddy, Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Lovely Kumari Singh, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Uttam Datt, Adv. Mr. TVS Raghnendra Sreyas, Adv. Mr. Gayatri Gulati Sreyas, Adv. Mr. Saksham Marwa, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the relevant material. Issue notice.

2 Until further orders, status quo , as on today with regard to the possession of property, shall be maintained by the parties. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Asha Soni) Court Master

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.13781/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/01/2016 in SB No. 1306/2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) YOGENDRA PAL SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,AOR Mr. Shaantanu Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition, which is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13784/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/12/2015 in MCA No. 3139/2015 04/12/2015 in FA No. 4512/2007 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) DIPESH DEVENDRABHAI GAUR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMESHBHAI MANGALBHAI PATEL AND ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and office report) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Uday Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shivani M. Lal, Adv. Mr. M.K. Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dave, Adv. Mr. D. Bhowmick, Adv. Mr. Mohan Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. Interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SWETA DHYANI ) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

Ø ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13784/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/12/2015 in MCA No. 3139/2015 04/12/2015 in FA No. 4512/2007 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) DIPESH DEVENDRABHAI GAUR AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMESHBHAI MANGALBHAI PATEL AND ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to place addl. documents on record and office report) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Uday Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shivani M. Lal, Adv. Mr. M.K. Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dave, Adv. Mr. D. Bhowmick, Adv. Mr. Mohan Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. Interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SWETA DHYANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.05.1410:04:30 ISTReason:

 ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.5 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13730/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/12/2015 in SBCEA No. 27/1994 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) DAMODAR DAS (D) THROUGH LRS Petitioner(s) VERSUS PUSHKARNA BRAHMIN BHIMJI KA MOHALA VIKAS SAMITI AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and substitution and interim relief and office report) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Apurv Taran, Adv. Mr. Manu Maheswari, Adv. Ms. Ankita Gutpa, Adv. Ms. Pratibha Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the special leave petition, application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application and application for substitution do not arise and are dismissed as such.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of.SWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.05.1410:04:29 ISTReason: (SWETA DHYANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

p 1 ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No...... in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11163/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in WA No. 502/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore) THE TOBACCO INSTITUTE OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for clarification/modification of court's order dated 04.05.2016 and office report) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravinder Narain, Adv. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Kanika Gomber, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Adv.Digitally signed by Mr. Harsh Parasher, Adv.R.NATARAJANDate: 2016.05.1412:53:18 IST Ms. Nithya Rajashekar, Adv.Reason: Mr. Lorren M. Adv. Ms. Shrinidhi Rao, Adv. 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. After hearing the parties, we consider it appropriate that theapplication which has been filed before this Court may also betransferred to the Karnataka High Court.

Liberty is also granted to the applicant to apply before theKarnataka High Court even before the transfer of records of thecase. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, werequest the Karnataka High Court to pass an order even during thevacation, after hearing the parties, upon notice to the partiesconcerned. The I.A. is disposed of on the aforestated terms. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13758/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in OP No. 120/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) ABDUL JAWAD M.F AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS R. RAJ PRADEEP AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 13785-13786/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 13/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv. Ms. Beena Victor, Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Krishna Mohan Menon, Adv. Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv. Ms. Reena Roy, Adv. Ms. Seema Jain, Adv. Mr. Gautam Shivasankar, Adv. Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byDEEPAK MANSUKHANIDate: 2016.05.1412:52:40 ISTReason: -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Status quo, obtaining as on today, shall bemaintained by the parties. Subject to completion of service, list the mattersfor hearing in the first week of December, 2016. Counter affidavit be filed within eight weeks.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13761/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2016 in CMAA No. 99/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) M/S OPEL BUILDCON PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAM AWTAR GUPTA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Katriar, Sr. Adv. Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Arindam Mukherjee, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. Interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SWETA DHYANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySWETA DHYANIDate: 2016.05.1410:04:10 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13676/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/01/2016 in RFA No. 1501/2003 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SUKHDEV SINGH AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB, THR. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES Respondent(s) Date :13/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Ms. Jaspreet Gogia,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 08.07.2016. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Chander Bala ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCHARANJEET KAURDate: 2016.05.1317:48:42 ISTReason:

SECTION - III IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 10003 OF 2016 M/s Samtel India Limited …..Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate ….Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above-mentioned has been filed by Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate, on behalf of the Petitioner against the Interim Order dated 11 th January, 2016 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur in Civil Excise Reference Petition No. 9 of 2004. It is submitted that counsel for the Petitioner has on 2 nd May, 2016 filed Copies of the Orders dated 24.05.2004 and 15.10.2004 as per her letter of Undertaking dated 8 th April, 2016. Copies of the said Documents have been included in the Paper Books. The matter is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report Dated this the 3 rd Day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate 13, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi 110001 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c4

MATTER FOR:12.05.2016 COURT NO. 5 ITEM NO. 12 SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13787/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for permission to file additional documents) HIMANSHU SHARMA ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Petition above mentioned has been filed by Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Advocate on 06.05.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.03.2016 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1292/2016. It is submitted that the Registrar General, High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur has been made party as Respondent No. 2. It is submitted that Special Leave Petition No. 12542/2016 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to leave grant. Copy of the Record of Proceedings dated 09.05.2016 is enclosed herewith for the kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition Nos. 11898­11899/2016 arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 04.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to issue notice. Copy of the Record of Proceedings dated 04.05.2016 has already been included in the paper books as Annexure P­6  at Page No. 79. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition Nos. 14323/2013  referred to on Annexure P­3 was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to dismiss the same. Copy of the Record of Proceedings dated 12.01.2016 has already been included in the paper books as Annexure P­3 at Page Nos. 63­64.

It is lastly submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 11.05.2016 filed an application for permission to file additional documents with P­7 to P­11. The same has been registered as I.A. No. 3. Copy of the same is being circulated  herewith. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 11 th   day of May, 2016.    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:     1.  Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/F.OR.

ITEM NO.826 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post this petition in the week commencing 23 rd May, 2016. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

xITEM NO.12 COURT NO.5 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13787/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2016in SBCWP No. 1292/2016 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur)HIMANSHU SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report)Date : 12/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Uday Gupta, Adv.Mr. Hiren Dasan, Adv.Mr. Chand Qureshi, Adv.Mr. Rahul Arya, Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RApplications for exemption from filing C/C of theimpugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. areallowed.Leave granted.Tag with Civil Appeal @ SLP(C) No. 12542/2016.(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13436/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2016 in RP No. 3069/2015 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal) AMRAPALI HOMES PROJECT PVT. LTD AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS GAUTAM SINHA Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 12/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, AOR Ms. Taruna A. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Aviral Shukla, Adv. Mr. Panshul Chandra, Adv. Mr. Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (INDU POKHRIYAL) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.05.1317:02:31 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.826 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14678/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/04/2016 in WP No. 9249/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) SHRI SANT ROHIDAS CHARMODYOG SANSHODHAN VIKAS AND PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vinay Navare, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post this petition in the week commencing 23rd May, 2016. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySHASHI SAREENDate: 2016.05.1412:48:17 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 431/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10004/2016 DEEPAK KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOVT. OF U.P LUCKNOW (U.P) AND ORS. Respondent(s) (for deletion of the name of respondent and office report) WITH IA No.352/2016 IN SLP(C) No. 10006/2016 (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) IA No.556/2016 IN SLP(C) No. 10008/2016 (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) IA No.599/2016 IN SLP(C) No. 10005/2016 (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) Date : 11/05/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishna M. Singh,Adv. Mr. Danish Zubair Khan,Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, the application for deletion of proforma respondents in each of the special leave petitions is allowed at the risk of the petitioners. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (SAROJ SAINI) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11163/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in WA No. 502/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore) THE TOBACCO INSTITUTE OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief) Date : 11/05/2016 This Application was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravinder Narain, Adv. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Kanika Gomber, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this I.A on Friday, the 13 th May, 2016. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.12 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13386/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2016 in WP No. 519/2016 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) BHUPENDRA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUSHILA SHARMA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 11/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prafulla Behra, Adv. Ms. Sudha R. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Interlocutory application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (Ashwani Thakur) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13388/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/03/2016 in WP No. 494/2016 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) M/S SHAHJI CLOTH HOUSE PRO. TAFFAZUL HUSSAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUS UTTARAKHAND GRAMIN BANK AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 11/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Sr.Adv. Mr. Y.R. Mishara, Adv. Mr.Ajit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kailash Sharma, Adv. Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We find no ground to interfere. The special leave petition is dismissed. Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENU DIWAN) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13422/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2016 in WC No.4304/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) SURENDRA MISHRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 11/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Dr. Surat Singh,Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kr. Singh,Adv. For Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not find any merit in this petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Sarita Purohit) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master

8ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13388/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/03/2016in WP No. 494/2016 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand atNainital)M/S SHAHJI CLOTH HOUSE PRO. TAFFAZUL HUSSAIN Petitioner(s) VERSUSUTTARAKHAND GRAMIN BANK AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief)Date : 11/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Sr.Adv. Mr. Y.R. Mishara, Adv. Mr.Ajit Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kailash Sharma, Adv. Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard learned counsel for the petitioner.We find no ground to interfere.The special leave petition is dismissed.Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENU DIWAN) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

¢ ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11163/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in WA No. 502/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore) THE TOBACCO INSTITUTE OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With interim relief) Date : 11/05/2016 This Application was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravinder Narain, Adv. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Kanika Gomber, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this I.A on Friday, the 13th May, 2016. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byR.NATARAJANDate: 2016.05.1116:51:30 ISTReason:

\226 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 431/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10004/2016 DEEPAK KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOVT. OF U.P LUCKNOW (U.P) AND ORS. Respondent(s) (for deletion of the name of respondent and office report) WITH IA No.352/2016 IN SLP(C) No. 10006/2016 (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) IA No.556/2016 IN SLP(C) No. 10008/2016 (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) IA No.599/2016 IN SLP(C) No. 10005/2016 (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) Date : 11/05/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishna M. Singh,Adv. Mr. Danish Zubair Khan,Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, the application for deletion of proforma respondents in each of the special leave petitionsSignature Not Verified is allowed at the risk of the petitioners.Digitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2016.05.1217:10:11 ISTReason: (SUMAN WADHWA) (SAROJ SAINI) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :10/05/2016 COURT No. :1 ITEM No.  :21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) No. 13022 of 2016    (With Prayer for Interim Relief) M/S BINSYS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents OFFICE­REPORT The Special Leave Petition above­mentioned has been filed by Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Advocate against the judgment and Order dated the 12/04/2016 of the High Court of Calcutta in W.P. 6975(W) of 2016 . It is submitted that Civil Appeal No. 14292 of 2015 arising out  of SLP (c) 33269 of 2015 arising out of similar issue, in which leave was granted on 7/12/2015,   is pending.  (Copy of order dated 7/12/2015 is enclosed).  It is submitted that Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Advocate for the Petitioner has on 9/05/2016 filed Annexures P­26 to P­38 as additional documents along with application for permission to file additional documents.  The same is defective for the reasons that some pages are in dim impression.  However the unregistered I.A. is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court for kind perusal. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­report. Dated this the 9 th  day of May, 2016. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, Advocate Assistant Registrar

LISTED ON : 10.05.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.: 08                             ITEM NO.: 18                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 13032 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing Certified Copy of the Impugned final Order) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for permission to file lengthy synopsis and list of dates) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for pleading additional facts and taking on record additional documents) NEOTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION               ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT  I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 7277 of 2014 (Civil Appeal No. 6938 of 2015) involving similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.09.2015 when the Court was pleased to grant leave and the same is pending before the Hon'ble Court (Copy of the order dated 01.09.2015 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 15001­15004 of 2015 arising out of similar issue was dismissed/disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 01.09.2015 (Copy of the order dated 01.09.2015 is enclosed herewith). It is lastly submitted that Writ Petition (C) No. 895 of 2013 referred to on Annexure P­3 of the paper­books at page No. 53 was dismissed by the Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016 (Copy of the order dated 08.03.2016 is enclosed herewith). The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 09th day of May, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTED ON : 10.05.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.: 02                             ITEM NO.: 13                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 12662 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing Certified Copy of the Impugned Order) M/S. BHAIRAV INDUSTRIES THR. ITS PROPRIETOR  ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR.                    ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT  I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that counsel for the petitioner has on 02.05.2016 filed the undertaking documents (Order dated 11.01.2013) and the same is being circulated before the Hon'ble Court. The matter above­ mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 09th day of May, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Advocate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 12662/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/03/2016 in APP No. 51/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) M/S. BHAIRAV INDUSTRIES THR. ITS PROPRIETOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report) Date :10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these petitions so as to approach the official liquidator. Permission sought for is granted. The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Sneh Bala Mehra ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12663/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2016 in CMWP No. 66484/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) DR. ZEBA HASAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, AOR Mr. C. George Thomas, Adv. Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Jain, AOR Mr. Ullas Saraswat, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition, which is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (RASHMI DHYANI) (SHARDA KAPOOR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12673/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2016 in RSA No. 340/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) TEJA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SATISH KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Chatanya Siddharth, Adv.for Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner circulated a letter seeking an adjournment indicating that the arguing counsel is unwell and is not in a position to appear before this Court. As prayed for, list after summer vacation. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

1 ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/04/2016 in WP No. 6975/2016 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta) M/S BINSYS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv. Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. The order under challenge is an order passed by a Single Judge of the High Court of Calcutta. It is not in dispute that an appeal lies, against any such order, before a Division Bench of that Court. We see no reason why the petitioner should have rushed to this Court instead of filing an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court. This special leave petition accordingly fails and is hereby dismissed, reserving liberty for the petitioner to seek redress by way of an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court, if so advised. We make

2 it clear that we have expressed no opinion on the merits of the contentions sought to be urged. All such contentions on law and facts shall remain open. No costs. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13032/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/04/2016 in SCA No. 2620/2016 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) NEOTECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and placing addl. facts and documents on record and interim relief and office report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Adv. Ms. Priti Kumari, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R E xemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment granted. Issue notice. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13035/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/02/2016 in FAO No. 141/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) M/S UNITECH LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Saket Sikri, Adv. Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohtagi,Adv. Mr. Samten Doma, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.601 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13932/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/04/2016 in IA No. 345/2016 In FCOP No. 360/2016 passed by the Additional Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District At Miyapur) DR. ATLURI VIDYALATHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DR. RAVIPATI SRINIVASA KUMAR Respondent(s) (With appln. For exmeption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was taken up in mentioning Board today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Kankaraj, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.V. Kameshwaran,Adv. Mr. Y. Likesh, Adv. Mr. Kondappally, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on Board. We do not find any merit in this petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Sneh Bala Mehra ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar

² ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 12662/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/03/2016 in APP No. 51/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) M/S. BHAIRAV INDUSTRIES THR. ITS PROPRIETOR Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report) Date :10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these petitions so as to approach the official liquidator. Permission sought for is granted. The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Sneh Bala Mehra ]Signature Not Verified A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. RegistrarDigitally signed byCHARANJEET KAURDate: 2016.05.1016:50:17 ISTReason:

¾ ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12663/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2016 in CMWP No. 66484/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad) DR. ZEBA HASAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, AOR Mr. C. George Thomas, Adv. Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Praveen Jain, AOR Mr. Ullas Saraswat, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition, which is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (RASHMI DHYANI)Signature Not Verified (SHARDA KAPOOR) SR.P.A.Digitally signed by COURT MASTERRASHMI DHYANIDate: 2016.05.1212:42:58 ISTReason:

¶ 1 ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/04/2016 in WP No. 6975/2016 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta) M/S BINSYS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv. Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. The order under challenge is an order passed by a Single Judge of the High Court of Calcutta. It is not in dispute that an appeal lies, against any such order, before a Division Bench of that Court. We see no reason why the petitioner should have rushed to this Court instead of filing an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.Signature Not Verified This special leave petitionDigitally signed byMahabir SinghDate: 2016.05.16 accordingly fails and is hereby dismissed, reserving liberty15:49:13 ISTReason: for the petitioner to seek redress by way of an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court, if so advised. We make 2it clear that we have expressed no opinion on the merits of the

contentions sought to be urged. All such contentions on lawand facts shall remain open. No costs.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

4 ITEM NO.825 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13758/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in OP No. 120/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) ABDUL JAWAD M.F AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS R. RAJ PRADEEP AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13785-13786/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S,Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post on Friday i.e. on 13.05.2016 along with connected matters. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySHASHI SAREENDate: 2016.05.1314:42:17 ISTReason:

4 ITEM NO.825 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13758/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in OP No. 120/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) ABDUL JAWAD M.F AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS R. RAJ PRADEEP AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13785-13786/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S,Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post on Friday i.e. on 13.05.2016 along with connected matters. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySHASHI SAREENDate: 2016.05.1117:03:22 ISTReason:

4 ITEM NO.825 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13758/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in OP No. 120/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) ABDUL JAWAD M.F AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS R. RAJ PRADEEP AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13785-13786/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S,Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post on Friday i.e. on 13.05.2016 along with connected matters. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySHASHI SAREENDate: 2016.05.1314:42:17 ISTReason:

4 ITEM NO.825 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13758/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/03/2016 in OP No. 120/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) ABDUL JAWAD M.F AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS R. RAJ PRADEEP AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 13785-13786/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S,Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R Post on Friday i.e. on 13.05.2016 along with connected matters. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySHASHI SAREENDate: 2016.05.1314:42:17 ISTReason:

Þ ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12673/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2016 in RSA No. 340/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) TEJA SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS SATISH KUMAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Chatanya Siddharth, Adv.for Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner circulated a letter seeking an adjournment indicating that the arguing counsel is unwell and is not in a position to appear before this Court. As prayed for, list after summer vacation. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by USHARANI BHARDWAJDate: 2016.05.1117:11:49 ISTReason:

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 09.05.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :  2                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :   3 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 10075 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  matter above­mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Issue notice by speed post, returnable on 09 th  May, 2016.” Accordingly, show cause notice returnable for 09.05.2016 was issued to all the 4 Respondents on 22.04.2016 through Speed Post. As per Postal Authority delivery report notice have been delivered on all the respondents. No one has entered appearance on behalf of any of the respondents so far. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 06 th   day of May , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:        Mr. P. K. Singh, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

LISTED ON : 09.05.2016                         BEFORE COURT NO.: 09                              ITEM NO.:40       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 12643 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) HUSENBHAI ABDUL SATTARBHAI MOR ....PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ SHAHIKUMAR CHHOTALAL KAMDAR (SINCE DECEASED)  THR. HIS LR. AND ORS.                               ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is a delay of 14 days in re­filing the Special Leave Petition which has been condoned by the Competent Authority. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 02nd    day of May, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. O. P. Bhadani, Advocate L  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IVB       Listed on 9.5.2016           Court No.8              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.39              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO.12645 OF 2016     WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF      INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of  impugned judgment/order)   AND NTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.3 (Application for impleadment) Dharambir Petitioner(s) Versus Jasbir & Anr. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Sachin Patil , Advocate on 4.3.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 4.12.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No.4550/2015 along with the applications for exemption from filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order and impleadment. It is further submitted that initially SLP filed against the Order dated 4.12.2015 was within time but there was a delay of 27 days in refiling the SLP. Counsel had filed an application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP and the same has been condoned by Additional Registrar I­B on  29.4.2016. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 6th day of May, 2016.                                                                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :­  Mr.  Sachin Patil , Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  neeraj

SECTION­XVI LISTED ON:09.05.2016 COURT NO.:6 ITEM No.: 30 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 12656 OF 2016 (With prayer for Interim Relief) AKHILESH CHAUDHARY  … PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. … RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above­mentioned has been filed by Mr. Danish Zubair Khan, Advocate against the impugned Order dated 29.04.2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in LPA No. 993 of 2010. It is submitted that there was a delay of 150 days in re­filing the special leave petition which is condoned by Hon'ble Judge­in­Chamber Court vide Order dated 11.04.2016 as the counsel for the petitioner has deposited Rs.1000/­ and filed a proof of cost to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office report. Dated this the 4th    day of May 2016 SSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Danish Zubair Khan, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR rm

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10075/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015 in WC No. 59470/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shashank Bajpai,Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Shakun S.Shukla,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. N.R.Shamsad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 8 th July, 2016. Four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed thereafter. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (SNEH BALA MEHRA) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12640/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/04/2016 in IA No. 4070/2015 in ARBA No. 48/2015 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) M/S. PANCHAMY PACK (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Gopakumaran Nair, Sr. Adv. Mr. T. G. Narayanan Nair, AOR Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagari, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Adv. Ms. Azra Rehman, Adv. For M/s Lawyer's Knit & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition, which is dismissed. However, taking into account the fact that the petitioner is a small scale industry, we only request the High Court to dispose of the appeal itself expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. (RASHMI DHYANI) (SHARDA KAPOOR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12653/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2016 in FA No. 109/2016 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Reddressal Commission, New Delhi) M/S. LAKSHMI BUILDERS AND ANOTHER Petitioner(s) VERSUS KESAVARAPU SOMESWARA RAO AND ANOTHER Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shravan Kumar Yammanur, Adv. Mr. Selvin Raja A., Adv. Mr. Rana Sandeep, Adv. Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. While declining to interfere, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for review with regard to grant of punitive damages. If the application for review is filed within three weeks hence, the same shall be dealt with on merits. The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 12656/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/04/2015 in LPA No. 993/2010 29/04/2015 in CWJC No. 5654/2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna) AKHILESH CHOUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishna M. Singh, Adv. Mr. Pushkar Anand, Adv. Mr. Danish Zubair Khan, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no infirmity in the order impugned herein. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12657/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/01/2016 in WPC No. 10208/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SOCIETY FOR VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND JUSTICE Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shruti Jose, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer,Adv. Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, adv. Ms. Anne Mathew,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the petitioner, post after summer vacation. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

¬ ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12640/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/04/2016 in IA No. 4070/2015 in ARBA No. 48/2015 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) M/S. PANCHAMY PACK (P) LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Gopakumaran Nair, Sr. Adv. Mr. T. G. Narayanan Nair, AOR Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagari, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Adv. Ms. Azra Rehman, Adv. For M/s Lawyer's Knit & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition, which is dismissed. However, taking into account the fact that the petitioner is a small scale industry, we only request the High Court to dispose of the appeal itself expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRASHMI DHYANIDate: 2016.05.1017:21:03 ISTReason: (RASHMI DHYANI) (SHARDA KAPOOR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

F ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12653/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/03/2016 in FA No. 109/2016 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Reddressal Commission, New Delhi) M/S. LAKSHMI BUILDERS AND ANOTHER Petitioner(s) VERSUS KESAVARAPU SOMESWARA RAO AND ANOTHER Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shravan Kumar Yammanur, Adv. Mr. Selvin Raja A., Adv. Mr. Rana Sandeep, Adv. Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. While declining to interfere, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for review with regard to grant of punitive damages. If the application for review is filed within three weeks hence, the same shall be dealt with on merits.Signature Not Verified The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of.Digitally signed byGULSHAN KUMARARORADate: 2016.05.0918:31:13 ISTReason: (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

Ô ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10075/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/10/2015 in WC No. 59470/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) RAM CHANDRA JI MAHARAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 09/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shashank Bajpai,Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Shakun S.Shukla,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. N.R.Shamsad,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 8th July, 2016. Four weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed thereafter. (SUMAN WADHWA) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRARSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2016.05.1016:39:09 ISTReason:

LISTING ON 06.05.2016 COURT NO. 5 ITEM NO. 33 SEC.IV­A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 12273 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for exemption from filing Certified Copy impugned  Judgment) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing O.T.) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3 (Application for permission to file additional documents) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4 (Application for exemption from filing O.T.) ASHOK KUMAR   ...PETITIONER ­Versus­ NARAYAN SINGH AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The Special Leave Petition above mentioned has been filed against the final Judgment and Order dated 04.02.2016 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in F.A. No. 509/1998. It is submitted that Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Advocate for the petitioner has on 29.04.2016 filed application for permission to file additional documents alongwith Annexure P/3 (colly) and Affidavit in support thereof and also application for exemption from filing official translation. The copies of the same are being circulated with this office report. The matter above mentioned alongwith applications is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 4 th  day of May, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR PC4

SECTION IVB       Listed on 6.5.2016           Court No.11              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.26              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO.12648  OF  2016 Suresh Devi and Ors. Petitioner(s)            Versus State of Haryana and Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. R.C Kaushik, Advocate on 3.2.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 3.11.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 129/2012. It is further submitted that initially SLP filed against the Order dated 3.11.2015 was within time but there was a delay of 55 days in refiling the SLP. Counsel had filed an application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP and the same has been condoned by Additional Registrar I­B on 29.4.2016. It is further submitted that the instant matter is  tagged  with SLP (C)CC No. 8364/2016 Entitled  JAIPAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.  as both are arising out of similar issue. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 5th day of May, 2016.                                                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :­  Mr.R.C Kaushik , Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  neeraj

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12273/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2016 in FA No. 509/1998 passed by the High Court Of M.p At Jabalpur) ASHOK KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NARAYAN SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 06/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanchit Guru,Adv. Mr. S. Siddhartha,Adv. Mr. Janmesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. However, three months' time is granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking within four weeks. Application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12274/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2016 in DBCSA No. 1681/2014 29/01/2016 in SBCWP No. 13215/2012 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur) GOPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 06/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not find any merit in this petition. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (SNEH BALA MEHRA) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12274/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/01/2016 in DBCSA No. 1681/2014 29/01/2016 in SBCWP No. 13215/2012 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jaipur) GOPAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 06/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not find any merit in this petition. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SUMAN WADHWA) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRARSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2016.05.0711:50:56 ISTReason:

LISTED ON: 02.05.2016 BEFORE COURT NO.:08            ITEM NO.: 28        SECTION­IX             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11170 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy) DIGAMBER (DECEASED) THR. LRS.  ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ GAJANAN MAHARAJ SANSTHAN                    ..RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the  there is a delay of 18 days in re­filing the Special Leave Petition which has been condoned by the Competent Authority. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 30 th     day of April, 2016.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­    MR. RAJAN K. CHOURASIA , Advocate M/S. S.M. JADHAV & COMPANY, Advocate   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ga

8 1 ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11170/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/11/2015 in LPA No. 39/2005 in WP No. 516/1992 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) DIGAMBER (DECEASED) THR. LRS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS GAJANAN MAHARAJ SANSTHAN Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 02/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Prachi Mishra, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya, Adv. Mr. U. Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. A.R. Patil, Adv. Mr. V.N. Patil, Adv. Mr. Shiaji M. Jadhav, Adv. for M/s. S.M. Jadhav & Company UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the order of Tehsildar was complied with inasmuch as the arrears of rent were paidSignature Not Verified The finding of the High Court is to the contrary.Digitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.05.0412:25:02 ISTReason: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the High Court and file a review petition. 2 Leave and liberty granted. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the event, the petitioner is not satisfied withthe order of the High Court, the impugned order may be

challenged again. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

MATTER FOR:29.04.2016               COURT NO.11                           ITEM NO.34  SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10022/2016   WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF KAUSHALIYA   ...PETITIONER                             VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT   The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 22.04.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Having regard to the nature of dispute, that too between the parties who are related to each other, we are of the opinion that an attempt should be made to amicable settle the dispute. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that she is appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1. She further says that she will take instructions as to whether she can represent respondent No. 2 and 3 as well. For this purpose, list on 29.04.2016.” It is submitted that neither any document has been filed by counsel for the parties nor Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 3 so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 28 th  day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    1.  Ms. Aishwarya Bhati ,  Adv.   2.   Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3/KS/OR

Listed on : 29.04.2016           Court No. 9                         Item No. 39                                SECTION XI­A                               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION                       PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) No. 11153 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF                 RASHID KHAN & ANR.                                        .....Petitioners                              Versus  SRI LAXMIDHAR BASANTA RAY & ORS.                         ....Respondents                    OFFICE REPORT This Special Leave Petition has been filed by Mr. Milind Kumar, Advocate on 26 th February, 2016 against the judgment and Order dated 16.11.2015 of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in S.A. No. 268 of 1997. It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there was a delay of 17 days in refiling the Special Leave Petition. Therefore, counsel had filed an application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP and the delay has been condoned by Additional Registrar (I­B) on 19 th  April, 2016. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 23 rd   day of April, 2016.              Sd/­                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

LISTED ON :29.04.2016                         BEFORE COURT NO.:05                              ITEM NO.:30       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11164 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2 (Application for exemption from filing Certified Copy of the impugned Final Judgment and Order dated 06.11.2015) NARESH S. DESAI ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,  BANK OF BARODA AND ORS.                                            ..RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT  I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is a delay of 46 days in re­filing the Special Leave Petition which has been condoned by the Competent Authority. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report.  Dated this the 27th day of April, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, Advocate  L   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION IVB      Listed on 29.04.2016          Court No. 7              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.39              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 11173 OF  2016      WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF   Dalip Kumar & Anr.  Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors.  Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate on 04.03.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 11.12.2015 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 8746 of 2013 . It is further submitted that initially SLP filed against the Order dated 11.12.2015 was within time but there was a delay of 18 days in refiling the SLP. Counsel had filed an application for condonation of delay in refiling the SLP and the same has been condoned by Additional Registrar I­B on 19.04.2016. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 28 th  day of April, 2016.                                                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr.  Brajesh Kumar Singh , Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Haokip

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11172/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2016 in RP No. 618/2015 15/01/2016 in WPC No. 3687/1995 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) NARENDER MALIK & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS FEDERATION OF RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, VASANT KUNJ & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. N.S.Dalal, Adv. Mr. Devesh Partap Singh, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We do not see any merit in this special leave petition, which is hereby dismissed. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11173/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/12/2015 in CWP No. 8746/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) DALIP KUMAR AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. We do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. (Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Asha Soni) Court Master

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11173/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/12/2015in CWP No. 8746/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryanaat Chandigarh)DALIP KUMAR AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANTFor Petitioner(s) Dr. Surat Singh, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard learned counsel for the petitionersand perused the relevant material. We do not find any legal and valid groundfor interference. The Special Leave Petition isdismissed. (Neetu Khajuria)Sr.P.A. (Asha Soni)Court Master

èITEM NO.39 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11153/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated16/11/2015 in SA No. 268/1997 passed by the High Court Of OrissaAt Cuttack)RASID KHAN & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSRI LAXMIDHAR BASANTA RAY & ORS. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N.C. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

8ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11164/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/11/2015in LPA No. 1122/2010 06/11/2015 in SCA No. 9868/2008 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)NARESH S. DESAI Petitioner(s) VERSUSCHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANK OF BARODA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment)Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Alok Bachawat, Adv.Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Adv. for Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe special leave petition is dismissed.Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11171/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/11/2015in RSA No. 159/2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana atChandigarh)LACHCHMAN DASS Petitioner(s) VERSUSMOHAN LAL AND ORS. Respondent(s)Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. O. P. Bhadani,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIssue notice. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

ôITEM NO.28 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10477/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/02/2016in Arbitration Appeal (L) No. 463/2015 passed by the High Court ofJudicature at Bombay)SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUSJBF INDUSTRIES LTD Respondent(s)Date : 29/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON&#39;BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya,Adv. Mr. Mukand P. Unny, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Natasha Bopaiah, Adv. Mr. Vivek A. Vashi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RWe are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition.But to enable the petitioner to comply with the order, insofar asthe direction to deposit the amount alone, not for furnishing bankguarantee, we grant two months&#39; time to the petitioner. The special leave petition stands dismissed. (SWETA DHYANI) (SHARDA KAPOOR) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

MATTER FOR:25.04.2016                             COURT NO.2         ITEM NO.23   SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10486/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF KUNDALIK KACHRU DODKE        ...PETITIONER                               VERSUS PIMPRI­CHINCHAWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.   ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The  Petition above mentioned has been filed by Mr . Arvind S. Avhad , Advocate on 08.04.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 01.02.2016 of the Hon'ble  High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 10410 of 2014. It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed the copy of order dated 06.06.2001, 09.07.2001, 10.11.2003, 04.04.2005, 17.01.2006, 02.03.2006, 27.05.2008, 23.08.2010, 29.03.1988, 21.09.2005 and copy of MRTU and PULP Act and Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act and he has given a letter in this regard. Copy of the letter dated 11.04.2016 has already been included in the paper books at Page No. 95. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 22 nd  day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1.     Mr . Arvind S. Avhad, Adv.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10486/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/02/2016 in WP No.10410/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) KUNDALIK KACHRU DODKE Petitioner(s) VERSUS PIMPRI-CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek K.,Adv. For Mr. Arvind S. Avhad,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not find any merit in this petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10500/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/01/2016 in CA No. 705/2011 in WP No. 4388/2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay) SUNDARIBAI LAXMINARAYAN AGARWAL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER L.R. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHANLAL MOTILAL JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Navare, Adv. Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10546/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/01/2016 in RCREV No. 412/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) MOHD. JAVED AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHAGWAN DAS AND ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arup Banerjee,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain this Special Leave Petition, the same is dismissed. However, we direct the trial court to expedite the hearing of the eviction petition and dispose of the same preferably within six months. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER

v ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10500/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/01/2016 in CA No. 705/2011 in WP No. 4388/2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay) SUNDARIBAI LAXMINARAYAN AGARWAL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER L.R. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHANLAL MOTILAL JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Navare, Adv. Ms. Gwen K.B., Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (S. K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byVINOD KUMARDate: 2016.04.2517:45:19 ISTReason:

MATTER FOR:22.04.2016              COURT NO.10                    ITEM NO.38 SECTION­ XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 10022 OF 2016       WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Kaushaliya      ….Petitioner VERSUS Jodha Ram & Ors.     ….Respondents   OFFICE REPORT The petition above­mentioned has been filed on 11.04.2016 by Ms. Aishwarya Bhati Advocate against the Judgment and Order dated 18.03.2016 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in S. B. Civil Second Appeal No. 39/2016. It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the counsel for the petitioner has not filed the copy of Orders dated 12.04.2013 and 07.05.2014 and she has given a letter in this regard. Copy of the letter dated 11.04.2016 has already been included in paper­books at Page No.99. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court for Orders with this Office Report. Dated this the 21 st  day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

MATTER FOR:22.04.2016                 COURT NO.           ITEM NO.          SECTION  XV   IN  THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.     10067/2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF RAM GOPAL & ORS.        ...PETITIONERS                               VERSUS SRIJI MAHARAJ (BHAGWAN) THROUGH PRIEST VIJAY NARAYAN PATHAK S/O RATAN LAL JI PATHAK THROUGH LRS.     ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The  petition above mentioned has been filed by Mrs . Madhurima Tatia , Advocate on 15.03.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 14.12.2015 of the Hon'ble  High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 224/2001. It is submitted that Civil Appeal No. 6549/2002 between cross parties arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.07.2010, when the Court was pleased to disposed of the same. Copy of the Record of Proceedings dated 14.07.2010 has already been included in the paper books as Annexure P­9 at Page Nos. 144­145. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 13 th  day of April, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:  1.    Mrs. Madhurima Tatia , Adv.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   : 22.04.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA      Court No.     :    4                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION         Item No.       :  40 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 10063 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF    U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD                 ...PETITIONER(s)    VERSUS KRIPAL SINGH  & ORS.        ...RESPONDENT(s) OFFICE REPORT The  Special Leave Petition above­mentioned has been filed against the Judgement and Order dated 07.10.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in First Appeal No. 94 of 2004. It is submitted that the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 5833 of 2016 arising out of similar issue was dismissed by this Hon'ble Court on 11.04.216. (Copy of order dated 11.04.2016 enclosed). The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21 st     day of April , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

SECTION­XVI LISTED On :21/04/2016 COURT No. :6 ITEM No.  :3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) No. 10078 of 2016   (With Prayer for Interim Relief) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Nos 1 & 2 (Applications for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order & permission to file lengthy list of dates) DUNLOP INDIA LTD. ... Petitioner Versus M/S. E.V. MATHAI & SONS.   ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The Special Leave Petition above­mentioned has been filed by Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, Advocate against the judgment and Order dated the 8/03/2016 of the High Court of Calcutta in ACO No. 238 of 2015 in APOT No. 602 of 2015 in CA No. 737 of 2014 in CP No. 232 of 2008. It is submitted that SLP(C) Nos. 18265­18266 of 2013 filed between same parties is pending before the Hon'ble Court in which Hon'ble Court has on 12/06/2013 directed issue notice. Copy of order dated 12/06/2013 is enclosed.  The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­report. Dated this the 19 th  day of April, 2016. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, Advocate Assistant Registrar AY

LISTED ON:  22.04.2016                     BEFORE COURT NO.: 07 ITEM NO.: 34 SECTION – IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL  APPELLATE  JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 10476 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AZAD HAWKERS UNION                  ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.             ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT    It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is delay of 03 days in refiling the SLP which has been condoned by the Ld. Additional Registrar. It is further submitted that Civil Appeal (C) No. 4156­4157 of 2002 arising out of similar issue was dismissed / disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on 09/09/2013 (Copy of the Order dated 09/09/2013 is placed at page Nos. 30 ­56 as annexure P­1 in the paper books)  The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with report. Dated this the 18 th   day of April, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. M. M. Kashyap, Advocate                                                                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  VT

SECTION IVB           Mentioning Listed on 22.4.2016           Court No.              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  Item No.              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO.11163  OF  2016     WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF  INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.  (Application for exemption from filing certified copy of  impugned judgment/order) The Tobacco Institute of India Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above mentioned Special Leave Petition is filed by Mr. Rajan Narain , Advocate on 21.4.2016 against the Judgment and Order dated 11.3.2016 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in WP No. 502/2016 along with the application for  filing certified copy of impugned judgment/order. It is further submitted that the instant matter is  tagged  with SLP (C) No.10119­10121/2016 Entitled KARNATAKA BEEDI INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION AND ANR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR  as both are arising out of common order. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 21st  day of April, 2016.                                                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :­  Mr.  Rajan Narain  , Adv.                                                  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  neeraj

ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in SBCSA No.39/2016 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Ms.Anshul Sharma, Adv. Ms.Eshita Kapur, Adv. Ms.Heena Khan, Adv. Ms.Tanuja Patra, Adv. Mr.T.Gopal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Esha Mazumdar, Adv. Mr.Setu Niket, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, A OR Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having regard to the nature of dispute, that too between the parties who are related to each other, we are of the opinion that an attempt should be made to amicably settle the dispute. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that she is appearing on behalf of respondent No.1. She further says that she will take instructions as to whether she can represent respondent Nos.2 and 3 as well. For this purpose, list on 29.04.2016. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (TAPAN KR.CHAKRABORTY) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10082/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/03/2016 in MAT No. 229/2016 passed by the High Court of Calcutta) MOZAFFAR HOSSAIN KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meanwhile, the effect and operation of the impugned Order shall remain stayed. (S. K. RAKHEJA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

1 ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10476/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/12/2015 in WP(C) No. 3346/2015 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) AZAD HAWKERS UNION Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. M. Kashyap,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to seek early hearing of the pending writ petition. If such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in

2 accordance with law within reasonable time. If it is not disposed of within reasonable time, the petitioner is at liberty to move the High Court for interim relief again. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR JHA) COURT MASTER (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER

\226 ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10067/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/12/2015 in SBCSA No. 224/2001 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan At Jodhpur) RAM GOPAL AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SRIJI MAHARAJ (BHAGWAN) THR. PRIEST VIJAY NARAYAN PATHAK S/O RATAN LAL JI PATHAK THR. LRS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Madhurima Tatia,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. The special leave petition is dismissed. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by OMPARKASH SHARMADate: 2016.04.2313:42:49 ISTReason:

Ê ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10063/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/10/2015 in FA No.94/2004 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD Petitioner(s) VERSUS KRIPAL SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C)No.10100/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 22/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwajit Singh,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhindra Maheshwari,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Tripathi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As SLP(C)No.5833/2016 and batch arising of similar issue have been dismissed by this Court on 11th April, 2016, these special leave petitions are also dismissed.Signature Not Verified (Sarita Purohit)Digitally signed by (Asha Soni)SARITA PUROHITDate: 2016.04.2312:23:27 IST Court Master Court MasterReason:

ô ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10022/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/03/2016 in SBCSA No.39/2016 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur) KAUSHALIYA Petitioner(s) VERSUS JODHA RAM AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 22/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. Ms.Anshul Sharma, Adv. Ms.Eshita Kapur, Adv. Ms.Heena Khan, Adv. Ms.Tanuja Patra, Adv. Mr.T.Gopal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Esha Mazumdar, Adv. Mr.Setu Niket, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having regard to the nature of dispute, that too between the parties who are related to each other, we are of the opinion that an attempt should be made to amicably settle the dispute. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that she is appearing on behalf of respondent No.1. She further says that she will take instructions as to whether she can represent respondent Nos.2 and 3 as well.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySATISH KUMAR YADAVDate: 2016.04.2216:36:47 TLTReason: For this purpose, list on 29.04.2016. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (TAPAN KR.CHAKRABORTY) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10078/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/03/2016 in ACO No. 238/2015 in APOT No. 602/2015 in CA No. 737/2014 in CP No. 232/2008 passed by the High Court of Calcutta) DUNLOP INDIA LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S E.V. MATHAI AND SONS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and office report) Date : 21/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. C. Mukund, Adv. Mr. Ashok Jain, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Jain, Adv. Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending application is disposed of. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.601 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10538/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/03/2016 in RFA No.624/2003 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) BIR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS MEENA DUBE Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 19/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr.A.K.Srivastava, Adv. Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ºITEM NO.601 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10538/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/03/2016in RFA No.624/2003 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)BIR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSMEENA DUBE Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedjudgment and interim relief)Date : 19/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON&#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPANFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr.A.K.Srivastava, Adv. Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Taken on board.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.No ground for interference is made out in exercise of ourjurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutoryapplication also stands disposed of. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER