ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5762/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/09/2012 in TRA No. 250/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 13/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv. Mr. K.G. Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nidhi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
T ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.8 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5762/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/09/2012 in TRA No. 250/2011 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 13/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv. Mr. K.G. Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nidhi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2014.10.1416:56:06 ISTReason:
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.5762 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.14591 OF 2013 (Application for stay) MOHD. JABER ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.07.2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. There shall be stay of the operation of the impugned order of the High Court.” Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to both the respondents through registered post A.D. on 30.07.2013. A.D. duly signed has been received from respondent No.1/State but no one has entered appearance on It is submitted that behalf. Ms. Nidhi, Advocate has on 6.03.2014 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. Contd..
..2.. The matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Registrar on 11.08.2014 when the following order was passed: “ Service is complete on respondent No.1 but no one has put in appearance. Despite final opportunity, respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.” The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 23rd day of September, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate 2. Ms. Nidhi , Advocate c3/sk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
è ITEM NO.39 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5762/2013 MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) Date : 11/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Nidhi ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on respondent No.1 but no one has put in appearance. Despite final opportunity, respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.08.1317:42:42 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).5762/2013MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report )Date: 24/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Nidhi,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Six weeks time is granted as final chance torespondent no.2 for filing counter affidavit. Service on respondent no.1 is complete but noneappeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. List again on 11.8.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj
ÀITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).5762/2013MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 13/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly and properly served throughthe concerned District Court (report at F/A) but none appeared on hisbehalf. Therefore, proceeded ex parte. On behalf of respondent No.2, notice has been accepted by the learnedAdvocate, Ms.Nidhi, who has undertaken to file vakalatnama and counteraffidavit by the next date. Complete set of the pleadings be served on thelearned counsel within three weeks of which necessary proof be filed onrecord and thereafter counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. List again on 24.4.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR ||rd | | |
FITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).5762/2013MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 26/11/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice be reissued to both the respondents through the concernedDistrict Court in addition to postal service. List again on 13.1.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
>ITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).5762/2013MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report ))Date: 16/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of both the respondents. List the matter on 26.11.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
(ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).5762/2013MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 02/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.C. Vasudev, Adv. Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service report in respect of both the respondents is awaited. List again on 16.9.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
ôITEM NO.28 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2013 CRLMP.NO(s). 13001(From the judgement and order dated 26/09/2012 in TRA No.250/2011, of TheHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)MOHD. JUBER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP & c/delay in refiling SLP and forexemption from filing OT)Date: 12/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Piyush Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. There shall be stay of the operation of the impugned order of the High Court. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master