ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1275/2013 SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM THROUGH HEREDITARY TRUSTEE Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 18-02-2026 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For Appellant(s) Mr. V. K. Biju, AOR Mr. Atul Tripathi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K, Adv. Mrs. Devika A.l., Adv. Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Ms. Niveditha R Menon, Adv. Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv. Mr. Tarun Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. List on 18.03.2026. (NIRMALA NEGI) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.105 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 1275/2013 SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM THROUGH HEREDITARY TRUSTEE Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 12-02-2026 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI For Appellant(s) Mr. V. K. Biju, AOR Mr. Atul Tripathi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K, Adv. Mrs. Devika A.l., Adv. Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. Shinoj K.narayanan, Adv. Ms. Niveditha R Menon, Adv. Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv. Mr. Tarun Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At request of learned counsel for the appellant, list the matter next week. (SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 1275/2013 SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 27/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. V. K. Biju,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the appellant and the appearing respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by notices dated 08.02.14 of this Registry. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1-3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to file any further statement of case. … ........2
ITEM NO.98 -2- The order further provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
SECTION XIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 1275 OF 2013. Sree Kodikat Bhagavathy Devaswom Tr. Trst. ...Appellants Versus State of Kerala Tr. Sec. To Rev. & Ors. ...Respondents OFFICE REPORT This is an appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 22.11.2010 of the High Court Kerala at Ernakulam in W.A No. 1962 of 2010. The Service of notice is complete. Original record is available for the reference of the Hon'ble Court. It is submitted that Counsel for the appellant and for appearing Respondents have not filed statement of case so far and as per proviso Rule 32(2) of Order XIX of new SCR 2013 read as , “if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to file any further statement of case”. “Provided that where a respondent, who has entered appearance, does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in subrule (1), it shall be presumed that the respondent does not desire to lodge statement of case in the appeal.” The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar for prefinal hearing under order V Rule (1) (30) SCR 2013. Dated this the 24 th day of November, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : 1. Mr. V. K. Biju, Adv. 2. Mr. K. Rajeev, Adv. g1 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
R ITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 1275/2013 SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 27/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. V. K. Biju,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the appellant and the appearing respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by notices dated 08.02.14 of this Registry. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1-3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petitionSignature Not Verified for seeking special leave to appeal(SLP)/appeal, asDigitally signed bySushma Kumari Bajaj statementDate: 2014.11.2911:53:28 IST of case,and does not desire to file any furtherReason: statement of case. ...........2ITEM NO.98 -2-
The order further provides that if the respondent hasentered appearance and does not file a statement of case withinthe time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall bepresumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shallbe processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in WA No.1962/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 11/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.K. Biju, Adv.for Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Hearing expedited|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) ||Court Master | |Court Master |
ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 11/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.V.K.Biju,adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Respondent Nos.4-9 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent Nos.1-3 have not filed counter affidavit in spite of last chance granted. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
FITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 19/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.V.K.Biju,adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. State is granted one more opportunity to filevakalatnama and counter affidavit as a last chance. List the matter on 3.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 02/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Biju,Adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. Mrs. Sana Hashmi,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of the pleadings has been served on the respondents. Respondents appear through Ms. Liz Mathew, advocate. Seeks time for filing Vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Granted. List the matter on 19.7.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
¤ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 27/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.V.K.Biju,adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks service of notice to respondent No.1 through the Standing Counsel. Granted as a last chance. List the matter on 2.05.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
¤ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 27/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.V.K.Biju,adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks service of notice to respondent No.1 through the Standing Counsel. Granted as a last chance. List the matter on 2.05.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
HITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 21/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.V.K.Biju,adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No.1. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve notice on the Standing Counsel within four weeks and file proof. List the matter on 27.03.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
æITEM NO.11 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in WA No.1962/2010 ofThe HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 05/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Biju, Adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let fresh notice be issued to respondent No. 1, returnable in four weeks. In addition to ordinary process, dasti granted. Service may also be effected on the Standing Counsel for State of Kerala. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master
LITEM NO.10 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19213/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in WANo.1962/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 05/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Biju,Adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused a letter. Counter in four weeks. Rejoinder in four weeks after filing of the counter. List thereafter. (O.P. Sharma) ( M.S. Negi ) Court Master Court Master
ÈITEM NO.9 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 7700/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in WA No.1962/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)WITH I.A.1(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and officereport)Date: 11/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. N. Venkataswamy, Sr.Adv. Mr. V.K. Biju,Adv. Mr. Benny Jose,Adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable in six weeks. (O.P. Sharma) ( M.S. Negi ) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 7700/2011(From the judgement and order dated 22/11/2010 in WA No. 1962/2010of The HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)SREE KODIKAT BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM TR.TRST Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA TR.SEC.TO REV.& ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 09/05/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIKFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V.K. Biju, Adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. List after summer vacation. ( Ravi P. Verma ) ( M.S. Negi ) Court Master Court Master