1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2021 (Arising from SLP(C) No. 2704 of 2021) NAND KISHORE & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2021 (Arising from SLP(C) No. 3798 of 2021) O R D E R Civil Appeal arising from SLP(C) No. 2704 of 2021 Leave granted The grievance in this appeal is very limited. It is urged that the High Court dealt with a group of cases together, but has not specifically dealt with the case of the appellants pertaining to writ petition being C.W.P No. 319 of 2018 unlike other cases, but has disposed of the same by a general/common order. In other words, the grievance of the present appellants has not been specifically dealt with by the High Court in the impugned judgment. This position is
2 fairly accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh only in respect of C.W.P. No. 319 of 2018 and restore the said writ petition to the file of the High Court for being considered afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law. All contentions available to both sides are left open. T his appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. Civil Appeal arising from SLP(C) No. 3798 of 2021 Leave granted The grievance in this appeal is very limited. It is urged that the High Court dealt with a group of cases together, but has not specifically dealt with the case of the appellants pertaining to writ petition being C.W.P No. 9479 of 2018 unlike other cases, but has disposed of the same by a general/common order. In other words, the grievance of the present appellants has not been specifically dealt with by the
3 High Court in the impugned judgment. This position is fairly accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh only in respect of C.W.P No. 9479 of 2018 and restore the said writ petition to the file of the High Court for being considered afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law. All contentions available to both sides are left open. T his appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ....................,J. (A.M. KHANWILKAR) ....................,J. (DINESH MAHESHWARI) ....................,J. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) NEW DELHI; September 29, 2021.
4 ITEM NO.9 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2966-2967/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 17983/2017 18-01-2021 in RACW No. 12/2021 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RAMESH SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 89378/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 89381/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH SLP(C) No. 2704/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 21021/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 21018/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 15797/2020 (IV-B) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 134811/2020 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 91249/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 91251/2021 IA No. 91249/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 134811/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 91251/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Diary No(s). 14910/2021 (IV-B) (FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 82022/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 82023/2021 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 82025/2021 IA No. 82023/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 82025/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No. 82022/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)) SLP(C) No. 4042/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 33877/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 5537/2021 (IV-B) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 47691/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 82597/2021
5 IA No. 82597/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 47691/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 2822/2021 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. 2703/2021 (IV-B) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 21007/2021 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE SPARE COPIES ON IA 40840/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 79329/2021 IA No. 79329/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 40840/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE SPARE COPIES IA No. 21007/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 7687/2021 (IV-B) ( FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 91260/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 91263/2021 IA No. 91260/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 91263/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 3363/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 27926/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 27922/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78513/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 4622/2021 (IV-B) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 40167/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 89414/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 89418/2021 IA No. 89414/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 40167/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 89418/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 2216-2218/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 78527/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION) SLP(C) No. 3373/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 28023/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 28020/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78565/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 3798/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 78574/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 30947/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 30945/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78582/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 6641/2021 (IV-B) (FOR
6 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 58789/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 89553/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 89556/2021 IA No. 89553/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 58789/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 89556/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 6195/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 11559-11561/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.88900/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 12384/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.96850/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 14121/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R..) Date : 29-09-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) M/S. Delhi Law Chambers, AOR Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mamta Sharma, Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Pratima Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR Mr. Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania, Adv Ms. Amit Kumari Saroha, aDv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR Mr. Rajiv Kataria, AOR Mr. Debjani Das Purkayashtha, AOR
7 Mr. Vishvendra Verma, ADv. Mr. Sandiv Kalia, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania, Adv. Ms. Reena Rao, Adv. Mr. Nand Ram, Adv. Mr. Karan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Manik Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Akshay Munjal, Advv. Mr. Shashank S. Jha, Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, Adv. Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Mr. Vidisha Swarup, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. B.K. Satija, AAG Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 4042 of 2021 The first argument canvassed before us is about the correctness of the decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court in Indore Development Authority vs. Manohar Lal & Ors. reported in (2020) 8 SCC 129 . The argument that the expression ‘ or’ occurring in Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 ought not to have been interpreted as ‘ and’ does not commend to us.
8 For, the Constitution Bench has analyzed all aspects of the matter for taking the view that it has taken in that judgment. We do not see any reason to take a different view of that matter. Hence, that argument is rejected. The next argument of the petitioners is that the High Court proceeded on the assumption that possession has already been taken. The argument overlooks the factual position stated in paragraph 52 of the impugned judgment while dealing with the case of these petitioners. It is noted that possession of land was taken vide rapat rojnamcha No. 881 dated 16.07.2005. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of this factual position noted in the impugned order. In the special leave petition, a vague statement has been made that no report whatsoever was produced before the High Court. If that is the grievance, it is open to the petitioners to approach the High Court by way of appropriate proceedings. The High Court may decide the same on its own merits and in accordance with law. For the time being, suffice it to observe, that the relief claimed by the petitioners has been answered
9 against the petitioners by the High Court on the fact noted in paragraph 52 of the order. If that fact is accurate, the consequences must follow and no declaration of lapsing can be issued in favour of the petitioners. In light of the aforesaid observation, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the special leave petition with leave to approach the High Court. The petitioners are free to do so, if so advised. We are not expressing any opinion on the correctness of the said plea taken by the petitioners in this special leave petition. The High Court may decide that plea on its own merits and in accordance with law. We make it clear that if the High Court reiterates the position stated in paragraph 52, no further special leave petition against the original order would be entertained as we are in agreement with the conclusion mentioned therein, but in the proceedings to be initiated by the petitioners, if other factual aspects are raised and dealt with by the High Court only that grievance regarding the correctness of finding thereon alone can be assailed by the petitioners by way of special leave petition.
10 The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. SLP (C) Nos. 2966-2967 of 2021, 15797 of 2020, Diary No. 14910 of 2021, SLP(C) Nos. 5537, 2822, 3363, 4622, 2216- 2218, 3373 and 14121 of 2021 Permission to file special leave petition is granted. The application(s) for substitution are allowed, subject to all just exceptions, after condoning the delay in the concerned special leave petitions. The special leave petitions are dismissed as we see no reason to deviate from the view taken by the High Court while dealing with the factual position in concerned writ petition filed by the respective petitioners 1 . The petitioners, however, are at liberty to make representation to the State Government in terms of Section 101A of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as applicable to the State of Haryana, which be decided expeditiously in accordance with the exposition of this Court in Civil Appeal 1
P aragraph 62 in SLP(C) Nos. 2966-2967/2021, paragraph 62 in SLP(C) No. 15797/2020, paragraph 40 in Diary No. 14910/2021, paragraph 21 in SLP(C) No. 5537/2021, paragraph 31 in SLP(C) No. 2822/2021, paragraph 36 in SLP(C) No. 3363/2021, paragraph 47 in SLP(C) No. 4622/2021, paragraph 36 in SLP(C) Nos. 2216-2218/2021, paragraph 36 in SLP(C) No. 3373/2021 and paragraph 74 in SLP(C) No. 14121/2021.
11 Nos.2714-2715 of 2021 and connected cases decided on 15.07.2021. SLP(C) Nos. 2704 and 3798 of 2021 Leave granted. The civil appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. SLP(C) No. 2703 of 2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance in this petition, essentially, is about the non-consideration of the report dated 22.08.2015 submitted by the Secretary-cum-Director General, Urban Estates Department, Haryana to the High Court pursuant to order dated 17.11.2014. According to the petitioners, this report was part of the proceeding in CWP No. 26277 of 2016 but has been glossed over by the High Court. According to this report, it is urged that the possession of a substantial part of the property continued with the writ petitioners even after 11.07.2001. This grievance can be made by the
12 petitioners by way of a review petition before the High Court. Accordingly, we permit the petitioners to file a review petition and urge all contentions as may be permissible in law. The High Court may consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to approach this Court, in case, the decision of the High Court in review petition is adverse to the petitioners. We grant liberty to the petitioners to the limited extent of questioning the correctness of the finding of the High Court in reference to the report of Secretary- cum-Director General referred to above, and the effect thereof as regards the finding recorded by the High Court in paragraph 25 of the impugned judgment — that possession of the land was taken vide report No.544 dated 11.07.2011. That finding cannot be once again challenged before this Court even if the petitioners are granted liberty to file a review petition before the High Court and to approach this Court.
13 The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. SLP(C) No. 7687 of 2021 The special leave petition is dismissed as we affirm the view taken by the High Court in paragraphs 15 to 17 of the impugned judgment qua the present petitioners. The petitioners, however, is granted liberty, as prayed, to approach the State Government to invoke powers of the State Government under section 101A of the Act, 2013, as applicable to the State of Haryana which application be decided by the State Government on its own merits and in accordance with law keeping in mind the exposition of this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.2714-2715 of 2021 and connected cases decided on 15.07.2021. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. SLP(C) No. 6641 of 2021 The application for substitution is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The grievance of the petitioners before us is that their case has not been discussed at all in the impugned
14 judgment. They invited an order on same terms as passed in c ivil appeal arising from SLP(C) No. 2704 of 2021. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, however, points out paragraph 62 of the impugned judgment and contends that the case of the present petitioners has been dealt with therein, but wrongly mentioned as CWP No. 3567 of 2017 instead of CWP No.3657 of 2017. We permit the petitioners to go back to the High Court to point out this discrepancy and invite appropriate clarification, if so advised. That application be considered by the High Court on its own merits and in accordance with law, including, to examine the argument that their case is not covered with the finding of fact recorded in paragraph 62 of the impugned judgment. The special leave petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. SLP(C) Nos. 6195 and 11559-11561 of 2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners in SLP(C) No. 6195 of 2021 submits that the High Court ought not to have rejected the relief as claimed in the Civil Writ
15 Petition No. 9179 of 2018 in toto. Instead, the High Court should have declared that the acquisition proceedings in respect of land referred to in the speaking order dated 19.02.2018 passed by the Chairman- cum-Zonal Administrator, HUDA (Annexure P-9) had lapsed or at least issued mandamus to the State to the limited extent that the petitioners shall not be proceeded in respect of land referred to in the speaking order without taking recourse to due process of law. We find force in the argument that if the land has already been released by the appropriate authority, the acquisition proceedings cannot be precipitated at least to that limited extent. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Court may confirm the order of the High Court rejecting the prayer for lapsing of the remaining part of the land, which is not referred to in the speaking order dated 19.02.2018. We have no hesitation in doing so. Ordered accordingly. Even in the case bearing SLP(C) Nos.11559-11561 of 2021 , the petitioners are relying on communication dated 24.06.2015 (Annexure P-13) to contend that a portion of the land stands released in terms of this order. In that
16 case, the observation made in the companion case would apply with full force to this case and the order passed by the High Court which is impugned in the present petition be understood accordingly. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. SLP(C) No. 12384 of 2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties. We agree with the grievance made by the petitioners that the High Court has merely adverted to the petition filed by these petitioners being CWP No. 9281 of 2018, but has not dealt with factual aspects involved for reaching at the conclusion as to whether the acquisition has lapsed or otherwise. Indeed, our attention was drawn to the third sub-paragraph of paragraph 34, which appears to be a general observation with regard to two different writ petitions. But, as the High Court has dealt with each writ petition separately, to avoid any confusion, it is appropriate that the petitioners are granted liberty to approach the High Court by way of review petition, if
17 so advised. The petitioners may do so. That application be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. Liberty granted in terms of this order does not mean that we have expressed any opinion either way on the claim of the petitioners. The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.9+11 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2966-2967/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 17983/2017 18-01-2021 in RACW No. 12/2021 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RAMESH SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 89378/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 89381/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH SLP(C) No. 2704/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 21021/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 21018/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 15797/2020 (IV-B) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 134811/2020 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 91249/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 91251/2021 IA No. 91249/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 134811/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 91251/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Diary No(s). 14910/2021 (IV-B) (FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 82022/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 82023/2021 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 82025/2021 IA No. 82023/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 82025/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No. 82022/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)) SLP(C) No. 4042/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 33877/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 5537/2021 (IV-B) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 47691/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 82597/2021
2 IA No. 82597/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 47691/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 2822/2021 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 2703/2021 (IV-B) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 21007/2021 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE SPARE COPIES ON IA 40840/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 79329/2021 IA No. 79329/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 40840/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE SPARE COPIES IA No. 21007/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 7687/2021 (IV-B) (FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 91260/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 91263/2021 IA No. 91260/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 91263/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 3363/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 27926/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 27922/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78513/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 4622/2021 (IV-B) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 40167/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 89414/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 89418/2021 IA No. 89414/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 40167/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 89418/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 2216-2218/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 78527/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION) SLP(C) No. 3373/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 28023/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 28020/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78565/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 3798/2021 (IV-B) IA No. 78574/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 30947/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 30945/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78582/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 6641/2021 (IV-B) (FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 58789/2021 FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 89553/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 89556/2021
3 IA No. 89553/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 58789/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 89556/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 6195/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 11559-11561/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.88900/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 12384/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.96850/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No(s). 14121/2021 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R............) Date : 16-09-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishwendra Verma,Adv. Mr. Sandiv Kalia Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Adv. Mr. Nand Ram, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR Mr. Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania Adv. Ms. Amit Kumari Saroha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Adv. Mr. Debjani Das Purkayastha, M/S. Delhi Law Chambers, AOR Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR Mr. Karan Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Manik Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Akshay Munjal, Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR
4 Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Pratima Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Pratima Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Vidisha Swarup, Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. B.K. Satija, AAG HARYANA Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Himanshu Satija, Advocate. Ms. Adira A Nair, Advocate Ms. Adira A Nair, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR Mr. Alakh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR Ms. Mahima Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Pant, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A request for adjournment is made by the State of Haryana, to which objection is taken on the ground that in the past matters have been adjourned for the same reason cited in the letter circulated to the Court. Accordingly, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, hearing of these matters is deferred till 29.09.2021.
5 It is made clear that no request for further adjournment will be entertained, at the instance of the State of Haryana, on any count, on future dates. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.5 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12384/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-11-2020 in CWP No. 9281/2018 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SATISH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.96850/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) Date : 06-09-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr.Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania, Adv. Ms. Amit Kumari Saroha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter alongwith SLP(C) No. 2966-2967 of 2021 and and connected matters, which is stated to be listed on 16.09.2021. List all the matters together on 16.09.2021 before the appropriate Bench If any matter is unready, appropriate office report be circulated for consideration. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.43 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11559- 11561/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-11-2020 in CWP No. 9552/2018 11-11-2020 in CWP No. 9597/2018 11-11-2020 in CWP No. 9480/2018 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SAT DEV & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.88900/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) Date : 19-08-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania, Adv. Ms. Amit Kumari Saroha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Liberty is granted to the petitioners to serve advance copy of petition on the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana. List this matte alongwith Special Leave Petition(C) No. 3798 of 2021 and connected cases, if any, before the
2 appropriate Bench on 16.09.2021. If any matter is unready, appropriate office report be circulated for consideration. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.12 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6195/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-11-2020 in CWP No. 9179/2018 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RAJ PAL SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) Date : 13-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania, Adv. Ms. Amit Kumari Saroha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Liberty is granted to the petitioners to serve advance copy of petition on the standing counsel for the State of Haryana. List this matter along with Special Leave Petition (C) No.3798 of 2021 and connected cases, if any before appropriate Bench on 16 th September, 2021.
2 If any matter is unready, appropriate office report be circulated for consideration. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.11 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6641/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 3657/2017 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) TEJVIR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58789/2021-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ) Date : 02-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter alongwith SLP(C) 4042 of 2021 and connected matters on 06.09.2021. In the meantime, liberty is granted to serve advance copy of petition on the Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana. If the connected matters are unready, appropriate office report be circulated for consideration. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.33 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2966-2967/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 17983/2017 18-01-2021 in RACW No. 12/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RAMESH SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 2216-2218/2021 IA No. 78527/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION) SLP(C) No. 2703/2021 IA No. 79329/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 21007/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 2704/2021 IA No. 21021/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 21018/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 3363/2021 IA No. 27926/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 27922/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78513/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. SLP(C) No. 3373/2021 IA No. 28023/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 28020/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78565/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. SLP(C) No. 3798/2021 IA No. 78574/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 30947/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 30945/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 78582/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. SLP(C) No. 2822/2021 SLP(C) No. 5537/2021 IA No. 47691/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 4042/2021
2 IA No. 33877/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. SLP(C) No. 4622/2021 IA No. 40167/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT SLP(C) No. 7687/2021 SLP(C) No. 15797/2020 IA No. 134811/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT Date : 30-07-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Vidisha Swarup, Adv. Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Pratima Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR Mr. Somvir Singh Deswal, Adv. Mr. Satbir Singh Pillania, Adv. Ms. Amit Amit Kumari Saroha, Adv. Mr. Puneet Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Adv. Mr. Debjani Das Purkayashtha, Adv. For M/S. Delhi Law Chambers, AOR Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR Mr. Karan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Manik Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Akshay Munjal, Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Adira A. Nair, Adv. Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR
3 Mr. Sanjay K. Visen, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. Alakh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR Ms. Mahima Khandelwal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, learned counsel for the respondent(s) seeking adjournment, list the matters on 20.08.2021. (NEETU KHAJURIA) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) (COURT MASTER) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.34 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 14910/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-12-2020 in CWP No. 5536/2017 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SURESH KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.82023/2021-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.82022/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.82025/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ) Date : 30-07-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Ms. Pratima Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List this matter along with Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.2966-2967 of 2021 and connected cases on 20 th August, 2021. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (ANITA RANI AHUJA) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 ITEM NO.35+38+39 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2966-2967/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 17983/2017 18-01-2021 in RACW No. 12/2021 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RAMESH SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) WITH SLP(C) No. 15797/2020 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.134811/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No(s).2703/2021 (IA No. 21007/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 2216-2218/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 2704/2021 (IV-B) (IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 21018/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 21021/2021 IA No. 21021/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 21018/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 3363/2021 (IV-B) (IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 27922/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 27926/2021 IA No. 27926/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 27922/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 3373/2021 (IV-B) (IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 28020/2021 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 28023/2021 IA No. 28023/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 28020/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No. 3798/2021 (IV-B) (IA No. 30947/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 30945/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) SLP(C) No(s). 2822/2021 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Date : 12-07-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Pratima Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv. Mr. Karan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Manik Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Adv. Ms. Shivali, Adv. Ms. Subhavana, ADv. Ms. Pritika, Adv. Mr. Pranav Verma, Adv. Mr. Sandiv Kalia, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. Veena Bansal, Adv. Mr. Sorav Jindal, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Akshay Goyal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters alongwith SLP(C) Nos. 5537, 2703 and 4042 of 2021 on 30.07.2021. In the meantime, pleadings, if any, be exchanged. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.21 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7687/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-12-2020 in CWP No. 5433/2015 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) ROHTAS & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) Date : 29-06-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) Nos. 4042 and 4622, 2021, which is stated to be listed on 30.07.2021. List all the matters together on 30.07.2021. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.5 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5537/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 26226/2017 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) CHANDAN SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.47691/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 12-04-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Debjani Das Purkayashtha, Adv. M/S. Delhi Law Chambers, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list the matter after four weeks. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.12+36 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4042/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 26140/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SATISH KUMAR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.33877/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH SLP(C) No(s). 4622/2021 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.40167/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT....[TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO.12 I.E. SLP(C) No. 4042/2021 ] ) Date : 19-03-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Ms. Vidisha, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR Mr. S.P. Khatri, Adv. Mr. Shubham Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the prayer for stay as well as on the Special Leave Petition, returnable within two weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. Liberty is granted to serve on the Standing Counsel for the
2 State of Haryana. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.15 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2703/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 26277/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) RISHI PAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.21007/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) WITH SLP(C) No. 2216-2218/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Date : 01-03-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nischal Kumar Neeraj, AOR Mr Vishwendra Verma, Adv. Mr. Sandiv Kalia, Adv. Mr. Ram Nath, Adv. Mr. S N Rath, Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter alongwith SLP(C) No. 11229 of 2020 and connected matters tomorrow, i.e. 02.03.2021. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.20 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3363/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2020 in CWP No. 1425/2017 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) AZAD & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) ( IA No.27922/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.27926/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ) WITH SLP(C) No. 3373/2021 (IV-B) ( IA No.28020/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.28023/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT) Date : 01-03-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Mr. Karan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Manik Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Akshay Munjal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter alongwith SLP(C) No. 11229 of 2020 and connected matters tomorrow, i.e. 02.03.2021. (DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)