Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2011 / Diary 10005

SONAL AGARWAL v. PUNEET AGARWAL

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10005/2011

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

Bench

Petitioner

SONAL AGARWAL

Respondent

PUNEET AGARWAL

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

Download Judgment (PDF) Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

\210ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. 412 OF 2011SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln. for stay and office report )Date: 04/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D.S. Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Juneja, Adv. Mr. Rajan Bharti, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The transfer petition is allowed. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master Signed order is placed on the file. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 412 OF 2011Sonal Agarwal ...Petitioner VersusPuneet Agarwal ...Respondent O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties. We have gone through the grievance expressed by the petitioner and we accept the same. Therefore, the Matrimonial Suit No. 421 of 2011 titled as "Mr. Puneet Agarwal vs. Mrs. Sonal Agarwal" pending before the Court of District Judge Pargana at Alipore, West Bengal is ordered to be transferred to the District Judge, Rohini Court Delhi. The District Judge is directed either to decide himself or assign it to a competent Court having jurisdiction. The transfer petition is allowed accordingly.

After transfer of the petition, the transferee court is directed to take all endeavour either for amicable settlement or for early decision in the main matter without unnecessary adjournments. ...................J. (P. SATHASIVAM) ...................J. (J. CHELAMESWAR)New Delhi,May 04, 2012.

äITEM NO.54 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. 412 OF 2011SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln. for stay and office report)Date: 19/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Ram Shiromani Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D.S. Chauhan,Adv. Mr.Rajinder Juneja, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Considering the grievance expressed by both the parties and issues involved, we are of the view that the matter is to be settled before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Therefore, we direct both the parties to appear before the Co-ordinator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre at 110, Lawyers' Chambers (R.K. Jain Block), Supreme Court Compound, Tilak Marg, New Delhi -110 001 on 16th April, 2012 at 11.00 a.m. List the matter after the report of Coordinator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre is received. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

äITEM NO.54 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. 412 OF 2011SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln. for stay and office report)Date: 19/03/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Ram Shiromani Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D.S. Chauhan,Adv. Mr.Rajinder Juneja, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Considering the grievance expressed by both the parties and issues involved, we are of the view that the matter is to be settled before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Therefore, we direct both the parties to appear before the Co-ordinator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre at 110, Lawyers' Chambers (R.K. Jain Block), Supreme Court Compound, Tilak Marg, New Delhi -110 001 on 16th April, 2012 at 11.00 a.m. List the matter after the report of Coordinator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre is received. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

VITEM NO.50 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. 412 OF 2011SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln. for stay and office report )Date: 30/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D.S. Chauhan,Adv. Mr.Rajinder Juneja, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Four weeks' time is allowed for filing rejoinder affidavit. List thereafter. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

¢ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 412 OF 2011SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 15/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajinder Juneja, Adv. Mr. D.S. Chauhan,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As last chance, counter affidavit is to be filed onrecord on or before 25.1.2012. List thereafter before the Hon'ble Court, as perrules, without waiting for counter affidavit and any formalorder to that effect from this court. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

ªITEM NO.136 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 412 OF 2011SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 11/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice upon the unserved respondent. Dasti service is allowed which is permitted to beserved through the concerned Trial Court with the specificdirection to serve the notice upon the unserved respondent,(who is the petitioner before that Court in pendinglitigation) either through the learned Advocate appearing forsuch litigant or even by affixing the same at the addressdisclosed before that Court in the petition filed by thepresent respondent, since he could not be served by regularItem No.136 -2-notice. If respondent is not found at the registered addressand failed to disclose his correct address, in the matterwhich is pending before that Court, then that Court shall takeappropriate steps, as per Code of Civil Procedure. Photocopy of the postal remark received to beforwarded to the trial court for taking appropriate action, ifunserved respondent, who is petitioner before the trial court,has not disclosed his correct and better address on record. Process fee and spare copies are to be paid on or

before 18.7.2011. If not paid before 18.7.2011, list before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If paid before 18.7.2011, issue notice as per aboveorder. List again on 24.8.2011. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. 412 OF 2011 (FOR PREL.HEARING)SONAL AGARWAL Petitioner(s) VERSUSPUNEET AGARWAL Respondent(s)(With appln. for ex-Parte stay)Date: 18/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHANFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Vinay Jain, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of further proceedings in Matrimonial Case bearing No.421 of 2011 titled as "Mr. Puneet Agarwal vs. Mrs. Sonal Agarwal", pending before the Court of District Judge 24, Pargana, Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India