NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2395/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2396/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2398/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2399-2401/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2402/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2403/2023 J U D G M E N T ABHAY S OKA, J. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2399-2401/2023 1. The appellants are the defendants in a suit filed by the first respondent and one Shanti Devi, who is no more and has been shown as the third respondent in these Appeals. For convenience, we are referring to the parties with reference to their status in the suit. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The suit was filed on 8 th November, 2001 for possession of the property, more particularly described in the schedule (suit property). The allegation in the suit is that the first defendant, the State of Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand), was a tenant of the 1
plaintiffs in respect of the suit property at a monthly rent of Rs.86,232/- (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty- two), which was fixed by an order dated 18 th May, 1999 passed by the learned 3 rd Additional District Judge, Dehradun. The allegation is that though the rent was fixed with effect from 1 st September, 1993, the first defendant did not pay the rent. Therefore, the plaintiffs issued a notice of termination of tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. As the defendants failed to comply with the said notice, the suit for eviction was filed. 3. It appears from the record of the Trial Court that after the service of summons on the defendants, they appeared and applied for adjournments for filing the written statement. The first such application was made on 13th December 2001. Subsequent applications were made for adjournments. On 22 nd April 2002, the learned trial Judge did not accede to the prayer for grant of further time and passed an order that the suit would proceed ex parte and a date for ex parte hearing, i.e., 30th May 2002, was fixed. At this stage, we may also note that the plaintiffs also made an application to strike out the defence of the defendants. The said application was filed on 18 th February 2002. On the said application, the Advocate for the plaintiffs made an endorsement in the margin that as there was no advocate representing the defendants, a copy of the application was attached to the application. Though the date for the ex parte hearing was already fixed as 30th May 2002, on 3rd May 2002, the plaintiffs made an application to the Trial Court for passing an order on the 2
application dated 18th February 2002 for striking out the defendants' defence. Interestingly, on the same day, the plaintiffs moved another application stating that the plaintiffs may be permitted to lead their ex parte evidence through affidavits. It appears that on 3 rd May, 2002, the Trial Court allowed the application for striking out the defence. Subsequent facts narrated in this judgment would show that the suit was taken on the cause list on that day without any notice to the defendants. 4. On 16 th May, 2002, an application was moved by the defendants for setting aside the order dated 22 nd April, 2002. In the application, the averments were made that on 22 nd April, 2002, the District Judge before whom the suit was pending, was holding a Camp Court at Mussoorie. We may note that the suit was pending in the Court at Dehradun. The contention in the said application was that as the learned District Judge was unavailable, the defendants were under the impression that the suit would not proceed. In fact, in the affidavit filed in support of the said application by one Mukesh Kumar Malik on behalf of the Superintendent of Police, Dehradun, it is stated that he was present on 22 nd April 2002 till 4:00 p.m., but the case was not called out. On 30 th May, 2002, the application for setting aside the order directing the suit to proceed ex parte was rejected. At this stage, we may note here that in the proceedings of 22 nd April 2002, it was recorded that on that day, the lawyers had abstained from the Court work, and the learned Presiding Judge was on a tour of Mussoorie for holding a camp. There is no mention in the proceedings of 22 nd April, 2002 3
that any in charge Judicial Officer passed an order to proceed with the suit ex parte . To the specific allegations made by the defendants in the application for setting aside the ex parte order that the Judicial Officer was not available, in the reply filed by the plaintiffs in paragraph 4, all that is stated is that the contentions that on 22 nd April, 2002, the learned District Judge had proceeded to Mussoorie, are misconceived and the provisions of the Assam and Agra Civil Courts Act are apparent in this respect. 5. On 1 st July, 2002, the defendants applied for setting aside the order dated 3 rd May, 2002 by which their defence was struck out. The application proceeds on the allegation that on 3 rd May, 2002, the Court proceeded to strike out the defendants' defence without giving them an opportunity of being heard and the hearing was conducted ex parte . Very interestingly, a reply was filed to the said application by the plaintiffs in which a stand has been taken that as the suit was directed to proceed ex parte , there was no occasion to give an intimation to the defendants or their counsel that the application will be taken up on 3 rd May, 2002. Therefore, it is an accepted position that the application for striking out the defence of the defendants was taken up on the cause list on 3 rd May 2002 without issuing notice to the defendants, though on 22 nd April, 2002, the next date was already fixed as 30th May 2002. The application for setting aside the order dated 3rd May, 2002 was rejected. At this stage, we must clarify the legal position. Even if a defendant does not file a written statement and the suit is ordered to proceed ex parte against him , the limited defence 4
available to the defendant is not foreclosed. A defendant can always cross-examine the witnesses examined by the plaintiff to prove the falsity of the plaintiff's case. A defendant can always urge, based on the plaint and the evidence of the plaintiff, that the suit was barred by a statute such as the law of limitation. Therefore, notwithstanding an order passed earlier to proceed ex parte, while deciding an application for striking out the defence, it was the duty of the Court to give an opportunity of being heard to the defendants. However, that was not done. As the suit was fixed on 30 th May, 2002, the defendants were entitled to a notice that the suit would be taken up on an earlier date for hearing the application for striking out the defence. When the defendants had appeared in the suit, the act of preponing the date without notice to them or their advocate was completely illegal and contrary to elementary principles of natural justice. Therefore, it follows that the order striking out the defendants' defence is completely illegal, and the said order deserves to be set aside. 6. There is something further which must be noted. As can be seen from the record, the plaintiffs moved an application on 2 nd August, 2002 to amend the description of the suit property. The endorsement on the application records that ‘the case is proceeding ex parte against the defendants’. Therefore, a copy of the said application was not served upon the defendants. As seen from the proceedings, the application was allowed on 2 nd August, 2002. Thereafter, the suit was decreed on 24 th August, 2002. It is true that before the application for amendment of the plaint was 5
allowed, the defendants' defence was already struck out. Even if the defendants' defence was struck out, the defendants were entitled to a copy of the amended plaint. What was struck out was the right to defend the suit as unamended. Whether the subsequent plaint will affect the earlier order of striking out the defence will depend upon the nature of the amendment. However, even a copy of the amended plaint was not served on the defendants. 7. The defendants challenged the ex par te decree by filing a statutory revision application under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, before the learned Single Judge of the High Court. By the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge rejected the said revision application without noticing the glaring facts borne out from the record which we have reproduced above. A review of the said order of the learned Single Judge was sought. However, the same was dismissed on 4 th January, 2011. However, the defendants did not challenge the decree or the order passed on the revision application or review for three years. Instead, they were advised to raise objections under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in the execution proceedings. 8. The learned senior counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submitted that the defendants' conduct needs to be deprecated. The revenue entries were illegally altered to enable them to raise a contention regarding the lack of title on the part of the plaintiffs. Even the State Government prosecuted the plaintiffs. 6
9. Now, the clear picture which emerges is that the suit was decreed ex parte without giving proper opportunity to the defendants to defend themselves. On 22 nd April 2002, when the order directing that the suit would proceed ex parte was passed, the date fixed for ex parte hearing was 30th May 2002. On that date, the defendants could have appeared and applied for setting aside the said order. The Court could have always favourably considered that application by putting the defendants to conditions. However, without waiting till 30 th May, 2002, on 3 rd May 2002, without issuing notice to the defendants, the suit was taken up by the Trial Court, and an order of striking out the defendants' defence was passed, obviously, without hearing the defendants. Therefore, an illegality has been associated with the conduct of the suit proceedings and the manner in which the ex parte decree was passed. Consequently, we propose to set aside the orders dated 22 nd April, 2002 and 3 rd May, 2002 and relegate the suit to that stage. 10. There is another aspect of the matter. On 18 th May 1999, the 3rd Additional District Judge, Dehradun, passed an order in an Appeal directing the defendants to pay rent at Rs.86,232/ (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty-two) per month. The High Court and this Court confirmed the said order. The defendants' liability under the said order was to pay rent at Rs.86,232/- per month from 1 st September, 1993. The learned Attorney General for India, on instructions of the State Government, states that the rent at the said rate has been deposited up to date. We take the statement on record. 7
11. Much water has flown after the rent was fixed at the rate of Rs.86,232/- per month on 18 th May, 1999. The fact remains that the proceedings were delayed due to some default on the part of the defendants. Therefore, as a condition for setting aside the ex parte decree, we propose to direct the State Government to pay an ad hoc amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month from 14 th July, 2014 and continue to pay the said amount till the disposal of the suit. The deposit will be subject to the outcome of the suit. The defendants will be entitled to an adjustment of the amounts they paid at the rate of Rs.86,232/- per month. We propose to grant two months to the defendants to pay the balance amount payable up to date at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- per month from 14 th July, 2014. 12. Hence, we set aside the impugned orders and partly allow the Appeals with the following directions: (i) The ex parte decree dated 24 th August, 2002 passed by the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun, in SCC Suit No.24/2001 is hereby set aside. The suit is restored to the file of the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun, subject to the condition of the appellants/defendants depositing an ad hoc amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month from 14 th July, 2014 with the Trial Court within a period of two months from today. As stated earlier, the appellants/defendants will be entitled to an adjustment of Rs.86,232/- (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two 8
Hundred and Thirty-two) per month deposited by them for the said period. We make it clear that on the failure of the appellants/defendants to deposit the said amount within the stipulated period, the ex parte decree shall stand revived ; (ii) If the direction mentioned above is complied with, even the orders dated 22 nd April, 2002 and 3 rd May, 2002 will stand set aside; (iii) The defendants shall continue to deposit the amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month till the disposal of the suit; (iv) In the event the compliance is made by the appellants/defendants, we direct that the restored suit shall be listed before the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun in the morning on 25 th November, 2024. We make it clear that the defendants and the plaintiffs shall be under an obligation to appear before the Court of the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun, on that day, and no further notice shall be served upon them. We clarify that on the date of appearance, the appellants/defendants shall file a reply to the application for striking out the defence, and no further time shall be granted to them for that purpose. If the appellants/defendants fail to file a reply to the application for striking out their defence on that day, the Trial Court will be justified in proceeding with the hearing of the said application without the reply of the appellants/defendants; 9
(v) Only after deciding the application for striking out the defence, depending upon the outcome of the said application, the Trial Court will pass orders regarding permitting the appellants/defendants to file written statement; (vi) The amounts deposited in this Court at the rate of Rs.86,232/- (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty-two) per month with accrued interest thereon shall be transferred by the Registry of this Court to the Trial Court at Dehradun after expiry of the present fixed deposit. We direct the Trial Court to invest the amount which may be deposited by the appellants/defendants in terms of this judgment and the amount which will transferred by the Registry of this Court to the Trial Court in a fixed deposit with any nationalised bank; (vii) After the application for striking out the defence is decided, it will be open for the plaintiffs to apply for withdrawal of the amounts. The Trial Court shall decide the said application on its own merits. All contentions on that behalf are left open; (viii) We make it clear that we have made no adjudication on the merits of the controversy, including the title issue raised by the appellants/defendants. The Trial Court shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law in the restored suit on its own merits; 10
(ix) We make it clear that as we have directed the appellants/defendants to deposit the ad hoc amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month, we are not passing a separate order of costs; (x) Considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2001, it is obvious that the Trial Court will give necessary out of turn priority for hearing the application for striking out the defence. In the event the suit is required to be heard on merits, the Trial Court will give the necessary priority to the disposal of the suit, considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2001; (xi) In view of this judgment, the pending execution application for execution of the decree will not survive. However, if the ex parte decree is revived in terms of the clause (i) above, the execution application shall proceed; (xii) The findings recorded in this judgment are only for the limited purposes of considering the legality and validity of the ex parte order and the order by which the defence of the defendants was struck out. This judgment will not affect any other proceedings pending between the parties and all contentions therein are left open; (xiii) The Appeals are partly allowed on above terms; and (xiv) The Registry is directed to immediately return the 11
record of the suit along with a copy of this judgment to the Trial Court. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 1. As the execution application has been disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023, this Appeal does not survive. The same is disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2395/2023 1. The compulsory acquisition of the property claimed by the appellants was initiated by the State Government, which has been set aside by the impugned judgment. The appellants cannot have any grievance about setting aside the acquisition. Hence, no case for interference with the impugned order is made out. The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2396/2023 1. As the execution application has been disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023, this Appeal does not survive. The same is disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2398/2023 1. The application made by the appellant under Rule 97 Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been dismissed by the executing Court on the ground that the appellant was not in possession. It is an admitted position that the appellant was not in possession. Therefore, we find no error in the view taken under the impugned order. The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. 12
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2402/2023 1. As the decree dated 24 th August, 2002 has been set aside in terms of the judgment in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023, this Appeal does not survive. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly by keeping all the contentions in the restored suit expressly open. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2403/2023 1. Admittedly, this Appeal arises from the orders passed in the execution of the decree dated 24th August 2002. Therefore, in view of the judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023 setting aside the decree dated 24 th August 2002, this Appeal will not survive, and the same is disposed of accordingly. ..........................J. (ABHAY S. OKA) ..........................J. (AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH) ..........................J. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER 12, 2024. 13
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2395/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2396/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2398/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2399-2401/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2402/2023 CIVIL APPEAL NO.2403/2023 J U D G M E N T ABHAY S OKA, J. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2399-2401/2023 1. The appellants are the defendants in a suit filed by the first respondent and one Shanti Devi, who is no more and has been shown as the third respondent in these Appeals. For convenience, we are referring to the parties with reference to their status in the suit. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The suit was filed on 8 th November, 2001 for possession of the property, more particularly described in the schedule (suit property). The allegation in the suit is that the first defendant, the State of Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand), was a tenant of the 1
plaintiffs in respect of the suit property at a monthly rent of Rs.86,232/- (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty- two), which was fixed by an order dated 18 th May, 1999 passed by the learned 3 rd Additional District Judge, Dehradun. The allegation is that though the rent was fixed with effect from 1 st September, 1993, the first defendant did not pay the rent. Therefore, the plaintiffs issued a notice of termination of tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. As the defendants failed to comply with the said notice, the suit for eviction was filed. 3. It appears from the record of the Trial Court that after the service of summons on the defendants, they appeared and applied for adjournments for filing the written statement. The first such application was made on 13th December 2001. Subsequent applications were made for adjournments. On 22 nd April 2002, the learned trial Judge did not accede to the prayer for grant of further time and passed an order that the suit would proceed ex parte and a date for ex parte hearing, i.e., 30th May 2002, was fixed. At this stage, we may also note that the plaintiffs also made an application to strike out the defence of the defendants. The said application was filed on 18 th February 2002. On the said application, the Advocate for the plaintiffs made an endorsement in the margin that as there was no advocate representing the defendants, a copy of the application was attached to the application. Though the date for the ex parte hearing was already fixed as 30th May 2002, on 3rd May 2002, the plaintiffs made an application to the Trial Court for passing an order on the 2
application dated 18th February 2002 for striking out the defendants' defence. Interestingly, on the same day, the plaintiffs moved another application stating that the plaintiffs may be permitted to lead their ex parte evidence through affidavits. It appears that on 3 rd May, 2002, the Trial Court allowed the application for striking out the defence. Subsequent facts narrated in this judgment would show that the suit was taken on the cause list on that day without any notice to the defendants. 4. On 16 th May, 2002, an application was moved by the defendants for setting aside the order dated 22 nd April, 2002. In the application, the averments were made that on 22 nd April, 2002, the District Judge before whom the suit was pending, was holding a Camp Court at Mussoorie. We may note that the suit was pending in the Court at Dehradun. The contention in the said application was that as the learned District Judge was unavailable, the defendants were under the impression that the suit would not proceed. In fact, in the affidavit filed in support of the said application by one Mukesh Kumar Malik on behalf of the Superintendent of Police, Dehradun, it is stated that he was present on 22 nd April 2002 till 4:00 p.m., but the case was not called out. On 30 th May, 2002, the application for setting aside the order directing the suit to proceed ex parte was rejected. At this stage, we may note here that in the proceedings of 22 nd April 2002, it was recorded that on that day, the lawyers had abstained from the Court work, and the learned Presiding Judge was on a tour of Mussoorie for holding a camp. There is no mention in the proceedings of 22 nd April, 2002 3
that any in charge Judicial Officer passed an order to proceed with the suit ex parte . To the specific allegations made by the defendants in the application for setting aside the ex parte order that the Judicial Officer was not available, in the reply filed by the plaintiffs in paragraph 4, all that is stated is that the contentions that on 22 nd April, 2002, the learned District Judge had proceeded to Mussoorie, are misconceived and the provisions of the Assam and Agra Civil Courts Act are apparent in this respect. 5. On 1 st July, 2002, the defendants applied for setting aside the order dated 3 rd May, 2002 by which their defence was struck out. The application proceeds on the allegation that on 3 rd May, 2002, the Court proceeded to strike out the defendants' defence without giving them an opportunity of being heard and the hearing was conducted ex parte . Very interestingly, a reply was filed to the said application by the plaintiffs in which a stand has been taken that as the suit was directed to proceed ex parte , there was no occasion to give an intimation to the defendants or their counsel that the application will be taken up on 3 rd May, 2002. Therefore, it is an accepted position that the application for striking out the defence of the defendants was taken up on the cause list on 3 rd May 2002 without issuing notice to the defendants, though on 22 nd April, 2002, the next date was already fixed as 30th May 2002. The application for setting aside the order dated 3rd May, 2002 was rejected. At this stage, we must clarify the legal position. Even if a defendant does not file a written statement and the suit is ordered to proceed ex parte against him , the limited defence 4
available to the defendant is not foreclosed. A defendant can always cross-examine the witnesses examined by the plaintiff to prove the falsity of the plaintiff's case. A defendant can always urge, based on the plaint and the evidence of the plaintiff, that the suit was barred by a statute such as the law of limitation. Therefore, notwithstanding an order passed earlier to proceed ex parte, while deciding an application for striking out the defence, it was the duty of the Court to give an opportunity of being heard to the defendants. However, that was not done. As the suit was fixed on 30 th May, 2002, the defendants were entitled to a notice that the suit would be taken up on an earlier date for hearing the application for striking out the defence. When the defendants had appeared in the suit, the act of preponing the date without notice to them or their advocate was completely illegal and contrary to elementary principles of natural justice. Therefore, it follows that the order striking out the defendants' defence is completely illegal, and the said order deserves to be set aside. 6. There is something further which must be noted. As can be seen from the record, the plaintiffs moved an application on 2 nd August, 2002 to amend the description of the suit property. The endorsement on the application records that ‘the case is proceeding ex parte against the defendants’. Therefore, a copy of the said application was not served upon the defendants. As seen from the proceedings, the application was allowed on 2 nd August, 2002. Thereafter, the suit was decreed on 24 th August, 2002. It is true that before the application for amendment of the plaint was 5
allowed, the defendants' defence was already struck out. Even if the defendants' defence was struck out, the defendants were entitled to a copy of the amended plaint. What was struck out was the right to defend the suit as unamended. Whether the subsequent plaint will affect the earlier order of striking out the defence will depend upon the nature of the amendment. However, even a copy of the amended plaint was not served on the defendants. 7. The defendants challenged the ex par te decree by filing a statutory revision application under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, before the learned Single Judge of the High Court. By the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge rejected the said revision application without noticing the glaring facts borne out from the record which we have reproduced above. A review of the said order of the learned Single Judge was sought. However, the same was dismissed on 4 th January, 2011. However, the defendants did not challenge the decree or the order passed on the revision application or review for three years. Instead, they were advised to raise objections under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in the execution proceedings. 8. The learned senior counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submitted that the defendants' conduct needs to be deprecated. The revenue entries were illegally altered to enable them to raise a contention regarding the lack of title on the part of the plaintiffs. Even the State Government prosecuted the plaintiffs. 6
9. Now, the clear picture which emerges is that the suit was decreed ex parte without giving proper opportunity to the defendants to defend themselves. On 22 nd April 2002, when the order directing that the suit would proceed ex parte was passed, the date fixed for ex parte hearing was 30th May 2002. On that date, the defendants could have appeared and applied for setting aside the said order. The Court could have always favourably considered that application by putting the defendants to conditions. However, without waiting till 30 th May, 2002, on 3 rd May 2002, without issuing notice to the defendants, the suit was taken up by the Trial Court, and an order of striking out the defendants' defence was passed, obviously, without hearing the defendants. Therefore, an illegality has been associated with the conduct of the suit proceedings and the manner in which the ex parte decree was passed. Consequently, we propose to set aside the orders dated 22 nd April, 2002 and 3 rd May, 2002 and relegate the suit to that stage. 10. There is another aspect of the matter. On 18 th May 1999, the 3rd Additional District Judge, Dehradun, passed an order in an Appeal directing the defendants to pay rent at Rs.86,232/ (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty-two) per month. The High Court and this Court confirmed the said order. The defendants' liability under the said order was to pay rent at Rs.86,232/- per month from 1 st September, 1993. The learned Attorney General for India, on instructions of the State Government, states that the rent at the said rate has been deposited up to date. We take the statement on record. 7
11. Much water has flown after the rent was fixed at the rate of Rs.86,232/- per month on 18 th May, 1999. The fact remains that the proceedings were delayed due to some default on the part of the defendants. Therefore, as a condition for setting aside the ex parte decree, we propose to direct the State Government to pay an ad hoc amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month from 14 th July, 2014 and continue to pay the said amount till the disposal of the suit. The deposit will be subject to the outcome of the suit. The defendants will be entitled to an adjustment of the amounts they paid at the rate of Rs.86,232/- per month. We propose to grant two months to the defendants to pay the balance amount payable up to date at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- per month from 14 th July, 2014. 12. Hence, we set aside the impugned orders and partly allow the Appeals with the following directions: (i) The ex parte decree dated 24 th August, 2002 passed by the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun, in SCC Suit No.24/2001 is hereby set aside. The suit is restored to the file of the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun, subject to the condition of the appellants/defendants depositing an ad hoc amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month from 14 th July, 2014 with the Trial Court within a period of two months from today. As stated earlier, the appellants/defendants will be entitled to an adjustment of Rs.86,232/- (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two 8
Hundred and Thirty-two) per month deposited by them for the said period. We make it clear that on the failure of the appellants/defendants to deposit the said amount within the stipulated period, the ex parte decree shall stand revived ; (ii) If the direction mentioned above is complied with, even the orders dated 22 nd April, 2002 and 3 rd May, 2002 will stand set aside; (iii) The defendants shall continue to deposit the amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month till the disposal of the suit; (iv) In the event the compliance is made by the appellants/defendants, we direct that the restored suit shall be listed before the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun in the morning on 25 th November, 2024. We make it clear that the defendants and the plaintiffs shall be under an obligation to appear before the Court of the learned District and Session Judge, Dehradun, on that day, and no further notice shall be served upon them. We clarify that on the date of appearance, the appellants/defendants shall file a reply to the application for striking out the defence, and no further time shall be granted to them for that purpose. If the appellants/defendants fail to file a reply to the application for striking out their defence on that day, the Trial Court will be justified in proceeding with the hearing of the said application without the reply of the appellants/defendants; 9
(v) Only after deciding the application for striking out the defence, depending upon the outcome of the said application, the Trial Court will pass orders regarding permitting the appellants/defendants to file written statement; (vi) The amounts deposited in this Court at the rate of Rs.86,232/- (Rupees Eighty-six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty-two) per month with accrued interest thereon shall be transferred by the Registry of this Court to the Trial Court at Dehradun after expiry of the present fixed deposit. We direct the Trial Court to invest the amount which may be deposited by the appellants/defendants in terms of this judgment and the amount which will transferred by the Registry of this Court to the Trial Court in a fixed deposit with any nationalised bank; (vii) After the application for striking out the defence is decided, it will be open for the plaintiffs to apply for withdrawal of the amounts. The Trial Court shall decide the said application on its own merits. All contentions on that behalf are left open; (viii) We make it clear that we have made no adjudication on the merits of the controversy, including the title issue raised by the appellants/defendants. The Trial Court shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law in the restored suit on its own merits; 10
(ix) We make it clear that as we have directed the appellants/defendants to deposit the ad hoc amount at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) per month, we are not passing a separate order of costs; (x) Considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2001, it is obvious that the Trial Court will give necessary out of turn priority for hearing the application for striking out the defence. In the event the suit is required to be heard on merits, the Trial Court will give the necessary priority to the disposal of the suit, considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2001; (xi) In view of this judgment, the pending execution application for execution of the decree will not survive. However, if the ex parte decree is revived in terms of the clause (i) above, the execution application shall proceed; (xii) The findings recorded in this judgment are only for the limited purposes of considering the legality and validity of the ex parte order and the order by which the defence of the defendants was struck out. This judgment will not affect any other proceedings pending between the parties and all contentions therein are left open; (xiii) The Appeals are partly allowed on above terms; and (xiv) The Registry is directed to immediately return the 11
record of the suit along with a copy of this judgment to the Trial Court. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 1. As the execution application has been disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023, this Appeal does not survive. The same is disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2395/2023 1. The compulsory acquisition of the property claimed by the appellants was initiated by the State Government, which has been set aside by the impugned judgment. The appellants cannot have any grievance about setting aside the acquisition. Hence, no case for interference with the impugned order is made out. The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2396/2023 1. As the execution application has been disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023, this Appeal does not survive. The same is disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2398/2023 1. The application made by the appellant under Rule 97 Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been dismissed by the executing Court on the ground that the appellant was not in possession. It is an admitted position that the appellant was not in possession. Therefore, we find no error in the view taken under the impugned order. The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. 12
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2402/2023 1. As the decree dated 24 th August, 2002 has been set aside in terms of the judgment in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023, this Appeal does not survive. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly by keeping all the contentions in the restored suit expressly open. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2403/2023 1. Admittedly, this Appeal arises from the orders passed in the execution of the decree dated 24th August 2002. Therefore, in view of the judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos.2399-2401/2023 setting aside the decree dated 24 th August 2002, this Appeal will not survive, and the same is disposed of accordingly. ..........................J. (ABHAY S. OKA) ..........................J. (AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH) ..........................J. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER 12, 2024. 13
ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (IA No.2 – FOR DIRECTIONS, IA NO.3/2014-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.4/2014-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.6/2014-MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER, IA NO.8/2014-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.13/2015-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.15/2015-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.17/2015-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.37472/2017-INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION AND IA NO.156329/2021- APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) (IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) (IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) (IA No. 74253/2023 – ADDITION/DELETION/MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) (IA No. 74261/2023 – ADDITION/DELETION/MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 12-09-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. 1
Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Ms. Poonam Shukla, Adv. Ms. Reba Jena Mishra, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri, Adv. Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR Ms. Shreya Bansal, Adv. Mr. Mandaar Giri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Ms. Shrestha Narayan, Adv. Ms. Urmi Raval, Adv. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amrit Pardhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Raina, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2399-2401/2023 The Appeals are partly allowed in terms of the signed non- reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non- 2
reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2395/2023 The Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2396/2023 The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non- reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2398/2023 The Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2402/2023 The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non- reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2403/2023 3
The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non- reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) [THE COMMON SIGNED NON-REPORTABLE JUDGMENT IS PLACED ON THE FILE] 4
ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 C.A. No. 2398/2023 (IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (IA No. 74253/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (IA No. 74261/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 31-07-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. 1
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s) Mr. Harin Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri, Adv. Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR Mr. Mandaar Giri, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Shreya Bansal, Adv. Mr. Chitwan Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Abhiraj Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Chirag Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amrit Pardhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Raina, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We permit the learned Advocate-on-Record appearing for the State of Uttarakhand to file a separate compilation of the relevant documents which are required for hearing of the appeals. 2
List on 12 th September, 2024. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER 3
ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. APARNA AJITSARIA Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FOR FDR RENEWAL ) Date : 15-05-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the FDRs, mentioned in the office report dated 14.5.2024, be renewed for a further period of one year from the respective due dates of their maturity. APARNA AJITSARIA Registrar
ITEM NO.121 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (IA NO. 3/2014- EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO. 4/2014-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO. 6/2014-MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER, IA NO. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA NO.37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION AND IA NO.156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) (IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) (IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) (IA No. 74253/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) (IA No. 74261/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 24-04-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Tiwari, Adv. 1
Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Abhiraj Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Chirag Joshi, Adv. Mr. Harin P Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K Giri, Adv. Mr. Mandar Mukesh Giri, Adv. Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR Mr. Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are informed across the Bar that the learned Attorney General for India has been instructed to appear for the State of Uttarakhand. Time is sought on the ground that he is not available. List on 31 st July, 2024. It is pointed out that by an order dated 27 th April, 2023, this Court had called for the record of the cases before the High Court. The Registry to immediately issue a requisition to the concerned High Court to forward the soft copies of the records. The soft copies be provided to the learned counsel representing the parties. 2
The parties are free to place on record the relevant documents forming part of the record. (ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 3
1 ITEM NO.109 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) ( IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS, IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION, IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER, IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES & IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014, FOR ON IA 3/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014 & FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 & FOR ON IA 6/2014) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74253/2023) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74261/2023) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 141209/2019 & FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 141212/2019) Date : 04-04-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR
2 Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Manan Verma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Hiren Raval, Sr.Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri, Adv. Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Manan Verma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after one week. (NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.801(MM) COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 13-03-2024 This appeal was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR For Parties Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List on 03.04.2024. (NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014 FOR ON IA 3/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 FOR ON IA 6/2014 IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) (FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74253/2023 IA No. 74253/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) 1
(FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74261/2023 IA No. 74261/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 141209/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 141212/2019 IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 28-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Abhiraj Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Chirag Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, D.A.G. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request made by Mr. Harin P. Raval, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent-State and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the other parties, the matters stand adjourned. List the matters next week. (VIJAY KUMAR) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2
ITEM NO.801(MM) COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 25-01-2024 This appeal was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K Giri, Adv. Mr. Mandaar Mukesh Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List on 28.02.2024 along with connected matter(s). (NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (ONLY C.A. NO. 2394 OF 2023 IS TO BE LISTED. FOR RENEWAL OF F.D.R. MATURING ON 15.01.2024 ) Date : 03-01-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the 3 FDRs (bearing FDR Nos. 966-C-T, 966-C-U and 966-C-V) be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity i.e. 15.1.2024. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar
1 ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) (FOR ON IA 3/2014 IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) (FOR ON IA 6/2014 IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) (IA No. 74253/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) (IA No. 74261/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
2 IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 22-11-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Appellant(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. R.venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Harin P.Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya, Adv. Ms. Aviteeya, Adv. Ms. Sonali Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. R.venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Harin P,raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya, Adv. Ms. Sonali Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after two weeks. (SNEHA DAS) (VIDYA NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) ([ TOP OF THE BOARD ] IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS, IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION, IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER, IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES & IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 141209/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 141212/2019 IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014 FOR ON IA 3/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 FOR ON IA 6/2014 IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X)
2 ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74253/2023 IA No. 74253/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74261/2023 IA No. 74261/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) Date : 04-10-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI For Parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr.Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Abhiraj Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter dated 03.10.2023 circulated by Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant(s)/respondent(s) seeking adjournment, list these appeals on 08.11.2023 within first five matters. Let Fixed Deposit Receipts may be renewed in the same terms. (NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) ( IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS, IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION, IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER, IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES, IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014 FOR ON IA 3/2014, FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014, FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014, IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 FOR ON IA 6/2014) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74253/2023 IA No. 74253/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74261/2023 IA No. 74261/2023 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES) C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 141209/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 141212/2019) Date : 10-08-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI For Parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On mentioning of these matters, on behalf of learned counsel appearing for the State of Uttarakhand, we adjourn the hearing of this batch of appeals till 04.10.2023. Let this be the first hearing matter on that date. (NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 ITEM NO.108 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) IA No. 156329/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 15/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 37472/2017 - INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 11/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 14/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH C.A. No. 2395/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014 FOR ON IA 3/2014, FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014, FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) C.A. No. 2396/2023 (X) C.A. No. 2398/2023 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 FOR ON IA 6/2014) C.A. No. 2399-2401/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74253/2023) C.A. No. 2402/2023 (X) ( FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 74261/2023)
2 C.A. No. 2403/2023 (X) (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 12-07-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Appellant(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Kirti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Ms. Purnima Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Misra, Adv. Ms. Deepika Mishra, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Narang, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. R.Venkataramani, AG(NP) Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. R.Venkataramani, AG(NP) Mr. Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 09.08.2023. (NIRMALA NEGI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (Only C.A. No. 2394/2023 is to be listed before Ld. Registrar Court for F.D.R renewal. ) Date : 08-05-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Narang, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R All the FDRs (as mentioned in the office report dated 01.05.2023) maturing in the months of June, July, August and September, 2023, be renewed for a further period of one year from the respective due dates of their maturity. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar
ITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Civil Appeal No(s). 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (Only C.A. No. 2394/2023 is to be listed before Ld. Registrar Court for F.D.R renewal. ) Date : 28-04-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R All the 12 F.D.Rs (mentioned in the office report dated 26.4.2023) maturing in the month of May, 2023, be renewed for a further period of one year from the respective due dates of their maturity. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar
ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 27-04-2023 This appeal was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA For Parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. UPON mentioning the Court made the following O R D E R The matter is taken up on mentioning by learned counsel for the appellants. List in the second week of July, 2023. Let the original records be produced on the next date of hearing. (SNEHA DAS) (VIDYA NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No. 2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 18-04-2023 This appeal was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA For Parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON mentioning the Court made the following O R D E R List on 20.04.2023. (SNEHA DAS) (VIDYA NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 REVISED ITEM NO.65 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014 FOR ON IA 3/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 FOR ON IA 6/2014) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) (IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) (IA No. 1/2015 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 22115/2019 (X) (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 24-03-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
2 For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhishek Misra, Adv. Mr. Kirti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Narang, Adv. Mr. R.venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Harin P.raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amrit Pardhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Raina, Adv. Mr. R.venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Harin P.raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. List on 12.04.2023. (SNEHA DAS) (VIDYA NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
3 ITEM NO.65 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2014 FOR ON IA 3/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 IA No. 1/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 5/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014 FOR ON IA 6/2014) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) (IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) (IA No. 1/2015 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 22115/2019 (X) (IA No. 141209/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 141212/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 24-03-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv.
4 Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhishek Misra, Adv. Mr. Kirti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Narang, Adv. Mr. R.venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Harin P.raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Akshat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amrit Pardhan, Adv. Mr. Anil Raina, Adv. Mr. R.venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Harin P.raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K.giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. List on 12.04.2023. (SNEHA DAS) (VIDYA NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ATUL M. KURHEKAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) Date : 07-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Ms. Purnima Jain, Adv. Mr. Shaiwal Srivastava, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mr. Hrithik Manchanda, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R FDRs be renewed for a further period of one year from their due dates of maturity. ATUL M. KURHEKAR Registrar
ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) ([AS PER MENTIONING DATED 28.11.2022 NOT TO BE DELETED] ) Date : 20-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R FDRs maturing in the month of February, 2023 (16 FDRs) and in March, 2023 (19 FDRs) be renewed for a further period of six months from the respective due dates of their maturity. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar
ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. ANJU BAJAJ CHANDNA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER ) Date : 29-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Appearance Respondent-Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R FDR be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of its maturity. ANJU BAJAJ CHANDNA Registrar
ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER ) Date : 23-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R The FDRs maturing in the months of November 2022(11), December 2022(15), January 2023(17) and April 2023(12) respectively shall be renewed for a further period of six months from their respective due dates of maturity as mentioned in the office report dt.21.9.2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER ) Date : 22-07-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Upon hearing the ld. counsel for the respondent-State, all the 31 FDRs are permitted to be renewed for a further period of six months from their respective date(s) of maturity, as appears in the sheet drawn up by the Cash and Accounts(II) Branch and placed together with the office report. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER ) Date : 19-05-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Abhishek Misra, Adv. Mrs Deepika Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Upon hearing the ld. counsel for the respondents, it is directed that all the FDRs be renewed for a further period of six months from their respective dates of maturity, as indicated in the office report dt.17.5.2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER ) Date : 28-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Upon hearing learned counsel appearing for the parties it is directed that the 11 FDRs as listed hereafter may be renewed for a further period of six months from the respective date of maturity in the month of May. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER ) Date : 25-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Office report is not in order. Matter is adjourned to 28.4.2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 25-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms Rachna Gandhi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Upon hearing the ld. counsels, it is directed that all the 12 FDRs be renewed for a further period of one year from their respective dates of maturity in the month of April, 2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 28-02-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms.Rachna Gandhi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Upon hearing the Ld. counsels for the parties, it is directed that the F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity as indicated in the office report dated 25.2.2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 25-02-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is not put up as per rules. The same may be revised and put up on 28.2.2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 04-10-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Vikash Negai, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar
ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 28-07-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr Vikash Negai, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R FDRs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar
ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 17-12-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Aviral Saxena, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar
ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 02 - 11 - 2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Vikash Negai, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R FDRs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 25-09-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of the prayer made and upon hearing the counsel in that regard, it is directed that the eleven Fixed Deposit (Receipts as indicated in the office report) be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar
ITEM NO.1 REGISTRAR COURT - 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 31 - 07 - 2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Aviral Saxena, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R FDR be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of its maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS T O BE LISTED ONLY ) Date : 25 - 02 - 2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 7 FDRs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.31 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LIS TED ONLY ) Date : 03 - 02 - 2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Nine F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LIS TED ONLY ) Date : 18 - 12 - 2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Twelve F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (List the matter after disposal of [Civil Revision Petition 32/2015] FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) ) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) ) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) ) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) ( IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) ( IA No. 1/2015 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 22115/2019 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.141209/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.141212/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 02-12-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today.
-2- Item no.60 For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 33372/2013 Eight FDRs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (List the matter after disposal of [Civil Revision Petition 32/2015] FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) IA No. 1/2015 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 22115/2019 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.141209/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.141212/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 04-11-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today.
Item No.33 -2- For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.33372/2013 Eight F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 22115/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-06-2019 in CR No. 32/2015 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DEHRADUN Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHANTI DEVI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.141209/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.141212/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 04-10-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K.Venugopal,AG Mr. Mukesh K.Giri,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It appears that against the decree of eviction, proceedings are pending in SLP(Civil)...CC Nos.12481- 12483 of 2014 before this Court. The present proceedings arise out of the execution proceedings and though we were not inclined to enlarge the scope of execution or issue notice or grant stay in matter, proceedings pending 1
against the decree itself, we consider it appropriate to tag this matter with the said special leave petitions. We agree with the contention of the learned counsel for the parties that a quietus needs to be put to the larger dispute and it would be thus open for them to seek expeditious hearing in SLP(Civil)...CC Nos.12481-12483 of 2014. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (List the matter after disposal of [Civil Revision Petition 32/2015] FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) ) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) ) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) ) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) ( IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) ( IA No. 1/2015 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 30-09-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr Tavish B Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR
-2- Item no.13 For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP© NO.33372/2013 All the 10 FDRs are renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (List the matter after disposal of [Civil Revision Petition 32/2015] FDR MATTER: SLP(C) NO. 33372/2013 IS TO BE LISTED ONLY IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) ) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) ) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) ) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) ( IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) ( IA No. 1/2015 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 02-09-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms Mariya Siddiqui, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Ms Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr Ramneek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR
-2- Item no.13 For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Ms Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.33372/2013 FDRs are renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS) IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) Date : 26-08-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Spl.Counsel Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the Office Report dated 30.7.2019. The Registry is directed to renew the amount invested in F.D.R. in any Nationalized Bank which gives more interest rate. (VISHAL ANAND) (RAJ RANI NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (To be listed after the disposal of Civil Revision No. 32 of 2015(F.D.R. MATTER) IA No. 4/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 13/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 3/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 8/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 17/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 6/2014 - MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER IA No. 12/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 19/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 7/2014 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 18/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES IA No. 16/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) Date : 22-07-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr Vikas Negi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Eight FDRs are renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE IA 2/2014,3/2014,4/2014,5/2014,6/2014,7/2014,8/2014,9/2015,10/2015,12/ 2015,13/2015,16/2015,17/2015,18/2016,19/2016, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (To be listed after the disposal of Civil Revision No. 32 of 2015 ) Date : 10-05-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Ms Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the seven FDRs are renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
ITEM NO.101 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE IA 2/2014,3/2014,4/2014,5/2014,6/2014,7/2014,8/2014,9/2015,10/2015,12/ 2015,13/2015,16/2015,17/2015,18/2016,19/2016, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (To be listed after the disposal of Civil Revision No. 32 of 2015 ) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) ( ) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) Date : 16-04-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the F.D.Rs be renewed for a further period of six months from the due date of their maturity. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
SLP(C)No.33372/13 etc. 1. ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No.64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) IA No.8/2014 – Exemption from filing O.T. IA No.17/2015 – Exemption from filing O.T. IA No.4/2014 – Exemption from filing O.T. IA No.13/2015 – Exemption from filing O.T. IA No.3/2014 – Exemption from filing O.T. IA No.6/2014 – Modification of Court order IA No.19/2016 – Permission to file Annexures IA No.7/2014 – Permission to file Annexures IA No.18/2016 – Permission to file Annexures IA No.16/2015 – Permission to file Annexures IA No.12/2015 – Permission to file Annexures WITH SLP(C) No.34193/2013 (X) SLP(C) No.11083/2014 (X) SLP(C) No.16746/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC Nos.12481-12483/2014 (X) IA No.1/2014 – Condonation of delay in filing S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) IA No.1/2015 – Condonation of delay in filing Date : 08-02-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Petitioner(s) Mr.Partha Sil, AOR Mr.Tavish B.Prasad, Adv. Mrs.D.Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mrs.Rachna Gupta, AOR
SLP(C)No.33372/13 etc. 2. For Respondent(s) Mr.K.K.Venugopal, AG Mr.Mukesh K.Giri, Adv. Mrs.D.Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms.Rachna Gandhi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This Court, vide order dated 05.04.2016, granted liberty to the High Court of Uttarakhand to decide the revision petition filed against order dated 20.09.2014 rejecting the objections of the respondent-State. At the commencement of hearing, it is submitted by the learned Attorney General appearing on behalf of the respondent- State, as also by Mrs.Rachna Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, that Civil Revision No.32 of 2015, filed by the Government of Uttarakhand against the trial Court’s order rejecting the objections of the respondent – State under Section 47 CPC, is still pending before the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital. A joint request has also been made to this Court to issue a direction to the High Court to dispose of the said revision petition expeditiously. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, we request the High Court to dispose of the said revision in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Post these matters after the said Civil Revision is disposed of. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RAJ RANI NEGI) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) Date : 26-11-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Vidyottma, Adv. Ms. Gitanjali N. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following 1
O R D E R The Uttarakhand High Court has still not decided the revision petition. List the matters after 10 weeks. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (KAILASH CHANDER) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2
1 ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.4 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) ( FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2015) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) ( FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2014) SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) Date : 20-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Siddhant S.Malik, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR
2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the respondent-State, list these matter after eight weeks. (SHASHI SAREEN) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER
1 ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-09-2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (X) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (X) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (X) SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (X) Date : 10-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Ms. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Kusum Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel
2 for the respondents, list the matters after ten weeks since the matter is still pending in the Uttarakhand High Court. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SHARDA KAPOOR) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Ì1ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.4 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand atNainital)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR directions and exemption from filing O.T. andmodification of Court's Order and permission to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and permission to file additionaldocuments and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds &file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and Interim Relief and OfficeReport)WITHSLP(C) No. 34193/2013(WITH APPLN. (S) FOR exemption from filing O.T. and permission tofile additional documents and placing additional pleas and InterimRelief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11083/2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and placingadditional pleas and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 16746/2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission forurging additional facts and permission to file additional documentsand permission to file synopsis and list of dates and InterimRelief and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 27/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA2For Petitioner(s) Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Partha Sil, AORMr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv.Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv.Ms. Preeti Shukla, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh Giri, AAG Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AORMs. Rachna Gandhi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of the letter circulated by Ms. D. BharathiReddy, learned counsel for the respondents, list thematters after summer vacation. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SHARDA KAPOOR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 20/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents, list the matter after four weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
$1ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand atNainital)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. andmodification of court's order and permission to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and permission to file additionaldocuments and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds &file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and interim relief and officereport)WITHSLP(C) No. 34193/2013(With (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s)for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption fromfiling O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additionaldocuments and Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11083/2014(With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) forpermission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 16746/2014(With (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documentsand appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates andappln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s)for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and OfficeReport)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 20/09/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.2CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.Mrs Rachna Gupta, AORMr. Anurag Gupta, Adv.Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv.Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AORMrs Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of the letter circulated by learned counselfor the respondents, list the matter after four weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions and exemption from filing OT and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and application to plead additional facts and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 19/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.
Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by learned counsel, list the matters after six weeks. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master
TITEM NO.17 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand atNainital)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(With application for directions and exemption from filing OT andmodification of court's order and permission to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and permission to file additionaldocuments and application to plead additional facts and praying forleave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interimrelief and office report)(For final disposal)WITHSLP(C) No. 34193/2013(With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) forexemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to fileadditional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11083/2014(With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) forexemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 16746/2014(With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents andappln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates andappln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s)for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and OfficeReport)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Date : 19/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv.Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv.Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv.Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv.Mr. Partha Sil,Adv.Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAGMrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv.Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Adv.Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RIn view of letter circulated by learned counsel, list thematters after six weeks.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master
1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 05/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For appearing parties: Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of learned counsel for the State of Uttarakhand, the matters be listed after the summer vacation. We make it clear that the High Court is at liberty to decide the revision petition filed against the order dated 20 th September, 2014 rejecting the objections of the State. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (MADHU NARULA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
\210 1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANJAY KUMARDate: 2016.04.06 Date : 05/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.17:11:28 ISTReason: 2CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor appearing parties: Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of learned counsel for the State of Uttarakhand, the matters be listed after the summer vacation. We make it clear that the High Court is at liberty to decide the revision petition filed against the order dated 20th September, 2014 rejecting the objections of the State. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (MADHU NARULA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
CORRECTED ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 08/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI 1
For Parties Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the executing court should be placed on record. We may note that Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttarakhand says that a revision petition has been been filed by the State against order dated 22.09.2014. List the matters on a non-miscellaneous day. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master 2
ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 08/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI 3
For Parties Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the executing court should be placed on record. We may note that Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttarakhand says that a revision petition has been been filed by the State against order dated 22.09.2014. List the matters on a non-miscellaneous day. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master 4
ò; CORRECTED ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 08/03/2016Signature Not Verified These petitions were called on for hearingDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2016.03.10 today.15:52:00 ISTReason: CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI 1For Parties Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv.
Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the executing court should beplaced on record. We may note that Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learnedsenior counsel appearing for the State of Uttarakhand says that arevision petition has been been filed by the State against orderdated 22.09.2014. List the matters on a non-miscellaneous day.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master 2ITEM NO.45 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand atNainital)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. andmodification of court's order and permission to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and permission to file additionaldocuments and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds &file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on recordsubsequent facts and documents and interim relief and officereport)(For final disposal)
WITHSLP(C) No. 34193/2013(With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents andappln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placingadditional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 11083/2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) forplacing additional pleas and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 16746/2014(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) forpermission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permissionto file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission tofile additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report)S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Date : 08/03/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI 3For Parties Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the executing court should beplaced on record. We may note that Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learnedsenior counsel appearing for the State of Uttarakhand says that a
revision petition has been been filed by the State against orderdated 22.09.2014. List the matters on a non-miscellaneous day.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master 4
1 ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)
2 Date : 30/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Ms. Kritika Seth, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansole, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR (NP) Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned for ten weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
¶ 1 ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.09.30 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/201517:20:02 ISTReason: (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) 2Date : 30/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Ms. Kritika Seth, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansole, Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR (NP) Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned for ten weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
1 ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (for final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleads and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 08/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE
2 For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansode, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ramneek Misra, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR For Respondent(s) State Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters on 30 th September, 2015. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
À 1 ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (for final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleads and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.09.08 Date : 08/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.17:13:09 ISTReason: CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE 2For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.
Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansode, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ramneek Misra, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AORFor Respondent(s)State Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters on 30th September, 2015. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERÀ 1 ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (for final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleads and Interim
Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.09.08 Date : 08/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.17:13:09 ISTReason: CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE 2For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansode, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ramneek Misra, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AORFor Respondent(s)State Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. H.P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters on 30th September, 2015.
(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions and exemption from filing OT and modification of court's order and to plead additional facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds and file additional documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 04/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL 1
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. For Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. CC No. 12481-12483/2014 Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners says that he had an eye surgery. On his request, the matters are adjourned for two weeks. (Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
ä ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions and exemption from filing OT and modification of court's order and to plead additional facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds and file additional documents and praying for leave to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and interim relief and office report) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 04/08/2015Signature Not Verified These petitions were called on for hearingDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2015.08.04 today.12:11:53 ISTReason: CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL 1For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv.
Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. For Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.CC No. 12481-12483/2014 Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners says that he had an eye surgery. On his request, the matters are adjourned for two weeks.(Meenakshi Kohli) (Jaswinder Kaur) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, modification of court's order, permission to file additional documents, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTIDEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for exemption from filing official translation, placing additional pleas and interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHA V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, permission for urging additional facts, permission to file additional documents, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and Office Report) Date : 12/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 in SLP 33372 & 34193 in SLP 11083 & 16746 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Shama, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R. in CC 12481-83 Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. For State Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. For RR in SLP 16746 & CC 12481-83 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. For RR 5 Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Ms. Sakshi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by Mr. Rajiv Nanda, learned Advocate on Record for the State. List these matters on 4 th August, 2015. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 OF 2
¨ SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, modification of court's order, permission to file additional documents, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTIDEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for exemption from filing official translation, placing additional pleas and interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHA V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, permission for urging additional facts, permission to file additional documents, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and Office Report) Date : 12/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM :Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2015.08.13 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA16:49:37 ISTReason: Blank order HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) PAGE NO. 1 OF 2SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013in SLP 33372 & 34193in SLP 11083 & 16746 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Shama, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R.in CC 12481-83 Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G.For State Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For RR in SLP 16746& CC 12481-83 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R.For RR 5 Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Ms. Sakshi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by Mr. Rajiv Nanda, learned Advocate on Record for the State. List these matters on 4th August, 2015. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 OF 2
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 12/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by CORAM :Kalyani GuptaDate: 2015.05.1817:10:26 ISTReason: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RUPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
¨ SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, modification of court's order, permission to file additional documents, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTIDEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for exemption from filing official translation, placing additional pleas and interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHA V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, permission for urging additional facts, permission to file additional documents, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and Office Report) Date : 12/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM :Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2015.08.13 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA16:49:37 ISTReason: Blank order HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) PAGE NO. 1 OF 2SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013in SLP 33372 & 34193in SLP 11083 & 16746 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Shama, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rachna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R.in CC 12481-83 Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G.For State Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For RR in SLP 16746& CC 12481-83 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R.For RR 5 Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Ms. Sakshi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by Mr. Rajiv Nanda, learned Advocate on Record for the State. List these matters on 4th August, 2015. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 OF 2
1 CORRECTED ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds and file addl. Documents and interim relief and office report) (for final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 28/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
2 For Petitioner(s) SLP(C)33372/13 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. SLP(C)11083/14 & SLP(C) No.16746/14 Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR For Respondent(s) State Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, AG Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though these special leave petitions were listed today for hearing by consensus, Mr. Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsel appearing for State of Uttarakhand makes fervent appeal for adjournment by two weeks on the ground that certain facts have to be placed before us. Learned senior counsel makes a statement that, realising the stand of the petitioners, the State is even preferred to pay costs for adjournment. Considering the submission made by learned senior counsel for the State, while granting two weeks adjournment, we impose costs of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) to be payable to the petitioners in SLP(C) No.33372 of 2013. The costs shall
3 be paid within two weeks. List the matter on 12 th May, 2015 as first case, subject to overnight part heard matter. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
>" 1 ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds and file addl. Documents and interim relief and office report) (for final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015Signature Not Verified (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.04.2817:44:04 ISTReason: Date : 28/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH 2
For Petitioner(s)SLP(C)33372/13 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv.SLP(C)11083/14 &SLP(C) No.16746/14 Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv.S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AORFor Respondent(s)State Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, AG Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though these special leave petitions were listed today for hearing by consensus, Mr. Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsel appearing for State of Uttarakhand makes fervent appeal for adjournment by two weeks on the ground that certain facts have to be placed before us. Learned senior counsel makes a statement that, realising the stand of the petitioners, the State is even preferred to pay costs for adjournment. Considering the submission made by learned senior counsel for the State, while granting two weeks adjournment, we impose costs of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) to be payable to the petitioners in SLP(C) No.33372 of 2013. The costs shall 3be paid within two weeks. List the matter on 12th May, 2015 as first case,subject to overnight part heard matter.(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
# 1 CORRECTED ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds and file addl. Documents and interim relief and office report) (for final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for permission for urging additional facts and appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015Signature Not Verified (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.07.0715:16:21 ISTReason: Date : 28/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH 2
For Petitioner(s)SLP(C)33372/13 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv.SLP(C)11083/14 &SLP(C) No.16746/14 Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv.S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6459/2015 Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AORFor Respondent(s)State Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, AG Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Though these special leave petitions were listed today for hearing by consensus, Mr. Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsel appearing for State of Uttarakhand makes fervent appeal for adjournment by two weeks on the ground that certain facts have to be placed before us. Learned senior counsel makes a statement that, realising the stand of the petitioners, the State is even preferred to pay costs for adjournment. Considering the submission made by learned senior counsel for the State, while granting two weeks adjournment, we impose costs of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) to be payable to the petitioners in SLP(C) No.33372 of 2013. The costs shall 3be paid within two weeks. List the matter on 12th May, 2015 as first case,subject to overnight part heard matter.(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2015 CC No. 6459/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/06/2014 in CR No. 48/2014 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHANTI DEVI (DEAD) DIVYAM SINGH & ANR Respondent(s) Date : 09/04/2015 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R To be tagged along with SLP(C) 33372 of 2013 and connected matters. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar
B ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2015 CC No. 6459/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/06/2014 in CR No. 48/2014 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHANTI DEVI (DEAD) DIVYAM SINGH & ANR Respondent(s) Date : 09/04/2015 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R To be tagged along with SLP(C) 33372 of 2013 and connected matters. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.04.1015:37:33 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.2 (MM) COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead additional facts and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 07/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For the parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. 1
Mr. Anurag Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar,Adv. Mr. Samir Jain,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri,AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Saxena,Adv. Mr. R. Mishra,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call on 28.04.2015 as first case, subject to overnight part heard matter. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
4 ITEM NO.2 (MM) COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead additional facts and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleas and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 07/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHSignature Not Verified For the partiesDigitally signed byNarendra PrasadDate: 2015.04.0811:53:13 ISTReason: Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. 1 Mr. Anurag Gupta,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar,Adv. Mr. Samir Jain,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mukesh Giri,AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.
Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Saxena,Adv. Mr. R. Mishra,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call on 28.04.2015 as first case, subject to overnight partheard matter. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. and modification OF Court's order, permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. Documents and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T., permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleas and interim relief and office report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 17/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For the parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. 1
Mr. Anil Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra,Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal,Adv. General Mr. Mukesh K. Giri,AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal,Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I n the light of our order dated 14.07.2014 it must be stated that the State should continue to deposit the subsequent usage charges from the month of August, 2014. The same shall be deposited within four weeks from today to the credit of these special leave petitions with the Registry of this Court. The Registry is directed to invest the same in a fixed deposit initially for a period of six months which shall be renewed periodically, pending further orders. List these matters on 07.04.2015 as first case, subject to overnight part heard. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
¤ ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. and modification OF Court's order, permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. Documents and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T., permission to file additional documents and placing additional pleas and interim relief and office report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., permission for urging additional facts and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 17/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNarendra PrasadDate: 2015.03.18 For the parties17:23:52 ISTReason: Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. 1 Mr. Anil Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anurag Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra,Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal,Adv. General
Mr. Mukesh K. Giri,AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal,Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In the light of our order dated 14.07.2014 it must be statedthat the State should continue to deposit the subsequent usagecharges from the month of August, 2014. The same shall bedeposited within four weeks from today to the credit of thesespecial leave petitions with the Registry of this Court. TheRegistry is directed to invest the same in a fixed depositinitially for a period of six months which shall be renewedperiodically, pending further orders. List these matters on 07.04.2015 as first case, subject toovernight part heard. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
ITEM NO.8 (MM) COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file addl. Documents and placing additional pleas and interim relief and office report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., and placing additinoal pleas and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. , permission for urging additional facts and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 20/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT 1
For the parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Samir Jain,Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal,Adv. General Mr. Mukesh Giri,AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv. Mr. Rana Mukherji,Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call on 17.03.2015, immediately after overnight part heard, if any. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
ð ITEM NO.8 (MM) COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and modification of court's order and permission to bring on record subsequent facts and documents and permission to file additional documents and permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file addl. documents and interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file addl. Documents and placing additional pleas and interim relief and office report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T., and placing additinoal pleas and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. , permission for urging additional facts and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 20/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM :Signature Not Verified HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLADigitally signed byNarendra PrasadDate: 2015.01.21 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT15:41:27 ISTReason: 1For the parties Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Sr.Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Samir Jain,Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal,Adv. General Mr. Mukesh Giri,AAG Mr. Rajiv Nanda,Adv.
Mr. Rana Mukherji,Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Call on 17.03.2015, immediately after overnight part heard, ifany. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2
SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, modification of court's order, permission to file additional documents, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTIDEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for exemption from filing official translation, placing additional pleas and interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHA V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, permission for urging additional facts, permission to file additional documents, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and Office Report) Date : 08/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. in SLP 33372 & 34193 in SLP 11083 & 16746 Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R. in CC 12481-83 Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. For State Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. For RR in SLP 16746 & CC 12481-83 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by Ms. Rachna Gupta, learned Advocate on Record. List these matters on 20 th January, 2015, for final disposal. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 OF 2
Ê SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013 ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, modification of court's order, permission to file additional documents, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTIDEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for exemption from filing official translation, placing additional pleas and interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application for placing additional pleas and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHA V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for exemption from filing Official Translation, permission for urging additional facts, permission to file additional documents, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and Office Report)Signature Not Verified Date : 08/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.Digitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2015.01.1217:36:02 ISTReason: PAGE NO. 1 OF 2SLP(C) No. 33372 of 2013CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R.in SLP 33372 & 34193in SLP 11083 & 16746 Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ramnik Mishra, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R.in CC 12481-83 Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G.For State Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For RR in SLP 16746& CC 12481-83 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by Ms. Rachna Gupta, learned Advocate on Record. List these matters on 20th January, 2015, for final disposal. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 OF 2
SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents, modification of Court's order dated 14 th July, 2014 and interim relief, application to take on record additional and subsequent documents and exemption from filing official translation and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTI DEVI (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas and application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application to take on record additional and subsequent documents and exemption from filng official translation and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas, application for exemption from filing Official Translation and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 27/10/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 in SLP 33372 & Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. 34193 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. M s. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv. in SLP 11083 & Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv. 16746 Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. in CC 12481-483 Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) For State of Uttarakhand Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. RR in SLP 16746 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. 11083 & CC 12481-83 Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Gupta, Sr. Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As the issue involved in all these cases pertains to a property situated at Nainital in the State of Uttarakhand, all the cases have to be heard at length. Therefore, post these matters on a non-miscellaneous day in the second week of January, 2015. Learned Advocate General undertakes to produce the original records with regard to the suit property on the next date of hearing. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 OF 2
`# SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 ITEM NO.51 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents, modification of Court's order dated 14th July, 2014 and interim relief, application to take on record additional and subsequent documents and exemption from filing official translation and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTI DEVI (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas and application for exemption from filing Official Translation, application to take on record additional and subsequent documents and exemption from filng official translation and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas, application for exemption from filing Official Translation and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 27/10/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM :Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byKalyani Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLADate: 2014.10.3016:37:25 ISTReason: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) PAGE NO. 1 OF 2SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013in SLP 33372 & Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv.34193 Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Dr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv.in SLP 11083 & Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv.
16746 Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv.in CC 12481-483 Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For Respondent(s)For State of Uttarakhand Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.RR in SLP 16746 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R.11083 & CC 12481-83 Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Gupta, Sr. Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As the issue involved in all these cases pertains to a property situated at Nainital in the State of Uttarakhand, all the cases have to be heard at length. Therefore, post these matters on a non-miscellaneous day in the second week of January, 2015. Learned Advocate General undertakes to produce the original records with regard to the suit property on the next date of hearing. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 OF 2
SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents, modification of Court's order dated 14 th July, 2014 and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTI DEVI (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas and application for exemption from filing Official Translation and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas, application for exemption from filing Official Translation and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHADN AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 15/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 For Petitioner(s) in SLP 33372 & 34193 M s. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv. in SLP 11083 & Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv. 16746 Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. in SCC 12481-483 Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) For State of Uttarakhand Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R. RR in SLP 16746 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post these matters on 23 rd September, 2014. [KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER PAGE NO. 2 OF 2
´ SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing Official Translation, permission to plead the subsequent facts, grounds & file additional documents, modification of Court's order dated 14th July, 2014 and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTI DEVI (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas and application for exemption from filing Official Translation and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for placing additional pleas, application for exemption from filing Official Translation and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 12481-12483/2014 [STATE OF UTTARAKHADN AND ANR. V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for condonation of delay in filing SLP and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 16746/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.] (With application for permission to file additional documents, application for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 15/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.Signature Not Verified CORAM :Digitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2014.09.1617:42:09 ISTReason: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH PAGE NO. 1 OF 2SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013For Petitioner(s)in SLP 33372 &34193 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv.
in SLP 11083 & Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv.16746 Mr. Partha Sil, A.O.R. Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv.in SCC 12481-483 Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.For Respondent(s)For State of Uttarakhand Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, A.G. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, A.O.R.RR in SLP 16746 Ms. Rachna Gupta, A.O.R. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastav, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post these matters on 23rd September, 2014. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 OF 2
MATTER FOR: 4.8.2014 CT NO. 10 ITEM NO. 28 SEC-X IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No.16746 OF 2014 (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF) WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1. (APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2. (APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS OFFICE-REPORT It is submitted that SLP NOfor information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant Special Leave Petition has been filed against the order dated 14.3.2014 of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in W.P.NO.1142 of 2002 (Old No.547 of 1993. Initially the Petition was found defective and was returned to the counsel to cure the defects and there is a delay of 28 days in filing the Petition and the delay has been condoned. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 21st day of July, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:-Mr.Amit Sharma,Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\222 ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.10 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16746/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/03/2014 in FA No. 56/2010 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTRAKHAND AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar P. Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena,Adv. Mr. Partha Sil,Adv. Mr. Ramneer Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta,Adv. Mr. Samir Jain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Advocate, appears and accepts notice for respondent No.6. Let notice be issued to other respondents. Tag with SLP(C) No.33372 of 2013.Signature Not Verified (NARENDRA PRASAD)Digitally signed by (SHARDA KAPOOR)Narendra Prasad COURT MASTERDate: 2014.08.0518:31:00 IST COURT MASTERReason:
T> SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.10 SECTION X [REVISED] S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s) (With application for directions, exemption from filing official translation, prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013 [SHANTI DEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.] (With prayer for interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014 [DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.] (With application for placing additional documents, and and exemption from filing official translation and Office Report) Date : 14/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Ms. Rachna Gupta, Adv. In SLP 33372 Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv. In SLP 11083 Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, A.G. in all SLPs Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. (NP)Signature Not Verified UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingDigitally signed byKalyani GuptaDate: 2014.07.23 O R D E R18:13:16 ISTReason: PAGE NO. 1 OF 2SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 Before passing further orders at the first instance, we direct the respondent-State to deposit the entire arrears of rent from the month of January, 2012 to the credit of this Special Leave Petition within a period of eight weeks from today. On such deposit being made, the Secretary General shall invest in a fixed deposit with UCO Bank,
Supreme Court Branch initially for a period of six months which shall be renewed periodically pending further orders. We also direct the Execution Court to proceed with Section 47 application expeditiously and dispose of the same early preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order. The Execution Petition, shall, however, be kept pending awaiting further orders. The parties are directed to maintain status quo as of today with regard to the property in question as well as the revenue records entries pending further orders. List SLP(C) No. @ Diary No. 22431 of 2014 along with these matters subject to curing of defects. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 2 OF 2SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.10 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33372/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 inSA No. 64/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(With application for directions, exemption from filing officialtranslation, prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH SLP(C) No. 34193/2013[SHANTI DEVI (D) TH. LRS. & ANR. V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.](With prayer for interim relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11083/2014[DAYANAND SHIKSHA SANSTHAN V. RANJIT SINGH & ORS.](With application for placing additional documents, and andexemption from filing official translation and Office Report)Date : 14/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Rachna Gupta, Adv.In SLP 33372 Mr. Vishweshwar Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Samir Jain, Adv.In SLP 11083 Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Saxena, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, A.G. Mr. Rajv Nanda, Adv. For Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RPAGE NO. 3 OF 2SLP(C) NO. 33372 OF 2013 Before passing further orders at the first instance, we direct the respondent-State to deposit the entire arrears of rent from the month of January, 2012 to the credit of this Special Leave Petition within a period of eight weeks from today. On such deposit being made, the Secretary General shall invest in a fixed deposit with UCO Bank, Supreme Court Branch initially for a period of six months which shall be renewed periodically pending further orders. We also direct the Execution Court to proceed with Section 47 application expeditiously and dispose of the same early preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order. The Execution Petition, shall, however, be kept pending awaiting further orders. The parties are directed to maintain status quo as of today with regard to the property in question as well as the revenue records entries pending further orders. [KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERPAGE NO. 4 OF 2
rITEM NO.55 and 9 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33372/2013(From the judgement and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No.64/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for directions,exemption from filing O.T. and prayerfor interim relief and office report )WITH SLP(C) NO. 34193 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Item No. 9 : SLP(C)........./2014 (CC No. 5461)(For permission to file SLP and office report)Date: 17/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRIFor Petitioner(s)CC 5461 Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr.Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. R.F. Nariman, Sr.Adv. Mrs Rachna Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. V.K. Unniyal, Advocate General Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Item No. 9 : CC NO. 5461 Permission to file the special leave petition is granted. Delay condoned. Issue notice. ...2/- -2- Tag with Special Leave Petition(C) No. 33372 of2013. In the meantime, further proceedings in executionshall remain stayed. List on 14th July, 2014.
Item No. 55 : SLP(C)33372/2013 & SLP(C)34193/2013 Learned counsel for the State seeks four weeks'time for filing counter affidavit. By the impugned order, the respondent-State hasbeen given three months time to take a decision whetherthe entire or part of the property has to be acquired ornot. We have granted stay of the impugned order on 1stNovember, 2013. We make it clear that the State would notbe entitled to claim that because of the stay order dated1st November, 2013, they require a further period to beadded to the original three months period. Let the decision be taken within one month fromtoday. We also notice the submission made by Mr. R.F.Nariman, learned senior counsel that the rent has not beenpaid by the State from January, 2012 so that appropriateorders can be passed on the next date. List the matters on 14th July, 2014. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur) Court Master Court Master
\210ITEM NO.MM-2 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33372/2013(From the judgement and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No.64/2012 ofThe HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C) NO.34193 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 09/04/2014 These Petitions were MENTIONED today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Rachna Gupta, AORFor Respondent(s) Ms. Rachana Srivastava, AOR UPON being mentioned the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 17th April, 2014, before the appropriate Bench. (Chetan Kumar) (Savita Sainani) Court Master Assistant Registrar
@ITEM NO.29 & 60 COURT NO.9 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33372/2013(From the judgment and order dated 04/09/2013 in SA No.64/2012 of the HIGHCOURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL)RANJIT SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interimrelief and office report) WITHSLP(C) NO.34193/2013(WITH APPLN.(S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIMRELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT)Date: 01/11/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. In the meantime, operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed. |(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(INDU BALA KAPUR) ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |