Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 10000

V. PADMASHREE v. D. VINOTHKUMAR

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10000/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

12-04-2017

Bench

Petitioner

V. PADMASHREE

Respondent

D. VINOTHKUMAR

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

Download Judgment (PDF) Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2669/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2017 in CRLRC No. 713/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras) V. PADMASHREE Petitioner(s) VERSUS D. VINOTHKUMAR AND ANR Respondent(s) Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Aswin, Adv. Mr. Sethu Mahendran, Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. Anastasia Gill, Adv. Mr. M. Venmani, Adv. Mr. Arunmozhi, Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned, the Court made the following O R D E R On 7.4.2017, this Court made the following order: “ We find no reason to entertain this special leave petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.“ On being mentioned today, the order dated 7.4.2017 be now read as under: “ We find no reason to entertain this special leave petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.

2 However, the time to vacate the premises is extended for a further period of four months from today. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.“ (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

\2221ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2669/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2017in CRLRC No. 713/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras)V. PADMASHREE Petitioner(s) VERSUSD. VINOTHKUMAR AND ANR Respondent(s)Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Aswin, Adv.Mr. Sethu Mahendran, Adv. (Mentioned by)Mr. Anastasia Gill, Adv.Mr. M. Venmani, Adv.Mr. Arunmozhi, Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON being mentioned, the Court made the following O R D E R On 7.4.2017, this Court made the following order:⬠S We find no reason to entertain this specialleave petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.Pending application(s), if any, shall standdisposed of.⬠S On being mentioned today, the order dated 7.4.2017be now read as under:⬠S We find no reason to entertain this special leavepetition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.2 However, the time to vacate the premises isextended for a further period of four months from today.Pending application(s), if any, shall standdisposed of.⬠S (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2669/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2017 in CRLRC No. 713/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras) V. PADMASHREE Petitioner(s) VERSUS D. VINOTHKUMAR AND ANR Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 07/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Aswin, Adv. Mr. S. Sethu Mahendran, Adv. Ms. Anastasia Gill, Adv. Ms. M. Venmani, Adv. Mr. Arunmozhi, Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain this special leave petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

bITEM NO.12 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).2669/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/03/2017 in CRLRC No. 713/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras)V. PADMASHREE Petitioner(s) VERSUSD. VINOTHKUMAR AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief)Date : 07/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Aswin, Adv.Mr. S. Sethu Mahendran, Adv.Ms. Anastasia Gill, Adv.Ms. M. Venmani, Adv.Mr. Arunmozhi, Adv.Mr. S. Gowthaman,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain this special leavepetition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposedof. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India