Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2012 / Diary 1000

ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF DELHI

Supreme Court of India | Diary 1000/2012

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

Bench

Petitioner

ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA

Respondent

STATE OF DELHI

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

Download Judgment (PDF) Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1476 OF 2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1477 OF 2012 STATE NCT OF DELHI Appellant(s) VERSUS SATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties at length today. We do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment dated 10.10.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. In view of that, we find no merit in the criminal appeals. Accordingly, the criminal appeals are dismissed. ......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J NEW DELHI; (R.K. AGRAWAL ) October 13, 2015.

ITEM NO.110 COURT NO.13 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 1477/2012 Date : 13/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mohan, Adv. For Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan, AOR Mr. Anis Mohd. Adv. Mr. L. K. Pandey, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The criminal appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order. (R.NATARAJAN) (CHANDER BALA) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

v IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1476 OF 2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1477 OF 2012 STATE NCT OF DELHI Appellant(s) VERSUS SATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties at length today. We do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment dated 10.10.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. In view of that, we find no merit in the criminal appeals. Accordingly, the criminal appeals are dismissed. ......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J NEW DELHI; (R.K. AGRAWAL) October 13, 2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.10.1416:40:16 ISTReason:ITEM NO.110 COURT NO.13 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s)WITHCrl.A. No. 1477/2012

Date : 13/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mohan, Adv. For Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan, AOR Mr. Anis Mohd. Adv. Mr. L. K. Pandey, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The criminal appeals are dismissed in terms of the signedorder. (R.NATARAJAN) (CHANDER BALA) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.120 COURT NO.13 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 1477/2012 Date : 22/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mohan, Adv. Ms. Garima Tiwari, Adv. For Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan, Adv. Mr. Anis Mohammed, Adv. Ms. Dimple, Adv. Mr. L. K. Pandey, AOR Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande, AOR (N.P.) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande, Advocate-on-record has become judicial officer and a fresh Vakalatnama has to be filed and prays for an adjournment. In view of the prayer made, list after two weeks. In the meanwhile, fresh vakalatnama be filed. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 1477/2012 Date : 18/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Adv. Mrs. Garima Tiwari, Adv. For Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR (N.P.) Mr. L. K. Pandey, AOR (N.P.) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande, AOR (N.P.) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears on behalf of the respondent-State of Delhi, even on second call. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant undertakes that he will inform the other side about the next date of hearing. List on Tuesday, the 22 nd September, 2015. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 1477/2012 Date : 18/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Adv. Mrs. Garima Tiwari, Adv. For Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR (N.P.) For Respondent(s) Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR (N.P.) Mr. L. K. Pandey, AOR (N.P.) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande, AOR (N.P.) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R None appears on behalf of the respondent-State of Delhi, even on second call. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant undertakes that he will inform the other side about the next date of hearing.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by List on Tuesday, the 22nd September, 2015.Gulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.09.1912:17:53 ISTReason: (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 1477/2012 Date : 31/10/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Pawan Kumar Bansal, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Mr Sadashiv Gupta, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. Mr Anis Mohammad, Adv. Mr L.K.Pandey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Despite Registrar's Court order dt.10.9.2014 additional documents have not been filed. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. Name of the counsel, Mr L.K.Pandey be updated in the cause list. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Criminal Appeal No(s). 1476/2012 ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 1477/2012 (With office report) Date : 10/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Pawan Kumar Bansal, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Mr. K.R. Anand, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the parties for filing additional documents. List again on 31.10.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

HITEM NO.40 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Crl. M.P. No. 1592/2014 & 1593/2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1477 OF 2012STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Appellant (s) VERSUSSATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s)(For Restoration & c/delay in filing application for restoration)Date: 10/02/2014 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA (IN CHAMBERS)For Appellant(s) Mr. Harsh Vardhan Surana, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mehra, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the application for restoration is condoned. For the reasons stated in Cr.M.P.No. 1592 of 2014, the same is allowed and the Criminal Appeal is restored to its original number. (SONIA KUMARI) (PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) Sr. P.A. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Signed order is placed on file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Crl. M.P. No. 1592/2014 & 1593/2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1477 OF 2012STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Appellant (s) VERSUSSATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s) ORDER Delay in filing the application for restoration is condoned. For the reasons stated in Cr.M.P.No. 1592 of 2014, the same is allowed and the Criminal Appeal is restored to its original number. ...........,J [DIPAK MISRA] NEW DELHI 10th February, 2014

ôITEM NO.17 COURT NO.7 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1477 OF 2012STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Appellant (s) VERSUSSATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s)(Office Report on Default)Date: 16/08/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR (In Chambers)For Appellant(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. Ms. Sheikh B. Khan,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. One week's time is granted for filing spare copy of the special leave petition failing which this appeal shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court.|(Mahabir Singh) | (Indu Pokhriyal) || Court Master | Court Master |

\236ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1477 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI Appellant (s) VERSUSSATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s)Date: 11/10/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Babu Khan, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Copy of petition of appeal is to be filed before 10.11.2012. If it is not filed, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If it is filed, Registry has to forward to the concerned High Courtfor its record and process the matter, as per rules.| | | (S.G. SHAH) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

VITEM NO.48 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1185/2012(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in CRLA No.266/2009, of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.)WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 5872 of 2012(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T, issuance of nnon-bailablewarrant of arrest, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order andoffice report)Date: 17/08/2012 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar,Adv. Ms. Malvika Trivedi,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr.Bansal,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Mr. P.P. Malhotra,ASG Mr. P.K. Dey,Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav,Adv. Ms. Dimple,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks' time is granted to the respondents for filing counter affidavit in both the matters. List thereafter. (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

ÔITEM NO.51 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2012 CRLMP.NO(s). 13224(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in CRA No.266/2009, of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 27/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. P.P. Malhotra,ASG Mr. A.S. Chandhiok,Sr.Adv. Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Piyush Sanghi,Adv. Ms. Shweta Gupta,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Tyagi,Adv. Mr. P.K. Dey,Adv. Mr. Aman Ahluwalia,Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the sole respondent. Counter affidavit may be filed within two weeks. Tag with SLP(Crl)No.1185/2012. (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

òITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1185/2012(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in CRLA No.266/2009, of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.Date: 27/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Diwan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar,.Adv. Mr. Rakesh Sinha,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr.Bansal,Adv. For Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. Ms. Dimple,Adv. Mr. P.P. Malhotra,ASG Mr. P.K. Dey,Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit may be filed within two weeks. List thereafter alongwith SLP(Crl)..Crl.MP.No.13224 of 2012. (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

pITEM NO.23 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2012 CRLMP.NO(s).13224(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in CRANo.266/2009, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSATYA BHUSHAN JAIN Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))Date: 06/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R T (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

vITEM NO.41 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1185/2012(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in CRLANo.266/2009, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.)Date: 05/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Sinha,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Bansal,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande,Adv. Ms. Dimple,Adv. Mr. Nirmal Goyal,Adv. Mr. P.P. Malhotra,ASG Mr. P.K. Dey,Adv. Ms. Sadhna Sandhu,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das ,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after two weeks alongwith the SLP(Crl.).../2012 (Crl.M.P. No.13224 of 2012) filed by the State of NCT of Delhi against the same impugned judgment. (O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi)Court Master Court Master

LITEM NO.22 COURT NO.12 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2012 CRLMP.NO(s). 1296(From the judgement and order dated 10/10/2011 in CRLANo.266/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF DELHI AND ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP)Date: 30/01/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKURFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Diwan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petition is granted. Issue notice. (Deepak Mansukhani) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India