AYUSH JAIN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/224/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),338,340(2),61(2). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010103872026

Filing Number

ABA/4971/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABA/224/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),338,340(2),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYUSH JAIN

    Adv. SANDEEP TANDON,POONAM RANA,POONAM RANA, ,POONAM RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.VINOD PRAKASH AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: ABA/224/2026 Ayush Jain sought anticipatory bail in a property fraud case involving alleged duplicate sale deeds. The court granted interim anticipatory bail, conditional upon furnishing personal bond and sureties, while adjourning the matter to 16.07.2026 to allow the informant four weeks to file objections. The applicant must cooperate with investigation, avoid witness interference, and cannot leave the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/224/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: ABA/224/2026 Ayush Jain sought anticipatory bail in a property fraud case involving alleged duplicate sale deeds. The court granted interim anticipatory bail, conditional upon furnishing personal bond and sureties, while adjourning the matter to 16.07.2026 to allow the informant four weeks to file objections. The applicant must cooperate with investigation, avoid witness interference, and cannot leave the country without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case