KUSHAL SINGH vs SATYAJIT MOHANTY — CLCON/343/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010103742026

Filing Number

CLCON/5408/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CLCON/343/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUSHAL SINGH

    Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATYAJIT MOHANTY

  2. 2.MR NEERAJ KUMAR PATHAK

  3. 3.COL HEM CHANDRA SINGH

  4. 4.PARVEEN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand found that respondent Satyajit Mohanty (Joint Director D(HMI)) committed contempt by reiterated an order dated 08.02.2023 as valid after the Court had set it aside in April 2026 and directed passage of a fresh lawful order. The Court disposed of the contempt petition after respondent's counsel agreed to pass a fresh order, directing the Competent Authority to issue it within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand found that respondent Satyajit Mohanty (Joint Director D(HMI)) committed contempt by reiterated an order dated 08.02.2023 as valid after the Court had set it aside in April 2026 and directed passage of a fresh lawful order. The Court disposed of the contempt petition after respondent's counsel agreed to pass a fresh order, directing the Competent Authority to issue it within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case