ANANT RAM SHARMA ALIAS ANTRAM SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/220/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 409,420,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010103192026

Filing Number

ABA/4937/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABA/220/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 409,420,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANT RAM SHARMA ALIAS ANTRAM SHARMA

    Adv. RAJAT MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/220/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Anant Ram Sharma, who was accused of obtaining scholarship benefits for his son using a forged income certificate (showing ₹15,552 instead of actual ₹21,552 monthly income). The court found that since the applicant had already refunded the wrongfully obtained scholarship amount, fully cooperated with investigation, and the charge-sheet was filed, no custodial interrogation was necessary. The bail was granted subject to standard conditions including regular court appearances, cooperation with trial, non-tampering with evidence, and maintaining good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/220/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Anant Ram Sharma, who was accused of obtaining scholarship benefits for his son using a forged income certificate (showing ₹15,552 instead of actual ₹21,552 monthly income). The court found that since the applicant had already refunded the wrongfully obtained scholarship amount, fully cooperated with investigation, and the charge-sheet was filed, no custodial interrogation was necessary. The bail was granted subject to standard conditions including regular court appearances, cooperation with trial, non-tampering with evidence, and maintaining good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case